JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Massoulié, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Massoulié, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 52, Issue of December 26, 1997 pp. 33045-33055

Cloning and Expression of Acetylcholinesterase from Electrophorus
SPLICING PATTERN OF THE 3' EXONS IN VIVO AND IN TRANSFECTED MAMMALIAN CELLS*

(Received for publication, March 26, 1997, and in revised form, July 30, 1997)

Stéphanie Simon Dagger and Jean Massoulié

From the Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, CNRS URA 1857, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

We cloned and expressed a cDNA encoding acetylcholinesterase (AChE) of type T from Electrophorus electricus organs. When expressed in COS, HEK, and Chinese hamster ovary cells, the AChET subunits generated dimers and tetramers. The cells produced more activity at 27 than at 37 °C. The kinetic parameters of a recombinant enzyme, produced in the yeast Pichia pastoris, were close to those of the natural AChE. Analysis of genomic clones showed that the coding sequence is interrupted by an intron that does not exist in Torpedo and differs in its location from that observed in the mouse. This intron is preceded by a sequence encoding a non-conserved 29-amino acid peptide, which does not exist in Torpedo or mammalian AChEs. According to a three-dimensional model, this non-conserved peptide is located at the surface of the protein, opposite from the entry of the catalytic gorge; its deletion did not modify the catalytic parameters. Sequence analyses and expression of various constructs showed that the gene does not contain any H exon. We also found that splicing of transcripts in mammalian cells reveals cryptic donor sites in exons and acceptor sites in introns, which do not appear to be used in vivo.


INTRODUCTION

The molecular structure of acetylcholinesterase (AChE,1 EC 3.1.1.7) attracts considerable interest, because of its fundamental role in cholinergic synapses. It appeared useful to clone AChE from Electrophorus, since this enzyme has been used as a model in numerous biochemical studies (1, 2), due to its exceptional abundance in electric organs. The catalytic mechanism of AChE has been explored by site-directed mutagenesis, using mostly Torpedo and mammalian AChEs (3, 4). The comparison of AChEs from different species has also been extremely informative, particularly for the structure of the peripheral site in enzymes that show little or no inhibition by peripheral site inhibitors, such as Bungarus AChE (5) or chicken AChE (6).

It was also interesting to analyze the polymorphism of catalytic subunits, generated by alternative splicing, in a Teleost fish. In Torpedo and in mammals, the catalytic domain of AChE may be associated with different C-terminal peptides that determine the quaternary associations and anchoring of the enzyme in membranes or extracellular matrices (7) as follows: the H and T peptides, encoded by alternative exons, characterize, respectively, AChEH subunits, producing glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored dimers, and AChET subunits, producing an array of homo- and hetero-oligomers, including collagen-tailed molecules. This splicing pattern is, however, variable, since Drosophila possesses only AChEH subunits, and chicken possesses only AChET subunits.2 To understand this variability, it is necessary to explore the structure of AChE genes in the various vertebrate lineages.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Reagents for biochemistry were purchased from Prolabo (Paris, France) or from Sigma. Products, enzymes, and kits for molecular biology were from Ambion, Biolabs, Bioprobe Systems, Life Technologies, Inc., Invitrogen, Macherey-Nagel, Pharmacia Biotech Inc., Promega, and U. S. Biochemical Corp. Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Genset. Radioactive alpha -35S-labeled and alpha -32P-labeled nucleotides were from Amersham Corp. Phosphatidylinositol- phospholipase C from Bacillus thuringiensis was obtained from Immunotech (Marseille, France). The M2 monoclonal antibody directed against the "flag" epitope was from Eastman Kodak. Live Electrophorus were obtained from Worldwide Scientific Animals (Apopka, FL); they were rapidly sacrificed, and their tissues were stored in liquid nitrogen.

Determination of a cDNA Sequence Encoding Electrophorus AChE

Purification of Electrophorus AChE and Determination of Peptide Sequences

Collagen-tailed AChE was extracted from Electrophorus electric organs in a high salt buffer and purified by a combination of affinity chromatography, low ionic strength aggregation, and isopycnic centrifugation in CsCl (8, 9). Tryptic fragments of the catalytic subunit were sequenced by Prof. Joel Vandekerckhove (Rijksuniversiteit Gent, Belgium), as described (10).

Construction of a cDNA Library and Amplification of Partial Coding Fragments

mRNAs from Electrophorus electric organs were reverse-transcribed using oligonucleotide hexamers, for construction of a lambda ZAP-II library, which contained 160,000 independent recombinants. The cloning strategy is schematically indicated in Fig. 1. To obtain a non-degenerate probe, we first amplified a fragment of the coding region by PCR, using degenerate oligonucleotide primers. The forward primer F1 was deduced from the sequence of a tryptic peptide, LLDQR (170-174, Torpedo numbering). The reverse primer R1 was based on the peptide sequence WPEWMG (432-437), which is identically conserved in all known sequences of vertebrate and invertebrate cholinesterases. We thus amplified a fragment of 910 bp, called El1. This PCR product was ligated in the PCR-II plasmid (Invitrogen) and sequenced by the method of Sanger, with the Sequenase 2.0 kit (U. S. Biochemical Corp.). We amplified an overlapping fragment of 320 bp (El2), extending further upstream, using a forward degenerate primer, F2, based on another conserved region (EMWNPN, 82-87) and a reverse primer R2 deduced from the sequence of El1. The cloned El1 and El2 fragments were used to synthesize radioactive alpha -32P probes to screen the cDNA library. We thus obtained clones C1, C2, C3 and C4, as shown in Fig. 1.

Amplification and Cloning of the 3' Part of AChE Transcripts (RACE-3')

Total RNA was extracted from electric organs (Bioprobe Systems). Approximately 1 µg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed from the poly(A) tail, using the oligonucleotide (dT)17-Ri-Ro (11) and 5 units of avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Promega) in 20 µl. The products were diluted to 100 µl with water, and 10 µl of this dilution were used for amplification by PCR, using the forward primer F3 in the C3 sequence and Ro as the reverse primer (Fig. 1). For a second amplification, we used a specific downstream (nested) forward primer F4 and the Ri reverse primer, with 5 µl of the 100-fold diluted product of the first reaction. The RACE-3' product, obtained after two amplifications, was cloned in the PCR-II vector.

Construction of a Complete Coding Sequence: Subcloning in the pCDNA3 Mammalian Expression Vector

A complete coding region was constructed from the C3 cDNA fragment and the RACE-3' product, using a unique HgaI restriction site and ligated into pCDNA3 (Invitrogen), after digestion by HindIII and EcoRI. The resulting construct was called cDNAT.

Modeling of the Three-dimensional Structure

A model of Electrophorus electricus AChE, obtained by the first approach protocol of Swiss-Model, using the structure of Torpedo californica AChE as template, was displayed with the RASMOL program.

Analysis of the Electrophorus AChE Gene

Extraction of Genomic DNA

Approximately 1 g of Electrophorus spleen, stored in liquid nitrogen, was powdered with liquid nitrogen in a mortar and lysed in 1 ml of lysis buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 5 mM EDTA, 0.2% SDS, 200 mM NaCl, and 100 µg/ml proteinase K) for 2 h at 55 °C; 0.25 volume of saturated NaCl was added, and the homogenate was vigorously shaken and centrifuged for 20 min at 1500 × g. The pellet was resuspended in TEN buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM NaCl) with 1 mg/ml RNase A.

Analysis of Genomic DNA by PCR: Determination of the Position and Sequence of Introns

PCR was performed with 200 ng of genomic DNA, using 2.5 units of Taq polymerase (Promega) and 20 pmol of each primer, in a final volume of 100 µl. After 10 min at 94 °C, we performed 35 cycles of amplification (1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 55 °C, and 4 min at 72 °C). This was sufficient for all sets of primers (F1/R1, F3/R3, F4/R3, F5/R4, see Fig. 2), except in one case (F2/R2), for which we performed a second amplification of 30 cycles with 1/100 of the product of the first amplification. The PCR products were cloned into PCR-II and sequenced either directly or after a series of deletions according to Henikoff (12), using exonuclease III (Biolabs), S1 nuclease from Aspergillus oryzae (Pharmacia), and T4 DNA ligase (Promega).

Partial Genomic Constructions

Combination of cDNA and Genomic Sequences

A fragment of genomic DNA, which had been amplified by PCR with the primers F4/R3, was inserted in the PCR-II vector and digested by HgaI (in the coding sequence) and BamHI (in the polylinker). The product of digestion was ligated with a fragment of C3, between the HindIII and HgaI sites. The resulting DNA segment contained the complete coding sequence of AChET and the intronic regions located between exons 3, 4, and T; it was inserted into pCDNA3 after digestion by HindIII and BamHI. This partial genomic construction (lacking the intron between exons 2 and 3) was named iT (Fig. 2). We deleted the 3' end of this construction, between a unique HincII site located 7 bp upstream of exon T and the polylinker, producing iDelta T. In these constructions iT and iDelta T, we also suppressed the acceptor splicing sites of exon T and pseudo-exon VLECC (see "Results"), by point mutations from AG to TT: the resulting constructions were called imT and imDelta T (Fig. 2).

Analysis of mRNA Splicing in COS and HEK Cells

Total RNA was extracted from cells that had been incubated for 48 h at 37 °C after transfection and was analyzed by RACE-3' or by RPA.

Ribonuclease Protection Assays (RPA)

Labeled RNA probes were synthesized by Sp6 RNA polymerase with [alpha -32P]UTP (800 Ci/mmol). They were purified by electrophoresis in sequencing gels containing 8 M urea, 5% polyacrylamide and eluted in 2 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS at 37 °C. RNA from Electrophorus tissues or transfected cells was hybridized with radioactive probes and digested by RNase, using the HybSpeed RPA kit (Ambion). The protected fragments were separated by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide sequencing gels and analyzed in a Fuji image analyzer (BAS 1000).

Addition of a C-terminal Flag Epitope

In the constructions cDNAT, iDelta T, and imDelta T, a sequence encoding the flag peptide epitope DYKDDDDK (13) was inserted upstream of the stop codons of the coding sequences of the T and VLECC C-terminal peptides (Fig. 2). Prior to analysis by gel electrophoresis, extracts and culture media from cells expressing these "flagged" constructions were incubated for 1 h at 30 °C with 1/20 of the monoclonal antibody M2, which recognizes the epitope in a C-terminal position.

Site-directed Mutagenesis

Site-directed mutagenesis was performed according to the method of Kunkel et al. (14), in pCDNA3, as described previously (5). Mutagenic oligonucleotides were used as primers for unmodified T7 DNA polymerase form II (Biolabs), on single strands which were produced according to Blondel and Thillet (15).

Expression in the Yeast P. pastoris

In the pCDNA3 constructions cDNAC and cDNACDelta I, an EcoRI site was introduced 80 bp upstream of the ATG initiation codon (see Fig. 2). The coding regions were inserted at the EcoRI site of the pHILD2 expression vector (Invitrogen). The GS115 P. pastoris strain was transformed with the pHILD2 vector after linearization by either NotI or SalI, as described elsewhere (16). We analyzed the enzyme that was secreted in the culture medium 3-5 days after induction with 1% methanol.

Analysis of AChE Molecular Forms

Expression of AChE in COS, HEK, and CHO Cells

Plasmidic DNA was prepared with the Nucleobond plasmid purification kit (Macherey-Nagel). COS7, HEK293, and CHO cells were transfected with 5 µg of DNA per 10-cm dish containing about 106 cells, using the DEAE-dextran method for COS cells, as described previously (17), or the calcium phosphate method for HEK and CHO cells (18). Contrary to HEK and COS cells, CHO cells do not possess the SV40 T antigen and thus do not allow the replication of the pCDNA3 vector. Transiently transfected cells were generally grown at 37 °C for 36-48 h after transfection and then transferred to 27 °C for 48-72 h.

Preparation of Cellular Extracts from Transfected Cells and from Electrophorus Tissues

The transfected cells were scraped in 2 ml of cold TBS (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl) and centrifuged 5 min at 1,500 × g at 4 °C. The cellular pellet was resuspended in 300 µl of extraction buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7, 5 mM MgCl2; 0.01 mg/ml bacitracin; 1% Triton X-100) and homogenized in a Potter glass-teflon homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged 20 min at 19,000 × g at 4 °C, and the supernatant was used as the cellular extract. Extracts from various Electrophorus tissues were prepared by homogenizing approximately 0.5 g of tissue in 7 volumes of extraction buffer without detergent with an Ultraturrax T25 homogenizer (Janke and Kunkel, IKA Labortechnik). The supernatant obtained after centrifugation at 30,000 rpm in a Beckman SW41 rotor for 20 min, at 7 °C, was the "soluble" fraction. The pellet was re-homogenized in 7 volumes of extraction buffer containing 2% Triton X-100 and centrifuged at 40,000 rpm for 30 min, at 7 °C, yielding the "detergent-soluble" fraction.

Assay of AChE Activity: Catalytic Parameters

The AChE activity of tissue extracts, cellular extracts, and culture media was assayed by the colorimetric method of Ellman et al. (19). Enzyme samples were added to 0.2 ml of the assay medium (1 mM acetylthiocholine, in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 0.5 mM 5,5'-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid), 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin), and the reaction was monitored at 414 nm at 30-s intervals, over a period of 5 min, using a Multiskan RC microplate reader (Labsystems). One Ellman unit (EU) corresponds to an increase in optical density of 1 per min, with a path length of 1 cm. For the determination of kinetic parameters, we used crude extracts from electric organs and from transfected cells, as well as secreted AChE from P. pastoris. The extracts were diluted to 0.5 EU/ml in 10 mM Tris, pH 7, 0.1% bovine serum albumin; in some experiments, we added 1 M NaCl, as indicated. The values of Km and Kss, as defined by the Haldane equation, were fitted with the Kaleidagraph software, as described previously (5). Catalytic turnover numbers (kcat) were determined by titrating the active sites of AChE with the irreversible inhibitor O-ethyl-S-[2-(diisopropylamino)-ethyl]methylphosphonothioate (20). These experiments were performed at the Centre d'Etudes du Bouchet.

Analysis of AChE by Sedimentation and Electrophoresis

For sedimentation analyses, samples of tissue extracts, cell extracts, or culture medium containing about 100 mEU of AChE activity were centrifuged in 5-20% sucrose gradients, in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, 8 mM MgCl2, 0.08 mg/ml bacitracin, either without detergent or in the presence of 1% Triton X-100 or Brij-96, as described previously (5, 21, 22). The samples were mixed with Escherichia coli beta -galactosidase (16 S) and alkaline phosphatase (6.1 S) as internal standards of sedimentation coefficients. After centrifugation, the gradients were collected from the bottom of the tubes with a Microperpex peristaltic pump (LKB, Bromma, Sweden) and distributed into about 48 fractions of approximately 300 µl in microtitration plates with an FC 205 fraction collector (Gilson). Samples were transferred to other microtitration plates for assays of AChE (100 µl) and of sedimentation standards (50 µl). S values were obtained by assuming a linear relationship with fraction numbers. Nondenaturing electrophoresis was performed as described previously (17), and AChE activity was stained by the method of Karnovsky and Roots (23).


RESULTS

Structure of Electrophorus AChE

Construction of a Complete cDNA Encoding Electrophorus AChE

To clone AChE from Electrophorus, we used a partial sequence obtained from purified Electrophorus AChE, LLDQR, corresponding to residues 170-174 of Torpedo AChE (note: the number refers to the corresponding Torpedo residue that is considered as a reference (24, 25)) together with totally conserved peptide motifs EMWNPN at positions 82-87 and WPEWMG at positions 432-437. As shown in Fig. 1, oligonucleotide primers allowed us to amplify successive fragments of the coding sequence by PCR, from cDNA obtained by reverse transcription of electric organ poly(A)+ RNA.


Fig. 1. Cloning strategy and structure of a complete cDNA encoding Electrophorus AChE. Fragments of the coding sequence were amplified by PCR with primers F1 and R1 and F2 and R2 and were used as probes for isolating partial cDNA clones. The 3' region was obtained by RACE-3' using nested oligonucleotide primers (F3 and F4). The structure of a reconstructed complete cDNA is shown at the bottom. The coding sequence is boxed. Within this sequence, the limits of exons are indicated. The exons were numbered by analogy with those of the Torpedo AChE gene; this assumes that exon 2, which contains the translation initiation codon, is preceded by a non-coding exon. The size of the 5'-untranslated region is not known; the 5' limit of exon 2 and the 3' limit of exon T have not been determined.

[View Larger Version of this Image (8K GIF file)]


The El1 fragment clearly encodes AChE, including the characteristic peptide motif that surrounds the active site serine, FGESAG. An R2 primer, derived from El1, was combined with F2, corresponding to the EMWNPN peptide sequence, allowing us to amplify an overlapping upstream fragment, El2. Using radioactive probes derived from the El1 and El2 fragments, we obtained several cDNA clones from a random-primed cDNA library, constructed from electric organ mRNA. The clone that contained the longest insert, C3, was totally sequenced; it extends 117 bp upstream of the initiation codon of the AChE open reading frame but is incomplete at the 3' end. Using the RACE-3' method, we obtained the 3' end of the coding sequence and a 3'-untranslated sequence of approximately 770 bp that precedes the poly(A) tail. A complete coding sequence was constructed from these elements (Fig. 1) and used for expression of Electrophorus AChE. Partial genomic and other constructs are described in Fig. 2.


Fig. 2. Structure of constructs used for expression of Electrophorus AChE. The structure of the Electrophorus AChE gene is shown at the top. The coding sequence is boxed, and the non-coding regions are represented by a thick line. The positions of oligonucleotide primers used to determine the structure of the gene and to probe the splicing obtained in transfected cells are shown as arrows. Dashed or dotted lines indicate splicing patterns; those shown above the thick line correspond to natural splicing, producing the AChET transcript; additional splicing modes, which were found in transfected mammalian cells, are shown below. The splicing modes shown as dashed lines produce active AChE. In the 3' region, splicing occurred from exon 4 to exon T when it was present; when exon T was absent, exon 4 was joined to the pseudo-exons VLECC or ECC (V/E). The splicing shown as dotted lines was demonstrated by RT-PCR, using a forward primer located in the 5' non-coding region of the gene (F5), and a reverse primer located in exon T (R3); it removes a large part of the catalytic domain and thus does not lead to catalytically active protein. The lightly hatched box, at the 3' end of exon 2, corresponds to the non-conserved peptide, which is deleted in cDNAcDelta I. The partial genomic construct iT differs from the genomic structure by the absence of intron 2/3. The positions where flag epitopes were added are shown by flags. The asterisks indicate mutations that inactivated the splice acceptor site of pseudo-exon VLECC (imDelta T) or exon T (imT).

[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]


Primary Structure of Electrophorus AChE: a Catalytic Subunit of Type T

The open reading frame encodes a protein of 633 amino acids, beginning with a putative signal peptide of 23 amino acids. The mature protein contains the peptides that were labeled and sequenced by Salih et al. (26). (These sequences were published after our cloning of Electrophorus AChE.) Fig. 3 shows an alignment of the deduced primary sequence of Electrophorus AChE with that of Torpedo AChE (type T). The catalytic domains of the two proteins present 68% identity, without taking into account a 29-amino acid insertion that exists only in Electrophorus AChE, between residues 415 and 416 of Torpedo AChE. The additional peptide is highly hydrophilic, containing 7 glycines and 7 serines. A three-dimensional model of the catalytic domain of Electrophorus AChE, deduced from the structure of Torpedo AChE, indicates that this peptide is located at the surface of the molecule and may partially adopt an alpha -helical structure (Fig. 4).


Fig. 3. Alignment of the peptide sequences of Torpedo and Electrophorus AChEs. The sequences are numbered from the first residue of the mature protein. The underlined regions correspond to the signal peptide (dashed line) and to the C-terminal T peptide (thick line). Conserved residues are boxed. The three intracatenary disulfide bonds are indicated by lines joining the cysteine residues. The Ser, His, and Glu residues that constitute the catalytic triad are shown in gray boxes. The 14 aromatic residues that line the catalytic gorge are indicated by asterisks (13 of them are identically conserved, Phe-330 of Torpedo AChE is replaced by Tyr). Potential N-glycosylation sites of Electrophorus AChE are indicated as follows: common with both Torpedo AChE and human BChE (circle), common with human BChE (lozenges), Torpedo AChE (triangle), not common with either Torpedo AChE or human BChE (square).

[View Larger Version of this Image (75K GIF file)]



Fig. 4. Three-dimensional structure of Electrophorus and Torpedo AChEs. Left panels, Torpedo AChE; right panels, Electrophorus AChE. The ribbon structures of the two enzymes are shown in similar orientations, with the opening of the catalytic gorge (indicated by an arrow) on the right side (top) and on the left side (bottom). Selected residues are shown in space filling view; the active site serine (Ser-200, according to Torpedo numbering) is shown in red; in the peripheral site, tryptophan 279 is shown in green; the Omega  loop (Cys-67-Cys-94) is shown in blue, with the two cysteines as well as the tryptophan 84 in the active site in dark blue. The non-conserved peptide of Electrophorus AChE and the two residues corresponding to its extremities in Torpedo AChE (415-416) are shown in yellow. Part of this peptide is predicted to assume an alpha -helical conformation.

[View Larger Version of this Image (119K GIF file)]


As expected, Electrophorus AChE possesses the 6 cysteines that form three intracatenary disulfide bonds, the three amino acids of the catalytic triad (Ser-200, Glu-327, and His-440), the aromatic residues Phe-288 and Phe-290, which define an acetylcholine-specific acyl pocket, the tryptophan residue Trp-84, which interacts with the choline moiety in the active site, as well as the 14 aromatic residues lining the walls of the gorge; 13 of these residues are identical, but Phe-330 of Torpedo AChE is replaced by Tyr in Electrophorus AChE, as well as in Drosophila, Bungarus, mouse, and human AChEs (3). Together with Trp-84, this residue constitutes the choline-binding subsite of the catalytic site; both the Electrophorus Tyr-330 and Torpedo Phe-330 residues were found to react with the photoactivable ligand p-(N,N-dimethylamino)-benzenediazonium fluoroborate (27, 28).

The peptide sequence contains 6 putative sites for N-glycosylation, one of which (Asn-161, corresponding to His-159 in Torpedo) has not been observed previously in other ChEs; it seems to be localized at the surface of the protein, in the loop joining the secondary structure elements beta 4 and alpha C.

The C-terminal sequence (underlined in Fig. 3) clearly corresponds to a T peptide; it contains all the aromatic residues that are conserved in T peptides of vertebrate cholinesterases and a comparison with the Torpedo C-terminal 40 residues revealed only 9 differences (4, 29). The cloned cDNA therefore encodes a catalytic subunit of type T, AChET, in agreement with the fact that Electrophorus electric organs only contain collagen-tailed forms of AChE (7).

Expression of Electrophorus AChE in COS, HEK, and CHO Cells

Effect of Temperature on the Production of Active AChE

COS, HEK, and CHO cells were transiently transfected with a pCDNA3 vector encoding the Electrophorus AChET subunit. The production of active AChE was considerably increased when the cells were incubated at 27 °C, rather than 37 °C, after transfection, as reported previously in the case of Torpedo AChE (17). After 72 h, 40% of the total activity was released in the culture medium, as shown in Table I, indicating that secretion of this enzyme is somewhat less efficient than that of AChET from rat, but more than that of Torpedo, at 27 °C (30).

Table I. Production of recombinant Electrophorus AChE activity in transfected COS cells

Total activity (cellular and secreted) obtained after 72 h at 27 °C (see "Experimental Procedures") with the iT and iDelta T constructs is given as the proportion of that obtained in parallel transfections with a cDNA construct encoding AChET (T), defined as 100%. The cellular activity represents the proportion of total activity that was recovered in a detergent cell extract.

Total Activity (cells and medium) Cellular activity

% %
T 100 T(a) 61  ± 3
iT(a) 280  ± 20 iT(a) 62  ± 3
iDelta T(c) 250  ± 10 iDelta T(b) 29  ± 3

a >10 different transfections.
b 6-10 transfections.
c Three transfections.

Molecular Forms of AChE

Sedimentation analyses showed that extracts from transfected cells contained mostly amphiphilic dimers, G2a, sedimenting at 5.9 S in the presence of Brij-96 and 7.1 S in the presence of Triton X-100, together with smaller proportions of amphiphilic tetramers, G4a, sedimenting at 10.3 S in Brij-96 and 11 S in Triton X-100, and of nonamphiphilic tetramers, G4na, sedimenting at 12 S in the presence of both detergents (Fig. 5A). As shown in Fig. 5B, the culture medium also contained a majority of amphiphilic dimers, G2a, but the proportion of tetramers, G4na (12 S) and G4a, was higher than in the cell extract. In addition, the secreted amphiphilic AChE forms (G2a and G4a) sedimented slightly but reproducibly faster than the cellular forms, 6.3 S in Brij-96 and 7.3 S in Triton X-100 for the secreted G2a form and 11 S in Brij-96 for the secreted G4a form.


Fig. 5. Sedimentation analysis of AChE forms produced by expressing Electrophorus AChET in COS cells. A, cell extract; B, culture medium. The AChE activity is plotted on an arbitrary scale, as a function of S values, determined from the positions of sedimentation standards. The sedimentation was performed in sucrose gradient containing no detergent (black-square---black-square), Triton X-100 (bullet ---bullet ), or Brij-96 (open circle ---open circle ).

[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]


The nature and the proportions of AChE forms produced in transfected HEK, COS, and CHO cells appeared identical, according to sedimentation analyses (not shown). However, in nondenaturing electrophoresis, the migration of AChE forms produced in CHO cells appeared slightly different from that of the corresponding molecules produced in COS cells (Fig. 6) and in HEK cells (not shown); this was probably due to differences in glycosylation.


Fig. 6. Nondenaturing electrophoresis of AChE produced in COS and CHO cells. Cell extracts from COS and CHO cells expressing AChET after transfection by vectors containing either a cDNA sequence (cDNAT) or a partial genomic construct (iT) were analyzed by nondenaturing electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels, in the presence of Triton X-100 (upper panel) or Triton X-100 with deoxycholate (lower panel). AChE activity was revealed by the method of Karnovsky and Roots (23). The symbols indicate the position of monomers (black-triangle), dimers (bullet ), and tetramers (square ). Black symbols indicate amphiphilic forms that are accelerated by deoxycholate and white symbols indicate non-amphiphilic forms.

[View Larger Version of this Image (79K GIF file)]


Cleavage of a C-terminal Flag Peptide upon Secretion

A flag epitope, when inserted at the end of the AChET protein, did not alter the production of active AChE, or the proportions of the different oligomeric forms, but increased secretion by more than 50%. Although the cellular enzyme was retarded by the anti-flag M2 monoclonal antibody in nondenaturing electrophoresis, most of the secreted enzyme was not affected (Fig. 7, lanes 1-6), indicating that proteolytic removal of a peptide fragment may occur upon release, as previously observed in the case of rat AChET (30).


Fig. 7. Analysis of AChE forms produced in COS cells from various constructs by nondenaturing electrophoresis. Electrophoresis was performed in the presence of Triton X-100 (top panel) and of Triton X-100 with deoxycholate (bottom panel). The cells were transfected with constructs shown in Fig. 2: lanes 1 and 4 AChET; lanes 2, 3, 5, and 6, AChET-flag; lanes 7 and 10, iDelta T; lanes 8, 9, 11, and 12, iDelta T-flag; lanes 13 and 16, imDelta T; lanes 14, 15, 17, and 18, imDelta T-flag. The nature of the subunits obtained from each type of construct is indicated at the bottom (AChET, AChEVLECC/ECC, and AChEECC). Samples corresponding to cell extracts and medium are indicated. Symbols indicate the position of AChE monomers (triangles), dimers (circles), and tetramers (squares); filled symbols correspond to amphiphilic forms, and open symbols correspond to non-amphiphilic forms. Samples obtained from flagged constructs were analyzed with or without preincubation with 1/20 volume of anti-flag M2 antibody, as indicated (-, +). Asterisks indicate complexes of AChE forms with the M2 antibody. The presence of a flag peptide did not change the nature of the molecular forms produced from each construct but accelerated their migration, because of its acidic residues. We obtained two bands corresponding to complexes with M2, but the slower migrating one was much less abundant in the case of AChEECC than of AChEVLECC; this suggests that the epitope is more accessible when the C-terminal peptide contains two more residues.

[View Larger Version of this Image (53K GIF file)]


Co-expression of Electrophorus AChET and QN/Stop

When Electrophorus AChET subunits were expressed in COS cells together with the QN/stop protein, which contains the AChE binding domain of the N-terminal region of the collagen tail (17, 30), they produced soluble tetramers that were mainly recovered in the medium (data not shown).

Expression of Electrophorus AChE in P. pastoris: Catalytic Parameters

Expression of a Truncated Electrophorus AChE in P. pastoris

Because the transfected mammalian cells secreted very little Electrophorus AChET in their culture medium, we attempted to produce this enzyme in the methylotrophic yeast P. pastoris. This yeast was found to express rat AChE in an active form but secreted it better when the C-terminal T peptide was at least partly deleted (16). We therefore introduced a stop codon immediately after the catalytic domain, replacing the first residue of the T peptide and thus creating a truncated protein, which was limited to the catalytic domain, AChEC (Fig. 2). In another construction, AChECDelta I, we replaced the non-conserved 29-amino acid peptide of Electrophorus AChE by the corresponding 3 residues of Torpedo AChE, NGT, thus adding a potential N-glycosylation site. These mutated constructions were inserted in the Pichia expression vector pHILD2 and integrated in yeasts in the AOX gene (HIS+/Muts) or in the HIS4 gene (HIS+/Mut+). In both cases, the recombinant yeasts secreted active AChE, at similar levels.

Catalytic Parameters

We compared the catalytic parameters of natural AChE, purified from Electrophorus electric organs, and of recombinant enzymes (Table II). The expression vectors contained cDNAs encoding AChET, AChEC, or AChECDelta I or partial genomic constructs including 3' introns, with or without exon T (Fig. 2). We found no significant difference between the Km values of natural AChE and of recombinant enzymes obtained in COS cells and in Pichia, either without salt or in the presence of 1 M NaCl. The low salt values are very similar to those obtained previously for AChE from Electrophorus electric organ (26, 31). The increase observed at high ionic strength values illustrates the fact that electrostatic interactions participate in the binding of ligands to AChE. The higher values of Kss observed for AChE produced in Pichia, compared with natural enzyme and that obtained in mammalian cells, is possibly related to a difference in glycosylation. The kcat values were very similar for the recombinant enzyme secreted by Pichia and the natural enzyme from electric organs.

Table II. Catalytic parameters of natural and recombinant Electrophorus AChE

Hydrolysis of acetylthiocholine was analyzed as described under "Experimental Procedures," at room temperature (20 °C).

Km -NaCl Kss -NaCl Km +1 M NaCl Kss +1 M NaCl kcat

µM mM µM mM %
WT (electric organs) 104  ± 10a 14.2  ± 1.5a 282  ± 9b 20.3  ± 1.4b 100
AChET (COS) 110  ± 5a 16.3  ± 1.6a ND ND ND
iT (COS) 125  ± 7b 15.0  ± 1.1b ND ND ND
iDelta T (COS) 108  ± 5b 12.4  ± 0.9b ND ND ND
AChEC (yeast) 108  ± 4b 18.6  ± 0.3b 220  ± 13b 35  ± 9b 84  ± 10b
AChECDelta I (yeast) 106  ± 1a 23.5  ± 2.9a 206  ± 7b 39  ± 7b 86  ± 13b

a Data determined in duplicate, and values represent the means from three different experiments.
b Data determined in duplicate, and values represent the means from five different experiments.

Structure of the Electrophorus AChE Gene

Position of Introns in the Sequence Encoding the Catalytic Domain

As indicated in Fig. 2, we amplified fragments of genomic DNA by PCR to detect the presence of introns and to define their positions. The gene contains at least one 5' non-coding exon, which has not been determined (named exon 1 by analogy with that of Torpedo). The first coding exon of the Torpedo AChE gene, which encodes most of the catalytic domain, corresponds to two exons in Electrophorus (exon 2 and exon 3, see Fig. 8), as in the mouse gene, but the additional intron is located at a different position. It is noteworthy that the sequence encoding the non-conserved peptide is located at the 3' end of exon 2. The position of exon 4, which encodes the end of the catalytic domain, is conserved in all three species.


Fig. 8. Structure of the Electrophorus AChE gene: sequences of exons and introns. The nucleotide sequence is shown in lowercase letters (non-coding) and capital letters (coding). The pseudo-exons encoding the VLECC and ECC peptides are shown in italics. The underlined peptides correspond to the signal peptide (dashed line) and to the non-conserved peptide (solid line). The polyadenylation signal is boxed. Abnormal splice donor sites that are used in mammalian cells are shown by triangles above the nucleotide sequence. The sequence of intron 4/T is shown only partially; it is accessible in the GenBankTM Data base accession number AF030422. This intron and the 3'-untranslated region of exon T contain polypyrimidine stretches and repeated motifs.

[View Larger Version of this Image (74K GIF file)]


Existence of an H Exon?

GPI-anchored dimers, generated from AChEH subunits, have not been reported previously in Electrophorus electric organs or other tissues (24). In the present study, we failed to detect any phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C-sensitive AChE form in the liver, spleen, and electric organs (not shown). Exon 4 is separated from exon T, which encodes the C-terminal T peptide, by an intronic region of 1349 nucleotides. In the Torpedo and mammalian AChE genes, this region contains an alternative exon H, encoding a C-terminal GPI-addition signal (32, 33). An analysis of this region did not allow us to identify any open reading frame that would encode an appropriate H peptide. To confirm this, we transfected cells with partial genomic constructions which included this region (Fig. 2) with the T exon (iT), after its deletion (iDelta T) or inactivation of its acceptor consensus site (imT). These constructions produced 2-3 times more AChE activity than a vector encoding AChET without introns in COS cells (Table I) and in HEK cells (data not shown). However, the distribution of cellular and secreted AChE, as well as the patterns of molecular forms were identical with iT and AChET in cell extracts and in the culture medium (Table I and Fig. 6), indicating that the only type of active AChE subunit generated by splicing of the 3' intronic region was AChET. In the case of iDelta T or imT, the proportion of secreted activity was higher (see Table I), and the three types of cells mostly produced a non-amphiphilic form sedimenting at 7.3 S, together with a small component of about 4.5 S, probably corresponding to dimers and monomers, respectively (as illustrated for COS cells in Fig. 9, A and B). There was no indication for the production of amphiphilic GPI-anchored molecules, which might have been generated by AChEH subunits if splicing had uncovered a potential exon H, in the absence of exon T. 


Fig. 9. Analysis of AChE forms produced in COS cells from constructs with and without exon T. A, nondenaturing electrophoresis of AChE forms. Construct iDelta T produced AChEVLECC and AChEECC. Samples containing AChET, produced from cDNAT (T) and iT, are shown for comparison (cf. Fig. 6). The nature of molecular forms is indicated by symbols, as in Fig. 6. The molecular forms generated by AChET were mostly amphiphilic, as indicated by acceleration of their migration in the presence of deoxycholate (lower panel), and those generated by AChEVLECC subunits and AChEECC subunits were non-amphiphilic. Note that corresponding molecular forms from cell extracts and medium did not migrate at the same rate. B, sedimentation profile of a cell extract obtained after transfection with construct iDelta T. The cells produced AChEVLECC and AChEECC subunits, which generated mostly non-amphiphilic dimers (G2na) and a small proportion of non-amphiphilic monomers (G1na). The sedimentation profiles were obtained with and without detergent, as in Fig. 5.

[View Larger Version of this Image (35K GIF file)]


Utilization of Default Acceptor Sites, Upstream of Exon T: Pseudo-exons ECC and VLECC

To determine the 3' structure of AChE transcripts produced in cells expressing the iDelta T and imT constructions, we used the RACE-3' and RT-PCR methods with mRNA extracted from transfected COS cells (Fig. 10). The sequence of the amplified DNA fragments showed that exon 4 had been spliced to acceptor sites located 78 or 72 bp upstream of exon T, creating novel C-terminal peptide sequences of only five or three residues, VLECC or ECC. Using reverse primers located upstream of these acceptor sites, we did not detect any other splicing product. Analysis by RT-PCR of mRNA isolated from cells transfected with the iT construction, using as reverse primer either Ro or R3 (within exon T), revealed a major amplification product corresponding to the splicing of exon 4 to exon T (Fig. 10). However, using a reverse primer located upstream of exon T (R5), after two successive amplifications we observed a weak band, corresponding to the splicing of exon 4 to the upstream splice acceptors (pseudo-exons VLECC or ECC), showing that they are used at a very minor level when exon T is present.


Fig. 10. PCR analysis of AChE transcripts in COS cells, after transfection with the partial genomic constructs iT and iDelta T. The structure of the constructs is shown at the top, with the positions of the oligonucleotide primers (the dashed line corresponds to the vector sequence, located between the insert and the polyadenylation site). The mRNA was reverse-transcribed with (dT)17-Ri-Ro and amplified with F3 and various reverse primers (Ro, R3, R5 or R6). The products obtained after reamplification with F4 and Ri, R3, R5, or R6 are as illustrated. The structure of the amplified products corresponding to each lane is schematically shown at the bottom. Lane m corresponds to size markers (1-kilobase pair ladder, Life Technologies, Inc.).

[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]


To verify that transcripts AChEVLECC or AChEECC generated the non-amphiphilic dimers produced from the iDelta T construction or a mutated imDelta T construction, respectively (in which the acceptor VLECC site was mutated), we inserted the coding sequence of the flag epitope immediately before the stop codon. We found that the resulting cellular and secreted enzymes did carry this epitope, as shown by retardation with the M2 monoclonal antibody in nondenaturing gel electrophoresis (Fig. 7, lanes 7-18), showing that both VLECC and ECC C-terminal peptides produced non-amphiphilic dimers and that the flag peptide was not removed upon secretion, in contrast with AChET.

Utilization of a Cryptic Upstream Donor Splice Site in Mammalian Cells

We performed RNase protection assays on mRNA extracted from COS and HEK cells transfected with cDNAT, iT, and iDelta T with two probes corresponding to the 3' part of AChET or AChEVLECC (Fig. 11). We obtained the same results with the two types of transfected mammalian cells, indicating that they processed the primary transcripts in the same manner. In the case of iT, we found that exon 4 was joined to exon T, as expected. In the case of iDelta T, we found that exon 4 was joined to pseudo-exon VLECC but also to another 3' region, probably pseudo-exon ECC, in agreement with the results obtained in the RACE-3' experiments and with the production of the flagged AChEVLECC or AChEECC enzymes. Except in the case of cDNA, we also observed an unexpected heterogeneity at the junction of exon 3 and exon 4; in about half of the protected fragments, exon 4 was not linked to the upstream exon 3. An analysis of the corresponding transcripts showed that splicing may occur from donor sites located in the 5' region of exon 2, as illustrated in Fig. 2. This splicing deletes a large part of exon 2 and the totality of exon 3, e.g. most of the sequence encoding the catalytic domain, so that it cannot produce active AChE. Fig. 8 shows that splicing from the upstream donor sites, which are located in the sequence encoding the signal peptide and about 19 codons downstream of this sequence, does not respect the coding frame in either exon 4 or exon T. 


Fig. 11. RPA of AChE transcripts obtained in COS and HEK cells and in Electrophorus tissues. The probes contained a fragment of vector DNA, exon 3, exon 4 and either exon T (probe P1, left panel) or pseudo-exon VLECC (probe P2, right panel), as schematically indicated. The lanes correspond to the intact probes and to protected fragments obtained with transcripts from constructs iT, T (cDNAT), and iDelta T (see Fig. 2), expressed in COS cells (C) or HEK cells (H), and with mRNA from Electrophorus brain (Br) and spinal cord (SC). The structure of the protected fragments is indicated. Note that AChET transcripts are the only ones found in the case of the cDNA construct (T) and in the tissues. In the case of COS and HEK cells transfected with iT, they represent about half of the transcripts, another major component corresponding to transcripts lacking exon 3, derived from abnormal upstream splice donor sites (see Fig. 2). In the case of iDelta T, the upper two bands seen with probe P2 correspond to the use of VLECC and ECC acceptor sites. The lower bands were produced from abnormal upstream donor sites, with removal of exon 3.

[View Larger Version of this Image (56K GIF file)]


Utilization of the Upstream Donor Sites and of the Pseudo-exons VLECC and ECC in Electrophorus Tissues?

Analyses of AChE from Electrophorus electric organs in sucrose gradients did not show the presence of non-amphiphilic molecules sedimenting at 7.3 S (data not shown), so that pseudo-exons VLECC and ECC do not seem to be utilized in vivo. This was confirmed by RACE-3' experiments, which only characterized transcripts terminating with exon T, in this tissue. In addition, RNase protection assays performed with RNA extracted from Electrophorus spinal cord and brain showed that all transcripts contained exon 3, exon 4, and exon T (Fig. 11, left panel). We found no partially protected fragments that would suggest the use of alternative splicing, either upstream or downstream of exon 4 (Fig. 11, right panel), as observed in transfected mammalian cells with partial genomic constructions.


DISCUSSION

Primary Sequence of Electrophorus AChET

Homology with Other AChEs

The primary sequence deduced from cDNAs encoding Electrophorus AChE corresponds to a catalytic subunit of type T, containing all the residues that characterize acetylcholinesterases (catalytic triad, tryptophan and phenylalanine residues of the active site, and tryptophan residue of the peripheral site). The six cysteines that form three intracatenary disulfide bonds and the cysteine located near the C terminus which is involved in intercatenary linkage are conserved, but there is no free cysteine in the protein, as expected from previous chemical analyses (34).

Presence of a Non-conserved Peptide, with No Homology in Mammalian or Torpedo AChEs

The most conspicuous difference with Torpedo AChE and other previously studied AChEs is the presence of an additional hydrophilic peptide of 29 amino acids. Chicken AChE also contains a glycine-rich peptidic insertion, but larger and located at a different position. A homologous peptide insertion has recently been found in AChE from the zebrafish, Danio rerio (35). A three-dimensional model, based on the three-dimensional structure of Torpedo AChE (36), shows that the non-conserved peptide is located at the surface of the protein, opposite to the entry of the catalytic gorge. In agreement with this position, we found that its deletion did not modify the catalytic parameters of the enzyme (see below).

Molecular Weight and Glycosylation

There are six potential N-glycosylation sites in Electrophorus AChE as follows: one site is common with both Torpedo AChE and human butyrylcholinesterase (BChE, EC 3.1.1.8) (37), one site exists in Torpedo AChE, and three other sites exist in human BChE. Only one site has no equivalent in other ChEs (Asn-161 and His-159 in Torpedo). It is likely to be glycosylated, since it is located in a loop at the surface of the protein.

The catalytic subunit of Electrophorus AChE is progressively cleaved, upon storage, into fragments of approximately 60 and 30 kDa (38), which remain attached by a disulfide bond; the larger fragment carries the active site serine (labeled with diisopropyl fluorophosphate) and about twice the amount of carbohydrates as the smaller one (39). These features are consistent with the hypothesis that cleavage occurs within the non-conserved peptide and that all potential sites are glycosylated. The presence of these glycans may explain the fact that the apparent mass of Electrophorus AChE is higher than that of Torpedo AChE, 80 and 70 kDa, respectively; this difference does not appear in non-glycosylated polypeptides obtained by in vitro translation of electric organ mRNAs (40) and is essentially abolished after deglycosylation (41).

Structure of the Electrophorus AChE Gene

Intron-Exon Structure: Introduction of the Peptide Insertion

Electrophorus and mammalian AChE genes possess an additional intron, interrupting the coding sequence of the catalytic domain, but at a different position, indicating that the introduction of introns occurred independently in several lineages during evolution. The sequence encoding the additional peptide of Electrophorus AChE is located immediately upstream of this intron, suggesting that they were introduced together. This suggests that Electrophorus and Danio, which possess a homologous peptide insertion, belong to a Teleost lineage that did not give rise to terrestrial tetrapods.

Absence of an Alternative H Exon

Apart from the organization of exons encoding the catalytic domain, the vertebrate AChE genes differ by the possible existence of alternative exons encoding C-terminal peptides as follows: H or T in Torpedo and mammals (7), T or S in Bungarus,3 or only Thr in chicken.2 As mentioned above, we did not find evidence for the presence of alternative exons, in addition to exon T, in Electrophorus tissues. Expression of various constructs in transfected cells confirmed the absence of an H exon. However, deletion of the T exon, or mutation of its splicing acceptor site, revealed the possible use of additional intron acceptor sites, as discussed below.

Abnormal Splicing of Electrophorus AChE Transcripts in Transfected Mammalian Cells

In mammalian cells, splicing from the last exon corresponding to the catalytic domain to exon T was accompanied by splicing to upstream acceptor sites, leading to pseudo-exons, located about 80 bp upstream of exon T, encoding the C-terminal peptides VLECC and ECC. These events were minor in the presence of exon T but became dominant if exon T was deleted or if its splice acceptor site was mutated. In that case, the yield of active AChE was not reduced.

More surprisingly, about half of AChE transcripts were spliced from abnormal donor sites located in the first coding exon, down to the last catalytic exon (exon 4), ignoring the donor site of the conserved intron that precedes this exon (Fig. 11). The resulting protein is of course devoid of activity, since it lacks most of the catalytic domain. These observations show that cells may operate abnormal splicing, when expressing foreign genes.

Expression of Recombinant Electrophorus AChE

Expression and Secretion of Electrophorus AChE in Mammalian Cells and in the Yeast P. pastoris: Catalytic Parameters

When Electrophorus AChE was expressed in transfected mammalian cells, we observed that activity was low at 37 °C and was markedly increased at 27 °C. The effect of temperature on the folding of Electrophorus AChE therefore appears intermediate, compared with Torpedo AChE, which does not acquire any activity at 37 °C (17), and the Bungarus and mammalian enzymes, which yield more activity at 37 °C than at 27 °C (5).

The catalytic parameters of recombinant Electrophorus AChE, expressed in COS cells or in the yeast P. pastoris (16), were similar to those of the natural enzyme, extracted from Electrophorus electric organs. In addition, the deletion of the non-conserved peptide did not modify the yield of AChE activity or its secretion, in either mammalian cells or Pichia. Therefore, the presence of this peptide does not seem to affect the folding of Electrophorus AChE and does not modify its catalytic activity.

Characterization of the Electrophorus AChET Subunit and of Abnormally Spliced AChEVLECC and AChEECC: Quaternary Associations

The processing of Electrophorus AChET subunits in mammalian COS, HEK, or CHO cells was the same and produced the same types of molecular forms as for AChET subunits from other species, mostly amphiphilic dimers (G2a) together with both amphiphilic and non-amphiphilic tetramers (G4a and G4na). AChET subunits have previously been shown to generate dimers that were defined as amphiphilic forms of type II (22), and amphiphilic tetramers have also been obtained in transfected cells (30). The hydrophobic character of these molecules probably derives from the amphiphilic alpha -helical structure of the T peptide (7); amphiphilic and non-amphiphilic tetramers may thus differ by the exposure or occlusion of this peptide motif. Like Torpedo and mammalian AChET subunits (17, 30, 42), the Electrophorus AChET subunits presented the capacity to form heteromeric quaternary associations, since they were organized into tetramers in the presence of a QN binding domain (30).

The proportion of tetramers was relatively higher in the medium than in the cell extracts, as also observed in the case of rat AChET. In contrast with rat AChET, however, we found only traces of monomers, suggesting that Electrophorus subunits have a greater tendency to form dimers or are unstable in the monomeric form. In fact, the AChEVLECC and AChEECC subunits, which are obtained by abnormal splicing in mammalian cells and terminate with very short peptides, VLECC or ECC, were found to produce non-amphiphilic dimers, probably linked by disulfide bridges via their C-terminal cysteines. Therefore, the T peptide is not required for dimerization of AChE.

The sedimentation coefficients of the secreted G2a forms were slightly but significantly higher than those of the corresponding cellular molecules. This shows that the release of AChE into the medium does not reflect leakage from lysed cells but actually represents a true secretory process, which is accompanied by post-translational modifications. As previously observed in the case of rat AChET, we found that a flag peptide epitope, added by mutagenesis at the end of the T peptide, could be recognized by the specific M2 monoclonal antibody in the cellular molecules but not in the secreted molecules (30). In contrast, when a flag epitope was added at the C terminus of AChEVLECC or AChEECC subunits, it was retained in the secreted molecules, indicating that cleavage does not occur within the flag peptide itself. Thus, proteolysis appears to take place in the T peptide upon secretion, but it certainly does not remove the amphiphilic alpha -helix, in which the conserved aromatic residues form a hydrophobic patch (7), since the secreted molecules retain their interaction with detergents.

In conclusion, the cloning and expression of Electrophorus AChE allows interesting comparisons with other AChE genes, illustrating general evolutionary processes, in particular the introduction of introns that may be partially integrated into coding sequences and the loss or acquisition of alternative exons. The production of recombinant Electrophorus AChE shows that its processing and quaternary associations are similar but not identical to those of AChEs from other species.


FOOTNOTES

*   This research was supported by grants from the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, the Direction des Recherches et Etudes Techniques, the Association Française contre les Myopathies, and the Human Capital and Mobility program of the European Community.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    Recipient of a doctoral fellowship from the French Ministry of Research.
1   The abbreviations used are: AChE, acetylcholinesterase; BChE, butyrylcholinesterase; GPI, glycophosphatidylinositol; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT-PCR, reverse-transcription and PCR; RPA, ribonuclease protection assay; RACE-3', rapid amplification of cDNA 3' ends; S, Svedberg units; EU, Ellman units; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; bp, base pair(s).
2   A. Anselmet, unpublished results.
3   X. Cousin, S. Bon, J. Massoulié, and C. Bon, manuscript in preparation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Prof. Joel Vandekerckhove for the determination of peptide sequences; Dr. Françoise Coussen for help in cloning cDNAs; Dr. Suzanne Bon for purification of Electrophorus AChE and help with transfections in COS cells; Dr. Mariano Casado for transfections in HEK and CHO cells; Nathalie Morel for help with expression in Pichia; Dr. Xavier Cousin for help with the three-dimensional modeling; and Drs. Eric Krejci and Claire Legay for helpful discussions.


REFERENCES

  1. Rosenberry, T. L. (1975) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 72, 3834-3838 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Quinn, D. M. (1987) Chem. Rev. 87, 955-979 [CrossRef]
  3. Cousin, X., Hotelier, T., Liévin, P., Toutant, J. P., and Chatonnet, A. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 132-136 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cousin, X., Hotelier, T., Giles, K., Liévin, P., Toutant, J. P., and Chatonnet, A. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 143-146 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cousin, X., Bon, S., Duval, N., Massoulié, J., and Bon, C. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15099-15108 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Eichler, J., Anselmet, A., Sussman, J. L., Massoulié, J., and Silman, I. (1994) Mol. Pharmacol. 45, 335-340 [Abstract]
  7. Massoulié, J., Pezzementi, L., Bon, S., Krejci, E., and Vallette, F. M. (1993) Prog. Neurosci. 41, 31-91
  8. Massoulié, J., and Bon, S. (1976) Eur. J. Biochem. 68, 531-539 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Bon, S., Huet, M., Lemonnier, M., Rieger, F., and Massoulié, J. (1976) Eur. J. Biochem. 68, 523-530 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Krejci, E., Coussen, F., Duval, N., Chatel, J. M., Legay, C., Puype, M., Vandekerckhove, J., Cartaud, J., Bon, S., and Massoulié, J. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 1285-1293 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Frohman, M. A., Dush, M. K., and Martin, G. R. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 8998-9002 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Henikoff, S. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 155, 156-165 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Knappik, A., and Plückthun, A. (1994) BioTechniques 17, 754-761 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Kunkel, T. A., Roberts, J. D., and Zakour, R. A. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 154, 367-382 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Blondel, A., and Thillet, J. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 181 [Free Full Text]
  16. Morel, N., and Massoulié, J. (1997) Biochem. J., in press
  17. Duval, N., Massoulié, J., and Bon, S. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 118, 641-653 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Chen, C., and Okayama, H. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2745-2752 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ellman, G. L., Courtney, K. D., Andres, V., and Featherstone, R. M. (1961) Biochem. Pharmacol. 7, 88-95 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Vigny, M., Bon, S., Massoulié, J., and Leterrier, F. (1978) Eur. J. Biochem. 85, 317-323 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Bon, S., Toutant, J. P., Méflah, K., and Massoulié, J. (1988) J. Neurochem. 51, 776-785 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Bon, S., Rosenberry, T. L., and Massoulié, J. (1991) Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 11, 157-172 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Karnovsky, M. J., and Roots, L. (1964) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 12, 219-222 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Massoulié, J., and Bon, S. (1982) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 57-106 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Massoulié, J., Sussman, J. L., Doctor, B. P., Soreq, H., Velan, B., Cygler, M., Rotundo, R. L., Shafferman, A., Silman, I., and Taylor, P. (1992) in Multidisciplinary Approaches to Cholinesterase Functions (Shafferman, A., and Velan, B., eds), pp. 285-288, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York
  26. Salih, E., Chishti, S. B., Vicedomine, P., Cohen, S. G., Chiara, D. C., and Cohen, J. B. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1208, 324-331 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Harel, M., Schalk, I., Ehret-Sabatier, L., Bouet, F., Goeldner, M., Hirth, C., Axelsen, P. H., Silman, I., and Sussman, J. L. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 9031-9035 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kieffer, B., Goeldner, M., Hirth, M., Aebersolt, R., and Chang, J. Y. (1986) FEBS Lett. 202, 91-96 [CrossRef]
  29. Anselmet, A., Fauquet, M., Chatel, J. M., Maulet, Y., Massoulié, J., and Vallette, F. M. (1994) J. Neurochem. 62, 2158-2165 [Medline]</