Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khandekar, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khandekar, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 51, Issue of December 19, 1997 pp. 32190-32197

Conformational Integrity and Ligand Binding Properties of a Single Chain T-cell Receptor Expressed in Escherichia coli*

(Received for publication, July 23, 1997, and in revised form, October 9, 1997)

Sanjay S. Khandekar Dagger , Brian M. Bettencourt , Daniel F. Wyss , Jerome W. Naylor , Pamela P. Brauer , Kevin Huestis , Donard S. Dwyer , Albert T. Profy , Marcia S. Osburne , Julian Banerji and Barry Jones

From Procept, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

We recently showed that a soluble, heterodimeric murine D10 T-cell receptor (TCR) (Valpha 2Calpha , Vbeta 8.2Cbeta ) expressed in insect cells binds both Vbeta 8.2-specific bacterial superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin C2 (SEC2) and a soluble, heterodimeric major histocompatibility complex class II I-Ak·conalbumin peptide complex with a low micromolar affinity. To define further the structural requirements for the TCR/ligand interactions, we have produced in Escherichia coli a soluble, functional D10 single chain (sc) TCR molecule in which the Valpha and Vbeta domains are connected by a flexible peptide linker. Purified and refolded D10 scTCR bound to SEC2 and murine major histocompatibility complex class II I-Ak·conalbumin peptide complex with thermodynamic and kinetic binding constants similar to those measured for the baculovirus-derived heterodimeric D10 TCR suggesting that neither the TCR constant domains nor potential N- or O-linked carbohydrate moieties are necessary for ligand recognition and for expression and proper folding of the D10 scTCR. Purified D10 scTCR remained soluble at concentrations up to 1 mM. Circular dichroism and NMR spectroscopy indicated that D10 scTCR is stabilized predominantly by beta -sheet secondary structure, consistent with its native-like conformation. Because of its limited size, high solubility, and structural integrity, purified D10 scTCR appears to be suitable for structural studies by multidimensional NMR spectroscopy.


INTRODUCTION

Immune activation of T lymphocytes is normally initiated by the specific interaction between an antigenic peptide presented by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC)1 (1) and the alpha  and beta  (or gamma  and delta ) clonotypic chains of the T-cell receptor (TCR) complex (2, 3). T-cells can also be stimulated by superantigens, although the TCR/superantigen interaction differs from that of TCR/MHC peptide in that specificity for a particular superantigen appears to be determined only by the sequence of the germ line-encoded Vbeta segment of the TCR (4, 5).

Because of its central role in immune recognition, detailed structural information on the TCR is of great interest. Recently, three-dimensional structures of a heterodimeric, glycosylated murine alpha beta TCR (2C), the corresponding 2C TCR/class I MHC-peptide complex (6), and a nonglycosylated human alpha beta TCR (A6) bound to a class I MHC-peptide complex (7) were solved using x-ray crystallography. The overall orientation of the CDR regions of both of these TCRs is similar. Moreover, the folded variable domain structures of both TCRs resemble the antigen binding region of antibodies, although differences exist in the Calpha domain and in the interdomain pairing of Calpha and Cbeta (6). Crystal structures of an isolated TCR beta -chain (8) and a Valpha homodimer (9) also showed immunoglobulin-like folding patterns. Three-dimensional crystal structures of staphylococcal enterotoxin C2 and C3 bound to the extracellular portion of the beta -chain (Vbeta 8.2Jbeta 2.1Cbeta 1) of the mouse 14.3.d TCR were also recently reported (10). Unlike the TCR/MHC interactions (6, 7), only the CDR2 and to lesser extents CDR1 and hypervariable region 4 (HV4) of the Vbeta -chains are involved in binding to SEC.

Three-dimensional high resolution structures can also be derived from NMR-based approaches (11, 12). The NMR structures have the potential advantage of being obtained in solution and can provide insights into conformational flexibility and structural dynamics (13, 14). Although the NMR approach is mostly limited to proteins with molecular masses less than ~30 kDa that can be uniformly enriched with 13C and 15N isotopes and remain soluble at high submillimolar concentrations (12), deuteration in concert with 13C,15N multidimensional NMR techniques can push this limit to higher molecular masses (15). Because of their limited size (~30 kDa), single chain (sc) TCR molecules in which the Valpha - and Vbeta -chains are connected by a flexible polypeptide linker (reviewed in Ref. 16) might be amenable to NMR structure determination, and various scTCR constructions have been produced previously using Escherichia coli expression systems (reviewed in Ref. 16). Despite this, the conformational integrity and ligand binding characteristics of these proteins have not been well established (Ref. 17, and for review see Ref. 16).

We recently reported ligand binding properties of a soluble, heterodimeric murine alpha beta TCR derived from the D10 T-cell clone (Valpha 2, Vbeta 8.2) of the AKR (H-2k) mouse and expressed in baculovirus-infected insect cells (18). Using a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor (19, 20), we showed that this protein binds both Vbeta 8.2-specific bacterial superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin C2 (SEC2) and a soluble, heterodimeric MHC class II I-Ak-conalbumin peptide (residues 134-146) complex with a low micromolar affinity (18).

To define further the structural requirements for D10 TCR binding, and to obtain material suitable for NMR structural studies, we produced a soluble D10 scTCR molecule using an E. coli expression system. Purified and refolded protein bound to SEC2 and I-Ak-conalbumin peptide complex with thermodynamic and kinetic binding constants similar to those measured previously for the insect cell-derived, heterodimeric D10 TCR (18), suggesting that neither the TCR constant domains nor potential N- or O-linked carbohydrate moieties are necessary for ligand binding. In addition, based on circular dichroism and one-dimensional NMR spectroscopy, purified D10 scTCR appears to be suitable for structural studies by multidimensional NMR spectroscopy. NMR studies on the D10 scTCR may be helpful in assessing the flexibility of its various CDR regions and may provide further insight into whether the scTCR undergoes conformational changes as a result of its interactions with superantigens and class II MHC-peptide complex.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Antibodies

Hybridomas expressing D10 clonotype-specific mAb 3D3 (21) (provided by Dr. Al Bothwell, Yale Medical School, New Haven, CT), and ACID-p1/BASE-p1 leucine zipper (LZ)-specific mAb 1Velcro2H11 (2H11 (18, 22)) were grown in hollow fiber reactors, and the secreted antibodies were purified by affinity chromatography using immobilized protein A (Repligen, Cambridge, MA) as described (23). TCR Valpha 2-specific mAb B20.1 (24) and Vbeta 8.1/2-specific mAb MR5-2 (25) were obtained from Pharmingen (San Diego, CA).

Proteins

Heterodimeric D10 TCR expressed in baculovirus-infected insect cells was purified using 3D3 immunoaffinity chromatography as described (18). Similarly, baculovirus-derived soluble, heterodimeric murine MHC class II I-Ak derivatives containing a fused antigenic conalbumin (CA) peptide (26) and complementary LZ sequences to facilitate efficient chain pairing (22) were prepared as described (18). Baculovirus-derived soluble, heterodimeric human MHC class II HLA-DR1 loaded with an influenza hemagglutinin (HA) peptide (residues 306-318) was prepared as described (27). Purified superantigens staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB), staphylococcal enterotoxin C2 (SEC2), and toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1) were purchased from Toxin Technology, Inc. (Sarasota, FL). The purity of these proteins was confirmed by size exclusion chromatography and SDS-PAGE prior to use.

E. coli Expression Vector Encoding Maltose-binding Protein (MBP)-D10 scTCR Fusion Protein

Plasmids pFRSV-SRaD10alpha GPI TCR and pFRSV-SRbD10beta GPI TCR, encoding D10 alpha - and beta -chain variable domain genes, respectively, were gifts from Dr. Al Bothwell. These two cDNA plasmids were used as templates from which sequences encoding D10 TCR alpha - and beta -chain variable domains were generated, using PCR. Using appropriate oligonucleotide primers, the alpha -chain gene was engineered to encode NarI and XhoI restriction sites at the 5'- and 3'-ends, respectively, as well as two stop codons at the 3'-end. The beta -chain gene was engineered to encode NcoI and BamHI restriction sites at the 5'- and 3'-ends, respectively. The amplified genes were then ligated into plasmid p3xG"b3" using the 5'- and 3'-restriction sites, to generate plasmid p6/530. A flexible linker (the 3xG-linker, amino acid sequence GSGGGGSGGGGSGGSGA) was engineered into the plasmid between the alpha - and beta -chain genes, resulting in a gene encoding D10 scTCR in the order beta -linker-alpha (Fig. 1). The 5'-end of the scTCR gene was then modified, using PCR and standard molecular biology techniques, to encode an EcoRI restriction site, followed by a thrombin cleavage site encoding amino acids LVPRG (28). This modified D10 scTCR gene was inserted between the EcoRI and SalI sites within the polylinker of the MBP fusion protein expression vector pPR998 (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). The resulting plasmid encoded a MBP-D10 scTCR fusion protein. The tether sequence, between the 3'-end of the malE gene (encoding MBP) and the 5'-end of the D10 TCR gene, was then deleted for the factor Xa cleavage site present in plasmid pPR998, leaving the thrombin cleavage site previously engineered at the 5'-end of the D10 TCR gene. The resulting plasmid encoded a MBP-D10 scTCR fusion protein with a 10-amino acid tether (NSSSLVPRGS).

Using oligonucleotide primers to generate DNA of the correct sequence by the PCR, the linker between TCR alpha - and beta -chain genes was then modified by the addition of the FLAGG sequence (IBI, New Haven, CT), encoding amino acids DYKDDDDK. The resulting 27-amino acid linker sequence was GSDYKDDDDKRSGGGGSGGGGSGGSGA. Also, to minimize potential covalent aggregation, the codon for an unpaired cysteine residue in the Jalpha -region was changed to encode a serine residue. Finally, to aid in protein purification, a sequence encoding six histidine residues was added to the 3'-end of the MBP-D10 scTCR gene. This resulted in the final MBP-D10 scTCR fusion protein expression vector, p4/219. A schematic of the resulting MBP-D10 scTCR fusion protein construct is shown in Fig. 1A, and the amino acid sequence of D10 scTCR is shown in Fig. 1B. It was subsequently discovered that the fifth codon of the beta -chain gene of the D10 scTCR construct was mutated to encode a threonine rather than a serine residue (Fig. 1B). The mutation presumably occurred as a result of an error by Taq polymerase during a PCR procedure. The mutation appears to be benign, as the purified and refolded D10 scTCR protein was found to be in a native-like conformation (see below).

Expression and Purification of D10 scTCR

BL21 cells (Novagen, Madison, WI) transformed with vector p4/219 were grown in a 5-liter bioreactor (B. Braun Biotech, Allentown, PA) at 27 °C in 4 × YT medium (3.2% bactotryptone, 2% yeast extract, and 0.5% NaCl) containing 2.0% glycerol and 50 µg/ml ampicillin. Cells were induced with 1 mM isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside at A600 = 15 (late log phase). Cells were harvested 3 h after induction, with a yield of 60 g wet cell paste per liter of culture.

Cells were resuspended in lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.2 M NaCl, 0.1 mM 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride-HCl at 10 ml/g cells wet weight. Resuspended cells were lysed by passage through a microfluidizer (model M110T, Microfluidics Corporation, Newton, MA) at 15,000 p.s.i. Lysis supernatant was filtered through a 0.45-µ Pellicon filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA) and used for subsequent purification.

All purification steps, with the exception of nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) metal affinity chromatography, were performed at 4 °C. Lysis supernatant was applied to a cross-linked amylose column (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) at a flow rate of 3 ml/min. The column was then washed with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 0.2 M NaCl, and bound proteins were eluted with the same buffer containing 10 mM maltose. Purified fusion protein was next denatured with 6 M GdnHCl in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 0.2 M NaCl and 10% glycerol (buffer A), and applied to a Ni-NTA metal affinity column (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) at a flow-rate of 3.7 ml/min. After washing the column with 2 column volumes of buffer A, a refolding gradient was initiated and maintained at a flow rate of 3.7 ml/min using fast protein liquid chromatography (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). A 240-min linear gradient was formed from 100% buffer A to 100% buffer B containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.2 M GdnHCl, 20% glycerol, and 0.5 M NaCl. After washing the column with 1 column volume of buffer B, the bound material was eluted with buffer B containing 250 mM imidazole. The eluted MBP-D10 scTCR fusion protein was further purified by immunoaffinity chromatography on an immobilized 3D3 column, which specifically recognizes a D10 TCR conformational epitope (18, 21, 29). Finally, monomeric MBP-D10 scTCR was isolated by size exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 200PG 26/60 column (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.).

To obtain D10 scTCR, purified fusion protein was first digested with thrombin (Calbiochem) at 40:1 (w/w) for 16 h at 37 °C in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 2 mM CaCl2 and 0.02% sodium azide. The digested sample was next applied to the Ni-NTA column, and D10 scTCR containing the hexahistidine tag was eluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 250 mM imidazole. Purified D10 scTCR was dialyzed into 20 mM MES (pH 6.8) containing 1 mM EDTA and 0.02% sodium azide and stored at 4 °C. For NMR experiments (see below), purified protein was concentrated to 3 mg/ml using Centriprep-10 concentrators (Amicon, Beverly, MA).

Protein concentrations were determined by spectrophotometry at 280 nm using extinction coefficients of 1.7 and 1.2 M-1 cm-1 for MBP-D10 scTCR and D10 scTCR, respectively. Quantitative amino acid analysis was performed using an Applied Biosystems (Perkin-Elmer) model 421 amino acid analysis system. To test the solubility characteristic of D10 scTCR, a small amount of purified protein was concentrated using Centricon 10 concentrator. D10 scTCR remained soluble at concentrations up to 1 mM.

Protein Analysis

SDS-PAGE (30) and isoelectric focusing (31) analyses were performed essentially as described. N-terminal amino acid sequence analyses were performed on the proteins blotted on ProBlott membranes (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as described (32).

Molecular Weight Determination

The apparent molecular weight of purified D10 scTCR under nondenaturing conditions was determined by size exclusion chromatography on Superdex 75HR (Pharmacia) or TSK G2000 (Tosohaas, Philadelphia, PA) columns equilibrated with 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.8) containing 200 mM sodium sulfate and 10% glycerol. The columns were calibrated with the following molecular mass standards (Bio-Rad): thyroglobulin (66 kDa), gamma -globulin (158 kDa), ovalbumin (43 kDa), myoglobin (17 kDa), and vitamin B12 (1 kDa). A 50-µg (2.5 mg/ml) sample of purified D10 scTCR was injected at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min, and 0.5-ml fractions were collected. Molecular weight of D10 scTCR was also determined by electrospray-mass spectrometry using a VG Biotech Bio-Q instrument with a quadruple mass analyzer (M-Scan Inc., West Chester, PA).

Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopy

CD analysis was performed on purified D10 scTCR (0.15 mg/ml in 2 mM HEPES (pH 7.2)). Far-UV CD spectra were recorded on a CD instrument model 62 DS (Aviv Associates, Lakewood, NJ) using a 2-mm path length cell. Data were collected using a time constant of 1 s at every 0.2 nM and with a 1 nm constant spectral bandwidth at 25 °C. The CD data were analyzed for secondary structure prediction by an algorithm Prosec V3.1 provided by the manufacturer (Aviv Associates, Lakewood, NJ).

NMR Spectroscopy

One-dimensional NMR experiments were carried on purified D10 scTCR (~80 µM in 95% (v/v) H2O/D2O and 20 mM deuterated acetate (pH 4.5)) at 25 and 37 °C on a Varian UNITYplus750 MHz spectrometer with a 1H resonance frequency of 750.079 MHz. The spectral width was 23,995 Hz, and the carrier was placed on the H2O resonance which was suppressed by low power presaturation during the recycle delay (1.3 s). 8,192 complex points were obtained, and 1,024 transients were collected for signal averaging. Data processing was carried out using Felix software (Biosym Technologies, San Diego). The residual water signal was removed by the time domain convolution technique. Data were multiplied with a pi /2 shifted squared sine bell apodization function and zero-filled to 16,384 points prior to Fourier transformation. 1H chemical shifts were referenced relative to the water resonance, calibrated in turn at 4.755 and 4.631 ppm at 25 and 37 °C, respectively, on an external 2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentanesulfonic acid standard.

Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Binding Experiments

Binding studies were performed using a commercial biosensor instrument (BIAcoreTM, Pharmacia BioSensor, Uppsala, Sweden). All proteins used in these experiments were purified by size exclusion chromatography. Immobilizations were carried out in 10 mM sodium acetate at pH 5.5 for D10 scTCR or at pH 4.0 for superantigens using the Amine Coupling Kit (Pharmacia BioSensor, Uppsala, Sweden) as described (18, 19). Heterodimeric, soluble D10 TCR (18) and BDC2.5 TCR (33) derived from baculovirus-infected insect cells were used as control proteins for specificity experiments. HEPES-buffered saline (HBS; 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 3.4 mM EDTA, and 0.005% surfactant P20) was injected over the sensor chip at 5 µl/min, and 20-µl analyte samples diluted (~25-fold) in HBS buffer were injected. Where required, the biosensor surface was regenerated with 5-10 mM HCl. All binding experiments were conducted at 25 °C. The SPR signal was recorded as resonance units (RU) versus time and plotted as a "sensorgram." For kinetic rate analyses, binding studies were performed on ligands immobilized at multiple densities. The data, generated at least in triplicate, were analyzed using the non-linear curve-fitting software package (BIAevaluation 2.1, Pharmacia Biosensor) that also allows the parameters to be extracted from a single run (18, 34-36). To determine the apparent association (kon) and dissociation (koff) rate constants, the association and dissociation phases of the sensorgrams were fitted on single site models, A + B = AB and AB = A + B, respectively. The apparent dissociation constant (KD) was determined from the ratio of koff/kon.


RESULTS

Expression and Purification of D10 scTCR

The construct used to produce recombinant D10 scTCR is shown schematically in Fig. 1A. The TCR Vbeta and Valpha domains were connected by a 27-residue flexible peptide linker (Fig. 1B), and the E. coli maltose-binding protein (MBP) was fused to the N terminus of the Vbeta domain via a linker containing a thrombin cleavage site. In addition, six histidine residues were added to the C terminus to allow binding to a Ni-NTA affinity chromatography column. The expressed protein was purified under nonreducing conditions to preserve the disulfide bonds formed in vivo. A similar approach was utilized to refold an E. coli-expressed single chain antibody (37).


Fig. 1. Construction of D10 scTCR. A, schematic representation of MBP-D10 scTCR construct. SS, signal sequence of the MBP. L, linker that joins the Vbeta and Valpha domains of the D10 TCR. HH, hexahistidine tag. Thrombin cleavage site located between the MBP and D10 scTCR domains is marked with an arrow. B, amino acid sequence of D10 scTCR portion of the construct. The N-terminal amino acids of the Valpha and Vbeta domains of the D10 scTCR molecule are indicated with a *. The underlined LVPRGS amino acid sequence corresponds to the thrombin cleavage site located between the MBP (not shown) and D10 scTCR sequences. Thrombin cleaves after arginine (R). The 27-residue linker sequence connects the C terminus of Vbeta domain to the N terminus of Valpha domain of D10 TCR. The hexahistidine amino acid sequence added to the C terminus of the Valpha domain is underlined.

[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]


Monomeric MBP-D10 scTCR fusion protein was purified from E. coli lysis supernatants using a combination of amylose, Ni-NTA, and mAb 3D3 affinity chromatography steps. Purified fusion protein was then subjected to Superdex 200PG size exclusion chromatography to remove the small amounts of aggregates. Purity of the 70-kDa fusion protein was monitored after each step by SDS-PAGE performed under reducing (Fig. 2A, lanes 1-4) and nonreducing (Fig. 2A, lanes 5-8) conditions. The N-terminal sequence determined for the purified product (KIEEGKLVI) was as expected for the correctly processed maltose-binding protein (38).


Fig. 2. Production of D10 scTCR. A, SDS-PAGE analysis of MBP-D10 scTCR fusion protein at various stages of purification. Lanes 1-4 are run under reducing (R) conditions, and lanes 5-8 are run under nonreducing (NR) conditions. Protein bands were visualized using Coomassie Blue stain. Lanes 1 and 5, eluate from amylose affinity column; lanes 2 and 6, refolded fusion protein eluted from Ni-NTA column; lanes 3 and 7, eluate from mAb 3D3 immunoaffinity column; lanes 4 and 8, monomeric MBP-D10 scTCR isolated following Superdex 200 PG size exclusion chromatography. B, purification of D10 scTCR. Monomeric MBP-D10 scTCR (MBP-D10) was cleaved with thrombin and purified using Ni-NTA column (Ni. Chrom.) as described under "Materials and Methods." The samples were analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions. Lane 1, purified monomeric MBP-D10 scTCR; lane 2, thrombin digestion of MBP-D10 scTCR; lane 3, Ni-NTA flow-through (FT) of the thrombin-digested monomeric fusion protein; lane 4, D10 scTCR eluted (El) from Ni-NTA column using 250 mM imidazole. Presence and absence of thrombin is indicated by + or -.

[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]


Thrombin digestion of size exclusion chromatography, purified monomeric fusion protein resulted in efficient cleavage (Fig. 2B). Cleavage of the aggregated fusion protein isolated following size exclusion chromatography, by contrast, was inefficient and resulted in significant precipitation (not shown). Thrombin-cleaved D10 scTCR was purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography carried out under nondenaturing conditions (Fig. 2B). The overall yield of purified D10 scTCR was 0.7-1.0 mg/liter of E. coli cell culture.

Characterization of D10 scTCR

The N-terminal amino acid sequence of purified D10 scTCR was determined to be GSAVSQSP, corresponding exactly to the amino acid sequence predicted following thrombin cleavage of the fusion protein (Fig. 1B). On SDS-PAGE analysis, purified D10 scTCR migrated faster under non-reducing than under reducing conditions (Fig. 3A), suggesting the existence of intramolecular disulfide bonds that lead to a more compact structure. Furthermore, TCR family-specific mAbs B20.1 (Valpha 2) and MR5.2 (Vbeta 8.1/2) recognized only the non-reduced protein on Western blot analysis (not shown). Similar results were obtained with baculovirus-expressed, disulfide-linked, heterodimeric D10 TCR.2 Together, these results indicate that purified D10 scTCR is in a correctly disulfide-bonded conformation. The isoelectric point (pI) of purified D10 scTCR was determined to be 8.8 under native conditions (Fig. 3B), consistent with the theoretical pI of 8.9 calculated from the primary amino acid sequence. Purified D10 scTCR appears to be monomeric. The molecular mass was determined to be approximately 28 kDa by size exclusion chromatography performed under nondenaturing conditions (Fig. 3C). The molecular mass of purified D10 scTCR was also determined by electrospray-mass spectrometry to be 27,891.5 daltons (not shown). These values are in agreement with the molecular mass of 27,893 daltons calculated from the primary amino acid sequence of the thrombin-cleaved D10 scTCR containing the C-terminal hexahistidine extension.


Fig. 3. Characterization of purified D10 scTCR. A, SDS-PAGE analysis of purified protein. D10 scTCR (6 µg) was subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE under reducing (R, lane 1) and nonreducing (NR, lane 2) conditions. B, isoelectric focusing analysis. Purified D10 scTCR (5 µg) was analyzed by isoelectric focusing on Servalyte precoat gels (pH 3-10) at 4 °C under nonreducing conditions (lane 2). The protein bands were visualized using Serva Blue stain. The known pI values (lane 1) for the marker proteins (Pharmacia) are as follows: amyloglucosidase (3.5), soybean trypsin inhibitor (4.55), beta -lactoglobulin A (5.2), bovine carbonic anhydrase B (5.85), human carbonic anhydrase B (6.55), horse myoglobin (6.85, 7.35), lentil lectin (8.15, 8.45, 8.65), and trypsinogen (9.3). C, size exclusion chromatography of isolated D10 scTCR. A 100-µg aliquot of purified D10 scTCR (solid line) was passed over a TSK G2000 size exclusion chromatography column. Elution profile of molecular weight standards is shown (dashed line, arrows indicate molecular weights). The molecular mass of D10 scTCR was determined to be approximately 28 kDa.

[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]


The conformation of purified D10 scTCR was examined by CD and NMR spectroscopy. The far UV-visible CD spectrum indicated that purified D10 scTCR contained predominantly beta -sheet secondary structure (Fig. 4A). Deconvolution of the digitized CD data provided the following predictions for the relative percentage of secondary structural elements: 11% alpha -helix, 72% beta -sheet, 14% random coil, and 3% turn. These results are in agreement with the recently solved crystal structures of the heterodimeric TCRs (6, 7) and the immunoglobulin domain model for the Valpha /Vbeta TCR structure as proposed by others (17, 39-42).


Fig. 4. Biophysical characterization of D10 scTCR. A, far UV CD spectrum of purified D10 scTCR. Far UV CD spectrum of purified D10 scTCR was recorded on an Aviv Associates model 62 DS CD spectrophotometer. Protein concentration, 5.2 µm. B, one-dimensional NMR spectrum of purified D10 scTCR at 25 °C. The dispersion of the amide resonances (~11.0 to ~6.0 ppm) is typical for a folded protein. The position of the water resonance which was removed using the time domain convolution technique is indicated by an arrow. A, many Halpha resonances downfield shifted from the water resonance are indicative of beta  secondary structure. B, isolated signals upfield from the methyl resonances due to ring current shifts are typically observed in a folded structure. C, the highly repetitive primary sequence of the "FLAGG/3xG"-linker and the hexahistidine tag at the C terminus may result in the clustering of amide resonances, which is indicative of unstructured regions. Some intense signals between 3.9 and 3.5 ppm presumably originate from an impurity.

[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]


To probe further the secondary structure of the purified protein, a series of one-dimensional NMR experiments were performed. A representative one-dimensional NMR spectrum is shown in Fig. 4B. The following observations strongly suggest that purified D10 scTCR predominantly adopts a beta -sheet secondary structure: 1) the amide signals (~11.0 to ~6.0 ppm) show a dispersion, which is typical for folded proteins (11); 2) there are many low field shifted Halpha resonances, which confirm that the scTCR is predominantly folded (A in Fig. 4B); 3) a few isolated signals upfield from the methyl resonances are present, which are due to large ring current shifts in a folded structure (B in Fig. 4B); 4) many downfield shifted Halpha resonances are indicative of beta -sheet secondary structure (42-44). The spectrum also shows clustering of a large number of sharp resonances between 8.3 and 8.0 ppm, indicating that a part of the protein may be unstructured (45) (C in Fig. 4B). The highly repetitive primary sequence of the "FLAGG/3xG"-linker and the hexahistidine tag at the C terminus may give rise to these resonances.

Binding of D10 scTCR to Vbeta 8-specific Superantigens

Our previous SPR binding studies demonstrated that Vbeta 8.2-specific bacterial superantigen SEC2 binds to insect cell-derived soluble, heterodimeric (Valpha Calpha /Vbeta Cbeta ) D10 TCR with an apparent KD of about 1.1 µM (18). In contrast, SEB, another Vbeta 8.2-specific bacterial superantigen, bound to D10 TCR very weakly (KD > 100 µM), although it, like SEC2, has been shown to stimulate proliferation of the D10 T-cell clone (46). To examine superantigen binding characteristics of E. coli-derived D10 scTCR, SPR analyses were performed. First, purified D10 scTCR was immobilized to the sensor surface and bacterial superantigens SEC2, SEB, and TSST-1 were each injected over the surface at a concentration of 0.5 mg/ml (18-20 µM) in water (Fig. 5A). Similar to our previous findings (18), Vbeta 8.2-specific superantigens SEC2 and SEB bound to immobilized D10 scTCR, whereas Vbeta 15-specific TSST-1 did not (Fig. 5A). The negative change in base line during injection of TSST-1 is due to a change in the bulk refractive index resulting from differences in the salt concentrations of the protein solutions and the running buffer (17, 18). In addition, the sensorgram shown in Fig. 5A indicates that, like baculovirus-derived D10 TCR, E. coli-expressed D10 scTCR binds to SEC2 with higher affinity than SEB due to a slower dissociation rate.


Fig. 5. Interactions between D10 scTCR and bacterial superantigens analyzed by SPR. A, sensorgram showing binding of superantigens to immobilized D10 scTCR. Superantigens TSST-1, SEB, and SEC2, each at 0.5 mg/ml in water, were passed over coupled D10 scTCR (5300 RU). B-E, sensorgrams showing binding of D10 scTCR to immobilized superantigens. D10 scTCR (5.0 to 1.0 µM) was passed over immobilized SEC2 (B, 1313 RU), TSST-1 (C, 1253 RU), and control (D) surfaces. Between injections, surfaces were regenerated with 5 µl of 10 mM HCl (not shown). E, sensorgram showing mAb 3D3 blocks the D10 scTCR/SEC2 interaction. D10 scTCR (2.5 µM) was passed over immobilized SEC2 (983 RU) either in the absence or presence of mAb 3D3 (5.0 µM). Between injections, surfaces were regenerated with HCl.

[View Larger Version of this Image (11K GIF file)]


The binding of solution phase D10 scTCR to immobilized superantigens was also examined. D10 scTCR (5 to 1 µM) bound to an SEC2-coated (Fig. 5B) surface in a concentration-dependent manner but did not bind to TSST-1-coated (Fig. 5C) or control (Fig. 5D) surfaces. Moreover, similar to our previous findings (18), D10 clone-specific mAb 3D3 completely blocked the sD10 TCR/SEC2 interaction (Fig. 5E). Antibody 3D3 (21) recognizes a conformational epitope formed by the juxtaposition of the Valpha and Vbeta domains (18). These results therefore imply that the epitope for mAb 3D3 may overlap the binding site for SEC2. Alternatively, it may be that the excluded volume of 3D3 sterically blocks the binding of SEC2.

Kinetic constants for the D10 scTCR-SEC2 interaction were also determined using SPR measurements (34, 35). For D10 scTCR binding to immobilized SEC2, kon and koff were determined to be 2.45 ± 0.72 × 104 M-1 s-1 and 1.36 ± 0.15 × 10-2 s-1, respectively. From these values, a KD of about 0.6 µM was calculated. These values are similar to those determined for the baculovirus-derived, heterodimeric D10 TCR/SEC2 interaction (Table I).

Table I. Binding parameters for D10 TCR/ligand interactions

All binding experiments were performed at 25 °C on BIAcoreTM instrument (Pharmacia Biosensor). Data were analyzed using the non-linear curve itting software (BIAevaluation 2.1, Pharmacia Biosensor).

Complex Apparent kon Apparent koff Apparent KD

M-1s-1 s-1 µM
D10 scTCR/SEC2 2.45  ± 0.72 × 104 1.36  ± 0.15 × 10-2 0.6
D10 TCR/SEC2a 1.69  ± 0.12 × 104 1.86  ± 0.47 × 10-2 1.1
D10 scTCR/IAk-CA-LZ 1.71  ± 0.47 × 104 2.58  ± 0.38 × 10-2 1.5
D10 TCR/IAk-CA-LZa 1.07  ± 0.19 × 104 2.20  ± 0.65 × 10-2 2.1

a Taken from Ref. 18.

Binding of D10 scTCR to Soluble MHC Class II-Peptide Complex

Our previous studies showed that an insect cell-derived, soluble, heterodimeric murine class II MHC I-Ak derivative containing fused antigenic conalbumin peptide and complementary leucine zipper sequences (I-Ak-CA-LZ) specifically stimulates proliferation of the D10 T-cell clone and binds to the soluble, heterodimeric D10 TCR with a KD of about 2.1 µM (18). As expected, this interaction was not seen with the soluble, heterodimeric BDC2.5 TCR (18), a control TCR protein specific for a murine pancreatic beta -cell antigen presented by murine MHC class II I-Ag7 (33, 47). Moreover, neither unloaded I-Ak-LZ nor human HLA-DR1·HA peptide complex showed detectable binding to the heterodimeric D10 TCR, indicating that the bimolecular interaction between D10 TCR and I-Ak-CA-LZ is specific (18).

To understand better the structural requirements for immune recognition, SPR experiments were performed to examine the binding interactions between D10 scTCR and various MHC class II-peptide complexes. Purified I-Ak-CA-LZ at 5 µM bound specifically to D10 scTCR immobilized on the sensor surface (Fig. 6A). The sensorgram spike at the end of the injection is due to differences in salt concentration between the protein solution and running buffer. Neither I-Ak-LZ at 5 µM nor human HLA-DR1·HA peptide complex (27) at 15 µM showed detectable binding. These specificities are identical to those observed for heterodimeric D10 TCR (18).


Fig. 6. Interactions between D10 scTCR and soluble class II MHC molecules analyzed by SPR. A, sensorgram showing that I-Ak-CA-LZ specifically interacts with immobilized D10 scTCR. Purified I-Ak-CA-LZ (5 µM), I-Ak-LZ (5 µM), and soluble HLA-DR1·HA peptide complex (15 µM) proteins were passed over immobilized D10 scTCR (2004 RU). B, sensorgram showing concentration-dependent binding of I-Ak-CA-LZ to immobilized sD10 TCR. Purified I-Ak-CA-LZ (5.0-1.0 µM) was passed over immobilized sD10 TCR (2768 RU). Between injections, surfaces were regenerated with 5 µl of 10 mM HCl.

[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]


Kinetic and equilibrium binding constants for I-Ak-CA-LZ binding to immobilized D10 scTCR were also measured using the SPR biosensor. For these studies, I-Ak-CA-LZ was injected over a D10 scTCR-coated surface at various concentrations (5 to 1 µM) (Fig. 6B), and association and dissociation rate constants were determined to be 1.71 ± 0.47 × 104 M-1 s-1 and 2.58 ± 0.38 × 10-2 s-1, respectively. The ratio of these kinetic constants gave an equilibrium dissociation constant of 1.5 µM. These values are nearly identical to those determined for the heterodimeric D10 TCR/I-Ak-CA-LZ interaction (Table I) (18).


DISCUSSION

In the present study, milligram amounts of refolded, native-like D10 scTCR were produced for structural and functional studies. The scTCR molecule was expressed as a fusion protein in which the E. coli maltose-binding protein was fused to the N terminus of the D10 scTCR molecule. We selected MBP (38, 48) as a fusion partner for the following reasons. First, MBP can be transported to the periplasmic space of E. coli, where proper disulfide bonds can be formed (49). Second, the fusion protein can be purified in high yield utilizing amylose affinity chromatography. Third, MBP may act as a scaffold to facilitate the folding of the scTCR domains. Finally, MBP does not contain any cysteine residues that would interfere with the intramolecular disulfide bond formation within the D10 scTCR molecule.

Purified D10 scTCR possessed native-like properties based on several analytical techniques. CD and one-dimensional NMR spectra indicated that purified protein is stabilized predominantly by beta -sheet secondary structure. Recently, similar results were reported for an E. coli-derived Valpha domain of a murine B4.2.3 TCR (42). Importantly, purified D10 scTCR remains soluble at concentrations to 30 mg/ml, further indicating a native-like conformation. This has not been reported for other E. coli-derived scTCR molecules (17, 40, 41, 50, 51). Previously, it was suggested that the solubility of E. coli-derived scTCR molecules is enhanced by the presence of >20 charged amino acid residues in the variable domains (particularly Valpha ) and by a small (1-2) number of potential N-linked glycosylation sites (52). The solubility of purified D10 scTCR is consistent with the first criterion (there are 23 charged amino acids in the alpha -chain) but not with the second (there are 3 potential N-linked glycosylation sites in D10 scTCR).

The ability of E. coli-derived D10 scTCR to interact with Vbeta 8.2 TCR-specific bacterial superantigens in the absence of MHC class II molecules is consistent with our previous finding (Ref. 18, also see Table I) and also with other published reports (17, 53-54). The kinetic and binding constants for the D10 scTCR/SEC2 interaction are similar to those of the baculovirus-derived, heterodimeric (Valpha Calpha /Vbeta Cbeta ) D10 TCR/SEC2 interaction (Table I), indicating that only Valpha Vbeta domains are required for SEC2 binding. Previously, the affinity of SEC2 for the myeloma cell-derived, soluble Vbeta Cbeta -chain of the 14.3.d TCR (Valpha 4.1, Vbeta 8.2) was determined to be 5.4 µM using the SPR biosensor, and 2.32 µM by a sedimentation equilibrium binding technique (55). Together, these results further imply that residues in the common Vbeta 8.2 segment alone are sufficient for binding to superantigens, at least in the absence of MHC (17, 55-57). The recently solved three-dimensional crystal structures of the beta -chain of the 14.3.d TCR bound to both SEC2 and SEC3 further support this conclusion (10).

Kinetic and dissociation constants for the interactions between different TCRs and MHC-antigen complexes have been determined by several laboratories (58, 59, also reviewed in Ref. 16). Our recent studies (18) showed that the affinity of soluble, heterodimeric D10 TCR for soluble I-Ak·CA peptide complex is about 2.1 µM. The KD for E. coli-derived D10 scTCR/I-Ak·CA peptide complex was found to be nearly identical (1.5 µM) to this value (Table I), further implying that the variable domains of the heterodimeric D10 TCR are sufficient for their interaction with the murine MHC class II I-Ak·CA peptide complex.

Malchiodi and co-workers (55) showed that an unglycosylated mutant form of the murine 14.3.d TCR beta -chain in which four out of five potential Asn-linked glycosylation sites were eliminated through site-directed mutagenesis bound to various forms of SEC with affinities similar to those of fully glycosylated form. Although these results suggest that N-linked glycans do not contribute to superantigen binding, the possible involvement of the fifth remaining site as well as the potential yet unidentified O-linked carbohydrate sites (60) in binding to SEC could not be ruled out. Since the E. coli-derived D10 scTCR was not glycosylated, our studies provide a direct evidence that the carbohydrates do not play a significant role in the binding of D10 TCR to SEC2 and also to murine MHC class II I-Ak·CA peptide complex. In addition, these results suggest that carbohydrates are also not required for the expression and conformational stability of the D10 TCR.

Sequence alignments (39) and more recently the x-ray crystallographic data (6-9) suggest that TCRs and Igs are built on the same principles. Interestingly, the interdomain contact residues that are present in the corresponding VL-VH antibody interface are also conserved between Valpha and Vbeta domains of TCR (6). Moreover, similar to Ig molecules, within each Valpha and Vbeta domains of 2C TCR about 24 residues form the core of the beta -sheet sandwich (6). The CD and one-dimensional NMR spectra of purified D10 scTCR described here also indicate that scTCR is stabilized predominantly by beta -sheet secondary structure, consistent with its native-like conformation.

Because of its size, high solubility, and structural integrity, purified D10 scTCR should be suitable for structural studies by multidimensional NMR spectroscopy.3 Such studies may help in determining the packing of the Valpha and Vbeta domains in scTCR and in assessing the flexibility of its various CDR regions in solution. In addition, the structural and dynamic studies with superantigens and class II MHC/peptide should be useful in further understanding the molecular interactions between TCR and its ligands.


FOOTNOTES

*   The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Protein Biochemistry, UE 0435, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, 709 Swedeland Rd., King of Prussia, PA 19406. Tel.: 610-270-7085; Fax: 610-270-7359.
1   The abbreviations used are: MHC, major histocompatibility complex; TCR, T-cell receptor; scTCR, single chain TCR; SPR, surface plasmon resonance; SEB, S. aureus enterotoxin B; SEC2, S. aureus enterotoxin C2; TSST-1, toxic shock syndrome toxin 1; MBP, maltose-binding protein; Ni-NTA, nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid; CA, conalbumin peptide-(134-146); LZ, leucine zipper; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; mAb, monoclonal antibody; RU, resonance units; CDR, complimentarity determining region; HA, hemagglutinin; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
2   S. Khandekar, unpublished observations.
3   B. Hare, D. Wyss, M. Osburne, B. Bettencourt, S. Khandekar, E. Reinherz, and G. Wagner, Poster presented at the XVIIth International Conference on Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems, August 18-23, 1996, Keystone, CO.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank our colleagues mentioned in the text for providing reagents; Drs. Ellis Reinherz and Gerhard Wagner for advice, and Christopher Whalen (Pharmacia Biosensor) for discussion on the SPR analyses; Thao Duong and Gina Stroh for excellent technical assistance; Kevin McDonald for purified HLA-DR/HA peptide protein; and Stanley Erck for enthusiastic support.


REFERENCES

  1. Stern, L. J., and Wiley, D. C. (1994) Curr. Biol. 2, 245-251
  2. Meuer, S. C., Acuto, O., Hercend, T., Schlossman, S. F., and Reinherz, E. L. (1984) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2, 23-50 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Ashwell, J. D., and Klausner, R. D. (1990) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 8, 139-167 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Janeway, C. A., Jr., Yagi, J., Conrad, P. J., Katz, B., Jones, B., Vroegop, S., and Buxser, S. (1989) Immunol. Rev. 107, 61-88 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Marrack, P., and Kappler, J. (1990) Science 248, 705-711 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Garcia, K. C., Degano, M., Stanfield, R. L., Brunmark, A., Jackson, M. R., Peterson, P. A., Teyton, L., and Wilson, I. A. (1996) Science 274, 209-219 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Garboczi, D. N., Ghosh, P., Utz, U., Fan, Q. R., Biddison, W. E., and Wiley, D. C. (1996) Nature 384, 134-141 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Bentely, G. A., Boulot, G., Karjalainen, K., and Mariuzza, R. A. (1995) Science 267, 1984-1987 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Fields, B. A., Ober, B., Malchiodi, E. L., Lebedeva, M. I., Braden, B. C., Ysern, X., Kim, J.-K., Shao, X., Ward, E. S., and Mariuzza, R. A. (1995) Science 270, 1821-1824 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Fields, B. A., Malchiodi, E. L., Li, H., Ysern, X., Stauffacher, C. V., Schlievert, P. M., Karjalainen, K., and Mariuzza, R. A. (1996) Nature 384, 188-192 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Wüthrich, K. (1986) NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
  12. Bax, A., and Grzesiek, S. (1993) Acc. Chem. Res. 26, 131-138 [CrossRef]
  13. Peng, J. W., and Wagner, G. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 239, 563-596 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Lane, A. N., and Lefèvre, J. F (1994) Methods Enzymol. 239, 596-619 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Sattler, M., and Fesik, S. W. (1996) Structure 4, 1245-1249 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Fremont, D. H., Rees, W. A., and Kozono, H. (1996) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 8, 93-100 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Hilyard, K. L., Reyburn, H., Chung, S., Bell, J. I., and Strominger, J. L. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 9057-9061 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Khandekar, S. S., Brauer, P. P., Naylor, J. W., Chang, H.-C., Kern, P., Newcomb, J. R., LeClair, K. P., Stump, H. S., Bettencourt, B. M., Kawasaki, E, Banerji, J., Profy, A., and Jones, B. (1997) Mol. Immunol. 34, 493-503 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Johnsson, B., Lofas, S., and Lindqvist, G. (1991) Anal. Biochem. 198, 268-277 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Malmqvist, M. (1993) Curr. Biol. 5, 282-286 [CrossRef]
  21. Kaye, J., Porcelli, S., Tite, J., Jones, B., and Janeway, C. A., Jr. (1983) J. Exp. Med. 158, 836-856 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Chang, H.-C., Bao, Z. Z., Yao, Y., Tse, A. G. D., Goyarts, E. C., Madsen, M., Kawasaki, E., Brauer, P., Sacchettini, J. C., Nathenson, S. G., and Reinherz, E. L. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 11408-11412 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Harlow, E., and Lane, D. (1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  24. Pircher, H., Rebai, N., Groettrup, M., Gregoire, C., Speiser, D. E., Happ, M. P., Palmer, E., Zinkernagel, R. M., Hengartner, H., and Malissen, B. (1992) Eur. J. Immunol. 22, 399-404 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Kanagawa, O. (1989) J. Exp. Med. 170, 1513-1519 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Kozono, H., White, J., Clements, J., Marrack, P., and Kappler, J. (1994) Nature 369, 151-154 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Stern, L. J., and Wiley, D. C. (1992) Cell 68, 465-477 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Engel, I., Ottenhoff, M., and Klausner, R. D. (1992) Science 256, 1318-1321 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Corr, M., Slanetz, A. E., Boyd, L. F., Jelonek, M. T., Khilko, S., Al-Ramadi, B. K., Kim, Y. S., Maher, S. E., Bothwell, A. L. M., and Margulies, D. H. (1994) Science 265, 946-949 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 277, 680-682
  31. Khandekar, S. S., Bettencourt, B. M., Kelley, K. C., and Recny, M. A. (1993) Protein Expression Purif. 4, 580-584 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Matsudaira, P. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 10035-10038 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. McKeever, U., Khandekar, S., Newcomb, J., Naylor, J., Gregory, P., Brauer, P., Jesson, M., Bettencourt, B., Burke, E., Alderson, A., Banerji, J., Haskins, K., and Jones, B. (1996) J. Exp. Med. 184, 1755-1768 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. O'Shannessy, D. J. (1994) Curr. Biol. 5, 65-71
  35. Kozono, H., Parker, D., White, J., Marrack, P., and Kappler, J. (1995) Immunity 3, 187-196 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Balasubramanian, S., Chernov-Rogan, T., Davis, A. M., Whitehorn, E., Tate, E., Bell, M. P., Zurawski, G., and Barrett, R. W. (1995) Int. Immunol. 7, 1839-1849 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Pantoliano, M. W., Bird, R. E., Johnson, S., Asel, E. D., Dodd, S. W., Wood, J. F., and Hardman, K. D. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 10117-10125 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Guan, C. D., Li, P., Riggs, P. D., and Inouye, H. (1988) Gene (Amst.) 67, 21-30 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Novotny, J., Tonegawa, S., Saito, H., Kranz, D. M., and Eisen, H. N. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 742-746 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Novotny, J., Ganju, R. K., Smiley, S. T., Hussey, R., Luther, M. A., Recny, M. A., Siliciano, R. F., and Reinherz, E. L. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 8646-8650 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Ward, E. S. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 224, 885-890 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Plaksin, D., Chacko, S., McPhie, P., Bax, A., Padlan, E. A., and Margulies, D. H. (1996) J. Exp. Med. 184, 1251-1258 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Wishart, D. S., Sykes, B. D., and Richards, F. M. (1991) J. Mol. Biol. 222, 311-333 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Wishart, D. S., Sykes, B. D., and Richards, F. M. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 1647-1651 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Gross, K. H., and Kalbitzer, H. R. (1988) J. Magn. Reson. 76, 87-99
  46. Hong, S.-C., Waterbury, G., and Janeway, C. A., Jr. (1996) J. Exp. Med. 183, 1437-1446 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Haskins, K., Portas, M., Bergman, B., Lafferty, K., and Bradley, B. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 8000-8004 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Bregegere, F., Schwartz, J., and Bedoulle, H. (1994) Protein Eng. 7, 271-280
  49. Plückthun, A. (1992) Immunol. Rev. 130, 151-188 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Soo Hoo, W. F., Lacy, M. J., Denzin, L. K., Voss, E. W., Jr., Hardman, K. D., and Kranz, D. M. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 4759-4763 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Kurucz, I., Jost, C. R., George, A. J. T., Andrew, S. M., and Segal, D. M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 3830-3834 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Wülfing, C., and Plückthun, A. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 242, 655-669 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Avery, A. C., Markowitz, J. S., Grusby, M. J., Glimcher, L. H., and Cantor, H. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 4853-4861 [Abstract]
  54. Seth, A., Stern, L. J., Ottenhoff, T. H. H., Engel, I., Owens, M. J., Lamb, J. R., Klausner, R. D., and Wiley, D. C. (1994) Nature 369, 324-327 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Malchiodi, E. L., Eisenstein, E., Fields, B. A., Ohlendorf, D. H., Schlievert, P. M., Karjalainen, K., and Mariuzza, R. A. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 182, 1833-1845 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Woodland, D. L., and Blackman, M. A. (1993) Immunol. Today 14, 208-211 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Deckhut, A. M., Chien, Y.-H., Blackman, M. A., and Woodland, D. L. (1994) J. Exp. Med. 180, 1931-1935 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Munir Alam, S., Travers, P. J., Wung, J. L., Nasholds, W., Redpath, S., Jameson, S. C., and Gascoigne, N. R. (1996) Nature 381, 616-620 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Lyons, D. S., Lieberman, S. A., Hampl, J., Boniface, J. J., Chien, Y.-H., Berg, L. J., and Davis, M. M. (1996) Immunity 5, 53-61 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  60. Parekh, R. B. (1994) Biologicals 22, 113-119 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] .

Volume 272, Number 51, Issue of December 19, 1997 pp. 32190-32197
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
B. D. Cohen, J. T. Bariteau, L. M. Magenis, and J. A. Dias
Regulation of Follitropin Receptor Cell Surface Residency by the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway
Endocrinology, October 1, 2003; 144(10): 4393 - 4402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
J. M. Boulter, M. Glick, P. T. Todorov, E. Baston, M. Sami, P. Rizkallah, and B. K. Jakobsen
Stable, soluble T-cell receptor molecules for crystallization and therapeutics
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., September 1, 2003; 16(9): 707 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. H. McMahan, L. Watson, R. Meza-Romero, G. G. Burrows, D. N. Bourdette, and A. C. Buenafe
Production, Characterization, and Immunogenicity of a Soluble Rat Single Chain T Cell Receptor Specific for an Encephalitogenic Peptide
J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 30961 - 30970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Xiong, P. Kern, H.-C. Chang, and E. L. Reinherz
T Cell Receptor Binding to a pMHCII Ligand Is Kinetically Distinct from and Independent of CD4
J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2001; 276(8): 5659 - 5667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khandekar, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khandekar, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement