|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vol. 273, Issue 1, 653-659, January 2, 1998
From the Cancer Research Campaign Nucleic Acid Structure Research
Group, Department of Biochemistry, The University,
Dundee DD1 4HN, United Kingdom
The leu-500 promoter is inactivated
by a mutation in the The activation of the leu-500 promoter provides a good
illustration of the possible interrelationships between transcription and the topology of the DNA template in vivo.
leu-500 is a leucine auxotroph of Salmonella
typhimurium (1) that results from an A to G transition in the More recent work in this laboratory has identified an additional level
of complexity in this process. The demonstration of a direct
requirement for a null topA background (8) led to the
suggestion that the leu-500 promoter might be activated by variations in template supercoiling arising from
transcriptional-induced supercoiling due to the transcription of a
nearby gene (9, 10). According to the twin-supercoiled domain model of
Liu and Wang (11), a rotationally hindered RNA polymerase in the
elongation phase of transcription will tend to generate positive
supercoiling ahead of its passage and negative supercoiling in its
wake. These domains will be relaxed by DNA gyrase and topoisomerase I,
respectively, in eubacteria, but unbalanced relaxation by topoisomerase
activity due to either inhibition or mutation will lead to alteration
in the local level of DNA supercoiling (12, 13). Thus the
leu-500 promoter might be activated by negative supercoiling
arising from the transcription of the putative nearby gene, which would
be less efficiently relaxed in topA cells.
Although this model could explain the activation of the chromosomal
leu-500 promoter in topA Salmonella, a further
complication came to light when we sought to reproduce the effect on a
plasmid. We found that we could only obtain significant activity of the leu-500 promoter when the plasmid also bore the gene
encoding resistance to tetracycline, tetA. Using such
plasmids we could achieve topA-dependent
activation of the promoter in either Salmonella (10) or
Escherichia coli (14). This implied a key role for the
tetA gene, and a number of studies have indicated that the coupled transcription, translation, and membrane insertion of the
tetA gene product are essential for efficient
oversupercoiling of plasmids in topA eubacterial cells (13,
15-17) due to the anchorage of the transcribing RNA polymerase to the
membrane. We showed that activation of the leu-500 promoter
on a plasmid did indeed require transcription and translation of the
tetA gene and insertion of the TetA polypeptide into the
membrane (10, 18).
We can conceive of two roles for the tetA gene in the
activation of the leu-500 promoter on a plasmid. First,
transcription of the tetA gene could be the primary
generator of supercoiling; tethering RNA polymerase to the membrane
would be a particularly effective way in which to hinder its rotation
about the DNA template, and thus efficient induction of supercoiling
might be expected. The second role could be more passive: to provide a
barrier to the diffusion of supercoiling. If negative and positive
domains of supercoiling were generated by transcription elsewhere on
the plasmid, these could diffuse around the circle and cancel each other by rotation about the duplex axis, providing a highly efficient nonenzymatic relaxation mechanism. However a point of anchorage (such
as the insertion of the nascent TetA polypeptide into the membrane)
should provide a barrier to the diffusion of supercoiling around the
plasmid and might thus increase local levels of DNA supercoiling.
In the plasmid pLEU500Tc, with which we first achieved the
topA-dependent activation of the
leu-500 promoter (10), the tetA gene was oriented
divergently to the leu-500 promoter, with a short distance
between the promoters. This places the leu-500 promoter
immediately upstream of the tetA promoter, which would be
consistent with a very local effect whereby the leu-500
promoter responds to a domain of negative supercoiling directly
upstream of tetA. We therefore wondered if the
leu-500 promoter would still be activated in topA
cells if the orientation of the tetA gene were reversed. We
find that the leu-500 promoter is activated to the same
level under these circumstances and that the activity remains fully
dependent on the function of the tetA gene. We conclude that
transcription of the tetA gene is the major source of
negative supercoiling that activates the leu-500 promoter,
but that this is mediated through the global topology of the
plasmid.
Bacterial Strains and Their Growth Conditions
E. coli strains HB101 (F Plasmid Constructions
The plasmids used in this work are summarized in Table
I
pL500TR-- The plasmid pLEU500Tc (10) was cleaved with NheI and BalI, and pAT153 (28) was digested with EcoRI and BalI. The NheI and EcoRI termini were rendered flush by incubation with 2.5 units of VentR DNA polymerase (NEB) at 72 °C for 30 min. The smaller EcoRI-BalI fragment of pAT153, containing the entire tetA gene, and the larger NheI-BalI fragment of plasmid pLEU500Tc were isolated by preparative gel electrophoresis. The two blunt-ended fragments were then ligated together with T4 DNA ligase, and the resulting plasmid was transformed into E. coli HB101. The plasmid containing the complete tetA gene oriented anticlockwise (see Fig. 1) was identified by restriction digestion of isolated plasmid DNA. pL500TR. pL500TR. pL500TR. pL500TR. pL500TR. Plasmids Containing Translation Terminators within the tetA Gene of pL500TR-- Pairs of complementary oligonucleotides (10) were ligated into the plasmid pL500TR linearized by the appropriate restriction enzyme; NheI (partial digestion was required since there are two NheI sites in pL500TR), BamHI, SalI, and NruI, generating pL500TR.Tet48, pL500TR.Tet96, pL500TR.Tet188, and pL500TR.Tet296, respectively. pL500TR.Bla12, pL500TR.Bla80-- These plasmids contain translation termination codons inserted into either the Eco57 or ScaI sites within the bla gene of pL500TR. Self-complementary oligonucleotides encoding a universal translation terminator (18) were inserted into the Eco57 or the ScaI sites within the bla gene of pL500TR, generating pL500TR.Bla12 and pL500TR.Bla80, respectively. Extraction and Analysis of Cellular RNA RNA was isolated using essentially the method described
previously (10). RNA was prepared from 200-µl cultures in the
mid-exponential growth phase by the addition of an equal volume of 20 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.2), 2% SDS, 0.3 M
sucrose and transferring to a boiling water bath for 1 min. The sample
was then extracted twice with phenol/chloroform, and the nucleic acids
were precipitated with ethanol. After the addition of 0.2 pmol of the
appropriate radioactively [5 Analysis of Linking Number of Extracted Plasmid DNA-- E. coli cells were grown in 30 ml of LB plus appropriate antibiotics to mid-exponential growth phase, and the plasmid DNA was extracted using the Wizard Plus DNA extraction system (Promega). The purified DNA was electrophoresed in 1% agarose gels in TBE containing 2 µg/ml chloroquine. After electrophoresis, the gels were subjected to extensive washing in water followed by staining in 1 µg/ml ethidium bromide and further washing in water. The stained gels were photographed under UV illumination with red and green filters to remove background fluorescence. The photographic negatives were scanned electronically, and a negative image was presented.
Reversal of the tetA Gene of pLEU500Tc--
In previous studies we
showed that the activation of the leu-500 promoter on the
plasmid pLEU500Tc in topA S. typhimurium was dependent on
the function of the adjacent tetracycline resistance gene
tetA (10). The orientation of the tetA gene in
pLEU500Tc is opposite to that of the leu-500 promoter,
i.e. the leu-500 promoter is located immediately
upstream of the tetA gene. Thus transcription of
tetA might be the major generator of negative supercoiling
in this local region, by the mechanism of Liu and Wang (11). Activation
of the leu-500 promoter in pLEU500Tc required the coupled
transcription and translation of tetA and the membrane insertion of its product (10, 18). This suggested that membrane insertion of the TetA protein was essential to provide an anchorage point, which might act as a topological barrier against the diffusion of DNA supercoiling. These two related yet distinct roles for the
tetA gene might be dissected if its polarity were reversed in the plasmid, and we therefore constructed a new plasmid pL500TR that
contains a tetA gene oriented anticlockwise in the
conventional depiction of pBR322-based plasmids. The reversed
tetA gene is fully functional, and transformed cells have
normal levels of resistance to tetracycline. pL500TR still contains the
original clockwise tetA promoter, but the gene
(tetA
topA-dependent Activation of the leu-500 Promoter of pL500TR-- In our earlier study, we demonstrated topA-dependent activation of the leu-500 promoter carried on plasmid pLEU500Tc containing a clockwise tetA gene. To investigate the effect of a reversed polarity tetA gene on the activity of the leu-500 promoter, RNA was isolated from pL500TR-carrying topA or top+ E. coli cells in mid-exponential growth, and transcripts initiated at the leu-500 promoter were sought. This was achieved by means of run-off reverse transcription using a primer that hybridizes to the vector sequence upstream of the S. typhimurium DNA (10). A cDNA corresponding to RNA initiated at the leu-500 promoter should be 191 nuceotides in length. Since the antitet promoter (the tetR promoter transcribing the same strand as the leu-500 promoter) is retained on pL500TR, cDNA corresponding to initiation at this promoter would be 281 nucleotides in length and provides a useful reference for quantitation. The results of the reverse transcription analysis are shown in Fig. 2A. There is a clear band of cDNA corresponding to initiation at the leu-500 promoter in DM800 ( topA) cells, but the intensity of this species
is very much lower for the RNA extracted from SD108
(top+). The cDNA band corresponding to
initiation at the antitet promoter is of similar intensity
in both top+ and topA experiments.
Thus the leu-500 promoter was activated by the reversed
polarity tetA gene, and this activation was dependent on the
topA background.
topA) in
exponential growth and subjected to reverse transcription analysis as
before. The level of initiation at the leu-500 promoter is
closely similar in both plasmids. Thus the
topA-dependent activation of the
leu-500 promoter does not depend on the orientation of the
tetA gene.
Activation of the leu-500 Promoter Requires Transcription of the
Reversed tetA Gene--
In its original orientation in pLEU500Tc, the
tetA gene must be transcribed to activate the
leu-500 promoter (10). We therefore investigated whether
this was also required when tetA was reversed in pL500TR.
Plasmid pL500TR.
Activation of the leu-500 Promoter Requires Translation of the Reversed tetA Gene-- By analogy with the role of the clockwise tetA gene of pLEU500Tc, it seemed probable that translation would be required in the reversed gene of pL500TR. This was examined by provoking premature termination of translation of the reversed tetA gene by introducing translation terminators at various positions in the coding sequence. This was achieved by introducing complementary oligonucleotides into the NheI, BamHI, SalI, and NruI restriction sites along the tetA gene, thereby generating truncated TetA polypeptides of 48, 96, 188, and 296 amino acids, respectively. These can be compared with the full-length TetA that is 394 amino acids in length. These plasmids are called pL500TR.Tet48, pL500TR.Tet96, pL500TR.Tet188, and pL500TR.Tet296, respectively. These plasmids were transformed into E. coli DM800 ( topA), RNA was prepared from cells in exponential
growth, and the initiation of transcription from the leu-500
promoter was analyzed by reverse transcription as before.
Electrophoretic analysis of the cDNA (Fig.
4A) showed that the level of
activity of the leu-500 promoter became lower as the length
of the translated reversed TetA polypeptide was reduced. The data were
quantified by phosphorimaging and are presented graphically in Fig.
4B. Evidently the function of the leu-500
promoter is dependent on translation of the reversed tetA gene, and the level of the activation of the leu-500
promoter is approximately linearly dependent on the size of the TetA
polypeptide synthesized. Thus the topA-dependent
activation of the leu-500 promoter depends both on
transcription and translation of the reversed tetA gene.
This closely parallels the situation where the tetA gene was
oriented clockwise in the original construct pLEU500Tc, suggesting that
a similar mechanism of activation of the leu-500 promoter is
involved in both cases.
Negative Supercoiling of Reversed-tetA Plasmids Isolated from
topA) in exponential growth and analyzed by
electrophoresis in 1% agarose in TBE buffer containing 2 µg/ml
chloroquine (Fig. 5). The distribution of
pL500TR topoisomers was clearly bimodal, with a significant fraction of
hypersupercoiled DNA. Reversing the polarity of the tetA
gene has not changed its effect on the overall topology of the plasmid.
Interference with the function of the tetA gene reduces the
extent of this fraction of highly supercoiled plasmid. The proportion
was severely reduced for pL500TR. Ptet.rev (the plasmid containing a 4-bp deletion in the promoter of the reversed
tetA gene), demonstrating the role of transcription of the
reversed tetA in generating hypersupercoiled DNA.
Translation of the tetA gene is also important for the
hypersupercoiling, since the fraction of hypersupercoiled DNA was
reduced in the plasmids where the tetA gene was interrupted
by translation terminators; the shorter the translated TetA
polypeptide, the smaller the fraction of hypersupercoiled DNA. Overall,
there was a reasonable correlation between the fraction of
hypersupercoiled DNA and the activity of the leu-500
promoter for the different plasmid constructs containing a reversed
tetA gene (see "Discussion").
Local Gene Expression and the Activation of the leu-500 Promoter in pL500TR-- Analysis of the topA-dependent activation of the leu-500 promoter in pL500TR clearly highlights the importance of the reversed tetA gene. We discussed two conceivable roles for this gene: as a direct generator of negative supercoiling by transcription with hindered rotation of RNA polymerase and as a topological barrier against the diffusion of negative supercoiling. Since the promoter of the tetA gene is a significant distance from the leu-500 promoter in pL500TR, it is possible that the primary role is the latter function and that other more local promoters are important in the generation of supercoiling. We therefore turned our attention to other gene expression occurring within the vicinity of the leu-500 promoter. This arises primarily from the bla gene and the original tetA gene of which the promoter is retained in pL500TR. To determine the effect of local gene expression on the activity of the leu-500 promoter, a number of new plasmids were constructed. pL500TR. bla contains a 30% deletion in the
bla gene, generated by removing the fragment between the
SspI site and the ScaI site of the bla
gene in pL500TR. The bla promoter is not directly affected by this deletion. pL500TR. Ptet contains a 4-bp deletion
in the HindIII site at the clockwise tetA
promoter in pL500TR. This deletion is known to inactivate the promoter
of the tetA gene (10).
pL500TR. bla Ptet combines the deletions in
the bla gene and in the clockwise-oriented tetA
promoter. pL500TR. Ptet.rev contains a 4-bp deletion at
the ClaI site at the anticlockwise-oriented tetA
promoter; this plasmid has been discussed above.
pL500TR. Ptet Ptet.rev contains both the
deletion at the HindIII site at the clockwise-oriented
tetA promoter and the deletion at the ClaI site
at the anticlockwise-oriented tetA promoter.
These plasmids were transformed into E. coli DM800
( topA), cellular RNA was isolated from cells in
mid-exponential growth, and the initiation of transcription at the
leu-500 promoter was analyzed by primer extension as before
(Fig. 6A). The activity of the
leu-500 promoter in pL500TR. bla (lane
4) was not significantly less than that in pL500TR, indicating
that bla was not important in the
topA-dependent activation of the
leu-500 promoter. Deletion of the clockwise-oriented
tetA promoter that remains in pL500TR (pL500TR. Ptet; lane 5) also had very little
effect on the activity of the leu-500 promoter. Even the
combination of both bla and clockwise tetA
promoter deletions (pL500TR. bla Ptet;
lane 6) resulted in a relatively minor reduction in
leu-500 promoter activity.
Effect of Premature Termination of Translation of the bla Gene on
the Activation of the leu-500 Promoter in pL500TR--
Previous
experiments showed that in the original construct with a clockwise
tetA gene (pLEU500Tc), initiation of transcription at the
leu-500 promoter was influenced by translation of the
bla gene under some circumstances (18). We therefore
examined the effect of modulating the function of the bla
gene on the activation of the leu-500 promoter in the
presence of the reversed tetA gene. Two new plasmids were
constructed to examine the influence of bla translation.
pL500TR.Bla12 and pL500TR.Bla80 contain translation termination codons
inserted into the bla coding sequences at the Eco57 and the ScaI sites, respectively,
generating topA), cellular
RNA was isolated from cells in mid-exponential growth, and the initiation of transcription at the leu-500 promoter was
analyzed by reverse transcription as before (Fig. 6B). The
activity of the leu-500 promoter was not significantly
reduced in either of these plasmids, indicating that translation of the
bla gene is relatively unimportant in the activation of the
leu-500 promoter in pL500TR.
Our results clearly demonstrate that the leu-500 promoter can be activated on a plasmid in topA E. coli by the presence of a tetA gene in either orientation. Activation requires the full function of the tetA gene, but the leu-500 promoter can be located in a position that can be regarded either as primarily upstream or one that is downstream of this gene. Moreover the role of the tetA gene is paramount; although other promoters present in pL500TR are of relatively minor consequence, inactivation of tetA function reduces the activity of the leu-500 promoter to background levels. In summary, the tetA gene is essential for the topA-dependent activation of the leu-500 promoter, but its orientation is unimportant. It might be regarded as surprising that this effect is independent of tetA orientation; that the activation of the leu-500 promoter is equally efficient when it is placed in what is formally the domain of positive supercoiling (downstream of tetA) (11), as when it is located in the upstream domain of negative supercoiling. We therefore change our perspective from a local view of variation in superhelix density to a more global view. The local view supposes that the leu-500 promoter must be located directly within the domain of negative supercoiling to be activated. In the global view, unbalanced relaxation of transcriptional-induced supercoiling from the tetA gene results in a net reduction in the linking difference of the plasmid. If the tetA gene is the primary generator of supercoiling (because of its membrane anchoring effect), then it will create local domains of negative and positive supercoiling. If only the latter can be relaxed in a topA cell, the overall effect will be to lower the linking number of the plasmid. If the leu-500 promoter is responding to this global change in topology, then it will do so independent of relative orientation or separation. We arrive at the same conclusion following a second line of argument. As we discussed in the introduction, an alternative role of membrane anchorage by coupled transcription, translation, and insertion of TetA could be to provide a topological barrier so that the domains of positive and negative supercoiling generated by transcription (in theory from any promoter) cannot diffuse around the circular plasmid and undergo self-cancellation by a simple rotation of the helix. If this were true, it would require the existence of a second barrier on the opposite side of the circular plasmid, and it has been suggested that the replication origin might function in this way (19). The combined effect of two such barriers would effectively isolate the lower half of the plasmid in topological terms. However, in pL500TR, the promoter of the reversed tetA gene would be located in this domain, isolated topologically from the leu-500 promoter. Yet we have shown that the single most important factor on the plasmid for the topA-dependent activation of the leu-500 promoter is the tetA promoter. We therefore conclude that it cannot be located in a separate domain and that the barrier model does not hold. We are left with the primary role of membrane anchorage as the provision of rotational hindrance to RNA polymerase transcribing the tetA gene. Since the tetA and leu-500 promoters are separated by more than 1.6 kbp, this must be considered as an essentially global phenomenon in the plasmid. The global view of the activation is consistent with measurement of the linking difference of isolated plasmids (e.g. Fig. 5), which is a measure of the global topology by definition. This shows that the fraction of hypersupercoiled plasmid DNA is generated whenever the tetA gene is present in cis, whatever its orientation. Indeed, we obtain a linear correlation between the level of activation of the leu-500 promoter in topA E. coli with the fraction of hypersupercoiled plasmid DNA isolated from the cells (Fig. 7). In situ probing of the formation of cruciform structures by alternating adenine-thymine ((AT)n) sequences can be used as a means of testing local negative superhelix density in cellular DNA (20), and we have shown that reporter (AT)n sequences introduced in the region corresponding to that upstream of tetA in pLEU500Tc detect unconstrained oversupercoiling in topA strains (21). However, contrary to initial expectations, we also detected elevated negative supercoiling at (AT)nsequences placed downstream of the tetA gene,2 i.e. in the region that might be expected to experience transcriptional induction of positive supercoiling. Once again this result is more consistent with a global view of the induction of negative plasmid supercoiling in topA cells.
The topA-dependent activation of the leu-500 promoter in pL500TR does differ in some respects from that in the original pLEU500Tc containing the clockwise tetA gene. One is the effect of bla expression; we observed that bla deletion lowered the level of leu-500 promoter activation in pLEU500Tc (18), whereas there is little influence of bla in the presence of the anticlockwise tetA gene of pL500TR. However, we found that the effect of bla deletion on the leu-500 promoter in pLEU500Tc could be removed when a tac promoter was introduced into this plasmid, suggesting that subtle effects may occur in this region. Another difference is the effect of spacing. When we introduced random DNA fragments between the leu-500 and tetA promoters of pLEU500Tc, this reduced the level of initiation of transcription at the former, whereas in pL500TR, the crucial Ptet.rev is almost diametrically opposite to the leu-500 promoter. At present we are unable to account for this difference. There have been reports of activation of the leu-500 promoter in topA cells using plasmids that do not include the tetA gene (22, 23). We find these observations perplexing, because in our experiments the role of the tetA gene is paramount. It is conceivable that other factors play a role in these constructs, but it is possible that the overall level of activation of transcriptional initiation was lower in those investigations. It is beyond question that in the plasmids based upon pLEU500Tc, the role of the tetA gene is essential for the observed level of activation and cannot be replaced by any other gene that we have explored. Moreover, correlation with the physical level of hypersupercoiling in our plasmids has been independently confirmed by the experiments of Mojica and Higgins (24), who measured the level of unconstrained plasmid supercoiling using an intercalation assay. In summary, the leu-500 promoter is activated highly efficiently in topA cells when it is borne on a plasmid carrying the tetA gene in cis, irrespective of orientation. The most probable explanation is that it is activated by negative supercoiling arising from the transcription of the tetA gene and that this process is most effective when RNA polymerase is effectively tethered due to coordinate transcription, translation, and membrane insertion. The coupling between the promoters can be fully explained by topological effects operating within the plasmid globally.
We thank Dr. Richard Bowater for discussions and the Medical Research Council and Cancer Research Campaign for financial support.
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-1382-344243; Fax: 44-1382-201063; E-mail: dmjlilley{at}bad.dundee.ac.uk.
1 The abbreviation used is: bp, base pair(s).
2 R. P. Bowater, D. Chen, and D. M. J. Lilley, unpublished data.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||