Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Guengerich, F. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bell, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Guengerich, F. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 47, Issue of November 21, 1997 pp. 29643-29651

Oxidation Kinetics of Ethanol by Human Cytochrome P450 2E1
RATE-LIMITING PRODUCT RELEASE ACCOUNTS FOR EFFECTS OF ISOTOPIC HYDROGEN SUBSTITUTION AND CYTOCHROME b5 ON STEADY-STATE KINETICS*

(Received for publication, June 18, 1997, and in revised form, August 13, 1997)

L. Chastine Bell Dagger and F. Peter Guengerich §

From the Department of Biochemistry and Center in Molecular Toxicology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-0146

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

A number of cytochrome P450 (P450) 2E1 substrates are known to show kinetic deuterium isotope effects of ~5 on Km (DK = DKm/HKm), but not on kcat, in rat liver microsomes (e.g. N-nitrosodimethylamine, ethanol, and CH2Cl2). We observed DKm values of 3-5 for recombinant human P450 2E1-catalyzed ethanol oxidation. Replacing NADPH and O2 with the oxygen surrogate cumene hydroperoxide yielded similar results. Ferric P450 2E1 reduction was fast (k >1000 min-1) even in the absence of substrate. These results indicate that the basis for the increase in Km is in the latter portion of the catalytic cycle. The intrinsic isotope effect (Dk) for ethanol oxidation was determined (competitively) to be 3.8, indicating that C-H bond cleavage is isotopically sensitive. Pre-steady-state studies showed a burst of product formation (k = 410 min-1), with the burst amplitude corresponding to the P450 concentration. Deuteration of ethanol resulted in an isotope effect of 3.2 on the rate of the burst. We conclude that product release is rate-limiting in the oxidation of ethanol to acetaldehyde by P450 2E1. The steady-state kinetics can be described by a paradigm in which the kcat approximates the rate of product release, and Km is an expression in which the denominator is dominated by the rate of C-H bond breaking.


INTRODUCTION

Microsomal cytochromes P4501 (also termed heme-thiolate protein P450 by the Enzyme Commission, EC 1.14.14.1) (1) catalyze a variety of mixed-function monooxygenase reactions that often result in detoxication of drugs and other xenobiotics (2-4). Occasionally, oxidation results in the bioactivation of potentially potent carcinogens, particularly with substrates metabolized by P450 2E1 (5, 6). P450 2E1 is active in the oxidation of many low molecular weight organic compounds (e.g. nitrosamines and alkenes) associated with human cancers, and the reactivity of products with DNA has been demonstrated (7, 8). DNA alkylating ability and carcinogenicity were shown to be decreased upon deuterium substitution of N-nitrosodimethylamine, now known to be a substrate of P450 2E1 (9). When rat liver microsomes were examined, deuteration was found to increase Km for these reactions ~5-fold, but the kcat (Vmax) remained unaffected by deuterium substitution (10-12).

Most P450s are considered to operate according to a general scheme (Fig. 1) (13). Following substrate binding (step 1), ferric P450 receives 1 electron via NADPH-P450 reductase (step 2). Steps 1a and 2a represent a potential pathway by which Fe3+ is reduced to Fe2+ in the absence of substrate and suggests a possibility for later entry of the substrate into the catalytic cycle. The ferrous form of the heme binds O2 (step 3) before undergoing a second 1-electron reduction to begin O2 activation (step 4). Although this second electron originates from NADPH-P450 reductase, the accessory protein cytochrome b5 (b5, EC 4.4.2 group) appears to play some role in the delivery of the electron to the P450 (14). Insertion of the activated oxygen into the substrate is believed to occur by way of C-H bond cleavage (step 6) followed by rapid oxygen rebound to form product (step 7) (15). Step 8 is release of the product from the enzyme active site. Within the context of this scheme, the reduction (steps 2 and 4) and chemistry (step 6) are generally considered to be rate-limiting (13). Steps 9 and 10 reflect the potential for the Fe3+ROH complex to receive an electron from NADPH-P450 reductase, possibly leading to a second cycle of oxidation.


Fig. 1. General scheme for P450-catalyzed oxidation reactions. Step numbers are identified and described in the text. RH, substrate; ROH, product.

[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]


High intramolecular kinetic hydrogen isotope effects are seen in many P450 reactions involving C-H bond cleavage and are usually interpreted as evidence for a hydrogen atom abstraction mechanism (16), with some caveats (17). There are fewer reports of non-competitive intermolecular hydrogen isotope effects on P450 reactions, and these tend to be on kcat not Km (18).

Although the effects of deuterium substitution on N-nitrosodimethylamine N-demethylation were first reported in 1973, a definitive explanation for the intermolecular isotope effect on Km (and not kcat) has not been given. The observation has been repeated using several P450 2E1 substrates (9-11, 19-22). Yang et al. (10) compared the competitive inhibition of alternate 2H and 1H substrates of P450 2E1 and suggested that the observed deuterium effect was due, in part, to a rate difference in the breaking of the C-H bond and its relationship with other rate constants. It was also proposed (10) that the effect on V/K might be interpreted in the context of a generalized scheme (23, 24) in which (i) the isotopically sensitive step (C-H bond breaking) precedes a slower step (possibly product release) and (ii) the enzyme exhibits a low commitment to catalysis. Yang et al. (10) also suggested that rate-limiting product release could explain the results if a relatively high degree of uncoupling of the activated P450-oxygen complex also occurred.

MMO is a mixed-function monooxygenase that is functionally similar to P450 2E1 (25). MMO requires a multi-enzyme complex and NADH as a co-substrate. The non-heme, two-iron catalytic center catalyzes the oxidation of a variety of low molecular weight hydrocarbons. Additionally, MMO has been shown to exhibit apparent isotope effects that are similar to those seen with P450 2E1. Chemical quench studies of the intermediates and interconversion rates in the MMO catalytic cycle revealed that product release is the rate-limiting step in this cycle (26, 27). Therefore, it is plausible that this might be the case for P450 2E1.

To determine the basis for the kinetic hydrogen isotope effects observed with P450 2E1, we have used deuterium substitution and pre-steady-state kinetic techniques to characterize the effect of deuteration on individual steps of the catalytic cycle. The role of b5 and its ability to enhance the rate of product formation were also examined. We interpret the observed kinetic isotope effects terms of rate-limiting product release and isotopically sensitive C-H bond cleavage.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Enzymes

Rabbit NADPH-P450 reductase (EC 1.6.2.4) and rabbit b5 were purified as previously reported (28, 29). Recombinant human P450 2E1 was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified essentially as described (30). Recombinant NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase was expressed in E. coli and purified by a modification of the method of Shen et al. (31). Apo-b5 was prepared from rabbit liver b5 by acid/acetone treatment (32).

Chemicals

Reagent grade ethanol was obtained from McCormick Distilling Co. (Weston, MO). [1,1-2H]Ethanol and d23-lauric acid were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Andover, MA). Lauric acid was purchased from Aldrich and recrystallized from CH3OH:H2O (50:50, v/v). 11-Hydroxylauric acid was synthesized from 11-dodecenoic acid (Nu-Check-Prep, Elysian, MN) as described by Brown and Geoghegan (33). The identity of 11-hydroxylauric acid was confirmed by NMR and fast atom bombardment-mass spectral analysis. Cumene hydroperoxide (80%, Aldrich) was purified by extraction with alkali (34) and stored under argon Dinitrophenylhydrazine·HCl, purchased from Eastman Kodak Co., was recrystallized from H2O before use. 18-Crown-6-ether and 4-bromomethyl-6,7-dimethoxycoumarin were purchased from Aldrich. FloroxTM reagent (2.5 mg of O-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyl)hydroxylamine·HCl ml-1, in pyridine) was obtained from Pierce. Pesticide grade hexane was purchased from Mallinckrodt-Baker (Paris, KY), and pesticide grade CH3OH was from Burdick and Jackson (Muskegon, MI).

[1-3H]Ethanol (16.3 mCi/mmol, anhydrous), [14C]ethanol (55 mCi/mmol), and [1-14C]lauric acid (55 mCi/mmol) were purchased from American Radiolabeled Chemicals (St. Louis, MO). Before use, [1-3H]ethanol and [1-14C]ethanol were purified on BakerbondTM octadecylsilane 3-ml disposable extraction columns (J. T. Baker Inc.) to remove, respectively, 3H2O and [14C]acetaldehyde, by-products of radioactive ethanol synthesis. For purification, extraction columns were first washed with 10 ml of CH3OH and then equilibrated with 10 ml of H2O. [1-3H]Ethanol (100 µl diluted with H2O to 340 mM, 16.3 mCi mmol-1) or 150 µl of [14C]ethanol (diluted with [1H]ethanol and H2O to 170 mM, 10 mCi of mmol-1) was loaded onto the column. Analytes were eluted with <3 ml of H2O, and ~150-µl fractions were collected. A portion of each fraction was counted by liquid scintillation spectrometry. Radioactivity was plotted against fraction number, and the fractions comprising the major radioactive peak were pooled. The purity of the pooled solutions was confirmed by HPLC interfaced with radioflow detection (described under "Intrinsic Isotope Effect Estimation," see below). The concentrations of ethanol solutions were determined by measuring NADH formation spectrophotometrically at 340 nm in a reduction assay using yeast alcohol dehydrogenase (35). The purified solutions were then counted by liquid scintillation to determine the specific activity.

Ethanol Oxidation Assay

Unless otherwise specified, P450 2E1 (1.0 µM) was reconstituted with b5 (2.0 µM), NADPH-P450 reductase (3.0 µM), and DLPC (30 µM) in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. For steady-state measurements, 100-µl reactions were initiated with either an NADPH-generating system (36) or 1.0 mM cumene hydroperoxide and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C in reaction vials sealed with Teflon-lined rubber septa. Reactions supported by cumene hydroperoxide lacked NADPH-P450 reductase and b5. Reactions were terminated with 20 µl of a mixture of 17% ZnSO4 (w/v) and 0.55 mM semicarbazide (1:1, v/v) and centrifuged following addition of saturated Ba(OH)2 (5.0 µl). The acetaldehyde product was rederivatized to form the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone (37) and then analyzed by HPLC using a Zorbax 6.2 × 80-mm octadecylsilane reversed-phase analytical column (3 µm, DuPont Chromatography Products, Wilmington, DE) (H2O:CH3CN, 45:55, v:v; 2.0 ml min-1), monitoring A340) (38). For reactions with [3H]- and [14C]ethanol, the HPLC peaks containing the radioactive product were collected and counted by liquid scintillation spectrometry, with calibration of counting efficiency using external [3H]- and [14C]toluene standards.

Lauric Acid Hydroxylation Assay

P450 2E1 (0.5 µM) was reconstituted with NADPH-P450 reductase and b5 as described for the ethanol oxidation assay. Reactions (400 µl) with lauric acid or d23-lauric acid (0-200 µM, as sodium salt) were terminated after 10 min at 37 °C by adding 50 µl of 12.5% H2SO4 (v:v). The quenched reactions were extracted twice with 6 ml of (C2H5)2O, and the combined extracts were dried over Na2SO4 and then evaporated under a stream of N2. The residue was redissolved in 100 µl of 18-crown-6-ether dissolved in CH3CN (2.5 mg ml-1), to which was added 100 µl of 4-bromomethyl-6,7-dimethoxycoumarin dissolved in (CH3)2CO (10 mg ml-1) (in the presence of 2 mg of anhydrous K2CO3). The samples were incubated 60 min at 70 °C to form fluorescent derivatives. Product formation was measured by HPLC using a Zorbax 6.2 × 80 mm octadecylsilane reversed-phase analytical column (3 µm, DuPont, H2O:CH3CN, 41:59, v:v; 2.0 ml min-1). Fluorescence was monitored at lambda excitation 375 nm, lambda emission 470 nm (39). External standards of 11-hydroxylauric acid were used for quantitation. Experiments using [1-14C]lauric acid were quenched with H2SO4 as described above, and reactions (40 µl) were extracted twice with 3 ml of (C2H5)2O, and the combined extracts were dried under N2. The residue was redissolved in 100 µl of CH3OH, and 50-µl aliquots were analyzed by HPLC interfaced with radioflow counting (ZorbaxTM 4.6 × 250-mm octadecylsilane reversed-phase analytical column, 5 µm, DuPont) (H2O:CH3CN, 50:50, v:v; 2.0 ml min-1). The [1-14C]11-hydroxylauric acid peak was collected and re-counted by liquid scintillation spectrometry.

Apparent Isotope Effect Determination

Deuterium isotope effects were determined by two methods (40). In a non-competitive method, P450 2E1 was incubated with d0-ethanol or d2-[1,1-2H]ethanol (0-100 mM) or d0-lauric acid or d23-lauric acid (0-150 µM), and the products were analyzed as described. Km and kcat were calculated using a kcat nonlinear regression program (Bio-Metallics, Princeton, NJ). In a competitive method, P450 2E1 was incubated with a 1:1 mixture (v/v) of d0-ethanol and d2-ethanol (20 mM). The 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazones were extracted into CH2Cl2 and analyzed by capillary column GC-PIEIMS (17, 21). D(V/K) was determined as the ratio of 1H to 2H product formed in the competitive reaction.

Intrinsic Isotope Effect Estimation

The approach was that of Miwa et al. (41) and Northrop (42), only modified in regard to the analysis of isotopes in the products. The tritium isotope effect T(V/K) on ethanol oxidation was determined by reaction of P450 2E1 with [1-3H]ethanol (20 mM). Previous work by others (21), with rabbit P450s, indicated no stereoselectivity in the removal of hydrogen from ethanol. 3H2O formation during ethanol oxidation was measured by injecting one-half of the total reaction supernatant onto two 4.6 × 250-mm octadecylsilane reversed-phase analytical columns (ZorbaxTM column from DuPont and EconosphereTM column from Alltech Associates, Deerfield, IL, both 5 µm) connected in tandem (mobile phase 100% H2O; 1.0 ml min-1) interfaced with a radioflow counter (IN/US Systems, Inc., Tampa, FL). Retention times and separation of analytes are shown in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. The 3H2O peak was collected and re-counted by liquid scintillation spectrometry. T(V/K) and Dk were calculated according to the method of Northrop (42, 43) (see Equation 1),
<SUP><UP>T</UP></SUP>(V/K)=[<UP>log</UP>(1−f)]/<UP>log</UP>[1−f(SA<SUB><UP>p</UP></SUB>/SA<SUB><UP>o</UP></SUB>)] (Eq. 1)
where f is the fractional conversion of substrate to product, determined as the ratio of 3H2O to the initial amount of [3H]ethanol; SAp is the specific activity of the product, expressed as a ratio of 3H2O formed/total acetaldehyde formed, and SAo is the specific activity of the substrate. Finally, Dk was determined (Equation 2) from the Swain relationship (44)
(<SUP><UP>D</UP></SUP>k−1/<SUP><UP>D</UP></SUP>k<SUP>1.442</SUP>−1)=[<SUP><UP>D</UP></SUP>(V/K)−1]/[<SUP><UP>T</UP></SUP>(V/K)−1] (Eq. 2)


Fig. 2. Reversed-phase HPLC elution profiles of [3H]H2O (A), acetaldehyde (B), and [3H]ethanol (C) using tandem 4.6 × 250-mm octadecylsilane columns.

[View Larger Version of this Image (10K GIF file)]



Fig. 3. HPLC separation of reaction products from P450 2E1-catalyzed [3H]ethanol oxidation. 3H was measured by radioflow detection.

[View Larger Version of this Image (11K GIF file)]


Pre-steady-state Kinetics

Pre-steady-state ethanol oxidation reactions were done in a quench-flow apparatus (model RQF-3, KinTek Corp., State College, PA). P450 2E1 (40 or 200 pmol) was incubated in the presence of either 200 mM [1H]ethanol, 20 mM [3H]- or [14C]ethanol, or 100 µM [14C]lauric acid in a 40-µl reaction volume for a period ranging from 2 ms to 10 min (as indicated) at 37 °C. Reactions with radioactive ethanol were quenched with a ZnSO4/semicarbazide mixture and analyzed as described for steady-state reactions. Reactions using [1H]ethanol were quenched by the addition of 30% pesticide grade CH3OH and derivatized with PFB-hydroxylamine by reacting the 250-µl quenched reaction volume with 20 µl of FloroxTM reagent for 20 min at 60 °C. The oxime derivative was extracted into 1.0 ml of pesticide grade hexane, and the residual reagent was back-extracted following addition of 3 drops of concentrated H2SO4. The hexane layer (0.7 ml) was dried under N2 and then redissolved in 20 µl of hexane. The oxime derivative was analyzed by GC-NICIMS (45-47). Reactions with [14C]lauric acid were analyzed as described previously.

NADPH Oxidation

P450 2E1 was reconstituted with NADPH-P450 reductase with or without b5 as described for steady-state ethanol oxidation experiments. Reconstituted enzyme (196 µl) was preincubated for 1 min at 37 °C in the presence or absence of substrate (20 mM ethanol or 0.15 mM chlorzoxazone). Reactions were initiated with the addition of 4 µl of 10 mM NADPH, and the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm was monitored spectrophotometrically. UV-visible spectra were recorded using a modified Cary 14/OLIS spectrophotometer (On-Line Instrument Systems, Bogart, GA). Rates of NADPH oxidation were calculated using epsilon 340 = 6.22 mM-1 cm-1 for NADPH.

H2O2 Formation

Reaction systems were prepared exactly as described above, except that reaction volumes were 0.5 ml. Reactions were initiated by adding the NADPH-generating system and were terminated by adding 0.8 ml of cold CF3CO2H (3%, w:v) after 10 min at 37 °C. H2O2 was determined spectrophotometrically by reaction with ferroammonium sulfate and potassium thiocyanate as described (48).

Anaerobic Reduction Kinetics

Enzyme mixtures and NADPH (600 µM) solutions were prepared separately as described for steady-state reactions. Some enzyme mixtures contained 20 mM ethanol (or 0.15 mM chlorzoxazone). The solutions were made anaerobic by alternating applications of vacuum and argon to a closed system as described previously (49). Reduction kinetics were monitored in a stopped-flow apparatus (Applied Photophysics SX-17MV instrument, Applied Photophysics, Leatherhead, UK) at 37 °C under a CO atmosphere. Rapid reduction of P450 2E1 to a Fe2+·CO complex was observed at 450 nm upon mixing of reconstituted enzymes with NADPH. Data were collected using the Applied Photophysics software system and fitted to exponential equations using a Marquardt-Levenberg algorithm for nonlinear regression analysis. Results are reported as three to eight individually monitored reactions averaged using the manufacturer's software.

Mass Spectrometry

The hydrazone derivatives were analyzed by GC-PIEIMS. Analytes were separated on a 15-m SPBTM-1 fused silica capillary column (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA) interfaced to a Finnigan INCOS 50 mass spectrometer (Finnigan, San Jose, CA). GC conditions were as follows: carrier gas (2He) at constant pressure of 10 p.s.i.; injection port 230 °C; transfer line 260 °C. The initial column temperature was 150 °C and was increased to 300 °C at a rate of 20 °C min-1. The [1H]acetaldehyde hydrazone was detected by selected ion monitoring at m/z 224, and the [2H]acetaldehyde hydrazone was monitored at m/z 225 (Fig. 4). GC-NICIMS of the PFB-oxime derivatives was performed using a 30-m SPBTM-5 fused silica capillary column (Supelco) coupled to a Hewlett-Packard 5989A mass spectrometer (Hewlett-Packard, Wilmington, DE). GC conditions were as follows: carrier gas (2He) at constant pressure of 0.8 p.s.i.; injection port 265 °C; transfer line 270 °C. The column was initially held at 65 °C for 10 min, increased by 5 °C min-1 to 100 °C, and then raised at 20 °C min-1 to 250 °C (Fig. 5). Acetaldehyde-PFB oxime was quantitated by selected ion monitoring at m/z 181, using propionaldehyde-PFB oxime as an internal standard. The retention times of the analytes were verified by monitoring ions corresponding to M+ - 20 (M+-HF) for each of the oximes (Fig. 6).


Fig. 4. Mass spectrum of acetaldehyde-2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone. The sample was analyzed in PIEIMS mode following GC separation (shown in inset). The peak at m/z 224 represents the M+ ion for the [1H]acetaldehyde derivative, and the peak at m/z 225 is for the natural abundance peak.

[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]



Fig. 5. GC-MS of aldehyde-PFB oximes. Peaks 1 and 2 are identified as acetaldehyde-PFB oxime stereoisomers (E and Z), and peaks 4 and 5 are identified as propionaldehyde-PFB oxime stereoisomers (used as internal standard). Peak 3 is a contaminant attributed to an acetone-PFB derivative.

[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]



Fig. 6. Mass spectra of acetaldehyde-PFB oxime (A) and propionaldehyde-PFB oxime (B). Samples were analyzed by GC-NICIMS.

[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]



RESULTS

Steady-state Kinetic Parameters

In rat liver microsomes, deuterium substitution of P450 2E1 substrates usually results in a 3-5-fold increase in Km without any effect on kcat (9, 11, 12, 19, 20, 50). Recombinant human cytochrome P450 2E1 was reconstituted with NADPH-P450 reductase and b5 and incubated with a variety of substrates and their deuterated analogs to determine the effects of deuterium substitution on the steady-state kinetic parameters (Fig. 7 and Table I). Deuteration of ethanol increased the Km 4.7-fold. kcat was essentially unaffected so that DV approx  1 (Fig. 7A). In a reaction system supported by the oxygen surrogate cumene hydroperoxide, the effects on Km and kcat for ethanol oxidation were the same. Km was increased 6.0-fold and kcat was unchanged. For each of these systems, the apparent deuterium isotope effect, D(V/K), was ~5.2


Fig. 7. Hanes-Woolf plots of P450 2E1-catalyzed oxidation of [1H]ethanol (black-square) and 1,1-[2H]ethanol (square ) (A) or [1H]lauric acid (black-square) and d23-lauric acid (square ) (B). Reaction mixtures contained 1.0 µM P450 2E1, 3.0 µM P450 reductase, 30 µM DPLC, and 2.0 µM b5 with 0 to 25 mM [1H]ethanol or 0-100 mM [2H]ethanol or with 0 to 150 µM [1H]- or d23-laurate. Kinetic constants are shown in Table I. Results are shown as the average of duplicate rate (v) determinations for each concentration of substrate. Fits were done using non-linear regression analysis. Rates were expressed as nmol product min-1 (nmol P450 2E1)-1.

[View Larger Version of this Image (12K GIF file)]


Table I. Steady-state kinetic parameters for oxidations catalyzed by recombinant human cytochrome P450 2E1

Rate determinations were performed in duplicate for each substrate concentration. Kinetic values and the stated error estimates were calculated by nonlinear regression analysis using the kcat program.

System kcat Km DV D(V/K)

nmol min(nmol P450)-1 mM
Reductase, b5, CH3CH2OH 2.7 (±0.21) 11.2 (±1.6)
Reductase, b5, CH3CD2OH 2.4 (±0.14) 52.6 (±6.4) 1.1 5.2
Cumene hydroperoxide, CH3CH2OH 0.81 (±0.07) 5.3 (±1.2)
Cumene hydroperoxide, CH3CD2OH 1.02 (±0.05) 32 (±4) 0.79 4.7
Reductase, b5, lauric acid 3.2 (±0.5) 0.066 (±0.024)
Reductase, b5, d23-lauric acid 1.5 (±0.3) 0.061 (±0.020) 2.1 2.0

For lauric acid 11-hydroxylation, the isotope effect was on kcat rather than on Km (Fig. 7B). Deuteration of lauric acid decreased kcat from 2.4 to 1.5 min-1 (DV = 2.1), whereas Km remained unaffected.

Estimation of Intrinsic Isotope Effect (Dk)

Dk for ethanol oxidation was determined from the Swain relationship, which considers D(V/K) as well as the apparent tritium isotope effect, T(V/K) (44). The approach has been applied to another P450-mediated reaction, 7-ethoxycoumarin O-deethylation, by Miwa et al. (41), and an identical strategy was used here. D(V/K) was measured in a competitive assay in which P450 2E1 was incubated with a 1:1 mixture of d0- and d2-ethanol. D(V/K) was calculated as a ratio of 1H to 2H removal from the substrate and was found to be 3.9 ± 0.3. T(V/K) was also determined competitively by incubating the enzyme with a mixture of [1H]- and [1-3H]ethanol. Removal of 3H from the C1 position results in the formation of a molecule of 3H2O. Alternatively, removal of 1H from [1-3H]ethanol results in the formation of [1-3H]acetaldehyde. Using the equation T(V/K) = (log(1 - f))/log(1 - f(SAp/SAo)) (defined under "Experimental Procedures"), T(V/K) = 6.8. From the relationship (Dk - 1)/(Dk1.442 - 1) = (D(V/K- 1)/ (T(V/K- 1), Dk = 3.8.

Effect of b5 on Steady-state Kinetic Parameters---b5 has been shown to enhance the rate of product formation in P450 2E1-catalyzed reactions (38, 51

54). When P450 2E1 was reconstituted with or without b5, the values for kcat were 16 and 19 min-1, respectively (data not shown). The Km for ethanol was increased ~2-fold, from 28 to 52 mM, in the absence of b5. Apo-b5 did not have an effect. The effect of deuterium substitution on ethanol oxidation in the reactions system lacking b5 was the same as observed in the reaction system that included b5.

Anaerobic Reduction of Ferric P450 2E1

To evaluate the role of substrate on P450 2E1 reduction rates, P450 2E1 was reconstituted with NADPH-P450 reductase, and reduction was monitored in the presence or absence of 170 mM ethanol (Fig. 8). P450 2E1 showed biphasic reduction kinetics that could be fit to bi-exponential equations to calculate rate constants. P450 reduction rates were not substantially altered by adding substrate to the reaction mixture. The rapid phase of reduction was 1800 min-1 without ethanol and 1380 min-1 with ethanol. The rates of the slow phase were 120 and 300 min-1 with and without ethanol, respectively.


Fig. 8. Effects of substrate on rates of anaerobic reduction of ferric P450 2E1. Formation of a Fe2+·CO complex was followed by the increase in A450, and the traces were fit to a double-exponential equation as described under "Experimental Procedures." The residuals analysis is shown at the bottom of each trace. Reaction mixture A consisted of 1.0 µM P450 2E1, 3.0 µM NADPH-P450 reductase, 30 µM DLPC, and 0.25 mM NADPH in 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. B, the mixture was the same as A except that 170 mM ethanol was included.

[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]


b5 decreased the apparent rate of reduction of ferric P450 2E1 from 1800 to 420 min-1 (rapid phase) and from 300 to 12 min-1 (slow phase). Further addition of ethanol to the reaction system already containing b5 did not significantly change the reduction rate (results not shown).

Uncoupling of P450 2E1 Reactions

The effects of b5 on NADPH oxidation and O2 utilization were also examined. P450 2E1 reconstituted with b5 showed a 35% decrease in NADPH oxidation rates (from 55 to 36 min-1) as compared with P450 2E1 systems that lacked b5. H2O2 formation remained relatively unchanged (14 min-1). b5 yielded a 42% increase in the rate of acetaldehyde formation, indicating more efficient coupling, consonant with results of others with P450 2E1 (55).

Pre-steady-state Kinetics and Rate-limiting Product Release

Rapid quench kinetic techniques were used to determine pre-steady-state product formation in P450 2E1-catalyzed ethanol oxidation. Initially, 3H- and 14C-radiolabeled substrates were used to improve sensitivity for detection of product formation (Fig. 9, A and B). Although substrates were purified before use, the remaining background contribution confounded determination of the burst phase amplitude for oxidation of [14C]ethanol (Fig. 9B). An improved method of quantitation involved formation of the PFB-oxime derivative of acetaldehyde, which could be analyzed by GC-NICIMS (Fig. 9C). This system also has the advantage that stable isotopes may be utilized.


Fig. 9. Pre-steady-state and steady-state product formation. P450 2E1 was reconstituted with NADPH-P450 reductase and b5 in 30 µM DLPC and 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, and was then preincubated with either 20 mM [3H]ethanol (A), 20 mM [14C]ethanol (B), 200 mM [1H]ethanol (C), or 100 µM [14C]lauric acid (D). Reconstituted enzyme was mixed with a solution of NADPH in the rapid quench apparatus at 37 °C (and on bench top at 25 °C for lauric acid hydroxylation reactions). Reactions with radiolabeled ethanol were terminated with 3% ZnSO4 and product was converted to a hydrazone, which was quantitated by scintillation counting. Reactions with [1H]ethanol were terminated by the addition 30% CH3OH (v:v) and derivatized to form the PFB-oxime, which was quantitated by GC-NICIMS. Reactions with [1-14C]lauric acid were quenched with H2SO4, and the 11-hydroxylation product was analyzed by HPLC as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data for the slow phase of product formation were fitted to a linear equation, y = mx + b, where m = k2 and back-extrapolation to x = 0 was used to calculate the amplitude of the burst, A. The rate of product formation in the burst phase was analyzed by fitting a linear equation to a plot of reaction time versus log(A - product at t = x) so that m = -k1. Data presented are fitted (solid line) to the equation y = A(1 -e-kpss) + ksst, where A = bust amplitude, kpss = pre-steady-state rate of product formation, t = time, and kss = steady-state rate of product formation. (All data points were used to determine rates but are not all shown.)

[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]


All three methods clearly revealed two distinct phases of product formation for ethanol oxidation. In each case, a rapid pre-steady-state burst of product formation was followed by a much slower phase of product formation that roughly corresponded to the observed steady-state rate. The rates of burst phase product formation were 410, 370, and 410 min-1 for [3H]-, [14C]-, and [1H]ethanol, respectively (Fig. 10). The amplitudes of the bursts correlated well with the amounts of P450 used in the reaction.


Fig. 10. Burst analysis of pre-steady-state product formation in P450 2E1-catalyzed ethanol oxidations. A, the experiment is as described in Fig. 9C. B and C, the experiment is the same except that b5 is absent (B) or [1H]ethanol is replaced with [1,1-2H]ethanol (C). The amount of P450 2E1 in each experiment is 40 pmol.

[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]


Pre-steady-state analysis of product formation during lauric acid hydroxylation did not show a kinetic burst. The time course for product formation was linear through the first turnover cycle and into subsequent cycles (Fig. 9D).

Effects of b5 and 2H Substitution on Burst Phase Product Formation

Since b5 has been shown to enhance both the rate of product formation and the extent of O2 coupling in steady-state product formation, its effect on pre-steady-state product formation was examined. The amplitude of the burst was diminished in comparison to reactions containing b5 (Fig. 10B). Only ~30% of P450 yielded product during the burst. The rate of the burst, however, was similar to the rates observed with b5 present.

Although deuterium substitution does not affect steady-state rates of product formation at high substrate concentration, the measurable intrinsic isotope effect suggests that subsets of reaction steps may be affected if they include the isotopically sensitive step. Deuteration of ethanol decreased the rate of the burst phase from 410 to 130 min-1, so that DV for burst phase product formation is 3.2 (the experiment was done at saturating substrate concentration, thus the effect is presented as DV rather than Dv).


DISCUSSION

Isotopic substitution is frequently used as a probe for studying enzyme mechanisms. In reactions that involve a proton transfer step, deuteration of substrates often produces an apparent isotope effect on kcat (Vmax). Oxidation of substrates by P450 2E1 involves a C-H bond breaking step, but deuterium substitution has been shown by several investigators to have little effect on kcat. Rather, there is an intermolecular isotope effect on Km for many substrates of P450 2E1 (9, 11, 12, 19, 20, 50).

In liver microsomes, this isotope effect on V/K (but not kcat) has been reported for N-nitrosodimethylamine (10, 12, 54), CH2Cl2 (50), and ethanol (10). We measured D(V/K) values of 3-5 for ethanol oxidation catalyzed by purified recombinant human P450 2E1. In a system where NADPH and O2 were replaced with the oxygen surrogate cumene hydroperoxide, similar isotope effects were observed, indicating that the basis for the effect on Km is related to steps in the latter portion of the catalytic cycle (as described in Fig. 1). Additionally, early steps, i.e. ferric P450 2E1 reduction (step 2 or 1a) and oxygen activation (steps 3-5), were not affected by substrate. Enzyme reduction prior to the addition of substrate is reminiscent of the mechanism of liver microsomal flavin-containing monooxygenases in which FAD reduction by NADPH is preceded by and is independent of substrate (56-58). Following oxygen activation, substrate undergoes a first-order reaction with activated oxygen (flavin 4a-hydroperoxide) to form product. Andersen et al. (50) proposed a similar mechanism for P450 2E1 that involved rate-limiting O2 activation preceding substrate binding. We are of the opinion that bacterial MMO (25-27) serves as a better model for the observations with P450 2E1. The catalytic center of MMO can be reduced prior to substrate binding. Additionally, MMO shows kinetic hydrogen isotope effects similar to P450 2E1, and product release has been proven to be rate-limiting in the MMO catalytic cycle (26, 27). Although a mechanism resembling that for flavin-containing monooxygenase cannot be dismissed, there is no strong evidence that this should be preferred to explain the results, and the MMO model appears more reasonable.

b5, which has been shown to enhance the product formation rates with a number of substrates for P450 2E1 (i.e. chlorzoxazone, N-nitrosodimethylamine, aniline, diethyl ether) (38, 53, 53, 54), did not alter the deuterium effect on V/K for ethanol oxidation but did slow the rates of steps 1a and 2 and decrease steady-state NADPH oxidation, in agreement with previous reports (55). The effect of b5 on apparent P450 reduction rates may be explained in a model in which electrons from NADPH-P450 reductase are transferred to P450 2E1, which then reduces b5 and requires reduction again (59).

Rapid quench kinetic experiments clearly indicated a rapid burst of pre-steady-state product formation (k >= 400 min-1) for ethanol oxidation. This behavior is indicative of a mechanism in which the rate-limiting event occurs after product formation. We assign the rate-limiting step as product release.

The isotope effect on Km, but not on kcat, cannot be explained in terms of a model where Km ~ KD = (k-1 + k2)/k1, where k2 is a single slow step approximating kcat and both k1 and k-1 (substrate binding and dissociation) are rapid. The only isotopically sensitive step in P450 catalysis should be step 6 of Fig. 1. We propose that in the optimal reconstituted P450 2E1 system (with NADPH-P450 reductase and b5), or in microsomes, product release is effectively rate-limiting. Thus (using the nomenclature of the steps in Fig. 1) kcat ~ k8 [E]T and (see Equation 3)
K<SUB>m</SUB> ∼ <FR><NU>k<SUB>8</SUB></NU><DE>k<SUB>6</SUB></DE></FR> (Eq. 3)
(where [E]T is the total enzyme concentration). However, the units for the approximation of Km are inappropriate, and no dependence on [RH], the concentration of substrate, would be expected. A more extensive treatment of the system is available in a model presented by Kuby (60) and suggested for consideration in our own earlier review of P450 isotope effects (61). In this case, which is still simplified, the reaction is depicted as shown in Equation 4.
E <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇄</ARROW></OP><LL>k<SUB>2</SUB></LL><UL>k<SUB>1</SUB>S</UL></LIM> ES <LIM><OP><ARROW>→</ARROW></OP><UL>k<SUB>3</SUB></UL></LIM> EP <LIM><OP><ARROW>→</ARROW></OP><UL>k<SUB>5</SUB></UL></LIM> E+P (Eq. 4)
where S is the substrate and P the product. Then
k<SUB><UP>cat</UP></SUB>=<FR><NU>k<SUB>3</SUB>k<SUB>5</SUB></NU><DE>k<SUB>3</SUB>+k<SUB>5</SUB></DE></FR> [E]<SUB>T</SUB> (Eq. 5)
K<SUB>m</SUB>=<FR><NU>k<SUB>5</SUB>(k<SUB>2</SUB>+k<SUB>3</SUB>)</NU><DE>k<SUB>1</SUB>(k<SUB>3</SUB>+k<SUB>5</SUB>)</DE></FR> (Eq. 6)
so that Km has units of molarity. Therefore,
<SUP><UP>D</UP></SUP>V=<FR><NU> <SUP><UP>D</UP></SUP>k<SUB>3</SUB>+k<SUB>3</SUB>/k<SUB>5</SUB> </NU><DE>1+k<SUB>3</SUB>/k<SUB>5</SUB></DE></FR> (Eq. 7)
and
<SUP><UP>D</UP></SUP>(V/K)=<FR><NU> <SUP><UP>D</UP></SUP>k<SUB>3</SUB>+k<SUB>3</SUB>/k<SUB>2</SUB> </NU><DE>1+k<SUB>3</SUB>/k<SUB>2</SUB></DE></FR> (Eq. 8)
where DV is the kinetic deuterium isotope effect on kcat, and D(V/K) is the kinetic deuterium isotope effect on the ratio of kcat/Km, according to the convention of Northrop (40, 42, 43). In this mechanism the isotopically sensitive step is included in k3. The value D(V/K) is a reflection of Dk3 when k3/k2 approaches 0, i.e. k2 >>  k3. The value of D(V/K) is ~3-5 in our own and other studies (10). Dk for C-H bond breaking was found to be 3.8, and the isotopic effect on product formation in the pre-steady-state studies was estimated to be 3.2 (Fig. 10), in reasonable agreement. Therefore, k3/k2 must be near 0. O2 activation preceding substrate binding may occur to give a high level of oxygen uncoupling, or reversible substrate binding may be rapid so that k2 >>  k3. Since DV approx  1, then Dk3 + k3/k5 approx  1 + k3/k5. This is valid only if k3 >>  k5. In fact, from results presented here, k3 (the rate of product formation) is much faster than k5 (the rate of product release). Hence, the above expressions for kcat and Km are reduced to Equations 9 and 10.
k<SUB><UP>cat</UP></SUB> ≅ k<SUB>5</SUB>[E]<SUB>T</SUB> (Eq. 9)
K<SUB>m</SUB> ≅ <FR><NU>k<SUB>5</SUB>k<SUB>2</SUB></NU><DE>k<SUB>1</SUB>k<SUB>3</SUB></DE></FR>. (Eq. 10)
Thus, this paradigm includes rate-limiting product release in the overall reaction. Km increases as k3 decreases, consistent with the observed effect of isotopic substitution (and a decrease in V/K and a value of D(V/K) greater than unity). This model may also be used to explain the observations with b5. With respect to this scheme, b5 essentially has the effect of increasing k3, consequently decreasing Km. The step measured by k3 is a simplification of several events, including P450 reduction, oxygen binding, further oxygen activation, and insertion of oxygen into the substrate, the step that must be sensitive to isotopic substitution.

Although the pre-steady-state burst of product formation may be interpreted in terms of rate-limiting product release, it is acknowledged that the rate-limiting step may be any first-order event required to renew P450 to its ground state. This step may include some degree of conformational change associated with product release. However, the burst kinetics can only be explained by a rate-limiting step following formation of acetaldehyde. A chemical explanation for rate-limiting product release is not obvious. The possibility was considered that the carbonyl product may bond with residues in the active site. In support of this, lauric acid, which is hydroxylated to form an alcohol product, showed an isotope effect on kcat rather than Km and did not show a kinetic burst of product formation (Fig. 9D). Also, no burst was observed in similar studies done on chlorzoxazone 6-hydroxylation (62) (an aromatic hydroxylation, results not shown). Therefore, we conclude that the nature of the carbonyl product may account for the kinetic behavior observed in the reactions.

There is some evidence, at least for ethanol oxidation, that the aldehyde product may be an even better substrate for P450 2E1 than the alcohol (63, 64). Because this P450 is rapidly reduced (k > 1000 min-1) in the presence or absence of substrate, it is possible that the product of alcohol oxidation might remain in the enzyme active site of P450 2E1 and undergo further oxidation to the carboxylic acid (Fig. 1, steps 9 and 10). (We also measured the rate of ferric P450 2E1 reduction in the presence of 500 µM acetaldehyde and found it to be identical to that observed in the absence.) Occupation of the active site by-product may account for the high level of uncoupling seen with this enzyme. Continued production of reaction oxygen species in the absence of renewable substrate may force release of the oxygen in the form of H2O2 or H2O. This is supported by the high level of coupling seen in the pre-steady-state phase of product formation preceding rate-limiting product release.

It is clear that this model is not valid for all substrates for P450 2E1. As with lauric acid, deuterium substitution of the substrate 7-ethoxycoumarin resulted in a decrease in kcat with no effect on Km when 7-hydroxycoumarin was measured as the product (results not shown). Whether this is a result of switching to alternate pathways (65-68) or formation of a product that does not show rate-limiting product release remains to be investigated. However, our current view is that the paradigm of rate-limiting product release should explain all P450 2E1-catalyzed reactions in which a kinetic hydrogen isotope effect on Km has been observed (9-12, 19, 20, 50).


FOOTNOTES

*   This research was supported in part by United States Public Health Service Grants R35 CA44353 and P30 ES00267.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    Supported in part by United States Public Health Service Training Grant T32 ES0728.
§   To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 638 Medical Research Bldg. I, 23rd and Pierce Aves., Nashville, TN 37232-0146. Tel.: 615-322-2261; Fax: 615-322-3141; E-mail: guengerich{at}toxicology.mc.vanderbilt.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: P450, microsomal cytochrome P450; b5, cytochrome b5; DLPC, L-alpha -dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; PFB-, pentafluorobenzyl-; GC, gas chromatography; PIEIMS, positive ion electron ionization mass spectrometry; NICIMS, negative ion chemical ionization mass spectrometry; MMO, methane monooxygenase; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography.
2   In subsequent experiments presented here, catalytic rates were generally higher with other preparations of P450 2E1 and NADPH-P450 reductase under more refined conditions. However, the apparent deuterium isotope effect was similar (~3-5) for all preparations.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank C. G. Turvy for assistance in preparing NADPH-P450 reductase; I. H. Hanna and Prof. P. F. Hollenberg for providing a modified NADPH-P450 reductase purification protocol; B. J. Fox for technical assistance with aspects of mass spectrometry; and particularly Dr. W. W. Johnson for assistance with the stopped-flow kinetics and discussion of kinetics and mechanism.


REFERENCES

  1. Palmer, G., and Reedijk, J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 665-677 [Free Full Text]
  2. Brodie, B. B., Gillette, J. R., and LaDu, B. N. (1958) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 27, 427-454 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Wislocki, P. G., Miwa, G. T., and Lu, A. Y. H. (1980) in Enzymatic Basis of Detoxication (Jakoby, W. B., ed), Vol. 1, pp. 135-182, Academic Press, New York
  4. Guengerich, F. P. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 10019-10022 [Free Full Text]
  5. Guengerich, F. P., and Liebler, D. C. (1985) Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 14, 259-307 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Nelson, S. D., and Harvison, P. J. (1987) in Mammalian Cytochromes P-450 (Guengerich, F. P., ed), Vol. 2, pp. 19-79, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Rotan, FL
  7. Guengerich, F. P., Kim, D.-H., and Iwasaki, M. (1991) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 4, 168-179 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Yamazaki, H., Inui, Y., Yun, C.-H., Mimura, M., Guengerich, F. P., and Shimada, T. (1992) Carcinogenesis 13, 1789-1794 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Keefer, L. K., Lijinsky, W., and Garcia, H. (1973) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 51, 299-302
  10. Yang, C. S., Ishizaki, H., Lee, M., Wade, D., and Fadel, A. (1991) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 4, 408-413 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Dagani, D., and Archer, M. C. (1976) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 57, 955-957
  12. Wade, D., Yang, C. S., Metral, C. J., Roman, J. M., Hrabie, J. A., Riggs, C. W., Anjo, T., Keefer, L. K., and Mico, B. A. (1987) Cancer Res. 47, 3373-3377 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. White, R. E., and Coon, M. J. (1980) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 49, 315-356 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Pompon, D. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 6429-6435 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Groves, J. T., and McClusky, G. A. (1976) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98, 859-861 [CrossRef]
  16. Groves, J. T., McClusky, G. A., White, R. E., and Coon, M. J. (1978) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 81, 154-160 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Guengerich, F. P., Yun, C.-H., and Macdonald, T. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 27321-27329 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Guengerich, F. P., Peterson, L. A., and Böcker, R. H. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 8176-8183 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Swann, P. F., Mace, R., Angeles, R. M., and Keefer, L. K. (1983) Carcinogenesis 4, 821-825 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Mico, B. A., Swagzdis, J. E., Hu, H. S.-W., Keefer, L. K., Oldfield, N. F., and Garland, W. A. (1985) Cancer Res. 45, 6280-6285 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ekström, G., Norsten, C., Cronholm, T., and Ingelman-Sundberg, M. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 7348-7354 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Vaz, A. D. N., and Coon, M. J. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 6442-6449 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Korzekwa, K., Trager, W. F., and Gillette, J. R. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 9012-9018 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Gillette, J. R., Darbyshire, J. F., and Sugiyama, K. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 2927-2937 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Rataj, M. J., Kauth, J. E., and Donnelly, M. I. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 18684-18690 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Lee, S. K., Nesheim, J. C., and Lipscomb, J. D. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 21569-21577 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Nesheim, J. C., and Lipscomb, J. D. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 10240-10247 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Yasukochi, Y., and Masters, B. S. S. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251, 5337-5344 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Shimada, T., Misono, K. S., and Guengerich, F. P. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 909-921 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Gillam, E. M. J., Guo, Z., and Guengerich, F. P. (1994) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 312, 59-66 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Shen, A. L., Porter, T. D., Wilson, T. E., and Kasper, C. B. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 7584-7589 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Cinti, D. L., and Ozols, J. (1975) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 410, 32-44 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Brown, H. C., and Geoghegan, P., Jr. (1967) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 89, 1522-1524 [CrossRef]
  34. Nordblom, G. D., White, R. E., and Coon, M. J. (1976) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 175, 524-533 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Sund, H., and Theorell, H. (1963) in The Enzymes (Boyer, P. D., Lardy, H., and Myrback, K., eds), 2nd Ed., Vol. VII, p. 25, Academic Press, New York
  36. Guengerich, F. P. (1989) in Principles and Methods of Toxicology (Hayes, A. W., ed), pp. 777-814, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
  37. Shriner, R. L., Fuson, R. C., and Curtin, D. Y. (1965) The Systematic Identification of Organic Compounds, pp. 253-254, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
  38. Brady, J. F., Lee, M. J., Li, M., Ishizaki, H., and Yang, C. S. (1988) Mol. Pharmacol. 33, 148-154 [Abstract]
  39. Amet, Y., Berthou, F., Goasduff, T., Salaun, J. P., Le Breton, L., and Menez, J. F. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 203, 1168-1174 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Northrop, D. B. (1982) Methods Enzymol. 87, 607-625 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Miwa, G. T., Walsh, J. S., and Lu, A. Y. H. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 3000-3004 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Northrop, D. B. (1975) Biochemistry 14, 2644-2651 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Northrop, D. B. (1977) in Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Harry Steenbock Symposium (Cleland, W. W., O'Leary, M. H., and Northrop, D. B., eds), pp. 122-152, University Park Press, Baltimore
  44. Swain, C. G., Stivers, E. C., Reuwer, J. F., Jr., and Schaad, L. J. (1958) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80, 5885-5893 [CrossRef]
  45. Koshy, K. T., Kaiser, D. G., and VanDerSlik, A. L. (1975) J. Chromatogr. Sci. 13, 97-103 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Knapp, D. R. (ed) (1979) Handbook of Analytical Derivatization Reactions, (ed) pp. 485-486, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
  47. Luo, X. P., Yazdanpanah, M., Bhooi, N., and Lehotay, D. C. (1995) Anal. Biochem. 228, 294-298 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Kostrubsky, V. E., Szakacs, J. G., Jeffery, E. H., Woods, S. G., Bement, W. J., Wrighton, S. A., Sinclair, P. R., and Sinclair, J. F. (1997) Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 27, 57-62 [Abstract]
  49. Yamazaki, H., Johnson, W. W., Ueng, Y.-F., Shimada, T., and Guengerich, F. P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 27438-27444 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Andersen, M. E., Clewell, H. J., III, Mahle, D. A., and Gearhart, J. M. (1994) Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 128, 158-165 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Patten, C. J., Ning, S. M., Lu, A. Y. H., and Yang, C.-S. (1986) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 251, 629-638 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Snyder, R., Chepiga, T., Yang, C. S., Thomas, H., Platt, K., and Oesch, F. (1993) Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 122, 172-181 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Yamazaki, H., Nakano, M., Gillam, E. M. J., Guengerich, F. P., and Shimada, T. (1996) Biochem. Pharmacol. 52, 301-309 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Levin, W., Thomas, P. E., Oldfield, N., and Ryan, D. E. (1986) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 248, 158-165 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Patten, C. J., and Koch, P. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 317, 504-513 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Ziegler, D. M. (1988) Drug Metab. Rev. 19, 1-32 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Beaty, N. B., and Ballou, D. P. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 4611-4618 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Poulsen, L. L., and Ziegler, D. M. (1995) Chem. Biol. Interact. 96, 57-73 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Johnson, W. W., and Guengerich, F. P. (1997) Biochemistry, in press
  60. Kuby, S. A. (1991) A Study of Enzymes, Vol. I, pp. 272-273, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL
  61. Guengerich, F. P., Bell, L. C., and Okazaki, O. (1995) Biochimie (Paris) 77, 573-580 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  62. Peter, R., Böcker, R. G., Beaune, P. H., Iwasaki, M., Guengerich, F. P., and Yang, C.-S. (1990) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 3, 566-573 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Kunitoh, S., Asai, H., Imaoka, S., Funae, Y., and Monna, T. (1996) Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 20, 22A-24A [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Terelius, Y., Norsten-Höög, C., Cronholm, T., and Ingelman-Sundberg, M. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 179, 689-694 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  65. Miwa, G. T., and Lu, A. Y. H. (1987) BioEssays 7, 215-219 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  66. Jones, J. P., Korzekwa, K. R., Rettie, A. E., and Trager, W. F. (1986) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108, 7074-7078 [CrossRef]
  67. Harada, N., Miwa, G. T., Walsh, J. S., and Lu, A. Y. H. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 3005-3010 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. White, R. E., McCarthy, M. B., Egeberg, K. D., and Sligar, S. G. (1984) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 228, 493-502 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Volume 272, Number 47, Issue of November 21, 1997 pp. 29643-29651
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. R. Porubsky, K. M. Meneely, and E. E. Scott
Structures of Human Cytochrome P-450 2E1: INSIGHTS INTO THE BINDING OF INHIBITORS AND BOTH SMALL MOLECULAR WEIGHT AND FATTY ACID SUBSTRATES
J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 2008; 283(48): 33698 - 33707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. A. Krauser and F. P. Guengerich
Cytochrome P450 3A4-catalyzed Testosterone 6{beta}-Hydroxylation Stereochemistry, Kinetic Deuterium Isotope Effects, and Rate-limiting Steps
J. Biol. Chem., May 20, 2005; 280(20): 19496 - 19506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
K. K. M. Miller, J. Cai, S. L. Ripp, W. M. Pierce Jr., T. H. Rushmore, and R. A. Prough
STEREO- AND REGIOSELECTIVITY ACCOUNT FOR THE DIVERSITY OF DEHYDROEPIANDROSTERONE (DHEA) METABOLITES PRODUCED BY LIVER MICROSOMAL CYTOCHROMES P450
Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2004; 32(3): 305 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. P. Guengerich, G. P. Miller, I. H. Hanna, H. Sato, and M. V. Martin
Oxidation of Methoxyphenethylamines by Cytochrome P450 2D6. ANALYSIS OF RATE-LIMITING STEPS
J. Biol. Chem., September 6, 2002; 277(37): 33711 - 33719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
H. C. Chung, S. H. Kim, M. G. Lee, and S. G. Kim
Increase in Urea in Conjunction with L-Arginine Metabolism in the Liver Leads to Induction of Cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1): The Role of Urea in CYP2E1 Induction by Acute Renal Failure
Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2002; 30(6): 739 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
A. L. Upthagrove and W. L. Nelson
Importance of Amine pKa and Distribution Coefficient in the Metabolism of Fluorinated Propranolol Derivatives. Preparation, Identification of Metabolite Regioisomers, and Metabolism by CYP2D6
Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2001; 29(11): 1377 - 1388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
G. Robertson, I. Leclercq, and G. C. Farrell
Nonalcoholic Steatosis and Steatohepatitis: II. Cytochrome P-450 enzymes and oxidative stress
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): G1135 - G1139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
F. P. Guengerich
Metabolism of chemical carcinogens
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2000; 21(3): 345 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. C. Bell-Parikh and F. P. Guengerich
Kinetics of Cytochrome P450 2E1-Catalyzed Oxidation of Ethanol to Acetic Acid via Acetaldehyde
J. Biol. Chem., August 20, 1999; 274(34): 23833 - 23840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
F. P. Guengerich, N. A. Hosea, A. Parikh, L. C. Bell-Parikh, W. W. Johnson, E. M. J. Gillam, and T. Shimada
Twenty Years of Biochemistry of Human P450s. Purification, Expression, Mechanism, and Relevance to Drugs
Drug Metab. Dispos., December 1, 1998; 26(12): 1175 - 1178.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
Proceedings of the British Toxicology Society Annual Congress University of Surrey, Guildford 19 - 22 April 1998
Human and Experimental Toxicology, September 1, 1998; 17(9): 469 - 534.
[PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Kominami, A. Owaki, T. Iwanaga, H. Tagashira-Ikushiro, and T. Yamazaki
The Rate-determining Step in P450 C21-catalyzing Reactions in a Membrane-reconstituted System
J. Biol. Chem., March 30, 2001; 276(14): 10753 - 10758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bell, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Guengerich, F. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bell, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Guengerich, F. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement