Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by So, T.
Right arrow Articles by Imoto, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by So, T.
Right arrow Articles by Imoto, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 51, Issue of December 19, 1997 pp. 32136-32140

Depression of T-cell Epitope Generation by Stabilizing Hen Lysozyme*

(Received for publication, July 15, 1997, and in revised form, October 7, 1997)

Takanori So Dagger , Hiro-O Ito §, Toshitaka Koga §, Sanae Watanabe Dagger , Tadashi Ueda Dagger and Taiji Imoto Dagger

From the Dagger  Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University and the § Department of Biochemistry, Kyushu University School of Dentistry, Fukuoka 812-82, Japan

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Conformational stability of proteins is an important factor that determines their resistance/susceptibility to proteolytic digestion. Intracellular proteolysis is the key step in antigen presentation events for protein antigens; hence, it is likely that increasing protein stability reduces the antigenicity of proteins. We prepared three hen egg white lysozyme derivatives possessing different stabilities by chemical modification to clarify the relationship between conformational stability and the antigenicity of the protein. One of the derivatives was conformationally unstabilized by removing one intramolecular disulfide bond, whereas the two others were stabilized by the addition of an intramolecular cross-link. The antigenicity of these derivatives was evaluated using hen egg white lysozyme-specific T-cell hybridoma cells and a B-lymphoma cell line, A20, as antigen-presenting cells. With an increase in conformational stability, the T-cell response decreased. However, the reduction was not derived from the inefficiency of internalization to A20 cells nor the alteration of antigenicity by chemical modifications. Moreover, from analyses of their susceptibility to proteolysis and the kinetics of presentation of the T-cell epitope, it was confirmed that increasing protein stability led to the depression of T-cell epitope generation by increasing resistance to proteolysis. These results have an important implication in devising a new strategy for manipulating T-cell response by the stability of protein antigen.


INTRODUCTION

An antigen-specific CD4+ T-cell recognizes an antigen-derived peptide that is mounted on a major histocompatibility complex class II molecule on a cell surface of antigen-presenting cells, via its antigen receptor (1, 2). Therefore, the conformation of protein antigens is unlikely to have any role in the step of T-cell recognition. Prior to T-cell activation, however, antigen processing is necessary for a protein antigen to stimulate the specific T-cells; this processing consists of multiple steps of cellular events, i.e. internalization of proteins by antigen-presenting cells, reduction of the disulfide bond and unfolding of proteins, enzymatic digestion, and assembly of the generated peptides with major histocompatibility complex class II molecules (3, 4). Proteases preferentially digest proteins in an unfolded state rather than those in a folded state (5-7); thus, the unfolding may be a crucial step for intracellular antigen processing. In this context, we can expect that depression of protein unfolding by increasing protein stability would reduce the antigenicity of proteins for T-cells.

Several reports have demonstrated a relationship between increased antigenicity and the decreased stability of proteins (8-10). However, the influence of protein stability on the antigenicity remains unknown. To address this issue, we prepared three derivatives of hen egg white lysozyme (HEL)1 possessing different conformational stabilities (see Table I). A three-disulfide derivative of HEL, S-carboxymethylated HEL at Cys6 and Cys127 (6,127CM-HEL), was produced by selective reduction of a disulfide bond Cys6-Cys127 in four original disulfide bridges (11). The loss of a single disulfide bond was reported not to give major three-dimensional structural change (11, 12) but to dramatically decrease the conformational stability (13). On the other hand, HEL was stabilized by cross-linking between Lys1 and His15 with alkyl chain, 1-15CL-HEL (14), and by cross-linking between Glu35 and Trp108 through an ester bond, 35-108CL-HEL (15, 16). These intramolecular bridges were shown not to cause structural constraint; therefore, they keep a similar native structure with enhancing protein stability (17, 18). Using these derivatives, we evaluated the influence of the conformational stability of HEL on the steps of the antigen presentation pathway. We report that the increasing conformational stability of HEL resulted in reducing the antigenicity for HEL-specific T-cells. The results indicate that protein stability is an important factor in determining the dose of T-cell epitopes and consequently may determine the magnitude of T-cell response.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Antigen Preparations

HEL, purified by repeated recrystallization five times, was kindly donated by QP Co. (Tokyo, Japan). Three derivatives of HEL used in this study, 6,127CM-HEL, 1-15CL-HEL, and 35-108CL-HEL, were prepared by the methods of Radford et al. (11), Ueda et al. (14), and Imoto et al. (15), respectively. Unfolded-HEL and unfolded-1-15CL-HEL were prepared with an S-alkylating reagent of (3-bromopropyl)trimethylammonium bromide (TAP-Br) following reduction of HEL and 1-15CL-HEL with 2-mercaptoethanol as described previously (19). Because 35-108CL-HEL was highly stable, unfolding was carried out as follows: to hydrolyze the ester bond, 10 mg of 35-108CL-HEL was dissolved in 50 ml of 0.05 M sodium borate buffer (pH 10.0) and lyophilized. After dialyzing against distilled water, the soluble fraction was subjected to cation exchange chromatography using CM-Toyoperarl 650 M (Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) and eluted with a gradient of 0.05 M sodium borate buffer (pH 10.0) and the same buffer containing 1 M NaCl to separate non-ester molecules from native 35-108CL-HEL. The protein fraction eluted earlier than native 35-108CL-HEL was collected, dialyzed against distilled water, and reduced with 2-mercaptoethanol, followed by S-alkylation with TAP-Br.

Conditions for Cell Culture

Cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Sigma) containing 4.5 g/liter glucose supplemented with L-glutamine (216 µg/ml), L-asparagine (36 µg/ml), L-arginine-HCl (116 µg/ml), folic acid (6 µg/ml), HEPES (10 mM), 2-mercaptoethanol (5 × 10-5 M), penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Bio Whittaker, Walkersville, MD) in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C, 5% CO2 and 95% air.

T-cell Hybridoma

T-cell hybridoma was established according to Adorini et al. (20). Briefly, lymph node cells were obtained from BALB/c mice (Seac Yoshitomi, Ltd., Fukuoka, Japan) 9 days after immunization with HEL (50 µg/mouse) emulsified in complete Freund's adjuvant (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI). The cells were cultured in the presence of 150 µg/ml HEL for 3 days, fused with a thymoma cell line, BW5147, using PEG-4000 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and cultured in a medium containing hypoxanthine, aminopterin, and thymidine. Growing hybrids were screened for interleukin-2 (IL-2) producing capacity in response to HEL in a major histocompatibility complex-restricted manner using a syngenic mouse B-lymphoma cell line, A20 (21), as antigen-presenting cells. One representative clone established by repeated limiting dilution was used in this study.

T-cell Stimulation Assay

The T-cell hybridoma (2 × 105 cells) were cultured with 5 × 104 A20 cells in a well of microtiter plates (FalconTM number 3072), in the presence of various concentration of HEL derivatives in a total volume of 240 µl. After a 24-h incubation, IL-2 produced by the T-cell hybridoma was measured using a proliferative response of an IL-2-dependent cell line, CTLL-2, as already described (22). Cell-free supernatants of the T-cell hybridoma cultures (100 µl) were transferred to other plates containing CTLL-2 (104 cells/well) in 100 µl of culture medium. The cells were cultured for 24 h, followed by the colorimetric 3-[4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (Sigma) assay (23, 24). CTLL-2 cultured with known concentrations of recombinant IL-2 (Genzyme, Cambridge, MA) are included in each experiment as an internal standard.

Quantification of Endocytosed HEL

Ten million A20 cells in 1 ml of complete culture medium were incubated with 25 µM of various HEL derivatives at 37 °C in triplicate dishes. After incubation for 30 min, the cells were washed three times with cold Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 1% fetal calf serum to remove free antigens. Cells were then treated once with 0.5 M NaCl in 0.2 M acetic acid for 10 min at 4 °C to remove any proteins attached to the cell surface (25). After the acid treatment, cell pellets were stored at -80 °C.

Amounts of HEL and the derivatives incorporated into A20 cells were determined using competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Microtiter enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plates (number 442404; Nunk, Roskilide, Denmark) were coated with 50 µl of goat anti-mouse IgM + IgG (Tago Inc., Burlingame, CA) in 0.1 M sodium carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) at 2 µg/ml overnight at 4 °C. After washing with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST), a mouse anti-HEL polyclonal antibody diluted 1:1000 in PBST was incubated overnight at 4 °C. Blocking was done with 2% nonfat dry milk in PBST. Cells stored at -80 °C were thawed and lysed in the presence of 1% Triton X-100 in PBS (100 µl) and diluted in the blocking buffer, and 50 µl of the mixture was added to the precoated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plates. The HEL derivatives were allowed to react with coated antibody overnight at 4 °C. 50 µl of biotinylated HEL (20 nM) in the blocking buffer was then added to each well and incubated for an additional 1 h at room temperature. The binding of biotinylated HEL was subsequently probed with an alkalinephosphatase-biotin/avidin complex (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Coloring was obtained using a 1 mg/ml p-nitrophenyl phosphate (Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan) substrate solution with 1 mM MgCl2 in 0.1 M sodium carbonate buffer (pH 9.6), and absorbance at 405 nm of each well was recorded at 24 h. Known concentrations of HEL derivatives are included in each plate as an internal standard. In preliminary experiments, no difference was observed between each of the HEL derivatives and native HEL in their reactivity to the polyclonal anti-HEL antibody.

Proteolytic Degradation of HEL Derivatives

Digestion of HEL derivatives was carried out following the method of Collins et al. (26) with some modifications. Briefly, HEL derivatives at 200 µg/ml were digested either with 20 µg of cathepsin B or cathepsin D (Sigma) in 1 ml of 0.1 M MES/acetate (pH 5.0) and 0.1 M Tris/citrate (pH 3.5), respectively, containing 1 mM EDTA and 3 mM 2-mercaptoethanol at 37 °C. These digests were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by a densitometric analysis as described previously (23).


RESULTS

T-cell-stimulating Capacity of HEL Derivatives

To examine the influence of protein stabilities on the antigenicity for an antigen-specific T-cell, a cloned T-cell hybridoma was established from BALB/c mice (H-2d). The sole T-cell epitope noted for H-2d haplotype is located in the HEL sequence 107-116 and is presented in association with I-Ed class II major histocompatibility complex molecules (20, 27, 28). In accordance, this hybridoma responded to HEL peptides 106-129 and 98-116 (data not shown).

The antigenicity of various HEL derivatives was evaluated by measuring the activities to induce IL-2 production in the T-cell hybridoma. The T-cell-stimulating capacity of the derivatives inversely correlated with their stabilities (Fig. 1). The order of antigenicity was 1) unfolded HEL, 2) 6,127CM-HEL, 3) native HEL, 4) 1-15CL-HEL, and 5) 35-108CL-HEL. Unfolded HEL was found to be approximately 100 times more potent than native HEL, whereas under the same conditions, 35-108CL-HEL did not activate the T-cells at all. None of the HEL derivatives were cytotoxic by themselves (data not shown); thus, conformational stability may be the factor that determines their differential antigenicity for the T-cell.


Fig. 1. Influence of conformational stability of HEL on the capacity to activate specific T-cells. HEL-specific T-cell hybridoma was cultured with A20 cells in the presence of varied concentrations of native HEL (×), unfolded HEL (open circle ), 6,127CM-HEL (triangle ), 1-15CL-HEL (bullet ), and 35-108CL-HEL (black-triangle). Culture supernatants were harvested at 24 h, and the levels of IL-2 were determined by growth of CTLL-2. Data are presented as the mean IL-2 concentrations with standard deviations of triplicate cultures.

[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]


Internalization of HEL Derivatives to A20 Cells

There was a possibility that the differing T-cell-stimulating capacities of HEL derivatives might be due to their differential properties incorporated into antigen-presenting cells. To address this question, A20 cells were cultured with each derivative for 30 min, as the intracellular accumulation of antigen by fluid-phase endocytosis in A20 cells was saturated by 20 min (29) and as the intracellular level of native HEL peaked at 30 min (data not shown). After the culture, antigens attached to the cells but not internalized were removed from the cell surface by treatment with an acidic high salt solution, and the amounts of endocytosed derivatives were assessed by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Fig. 2). The intracellular level of stabilized derivatives, 1-15CL-HEL and 35-108CL-HEL, which possessed lowered antigenicities, was higher than that of their native counterpart. This indicates that the reduced antigenicity of stabilized HELs for the T-cell was not due to their inefficiency in being internalized into antigen-presenting cells. On the other hand, endocytosis of the unstabilized derivative, 6,127CM-HEL, was also increased compared with the native one. Its augmented antigenicity may be, in part, due to increased endocytosis by the antigen-presenting cells.


Fig. 2. Intracellular accumulation of HEL derivatives in A20 cells. Cells were incubated in 35-mm dishes at 107 cells/ml in the presence of 25 µM of native HEL or HEL derivatives as indicated at left for 30 min. After three washes with cold Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 1% fetal calf serum followed by treatment with an acidic high salt solution, cells were lysed with 1% Triton X-100 in PBS, and the amount of released HEL was determined. Data are presented as the mean values of triplicate cultures, and the standard deviations with background values are subtracted.

[View Larger Version of this Image (12K GIF file)]


It is also suggested that the protein stabilization may lead to the enhancement of intracellular accumulation of protein antigen. During the time course of accumulation, the amount of 35-108CL-HEL was further increased by 60 min, whereas the maximum accumulation of 6,127CM-HEL was observed at 15-30 min, and then the level was gradually decreased (data not shown).

Recovery of T-cell-stimulating Activity of Stabilized HELs by Denaturation

There is another possibility that the reduced T-cell-stimulating capacities of 1-15CL-HEL and 35-108CL-HEL may be due to their antigenic alteration of the T-cell epitope region by chemical modifications. To evaluate this possibility, we measured T-cell responses against their unfolded forms (Fig. 3). In the native state, the T-cell-stimulating capacities of these HEL derivatives at 3 µM were not so potent. When the stabilized derivatives were unfolded, they showed strong antigenicities comparable with the unfolded HEL prepared from the unmodified one. This means that the chemical modifications for cross-linking did not alter the antigenicity of the epitope region in HEL molecules for H-2d T-cells. Thus, the importance of conformational stability in the antigenicity of HEL was again suggested.


Fig. 3. T-cell-stimulating capacity of stabilized HEL derivatives after extensive denaturation. HEL, 1-15CL-HEL, and 35-108CL-HEL were unfolded by reduction and S-alkylation with TAP-Br. T-cell-stimulating capacities of these unfolded derivatives were compared with those in the folded forms at a dose of 3 µM. IL-2 production during a 24-h incubation was determined as described in the legend to Fig. 1.

[View Larger Version of this Image (15K GIF file)]


Susceptibility of HEL Derivatives to Proteolytic Degradation

Restriction of the denaturation by increasing protein stability probably leads to blocking the generation of antigenic peptides, resulting in suppression of T-cell activation. To test this possibility, HEL derivatives were digested in vitro with two putative processing enzymes for HEL, cathepsin B and D. Both cathepsins completely degraded unfolded HEL within 1 h. On the other hand, stabilized HELs, 1-15CL-HEL, and 35-108CL-HEL were almost intact throughout the incubation period (Fig. 4). Although degradation profiles of native HEL and 6,127CM-HEL for each cathepsin were different, the result clearly indicated that the more stable one was more resistant to protease degradations. Thus, reduced antigenicity of stabilized HEL against T-cell may be derived from acquiring the resistance to intracellular proteases by protein stabilization.


Fig. 4. Influence of protein stability on protease degradation. Native HEL (×), unfolded HEL (open circle ), 6,127CM-HEL (triangle ), 1-15CL-HEL (bullet ), and 35-108CL-HEL (black-triangle), were digested with cathepsin B (A) and cathepsin D (B). Each digested sample was collected at various times and subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250. Densitometry was performed to determine the intensity of the bands. Results are expressed using the following formula,
 <FENCE>1−<FR><NU><AR><R><C><UP>Density of</UP></C></R><R><C><UP>residual band after enzyme treatment</UP></C></R></AR></NU><DE><UP>Density of band prior to enzyme treatment</UP></DE></FR></FENCE>×100(%) (Eq. 1)

[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]


Time Course of Antigen Processing for HEL Derivatives

The kinetics of presentation of a T-cell determinant of HEL was examined by the pulsing of A20 cells with native HEL and various derivatives for an appropriate time period (Fig. 5). The epitope of HEL was more rapidly generated from unstabilized 6,127CM-HEL and was efficiently presented on the cell surface, compared with native HEL. On the contrary, the epitope presentation from more stable 1-15CL-HEL required longer incubation time and never reached to the same extent as the native HEL. The most stable 35-108CL-HEL was never processed during the incubation periods of 24 h. The efficiency of presentation showed a positive correlation with the susceptibilities to proteolysis (Fig. 4). Therefore, it is strongly suggested that stabilized HEL resists proteolysis by intracellular processing enzymes in the acidic compartments of antigen-presenting cells, which depresses the generation of the T-cell epitope.


Fig. 5. Kinetics of T-cell epitope processing from HEL derivatives. A20 cells were cultured in 24-well plates at 106 cells/500 µl in the presence of 10 µM of native HEL (×), 6,127CM-HEL (triangle ), 1-15CL-HEL (bullet ), and 35-108CL-HEL (black-triangle) for the indicated periods and were washed three times with the complete culture medium to remove free antigens. T-hybridoma cells (2 × 105) were cultured with the antigen pulsed A20 cells (5 × 104) in 96-well microtiter plates for 24 h. IL-2 contents in the culture medium were determined as described in the legend to Fig. 1.

[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]



DISCUSSION

The theory that the digestion of a small globular protein with a protease proceeds via the unfolded state rather than the folded state of the protein has been proposed by several investigators (5-7, 30). The theory can be summarized by the following equation,
N ⇌ D <LIM><OP><ARROW>→</ARROW></OP><UL>P</UL></LIM> <UP>peptide</UP> (Eq. 2)
where N and D are the folded and the unfolded proteins, respectively, and P is the protease (7, 30). Prior to antigen-specific T-cell activation, protein antigens are taken up by antigen-presenting cells and then degraded within intracellular acidic organelle by proteases, such as cathepsin B and D (31-33). The process of proteolysis is a limiting step in transmitting information of antigen to T-cells. Thus, the theory suggests that the stability of protein antigen may be a critical parameter in determining the rate of processing and also that by controlling antigen stability, the dose of antigenic peptides and the resulting T-cell response could be artificially manipulated. For this reason, the conformational stability of a protein antigen may be a critical factor in determining the immune response of lymphocytes against the foreign molecule. However, the precise role of the stability of antigens in T-cell activation has not been well defined, although its importance has been implied in several reports (8-10).

To examine the relationship between the conformational stability of antigens and the susceptibility to proteolytic degradation, three derivatives of HEL with different conformational stabilities (Table I) but with retained similar native conformation and unfolded HELs were prepared. As was indicated by the previous theory, the resistance of each HEL derivative to proteolysis was correlated with the stability. In accordance with the results, T-cell epitope generation of HEL was suppressed by increasing HEL stability, which resulted in reduced T-cell activation. We found a similar result when HEL-specific polyclonal T-cells were stimulated with these HEL derivatives,2 indicating that this result is not specific to the T-cell hybridoma used in this study.

Table I. Stability of HEL derivatives: melting temperature and conformational stability


HEL derivatives  Delta Tma  Delta Delta Gb

°C kcal/mol
6,127CM-HEL  -24c  -7.2f
Native HEL 0 0
1-15CL-HEL +10.0d +2.3d
35-108CL-HEL +29.4e +5.2e

a Difference in the melting temperature between native HEL and its derivative.
b Conformational stability relative to native HEL.
c Radford et al. (11).
d Ueda et al. (14).
e Johnson et al. (16).
f This value was calculated using the difference in free energy change between native HEL and 6,127CM-HEL at pH 3.8, which were reported in the literature (13).

Rouas et al. reported that T-cell response for a subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin was dependent on the quaternary structure and that dissociation of the alpha /beta subunit was required for the recognition (9). Also, Janssen et al. showed that a T-cell epitope of myelin basic protein inserted into the outer membrane protein PhoE of Escherichia coli was barely stimulative for the specific T-cell in the native trimeric form, whereas the denatured monomeric form was immunogenic and induced autoimmune encephalomyelitis (10). These reports suggest the critical role of the quaternary structure of protein antigen in depressing the T-cell triggering response. The conformation of an oligomeric protein is generally stabilized by intermolecular interactions of the subunits (34, 35), and the previous two experiments suggest the role of intermolecular stabilization of a protein in depressing T-cell response. A favorable binding of a ligand to the folded state of the protein usually enhances the stability of the protein (36-38). The stabilization by a ligand is expressed in the following equation,
XN <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇌</ARROW></OP><UL>X</UL></LIM> N ⇌ D <LIM><OP><ARROW>→</ARROW></OP><UL>P</UL></LIM> <UP>peptide</UP> (Eq. 3)
where X is a ligand to bind to the folded state of the protein. Therefore, the theory regarding stabilizing a protein by intermolecular interaction may be explained to be different from the present theory where an equilibrium shifts from the unfolded state to the folded one by intramolecular interaction. Stabilization of proteins is generally achieved by introducing an additional cross-link either by chemical modification (14, 15, 39) or by genetically introducing a disulfide bond (40, 41). It is widely accepted that the stability conferred by the cross-link can be largely related to the entropic destabilization of the unfolded state (42, 43). The strengthened conformational stability of 1-15CL-HEL and 35-108CL-HEL by the cross-link originates from this type of stabilization force. On the other hand, irreversible processes coupled with the unfolded state, such as protease digestions, can be effectively resisted by decreasing the unfolding rate as shown in the following equation,
N <LIM><OP><ARROW>⇌</ARROW></OP><LL>k<SUB><UP>f</UP></SUB></LL><UL>k<SUB><UP>u</UP></SUB></UL></LIM> D <LIM><OP><ARROW>→</ARROW></OP><UL>P</UL></LIM> <UP>peptide</UP> (Eq. 4)
where ku and kf are the unfolding and the folding rate constants, respectively (44, 45). In the case of 35-108CL-HEL, this kind of stabilization force also has an effect on enhancing the stability (46), which may be involved in the higher resistance for proteolytic digestion and the most depressed T-cell-stimulating capacity. Alternatively, protein stabilization can be accomplished by strengthening favorable interactions, such as hydrophobic interactions, electrostatic interactions, and hydrogen bonds (47-49). Also, conjugating the protein with a non-immunogenic polymer, polyethylene glycol, is effective in stabilizing proteins against proteolytic degradation, which resulted in the abortion of the T-cell-stimulating capacity of HEL (23). These genetic or protein engineering strategies are promising for regulating the generation of stimulatory peptides from the proteins.

Some forms of chemical reactions are coupled with the unfolded state of proteins. The reactions causing irreversible denaturation are suggested to be the deamidation of asparagine residues, the hydrolysis of peptide bonds at aspartic acid residues, and the destruction of disulfide bonds (50, 51). Accumulation of these chemical reactions in the unfolded state leads to the formation of irreversibly unfolded molecular species, which are highly susceptible to proteolytic degradation. Thus, the T-cell-triggering capacity of these irreversible forms may be greater than the native form, and these processes may increase the antigenicity of proteins. Indeed, we observed that native HEL stored in PBS solution at 4 °C for 1 month was more antigenic for T-cell hybridoma than the freshly purified one.2 Therefore, HEL derivatives used in this study were subjected to assays immediately after purification using cation exchange chromatography. Moreover, it has been demonstrated by Weigle and his colleagues that an aggregated form of human gamma globulin (HGG) is highly antigenic for T-cells (52, 53), whereas an aqueous preparation of HGG (deaggregated HGG) that is ultracentrifuged to remove small amounts of aggregates is highly tolerogenic for T-cells, i.e. injection of adult mice with deaggregated HGG renders them immunologically unresponsive to a subsequent injection of the immunogenic HGG (54, 55). According to the present theory, the difference in their immunological properties between the deaggregated HGG and the untreated one may be attributed to the amount of irreversibly unfolded HGG (aggregated HGG) in the solutions, which may be extremely sensitive to protease degradation in vivo, resulting in the generation of greater quantities of antigenic peptides for the T-cells.

In conclusion, this article reports the first evidence to show the effect of the conformational stability of a protein antigen on T-cell-triggering response and the related mechanism. The finding that the production of the T-cell epitope can be controlled by the conformational stability of a protein antigen may have many ramifications for manipulating T-cell immunity.


FOOTNOTES

*   The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
   To whom correspondence should be addressed: Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-82, Japan. Tel.: 81-92-642-6662; Fax: 81-92-642-6667; E-mail: imoto{at}imm1.phar.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
1   The abbreviations used are: HEL, hen egg white lysozyme; IL-2, interleukin-2; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TAP-Br, 3-(bromopropyl)trimethylammonium bromide; MES, 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid; HGG, human gamma globulin.
2   T. So, H.-O. Ito, T. Koga, S. Watanabe, T. Ueda, and T. Imoto, unpublished data.

REFERENCES

  1. Schwartz, R. H. (1985) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 3, 237-261 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Buus, S., Sette, A., Colon, S. M., Jenis, D. M., and Grey, H. M. (1986) Cell 47, 1071-1077 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Harding, C. V., and Unanue, E. R. (1990) Cell Regul. 1, 499-509 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Jensen, P. E. (1993) J. Immunol. 150, 3347-3356 [Abstract]
  5. Matthyssens, G. E., Simons, G., and Kanarek, L. (1972) Eur. J. Biochem. 26, 449-454 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Pace, C. N., and Barrett, A. J. (1984) Biochem. J. 219, 411-417 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Imoto, T., Yamada, H., and Ueda, T. (1986) J. Mol. Biol. 190, 647-649 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Streicher, H. Z., Berkower, I. J., Busch, M., Gurd, F. R., and Berzofsky, J. A. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 6831-6835 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Rouas, N., Christophe, S., Housseau, F., Bellet, D., Guillet, J. G., and Bidart, J. M. (1993) J. Immunol. 150, 782-792 [Abstract]
  10. Janssen, R., Wauben, M. H., and Tommassen, J. (1996) Int. Immunol. 8, 829-836 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Radford, S. E., Woolfson, D. N., Martin, S. R., Lowe, G., and Dobson, C. M. (1991) Biochem. J. 273, 211-217
  12. Hill, C. P., Johnston, N. L., and Cohen, R. E. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 4136-4140 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Eyles, S. J., Radford, S. E., and Dobson, C. M. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 225, 939-943 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Ueda, T., Yamada, H., Hirata, M., and Imoto, T. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 6316-6322 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Imoto, T., Hartdegen, F. J., and Rupley, J. A. (1973) J. Mol. Biol. 80, 637-648 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Johnson, R. E., Adams, P., and Rupley, J. A. (1978) Biochemistry 17, 1479-1484 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Mizuno, H., Ueda, T., Yamada, H., and Imoto, T. (1990) Protein Eng. 3, 325-326
  18. Beddell, C. R., Blake, C. C., and Oatley, S. J. (1975) J. Mol. Biol. 97, 643-654 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Yamada, H., Seno, M., Kobayashi, A., Moriyama, T., Kosaka, M., Ito, Y., and Imoto, T. (1994) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 116, 852-857 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Adorini, L., Sette, A., Buus, S., Grey, H. M., Darsley, M., Lehmann, P. V., Doria, G., Nagy, Z. A., and Appella, E. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 5181-5185 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kim, K. J., Kanellopoulos, L. C., Merwin, R. M., Sachs, D. H., and Asofsky, R. (1979) J. Immunol. 122, 549-554 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Gillis, S., Ferm, M. M., Ou, W., and Smith, K. A. (1978) J. Immunol. 120, 2027-2032 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. So, T., Ito, H.-O., Koga, T., Ueda, T., and Imoto, T. (1996) Immunol. Lett. 49, 91-97 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Mosmann, T. (1983) J. Immunol. Methods 65, 55-63 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. McCoy, K. L., Page, M. S., Merkel, B. J., Inman, J. K., and Stutzman, R. (1993) J. Immunol. 151, 6757-6768 [Abstract]
  26. Collins, D. S., Unanue, E. R., and Harding, C. V. (1991) J. Immunol. 147, 4054-4059 [Abstract]
  27. Demotz, S., Grey, H. M., Appella, E., and Sette, A. (1989) Nature 342, 682-684 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Gammon, G., Geysen, H. M., Apple, R. J., Pickett, E., Palmer, M., Ametani, A., and Sercarz, E. E. (1991) J. Exp. Med. 173, 609-617 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Levine, T. P., and Chain, B. M. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 8342-8346 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Imoto, T., Fukuda, K., and Yagishita, K. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 336, 264-269
  31. Roederer, M., Bowser, R., and Murphy, R. F. (1987) J. Cell. Physiol. 131, 200-209 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Diment, S., Leech, M. S., and Stahl, P. D. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 6901-6907 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Schmid, S. L., Fuchs, R., Male, P., and Mellman, I. (1988) Cell 52, 73-83 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Beernink, P. T., and Tolan, D. R. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 5374-5379 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Miller, S., Lesk, A. M., Janin, J., and Chothia, C. (1987) Nature 328, 834-836 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Kuroki, R., Taniyama, Y., Seko, C., Nakamura, H., Kikuchi, M., and Ikehara, M. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 6903-6907 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Ruvinov, S. B., and Miles, E. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 11703-11706 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Sorokin, A., Lemmon, M. A., Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 9752-9759 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Lin, S. H., Konishi, Y., Denton, M. E., and Scheraga, H. A. (1984) Biochemistry 23, 5504-5512 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Matsumura, M., Signor, G., and Matthews, B. W. (1989) Nature 342, 291-293 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Kanaya, S., Katsuda, C., Kimura, S., Nakai, T., Kitakuni, E., Nakamura, H., Katayanagi, K., Morikawa, K., and Ikehara, M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 6038-6044 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Poland, D. C., and Scheraga, H. A. (1965) Biopolymers 3, 373-399
  43. Pace, C. N., Grimsley, G. R., Thomson, J. A., and Barnett, B. J. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 11820-11825 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Yamada, H., Ueda, T., and Imoto, T. (1993) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 114, 398-403 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Imoto, T. (1997) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 53, 215-223 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Segawa, S., and Sugihara, M. (1984) Biopolymers 23, 2489-2498 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Matsumura, M., Becktel, W. J., and Matthews, B. W. (1988) Nature 334, 406-410 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Sali, D., Bycroft, M., and Fersht, A. R. (1988) Nature 335, 740-743 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Alber, T., Sun, D. P., Wilson, K., Wozniak, J. A., Cook, S. P., and Matthews, B. W. (1987) Nature 330, 41-46 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Ahern, T. J., and Klibanov, A. M. (1985) Science 228, 1280-1284 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Tomazic, S. J., and Klibanov, A. M. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 3086-3091 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Levich, J. D., Parks, D. E., and Weigle, W. O. (1985) J. Immunol. 135, 873-878 [Abstract]
  53. Levich, J. D., Signorella, A. P., Wittenberg, G., and Weigle, W. O. (1987) J. Immunol. 138, 3675-3679 [Abstract]
  54. Chiller, J. M., Habicht, G. S., and Weigle, W. O. (1971) Science 171, 813-815 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Parks, D. E., and Weigle, W. O. (1980) J. Immunol. 124, 1230-1236 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Volume 272, Number 51, Issue of December 19, 1997 pp. 32136-32140
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
T. R. Dagenais, K. P. Demick, J. D. Bangs, K. T. Forest, D. M. Paulnock, and J. M. Mansfield
T-Cell Responses to the Trypanosome Variant Surface Glycoprotein Are Not Limited to Hypervariable Subregions
Infect. Immun., January 1, 2009; 77(1): 141 - 151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Flobakk, I. B. Rasmussen, E. Lunde, T. Frigstad, G. Berntzen, T. E. Michaelsen, B. Bogen, and I. Sandlie
Processing of an Antigenic Sequence from IgG Constant Domains for Presentation by MHC Class II
J. Immunol., November 15, 2008; 181(10): 7062 - 7072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. J. Landry
Three-Dimensional Structure Determines the Pattern of CD4+ T-Cell Epitope Dominance in Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin
J. Virol., February 1, 2008; 82(3): 1238 - 1248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
L. Delamarre, R. Couture, I. Mellman, and E. S. Trombetta
Enhancing immunogenicity by limiting susceptibility to lysosomal proteolysis
J. Exp. Med., September 4, 2006; 203(9): 2049 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. S. Jones, L. J. Peek, J. Power, A. Markham, B. Yazzie, and C. R. Middaugh
Effects of Adsorption to Aluminum Salt Adjuvants on the Structure and Stability of Model Protein Antigens
J. Biol. Chem., April 8, 2005; 280(14): 13406 - 13414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
L. J. Brady
Antibody-Mediated Immunomodulation: a Strategy To Improve Host Responses against Microbial Antigens
Infect. Immun., February 1, 2005; 73(2): 671 - 678.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. W. Oli, N. Rhodin, W. P. McArthur, and L. J. Brady
Redirecting the Humoral Immune Response against Streptococcus mutans Antigen P1 with Monoclonal Antibodies
Infect. Immun., December 1, 2004; 72(12): 6951 - 6960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Thai, G. Moine, M. Desmadril, D. Servent, J.-L. Tarride, A. Menez, and M. Leonetti
Antigen Stability Controls Antigen Presentation
J. Biol. Chem., November 26, 2004; 279(48): 50257 - 50266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
N. R. Rhodin, M. L. J. A. Van Tilburg, M. W. Oli, W. P. McArthur, and L. J. Brady
Further Characterization of Immunomodulation by a Monoclonal Antibody against Streptococcus mutans Antigen P1
Infect. Immun., January 1, 2004; 72(1): 13 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
Y. Markert, J. Koditz, R. Ulbrich-Hofmann, and U. Arnold
Proline versus charge concept for protein stabilization against proteolytic attack
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., December 1, 2003; 16(12): 1041 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. C. Schneider, J. Ohmen, L. Fosdick, B. Gladstone, J. Guo, A. Ametani, E. E. Sercarz, and H. Deng
Cutting Edge: Introduction of an Endopeptidase Cleavage Motif into a Determinant Flanking Region of Hen Egg Lysozyme Results in Enhanced T Cell Determinant Display
J. Immunol., July 1, 2000; 165(1): 20 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
T. So, H.-O Ito, Y. Tsujihata, M. Hirata, T. Ueda, and T. Imoto
The molecular weight ratio of monomethoxypolyethylene glycol (mPEG) to protein determines the immunotolerogenicity of mPEG proteins
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., August 1, 1999; 12(8): 701 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Carmicle, G. Dai, N. K. Steede, and S. J. Landry
Proteolytic Sensitivity and Helper T-cell Epitope Immunodominance Associated with the Mobile Loop in Hsp10s
J. Biol. Chem., January 4, 2002; 277(1): 155 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by So, T.
Right arrow Articles by Imoto, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by So, T.
Right arrow Articles by Imoto, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement