|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 11, 6446-6451, March 13, 1998
T Cell Receptor-mediated Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Cas-L, a
105-kDa Crk-associated Substrate-related Protein, and Its
Association of Crk and C3G*
Yoshiyuki
Ohashi ,
Kouichi
Tachibana §,
Kenjiro
Kamiguchi ,
Hiroo
Fujita , and
Chikao
Morimoto ¶
From the Division of Tumor Immunology, Dana-Farber
Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 and the ¶ Department of Clinical Immunology and AIDS Research
Center, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1, Shiroganedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
 |
ABSTRACT |
Cas-L (pp105), a Crk-associated substrate
(p130Cas)-related protein, was first identified as a
105-kDa protein that is tyrosine-phosphorylated following 1 integrin
cross-linking in T cells. Cas-L contains possible multiple binding
sites for the Src homology (SH) 2 domains of various signaling
molecules, and appears to be involved in signal transduction through
phosphorylated tyrosine-mediated protein-protein interaction. Since
Cas-L is preferentially expressed in lymphocytes, it is conceivable
that Cas-L plays an important role in lymphocyte-specific signals.
Here, we show the involvement of Cas-L in the T cell receptor (TCR)/CD3
signaling pathway. Cas-L is transiently phosphorylated following CD3
cross-linking, and tyrosine-phosphorylated Cas-L binds to Crk and C3G.
Furthermore, a Cas-L mutant that lacks the SH3 domain, the binding site
for focal adhesion kinase (FAK), is also tyrosine-phosphorylated upon
CD3 cross-linking, but not upon 1 integrin crosslinking, suggesting
that FAK is not involved in CD3-dependent Cas-L
phosphorylation. Taken together, the present study indicates a novel
signaling pathway mediated by tyrosine-phosphorylated Cas-L upon the
TCR/CD3 stimulation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
T cell receptor (TCR)1
-antigen binding induces gene expression, cytokine production, and cell
proliferation in T lymphocytes (1). These TCR-dependent
signals are mediated by tyrosine phosphorylation of various proteins
including CD3 , CD3 , CD3 , ZAP-70, Shc, Vav, and c-Cbl (2).
These signaling molecules appear to be involved in the phosphorylated
tyrosine-mediated protein-protein interaction and the recruitment of
the other signaling molecules containing Src homology (SH) 2 domains
(3). The recruitment of these signaling molecules is essential to
induce various signals to the downstream events such as the activation
of mitogen-activated protein kinases, Ca2+ influx, and
transcriptional activation of various genes (1). Thus, protein tyrosine
phosphorylation plays a key role during the initial phase of
TCR-mediated T cell activation. However, the essential phosphorylated
molecule and the precise function of each phosphorylated molecule for
these signaling pathways have not yet been clarified.
Cas-L (pp105) was first identified as a 105-kDa protein that is
tyrosine-phosphorylated upon 1 integrin cross-linking (4). Cas-L
belongs to Cas-family along with p130Cas and Efs/Sin
(5-7). The three proteins share the structural characteristics of an
N-terminal SH3 domain, followed by multiple (8 to 15) YXXP motifs, which are putative binding sites for the Crk SH2 domain, and a
conserved YDYVHL sequence that possibly binds to the Src SH2 domain.
(5-7). Cas-L was shown to associate with the C-terminal domain of
focal adhesion kinase (FAK), a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase that is
localized to focal adhesions (5, 8). Recently, we reported that the
conserved YDYVHL sequence of Cas-L was phosphorylated by FAK following
1 integrin cross-linking and that an Src family tyrosine kinase is
recruited to the phosphorylated YDYVHL sequence and causes further
tyrosine phosphorylation of Cas-L (9). We also reported that
tyrosine-phosphorylated Cas-L binds to Crk, Nck, and SHPTP2 following
1 integrin cross-linking (5). These findings suggest that Cas-L
plays an important role in the 1 integrin-mediated signaling
pathway.
Although the significance of Cas-L in 1 integrin-mediated signaling
has been well documented, little is known about its ability in other
signaling pathways. Since Cas-L is predominantly expressed in
lymphocytes (5), it is conceivable that Cas-L may participate in
lymphocyte-specific signaling pathways. Recently, Kanda et al. (10) reported TCR-dependent tyrosine
phosphorylation of a 105-kDa Cas-related protein. However, the precise
molecular mechanism for signal transduction though Cas-L remains
unclear. In this study, we show that Cas-L is tyrosine-phosphorylated
and forms complexes with Crk and C3G following CD3 cross-linking. We
further demonstrate that FAK is not likely involved in the CD3-dependent Cas-L phosphorylation.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture--
A human T lymphoblastoid cell line, H9, a
human breast cancer cell line, T-47D, and a monkey kidney-derived cell
line, COS-1, were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC,
Rockville, MD) and grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium or
RPMI 1640 supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and gentamycin (50 µg/ml)
(complete medium). JMC-T5, a Jurkat strain carrying SV40 large T
antigen (a gift from Dr. Hamid Band, Brigham and Women's Hospital,
Boston, MA) was maintained in the complete medium containing 1 mg/ml
geneticin (Life Technologies, Inc.). Human peripheral T lymphocytes
were isolated from normal healthy donors as described elsewhere (11).
Briefly, mononuclear cells were separated by Ficoll-Paque gradient
centrifugation from leukopheresed products followed by a positive
selection with sheep erythrocytes. Contaminating monocytes were
depleted by adherence to plastic plates.
Antibodies and Glutathione S-Transferase Fusion
Proteins--
The affinity-purified anti-human Cas-L rabbit antibody
was raised in rabbits immunized with the glutathione
S-transferase (GST) fusion protein of Cas-L containing Cas-L
residues 419 to 524 (14). Anti-Crk, anti-p130Cas, and
anti-FAK monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were purchased from Transduction
Laboratories (Lexington, KY). Rabbit antibodies against C3G, Lck, and
ZAP70 were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA).
Anti-phosphotyrosine mAb (anti-P-Tyr, 4G10) and anti-c-Myc
tag mAb (9E10) were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (Lake
Placid, NY) and Oncogene Science Inc. (Manhasset, NY), respectively.
Anti-CD3 (OKT3) and anti-CD29 (4B4) mAbs have been described previously
(11). GST-Crk SH2 was provided by Dr. Bruce J. Mayer (Children's
Hospital, Boston, MA). GST-Shc SH2 was obtained from Dr. Gotz Baumann
(Sandoz Pharma LTD., Basel, Switzerland). Rat p130Cas
cDNA was obtained from Dr. Hisamaru Hirai (University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan).
Transfections--
Plasmid DNA was transfected into COS-1 cells
by the DEAE-dextran method (12). Ten µg of plasmid DNA was
transfected into JMC-T5 cells (20-30 million) in 300 µl of
serum-free RPMI 1640 by electroporation at 250 V and 960 microfarad
using the Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
Cell Stimulation and Preparation of Cell
Extracts--
Cells were washed three times with Iscove's serum-free
medium (Sigma), and incubated with 500 µl of Iscove's media
containing 10 µg/ml anti-CD3 or anti-CD29 mAb on ice for 15 min.
After a wash with cold medium, cells were incubated with 200 µl of
media containing 10 µg/ml anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Ig) at 37 °C
for appropriate durations of time. The reactions were stopped by the addition of ice-cold Iscove's medium containing 5 mM EDTA,
10 mM sodium fluoride, 10 mM pyrophosphate, and
0.4 mM sodium vanadate. After centrifugation, cells were
lysed in a lysis buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mM iodoacetamide, 1 µg/ml pepstatin A, 10 mM
sodium fluoride, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 0.4 mM sodium vanadate, and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0)
for 15 min on ice. For stimulation with the extracellular matrix, cells
were incubated in plates coated with poly-L-lysine (PLL,
Sigma) or human plasma fibronectin (FN, Life Technologies, Inc.), and
then solubilized in the lysis buffer. The lysate was centrifuged at
14,000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was used for precipitations
with antibodies or GST fusion proteins.
Protein Precipitation--
For immunoprecipitations, cell
lysates were incubated with indicated antibodies for 2 h at
4 °C and then with protein A-Sepharose (Pharmacia LKB, Upssala,
Sweden) for an additional 1 h. In the case of GST fusion proteins,
cell lysates were incubated with glutathione-Sepharose (Pharmacia LKB)
conjugated with GST fusion proteins for 1 h at 4 °C. The beads
were washed five times with the washing buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 140 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM EDTA, and 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0). Bound proteins were eluted by boiling in Laemmli
sample buffer for 5 min.
Western Blotting--
Proteins were fractionated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under reducing conditions and
then electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose membranes.
Following incubation with PBS containing 5% nonfat dry milk or 3%
bovine serum albumin, the filters were blotted with indicated primary
antibodies. The primary antibodies were detected with horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit Ig antibodies (Amersham
Corp.) and chemiluminescence reagents (NEN Life Science Products).
Alternatively, the membranes were incubated with
125I-labeled anti-P-Tyr.
 |
RESULTS |
Development of Cas-L Specific Antibody--
In previous studies,
Cas-L was analyzed by conventional anti-p130Cas mAb that
cross-reacts with Cas-L (5, 10). To distinguish Cas-L from
p130Cas, anti-Cas-L-specific antibody was generated by the
immunization of a GST fusion protein of the Cas-L residues 419-524,
which shares the lowest homology with p130Cas or Efs/Sin
(5). Cellular lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with this
antibody to determine its reactivity. As shown in Fig. 1, c-myc-epitope-tagged Cas-L from COS
cells and the endogenous Cas-L from H9 cells were detected by this
anti-Cas-L antibody. Two species of 110- and 105-kDa were equally
expressed in COS transfectant cells, whereas a 110-kDa form of Cas-L
was less expressed in H9 cells. However, c-myc-tagged
p130Cas expressed in COS cells and the endogenous
p130Cas protein from T-47D cells were not detected by this
antibody. In contrast, anti-p130Cas mAb reacted with both
p130Cas and Cas-L proteins. Therefore, this anti-Cas-L
antibody that we developed specifically recognizes Cas-L but not
p130Cas.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Characterization of Cas-L-specific antibody.
A, cell lysates from COS-1 untransfected ( ) and
transfected with c-myc-tagged Cas-L or p130Cas plasmid
vector, or from H9 and T-47D human cell line cells, were immunoprecipitated with an anti-c-Myc tag mAb (9E10) or anti-Cas mAb,
respectively. Immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotted with anti-Cas-L antibody or
anti-Cas mAb.
|
|
Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Cas-L upon CD3 Cross-linking--
We
next attempted to determine whether Cas-L was tyrosine-phosphorylated
upon CD3 cross-linking using the Cas-specific Ab. The CD3 molecule on
the H9 cell surface was cross-linked with anti-CD3 mAb and rabbit
anti-mouse IgG antibody for appropriate durations of time. Cellular
lysates were analyzed by immunoprecipitation with specific antibodies
and immunoblotting with anti-P-Tyr. As shown in Fig.
2A, Cas-L was
tyrosine-phosphorylated 1 min and 5 min after CD3 cross-linking and
then dephosphorylated 20 min after CD3 cross-linking. Similar kinetics
were also observed in p59Fyn and p56Lck, which
were phosphorylated 1 min after CD3 cross-linking. On the other hand,
FAK was not significantly phosphorylated upon CD3 cross-linking. In
contrast to CD3 stimulation, both FAK and Cas-L were
tyrosine-phosphorylated following 1 integrin cross-linking (Fig.
2B). It should be noted that Cas-L tyrosine phosphorylation following 1 integrin cross-linking was slower (5 min) than that following CD3 cross-linking. The Cas-L tyrosine phosphorylation was
still observed 20 min after 1 integrin cross-linking.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Cas-L is tyrosine-phosphorylated after the
CD3 cross-linking in T cells. H9 cells stimulated with OKT3 (CD3)
(A) or 4B4 (CD29) (B) or peripheral T lymphocytes
stimulated with OKT3 (C), for the indicated times, were
lysed and then immunoprecipitated with indicated antibodies. The
immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western blotting with the same
antibodies, followed by 125I-labeled anti-P-Tyr
(Anti-pTyr). The levels of tyrosine phosphorylation and
amounts of proteins were determined by a densitometer. They were
relative to the level of tyrosine phosphorylation in the unstimulated
status as shown. Each level of tyrosine phosphorylation was normalized
to the amount of the protein immunoprecipitated. Data are
representative of three independent experiments.
|
|
To define whether or not Cas-L is phosphorylated in normal peripheral T
lymphocytes upon CD3 cross-linking, a similar study was performed. As
shown in Fig. 2C, Cas-L was most strongly
tyrosine-phosphorylated 5 min after CD3 cross-linking in peripheral T
cells. As well as in H9 cells, no significant tyrosine phosphorylation
of FAK was observed in normal peripheral T lymphocytes (data not
shown). These results strongly suggest that Cas-L is involved in the
TCR/CD3 signaling pathway, and that FAK is not catalytically active
upon CD3 cross-linking in T lymphocytes.
CD3-dependent Recruitment of Crk and C3G to
Tyrosine-phosphorylated Cas-L--
Based on the finding of
CD3-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of Cas-L, we next
attempted to define binding molecules to tyrosine-phosphorylated Cas-L.
Since Cas-L contains multiple possible binding sites for the Crk SH2
domain, we determined the Cas-L-Crk association following CD3
cross-linking. For this purpose, H9 cells were lysed 1 min after CD3
cross-linking. Then, cellular lysates were immunoprecipitated with
anti-Crk mAb and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Cas-L-specific
antibody. As shown in Fig. 3A,
CD3 cross-linking increased Cas-L coprecipitation with Crk. The
co-immunoprecipitated species by anti-Crk antibody migrated slower than
those by anti-Cas-L antibody. This result suggests that a large form of
Cas-L could significantly bind to Crk. In addition to a 105-110-kDa
tyrosine-phosphorylated Cas-L band, a 120-kDa tyrosine-phosphorylated
molecule was immunoprecipitated by anti-Crk antibody upon CD3
cross-linking (Fig. 3A). Since this 120-kDa protein was not
observed after immunodepletion with anti-Cbl antibody (data not shown),
this 120-kDa species could be Cbl (10, 13). We also performed a reverse
experiment of Crk coprecipitation with Cas-L. As shown in Fig.
3B, Crk was co-immunoprecipitated with Cas-L 1 min following
CD3 cross-linking, whereas Crk was not coprecipitated 20 min after CD3
stimulation. The immunoprecipitated Cas-L was remarkably
tyrosine-phosphorylated 1 min after CD3 cross-linking, whereas Cas-L
phosphorylation was diminished 20 min after cross-linking, indicating
that this association of Cas-L and Crk corresponds to tyrosine
phosphorylation of Cas-L. Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 3C,
Cas-L was precipitated by the GST-Crk SH2 domain, whereas Cas-L was not
precipitated by the GST or GST-Shc SH2 proteins. Taken together, these
results indicate that Cas-L associates with Crk via the Crk SH2 domain
following CD3 cross-linking in a tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent manner.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Cas-L binds to Crk via the Crk SH2
domain. H9 cells were stimulated with (+) or without ( ) OKT3 for
1 min (A and C) or the indicated times
(B). A, cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with
control antibody, anti-Crk mAb, or anti-Cas-L antibody and then
analyzed by Western blotting with anti-Cas-L antibody followed by
anti-Crk mAb. The immunoblots were reprobed with
125I-labeled anti-P-Tyr (Anti-pTyr).
B, cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with control or
anti-Cas-L antibody. The immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with
anti-Crk mAb and anti-Cas-L Ab, followed by 125I-labeled
anti-P-Tyr. C, cell lysates were incubated with
GST-, GST-Shc SH2-, and GST-Crk SH2-conjugated beads. The precipitates were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-p130Cas mAb. The
amounts of proteins coimmunoprecipitated were quantitated by a
densitometer and normalized to the amounts of proteins
immunoprecipitated with primary antibodies. Data are representative of
two independent experiments.
|
|
One of the major Crk-binding proteins via the Crk SH3 domain is C3G, a
guanine exchange factor for Rap1A/K-rev1 (14, 15). Therefore, we next
investigated CD3-dependent Cas-L-C3G interaction. As shown
in Fig. 4, Cas-L was coprecipitated with
C3G 1 min following CD3 cross-linking, whereas Cas-L was not
coprecipitated 20 min after CD3 stimulation. The Cas-L species
associated with C3G also migrated slower than immunoprecipitated Cas-L
by anti-Cas-L antibody. Western blotting analysis with
anti-P-Tyr mAb revealed that the coimmunoprecipitated Cas-L
was tyrosine-phosphorylated. This result suggests that Cas-L binds to
C3G possibly via the association with Crk.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Cas-L forms complexes with C3G following
CD3-stimulation in T cells. Immunoprecipitates from CD3-stimulated
H9 cell lysates using anti-Cas-L, anti-C3G, or control antibody were
analyzed by Western blotting with anti-Cas-L or anti-C3G Ab, followed
by 125I-labeled anti-P-Tyr
(Anti-pTyr). The amounts of coimmunoprecipitated Cas-L
proteins were analyzed as described in Fig. 3. Data are representative
of two independent experiments.
|
|
The SH3 Domain-independent Phosphorylation of Cas-L upon CD3
Cross-linking--
Cas-L is tyrosine-phosphorylated and binds to Crk
upon both 1 integrin (5) and CD3 stimulation. We next investigated
the mechanism by which Cas-L is tyrosine-phosphorylated upon such stimulation. We recently found that FAK initiates tyrosine
phosphorylation of Cas-L following integrin stimulation (9). However,
FAK is not tyrosine-phosphorylated upon CD3 cross-linking (Fig.
2A), suggesting that Cas-L may be tyrosine-phosphorylated
upon CD3 cross-linking in a FAK-independent manner. To elucidate this
hypothesis, we studied CD3-dependent tyrosine
phosphorylation of a Cas-L mutant, c-myc-tagged Cas-L SH3, which
lacks the SH3 domain and does not bind to FAK (data not shown). This
mutant was expressed in JMC-T5, a Jurkat cell strain that is available
for transient transfection analysis. After CD3 cross-linking,
Cas-L SH3 was immunoprecipitated with anti-c-Myc mAb and analyzed by
immunoblotting with anti-P-Tyr. As shown in Fig.
5, Cas-L SH3 was
tyrosine-phosphorylated upon CD3 cross-linking, whereas Cas-L SH3 was
not phosphorylated upon FN stimulation. The CS1 region of FN also
failed to induce Cas-L SH3 tyrosine phosphorylation (data not shown).
In contrast, wild-type Cas-L was tyrosine-phosphorylated following
the ligation of CD3 or 1 integrin. These results indicate that Cas-L
tyrosine phosphorylation upon CD3 cross-linking is caused by a
different mechanism from 1 integrin-dependent Cas-L
tyrosine phosphorylation.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
The SH3-deletion mutant of Cas-L, as well as
wild-type Cas-L, is tyrosine-phosphorylated after CD3-cross-linking in
Jurkat T cells. Control plasmid, c-myc-tagged wild-type
Cas-L, or c-myc-tagged- SH3 Cas-L were transfected into JMC-T5, a
Jurkat strain carrying SV40 large T antigen, by electroporation as
described under "Experimental Procedures." After 2 days of
culturing, live cells (20 × 106) were stimulated with
(+) or without ( ) OKT3 plus anti-mouse IgG antibody for 2 min, or
with poly-L-lysine (PLL) or fibronectin (FN) for 1 h, and then lysed. The cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with anti-c-Myc mAb (9E10), and analyzed by Western
blotting with 9E10, followed by 125I-labeled
anti-P-Tyr (Anti-pTyr). The levels of tyrosine
phosphorylation were expressed as a ratio to that of the unstimulated
status, normalized to the amounts of proteins immunoprecipitated. Data are representative of three independent experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
It has been reported that Cas family proteins,
p130Cas, Cas-L/HEF-1, and Efs/Sin are
tyrosine-phosphorylated upon various stimuli, including
integrin-mediated cell adhesion, growth factors, chemokines, and
cross-linking of the B cell receptor (4, 5, 16-19).
Tyrosine-phosphorylated Cas family proteins bind to signaling molecules
containing SH2 domains (5, 20, 21). However, the precise nature of
signaling pathways through Cas family proteins is poorly understood.
Especially, since Cas-L is preferentially expressed in lymphocytes, it
is conceivable that Cas-L may play an important role in
lymphocyte-specific function. In this study, we have demonstrated that
Cas-L is tyrosine-phosphorylated following CD3 cross-linking and forms
complexes with Crk and C3G. The tyrosine phosphorylation of Cas-L and
its association with Crk and C3G are rapid, but transient, events
following CD3 cross-linking. These results demonstrated a novel
signaling pathway through Cas-L following TCR stimulation.
Antigen-TCR binding induces various signals in T cells (1, 2). Our
study raised the question as to what signal Cas-L is involved in. We
showed that tyrosine-phosphorylated Cas-L binds to Crk via the Crk SH2
domain following CD3 cross-linking. Crk is an adapter protein composed
of one SH2 domain and one or two SH3 domains, and binds to various
proteins including C3G, Dock180, Sos, and c-Abl via the Crk SH3 domain
(15, 22-24). This suggests that Cas-L can recruit these signaling
molecules in a tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent manner
via Crk. One of the major Crk SH3 domain-binding proteins, C3G, is a
guanine nucleotide exchange factor that activates a small GTPase,
Rap1A/K-rev1 (15). K-rev1 was first reported to be a protein that
reverts the K-Ras transformed phenotype of NIH-3T3 cells (25). Rap1A
has been shown to inhibit the binding of Ras to Raf-1 and
Ras-dependent Raf-1 activation (26). These findings
indicate that K-rev1/Rap1A competitively inhibits Ras-signaling
pathway. Therefore, the recruitment of C3G to Cas-L may be involved in
the regulation of Ras-mediated signaling pathways. The other putative
signal downstream of C3G is the JNK/SAPK pathway. Tanaka et
al. (27) recently reported that overexpression of Crk induces
activation of JNK/SAPK and that coexpression of C3G further enhances
the JNK activity. Overexpression of Crk has been shown also to induce
tyrosine phosphorylation of Cas-L and p130Cas, as well as
the recruitment of C3G to the phosphorylated Cas proteins (5, 6). Our
study demonstrated that Cas-L is one of the major Crk-binding proteins
upon CD3 cross-linking. On the other hand, it has been reported that
JNK is activated upon TCR stimulation and that JNK activation plays a
significant role in T cell activation (28). These findings suggest that
Cas-L is involved in TCR-mediated JNK activation through the
recruitment of C3G. Ras/Raf-1 and JNK pathways have been shown to serve
an important function in T cell activation (28, 29). Cas-L may regulate
T cell responses through such pathways.
The other question raised from our study is how Cas-L is phosphorylated
following CD3 cross-linking. We found that FAK initiates tyrosine
phosphorylation of Cas-L by plural tyrosine kinases following 1
integrin-mediated cell adhesion (9). In this study, we showed that the
Cas-L SH3 mutant lacking the SH3 domain responsible for Cas-L binding
to FAK (30) is not tyrosine-phosphorylated upon 1 integrin
cross-linking. These findings indicate that FAK plays an important role
in Cas-L phosphorylation in the 1 integrin-mediated signaling
pathway. However, we found that FAK is not tyrosine-phosphorylated upon
CD3 cross-linking. Since FAK phosphorylation is well correlated to its
activation (31), FAK is not likely to be activated upon CD3
cross-linking. In contrast to our findings, Maguire et al. (32) demonstrated that FAK is synergistically tyrosine-phosphorylated upon both CD3 and 1 integrin cross-linking in T cells and that anti-CD3 mAb (OKT3) alone also induces low levels of FAK tyrosine phosphorylation. On the other hand, Kanner et al. (33)
reported that FAK is not tyrosine-phosphorylated following CD3
cross-linking, which supports our results. This paradoxical observation
may be caused by the difference of the cross-linking method; liquid
phase cross-linking was used in our system, whereas solid phase
cross-linking was used in the Maguire et al. (32)
observation. However, the Cas-L SH3 mutant that fails to bind to FAK
is demonstrated to be tyrosine-phosphorylated, as well as the wild-type
Cas-L, upon CD3 cross-linking. This result strongly suggests that FAK
is not involved in CD3-mediated Cas-L phosphorylation.
How, then, is Cas-L phosphorylated upon CD3 cross-linking? We reported
that activated p56Lck phosphorylates Cas-L (5), and we also
found that the coexpression of ZAP-70 also phosphorylates
Cas-L.2 As both
p56Lck and ZAP-70 are involved in TCR/CD3 signaling
pathways (1, 2), these tyrosine kinases are, therefore, likely involved in the CD3-dependent phosphorylation of Cas-L. Recently,
Ingham et al. (18) reported that Cas-L is observed in the
membrane fraction in B lymphocytes, suggesting a putative subcellular
localization of Cas-L. Taken together, we hypothesize that Cas-L is
localized to the cytoplasmic membrane by an unknown mechanism and
interacts with TCR/CD3 molecules or their downstream signaling
molecules, and that Cas-L is tyrosine phosphorylated by
p56Lck or ZAP-70 upon cross-linking of TCR/CD3
molecules.
We demonstrated Cas-L tyrosine phosphorylation not only upon 1
integrin cross-linking but also upon CD3 cross-linking. However, Cas-L
is rapidly phosphorylated but dephosphorylated quickly after CD3
cross-linking, whereas Cas-L phosphorylation upon 1 integrin cross-linking is slow but stable. Such a difference in the kinetics of
Cas-L tyrosine phosphorylation suggests that Cas-L may serve as a
distinct regulatory function in TCR-mediated T cell responses from
those mediated by 1 integrin. Cas-L has also been demonstrated to be
tyrosine-phosphorylated upon B cell receptor cross-linking (18, 19).
These findings indicate that Cas-L is tyrosine-phosphorylated following
the interaction of lymphocyte receptors to antigens and is involved in
the lymphocyte receptor-specific signaling events.
In summary, TCR stimulation induces tyrosine phosphorylation of Cas-L
by a FAK-independent manner and also the recruitment of signaling
molecules, Crk and C3G, to Cas-L. These results suggest a potential
role of Cas-L in TCR/CD3-mediated signal transduction that leads to
cellular responses. Further biological analysis may help to elucidate
the mechanisms by which Cas-L functions in lymphocytes.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Donny Cho for technical assistance
and Lisa Wilis for secretarial assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants AI29530 and AR33713.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Tumor
Immunology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 44 Binney St., Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-632-4484; Fax:
617- 632-4569.
1
The abbreviations used are: TCR, T cell receptor; Cas,
Crk-associated substrate; FAK, focal adhesion kinase; JNK, c-Jun
NH2-terminal kinase; SAPK, stress-activated protein kinase;
GST, glutathione S-transferase; PLL, poly-L-lysine; FN,
fibronectin; P-Tyr, phosphotyrosine; SH, Src homology; mAb,
monoclonal antibody.
2
K. Tachibana, Y. Ohashi, H. Fujita, K. Kamiguchi, and C. Morimoto, unpublished data.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Weiss, A.,
and Littman, D. R.
(1994)
Cell
76,
263-274[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wange, R. L.,
and Samelson, L. E.
(1996)
Immunity
5,
197-205[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Songyang, Z.,
Shoelson, S. E.,
Chaudhuri, M.,
Gish, G.,
Pawson, T.,
Haser, W. G.,
King, F.,
Roberts, T.,
Ratnofsky, S.,
Lechleider, R. J.,
Neel, B. G.,
Birge, R. B.,
Fajardo, J. E.,
Chou, M. M.,
Hanafusa, H.,
Schaffhausen, B.,
Cantley, L. C.
(1993)
Cell
72,
767-778[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nojima, Y.,
Rothstein, D. M.,
Sugita, K.,
Schlossman, S. F.,
Morimoto, C.
(1992)
J. Exp. Med.
175,
1045-1053[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Minegishi, M.,
Tachibana, K.,
Sato, T.,
Iwata, S.,
Nojima, Y.,
and Morimoto, C.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
184,
1365-1375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sakai, R.,
Iwamatsu, A.,
Hirano, N.,
Ogawa, S.,
Tanaka, T.,
Mano, H.,
Yazaki, Y.,
and Hirai, H.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3748-3756[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ishino, M.,
Ohba, T.,
Sasaki, H.,
and Sasaki, T.
(1995)
Oncogene
11,
2331-2338[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hanks, S. K.,
and Polte, T. R.
(1997)
Bioessays
19,
137-145[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tachibana, K.,
Urano, T.,
Fujita, H.,
Ohashi, Y.,
Kamiguchi, K.,
Iwata, S.,
Hirai, H.,
and Morimoto, C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
29083-29090[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kanda, H.,
Miura, T.,
Morino, N.,
Hamasaki, K.,
Nakamoto, T.,
Hirai, H,
Morimoto, C.,
Yazaki, Y.,
and Nojima, Y.
(1997)
Eur. J. Immunol.
27,
2113-2117[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sato, T.,
Tachibana, K.,
Nojima, Y.,
D'Avirro, N.,
and Morimoto, C.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
155,
2938-2947[Abstract]
-
Ausubel, F. M.,
Brent, R.,
Kingston, R. E.,
Moore, D. D.,
Seidman, J. G.,
Smith, J. A.,
Struth, K.
(1994)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
-
Bunday, L.,
Khwaja, A.,
Sipeki, S.,
Farago, A.,
and Downward, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
6159-6163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tanaka, S.,
Morishita, T.,
Hashimoto, Y.,
Hattori, S.,
Nakamura, S.,
Shibuya, M.,
Matuoka, K.,
Takenawa, T.,
Kurata, T.,
Nagashima, K.,
and Mastuda, M.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
3443-3447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gotoh, T.,
Hattori, S.,
Nakamura, S.,
Kitayama, H.,
Noda, M.,
Takai, Y.,
Kaibushi, K.,
Matsui, H.,
Hatase, O.,
Takahashi, H.,
Kurata, T.,
and Matsuda, M.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
6746-6753[Abstract]
-
Ribon, V.,
and Satiel, A. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
7375-7380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schraw, W.,
and Richmond, A.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
13760-13767[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ingham, R. J.,
Krebs, D. L.,
Barbazuk, S. M.,
Turck, C. W.,
Hirai, H.,
Matsuda, M.,
Gold, M. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
32306-32314[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Manie, S. N.,
Beck, A. R.,
Astier, A.,
Law, S. F.,
Canty, T.,
Hirai, H.,
Drucker, B. J.,
Avraham, H.,
Haghayeghi, N.,
Sattler, M.,
Salgia, R.,
Griffin, J. D.,
Golemis, E. A.,
Freedman, A. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4230-4236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schlaepfer, D. D.,
Broome, M. A.,
and Hunter, T.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1702-1713[Abstract]
-
Alexandropoulos, K.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1341-1355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hasegawa, H.,
Kiyokawa, E.,
Tanaka, S.,
Nagashima, K.,
Gotoh, N.,
Shibuya, M.,
Kurata, T.,
and Matsuda, M.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
1770-1776[Abstract]
-
Feller, S. M.,
Knudsen, B.,
and Hanafusa, H.
(1995)
Oncogene
10,
1465-1473[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ren, R.,
Ye, Z. S.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
783-795[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kitayama, H.,
Sugimoto, Y.,
Matsuzaki, T.,
Ikawa, Y.,
and Noda, M.
(1989)
Cell
56,
77-84[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hu, C. D.,
Kariya, K.,
Kotani, G.,
Shirouzu, M.,
Yokoyama, S.,
and Kataoka, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11702-11705[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tanaka, S.,
Ouchi, T.,
and Hanafusa, H.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2356-2361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Su, B.,
Jacinto, E.,
Hibi, M.,
Kallunki, T.,
Karin, M.,
and Ben-Neriah, Y.
(1994)
Cell
77,
727-736[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Owaki, H.,
Varma, R.,
Gillis, B.,
Bruder, J. T.,
Rapp, U. R.,
Davis, L. S.,
Geppert, T. D.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
4367-4373[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Law, S. F.,
Estojak, J.,
Wang, B.,
Mysliwiec, T.,
Kruh, G.,
and Golemis, E. A.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
3327-3337[Abstract]
-
Schaller, M. D.,
Borgman, C. A.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
785-791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Maguire, J. E.,
Danahey, K. M.,
Burkly, L. C.,
van Seventer, G. A.
(1995)
J. Exp. Med.
182,
2079-2090[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kanner, S. B.,
Aruffo, A.,
and Chan, P-Y.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
10484-10487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Sasaki, S. Iwata, H. J. Okano, Y. Urasaki, J. Hamada, H. Tanaka, N. H. Dang, H. Okano, and C. Morimoto
Nedd9 Protein, a Cas-L Homologue, Is Upregulated After Transient Global Ischemia in Rats: Possible Involvement of Nedd9 in the Differentiation of Neurons After Ischemia
Stroke,
November 1, 2005;
36(11):
2457 - 2462.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Xing, L. T. Donlin, R. H. Miller, and K. Alexandropoulos
The Adapter Molecule Sin Regulates T-Cell-Receptor-Mediated Signal Transduction by Modulating Signaling Substrate Availability
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
May 15, 2004;
24(10):
4581 - 4592.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Sakakibara, S. Hattori, S. Nakamura, and T. Katagiri
A Novel Hematopoietic Adaptor Protein, Chat-H, Positively Regulates T Cell Receptor-mediated Interleukin-2 Production by Jurkat Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 14, 2003;
278(8):
6012 - 6017.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. F. Law, G. M. O'Neill, S. J. Fashena, M. B. Einarson, and E. A. Golemis
The Docking Protein HEF1 Is an Apoptotic Mediator at Focal Adhesion Sites
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
July 15, 2000;
20(14):
5184 - 5195.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Sakakibara and S. Hattori
Chat, a Cas/HEF1-associated Adaptor Protein That Integrates Multiple Signaling Pathways
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 25, 2000;
275(9):
6404 - 6410.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Hunter, N. Ottoson, N. Boerth, G. A. Koretzky, and Y. Shimizu
Cutting Edge: A Novel Function for the SLAP-130/FYB Adapter Protein in {beta}1 Integrin Signaling and T Lymphocyte Migration
J. Immunol.,
February 1, 2000;
164(3):
1143 - 1147.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Ohashi, S. Iwata, K. Kamiguchi, and C. Morimoto
Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Crk-Associated Substrate Lymphocyte-Type Is a Critical Element in TCR- and {beta}1 Integrin-Induced T Lymphocyte Migration
J. Immunol.,
October 1, 1999;
163(7):
3727 - 3734.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Zhang, L. Hernandez-Lagunas, W. C. Horne, and R. Baron
Cytoskeleton-dependent Tyrosine Phosphorylation of the p130Cas Family Member HEF1 Downstream of the G Protein-coupled Calcitonin Receptor. CALCITONIN INDUCES THE ASSOCIATION OF HEF1, PAXILLIN, AND FOCAL ADHESION KINASE
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 27, 1999;
274(35):
25093 - 25098.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Gelkop and N. Isakov
T Cell Activation Stimulates the Association of Enzymatically Active Tyrosine-phosphorylated ZAP-70 with the Crk Adapter Proteins
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 30, 1999;
274(31):
21519 - 21527.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Kamiguchi, K. Tachibana, S. Iwata, Y. Ohashi, and C. Morimoto
Cas-L Is Required for {beta}1 Integrin-Mediated Costimulation in Human T Cells
J. Immunol.,
July 15, 1999;
163(2):
563 - 568.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|