|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 10, 5645-5654, March 6, 1998
The HepG2 Extracellular Matrix Contains Separate Heparinase- and
Lipid-releasable Pools of ApoE
IMPLICATIONS FOR HEPATIC LIPOPROTEIN METABOLISM*
Jim W.
Burgess,
David R.
Gould, and
Yves L.
Marcel
From the Lipoprotein and Atherosclerosis Group, University of
Ottawa Heart Institute, Departments of Biochemistry, and Pathology and
Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa,
Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, Canada
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have examined the association of apoE with the
extracellular matrix (ECM) of HepG2 cells. Comparison of ECM
prepared by previously published methods demonstrated that
cytochalasin B-prepared material yielded the highest endogenous apoE,
representing 23.6% of that in cell monolayers. ECM prepared with EDTA
or Triton X-100 exhibited decreased levels of apoE, 3 and 6%,
respectively. ECM bound very low density lipoprotein poorly (5-6% of
the monolayer capacity); however, these incubations dramatically
increased the apoE content of the ECM. Heparinase or suramin decreased
apoE of the ECM by 19.6 and 37.3%, respectively, suggesting
association with heparin sulfate proteoglycans. EDTA or EGTA also
displaced 35% of the apoE, suggesting a
Ca2+-dependent association. Incubation
with phosphatidylcholine vesicles (PCV) displaced 30% of the apoE,
suggesting that lipid content affects association of apoE with the ECM.
Data derived from sequential incubations with combinations of suramin,
EGTA, and PCV were consistent with the presence of two distinct pools
of apoE on the HepG2 ECM, one releasable with suramin and EGTA and the
other releasable with lipids. Exogenously applied lipid-free apoE
readily bound to the ECM; however, increasing the lipid content
decreased its association. Lipid-free apoE could be equally displaced
from the ECM with PCV or suramin. When lipid-free apoE adsorbed to
microtiter wells was incubated with a triglyceride emulsion or
palmitoyloleyl phosphatidylcholine micelles, the immunoreactivity of
3H1 (but not other antibodies), a monoclonal antibody against an
epitope in the C-terminal domain of apoE, increased about 4-fold. In a similar manner, incubation of ECM with lipid dramatically increased the
immunoreactivity of 3H1, indicating that apoE of the ECM exists in a
lipid-poor form. Scatchard analysis demonstrated that the increased
immunoreactivity was due to an increase in the number of antibody
binding sites. In conclusion, the ECM contains two pools of lipid-poor
apoE. One pool associates with the ECM through heparin sulfate
proteoglycans- and Ca2+-dependent interactions.
A second pool of apoE dissociates from the ECM upon lipidation. The
lipid-sensitive pool of apoE may participate in secretion or efflux of
lipids or in the capture of lipoproteins by providing the apoE
needed for receptor-mediated uptake.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In the liver, the abundant gaps and fenestrations of the
sinusoidal endothelial cells form an open network that allows an efficient exchange of macromolecules between the blood and hepatocytes (1). The endothelium is separated from the hepatocyte plasmalemma by
the space of Disse that contains irregular clumps of extracellular matrix (2). The ECM1 is the
basal lamina secreted by cells and on which cells migrate, proliferate,
and differentiate in vivo (3). Several studies have
contributed to the characterization of the ECM, which is defined
in vitro as the growth substratum remaining attached to culture dishes after removal of cells by Triton X-100 (3-5), EDTA (5),
or cytochalasin B (6). Major components of the hepatic ECM include
collagen type III, collagen IV, fibronectin, and laminin (2, 7, 8) as
well as abundant basement membrane-type heparin sulfate proteoglycans
(HSPG) (7, 9, 10). In the liver, the ECM is a discontinuous structure
and is therefore unlikely to have an efficient filtration function as
described for more organized matrices of other tissues (11). A
potential function for the hepatic ECM, suggested by the presence of
HSPG, could involve a role in lipoprotein metabolism. Lipoprotein
lipase readily interacts with HSPG of the ECM elaborated by bovine
corneal endothelial cells (12) or aortic endothelial cells (4, 13).
Other components of chylomicron remnant and VLDL remnant metabolism,
including hepatic lipase (14, 15), apolipoprotein E (apoE) (16-20), as well as apoE-enriched remnant particles (18, 20, 21), bind to HSPG.
ApoE secreted by hepatocytes into the space of Disse is believed to
participate in the secretion-capture pathway of lipoprotein metabolism
(18, 20). ApoE enrichment of lipoproteins increases the affinity of the
lipoprotein for HSPG and the LRP (18, 20) and hence increases the
surface binding and internalization of lipoproteins. ApoE is also
associated with the basolateral surface of hepatic parenchymal cells
(22), as well as the surface of HepG2 cells (16, 17) and McA7777 cells
transfected with human apoE3 (18). In these latter studies, incubation
of cells with heparin, suramin, or heparinase increased the apoE
content of the surrounding medium, suggesting attachment with the cell
surface via HSPG. Cell surface apoE appears to be internalized upon
perfusion of the liver with chylomicron remnants (21), suggesting a
role in lipoprotein internalization.
In the present study, we have measured the specific binding of
radiolabeled antibodies against apoE to the ECM of HepG2 cells to
directly resolve the nature of the relationship between apoE and the
ECM. Our results suggest that significant amounts of endogenous apoE
associate with the ECM through HSPG-, divalent metal ion-, and
lipid-dependent interactions. We provide evidence that the HSPG- and EGTA-releasable pools of apoE represent a single population that is distinct from a lipid-releasable pool. We also demonstrate that
apoE of the ECM is lipid-poor and dissociates with the addition of
lipid. This property could allow ECM apoE to participate either in
lipoprotein secretion or in lipoprotein uptake.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials
Na125I was obtained from Amersham Corp. (Oakville,
Ontario, Canada). IODO-BEADs were from Pierce. EDTA was
obtained from British Drug House. Cytochalasin B, heparin from pork
intestinal mucosa, suramin, heparinase type 1, EGTA, egg
phosphatidylcholine, and most other chemicals were obtained from Sigma.
POPC and DMPC were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (Birmingham, AL).
Liposyn II, a solubilized triglyceride-rich emulsion containing 10%
safflower oil, 10% soybean oil, 1.2% egg phospholipids, and 2.5%
glycerin is a product from Abbott Laboratories (Montreal, Quebec,
Canada). Tissue culture reagents were obtained from either Sigma or
Life Technologies, Inc. (Burlington, Ontario, Canada), and culture plasticware was obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. or Falcon (St.
Laurent, Quebec, Canada). Other laboratory chemicals were obtained from
Sigma, British Drug House (Toronto, Ontario, Canada), or Fisher
(Ottawa, Ontario, Canada). HepG2 cells were from the ATCC.
Antibodies
The monoclonal antibodies against apoE used in these studies
have been described earlier (23, 24) and include 7C9 and 6C5, which
recognize residues 1-15 of the N terminus, 1D7, which recognizes the
region encompassed by residues 142-158, and 3H1, which recognizes
residues 220-272 of the C terminus. Some studies used monoclonal 1D1,
which recognizes residues 474-528 of apoB (25, 26). Rabbit polyclonal
anti-human fibronectin was obtained from Sigma. Rabbit polyclonal
anti-apoE was a generous gift from Dr. Karl Weisgraber (Gladstone
Foundation Laboratories for Cardiovascular Disease,
University of California, San Francisco). Rabbit polyclonal anti-human
LRP was a generous gift from Dr. Guojun Bu (Washington University
School of Medicine). Iodination of antibodies was performed by the
IODO-BEAD method (Pierce), and specific activities from 1.5 to 10.6 uCi/µg were obtained.
Lipoproteins and Lipids
Fresh plasma was obtained from the Canadian Red Cross or from
healthy normolipemic volunteers, from which lipoproteins were isolated
by density gradient centrifugation as described by Rall et
al. (27). After extensive dialysis against PBS, protein
determinations were done by the Markwell Lowry method (28). VLDL was
iodinated by the IODO-BEAD method (Pierce). ApoVLDL was prepared as
previously reported (27).
Spherical particles were produced from egg phosphatidylcholine by the
sonication method of Sparks et al. (29). POPC cholate micelles were prepared as described by Sparks et al.
(30).
Cell Culture
HepG2 cells were cultured in EMEM growth medium containing 10 mM HEPES, 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM
glutamine, penicillin (100 units/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml).
Confluent cultures were split 1:6 to 1:8 (~100,000
cells/cm2) into 12-well plates for individual experiments.
On the day prior to surface labeling experiments, fresh medium was
added to the cells. All experiments were done on fully confluent
cultures.
Preparation of Extracellular Matrix
Extracellular matrix was prepared from fully confluent HepG2
cell monolayers by three methods. All ECM preparations were washed three times with ice-cold PBS-BSA prior to experiments.
Method 1--
ECM was prepared by the Triton X-100 method of
Owensby et al. (5). Briefly, the medium was aspirated from
HepG2 cells and replaced with 1% Triton X-100 in PBS containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The cells were incubated
at 37 °C for 5 min and then the solubilized cells were aspirated off
and replaced with ice-cold PBS containing 2 mg/ml of fatty acid-free
BSA and 1.7 mM CaCl2 (PBS-BSA).
Method 2--
ECM was prepared by incubation of HepG2 cell
monolayers with PBS containing 3 mM EDTA and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride for 5 min at 37 °C as
described by Owensby et al. (5).
Method 3--
ECM was prepared from HepG2 monolayers by a
modification of the cytochalasin B method of Mai and Chung (6).
Briefly, 10 µl of a 1 mg/ml stock of cytochalasin B in ethanol was
added directly to the HepG2 cell monolayers in complete medium to a
final concentration of 10 µg/ml. The cells were incubated for 60 min
at 37 °C and then transferred to ice. The cell monolayers lifted off
the plates as sheets of cells when subjected to repeated aspirations of
medium with a P1000 pipette.
Determination of the ApoE Content of the Cell Surface and ECM
The apoE content of cell monolayers or ECM was determined using
radiolabeled 7C9. This monoclonal antibody recognizes an N-terminal epitope of apoE and provides determinations of ECM apoE that are independent of lipid content (see below). Cells were prechilled for 15 min on ice and then washed three times in ice-cold PBS-BSA. Iodinated
mAb (5 × 105 cpm/ml), diluted in PBS-BSA, was added
to wells containing either cell monolayers or ECM and incubated at
4 °C for 2-4 h. To determine nonspecific binding, a 100-fold excess
of cold mAb was added to replicate wells. Following antibody
incubations, the cells or ECM were washed three times in cold PBS
containing 1.7 mM CaCl2 and then solubilized
with 1 ml of 0.5 M NaOH. Radioactivity was measured in a
counter, and the results for antibody binding are expressed as the
mean specific binding/well. Experiments were always performed in
triplicate for both total and nonspecific binding in multiwell
plates.
In some studies, radiolabeled 3H1 was used to characterize apoE of the
cell surface or ECM. In these experiments, ECM or HepG2 cell monolayers
were first incubated at 4 or 37 °C for 1 h in the absence and
presence of 1 mg of Liposyn II or POPC micelles/ml. The lipids were
removed by two washes with PBS-BSA, and the incubations with
radiolabeled 3H1 were performed at 4 °C as described above for 7C9.
Competition Scatchard analysis was performed on cell monolayers that
had been preincubated in the absence or presence of 1 mg/ml Liposyn II.
These fractions were incubated with a constant amount of
125I-mAb and a range of concentrations of the same
unlabeled mAb in triplicate wells for each point.
Lipoprotein Binding to Cell Monolayers and ECM
HepG2 cells or ECM were incubated at 4 °C for 30 min in
PBS-BSA. Human VLDL (100 µg/ml, final concentration) was then added, and the incubation was continued for an additional 1 h at 4 °C. Unbound lipoproteins were removed with three washes with PBS-BSA. VLDL
particles bound to the cell surface or ECM were detected by the
addition of radiolabeled 1D1 or 7C9 (500,000 cpm/ml). Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of a 200-fold excess of unlabeled antibody. Antibody incubations were continued for 2-4 h at
4 °C. Unbound antibody was removed with three washes with ice-cold
PBS, and then the cell fractions were solubilized with 0.5 N NaOH.
Radioactivity was measured in a counter, and the results were
expressed as the mean specific antibody binding/well.
Specific VLDL binding to cell monolayers or ECM was also determined by
the addition of 125I-VLDL (500,000 cpm/ml; 20-40 ng of
protein) in PBS-BSA in the absence and presence of a 200-fold excess of
unlabeled VLDL. These incubations were conducted at 4 °C for 2 h and were followed by three washes with ice-cold PBS-BSA and
solubilization with 0.5 N NaOH. Radioactivity was measured in a counter, and the results were expressed as the mean specific VLDL
binding/well.
ApoE Lipid Content and Immunoreactivity of Anti-apoE Monoclonal
Antibodies
A solid phase radioimmunoassay was used to examine the effect of
apoE lipidation on the immunoreactivity of our monoclonal antibodies.
Briefly 0.5 µg of lipid-free apoVLDL or 5 µg of VLDL in 100 µl of
PBS was immobilized by passive adsorption to 96-well microtiter plates
for 16 h at 4 °C. Unbound material was removed with three
washes of PBS, and then the wells were incubated with 100-µl volumes
of Liposyn II or POPC cholate micelles (0-0.4 mg/ml) in PBS for 2 h at 37 °C. The wells were then washed three times with PBS and
blocked with 300 µl of PBS containing 1% fatty-acid free BSA for
2 h at 20 °C. 125I-labeled anti-apoE antibody
(100,000 cpm/well) was added and incubated for 2 h at 20 °C.
The wells were then washed three times with PBS-BSA and
counted.
Electrophoresis and Western Blotting
ECM was prepared from confluent monolayers grown in T-175
cm2 flasks (2 flasks/matrix preparation) as described
above. 7 ml of Laemmli sample buffer (31) containing SDS (2%) and
2-mercaptoethanol (5% w/v) was added to each T-175 flask and allowed
to solubilize the matrices overnight at 25 °C with gentle rocking.
The samples were concentrated approximately 5-fold (final volume 2.8 ml) in Centriprep 10 units (Amicon) and then heated at 95 °C for 5 min. Cell or ECM proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (7.5% separating gel; 3% stacking gel) and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (0.45 µm, Bio-Rad). PBS containing powdered milk (3% w/v) was used to block the nitrocellulose membranes and to dilute antibody stocks. The nitrocellulose membranes were incubated with gentle rocking for 1 h at 25 °C with rabbit antiserum specific for human fibronectin (Sigma), human apoE, or human
LRP followed by incubation for 1 h with goat anti-rabbit IgG
coupled to horseradish peroxidase. Peroxidase activity was detected
using the chemiluminescence method of Boehringer Mannheim.
 |
RESULTS |
Determination of ApoE of the ECM and HepG2 Cell
Surface--
Previous reports have characterized cell surface apoE
indirectly by measuring increases in medium apoE following incubation of cells with heparin or heparinase at 37 °C (16-18). These results are likely to be complicated by secretion of apoE. In this study, we
have assessed cell surface apoE directly by determining the specific
binding of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies against apoE to the cell
surface or to the ECM of HepG2 cells. Monoclonal 7C9, which recognizes
residues 1-15 of the N-terminal domain of apoE, was incubated with
HepG2 monolayers at 4 °C to minimize membrane turnover and
secretion. Fig. 1 demonstrates that there is significant and specific binding of 125I-7C9 to the
HepG2 cell surface (top panel). In contrast a monoclonal IgG
against an irrelevant antigen (atrial natriuretic factor) displayed no
specific binding to HepG2 cells (data not shown). Suramin promoted a
36% decrease in the apparent binding of 125I-7C9 to the
cell surface (top panel). The decreased 7C9 binding observed
after suramin incubations results from displacement of apoE from cell
surface HSPG and is paralleled by a 2-fold increase in the amount of
apoE in the surrounding media (bottom panel). Control
experiments have shown that suramin exerts no effect on the apoE
radioimmunoassay (not illustrated). Collectively the data argue that
the specific binding of 7C9 to the cell surface accurately reflects the
levels of cell surface apoE.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Suramin decreases cell surface
125I-7C9 binding and increases the levels of medium
apoE. Confluent monolayers of HepG2 cells were washed three times
with PBS-BSA and then incubated with PBS-BSA (white bars) or
0.5 mg suramin/ml (shaded bars) at 4 °C for 1 h. The
medium was then removed for the analysis of apoE by radioimmunoassay.
The cells were washed three times with PBS-BSA and then incubated with
125I-7C9 (500,000 cpm/ml) at 4 °C for 3 h. The
cells were then washed three times with PBS-BSA, solubilized with 0.5 N
NaOH, and then counted in a counter. The results are the means and
S.E. of a typical experiment done in triplicate.
|
|
Characterization of the HepG2 Cell ECM--
We reasoned that the
ECM and its complement of HSPG should interact with secreted apoE and
present a simplified system to study the interaction of apoE with
extracellular components. Consequently, ECM was prepared by three
previously published methods that utilize incubations with 3 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, or 10 µg/ml cytochalasin B to
release cells from the matrix. Scanning electron microscopy and
immunefluorescence microscopy of ECM produced by these methods demonstrates an organized macromolecular network that is enriched in
vitronectin and fibronectin (5) as well as laminin and entactin (6) but
is devoid of cells and cell fragments. In agreement with these earlier
reports, our ECM preparations demonstrated no adherent cells or cell
fragments when examined by standard light microscopy (not illustrated).
Cell homogenates and ECM, prepared from a 96-fold greater surface area
were also analyzed by Western blotting. Fibronectin (Fig.
2A), an established matrix protein, stained intensely in the cytochalasin B prepared material and
was readily detected in the Triton X-100 and EDTA-prepared material.
The large subunit of LRP (~550 kDa) was readily observed in whole
cell fractions but was absent from all the matrix preparations (Fig.
2B). This demonstrated the absence of contaminating
membrane-associated proteins in these preparations. In agreement with
the findings of others (5), the recovery of protein in the matrix
fractions represented less than 1% of the originating cell material,
which is consistent with the absence of contaminating cell membrane protein.

View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Characterization of the ECM preparations by
Western blotting analysis. ECM extracts (100 µl) were loaded in
electrophoretic lanes (lanes 1-3); 50 µg of cell protein
was loaded (lane 4) on separate gels. The selected antigens
for the immunoblotting analysis are fibronectin (panel A),
LRP (panel B), and apoE (panel C). In the
fibronectin blot, lanes 1, 2, and 4 represent
5-min exposures, whereas lane 3 was derived from a 5-s
exposure.
|
|
Apolipoprotein E Content of the ECM and HepG2 Cell
Surface--
Table I compares the
binding of 7C9 to the HepG2 cell surface and the ECM prepared by the
three methods. The ECM preparation protocols yield matrices with
significantly different abilities to bind 7C9, in descending order are
cytochalasin B ECM > Triton X-100 ECM > EDTA ECM. In
contrast, cell free wells treated in an identical manner retained only
background levels of radiolabeled antibody. Matrix prepared by the
cytochalasin B method bound 125I-7C9 to levels representing
23.6% of that bound by HepG2 cell monolayers. The Triton X-100 and
EDTA preparations represented only 6.0% and 3.0% of the monolayer
capacity, respectively. The ECM preparations and whole cell homogenates
were also analyzed by Western blotting with anti-human apoE (Fig.
2C). In the whole cell homogenates, two bands in the 32-34
kDa range are readily visible and represent sialylated (Fig.
2C, upper band) and non-sialylated forms of apoE
(32, 33). Both bands are visible in the ECM preparations although the
upper sialylated band of apoE predominates. Band intensity is greatest
in the cytochalasin B-prepared material, indicating, in agreement with
the 125I 7C9 binding analysis of Fig. 1, that this method
of preparation yields matrix with the highest endogenous apoE content.
The variable 7C9 binding activity of the preparations could be
explained by a differential loss of apoE during the procedures or by
reduced binding of 7C9 due to conformational changes in apoE brought
about by ECM preparation. We first tested the effects of the matrix preparation procedures on apoE that had been exogenously bound to the
ECM. To minimize the concentration of endogenous apoE, we used
apoE-poor Triton X-100 ECM. Incubation of Triton X-100-derived ECM with
conditioned medium at 4 °C results in a 4-fold increase in the 7C9
binding activity (Table II). The
apoE-enriched ECM were then subjected to one of the three preparation
protocols and a PBS control, washed twice with PBS-BSA, and then
incubated with 125I-7C9 (Fig.
3). The EDTA and Triton X-100 protocols
reduced the 125I-7C9 binding activity by 70 and 40%,
respectively. In contrast to these harsh extraction procedures, the
cytochalasin B protocol did not decrease the apoE content of the ECM
relative to control incubations. The recoveries of exogenous apoE
during the preparation protocols closely parallel those of endogenous
apoE in Table I. We also tested the effects of the preparation
protocols on the ability of 7C9 to recognize apoE. We subjected
apoVLDL, immobilized in microtiter wells, to the matrix preparation
conditions and a PBS control and found no change in the subsequent
binding of 125I-7C9 to apoE following the EDTA and
cytochalasin B protocols. This type of analysis was not possible for
the Triton X-100 preparation method since we found that incubation with
this protocol resulted in a 77.3% loss of immobilized and radiolabeled
apoE from the microtiter wells. There was, however, a coincident 75%
decrease in the binding of 125I-7C9 to the microtiter
wells. Thus the decreased binding of 7C9 with prior Triton X-100
treatment correlates best with the amounts of immobilized apoE rather
than alterations in the immunoreactivity of 7C9 for apoE as a result of
Triton X-100-induced conformational changes. These results indicate
that the 7C9 binding activity of the matrix preparations reflects the
variable recovery of endogenous apoE rather than conformational
alterations of apoE brought about by the preparation procedures. With
regard to the apoE content, the cytochalasin B-derived ECM appears to
be the best representative of the native ECM of HepG2 cells because
this preparation method yields the highest endogenous apoE content and
does not result in the loss of exogenously added and bound
apoE-containing lipoproteins.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
The apolipoprotein E content of ECM prepared by different methods
ECM was prepared from confluent HepG2 cell monolayers by the Triton
X-100, EDTA, or cytochalasin B protocols as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The cell monolayers, ECM, or cell-free
well controls were washed twice with PBS-BSA and then incubated with
125I-7C9 (500,000 cpm/well, representing 70-100 ng of 7C9
protein) for 2h at 4 °C. The cells were then washed three times with
PBS containing 1.7 mM CaCl2, solubilized overnight
in 0.5 N NaOH, and counted in a counter. All data are the means and
S.E. of three separate experiments.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Relative increases in apoE and apoB content of the HepG2 cell surface
and ECM after incubation with conditioned medium or human VLDL
Confluent cell monolayers or ECM prepared by the Triton X-100 or
cytochalasin B methods were washed twice with PBS-BSA and then
incubated with conditioned medium or 100 µg of human VLDL/well for
1 h at 4 °C. Control cell-free wells were incubated with
conditioned medium or VLDL in an idential manner. The wells were then
washed twice with PBS-BSA, and then radiolabeled 7C9 or 1D1 monoclonal antibodies (500,000 cpm/well, representing 70-100 ng of protein) was
added and incubated at 4 °C for a further 2 h. The wells were then washed three times with PBS containing 1.7 mM
CaCl2, solubilized overnight with 0.5 N NaOH, and counted. All
values represent the mean and S.E. of at least three separate
determinations.
|
|

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of the EDTA, Triton X-100, and
cytochalasin B preparation protocols on the apoE content of ECM.
ECM was prepared from confluent HepG2 cells by the Triton X-100 method,
washed three times with PBS-BSA, and then incubated at 4 °C for
1 h with conditioned medium. The ECM was then incubated with PBS
(white bar) or subjected to the EDTA and Triton X-100
preparation protocols as described under "Experimental Procedures."
The effect of cytochalasin B (10 µg/ml in PBS) was also examined
under identical incubation times and temperatures as described for the
cytochalasin B preparation protocol. Shaded bars indicate
ECM, subjected to a second preparation protocol. The apoE content of
the ECM was determined by incubation with 125I-7C9 (500,000 cpm/well) for 2 h at 4 °C. This was followed by three washes
with PBS-BSA, solubilization with 0.5 N NaOH, and counting in a counter. Data are presented as means ± S.E. obtained in three
separate experiments.
|
|
Lipoprotein Binding by ECM Prepared by Different Methods--
To
determine the capacity of ECM for binding apoE-containing lipoproteins
relative to HepG2 cell monolayers, we incubated the Triton X-100- and
cytochalasin B-derived preparations of ECM and the HepG2 cells with
conditioned medium or 100 µg of human VLDL at 4 °C. The unbound
lipoproteins were removed with two washes in PBS-BSA, and then the ECM
and cells were probed with radiolabeled 7C9 (Table II). This protocol
thus assesses the total contributions of endogenous and exogenously
applied apoE to the cell fractions. Following incubation with
conditioned medium, the binding of 125I-7C9 to ECM prepared
by the Triton X-100 and cytochalasin B methods increased 4- and
2.2-fold, respectively. A second incubation with conditioned medium did
not further increase the apoE content of the ECM, indicating that
saturation had been achieved. The conditioned medium used in these
studies was derived from a 72-h incubation of a confluent HepG2
monolayer and is relatively more conditioned than the media (24 h
incubation) bathing the monolayers just prior to our experiments.
Therefore, with our standard cell culture conditions for the ECM
preparation protocols, the cell surface and ECM are not fully saturated
with apoE. Most striking are comparisons between the levels of 7C9
binding achieved after incubation of ECM and monolayers with VLDL.
Under these conditions, 7C9 binding to the HepG2 monolayers increased
by 1.9-fold. In contrast, 7C9 binding to the Triton X-100- and
cytochalasin B-derived matrices increased by 15.8- and 2.5-fold,
respectively, after incubation with VLDL. Binding of
125I-7C9 to cell-free wells after identical incubations
with conditioned medium or human VLDL was minimal (Table II),
indicating association of apoE with cellular components rather than the
plastic surface of the cell culture plates. We also examined the
specific binding of 1D1, a monoclonal antibody against apoB, to our
cell fractions before and after incubations with VLDL (Table II).
Before incubations with VLDL, binding of 125I-1D1 to the
ECM preparations was similar to that found in control cell-free wells.
Incubation with VLDL increased the specific 1D1 binding substantially
in monolayers but to much lesser extents in the ECM preparations. In
contrast to the striking proportion of 125I-7C9 bound by
ECM versus monolayers after VLDL incubations (61%, Triton
X-100 ECM; 38.5%, cytochalasin B ECM), the binding of
125I-1D1 by ECM under the same conditions achieved only
5-6% of that observed in monolayers. Similar low levels of VLDL
binding in ECM fractions were obtained using 125I-labeled
VLDL (results not illustrated).
We also considered the ratios of the absolute changes in 7C9 and 1D1
immunoreactivity following incubations with VLDL. The 7C9/1D1 ratio
(Table II) of 1.3 for monolayers suggests the binding of intact VLDL
particles to the monolayer surface. In contrast, the 7C9/1D1 ratios for
the Triton X-100 and cytochalasin B matrices were 32.1 and 13.7, respectively, indicating a preferential shift toward apoE association.
Thus the ECM has a high capacity to sequester apoE from exogenous
lipoproteins without significant binding of the lipoprotein particle to
the matrix surface. However, it cannot be ruled out that the ECM
preferentially binds VLDL subclasses that are highly enriched in
apoE.
ApoE Binding Components of the Cytochalasin B-prepared ECM--
It
is generally accepted that apoE binds to HSPG via its heparin binding
domains (34). The exogenous addition of heparin or suramin would be
expected to competitively displace apoE from HSPG of the ECM. The
endogenous apoE remaining after incubations was determined by measuring
the specific binding of 125I-7C9 to the matrix. Incubation
of matrix with heparin at 37 °C had no significant effect on the
endogenous apoE content (Table III).
Suramin incubations at 37 °C and heparinase (3 units/ml) at 30 °C
removed 37.4 and 20%, respectively, of the endogenous apoE. As
described earlier, ECM prepared with EDTA exhibited a much reduced apoE
content when compared with cytochalasin B-derived matrix. This
suggested that endogenous apoE associates with the ECM in a divalent
cation-dependent manner. To test this, we have examined the
effect of incubations with EDTA and EGTA on the endogenous apoE content
of the ECM. Incubation with 3 mM EDTA or 3 mM
EGTA at 37 °C significantly decreased (p < 0.05)
the endogenous apoE content by about 33% in both cases. Incubation
with 1 mg/ml egg PCV also significantly decreased the endogenous apoE
content by about 30% (p < 0.005). Increasing the
concentration of PCV to 10 mg/ml did not result in further release of
apoE from the ECM. We also found that incubations with heparin,
suramin, EGTA, EDTA, and PCV under identical conditions did not alter
the ability of 7C9 to bind to apoE immobilized on microtiter wells
(Table III). The 7C9 binding data of Table III therefore represent the
effects of these agents on the relative levels of matrix apoE rather
than conformational changes that affect the ability of 7C9 to
recognize apoE.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Release of endogenous apoE from cytochalasin B ECM
ApoE displacement reactions were performed for 1 h at the
concentrations and temperatures described. The displacement reactions for heparin and suramin were performed with PBS-BSA as vehicle heparinase and egg PCV were performed in EMEM-BSA and EDTA and EGTA in
PBS. Following the reactions, the ECM was washed twice with PBS-BSA and
then incubated with 125I-7C9 antibody for 3 h. Unbound
antibody was removed with three washes with PBS containing
CaCl2. The ECM was solubilized overnight in 0.5 N NaOH and then
counted in a counter. ECM incubated with PBS-BSA, EMEM-BSA, or PBS
bound 3177 ± 426, 2813 ± 120, and 3186 ± 314 cpm of
125I-7C9/well respectively. Endogenous apoE experiments
represent the mean and S.E. of three separate determinations.
The effect of the release conditions on the ability of 7C9 to recognize
apoE were tested by passively adsorbing 0.5 µg of apoVLDL onto
microtiter wells as described under "Experimental Procedures" and
incubating the immobilized samples with the release conditions. The
wells were washed twice with PBS, blocked with PBS-BSA, and then
incubated with 100,000 cpm/well of 125I-7C9. The microtiter
wells were then washed three times and counted. The counts for PBS-BSA
controls were 8919 ± 380 cpm, and each condition was tested with
six wells.
|
|
To determine if the HSPG, Ca2+, and lipid-releasable pools
of apoE represent the same or distinct populations, we tested the effects of sequential incubations with suramin, EGTA, and PCV on matrix
apoE. Incubations with suramin or EGTA followed by a second incubation
with PCV resulted in an additive removal of matrix apoE, 51.8 ± 8.3% and 60.6 ± 2.9%, respectively (Fig.
4). In contrast, incubations with suramin
followed by EGTA removed approximately the same amount of apoE as
incubations with suramin and EGTA alone. Collectively the data suggest
that two populations of apoE are associated with the ECM. One pool
associates with matrix HSPG and can be released with suramin or EGTA. A
second pool associates with the ECM through unknown mediators but can be released by association with lipid.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of sequential incubations with
suramin, EGTA, and PCV on ECM apoE. Cytochalasin B ECM was
incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with EMEM-BSA, suramin (0.5 mg/ml),
PCV (1 mg/ml), or EGTA (3 mM) as described. Following this
incubation, the ECM was washed twice and the media replaced with second
incubations as described. The second incubations were conducted at
37 °C for 1 h, and reagent concentrations were as described for
the first incubation. The ECM was then washed twice with PBS-BSA, and
the levels of 125I-7C9 binding was determined as described
under "Experimental Procedures." All data are the means and S.E. of
three separate determinations.
|
|
Binding of Lipid-poor and Lipid-containing ApoE to an ApoE-depleted
ECM, the Triton X-100 ECM--
Table III and Fig. 4 demonstrate that
endogenous apoE can be displaced from the ECM by PCV. This suggests
that the extent of lipidation might limit or control the association of
apoE with the ECM. To test this hypothesis, we incubated ECM at
37 °C with lipid-free apoVLDL or apoVLDL that had been pre-incubated
with equal or 10-fold (w:w) amounts of PCV (Fig.
5). To minimize the contributions of
endogenous apoE in these experiments, we have used apoE-poor ECM
prepared by the Triton X-100 method. The apoE content of the ECM, as
indicated by 125I-7C9 binding activity, increased the most
when lipid-free apoVLDL was incubated with ECM. Less binding was
observed when apoVLDL was preincubated with an equal amount (w:w) of
PCV and less still when apoVLDL was pre-incubated with a 10-fold
(µg:µg) amount of PCV. We then examined the effect of PCV or
suramin on lipid-free apoVLDL that had been prebound to the Triton
X-100 ECM. Incubation with 1 mg/ml PCV or 1 mg/ml suramin displaced
approximately equal amounts of apoE (34 to 36%) from the ECM (Fig.
6). Sequential incubations with PCV and
suramin displaced 53% of the lipid-poor apoE from the ECM.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of phospholipid on the binding of
apoVLDL to ECM. ApoVLDL (0.75 mg/ml) was incubated with EMEM
containing 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol at 37 °C for 1 h
in the absence (0:1) or presence of PCV (1:1 or 10:1, w:w, egg
phosphatidylcholine:protein). ECM, prepared by the Triton X-100 method,
was incubated with 0-100 µg of apoVLDL for 1 h at 37 °C and
then washed three times with PBS-BSA. The apoE content of the ECM was
determined by incubation with 125I-7C9 and counting in a
counter. Data are presented as means ± S.E. obtained in three
separate experiments.
|
|

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Displacement of lipid-poor apoE from the ECM
with PCV and suramin. Lipid-free apoVLDL (100 µg of
protein/well) was incubated with Triton X-100-prepared ECM as described
in the legend to Fig. 5. The ECM was washed twice with EMEM-BSA to
remove free apoVLDL and then incubated at 37 °C with PBS-BSA
(white bar) or PCV (1 mg/ml), suramin (0.5 mg/ml), or
sequentially with PCV and suramin (shaded bars). ApoE was
determined by incubation with 125I-7C9. The data represent
the means and S.E. of three separate determinations.
|
|
Endogenous ApoE of the Cell Surface and Cytochalasin B ECM Is Lipid
Poor--
To test the effects of lipid complement on the
immunoreactivity of anti-apoE monoclonal antibodies, we coated
microtiter wells with either 0.5 µg of apoVLDL or 5 µg of VLDL and
then incubated these immobilized ligands with increasing concentrations
of Liposyn II, a solubilized triglyceride-rich emulsion, or
POPC-cholate micelles. The immunoreactivity of antibodies reacting at
three distinct epitopes was analyzed: 7C9 at the N terminus, 1D7 in the
receptor binding domain, and 3H1 in the lipid binding domain. In wells
that had not been coated with apoVLDL, only background counts were
obtained, and there was no effect of increasing lipid (data not shown).
Fig. 7 demonstrates that incubations of
immobilized apoVLDL with Liposyn II or POPC induces a
concentration-dependent increase in its immunoreactivity
with 3H1. Maximal 3H1 immunoreactivity toward immobilized apoVLDL
(3.8-fold) was achieved rapidly with 2.5-20 µg of Liposyn II (Fig.
7, top panel, solid symbols). Studies in which
VLDL was adsorbed to the microtiter wells demonstrated maximal 3H1
immunoreactivity even in the absence of added lipids; the
immunoreactivity was not significantly affected by further addition of
Liposyn II (Fig. 7, top panel, hollow symbols). A more gradual increase in 3H1 immunoreactivity was achieved with POPC
micelles (Fig. 7, bottom panel) with a maximal 4.3-fold
increase observed at 20-40 µg of POPC. The immunoreactivity of 1D7
(Fig. 7, top panel), a monoclonal antibody directed against
residues 142-158 of apoE (LDL receptor and heparin binding region),
also exhibited a 1.5-fold increase in binding with increasing Liposyn II. In contrast, the immunoreactivity of 7C9 was unaffected by the
addition of Liposyn II (Fig. 7, top panel) or POPC cholate micelles (Fig. 7, bottom panel).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Immunoreactivity of monoclonal 3H1, 1D7, and
7C9 to apoVLDL following incubation with Liposyn II and POPC
micelles. ApoVLDL (0.5 µg in 100 µl, solid symbols)
or human VLDL (5 µg in 100 µl, white symbols) in PBS was
immobilized by passive adsorption to microtiter wells for 16 h at
4 °C. The wells were washed three times and then incubated with
100-µl volumes of PBS containing 0-40 µg of Liposyn II (top
panel) or POPC micelles (bottom panel) for 2 h at
37 °C. The wells were then washed and blocked with PBS containing
1% fatty acid-free BSA. This was followed by incubation with
radiolabeled 3H1, 1D7, or 7C9 (100,000 cpm/well) in PBS-BSA for 2 h at 25 °C, washing, and counting in a counter. The data represent the means and S.E. of three separate determinations.
|
|
We next tested the effects of Liposyn II on the immunoreactivity of
endogenous apoE of the cytochalasin B-derived ECM and cell surface with
3H1 and 7C9 (Fig. 8). At 4 °C,
incubation with 1 mg/ml Liposyn II increased the immunoreactivity of
3H1 by 2-fold in cell monolayers and by 3.4-fold in matrix (Fig. 8,
top left panel). 7C9 binding at 4 °C was unaffected by
the presence of Liposyn II (Fig. 8, bottom left panel).
Liposyn II incubations at 37 °C increased the immunoreactivity of
3H1 (top right panel) by about 2-fold in cell monolayers and
5-fold in ECM. Incubation of ECM with 1 mg/ml PCV at 37 °C also
increased 3H1 immunoreactivity by 3.7-fold (data not shown). These
results suggest that much of the endogenous apoE of ECM, and to a
lesser extent the cell surface, exists in a lipid-poor form. In
addition, incubations of cell monolayers with Liposyn II decreased the
content of immunodetectable apoE as indicated by a 30% reduction in
7C9 binding activity (Fig. 8, bottom right panel),
indicating either increased release or metabolism of cell surface apoE
in the presence of Liposyn II. Incubation of the ECM with Liposyn II,
however, did not result in a significant decrease in 7C9 binding
activity although we observed earlier that incubation of the ECM with
PCV at 37 °C did significantly reduce the 7C9 binding activity of
this fraction by 30% (Table III). Table
IV summarizes the Scatchard analysis of
7C9 and 3H1 binding to the cell surface in the presence and absence of
Liposyn II treatment. Liposyn II induced no change in the affinity of
binding for either antibody and had no effect on the number of
available 7C9 epitopes. Liposyn II did, however, promote a significant
1.7-fold increase in the number of 3H1 epitopes on the cell surface
(p < 0.005). Collectively, the data suggest that much
of the apoE on the ECM and cell surface may exist as a lipid-poor
oligomeric form. Treatment with Liposyn II could disassemble the
oligomer, revealing additional 3H1 binding sites.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of Liposyn II on the binding of 3H1
and 7C9 to HepG2 cell monolayers and ECM. Confluent monolayers or
ECM prepared by the cytochalasin B method were incubated with PBS-BSA
(white bars) or 1 mg/ml Liposyn II (shaded bars)
for 1 h at 4 °C (left) or 37 °C
(right). The wells were then washed and blocked with PBS
containing fatty acid-free BSA and incubated with 500,000 cpm/well of
125I-3H1 (top panels) or 125I-7C9
(bottom panels). The wells were finally washed with PBS-BSA, solubilized with 0.5 N NaOH, and counted in a counter. The data represent the means and S.E. of three separate determinations.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table IV
Scatchard analysis of 7C9 and 3H1 binding to cell monolayers in the
absence and presence of Liposyn II
HepG2 monolayers were grown to confluence, chilled on ice, and then
washed three times with PBS-BSA. The cells were then incubated with
PBS-BSA (control) or 1 mg/ml Liposyn II for 2 h at 37 °C. The
monolayers were transferred to an ice bath and washed twice with
PBS-BSA. A constant amount of 125I-mAb (50 ng/ml) with a range
of 10 concentrations of the same unlabelled mAb (0-50 ng/ml) was added
to the monolayers in triplicate wells and incubated for 4 h. The
percent specific binding was used to calculate bound and bound/free
ratios for Scatchard plots.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A heparin/heparinase-releasable pool of apoE on the HepG2 cell
surface has previously been described (16, 17). Cell surface apoE has
also been characterized in rat hepatoma McA-RH7777 cells transfected
with human apoE3 (18). These studies have not assessed cell surface
apoE directly but rather measured increases in the levels of medium
apoE after incubations with heparin, heparinase, or suramin. The
specific binding of monoclonal 7C9 measures changes in cell surface
apoE directly as indicated by the 30% decrease of cell surface apoE
and the parallel increase in medium apoE following incubation with
suramin (Fig. 1). We have used 7C9 binding to examine the endogenous
apoE content and binding of apoE-containing lipoproteins to ECM
prepared by three different methods. Preparation with cytochalasin B
yields ECM with the highest endogenous apoE content (23.6% of the
binding of cell monolayers). When compared with control incubations,
the cytochalasin B method, in contrast to the protocols using Triton
X-100 and EDTA, did not promote the dissociation of exogenously added
apoE from the ECM. In terms of apoE content, we believe that the
cytochalasin B-prepared material best represents the native HepG2 ECM.
ECM prepared with Triton X-100 or EDTA demonstrates lower endogenous
apoE levels (6 and 3%, respectively, of cell monolayers). Regardless
of the preparation method used, ECM material represents less than 1%
of the total cellular protein. Despite this minor representation, the
ECM can attain levels of apoE that represent about 60% of the HepG2
monolayer. This is evident after incubation of ECM with VLDL. The
ability to sequester apoE is in contrast to the low capacity for apoB, as indicated by specific 1D1 binding, following incubation with VLDL
(Table II). Possible mechanisms could include the transfer of apoE from
VLDL to the ECM without particle binding or the preferential binding of
apoE-rich VLDL to the ECM. But in the second case, binding would have
to be mediated by apoE and not apoB. Either mechanism would explain the
disproportionate levels of apoE and apoB binding to ECM after
incubation with VLDL.
The association of apoE with the ECM appears to be heterogeneous.
Suramin removes 37.4% and heparinase about 20% of the endogenous apoE
of the ECM, suggesting attachment of a population via HSPG (Table III).
We have found that incubations with heparin under various conditions
(1-5 mg/ml, 4 and 37 °C) do not reproducibly affect the apoE
content of the ECM. This varies from previous reports (16-18) and
probably reflects differences in the interaction and association of
apoE with the cell surface and the ECM. About one-third of the apoE
associates with the ECM in a divalent cation-dependent manner as indicated by displacement with EDTA or EGTA. EGTA is a
specific chelator of Ca2+ ions, suggesting that
Ca2+-dependent interactions are involved in the
binding of apoE to the ECM. In this regard, several components of the
ECM have been shown to interact with extracellular proteins in a
Ca2+-dependent manner. Fibulin-2 binding to
fibronectin and nidogen requires Ca2+ (35) as does
SPARC/BM-40 binding to collagen IV (36, 37). Of particular interest is
a recent report describing an interaction between apoE and laminin
(38). HepG2 cells express and secrete the laminin B chain (39), and
laminin interacts in a calcium-dependent manner with
several components of the ECM including the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (40), calreticulin (41), BM 90/fibulin (42), and HSPG (43, 44).
Our results therefore could be explained by a
Ca2+-dependent conformation of matrix elements,
including laminin and HSPG, which controls apoE binding.
The data from several experiments indicate that apoE also associates
with the ECM in a lipid-dependent manner. PCV efficiently displaced about 30% of the endogenous apoE from the ECM either by
itself (Table III) or following incubations with suramin or EGTA (Fig.
3). The additive nature of these sequential incubations suggests that
the lipid-releasable pool and the suramin/EGTA-releasable pool
associate differently with components of the ECM. A similar conclusion
resulted from the studies of Getz et al. (45) who described
additive release of apoE from the HepG2 cell surface by heparin and
phospholipid vesicles. Surprisingly, Liposyn II, though displacing
about 30% of the cell surface apoE from HepG2 monolayers, was
ineffective at displacing apoE from the ECM (Fig. 8). As with the
heparin data, this further delineates the differences between the
association of apoE with components of the cell surface and ECM. In
other experiments, lipid-free apoE derived from apoVLDL bound most
efficiently to the ECM, whereas increasing the phospholipid:protein ratio to 1:1 or 10:1 (w:w) decreased apoE association by 45.8 and
58.6%, respectively. Approximately 35% of the lipid-free apoE could
be displaced from the ECM by incubation with PCV or suramin; sequential
incubations removed 53.3%. This data indicates that exogenously
applied and lipid-poor apoE associates equally well with the
suramin/EGTA- and lipid-releasable pools.
In many studies, we have found that the effects of EDTA, while always
reducing the apoE content of the matrix, were variable. Preparation of
ECM with EDTA, for example, results in matrix with a very low apoE
content (3% of the monolayer content, Table I). In contrast,
incubation of cytochalasin B-prepared ECM with EDTA, while removing
one-third of the endogenous apoE content, results in a matrix
preparation with 16% of the monolayer content. This difference might
be explained by the varied nature of the starting materials. As cells
separate from the ECM during the EDTA preparation protocol, cell
surface molecules, for example HSPG, could pull endogenous apoE away
from the ECM. This additional removal of apoE would not be expected
when examining the effect of EDTA on the cytochalasin B prepared-ECM.
In other studies in which the apoE content of the Triton X-100-prepared
ECM had been increased by incubation with conditioned medium, we
observed that EDTA could remove about 70% of the apoE content of the
matrix (Fig. 2). Exogenously applied lipoproteins may associate with
the isolated matrix in a different manner and may be more readily
released by EDTA than endogenous apoE of the ECM. Based on our 3H1
immunoreactivity studies, we would expect lipoproteins of conditioned
medium to have a greater proportion of associated lipid than apoE of
the ECM and a decreased affinity for the ECM. This is particularly evident when considering the varied displacements of endogenous apoE
and human VLDL from the ECM with suramin. We have found that suramin
can displace 51.8 ± 8.0% of human VLDL from the Triton X-100-prepared ECM.2 This
contrasts with the 37.3% displacement of endogenous apoE from the
cytochalasin B-prepared ECM with suramin. Thus, lipidated lipoproteins
may be more readily released from the matrix by suramin, EDTA, and
possibly other treatments.
ApoE may be secreted from HepG2 cells (46, 47) or primary rat adult
hepatocytes (48) in association with large, apoB-containing lipoproteins when cellular lipogenesis and VLDL production are stimulated or as relatively lipid-poor -migrating particles (47). It
has also been reported that 25-hydroxycholesterol promotes a
significant redistribution of apoE from HDL to a density greater than
1.21 g/ml infranatant (49) in HepG2 cells. This dense apoE fraction was
composed of 85% of weight protein and 15% of weight of free
cholesterol and phospholipid, and several methods of analysis demonstrated that its appearance was not an artifact of
ultracentrifugation. To examine the lipid content of apoE of the ECM
and cell surface, we have used the monoclonal 3H1 antibody. The
immunoreactivity of 3H1, which recognizes an epitope in the C-terminal
domain of apoE, increases in a concentration-dependent
manner with the addition of Liposyn II or POPC micelles. The C-terminal
domain of apoE contains amphipathic -helices, binds avidly to
lipoproteins (50, 51), and is responsible for the formation of the
stable tetramer of apoE in aqueous solution (51, 52). Lipid association
would be expected to alter both the conformation of the C-terminal
region and the immunoreactivity of 3H1. Scatchard analysis of cell
surface apoE demonstrated that Liposyn II alters the number of
available antigen binding sites rather than changing the affinity of
3H1 for apoE. In this regard, incubation of immobilized apoVLDL with Liposyn II or POPC cholate micelles induced an approximate 4-fold increase in the immunoreactivity of 3H1, suggesting tetramer to monomer
conversion. The immunoreactivity of 3H1 to endogenous apoE of the ECM
also increased 3.2- and 5-fold with Liposyn II incubation at 4 and
37 °C, respectively. Incubations of HepG2 monolayers with Liposyn II
at 4 and 37 °C increased 3H1 immunoreactivity by 2-fold.
Interpretation of the effects of Liposyn II on the apoE of monolayers
is complicated by several factors, including membrane turnover and
metabolism at 37 °C. This is apparent in the 7C9 analysis where a
substantial decrease in cell surface apoE is observed in the presence
of Liposyn II. In addition, a substantial proportion of the Liposyn II
effect in monolayers is probably due to the presence of apoE of the
ECM. Regardless, the data suggests that apoE of the ECM exists in a
lipid-poor form.
The function of endogenous ECM apoE may prove as complex or
heterogeneous as the mode of apoE association with the ECM. Our results
indicate that association of lipoprotein particles with the lipid-poor
apoE on the ECM would decrease the affinity of apoE for its binding
sites on the ECM and result in the subsequent release of the
lipoprotein and its newly acquired apoE. As with the secretion-capture
hypothesis of Ji et al. (18, 20) the net result would be an
apoE-enriched lipoprotein particle with an increased predisposition for
binding to the LDL receptor and the LRP. A similar mechanism could be
used to enhance the apoE content of newly secreted lipoprotein
particles. Hepatocytes secrete HDL that contains either or both apoA-I
and apoE (53, 54). Although apoA-I is the major apolipoprotein of
plasma HDL, newly secreted HDL has been shown to range from particles
containing mostly apoA-I to others containing mostly apoE (55). The
present results indicate that lipid-poor apoE of the ECM and cell
surface can be transferred to the newly secreted lipoproteins as they emerge into the space of Disse and as required for lipid transport. In
this regard, we have found that incubations of HepG2 cells with suramin
decreases both cell surface apoE and the apoE content of newly secreted
apoB-containing lipoproteins while having no effect on the secretion of
apoE from intracellular
stores.3 In macrophage,
lipid-poor apoE of the ECM and cell surface might also participate in
the reverse cholesterol transport (56, 57). Incubations of a
transformed macrophage cell line constitutively expressing human apoE
at 4 °C with lactoferrin or PCV promoted the release of apoE to the
extracellular medium (58), suggesting, like HepG2 and McA7777 cells,
that macrophage maintain apoE at the cell surface. Binding of lipids by
cell surface apoE would decrease the affinity of the apoE-lipid complex
for the ECM/cell surface, which would then dissociate and move into the
circulation.
In conclusion, we have shown that apoE is bound to the ECM of HepG2
cells via charge interactions that depend on the presence of
Ca2+, either directly for binding to the ECM or indirectly
to maintain the appropriate ECM structure. The ECM apoE is mostly
lipid-poor and forms oligomers that are releasable by lipids and
lipoproteins. This protein may serve to arm lipoproteins with apoE that
is used for both lipid transport and lipoprotein uptake.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. R. Milne, J. Schultz, and Z. Yao for useful discussions and comments on the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This research was supported by a grant from the Heart and
Stroke Foundation of Ontario.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: University of
Ottawa Heart Institute, 1053 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario
K1Y4E9, Canada. Tel.: 613-761-5255; Fax: 613-761-5281; E-mail:
ymarcel{at}heartinst.on.ca.
1
The abbreviations used are: ECM, extracellular
matrix; apoB, apolipoprotein B; apoE, apolipoprotein E; BSA, bovine
serum albumin; EMEM, Eagle's minimum essential medium; HSPG, heparin
sulfate proteoglycan; LDL, low density lipoprotein; VLDL, very low
density lipoprotein; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PCV,
phosphatidylcholine vesicle; POPC, palmitoyloleyl phosphatidylcholine;
mAb, monoclonal antibody; DMPC, dimyristoyl
L- -phosphatidylcholine; LRP, LDL receptor-related
protein.
2
J. W. Burgess and Y. L. Marcel,
unpublished results.
3
J. W. Burgess, C. Vaidyanath, P. Liang, and
Y. L. Marcel, manuscript in preparation.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Martinez-Hernandez, A.,
and Amenta, P. S.
(1993)
Virchows Arch. Abt. A Pathol. Anat.
423,
1-11
-
Martinez-Hernandez, A.
(1984)
Lab. Invest.
51,
57-74[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gospodarowicz, D.,
Delgado, D.,
and Vlodavsky, I.
(1980)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
77,
4094-4098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Saxena, U.,
Ferguson, E.,
and Bisgaier, C. L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
14812-14819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Owensby, D. A.,
Morton, P. A.,
and Schwartz, A. L.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
18180-18187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mai, S.,
and Chung, A. E.
(1984)
Exp. Cell Res.
152,
500-5093[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Geerts, A.,
Geuze, H. J.,
Slot, J. W.,
Voss, B.,
Schuppan, D.,
Schellinck, P.,
Wisse, E.
(1986)
Histochemistry
84,
355-362[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Maher, J. J.,
Friedman, S. L.,
Roll, R. J.,
Bissell, D. M.
(1988)
Gastroenterology
94,
1053-1062[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Friedman, S. L.,
Roll, F. J.,
Boyles, J.,
and Bissell, D. M.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
8681-8685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Soroka, C. J.,
and Farquhar, M. G.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
113,
1231-1241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., and Watson, J. D.
(eds)
(1994)
Molecular Biology of the Cell, 3rd Ed., pp. 971-995, Garland Publishing, NY
-
Chajek-Shaul, T.,
Friedman, G.,
Bengtsson-Olivecrona, G.,
Vlodavsky, I.,
and Bar-Shavit, R.
(1990)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1042,
168-175[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Saxena, U.,
Klein, M. G.,
and Goldberg, I. J.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
12880-12886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cisar, L. A.,
Melford, K. H.,
Sensel, M.,
and Bensadoun, A.
(1989)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1004,
196-204[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kounnas, M. Z.,
Chappell, D. A.,
Wong, H.,
Argaves, W. S.,
Strickland, D. K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
9307-9312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lilly-Stauderman, M.,
Brown, T. L.,
Balasubramaniam, A.,
Harmony, J. A. K.
(1993)
J. Lipid Res.
34,
190-200[Abstract]
-
Deng, J.,
Rudick, V.,
Rudick, M.,
and Dory, L.
(1997)
J. Lipid Res.
38,
217-227[Abstract]
-
Ji, Z.-S.,
Fazio, S.,
Lee, Y.-L.,
and Mahley, R. W.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
2764-2772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Williams, D. L.,
Wong, J. S.,
Wissig, S. L.,
Hamilton, R. L.
(1995)
J. Lipid Res.
36,
745-758[Abstract]
-
Ji, Z.-S.,
Brecht, W. J.,
Miranda, R. D.,
Hussain, M. M.,
Innerarity, T.,
Mahley, R. W.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
10160-10167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shimano, H.,
Namba, Y.,
Ohsuga, J.,
Kawamura, M.,
Yamamoto, K.,
Shimada, M.,
Gotoda, T.,
Harada, K.,
Yazaki, Y.,
and Yamada, N.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
93,
2215-2223
-
Hamilton, R. L.,
Wong, J. S.,
Guo, L. S. S.,
Krisans, S.,
Havel, R. J.
(1990)
J. Lipid Res.
31,
1589-1603[Abstract]
-
Milne, R. W.,
Douste-Blazy, P.,
Retegui, L.,
and Marcel, Y. L.
(1981)
J. Clin. Invest.
68,
111-117
-
Weisgraber, K. H.,
Innerarity, T. L.,
Harder, K. J.,
Mahley, R. W.,
Milne, R. W.,
Marcel, Y. L.,
Sparrow, J. T.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
12348-12354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Milne, R. W.,
Théolis, R., Jr.,
Verdery, R. B.,
Marcel, Y. L.
(1983)
Arteriosclerosis
3,
23-30[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pease, R. J.,
Milne, R. W.,
Jessup, W. K.,
Law, A.,
Provost, P.,
Fruchart, J.-C.,
Dean, R. T.,
Marcel, Y. L.,
Scott, J.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
553-568[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rall, S. C.,
Weisgraber, K. H.,
and Mahley, R. W.
(1986)
Methods Enzymol.
128,
273-287[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Markwell, M. A.,
Haas, S. M.,
Bieber, L. L.,
Tolbert, N. E.
(1978)
Anal. Biochem.
87,
206-210[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sparks, D. L.,
Anantharamaiah, L. M.,
Segrest, J. P.,
Phillips, M. C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
5151-5157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sparks, D. L.,
Phillips, M. C.,
and Lund-Katz, S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
25830-25838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zannis, V. I.,
vanderSpek, J.,
and Silverman, D.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
13415-13421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Weisgraber, K. H.,
and Shinto, L. H.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
12029-12034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Weisgraber, K. H.,
Rall, R. C., Jr.,
Mahley, R. W.,
Milne, R. W.,
Marcel, Y. L.,
Sparrow, J. T.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
2068-2076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sasaki, T.,
Gohring, W.,
Pan, T. C.,
Chu, M. L.,
Timpl, R.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
254,
892-899[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sage, E. H.,
and Bornstein, P.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
14831-14834[Free Full Text]
-
Timpl, R.,
and Aumailley, M.
(1993)
in
Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Basement Membranes (Rohrbach, D. H., and Timpl, R., eds), pp. 211-235, Academic Press, Orlando, FL
-
Huang, D. Y.,
Weisgraber, K. H.,
Strittmatter, W. J.,
Matthew, W. D.
(1995)
Exp. Neurol.
136,
251-257[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rescan, P. Y.,
Clement, B.,
Yamada, Y.,
Glaise, D.,
Segui-Real, B.,
Guguen-Guillouzo, C.,
and Guillouzo, A.
(1991)
Hepatology
13,
289-296[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ervasti, J. M.,
and Campbell, K. P.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
809-823[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McDonnell, J. M.,
Jones, G. E.,
White, T. K.,
Tanzer, M. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
7891-7894[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pan, T. C.,
Kluge, M.,
Zhang, R. Z.,
Mayer, U.,
Timpl, R.,
Chu, M. L.
(1993)
Eur. J. Biochem.
215,
733-740[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Battaglia, C.,
Mayer, U.,
Aumailley, M.,
and Timpl, R.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
208,
359-366[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schger, L.,
Skubitz, A. P.,
Gilbride, K.,
Mandel, R.,
and He, L.
(1996)
Dev. Biol.
179,
264-273[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Getz, G. S.,
Ye, S. Q.,
Thurberg, B.,
and Reardon, C. A.
(1995)
in
Atherosclerosis X (Woodford, F. P., Davignon, J., and Sniderman, A., eds), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam
-
Craig, W. Y.,
Nutik, R.,
and Cooper, A. D.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
13880-13890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fazio, S.,
and Yao, Z.
(1995)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
15,
593-600[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hussein, M. M.,
Zannis, E. E.,
Kelly, M.,
and Zannis, V. I.
(1989)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
100,
90-101
-
Tam, S. P.,
and Ramharack, R.
(1992)
Atherosclerosis
95,
137-146[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Weisgraber, K. H.
(1990)
J. Lipid Res.
31,
1503-1511[Abstract]
-
Westerlund, J. A.,
and Weisgraber, K. H.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
15745-15750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Aggerbeck, L. P.,
Wetterau, J. R.,
Weisgraber, K. H.,
Wu, C. S.,
Lindgren, F. T.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
6249-6258[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Johnson, F. L.,
Babiak, J.,
and Rudel, L. L.
(1986)
J. Lipid Res.
27,
537-548[Abstract]
-
Winkler, K. E.,
and Marsh, J. B.
(1989)
J. Lipid Res.
30,
979-987[Abstract]
-
Forte, T. M.,
Goth-Goldstein, R.,
Nordhausen, R. W.,
McCall, M. R.
(1993)
J. Lipid Res.
34,
317-324[Abstract]
-
Zhang, W.-Y.,
Gaynor, P. M.,
and Kruth, H. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
28641-28646[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Smith, J. D.,
Miyata, M.,
Ginsberg, M.,
Grigaux, C.,
Shmookler, E.,
and Plump, A. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
30647-30655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lucas, M.,
and Mazzone, T.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
13454-13460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kockx, W. Jessup, and L. Kritharides
Regulation of Endogenous Apolipoprotein E Secretion by Macrophages
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
June 1, 2008;
28(6):
1060 - 1067.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Ruiz, D. Kouiavskaia, M. Migliorini, S. Robinson, E. L. Saenko, N. Gorlatova, D. Li, D. Lawrence, B. T. Hyman, K. H. Weisgraber, et al.
The apoE isoform binding properties of the VLDL receptor reveal marked differences from LRP and the LDL receptor
J. Lipid Res.,
August 1, 2005;
46(8):
1721 - 1731.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Vassiliou and R. McPherson
A Novel Efflux-Recapture Process Underlies the Mechanism of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesteryl Ester-Selective Uptake Mediated by the Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
September 1, 2004;
24(9):
1669 - 1675.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kockx, K.-A. Rye, K. Gaus, C. M. Quinn, J. Wright, T. Sloane, D. Sviridov, Y. Fu, D. Sullivan, J. R. Burnett, et al.
Apolipoprotein A-I-stimulated Apolipoprotein E Secretion from Human Macrophages Is Independent of Cholesterol Efflux
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 18, 2004;
279(25):
25966 - 25977.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Havel and R. L. Hamilton
Hepatic Catabolism of Remnant Lipoproteins: Where the Action Is
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
February 1, 2004;
24(2):
213 - 215.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Saito, P. Dhanasekaran, D. Nguyen, F. Baldwin, K. H. Weisgraber, S. Wehrli, M. C. Phillips, and S. Lund-Katz
Characterization of the Heparin Binding Sites in Human Apolipoprotein E
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 18, 2003;
278(17):
14782 - 14787.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. Burgess, R. S. Kiss, H. Zheng, S. Zachariah, and Y. L. Marcel
Trypsin-sensitive and Lipid-containing Sites of the Macrophage Extracellular Matrix Bind Apolipoprotein A-I and Participate in ABCA1-dependent Cholesterol Efflux
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 23, 2002;
277(35):
31318 - 31326.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Rittling, Y. Chen, F. Feng, and Y. Wu
Tumor-derived Osteopontin Is Soluble, Not Matrix Associated
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 8, 2002;
277(11):
9175 - 9182.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. Burgess and Y. L. Marcel
Dynamic and stable pools of apoE differ functionally at the HepG2 cell surface
J. Lipid Res.,
September 1, 2001;
42(9):
1413 - 1420.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Tomiyasu, B. W. Walsh, K. Ikewaki, H. Judge, and F. M. Sacks
Differential Metabolism of Human VLDL According to Content of ApoE and ApoC-III
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
September 1, 2001;
21(9):
1494 - 1500.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. B. DeMattos, L. L. Rudel, and D. L. Williams
Biochemical analysis of cell-derived apoE3 particles active in stimulating neurite outgrowth
J. Lipid Res.,
June 1, 2001;
42(6):
976 - 987.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|