|
Volume 272, Number 51, Issue of December 19, 1997
pp. 32025-32033
Cytosolic Pyridoxine- -D-Glucoside Hydrolase from
Porcine Jejunal Mucosa
PURIFICATION, PROPERTIES, AND COMPARISON WITH BROAD SPECIFICITY
-GLUCOSIDASE*
(Received for publication, August 5, 1997)
Laura G.
McMahon
,
Hideko
Nakano
,
Marc-David
Levy
and
Jesse F.
Gregory III
From the Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, University of
Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-0370
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
During studies of the nutritional utilization of
pyridoxine 5 - -D-glucoside, a major form of
vitamin B6 in plants, we detected two cytosolic -glucosidases in
jejunal mucosa. As expected, one was broad specificity -glucosidase
that hydrolyzed aryl -D-glycosides but not pyridoxine
-D-glucoside. We also found a previously unknown enzyme,
designated pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase, that
efficiently hydrolyzed pyridoxine -D-glucoside. These
were separated and purified as follows: broad specificity
-glucosidase 1460-fold and pyridoxine- -D-glucoside
hydrolase 36,500-fold. Purified pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase did not hydrolyze any of the aryl glycosides tested but did
hydrolyze cellobiose and lactose.
Pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase exhibited a pH optimum
of 5.5 and apparent molecular mass of 130 kDa by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and 160 kDa by nondenaturing gel filtration, in
contrast to 60 kDa for native and denatured broad specificity
-glucosidase. Glucono- -lactone was a strong inhibitor of both
enzymes. Ionic and nonionic detergents were inhibitory for each enzyme.
Conduritol B epoxide, a potent inhibitor of lysosomal acid
-glucosidase, inhibited pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase but not broad specificity -glucosidase, but both were inhibited by the mechanism-based inhibitor
2-deoxy-2-fluoro- -D-glucosyl fluoride. Our findings
indicate major differences between these two cytosolic
-glucosidases. Studies addressing the role of vitamin B6 nutrition
in regulating the activity and its consequences regarding pyridoxine
glucoside bioavailability are in progress.
INTRODUCTION
A naturally occurring glycosylated derivative of vitamin B6,
pyridoxine 5 - -D-glucoside
(PNG),1 was first isolated
from rice bran (1). PNG is now known to exist in most fruits,
vegetables, and cereal grains, in which it comprises from 5-75% of
total vitamin B6 (2, 3). Because of the prevalence of PNG in
plant-derived foods, its bioavailability as a source of available
vitamin B6 is a matter of nutritional concern. The bioavailability of
this glycosylated form of vitamin B6, relative to pyridoxine (PN), is
~25% in rats (4, 5) and ~50% for humans (6, 7), as estimated from
urinary excretion of 4-pyridoxic acid after oral administration of
isotopically labeled PNG. The rate-limiting phase of PNG utilization in
vitamin B6 metabolism is the hydrolysis of the -glycosidic bond in
both rats and humans. These findings indicate that the hydrolysis of PNG is a major factor governing its bioavailability.
Glucosidases exist widely in nature. The primary -glucosidases in
mammalian tissues consist of a lysosomal membrane-bound acid
-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.45;
N-acylsphingosyl- -D-glucopyranoside glucohydrolase) which is responsible for the hydrolytic cleavage of
glucosphingolipids (for review see Ref. 8), and a cytosolic -glucosidase capable of hydrolyzing a variety of aryl
-D-glycosides (for review see Ref. 9). This cytosolic
enzyme has been detected in a variety of mammalian tissues and has been
designated broad specificity -glucosidase. Although broad
specificity -glucosidase has been purified from several organs,
cloned, sequenced, and intensively studied, the physiological function
of this enzyme remains unclear. It has been reported that cytosolic
broad specificity -glucosidase from liver is capable of hydrolyzing
certain cyanogenic plant glucosides such as L-picein (10,
11). Enzymatic activity capable of hydrolyzing PNG has been found in
nonpurified supernatant fractions of small intestinal mucosa and
attributed initially to broad specificity -glucosidase (12). PNG
hydrolyzing activity, presumably of microbial origin, also has been
detected in small intestinal contents of rodents and may contribute to
the in vivo hydrolysis of dietary PNG (13, 14), although the
role of microbial -glucosidases in PNG hydrolysis in the human small
intestine probably would be less significant.
Hydrolysis, rather than intestinal absorption, is a rate-limiting
factor for the utilization of PNG (4), and in vivo studies in rats and humans have indicated that much of the hydrolysis of PNG is
associated with the intestine (6, 15). To obtain a better understanding
of the biochemistry of PNG hydrolysis, we initiated purification of
broad specificity -glucosidase from jejunal mucosa of the pig, a
monogastric animal physiologically similar to the human. After
purification of broad specificity -glucosidase from porcine
intestinal mucosa using procedures of Glew and associates (9) and
DePetro (16) with p-nitrophenyl- -D-glucoside as a routine substrate, we observed that the purified enzyme does not
catalyze the hydrolysis of PNG nor does PNG inhibit the hydrolysis of
this aryl -D-glucoside. This observation led us to
undertake the isolation of the enzyme that is responsible for the
hydrolysis of PNG. Using PNG as substrate, we have succeeded in
purifying a previously unknown enzyme that we designate
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase from porcine jejunal
mucosal cytosol.
In this paper we report (a) the purification of these two
cytosolic -glucosidases from porcine intestinal mucosa,
(b) initial characterization of
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase, and (c) comparison of the catalytic properties of these enzymes. Concurrent with the discovery of the distinct
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase in porcine intestine,
this laboratory has reported that vitamin B6 nutritional status
regulates the activity of mucosal cytosolic -glucosidases (13, 14).
Vitamin B6 deficiency causes elevation in mucosal activities of both
broad specificity -glucosidase and
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase. A long term objective is to determine the mechanism and metabolic consequences of the nutritional regulation of these enzymes.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials
Pyridoxine (PN) hydrochloride,
p-nitrophenyl -D-glucoside
(p-NPGlc),
p-nitrophenyl(p-NP)- -D-galactoside,
p-NP- -D-fucoside, p-NP- -D-xyloside,
p-NP-N-acetyl- -D-glucosaminide,
n-octyl- -D-glucoside, n-amyl- -D-glucoside, conduritol B epoxide,
taurocholic acid, deoxycholic acid, glucono- -lactone,
N-ethylmaleimide, p-hydroxymercuribenzoic acid,
octyl-Sepharose, and protein molecular weight standards were obtained
from Sigma. Prestained protein molecular weight standards were obtained
from Bio-Rad. DE52 cellulose was obtained from Whatman, and Bio-Gel HTP
and Econo-Pac t-Butyl HIC columns were from Bio-Rad;
Superdex 200 10/30 gel filtration columns were from Pharmacia Biotech
Inc., and the Hydropore AX anion exchange HPLC column was from Rainin
Instruments (Woburn, MA). 2-Deoxy-2-fluoro- -D-glucosyl fluoride was provided by Stephen Withers (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia). Pyridoxine
5 - -D-glucoside was prepared by biological synthesis
from pyridoxine using germinating alfalfa seeds and purified
chromatographically (15, 17).
Purification of Pyridoxine- -D-glucoside
Hydrolase
During this purification, all materials were kept on
ice or 4 °C. Pig jejunum was obtained immediately following
slaughter at the University of Florida Animal Science Department.
Sections were cut longitudinally and washed with 0.9% (w/v) NaCl and
then stored at 80 °C until use. Frozen intestine strips
(approximately 200 g) were allowed to thaw on ice overnight, and
mucosa was scraped off using a glass slide, yielding approximately
60 g of mucosa. The mucosa was homogenized in 180 ml of
homogenization buffer comprised of 10 mM sodium phosphate,
pH 7, containing 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride using a Polytron PT 10-35 device (Brinkmann Instruments, Inc., Westbury, NY). The homogenate was
centrifuged at 183,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, and
the pH of the supernatant was adjusted to 6 with 0.2 M
acetic acid followed by centrifugation at 20,000 × g
for 20 min at 4 °C (14, 16).
The supernatant from acid precipitation was applied to a DE52 cellulose
column (2.5 × 25 cm) equilibrated with 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6. The column was washed with 1 liter of the starting buffer and the enzyme eluted with a linear gradient of 0 to 0.4 M NaCl in the same buffer (total volume of 2 liters). The
fractions containing activity were pooled, concentrated by
ultrafiltration in a stirred-cell apparatus (Amicon Diaflo 10 PM30
membrane, W. R. Grace and Co., Danvers, MA), purified further by
chromatography on a Pharmacia Superdex 200 column (10 mm inner
diameter × 30 cm), equilibrated with 10 mM sodium
phosphate, pH 6, containing 50 mM NaCl. Fractions that
contained PNG hydrolase activity were pooled, concentrated by
ultrafiltration (Ultrafree-15 centrifugal filter device, Biomax-30K
NMWL membrane, 15-ml volume, Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA), and
subjected to chromatography on a Rainin Hydropore AX anion exchange
column (polyethyleneimine with mixed primary, secondary, and tertiary
amino sites, 4.6 mm inner diameter × 25 cm, Rainin Instruments,
Woburn, MA) in the same buffer at a flow rate of 1 ml/min using a
linear gradient of 0-0.4 M NaCl over 30 min. Fractions
that contained activity were again concentrated by ultrafiltration
(Ultrafree-15 centrifugal filter device, Biomax-30K NMWL membrane,
15-ml volume, Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) and then applied to a
Bio-Rad Econo-Pac t-Butyl HIC cartridge (Macro-Prep t-Butyl HIC support, 5-ml bed volume, Bio-Rad) equilibrated
in 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6, with 2.4 M
ammonium sulfate. Elution was accomplished using a linear gradient from
2.4 to 0 M ammonium sulfate over 30 min at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Fractions that contained pyridoxine- -D-glucoside
hydrolase activity were pooled and stored as small portions at
80 °C.
Initial attempts to purify pyridoxine- -D-glucoside
hydrolase involved application of active fractions from DE52 cellulose to a hydroxyapatite column (2.5 × 18 cm; Bio-Gel HTP, Bio-Rad) equilibrated with 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6, without
dialysis to remove salt. Nonretained effluent fractions exhibiting
activity were pooled and passed through another hydroxyapatite column
under the same conditions. Where noted, initial studies investigating factors affecting pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase
activity were conducted with this highly active, partially purified
preparation (275-fold purification; 98.5% reduction in broad
specificity -glucosidase activity).
Purification of Broad Specificity
-Glucosidase
Chromatographic purification of broad specificity
-glucosidase was conducted by a minor modification of the procedures
of Glew and associates (9) and DePetro (16). The pH 6 supernatant prepared and described above was applied to a DE52 cellulose column (2.5 × 25 cm) previously equilibrated with 10 mM
sodium phosphate, pH 6. After the column was washed with 1 liter of the
starting buffer, the enzyme was eluted with a linear gradient of 0-0.5 M NaCl in the same buffer (total volume of 1 liter). The
fractions containing the activity were pooled and applied to a
hydroxyapatite column (2.5 × 18 cm) equilibrated with 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6, without dialysis to remove salt.
The column was washed with five bed volumes of the same buffer, and
then the enzyme was eluted with a 500-ml gradient of 10 mM
to 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 6, followed by 200 ml of 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 6. The fractions that had activity
were collected and applied to an octyl-Sepharose column (1.5 × 25 cm) equilibrated with 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6, containing 0.5 M
(NH4)2SO4. The column was washed
with 200 ml of the same buffer and then the enzyme was eluted with 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6, containing 60% (v/v) ethylene
glycol. The fractions containing the activity were pooled and stored as small portions at 20 °C until further analysis.
Enzyme Activity Assays
The standard assays for broad
specificity -glucosidase and
pyridoxine-5 - -D-glucoside hydrolase were performed
according to Nakano and Gregory (14, 17). The activity of broad
specificity -glucosidase was determined with 2 mM
p-NPGlc and pyridoxine-5 - -D-glucoside hydrolase with 0.2 mM PNG and 0.2 M sodium
acetate buffer, pH 6.0. All incubations were conducted at 37 °C
under conditions that allowed measurement of initial rate. One unit of
broad specificity -glucosidase activity was defined as 1 nmol of
p-nitrophenol released from the substrate per hour, using
the molar absorptivity coefficient at 400 nm (18,300 M 1 cm 1; 18). One unit of
pyridoxine-5 - -D-glucoside hydrolase activity was
defined as the release of 1 nmol PN from PNG per h.
For the pH dependence studies, reactions were conducted using 0.2 M sodium acetate buffer at pH 4.5-6.0, 0.1 M
sodium phosphate buffer at pH 6.5-7.5, and 0.1 M Tris-HCl
buffer at pH 8.0-9.0. For kinetic studies, standard substrates were
replaced by various alternate -D-glycosides at
concentrations specified in the text and tables. Alternatively, a
variety of concentrations of potential inhibitors or stimulating
compounds as specified were added to the standard mixtures without
preincubation of the enzyme.
Purified PNG hydrolase was evaluated for disaccharidase activity using
1 mM lactose, cellobiose, or sucrose individually as substrate. Incubations were conducted at 37 °C and then stopped by
incubating for 3 min in boiling water. Parallel blank reactions were
conducted without enzyme added. Samples were analyzed for the residual
disaccharides and formation of monosaccharide products by liquid
chromatography (19) using a Dionex DX500 HPLC system and Dionex ED400
electrochemical detection system with pulsed amperometric detector
(Dionex Corp., Sunnyvale, CA). Separations were performed using a
Dionex CarboPac PA10 column eluted isocratically with 14 mM
NaOH for 22 min at 1 ml/min and an additional 18 min at 100 mM NaOH. Retention times were determined and calibration curves established with authentic standards.
Protein concentration during chromatography was monitored by absorbance
at 280 nm. Determination of protein concentration in the isolation of
broad specificity -glucosidase was determined according to Bradford
(20), and the method of Markwell et al. (21) was used in the
isolation of PNG hydrolase for its lower detection limits. Bovine serum
albumin was the standard in each procedure.
Electrophoretic and Chromatographic
Characterization
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was
performed in 5% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels according to Laemmli (22).
The molecular weight standards used were obtained in prestained form
from Bio-Rad, which included myosin heavy chain (213 kDa),
-galactosidase (119 kDa), bovine serum albumin (83 kDa), and
ovalbumin (47 kDa). The gels were stained with Coomassie Blue
R-250.
Isoelectric focusing was performed in 5% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels as
described by Garfin (23). Standard proteins (Sigma) used were soybean
trypsin inhibitor (pI 4.6), bovine -lactoglobulin A (pI 5.1), bovine
carbonic anhydrase II (pI 5.9), and human carbonic anhydrase I (pI
6.6). pH gradients were prepared using a 60:40 (v/v) mixture of pH
3-10 and pH 2.5-5 ampholyte solutions (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). In a
parallel gel that was not fixed or stained, gel slices (3 mm) of the
PNG hydrolase lane were assayed for enzymatic activity. In this
procedure the gel segments were incubated in 0.2 M sodium
acetate buffer, pH 5.5, for 10 h and then incubated with 125 µM PNG at 37 °C for 3 h.
Gel filtration chromatography was performed as described above using
Pharmacia Superdex 200 column for determination of molecular mass under
nondenaturing conditions. Molecular weight standards (Sigma) were
cytochrome c (12.4 kDa), carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa), bovine
serum albumin (66 kDa), and -amylase (200 kDa). The absorbance of
the column effluent was monitored at 280 nm.
Amino Acid Analysis
The purified enzyme preparations were
subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in a Tris-Tricine
discontinuous buffer system (24) and then electrophoretically blotted
to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and stained with Coomassie Blue
R-250 (25). The band corresponding to each enzyme was excised and
subjected to gas-phase acid hydrolysis (26) followed by amino acid
analysis as the phenylisothiocarbamate derivative using an Applied
Biosystems 420A instrument (Foster City, CA).
Kinetic Analysis
Kinetic constants (Km,
Vmax, and Ki) were calculated
by nonlinear regression using EZ-FIT software (27).
RESULTS
Purification of Pyridoxine- -D-Glucoside
Hydrolase
The separation of
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase and broad specificity
-glucosidase activities by ion exchange on DE52 cellulose provided
clear evidence of the existence of a distinct enzyme able to hydrolyze
PNG (Fig. 1). The subsequently developed purification scheme of four consecutive chromatographic steps is shown
in Fig. 2, and a summary of the
purification of pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase is
shown in Table I. HPLC gel filtration and
ion exchange steps each yielded further purification, and the final
hydrophobic interaction chromatography step yielded an essentially pure
enzyme with 36,500-fold purification relative to the supernatant from acid precipitation. This procedure has been repeated several times with
consistent results.
Fig. 1.
Elution profile of broad specificity
-glucosidase and pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase
activity from DE52 cellulose column chromatography. The
supernatant from acid precipitation was loaded onto DE52 column and
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase ( ) and broad
specificity (Broad-spec.) -glucosidase ( ) was eluted
with a gradient of 0-0.25 M NaCl in 10 mM
sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6. Protein ( ) was monitored as the
absorbance at 280 nm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (32K GIF file)]
Fig. 2.
Chromatographic purification of
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase. A, anion
exchange chromatography on DE52 cellulose. Mucosal cytosolic fraction
following acid precipitation was applied to a DE52 diethylaminoethyl
cellulose column. Protein concentration was monitored as absorbance at
280 nm. Elution was accomplished using a 0-0.4 M NaCl
gradient in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6, following
a 1-liter wash. Fractions (15 ml) were collected throughout the NaCl
gradient only. B, gel filtration chromatography on Superdex
200. Fractions with activity from the previous column were concentrated
and then separated (750-µl injections) at 0.5 ml/min flow rate and 1 ml/fraction. Absorbance (solid line) was measured
continuously at 280 nm. C, anion exchange HPLC on Hydropore AX column. Fractions with activity from the previous column were concentrated and then separated (750-µl injections) at 1 ml/min with
a gradient of 0-0.4 M NaCl in 10 mM sodium
phosphate buffer, pH 6, in 30 min. Absorbance (solid line)
was measured continuously at 280 nm. Fractions of 1 min/tube were
collected. D, hydrophobic interaction chromatography on
Econo-Pac t-Butyl HIC column. Fractions with activity from
the previous column were concentrated and then separated (100-µl
injections) at 1 ml/min using a linear gradient from 2.4 to 0 M ammonium sulfate over 60 min in 10 mM sodium
phosphate, pH 6. The column was initially equilibrated in this buffer
containing 2.4 M ammonium sulfate. Absorbance (solid
line) was measured continuously at 280 nm. Fractions of 1 min/tube
were collected.
[View Larger Version of this Image (35K GIF file)]
Table I.
Purification of broad specificity -glucosidase from pig intestinal
mucosa
|
| Fraction |
Fraction volume |
Total protein |
Total
activity |
Specific activity |
Yield |
Purification
|
|
|
ml |
mg |
units |
units/mg |
% |
-fold
|
| Supernatant from acid
precipitation |
112 |
613 |
223,000 |
363 |
100 |
1 |
| DE52
cellulose eluent |
105 |
54.9 |
242,000 |
4400 |
109 |
12
|
| Hydroxyapatite
eluent |
88 |
0.74 |
132,000 |
178,000 |
59 |
490
|
| Octyl-Sepharose
eluent |
32 |
0.19 |
103,000 |
530,000 |
46 |
1460 |
|
Although PNG hydrolase activity is quite stable in frozen intestine,
the fully purified enzyme exhibits much less stability. Only about 25%
retention of activity is observed following a single cycle of frozen
storage at 80 °C (2 days) followed by thawing and assay. In
contrast, the purified enzyme loses about 15% activity per day at
4 °C.
Purification of Broad Specificity -Glucosidase
A summary
of the purification is shown in Table II.
The enzyme was purified ~1,460-fold relative to the supernatant from
acid precipitation.
Table II.
Purification of pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase from
pig intestinal mucosa
|
| Fraction |
Fraction volume |
Total protein |
Total
activity |
Specific activity |
Yield |
Purification
|
|
|
ml |
mg |
units |
units/mg |
% |
-fold
|
| Supernatant from acid
precipitation |
82 |
950 |
4410 |
4.64 |
100 |
1 |
| DE52
cellulose eluent |
206 |
222 |
3370 |
15.2 |
77 |
3
|
| Hydroxyapatite effluent 1 |
54 |
3.4 |
2490 |
736 |
56 |
159
|
| Hydroxyapatite effluent
2 |
58 |
1.5 |
1940 |
1275 |
44 |
275 |
|
The enzyme activity was stable in 10 mM sodium phosphate,
pH 6, containing 60% (v/v) ethylene glycol at 20 or 80 °C for over 2 months. The activity toward p-NPGlc did not change in
the presence of 0.1% (w/v) taurocholic acid with or without 0.05% (v/v) Triton X-100 in the assay medium.
Molecular Mass and Isoelectric Point
SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis analysis indicated that broad specificity
-glucosidase and pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase
had been purified to homogeneity (Fig.
3). The apparent molecular mass under
denaturing conditions as determined by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis was 60 kDa for broad specificity -glucosidase and
130 kDa for pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase.
Determination of native molecular mass by gel filtration chromatography
purification indicated 57 kDa for broad specificity -glucosidase and
160 kDa for pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase (Fig.
4). The isoelectric point of broad
specificity -glucosidase was 4.8, and
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase exhibited a cluster of
at least 4 bands all with pI 4.8 (Fig.
5). Direct assay of gel slices for PNG
hydrolase activity revealed activity across this cluster, which
confirmed the heterogeneity of charged species in this preparation.
Fig. 3.
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic
analysis. Electrophoresis was performed using 5% (w/v) total
polyacrylamide gel. The gel was stained with Coomassie Blue. Lane
M, prestained standard proteins (myosin heavy chain (213 kDa),
-galactosidase (119 kDa), bovine serum albumin (83 kDa), and
ovalbumin (47 kDa)); lanes 1-4, fractions from Hydropore AX
anion exchange HPLC column, from most active to least active in
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase; lane 5,
purified broad specificity -glucosidase; lanes 6-9,
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase from Econo-Pac
t-butyl HIC column, from most active to least active in
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase.
[View Larger Version of this Image (60K GIF file)]
Fig. 4.
Determination of molecular weight by gel
filtration. The calibration curve for the estimation of molecular
weight using Superdex 200 chromatography. Standard proteins used were
cytochrome c (12.4 kDa), carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa),
bovine serum albumin (66 kDa), and -amylase (200 kDa). The positions
of broad specificity -glucosidase and
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase are indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]
Fig. 5.
Determination of isoelectric point by
isoelectric focusing. Lane 1, human carbonic anhydrase I
standard (pI 6.6); lane 2, bovine carbonic anhydrase II
standard (pI 5.9); lane 3, bovine -lactoglobulin A
standard (pI 5.1); lane 4, soybean trypsin inhibitor standard (pI 4.6); lanes 5 and 6, purified
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase; lane 7,
purified broad specificity -glucosidase. The gel was stained with
Coomassie Blue. pI values for the standards are indicated on the
left of the gel. Relative
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase activity of gel slices
(3 mm each, shown by brackets, determined in a replicate
gel) is shown by + symbols. Where not designated, the
activity was not detected.
[View Larger Version of this Image (131K GIF file)]
pH Dependence
Broad specificity -glucosidase showed a pH
optimum of approximately 6.5, and
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase exhibited a pH optimum
of approximately 5.5 (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
pH activity profiles of
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase and broad specificity
-glucosidase. This study was conducted with purified broad
specificity -glucosidase and partially purified pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]
Amino Acid Composition
The results presented in Table
III indicate similarity but also
substantial compositional differences between these two enzymes. Most
notably, broad specificity -glucosidase exhibited ~2-fold greater
proline and ~30% greater serine, whereas
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase exhibited ~80%
greater lysine and over 40% greater alanine content. Both enzymes were
high in glycine (~12 mol%) and Asx + Glx (18-21 mol%).
Effects of Various Compounds on Activity
Effects of various
compounds on the activities of these enzymes are shown in Table
IV. The effects of detergents were
examined because ionic detergents (bile salts) are known markedly to
activate lysosomal acid -glucosidase (28-30) and are needed for
extracting this enzyme (31); however, these are inhibitors for
cytosolic -glucosidases. Nonionic detergents were found to be
activators for broad specificity -glucosidase, whereas these
detergents slightly inhibited the activity of
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase. The ionic detergents
were found to be inhibitory for both of these mucosal cytosolic
enzymes. For broad specificity -glucosidase, concentrations of
approximately 0.1% (w/v) detergents caused ~50% inhibition,
although approximately 1% (w/v) was necessary to achieve the same
degree of inhibition to pyridoxine- -D-glucoside
hydrolase. Deoxycholate was a more potent inhibitor of both enzymes
than taurocholate, similar to the report by Raghavan et al.
(32) regarding the lysosomal acid -glucosidase.
Thiol compounds either stimulated or lacked inhibition of these
enzymes (Table IV). Sulfhydryl reagents (e.g.
N-ethylmaleimide) were inhibitory to the activities of both
enzymes (Table IV).
Alcohols (ethyl and n-butyl alcohol; Table IV) were
activators for the enzymes at low concentration (less than 1% (v/v)); however, they were inhibitory at higher concentrations (2-10%) as
reported by Gopalan et al. (33). Ethylene glycol was used to
elute broad specificity -glucosidase from the hydrophobic gel
(octyl-Sepharose), and it stabilized the activity of the enzyme in this
study and others (16, 34). However, ethylene glycol was an inhibitor
for pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase, and the inclusion
of 10% (v/v) of this solvent in the assay medium yielded 50%
inhibition.
Substrate Specificity and
Kinetics
Pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase did not
hydrolyze any of the aryl -D-glycosides examined above;
thus, comparative Km values were not determined.
Pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase exhibited a
Km for PNG of 0.88 ± 0.12 mM
(±S.E.), and the Vmax of the purified enzyme
was 13.2 ± 0.8 µmol/h·mg protein (Fig.
7).
Fig. 7.
Michaelis-Menten plots for
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase-catalyzed hydrolysis
of pyridoxine -D-glucoside in the presence and absence
of 0.4 mM 2-deoxy-2-fluoro- -D-glucosyl
fluoride.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]
Although broad specificity -glucosidase does not hydrolyze
cellobiose or other disaccharides (9), we examined
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase for potential
disaccharidase activity. HPLC analysis indicated that
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase cleaved 1 mM lactose and 1 mM cellobiose to their
respective monosaccharides at 30 and 16 µmol/h/mg protein,
respectively (Table V). Equivalent rates
of substrate disappearance and product formation were observed within
each reaction. The enzyme did not exhibit sucrase activity.
Table V.
Hydrolsis of disaccharides by pyridoxine- -D-glucoside
hydrolase
Values presented are concentrations of glucose, galactose, and fructose
following incubation of 1 mM lactose, 1 mM
cellobiose, and 1 mM sucrose with purified
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase for 1 h. Reaction
rates, expressed as a specific activity, are also presented. Reaction
mixtures (500 µl, containing 0.015 µg of purified enzyme or
corresponding blanks with no enzyme) were incubated for 60 min,
and reactions were terminated by incubation for 3 min in boiling water
and then analyzed by HPLC. ND, not detected. Values without enzyme
represent contaminants in substrates and/or products of nonenzymatic
hydrolysis.
|
| Substrate |
Glucose |
Galactose
|
Fructose |
Reaction
rate |
|
|
µM |
µmol/min*mg
protein |
| Lactose (1 mM) |
| With
enzyme |
26.0 |
30.0 |
1.1 |
30.4 |
| Without
enzyme |
0.61 |
0.72 |
1.1 |
| Cellobiose (1 mM) |
| With
enzyme |
26.0 |
0.72 |
ND |
16.3 |
| Without
enzyme |
0.61 |
0.72 |
ND |
| Sucrose (1 mM) |
| With
enzyme |
0.61 |
0.61 |
1.1 |
ND |
| Without
enzyme |
0.61 |
0.61 |
1.1 |
ND |
|
Broad specificity -glucosidase exhibited the ability to hydrolyze
various aryl -D-glycosides including p-NPGlc,
p-NP- -D-galactoside, p-NP- -D-fucoside, and
p-NP- -D-xyloside.
p-NP- -D-galactoside was nearly as effective a
substrate as p-NPGlc, whereas
p-NP- -D-fucoside and
p-NP- -D-xyloside were relatively poor
substrates (Table VI). Purified broad
specificity -glucosidase did not hydrolyze PNG nor did PNG (7 mM) inhibit the hydrolysis of p-NPGlc. Apparent Km values for these substrates were 1.12 mM for p-NPGlc, 2.60 mM for
p-NP- -D-galactoside, 0.84 mM for
p-NP- -D-fucoside, and 1.21 mM for
p-NP- -D-xyloside, respectively. The
Km value for
p-NP-N-acetyl-glucosaminide was not determined,
since this substrate underwent little or no hydrolysis by the broad specificity -glucosidase.
Investigation of Inhibitors
Various potential inhibitors were
examined to gain further insight into the specificity of these enzymes
and to further differentiate the nature of their catalytic properties.
Aldono-(1, 5)-lactones were examined because they are potent, highly
specific transition state analogue inhibitors of glucosidases (35-37).
The carbohydrate moiety of a substrate and the lactone ring of
corresponding configuration of these inhibitors bind competitively to
the same site of the active catalytic center (38). It has been
previously reported that the cytosolic broad specificity
-glucosidase is inhibited by micromolar concentrations of
glucono- -lactone (38, 39). In the present study, both the broad
specificity -glucosidase and pyridoxine- -D-glucoside
hydrolase were similarly inhibited by glucono- -lactone, with
Ki values of 10.3 and 7.4 µM,
respectively, as shown by Dixon plots (Fig.
8).
Fig. 8.
A, inhibition of broad specificity
-glucosidase by n-amyl- -glucoside. The substrate
(p-NPGlc) concentrations were 2 mM ( ), 1 mM ( ), and 0.5 mM ( ), respectively.
B, inhibition of pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase by n-octyl- -glucoside. The substrate
concentrations were 1 mM ( ), 0.8 mM ( ),
and 0.5 mM ( ), respectively. This study was conducted
with partially purified pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]
Gopalan et al. (40) reported that amphiphilic alkyl
-D-glucosides consistently displayed 100-250-fold lower
inhibition constants (Ki) with the broad specificity
-glucosidase of human liver compared with a placental lysosomal
acidic -glucosidase. In their study, the inhibitory effects of alkyl
-D-glucosides increased in proportion to the alkyl chain
length. In the present study, we observed that
n-octyl- -D-glucoside inhibited the activities of both broad specificity -glucosidase and
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase more effectively than
did n-amyl(pentyl)- -D-glucoside (Table VI).
These glucosides were potent competitive inhibitors for broad
specificity -glucosidase; Ki values of 1.1 mM for n-amyl- -D-glucoside and
0.12 mM for n-octyl- -D-glucoside, respectively, were observed (Table VI). Differences in the
Ki values were noted between the two enzymes.
Pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase was found to be less
sensitive to these alkyl glucosides, like lysosomal -glucosidase
(40), with inhibition constants of 33 mM for
n-amyl- -D-glucoside and 7.5 mM
for n-octyl- -D-glucoside (Table VI). These
Ki values are 30-60-fold higher than those observed
for broad specificity -glucosidase. Modes of inhibition were found
to be competitive. Dixon plots for broad specificity -glucosidase
with n-amyl- -D-glucoside and for
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase with
n-octyl- -D-glucoside are shown in Fig.
8, A and B, respectively.
The potent irreversible inhibitor of lysosomal acidic -glucosidase,
conduritol B epoxide (41-45), inactivates the enzyme by reacting with
an essential carboxyl group (presumably aspartate) at the enzyme's
active site (46). This inhibitor had no effect on broad specificity
-glucosidase up to 5 mM but caused ~70% inhibition on
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase.
-D-Glucose (18 mM) had no effect on either
enzyme, and PN had no inhibitory effect up to 50 µM in
assay medium on pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase (data
not shown).
Previous studies have shown that
2-deoxy-2-fluoro- -D-glucosyl fluoride is a
mechanism-based inhibitor of -glucosidases, including hepatic
cytosolic broad specificity -glucosidase, by forming a stable
covalent linkage of the 2-deoxy-2-fluoro- -D-glucosyl moiety to the active site (47). We examined
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase to evaluate its
susceptibility to this mechanism-based inhibitor.
Pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase exhibited a
mixed mode of inhibition when evaluated in the presence of 0.4 mM 2-deoxy-2-fluoro- -D-glucosyl fluoride
(Fig. 7). In contrast to the uninhibited reaction which yielded a
Km for PNG of 0.88 ± 0.12 mM and
Vmax of 13.2 ± 0.8 µmol/h·mg protein,
the presence of 0.4 mM
2-deoxy-2-fluoro- -D-glucosyl fluoride yielded a
Km for PNG of 3.7 ± 2.5 mM and
Vmax of 7.5 ± 3.5 µmol/h·mg
protein.
DISCUSSION
Because we did not anticipate the existence of a novel enzyme that
is responsible for the hydrolysis of PNG, we initially attempted a
purification of broad specificity -glucosidase from the cytosolic
fraction of jejunal mucosa and monitored the purification using a
conventional assay with a nonphysiological substrate often used for
this purpose. However, the activity catalyzing PNG hydrolysis was not
co-eluted with broad specificity -glucosidase, and the final
preparation was completely devoid of activity toward PNG. Using PNG as
substrate in assays to monitor the chromatographic fractionations, we
were able to partially purify pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase and separate it from broad specificity -glucosidase on
DE52 cellulose (Fig. 1). We initially observed that this enzyme does
not bind to hydroxyapatite gel under the conditions we used to retain
broad specificity -glucosidase. Subsequent attempts to use this as a
step in further purification of pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase failed because current commercially available forms of
hydroxyapatite retain pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase
apparently irreversibly. The sequence of four chromatographic steps
(DE52 cellulose, Superdex 200, Hydropore AX, and Econo-Pac
t-Butyl HIC columns) successfully purified
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase to homogeneity. The
effectiveness of hydrophobic interaction chromatography in this
purification is illustrated in the SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis comparison of Hydropore AX fractions that contained
high enzyme activity but many contaminating bands with t-butyl HIC fractions showing the purified enzyme (Fig.
3).
Nonionic detergents (30, 44, 48) and bile salts (31) are required to
extract the lysosomal acid -glucosidase in a soluble form, and it
requires incorporation of neutral detergents or ionic lipids such as
sodium taurocholate or acidic phospholipids into the assay medium to
achieve maximum glucocerebrosidase activity (29, 49). Although nonionic
detergents are only weak activators of lysosomal -glucosidase, ionic
detergents are potent activators (32). Nonionic detergents were modest
activators of broad specificity -glucosidase in this study (Table
IV). Similar activation by nonionic detergents of broad specificity
-glucosidase from rat kidney cortex was also seen by Glew et
al. (50). In contrast, nonionic detergents provided no activation
of pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase activity; they were
actually slightly inhibitory. As stated above, ionic detergents were
inhibitors to both of the enzymes in this study, although less so for
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase. Overall, these
results indicate that the mucosal cytosolic enzymes examined here
differ markedly from the lysosomal acid -glucosidase
(i.e. glucocerebrosidase). The cytosolic broad specificity -glucosidase is known as a neutral -glucosidase, whereas the lysosomal enzyme is an acidic -glucosidase on the basis of pH optima. Cytosolic pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase
exhibited a similar pH optimum (pH 5.5) to the cytosolic broad
specificity -glucosidase in human liver (43), and the mucosal broad
specificity -glucosidase exhibited a slightly higher pH optimum (pH
6.5).
The overall results indicate that
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase has an acidic pH
preference and is much less sensitive to alkyl glucosides than broad
specificity -glucosidase, although it is affected greatly by the
potent inhibitor of the lysosomal enzyme, conduritol B epoxide.
However, pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase is as
sensitive to glucono- -lactone as cytosolic broad specificity
-glucosidase, and bile salts and nonionic detergents are inhibitory,
not stimulatory as seen with the lysosomal -glucosidase. Also this
enzyme does not require the presence of detergents to obtain a soluble
form. To purify -glucosidases, DEAE-cellulose is often used for the
cytosolic enzyme and CM-Sephadex for the lysosomal enzyme. The
cytosolic enzyme generally does not show affinity for CM-Sephadex (29).
Pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase exhibits some
similarity to the lysosomal enzyme but binds readily to DEAE-cellulose
(Fig. 1). Pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase appeared to
exist as a monomer of approximately 130 kDa. Gel filtration behavior in
nondenaturing conditions suggested possible rapid associative-dissociative behavior (apparent native mass 160 kDa). As
reviewed by Glew et al. (46), lysosomal -glucosidases
aggregate to form a dimer or tetramer as an active form.
Pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase differs in many ways
from lysosomal acid -glucosidase, and in many respects it has
similarities to cytosolic -glucosidases. Perhaps the most novel
aspect of the identification and initial characterization of
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase is the high degree of
substrate specificity of this enzyme and the fact that this specificity
is for a naturally occurring substrate that comprises a significant
fraction of dietary vitamin B6. The observations that
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase also hydrolyzes
cellobiose, a glucosyl -D-glucoside, and lactose, a
glucosyl -D-galactoside, with rates similar to that of
PNG hydrolysis and that nonglycosylated PN is not an inhibitor at the
low concentration used (i.e. 50 µM) suggest
that pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase may have little recognition at its active site for the pyridoxyl aglycone of PNG.
The initial amino acid analysis of these enzymes revealed substantial
differences in the relative quantity of several amino acids. In
addition, substantial differences were observed for both enzymes from
that reported by LaMarco and Glew (34) for broad specificity
-glucosidase from human liver, although the porcine broad
specificity -glucosidase exhibited the greater similarity to that
from human liver. The molecular mass of ~57-60 kDa for porcine
jejunal mucosal broad specificity -glucosidase differs from the
68-kDa value reported by LaMarco and Glew (34) for the human hepatic
enzyme and from 53 kDa deduced from the cDNA sequence of broad
specificity -glucosidase from guinea pig liver (50). The observed
isoelectric point of porcine intestinal broad specificity
-glucosidase of 4.8 is in close agreement with those of 4.5-5.2
reported for mammalian cytosolic -glucosidases (9, 51). The multiple
bands observed in isoelectric focusing of
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase suggest charge
heterogeneity, potentially related to glycosylation, with low pI
( 4.8) consistent with the acidic character of many glycohydrolases.
Until the full amino acid sequence is determined, the overall
differences cannot be fully assessed. Analysis of sequence will permit
an evaluation of the relationship, if any, between mucosal cytosolic
broad specificity -glucosidase,
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase, lysosomal acid -glucosidase, broad specificity -glucosidase from other tissues, and the many -glucosidases from plant and microbial sources. Since
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase seems to prefer quite hydrophilic substrates (PNG and disaccharides), its amino acid composition, especially at the active site, may differ considerably from known cytosolic or lysosomal -glucosidases. Of additional interest is the fact that the molecular mass of
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase (130 kDa) is similar
to the family of higher molecular mass glycohydrolases such as
mammalian intestinal brush border lactase-phlorizin hydrolase (52). Our
data suggest that both broad specificity -glucosidase and
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase have at least one
essential cysteine residue at or near the active site, since thiol
compounds stimulate but sulfhydryl reagents are potent inhibitors, as
noted by Glew et al. (46). It should also be noted that
2-deoxy-2-fluoro- -D-glucosyl fluoride inhibited pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase in this study,
affecting both Km and Vmax
consistent with the mechanism-based covalent modification of the enzyme
(47). This compound also inhibits cytosolic broad specificity
-glucosidase (53), although kinetic data have not been reported to
our knowledge.
Pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase has similarities and
differences from mammalian cytosolic and lysosomal -glucosidases and, in terms of size and lactose hydrolysis, with mammalian
lactase-phlorizin hydrolase. Aside from catalyzing the intracellular
mucosal hydrolysis of absorbed PNG, we do not know yet if this enzyme
can hydrolyze other natural glucosides. LaMarco and Glew (10) reported
that some natural glucosides such as L-picein and dhurrin
can inhibit the broad specificity -glucosidase activity in guinea
pig liver, and L-picein is itself a substrate for this
enzyme. Cyanogenic plant glucosides could also be hydrolyzed by the
broad specificity enzyme, although their rates of hydrolysis are
relatively low. For example, D-amygdalin was hydrolyzed at
35% of the rate at which p-NPGlc was hydrolyzed by the
cytosolic -glucosidase (11).
Iwami and Yasumoto (54) reported that pyridoxine
4 - -D-glucoside, a minor form of vitamin B6 in certain
plants, was absorbed by simple diffusion and that rat intestinal
-glucosidase activity did not hydrolyze this glucoside. We have
shown in the present study that pyridoxine
5 - -D-glucoside is hydrolyzed by a specific enzyme
present in pig intestinal mucosal cytosol but not by the cytosolic
broad specificity -glucosidase. We have also shown that
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase activity exists in
rat, guinea pig, and human intestinal mucosal cytosolic fractions (12, 54). As shown in the present study, our previous assumption that the
intestinal cytosolic broad specificity -glucosidase was solely
responsible for hydrolysis of PNG in rat, guinea pig, and human
intestine (12) is incorrect. Whether the disaccharidase activity of
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase has physiological function in mucosal cells is unclear. This enzyme differs markedly from
several membrane-bound glycosidases involved in trimming newly
synthesized glycoproteins in endoplasmic reticulum. No role of
cytosolic pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase in
disaccharide digestion is expected because of its intracellular
location.
The specific activity of pyridoxine- -D-glucoside
hydrolase in human jejunum is approximately 5.8-fold greater than that
of rat intestine (12). This difference is consistent with the greater in vivo bioavailability of orally administered PNG in humans
than rats. However, guinea pigs and rats exhibit similar specific
activity of intestinal cytosolic pyridoxine- -D-glucoside
hydrolase but guinea pigs exhibit much greater PNG bioavailability than
either rats or humans (55). The high intralumenal -glucosidase
activity in guinea pig small intestine may be responsible for this high bioavailability. The fact that some tissues other than small intestine showed this activity, for example, kidney in rats (14), suggests that
these organs may contribute to the in vivo post-absorptive hydrolysis of PNG and, thus, contribute to the bioavailability of PNG.
Studies of intravenously injected PNG in humans have shown bioavailability approximately half that of the orally administered compound (6). This suggests that organs in addition to the intestine in humans contribute to the partial hydrolysis and
utilization of dietary PNG.
Currently efforts are directed toward the preparation of antibodies
against pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase and broad
specificity pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase. Glew
et al. (9) have reported the existence of immunoreactive
broad specificity -glucosidase in a variety of tissues, including
intestine. It will be of interest to determine the distribution of
pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase among tissues as well
as to determine the cross-reactivity among the various mammalian
cytosolic and lysosomal -glucosidases. In addition, immunochemical
analysis will be essential in clarifying the mechanism by which vitamin
B6 deficiency causes increased activity of both intestinal
broad specificity -glucosidase and pyridoxine- -D-glucoside hydrolase (7).
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by Grant DK37481 from the National
Institutes of Health. This is Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series No. R-05888.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Food Science and Human
Nutrition Dept., P.O. Box 110370, University of Florida, Gainesville,
FL 32611-0307. Tel.: 352-392-1991 (ext. 225); Fax: 352-392-9467;
E-mail: jfgy{at}gnv.ifas.ufl.edu.
1
The abbreviations used are: PNG, pyridoxine
5 - -D-glucoside; PN, pyridoxine; p-NP,
p-nitrophenyl; p-NPGlc,
p-nitrophenyl- -D-glucoside; HPLC, high
pressure liquid chromatography; Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy- 1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We acknowledge the contributions of the
Glycobiology and Protein Chemistry Core Laboratories of the University
of Florida Interdisciplinary Center for Biotechnology Research.
REFERENCES
-
Yasumoto, K., Iwami, K., and Mitsuda, H.
(1977)
Agric. Biol. Chem.
41,
1061-1067
-
Kabir, H., Leklem, J. E., and Miller, L. T.
(1983)
J. Food Sci.
48,
1422-1425
[CrossRef]
-
Gregory, J. F., and Ink, S. L.
(1987)
J. Agric. Food Chem.
35,
76-82
[CrossRef]
-
Ink, S. L., Gregory, J. F., and Sartain, D. B.
(1986)
J. Agric. Food Chem.
34,
857-862
[CrossRef]
-
Trumbo, P. R., Gregory, J. F., and Sartain, D. B.
(1988)
J. Nutr.
118,
179-175
-
Gregory, J. F., III, Trumbo, P. R., Bailey, L. B., Toth, J. P., Baumgartner, T. G., and Cerda, J. J.
(1991)
J. Nutr.
121,
177-186
-
Nakano, H., McMahon, L. G., and Gregory, J. F., III
(1997)
J. Nutr.
127,
1508-1513
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Grabowski, G. A., Berg-Fussman, A., and Grace, M.
(1993)
in
-Glucosidases: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Esen, A., ed), pp. 66-82, American Chemical Society, Washington, D. C.
-
Glew, R. H., Gopalan, V., Forsyth, G. W., and VanderJagt, D. J.
(1993)
in
-Glucosidases: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Esen, A., ed), pp. 83-112, American Chemical Society, Washington, D. C.
-
LaMarco, K. L., and Glew, R. H.
(1986)
Biochem. J.
237,
469-476
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gopalan, V., Pastuszyn, A. P., Galey, W. R., Jr., and Glew, R. H.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
14027-14032
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Trumbo, P. R., Banks, M. A., and Gregory, J. F.
(1990)
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
195,
240-246
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Banks, M. A., Porter, D. W., Martin, W. G., and Gregory, J. F.
(1994)
J. Nutr. Biochem.
5,
238-242
[CrossRef]
-
Nakano, H., and Gregory, J. F.
(1995)
J. Nutr.
125,
2751-2762
-
Trumbo, P. R., and Gregory, J. F.
(1988)
J. Nutr.
118,
1336-1342
-
DePetro, J. J.
(1987)
Characterization of the Interaction between a Mammalian Liver
Glucosidase and Amphipathic Organic Compounds. M.Sc. thesis, University of Pittsburgh
-
Gregory, J. F., and Nakano, H.
(1997)
Methods Enzymol.
280,
58-65
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dale, M. P., Ensley, H. E., Kern, K., Sastry, K. A. R., and Byers, L. D.
(1985)
Biochemistry
24,
3530-3539
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rocklin, R. D., and Pohl, C. A.
(1983)
J. Liq. Chromatogr.
6,
1577-1590
-
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Markwell, M. A. K., Haas, S. M., Bieber, L. L., and Tolbert, N. E.
(1978)
Anal. Biochem.
87,
206-210
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Garfin, D. E.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
182,
459-477
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schagger, H., and von Jagow, G.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
166,
368-379
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ploug, M., Jensen, A. L., and Barkholt, V.
(1989)
Anal. Biochem.
181,
33-39
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ozols, J.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
182,
587-601
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Perrella, F. W.
(1988)
Anal. Biochem.
174,
1983-1989
-
Ho, M. W., and O'Brien, J. S.
(1971)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
68,
2810-2813
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Peters, S. P., Coyle, P. J., and Glew, R. H.
(1976)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
175,
569-582
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Maret, A., Salvayre, R., Negre, A., and Douste-Blazy, L.
(1981)
Eur. J. Biochem.
115,
455-461
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pentchev, P. G., Brady, R. O., Hibbert, S. R., Gal, A. E., and Shapiro, D.
(1973)
J. Biol. Chem.
248,
5256-5261
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Raghavan, S. S., Topol, J., and Kolodny, E. H.
(1980)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
32,
158-173
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gopalan, V., Daniels, L. B., Glew, R. H., and Claeyssens, M.
(1989)
Biochem. J.
262,
541-548
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
LaMarco, K. L., and Glew, R. H.
(1985)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
236,
669-676
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Conchie, J., Hay, A. J., Strachan, I., and Levvy, G. A.
(1967)
Biochem. J.
102,
929-941
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Leaback, D. H.
(1968)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
32,
1025-1030
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Walaszek, Z., Horton, D., and Ekiel, I.
(1982)
Carbohydr. Res.
106,
193-201
[CrossRef]
-
Tanaka, A., Ito, M., and Hiromi, K.
(1986)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
100,
1379-1385
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pócsi, I., and Kiss, L.
(1988)
Biochem. J.
256,
139-146
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gopalan, V., Glew, R. H., Libell, D. P., and DePetro, J. J.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
15418-15422
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kanfer, J. N., Legler, B., Sullivan, J., Raghavan, S. S., and Mumford, R. A.
(1975)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
67,
85-90
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hara, A., and Radin, N. S.
(1979)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
582,
412-422
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Daniels, L. B., Coyle, P. J., Chiao, Y.-B., Glew, R. H., and Labow, R. S.
(1981)
J. Biol. Chem.
256,
13004-13013
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Aerts, J. M. F. G., Donker-Koopman, W. E., Van Der Vliet, M. K., Jonsson, L. M. V., Ginns, E. I., Murray, G. J., Barranger, J. A., Tager, J. M., and Schram, A. W.
(1985)
Eur. J. Biochem.
150,
565-574
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Daniels, L. B., and Glew, R. H.
(1982)
Clin. Chem.
28,
569-577
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Glew, R. H., Basu, A., LaMarco, K. L., and Prence, E. M.
(1988)
Lab. Invest.
58,
5-25
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Withers, S. G., Rupitz, K., and Street, I. P.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
7929-7932
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Aerts, J. M. F. G., Donker-Koopman, W. E., Murray, G. J., Barranger, J. A., Tager, J. M., and Schram, A. W.
(1986)
Anal. Biochem.
154,
655-663
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ho, M. W., and Light, N. D.
(1973)
Biochem. J.
136,
821-823
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Glew, R. H., Peters, S. P., and Christopher, A. R.
(1976)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
422,
179-199
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hays, W. S., Jenison, S. A., Yamada, T., Pastuszyn, A., and Glew, R. H.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
319,
829-837
-
Naim, H. Y., Lacey, S. W., Sambrook, J. F., and Gething, M. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
12313-12320
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McCarter, J. D., Adam, M. J., Hartman, N. G., and Withers, S. G.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
301,
343-348
-
Iwami, K., and Yasumoto, K.
(1986)
Nutr. Res.
6,
407-414
[CrossRef]
-
Banks, M. S., and Gregory, J. F.
(1994)
J. Nutr.
124,
406-414
Volume 272, Number 51,
Issue of December 19, 1997
pp. 32025-32033
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. P Rempel and S. G Withers
Covalent inhibitors of glycosidases and their applications in biochemistry and biology
Glycobiology,
August 1, 2008;
18(8):
570 - 586.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Cassidy, J. E. Brown, A. Hawdon, M. S. Faughnan, L. J. King, J. Millward, L. Zimmer-Nechemias, B. Wolfe, and K. D.R. Setchell
Factors Affecting the Bioavailability of Soy Isoflavones in Humans after Ingestion of Physiologically Relevant Levels from Different Soy Foods
J. Nutr.,
January 1, 2006;
136(1):
45 - 51.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Mackey, R. J. McMahon, J. H. Townsend, and J. F. Gregory III
Uptake, Hydrolysis, and Metabolism of Pyridoxine-5'-{beta}-D-Glucoside in Caco-2 Cells
J. Nutr.,
April 1, 2004;
134(4):
842 - 846.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Mackey, S. O. Lieu, C. Carman, and J. F. Gregory III
Hydrolytic Activity toward Pyridoxine-5'-{beta}-D-Glucoside in Rat Intestinal Mucosa Is Not Increased by Vitamin B-6 Deficiency: Effect of Basal Diet Composition and Pyridoxine Intake
J. Nutr.,
May 1, 2003;
133(5):
1362 - 1367.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. J. Armada, A. D. Mackey, and J. F. Gregory III.
Intestinal Brush Border Membrane Catalyzes Hydrolysis of Pyridoxine-5'-{beta}-D-Glucoside and Exhibits Parallel Developmental Changes of Hydrolytic Activities Toward Pyridoxine-5'-{beta}-D-Glucoside and Lactose in Rats
J. Nutr.,
September 1, 2002;
132(9):
2695 - 2699.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. Setchell, N. M Brown, L. Zimmer-Nechemias, W. T Brashear, B. E Wolfe, A. S Kirschner, and J. E Heubi
Evidence for lack of absorption of soy isoflavone glycosides in humans, supporting the crucial role of intestinal metabolism for bioavailability
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition,
August 1, 2002;
76(2):
447 - 453.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Mackey, G. N. Henderson, and J. F. Gregory III
Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Pyridoxine-5'-beta -D-glucoside Is Catalyzed by Intestinal Lactase-Phlorizin Hydrolase
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 19, 2002;
277(30):
26858 - 26864.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. R. Setchell
Soy Isoflavones--Benefits and Risks from Nature's Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs)
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.,
October 1, 2001;
20(90005):
354S - 362.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. R. Setchell, N. M. Brown, P. Desai, L. Zimmer-Nechemias, B. E. Wolfe, W. T. Brashear, A. S. Kirschner, A. Cassidy, and J. E. Heubi
Bioavailability of Pure Isoflavones in Healthy Humans and Analysis of Commercial Soy Isoflavone Supplements
J. Nutr.,
April 1, 2001;
131(4):
1362S - 1375.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Andlauer, J. Kolb, and P. Furst
Isoflavones from Tofu Are Absorbed and Metabolized in the Isolated Rat Small Intestine
J. Nutr.,
December 1, 2000;
130(12):
3021 - 3027.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|