|
Volume 272, Number 51, Issue of December 19, 1997
pp. 32190-32197
Conformational Integrity and Ligand Binding Properties of a
Single Chain T-cell Receptor Expressed in Escherichia
coli*
(Received for publication, July 23, 1997, and in revised form, October 9, 1997)
Sanjay S.
Khandekar
,
Brian M.
Bettencourt
,
Daniel F.
Wyss
,
Jerome W.
Naylor
,
Pamela P.
Brauer
,
Kevin
Huestis
,
Donard S.
Dwyer
,
Albert T.
Profy
,
Marcia S.
Osburne
,
Julian
Banerji
and
Barry
Jones
From Procept, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
We recently showed that a soluble, heterodimeric
murine D10 T-cell receptor (TCR) (V 2C , V 8.2C ) expressed in
insect cells binds both V 8.2-specific bacterial superantigen
staphylococcal enterotoxin C2 (SEC2) and a soluble, heterodimeric major
histocompatibility complex class II I-Ak·conalbumin
peptide complex with a low micromolar affinity. To define further the
structural requirements for the TCR/ligand interactions, we have
produced in Escherichia coli a soluble, functional D10
single chain (sc) TCR molecule in which the V and V domains are
connected by a flexible peptide linker. Purified and refolded D10 scTCR
bound to SEC2 and murine major histocompatibility complex class II
I-Ak·conalbumin peptide complex with thermodynamic and
kinetic binding constants similar to those measured for the
baculovirus-derived heterodimeric D10 TCR suggesting that neither the
TCR constant domains nor potential N- or
O-linked carbohydrate moieties are necessary for ligand
recognition and for expression and proper folding of the D10 scTCR.
Purified D10 scTCR remained soluble at concentrations up to 1 mM. Circular dichroism and NMR spectroscopy indicated that
D10 scTCR is stabilized predominantly by -sheet secondary structure,
consistent with its native-like conformation. Because of its limited
size, high solubility, and structural integrity, purified D10 scTCR
appears to be suitable for structural studies by multidimensional NMR
spectroscopy.
INTRODUCTION
Immune activation of T lymphocytes is normally initiated by the
specific interaction between an antigenic peptide presented by the
major histocompatibility complex
(MHC)1 (1) and the and
(or and ) clonotypic chains of the T-cell receptor (TCR)
complex (2, 3). T-cells can also be stimulated by superantigens,
although the TCR/superantigen interaction differs from that of TCR/MHC
peptide in that specificity for a particular superantigen appears to be
determined only by the sequence of the germ line-encoded V segment
of the TCR (4, 5).
Because of its central role in immune recognition, detailed structural
information on the TCR is of great interest. Recently, three-dimensional structures of a heterodimeric, glycosylated murine
 TCR (2C), the corresponding 2C TCR/class I MHC-peptide complex
(6), and a nonglycosylated human  TCR (A6) bound to a class I
MHC-peptide complex (7) were solved using x-ray crystallography. The
overall orientation of the CDR regions of both of these TCRs is
similar. Moreover, the folded variable domain structures of both TCRs
resemble the antigen binding region of antibodies, although differences
exist in the C domain and in the interdomain pairing of C and
C (6). Crystal structures of an isolated TCR -chain (8) and a
V homodimer (9) also showed immunoglobulin-like folding patterns.
Three-dimensional crystal structures of staphylococcal enterotoxin C2
and C3 bound to the extracellular portion of the -chain
(V 8.2J 2.1C 1) of the mouse 14.3.d TCR were also recently
reported (10). Unlike the TCR/MHC interactions (6, 7), only the CDR2
and to lesser extents CDR1 and hypervariable region 4 (HV4) of the
V -chains are involved in binding to SEC.
Three-dimensional high resolution structures can also be derived from
NMR-based approaches (11, 12). The NMR structures have the potential
advantage of being obtained in solution and can provide insights into
conformational flexibility and structural dynamics (13, 14). Although
the NMR approach is mostly limited to proteins with molecular masses
less than ~30 kDa that can be uniformly enriched with 13C
and 15N isotopes and remain soluble at high submillimolar
concentrations (12), deuteration in concert with
13C,15N multidimensional NMR techniques can
push this limit to higher molecular masses (15). Because of their
limited size (~30 kDa), single chain (sc) TCR molecules in which the
V - and V -chains are connected by a flexible polypeptide linker
(reviewed in Ref. 16) might be amenable to NMR structure determination,
and various scTCR constructions have been produced previously using
Escherichia coli expression systems (reviewed in Ref. 16).
Despite this, the conformational integrity and ligand binding
characteristics of these proteins have not been well established (Ref.
17, and for review see Ref. 16).
We recently reported ligand binding properties of a soluble,
heterodimeric murine  TCR derived from the D10 T-cell clone (V 2, V 8.2) of the AKR (H-2k) mouse and expressed in
baculovirus-infected insect cells (18). Using a surface plasmon
resonance (SPR) biosensor (19, 20), we showed that this protein binds
both V 8.2-specific bacterial superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin
C2 (SEC2) and a soluble, heterodimeric MHC class II
I-Ak-conalbumin peptide (residues 134-146) complex with a
low micromolar affinity (18).
To define further the structural requirements for D10 TCR binding, and
to obtain material suitable for NMR structural studies, we produced a
soluble D10 scTCR molecule using an E. coli expression system. Purified and refolded protein bound to SEC2 and
I-Ak-conalbumin peptide complex with thermodynamic and
kinetic binding constants similar to those measured previously for the
insect cell-derived, heterodimeric D10 TCR (18), suggesting that
neither the TCR constant domains nor potential N- or
O-linked carbohydrate moieties are necessary for ligand
binding. In addition, based on circular dichroism and one-dimensional
NMR spectroscopy, purified D10 scTCR appears to be suitable for
structural studies by multidimensional NMR spectroscopy. NMR studies on
the D10 scTCR may be helpful in assessing the flexibility of its
various CDR regions and may provide further insight into whether the
scTCR undergoes conformational changes as a result of its interactions
with superantigens and class II MHC-peptide complex.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Antibodies
Hybridomas expressing D10 clonotype-specific mAb
3D3 (21) (provided by Dr. Al Bothwell, Yale Medical School, New Haven, CT), and ACID-p1/BASE-p1 leucine zipper (LZ)-specific mAb 1Velcro2H11 (2H11 (18, 22)) were grown in hollow fiber reactors, and the secreted
antibodies were purified by affinity chromatography using immobilized
protein A (Repligen, Cambridge, MA) as described (23). TCR
V 2-specific mAb B20.1 (24) and V 8.1/2-specific mAb MR5-2 (25)
were obtained from Pharmingen (San Diego, CA).
Proteins
Heterodimeric D10 TCR expressed in
baculovirus-infected insect cells was purified using 3D3 immunoaffinity
chromatography as described (18). Similarly, baculovirus-derived
soluble, heterodimeric murine MHC class II I-Ak derivatives
containing a fused antigenic conalbumin (CA) peptide (26) and
complementary LZ sequences to facilitate efficient chain pairing (22)
were prepared as described (18). Baculovirus-derived soluble,
heterodimeric human MHC class II HLA-DR1 loaded with an influenza
hemagglutinin (HA) peptide (residues 306-318) was prepared as
described (27). Purified superantigens staphylococcal enterotoxin B
(SEB), staphylococcal enterotoxin C2 (SEC2), and toxic shock syndrome
toxin-1 (TSST-1) were purchased from Toxin Technology, Inc. (Sarasota,
FL). The purity of these proteins was confirmed by size exclusion
chromatography and SDS-PAGE prior to use.
E. coli Expression Vector Encoding Maltose-binding Protein
(MBP)-D10 scTCR Fusion Protein
Plasmids pFRSV-SRaD10 GPI TCR
and pFRSV-SRbD10 GPI TCR, encoding D10 - and -chain variable
domain genes, respectively, were gifts from Dr. Al Bothwell. These two
cDNA plasmids were used as templates from which sequences encoding
D10 TCR - and -chain variable domains were generated, using PCR.
Using appropriate oligonucleotide primers, the -chain gene was
engineered to encode NarI and XhoI restriction
sites at the 5 - and 3 -ends, respectively, as well as two stop codons
at the 3 -end. The -chain gene was engineered to encode
NcoI and BamHI restriction sites at the 5 - and
3 -ends, respectively. The amplified genes were then ligated into
plasmid p3xG"b3" using the 5 - and 3 -restriction sites, to
generate plasmid p6/530. A flexible linker (the 3xG-linker, amino acid
sequence GSGGGGSGGGGSGGSGA) was engineered into the plasmid between the
- and -chain genes, resulting in a gene encoding D10 scTCR in the
order -linker- (Fig. 1). The 5 -end of the scTCR gene was then
modified, using PCR and standard molecular biology techniques, to
encode an EcoRI restriction site, followed by a thrombin
cleavage site encoding amino acids LVPRG (28). This modified D10 scTCR
gene was inserted between the EcoRI and SalI
sites within the polylinker of the MBP fusion protein expression vector
pPR998 (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). The resulting plasmid
encoded a MBP-D10 scTCR fusion protein. The tether sequence, between
the 3 -end of the malE gene (encoding MBP) and the 5 -end of
the D10 TCR gene, was then deleted for the factor Xa cleavage site
present in plasmid pPR998, leaving the thrombin cleavage site
previously engineered at the 5 -end of the D10 TCR gene. The resulting
plasmid encoded a MBP-D10 scTCR fusion protein with a 10-amino acid
tether (NSSSLVPRGS).
Using oligonucleotide primers to generate DNA of the correct sequence
by the PCR, the linker between TCR - and -chain genes was then
modified by the addition of the FLAGG sequence (IBI, New Haven, CT),
encoding amino acids DYKDDDDK. The resulting 27-amino acid linker
sequence was GSDYKDDDDKRSGGGGSGGGGSGGSGA. Also, to minimize potential
covalent aggregation, the codon for an unpaired cysteine residue in the
J -region was changed to encode a serine residue. Finally, to aid in
protein purification, a sequence encoding six histidine residues was
added to the 3 -end of the MBP-D10 scTCR gene. This resulted
in the final MBP-D10 scTCR fusion protein expression vector, p4/219. A
schematic of the resulting MBP-D10 scTCR fusion protein construct is
shown in Fig. 1A, and the amino acid sequence of D10 scTCR
is shown in Fig. 1B. It was subsequently discovered that the
fifth codon of the -chain gene of the D10 scTCR construct was
mutated to encode a threonine rather than a serine residue (Fig.
1B). The mutation presumably occurred as a result of an
error by Taq polymerase during a PCR procedure. The mutation
appears to be benign, as the purified and refolded D10 scTCR protein
was found to be in a native-like conformation (see below).
Expression and Purification of D10 scTCR
BL21 cells
(Novagen, Madison, WI) transformed with vector p4/219 were grown in a
5-liter bioreactor (B. Braun Biotech, Allentown, PA) at 27 °C in
4 × YT medium (3.2% bactotryptone, 2% yeast extract, and 0.5%
NaCl) containing 2.0% glycerol and 50 µg/ml ampicillin. Cells were
induced with 1 mM
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside at
A600 = 15 (late log phase). Cells were harvested
3 h after induction, with a yield of 60 g wet cell paste per
liter of culture.
Cells were resuspended in lysis buffer containing 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.2 M NaCl, 0.1 mM
4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride-HCl at 10 ml/g cells wet
weight. Resuspended cells were lysed by passage through a
microfluidizer (model M110T, Microfluidics Corporation, Newton, MA) at
15,000 p.s.i. Lysis supernatant was filtered through a 0.45-µ
Pellicon filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA) and used for subsequent
purification.
All purification steps, with the exception of nickel-nitrilotriacetic
acid (Ni-NTA) metal affinity chromatography, were performed at 4 °C.
Lysis supernatant was applied to a cross-linked amylose column (New
England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) at a flow rate of 3 ml/min. The column
was then washed with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 0.2 M NaCl, and bound proteins were eluted with the same buffer
containing 10 mM maltose. Purified fusion protein was next
denatured with 6 M GdnHCl in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH
8.0) containing 0.2 M NaCl and 10% glycerol (buffer A),
and applied to a Ni-NTA metal affinity column (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA)
at a flow-rate of 3.7 ml/min. After washing the column with 2 column volumes of buffer A, a refolding gradient was initiated and maintained at a flow rate of 3.7 ml/min using fast protein liquid chromatography (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). A 240-min linear gradient was formed from
100% buffer A to 100% buffer B containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.2 M GdnHCl, 20% glycerol, and 0.5 M NaCl. After washing the column with 1 column volume of
buffer B, the bound material was eluted with buffer B containing 250 mM imidazole. The eluted MBP-D10 scTCR fusion protein was
further purified by immunoaffinity chromatography on an immobilized 3D3
column, which specifically recognizes a D10 TCR conformational epitope
(18, 21, 29). Finally, monomeric MBP-D10 scTCR was isolated by size
exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 200PG 26/60 column (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.).
To obtain D10 scTCR, purified fusion protein was first digested with
thrombin (Calbiochem) at 40:1 (w/w) for 16 h at 37 °C in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 2 mM
CaCl2 and 0.02% sodium azide. The digested sample was next
applied to the Ni-NTA column, and D10 scTCR containing the
hexahistidine tag was eluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)
and 250 mM imidazole. Purified D10 scTCR was dialyzed into
20 mM MES (pH 6.8) containing 1 mM EDTA and 0.02% sodium azide and stored at 4 °C. For NMR experiments (see below), purified protein was concentrated to 3 mg/ml using
Centriprep-10 concentrators (Amicon, Beverly, MA).
Protein concentrations were determined by spectrophotometry at 280 nm
using extinction coefficients of 1.7 and 1.2 M 1 cm 1 for MBP-D10 scTCR and
D10 scTCR, respectively. Quantitative amino acid analysis was performed
using an Applied Biosystems (Perkin-Elmer) model 421 amino acid
analysis system. To test the solubility characteristic of D10 scTCR, a
small amount of purified protein was concentrated using Centricon 10 concentrator. D10 scTCR remained soluble at concentrations up to 1 mM.
Protein Analysis
SDS-PAGE (30) and isoelectric focusing
(31) analyses were performed essentially as described. N-terminal amino
acid sequence analyses were performed on the proteins blotted on
ProBlott membranes (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as described
(32).
Molecular Weight Determination
The apparent molecular
weight of purified D10 scTCR under nondenaturing conditions was
determined by size exclusion chromatography on Superdex 75HR
(Pharmacia) or TSK G2000 (Tosohaas, Philadelphia, PA) columns
equilibrated with 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.8) containing 200 mM sodium sulfate and 10% glycerol. The
columns were calibrated with the following molecular mass standards
(Bio-Rad): thyroglobulin (66 kDa), -globulin (158 kDa), ovalbumin
(43 kDa), myoglobin (17 kDa), and vitamin B12 (1 kDa). A 50-µg (2.5 mg/ml) sample of purified D10 scTCR was injected at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min, and 0.5-ml fractions were collected. Molecular weight of D10
scTCR was also determined by electrospray-mass spectrometry using a VG
Biotech Bio-Q instrument with a quadruple mass analyzer (M-Scan Inc.,
West Chester, PA).
Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopy
CD analysis was
performed on purified D10 scTCR (0.15 mg/ml in 2 mM HEPES
(pH 7.2)). Far-UV CD spectra were recorded on a CD instrument model 62 DS (Aviv Associates, Lakewood, NJ) using a 2-mm path length cell. Data
were collected using a time constant of 1 s at every 0.2 nM and with a 1 nm constant spectral bandwidth at 25 °C.
The CD data were analyzed for secondary structure prediction by an
algorithm Prosec V3.1 provided by the manufacturer (Aviv Associates,
Lakewood, NJ).
NMR Spectroscopy
One-dimensional NMR experiments were
carried on purified D10 scTCR (~80 µM in 95% (v/v)
H2O/D2O and 20 mM deuterated
acetate (pH 4.5)) at 25 and 37 °C on a Varian
UNITYplus750 MHz spectrometer with a 1H
resonance frequency of 750.079 MHz. The spectral width was 23,995 Hz,
and the carrier was placed on the H2O resonance which was suppressed by low power presaturation during the recycle delay (1.3 s).
8,192 complex points were obtained, and 1,024 transients were collected
for signal averaging. Data processing was carried out using Felix
software (Biosym Technologies, San Diego). The residual water signal
was removed by the time domain convolution technique. Data were
multiplied with a /2 shifted squared sine bell apodization function
and zero-filled to 16,384 points prior to Fourier transformation.
1H chemical shifts were referenced relative to the water
resonance, calibrated in turn at 4.755 and 4.631 ppm at 25 and
37 °C, respectively, on an external
2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentanesulfonic acid standard.
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Binding Experiments
Binding
studies were performed using a commercial biosensor instrument
(BIAcoreTM, Pharmacia BioSensor, Uppsala, Sweden). All
proteins used in these experiments were purified by size exclusion
chromatography. Immobilizations were carried out in 10 mM
sodium acetate at pH 5.5 for D10 scTCR or at pH 4.0 for superantigens
using the Amine Coupling Kit (Pharmacia BioSensor, Uppsala, Sweden) as
described (18, 19). Heterodimeric, soluble D10 TCR (18) and BDC2.5 TCR
(33) derived from baculovirus-infected insect cells were used as
control proteins for specificity experiments. HEPES-buffered saline
(HBS; 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 3.4 mM EDTA, and 0.005% surfactant P20) was injected over the
sensor chip at 5 µl/min, and 20-µl analyte samples diluted
(~25-fold) in HBS buffer were injected. Where required, the biosensor
surface was regenerated with 5-10 mM HCl. All binding
experiments were conducted at 25 °C. The SPR signal was recorded as
resonance units (RU) versus time and plotted as a
"sensorgram." For kinetic rate analyses, binding studies were
performed on ligands immobilized at multiple densities. The data,
generated at least in triplicate, were analyzed using the non-linear
curve-fitting software package (BIAevaluation 2.1, Pharmacia Biosensor)
that also allows the parameters to be extracted from a single run (18,
34-36). To determine the apparent association (kon) and dissociation
(koff) rate constants, the association and
dissociation phases of the sensorgrams were fitted on single site
models, A + B = AB and AB = A + B, respectively. The apparent dissociation constant (KD) was determined from the
ratio of koff/kon.
RESULTS
Expression and Purification of D10 scTCR
The construct used
to produce recombinant D10 scTCR is shown schematically in Fig.
1A. The TCR V and V
domains were connected by a 27-residue flexible peptide linker (Fig.
1B), and the E. coli maltose-binding protein
(MBP) was fused to the N terminus of the V domain via a linker
containing a thrombin cleavage site. In addition, six histidine
residues were added to the C terminus to allow binding to a Ni-NTA
affinity chromatography column. The expressed protein was purified
under nonreducing conditions to preserve the disulfide bonds formed
in vivo. A similar approach was utilized to refold an
E. coli-expressed single chain antibody (37).
Fig. 1.
Construction of D10 scTCR. A,
schematic representation of MBP-D10 scTCR construct. SS,
signal sequence of the MBP. L, linker that joins the V
and V domains of the D10 TCR. HH, hexahistidine tag.
Thrombin cleavage site located between the MBP and D10 scTCR domains is
marked with an arrow. B, amino acid sequence of
D10 scTCR portion of the construct. The N-terminal amino acids of the
V and V domains of the D10 scTCR molecule are indicated with a *.
The underlined LVPRGS amino acid sequence corresponds to the
thrombin cleavage site located between the MBP (not shown) and D10
scTCR sequences. Thrombin cleaves after arginine (R). The
27-residue linker sequence connects the C terminus of V domain to
the N terminus of V domain of D10 TCR. The hexahistidine amino acid
sequence added to the C terminus of the V domain is underlined.
[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]
Monomeric MBP-D10 scTCR fusion protein was purified from E. coli lysis supernatants using a combination of amylose, Ni-NTA, and mAb 3D3 affinity chromatography steps. Purified fusion protein was
then subjected to Superdex 200PG size exclusion chromatography to
remove the small amounts of aggregates. Purity of the 70-kDa fusion
protein was monitored after each step by SDS-PAGE performed under
reducing (Fig. 2A, lanes 1-4)
and nonreducing (Fig. 2A, lanes 5-8) conditions. The
N-terminal sequence determined for the purified product (KIEEGKLVI) was
as expected for the correctly processed maltose-binding protein
(38).
Fig. 2.
Production of D10 scTCR. A,
SDS-PAGE analysis of MBP-D10 scTCR fusion protein at various stages of
purification. Lanes 1-4 are run under reducing
(R) conditions, and lanes 5-8 are run under
nonreducing (NR) conditions. Protein bands were visualized using Coomassie Blue stain. Lanes 1 and 5, eluate
from amylose affinity column; lanes 2 and 6,
refolded fusion protein eluted from Ni-NTA column; lanes 3 and 7, eluate from mAb 3D3 immunoaffinity column;
lanes 4 and 8, monomeric MBP-D10 scTCR isolated
following Superdex 200 PG size exclusion chromatography. B,
purification of D10 scTCR. Monomeric MBP-D10 scTCR (MBP-D10)
was cleaved with thrombin and purified using Ni-NTA column (Ni.
Chrom.) as described under "Materials and Methods." The
samples were analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions.
Lane 1, purified monomeric MBP-D10 scTCR; lane 2,
thrombin digestion of MBP-D10 scTCR; lane 3, Ni-NTA
flow-through (FT) of the thrombin-digested monomeric fusion
protein; lane 4, D10 scTCR eluted (El) from
Ni-NTA column using 250 mM imidazole. Presence and absence
of thrombin is indicated by + or .
[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]
Thrombin digestion of size exclusion chromatography, purified monomeric
fusion protein resulted in efficient cleavage (Fig. 2B).
Cleavage of the aggregated fusion protein isolated following size
exclusion chromatography, by contrast, was inefficient and resulted in
significant precipitation (not shown). Thrombin-cleaved D10 scTCR was
purified by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography carried out under
nondenaturing conditions (Fig. 2B). The overall yield of
purified D10 scTCR was 0.7-1.0 mg/liter of E. coli cell
culture.
Characterization of D10 scTCR
The N-terminal amino acid
sequence of purified D10 scTCR was determined to be GSAVSQSP,
corresponding exactly to the amino acid sequence predicted following
thrombin cleavage of the fusion protein (Fig. 1B). On
SDS-PAGE analysis, purified D10 scTCR migrated faster under
non-reducing than under reducing conditions (Fig. 3A), suggesting the existence
of intramolecular disulfide bonds that lead to a more compact
structure. Furthermore, TCR family-specific mAbs B20.1 (V 2) and
MR5.2 (V 8.1/2) recognized only the non-reduced protein on Western
blot analysis (not shown). Similar results were obtained with
baculovirus-expressed, disulfide-linked, heterodimeric D10
TCR.2 Together, these results
indicate that purified D10 scTCR is in a correctly disulfide-bonded
conformation. The isoelectric point (pI) of purified D10 scTCR was
determined to be 8.8 under native conditions (Fig. 3B),
consistent with the theoretical pI of 8.9 calculated from the primary
amino acid sequence. Purified D10 scTCR appears to be monomeric. The
molecular mass was determined to be approximately 28 kDa by size
exclusion chromatography performed under nondenaturing conditions (Fig.
3C). The molecular mass of purified D10 scTCR was also
determined by electrospray-mass spectrometry to be 27,891.5 daltons
(not shown). These values are in agreement with the molecular mass of
27,893 daltons calculated from the primary amino acid sequence of the
thrombin-cleaved D10 scTCR containing the C-terminal hexahistidine
extension.
Fig. 3.
Characterization of purified D10 scTCR.
A, SDS-PAGE analysis of purified protein. D10 scTCR (6 µg)
was subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE under reducing (R,
lane 1) and nonreducing (NR, lane 2)
conditions. B, isoelectric focusing analysis. Purified D10 scTCR (5 µg) was analyzed by isoelectric focusing on Servalyte precoat gels (pH 3-10) at 4 °C under nonreducing conditions
(lane 2). The protein bands were visualized using Serva Blue
stain. The known pI values (lane 1) for the marker proteins
(Pharmacia) are as follows: amyloglucosidase (3.5), soybean trypsin
inhibitor (4.55), -lactoglobulin A (5.2), bovine carbonic anhydrase
B (5.85), human carbonic anhydrase B (6.55), horse myoglobin (6.85, 7.35), lentil lectin (8.15, 8.45, 8.65), and trypsinogen (9.3).
C, size exclusion chromatography of isolated D10
scTCR. A 100-µg aliquot of purified D10 scTCR (solid line)
was passed over a TSK G2000 size exclusion chromatography column.
Elution profile of molecular weight standards is shown (dashed
line, arrows indicate molecular weights). The molecular mass of
D10 scTCR was determined to be approximately 28 kDa.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]
The conformation of purified D10 scTCR was examined by CD and NMR
spectroscopy. The far UV-visible CD spectrum indicated that purified
D10 scTCR contained predominantly -sheet secondary structure (Fig.
4A). Deconvolution of the
digitized CD data provided the following predictions for the relative
percentage of secondary structural elements: 11% -helix, 72%
-sheet, 14% random coil, and 3% turn. These results are in
agreement with the recently solved crystal structures of the
heterodimeric TCRs (6, 7) and the immunoglobulin domain model for the
V /V TCR structure as proposed by others (17, 39-42).
Fig. 4.
Biophysical characterization of D10 scTCR.
A, far UV CD spectrum of purified D10 scTCR. Far UV CD
spectrum of purified D10 scTCR was recorded on an Aviv Associates model
62 DS CD spectrophotometer. Protein concentration, 5.2 µm.
B, one-dimensional NMR spectrum of purified D10 scTCR at
25 °C. The dispersion of the amide resonances (~11.0 to ~6.0
ppm) is typical for a folded protein. The position of the water
resonance which was removed using the time domain convolution technique
is indicated by an arrow. A, many
H resonances downfield shifted from the water resonance
are indicative of secondary structure. B, isolated
signals upfield from the methyl resonances due to ring current shifts
are typically observed in a folded structure. C, the highly
repetitive primary sequence of the "FLAGG/3xG"-linker and the
hexahistidine tag at the C terminus may result in the clustering of
amide resonances, which is indicative of unstructured regions. Some
intense signals between 3.9 and 3.5 ppm presumably originate from an
impurity.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]
To probe further the secondary structure of the purified protein, a
series of one-dimensional NMR experiments were performed. A
representative one-dimensional NMR spectrum is shown in Fig. 4B. The following observations strongly suggest that
purified D10 scTCR predominantly adopts a -sheet secondary
structure: 1) the amide signals (~11.0 to ~6.0 ppm) show a
dispersion, which is typical for folded proteins (11); 2) there are
many low field shifted H resonances, which confirm
that the scTCR is predominantly folded (A in Fig.
4B); 3) a few isolated signals upfield from the methyl resonances are present, which are due to large ring current shifts in a
folded structure (B in Fig. 4B); 4) many
downfield shifted H resonances are indicative of
-sheet secondary structure (42-44). The spectrum also shows
clustering of a large number of sharp resonances between 8.3 and 8.0 ppm, indicating that a part of the protein may be unstructured (45)
(C in Fig. 4B). The highly repetitive primary
sequence of the "FLAGG/3xG"-linker and the hexahistidine tag
at the C terminus may give rise to these resonances.
Binding of D10 scTCR to V 8-specific Superantigens
Our
previous SPR binding studies demonstrated that V 8.2-specific
bacterial superantigen SEC2 binds to insect cell-derived soluble,
heterodimeric (V C /V C ) D10 TCR with an apparent
KD of about 1.1 µM (18). In contrast,
SEB, another V 8.2-specific bacterial superantigen, bound to D10 TCR
very weakly (KD > 100 µM), although
it, like SEC2, has been shown to stimulate proliferation of the D10
T-cell clone (46). To examine superantigen binding characteristics of
E. coli-derived D10 scTCR, SPR analyses were performed.
First, purified D10 scTCR was immobilized to the sensor surface and
bacterial superantigens SEC2, SEB, and TSST-1 were each injected over
the surface at a concentration of 0.5 mg/ml (18-20 µM)
in water (Fig. 5A). Similar to
our previous findings (18), V 8.2-specific superantigens SEC2 and SEB
bound to immobilized D10 scTCR, whereas V 15-specific TSST-1 did not
(Fig. 5A). The negative change in base line during injection
of TSST-1 is due to a change in the bulk refractive index resulting
from differences in the salt concentrations of the protein solutions
and the running buffer (17, 18). In addition, the sensorgram shown in
Fig. 5A indicates that, like baculovirus-derived D10 TCR,
E. coli-expressed D10 scTCR binds to SEC2 with higher
affinity than SEB due to a slower dissociation rate.
Fig. 5.
Interactions between D10 scTCR and bacterial
superantigens analyzed by SPR. A, sensorgram showing binding
of superantigens to immobilized D10 scTCR. Superantigens TSST-1, SEB,
and SEC2, each at 0.5 mg/ml in water, were passed over coupled D10
scTCR (5300 RU). B-E, sensorgrams showing binding of D10
scTCR to immobilized superantigens. D10 scTCR (5.0 to 1.0 µM) was passed over immobilized SEC2 (B, 1313 RU), TSST-1 (C, 1253 RU), and control (D)
surfaces. Between injections, surfaces were regenerated with 5 µl of
10 mM HCl (not shown). E, sensorgram showing mAb
3D3 blocks the D10 scTCR/SEC2 interaction. D10 scTCR (2.5 µM) was passed over immobilized SEC2 (983 RU) either in
the absence or presence of mAb 3D3 (5.0 µM). Between
injections, surfaces were regenerated with HCl.
[View Larger Version of this Image (11K GIF file)]
The binding of solution phase D10 scTCR to immobilized superantigens
was also examined. D10 scTCR (5 to 1 µM) bound to an SEC2-coated (Fig. 5B) surface in a
concentration-dependent manner but did not bind to
TSST-1-coated (Fig. 5C) or control (Fig. 5D) surfaces. Moreover, similar to our previous findings (18), D10 clone-specific mAb 3D3 completely blocked the sD10 TCR/SEC2 interaction (Fig. 5E). Antibody 3D3 (21) recognizes a conformational
epitope formed by the juxtaposition of the V and V domains (18).
These results therefore imply that the epitope for mAb 3D3 may overlap the binding site for SEC2. Alternatively, it may be that the excluded volume of 3D3 sterically blocks the binding of SEC2.
Kinetic constants for the D10 scTCR-SEC2 interaction were also
determined using SPR measurements (34, 35). For D10 scTCR binding to
immobilized SEC2, kon and
koff were determined to be 2.45 ± 0.72 × 104 M 1
s 1 and 1.36 ± 0.15 × 10 2
s 1, respectively. From these values, a
KD of about 0.6 µM was calculated.
These values are similar to those determined for the
baculovirus-derived, heterodimeric D10 TCR/SEC2 interaction (Table
I).
Binding of D10 scTCR to Soluble MHC Class II-Peptide
Complex
Our previous studies showed that an insect cell-derived,
soluble, heterodimeric murine class II MHC I-Ak derivative
containing fused antigenic conalbumin peptide and complementary leucine
zipper sequences (I-Ak-CA-LZ) specifically stimulates
proliferation of the D10 T-cell clone and binds to the soluble,
heterodimeric D10 TCR with a KD of about 2.1 µM (18). As expected, this interaction was not seen with
the soluble, heterodimeric BDC2.5 TCR (18), a control TCR protein
specific for a murine pancreatic -cell antigen presented by murine
MHC class II I-Ag7 (33, 47). Moreover, neither unloaded
I-Ak-LZ nor human HLA-DR1·HA peptide complex showed
detectable binding to the heterodimeric D10 TCR, indicating that the
bimolecular interaction between D10 TCR and I-Ak-CA-LZ is
specific (18).
To understand better the structural requirements for immune
recognition, SPR experiments were performed to examine the binding interactions between D10 scTCR and various MHC class II-peptide complexes. Purified I-Ak-CA-LZ at 5 µM bound
specifically to D10 scTCR immobilized on the sensor surface (Fig.
6A). The sensorgram spike at
the end of the injection is due to differences in salt concentration
between the protein solution and running buffer. Neither
I-Ak-LZ at 5 µM nor human HLA-DR1·HA
peptide complex (27) at 15 µM showed detectable binding.
These specificities are identical to those observed for heterodimeric
D10 TCR (18).
Fig. 6.
Interactions between D10 scTCR and soluble
class II MHC molecules analyzed by SPR. A, sensorgram
showing that I-Ak-CA-LZ specifically interacts with
immobilized D10 scTCR. Purified I-Ak-CA-LZ (5 µM), I-Ak-LZ (5 µM), and
soluble HLA-DR1·HA peptide complex (15 µM) proteins were passed over immobilized D10 scTCR (2004 RU). B,
sensorgram showing concentration-dependent binding of
I-Ak-CA-LZ to immobilized sD10 TCR. Purified
I-Ak-CA-LZ (5.0-1.0 µM) was passed over
immobilized sD10 TCR (2768 RU). Between injections, surfaces were
regenerated with 5 µl of 10 mM HCl.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]
Kinetic and equilibrium binding constants for I-Ak-CA-LZ
binding to immobilized D10 scTCR were also measured using the SPR biosensor. For these studies, I-Ak-CA-LZ was injected over
a D10 scTCR-coated surface at various concentrations (5 to 1 µM) (Fig. 6B), and association and
dissociation rate constants were determined to be 1.71 ± 0.47 × 104 M 1
s 1 and 2.58 ± 0.38 × 10 2
s 1, respectively. The ratio of these kinetic constants
gave an equilibrium dissociation constant of 1.5 µM.
These values are nearly identical to those determined for the
heterodimeric D10 TCR/I-Ak-CA-LZ interaction (Table I)
(18).
DISCUSSION
In the present study, milligram amounts of refolded, native-like
D10 scTCR were produced for structural and functional studies. The
scTCR molecule was expressed as a fusion protein in which the E. coli maltose-binding protein was fused to the N terminus of the
D10 scTCR molecule. We selected MBP (38, 48) as a fusion partner for
the following reasons. First, MBP can be transported to the periplasmic
space of E. coli, where proper disulfide bonds can be formed
(49). Second, the fusion protein can be purified in high yield
utilizing amylose affinity chromatography. Third, MBP may act as
a scaffold to facilitate the folding of the scTCR domains. Finally, MBP
does not contain any cysteine residues that would interfere with the
intramolecular disulfide bond formation within the D10 scTCR
molecule.
Purified D10 scTCR possessed native-like properties based on several
analytical techniques. CD and one-dimensional NMR spectra indicated
that purified protein is stabilized predominantly by -sheet
secondary structure. Recently, similar results were reported for an
E. coli-derived V domain of a murine B4.2.3 TCR (42). Importantly, purified D10 scTCR remains soluble at concentrations to 30 mg/ml, further indicating a native-like conformation. This has not been
reported for other E. coli-derived scTCR molecules (17, 40,
41, 50, 51). Previously, it was suggested that the solubility of
E. coli-derived scTCR molecules is enhanced by the presence
of >20 charged amino acid residues in the variable domains
(particularly V ) and by a small (1-2) number of potential N-linked glycosylation sites (52). The solubility of
purified D10 scTCR is consistent with the first criterion (there are 23 charged amino acids in the -chain) but not with the second (there are 3 potential N-linked glycosylation sites in D10
scTCR).
The ability of E. coli-derived D10 scTCR to interact with
V 8.2 TCR-specific bacterial superantigens in the absence of MHC class II molecules is consistent with our previous finding (Ref. 18,
also see Table I) and also with other published reports (17, 53-54).
The kinetic and binding constants for the D10 scTCR/SEC2 interaction
are similar to those of the baculovirus-derived, heterodimeric (V C /V C ) D10 TCR/SEC2 interaction (Table I), indicating that only V V domains are required for SEC2 binding. Previously, the affinity of SEC2 for the myeloma cell-derived, soluble V C -chain of the 14.3.d TCR (V 4.1, V 8.2) was determined to be 5.4 µM using the SPR biosensor, and 2.32 µM by
a sedimentation equilibrium binding technique (55). Together, these
results further imply that residues in the common V 8.2 segment alone
are sufficient for binding to superantigens, at least in the absence of
MHC (17, 55-57). The recently solved three-dimensional crystal
structures of the -chain of the 14.3.d TCR bound to both SEC2 and
SEC3 further support this conclusion (10).
Kinetic and dissociation constants for the interactions between
different TCRs and MHC-antigen complexes have been determined by
several laboratories (58, 59, also reviewed in Ref. 16). Our recent
studies (18) showed that the affinity of soluble, heterodimeric D10 TCR
for soluble I-Ak·CA peptide complex is about 2.1 µM. The KD for E. coli-derived D10 scTCR/I-Ak·CA peptide complex
was found to be nearly identical (1.5 µM) to this value
(Table I), further implying that the variable domains of the
heterodimeric D10 TCR are sufficient for their interaction with the
murine MHC class II I-Ak·CA peptide complex.
Malchiodi and co-workers (55) showed that an unglycosylated mutant form
of the murine 14.3.d TCR -chain in which four out of five potential
Asn-linked glycosylation sites were eliminated through site-directed
mutagenesis bound to various forms of SEC with affinities similar to
those of fully glycosylated form. Although these results suggest that
N-linked glycans do not contribute to superantigen binding,
the possible involvement of the fifth remaining site as well as the
potential yet unidentified O-linked carbohydrate sites (60)
in binding to SEC could not be ruled out. Since the E. coli-derived D10 scTCR was not glycosylated, our studies provide a
direct evidence that the carbohydrates do not play a significant role
in the binding of D10 TCR to SEC2 and also to murine MHC class II
I-Ak·CA peptide complex. In addition, these results
suggest that carbohydrates are also not required for the expression and
conformational stability of the D10 TCR.
Sequence alignments (39) and more recently the x-ray crystallographic
data (6-9) suggest that TCRs and Igs are built on the same principles.
Interestingly, the interdomain contact residues that are present in the
corresponding VL-VH antibody interface are also
conserved between V and V domains of TCR (6). Moreover, similar
to Ig molecules, within each V and V domains of 2C TCR about 24 residues form the core of the -sheet sandwich (6). The CD and
one-dimensional NMR spectra of purified D10 scTCR described here also
indicate that scTCR is stabilized predominantly by -sheet secondary
structure, consistent with its native-like conformation.
Because of its size, high solubility, and structural integrity,
purified D10 scTCR should be suitable for structural studies by
multidimensional NMR
spectroscopy.3 Such studies
may help in determining the packing of the V and V domains in
scTCR and in assessing the flexibility of its various CDR regions in
solution. In addition, the structural and dynamic studies with
superantigens and class II MHC/peptide should be useful in further
understanding the molecular interactions between TCR and its
ligands.
FOOTNOTES
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Protein Biochemistry,
UE 0435, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, 709 Swedeland Rd., King of
Prussia, PA 19406. Tel.: 610-270-7085; Fax: 610-270-7359.
1
The abbreviations used are: MHC, major
histocompatibility complex; TCR, T-cell receptor; scTCR, single chain
TCR; SPR, surface plasmon resonance; SEB, S. aureus
enterotoxin B; SEC2, S. aureus enterotoxin C2; TSST-1, toxic
shock syndrome toxin 1; MBP, maltose-binding protein; Ni-NTA,
nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid; CA, conalbumin peptide-(134-146); LZ,
leucine zipper; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; MES,
4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; mAb, monoclonal antibody; RU,
resonance units; CDR, complimentarity determining region; HA,
hemagglutinin; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
2
S. Khandekar, unpublished observations.
3
B. Hare, D. Wyss, M. Osburne, B. Bettencourt, S. Khandekar, E. Reinherz, and G. Wagner, Poster presented at the XVIIth
International Conference on Magnetic Resonance in Biological Systems,
August 18-23, 1996, Keystone, CO.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank our colleagues mentioned in the text
for providing reagents; Drs. Ellis Reinherz and Gerhard Wagner for
advice, and Christopher Whalen (Pharmacia Biosensor) for discussion on
the SPR analyses; Thao Duong and Gina Stroh for excellent technical assistance; Kevin McDonald for purified HLA-DR/HA peptide protein; and
Stanley Erck for enthusiastic support.
REFERENCES
-
Stern, L. J., and Wiley, D. C.
(1994)
Curr. Biol.
2,
245-251
-
Meuer, S. C., Acuto, O., Hercend, T., Schlossman, S. F., and Reinherz, E. L.
(1984)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
2,
23-50
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ashwell, J. D., and Klausner, R. D.
(1990)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
8,
139-167
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Janeway, C. A., Jr., Yagi, J., Conrad, P. J., Katz, B., Jones, B., Vroegop, S., and Buxser, S.
(1989)
Immunol. Rev.
107,
61-88
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Marrack, P., and Kappler, J.
(1990)
Science
248,
705-711
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Garcia, K. C., Degano, M., Stanfield, R. L., Brunmark, A., Jackson, M. R., Peterson, P. A., Teyton, L., and Wilson, I. A.
(1996)
Science
274,
209-219
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Garboczi, D. N., Ghosh, P., Utz, U., Fan, Q. R., Biddison, W. E., and Wiley, D. C.
(1996)
Nature
384,
134-141
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bentely, G. A., Boulot, G., Karjalainen, K., and Mariuzza, R. A.
(1995)
Science
267,
1984-1987
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fields, B. A., Ober, B., Malchiodi, E. L., Lebedeva, M. I., Braden, B. C., Ysern, X., Kim, J.-K., Shao, X., Ward, E. S., and Mariuzza, R. A.
(1995)
Science
270,
1821-1824
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fields, B. A., Malchiodi, E. L., Li, H., Ysern, X., Stauffacher, C. V., Schlievert, P. M., Karjalainen, K., and Mariuzza, R. A.
(1996)
Nature
384,
188-192
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wüthrich, K.
(1986)
NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
-
Bax, A., and Grzesiek, S.
(1993)
Acc. Chem. Res.
26,
131-138
[CrossRef]
-
Peng, J. W., and Wagner, G.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
239,
563-596
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lane, A. N., and Lefèvre, J. F
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
239,
596-619
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sattler, M., and Fesik, S. W.
(1996)
Structure
4,
1245-1249
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fremont, D. H., Rees, W. A., and Kozono, H.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
8,
93-100
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hilyard, K. L., Reyburn, H., Chung, S., Bell, J. I., and Strominger, J. L.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
9057-9061
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Khandekar, S. S., Brauer, P. P., Naylor, J. W., Chang, H.-C., Kern, P., Newcomb, J. R., LeClair, K. P., Stump, H. S., Bettencourt, B. M., Kawasaki, E, Banerji, J., Profy, A., and Jones, B.
(1997)
Mol. Immunol.
34,
493-503
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Johnsson, B., Lofas, S., and Lindqvist, G.
(1991)
Anal. Biochem.
198,
268-277
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Malmqvist, M.
(1993)
Curr. Biol.
5,
282-286
[CrossRef]
-
Kaye, J., Porcelli, S., Tite, J., Jones, B., and Janeway, C. A., Jr.
(1983)
J. Exp. Med.
158,
836-856
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chang, H.-C., Bao, Z. Z., Yao, Y., Tse, A. G. D., Goyarts, E. C., Madsen, M., Kawasaki, E., Brauer, P., Sacchettini, J. C., Nathenson, S. G., and Reinherz, E. L.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
11408-11412
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Harlow, E., and Lane, D.
(1988)
Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Pircher, H., Rebai, N., Groettrup, M., Gregoire, C., Speiser, D. E., Happ, M. P., Palmer, E., Zinkernagel, R. M., Hengartner, H., and Malissen, B.
(1992)
Eur. J. Immunol.
22,
399-404
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kanagawa, O.
(1989)
J. Exp. Med.
170,
1513-1519
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kozono, H., White, J., Clements, J., Marrack, P., and Kappler, J.
(1994)
Nature
369,
151-154
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Stern, L. J., and Wiley, D. C.
(1992)
Cell
68,
465-477
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Engel, I., Ottenhoff, M., and Klausner, R. D.
(1992)
Science
256,
1318-1321
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Corr, M., Slanetz, A. E., Boyd, L. F., Jelonek, M. T., Khilko, S., Al-Ramadi, B. K., Kim, Y. S., Maher, S. E., Bothwell, A. L. M., and Margulies, D. H.
(1994)
Science
265,
946-949
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
277,
680-682
-
Khandekar, S. S., Bettencourt, B. M., Kelley, K. C., and Recny, M. A.
(1993)
Protein Expression Purif.
4,
580-584
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Matsudaira, P.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
10035-10038
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McKeever, U., Khandekar, S., Newcomb, J., Naylor, J., Gregory, P., Brauer, P., Jesson, M., Bettencourt, B., Burke, E., Alderson, A., Banerji, J., Haskins, K., and Jones, B.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
184,
1755-1768
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
O'Shannessy, D. J.
(1994)
Curr. Biol.
5,
65-71
-
Kozono, H., Parker, D., White, J., Marrack, P., and Kappler, J.
(1995)
Immunity
3,
187-196
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Balasubramanian, S., Chernov-Rogan, T., Davis, A. M., Whitehorn, E., Tate, E., Bell, M. P., Zurawski, G., and Barrett, R. W.
(1995)
Int. Immunol.
7,
1839-1849
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pantoliano, M. W., Bird, R. E., Johnson, S., Asel, E. D., Dodd, S. W., Wood, J. F., and Hardman, K. D.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
10117-10125
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Guan, C. D., Li, P., Riggs, P. D., and Inouye, H.
(1988)
Gene (Amst.)
67,
21-30
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Novotny, J., Tonegawa, S., Saito, H., Kranz, D. M., and Eisen, H. N.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
742-746
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Novotny, J., Ganju, R. K., Smiley, S. T., Hussey, R., Luther, M. A., Recny, M. A., Siliciano, R. F., and Reinherz, E. L.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
8646-8650
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ward, E. S.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
224,
885-890
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Plaksin, D., Chacko, S., McPhie, P., Bax, A., Padlan, E. A., and Margulies, D. H.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
184,
1251-1258
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wishart, D. S., Sykes, B. D., and Richards, F. M.
(1991)
J. Mol. Biol.
222,
311-333
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wishart, D. S., Sykes, B. D., and Richards, F. M.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
1647-1651
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gross, K. H., and Kalbitzer, H. R.
(1988)
J. Magn. Reson.
76,
87-99
-
Hong, S.-C., Waterbury, G., and Janeway, C. A., Jr.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
183,
1437-1446
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Haskins, K., Portas, M., Bergman, B., Lafferty, K., and Bradley, B.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
8000-8004
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bregegere, F., Schwartz, J., and Bedoulle, H.
(1994)
Protein Eng.
7,
271-280
-
Plückthun, A.
(1992)
Immunol. Rev.
130,
151-188
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Soo Hoo, W. F., Lacy, M. J., Denzin, L. K., Voss, E. W., Jr., Hardman, K. D., and Kranz, D. M.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
4759-4763
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kurucz, I., Jost, C. R., George, A. J. T., Andrew, S. M., and Segal, D. M.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
3830-3834
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wülfing, C., and Plückthun, A.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
242,
655-669
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Avery, A. C., Markowitz, J. S., Grusby, M. J., Glimcher, L. H., and Cantor, H.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
153,
4853-4861
[Abstract]
-
Seth, A., Stern, L. J., Ottenhoff, T. H. H., Engel, I., Owens, M. J., Lamb, J. R., Klausner, R. D., and Wiley, D. C.
(1994)
Nature
369,
324-327
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Malchiodi, E. L., Eisenstein, E., Fields, B. A., Ohlendorf, D. H., Schlievert, P. M., Karjalainen, K., and Mariuzza, R. A.
(1995)
J. Exp. Med.
182,
1833-1845
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Woodland, D. L., and Blackman, M. A.
(1993)
Immunol. Today
14,
208-211
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Deckhut, A. M., Chien, Y.-H., Blackman, M. A., and Woodland, D. L.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
180,
1931-1935
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Munir Alam, S., Travers, P. J., Wung, J. L., Nasholds, W., Redpath, S., Jameson, S. C., and Gascoigne, N. R.
(1996)
Nature
381,
616-620
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lyons, D. S., Lieberman, S. A., Hampl, J., Boniface, J. J., Chien, Y.-H., Berg, L. J., and Davis, M. M.
(1996)
Immunity
5,
53-61
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Parekh, R. B.
(1994)
Biologicals
22,
113-119
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
.
Volume 272, Number 51,
Issue of December 19, 1997
pp. 32190-32197
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. D. Cohen, J. T. Bariteau, L. M. Magenis, and J. A. Dias
Regulation of Follitropin Receptor Cell Surface Residency by the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway
Endocrinology,
October 1, 2003;
144(10):
4393 - 4402.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Boulter, M. Glick, P. T. Todorov, E. Baston, M. Sami, P. Rizkallah, and B. K. Jakobsen
Stable, soluble T-cell receptor molecules for crystallization and therapeutics
Protein Eng. Des. Sel.,
September 1, 2003;
16(9):
707 - 711.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. H. McMahan, L. Watson, R. Meza-Romero, G. G. Burrows, D. N. Bourdette, and A. C. Buenafe
Production, Characterization, and Immunogenicity of a Soluble Rat Single Chain T Cell Receptor Specific for an Encephalitogenic Peptide
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 15, 2003;
278(33):
30961 - 30970.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Xiong, P. Kern, H.-C. Chang, and E. L. Reinherz
T Cell Receptor Binding to a pMHCII Ligand Is Kinetically Distinct from and Independent of CD4
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 16, 2001;
276(8):
5659 - 5667.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|