![]()
|
|
||||||||
Volume 272, Number 46, Issue of November 14, 1997
pp. 28895-28900
(Received for publication, July 2, 1997, and in revised form, September 2, 1997)
From the Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, Case Western
Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-4955
Chitinases that function in the molting of the
larval exoskeleton have been characterized previously. However,
chitinase expression in an adult insect gut has not been described.
Here we report on the initial characterization and cloning of a novel
chitinase gene that is expressed specifically in the midgut of adult
Anopheles gambiae females. Upon feeding, chitinase is
secreted into the gut lumen as an inactive pro-enzyme that is later
activated by trypsin. Thus, temporal regulation of chitinase activity
is tightly coupled to the temporal pattern of trypsin secretion. The
enzyme may play a role in structuring the chitin-containing
extracellular peritrophic matrix, whose formation is also induced by
feeding. A chitinase cDNA was cloned from a library enriched for
gut-specific sequences. The open reading frame encodes a 525-amino acid
protein comprised of a putative catalytic domain at the N terminus, a putative chitin-binding domain at the C terminus, and a
threonine/serine/proline-rich amino acid stretch in between them.
Northern analysis indicates that this chitinase is expressed
exclusively in the guts of adult females and not in adult carcasses or
in any larval or pupal tissues. The present findings suggest the
possibility of using this chitinase as an antigen for a malaria
transmission-blocking vaccine.
Chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) are endoglycosidases that cleave
N-acetylglucosamine residues in chitin at the C-1-C-4
positions. Chitinases have been found in chitin-containing organisms,
such as insects and fungi, and in organisms that do not contain chitin, such as bacteria, plants, and mammals (1-2). Chitinases in
non-chitin-containing organisms may be involved in the defense against
chitin-containing pathogens and pests (1).
In insects, chitin is the major component of the exoskeleton. During
molting, chitinases degrade the chitin in the exoskeleton to facilitate
molting. Chitinases in the molting fluid of the tobacco hornworm,
Manduca sexta, have been characterized (3-5), and one of
the corresponding cDNAs has been cloned (6). A chitinase from the
venom of the wasp Chelonus sp. near curimaculatus
has also been cloned (7). It is not clear what function this chitinase may have.
In addition to the exoskeleton, chitin is also an important component
of the insect peritrophic matrix
(PM).1 The PM is a
sleeve-like extracellular layer that surrounds the food bolus in the
gut of most arthropods (8-10). In addition to chitin, the PM contains
proteins and proteoglycans (8-10). The function of the PM in insects
is a matter of conjecture. It may provide a physical barrier to
pathogens, facilitate digestion, and provide physical protection of gut
epithelial cells from damage by food particles (8-10). It is unknown
how the formation and structure of any PM are regulated.
Mosquitoes of the genus Anopheles are the sole vectors of
human malaria. Malaria is caused by the protozoan Plasmodium
sp. Transmission is initiated when the mosquito ingests an
infected blood meal. In the gut, Plasmodium gametocytes mate
and then develop into ookinetes that cross both the PM and the gut
epithelium. Increased PM thickness can impair Plasmodium
development in the mosquito (11). Moreover, feeding mosquitoes with the
chitinase inhibitor allosamidin results in a thicker PM that starts
forming earlier and persists longer (12). The latter observation is consistent with the existence of a chitinase in the mosquito gut that
modulates the physical properties of the PM. However, to date there has
been no direct experimental evidence for this hypothesis. Here we
demonstrate that upon feeding, adult A. gambiae females secrete a chitinase zymogen into the gut lumen that is subsequently activated by trypsin. Furthermore, we have isolated a cDNA clone that encodes a midgut-specific chitinase.
A colony of A. gambiae (G3 strain) was
maintained as described previously (13). Experiments were normally
conducted with 4-5-day-old mosquitoes.
Before feeding, mosquitoes were deprived of sugar
for 18-24 h. Porcine A chitinase assay modified from that of
Trudel and Asselin (15) was used. Native substrate PAGE was performed
using a Tris-glycine buffer system (pH 8.8). Glycol chitin (0.02%) was
incorporated into 8% (w/v) polyacrylamide mini-gels (50 × 140 × 0.75 mm). Samples contained 10% glycerol and 0.001%
bromphenol blue. Electrophoresis was performed at room temperature for
2 h at 15 mA. After electrophoresis, the gel was immersed in 100 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.0) and incubated at 37 °C for
2 h. The gel was then stained for 15 min in 0.01% Calcofluor
White M2R (Sigma; a fluorescent dye that binds chitin) and destained in
water for 1 h. The activity band was visualized under an UV
transilluminator and photographically documented with a Gel Doc 1000 imaging system (Bio-Rad).
Two groups of about 100 female mosquitoes were fed with
Mosquitoes were fed with
The PCR-Select Subtraction kit
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) was used to generate a
mini-library enriched for gut-specific sequences according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the cDNA synthesized from
0.1 µg of carcass polyadenylated RNA was used as the driver, and the
cDNA from 0.1 µg of gut polyadenylated RNA was used as the
tester. The subtracted cDNAs were cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector
(Promega). Forty random clones were partially sequenced, and a BLAST
search (16) was performed to identify similarity to the sequences in
the data bases.
A cDNA
insert from the subtraction library that had similarity to chitinases
was labeled with [ Total RNA (5 µg each) from larval guts,
larval carcasses, whole pupae, adult female guts, and adult carcasses
was fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis, transferred to a nylon
membrane, and hybridized with an The mosquitoes were
fed with rabbit serum with or without adding allosamidin to 0.5 mM (18). The PMs were dissected at different times after
feeding and examined by light microscopy.
Chitinase
activity was measured by electrophoresis of gut extracts in native
polyacrylamide gels containing the synthetic substrate glycol chitin.
After electrophoresis, the gels were incubated at 37 °C to allow
substrate hydrolysis by chitinases and then stained with a fluorescent
dye that binds the substrate (Fig. 1).
Brightly fluorescent areas represent regions with no active enzyme,
whereas dark areas represent regions where enzyme activity degraded the
substrate. The wells of the gel contain no substrate and are always
dark (Fig. 1, top). Enzyme activity was distributed somewhat
heterogenously near the top of the gel (Fig. 1). This may be because
the enzyme interacts with the substrate (glycol chitin) during
electrophoresis and/or because under native conditions the enzyme is
associated with other molecules to form aggregates of large molecular
mass.
[View Larger Version of this Image (66K GIF file)]
Fig. 1 illustrates the temporal profile of gut chitinase activity as a
function of time after feeding on a protein meal (Fig. 1, upper
panel). It also shows the effect that a trypsin inhibitor has on
this profile (Fig. 1, lower panel). When mosquitoes were fed
In the
experiments described in the previous paragraph, chitinase activity was
assayed in whole-gut homogenates. To determine whether chitinase is
secreted into the gut lumen in response to food ingestion, the lumenal
contents of guts dissected within 30 min after feeding were collected
and assayed for chitinase activity (Fig.
2A). No activity was detected
when the sample was analyzed without treatment with trypsin (Fig.
2A, lane 1). However, when the sample was treated
with trypsin, significant activity was detected (Fig. 2A,
lanes 2 and 3). This result indicates that upon
feeding, chitinase is released into the gut lumen in an inactive form
and that trypsin can activate it.
[View Larger Version of this Image (69K GIF file)]
The activation of the chitinase by trypsin was also observed with
whole-gut extracts collected 5 h after feeding a A
gut-enriched cDNA mini-library was constructed by subtractive
cDNA cloning. About 40 individual clones from this library were
partially sequenced. One of them had an insert of 120 bp that shares
sequence similarity with chitinases from various sources. This cDNA
fragment was then used as a probe to screen a gut cDNA library. Two
clones were isolated (clone 181 and clone 182). These two cDNAs
were incomplete and were missing a 5
[View Larger Version of this Image (57K GIF file)]
A BLAST search with
the deduced amino acid sequence revealed similarity with chitinases
from a number of organisms, including arthropods, plants, fungi, and
bacteria. Sequence alignment analysis identified a putative catalytic
domain at the N terminus, a putative chitin-binding domain at the C
terminus, and a serine/threonine/proline-rich stretch in between them.
In the catalytic domain, all chitinases have a stretch of conserved
amino acids (underlined in Fig.
4A). These include three
aspartic acid residues and one glutamic acid residue, some or all of
which have been suggested to be involved in the enzymatic hydrolysis of
glycosidic bonds (19-21). This conserved stretch of amino acids also
appears in AgChi-1, suggesting that this gene encodes a chitinase. The
putative chitin-binding domain of insect chitinases was reported to be
similar to each of the five chitin-binding domains of the PM protein
peritrophin-44 (22). Six cysteine and three aromatic residues are
conserved among them. AgChi-1 has all of these conserved residues (Fig.
4B). Whereas the putative chitin-binding domain of most
insect chitinases is at the C terminus, that of Penaeus
japonicus chitinase is at the N terminus (23). The
serine/threonine/proline-rich stretch (residues 401-466;
underlined in Fig. 3) has a highly biased amino acid composition. 45% of the amino acids in this region are serines or
threonines, 20% are prolines, and 12% are glycines. The high proline
and glycine content probably suppresses the formation of a secondary
structure in this region of the protein, thus providing a flexible
swivel between the chitin-binding domain and the catalytic domain. This swivel may allow the enzyme to catalyze chitin
hydrolysis at multiple nearby sites after binding to chitin. The
serine/threonine residues may be sites of O-linked
glycosylation (6).
[View Larger Version of this Image (61K GIF file)]
The deduced AgChi-1 N-terminal sequence contains a highly hydrophobic
amino acid stretch that is likely to function as a signal peptide (Fig.
3). This indicates that the protein is secreted and is consistent with
recovery of chitinase activity in the gut lumen after ingestion of a
meal (Fig. 2). Using von Heijne's rules (24), we predict that the
signal peptide is cleaved after Ala-19. Activation of the gut chitinase
by trypsin in our activity assay suggests the presence of a pro-peptide
after the signal peptide. Two consecutive lysine residues were found 11 amino acids after the predicted signal peptide cleavage site (Fig. 3).
These two lysine residues may be the trypsin cleavage sites for
pro-enzyme activation. Pro-chitinase activation by trypsin was also
observed in other species, such as the fungus Mucor mucedo
(25), the molting chitinase of Bombyx mori (26), and the
chitinase from P. gallinaceum (27).
The tissue and developmental specificity of chitinase
expression was determined by Northern analysis (Fig.
5). AgChi-1 mRNA is only detectable
in adult guts. No AgChi-1 mRNA was detected at any larval or pupal
stage of development, suggesting that this chitinase does not play a
role in molting. Moreover, the mRNA is not detected in the guts of
larvae, indicating that AgChi-1 plays a specific role in the adult
gut.
[View Larger Version of this Image (80K GIF file)]
After ingestion of a meal, the PM forms rapidly (within
minutes) and gradually thickens and matures. By 7 or 24 h after
ingestion of the meal, the PM can be easily dissected. However, as time progresses, the PM becomes more fragile. By 72 h, the PM has
completely disappeared (in 55% of the mosquitoes) or become very small
and brittle (Fig. 6A). When
allosamidin (a chitinase inhibitor) was included in the meal,
degradation of the PM was substantially delayed such that at the 72-h
time point, all guts had large and intact PMs (Fig. 6B).
These results suggest that the Anopheles gut chitinase is a
regulator of PM formation and degradation.
[View Larger Version of this Image (42K GIF file)]
The substrate gel
electrophoresis activity assay is sensitive because it uses
fluorescence for detection of the substrate. High sensitivity is an
advantage for these experiments, because it reduces the number of guts
that need to be dissected. Moreover, electrophoretic fractionation of
the enzyme before the activity assay separates the enzyme from other
gut proteinases. Proteinases can influence chitinase activity either by
activating the zymogen or by degrading the enzyme. For example, a
chitinase zymogen from the fungus M. mucedo is activated
when a crude extract is stored at The evidence that the enzyme whose activity was
detected in the gut is encoded by the AgChi-1 gene is
circumstantial. The possibility that AgChi-1 encodes a
chitinase is supported by the similarity of the predicted amino acid
sequence to a number of known chitinases and, more importantly, by the
fact that key amino acids required for function are conserved in
AgChi-1. Furthermore, enzyme and mRNA are both found in the same
tissue. Final proof of identity can be obtained by purification of the
enzyme from Anopheles guts followed by microsequencing of
the protein or by immunological methods. Experiments that address this
issue are in progress.
Upon feeding, mosquitoes secrete a PM composed of chitin,
proteins, and proteoglycans. Chitin is of critical importance, because it provides structural support for the PM. Therefore, temporal modulation of chitinase activity in the guts (relative to food ingestion) is important to maintain a functional PM, because
inappropriate levels of chitinase activity could interfere with PM
formation. Temporal modulation could occur by at least two different
mechanisms: 1) secretion of an active enzyme only late in the digestion
cycle or 2) secretion of the enzyme as an inactive zymogen that is
later activated. The present data support the latter hypothesis. In A. gambiae, chitinase is secreted as a zymogen that can be
activated by trypsin (Fig. 2). In this mosquito, trypsin activity rises only slowly during the first 10 h after the blood meal and rises rapidly thereafter (13). Similarly, chitinase activity is low during
the first 10 h and rises rapidly thereafter (Fig. 1). These observations are consistent with a causal relationship between the
increase of trypsin activity and chitinase activation. Moreover, it is
likely that the temporal pattern of chitinase activation is
physiologically significant. An inactive chitinase would allow the
initial organization and formation of the chitin-containing PM without
the interference of hydrolytic activity. Later, after the PM has
formed, maturation of the PM would occur as a balance of PM secretion
and degradation of the PM scaffold. Finally, toward the end of the
digestion cycle, PM secretion would cease, and the chitinase would
destroy the remaining PM structure (Fig. 6).
Because chitin is an important structural component of
the PM, it was at first surprising that food ingestion should trigger chitinase secretion. It seems likely that chitinase acts to modulate PM
thickness and permeability. In support of this conjecture, we found
that PMs were stronger and persisted longer in the guts when the
mosquitoes were fed with chitinase inhibitor. This agrees with the
observation made by Shahabuddin et al. (12). Conversely, Regev et al. (28) have shown that administration of
chitinase to Spodoptera littoralis larvae causes perforation
of the PM and in this way greatly facilitates the action of a
Bacillus thuringiensis Previous work has demonstrated that to cross the
PM, the Plasmodium ookinete secretes a pro-chitinase that is
activated by the mosquito trypsin (29). However, the PM still
represents a significant barrier for penetration by
Plasmodium. For instance, experimental induction of a
thicker PM by providing multiple blood meals also had a detrimental
effect on parasite transmission (11). It is possible that the gut
chitinase characterized here may facilitate Plasmodium
penetration of the PM by generating a thinner, more porous PM. If
antibodies directed against the AgChi-1 protein inhibit gut chitinase
activity in vivo, then the recombinant protein may serve as
an antigen for a transmission-blocking vaccine. Experiments to test the
effectiveness of such antibodies in hindering transmission are in
progress.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF008575 We are grateful to Joseph Vinetz (National
Institutes of Health) for providing a sample of glycol
chitin, to Shohei Sakuda for providing the chitinase inhibitor
allosamidin, and to Marten Edwards for his comments on the
manuscript.
Characterization of a Novel Gut-specific Chitinase Gene from the
Human Malaria Vector Anopheles gambiae*
and
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
Insects
-Globulin
-globulin (Sigma) was dissolved to 300 mg/ml
in feeding buffer (120 mM NaCl and 20 mM
NaHCO3, pH 7.0) and dialyzed overnight against the same
buffer. When indicated, soybean trypsin inhibitor (Sigma) was also
added. The protein-free meal consisting of 10% (v/v) latex beads
(Sigma) was prepared and administered as described previously (14),
except that the jacketed glass feeder was covered with Parafilm.
-Globulin
Feeding
-globulin or
-globulin plus 5 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor. Fifteen mosquitoes were collected from each group at different times
after feeding. The guts were immediately dissected and homogenized in
30 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). Five µl from each
sample were loaded onto a native substrate polyacrylamide gel for the activity assay.
-globulin plus 5 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor and immediately
dissected on a dry glass slide, and the fluid from the gut lumen was
collected with a fine glass pipette. Different amounts (0, 1, and 3 µl) of trypsin (1 mg/ml) were then added to a fixed amount (5 µl)
of fluid. The volume of each sample was adjusted to 10 µl with
H2O and then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After
incubation, the activity was assayed by substrate native PAGE as
described above. Whole-gut extracts from mosquitoes dissected 5 h
after feeding with
-globulin containing 5 mg/ml soybean trypsin
inhibitor were also tested for activation by the same procedure.
-32P]dCTP and used to screen the
A. gambiae midgut
-ZAP II cDNA library that was
described by Lemos et al. (13). Inserts from two positive
phages were sequenced. To obtain the sequence of the 5
end of the
cDNA, a polymerase chain reaction reaction was performed using
whole library DNA as a template and a chitinase-specific oligonucleotide (5
-GCCGAAAACTCCACCGAAGC-3
) plus a T3 universal primer
as primers. The polymerase chain reaction was performed using the
Taqlong kit (Stratagene) for 30 cycles at 94 °C for 20 s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min. The
resulting fragment was subcloned and sequenced. The amino acid sequence
alignment was carried out using the ClusterV program (17).
-32P-labeled probe
derived from the 1.2-kilobase cDNA insert of a chitinase cDNA
clone. The final wash of the filter was done at 65 °C and 0.1× SSC.
The same blot was then stripped and rehybridized with an A. gambiae mitochondrial rRNA probe to serve as a loading control
(13).
Chitinase Activity in Midguts Is Low Early after Feeding and
Increases Significantly after the PM Has Formed
Fig. 1.
Changes of gut chitinase activity after
feeding. Mosquitoes were fed with
-globulin only (upper
panel) or with
-globulin plus soybean trypsin inhibitor
(STI; lower panel). Groups of 15 guts dissected
at 5, 10, 20, and 32 h after feeding were homogenized in 30 µl
of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and 5 µl of each sample were analyzed by electrophoresis on substrate activity gels (see the text).
The dark areas at the top of each lane are the loading wells. Dark
areas below the wells indicate chitinase activity. Five µl of the
-globulin solution (300 mg/ml) used to feed the mosquitoes were
loaded in the control lane.
-globulin alone, chitinase activity was barely detectable at 5 h after feeding, but it was easily detectable at 10 h. However, when soybean trypsin inhibitor was included in the meal, chitinase activity was much lower at early times (5 and 10 h after feeding) and increased only at later times (20 and 32 h). This delay in the
increase of chitinase activity suggested that trypsin may be required
for chitinase activation.
Fig. 2.
Chitinase activation by trypsin.
Chitinase activity was measured by the substrate gel activity assay
(see the text). The dark areas at the top of each lane are the loading
wells. Dark areas below the wells indicate chitinase activity.
A, samples were the lumenal contents of mosquito guts
dissected within 30 min of feeding on a meal containing
-globulin
plus 5 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor. B, samples were
whole-gut extracts obtained from mosquitoes dissected 5 h after
feeding with
-globulin plus 5 mg/ml trypsin inhibitor. For both
A and B, samples (3 µl) were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C after the addition of H2O (lane 1) or trypsin to either 0.1 mg/ml (lane 2) or 0.3 mg/ml
(lane 3).
-globulin meal
containing trypsin inhibitor (Fig. 2B). There was no
detectable chitinase activity in the sample (Fig. 2B, also
shown in Fig. 1), However, treatment of the sample with trypsin
resulted in a significant increase of chitinase activity (Fig.
2B, lane 3). Together, these results indicated
that chitinase is secreted into gut lumen in an inactive form and that
trypsin is likely to be involved in the activation of the enzyme.
sequence. To determine the
missing 5
sequence, a cDNA fragment was obtained by polymerase chain reaction using total library DNA as a template. The overlapping sequence between this cDNA and clone 181 is identical, indicating that it is part of the same gene, named AgChi-1. Fig.
3 presents the full AgChi-1
cDNA sequence and the deduced amino acid sequence. The cDNA is
1725 bp long and contains an open reading frame of 525 amino acids. It
includes 62 bp of 5
-untranslated sequences and 86 bp of
3
-untranslated sequences. Also, there is a predicted polyadenylation
signal (AATAA) 29 bp upstream of a stretch of A residues. The size of
this cDNA is close to the mRNA size estimated from Northern
blots.
Fig. 3.
Nucleic acid and deduced amino acid sequences
of the AgChi-1 cDNA. The arrowhead
after Ala-19 indicates the predicted signal peptide cleavage site; the
arrowheads after Lys-31 and Lys-32 indicate possible trypsin
activation sites. The putative polyadenylation signal (AATAA) is in
bold. The serine/threonine/proline-rich domain is
underlined.
Fig. 4.
Amino acid sequence alignment of the
catalytic and chitin-binding domains of arthropod chitinases. The
sequences were retrieved from GenBankTM. The chitinase
sequences listed are from A. gambiae (this work), M. sexta (Ref. 6; S64757), B. mori (M. K. Kim, H. Y. Park, and S. W. Shin, unpublished observations; U86876), Chelonus sp. (Ref. 7; U10422), and P. japonicus (Ref. 23; D84250). PM-44 is a peritrophic matrix protein from Lucilia cuprina
(Ref. 22; LUCPER144P). A, alignment of the putative
catalytic domains; the best conserved sequence, which may be involved
in catalysis, is underlined. B, alignment of
putative chitin-binding domains. An asterisk indicates that
the residues are identical; a period indicates that the
residues are conserved; a dash indicates a gap introduced to
maximize sequence identity.
Fig. 5.
Tissue and developmental specificity of
AgChi-1 mRNA accumulation. About 5 µg of total RNA were
fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis, blotted to a nylon
membrane, and hybridized with a radioactive AgChi-1 probe
(upper panel). An autoradiogram is shown. The source of RNA
in each lane is as follows: lane 1, fourth instar larval
carcasses (whole bodies minus gut); lane 2, fourth instar
larval guts; lane 3, whole pupae; lane 4, adult carcasses; lane 5, adult female guts. The origin of the
upper band in lane 5 is unknown; its relative
intensity is variable in different experiments. The probe was stripped
after autoradiography, and the blot was rehybridized with a
mitochondrial rRNA probe used as a loading control (lower
panel).
Fig. 6.
Effects of a chitinase inhibitor on the
degradation of the peritrophic matrix. Mosquitoes were fed with
rabbit serum containing or not containing the chitinase inhibitor
allosamidin. The PMs were dissected and photographed at 72 h after
feeding. A, mosquitoes fed with rabbit serum only. In 45%
of the mosquitoes, the PMs were small and brittle, and the remaining
mosquitoes did not have a PM. B, mosquitoes fed with rabbit
serum containing 0.5 mM allosamidin. All mosquitoes had a
large and strong PM. Arrows point to individual PMs, which
appear translucent. The white masses are food particles
contained within the PMs.
Detection of Chitinase Activity
20 °C over a period of several
days (25). The detection system used for the present experiments
differs from that of Trudel and Asselin (15) in that the substrate
(glycol chitin) was incorporated directly into the separating gel
instead of using an overlay substrate gel for enzyme detection. A
disadvantage of incorporating the substrate into the gel is that it may
cause retardation of enzyme migration and some smearing. However, it
has the advantage of being faster and more sensitive, because it does
not require the enzyme to migrate out of the separating gel and into
the overlay substrate gel. We investigated the effect of pH during
incubation of the gel after electrophoresis and found no significant
difference in activity from pH 5 to pH 9 (data not shown). In the
present experiments, the pH at the beginning of the incubation was pH 8.8 (the pH of the electrophoresis running buffer) and then gradually decreased to pH 5.0 during incubation in the acetate buffer (pH 5.0).
Attempts to detect enzyme activity after boiling the sample in the
presence of SDS and performing SDS-PAGE followed by renaturation in the
presence of Triton X-100 (15) were not successful. In conclusion, the
present substrate native PAGE activity assay is relatively simple and
sensitive and represents the actual activity in the gut at the time of
dissection.
-endotoxin. During digestion,
enzyme molecules secreted by the gut epithelium must traverse the PM to
reach the food bolus, and digestion products must cross the PM in the
opposite direction to be absorbed by the epithelial cells. A thicker PM
may have adverse effects on digestion and food absorption by hampering the traffic of these essential molecules across the PM.
*
This work was supported by grants from the John D. and
Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and from the NIAID, National
Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Genetics,
School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave.,
Cleveland, OH 44106-4955. Tel.: 216-368-2790; Fax: 216-368-3432; Email:
zxs{at}po.cwru.edu.
1
The abbreviations used are: PM, peritrophic
matrix; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; bp, base
pair(s).
Volume 272, Number 46,
Issue of November 14, 1997
pp. 28895-28900
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Merzendorfer and L. Zimoch Chitin metabolism in insects: structure, function and regulation of chitin synthases and chitinases J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2003; 206(24): 4393 - 4412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hemmi, J. Ishibashi, T. Tomie, and M. Yamakawa Structural Basis for New Pattern of Conserved Amino Acid Residues Related to Chitin-binding in the Antifungal Peptide from the Coconut Rhinoceros Beetle Oryctes rhinoceros J. Biol. Chem., June 13, 2003; 278(25): 22820 - 22827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. You, X. Xuan, N. Tsuji, T. Kamio, D. Taylor, N. Suzuki, and K. Fujisaki Identification and Molecular Characterization of a Chitinase from the Hard Tick Haemaphysalis longicornis J. Biol. Chem., February 28, 2003; 278(10): 8556 - 8563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Fujitani, S.-i. Kawabata, T. Osaki, Y. Kumaki, M. Demura, K. Nitta, and K. Kawano Structure of the Antimicrobial Peptide Tachystatin A J. Biol. Chem., June 21, 2002; 277(26): 23651 - 23657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Ghosh, P. E. M. Ribolla, and M. Jacobs-Lorena Targeting Plasmodium ligands on mosquito salivary glands and midgut with a phage display peptide library PNAS, October 25, 2001; (2001) 241491198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Zieler, D. B. Keister, J. A. Dvorak, and J. M. C. Ribeiro A snake venom phospholipase A2 blocks malaria parasite development in the mosquito midgut by inhibiting ookinete association with the midgut surface J. Exp. Biol., January 12, 2001; 204(23): 4157 - 4167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Vinetz, S. K. Dave, C. A. Specht, K. A. Brameld, B. Xu, R. Hayward, and D. A. Fidock The chitinase PfCHT1 from the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum lacks proenzyme and chitin-binding domains and displays unique substrate preferences PNAS, November 23, 1999; 96(24): 14061 - 14066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Shen and M. Jacobs-Lorena A Type I Peritrophic Matrix Protein from the Malaria Vector Anopheles gambiae Binds to Chitin. CLONING, EXPRESSION, AND CHARACTERIZATION J. Biol. Chem., July 10, 1998; 273(28): 17665 - 17670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Suetake, S. Tsuda, S.-i. Kawabata, K. Miura, S. Iwanaga, K. Hikichi, K. Nitta, and K. Kawano Chitin-binding Proteins in Invertebrates and Plants Comprise a Common Chitin-binding Structural Motif J. Biol. Chem., June 9, 2000; 275(24): 17929 - 17932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Boot, E. F. C. Blommaart, E. Swart, K. Ghauharali-van der Vlugt, N. Bijl, C. Moe, A. Place, and J. M. F. G. Aerts Identification of a Novel Acidic Mammalian Chitinase Distinct from Chitotriosidase J. Biol. Chem., February 23, 2001; 276(9): 6770 - 6778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Ghosh, P. E. M. Ribolla, and M. Jacobs-Lorena Targeting Plasmodium ligands on mosquito salivary glands and midgut with a phage display peptide library PNAS, November 6, 2001; 98(23): 13278 - 13281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |