![]()
|
|
||||||||
Volume 272, Number 48, Issue of November 28, 1997
pp. 30558-30562
(Received for publication, May 14, 1997, and in revised form, August 27, 1997)
From the Recent genetic studies indicate that several
molecular variants discovered in angiotensinogen (AG), the precursor of
vasoactive octapeptide angiotensin II, could potentially be responsible
for inherited predisposition to human blood pressure variation. We have
previously shown that a ubiquitously expressed nuclear factor, AGCF1,
bound to AGCE1 (AG core promoter
element 1 including the core nucleotides,
CTCGTG, CTC-type) located between the TATA box and
transcription initiation site (positions The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in the
regulation of blood pressure and electrolyte homeostasis. The reaction
between renin and angiotensinogen
(AG)1 is the initial and
rate-limiting step of this enzymatic cascade that generates the
decapeptide angiotensin I, which is further processed to the functional
octapeptide angiotensin II by angiotensin-converting enzyme (1-3).
Because plasma AG concentration is close to the Km
of the renin reaction, variation of plasma AG concentration can
influence angiotensin II generation (4). Several observations indicate
a direct relationship between plasma AG levels and blood pressure.
First, plasma AG concentrations highly correlate with blood pressures
in some patients (5), and associations between AG concentrations and
hypertension have been demonstrated in families (6). Second, the
overexpression of AG leads to elevated blood pressure in transgenic
animals (7). Recently, Jeunemaitre et al. (8) showed that a
common AG gene variant, M235T, was significantly linked to essential
hypertension and was also associated with elevated plasma AG
concentration. Whether M235T directly accounts for a physiological
effect or acts as a marker for a causative mutation is as yet
unresolved, they proposed that some other variants of the AG gene lead
to a chronic increase in AG levels and thereby eventually to increased
blood pressure.
AG is mainly synthesized in the liver and is secreted into the plasma
through the constitutive pathway (9). Therefore, it is possible to
suppose that the transcriptional regulation of the AG gene affects its
plasma concentration. Kim et al. (10) have generated mice
carrying two, three, or four functional copies of the murine wild-type
AG gene at its normal chromosomal location and reported that plasma AG
levels increased progressively with an increase in blood pressure. A
recent study showed that the inhibition of AG transcription resulted in
a reduction in plasma AG levels associated with a decrease in blood
pressure of spontaneously hypertensive rats, by using synthetic
double-stranded oligonucleotides as "decoy" cis-elements
to block the binding of nuclear factors to the targeted promoter
regions (11). These observations suggest an etiological importance of
the transcriptional regulation of the AG gene.
We previously identified several regulatory elements of the human AG
gene transcription including the upstream and downstream activating
elements (12-14) and recently demonstrated that a ubiquitously expressed nuclear factor, AGCF1, bound to AGCE1 (AG
core promoter element 1) including the core
nucleotides (CTCGTG), an E box-like motif located between the TATA box
and transcription initiation site, is an authentic regulator that
mediates the responsiveness to multiple AG regulatory elements (15).
Moreover, a recent genetic study found the three types of molecular
variants, CTCGTG, ATCGTG, and ATTGTG, in the AGCE1 position of the
human AG promoters (8). Therefore, we examined whether these variations
affect the AGCF1-binding affinity and the human AG transcriptional
activity. Here, we suggested the possible involvement of USF1, an E
box-binding helix-loop-helix (HLH) transcription factor (16) as a
component in AGCF1 formation and discussed the potentially important
relationship between the naturally occurring AGCE1 variations and their
transcriptional activity.
The reconstituted human AG gene,
13B2(3 HepG2 cells were maintained in
minimum essential medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and
nonessential amino acids. The cells were plated at a density of 5 × 105 cells/60-mm dish and transfected 24 h later by
calcium phosphate co-precipitation with reporter plasmids (3 µg) and
a Nuclear
extracts from HepG2 cells were prepared using the protocol of Dignam
et al. (21). Double-stranded DNA probe was end-labeled using
[ We previously showed that AGCF1 contained 31-, 33-, and 43-kDa
proteins as major components by UV cross-linking (15). In the course of
characterizing AGCF1, we noticed that its binding activity was
heat-stable and affected by MgCl2 (data not shown). These
observations allowed us to speculate that the 43-kDa proteins identified would be USF1, which is classified as the members of basic
HLH/leucine zipper family of transcription factors (16), although the
nucleotide residue at position
[View Larger Version of this Image (80K GIF file)]
The ability of USF1 to function as a transcriptional modulator of the
human AG gene was analyzed by using a dominant negative form of USF1
protein (dnUSF) that lacked the NH2-terminal activation domain but possessed its DNA binding domain (Fig.
2A) (24). The bacterially
expressed GST-dnUSF fusion protein had the same binding specificity as
compared with that of AGCF1 (data not shown). The expression of dnUSF
dramatically reduced the transcriptional activity of the reconstituted
human AG gene (13B2(3
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]
Interestingly, a previous genetic study identified the three types of
molecular variants, CTCGTG, ATCGTC, and
ATTGTG (8), localized to AGCE1 position of the human hAG
promoters. In contrast, these E box-like motifs in AGCE1 were not
conserved in the rodent angiotensinogen promoters (Fig.
4A) (25). These differences prompted us to examine the possibility that the AGCF1 binding affinity
might be affected by the naturally occurring molecular variants by
using competition assays. Although the DNA-protein complex formed by
AGCF1 binding to the CTC-type AGCE1 was inhibited by a molar excess of
the unlabeled CTC-type AGCE1, ATC-type AGCE1 partially prevented this
complex formation. In particular, the ATT-type and rodent counterparts
hardly competed for this binding (Fig. 4, B and
C). These results indicate that the AGCF1 binding to AGCE1
is a species-specific interaction and that the molecular variation in
AGCE1 alters the AGCF1 binding affinity.
[View Larger Version of this Image (40K GIF file)]
AGCE1 plays an important role in mediating the responsiveness of
multiple upstream and downstream cis-acting elements of the human AG gene to activate its promoter (15). As the disruption of AGCF1
binding, which resulted in the functional attenuation of the human AG
regulatory elements, dramatically reduced the AG transcriptional
activity (15), we examined the possibility that the alteration of AGCF1
binding affinity caused by the three types of naturally occurring
mutations affected the AG transcription (Fig.
5). Although the transcriptional activity
of the ATC-type in the reconstituted human AG gene (13(ATC)B2(3
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]
In the present study, we showed that AGCF1 has a DNA binding
specificity similar to that of a HLH nuclear factor USF1 (26-28) (Fig.
1). Furthermore, co-transfection experiments demonstrated that USF1
could regulate transcriptional activity of the human AG gene in the
AGCE1-dependent manner (Figs. 2 and 3). Next, we examined
the effects of naturally occurring molecular variants (CTCGTG,
CTC-type; ATCGTG, ATC-type; and ATTGTG, ATT-type) localized to AGCE1 on
the hAG transcriptional activity. Competitive EMSA and site-directed
mutagenesis experiments demonstrated that the transcriptional activity
for the CTC- and ATC-type mutations was significantly higher than that
for the ATT-type by alteration of the AGCF1 binding affinity (Figs. 4
and 5).
USF was originally described as a transcription factor derived from
HeLa nuclear extract that binds to an E box of the adenovirus major
late promoter (16). This factor is also shown to be involved in the
regulation of cellular genes, including the murine metallothionein I
gene (29), the rat Recently, Caulfied et al. (35) have shown significant
linkage between hypertension and chromosomal regions including and close to the human AG gene, but they could not confirm association with
the M235T mutation as a candidate marker for essential hypertension, probably due to ethnic differences in its allele frequency. As the
functional effect of the M235T on essential hypertension was unclear,
Lifton (36) pointed out the possible existence of functional variant(s)
other than this mutation at AG locus. For example, we considered that
the transcriptional regulation is one of the candidate control
mechanism accounting for the variation of human angiotensinogen
expression and provided the functional evidence that the
transcriptional activities for the CTC- and ATC-type AG promoters were
2.5 times higher than that for the ATT-type by alteration of the AGCF1
binding affinity (Figs. 4 and 5). On the basis of the present results,
it is suggested that the transcriptional activities of the CTC/CTC and
ATC/ATC homozygotes or the CTC/ATC heterozygote are 2.5 times higher
than that of the ATT/ATT homozygote and that the CTC/ATT and ATC/ATT
heterozygotes is 1.75 times higher than that of the ATT/ATT
homozygote.
A genetically chronic overactivity of the renin-angiotensin system
could favor renal sodium reabsorption, vascular hypertrophy, and/or an
increase in sympathetic nervous system activity, and predisposition to
the development of common cardiovascular diseases. In this point,
interestingly, associations between molecular variation of the AG gene
and diseases including pre-eclampsia, coronary atherosclerosis,
myocardial infarction, and nephropathy in insulin-dependent diabetes have been reported (37-42). In addition to the systemic action of angiotensin II, the tissue function of this peptide is now
considered to play an important role in local tissue regulation because
components of the renin-angiotensin system have been demonstrated in a
variety of tissues, such as adrenal glands, kidney, heart, and brain
(43). Since AGCF1 is a ubiquitously expressed transcription factor,
variants in AGCE1 may affect the levels of local AG synthesis, resulting in a change in the rate of angiotensin II formation.
Recently, Sato et al. (44) performed a case-control study in
Japanese population to examine whether a genetic variant in AGCE1 is
directly associated with increased risk of hypertension and suggested
that a part of the previously reported genetic risk of hypertension
associated with M235T might be explained by an increase in
transcriptional regulation of AG induced by the AGCE1 polymorphisms. As
discussed to date, the statistical significance that incriminates the
AG gene locus is strongly associated with human hypertension (8,
35-42, 44). However, there was little direct evidence regarding the
mechanism by which molecular variants of the AG gene affect the
regulation of AG levels. Here we presented the first clue of human AG
variations associated with the alteration of their transcription
regulation, providing an experimental tool or a predictive marker to
probe the predisposition of this disorder.
We thank Professor Ogiwara, Dr. Higaki, and
Dr. Katsuya for their kindness and the laboratory members for their
technical advice and helpful discussion.
Molecular Variation of the Human Angiotensinogen Core Promoter
Element Located between the TATA Box and Transcription Initiation Site
Affects Its Transcriptional Activity*
§,
,
,
and
**
Institute of Applied Biochemistry,
Tsukuba Advanced Research Alliance (TARA),
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES
25 to
1) is an authentic
regulator of human AG transcription. In the present study, we showed
that AGCF1 has biologically and immunologically similar properties to
those of a helix-loop-helix nuclear factor USF1 and examined the
effects of two other naturally occurring molecular variants
(ATCGTG, ATC-type and ATTGTG, ATT-type) found in the AGCE1 position on the human AG transcriptional activity. Competitive gel-shift and transfection experiments demonstrated that
the transcriptional activity for the CTC- and ATC-type promoters was
2.5 times higher than that for the ATT-type through the alteration of
AGCF1-binding affinity. These results suggest the possible involvement
of USF1 as a component in AGCF1 formation and the potential importance
of AGCE1 variation in blood pressure regulation through human AG
expression.
Plasmid Constructions
)(+) and 13Am4B2(3
)(+) were constructed as described previously
(15). 13cat were used as templates to construct mutations in AGCE1 by
oligonucleotides-directed mutagenesis (15, 17). Once the site-directed
mutations were obtained and confirmed by sequencing, the altered
1266-base pair (position
1222 to +44) fragments were used for
constructions of 13(ATC)B2(3
)(+) and 13(ATT)B2(3
)(+). Human USF1
cDNA fragment were obtained by reverse transcriptase-polymerase
chain reaction as follows. Single-stranded cDNA generated from
human hepatoma cell line (HepG2) total RNA using a first-strand
cDNA synthesis kit (Pharmacia Biotech Inc., Uppsala, Sweden) was
subjected to polymerase chain reaction amplification using primers
synthesized based on the human USF sequence (18):
5
-TCGGGAATTCCCCCTCACAGAGAGATGAAGGGG-3
(primer 1; corresponding to
nucleotide 97-129) for the full-length fragment, or
5
-GGTCGAATTCCCGCCATGATGTCACCACAAGAAGTACTG-3
(primer 2; corresponding
to nucleotide 607-630) for the truncated fragment, and
5
-GATCCCTCGAGTTAGTTGCTGTCATTCTTGATGACG-3
(primer 3; comple- mentary to nucleotides 1029-1053). DNA amplification using a GeneAmp AmpliTaq PCR kit (Perkin-Elmer) was performed in a Perkin-Elmer thermal
cycler with 25 cycles of denaturation (94 °C, 1 min), annealing
(63 °C, 1 min), and extension (72 °C, 1 min). The obtained fragment was cloned into the pcDNA3 expression vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) and confirmed by sequencing.
-galactosidase expression plasmid, pCMV-
gal (1 µg) to
normalize transfection efficiency. In the co-transfection assay, 2 µg
of reporter plasmids were transfected with 1, 2, or 4 µg of modulator
plasmids and 1 µg of pCMV-
gal. Total amounts of DNA were adjusted
7 µg by pcDNA3. After 48 h of culture,
-galactosidase
activities were measured (19), and cell extracts containing equivalent
amounts of
-galactosidase activity were used for CAT assay (20). The extent of conversion of chloramphenicol to its acetylated form was
measured with a Bio-imaging analyzer (Model BAS2000; Fujix, Tokyo,
Japan).
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase. 5 µg of
nuclear extracts were incubated with 1 µg of poly[d(I-C)]
(Boehringer Mannheim) and end-labeled oligonucleotide (0.5 ng,
approximately 15,000 cpm) at 20 °C for 15 min in the presence or
absence of the unlabeled oligonucleotides. The binding reaction was
carried out in a solution containing 12 mM Hepes (pH 7.9),
60 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 12% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol,
and 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. In the supershift
experiments, 2 µl of USF1-specific antibody (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, CA) was added to the reaction mixture. The reaction
mixtures were directly loaded onto 4.5% nondenaturing polyacrylamide
gels containing 4% glycerol made in 1 × TBE (90 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 89 mM boric acid, and 2 mM EDTA). After electrophoresis was performed at 150 V for 2.5 h at
4 °C, the gels were dried and autoradiographed with an intensifying screen.
18 in AGCE1 of the human AG core
promoter was substituted to the thymidine (CTCGTG) from the
adenine (CACGTG) in a consensus E box for USF. To examine whether USF1, a heat-stable MgCl2-sensitive 43-kDa
transcription factor, is a component of AGCF1, we performed EMSA using
the nuclear extracts prepared from HepG2 cells (Fig.
1). The DNA-protein complex formed by
AGCF1 binding to AGCE1 was inhibited by molar excess of nonlabeled USF1
binding element of the adenovirus major late promoter (18) as well as
AGCE1, although retinoic acid response element 1 of the cellular
retinoic acid-binding protein II promoter (CRABPII-1) (22) and estrogen
response element of vitellogenin promoter (vit-ERE) (23), which had
partially related sequences to AGCE1 (Fig. 1A), did not
compete for this binding at all (Fig. 1B, lanes
1-6). Similar results were obtained by using the adenovirus major
late promoter as the probes (Fig. 1B, lanes
7-12). Furthermore, the addition of USF1-specific antibody to
EMSA reactions generated a supershifted complex (Fig. 1B,
compare lane 13 with lane 14), indicating that
AGCF1 complex contains USF1.
Fig. 1.
Identification of USF1 as a component of
AGCF1. A, the AGCF1 binding region of human AG core
promoter. A bracketed line represents the region protected
from DNase I (15). The TATA box and transcriptional start site are
indicated by a box and an arrow, respectively.
Recognition sequences for known eukaryotic transcription factors,
estrogen response element (vit-ERE), retinoic acid response
element (CRABPII-1), and adenovirus major late promoter (AdML), were compared with the sequence of the AG core
promoter. A
indicates an identity among their nucleotides.
Double-stranded versions of the indicated sequences were used in
competition experiments. B, EMSA. The indicated
double-stranded oligonucleotides were end-labeled with T4
polynucleotide kinase using [
-32P]ATP. 5 µg of HepG2
nuclear extracts were incubated with 0.5 ng of 32P-labeled
probe in the presence or absence of 200-fold molar excess of the
unlabeled oligonucleotides. In supershift assays, USF1 antibodies were
added to the reaction mixture. Binding reactions were resolved by 4.5%
acrylamide, 1 × TBE electrophoresis. AGCF1 is indicated.
)(+)) but had little effect on that of the Am4
mutant (13Am4B2(3
)(+)) that completely disrupted AGCF1 binding
in vitro (15) in HepG2 cells (Fig. 2B). To
further confirm the participation of USF1 in human AG transcription, an
activator form of USF1 was co-transfected with the human AG reporters
(Fig. 3A). In this assay, we
used the minimal hAG core promoter (including only TATA box and AGCE1) as a reporter because of the saturated CAT activity in the
reconstituted construct and to avoid the effects of hAG regulatory
elements other than AGCE1. The expression of full-length USF1 activated the human AG minimal promoter (DM12cat), but had little effect on that
of the Am4 mutant (DM12Am4cat) in HepG2 cells (Fig. 3B). These results suggest that USF1 could regulate the human AG gene transcription in the AGCE1-dependent manner.
Fig. 2.
Repression by the truncated USF1 protein of
the reconstituted human AG gene. A, schematic maps of the
truncated USF1 expression vector and the reconstituted human AG
reporter plasmids. BR, HLH, and LZ represent a
basic region, helix-loop-helix, and leucine zipper, respectively.
Open boxes marked TATA box and white vertical lines represent TATA box and AGCE1 mutations,
respectively. An Am4 mutation (from CGT to ATG at positions
17 to 15 in AGCE1) (13Am4B2(3
)(+)) completely disrupted AGCF1 binding in
vitro in HepG2 cells (15). B, HepG2 cells were
transfected with 2 µg of the CAT reporters, 1, 2, or 4 µg of the
modulators, and 1 µg of the
-galactosidase expression plasmid
(pCMV-
gal) as an internal control for transfection efficiency. Total
amounts of DNA were adjusted to 7 µg by control vector pcDNA3.
After a 48-h culture period,
-galactosidase activities were
measured, and extracts containing equivalent amounts of
-galactosidase activities were used for CAT assays. The effect of
dominant-negative USF1 on 13B2(3
)(+) and 13Am4B2(3
)(+) is indicated
by
and
, respectively. The CAT activity of 13B2(3
)(+) is
designated as 100, and each value of CAT activity represents the
mean ± S.E. for at least four independent experiments.
Fig. 3.
Activation by an activator form USF1 of the
human AG core promoter. A, schematic maps of the full-length
USF1 expression vector and reporter plasmids containing the human AG
core promoter. AD, BR, HLH, and LZ represent
activation domains, a basic region, helix-loop-helix, and leucine
zipper, respectively. Open boxes marked TATA box
and white vertical lines represent TATA box and AGCE1
mutation (Am4), respectively. B, transfection
experiments and CAT assays were performed as described in Fig.
2B. The effect of USF1 on DM12cat and DM12Am4cat is
indicated by
and
, respectively. The CAT activity of DM12cat is
designated as 1, and each value of CAT activity represents the
mean ± S.E. for at least four independent experiments.
Fig. 4.
Effect of molecular variation of AGCE1 on the
AGCF1 binding activities. A, alignment of the AGCE1 of the
human, rat, and mouse AG genes. Optional alignments were generated
using the HARPLT2 program (SDC-GENETICS). Dashes (
), indicating
hypothetical deletions, were placed in the sequences to achieve maximum
homology.
indicates an identity among their nucleotides. The TATA
box and E box-like sequences are denoted by boxes. An E box
consensus motif was indicated by bold letters. The bases
different from a consensus E box motif are indicated by
underlines. Double-stranded versions of the indicated
sequences were used in competition experiments. B, EMSA was
performed as described in the legend to Fig. 1B. AGCF1 is
indicated. C, linear plots of binding form are shown. The
amount of AGCF1-DNA complex was quantified by imaging analyzer.
,
, and
represent the effects of ATT-, ATC-, and CTC-type
competitors (Fig. 4A), respectively, on AGCF1 binding
activity to the CTC-type AGCE1. The complex formed in the absence of
competitors is designated as 100, and each value of the complex
represents the mean ± S.E. for four independent
experiments.
)(+))
was not significantly different from that of the CTC-type, the ATT-type represented about 40% of the transcriptional activity compared with
that of the CTC-type. Taken together, these results demonstrate that
molecular variation of the human AG core promoter, AGCE1, affects its
transcriptional activity by alteration of the AGCF1-binding activity.
Fig. 5.
Effect of molecular variation of AGCE1 on
their transcriptional activities. The structure of the hAG gene is
shown at the top.
and
represent the translated and
untranslated region of exons, respectively. Intron and franking regions
are shown by thin lines. The positions of promoter and the
downstream enhancer are indicated below. Thick lines on the
left represent variant promoter sequences whose base
differences are indicated in Fig. 4A. On the
right, HepG2 cells were transfected with 3 µg of the CAT
reporters and 1 µg of the
-galactosidase expression plasmid
(pCMV-
gal) as an internal control for transfection efficiency. CAT
assays were performed as described in Fig. 2B. The CAT
activity of 13B2(3
)(+) is designated as 100, and each value of CAT
activity represents the mean ± S.E. for at least six independent
experiments.
-fibrinogen gene (30), the human growth hormone
gene (31), the p53 gene (32), and the cardiac ventricular myosin light
chain 2 gene (33). Furthermore, USF acts not only as a classical
upstream activator, but also as a factor that interacts with initiator
elements of a variety of core promoters, which can lead to markedly
enhanced levels of basal transcription (34). We previously demonstrated
that human AG promoter functioned without TATA box in the presence of
AGCE1 (15). This initiator-like activity of AGCE1 may be explained by
the presence of USF as a component of AGCF1 (Fig. 1), because USF could
activate the basal level of transcription of the human AG core promoter
in the AGCE1-dependent manner (Fig. 3).
*
This work was supported by Grants from Research for the
Future Program (The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (RFTF 97L00804)), the Ministry of Education, Science, and Sports, Uehara Memorial Foundation, Kanae Foundation of Research for New Medicine, The
Inamori Foundation, and The Asahi Glass Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institute of Applied
Biochemistry, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan. Tel.:
81-298-53-6599; Fax: 81-298-53-4605; E-mail:
akif{at}sakura.cc.tsukuba.ac.jp.
1
The abbreviations used are: AG, angiotensinogen;
hAG, human AG; AGCF1, human AG core promoter binding factor 1; AGCE1,
human AG core promoter element 1; CAT, chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assays; HLH,
helix-loop-helix.
Volume 272, Number 48,
Issue of November 28, 1997
pp. 30558-30562
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C Holzapfel, J Baumert, H Grallert, A M Muller, B Thorand, N Khuseyinova, C Herder, C Meisinger, H Hauner, H E Wichmann, et al. Genetic variants in the USF1 gene are associated with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus in women: results from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg case-cohort study, 1984-2002 Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2008; 159(4): 407 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-i. Asaka, T. Terada, K. Ogasawara, T. Katsura, and K.-i. Inui Characterization of the Basal Promoter Element of Human Organic Cation Transporter 2 Gene J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2007; 321(2): 684 - 689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. van der Vleuten, A. Isaacs, A. Hijmans, C. M. van Duijn, A. F. H. Stalenhoef, and J. de Graaf The involvement of upstream stimulatory factor 1 in Dutch patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 193 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Naukkarinen, M. Gentile, A. Soro-Paavonen, J. Saarela, H. A. Koistinen, P. Pajukanta, M.-R. Taskinen, and L. Peltonen USF1 and dyslipidemias: converging evidence for a functional intronic variant Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2005; 14(17): 2595 - 2605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shimizu, T. Oishi, A. Omori, A. Sugiura, K. Hirota, H. Aoyama, T. Saito, T. Sugaya, Y. Kon, J. D. Engel, et al. Identification of cis-Regulatory Sequences in the Human Angiotensinogen Gene by Transgene Coplacement and Site-Specific Recombination Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2005; 25(8): 2938 - 2945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schmidt, Y. S. Aulchenko, N. Schweighofer, R. Schmidt, S. Frank, G. M. Kostner, E. Ott, and C. van Duijn Angiotensinogen Promoter B-Haplotype Associated With Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Enhances Basal Transcriptional Activity Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11): 2592 - 2597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-T. Tsai, L.-P. Lai, J.-L. Lin, F.-T. Chiang, J.-J. Hwang, M. D. Ritchie, J. H. Moore, K.-L. Hsu, C.-D. Tseng, C.-S. Liau, et al. Renin-Angiotensin System Gene Polymorphisms and Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, April 6, 2004; 109(13): 1640 - 1646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shimamoto, J. Ishida, K. Yamagata, T. Saito, H. Kato, T. Matsuoka, K. Hirota, H. Daitoku, M. Nangaku, K. Yamagata, et al. Inhibitory Effect of the Small Heterodimer Partner on Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor-4 Mediates Bile Acid-induced Repression of the Human Angiotensinogen Gene J. Biol. Chem., February 27, 2004; 279(9): 7770 - 7776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Sethi, B. G. Nordestgaard, M.-L. M. Gronholdt, R. Steffensen, G. Jensen, and A. Tybjaerg-Hansen Angiotensinogen Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, Elevated Blood Pressure, and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Hypertension, June 1, 2003; 41(6): 1202 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-T. Tsai, D. Fallin, F.-T. Chiang, J.-J. Hwang, L.-P. Lai, K.-L. Hsu, C.-D. Tseng, C.-S. Liau, and Y.-Z. Tseng Angiotensinogen Gene Haplotype and Hypertension: Interaction With ACE Gene I Allele Hypertension, January 1, 2003; 41(1): 9 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. F. Hilgers, C. Delles, R. Veelken, and R. E. Schmieder Angiotensinogen Gene Core Promoter Variants and Non-Modulating Hypertension Hypertension, December 1, 2001; 38(6): 1250 - 1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. Sherman and A. R. Brasier Role of Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription 1 and -3 in Inducible Regulation of the Human Angiotensinogen Gene by Interleukin-6 Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2001; 15(3): 441 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schmidt, F. Fazekas, G. M. Kostner, C. M. van Duijn, and R. Schmidt Angiotensinogen Gene Promoter Haplotype and Microangiopathy-Related Cerebral Damage : Results of the Austrian Stroke Prevention Study Stroke, February 1, 2001; 32(2): 405 - 412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hasegawa, K. Fujii, M. Yamada, Y. Igarashi, K. Tachibana, T. Tanaka, K. Onigata, Y. Nishi, S. Kato, and T. Hasegawa Identification of Novel Human GH-1 Gene Polymorphisms that Are Associated with Growth Hormone Secretion and Height J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2000; 85(3): 1290 - 1295. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yanai, K. Hirota, K. Taniguchi-Yanai, Y. Shigematsu, Y. Shimamoto, T. Saito, S. Chowdhury, M. Takiguchi, M. Arakawa, Y. Nibu, et al. Regulated Expression of Human Angiotensinogen Gene by Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4 and Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter-Transcription Factor J. Biol. Chem., December 3, 1999; 274(49): 34605 - 34612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||