|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 13, 7252-7259, March 27, 1998
A Peptide Derived from a Conserved Domain of Sendai Virus Fusion
Protein Inhibits Virus-Cell Fusion
A PLAUSIBLE MODE OF ACTION*
Jimut Kanti
Ghosh and
Yechiel
Shai§
From the Department of Membrane Research and Biophysics, The
Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
 |
ABSTRACT |
SV-201, a peptide derived from a conserved and
potentially amphipathic region (amino acids 201-229) in the Sendai
virus ectodomain, specifically inhibited virus-mediated hemolysis only
when added to virions prior to their attachment to red blood cells.
Sendai virus-mediated hemagglutinin assay in the presence of SV-201
demonstrated that the peptide does not disturb the binding of virions
to the target red blood cells. A mutated peptide with 2 amino acids
substitution, rendering the peptide neutral, was biologically inactive.
A second mutant with 7 amino acids randomized at the N terminus keeping the hydrophobicity of the peptide unaltered was only slightly active. A
hydrophobic peptide corresponding to the fusion peptide domain was also
inactive. SV-201, the two mutants, and the fusion peptide bind
similarly with high affinity to both negatively charged phosphatidylserine/phosphatidylcholine and zwitterionic
phosphatidylcholine lipid vesicles, suggesting that the inhibitory
effect is not due merely to membrane modulation. Fluorescence studies
with rhodamine-labeled peptides and SV-201-induced inhibition assays,
demonstrated that the SV-201 binding site is most probably located in
the region corresponding to amino acids 201-229 of the Sendai virus
fusion protein. The data presented here suggest that SV-201 disturbs a
functional domain in the Sendai virus fusion protein, which is most
probably associated with the assembly of the fusion protein and/or
membrane apposition. The existence of homologous SV-201 regions in
other viruses suggests that these regions may have a similar role, and
their synthetic counterparts may act as inhibitors for the
corresponding viruses.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Penetration of enveloped viruses into host cells involves the
fusion of viral and cellular membranes and the subsequent transfer of
genetic material into the target cell (1-3). Some of the enveloped viruses, including single-stranded RNA viruses such as influenza viruses, and alphaviruses, are internalized into the target cell by
receptor-mediated endocytosis at acidic pH (4). However, the viral
envelopes of e.g. paramyxoviruses and retroviruses including human immunodeficiency virus, fuse directly with the cellular plasma
membrane at neutral pH (2, 5).
Sendai virus, a member of the paramyxovirus family, contains two types
of glycoproteins, hemagglutinin neuraminidase and fusion (F)
glycoprotein (5, 6). Although the hemagglutinin neuraminidase glycoprotein is responsible for the attachment of virions to the receptor of the target cell (7, 8), it may also play some as yet
undefined role in the fusion process (9). The fusion glycoprotein is
believed to disrupt the target cell membrane and induce membrane
fusion. The fusion protein monomer, synthesized as an inactive
precursor (F0), is cleaved by a host proteolytic enzyme to form the
biologically active protein consisting of two disulfide-linked
subunits, F1 and F2 (7, 8, 10-12). This processing exposes a
hydrophobic region at the N terminus of the F1 subunit, which is highly
conserved among paramyxovirus F proteins. This domain, designated
"fusion peptide", is considered to be directly involved in
promoting fusion with the target membrane (12, 13). Evidence supporting
this hypothesis includes: (1) site-directed mutagenesis in the fusion
peptide regions of several enveloped viruses including influenza virus
(1, 14), HIV1 (15, 16),
simian immunodeficiency virus (17), and SV5 (18), which severely affect
the fusogenic activity of the corresponding viruses; and (2) studies
with synthetic peptides that mimic the fusion peptide region of several
viruses including influenza virus (19, 20), HIV (21-23), simian
immunodeficiency virus (24), and Sendai virus (25). In addition, the
photoactive lipid probe preferentially labeled the fusion peptide
domain of influenza hemagglutinin (26). The role of the F2 subunit in the paramyxovirus-mediated membrane fusion process is not yet clearly
understood. Reduction of disulfide bonds on the F1-F2 fusion protein
results in loss of fusion activity, which may mean that F2 is required
for the function of the fusion protein (27).
Although the role of the fusion peptide of the viral envelope
glycoprotein has been substantiated, it is difficult to envision that
the entire fusion process is determined solely through the small
N-terminal region of the fusion protein. Indeed, recent reports point
to the possible involvement of heptad repeats located adjacent to the
fusion peptide region and the transmembrane anchor domain in the
mediation of membrane fusion. Heptad repeats have been assumed to play
a role in the assembly of the fusion protein of the influenza virus
(28), HIV (29), and Sendai virus (30). Point mutations in the heptad
repeats of the fusion proteins of the measles virus (31), the
transmembrane gp41 of HIV (32, 33), and Newcastle disease virus (34)
severely affect viral activity. Furthermore, synthetic peptides
corresponding to heptad repeats of HIV (35-37), Sendai virus (30), and
several paramyxoviruses (38) can inhibit viral-induced cell fusion by
their corresponding viruses.
Hydropathy plot of Sendai virus fusion protein shows that in addition
to the N-terminal fusion peptide and the transmembrane anchor domain,
there are other significantly hydrophobic regions within the ectodomain
of the fusion protein (39). This may indicate that additional regions
may be involved with the membrane fusion process. To study this
possibility, we selected SV-201 (amino acids 201-229), a domain with
intermediate hydrophobicity, preceding the N-terminal heptad repeat and
which potentially can form an amphipathic -helix structure. This
region is not only extremely conserved in the Sendai virus family but
also has appreciable amino acid homology with the corresponding regions
of other paramyxoviruses (Fig. 1). We have synthesized SV-201 and two
mutant peptides, Mu1SV-201 and Mu2SV-201. In Mu1SV-201, 2 conserved
amino acids were substituted by 2 negatively charged amino acids to
retain the peptide with a zero net charge, and in Mu2SV-201, 7 amino acids at the N terminus were randomized keeping the hydrophobicity of
the peptide unaltered. We found that SV-201 but not the two mutants and
the hydrophobic 33-amino acid fusion peptide of the Sendai virus was a
potent inhibitor of virus-induced hemolysis. SV-201 inhibited lysis
only when it was incubated with the virions prior to, but not after,
their attachment to red blood cells. However, both the wild type and
mutant peptides could not inhibit virus-mediated agglutination of human
red blood cells. These results, together with data obtained using
fluorescently labeled wild type and mutant peptides, are discussed in
terms of the possible role of the SV-201 domain of the Sendai virus
fusion protein in the assembly of the fusion protein during the initial
step of the fusion process and in membrane apposition.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Butyloxycarbonyl-amino acid phenylacetamidomethyl
resin and dimethylformamide (peptide synthesis grade) were purchased
from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA), and
butyloxycarbonyl-amino acids were obtained from Peninsula
Laboratories (Belmont, CA). Other reagents for peptide synthesis
included trifluoroacetic acid (Sigma),
N,N-diisopropylethylamine (Aldrich, distilled
over ninhydrin), dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (Fluka), and
1-hydroxybenzotriazole (Pierce). Egg phosphatidylcholine (PC) and
phosphatidylserine (PS) from bovine spinal cord (sodium salt, grade I)
were purchased from Lipid Products (South Nutfield, United Kingdom).
NBD-F (4-fluoro-7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole) was obtained from
Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). All other reagents were of analytical
grade. Buffers were prepared in doubly glass-distilled water.
Peptide Synthesis, Fluorescent Labeling, and
Purification--
The peptides were synthesized by the solid phase
method on the corresponding resin (0.15 meq) as described previously
(40, 41). Double coupling was carried out with freshly prepared
hydroxybenzotriazole-active esters of butyloxycarbonyl-amino acids.
Labeling of the N terminus of a peptide was achieved as reported
previously (42). Briefly, 15 mg of a resin-bound peptide in its fully
protected form was treated with trifluoroacetic acid (50% v/v in
methylene chloride) to remove the butyloxycarbonyl-protecting group
from the N-terminal amino groups of the linked peptides. The
resin-bound peptides were then treated with either (i)
tetramethylrhodamine succinimidyl ester (3-4 eq) in dry
dimethylformamide containing 5% v/v diisopropylethylamine or (ii)
NBD-fluoride (2-3 eq) in dry dimethylformamide, which led to the
formation of resin-bound N1-Rho or
N1-NBD peptides, respectively. After
48 h, the resins were washed thoroughly with
N,N-dimethylformamide and then with methylene chloride. The peptides were then cleaved from the resins by hydrogen fluoride and finally precipitated with ether. All the peptides were
purified using reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatography on
a C4 reversed phase Vydac column (300 Å pore size). The
column was eluted in 40 min using a linear gradient of 25-80%
acetonitrile in water (containing 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid (v/v)),
at a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min. The purified peptides were shown to be
homogeneous (~99%) by analytical high performance liquid
chromatography. The peptides were subjected to amino acid analysis.
Preparation of Small Unilamellar Vesicles--
Small unilamellar
vesicles were prepared by sonication of PC or PS/PC (1:1 w/w) as
described previously (43). Briefly, dry lipids were dissolved in
CHCl3:MeOH (2:1 v/v). The solvents were evaporated under a
stream of nitrogen, and the lipids were resuspended in PBS buffer (at a
concentration of 7.2 mg/ml) by vortex mixing. The resulting lipid
dispersions were sonicated (10-30 min) in a bath-type sonicator
(G1125SP1 Sonicator, Laboratory Supplies Company Inc., NY) until the
turbidity had cleared. The lipid concentrations of the resulting
preparations were determined by phosphorus analysis (44). Vesicles were
visualized using a JEOL JEM 100B electron microscope (Japan Electron
Optics Laboratory Co., Tokyo, Japan) by depositing a drop of vesicles
on a carbon-coated grid and negatively staining with uranyl acetate.
Examination of the grids demonstrated that the vesicles were
unilamellar with an average diameter of 20-50 nm.
Virus and Erythrocytes--
Sendai virus (Z strain) was a
generous gift of Prof. Michael Ovadia from Tel Aviv University, Israel.
The virus was resuspended in buffer composed of 160 mM
NaCl, 20 mM Tricine, pH 7.4, and stored at 70 °C.
Human blood was obtained from a blood bank and used fresh. Prior to
use, erythrocytes were washed twice with PBS, pH 7.3, and diluted to
the desired concentration with the same buffer.
Sendai Virus-induced Hemolysis of Human RBCs and Its Inhibition
by SV-201--
Virions, erythrocytes, and peptides were mixed in
different orders of addition and in various amounts. Briefly, peptides
were added at different concentrations to virions (35 hemagglutination units) and erythrocytes (2.2%) by three different methods: (i) Peptides were added to virions suspension followed by incubation (20 or
80 min, room temperature) to enable the binding of peptides to virions.
Erythrocytes were then added and the suspension further incubated for
10 min. (ii) Virions were incubated with erythrocytes in an ice bath
for 30 min followed by the addition of peptides, and further incubated
for 20 min. (iii) Peptides were incubated with erythrocytes for 10 min
at room temperature followed by the addition of virions, and further
incubated for 20 min. At the end of each one of the three experiments,
final incubation was always at 37 °C for 40 min, followed by
centrifugation at 5700 × g for 8 min to remove intact
cells. In all assays, duplicate samples were used, and two aliquots
taken from the supernatant of each sample were placed in two wells of a
96-well plate. Each experiment was repeated 2-4 times. The amount of
hemoglobin released was monitored by measuring the absorbance of the
wells by using a plate reader at 540 nm.
Hemagglutinin Assay--
Hemagglutinating activity of Sendai
virus in the presence and absence of peptides was determined using
fresh human RBCs in a 96-well microtiter plate by standard methods (27,
45, 46). In a control experiment, 100 µl of 4% RBC were added to 100 µl of Sendai virus suspension. In another control experiment the same
amount of RBCs was added to solutions of SV-201, Mu1SV-201, and
Mu2SV-201 in PBS (concentrations ranging from 0 to 15 µM). In the actual experiment, Sendai virions were
incubated with SV-201, Mu1SV-201, Mu2SV-201, and the fusion peptide
(0-15 µM each) for 80 min to allow the binding of
peptides to virions, followed by the addition of 4% RBCs (100 µl) to
each suspension. One hour after the addition of RBCs, the degree of
agglutination was observed as described by others (45, 46). The
agglutinated RBCs settled in the bottom of the wells in aggregates to
form a uniform carpet of cells, whereas unagglutinated RBCs formed a
compact button of cells. All the experiments were done in duplicate
using 2% RBCs and 35 hemagglutination units Sendai virions in a volume of 200 µl.
NBD and Rhodamine Fluorescence Measurements--
Fluorescence
emission spectra of NBD- and Rho-labeled peptides either in PBS or in
the presence of lipid vesicles were recorded at room temperature on a
Perkin-Elmer LS-50B spectrofluorometer with the excitation
monochromator set at 467 and 530 nm, respectively, with a 5-8-nm slit
width. Measurements were performed in a 0.5-cm path length glass
cuvette in a final reaction volume of 0.4 ml.
 |
RESULTS |
We report the identification, synthesis, biological function, and
possible site of action of a 29-residue peptide, designated SV-201,
derived from a conserved region in the ectodomain of Sendai virus
fusion protein (amino acids 201-229). Fig.
1 depicts the sequence, designation, and
location of SV-201 in the F1 domain of the fusion protein. A possible
structure of this sequence could be an amphipathic -helix, which
could be involved in the assembly of proteins in solution as well as
within membranes (47). A Shiffer and Edmundson wheel projection of the
18 most conserved amino acids of SV-201 reveals that the peptide has
the potential to form an amphipathic -helical structure (Fig.
2, inner circle), in which
most of the hydrophobic amino acids are segregated on one surface with
the hydrophilic amino acids on the opposite surface. Indeed, CD studies
showed that SV-201 has ~70% -helical structure in
trifluoroethanol (48), a solvent which stabilizes the helical structure. Fig. 2 also shows the wheel structure of the three homologous regions of three other viruses. Interestingly, the most
conserved regions face the hydrophobic surface. In addition, a net
positive charge is conserved in the hydrophilic surface. The two mutant
peptides, Mu1SV-201 and Mu2SV-201, served as controls (Fig. 1). In
Mu1SV-201 a conserved glycine at the hydrophobic face (position 207)
and a positively charged arginine in the hydrophilic face (position
205) were substituted with 2 negatively charged amino acids, rendering
the peptide neutral. In Mu2SV-201, 7 amino acids at the N terminus were
randomized, thus maintaining the same amino acid composition as in
SV-201. The hydrophobic fusion peptide (25) served as a third control.
CD experiments showed that Mu1SV-201 and Mu2SV-201 adopt 61 and 60%
-helical structure, respectively, in trifluoroethanol indicating
that the mutations did not alter significantly the secondary
structure.2 The fusion
peptide has been shown previously to adopt a predominantly -helical
structure (25). The peptides were then labeled with the fluorescent
probes rhodamine and NBD to study their ability to assemble in solution
and to bind phospholipid membranes.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A, sequence alignment of SV-201 (amino
acids 201-229) of Sendai virus with homologous regions of Rinderpest,
measles, and parainfluenza virus. Conserved residues are
underlined. B, schematic representation of the F1
domain of the fusion protein of the Sendai virus; C,
designations and sequences of the peptides used. Mutated amino acids
are underlined.
|
|

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Shiffer and Edmundson wheel projections of 18 (amino acids 5-22) most conserved amino acids of SV-201 and the
corresponding domains of Rinderpest, measles, and parainfluenza viruses
(from inside to outside). Shaded areas represent hydrophobic
amino acids.
|
|
SV-201 Is a Potent Inhibitor of Sendai Virus-mediated Hemolysis
Only If Added Prior to the Attachment of the Virus to
Erythrocytes--
The hemolytic activity of Sendai virus is associated
with fusion of the virus with target RBCs (49). The assay was performed as follows. Virions were initially incubated with RBCs at room temperature to allow their attachment to the cells. Subsequent incubation at 37 °C resulted in RBCs lysis. The extent of lysis was
measured by absorbance at 540 nm (characteristic of hemoglobin). Fig.
3 depicts the inhibitory effect of
SV-201, Mu1SV-201, Mu2SV-201, and the fusion peptide on Sendai
virus-mediated hemolysis. Column A shows the absorbance
measured for a control experiment in the absence of a peptide. The
hemolytic activity of the Sendai virus was drastically reduced when the
same amount of virions was pretreated with SV-201 (4 µM)
prior to the addition of RBCs (column B). The absorbance
measured was only 23% of controls, indicating 77% inhibition of
Sendai virus-induced hemolytic activity. In contrast, Mu1SV-201 (4 µM, column C) and the fusion peptide (4 µM, column D) did not exhibit any inhibition
activity, and Mu2SV-201 (4 µM, column E) exhibited very little inhibition. Interestingly, by changing the order
of addition of peptide and virions, SV-201 lost its inhibitory effect.
If RBCs were first added to virions and incubated for 30 min to permit
viral attachment to the RBCs, and then SV-201 was added, no inhibition
was observed (column F). Thus, SV-201 could inhibit Sendai
virus-induced hemolytic activity only if interacted first with virions.
Column G shows that SV-201 (4 µM) also has no
inhibitory effect when incubated with RBCs before virions were added.
Since ~70% of the peptide remains free in the solution in the
presence of RBCs (data not shown), the attachment of virions to RBCs is
probably kinetically faster than binding of SV-201 to virions. It
should be noted that the wild type, mutant, and fusion peptides had no
hemolytic activity up to the maximum concentration tested (100 µM) (data not shown), thus eliminating the possibility
that they contribute to the hemolytic activity during the fusion
process. Overall, these results suggest that SV-201 inhibits Sendai
virus-mediated hemolytic activity by interfering with some of the steps
that take place during the attachment of virions to the target
cells.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The inhibition potential of wild type SV-201,
the mutants Mu1SV-201 and Mu2SV-201, and the fusion peptide under
various conditions as measured by absorbance at 540 nm. All
experiments were done in duplicates in two to four separate experiments
and the concentrations of peptides, Sendai virus, and RBCs were fixed at 4.0 µM, 35 hemagglutination units, and 2.2% (v/v),
respectively. The final incubation was always at 37 °C for 40 min,
followed by centrifugation at 5700 × g for 8 min.
A, a control experiment. Virions were added to 100 µl of
PBS followed by the addition of 125 µl of 4% RBC and incubated for
80 min at room temperature. SV-201 (B), Mu1SV-201
(C), fusion peptide (D), and Mu2SV-201
(E) were added to virions in 100 µl of PBS and incubated
for 80 min at room temperature (similar results were obtained following
incubation at 4 °C). 125 µl of RBC (4%) were then added and
incubated for 10 min. Virions were added to 225 µl of 2.2% RBC at
4 °C and incubated on ice for 30 min (F). SV-201 was then
added and incubation continued for 20 min at room temperature. Similar
results were obtained at an incubation time of 80 min and therefore are
not shown. Wild type SV-201 was added to 225 µl of 2.2% RBC and
incubated for 10 min at room temperature (G). Virions were
then added and incubated for an additional 20 min.
|
|
A Possible Mechanism of Inhibition--
The results of Fig. 3
suggest that SV-201 can interfere with a functional domain of the
Sendai virus fusion protein only when it is allowed to interact with
the virions before the addition of RBCs. To search for a possible
mechanism for the inhibitory effect of SV-201, hemagglutinin activity
of Sendai virions was examined in the presence of the peptides.
Moreover, the wild type SV-201 and the two mutants were tested for
their ability to self associate, to coassemble in solution, and to bind
phospholipid membranes.
SV-201 Does Not Inhibit the Binding of Sendai Virions to Target Red
Blood Cells--
Sendai virus-induced hemagglutinin assay was
performed in the presence and absence of the peptides to examine
whether they disturb the binding of virions to target RBCs. Binding of
Sendai virions to human red blood cells causes their agglutination (27, 50, 51). In a control experiment agglutination of human red blood cells
was readily observed upon their incubation with virions. In another
control experiment the same amount of RBCs was added to solutions of
SV-201, Mu1SV-201, Mu2SV-201, and the fusion peptide in PBS (in the
concentration range used for the inhibition assay) to examine whether
the peptides themselves agglutinate RBCs. No hemagglutination was
observed, which ruled out hemagglutinin activity of the peptides (Table
I). The peptides (0-15 µM,
in duplicates) were then incubated with virions for 80 min to allow
their binding to the virions, followed by the addition of RBCs and
incubation for 1 h. We observed that Sendai virions could
agglutinate the RBCs in the presence of SV-201, Mu1SV-201, Mu2Sv-201,
and the fusion peptide to the same extent observed in the absence of
the peptides (Table I). These results reveal that SV-201, Mu1SV-201, Mu2SV-201, and the fusion peptide do not disturb the binding of virions
to target RBCs.
SV-201, but Not the Mutant Peptides, Self-Associates in
Solution--
Viral fusion proteins are oligomeric in both native and
fusogenic states (52). To examine the possible involvement of the 201-229 amino acid domain in the assembly of the fusion protein in the
native state, the assembly of SV-201, Mu1SV-201, and Mu2SV-201 were
studied in aqueous solution. For these measurements, the peptides were
labeled at their N termini by either rhodamine or NBD. Identical
results were obtained with both fluorescent probes, and therefore, only
the data with the rhodamine-labeled peptides are presented. Since the
fluorescence of rhodamine is quenched when several molecules are in
close proximity, an increase in fluorescence is expected when an
aggregated rhodamine-labeled peptide dissociates, a process that occurs
when the peptide is cleaved by a proteolytic enzyme. When equal
concentrations of Rho-SV-201, Rho-Mu1SV-201, and Mu2SV-201 (0.10 µM each) were dissolved in methanol, a solvent which does
not promote peptides' aggregation, the three peptides exhibited the
same fluorescence as expected (data not shown). However, in PBS the
fluorescence intensity of Rho-SV-201 was much lower than that of
Rho-Mu1SV-201 and Rho-Mu2SV-201 (Fig. 4,
time point 2), suggesting that the former is in a higher oligomeric state than the other two peptides. Fig. 4 shows the time
response profile of the changes of rhodamine fluorescence upon the
addition of proteinase K. The data revealed that upon addition of
proteinase K (time point 2), the fluorescence of Rho-SV-201 increased
drastically (5 times), whereas that of Rho-Mu1SV-201 and Rho-Mu2SV-201
changed only slightly. It should be noticed that both Rho-labeled
mutants dissociate when they are diluted in PBS, as evidenced from the
spontaneous dequenching of rhodamine fluorescence prior to the addition
of proteinase K. Eventually, the wild type and mutant Rho-labeled
peptides (0.10 µM each) exhibited very similar
fluorescence after degradation with proteinase K. This indicates that
the lower fluorescence of Rho-SV-201 in PBS is due to its
oligomerization in aqueous solution. The finding that Mu2SV-201 is not
self-associated in solution although it has the same amino acid
composition and similar structure as that of the wild type peptide
indicates that the self-association of SV-201 is sequence specific and
not due to its hydrophobic nature.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Determination of the aggregation state of the
peptides by enzymatic digestion of rhodamine-labeled peptides.
Rho-SV-201 ( ), Rho-Mu1SV-201 (- - - -), and Rho-Mu2SV-201
(... . .) were dissolved in PBS (0.1 µM final
concentration) at time point 1, and proteinase K (0.5 mg/ml)
was added at time point 2.
|
|
To investigate the reversibility of the oligomerization process,
unlabeled SV-201 was added to Rho-SV-201. We observed a dequenching of
rhodamine fluorescence, which indicates the reversible nature of SV-201
association in solution (Fig. 5).
Dequenching of fluorescence is due to the exchange of labeled and
unlabeled SV-201 molecules in aqueous solution (from aggregates of
unlabeled SV-201 to aggregates of Rho-labeled peptide). However, there
was no increase in rhodamine fluorescence following the addition of
equal amounts of unlabeled Mu1SV-201 to Rho-SV-201 (Fig. 5), indicating
that the wild type peptide cannot associate with this mutant peptide.
When unlabeled Mu2SV-201 was added to Rho-SV-201 only a small level of
dequenching of Rho-fluorescence was observed. This result suggests that
Mu2SV-201 cannot appreciably retain the self-association property of
the wild type SV-201 despite having the same amino acid composition. Moreover, the dequenching of rhodamine fluorescence of Rho-SV-201 caused by the addition of unlabeled SV-201 increased with time, whereas
the slight dequenching of Rho-SV-201 after the addition of unlabeled
Mu2SV-201 did not. We also studied SV-201 coassembly with SV-473, the
heptad repeat positioned near the transmembrane anchor domain which
also inhibits Sendai virus-mediated hemolysis, which may be involved in
the fusogenic assembly of Sendai virus fusion protein (30). Fig. 5
shows that SV-201 also cannot recognize SV-473 in solution.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Detection of assembly of SV-201, Mu1SV-201,
and Mu2SV-201 in aqueous solution from dequenching of fluorescence of
Rho-labeled peptides following the addition of different unlabeled
peptides. Curves, represented by a continuous line, a
dashed line, a dashed dotted line, and a
dotted line, indicate the addition of 0.4 µM unlabeled SV-201, Mu1SV-201, Mu2SV-201, and SV-473, respectively, to
Rho-labeled SV-201 (0.035 µM).
|
|
Binding Site of SV-201 in the Sendai Virus Fusion
Protein--
SV-201 cannot inhibit Sendai virus-mediated hemolysis
after the attachment of virions to RBC. This suggests that the
mechanism of the inhibitory effect of SV-201 involves its interaction
with a functional domain in the Sendai virus fusion protein, which is
not associated with the merging of the host and target cell membrane
bilayers. Since SV-201 self-associates in aqueous solution, it is
possible that SV-201 binds to its counterpart in the Sendai virus
fusion protein. Fig. 5 demonstrates that the self-association of SV-201
in aqueous solution is a slow kinetic process, and that Mu2SV-201
interferes only slightly with the assembly process with fast kinetics.
Therefore, if the interaction of SV-201 with its counterpart in the
Sendai virus fusion protein is indeed required for its inhibitory
effect, then the level of inhibition should be dependent on the
incubation time of virions with SV-201 but not with Mu2SV-201 or
Mu1SV-201. We therefore assayed the inhibitory effects of SV-201 and
the control peptides after three incubation periods: (i) at almost zero
incubation time, i.e. RBCs were added to virions immediately
after the addition of SV-201 to the virions; (ii) after 20 min of
incubation; and (iii) after 80 min of incubation. Fig.
6A demonstrates that the
inhibitory effect of SV-201 increases with longer incubation time with
virions, whereas the lower inhibitory effect of Mu2SV-201 is not
increased with longer incubation time (Fig. 6C). Both
Mu1SV-201 (Fig. 6B) and the fusion peptide (data not shown)
were inactive. These data suggest that the binding site of SV-201 is
probably located on its counterpart in the Sendai virus fusion protein.
In other words, the synthetic peptide SV-201 most probably interacts
with the functional domain consisting of amino acids 201-229 in the
fusion protein to exhibit its inhibitory effect. However, we cannot
rule out the possibility that SV-201 interacts with some other
functional domains in the Sendai virus fusion protein in a kinetically
slow process.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Percentage of hemolysis as a function of
peptide concentration and time of incubation. A longer incubation
period of SV-201 with virions decreases the degree of hemolysis,
indicating increase in inhibition potential, whereas the inhibition
potential of Mu1SV-201 and Mu2SV-201 remains the same at a lower or
longer incubation time. Panel A, SV-201; panel B,
Mu1SV-201; and panel C, Mu2SV-201. The histogram found with
the fusion peptide was identical to that in panel B and
therefore not shown. Various amounts of peptides were incubated with
virions in 100 µl of PBS for variable times at room temperature,
followed by the addition of 125 µl of 4% RBC for 10 min and finally
for 40 min at 37 °C. RBCs were added to virions immediately after
the addition of peptides ( ); RBCs were added to virions 20 min after
the addition of peptides ( ); and RBCs were added to virions 80 min
after the addition of peptides ( ). After the final incubation,
solutions were centrifuged at 5700 × g for 8 min.
Percentage of hemolysis was calculated from the absorbance of the
supernatants at 540 nm.
|
|
Membrane Binding of NBD-labeled SV-201--
The sensitivity of the
NBD moiety to the dielectric constant of its surroundings facilitates
the determination of the environment of the NBD-labeled polypeptide in
its membrane-bound state. NBD has been used previously in polarity and
binding experiments (53-56). The fluorescence emission spectra of
NBD-labeled SV-201, Mu1SV-201, and Mu2SV-201 were measured in aqueous
solutions and in the presence of zwitterionic PC vesicles. All of the
three NBD-labeled peptides exhibited fluorescence emission maxima
around 540 nm in PBS (Fig. 7), pointing
to the location of the NBD-labeled segments in hydrophilic environments
(55-57). However, in the presence of PC vesicles in PBS, the
fluorescence emission maxima of the three NBD-labeled peptides shifted
to 531 ± 1 nm, concomitant with large increases in fluorescence
intensities (Fig. 7), indicating their binding to membranes. The three
NBD-labeled peptides exhibited similar blue shifts and fluorescence
enhancement also in the presence of negatively charged PS/PC vesicles
(data not shown). The NBD-labeled fusion peptide of Sendai virus has a
similar magnitude of blue shift and fluorescence enhancement in the
presence of vesicles (42). Similar magnitudes of blue shifts are
observed when surface-active NBD-labeled peptides interact with lipid
membranes (54-56) and are consistent with location of the NBD on the
surface of the membrane (57). It might be speculated from the ability
of SV-201 to bind lipid vesicles that the corresponding 201-229 amino
acid domain of the Sendai virus fusion protein binds to the target cell
membrane and assists in membrane apposition. NBD-labeled Mu1SV-201,
Mu2-SV-201, as well as the fusion peptide exhibited the same emission
maximum and almost identical fluorescence enhancement compared with
wild type peptide in the presence of PC and PS/PC vesicles. Therefore,
the inhibitory activity of SV-201 is most likely not the result of a
nonspecific effect resulting from membrane modulation as has been seen
with derivatives of hydrophobic peptides (58-60).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Fluorescence emission spectra of NBD-labeled
peptides in PBS or in the presence of phospholipid vesicles.
Fluorescence spectra of 0.113 µM NBD-SV-201 (- - -),
0.112 µM NBD-Mu1SV-201 ( ), and 0.110 µM
NBD-Mu2SV-201 (-··-··-) in PBS before and after the addition of 288 µM SUV composed of PC; (-·-·-)
wild type NBD-SV-201, (····) mutant NBD-Mu1SV-201 and
(- - · - - ·) NBD-Mu2SV-201. The excitation wavelength was set at 467 nm.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have described here the biological function and a possible site
of interaction of a synthetic segment SV-201, corresponding to amino
acids 201-229 in the Sendai virus fusion protein adjacent to the
heptad repeat SV-163, which is located near the fusion peptide (30). A
summary of the results of the functional studies is shown in Table I.
Recent studies have demonstrated the inhibitory effects of synthetic
peptides modeled after heptad repeat regions in several viruses
including HIV, Sendai, and other paramyxoviruses (30, 35, 36, 38, 61).
However, the peptides induced similar inhibitory effects whether they
were incubated with the virions before or after their attachment to the
target cell. Unlike the reported heptad repeats, SV-201 specifically
inhibited the hemolytic activity of Sendai virus if interaction with
the virions took place prior to their attachment to RBCs (Fig. 3). When
virions were added to a mixture of RBCs and SV-201, Sendai
virus-induced hemolysis was not inhibited (Fig. 3). This may be due to
two reasons: (i) a major portion of the peptide is bound to RBCs,
leaving only a small amount of the peptide to interact with the
virions; and (ii) viral attachment to RBCs is faster than SV-201
binding to virions. The first possibility was ruled out following our
observation that more than 70% of SV-201 remains free in solution in
the presence of RBCs (data not shown). Therefore, it is probable that
the faster kinetics involved in attachment of virions to RBCs protects
the virions from the interference of SV-201. The data presented here suggest a possible binding site and a stage of the fusion process that
might be affected by SV-201.
A Possible Binding Site for SV-201--
Fluorescence dequenching
experiments with rhodamine-labeled and unlabeled peptides demonstrated
that SV-201 self-associates in aqueous solution, which is not the case
for both of its mutants (Fig. 5). The fact that Mu2SV-201 cannot
self-associate in aqueous solution despite having the same amino acid
composition (same hydrophobicity) as the wild type SV-201, suggests
that the oligomerization of SV-201 is a sequence-specific process and
not due merely to nonspecific hydrophobic interactions. Moreover,
Mu1SV-201 cannot coassemble with wild type SV-201, and Mu2SV-201 can
only coassemble slightly at high concentrations, although Mu1SV-201
contains two negative charges that are located in a position which
should favor attraction to the positive charges in SV-201, assuming
parallel assembly. Fig. 5 also shows that SV-201 cannot associate with SV-473, a heptad repeat positioned near the transmembrane anchor domain
that possesses potent inhibitory effects, both before and after virion
attachment to RBCs (30). The self-association of SV-201 led us to
speculate that its counterpart (amino acids 201-229) in the Sendai
virus fusion protein might be the functional domain with which it
interacts to exhibit its inhibition potential. This possibility was
strengthened by experiments in which longer incubation time of SV-201
with virions yielded increased levels of inhibition (Fig. 6) due to the
slow kinetics of monomer displacement in the aggregate (Fig. 5). In
contrast, longer incubation time of Mu2SV-201 with virions did not
enhance its inhibition potential supporting the
non-time-dependent fluorescence dequenching experiment of Rho-SV-201 in the presence of unlabeled Mu2SV-201. Presumably, the
Mu1SV-201 mutant peptide does not inhibit lysis because it cannot
recognize the functional domain (probably amino acids 201-229) on the
Sendai virus fusion protein as demonstrated by the inability of
Mu1SV-201 to interfere with SV-201 assembly (Fig. 5).
A Step in the Fusion Process That Might Be Affected by
SV-201--
Membrane fusion has been postulated to involve four steps
(reviewed in Ref. 6): 1) adhesion of the membranes involved in fusion;
2) close approach of the lipid bilayers of the membranes; 3)
destabilization of the bilayers at the point of fusion; and 4) the
actual fusion event, i.e. mixing of the two bilayer
membranes. SV-201 can inhibit the fusion process by interfering
directly with one of these steps, or alternatively, the interaction of SV-201 with amino acids domain 201-229 (as suggested above) can disrupt the functional structure of the fusion protein, which in turn
can affect one of the fusion steps.
Direct interference with step 1 can be ruled out based on our
experiments with the Sendai virus-mediated hemagglutinin assay in the
presence of the peptides. The adhesion of the viral and erythrocyte
membranes is mediated by the hemagglutinin neuraminidase protein, which
binds to a receptor on the cell surface. It has been reported that
binding of Sendai virions to human red blood cells causes their
agglutination (27, 50, 51). We observed that SV-201, Mu1SV-201, and
Mu2SV-201 could not inhibit Sendai virus-induced agglutination of human
RBCs, indicating that the peptides probably do not affect the binding
of the hemagglutinin neuraminidase protein of Sendai virus to the
sialic acid receptors on the RBCs.
Step 3 of the fusion event involves destabilization of the lipid
bilayers. SV-201 is significantly hydrophobic, adopts an amphipathic
-helical structure, and binds strongly to membranes irrespective of
their charge (Fig. 7). These properties raise the possibility that the
inhibitory effect of SV-201 is a result of its ability to modulate the
membrane, a property characteristic of other inhibitors of Sendai
virus, which are composed of derivatives of enantiomers of short
hydrophobic peptides, some of which are derived from the hydrophobic
fusion peptide of the virus (58, 59, 62). However, this possibility can
also be ruled out considering the following findings. First, both
mutants, Mu1SV-201 and Mu2SV-201, and the fusion peptide have the same
binding ability to phospholipid membranes, yet only SV-201 is a potent
inhibitor. Whereas the hydrophobicity of SV-201 was slightly altered in
Mu1SV-201, Mu2SV-201 retains the same amino composition of SV-201 with
only 7 amino acids in the N terminus randomized. Second, SV-201 cannot
inhibit fusion when incubated first with erythrocytes, which would be expected if it directly affects the properties of the membrane. Indeed,
the above mentioned small hydrophobic peptides are inhibitors whether
they are incubated first with virions or with erythrocytes (63). Third,
SV-201 inhibits at the µM range, which is about 2 orders
of magnitude less than that found with peptides that modulate the
structure of the membrane (6). Fourth, the inhibitory effect of SV-201
is time dependent, whereas membrane binding and modulation take place
within seconds to minutes (25, 43, 64). We can exclude also the
possibility that SV-201 interferes with step 4, which is the actual
fusion event, since we have shown that SV-201 cannot inhibit fusion
after the binding of virions to target cells.
Thus SV-201 probably disturbs step 2, i.e. close approach of
the two lipid bilayers of the viral and cellular membranes. The finding
that SV-201 has high affinity to phospholipid membranes and
specifically self-associates in solution suggests, therefore, two
plausible roles of the 201-229 amino acid domain in step 2 of Sendai
virus-mediated membrane fusion. (i) It is possible that this domain is
involved in membrane apposition since it is not perturbed by the
corresponding SV-201 after the attachment of virions to target cells.
This is further supported by the fact that SV-201 binds to both
negatively charged (PS/PC) and zwitterionic (PC) phospholipid vesicles
(Fig. 6), suggesting that the 201-229 amino acid domain can bind to
the target cell membrane and thus assist in bringing the viral and
cellular membranes closer to facilitate fusion. A similar role has been
proposed for the leucine zipper motifs present in influenza
hemagglutinin and HIV gp41 (65, 66). (ii) A conformational change or a
change in the assembly of Sendai virus fusion protein may take place
before the apposition of viral and target membranes, followed by the attachment of virions to target cell. One may speculate that the amino
acid 201-229 domain is involved in these changes. The ability of
SV-201 to assemble in an aqueous environment (Figs. 4 and 5) points to
the involvement of this domain in the assembly of the fusion protein.
By interacting with this domain before virions attachment to target
RBCs, the synthetic peptide SV-201 could interfere with the necessary
conformation change and/or assembly and thus inhibit the hemolytic
activity of Sendai virus. This is in line with the hypothesis suggested
recently based on the inhibitory effect of heptad repeat regions in
other paramyxoviruses (38). At this point we cannot rule out any of the
possibilities. The finding that SV-201 is a potent inhibitor only at a
certain step before attachment of the virions to target cells, suggests that its binding site (most probably the domain of amino acids 201-229) is no longer accessible once the virions are already attached
to cells. Alternatively, irreversible conformational changes are
induced following viral attachment to RBCs. Therefore, even if SV-201
binds to its counterpart in the fusion protein, it cannot induce
further disorganization of the fusogenic complex.
The finding that synthetic heptad repeats located at similar positions
in the fusion proteins of several viruses have inhibitory effects,
together with the finding that homologous SV-201 regions exist in other
viruses (Fig. 1), suggests that these regions may play a role similar
to that of the amino acids 201-229 domain in the Sendai virus and may
act as inhibitors for their corresponding viruses.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We are grateful to Prof. Michael Ovadia, Tel
Aviv University, Israel, for his generous supply of Sendai virus and
helpful discussion regarding the hemagglutinin assay. Thanks to Dr.
Yehuda Marikovsky for his technical help.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This research was supported in part by the Henri and
Francoise Glasberg Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by a Sir Charles Clore postdoctoral fellowship from the
Feinberg Graduate School, The Weizmann Institute of Science.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 972-8-9342711;
Fax: 972-8-9344112; E-mail: bmshai{at}weizmann.weizmann.ac.il.
1
The abbreviations used are; HIV, human
immunodeficiency virus; NBD,
12-(N-methyl-N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl));
PC, phosphatidylcholine; PS, phosphatidylserine; PBS,
phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.3); RBC, red blood cells; Rho,
tetra-methylrhodamine; Tricine,
N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine.
2
J. K. Ghosh and Y. Shai, unpublished
results.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Stegmann, T.,
Doms, R. W.,
and Helenius, A.
(1989)
Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem.
18,
187-211[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hoekstra, D.,
and Kok, J. W.
(1989)
Biosci. Rep.
9,
273-305[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
White, J. M.
(1990)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
52,
75-97
-
Wiley, D. C.,
and Skehel, J. J.
(1987)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
56,
365-394[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lamb, R. A.
(1993)
Virology
197,
1-11[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yeagle, P. L.
(1993)
The Fusion of Sendai Virus, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL
-
Haywood, A. M.
(1974)
J. Mol. Biol.
83,
427-436[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Scheid, A.,
and Choppin, P. W.
(1974)
Virology
57,
475-490[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Miura, N.,
Uchida, T.,
and Okada, Y.
(1982)
Exp. Cell Res.
141,
409-420[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Homma, M.,
and Ouchi, M.
(1973)
J. Virol.
12,
1457-1465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Klenk, H. D.,
Rott, R.,
Orlich, M.,
and Blodorn, J.
(1975)
Virology
68,
426-439[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Scheid, A.,
and Choppin, P. W.
(1977)
Virology
80,
54-60[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gething, M. J.,
White, J. M.,
and Waterfield, M. D.
(1978)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
75,
2737-2740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gething, M. J.,
Doms, R. W.,
York, D.,
and White, J.
(1986)
J. Cell Biol.
102,
11-23[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Freed, E. O.,
Myers, D. J.,
and Risser, R.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
4650-4654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Freed, E. O.,
Delwart, E. L.,
Buchschacher, G. J.,
Panganiban, A. T.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
70-74[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bosch, M. L.
(1989)
Science
244,
694-696[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Horvath, C. M.,
and Lamb, R. A.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
2443-2455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lear, J. D.,
and DeGrado, W. F.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
6500-6505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Murata, M.,
Sugahara, Y.,
Takahashi, S.,
and Ohnishi, S.
(1987)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
102,
957-962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rafalski, M.,
Lear, J. D.,
and DeGrado, W. F.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
7917-7922[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Slepushkin, V. A.,
Melikyan, G. B.,
Sidorova, M. S.,
Chumakov, V. M.,
Andreev, S. M.,
Manulyan, R. A.,
Karamov, E. V.
(1990)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
172,
952-957[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kliger, Y.,
Aharoni, A.,
Rapaport, D.,
Jones, P.,
Blumenthal, R.,
and Shai, Y.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13496-13505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Martin, I.,
Defrise, Q. F.,
Mandieau, V.,
Nielsen, N. M.,
Saermark, T.,
Burny, A.,
Brasseur, R.,
Ruysschaert, J. M.,
Vandenbranden, M.
(1991)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
175,
872-879[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rapaport, D.,
and Shai, Y.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
15124-15131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Durrer, P.,
Galli, C.,
Hoenke, S.,
Corti, C.,
Gluck, R.,
Vorherr, T.,
and Brunner, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
13417-13421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nussbaum, O.,
Zakai, N.,
and Loyter, A.
(1984)
Virology
138,
185-197[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Carr, C. M.,
and Kim, P. S.
(1993)
Cell
73,
823-832[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shugars, D. C.,
Wild, C. T.,
Greenwell, T. K.,
Matthews, T. J.
(1996)
J. Virol.
70,
2982-2991[Abstract]
-
Rapaport, D.,
Ovadia, M.,
and Shai, Y.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
5524-5531[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Buckland, R.,
Malvoisin, E.,
Beauverger, P.,
and Wild, F.
(1992)
J. Gen. Virol.
73,
1703-1707[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dubay, J. W.,
Roberts, S. J.,
Brody, B.,
and Hunter, E.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
4748-4756[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chen, S. S.,
Lee, C. N.,
Lee, W. R.,
McIntosh, K.,
Lee, T. H.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
3615-3619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sergel-Germano, T.,
McQuain, C.,
and Morrison, T.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
7654-7658[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wild, C.,
Oas, T.,
McDanal, C.,
Bolognesi, D.,
and Matthews, T.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
10537-10541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jiang, S.,
Lin, K.,
Strick, N.,
and Neurath, A. R.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
195,
533-538[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lawless, M. K.,
Barney, S.,
Guthrie, K. I.,
Bucy, T. B.,
Petteway, S. R.,
Merutka, G.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
13697-13708[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lambert, D. M.,
Barney, S.,
Lambert, A. L.,
Guthrie, R.,
Medinas, R.,
Davis, D. E.,
Bucy, T.,
Erickson, J.,
Merutka, G.,
Petteway, S. R., Jr.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
2186-2191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Blumberg, B. M.,
Giorgi, C.,
Rose, K.,
and Kolakofsky, D.
(1985)
J. Gen. Virol.
66,
317-331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shai, Y.,
Bach, D.,
and Yanovsky, A.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
20202-20209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Merrifield, R. B.,
Vizioli, L. D.,
and Boman, H. G.
(1982)
Biochemistry
21,
5020-5031[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rapaport, D.,
and Shai, Y.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
6502-6509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shai, Y.,
Hadari, Y. R.,
and Finkels, A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
22346-22354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bartlett, G. R.
(1959)
J. Biol. Chem.
234,
466-468[Free Full Text]
-
Yamada, K. M.,
Yamada, S. S.,
and Pastan, I.
(1975)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
72,
3158-3162[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kennedy, D. W.,
Rohrbach, D. H.,
Martin, G. R.,
Momoi, T.,
Yamada, K. M.
(1983)
J. Cell. Physiol.
114,
257-262[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shai, Y.
(1995)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20,
460-464[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ghosh, J. K.,
Ben-Efraim, I.,
Hermesh, C.,
and Shai, Y.
(1996)
Abstracts of the Xth International Congress of Virology, Jerusalem, Israel, August 11-16, 1996, p. 166, Jerusalem, Israel
-
Loyter, A.,
and Volsky, D. J.
(1982)
Cell Surf. Rev.
8,
215-266
-
Shimizu, Y. K.,
Shimizu, K.,
Ishida, N.,
and Homma, M.
(1976)
Virology
27,
48-60
-
Rott, R.,
and Klenk, H. O.
(1977)
in
Virus Infection and the Cell Surface: Cell Surface Reviews (Poste, G., and Nicholson, G. L., eds), Vol. 2, pp. 47-87, North-Holland, Amsterdam
-
Doms, R. W.,
Lamb, R. A.,
Rose, J. K.,
Helenius, A.
(1993)
Virology
193,
545-562[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kenner, R. A.,
and Aboderin, A. A.
(1971)
Biochemistry
10,
4433-4440[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Frey, S.,
and Tamm, L. K.
(1990)
Biochem. J.
272,
713-719[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rapaport, D.,
and Shai, Y.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
23769-23775[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pouny, Y.,
Rapaport, D.,
Mor, A.,
Nicolas, P.,
and Shai, Y.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
12416-12423[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rajarathnam, K.,
Hochman, J.,
Schindler, M.,
and Ferguson, M. S.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
3168-3176[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Richardson, C. D.,
Scheid, A.,
and Choppin, P. W.
(1980)
Virology
105,
205-222[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kelsey, D. R.,
Flanagan, T. D.,
Young, J.,
and Yeagle, P. L.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
12178-12183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Epand, R. M.,
Shai, Y.,
Segrest, J. P.,
Anantharamaiah, G. M.
(1995)
Biopolymers
37,
319-338[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wild, C. T.,
Shugars, D. C.,
Greenwell, T. K.,
McDanal, C. B.,
Matthews, T. J.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
9770-9774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kelsey, D. R.,
Flanagan, T. D.,
Young, J.,
and Yeagle, P. L.
(1991)
Virology
182,
690-702[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Asano, K.,
and Asano, A.
(1988)
Biochemistry
27,
1321-1329[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gazit, E.,
and Shai, Y.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
12363-12371[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yu, Y. G.,
King, D. S.,
and Shin, Y.-K.
(1994)
Science
266,
274-276[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rabenstein, M.,
and Shin, Y.-K.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
13390-13397[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Seth, I. Skountzou, K. M. Gernert, and R. W. Compans
Fusogenic Variants of a Noncytopathic Paramyxovirus
J. Virol.,
April 15, 2007;
81(8):
4286 - 4297.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ahmad, S. P. Yadav, N. Asthana, K. Mitra, S. P. Srivastava, and J. K. Ghosh
Utilization of an Amphipathic Leucine Zipper Sequence to Design Antibacterial Peptides with Simultaneous Modulation of Toxic Activity against Human Red Blood Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 4, 2006;
281(31):
22029 - 22038.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Asthana, S. P. Yadav, and J. K. Ghosh
Dissection of Antibacterial and Toxic Activity of Melittin: A LEUCINE ZIPPER MOTIF PLAYS A CRUCIAL ROLE IN DETERMINING ITS HEMOLYTIC ACTIVITY BUT NOT ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 31, 2004;
279(53):
55042 - 55050.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Seth, A. L. Goodman, and R. W. Compans
Mutations in Multiple Domains Activate Paramyxovirus F Protein-Induced Fusion
J. Virol.,
August 15, 2004;
78(16):
8513 - 8523.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. P. Yadav, B. Kundu, and J. K. Ghosh
Identification and Characterization of an Amphipathic Leucine Zipper-like Motif in Escherichia coli Toxin Hemolysin E: PLAUSIBLE ROLE IN THE ASSEMBLY AND MEMBRANE DESTABILIZATION
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 19, 2003;
278(51):
51023 - 51034.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Sergel, L. W. McGinnes, and T. G. Morrison
A Single Amino Acid Change in the Newcastle Disease Virus Fusion Protein Alters the Requirement for HN Protein in Fusion
J. Virol.,
June 1, 2000;
74(11):
5101 - 5107.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. Young, D. Li, M. C. Abramowitz, and T. G. Morrison
Interaction of Peptides with Sequences from the Newcastle Disease Virus Fusion Protein Heptad Repeat Regions
J. Virol.,
July 1, 1999;
73(7):
5945 - 5956.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. Ghosh, S. G. Peisajovich, M. Ovadia, and Y. Shai
Structure-Function Study of a Heptad Repeat Positioned Near the Transmembrane Domain of Sendai Virus Fusion Protein Which Blocks Virus-Cell Fusion
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 16, 1998;
273(42):
27182 - 27190.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|