|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Received for publication, August 8, 1996, and in revised form, October 4, 1996)
From the Department of Cell Biology, Institute for Molecular and
Cellular Regulation, Gunma University, Maebashi 371, Japan
CD20 functions as a calcium-permeable cation
channel. When expressed in Balb/c 3T3 cells, CD20 accelerates the
G1 progression induced by insulin-like growth factor-I
(IGF-I). To further characterize how CD20 modulates the action of
IGF-I, we investigated whether the activity of CD20 channel was
affected by IGF-I. In quiescent cells expressing CD20, IGF-I increased
cytoplasmic free calcium concentration, [Ca2+]c,
which was reversed by the removal of extracellular calcium. In
contrast, IGF-I did not increase [Ca2+]c in cells
that did not express CD20. In perforated patch clamp recordings,
addition of IGF-I to the bath solution augmented the Ca2+
permeability, which was reversed by anti-CD20 antibody. In
cell-attached patch, calcium-permeable channel activity with unitary
conductance of 7 picosiemens was detected, which was abolished by
anti-CD20 antibody. The single channel activities were markedly
enhanced when IGF-I was included in the pipette solution, whereas IGF-I added to the bath solution was ineffective. When cells were first exposed to pertussis toxin, activation of the channel by IGF-I was
blocked. Transfection of cDNA for Gip2, a constitutive active form
of CD20 is a cell surface protein with a molecular mass of 35 kDa
expressed in mature B lymphocytes (1-4). Monoclonal antibodies raised
against CD20 affect the growth of B lymphocytes. Thus, most of the
antibodies inhibit cell proliferation, whereas some are stimulatory.
These observations led to the consideration that CD20 is involved in
the regulation of cell growth in lymphocytes. The primary structure of
CD20 has been determined by molecular cloning (5-7), and the predicted
amino acid sequence indicated that CD20 is a transmembrane protein with
four transmembrane domains with both C- and N-terminals located in the
cytoplasm. Hence, the structure of CD20 resembles those of ion channels
and ion transporters. Indeed, when expressed in fibroblasts, CD20
functions as a calcium-permeable cation channel (8). In lymphocytes, CD20 is phosphorylated by protein kinases including
calmodulin-dependent protein kinase. Furthermore, CD20
associates with src family tyrosine kinases including
p53/56lyn, p56lck, and p59fyn (9). Since an
addition of monoclonal antibody against CD20 induces tyrosine
phosphorylation of several proteins (10), CD20 may also participate in
the protein tyrosine kinase cascade. Nevertheless, the regulatory
mechanism modulating the activity of CD20 is largely unknown and the
ligand that activates CD20 has not been identified.
To investigate the function of CD20 as a calcium-permeable channel, we
stably expressed CD20 in Balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts (11). CD20 expressed in
these cells functioned as a calcium-permeable channel and modulated the
growth characteristics of these cells. Thus, CD20 expression
accelerated cell cycle progression through the G1 phase and
enabled the cells to progress to the S phase in medium containing low
extracellular calcium (11). Insulin-like growth factor-I
(IGF-I)1 is a progression factor that
induces G1 progression (12). As described by Stiles
et al. (12), IGF-I exerts its action in a cell
cycle-dependent manner. When IGF-I is added to quiescent Balb/c 3T3 cells, it cannot induce cell cycle progression (12, 13). In
contrast, cells progress toward the S phase in response to IGF-I when
they are first exposed to platelet-derived growth factor followed by
epidermal growth factor (14). These are referred to as primed competent
cells (14, 15). Therefore, IGF-I exerts its progression activity
specifically in primed competent, but not quiescent, cells. However,
when CD20 is expressed in quiescent Balb/c 3T3 cells expressing CD20,
at least some of the cells progress toward S phase in response to IGF-I
(11). This result suggests that IGF-I can elicit progression, even in
quiescent cells with the aid of CD20, and implies that a CD20-like
protein is critical for the progression activity of IGF-I. If so, it is
possible that the function of CD20 expressed in Balb/c 3T3 cells is
modulated by IGF-I. In the present study, we investigated this notion.
The results indicate that IGF-I, by acting on the IGF-I receptor, activates the channel activity of CD20.
Recombinant human IGF-I was supplied by Fujisawa
Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Na[125I] was
obtained from ICN Biomedicals (Costa Mesa, CA).
[3H]Thymidine and [32P]dCTP were obtained
from Dupont NEN. mAb against CD20 (CBL456) was purchased from Cymbus
Bioscience Ltd. (Southampton, UK).
Balb/c 3T3 cells (clone A31) and Raji cells (B
lymphoblastoid cell line) were provided by the RIKEN cell bank
(Tsukuba, Japan). Balb/c 3T3 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal calf serum (Life
Technologies, Inc.). Raji cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium
containing 10% fetal calf serum. These cells were cultured under
humidified conditions of 95% air and 5% CO2 at
37 °C.
The inducible CD20 expression
vector (CD20-pMEP4) was stably transfected into Balb/c 3T3 cells by
electroporation as described previously (11). CD20 expressing quiescent
Balb/c 3T3 cells were obtained by incubating confluent cells in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 0.5% platelet-poor
plasma and 80 µM ZnCl2 for 24 h. After
the treatment with ZnCl2, all of the cells expressed CD20
(11).
DNA synthesis was assessed by
measuring [3H]thymidine incorporation into
trichloroacetic acid-precipitable materials. Cells were cultured in
24-well plate (Falcon, Lincoln Park, NJ). Queiscent cells were
incubated with 0.5 µCi/ml [3H]thymidine for 24 h
in the presence of 1 nM IGF-I. The level of
[3H]thymidine incorporation was measured as described by
McNiel et al. (16).
Constitutively active Gi2 mutant (Gip2)
expression vector, Gip2-pcDNA I was generously provided by Dr. H. Bourne of the University of California, San Francisco. Balb/c 3T3 cells
were co-transfected with CD20-pMEP4 and Gip2-pcDNA I using a
transfection reagent DOTAP (Boehringer Manhein, GmbH, Germany).
Twenty-four hours after exposure to DNA, cells were selected for 3 weeks of culture in the presence of 100 µg/ml hygromycin B. Hygromycin-resistant colonies were independently picked up and screened
by Northern blotting for high expression of Gip2 and CD20.
The cytoplasmic
free Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]c) was
monitored using fura-2, as described previously (11). Briefly, cells
cultured on glass coverslips were incubated with 2 µM
fura-2 acetoxymethyl ester (Dojin Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) for 20 min at room temperature (20-26 °C), then placed on a flow-through chamber mounted on the stage of TMD microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
The perifusion medium comprised 137 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM glucose, and 10 mM Hepes/NaOH (pH 7.4). Dual wavelength microfluorometry of
the fura-2 fluorescence was performed using CAM-230 (Nihon Bunko,
Tokyo, Japan). The emission signals excited at both 340 and 380 nm and
the ratio of these signals (340/380 ratio) was recorded. In some
experiments, the cytoplasmic free Ca2+ concentration was
calibrated as described elsewhere (17). Statistical significance was
evaluated by analysis of variance.
The perforated-patch (18)
and the cell-attached patch clamp techniques were applied for the
voltage-clamp studies. Micropipettes were pulled from borosilicate
glass capillaries and heat-polished at the tip. They had resistance
values between 4 and 8 megohms after filling with a pipette solution.
High resolution membrane currents were recorded using an EPC-9
patch-clamp amplifer (HEKA, Lambrecht, Germany) controlled by
"E9SCREEN" software on an Atari computer. All voltages were
corrected for a liquid junction potential between the bath and pipette
solutions. Voltage ramps were of 300-ms duration, covering a range of
Single-channel currents were recorded as described by Hamill et
al. (19). The signal was stored on video tape after
analogue/digital conversion (Sony PCM 501 ES, modified by Shoshin EM
Corp., Okazaki, Japan). For studies using the cell-attached
configuration, the micropipettes were filled with a solution containing
110 mM BaCl2 or CaCl2, 200 nM tetrodotoxin, and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4, adjusted by adding Ba(OH)2 or Ca(OH)2). In some
experiments, Cl Cells were harvested, and the total RNA was isolated using Isogene and quantified spectrophotometrically. Total RNA (20 µg) was resolved by electrophoresis on 1.2% agarose gels containing 2.2 M formaldehyde, 20 mM MOPS (pH 7.0), 8 mM sodium acetate, and 1 mM EDTA, and transferred to a nylon membrane (Hybond-N++, Amersham Corp.). by means of capillary blotting in 10 × sodium citrate buffer. Hybridization was performed with a probe labeled with [32P]dCTP by random priming according to the manufacture's instructions (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). The hybridized membrane was exposed to Kodak XAR film (Eastman Kodak Co.). Effect of IGF-I on DNA Synthesis in Quiescent CD20-expressing Cells We showed that IGF-I stimulates DNA synthesis when added to
quiescent cells expressing CD20, whereas it has no stimulatory effect
on DNA synthesis in untransfected quiescent cells (12). As shown in
Fig. 1, IGF-I stimulated [3H]thymidine
incorporation in CD20-expressing quiescent cells and the effect of
IGF-I was inhibited by a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against CD20 in a
dose-dependent manner. This monoclonal antibody also
inhibited serum-induced DNA synthesis in Raji cells that express native
CD20 (data not shown). It should be noted that mAb against CD20 did not
affect DNA synthesis induced by IGF-I (Table I).
Furthermore, mAb against CD20 did not cross-react with IGF-I assessed
by Western blotting (data not shown).
Fig. 1. Effect of monoclonal antibody against CD20 on IGF-I-induced DNA synthesis in quiescent Balb/C 3T3 cells expressing CD20. CD20-expressing quiessent cells were incubated for 24 h with ( ) or without ( ) 1 nM IGF-I in the presence of
various concentrations of monoclonal antibody against CD20.
[3H]Thymidine incorporation was then measured. Values are
the means ± S.E. for four experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]
IGF-I induces oscillatory changes in
[Ca2+]c in primed competent cells (17) by
activating IGF-operated calcium-permeable channels (15, 20). In
quiescent cells, however, IGF-I does not affect
[Ca2+]c (16). To test whether or not CD20 is
modulated by IGF-I, we first monitored the changes in
[Ca2+]c in response to IGF-I using quiescent
cells expressing CD20. Fig. 2A shows the
typical changes in [Ca2+]c in CD20-expressing
cells monitored by measuring the fluorescence of a Ca2+
indicator, fura-2. As we reported (11), increasing the extracellular calcium concentration from 10 µM to 2 mM
slightly increased [Ca2+]c. When 1 nM
IGF-I was added to the cells, [Ca2+]c further
increased (43 out of 43 cells). The increase in
[Ca2+]c induced by IGF-I was monophasic in 39 out
of 43 cells and the net increase in [Ca2+]c was
168 ± 46 nM (means ± S.E., n = 39), which was statistically significant (p < 0.01).
The [Ca2+]c of mock-transfected control and
untransfected cells did not change significantly under these
conditions. In some cells (4 out of 43 cells), IGF-I induced
oscillatory changes in [Ca2+]c (Fig.
2B). The effect of IGF-I was reproduced by 100 nM insulin (30 of 30 cells) (Fig. 2C). The
IGF-I-induced elevation of [Ca2+]c was dependent
on extracellular calcium and its removal (Fig. 2A) or the
addition of lanthanum (data not shown) abolished the elevated
[Ca2+]c. Elevation of
[Ca2+]c induced by IGF-I were completely
abolished by the mAb against CD20 and [Ca2+]c
returned to the level of that in cells incubated low-calcium containing
medium (6 out of 6 cells) (Fig. 2D). These results suggest
that IGF-I stimulated Ca2+ influx through the CD20 channel
in CD20-expressing cells.
Fig. 2. Effect of IGF-I and insulin on [Ca2+]c in CD20-expressing cells. CD20-expressing cell was treated with either 1 nM IGF-I (A, B, and D) or 100 nM insulin (C), and changes in fura-2 fluorescence were monitored. mAb was added together with IGF-I in D. The extracellular calcium concentration was changed from 1 µM as indicated. [View Larger Version of this Image (12K GIF file)]
Effect of IGF-I on the Activity of CD20 Channel in CD20-expressing Cells Patch-clamp experiments were performed to record the changes in calcium permeability of the membrane induced by IGF-I. We previously reported that IGF-I increases the open probability of a calcium permeable cation channel in primed competent, but not quiescent cells (15, 20). To distinguish CD20 from the native IGF-operated Ca2+-permeable cation channel, we used quiescent cells. First, we examined changes in Ca2+ conductance induced by
IGF-I using a nystatin-perforated whole-cell patch clamp. The
current-voltage (I-V) relationship was obtained by applying voltage
ramps from Fig. 3. Effect of IGF-I and insulin on calcium current in CD20-expressing cells. Whole-cell calcium current was monitored in a CD20-expressing cell by perforated patch clamp applying voltage ramps from 100 mV to +100 mV. The I-V curves are presented.
A, calcium current was measured in a cell before and 3 min
after the addition of 1 nM IGF-I. The result is the
representative of 42 experiments. B, calcium current was
measured before and 3 min after the addition of control solution. The
result is the representative of 15 experiments. C, calcium
current was measured in an IGF-I-stimulated cell in the presence and
absence of 2 µg/ml mAb against CD20. The result is the representative
of 10 experiments. D, calcium current was measured in a cell
in the presence and absence of 100 nM insulin. The result
is the representative of eight experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (12K GIF file)]
Next, we recorded inward currents in cell-attached patches to further
characterize the action of IGF-I on Ca2+ influx in cells
expressing CD20. Fig. 4 shows a typical record obtained
from a cell-attached patch on a CD20-expressing cell with a high
concentration of barium (110 mM) in the pipette and a
holding potential of Fig. 4. Single channel current of CD20. Single channel Ba2+ current was recorded by cell-attached mode with a holding potential of 40 mV. A, IGF-I was not added
in the pipette. B, 1 nM IGF-I in the pipette;
C, 1 nM IGF-I and 2 µg/ml mAb against CD20 in the pipette; D, 1 nM IGF-I in the bath
solution.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]
Fig. 5. I-V relationship for single CD20 current. Single channel Ba2+ current was measured in cell-attached patch with 1 nM IGF-I in the pipette and the membrane potential was changed from 80 to 0 mV. Values are the
mean ± S.E. for eight experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]
Effect of Pertussis Toxin and Mastoparan on the Activity of CD20 To examine the involvement of pertussis toxin
(PTX)-sensitive G protein in IGF-I-induced activation, we studied the
effect of IGF-I in PTX-treated cells. When cells were pretreated with PTX (21), the addition of IGF-I in the pipette did not affect the
activity of CD20 channel (none of 30 patches) (Fig.
6A). Likewise, IGF-I did not increase calcium
current in PTX-treated cells (none of 18 cells) (Fig. 6B).
Additionally, IGF-I did not elevate [Ca2+]c in
PTX-treated cells (none of 40 cells) (Fig. 6C). Conversely,
50 pM mastoparan, an activator of
Gi/Go class of G proteins (22), markedly
stimulated the activity of the CD20 channels (43 out of 43 patches)
(Fig. 7A) whereas Mas 17, an analogue which
does not activate the G proteins, was ineffective (none of 14 patches)
(Fig. 7B).
Fig. 6. Effect of pertussis toxin on IGF-I-induced activation of CD20. CD20-expressing cells were incubated with 100 ng/ml PTX for 2 h. A, single channel Ba2+ current was recorded in a PTX-treated cell with 1 nM IGF-I in the pipette. B, whole-cell calcium current was measured by perforated patch clamp in PTX-treated and untreated cells with 1 nM IGF-I in the bath solution. Voltage ramps from 100 mV
to +100 mV were applied. C, PTX-treated cell was incubated
with 1 nM IGF-I and changes in
[Ca2+]c were monitored. Extracellular calcium
concentration was changed from 1 µM to 2 mM
as indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (12K GIF file)]
Fig. 7. Effect of mastoparan on single channel CD20 current single channel current was measured in cell-attached patch with 50 pM mastoparan (A) or Mas 17 (B), an inactive analogue, in the pipette. [View Larger Version of this Image (9K GIF file)]
Effect of Transfection of Gip2 on the Activity of the CD20 Channel To further assess the role of a G protein in the
regulation of CD20 channel, we transfected Balb/c 3T3 cells expressing
CD20 with the cDNA for Gip2, a constitutive active form of
Gi2 protein (23). When Gip2 cDNA was expressed, the
activity of CD20 channel measured in the cell-attached patch was
markedly augmented without the addition of any ligand (32 of 32 patches) (Fig. 8A). When transmembrane
calcium current was measured in the whole-cell-perforated patch,
calcium permeability was greatly elevated (20 out of 20 cells)
(Fig. 8B).
Fig. 8. CD20 channel current in Gip2-transfected cells. Cells expressing Gip2 and CD20 were obtained as described under "Experimental Procedures." Single channel current (A) and whole-cell calcium current (B) were measure by cell-attached and perforated patches, respectively. [View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]
In the present study, we examined whether the calcium-permeable
cation channel activity of CD20 is affected by IGF-I in CD20-expressing Balb/c 3T3 cells. The notion that CD20 channel is activated by IGF-I in
Balb/c 3T3 cells was supported by results obtained by three independent
methods: monitoring changes in [Ca2+]c,
measurement of whole-cell calcium current and the single channel
analysis. It was most explicitly demonstrated by using the perforated
patch clamp. As shown in Fig. 4, addition of IGF-I to the bath solution
increased the inward calcium current, which was reversed by an
anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. Therefore, it is clear that IGF-I
activates the channel activity of CD20 expressed in Balb/c 3T3 cells.
The following observations supported the notion that IGF-I exerts its
effect via the IGF-I receptor. First, we showed previously that, at a
concentration of 10 CD20 is a cell-surface protein expressed in B lymphocytes. Although it has several functions in the signal transduction system in B cells (8-10), information regarding the ligand that activates CD20 is not available. The present results may provide some insight into the regulation of CD20 functions. An obvious candidate ligand that may activate CD20 is interleukin 4, since this cytokine and insulin share the signaling molecules, insulin receptor substrate-1 and -2 (31, 32). However, interleukin 4 does not activate CD20 channels in Raji cells.2 It is possible that a ligand that acts on a receptor system functionally resembling the IGF-I receptor activates the channel activity of CD20. Alternately, the ligand activating PTX-sensitive G proteins may activate the CD20 channel. * This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-272-20-8835;
Fax: 81-272-20-8893; E-mail: ikojima{at}sb.gunma-u.ac.jp.
1 The abbreviations used are: IGF-I, insulin-like growth factor-I; [Ca2+]c, cytoplasmic free calcium concentration; I-V, current-voltage; PTX, pertussis toxin; mAb, monoclonal antibody; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid; GTP S,
guanosine 5 -3-O-(thio)triphosphate; GDP S, guanosine 5 -O-2-(thio)diphosphate).
2 M. Kanzaki and I. Kojima, unpublished observations. We thank Dr. M. Kato of the Nihon Medical College for suggestions and Kiyomi Ohgi for secretarial assistance.
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||