Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Craddock, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Welham, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Craddock, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Welham, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 46, Issue of November 14, 1997 pp. 29281-29289

Interleukin-3 Induces Association of the Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase SHP2 and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase with a 100-kDa Tyrosine-phosphorylated Protein in Hemopoietic Cells*

(Received for publication, April 25, 1997, and in revised form, August 12, 1997)

Bridget L. Craddock and Melanie J. Welham Dagger

From the Pharmacology Group, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

We have observed previously the co-immunoprecipitation of the p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) and SHP2 in murine lymphohemopoietic cells after stimulation with interleukin-3. We have investigated this interaction in more detail and now report the identification of a potentially novel 100-kDa protein (termed p100), which is inducibly phosphorylated on tyrosine after interleukin-3 treatment and which co-immunoprecipitates with both p85 PI3K and SHP2. The Src homology region 2 domains of both p85 and SHP2 appear to mediate their interactions with p100. Sequential precipitation analyses suggest that these interactions are direct and do not involve Grb2, and that the same p100 protein, or a portion of it, interacts with both p85 and SHP2, implying that p100 may serve to link these two proteins. Far Western blotting with both full-length p85 and isolated p85 Src homology region 2 domains supports this view. Interestingly, p100 also appears to be a substrate for the SHP2 phosphatase activity. In addition, p100 is precipitated by Grb2-glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins, an interaction largely mediated by the Grb2 SH3 domains. p100 appears to be distinct from JAK2, Vav, STAT5, and c-Cbl. Although largely cytosolic, p100 can be detected associated with SHP2 and PI3K in crude membrane fractions after interleukin-3 stimulation. We propose that p100 plays a role as an adaptor molecule, linking PI3K and SHP2 in IL-3 signaling.


INTRODUCTION

Interleukin-3 (IL-3)1 is a potent growth factor for many progenitor and myeloid cells, including mast cells (1). The IL-3 receptor is a heterodimer and in murine cells is composed of a 70-kDa alpha -chain and a 130-kDa beta -chain, known as Aic2A (2-4). Both these subunits belong to the hemopoietin receptor superfamily and lack any intrinsic catalytic activity (5). However, IL-3 activates a number of signaling pathways known to be controlled by tyrosine phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events. These include the p21ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway (6-10), the JAK2-STAT5 pathway (11), the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway (12), and the tyrosine phosphatases SHP1 and SHP2 (13, 14). Characterization of the inter-relationships of these pathways is key to understanding how the molecular signaling events induced by IL-3 relate to its functions.

The class 1 PI3K are heterodimers composed of a p85 (regulatory) and a p110 (catalytic) subunit (reviewed by Kapeller and Cantley (15)). Activation of these enzymes occurs after ligation of a broad range of receptors and leads to phosphorylation of the inositol ring at the D3 position, resulting in the transient in vivo production of phosphatidylinositol 3,4-bisphosphate and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate, which are thought to act as novel second messengers (reviewed in Ref. 15). The downstream targets of these lipid products include various isoforms of protein kinase C and Akt/protein kinase B (16-20). PI3K may be activated in a number of different ways, one of the best characterized being the binding of the SH2 domains of p85 to proteins with phosphorylated tyrosines in YXXM motifs (21). This leads to a conformational change, resulting in activation of the p110 catalytic subunit (22). In addition, it has been suggested that PI3K may be activated by tyrosine phosphorylation of the p85 subunit itself (23, 24), although this does not occur after IL-3 stimulation (12). However, after treatment of cells with IL-3, there is a transient rise in the in vivo production of both phosphatidylinositol 3,4-bisphosphate and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (12), and p85 co-precipitates with a number of phosphotyrosine-containing proteins including those of 100, 70, and 60 kDa (12, 14).

SHP2 (also known as SH-PTP3 (25), SH-PTP2 (26), PTP2C (27), PTP1D (28), and Syp (29)) is a cytosolic protein-tyrosine phosphatase that is ubiquitously expressed and is thought to represent the mammalian homologue of the Drosophila protein CSW (30). SHP2 has two SH2 domains that allow it to interact with tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins, and it has been reported that ligation of SHP2 SH2 domains contributes to activation of its phosphatase activity (31-33). SHP2 is itself tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to cell stimulation by a number of different growth factors, including PDGF, EGF, Steel factor, erythropoietin, IL-3, and GM-CSF, which also lead to its activation (14, 28, 29, 34-36). However, insulin activates SHP2 without inducing its tyrosine phosphorylation (37), suggesting SHP2 tyrosine phosphorylation is not essential for its activation. In addition to its catalytic activity, it has been suggested that SHP2 may perform an additional function as an adaptor molecule. Tyrosine-phosphorylated SHP2 has been shown to interact with the small adaptor protein Grb2, via the Grb2 SH2 domain (14, 32, 38, 39). In this role, SHP2 acts as a positive mediator of signal transduction, as it serves to recruit the Grb2-Sos complex to the activated PDGF receptor, facilitating activation of the p21ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade (38, 39). SHP2 has also been suggested to act as an adaptor in promoting the association of the insulin receptor with IRS-1 (40).

We have shown previously that PI3K and SHP2 can be co-immunoprecipitated after activation of cells with IL-3 (14). Recently, we have characterized the association of SHP2 with the beta -chain of the human IL-3 receptor (41). We report here that the major tyrosine-phosphorylated protein that co-precipitates with both PI3K (p85) and SHP2 in murine cells is a protein of 100 kDa. The same p100 protein, or a portion of it, appears to interact directly with both SHP2 and PI3K and can be dephosphorylated by SHP2. We show that p100 is not JAK2, STAT5, Vav, or c-Cbl and that, although p100 is mainly cytosolic, it can be detected at the membrane in association with PI3K and SHP2 after IL-3 stimulation. Therefore, we propose that p100 is a novel adaptor protein that serves to link PI3K and SHP2 in IL-3 signaling.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell Culture

All cells were cultured in humidified incubators at 37 °C, 5% CO2 (v/v) in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Inc., Paisley, Scotland, United Kingdom (UK)), supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Sigma, Poole, Dorset, UK), 20 µM 2-mercaptoethanol, 100 units of penicillin/streptomycin, and 2 mM glutamine. Ba/F3, an IL-3-dependent pro-B cell line (42), were cultured with the addition of 5% (v/v) conditioned medium from WEHI 3B cells as a source of murine IL-3, to the above media. FDMAC11/4.6 (FD-6) cells are clones of FD-5 that have been described previously (43) and were cultured in 5% (v/v) conditioned medium from x63omIL-4 cells, as a source of murine IL-4.

Cell Stimulation and Growth Factors

Stimulation of cells with IL-3 was carried out as described previously (44, 45), and, unless otherwise stated, cells were stimulated for 10 min with 10 µg/ml synthetic IL-3 (kindly provided by Dr. I. Clark-Lewis, Biomedical Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada), shown previously to induce maximal tyrosine phosphorylation of the major IL-3 substrates (44). Cell pellets were lysed in immunoprecipitation buffer (IP buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM sodium molybdate, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 40 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.7 µg/ml pepstatin) at 1-2 × 107 cells/ml.

Immunoprecipitations

Immunoprecipitations were performed as described previously (44, 45). The following antibodies were used: 4 µl of polyclonal rabbit antiserum raised against the SH3/bcr region of the p85 subunit of PI3K (a gift from Dr. Peter Shepherd, University College London, London, UK), and 1 µg of polyclonal rabbit antipeptide antibodies against SHP2, c-Cbl, Vav, or STAT5 (sc-280, sc-168, sc-132, and sc-835; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA).

Sequential Precipitations

Immunoprecipitations were performed on extracts from control or IL-3-treated cells as described previously (44, 45). Proteins were released by boiling the immune complexes in 1% (w/v) SDS and 1% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol. 80% of the reaction was removed and the SDS was diluted to 0.1% using IP buffer. Secondary precipitations were performed using various GST fusion proteins, as described previously (14). The remaining 20% of the primary immunoprecipitation was reboiled with an appropriate volume of 5 × SDS sample buffer (5% (w/v) SDS, 50% (v/v) glycerol, 200 mM Tris-Cl, pH 6.8, plus trace of bromphenol blue) so that primary and secondary precipitations could be compared by immunoblotting.

GST Fusion Proteins and Affinity Purifications

The GST fusion proteins containing full-length Grb2 (FLGrb2-GST), the SH2 domain of Grb2 (Grb2SH2-GST), and the bovine p85alpha N-terminal SH2 (NSH2-GST) or C-terminal SH2 (CSH2-GST) have been described previously (45, 46). The construct for SHP2SH2-GST was a kind gift from Dr. U. Dechert (Biotechnology Research and Information Network GmbH, Darmstaeter, Germany) and the construct for the double SH3 domain mutant of Grb2 (Grb2N+CSH3*-GST) was a kind gift from Dr. D. Cantrell (Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, UK). Using standard polymerase chain reaction techniques, a full-length cDNA for bovine p85alpha was generated and cloned in frame into pGEX2T (pGEX2T-FLp85). The p85 SH3 domain, encoding amino acids 1-80, was derived from pGEX2T-FLp85 by BamHI-BglII digestion and cloned in frame into pGEX2T using standard techniques (pGEX2T-p85SH3). GST fusion proteins were purified over glutathione-Sepharose according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). 10 µg of each fusion protein was used in precipitation analyses, as described previously (14).

SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting

SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting were carried out as described previously (44, 47). Primary antibodies were used at the following concentrations: anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 at 0.1 µg/ml (Upstate Biotechnology Inc., Lake Placid, NY); polyclonal anti-SHP2, anti-STAT5, and anti-c-Cbl antibodies at 0.2 µg/ml; polyclonal anti-p85 (SH3/bcr) antibody at a dilution of 1:4000; and monoclonal anti-p85alpha antibody (tissue culture supernatant, a gift from Dr. M. Waterfield, Ludwig Institute and University College London, London, UK) at 1:50. For "Far Western" blotting, primary incubations were performed with either NSH2-GST or FLp85-GST at 200 ng/ml for 2 h and then incubated with a 1:20,000 dilution of a monoclonal anti-GST antibody (Sigma). Secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase were used at a concentration of 0.05 µg/ml (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Immunoblots were developed using the ECL system (Amersham Corp.) and Kodak X-AR 5 film. Blots were stripped as described previously (45).

In Vitro Phosphatase Assays

SHP2 immunoprecipitations were prepared from extracts of the equivalent of 2 × 107 cells/sample, which had been lysed in IP buffer containing or lacking phosphatase inhibitors. Samples were washed three times in the appropriate IP buffer and once in phosphatase buffer (25 mM PIPES, pH 6.25, 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.7 µg/ml pepstatin, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 40 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), containing or lacking phosphatase inhibitors, before resuspension in the appropriate phosphatase buffer and incubation at 20 °C for 50 min, with occasional agitation. Reactions were terminated by pelleting the precipitates and boiling in SDS sample buffer.

Subcellular Fractionation

Control or IL-3-treated Ba/F3 or FD-6 cells were washed briefly and then resuspended in hypotonic buffer (10 mM Hepes, pH 7.2, 5 mM EDTA, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM sodium molybdate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 40 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.7 µg/ml pepstatin, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor). The cells were left on ice for 10 min to swell. Homogenization was carried out by 50 strokes of a tight fitting Dounce homogenizer on ice. Nuclei and intact cells were removed by centrifugation for 20 s at 4 °C in a microcentrifuge at full speed. The supernatant was then subjected to centrifugation at 100,000 × g at 4 °C for 20 min. The resulting supernatant (S100) was designated the cytosol and the pellet (P100) the crude membrane. Nonidet P-40 was added to the cytosol to 1% prior to its use for immunoprecipitations. The pellet was rinsed briefly in buffer A (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM sodium molybdate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 40 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 0.7 µg/ml pepstatin, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor) and then solubilized in a volume of buffer A containing 1% Nonidet P-40 equivalent to the volume of the cytosol. Remaining insoluble material was removed by centrifugation for 5 min at 4 °C in a microcentrifuge at full speed.


RESULTS

We have reported previously that both PI3K and SHP2 are activated in response to IL-3 (12, 14), and recently we have shown that SHP2 associates with the beta -chain of the IL-3 receptor (41). No such association has been observed for PI3K; thus, the mechanism used by IL-3 to locate PI3K to the membrane, and so to its lipid substrates, remains undefined but is of obvious importance. In light of the fact that we have previously reported co-immunoprecipitation of p85 and SHP2 from extracts of IL-3-treated cells (14), it is possible that PI3K is coupled to the IL-3 receptor via SHP2-IL-3 receptor beta -chain interactions. Therefore, we were interested to further investigate the interaction between PI3K and SHP2 in an attempt to identify any potential adaptor proteins involved in linking them after IL-3 treatment.

A 100-kDa phosphotyrosine-containing Protein Co-precipitates with SHP2 and p85

To investigate the major tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins interacting with SHP2 and p85 in response to IL-3, murine Ba/F3 cells were treated with IL-3 or left untreated as a control. Immunoprecipitates were prepared using either anti-p85 or anti-SHP2 antibodies, and immunoblotting was performed with the anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10. The major co-precipitating species in the IL-3-treated samples in both p85 and SHP2 immunoprecipitates was a tyrosine-phosphorylated protein of 100 kDa (p100; see Fig. 1A). Additional proteins of 60 and 70 kDa were also observed in p85 precipitates. As we have described previously, the p70 protein was SHP2 (14). Tyrosine phosphorylation of the 60-kDa protein was variably observed in unstimulated samples. Additional proteins of 70 and 135 kDa were observed in the SHP2 immunoprecipitates from IL-3-treated samples. SHP2 corresponds to the 70-kDa protein, and the 135-kDa protein is the beta -chain of the IL-3 receptor (41). These results demonstrate that a 100-kDa phosphotyrosine-containing protein is the major protein that co-precipitates with p85 PI3K and SHP2 after IL-3 treatment of Ba/F3 cells. Similar results were obtained when FD-6 cells were subjected to the same analyses (data not shown). It is interesting to note that we do not observe co-immunoprecipitation of tyrosine-phosphorylated p145SHIP with SHP2 from lysates of IL-3-treated Ba/F3 or FD-6 cells. This is in agreement with our previous work (14) and that of other groups using similar cells (48, 49). However, it is in contrast to a recent report by Liu et al. (50), who describe co-precipitation of p145SHIP and SHP2 after IL-3 stimulation of murine B6SUtA1 cells, the reasons for these differences are not clear.


Fig. 1. IL-3 induces association of SHP2 and p85 PI3K with tyrosine-phosphorylated p100: a direct interaction mediated by the p85 SH2 domains. Ba/F3 cells were either left untreated as a control (C) or treated for 10 min with IL-3 (3). 2 × 107 cells/sample were lysed in IP buffer, and aliquots containing the equivalent of 2.4 × 105 cells were removed as the preimmunoprecipitation samples (Pre IP). A, immunoprecipitations were prepared using either anti-p85 (alpha p85) or SHP2 (alpha SHP2) antibodies. B, precipitations were performed with 10 µg of p85NSH2-GST (NSH2), FLp85-GST (FL p85), p85CSH2-GST (CSH2), or p85SH3-GST (p85SH3). Immunoblotting in each case was performed with the anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody, 4G10 (alpha PY). C, Far Western blotting was performed on triplicate blots prepared with the same preimmunoprecipitation samples and anti-p85 immunoprecipitates as in A. p85NSH2-GST (N-SH2; left panel) or FLp85-GST (FLp85; right panel) were used as the primary detection reagents. Molecular size standards are shown (in kDa), and the positions of p135 (Aic2A), p100, SHP2, and p64 are indicated.

[View Larger Version of this Image (56K GIF file)]


p100 Binds Directly to the SH2 Domains of p85

The interaction between p100 and p85 was investigated further to establish whether binding was direct and, if so, which region of p85 was involved. Ba/F3 were treated with IL-3 or left untreated as a control, and precipitations were performed using GST fusion proteins of full-length p85 (FLp85-GST), the N-terminal SH2 domain of p85 (NSH2-GST), the C-terminal SH2 domain of p85 (CSH2-GST), or the p85 SH3 domain (p85SH3-GST), the results are shown in Fig. 1B. A 100-kDa phosphotyrosine-containing protein was precipitated from extracts of IL-3-treated cells with FLp85-GST, NSH2-GST and CSH2-GST, but not with p85SH3-GST. These results suggest that the interaction between p100 and p85 PI3K is mediated by the p85 SH2 domains. A small amount of SHP2 was also precipitated by these fusion proteins, as we have described previously (14), but the relative stoichiometry suggests that the interaction is unlikely to be direct, there being far more p100 present. Similar results were observed in FD-6 cells (data not shown). Interestingly, the p85SH3-GST fusion protein precipitated a 64-kDa protein from IL-3-treated cell extracts, the identity of which is unknown, but may be related to the p60 protein observed in anti-p85 immunoprecipitates (see Fig. 1A).

The identity of the 145-kDa protein precipitated by the p85 SH2-domain GST fusions is not known. One candidate is the recently described SH2-containing inositol phosphatase p145SHIP. To investigate the possibility that p145 could be SHIP, the immunoblot in Fig. 1B was reprobed with anti-p145SHIP antibodies. These antibodies detected SHIP in the pre-immunoprecipitation samples, but they did not cross-react with any proteins co-precipitating with the p85-GST fusion proteins, suggesting that the p145 protein is not SHIP (data not shown). p145 is not observed in p85 immunoprecipitations (see Fig. 1A) using a number of different p85 antibodies,2 and neither is it observed in immunoprecipitations using anti-p110 (PI3K) antibodies (51). It may therefore represent a non-physiological association.

The interaction between p100 and p85 was analyzed further using the technique of Far Western blotting, whereby a recombinant protein is used in place of the primary antibody when probing an immunoblot. This technique is a useful way of detecting interactions that occur directly between particular proteins. Anti-p85 immunoprecipitates were prepared from control and IL-3-treated Ba/F3 cells and immunoblotted in triplicate with 4G10, to assess tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 1A) or with NSH2-GST or FLp85-GST (Fig. 1C). Both of these p85 fusion proteins bound to a species of 100 kDa on the Far Western blot (see Fig. 1C), in both whole cell extracts (Pre IP samples) and p85 immunoprecipitates from IL-3-treated cells. This supports our previous data and suggests that a direct interaction occurs between the SH2 domains of p85 and tyrosine-phosphorylated p100. The NSH2-GST, CSH2-GST, and FLp85-GST fusion proteins also bound a 100-kDa protein on Far Western blots of whole cell extracts from IL-3-treated FD-6 cells (data not shown). No other species were detected in these Far Western blots; hence, it is unlikely that the association of the p85-GST fusion proteins with the p145 protein observed in Fig. 1B is of high affinity or direct.

The Same p100 Interacts with Both PI3K and SHP2

We were interested to determine whether p100, or a portion of it, which we observed in SHP2 precipitates, was the same as the p100 protein, which we have demonstrated above to interact directly with the SH2 domains of p85. To investigate this, sequential immunoprecipitation analyses were performed using FD-6 cells. Anti-p85 antibodies were used to prepare a primary immunoprecipitate that was re-precipitated using the SHP2SH2-GST fusion protein. Fig. 2A shows the results of immunoblotting these two sets of precipitates with 4G10. The SHP2SH2-GST fusion protein reprecipitated a portion of the p100 protein that had initially co-precipitated with the p85 antibodies. Similar results were obtained from Ba/F3 cells (data not shown). These data suggest that the SHP2 SH2 domains can bind directly to p100 and that p85 PI3K interacts with a portion of the same p100 protein that interacts with SHP2. The sequential precipitations were repeated using SHP2 antibodies to prepare the primary precipitates, which were then re-precipitated using NSH2-GST (Fig. 2B) or CSH2-GST (Fig. 2C). It can be seen that both of the p85 SH2 domain fusion proteins are able to reprecipitate p100 that originally co-precipitated with SHP2. These data support the conclusion that SHP2 and p85 bind to the same p100 protein and indicate that p100 can interact with either of the SH2 domains of p85. In addition, on Far Western blots, NSH2-GST and FLp85-GST bind to p100 co-precipitated with SHP2 antibodies (data not shown).


Fig. 2. SHP2 and p85 bind directly to the same p100 protein. FD-6 cells were either left untreated as a control (C) or treated for 10 min with IL-3 (3). 2 × 107 cells/sample were lysed in IP buffer, and aliquots containing the equivalent of 2.4 × 105 cells were removed as the preimmunoprecipitation samples (Pre IP). A, primary immunoprecipitations (1° IP) were prepared using the anti-p85 antibody (alpha p85); after denaturation, a secondary precipitation (2° IP) was carried out with the SHP2SH2-GST fusion protein (SHP2). B, primary immunoprecipitations (1° IP) were prepared using the anti-SHP2 antibody (alpha SHP2), denatured, and then re-precipitated (2° IP) with the NSH2-GST fusion protein (NSH2). C, as for B, except the CSH2-GST fusion protein (CSH2) was used in the preparation of the secondary precipitation. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE through 7.5% (A and B) or 10% (C) acrylamide gels and immunoblotted with 4G10 (alpha -PY). Molecular size standards are shown (in kDa), and the positions of p100 and SHP2 are indicated.

[View Larger Version of this Image (29K GIF file)]


p100 Is a Substrate for the SHP2 Phosphatase Activity

We were interested to investigate the possibility that p100 was a substrate for SHP2 phosphatase activity. Control or IL-3-treated Ba/F3 cells were extracted in IP buffer containing or lacking the phosphatase inhibitors sodium orthovanadate, sodium molybdate and sodium fluoride and SHP2 immunoprecipitated in each case. After extensive washing the precipitates were resuspended in phosphatase buffer, again containing or lacking phosphatase inhibitors and incubated at 20 °C for 50 min. To specifically examine the effects of SHP2 phosphatase activity on SHP2-associated proteins, we analyzed the proteins that remained bound in the SHP2 precipitates by immunoblotting with 4G10 (Fig. 3, upper panel). In the absence of phosphatase inhibitors, there was a significant dephosphorylation of all of the tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins that co-immunoprecipitated with SHP2. This suggests that p100 and p135 (Aic2A) are substrates for SHP2 and also that SHP2 can auto-dephosphorylate. The evidence that p135 is a substrate for SHP2 is supported by previous work indicating that phosphopeptides based on the sequence of the IL-3 receptor beta  chain surrounding tyrosine 612 can act as substrates for the phosphatase activity of SHP2 (41). Reprobing the blot with anti-SHP2 antibodies demonstrated equivalent amounts of SHP2 were present in the immunoprecipitation samples (Fig. 3, lower panel). In the presence of phosphatase inhibitors the SHP2 precipitated from IL-3-treated cells is significantly broadened, reflecting its phosphorylation. This is decreased in the samples incubated in the absence of phosphatase inhibitors, correlating with the observed SHP2 dephosphorylation.


Fig. 3. p100 is a substrate for the phosphatase activity of SHP2. Ba/F3 cells were either left untreated as a control (C) or treated for 10 min with IL-3 (3). 2 × 107 cells/sample were lysed in IP buffer in the presence (+) or absence (-) of phosphatase inhibitors. Aliquots containing the equivalent of 2.4 × 105 cells were removed as preimmunoprecipitation samples (Pre IP). After precipitation and incubation in phosphatase assay buffer, proteins remaining bound were eluted and immunoblotted with 4G10 (alpha -PY, upper panel). The same blot was stripped and reprobed with the polyclonal antibody against SHP2 (alpha -SHP2, lower panel). Molecular size standards are shown (in kDa), and the positions of p135 (Aic2A), p100, and SHP2 are indicated.

[View Larger Version of this Image (52K GIF file)]


p100 Associates with Grb2

The results presented above are consistent with the notion that p100 is an adaptor molecule playing a role similar to that of IRS-1/IRS-2 or the recently discovered Gab-1 or DOS proteins (52-56). We were therefore interested to investigate whether p100 would bind to other signaling molecules implicated previously in IL-3 signaling, such as the small adaptor protein, Grb2.

Control and IL-3-treated Ba/F3 or FD-6 cell extracts were subjected to precipitations using GST fusion proteins of full-length Grb2 (FLGrb2-GST), the SH2 domain of Grb2 (Grb2SH2-GST), or full-length Grb2 with mutations in both SH3 domains (Grb2N+CSH3*-GST). Precipitates were analyzed using immunoblotting with the 4G10 antibody. The results for Ba/F3 cells are shown in Fig. 4A; the same results were also observed for FD-6 cell extracts (data not shown). A tyrosine-phosphorylated protein of 100 kDa precipitated with FLGrb2-GST but not with either of the other GST fusions. This suggests that the SH3 domains of Grb2 are capable of interacting with a 100-kDa protein.


Fig. 4. Grb2 co-precipitates with a 100-kDa phosphotyrosine-containing protein, via its SH3 domains. Ba/F3 cells were either left untreated as a control (C) or treated for 10 min with IL-3 (3). 2 × 107 cells/sample were lysed in IP buffer, and aliquots containing the equivalent of 2.4 × 105 cells removed as the pre-precipitation samples (Pre IP). A, 10 µg of either FLGrb2-GST (FLGrb2), Grb2SH2-GST (Grb2SH2), or FLGrb2N+CSH3*-GST (Grb2(N+CSH3*)) were used to prepare precipitates from extracts of Ba/F3 cells. B, sequential immunoprecipitation analyses were performed using anti-p85 antibodies to prepare the primary precipitations (1° IP) and 10 µg of either FLGrb2-GST (FL) or Grb2SH2-GST (SH2) as the secondary precipitating agents (2° IP). C, as for B, except anti-SHP2 antibodies were used for the primary precipitations. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE through 7.5% acrylamide gels and immunoblotting was performed in the upper panels using 4G10 (alpha -PY). The blot in B was stripped and reprobed with a monoclonal antibody against p85alpha (lower panel). Molecular size standards are shown (in kDa), and the positions of p135 (Aic2A), p100, p85 PI3K, and SHP2 are indicated.

[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]


To investigate this interaction further and determine if the p100 protein precipitated by the FLGrb2-GST fusion protein, or a portion of it, was the same p100 protein that had been observed to bind to SHP2 and p85, sequential precipitations were performed on control or IL-3-treated Ba/F3 cells. Anti-p85 (Fig. 4B) or anti-SHP2 (Fig. 4C) antibodies were used for the primary precipitations, while secondary precipitations were performed using either FLGrb2-GST or Grb2SH2-GST. The primary and secondary precipitations were then analyzed by immunoblotting with the 4G10 antibody.

It can clearly be seen that the FLGrb2-GST reprecipitated p100 that had first been precipitated by either p85 or SHP2 antibodies (see Fig. 4, B and C). This was not seen for Grb2SH2-GST, although this protein did reprecipitate SHP2 that had been immunoprecipitated by anti-SHP2 antibodies (Fig. 4C). On overexposure of the blot shown in Fig. 4C, a very small amount of p100 was seen to reprecipitate with Grb2SH2-GST. These data suggest that Grb2 interacts directly with p100 via its SH3 domains, with possibly some engagement of the Grb2 SH2 domain after stimulation of the cells with IL-3.

p85 (PI3K) and Grb2 Do Not Interact in These Cells

Although the evidence presented so far strongly suggests that p100 is mediating the interaction between p85 and SHP2, the possibility remained that the interaction could also be mediated by the small adaptor protein Grb2 (57). Grb2 has been shown to interact directly with SHP2 (14, 32, 38, 39), and this is supported by the sequential precipitation experiments presented above. There have also been reports that Grb2 interacts with p85 (57-59). To investigate whether p85 and Grb2 interact directly in our cells, the blot shown in Fig. 4B (upper panel) was reprobed with a monoclonal antibody against p85alpha (Fig. 4B, lower panel). It can be seen that p85 is visible in the preimmunoprecipitation samples and greatly enriched in the primary precipitation samples, but is not reprecipitated by either FLGrb2-GST or Grb2SH2-GST. In contrast, it can be seen in Fig. 4C that SHP2 precipitated using anti-SHP2 antibodies reprecipitated with both full-length Grb2-GST and Grb2SH2-GST. It is thus highly unlikely that Grb2 is mediating the interaction between p85 and SHP2 in IL-3-dependent murine hemopoietic cells.

p100 Is Not JAK2, Vav, or STAT5

A number of proteins of similar molecular weight to p100 have been reported previously to be tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to IL-3. These include JAK2, STAT5, and the proto-oncogene product Vav (11, 60). JAK2 is an unlikely candidate for p100 due to its size. JAK2 is tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to IL-3 but has been shown previously by us and others (11, 61) to run as a sharp band at around 120 kDa. This is in contrast to p100, which migrates as a rather diffuse band at around 100 kDa. To investigate the possibility of p100 being STAT5 or Vav, murine Ba/F3 or FD-6 cells were treated with IL-3 or left untreated as a control. Immunoprecipitates were prepared using anti-SHP2, anti-Vav, or anti-STAT5 antibodies, and immunoblotting was performed using the anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10. Fig. 5 shows the data for Ba/F3 cells. No tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins precipitated with the anti-Vav antibody. The anti-STAT5 antibody precipitated a heavily tyrosine-phosphorylated protein of around 95 kDa that migrated slightly faster than the p100 protein that co-precipitates with SHP2. To confirm that p100 is not STAT5, this same immunoblot was stripped and reprobed with anti-STAT5 (Fig. 5, lower panel). STAT5 is clearly visible in the preimmunoprecipitation and anti-STAT5 immunoprecipitation samples but does not co-precipitate with SHP2. In addition, p100 precipitated with the anti-SHP2 antibodies did not react with anti-Vav antibodies upon immunoblotting (data not shown). The same results were seen for analyses using FD-6 cells (data not shown).


Fig. 5. p100 is not Vav or STAT5. Ba/F3 cells were either left untreated as a control (C) or treated for 10 min with IL-3 (3). 2 × 107 cells/sample were lysed in IP buffer, and aliquots containing the equivalent of 2.4 × 105 cells removed as the preimmunoprecipitation samples (Pre IP). Immunoprecipitations were prepared using either anti-SHP2 (alpha SHP2), anti-Vav (alpha Vav), or anti-STAT5 (alpha STAT5) antibodies. Immunoblotting was first performed with 4G10 (alpha PY, upper panel). The same blot was subsequently stripped and reprobed with anti-STAT5 antibody (alpha STAT5, lower panel). Molecular size standards are shown (in kDa), and the positions of p100 and STAT5 are indicated.

[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]


p100 Is Not c-Cbl

One other molecule of a similar molecular weight that is a candidate for p100 is the proto-oncogene product c-Cbl. Although the exact function of c-Cbl is not clear, it has been suggested that it may play an important role in recruiting PI3K to receptor complexes at the plasma membrane and hence bring it within close proximity of its substrates. c-Cbl has been shown to be a major tyrosine-phosphorylated protein that co-precipitates with PI3K in response to ligation of both T- and B-cell antigen receptors and engagement of the Fcgamma R receptor on macrophages (62-66).

To investigate the possibility of a role for c-Cbl in PI3K-SHP2 interactions, FD-6 were stimulated with IL-3 for various times, immunoprecipitates prepared using a polyclonal antibody against c-Cbl and immunoblotted using the 4G10 antibody (Fig. 6A, upper panel). A low basal level of tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Cbl was observed in unstimulated cells, which was not significantly elevated in response to IL-3. Reprobing with the anti-c-Cbl antibody verified the immunoblots were evenly loaded (Fig. 6A, middle panel). Reprobing the same immunoblot with anti-p85 antibodies, showed that, while p85 was clearly visible in the preimmunoprecipitation samples, it could not be detected in the c-Cbl immunoprecipitates from control or IL-3-stimulated cells (Fig. 6A, lower panel). We also examined c-Cbl tyrosine phosphorylation in response to GM-CSF, IL-4, and insulin in FD-6 cells and in Ba/F3 cells in response to IL-3. In none of these analyses could we detect significant alterations in the state of tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Cbl, nor could we detect any interaction between p85 and c-Cbl (data not shown). Therefore, it would appear that c-Cbl does not play a significant role in coupling to the PI3K pathway in FD-6 or Ba/F3 cells. As further confirmation of this, we could not detect c-Cbl in p85 immunoprecipitates prepared from Ba/F3 cells, in the presence or absence of IL-3. While we could detect significant amounts of p100 in these precipitates (Fig. 6B, upper panel), when the immunoblot was reprobed with anti-c-Cbl antibodies, despite c-Cbl being clearly visible in the preimmunoprecipitation samples (Fig. 6B, lower panel), it was not detectable in the anti-p85 immunoprecipitates, even after lengthy exposure of the immunoblot. These results suggest that p85 and c-Cbl do not interact to a great extent in FD-6 or Ba/F3 cells in response to IL-3. c-Cbl clearly migrates as a sharper band of approximately 116 kDa on SDS-PAGE, whereas p100 migrates as a diffuse band between 97 and 105 kDa on the same gels. These differences, together with the data we have presented on their respective interactions, strongly suggest that tyrosine-phosphorylated p100 is not c-Cbl and that the role played by c-Cbl in other cells may be performed in our hemopoietic cells by p100 instead.


Fig. 6. p100 is not c-Cbl and PI3K (p85) does not bind c-Cbl in FD-6 or Ba/F3 cells. A, FD-6 cells were either left untreated as a control (0) or treated for 1, 2, 5, 10, or 15 min with IL-3 (as indicated). 2 × 107 cells/sample were lysed in IP buffer, and aliquots containing the equivalent of 2.4 × 105 cells removed as the preimmunoprecipitation samples (Pre IP). Anti-c-Cbl antibodies were used to prepare precipitates from the remaining cell lysates (alpha Cbl IP). Immunoblotting was first performed with 4G10 (alpha -PY; upper panel). The same blot was subsequently stripped and reprobed with the anti-c-Cbl antibody (alpha -Cbl; middle panel) and then the anti-p85 (SH3/bcr) antibody (alpha -p85; lower panel). B, anti-p85 immunoprecipitates were prepared from Ba/F3 cell lysates (alpha p85 IP) and immunoblotting first performed with 4G10 (alpha -PY; upper panel). The same blot was subsequently stripped and reprobed with the anti-c-Cbl antibody (alpha -Cbl; lower panel). Molecular size standards are shown (in kDa), and the positions of p100, c-Cbl, and p85 are indicated.

[View Larger Version of this Image (36K GIF file)]


Subcellular Localization of p100

We have demonstrated previously that SHP2 can interact directly with the beta -chain of the IL-3 receptor (41), and we now propose that p100 could be serving as an adaptor protein linking p85 (PI3K) to SHP2 in response to IL-3. Association of a complex of p85 and p100 with receptor-bound SHP2 would thus act to translocate PI3K to the membrane within the locality of its substrates. To test this hypothesis, we examined the subcellular localization of PI3K-p100 and SHP2-p100 complexes after IL-3 stimulation. Crude membrane and cytosol fractions were prepared from control and IL-3-stimulated Ba/F3 and FD-6 cells. The extracts were subjected to immunoprecipitations using either anti-SHP2 or anti-p85 antibodies and immunoblotted with the anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10. The data for Ba/F3 cells are shown in Fig. 7. The major tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins that precipitated with SHP2 antibodies from the cytosolic fraction of IL-3-stimulated cells were p100 and SHP2 (p70). Complexes between SHP2 and p135 (Aic2A) and SHP2 and p100 were also detected in the membrane fraction after IL-3 treatment. As expected for a transmembrane protein, Aic2A (p135) co-precipitated with SHP2 exclusively from the membrane fraction. These results suggest that, although p100 and SHP2 have a predominantly cytosolic localization, after IL-3 stimulation a portion of each tyrosine-phosphorylated protein is present at the membrane.


Fig. 7. p100 co-precipitates with p85 (PI3K) and SHP2 from the membrane fraction of IL-3-treated cells. Ba/F3 cells were either left untreated as a control (C) or treated for 10 min with IL-3 (3). Fractionation was performed as described previously (see "Materials and Methods"). Samples of cytosol (cyt.) and crude membrane (mem.) fractions containing the equivalent of 2.4 × 105 cells were removed as the preimmunoprecipitation samples (Pre IP). Aliquots of each fraction containing the equivalent of 2 × 107 cells/sample were used to prepare anti-SHP2 (alpha SHP2) or anti-p85 (alpha p85) immunoprecipitates. Immunoblotting was performed with 4G10 (alpha PY). Molecular size standards are shown (in kDa), and the positions of p135 (Aic2A), p100, and p70 (SHP2) are indicated.

[View Larger Version of this Image (42K GIF file)]


When anti-p85 IPs were carried out on subcellular fractions of Ba/F3 cells, the major tyrosine-phosphorylated protein co-precipitating with p85 from both membrane and cytosolic fractions was p100 (Fig. 7). Here again, p100 is mainly cytosolic with some membrane localization of the tyrosine-phosphorylated protein after IL-3 stimulation. A small amount of tyrosine-phosphorylated SHP2 (p70) can also be seen co-precipitating with p85 from the cytosol; on close inspection of a longer exposure, this band is also present in the immunoprecipitation of the membrane fraction of IL-3-treated cells, although it is rather faint. These data thus support the notion of a complex forming between Aic2A, SHP2, p100, and p85 (PI3K) at the membrane after IL-3 stimulation, and the potential role of p100 as an adaptor molecule linking PI3K and SHP2.


DISCUSSION

In this study, we provide evidence that the major tyrosine-phosphorylated protein that co-precipitates with both the p85 subunit of PI3K and SHP2 in IL-3-treated murine lymphohemopoietic cells is a 100-kDa protein, which we have termed p100. The same p100 protein, or a portion of it, appears to interact directly with both p85 and SHP2 via their SH2 domains, and evidence presented suggests that p100 is also a substrate for the phosphatase activity of SHP2. p100 also interacts with Grb2, an association that appears to be mediated predominantly by the Grb2 SH3 domains, suggesting that p100 either contains proline-rich motifs or an as yet undescribed SH3 binding domain.

With respect to proteins of similar size shown previously to be tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to IL-3, we have shown that p100 is not Vav or STAT5. p100 is also highly unlikely to be JAK2, since this protein, although tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to IL-3, runs as a sharp band at 120 kDa (11) while p100 migrates as a more diffuse band at around 100 kDa.

We also investigated the possibility that p100 could be the proto-oncogene product c-Cbl, since this protein had been shown previously to be the major tyrosine-phosphorylated protein that co-precipitates with p85 (PI3K) in response to a number of different stimuli in a variety of different cell lines. However, a number of lines of evidence that we have presented suggest that p100 is not c-Cbl. First, there is a difference in molecular mass; p100 migrates as a diffuse protein, ranging in size from 97 to 105 kDa, whereas c-Cbl migrates as a sharp band of 116 kDa in total cell lysates and as a closely migrating doublet in c-Cbl immunoprecipitates. Second, c-Cbl is not appreciably tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to treatment with a number of different cytokines in either Ba/F3 or FD-6 cells, whereas p100 is one of the major proteins phosphorylated in response to treatment of these same cells with IL-3. Finally, we did not detect any interaction between c-Cbl and p85 in response to IL-3, GM-CSF, IL-4, or insulin in the cell lines used in this study. These data are in contrast to a recent study by Anderson et al. (67), who reported that IL-3 induces the association of p85 with c-Cbl in the cell line 32D cl3. It should be noted that these investigators did not demonstrate a direct interaction between p85 and c-Cbl and also did not demonstrate significant co-immunoprecipitation of these two molecules (67). However, it is of interest that they did obtain good co-precipitation of a tyrosine-phosphorylated protein of around 100 kDa with p85, which could well be the p100 protein discussed here. Nonetheless, p100 does share certain characteristics with c-Cbl. For instance, p100 interacts with the SH2 domain(s) of p85 and with the SH3 domain(s) of Grb2 so it is possible that the two proteins are related or perform a similar function. Hartley et al. (68) have suggested that c-Cbl associates specifically with the beta -isoform of p85. However, this isoform appears either to be expressed at very low levels or not at all in our cells.2

A number of phosphotyrosine-containing proteins, with molecular masses ranging from 105 to 115 kDa, have been shown previously to associate with SHP2, although from the data we have presented here, p100 appears to be a distinct species. A 115-kDa protein is phosphorylated in response to insulin in CHO-IR cells and 3T3-L1 adipocytes or in response to nerve growth factor or EGF in PC12 cells, binds SHP2, and appears to be a major substrate for the SHP2 phosphatase (69). However, unlike p100, this protein did not associate with Grb2 and, in addition, p100 does not become tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to insulin in FD-6 cells.3 Yamouchi et al. (70) report that EGF also induces association of SHP2 with a 115-kDa phosphoprotein in NIH3T3ER and HepG2 cells. Additionally, in Jurkat T-cells, the major tyrosine-phosphorylated protein that associates with SHP2 is a 105-kDa protein (70). Again, neither p115 nor p105 were observed to bind to Grb2 (70). Recently, a family of transmembrane phosphotyrosine-containing glycoproteins have been identified that bind to SHP2 in response to treatment with different growth factors, and that appear to act as negative regulators of signaling (71-73). However, p100 is again distinct in that it has a predominantly cytosolic localization.

We propose that p100 functions, at least in part, by linking p85 and SHP2. Other investigators have suggested that Grb2 performs this linking function, which would require Grb2 to interact with both SHP2 and p85. We and others (14, 38, 39) have demonstrated a direct interaction between Grb2 and SHP2, and Grb2 has also been reported previously to bind p85 (57-59). In monocytes, M-CSF induces an association between Grb2 and p85 that appears to be direct. However, this association is dependent upon M-CSF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of p85 creating a binding site for the SH2 domain of Grb2 (59). Other investigators suggest that the Grb2 SH3 domains could be interacting with proline-rich sequences in p85, and Wang et al. (57) demonstrated such an interaction using the yeast two-hybrid system and also using GST fusion proteins of various domains of p85 and Grb2. In contrast, we could not detect any association of p85 and Grb2 in Ba/F3 or FD-6 cells, suggesting that Grb2 is not involved in mediating the interaction of p85 and SHP2. We used a monoclonal antibody specific for p85alpha in these analyses and our cells appear to contain little or no p85beta .2 However, the p85beta bcr region is more proline-rich than the same region of p85alpha ; hence, p85beta may participate in interactions with SH3-containing proteins, such as Grb2. Alternatively, since p85 has not been separately cloned from hemopoietic cells, it is formally possible that, although recognized by anti-p85alpha specific antibodies, the form of p85 present in our cells could differ to the extent that it lacks the particular proline-rich regions required for Grb2 binding. Indeed, the region of p85alpha and -beta that has the lowest identity is the bcr/proline-rich region.

In its characteristics, p100 most closely resembles the recently reported adaptor proteins Gab-1 (54) and DOS (the Drosophila protein Daughter of Sevenless) (55, 56). DOS binds to CSW, the Drosophila homologue of SHP2, and seems to be a substrate for the phosphatase activity of this molecule. DOS also has a potential binding site for the SH2 domain(s) of p85. Antibodies against DOS do not cross-react with p100.3 Gab-1, first described as a Grb2-associated docking protein for EGF and insulin signaling, co-precipitates with Grb2, SHP2, and PI3K. In addition, Gab-1 is detected on Far Western blots of EGF-stimulated cell extracts by PI3K SH2 domain fusion proteins (among others) and associates with Grb2 via the Grb2 SH3 domains. We cannot rule out the possibility that p100 is in some way related to Gab-1. However, the p100 protein that co-precipitates with PI3K and SHP2 from FD-6 and Ba/F3 cells is not detected on an immunoblot using anti-Gab-1 antibodies (data not shown), suggesting that p100 is distinct from Gab-1.

During revision of this manuscript, two other groups have characterized proteins that may well be identical to the p100 protein described here (48, 49). Carlberg and Rohrschneider (48) characterized a tyrosine-phosphorylated protein of 100 kDa that associates with SHP2 and p85 (PI3K) in response to M-CSF in FDC-P1 cells. This cell line is related to the FD-6 cells used in this study, and we have reported previously observing a tyrosyl-phosphorylated protein of around 100 kDa in response to CSF-1 stimulation in these cells (45). This p100 protein is similar in many ways to the p100 protein we describe here. Both interact with SHP2 and p85 (PI3K) via the SH2 domains of these proteins, and both appear to be substrates for the SHP2 phosphatase activity. Carlberg and Rohrschneider suggest that their p100 protein acts by directly binding to p85 (PI3K), which is bound to c-Fms (the M-CSF receptor), thus allowing for recruitment of SHP2. This was not addressed directly by experimentation.

Gu et al. (49) report the characterization of two SHP2-binding proteins from hemopoietic cells. Given that the authors used Ba/F3 cells, the p97 protein that they describe is likely to be identical to the p100 protein discussed here. p97 associated inducibly with SHP2 in response to IL-3 via the SH2 domains of SHP2 and appeared to be a substrate for the phosphatase activity of SHP2. In contrast to the studies reported here, Gu et al. did not detect any p97 in anti-SHP2 IPs from membrane fractions although tyrosine-phosphorylated SHP2 was present in small amounts. This apparent discrepancy with our results may be a question of sensitivity, because p97 was quite difficult to discern in the cytosolic fractions from IL-3-stimulated cells in the data presented by these authors (49). In contrast, we demonstrated good co-precipitation of tyrosine-phosphorylated p100 with SHP2 from the cytosolic fraction of IL-3-stimulated Ba/F3 cells and a contrastingly small amount co-precipitating from the membrane fraction.

Gu et al. also describe characterization of a p135 transmembrane glycoprotein that interacts with SHP2. They conclude that this protein is not the beta -chain of the IL-3 receptor and that SHP2 does not interact with IL-3R. However, we have shown previously that SHP2 does interact with beta c in response to IL-3, and that this interaction is mediated directly by the SH2 domains of SHP2 (41). Such an interaction is difficult to show in Ba/F3 cells due to the low numbers of IL-3 receptors thought to be present on these cells and the lack of good antibodies against Aic2A (the murine IL-3R beta -chain). Based on our previous work, we therefore believe that the tyrosine-phosphorylated p135 protein that we see co-precipitating with SHP2 in response to IL-3 is Aic2A and use this to suggest a model for the role of p100 in localizing PI3K to the membrane after IL-3 stimulation.

We propose that p100 is an adaptor protein in IL-3 signaling that may serve to link SHP2 and PI3K pathways in response to IL-3. One important role of the protein-protein interactions of PI3K mediated by the p85 subunit is its translocation from the cytosol to the plasma membrane, or membrane-bound organelles, where its lipid products are located. Recent reports suggest that targeting of the p110 subunit of PI3K to membranes is sufficient for activation (74). In vivo, this may be achieved via direct association of PI3K with growth factor receptors, and PI3K has been shown to bind directly to the activated PDGF receptor (75). For other factors that can activate PI3K, including IL-3, the situation is likely to be more complex. The IL-3 receptor alpha  and beta  subunits do not possess tyrosines that conform to the consensus for p85 binding, i.e. YXXM motifs, that could serve as binding sites for p85 (2-4). We suggest that p100 could play a role in the translocation of PI3K to the plasma membrane in response to IL-3 in the following way. Direct binding of SHP2 to the IL-3 receptor beta -chain, which we have reported previously (41), would allow for recruitment of a p100-p85 (PI3K) complex to the membrane by SHP2 binding to the p100 component, and hence facilitate translocation of PI3K to the vicinity of its substrates. This model is illustrated schematically in Fig. 8. We demonstrate, via subcellular fractionation, that a small amount of tyrosine-phosphorylated p100 can be co-precipitated from crude membrane fractions of IL-3-stimulated cells using both anti-SHP2 and anti-p85 antibodies. These data support our proposed model that p100-p85 (PI3K) translocates to the membrane after IL-3 stimulation. SHP2 may act to regulate these interactions via dephosphorylation of p100. With respect to this last point, it is of interest to note that expression of dominant negative SHP2 in Rat-1 fibroblasts overexpressing the human insulin receptor attenuates the activation of PI3K in response to insulin. This is thought to be mediated via an effect on the tyrosine phosphorylation of the adaptor molecule IRS-1 (76). If p100 plays a similar role to IRS-1 in IL-3 signaling, then modulation of SHP2 activity could also affect PI3K activation in this system.


Fig. 8. Model of proposed role of p100 in IL-3 signaling. Binding of IL-3 to the IL-3 receptor induces tyrosine phosphorylation of the receptor beta -chain. Direct binding of SHP2 to tyrosine 612 of the beta -chain would allow for recruitment of a complex of p100 and p85 (PI3K) to the receptor and hence translocation of PI3K to the membrane and the vicinity of its substrates. SHP2 may regulate these interactions through dephosphorylation of the beta -chain of the receptor and p100. For more detail, see "Discussion."

[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]


It will obviously be important in the future to identify p100 at the molecular level and determine the significance of the interaction between p85 and SHP2. Work is currently under way to achieve these aims. Further work is also required to confirm the role of p100 in IL-3 signaling, but given that it is the major tyrosine-phosphorylated protein that co-precipitates with SHP2 and p85 (PI3K) in response to IL-3, it is likely to be an important one.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by a Medical Research Council project grant (to M. J. W.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-1225-826428; Fax: 44-1225-826114; E-mail: M.J.Welham{at}bath.ac.uk.
1   The abbreviations used are: IL, interleukin; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; PTP, protein-tyrosine phosphatase; SH2, Src homology region 2; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; EGF, epidermal growth factor; GM-CSF, granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid.
2   M. J. Welham, unpublished data.
3   B. L. Craddock and M. J. Welham, unpublished data.

REFERENCES

  1. Ihle, J. N. (1992) Chem. Immunol. 51, 65-106 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Itoh, N., Yonehara, S., Schreurs, J., Gorman, D. M., Maruyama, K., Ishii, A., Yahara, I., Arai, K., and Miyajima, A. (1990) Science 247, 324-327 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hara, T., and Miyajima, A. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 1875-1884 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Duronio, V., Clark-Lewis, I., and Schrader, J. W. (1992) Exp. Hematol. 20, 505-511 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Ihle, J. N., Witthuhn, B. A., Quelle, F. W., Yamamoto, K., and Silvennoinen, O. (1995) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13, 369-398 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Satoh, T., Nakafuku, M., Miyajima, A., and Kaziro, Y. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 3314-3318 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Duronio, V., Welham, M. J., Abraham, S., Dryden, P., and Schrader, J. W. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 1587-1591 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Welham, M. J., Duronio, V., Sanghera, J. S., Pelech, S. L., and Schrader, J. W. (1992) J. Immunol. 149, 1683-1693 [Abstract]
  9. Okuda, K., Sanghera, J. S., Pelech, S. L., Kanakura, Y., Hallek, M., Griffin, J. D., and Drucker, B. J. (1992) Blood 79, 2880-2887 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Carroll, M. P., Clark-Lewis, I., Rapp, U. R., and May, W. S. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 19812-19817 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Silvennoinen, O., Witthuhn, B. A., Quelle, F. W., Cleveland, J. L., Yi, T., and Ihle, J. N. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 8429-8433 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Gold, M. R., Duronio, V., Saxena, S. P., Schrader, J. W., and Aebersold, R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5403-5412 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Yi, T. L., Mui, A. L. F., Krystal, G., and Ihle, J. N. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 7577-7586 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Welham, M. J., Dechert, U., Leslie, K. B., Jirik, F., and Schrader, J. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 23764-23768 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kapeller, R., and Cantley, L. C. (1994) BioEssays 16, 565-576 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Toker, A., Meyer, M., Reddy, K. K., Falck, J. R., Aneja, R., Aneja, S., Parra, A., Burns, D. J., Ballas, L. M., and Cantley, L. C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 32358-32367 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Nakanishi, H., Brewer, K. A., and Exton, J. H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13-16 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Franke, T. F., Yang, S.-I., Chan, T. O., Datta, K., Kazlauskas, A., Morrison, D. K., Kaplan, D. R., and Tsichlis, P. N. (1995) Cell 81, 727-736 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Klippel, A., Kavanaugh, M. W., Pot, D., and Williams, L. T. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 338-344 [Abstract]
  20. Datta, K., Franke, T. F., Chan, T. O., Makris, A., Yang, S.-I., Kaplan, D. R., Morrison, D. K., Golemis, E. A., and Tsichlis, P. N. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2304-2310 [Abstract]
  21. Backer, J. M., Myers, M. G., Jr., Shoelson, S. E., Chin, D. J., Sun, X.-J., Miralpeix, M., Hu, P., Margolis, B., Skolnik, E. Y., Schlessinger, J., and White, M. F. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3469-3479 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Klippel, A., Escobedo, J. A., Hirano, M., and Williams, L. T. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 2675-2685 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hayashi, H., Kamohara, S., Nishioka, Y., Kanai, F., Miyake, N., Fukui, Y., Shibasaki, F., Takenawa, T., and Ebina, Y. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 22575-22580 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hayashi, H., Miyake, N., Kanai, F., Shibasaki, F., Takenawa, T., and Ebina, Y. (1991) Biochem. J. 280, 769-775
  25. Adachi, M., Sekiya, M., Miyachi, T., Matsuno, K., Hinoda, Y., Imai, K., and Yachi, A. (1992) FEBS Lett. 314, 335-339 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Freeman, R. M., Jr., Plutzky, J., and Neel, B. G. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 11239-11243 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Ahmad, S., Banville, D., Zhao, Z., Fischer, E. H., and Shen, S.-H. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 2197-2201 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Vogel, W., Lammers, R., Huang, J., and Ullrich, A. (1993) Science 259, 1611-1614 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Feng, G.-S., Hui, C.-C., and Pawson, T. (1993) Science 259, 1607-1611 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Perkins, L. A., Larson, I., and Perrimon, N. (1992) Cell 70, 225-236 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Lechleider, R. J., Sugimoto, S., Bennett, A. M., Kashishian, A. S., Cooper, J. A., Shoelson, S. E., Walsh, C. T., and Neel, B. G. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 21478-21481 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sugimoto, S., Wandless, T. J., Shoelson, S. E., Neel, B. G., and Walsh, C. T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13614-13622 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Pluskey, S., Wandless, T. J., Walsh, C. T., and Shoelson, S. E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2897-2900 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Lechleider, R. J., Freeman, R. M., Jr., and Neel, B. G. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13434-13438 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Tauchi, T., Feng, G.-S., Marshall, M. S., Shen, R., Mantel, C., Pawson, T., and Broxmeyer, H. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25206-25211 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Tauchi, T., Feng, G.-S., Shen, R., Hoatlin, M., Bagby, G. C., Jr., Kabat, D., Lu, L., and Broxmeyer, H. E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 5631-5635 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Xiao, S., Rose, D. W., Sasaoka, T., Maegawa, H., Burke, T. R., Jr., Roller, P. P., Shoelson, S. E., and Olefsky, J. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21244-21248 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Bennett, A. M., Tang, T. L., Sugimoto, S., Walsh, C. T., and Neel, B. G. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 7335-7339 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Li, W., Nishimura, R., Kashishian, A., Batzer, A. G., Kim, W. J. H., Cooper, J. A., and Schlessinger, J. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 509-517 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Kharitonenkov, A., Schnekenburger, J., Chen, Z., Knyazev, P., Ali, S., Zwick, E., White, M., and Ullrich, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29189-29193 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Bone, H., Dechert, U., Jirik, F., Schrader, J. W., and Welham, M. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14470-14476 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Palacios, R., and Steinmetz, M. (1985) Cell 41, 727-734 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Welham, M. J., Duronio, V., and Schrader, J. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5865-5873 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Welham, M. J., and Schrader, J. W. (1992) J. Immunol. 149, 2772-2783 [Abstract]
  45. Welham, M. J., Duronio, V., Leslie, K. B., Bowtell, D., and Schrader, J. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21165-21176 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Otsu, M., Hiles, I., Gout, I., Fry, M. J., Ruiz-Larrea, F., Panayotou, G., Thompson, A., Dhand, R., Hsuan, J., Totty, N., Smith, A. D., Morgan, S. J., Courtneidge, S. A., Parker, P. J., and Waterfield, M. D. (1991) Cell 65, 91-104 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Carlberg, K., and Rohrschneider, L. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15943-15950 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Gu, H., Griffin, J. D., and Neel, B. G. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 16421-16430 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Liu, L., Damen, J. E., Ware, M. D., and Krystal, G. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10998-11001 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Vanhaesebroeck, B., Welham, M. J., Kotani, K., Stein, R., Warne, P. H., Zvelebil, M. J., Higashi, K., Volinia, S., Downward, J., and Waterfield, M. D. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 4330-4335 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Myers, M. G., Sun, X. J., and White, M. F. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 289-293 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Sun, X. J., Wang, L.-M., Zhang, Y., Yenush, L., Myers, M. G., Glasheen, E., Lane, W. S., Pierce, J. H., and White, M. F. (1995) Nature 377, 173-177 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Holgado-Madruga, M., Emlet, D. R., Moscatello, D. K., Godwin, A. K., and Wong, A. J. (1996) Nature 379, 560-564 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Raabe, T., Riesgo-Escovar, J., Liu, X., Bausenwein, B. S., Deak, P., Maroy, P., and Hafen, E. (1996) Cell 85, 911-920 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Herbst, R., Carroll, P. M., Allard, J. D., Schilling, J., Raabe, T., and Simon, M. A. (1996) Cell 85, 899-909 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Wang, J., Auger, K. R., Jarvis, L., Shi, Y., and Roberts, T. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 12774-12780 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Tailor, P., Jascur, T., Williams, S., von Willebrand, M., Couture, C., and Mustelin, T. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 237, 736-742 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Saleem, A., Kharbanda, S., Yuan, Z.-M., and Kufe, D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10380-10383 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Matsuguchi, T., Inhorn, R. C., Carlesso, N., Xu, G., Druker, B., and Griffin, J. D. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 257-265 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  61. Welham, M. J., Learmonth, L., Bone, H., and Schrader, J. W. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 12286-12296 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Matsuo, T., Hazeki, K., Hazeki, O., Katada, T., and Ui, M. (1996) FEBS Lett. 382, 11-14 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Meisner, H., Conway, B. R., Hartley, D., and Czech, M. P. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3571-3578 [Abstract]
  64. Fukazawa, T., Reedquist, K. A., Trub, T., Soltoff, S., Panchamoorthy, G., Druker, B., Cantley, L., Shoelson, S. E., and Band, H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19141-19150 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Panchamoorthy, G., Fukazawa, T., Miyake, S., Soltoff, S., Reedquist, K., Druker, B., Shoelson, S., Cantley, L., and Band, H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3187-3194 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Kim, T. J., Kim, Y.-T., and Pillai, S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27504-27509 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Anderson, S. M., Burton, E. A., and Koch, B. L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 739-745 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Hartley, D., Meisner, H., and Corvera, S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18260-18263 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Yamauchi, K., Ribon, V., Saltiel, A. R., and Pessin, J. E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17716-17722 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Yamauchi, K., and Pessin, J. E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 14871-14874 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Noguchi, T., Matozaki, T., Fujioka, Y., Yamao, T., Tsuda, M., Takada, T., and Kasuga, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 27652-27658 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Fujioka, Y., Matozaki, T., Noguchi, T., Iwamatsu, A., Yamao, T., Takahashi, N., Tsuda, M., Takada, T., and Kasuga, M. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6887-6899 [Abstract]
  73. Kharitonenkov, A., Chan, Z., Sures, I., Wang, H., Schilling, J., and Ullrich, A. (1997) Nature 386, 181-186 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  74. Klippel, A., Reinhard, C., Kavanaugh, W. M., Apell, G., Escobedo, M.-A, and Williams, L. T. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4117-4127 [Abstract]
  75. Kavanaugh, W. M., Klippel, A., Escobedo, J. A., and Williams, L. T. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 3415-3424 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Ugi, S., Maegawa, H., Kashiwagi, A., Adachi, M., Olefsky, J. M., and Kikkawa, R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 12595-12602 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

Volume 272, Number 46, Issue of November 14, 1997 pp. 29281-29289
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. V. Parry, G. C. Whittaker, M. Sims, C. E. Edmead, M. J. Welham, and S. G. Ward
Ligation of CD28 Stimulates the Formation of a Multimeric Signaling Complex Involving Grb-2-Associated Binder 2 (Gab2), Src Homology Phosphatase-2, and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase: Evidence That Negative Regulation of CD28 Signaling Requires the Gab2 Pleckstrin Homology Domain
J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 594 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. R. D. Paling, H. Wheadon, H. K. Bone, and M. J. Welham
Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cell Self-renewal by Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase-dependent Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., November 12, 2004; 279(46): 48063 - 48070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
R. E. Smith, V. Patel, S. D. Seatter, M. R. Deehan, M. H. Brown, G. P. Brooke, H. S. Goodridge, C. J. Howard, K. P. Rigley, W. Harnett, et al.
A novel MyD-1 (SIRP-1{alpha}) signaling pathway that inhibits LPS-induced TNF{alpha} production by monocytes
Blood, October 1, 2003; 102(7): 2532 - 2540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
H. Wheadon and M. J. Welham
The coupling of TEL/PDGF{beta}R to distinct functional responses is modulated by the presence of cytokine: involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinases
Blood, August 15, 2003; 102(4): 1480 - 1489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J. A. F. Vara, M. A. D. Caceres, A. Silva, and J. Martin-Perez
Src Family Kinases Are Required for Prolactin Induction of Cell Proliferation
Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2001; 12(7): 2171 - 2183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
H. Gu, H. Maeda, J. J. Moon, J. D. Lord, M. Yoakim, B. H. Nelson, and B. G. Neel
New Role for Shc in Activation of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Pathway
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2000; 20(19): 7109 - 7120.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Fernandez, M. P. Czech, and H. Meisner
Role of Protein Kinase C in Signal Attenuation following T Cell Receptor Engagement
J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 1999; 274(29): 20244 - 20250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. L. Craddock, E. A. Orchiston, H. J. Hinton, and M. J. Welham
Dissociation of Apoptosis from Proliferation, Protein Kinase B Activation, and BAD Phosphorylation in Interleukin-3-mediated Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., April 9, 1999; 274(15): 10633 - 10640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
K. Nishida, Y. Yoshida, M. Itoh, T. Fukada, T. Ohtani, T. Shirogane, T. Atsumi, M. Takahashi-Tezuka, K. Ishihara, M. Hibi, et al.
Gab-Family Adapter Proteins Act Downstream of Cytokine and Growth Factor Receptors and T- and B-Cell Antigen Receptors
Blood, March 15, 1999; 93(6): 1809 - 1816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Gadina, C. Sudarshan, and J. J. O'Shea
IL-2, But Not IL-4 and Other Cytokines, Induces Phosphorylation of a 98-kDa Protein Associated with SHP-2, Phosphatidylinositol 3'-Kinase, and Grb2
J. Immunol., February 15, 1999; 162(4): 2081 - 2086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. G. Myers Jr., R. Mendez, P. Shi, J. H. Pierce, R. Rhoads, and M. F. White
The COOH-terminal Tyrosine Phosphorylation Sites on IRS-1 Bind SHP-2 and Negatively Regulate Insulin Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., October 9, 1998; 273(41): 26908 - 26914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Gesbert, C. Guenzi, and J. Bertoglio
A New Tyrosine-phosphorylated 97-kDa Adaptor Protein Mediates Interleukin-2-induced Association of SHP-2 with p85-Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase in Human T Lymphocytes
J. Biol. Chem., July 17, 1998; 273(29): 18273 - 18281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Takahashi-Tezuka, Y. Yoshida, T. Fukada, T. Ohtani, Y. Yamanaka, K. Nishida, K. Nakajima, M. Hibi, and T. Hirano
Gab1 Acts as an Adapter Molecule Linking the Cytokine Receptor gp130 to ERK Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 1998; 18(7): 4109 - 4117.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JEMHome page
J. A. Frearson and D. R. Alexander
The Phosphotyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2 Participates in a Multimeric Signaling Complex and Regulates T Cell Receptor (TCR) coupling to the Ras/Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Pathway in Jurkat T Cells
J. Exp. Med., May 4, 1998; 187(9): 1417 - 1426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Machide, K. Kamitori, and S. Kohsaka
Hepatocyte Growth Factor-induced Differential Activation of Phospholipase Cgamma 1 and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Is Regulated by Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-1 in Astrocytes
J. Biol. Chem., September 29, 2000; 275(40): 31392 - 31398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Kong, C. Mounier, J. Wu, and B. I. Posner
Epidermal Growth Factor-induced Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Activation and DNA Synthesis. IDENTIFICATION OF Grb2-ASSOCIATED BINDER 2 AS THE MAJOR MEDIATOR IN RAT HEPATOCYTES
J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 2000; 275(46): 36035 - 36042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. L. Craddock, J. Hobbs, C. E. Edmead, and M. J. Welham
Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase-dependent Regulation of Interleukin-3-induced Proliferation. INVOLVEMENT OF MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASES, SHP2 AND Gab2
J. Biol. Chem., June 22, 2001; 276(26): 24274 - 24283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Mazerolles, C. Barbat, M. Trucy, W. Kolanus, and A. Fischer
Molecular Events Associated with CD4-mediated Down-regulation of LFA-1-dependent Adhesion
J. Biol. Chem., January 4, 2002; 277(2): 1276 - 1283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Craddock, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Welham, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Craddock, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Welham, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement