![]()
|
|
||||||||
Volume 272, Number 51, Issue of December 19, 1997 pp. 31941-31944
(Received for publication, September 26, 1997)
,From Myriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah 84108
Recent work has shown that the murine BRCA2 tumor suppressor protein interacts with the murine RAD51 protein. This interaction suggests that BRCA2 participates in DNA repair. Residues 3196-3232 of the murine BRCA2 protein were shown to be involved in this interaction. Here, we report the detailed mapping of additional domains that are involved in interactions between the human homologs of these two proteins. Through yeast two-hybrid and biochemical assays, we demonstrate that the RAD51 protein interacts specifically with the eight evolutionarily conserved BRC motifs encoded in exon 11 of brca2 and with a similar motif found in a Caenorhabditis elegans hypothetical protein. Deletion analysis demonstrates that residues 98-339 of human RAD51 interact with the 59-residue minimal region that is conserved in all BRC motifs. These data suggest that the BRC repeats function to bind RAD51.
Germline mutations in the brca1 and brca2 tumor suppressor genes account for approximately 5-10% of all breast cancer cases (1-4). In addition, deleterious alleles of brca1 or brca2 are responsible for almost all familial ovarian cancer, and deleterious alleles of brca2 are involved in hereditary male breast cancer (1-4). Currently the mechanism of action of these two genes remains largely undefined. The brca1 and brca2 genes encode large proteins, 1863 and 3418 amino acids, respectively (1, 3). A search of the public sequence data bases has revealed little sequence homology to previously identified proteins. However, analysis of the protein sequence has revealed several statistically significant repeated motifs in these genes (5, 6). For example, eight internal repeats, known as BRC motifs, are found clustered in exon 11 of the human BRCA2 protein. These motifs are not found in BRCA1 but are conserved in all mammalian BRCA2 proteins that have been sequenced. A similar motif is also present in the hypothetical protein encoded by the Caenorhabditis elegans gene T07E3.5 (5, 7).
A number of studies have been conducted in the past year to elucidate
the biological roles of the brca1 and brca2
genes. Knock-outs of the mouse homologs of these genes indicate that
they are essential during development. The ablation of either
brca1 or brca2 results in an embryonic lethal
phenotype characterized by failure of proliferation during
approximately days 6-8 of gestation (8, 9). Levels of RNA expression
from brca1 and brca2 are coordinately regulated during proliferation and differentiation in mammary epithelial cells
(11, 12). Furthermore, their expression varies at different stages of
the cell cycle, with RNA levels peaking at the G1/S boundary (13, 14). These findings provide preliminary evidence that
these breast cancer genes participate in a common functional pathway.
Three independent studies have now established that the RAD51 DNA
repair protein is linked to the BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathways (9, 10, 15).
Immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that RAD51 forms a complex with
BRCA1, and immunofluorescence analysis shows that both proteins are
co-localized to the synaptonemal complex of mouse meiotic chromosomes
(15). The direct interaction of murine RAD51 with murine BRCA2 has been
demonstrated in a yeast two-hybrid assay (9, 10). The loss of
interaction of these two proteins probably accounts for the
hypersensitivity to
irradiation that is observed in mouse
embryos deficient in BRCA2 (9). rad51, a homolog of
the Escherichia coli recA gene, is known to function in
recombination and DNA repair (16, 17). It is currently unclear how the
interaction of RAD51 with either BRCA1 or BRCA2 affects its function.
Alteration of normal DNA repair function may lead to genomic
instabilities that eventually contribute to tumorigenesis.
We have conducted yeast two-hybrid searches using various segments of the human brca2 gene as "baits" and identified a number of interacting proteins, one of which is RAD51. To further understand the structural and functional relationships between human BRCA2 and RAD51, we map the minimal regions of the BRCA2 protein that mediate binding to RAD51. Specifically we show that RAD51 interacts with the eight BRC motifs of the human BRCA2 protein. These sites of interactions are distinct from those that have been previously reported for the murine BRCA2 and RAD51 proteins.
Overlapping fragments of BRCA2
cDNA were ligated into the Gal4p DNA-binding domain vector pGBT.C
and the Gal4p activation domain vector pGAD.C (18) (see Table I).
Homologous recombination in yeast was also used to create a number of
fusion constructs (19). BRCA2-Gal4p DNA-binding domain fusions were
cotransformed into the yeast strain J692 with activation domain
libraries from B-cell, liver, testis, and breast (20, 21). The yeast
transformants were plated on yeast minimal media lacking tryptophan,
leucine, and histidine and containing 25 mM
3-amino-1,2,4-triazole. After incubation for approximately 8 days at
30 °C,
-galactosidase activity was determined by a filter assay
(22).
Templates for the eight BRC motifs of the human BRCA2 protein and the BRC motif encoded by C. elegans T07E3.5 were generated by PCR1 amplification using the following primer pairs: motif 1F, GGGAATTCCCAGAAAAAAATAATGATTACATGAACAA; motif 1R, GGGTCGACCTGTAAATGTGCAGATACAGTATTAATTG; motif 2F, GGGAATTCCTGTTGAAAAATGACTGTAACAAAAGTG; motif 2R, GGGTCGACATTATTTTGTAATATCAGTTGGCATTTATTA; motif 3F, GGGAATTCTCAAATAAAGAACAGTTAACTGCTACTAA; motif 3R, GGGTCGACTTGATTTCCAGTACCAACTGGGACA; motif 4F, GGGAATTCGTTGGTACTGGAAATCAACTAGTGAC; motif 4R, GGGTCGACTTCTTTACACTTTGGGGCAGCTGTG; motif 5F, GGGAATTCGAAACAGCAAAAAGTCCTGCAACTTG; motif 5R, GGGTCGACATAAGTATCTTGTTTTTCGGAGAGATG; motif 6F, GGGAATTCCCCTGCAAAAATAAAAATGCAGCCATTA; motif 6R, GGGTCGACATGTGAATGCGTGCTACATTCATCATTA; motif 7F, GGGAATTCTTGGAAACTTCAGATATATGTAAATGTAG; motif 7R, GGGTCGACTAAATGTTCTGGAGTACGTATAGCAG; motif 8F, GGGAATTCATACGTACTCCAGAACATTTAATATCC; motif 8R, GGGTCGACGTGCTCTGGGTTTCTCTTATCAACA; C. elegans motif F, GGGAATTCGTAAAAGACAGTTTCGACACAA; and C. elegans motif R, GGGTCGACTGGAGCTTCGAAATCTTCGAAACC.
The PCR products were subcloned into both pGBT.C and pGAD.C using standard techniques (23). Similarly, various truncated segments of RAD51 were created by PCR for subcloning. The sequence of all fusion constructs were verified by sequencing.
In Vitro Protein-Protein Interaction AssayTemplates for making radiolabeled proteins were either from PCR-generated DNA fragments or recombinant plasmids. The primers T7-act-forward (TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGACCACATGGATAAAGCGGAATTAATTCCCGA) and Adh-act-reverse (CCCTACATCATCATGCAGTATCTACGATTCATAGATCTCTG) specific for the pGAD.C vector were used to produce PCR templates of the BRC motifs and all other inserts that were fused to the Gal4p activation domain (24). The T7-act-forward primer contains the T7 RNA polymerase promoter. The PCR DNA templates were transcribed in vitro by T7 RNA polymerase using the Ribomax Kit (Promega) and translated in vitro in the presence of [35S]methionine using rabbit reticulocyte lysate (Promega). In some experiments, the Single Tube Protein System 2 from Novagen was used to synthesize radiolabeled proteins.
GST fusion protein constructs were made by cloning the PCR products containing amino acid residues 1-44, 1-95, or 98-339 of human RAD51 and residues 1912-2126 of BRCA2 into the GST expression vector pGEX (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). All GST and GST fusion constructs were transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS competent cells (Stratagene). The transformants were induced by isopropylthiogalactopyranoside, harvested, and lysed by sonication in phosphate-buffered saline with 0.1% Triton X-100. The binding assay of GST fusion protein with the radiolabeled protein was performed according to the protocol of Sande and Privalsky (25). Equal amounts of GST and GST fusion proteins, as determined by Coomassie Blue staining of aliquots run on gels, were used in each assay. The protein complexes bound to the beads were washed extensively and released by heating to 90 °C in an equal volume of 2 × SDS-PAGE loading buffer. The radiolabeled proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized using the Molecular Dynamics Storm PhosphorImager System (Molecular Dynamics).
The
yeast two-hybrid system provides a powerful approach for identifying
protein-protein interactions in vivo. In our initial experiments, we cloned the DNA segment of brca2 encoding
amino acid residues 1912-2126 as a Gal4p DNA-binding domain fusion
(Table I). This clone was used as a
"bait" to search four different human Gal4p activation domain
libraries. From a human B-cell library, we obtained 115 His+, blue clones of approximately three million
transformants. Sequencing of these potentially positive clones
indicated that 22 of 115 were derived from the rad51 gene.
The shortest of the RAD51 clones contained the cDNA segment
encompassing amino acids 98-339. This result indicates that the
N-terminal portion of RAD51 is not necessary for binding amino acid
residues 1912-2126 of the human BRCA2 protein. However, while our work
was in progress, it was reported that the N terminus of the murine
RAD51 protein is required for binding the C-terminal portion of the
murine BRCA2 protein (9). For this reason, we also examined several
overlapping segments that encompassed most of the BRCA2 gene to
determine if additional regions of BRCA2 could interact with RAD51.
Several BRCA2 segments as Gal4p DNA-binding domain fusions and RAD51 as
a Gal4p activation domain fusion were co-expressed in yeast cells. The
results of
-galactosidase filter assays are summarized in Table I.
Four regions (amino acid residues 736-1253, 1253-1708, 1708-2099,
and 1912-2126) of the BRCA2 protein scored positive for
-galactosidase activity, indicating an interaction with RAD51. Two
regions of BRCA2, encompassing residues 1253-1708 and 1708-2099, when
expressed as DNA-binding domain fusions, gave rise to light blue color. However, the intensity of the blue color increased dramatically when
the RAD51 activation domain fusion was present, indicating an
interaction with RAD51.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eight BRC motifs are
found in exon 11 (encoding amino acid residues 638-2280) of the human
brca2 gene (5, 7). Interactions of RAD51 with fragments of
BRCA2 encompassing residues 736-2126 raised the possibility that the
BRC motifs might serve as specific sites for RAD51 interaction. To test
this hypothesis, each BRC motif was tested individually for interaction
with RAD51 in a yeast two-hybrid assay. As shown in Table
II, six of the eight motifs (BRC1, -2, -3, -4, -7, and -8) interacted with RAD51 when it was expressed as an
activation domain fusion. Because the context of folding in the
Gal4p-DNA-binding domain fusion might have affected the binding of
motifs 5 and 6 to RAD51, we performed swapping experiments in which
motifs 5 and 6 were engineered as activation domain fusions and RAD51
was engineered as a DNA-binding domain fusion. After co-transformation,
motifs 5 and 6 remained negative in the
-galactosidase assay (Table
II). We also examined the BRC motif from C. elegans to see
if it was able to interact with RAD51 in a similar yeast two-hybrid
assay. A positive interaction with RAD51 was observed (Table II).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In vitro biochemical assays provide an
alternative means to investigate protein-protein interaction. Different
segments of the RAD51 protein, residues 1-44, 1-95, and 98-339,
cloned as glutathione S-transferase fusions, were examined
for in vitro association with radiolabeled BRCA2. The BRCA2
segment encompassing residues 1912-2126 was first used to optimize our
assay. It was found that this region interacts with GST-RAD98-339 but
not with nonrecombinant GST, GST-RAD1-44, or GST-RAD1-95 (Fig.
1A). In a negative control,
radiolabeled
-galactosidase was not retained on beads coupled to GST
or GST-RAD51 fusions (data not shown). This assay was also used to
confirm the physical associations of RAD51 with the BRC motifs of human
BRCA2 and C. elegans. It was found that only amino acid
residues 98-339 of RAD51 could associate with each of the radiolabeled
BRC motifs (representative examples are shown in Fig. 1, B,
C, and D). Interestingly, BRC motifs 5 and 6, which scored negative in the yeast two-hybrid assay, appeared to
interact significantly and specifically with RAD51 in the in
vitro assay.
[View Larger Version of this Image (52K GIF file)]
Minimal Region Required for RAD51 and BRC Motif Interaction
To determine the minimal region of RAD51 that can interact with the BRC motifs, we cloned a series of truncated segments of RAD51 into pGBT.C and co-transformed them into yeast with the BRC motif 3 in pGAD.C. As summarized in Table III, the segment from residues 98-339 of RAD51 is required for the interaction with BRC3, which indicates that most of the C-terminal part of RAD51 is crucial to binding. In addition, we performed the reciprocal experiment to determine the minimal region of a BRC motif necessary for binding to RAD51. The motif BRC3 was arbitrarily chosen for the deletion analysis. It was found that the amino acid residues from positions 1414 to 1463 of BRCA2 are critical to binding (Table III). This minimal region includes all the conserved amino acids that form the basis of the BRC consensus sequence (5, 7).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The identification of components in the BRCA2 functional pathway should further our understanding of BRCA2 function and its role in tumorigenesis. Through yeast two-hybrid screens of human cDNA libraries, we identified RAD51 as a BRCA2-binding protein. Sharan et al. (9) previously demonstrated that the C-terminal region of murine BRCA2 interacts with the N-terminal portion of murine RAD51. We identified eight sites of interaction between these proteins. Specifically the eight BRC motifs encoded in exon 11 of the human brca2 gene interact with RAD51. In addition, a similar motif found in a C. elegans hypothetical protein also interacts with RAD51. These data suggest that the BRC motifs function to bind RAD51.
Sequence comparison of the BRCA2 proteins from six mammalian species have revealed sequences conserved among the eight BRC motifs, which strongly implies functional significance (5, 7). Our findings that RAD51 binds to different protein sequences encoded by the 5-kilobase exon 11 of BRCA2 led us to examine whether the BRC internal repeats are the actual sites of interactions with RAD51. Because the amino acid sequences of these motifs are not identical, we analyzed each BRC motif individually to determine if they could associate with RAD51. All eight human BRC motifs showed interaction in biochemical assays, but only six of eight BRC motifs bound specifically to RAD51 in the yeast two-hybrid assays. This discrepancy in binding specificity might be caused by the different protein context of Gal4p and GST fusions. Subtle changes in the amino acid sequence of BRC motif 5 and 6 could have affected the proper folding of the predicted globular domain in these motifs in yeast.
Deletion analyses of the BRC motif 3 and RAD51 identified the minimal regions in both proteins that are required for binding. Our results indicate that the minimal region defined for the BRC motif 3 encompasses the entire consensus sequence that is highly conserved among mammalian species (7). Similarly, the minimal region of human RAD51, amino acid residues 98-339, that interacts with human BRCA2 is conserved among prokaryotic and eukaryotic species. The homologous region in the E. coli recA protein has been demonstrated to contain ATPase activity and is involved in oligomer formation and recombination (26). The role of multiple RAD51-binding sites in BRCA2 is open to interpretation. It seems reasonable that BRCA2 might bind several molecules of RAD51 simultaneously and therefore might serve as a scaffold for RAD51 assembly during DNA repair and recombination. Alternatively the multiple binding sites might play a role in the sequestration of active RAD51 or the facilitation of functional interactions of RAD51 with itself or other proteins. Because a similar BRC motif in a hypothetical protein from C. elegans is capable of binding to human RAD51, this same structural and functional relationship may hold in other eukaryotic species.
Using biochemical assays, we have confirmed that the association between RAD51 and BRCA2 is direct (10). In contrast, the binding of RAD51 to BRCA1 may be mediated through another protein in a complex (15). We have searched extensively for possible interactions between RAD51 and BRCA1 using the yeast two-hybrid assay, but so far without success (data not shown). It is interesting to note that the tumor suppressor gene p53 also associates with RAD51 (27). Together these data strongly suggest that RAD51 represents a crucial functional junction linking recombination and repair to cell cycle checkpoint signaling.
Our protein-protein interaction data, coupled with the previous
observations that 1) brca2-null mouse embryos are
hypersensitive to
irradiation, 2) brca1 and
brca2-null mouse embryos drastically overexpress p21 and
suffer a failure of embryonic cell proliferation, and 3) there is a
direct protein-protein interaction between RAD51 and p53, raise a
critical question about the function of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (28-31). Is
the primary deficit in brca1-null and/or brca2-null tumors a failure of DNA repair, or is it a
failure of signal transduction associated with the need for DNA repair? The answer to this question could have bearings on the rationale for
use of brca1 and brca2 as anti-tumor gene therapy
agents in patients. The restoration of BRCA1 and BRCA2 function might
stabilize genome integrity in the tumor without reversing the damages
that have already occurred. In contrast, restoration of signal
transduction might render the tumors more sensitive to apoptosis, a
process that can be triggered by p53 or possibly chemotherapeutic
agents. Further research is needed to address these possibilities.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Myriad Genetics, Inc.,
390 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108. Tel.: 801-584-3648; Fax:
801-584-3650; E-mail: alex{at}myriad.com.
We thank Drs. D. Ballinger, G. Frech, L. Fitzgerald, and D. Teng for helpful comments on the manuscript.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Hucl, C. Rago, E. Gallmeier, J. R. Brody, M. Gorospe, and S. E. Kern A Syngeneic Variance Library for Functional Annotation of Human Variation: Application to BRCA2 Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 68(13): 5023 - 5030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Y. Park, H.-W. Yoo, B.-R. Kim, R. Park, S.-Y. Choi, and Y. Kim Identification of a novel human Rad51 variant that promotes DNA strand exchange Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2008; 36(10): 3226 - 3234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Seong, M. G. Sehorn, I. Plate, I. Shi, B. Song, P. Chi, U. Mortensen, P. Sung, and L. Krejci Molecular Anatomy of the Recombination Mediator Function of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad52 J. Biol. Chem., May 2, 2008; 283(18): 12166 - 12174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Farrugia, M. K. Agarwal, V. S. Pankratz, A. M. Deffenbaugh, D. Pruss, C. Frye, L. Wadum, K. Johnson, J. Mentlick, S. V. Tavtigian, et al. Functional Assays for Classification of BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance Cancer Res., May 1, 2008; 68(9): 3523 - 3531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nomme, Y. Takizawa, S. F. Martinez, A. Renodon-Corniere, F. Fleury, P. Weigel, K.-i. Yamamoto, H. Kurumizaka, and M. Takahashi Inhibition of filament formation of human Rad51 protein by a small peptide derived from the BRC-motif of the BRCA2 protein. Genes Cells, May 1, 2008; 13(5): 471 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Coic, T. Feldman, A. S. Landman, and J. E. Haber Mechanisms of Rad52-Independent Spontaneous and UV-Induced Mitotic Recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 199 - 211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lu, J. Yue, X. Meng, J. A. Nickoloff, and Z. Shen BCCIP regulates homologous recombination by distinct domains and suppresses spontaneous DNA damage Nucleic Acids Res., December 18, 2007; 35(21): 7160 - 7170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. R. Petalcorin, V. E. Galkin, X. Yu, E. H. Egelman, and S. J. Boulton Stabilization of RAD-51-DNA filaments via an interaction domain in Caenorhabditis elegans BRCA2 PNAS, May 15, 2007; 104(20): 8299 - 8304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Wiltshire, J. Senft, Y. Wang, G. W. Konat, S. L. Wenger, E. Reed, and W. Wang BRCA1 Contributes to Cell Cycle Arrest and Chemoresistance in Response to the Anticancer Agent Irofulven Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2007; 71(4): 1051 - 1060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Agalliu, E. M. Kwon, D. Zadory, L. McIntosh, J. Thompson, J. L. Stanford, and E. A. Ostrander Germline Mutations in the BRCA2 Gene and Susceptibility to Hereditary Prostate Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2007; 13(3): 839 - 843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. V. Kovalenko, C. Wiese, and D. Schild RAD51AP2, a novel vertebrate- and meiotic-specific protein, shares a conserved RAD51-interacting C-terminal domain with RAD51AP1/PIR51 Nucleic Acids Res., October 6, 2006; (2006) gkl665v3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. K. Shivji, O. R. Davies, J. M. Savill, D. L. Bates, L. Pellegrini, and A. R. Venkitaraman A region of human BRCA2 containing multiple BRC repeats promotes RAD51-mediated strand exchange Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2006; 34(14): 4000 - 4011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Saeki, N. Siaud, N. Christ, W. W. Wiegant, P. P. W. van Buul, M. Han, M. Z. Zdzienicka, J. M. Stark, and M. Jasin Suppression of the DNA repair defects of BRCA2-deficient cells with heterologous protein fusions PNAS, June 6, 2006; 103(23): 8768 - 8773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Filippo, P. Chi, M. G. Sehorn, J. Etchin, L. Krejci, and P. Sung Recombination Mediator and Rad51 Targeting Activities of a Human BRCA2 Polypeptide J. Biol. Chem., April 28, 2006; 281(17): 11649 - 11657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Dray, N. Siaud, E. Dubois, and M.-P. Doutriaux Interaction between Arabidopsis Brca2 and Its Partners Rad51, Dmc1, and Dss1 Plant Physiology, March 1, 2006; 140(3): 1059 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. E. Galkin, F. Esashi, X. Yu, S. Yang, S. C. West, and E. H. Egelman BRCA2 BRC motifs bind RAD51-DNA filaments PNAS, June 14, 2005; 102(24): 8537 - 8542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Martin, N. Winkelmann, M. I. R. Petalcorin, M. J. McIlwraith, and S. J. Boulton RAD-51-Dependent and -Independent Roles of a Caenorhabditis elegans BRCA2-Related Protein during DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2005; 25(8): 3127 - 3139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ohashi, M. Z. Zdzienicka, J. Chen, and F. J. Couch Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group D2 (FANCD2) Functions Independently of BRCA2- and RAD51-associated Homologous Recombination in Response to DNA Damage J. Biol. Chem., April 15, 2005; 280(15): 14877 - 14883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Smiraldo, A. M. Gruver, J. C. Osborn, and D. L. Pittman Extensive Chromosomal Instability in Rad51d-Deficient Mouse Cells Cancer Res., March 15, 2005; 65(6): 2089 - 2096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lu, X. Guo, X. Meng, J. Liu, C. Allen, J. Wray, J. A. Nickoloff, and Z. Shen The BRCA2-Interacting Protein BCCIP Functions in RAD51 and BRCA2 Focus Formation and Homologous Recombinational Repair Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2005; 25(5): 1949 - 1957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wu, S. R. Hinson, A. Ohashi, D. Farrugia, P. Wendt, S. V. Tavtigian, A. Deffenbaugh, D. Goldgar, and F. J. Couch Functional Evaluation and Cancer Risk Assessment of BRCA2 Unclassified Variants Cancer Res., January 15, 2005; 65(2): 417 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Schoenfeld, S. Apgar, G. Dolios, R. Wang, and S. A. Aaronson BRCA2 Is Ubiquitinated In Vivo and Interacts with USP11, a Deubiquitinating Enzyme That Exhibits Prosurvival Function in the Cellular Response to DNA Damage Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2004; 24(17): 7444 - 7455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hussain, J. B. Wilson, A. L. Medhurst, J. Hejna, E. Witt, S. Ananth, A. Davies, J.-Y. Masson, R. Moses, S. C. West, et al. Direct interaction of FANCD2 with BRCA2 in DNA damage response pathways Hum. Mol. Genet., June 15, 2004; 13(12): 1241 - 1248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|