![]()
|
|
||||||||
Volume 272, Number 47, Issue of November 21, 1997
pp. 29475-29481
(Received for publication, July 11, 1997, and in revised form, September 8, 1997)
From the Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum, Medizinische Fakultaet, Institut
fuer Hygiene und Mikrobiologie, Abteilung fuer Medizinische
Mikrobiologie Virologie, Universitaetsstrasse 150, D-44780, Bochum,
Gebaeude MA 6/130, Germany and The major isoform of fibroblast growth factor 3 (FGF3) is initiated from a CUG codon, and the resultant product is
distributed to the nucleus/nucleolus and secretory pathway. This dual
subcellular localization is achieved in part by the competing effects
of two classical intracellular targeting signals located near the amino terminus. At the extreme amino terminus is a short stretch of 29 amino
acids before a signal peptide necessary for translocation into the
endoplasmic reticulum, which is next to an adjacent bipartite nuclear
localization signal. The carboxyl-terminal region of FGF3 is also
implicated in nuclear/nucleolar localization. We describe here the
characterization of carboxyl-terminal signals by showing they are
capable of directing a heterologous protein, Fibroblast growth factors
(FGFs)1 are structurally
related proteins encoded by at least 10 distinct genes in mammals
(Refs. 1 and 2; reviewed in Refs. 3 and 4). Members of the FGF family
demonstrate a variety of properties, depending on cell type and
context, such as induction of proliferation, differentiation, stimulation of motility, and enhanced survival (reviewed in Refs. 3 and
4). FGFs induce cell to cell signaling by interacting with high
affinity cell surface receptor, although there is also a requirement
for ligand presentation by a glucosaminoglycan-containing low affinity
receptor (reviewed in Ref. 5). Four receptor genes have been identified
that encode high affinity FGF binding receptors, but the number of
receptor species is extended by alternative splicing, which changes the
ligand binding specificity of some receptors (reviewed in Refs. 6 and
7). Binding of FGF to its receptors initiates signal transduction,
ultimately leading to a change in gene expression and cell function.
However, there is evidence that FGF1, FGF2, and FGF3 can directly
translocate to the nucleus, thereby providing the potential for an
alternative intracrine signaling pathway (8-16).
FGF3 (int2) was first identified as a proto-oncogene in
virally induced mouse mammary tumors (reviewed in Refs. 17 and 18). Its
role in tumorigenesis was strengthened by transgenic mouse studies,
which showed that inappropriate ectopic expression in the mammary gland
resulted in a partial recapitulation of the disease (19-21). In
situ hybridization revealed that normal expression of FGF3 is
primarily restricted to prenatal mouse development, where RNA was found
at a variety of sites at specific times (22, 23). An unusual feature of
FGF3 and FGF2 biosynthesis is the use of alternative CUG initiation
codons to generate isoforms extended at the amino terminus that
localize to the cell nucleus (24-26). A single CUG start codon is the
major start site for FGF3 translation, and the resulting protein is
directed in similar proportions to the nucleus and secretory pathway
(27). The choice between nuclear import and endoplasmic reticulum entry
appears to result from finely balanced opposing signals near the amino terminus. Next to the signal peptide for entry into the endoplasmic reticulum is a classical bipartite nuclear localization signal, but the
strength of these signals is modulated by an amino-terminal domain
upstream of the signal peptide and the relative position of the NLS to
the signal peptide (24). In addition to the bipartite NLS, a
carboxyl-terminal sequence has been identified as a motif essential for
nucleolar accumulation (28). When expressed in a mammary epithelial
cell line, a signal peptide deletion mutant of FGF3 that locates
exclusively to the nucleus resulted in inhibition of cell proliferation
(28). This finding suggested that FGF3 may have opposing effects,
depending on whether it is a secreted paracrine effector or intracrine
signaling molecule.
As these findings could have significant implications for the role of
FGF3 in mouse development, we have further characterized the signals
that target FGF3 to dual subcellular sites and investigated the
cooperation between different motifs within the protein. Specifically we demonstrate that in the presence of the competing signal peptide for
secretion, a second NLS is necessary to cooperate with the amino-terminal NLS for nuclear uptake. The import of FGF3 into the
nucleus is not only signal-mediated but is also shown to be energy-dependent and mediated by karyopherin COS-1 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal calf serum and
passaged once a week at a ratio of 1 to 10. For transient DNA
transfections, 20 µg of purified plasmid DNA was introduced into
5 × 105 COS-1 cells by electroporation (450 V/250
micorfarads) using a Bio-Rad Gene-Pulser. Between 48 and 72 h
after transfection, the cells were harvested for immunoblot analysis or
processed for immunofluorescence.
The construct pKC4.16, which
expresses a mutant mouse FGF3 lacking the signal peptide, has been
previously described (28). The plasmid pKC4.28 was created by replacing
the 3 COS-1 cells grown on glass coverslips
were transfected with the appropriate plasmids, and 48 h later the
cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS) for 20 min. The cells were then permeabilized with 0.2% Triton
X-100 in PBS for 4 min and treated with 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS to block nonspecific binding of the antibodies. The coverslips were
exposed to primary antibodies, and fluorescently tagged secondary antibodies were diluted in 3% bovine serum albumin, PBS. After washing
in PBS, the stained cells were mounted in 90% glycerol containing
p-phenylenediamine and viewed with a 100 × oil
immersion lens on a Zeiss microscope equipped with the appropriate
barrier filters for Texas red optics. Mouse and human FGF3
carboxyl-terminal antipeptide rabbit polyclonal serum were diluted 1 in
200 in PBS. The procedures
used for preparing cell lysates have been described in detail elsewhere
(27). Samples from equivalent numbers of cells were fractionated by
SDS-PAGE in 12.5 or 15% gels, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes
(Schleicher & Schuell), then probed with rabbit polyclonal antibody to
the carboxyl terminus of FGF3. The immunoreactive proteins were
detected with 125I-labeled protein A (26) or by enhanced
chemoluminescence (ECL) using horseradish peroxidase-coupled
anti-rabbit immunoglobulin antibodies as described by the manufacturer
(Amersham International). Mouse Fgf-3 and NPI-1
cDNAs in pGem4Z and pGem7Z, respectively, were used in a coupled
in vitro translation system (TNT; Promega) to generate
products for use in binding assays as described in the text (30).
A karyopherin COS-1 cells were transfected with
the appropriate plasmids by electroporation, and 40 h after
transfection, the medium was replaced with glucose minus Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 6 mM
deoxyglucose (Sigma), 10% dialyzed fetal calf serum, and 50 µM oligomycin B (Sigma). To block de novo
protein synthesis, cycloheximide (CHX) was added in a concentration of 50 µg/ml. The reversibility of the energy depletion was tested by
washing the cultures and incubating them for a further 3 h in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 10% fetal calf serum medium containing CHX.
In
previous studies, we showed that the choice between secretion and
nuclear uptake of FGF3 resulted from an interplay between an
amino-terminal domain joined to a downstream signal peptide and an
adjacent bipartite NLS (Fig. 1). The
bipartite NLS was shown to confer nuclear localization to
[View Larger Version of this Image (36K GIF file)]
[View Larger Version of this Image (41K GIF file)]
The
extended signal peptide and the adjacent bipartite NLS of FGF3 are weak
targeting signals, since substitution with stronger signals changes the
balance between secretion and nuclear uptake in a predictable manner
(27). The weak signals are thought to be mechanistically important to
allow competition between the intracellular trafficking pathways; but a
weak NLS is a disadvantage for efficient nuclear uptake. This could be
overcome by the presence of an additional weak NLS that acts
concertedly to enhance nuclear uptake without affecting the balance
between trafficking pathways. The additive effect of weak NLSs was
demonstrated by Roberts et al. (29) using pyruvate kinase as
a cytoplasmic protein in which to test NLSs in combination at different
structural locations. As illustrated in Fig. 1, there is a cluster of
basic amino acids that resembles a NLS in the carboxyl-terminal
sequences (motif 4), which could function as a second nuclear uptake
signal. To determine whether the two proposed NLS elements in FGF3 can
act together to promote nuclear uptake, we used the same vector to combine these elements. The sequences encoding the bipartite NLS (motif
3) and motif 4 were inserted into the expression plasmid XR30PK
separately or together, as illustrated in Fig.
3A. After transfection into
COS-1 cells, the subcellular location of the encoded fusion proteins
and control construct (PK) were determined by indirect
immunofluorescence, using a polyclonal rabbit antiserum against chicken
pyruvate kinase (Fig. 3B). Cells expressing pyruvate kinase
containing a single NLS (PK-1 and PK-2) showed only cytoplasmic staining, indicating that neither element has sufficient strength to
translocate chimeric pyruvate kinase into the nucleus. However, when
the bipartite NLS was combined with motif 4 (PK-3), virtually all of
the product was found in the nucleus (Fig. 3B).
Interestingly, motif 5 could not replace motif 4 in this assay (data
not shown). These findings support a model in which motif 4 acts
concertedly with the amino-terminal bipartite NLS to increase the
efficiency of nuclear uptake.
[View Larger Version of this Image (43K GIF file)]
Although some small proteins can enter the nucleus by
passive diffusion through the nuclear pore, most nuclear proteins are actively imported by an energy-dependent process that
requires recognition by a cytoplasmic receptor for the NLS. Hence,
nuclear import can be abolished in cells by depletion of ATP pools with deoxyglucose and oligomycin (31-33). To determine the importance of
the nucleolar retention signal for nuclear accumulation, we examined
the distribution of nuclear FGF3 with (pKC4.16) and without (pKC4.28)
motif 5. Forty hours after transfection of COS-1 cells, oligomycin was
added for 6 h to deplete ATP levels in the absence or presence of
CHX to inhibit de novo protein synthesis. Cells containing
pKC4.16 in the presence of CHX showed pronounced nuclear and nucleolar
staining with virtually no detectable cytoplasmic staining (Fig.
4B). However, in the presence
of new protein synthesis (no CHX), there is additional speckled
staining for FGF3 in the cytoplasm, suggesting the presence of protein
that is not transported to the nucleus. In contrast, cells expressing
pKC4.28 showed weak nucleoplasmic staining with no staining of the
nucleoli but strong staining of the cytoplasm irrespective of the
presence or absence of CHX (Fig. 4B). We interpret these
experiments to show that deoxyglucose/oligomycin treatment depletes ATP
pools and consequently blocks nuclear uptake of newly synthesized FGF3
(pKC4.16), but protein bound in the nucleoli is retained and does not
shuttle back into the cytoplasm at a detectable rate. In the absence of nucleolar retention (pKC4.28), the protein normally shuttles between the nucleus and cytoplasm, consistent with reversible nucleocytoplasmic trafficking, but in the presence of oligomycin nuclear uptake is
inhibited, resulting in accumulation of the FGF3 in the cytoplasm. In
other experiments (Fig. 4B), similarly transfected COS-1
cells were treated with oligomycin for 3 h and then withdrawn for
3 h. During the whole 6-h period CHX was included to inhibit
de novo protein synthesis. FGF3 expressed from pKC4.16 did
not change its localization during the course of the experiment,
whereas in contrast, after 3 h deoxyglucose/oligomycin treatment,
p4.28-encoded products showed a peri-nuclear distribution, but after
oligomycin withdrawal, there was re-entry of the mutant protein into
the nucleus consistent with nucleo-cytoplasmic shuttling.
[View Larger Version of this Image (48K GIF file)]
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]
To examine the stability of protein in the different compartments,
COS-1 cells were transiently transfected with the plasmids pKC4.16 and
pKC4.28, and 46 hours post-transfection, the cells were treated with
cycloheximide to block de novo protein synthesis. Cell
extracts were analyzed by immunoblotting at intervals from 0 to 72 h (Fig. 4C). The results show that products derived from pKC4.28 were significantly less stable than those from pKC4.16, suggesting that nucleolar sequestration extends the half-life of the
bound protein.
The import of nuclear
proteins containing a classical NLS involves binding to a heterodimeric
cytoplasmic receptor complex (karyopherin The
extreme amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions of human FGF3 show a
remarkable lack of sequence conservation to the mouse homolog. Despite
the lack of primary sequence conservation, the CUG initiation codon and
the functional requirements of the amino terminus necessary for dual
localization are present in human FGF3 (27). To determine whether the
carboxyl-terminal domain of human FGF3 retains the ability for
nucleolar retention, these sequences were exchanged for the equivalent
mouse sequences just upstream of motif 4 to generate pKC4.29 (Fig.
6A). COS-1 cells were transiently transfected with the
parental plasmid (pKC4.16) and pKC4.29, and the subcellular
localization of FGF3 was monitored by immunofluorescence 40-h
post-transfection. The results show that the same nuclear-nucleolar
distribution was obtained with the chimeric FGF3 as with the mouse
protein, indicating that the nucleolar retention function is conserved
between these homologs (Fig. 6B).
[View Larger Version of this Image (38K GIF file)]
Previous analyses have identified a bipartite NLS located in the
amino-terminal region of mouse FGF3, which is sufficient to confer a
nuclear localization upon The inhibitory effect of the signal peptide on nuclear
localization by the bipartite NLS fused to As signal-mediated nuclear import is energy-dependent,
depletion of ATP levels in the cell by the addition of deoxyglucose and
oligomycin will inhibit nuclear uptake (31-33). In the presence of
cycloheximide (to also inhibit new protein synthesis), previously synthesized FGF3 is retained in the nucleus/nucleolus, indicating nucleoplasmic and nucleolar binding of the protein (Fig. 4). In the
absence of cycloheximide, FGF3 protein accumulates in the cytoplasm,
consistent with nuclear import of FGF3 being
energy-dependent. In contrast, mutant FGF3 protein lacking
the retention signal (motif 5) still enters the nucleus, implying that
the retention signal is essential for nucleoli association and nuclear
retention. Hence, nucleolar targeting of FGF3 is a two-step process:
nuclear uptake and nuclear/nucleolar retention.
Motif 5 resembles the nucleolar targeting motifs described for the
retroviral proteins Rex of HTLV and Tat and Rev of HIV (36-38). The
accumulation of mouse FGF3 in the nucleolus depends on motif 5, but it
is a context-dependent signal, since it does not confer
this property to Two other members of the FGF family have acquired nuclear isoforms, but
they utilize different mechanisms for nuclear translocation. The
nuclear translocation of FGF1 seems to require an exogenous pathway in
which FGF receptor-1 may be involved (42, 43), although it can enter
the nucleus from the cytoplasm (10, 16). Once in the nucleus, it may
then be retained by binding to some nuclear structures, facilitating
its accumulation. Mutation of a putative NLS in FGF1 alters its
stability but does not abrogate its mitogenic activity, which is
consistent with a retention rather than a classical NLS uptake
mechanism (16, 44). Human FGF2 has three CUG-initiated protein isoforms
that localize to the cell nucleus, although the mechanism for nuclear
uptake again differs from that of FGF3 (11-14). In this case, the
amino-terminal sequences appear to undergo methylation, which
facilitates nuclear retention of FGF2 (45). One possible reason why
FGF3 should have acquired an active nuclear uptake capacity rather than
a retention mechanism is the difference in the second location sites; FGF1 and FGF2 are cytoplasmic proteins, whereas FGF3 is secreted. A
function for these nuclear FGFs remains elusive, but circumstantial evidence suggests the translocation is functionally important. For
example, FGF2 has been shown to move into the cell nucleus concomitantly with the induction of mesoderm in Xenopus
laevis, whereas in the chick, FGF2 is expressed in epithelial
cells of the developing kidney and translocates into the nucleus in
podocytes of meso and metanephric glomeruli as the cells start to
differentiate (46, 47). In cell culture, the nuclear forms of FGF2 have been shown to impair growth at low expression levels, whereas high
expression levels of FGF2 may reduce serum dependence and cause
morphological transformation (48-50).
Extensive mutation analyses have shown that FGF3 contains an array of
protein motifs that act in concert to direct the major primary
translation product into alternative intracellular trafficking pathways
(see Fig. 1). The secreted product can presumably interact with cell
surface transmembrane receptors in either an autocrine and/or paracrine
context to transduce a signal (51, 52). Nuclear uptake that is mediated
by interaction via two NLSs and the heteroduplex karyopherin receptor
results in nuclear uptake and subsequent nucleolar association through
a retention sequence. As an initial approach to elucidate the
properties of nuclear FGF3, we demonstrated that expression of a mutant
FGF3 with an exclusively nuclear location in mouse mammary cells
resulted in an inhibition of cell growth (28). In cells transfected
with cDNAs where the encoded FGF3 lacks the carboxyl-terminal
retention signal, the growth rates are similar to the parental line
(28).2 Taken together, these
findings strongly support the idea that FGF3 targeted directly to the
nucleus may induce an autocrine signal that relies on efficient nuclear
uptake and nucleolar retention.
We would like to thank Peter Palese for the
kind gift of the NPI-1 plasmid and Peter Parker for his useful comments
and suggestions on the manuscript.
Fibroblast Growth Factor 3, a Protein with Dual Subcellular
Localization, Is Targeted to the Nucleus and Nucleolus by the Concerted
Action of Two Nuclear Localization Signals and a Nucleolar Retention
Signal*
and
Imperial Cancer Research
Fund Laboratories, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields,
London WC2A 3PX, United Kingdom
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
-galactosidase, to the
nucleus. Furthermore, appending both the amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains onto
-galactosidase, reproduces the dual subcellular localization properties of FGF3. Nuclear uptake of FGF3 appears to be
signal-mediated since it binds to karyopherin
, the nuclear localization signal binding subunit of a heterodimeric receptor of the
nuclear import machinery. The import of FGF3 into the nucleus is
energy-dependent, and the inhibition of this process has
demonstrated the importance of the nucleolar retention signal in
nucleoplasmic and nucleolar accumulation.
, the NLS
binding subunit of a heterodimeric cytoplasmic receptor for
translocating proteins through the nuclear pore. Retention in the
nucleus is facilitated by a nucleolar binding motif that is conserved
between mouse and human FGF3 despite considerable surrounding
differences in primary structure.
Cell Culture
sequences of pKC4.16 with those of pKC4.22 (28), which has a
deletion of codons 238-247. To construct pKC4.29, the 5
sequences of
pKC4.16 were joined to the 3
sequences of a human FGF-3
cDNA via a conserved BamHI site. For pGem4.12,
pGem4.12NUC, and pGem4.12
1,2, the inserts
from the corresponding pKC plasmids (28) were transferred to the vector
pGem4Z. The cDNAs were oriented for transcription with the T7 RNA
polymerase. The
-galactosidase-FGF3 fusion proteins were based on
the expression plasmids pGAL1, pGAL1.1, pGAL1.2, and pGAL1.4, which
have been previously described (28). Using polymerase chain reaction,
the carboxyl-terminal 88 codons of FGF3 were amplified using a 5
primer that introduces an EcoRI site. The resulting
polymerase chain reaction fragment was fused to the single
EcoRI site of LacZ in pGAL1, pGAL1.2, and pGAL1.4 to obtain
the plasmids pGAL1.5, pGAL1.7, and pGAL1.8, respectively. The
-galactosidase-FGF3 chimeric clone pGAL1.6 was created by replacing
a PstI-EcoRI fragment of pGAL1.5 with the
corresponding region of pKC4.22. Pyruvate kinase (PK) fusion protein
constructs were based on the expression XSRL40-PK (Refs. 29; kindly
provided by W. Richardson, University College London). To construct
PK-1, a pair of complementary oligonucleotides encoding amino acids 50-77 of FGF3 encompassing the bipartite NLS were used to replace the
8-base pair XhoI-EcoRI fragment of XSRL40-PK. A
similar strategy was used to introduce the sequences encoding amino
acids 187-205 into the single BstEII site of XSRL40-PK to
create PK-2. PK-3 was created by replacing an appropriate restriction
enzyme fragment of PK-1 by the corresponding fragment of PK-2.
-Galactosidase was detected using a monoclonal antibody
kindly supplied by H. Durban, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, and the pyruvate kinase polyclonal rabbit antiserum was diluted 1 in 200 (generously provided by W. Richardson, University College London).
cDNA
encoding NPI-1 and additional six carboxyl-terminal histidine residues
were subcloned into a pGem7Z vector. 1 µg of cDNA was added to an
in vitro transcription and translation system and used as
described by the manufacturers. FGF3 cDNAs as described in the text
were also in vitro translated, and 5 µl of karyopherin
and 5 µl of FGF3 in vitro translates were incubated with
20 µl of Co2+-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose beads
(CLONTECH) for 1 h at 4 °C in binding
buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2) at a final volume of 100 µl. After
three washes with binding buffer, the bound proteins were eluted with
binding buffer containing 100 mM EDTA, and the eluates were
analyzed by immunoblotting using a polyclonal antibody against FGF3.
The immune complexes were detected by the enhanced chemoluminescence
technique as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Signals in the Amino Terminus and Carboxyl Terminus of FGF3 Can
Confer Dual Subcellular Localization to a Heterologous Protein
-galactosidase, although it was unable to do so in the presence of
the signal peptide. Surprisingly, deletion of the signal peptide and
bipartite NLS still resulted in the nuclear uptake of the truncated
protein, suggesting that other sequences in FGF3 could also mediate
nuclear import and/or retention. To determine whether the
carboxyl-terminal sequences of FGF3 could confer nuclear import upon a
heterologous cytoplasmic protein, we fused these 3
sequences, encoding
88 amino acids, to the bacterial LacZ gene (pGAL1.5) and examined the
subcellular localization of the chimeric protein in COS-1 cells by
indirect immunofluorescence (Fig.
2B). The parental plasmid (pGAL1) encoding the LacZ gene showed the expected cytoplasmic staining
of
-galactosidase (Fig. 2B). In contrast, the LacZ gene with the carboxyl terminus of FGF3 showed exclusive nuclear staining. As previous deletion analyses of FGF3 cDNA had implicated motif 5 in nucleolar retention, we determined whether it was necessary for
nuclear uptake. Deletion of motif 5 (pGAL1.6 in Fig. 2A)
resulted in expression of a fusion protein that retained its capacity
for nuclear localization, although there was some weak cytoplasmic staining, indicating that nuclear accumulation was less efficient. As
nuclear localization signals can act additively, we next asked whether
the FGF3 carboxyl-terminal sequences could overcome the previously
described negative effect of the signal peptide on nuclear localization
directed by the amino-terminal bipartite NLS. A LacZ gene construct
(pGAL1.7) was generated by adding the amino-terminal region of FGF3 at
the amino terminus of pGAL1.5, and a similar construct but without the
signal sequence was also made (pGAL1.8). The chimeric protein encoded
by pGAL1.7 showed staining in the secretory pathway and nucleus similar
to the dual localization of FGF3, whereas, as expected, the protein
without the signal peptide was exclusively nuclear. Hence, the combined amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains of FGF3 containing both the NLSs
were able to counter the suppressive effect of the signal peptide and
direct nuclear uptake.
Fig. 1.
Schematic depiction of FGF3 showing regions
implicated in dual subcellular localization. The predicted amino
acid sequence (single-letter code) of mouse FGF3 is encoded by pKC4.12
(27). To prevent alternative translation initiation, the downstream AUG
initiation codon was changed to AAG (K in bold type upstream of the signal peptide), which is the only sequence change compared with
wild-type FGF3. The amino-terminal domain (motif 1), signal peptide
(motif 2), bipartite NLS (motif 3), and two additional domains (motifs
4 and 5) implicated in subcellular targeting (28) are also
highlighted. The arrow denotes the signal peptide
cleavage site.
Fig. 2.
Properties of FGF3 nuclear targeting signals
appended to
-galactosidase. Segments of the carboxyl-terminal
region of FGF3 alone or in combination with amino-terminal domains of FGF3 were fused to
-galactosidase as shown schematically.
A, the black box represents the
-galactosidase
coding sequence. The shading convention used for the FGF3 sequence
motifs in Fig. 1 is used here. The overall staining patterns are
summerized alongside each cDNA: N, nuclear;
C, cytoplasmic; S, juxtanuclear; and reticular staining indicative of the secretory pathway. B, examples of
the subcellular distribution of the FGF3-
-galactosidase fusion
proteins schematically illustrated in A and expressed in
COS-1 are shown. The fusion proteins were detected by immunostaining
with a monoclonal antibody against
-galactosidase. bp,
bipartite NLS.
Fig. 3.
The effect of FGF3 NLSs alone and in
combination on the subcellular distribution of pyruvate kinase.
A, schematic depiction of XSRL40-PK (PK) and
derivative constructs showing the position of the amino-terminal and
candidate carboxyl-terminal NLSs. The NLS sequences incorporated into
PK are shown below PK-3. A summary of the intracellular
distributions is given in the box. B, following transfection
of the expression constructs into COS-1 cells, the localization of the
pyruvate kinase-FGF3 fusion proteins was determined by
immunofluorescence using a polyclonal antibody against chicken pyruvate
kinase.
Fig. 4.
Subcellular distribution of FGF3 protein with
and without a nucleolar localization signal following inhibition of
nuclear uptake. A, the structure of the mutant plasmids
pKC4.16 and pKC4.28 is shown schematically. bp, bipartite
NLS. B, COS-1 cells were transfected with pKC4.16 or pKC4.28
as indicated, and after 40 h the transfected cells were treated
for 6 h with deoxyglucose/oligomycin in the presence or absence of
CHX. For some cultures in the presence of CHX, deoxyglucose/oligomycin
was withdrawn after 3 h (-Oligo). The subcellular
distribution of FGF3-related products was assessed by
immunofluorescence using a carboxyl-terminal antipeptide serum. C, the stability of FGF3 protein in different subcellular
compartments. Expression constructs were introduced into COS-1 cells by
electroporation, and after 36 h the cells were treated for the
indicated times with CHX. Equivalent samples of the cell extracts were
fractionated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with a polyclonal antibody
against FGF3. The immune complexes were visualized with
125I-labeled protein A. kd, kildalton.
Fig. 5.
Binding of FGF3 to karyopherin
.
A, mutant cDNAs are depicted schematically with the same
convention as used in Fig. 1 and Ref. 27. B, in
vitro translated karyopherin
fused to the amino terminus of a
His6 cassette was incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with
in vitro translated FGF3 proteins. The bound proteins were
eluted and analyzed by immunoblotting using a polyclonal antibody
against FGF3. bp, bipartite NLS.
Interacts with FGF3
-karyopherin
/importin
-importin
) that translocates to the nuclear pore (reviewed in
Ref. 34). A 60-kDa subunit of this complex, karyopherin
(also known
as NPI-1) recognizes and binds proteins containing a NLS (30, 35). As
it is possible that FGF3 might enter the nucleus by an alternative
import pathway or by binding to a shuttle protein, we asked whether
FGF3 could bind to the karyopherin/importin nuclear transport
machinery. Using a column retention assay, we tested the capacity of
full-length FGF3, a similar protein but with the bipartite NLS
substituted for the nucleoplasmin NLS and a mutant deleted for the
bipartite NLS, to bind karyopherin
attached to an affinity matrix.
The protein was generated by in vitro translation of
appropriate cDNAs. The FGF3 proteins were then tested for their
ability to bind NPI-1 attached via a hexahistidine tag to a metal
affinity column. After washing the columns, the bound proteins were
eluted, separated by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by immunoblotting using a
FGF3 specific antibody. The results show that all forms of FGF3 were
able to bind karyopherin
, indicating the presence of a NLS. The
affinity matrix without karyopherin
was unable to bind FGF3
proteins. FGF3 deleted for the bipartite NLS was also bound karyopherin
, consistent with the presence of a second NLS.
Fig. 6.
Nucleolar retention signal is conserved
between mouse and human FGF3. A, functional domains
identified in the mouse FGF3 sequence are schematically depicted with a
comparison of the carboxyl-terminal amino acid sequences of mouse and
human FGF3 shown below. B, immunofluorescent staining of
pKC4.16 and pKC4.29 showing the same nuclear/nucleolar distribution.
bp, bipartite NLS.
-galactosidase (27). However, the addition
of amino-terminal sequences from FGF3 that encode an extended signal
peptide were sufficient to prevented nuclear uptake, causing the
protein to enter the secretory pathway and cytoplasm. This demonstrates
that the competition between the signal peptide and bipartite NLS,
which in native FGF3 results in the dual localization to the secretory
pathway and nucleus, could not be directly conferred to
-galactosidase. Subsequent analysis suggested a second NLS might
reside in the carboxyl-terminal region of FGF3 (28), and two candidate
sequences (motifs 4 and 5) are present in this region (Fig. 1). A
functional NLS in the carboxyl terminus was confirmed by fusing it to
-galactosidase and targeting the chimeric protein to the nucleus
(Fig. 2). Deletion of motif 5 resulted in a fusion protein that
retained the ability for nuclear uptake, although it was clearly less
efficient. However, a contribution of motif 5 to nuclear accumulation
can be explained by its nucleolar targeting properties, which lead to a
retention of FGF3 in the nucleus (see below).
-galactosidase was
overcome by adding the carboxyl-terminal domain of FGF3. Furthermore,
the resulting chimera was then shown to recapitulate the dual
localization of native FGF3 (Fig. 2). The additive effect of NLSs has
been shown before using weak NLSs that were not able to effect nuclear uptake alone but could when present in multiple copies (29). The
concerted action of the two FGF3 NLSs was confirmed by their ability to
locate pyruvate kinase protein to the nucleus, a process that was not
possible with the individual motifs (Fig. 3). It should be noted that
in these experiments the nucleolar retention signal (motif 5) could not
substitute for motif 4 despite its highly basic nature, underlining a
functional difference between these elements. It is interesting that
the weak NLSs were able to import
-galactosidase in to the nucleus,
although as shown in Fig. 2, sequences containing motif 4 in the
absence of motif 5 were relatively inefficient at conferring nuclear
uptake. The bone fide nature of the FGF3 NLSs is supported by their
ability to bind karyopherin
, which is the NLS recognition subunit
of the cytoplasmic nuclear pore targeting receptor (reviewed in Ref. 34). Interestingly, karyopherin
interacts with mutant FGF3s lacking
the bipartite motif, in agreement with the presence of a second
independent NLS in the carboxyl terminus.
-galactosidase but can to another member of the FGF
family (Fig. 2) (28). The carboxyl-terminal regions of all sequenced
FGF3s are poorly conserved downstream of motif 4, and a comparison
between mouse and human sequences demonstrates this point (Fig. 6).
Nevertheless, a motif 5 equivalent is present in the human sequence and
seems to function as a nucleolar retention signal when substituted for
the mouse carboxyl-terminal region (Fig. 6). Although the
nuclear/nucleolar localization of mammalian FGF3 is established, there
is no evidence that chicken, Xenopus, or zebra fish homologs
have CUG-initiated amino-terminal extensions, suggesting that the
mechanism for dual localization of FGF3 appears to have evolved after
divergence of mammals and birds (39-41).
*
This work was supported by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
49-234-700-6465; Fax: 49-234-709-4352; E-mail
Paul.Kiefer{at}rz.ruhr-uni-bochum.de.
1
The abbreviations used are: FGF, fibroblast
growth factor; NLS, nuclear localization signal; PK, pyruvate kinase;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; CHX, cycloheximide.
2
M. Antoine, K. Reimers, C. Dickson, and P. Kiefer, unpublished data.
Volume 272, Number 47,
Issue of November 21, 1997
pp. 29475-29481
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Nilsen, K. R. Rosendal, V. Sorensen, J. Wesche, S. Olsnes, and A. Wiedlocha A Nuclear Export Sequence Located on a beta-Strand in Fibroblast Growth Factor-1 J. Biol. Chem., September 7, 2007; 282(36): 26245 - 26256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Hao, X. Li, T. Qiao, R. Du, G. Zhang, and D. Fan Subcellular Localization of CIAPIN1 J. Histochem. Cytochem., December 1, 2006; 54(12): 1437 - 1444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Wada-Hiraike, H. Hiraike, H. Okinaga, O. Imamov, R. P. A. Barros, A. Morani, Y. Omoto, M. Warner, and J.-A. Gustafsson Role of estrogen receptor beta in uterine stroma and epithelium: Insights from estrogen receptor beta-/- mice PNAS, November 28, 2006; 103(48): 18350 - 18355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Sheng, J. A. Lewis, and W. J. Chirico Nuclear and Nucleolar Localization of 18-kDa Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Is Controlled by C-terminal Signals J. Biol. Chem., September 17, 2004; 279(38): 40153 - 40160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Offterdinger, C. Schofer, K. Weipoltshammer, and T. W. Grunt c-erbB-3: a nuclear protein in mammary epithelial cells J. Cell Biol., June 10, 2002; 157(6): 929 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kishima, H. Yamamoto, Y. Izumoto, K. Yoshida, H. Enomoto, M. Yamamoto, T. Kuroda, H. Ito, K. Yoshizaki, and H. Nakamura Hepatoma-derived Growth Factor Stimulates Cell Growth after Translocation to the Nucleus by Nuclear Localization Signals J. Biol. Chem., March 15, 2002; 277(12): 10315 - 10322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Cressman, W. J. O'Connor, S. F. Greer, X.-S. Zhu, and J. P.-Y. Ting Mechanisms of Nuclear Import and Export That Control the Subcellular Localization of Class II Transactivator J. Immunol., October 1, 2001; 167(7): 3626 - 3634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Reimers, M. Antoine, M. Zapatka, V. Blecken, C. Dickson, and P. Kiefer NoBP, a Nuclear Fibroblast Growth Factor 3 Binding Protein, Is Cell Cycle Regulated and Promotes Cell Growth Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2001; 21(15): 4996 - 5007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Scott, F.-M. Boisvert, D. Vieyra, R. N. Johnston, D. P. Bazett-Jones, and K. Riabowol UV induces nucleolar translocation of ING1 through two distinct nucleolar targeting sequences Nucleic Acids Res., May 15, 2001; 29(10): 2052 - 2058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Goomer, K. A. Johnson, D. W. Burton, D. Amiel, T. M. Maris, A. Gurjal, L. J. Deftos, and R. Terkeltaub The Tetrabasic KKKK147-150 Motif Determines Intracrine Regulatory Effects of PTHrP 1-173 on Chondrocyte PPi Metabolism and Matrix Synthesis Endocrinology, December 1, 2000; 141(12): 4613 - 4622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Antoine, M. Daum, R. Köhl, V. Blecken, M. J. Close, G. Peters, and P. Kiefer NH2-Terminal Cleavage of Xenopus Fibroblast Growth Factor 3 Is Necessary for Optimal Biological Activity and Receptor Binding Cell Growth Differ., November 1, 2000; 11(11): 593 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chen, T. E. Spencer, and F. W. Bazer Fibroblast Growth Factor-10: A Stromal Mediator of Epithelial Functionin the Ovine Uterus Biol Reprod, September 1, 2000; 63(3): 959 - 966. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Clau{beta}en, F. Rudt, and T. Pieler Functional Modules in Ribosomal Protein L5 for Ribonucleoprotein Complex Formation and Nucleocytoplasmic Transport J. Biol. Chem., November 26, 1999; 274(48): 33951 - 33958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Jarrous, J. S. Wolenski, D. Wesolowski, C. Lee, and S. Altman Localization in the Nucleolus and Coiled Bodies of Protein Subunits of the Ribonucleoprotein Ribonuclease P J. Cell Biol., August 9, 1999; 146(3): 559 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|