Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuriki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Preiss, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuriki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Preiss, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 46, Issue of November 14, 1997 pp. 28999-29004

Construction of Chimeric Enzymes out of Maize Endosperm Branching Enzymes I and II:
ACTIVITY AND PROPERTIES*

(Received for publication, June 9, 1996, and in revised form, August 20, 1997)

Takashi Kuriki Dagger , Douglas C. Stewart § and Jack Preiss

From the Department of Biochemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Branching enzyme I and II isoforms from maize endosperm (mBE I and mBE II, respectively) have quite different properties, and to elucidate the domain(s) that determines the differences, chimeric genes consisting of part mBE I and part mBE II were constructed. When expressed under the control of the T7 promoter in Escherichia coli, several of the chimeric enzymes were inactive. The only fully active chimeric enzyme was mBE II-I BspHI, in which the carboxyl-terminal part of mBE II was exchanged for that of mBE I at a BspHI restriction site and was purified to homogeneity and characterized. Another chimeric enzyme, mBE I-II HindIII, in which the amino-terminal end of mBE II was replaced with that of mBE I, had very little activity and was only partially characterized. The purified mBE II-I BspHI exhibited higher activity than wild-type mBE I and mBE II when assayed by the phosphorylase a stimulation assay. mBE II-I BspHI had substrate specificity (preference for amylose rather than amylopectin) and catalytic capacity similar to mBE I, despite the fact that only the carboxyl terminus was from mBE I, suggesting that the carboxyl terminus may be involved in determining substrate specificity and catalytic capacity. In chain transfer experiments, mBE II-I BspHI transferred more short chains (with a degree of polymerization of around 6) in a fashion similar to mBE II. In contrast, mBE I-II HindIII transferred more long chains (with a degree of polymerization of around 11-12), similar to mBE I, suggesting that the amino terminus of mBEs may play a role in the size of oligosaccharide chain transferred. This study challenges the notion that the catalytic centers for branching enzymes are exclusively located in the central portion of the enzyme; it suggests instead that the amino and carboxyl termini may also be involved in determining substrate preference, catalytic capacity, and chain length transfer.


INTRODUCTION

Starch branching enzyme (BE1; 1,4-alpha -D-glucan:1,4-alpha -D-glucan 6-alpha -D-(1,4-alpha -D-glucano)-transferase; EC 2.4.1.18) catalyzes the cleavage of an alpha -1-4 glucosidic bond and the subsequent transfer of alpha -1-4 glucan to form an alpha -1-6 branch point. The enzyme plays an important role in starch synthesis (1-3). Multiple forms of BE have been identified in many plants, including maize endosperm (4), pea seed (5), and rice endosperm (6-7). The cDNAs encoding the genes for the BEs have been cloned from various sources, such as maize endosperm (8, 9), pea seed (10), potato tuber (11, 12), and rice endosperm (6, 13). The cDNAs encoding mature mBE I and mBE II have been expressed in Escherichia coli using the T7 promoter (14, 15), allowing the study of the structure-function relationships of mBEs using site-directed mutagenesis and the construction of chimeric enzymes of mBE I and mBE II.

Homology in the primary structures between glycogen branching enzyme and amylolytic enzymes was first reported by Romeo et al. (16). Subsequently, Baba et al. (8) established that BEs contain the four highly conserved regions in the central portion of the enzyme that are present in alpha -amylases, pullulanase, isoamylase, and cyclodextrin glucanotransferases. Neopullulanase catalyzes the hydrolysis of alpha -1,4- and alpha -1,6-glucosidic linkages, as well as transglycosylation to form alpha -1,4- and alpha -1,6-glucosidic linkages (17, 18). The introduction of several replacements of the amino residues that constitute the active center of neopullulanase indicated that one active center of the enzyme participated in all four reactions described above (19). This suggested that not only were the structures of BE, alpha -amylase, pullulanase/isoamylase, and cyclodextrin glucanotransferase similar but also that they shared common catalytic mechanisms (18, 20). Based on these results, the alpha -amylase enzyme family was defined; it includes BE and other enzymes that catalyze hydrolysis and transglycosylation at alpha -1,4- and alpha -1,6-glucosidic linkages (21-25). Structure prediction and hydrophobic cluster analysis of the enzymes mentioned above indicated that they possess a catalytic (beta /alpha )8-barrel (23, 26) like that seen in crystal structure of alpha -amylases (27-29) and cyclodextrin glucanotransferases (30-31). It is currently considered that four of the beta -strands (i.e. the four highly conserved regions in the central portion of the enzymes) make up the catalytic center (23).

Some of the amino acids found to be essential for catalytic activity of the alpha -amylase family enzymes and also present in the four conserved regions of the maize endosperm branching enzymes were mutated via site-directed mutagenesis in mBE II and were found to be important for branching enzyme activity (32, 33). Thus, the conserved four active site regions found in the alpha -amylase family enzymes also play a role in branching enzyme catalysis.

The amino acid sequence of mBE I and mBE II has an identity of 58% (Fig. 1). The identity is higher (67%) in the center portion of the enzymes, which contains several highly conserved regions (regions 1-4), as previously mentioned (8, 15, 21, 23). When amino acid residues with similar functional side chains are taken into consideration, the two enzymes are 75% similar for the total amino acid sequence and 94% similar for the center portion. In contrast, the amino acid sequences and the numbers of amino acid residues are quite different for the amino-terminal and carboxyl-terminal sides of the center portion (Figs. 1 and 2).


Fig. 1. Alignment of the deduced primary structures of maize branching enzymes I (8) and II (15). The probable secondary structures (23) and endonuclease restriction sites used in the construction of the chimeric enzymes (introduced sites are shown in parentheses) are indicated. The double underlined regions (regions 1-4), which constitute the putative catalytic sites of amylolytic enzymes (27, 28), are conserved along all of the known branching enzyme amino acid sequences.

[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]



Fig. 2. Schematic diagram representing wild-type mBE I and mBE II, indicating amino and carboxyl termini and the four conserved regions (R1-R4) in the central portion and the chimeric enzymes constructed from maize endosperm BE I and II. The HindIII, NcoI, and BspHI restriction sites used in the construction of mBE II-I BspHI are shown; the restriction sites introduced to mBE I by site-directed mutagenesis are shown in parentheses. The chimeric enzymes were constructed from mBE I and mBE II as described in the text. Molecular weights are shown in parentheses. The portion of the chimeric enzyme from the amino terminus and/or carboxyl terminus of mBE I is shown in white, and that from mBE II is shown in black. The central portion from mBE I has light shading and that from mBE II has dark shading.

[View Larger Version of this Image (35K GIF file)]


It is therefore interesting to focus attention on the relationship between the enzyme specificities and the different structures in the amino terminus and carboxyl terminus. In this paper, we report on the construction and characterization of chimeric enzymes of mBE I and mBE II.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Media

LB medium (pH 7), consisting of 10 g of tryptone, 5 g of yeast extract, and 10 g of NaCl per liter, was used for culture of E. coli. 2 × YT broth (pH 7), consisting of 16 g of tryptone, 10 g of yeast extract, and 5 g of NaCl per liter, was used for the preparation of phage DNA. Ampicillin was used at final concentration of 100 µg/ml.

Bacterial Strains, Plasmid, and Phages

E. coli TG-1 (supE hsdDelta 5 thi Delta (lac-proAB) F'(traD36 proAB+ lacIqlacZDelta M15)) (42) was used as a host for site-directed mutagenesis and DNA manipulation. E. coli DH5 (supE44 hsdR17 recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 relA1) (42) and E. coli JM110 (rspL (Strr) thr leu thi-1 lacY galK galT ara tonA tsx dam dcm supE44 Delta (lac-proAB) F'(traD36 proAB+ lacIqlacZDelta M15)) (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was used for preparation of plasmid DNA without modification of BspHI sites. E. coli BL21(DE3) (hsdS gal(lambda c Its 857ind 1Sam 7nin 5lac UV5-T7 gene1) (Novagen, Madison, WI) was used to express the gene for wild-type or chimeric BE under control of the T7 promoter (14, 15). Plasmids pET-23D-MBE I (Apr encoding the gene for mature mBE I) and pET-23D-mBE II (Apr encoding the gene for mature mBE II) were described previously (14, 15). M13mp19 was used for the preparation of single-stranded DNA (34).

Creation of New Restriction Endonuclease Sites

Site-directed mutagenesis (Sculptor in vitro mutagenesis system, Amersham Corp., Amersham, UK) was used for the creation of a new restriction site by the introduction of a silent mutations in the mBE I and II genes. Oligonucleotides were synthesized in an Applied Biosystems model 380A DNA synthesizer (Macro-molecular Facility, Department of Biochemistry, Michigan State University, MI). The mutation was confirmed by restriction endonuclease digestion and DNA sequencing. DNA sequencing was done by the dideoxy chain-terminating method (35); the sequence reaction was started from the M13 linker region with the universal primer or primed by internal annealing of a 17-mer synthetic oligonucleotide.

Construction of mBE II-I BspHI, a Chimeric Gene of mBE I and II

To introduce a BspHI site into the mBE I gene by site-directed mutagenesis (silent mutation), the 1156-bp EcoRI-HindIII fragment from pET-23D-mBE I was cloned into the EcoRI-HindIII sites of phage M13mp19 multiple-cloning sites. Single-stranded DNA was prepared from the phage and used as template for the site-directed mutagenesis reaction. Sequence analysis of the 1156-bp EcoRI-HindIII fragment verified that the desired nucleotide had been changed and that no second-site mutations were present. After preparation of the replicative form of the phage DNA, the 1156-bp EcoRI-HindIII fragment of pET-23D-mBE I was exchanged for the mutant fragment, resulting in the construction of pET-23D-mBE I (BspHI). The following additional steps were used to avoid methylation of adenine residues by DNA adenine methylase in the recognition sequence 5'-G*ATC-3' (asterisk indicates methylated form) when the BspHI site was used for the construction of the chimeric gene. pET-23D-mBE I (BspHI) was constructed using E. coli TG-1 (rk- mk-) as a host. E. coli DH5 (rk- mk+) was transformed with pET-23D-mBE I (BspHI) for plasmid preparation from E. coli DH5. The plasmids obtained were then used for transformation of E. coli JM110 (dam rk+ mk+). Because BspHI sites on the plasmid DNAs prepared from E. coli JM110 were not affected by DNA adenine methylase, pET-23D-mBE I (BspHI) prepared from E. coli JM110 was used for construction of the chimeric gene at the BspHI site.

For the construction of the mBE II-I BspHI gene, the 687-base pair BspHI-carboxyl-terminal fragment of pET-23D-mBE II was exchanged for the 852-base pair BspHI-carboxyl-terminal fragment of pET-23D-mBE I (BspHI). Thus, pET-23D-mBE II-I BspHI, encoding the mBE II-I BspHI gene, was constructed (Fig. 2). The structure of the plasmid was confirmed by restriction endonuclease mapping.

Several other chimeric enzymes, mBE I-II NcoI, mBE II-I NcoI, mBE I-II HindIII, mBE II-I HindIII, mBE I-II BspHI, mBE I-II-I, and mBE II-I-II, were also constructed (Fig. 2). To construct these other chimeric enzymes, two silent mutations were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis to produce HindIII and NcoI endonuclease restriction sites in mBE I and II, respectively. The procedures used were similar to those described previously.

Preparation and Purification of Wild-type mBE I, mBE II, and Chimeric BEs

E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying a recombinant plasmid encoding the gene for wild-type BE I, wild-type BE II, or chimeric BEs was grown overnight in LB medium containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin. The preculture was then diluted 1:20 (v/v) in fresh LB medium containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin, and the cells grown at 37 °C to mid-log phase (A600 nm = 0.6). At this point, expression of the BE gene was induced by addition of isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside (final concentration, 0.5 mM), and were cultures transferred to 25 °C for 12 h. Cells were then harvested by centrifugation (10,000 × g for 10 min), and the pellet was resuspended and lysed by sonication in 50 mM Tris acetate buffer (pH 7.5) containing 10 mM EDTA and 5 mM dithiothreitol. The lysed suspension was then centrifuged at 30,000 × g for 15 min, and the resulting supernatant (cell extract) was used as crude enzyme for preliminary assay of BEs. Purification of wild-type BEs and the chimeric enzymes mBE II-I BspHI and mBE I-II HindIII was carried out according to Guan et al. (14, 15), with the exception that mBE I-II HindIII was expressed in AC71 (glgB-), a glycogen BE-deficient strain of E. coli (3).

Assay of BE Activity

BE activity was measured by three different assays as described by Guan and Preiss (36).

Assay a

The phosphorylase a stimulation assay is based on the stimulation by BE of the synthesis of alpha -D-glucan from alpha -D-Glc-1-P catalyzed by rabbit phosphorylase a (37). Reaction mixtures contained, in a final volume of 200 µl, 100 mM citrate (pH 7), 10 mM AMP, 0.4 mg phosphorylase a, and 50 mM D-[14C]-Glc-1-P (50 dpm·nmol-1). The reaction was initiated by the addition of an appropriate amount of enzyme. One unit of enzyme activity is defined as 1 µmol of Glc incorporated into alpha -D-glucan per min at 30 °C.

Assay b

The branching linkage assay determines the number of branching linkages introduced by BE into the substrate, reduced amylose (38). Substrates were prepared by the reduction of enzymatically synthesized amylose (AS-320, AS-110, and AS-70, Nakano Vinegar Co., Aichi, Japan; these amylose varieties had average degrees of polymerization of 1815, 722, and 438, respectively) as described by Takeda et al. (38). Reaction mixtures contained, in a final volume of 100 µl, 25 mM 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (pH 7.5) and an appropriate amount of substrate. The reaction was initiated by the addition of an appropriate amount of enzyme. One unit of enzyme activity is defined as 1 µmol of branching linkages formed per min at 30 °C.

Assay c

The iodine stain assay is based on monitoring the decrease in absorbance of the glucan-iodine complex resulting from the branching of the substrate, amylose or amylopectin (potato type III and corn, respectively; Sigma) (4, 36). Reaction mixtures contained, in a final volume of 200 µl, 50 mM citrate (pH 7) and 0.1 mg of substrate. The reaction was initiated by the addition of an appropriate amount of enzyme. One unit of enzyme activity is defined as the decrease in absorbance of 1.0 per min at 30 °C.

Protein Assay

Protein concentration was measured with the BCA protein assay reagent (39), using bovine serum albumin as the standard.

SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting

SDS-PAGE was performed on 8% polyacrylamide gels according to the method of Laemmli (40). Western blotting (immunoblotting) was carried out according to the method of Burnette (41). The primary rabbit antibodies, anti-mBE I and anti-mBE II, were diluted 1:200 and 1:2000, respectively, in 25 mM KH2PO4 (pH 7.2) containing 150 mM NaCl and 3% gelatin. The antigen-antibody complex was detected using anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (United States Biochemicals; diluted 1:10,000) with a chromogenic substrate (Boehringer Mannheim GmbH). Molecular weights were determined using Perfect Protein Western markers (Novagen) as standards (Mr 15,000, 25,000, 35,000, 50,000, 75,000, 100,000 and 150,000).

Preparation of Debranched alpha -Glucan for Chain Length Distribution Analysis by High Performance Anion Exchange Chromatography

Reduced amylose (1 mg of AS-320; degree of polymerization, 1815) was incubated in 25 mM 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid, pH 7.5 (200 µl) at 30 °C with BE (1.5 milliunits of mBE I, mBE II, mBE II-I BspHI, and mBE I-II HindIII by assay b). After 80, 160, and 320 min, the reaction was terminated by heating in a boiling water bath for 2 min, and M acetate buffer (pH 3.5, 20 µl) and isoamylase (5 µl of 590 units·ml-1) were added after the solution had cooled to room temperature. After 1 h of incubation at 45 °C, the solution was heated in a boiling water bath for 2 min. High performance anion exchange chromatography was performed with a Dionex BioLC system as described previously (3).

Other Procedures

Plasmid or M13 replicative form DNA was prepared by either the rapid alkaline extraction method (42) or QIAGEN Plasmid Maxi Kit (QIAGEN Inc., Chatsworth, CA). Treatment of DNA with restriction enzymes and ligation of DNA were done as recommended by the manufacturer. QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN Inc.) was used for recovery of DNA from agarose. Transformation of E. coli with plasmid DNA and M13 single-stranded template DNA preparation were done as described elsewhere (42).


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Activity of Branching Enzymes

Branching enzyme activity for wild-type mBE I and II and chimeric enzymes (Table I) and mBE I and II with silent mutations (BspHI and HindIII for mBE I and NcoI for mBE II) was determined in E. coli BL21(DE3) cell extracts. The silent mutations did not affect enzyme activity (results not shown). mBE II-I BspHI (17 units·mg-1 of protein) exhibited higher activity than wild-type mBE I (5.2 units·mg-1 of protein) and mBE II (11 units·mg-1 of protein) (Table I). The remaining chimeric enzymes were inactive, with the exception of mBE I-II HindIII and mBE II-I HindIII, which had a very small amount of activity (0.7 and 0.6 units·mg-1 protein, respectively) (Table I). To avoid destruction of the secondary structures of the chimeric enzymes, we chose all three endonuclease restriction sites (HindIII, NcoI, and BspHI) that were used for the construction of the chimeric enzyme genes, located on the highly homologous regions on the primary structures of mBE I and II (Fig. 1). Furthermore, those sites were not in the areas forming the probable secondary structures on the alpha -helix or beta -strand. It is therefore likely that despite the sequence similarities of mBE I and II, with the exception of mBE II-I BspHI, the chimeric enzymes did not fold in a way that produced wholly functional three-dimensional arrangements.

Table I. Specific activity of maize endosperm branching enzyme isoforms and chimeric enzymes in E. coli pET-23d-BL21(DE3) cell extracts

Enzyme activity was measured by the phosphorylase a stimulation assay (assay a). One unit of enzyme activity is defined as 1 µmol of Glc incorporated into alpha -D-glucan per min at 30 °C. BL21(DE3) with pET-23d refers to endogenous glycogen branching enzyme activity. Activity is expressed as units · mg-1 of protein. Results are from 1 of 3 experiments.

Branching enzyme isoform Branching enzyme activity

units · mg-1 of protein
BL21(DE3) with pET-23d only 0.32
mBE I 5.5
mBE II 11
mBE I-II BspHI 0
mBE II-I BspHI 17
mBE I-II HindIII 0.7
mBE II-I HindIII 0.6
mBE I-II NcoI 0
mBE II-I NcoI 0
mBE I-II-I 0
mBE II-I-II 0

Cell extracts were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting. The presence of immunoreactive proteins with molecular weights the same as those calculated from the amino acid sequences indicated the expression of mBE I and II and chimeric enzymes. An immunoblot of purified mBE I, mBE II, and mBE II-I BspHI is shown in Fig. 3.


Fig. 3. Western blot analysis of pure mBE I, mBE II, and mBE II-I BspHI. Anti-mBE I contained mBE I (0.5 µg) (lane 1), mBE II (0.5 µg) (lane 2), and mBE II-I BspHI (0.5 µg) (lane 3). Anti-mBE II contained mBE I (0.1 µg) (lane 1), mBE II (0.1 µg) (lane 2), and mBE II-I BspHI (0.1 µg) (lane 3). The lane labeled Std. contained molecular weight standards (Novagen). The primary antibodies used were anti-mBE I (1:200) and anti-mBE II (1:2000). Goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (1:10,000) was used as the secondary antibody.

[View Larger Version of this Image (77K GIF file)]


Purification and Characterization of Chimeric Enzymes mBE II-I BspHI and mBE I-II HindIII

mBE II-I BspHI was purified to homogeneity, as indicated by a single band in SDS-PAGE, from E. coli BL21(DE3) cell extract as described previously (Ref. 15; Table II). mBE I-II HindIII, which had very low activity, was partially purified from E. coli AC71 (glgB- ) cell extract according to the method of Guan et al. (Ref. 15; Table III). Three bands of approximately equal intensity were observed when the sample was subject to SDS-PAGE (not shown). One of the protein bands had a molecular weight and immunoreactivity consistent with mBE I-II HindIII. Due to the low activity mBE I-II HindIII, a thorough characterization could not be carried out, although useful information was gained on chain length transfer.

Table II. Purification of maize endosperm chimeric branching enzyme II-I BspHI expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3)

Enzyme activity was measured by the phosphorylase a stimulation assay (assay a).

Purification step Volume Protein Activity Specific activity Yield

ml mg units units · mg-1 protein %
Homogenate 170 1990 36440 18.3 100
Supernatant 161 1470 36010 24.5 99
0-40% (NH4)2SO4 70 407 30940 76.0 85
Amino-octyl agarose 12 3.2 4000 1250 11
Mono Q H/R 5/5 0.48 0.58 2239 3880 6

Table III. Purification of maize endosperm chimeric branching enzyme I-II HindIII expressed in E. coli AC71 (glgB-)

Enzyme activity was measured by the phosphorylase a stimulation assay (assay a).

Purification step Volume Protein Activity Specific activity Yield

ml mg units units · mg-1 protein %
Homogenate 500 2090 44 0.021 100
Supernatant 470 1550 44 0.028 100
0-40% (NH4)2SO4 50 480 44 0.092 100
Amino-octyl agarose 15 26 28 1.1 64
Mono Q H/R 5/5 1.6 1.5 5 3.3 11

The optimum temperature for catalysis by mBE II-I BspHI was 25 °C, intermediate between the optimum temperatures of mBE I (30 °C) and mBE II (20 °C). Although the change of the carboxyl terminus had some effect on the characteristics of the enzyme, there does not appear to be a specific relationship between the carboxyl terminus of mBEs and the optimum temperature for catalysis.

The specific activity of mBE II-I BspHI measured using assay a, the phosphorylase a stimulation assay, was 3880 units·mg-1 of protein, which is 3-4 times higher than wild-type mBE I (1196 units·mg-1 of protein) and mBE II (1017 units·mg-1 of protein) (Ref. 36; Table IV). The partially purified mBE I-II HindIII extract had a specific activity of 3.3 units·mg-1 of protein, over 2 orders of magnitude lower than wild-type mBE. Using assay b, the branching linkage assay, the specific activity of mBE II-I BspHI with different reduced amyloses as substrates (AS-320, AS-110, and AS-70) at a concentration of 100 µM was 1.3, 0.89, and 0.48 units·mg-1 of protein, respectively (Table IV). This value is similar to that of mBE I, at 2.1, 1.3, and 0.32 units·mg-1 of protein, respectively, but approximately 1 order of magnitude higher than that obtained from mBE II (0.4, 0.2, and 0.028 units·mg-1 of protein, respectively; Table IV). These results confirm that mBE I has a higher rate in branching amylose than mBE II (36), and indicate that mBE II-I BspHI has a substrate specificity similar to mBE I for amylose. The mBE I-II HindIII chimeric enzyme preparation had insufficient activity for use in assay b. Using assay c, the iodine stain assay, mBE I and mBE II-I BspHI had higher activity with amylose (90 and 69 units·mg-1 of protein, respectively) than with amylopectin (2.3 units·mg-1 of protein), giving a high amylose to amylopectin activity ratio (Table IV). In contrast, mBE II was more active with amylopectin (97 units·mg-1 of protein) than with amylose (6.4 units·mg-1 of protein), giving a lower amylose to amylopectin activity ratio (Table IV). There was insufficient mBE I-II HindIII activity to use for assay c. The ratios of mBE I and mBE II activity with amylose as a substrate to that with amylopectin as a substrate are similar to those previously reported (36). This result provides further evidence that mBE I and mBE II-I BspHI have similar substrate specificity for amylose, as well as for amylopectin. Because the carboxyl terminus of mBE II-I BspHI is from mBE I, it is possible that in addition to the four highly conserved regions in the central portion of mBEs, the carboxyl terminus may also be involved in substrate binding.

Table IV. Specific activity of maize endosperm branching enzyme isoforms and mBE II-I BspHI

Activity is expressed as units · mg-1 of protein. Results are the average of at least 3 experiments.

Branching enzyme mBE I mBE II mBE II-I BspHI

Assay a (phosphorylase stimulation) 1196 1040 3880
Assay b (branching linkage)
  AS320 (100 µM) 2.1 0.4 1.3
  AS110 (100 µM) 1.3 0.2 0.89
  AS70 (100 µM) 0.32 0.028 0.48
Assay c (iodine stain)
  Amylose (c1) 90 6.4 69
  Amylopectin (c2) 2.3 97 2.3
  Ratio of activity (c1/c2) 40 0.066 30

Using assay b with unbranched amylose (AS-320) as a substrate, the Km values obtained for mBE I, II, and II-I BspHI were quite similar, although the Vmax for mBE I and II-I BspHI (3.3 ± 0.4 and 2.7 ± 0.3 units·mg-1 of protein, respectively) were higher than the value obtained for mBE II (0.62 ± 0.02 units·mg-1 of protein; Table V). This indicates that the catalytic capacity of mBE II-I BspHI is similar to that of mBE I, suggesting that the carboxyl terminus of BEs may also play a role in determining the catalytic efficiency of the enzymes.

Table V. Kinetic parameters for branching enzyme isoforms and mBE II-I BspHI

Enzyme activity was assayed using the branching linkage assay (assay b) with reduced amylose, AS-320, as substrate. Results are the average of at least 3 experiments and are given ± the standard deviation.

Km Vmax

µM units · mg-1 of protein
mBE I 59  ± 10 3.3  ± 0.4
mBE II 59  ± 4 0.62  ± 0.02
mBE II-I BspHI 83  ± 16 2.7  ± 0.3

Chain length distribution of debranched products was analyzed by high performance anion exchange chromatography following the incubation of mBE I, mBE II, mBE II-I BspHI, and mBE I-II HindIII with AS-320 amylose for 80, 160, and 320 min as described previously. The distribution of side chains transferred by mBE I and mBE II varied markedly (38). Initially (80 min), mBE I transferred chains with a broad distribution of lengths up to 46 glucose units (under the conditions employed), and at later times (160 and 320 min), mBE I began to transfer more shorter chains, with a high frequency of chains of 11-12 glucose units in length (Fig. 4). In vitro, mBE I appears to preferentially transfer longer chains, but eventually makes short branch points (38). In contrast, mBE II initially transferred short chains, with a high frequency of chains consisting of 7 glucose units and few chains longer than 30 glucose units (Fig. 4). The transfer of chains of 36 glucose units or longer was not detected under the conditions employed. For mBE II the ratio of short to long chains transferred did not change markedly over the time monitored (Fig. 4). mBE II-I BspHI transferred chains in a fashion similar to mBE II, since very few chains over 30 glucose units were not detected, and there was no shift over time toward transferring shorter chains. Six glucose units was the most common length transferred, although the percentage of short chains was not as high as for mBE II (Fig. 4); more mid-sized (degree of polymerization, 10-15) chains were transferred. mBE I-II HindIII, which consists of the amino terminus of mBE I and the central portion and carboxyl terminus of mBE II, transferred chains in a similar manner to mBE I: few short chains were transferred initially, but with time, many more chains with a degree of polymerization of 11-12 were transferred (Fig. 4). Thus, the amino termini of mBEs appear to influence the length of the alpha -D-glucan chains transferred.


Fig. 4. High performance anion exchange chromatography analysis of the debranched alpha -glucan. Analysis was carried out as described in the text following incubation of reduced amylose (AS-320) with mBE I, mBE II, or mBE II-I BspHI for 80, 160, and 320 min at 30 °C, with a subsequent incubation with iso-amylase for 1 h at 45 °C.

[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]


The construction and characterization of a chimeric enzyme, mBE II-I BspHI, which consisted of the carboxyl terminus of mBE I and the amino terminus and central portion of mBE II (Fig. 2), which had substrate specificity and catalytic capacity similar to mBE I, indicates that the carboxyl terminus of mBEs may be involved to some extent in substrate binding and catalysis. mBE II-I BspHI transferred chains in a fashion similar to mBE II, suggesting that the central portion and/or amino terminus is involved in chain transfer. In the limited studies carried out with the low activity chimeric enzyme, mBE I-II HindIII, which consisted of the amino terminus of mBE I and the central portion and carboxyl terminus of mBE II (Fig. 2), chain transfer was similar to that of mBE I. Because the only portion of the mBE I-II HindIII from mBE I was the amino terminus, this would suggest that the amino terminus of mBEs is involved in chain transfer. This is also consistent with the chain transfer specificity of mBE II-I BspHI. These findings challenge previous reports that catalytic sites are conserved in the amylolytic family of enzymes (27, 28, 43), and in BEs these sites are located in regions 1-4 in the central portion of the enzyme (22). Because the putative catalytic centers for mBE isoforms are identical, the differing substrate specificity, catalytic capacity, and chain transfer of the isoforms may be due to either conformational changes in the central region caused by the carboxyl-terminal and amino-terminal regions or that one or more amino acid residues essential for activity are present in the terminal region(s) of mBEs.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported in part by United States Department of Agriculture Grants 93-37-36-9148 and 95-01085.
Dagger    Present address: Biochemical Research Laboratory, Ezaki Glico Co., Ltd., 4-5-6 Utajima, Nishiyodogawa-ku, Osaka 555, Japan.
§   Supported in part by The Queen's Trust, Australia. Present address: The Department of Plant Science, The Waite Agricultural Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Glen Osmond 5064, South Australia, Australia.
   To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 517-353-3137; Fax: 517-353-9334.
1   The abbreviations used are: BE, branching enzyme; mBE, maize branching enzyme; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Nathalie Libessart, Matt Langenberg, and Jeff Fletcher for their assistance with this project.


REFERENCES

  1. Preiss, J. (1991) Oxf. Surv. Plant Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 59-114
  2. Preiss, J., and Sivak, M. N. (1996) in Photoassimilate Distribution in Plants and Crops: Source-Sink Relationships (Zamski, E., and Schaffer, A. A., eds), pp. 63-96, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York
  3. Guan, H. P., Kuriki, T., Sivak, M., and Preiss, J. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 964-967 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Boyer, C. D., and Preiss, J. (1978) Carbohydr. Res. 61, 321-334 [CrossRef]
  5. Smith, A. M. (1988) Planta 175, 270-279 [CrossRef]
  6. Mizuno, K., Kawasaki, T., Shimada, H., Satoh, H., Kobayashi, E., Okumura, S., Arai, Y., and Baba, T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 19084-19091 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Nakamura, Y., Takeichi, T., Kawaguchi, K., and Yamanouchi, H. (1992) Physiol. Plant. 84, 329-335 [CrossRef]
  8. Baba, T., Kimura, K., Mizuno, K., Etoh, H., Ishida, Y., Shida, O., and Arai, Y. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 181, 87-94 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Fisher, D. K., Boyer, C. D., and Hannah, L. C. (1993) Plant Physiol. 102, 1045-1046 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Bhattacharyya, M., Smith, A. M., Ellis, T. H. N., Hedley, C., and Martin, C. (1990) Cell 60, 115-122 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Kossmann, J., Visser, R. G. F., Müller-Röber, B. T., Willmitzer, L., and Sonnenwald, U. (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 203, 237-244 [CrossRef]
  12. Poulsen, P., and Keiberg, J. D. (1993) Plant Physiol. 102, 1053-1054 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Nakamura, Y., and Yamanouchi, H. (1992) Plant Physiol. 99, 1265-1266 [Free Full Text]
  14. Guan, H. P., Baba, T., and Preiss, J. (1994) Plant Physiol. 104, 1449-1453 [Abstract]
  15. Guan, H. P., Baba, T., and Preiss, J. (1994) Cell. Mol. Biol. 40, 981-988
  16. Romeo, T., Kumar, A., and Preiss, J. (1988) Gene 70, 363-376 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Kuriki, T., Okada, S., and Imanaka, T. (1988) J. Bacteriol. 170, 1554-1559 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Takata, H., Kuriki, T., Okada, S., Takesada, Y., Iizuka, M., Minamiura, N., and Imanaka, T. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 18447-18452 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kuriki, T., Takata, H., Okada, S., and Imanaka, T. (1991) J. Bacteriol. 173, 6147-6152 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Nakamura, A., Haga, K., Ogawa, S., Kuwano, K., Kimura, K., and Yamane, K. (1992) FEBS Lett. 296, 37-40 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Takata, H., Takaha, T., Kuriki, T., Okada, S., Takagi, M., and Imanaka, T. (1994) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 3096-3104 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kuriki, T. (1992) Trends Glycosci. Glycotechonol. 4, 567-572
  23. Jespersen, H. M., MacGregor, E. A., Henrissat, B., Sierks, M., and Svensson, B. (1993) J. Protein Chem. 12, 791-805 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Svensson, B. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 25, 141-157 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Kuriki, T., and Okada, S. (1995) in Enzyme Chemistry and Molecular Biology of Amylases and Related Enzymes (, ed), pp. 87-92, CRC Press
  26. Jespersen, H. M., MacGregor, E. A., Sierks, M. R., and Svensson, B. (1991) Biochem. J. 280, 51-55
  27. Matsuura, Y., Kusunoki, M., Harada, W., and Kakudo, M. (1984) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 95, 697-702 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Buisson, G., Duée, E., Haser, R., and Payan, F. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 3909-3916 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Boel, E., Brady, L., Brozozowski, A. M., Derewenda, Z., Dodson, G. G., Jansen, V. J., Petersen, S. B., Swift, H., Thim, L., and Woldike, H. F. (1990) Biochem. 29, 6244-6249 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Klein, C., and Schulz, G. E. (1991) J. Mol. Biol. 217, 737-750 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Kubota, M., Matsuura, Y., Sakai, S., and Katsube, Y. (1991) Denpun Kagaku 38, 141-146
  32. Cao, H., and Preiss, J. (1996) J. Prot. Chem. 15, 291-304 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Kuriki, T., Guan, H., Sivak, M., and Preiss, J. (1996) J. Prot. Chem. 15, 305-313 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Messing, J. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 101, 20-78 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5463-5467 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Guan, H. P., and Preiss, J. (1993) Plant Physiol. 102, 1269-1273 [Abstract]
  37. Hawker, J. S., Ozbun, J. L., Ozaki, H., Greenberg, E., and Preiss, J. (1974) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 160, 530-551 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Takeda, Y., Guan, H. P., and Preiss, J. (1993) Carbohydr. Res. 240, 253-263 [CrossRef]
  39. Smith, P. K., Krohn, R. I., Hermanson, G. T., Mallia, A. K., Gartner, F. H., Provenzano, M. D., Fujimoto, E. K., Goeke, N. M., Olson, B. J., and Klenk, D. C. (1985) Anal. Biochem. 150, 76-85 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Burnette, W. W. (1981) Anal. Biochem. 112, 195-203 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  43. Strokopytov, B., Penninga, D., Rozeboom, H. J., Kalk, K. H., Dijkhuizen, L., and Dijkstra, B. W. (1995) Biochem. 34, 32234-2240

Volume 272, Number 46, Issue of November 14, 1997 pp. 28999-29004
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. Palomo, S. Kralj, M. J. E. C. van der Maarel, and L. Dijkhuizen
The Unique Branching Patterns of Deinococcus Glycogen Branching Enzymes Are Determined by Their N-Terminal Domains
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 1, 2009; 75(5): 1355 - 1362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
I. J. Tetlow, M. K. Morell, and M. J. Emes
Recent developments in understanding the regulation of starch metabolism in higher plants
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2004; 55(406): 2131 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. C. Abad, K. Binderup, J. Rios-Steiner, R. K. Arni, J. Preiss, and J. H. Geiger
The X-ray Crystallographic Structure of Escherichia coli Branching Enzyme
J. Biol. Chem., October 25, 2002; 277(44): 42164 - 42170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Hamada, H. Ito, S. Hiraga, K. Inagaki, K. Nozaki, N. Isono, Y. Yoshimoto, Y. Takeda, and H. Matsui
Differential Characteristics and Subcellular Localization of Two Starch-branching Enzyme Isoforms Encoded by a Single Gene in Phaseolus vulgaris L.
J. Biol. Chem., May 3, 2002; 277(19): 16538 - 16546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
H. Kamasaka, K. Sugimoto, H. Takata, T. Nishimura, and T. Kuriki
Bacillus stearothermophilus Neopullulanase Selective Hydrolysis of Amylose to Maltose in the Presence of Amylopectin
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., April 1, 2002; 68(4): 1658 - 1664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
K. Mizuno, E. Kobayashi, M. Tachibana, T. Kawasaki, T. Fujimura, K. Funane, M. Kobayashi, and T. Baba
Characterization of an Isoform of Rice Starch Branching Enzyme, RBE4, in Developing Seeds
Plant Cell Physiol., April 1, 2001; 42(4): 349 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
K. Ohdan, T. Kuriki, H. Takata, H. Kaneko, and S. Okada
Introduction of Raw Starch-Binding Domains into Bacillus subtilis alpha -Amylase by Fusion with the Starch-Binding Domain of Bacillus Cyclomaltodextrin Glucanotransferase
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 2000; 66(7): 3058 - 3064.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
K. Ohdan, T. Kuriki, H. Kaneko, J. Shimada, T. Takada, Z. Fujimoto, H. Mizuno, and S. Okada
Characteristics of Two Forms of alpha -Amylases and Structural Implication
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., October 1, 1999; 65(10): 4652 - 4658.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuriki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Preiss, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuriki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Preiss, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement