|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 14, 7920-7927, April 3, 1998
Identification of the Binding Partners for Flightless I, A Novel
Protein Bridging the Leucine-rich Repeat and the Gelsolin
Superfamilies*
Yu-Tsueng
Liu and
Helen L.
Yin
From the Department of Physiology and the Cell Regulation Graduate
Program, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center,
Dallas, Texas 75235
 |
ABSTRACT |
Flightless-I (fliI) is a novel member
of the gelsolin family that is important for actin organization during
Drosophila embryogenesis and myogenesis.
Drosophila fliI and the human homolog FLI both contain the
classic gelsolin 6-fold segmental repeats and an amino-terminal extension of 16 tandem leucine-rich repeats (LRR). LRR repeats form
amphipathic - structural units that mediate protein-protein interactions. Although there are close to 100 known LRR
domain-containing proteins, only a few binding pairs have been
identified. In this paper, we used biochemical and genetic approaches
to identify proteins that interact with human FLI. In vitro
synthesized FLI bound to actin-Sepharose and binding was reduced by
competition with excess soluble actin. Actin binding was mediated
through the gelsolin-like domain and not the LRR domain. Although the FLI LRR module is most closely related to the LRR domains of
Ras-interactive proteins, FLI does not associate with Ras, selected Ras
effectors, or other Ras-related small GTPases. Two-hybrid screens using
FLI LRR as bait identified a novel LRR binding partner. The
0.65-kilobase pair (kb) clone from the screen survived additional
rounds of stringent two-hybrid pairwise assays, establishing a specific interaction. Binding to FLI LRR was corroborated by
co-immunoprecipitation with FLI LRR. The translated sequence of the FLI
LRR associated protein (FLAP) encodes a novel protein not represented
in the data base. Northern blot analyses revealed four FLAP messages of
approximately 2.7, 2.9, 3.3, and 5.1 kb, which are differentially expressed in the tissues tested. Skeletal and cardiac muscles are
particularly rich in the 3.3-kb FLAP message, and the FLI message as
well. Full-length FLAP clones were isolated from a mouse skeletal
muscle cDNA library. They have an open reading frame which encodes
for a protein containing 626 amino acids. Sequence analyses predict
that the FLAP protein is rich in -helices and contains stretches of
dimeric coiled coil in its middle region and COOH terminus. The
identification of actin and FLAP as the binding ligands for the
gelsolin-like domain and the LRR domain, respectively, suggests that
FLI may link the actin cytoskeleton to other modules implicated in
intermolecular recognition and structural organization.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Gelsolin is a Ca2+- and phosphatidylinositol
4,5-bisphosphate-regulated actin-binding protein (1). It has been
implicated in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton and the
modulation of membrane-cytoskeletal cross-talks (2-4). Many
gelsolin-like proteins have been identified and they appear to have
evolved from an ancestral single segment gene that has duplicated
multiple times to form proteins with 3- or 6-fold repeats (5). Recent three-dimensional structure analyses show that the segments within gelsolin (6), as well as segments from different gelsolin family members, have a similar core structure (7-9). Nevertheless, the gelsolin family of proteins have distinct actin binding characteristics and intracellular localizations. For example, unlike most gelsolin members, CapG is a nuclear as well as cytoplasmic protein (10) and it
does not sever filaments (11). Therefore, the conserved residues in
each protein appear to maintain the basic folds of the repeated
segments, while actin binding per se involves residues customized for each segment and for each protein.
Flightless I
(fliI)1 is a
recently identified member of the gelsolin family (12). It was
discovered as a mutation in Drosphila melanogaster that
leads to flightlessness. This phenotype is accompanied by
disorganization of the indirect flight muscle myofibrils (13). Other
more severe fliI mutations lead to late larval or pupal death. Eggs
lacking maternally supplied fliI show incomplete cellularization, abnormal furrow formation, and impaired gastrulation. Defective cellularization of the syncytial blastoderm is associated with a
disorganized cortical actin cytoskeleton (14). The flightless and
cellularization phenotypes suggest that fliI is required for actin
organization during myogenesis and embryogenesis, respectively. The
human flightless I (FLI) locus has been mapped to a region deleted in the Smith-Magenis syndrome (15), which is associated with a
spectrum of developmental and behavioral abnormalities. The
COOH-terminal half of human FLI has 31% identity and 52% similarity to human gelsolin (12), and has the same 6-fold segmental repeat typical of many gelsolin family members (Fig. 1A). Since FLI
is more divergent from gelsolin than other gelsolin family members such
as CapG, adseverin, and villin (1), it probably arose from the
prototypical ancestral protein very early during phylogeny and evolved
independently (16). Therefore, it is necessary to determine whether FLI
is an actin-binding protein, and how it interacts with actin.
The NH2-terminal half of FLI is distinct from that of the
other previously identified gelsolin members. It contains 16 tandem 23-amino acid leucine-rich repeat motif (LRR) (12) (Fig. 1A) found in an emerging collection of proteins (17). Close to 100 proteins
containing this motif have been identified thus far. Proteins in this
LRR superfamily have diverse cellular localizations (extracellular,
cytoplasmic, transmembrane, and nuclear) and functions (receptor ligand
binding, signal transduction, cell adhesion, development, bacterial
virulence, DNA repair, and RNA processing). The unifying theme among
these diverse functions is molecular recognition. The LRR motif
contributes to protein-protein interactions, either directly as the
ligand binding module, or as a regulator to enhance affinity and/or
specificity of binding to a separate ligand-binding site. In a few
cases, the LRR binding partners have been identified. The ligand:LRR
protein pairs include glycoprotein hormones:G-protein coupled receptors
(18), collagen:matrix proteoglycans (such as decorin) (19), protein
phosphatase-1:sds22 (required for the completion of mitosis) (20),
neurotrophins:trk receptors (21), Ras:yeast adenylate cyclase (Cyr1)
(22, 23), and pancreatic RNases:RNase inhibitor (24).
Among the LRR modules identified thus far, the FLI LRR 23-amino acid
repeats fit the consensus for a LRR subgroup consisting of proteins
which can potentially interact with Ras-like ligands (17, 25). This
group includes Rsp-1 (also known as Rsu-1), which binds Raf-1 (26) and
the yeast adenylate cyclase (Cyr1). Rsp-1 has 35% identity and 53%
similarity to FLI. It binds Raf-1 (26) and suppresses the
transformation activity of v-Ras (27). Cyr1 is regulated by Ras, and
its LRR motif is required for membrane association and Ras binding
(22). The similarity in LRR motifs raises the intriguing possibility
that FLI may mediate interactions with Ras homologs (25). This is
plausible because Ras transformation disrupts the actin cytoskeleton,
and Rac1, a small G-protein which drives membrane ruffling (28), has
been implicated in Ras transformation. Gelsolin severing and capping
may be regulated by Rac1 (29), and gelsolin suppresses Ras-induced
transformation in foci assays (30). We therefore used a variety of
approaches to determine if FLI binds Ras or its downstream effectors.
In addition, we tried to identify other FLI-LRR binding partners, to
begin a molecular characterization of this novel member of the gelsolin
and LRR superfamilies.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmid Constructions--
The human FLI cDNA
which was inserted into pBluescript SK( ) vector (Stratagene) through
the EcoRI site, was kindly provided by H. D. Campbell (The Australian National University). This cDNA (12)
is missing the AT nucleotides of the ATG initiation codon (GenBank
accession U01184). To introduce a translation initiation codon, the
cDNA was excised with EcoRV and SpeI in the
multiple cloning region upstream and downstream of the EcoRI
site, and subcloned into pGEM-5Zf(+) vector (Promega). The resultant
clone contains a short fusion sequence 5' of the original fliI cDNA (5'-ccATGgccgcgggatatcgaattccgGAG-3') and was used for construction of
all the yeast and mammalian FLI expression vectors described here. The
FLI LRR domain construct was generated by SmaI digestion (nucleotide 1399), and encompasses amino acids 1-466. This construct extends past the end of the LRR repeat at amino acid 380 into part of
the linker between the LRR- and gelsolin-like domains (Fig.
1A). A gelsolin-like domain construct which contains an initiation codon and spans FLI amino acid 496-1269 was constructed by
introducing an initiation codon using polymerase chain reaction primers.
In Vitro Transcription and Translation--
Full-length and
truncated FLI cDNA were cloned into the pTM1 vector (31). 1 µg of
cDNA was added to the T7 polymerase-coupled reticulocyte lysate
system (TNT, Promega) in the presence of Trans35S-label
(ICN Biomedical, Inc.), and in vitro transcription and translation were carried out in a 50-µl volume according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Actin-Sepharose Binding--
2 and 4 µl of the in
vitro transcribed and translated product was diluted to 80 µl
with a buffer containing 2 mM Tris-HCl, 0.2 mM
CaCl2, and 0.1% gelatin, pH 7.5, and added to 20 µl of packed actin-Sepharose beads (32). The samples were incubated for 30 min at room temperature, and the beads were then washed three times in
the same buffer. Proteins bound to the beads were analyzed by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and radioactive bands were
detected by autoradiography. In some samples, 4 µl of 3 mg/ml actin
or bovine serum albumin was added to determine if binding to
actin-Sepharose was reduced by competition with soluble actin.
Binding to Small GTPases--
GST-Ras,
GST-RasVal-12, GST-RhoA, and GST-CDC42 (gifts of A. Hall,
University College London and M. White, University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center) were expressed in BL21 and purified with
glutathione-Sepharose (Pharmacia). They were charged with GTP or GDP.
35S-Labeled FLI and LRR produced by in vitro
transcription and translation were added to the beads and binding was
determined as described (33).
Yeast Two-hybrid Screening--
The LexA based yeast two-hybrid
system (34) was used initially to identify candidate FLI LRR
interactive clones. The FLI LRR domain was fused in-frame to the 3'-end
of the sequence encoding the LexA DNA-binding domain of the yeast
two-hybrid vector pBTM116. The construct (pLEX-LRR) was used as a bait
to screen a GAL4 activation domain-based human HeLa matchmaker cDNA
library (pGAD-GH vector, CLONTECH). The yeast L40
strain (MATa trp1 leu2 his3 LYS2::lexA-His URA3::lexA-lacZ) was sequentially transformed, and
potential interactors were identified as described previously (34).
Approximately 1.6 million transformants were screened. Positive
plasmids were isolated and tested against pLEX-lamin to rule out
nonspecific interaction. Pairwise assays were also used to detect
interaction with small GTPases (plasmids provided by M. White and J. Frost, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center).
The GAL4 DNA-binding domain-based two-hybrid system (35) was used to
confirm the specificity of the interaction between LRR and its
candidate binding partner. FLI LRR was fused to the COOH terminus of
GAL4 DNA-binding domain in the pAS2 vector to create pAS2-LRR. This
construct was co-transformed with the previously identified LRR
interactive plasmids into yeast Y190 (MATa gal4 gal80 his3
trp1-901 ade2-101 ura3-52 leu2-3-112 URA3::GAL-lacZ LYS2::GAL-HIS3 cyhr). Transformants were
plated as patches on selective medium, and replica plated on Whatman
No. 50 filter paper on agar plates for -galactosidase assays.
Northern Blotting--
32P-Labeled probes were
synthesized with random primers by the Ready-To-Go DNA labeling kit
(Pharmacia). Full-length FLI, H186 FLAP, and -actin cDNAs were
used as templates. The premade poly(A) RNA human tissue blot, purchased
from OriGene (Rockville, MD) was hybridized in buffer containing 0.2%
SDS, 5 × SSPE, 5 × Denhardt's solution, 100 µg/ml
denatured salmon sperm DNA, 50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate at
42 °C for 14-16 h. The membrane was washed with 2 × SSC,
0.1% SDS for 5 min at room temperature 3 times, and with 0.25 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65 °C for 30 min 2 times. The membrane was exposed
to x-ray film for 1 h to 4 days. Membrane was stripped between
probes.
cDNA Cloning of FLI LRR-associated Protein
(FLAP)--
A mouse I.M.A.G.E. consortium (LLNL) EST clone
(ID 532888) whose 5' sequence (GenBank accession number AA068950) (36) is homologous to the two-hybrid human FLAP cDNA insert, was
purchased from the ATCC. It was 32P-labeled and used to
screen a mouse skeletal muscle 5'-Stretch Plus gt11 cDNA library
(CLONTECH). Approximately 8 × 105
plaques were screened. The inserts in the positive plaques were amplified with the Expand Long Template polymerase chain reaction system (Boehringer Mannheim), using the gt11 LD-insert screening amplimer set (CLONTECH). The polymerase chain
reaction products were cloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega), and
nucleotide sequences were determined by manual and automatic sequencing
using external and internal primers.
Expression of Recombinant LRR-binding Partner and Antibody
Production--
The H186 FLAP cDNA was released from the HeLa
matchmaker vector pGAD GH with SpeI and XhoI. The
insert was ligated to the bacterial expression vector pGEX-KG (37)
digested with XbaI and XhoI. The resultant
plasmid was transformed into DH5 (Life Technologies) or BLR
(Novagen). Bacteria were grown to an OD600 of 0.5 and
GST-H186 FLAP fusion protein (GST-H186 FLAP) synthesis was induced with
0.5 mM isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside for 3 h at 37 °C. The bacteria were lysed and fusion protein
was purified with glutathione-Sepharose. Eluted proteins were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized by staining with 0.3 M cupric chloride without fixation. The GST-H186
FLAP band was excised and used for rabbit immunization. The antibody from an early bleed, which recognizes H186 FLAP but not GST, was used
for Western blotting.
Cell Culture and Transfection--
The FLI clone
containing the inserted initiation codon (as described above) was
further modified by attaching a COOH-terminal HA epitope tag
(YPYDVPDYA). The construct was subcloned into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen)
via the BamHI and XhoI sites in the multiple
cloning region. H186 FLAP was cloned into pCMV5 (38). The expressed protein contains a 12-residue Myc tag (MEQKLISEEDLN) at the
NH2 terminus, 218 amino acids from H186 FLAP, and 31 residues of pCMV5 sequence acquired because H186 does not contain its
own stop codon. The FLAP-1 cDNA has its own translation start and
stop codons and was cloned into pcDNA3. DNA was transfected singly
or in combination (at a 1:1 weight ratio) into human embryonic kidney
293 cells (HEK293) by calcium phosphate precipitation. Cells were
cultured for 24-36 h in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum.
Immunoprecipitation--
Transfected cells (in 60 mm dishes)
were labeled with Trans35S-label (100 µCi/ml) for 2 h in methionine-free medium and lysed in 300 µl of RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5%
sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 30 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 0.2 units/ml aprotinin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.025% sodium azide). The lysate was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for
30 min. 30-50 µl of 12CA5 anti-HA hybridoma culture medium (gift of
R. Gaynor, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) was added
to 150 µl of the lysis supernatant. After incubation for 2 h at
4 °C, 20 µl of packed Protein A-Sepharose (Pharmacia) was added
and incubation continued for 2 h at 4 °C with continuous
rocking. Beads were washed twice with RIPA buffer, once with a buffer
without detergent (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.025% sodium azide), and finally with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8. They were boiled in SDS gel sample
buffer with 4 M urea and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis, 7.5% acrylamide or 5-15% gradient acrylamide gels
were used. Immunoprecipitated proteins were detected by Western blotting using the ECL system (Amersham) or by autoradiography.
 |
RESULTS |
FLI Binding to Actin--
To determine if FLI is an actin-binding
protein, FLI and the FLI LRR domain (Fig.
1A) were expressed by in
vitro transcription and translation (Fig. 1B). In each
case, a single in vitro transcribed product which migrated
on a SDS-polyacrylamide gel with mobility consistent with the
calculated molecular mass was generated (145 and 68 kDa, respectively,
for FLI and LRR). The in vitro transcription products were
incubated with actin-Sepharose in the presence and absence of excess
soluble actin. FLI bound actin-Sepharose in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1C, left panel, lanes 1 and 2). Addition of actin monomers inhibited FLI
binding to actin-Sepharose, as evidenced by the lack of FLI in the
pellet, and its retention in the supernatant (compare lanes
3 with lanes 1). Densitometry scanning shows that
doubling the amount of in vitro transcription product
results in a 145% increase in FLI associated with actin-Sepharose (lanes 1 and 2) and addition of excess actin
reduced FLI binding to actin-Sepharose to 16% (lanes 1 and 3). In contrast, bovine serum albumin did not
decrease binding (data not shown). Thus, FLI bound actin specifically.
This is not surprising, but until now, FLI has not been formally
established as an actin-binding protein. In contrast to full-length
FLI, in vitro transcribed and translated FLI LRR (Fig.
1B, right panel) did not bind actin-Sepharose (data not
shown), suggesting that actin binding was mediated through the
gelsolin-like domain.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
In vitro synthesis of FLI and LRR and
binding to actin-Sepharose. A, the FLI domains. The
NH2-terminal half has sixteen 23-amino acid leucine-rich
repeats. The COOH-terminal half has six segmental repeats resembling
that of the gelsolin family. GLD, gelsolin-like domains.
a.a.#, amino acid residue number; nt#, nucleotide
number. The LRR-HA construct used in this paper extends past the true
LRR domain to residues 466. B, in vitro transcription and
translation. 35S-Labeled FLI and LRR were synthesized
in vitro, and the reaction products were analyzed by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by autoradiography. 2, 4, and 6 µl of FLI or LRR reaction products were loaded on the
left and right panels, respectively.
C, actin-Sepharose binding. Lanes 1 and
3, 2 µl of in vitro synthesized FLI, with and
without soluble actin, respectively. Lane 2, 4 µl in
vitro synthesized FLI. P, pelleted beads; S,
supernatant. The entire pellet and one-fourth of the supernatant were
analyzed. Densitometry scanning of the supernatants and pellets show
that the combined amount of radioactivity recovered was 84, 204, and 92 units for lanes 1-3, respectively. The amounts of FLI bound
to actin-Sepharose were 33, 20, and 5%, respectively, when expressed
as percent of total input.
|
|
Lack of Interaction between FLI-LRR and Ras and Other Small
GTPases--
The close resemblance between FLI-LRR with those of Cyr1
and Rsp-1 raises the possibility that FLI may also interact with Ras or
its downstream effectors. This possibility was examined in two ways.
First, two-hybrid pairwise assays were used to identify interactions
in vivo. Second, recombinant Ras and RasVal-12,
the consitutitvely active form of Ras, were expressed as fusion proteins with GST, and their binding to in vitro transcribed
and translated LRR was determined by sedimenting GST fusion proteins with glutathione beads. Neither assay was able to detect evidence for
Ras interaction with LRR. In the two-hybrid assay, LRR did not interact
with RasVal-12 or Ras (data not shown), although
RasVal-12 interacted with its known effectors, Ral GDS
(39), Raf (34), and Cyr1 (34), under identical conditions. In addition,
there was no evidence for LRR binding to other small G proteins, such as Rac2, RhoA, or CDC42 (data not shown). Likewise, we did not detect
specific binding of in vitro synthesized LRR to
GST-RasVal-12, GST-Ras, GST-CDC42, or GST-RhoA, either in
the presence of GTP or GDP with the GST bead pull down assay (data not
shown).
Identification of a Novel FLI LRR-binding Partner--
Two-hybrid
screens using LRR fused with the LexA DNA-binding domain as bait
yielded four interactive clones that did not bind the negative control,
lamin. All of these clones have similar DNA sequences, and one (H186)
was selected for further analysis. H186 survived additional stringent
tests for specific interactions (Table
I). H186 interacted with LRR regardless
of whether it was fused to the LexA DNA-binding domain or the
transcriptional activation domain. It did not bind lamin, and it still
bound LRR when fused with the GAL4 DNA-binding domain instead of the
LexA domain (Table I). In contrast, H186 did not bind the FLI
gelsolin-like domain. We will call this protein H186 FLI LRR-associated
protein (H186 FLAP).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Two hybrid pairwise assays for FLI-LRR binding to FLAP
Assays were performed using the LexA DNA-binding domain and GAL 4 activation domain, except in the bottom lane, where LRR fused to the
GAL4 DNA-binding domain was assayed against the H186 FLAP-activation
domain. FLAP-1 (R) indicates cloning in the antisense direction.
Interaction was detected by the -galactosidase assay.
|
|
H186 FLAP association with LRR was corroborated by immunoprecipitation
after coexpression in mammalian cells. HEK293 cells were transfected
with H186 FLAP and HA-tagged LRR (LRR-HA) either individually or in
combination, and the cells were metabolically labeled with
Tran35S-label. Anti-HA was used to immunoprecipitate
HA-tagged LRR and associated proteins. In cells transfected with LRR-HA
alone, a single 68-kDa band was immunoprecipitated (Fig.
2A, left panel, lane 3). When
cells were co-transfected with LRR-HA and H186 FLAP, an additional
32-kDa protein coprecipitated with the LRR (lane 4). This
band was not immunoprecipitated in the absence of LRR-HA (Fig.
2A, lane 5), even though the autoradiogram of cell lysates shows that the 32-kDa band was expressed at a high level under both
conditions (Fig. 2A, right panel, compare lanes 3 and 4). This band is only found in cells transfected with
the H186 FLAP cDNA (Fig. 2A, right panel, lanes 4 and
5, but not lanes 1-3), and its size corresponds
to that predicted from the nucleotide sequence of the H186 FLAP
expression construct. These results indicate that H186 FLAP was
captured in the anti-HA immunoprecipitate through binding to
LRR-HA.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Co-immunoprecipitation of FLAP with FLI
LRR. HEK293 cells were transfected with expression vectors for HA
epitope tagged-LRR (LRR-HA), FLI-HA, H186 FLAP, or FLAP-1, either
singly or in combination. P, immunoprecipitate;
S, supernatant after immunoprecipitation. A, FLAP
binding to LRR-HA. Transfected cells were 35S-labeled,
lysed, and HA-tagged proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA, and
analyzed on a 5-15% gradient gel. Labeled proteins were detected by
autoradiography. One-tenth of the amount of cell lysates used for
immunoprecipitation was loaded in the supernatant lanes. Only H186 FLAP
was expressed at sufficiently high level to be detected by the eye in
the supernatants (right panel, lanes 4 and 5).
B, FLAP-1 binding to LRR-HA. LRR-HA was immunoprecipitated
with anti-HA, and Western blotting with anti-HA and anti-FLAP was used
to detect LRR-HA and FLAP-1, respectively. Lane 1, cells
transfected with FLAP-1; lane 2, LRR-HA and FLAP-1;
lane 3, LRR-HA. LC, IgG light chain. The
secondary antibody used to detect -HA also cross-reacted with the
mouse IgG HC in the immunoprecipitate and LRR-HA comigrated with the
IgG HC. The staining of IgG HC accounts for the appearance of a faint
band in the lane 1 pellet, at a position overlapping with
that of LRR-HA in lanes 2 and 3. C,
Western blotting to show that FLAP-1 co-immunoprecipitated with FLI.
Overexpressed proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA or
anti-FLAP, and the proteins in the immunoprecipitates were analyzed by
gel electrophoresis in a 7.5% acrylamide gel. Immunoprecipitated
proteins were identified by Western blotting. Lane 1, cells
transfected with FLAP-1; lane 2, FLAP-1 and FLI-HA;
lane 3, FLI-HA; lane 4, FLAP-1 and FLI-HA;
lane 5, FLI-HA; lanes 6 and 7,
supernatants of lanes 4 and 5,
respectively.
|
|
Tissue Distribution of FLAP--
H186 FLAP is 0.65 kb and contains
an open reading frame which contains a potential translation initiation
codon but no termination codon. The translated amino acid sequence in
this frame, or in the other two frames (which are interrupted by
multiple stop codons), has no strong homology to known proteins in the
GenBank data base. It matches mouse EST clone sequences AA068950 and
AA106954 by BLAST search (40), except for the existence of two inserts in the latter sequence (Fig. 4C). These results raise the
possibility that H186 FLAP is not full-length, and that there may be
multiple splice variants or multiple FLAP genes.
To estimate the size and number of FLAP messages, H186 FLAP was used to
probe a human tissue poly(A) RNA blot. H186 hybridized with at least
four bands of 2.7, 2.9, 3.3, and 5.1 kb (Fig.
3B) which are present at
varying ratios in the tissues examined. The 2.7-kb message is
ubiquitous, and is least abundant in brain. Brain has a unique 2.9-kb
message. Skeletal muscle and heart have a unique 3.3-kb FLAP message.
The heart poly(A) RNA lane was apparently underloaded compared with the
other lanes, because neither the cardiac muscle -actin nor
cytoplasmic actin message is visible at a low exposure of the Northern
blot (Fig. 3C, top panel), while the actin message in other
lanes is detectible at this exposure. A longer exposure showed that
heart muscle has the two expected actin messages (Fig. 3C, bottom
panel). Skeletal muscle contains predominantly the lower skeletal
-actin message (41). The fact that we can detect significant FLAP
and FLI signals in the heart lane despite underloading suggests that
they are abundant in the heart. Kidney, lung, and small intestine have
the 5.1-kb FLAP mRNA predominantly. Overall, the Northern blot
results are consistent with the existence of multiple FLAP splice
variants or multiple genes, and suggest that they are differentially
expressed in a tissue-specific manner.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Northern blot analyses of FLAP and FLI
distributions in human tissues. A human tissue poly(A) RNA blot
was probed with FLI (A), H186 FLAP (B), and
-actin (C) cDNAs sequentially. The blot was stripped
between hybridization with each probe. Two exposures of the actin
blot were shown. The size of RNA standards are indicated in
kb.
|
|
The high abundance of FLAP message in skeletal muscle was matched by
high level expression of FLI (Fig. 3A). The enrichment of
FLI message in skeletal and heart muscles was reported recently by
Campbell et al. (16).
cDNA Cloning of Mouse FLAP--
To determine the sequence of
full-length FLAP, a mouse skeletal muscle cDNA library was screened
with a mouse embryonic carcinoma EST clone (GenBank sequence number
AA068950) which has extensive homology to the human H186 FLAP clone
(Fig. 4C). Phage clones with
inserts ranging from 0.9 to 3 kb were identified. The 2.7-kb clone
(called FLAP-1) contains an open reading frame which encodes for a
protein of 628 amino acids (Fig. 4A). The shorter clone (FLAP-1a, 1.6 kb) overlaps with the first clone and extends the 5'-untranslated sequence by 11 base pairs (Fig. 4C). The
5'-untranslated sequence of the mouse cDNA and mouse embryonic
carcinoma EST clones are identical to each other, but not to human H186
FLAP. In contrast, the coding sequences of the mouse skeletal muscle
and human HeLa H186 FLAP clones are highly homologous (95% identity,
100% similarity at the amino acid level), except for the existence of
a 148-amino acid insert (residues 52-199) and a 24-amino acid insert
(residues 253-276) in the former. Since these inserts are found in two
independently isolated muscle cDNA clones, they are unlikely to
result from cloning artifacts. Furthermore, parts of the first insert
and the entire second insert are found in another mouse embryonic carcinoma EST clone (sequence AA106954) and in a human skeletal muscle
EST clone (sequence AA180174), respectively. The existence of several
cDNA inserts and multiple mRNA strongly indicate that there are
tissue and/or species-specific alternative splice variants.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Sequence analyses of mouse skeletal muscle
FLAP-1. A, predicted amino acid sequence. The predicted
coiled coil regions are shown in bold. Inserts found in the
mouse skeletal muscle cDNA clones but not in human H186 FLAP are
underlined. The nucleotide sequence is deposited in GenBank
(accession number AF045573). B, predicted location of the
coiled coil regions, with the PAIRCOIL program (43). A score of above
0.5 indicates high probability of coiled coil structure. C,
alignment of mouse skeletal muscle FLAP-1 cDNA clones with
H186-FLAP and EST clones. FLAP-1 and FLAP-1a were isolated from a mouse
skeletal muscle cDNA library. H186-FLAP is the human HeLa
LRR-interactive plasmid identified by two-hybrid screens. Sequences
AA06895 and AA106954 are derived from mouse embryonic carcinoma EST
clones. Sequence AA180174 is derived from a human skeletal muscle EST
clone. Solid bars, sequenced regions. *, initiation codon;
×, termination codon. Lines linking solid bars denote
deleted regions compared with FLAP-1. Shaded bar,
5'-untranslated region of the human H186 FLAP which diverges from the
mouse sequences.
|
|
FLAP-1 has a predicted molecular mass of 71 kDa. The translated
sequence of FLAP-1 is not represented in the protein data base.
Secondary structure analyses predict that it is very rich in -helix
at its COOH-terminal half. The Heidelberg PHD algorithm (42) predicts
that the insert at the NH2-terminal region (residues 52-199) has 13.5% -helix, 13.5% -sheet, and 73% random coil, while the remainder of the molecule has 79% -helix, 2.7%
-sheet, 18.3% random coil. The -helices in the middle region and
the COOH-terminal end of FLAP-1 show weak homology to the coiled coils of skeletal muscle myosin heavy chain (28% identity, 55% similarity in a 74-amino acid stretch). The PAIRCOIL algorithm (43) predicts that
these regions in FLAP-1 form coiled coils (Fig. 4B) (Table II). There are four discontinuities in
the coiled coils. The first two are due to the omission of three or
four residues in the heptad repeats. Analyses of other coiled coil
proteins show that these discontinuities, called stutters and stammers,
respectively, have negative and positive effects on the extent of
supercoiling (44). The remaining discontinuities are due to
interruption by sequences with low coiled coil potentials. The
existence of coiled coils is confirmed using the MULTICOIL algorithm
(45) (Table II). The program also predicts that a large fraction
of the coiled coils have a high tendency to dimerize. The FLAP-1
sequence has no obvious signal peptide or membrane spanning segments,
and is therefore unlikely to be a secreted or transmembrane protein. There are multiple phosphorylation and myristylation consensus sites,
suggesting that FLAP may be modified post-translationally.
Evidence for the Binding of Full-length FLAP-1 to FLI--
FLAP-1
fused to the LexA DNA-binding domain interacted with FLI-LRR in the
two-hybrid assay to an extent comparable to that of H186 FLAP (Fig.
5) (Table II). In contrast, FLAP-1 cloned
in the antisense orientation was not positive.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Interaction of FLAP-1 with FLI LRR in the
two-hybrid system. The LexA based yeast two-hybrid system was
used. DBD, DNA-binding domain; AD, activation
domain. FLAP-1(R), cloned into the vector in the reverse (antisense)
orientation and lamin are used as negative controls. Four randomly
selected clones from each transformation were shown.
|
|
Binding was also demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitation from cells
transfected with both FLAP-1 and LRR-HA (Fig. 2, A and B). Anti-HA immunoprecipitated LRR-HA and at least two
additional bands with molecular mass of approximately 85 kDa from cells
co-transfected with both constructs (Fig. 2A, left panel, lane
2). The 85-kDa bands were not immunoprecipitated in the absence of
LRR-HA (Fig. 2A, lane 1), confirming that they were captured
as a result of binding to LRR-HA. These bands are larger than the
71-kDa size predicted from the FLAP-1 amino acid sequence, and can be
resolved into even more bands on a 7.5% gel (see Fig. 2C).
The reasons for the anomalous migration and the existence of multiple
FLAP-1 bands are not known, but are consistent with FLAP-1
post-translational modifications. This possibility will be explored in
future studies.
To establish unequivocally that the bands which bound LRR-HA were
FLAP-1, we generated a polyclonal antibody against recombinant H186
FLAP. It recognized a 85-kDa band(s) in the lysates of cells transfected with FLAP-1 (Fig. 2B, right panel, lanes 1 and 2), but not with cells transfected with LRR-HA
(lane 3). Thus this antibody specifically recognized FLAP.
The anti-FLAP antibody recognized the same cluster of bands which
co-immunoprecipitated with LRR-HA (Fig. 2B, left panel, lane
2), establishing that FLAP bound LRR-HA. The secondary antibody
used to detect anti-FLAP also recognized the IgG light chain, and to a
lesser extent, the IgG heavy chain (HC). Western blotting with anti-HA
confirmed that the 68-kDa band in the immunoprecipitates was LRR-HA
(Fig. 2B, left panel, lanes 2 and 3). This band
comigrated with the IgG HC, and the secondary antibody used to detect
anti-HA in the Western blot also recognizes the HC, accounting for the
presence of a faint band in the immunoprecipitates even in the absence of LRR-HA (Fig. 2B, left panel, lane 1).
FLAP-1 also bound full-length FLI. This was established by using both
anti-HA and anti-FLAP to pull down the FLAP·FLI-HA complexes. Transfection of FLAP-1 resulted in the overexpression of a cluster of
bands of approximately 85 kDa which were detected with anti-FLAP (Fig.
2C, right panel, lane 4). The FLAP-1 bands were much better separated here compared with Fig. 2A because a non-gradient
7.5% gel was used instead of a 5-15% gradient gel.
Immunoprecipitating FLI-HA with anti-HA brought down FLI-HA (Fig.
2C, left panel, lanes 1 and 2). This antibody did
not immunoprecipitate the FLAP-1 bands in cells transfected with FLAP-1
alone (lane 3), but immunoprecipitated FLAP-1 in cells
co-transfected with FLAP-1 and FLI-HA (lane 2). We
consistently observed an enrichment of the fastest migrating FLAP-1
band in the anti-HA immunoprecipitates. We cannot explain why this is
the case, and suspect that the fast migrating FLAP-1 may bind
preferentially to FLI. Thus, FLAP-1 binding to FLI may be regulated
post-translationally. This possibility will be investigated in future
experiments. There is no enrichment of a particular FLAP-1 species in
the anti-FLAP immunoprecipitate (lane 4), presumably because
the anti-FLAP does not discriminate between the different FLAP-1. Our
results show that the antibody to either FLI or FLAP-1 was able to
bring down its putative partner in the complex, providing definitive
evidence for the high affinity interaction of FLAP-1 and FLI in
vivo.
 |
DISCUSSION |
FLI is unique among the members of the LRR and gelsolin
superfamilies. Although many LRR proteins contain additional modules implicated in molecular recognition (17), such as epidermal growth
factor repeats, immunoglobulin domains, G-protein coupled receptors,
and leucine zippers, FLI is the first actin-binding LRR protein to be
identified. FLI is also unusual in the gelsolin family, because it is
the first example of the bridging of a motif with no known actin
binding function to gelsolin proper. Villin is the only other gelsolin
family protein with an extension identified thus far, but its extension
binds actin and is much shorter (46). The novel juxtaposition of the
LRR tandem repeats with the gelsolin 6-fold repeats suggests that FLI
may link the actin cytoskeleton to other structures in the cell in a
far more direct manner than has been envisioned for the more
traditional gelsolin-like proteins. The membrane signaling systems are
favored candidates for interaction with FLI, because many LRR proteins
and actin regulatory proteins are involved in signal transduction and
adhesion, and the FLI LRR repeats best fit the consensus found in
several Ras interactive proteins (17, 25).
In this paper, we demonstrate that FLI binds actin, establishing it as
a bona fide member of the gelsolin family. This is expected because of
its homology to gelsolin, and is consistent with the effects of fliI
mutations on actin organization in Drosophila embryos and
flight muscles. Nevertheless, interaction with actin cannot be assumed
a priori because FLI is far more divergent than the other
traditional members of the gelsolin family. Although a comparison of
FLI and gelsolin suggests that residues essential for the structural
integrity the S1 core are preserved in FLI S1 (7, 47), some of the
other FLI segments have unique insertions (5, 12). FLI binding to actin
was demonstrated by using in vitro synthesized FLI. This
assay has been used to identify proteins which bind monomeric actin
with high affinity. Most gelsolin family members bind actin-Sepharose
(48), although CapG does not (11). Therefore, FLI is likely to be bind
actin with high affinity. It will be important to determine whether FLI
caps and severs actin filaments like other gelsolin family proteins.
These issues cannot be addressed at present because we cannot isolate
soluble recombinant FLI.2
Preliminary results suggest that endogenous FLI is a low abundance protein and we have not purified enough to allow functional
characterizations.
Despite the resemblance of the FLI LRR to the LRR of known Ras
effectors such as Cyr1 and Rsp-1, we were unable to demonstrate FLI LRR
binding to Ras. FLI LRR also did not bind several Ras downstream
effectors, and other Ras-related small G proteins. These proteins are,
therefore, unlikely to be high affinity FLI interactive partners,
although we cannot rule out low affinity binding or linkage through
other interactive proteins. The negative result is not surprising,
because the LRR motif is probably used to present a platform for
interaction with other proteins, while binding specificity is dictated
by the nonconsensus amino acids in the repeats. Furthermore, FLI does
not have the same numbers of LRR repeats as Cyr1 and Rsp1 (16, 24, and
7 repeats, respectively) and it is flanked by unique sequences as
well.
We identified a novel FLI LRR interactive partner, FLAP, by two-hybrid
screens, and confirmed its specific binding to FLI by
immunoprecipitation. Northern blotting and cDNA analyses indicate that there are multiple FLAP messages, which are most likely generated through differential splicing. Skeletal and cardiac muscles have high
level expression of the 3.3-kb FLAP mRNA and the FLI mRNA as
well, lending further support to the possibility that FLAP and FLI are
in vivo partners. FLAP is predicted to form coiled coils at
its middle and COOH-terminal regions. -Helical coiled coils are the
most common assembly motif in proteins and provide the potential for
homotypic or heterotypic interactions (44, 49). The FLAP coiled coils
are predicted to have a high tendency for dimerization, in a manner
similar to that of well characterized cytoskeletal proteins like
tropomyosins, myosins, and kinesins. However, FLI has fewer heptads and
may not assemble into a fibrous structure. On the other hand, short
coiled coils have been identified in many other proteins and they
participate in important heterotypic interactions. These include the
cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase, the  dimer of
heterotrimeric G proteins, and the basic leucine zippers of certain
transcription factors (reviewed in Ref. 49).
In analogy, we hypothesize that the FLAP coiled coils bind FLI LRR.
While this has not been established directly, it is supported by the
finding that both H186 FLAP and FLAP-1 bind LRR, even though the former
has a large deletion in the NH2-terminal region upstream of
the coiled coil domain. In this context, it should be noted that there
is precedent for LRR protein interaction with -helical structures.
The best example is the binding of decorin, a small proteoglycan with
eleven 24-amino acid LRR repeats, to the triple helix of collagen (50).
How decorin affects collagen fibrillogenesis is predicted by molecular
modeling based on the crystal structure of the RNase inhibitor (51,
52). The entire RNase inhibitor molecule is composed of 15 tandem
alternating 28- and 29-residue LRR repeats with alternating short
-strands and -helices parallel to a common axis. This symmetrical
arrangement folds into an open, nonglobular protein with a horseshoe
shape, which is lined by -strands in its inner surface and
-helices on its outer surface. RNase inhibitor inhibits RNase, and
the crystal structure of the complex shows that RNase binds to a broad
region in the concave face (52). Decorin, which has fewer and shorter
repeats than RNase inhibitor, is predicted to fold into an arch shape
with an internal cavity just large enough to accommodate a single
triple helical collagen molecule (50). Decorin therefore acts a spacer to prevent lateral fusion of collagen fibrils and to guide collagen fibril assembly (50). In analogy, the FLAP coiled coil may insert into
the concave FLI LRR binding surface.
The identification of FLI as an actin-binding protein and the discovery
of a novel coiled coil ligand for the its LRR domain suggests that FLI
is a linkage protein between the cytoskeleton and an as yet
unidentified structure in the cell. Based on the intimate connections
between the cytoskeleton and the plasma membrane, we favor the
possibility that FLAP is part of the membrane cytoskeleton.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank our colleagues for providing various
plasmids (acknowledged individually in text), and particularly Michael
White for help with the yeast two-hybrid system. We also thank Ha Do for expert technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant R01 GM51112 and a Welch Foundation grant (to H. L. Y.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF045573.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology,
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235. Tel.: 214-648-7967; Fax: 214-648-8685; E-mail: yin01{at}utsw.swmed.edu.
1
The abbreviations used are: fliI,
Drosophila flightless-I gene; fliI, Drosphila
flightles-I protein; FLI, human flightless-I protein; LRR, leucine-rich
repeat, FLAP, FLI LRR associated protein; HC, IgG heavy chain; GST,
glutathione S-transferase; kb, kilobase pair(s).
2
Y.-T. Liu and H. L. Yin, unpublished
results.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Liu, Y. T.,
Rozelle, A.,
and Yin, H. L.
(1997)
in
G Proteins, Cytoskeleton, and Cancer (Aktories, K., Kohama, K., and Maruta, H., eds), Springer-Verlag & Lander Bio. Science, Austin, TX, in press
-
Sun, H.-Q.,
Kwiatkowska, K.,
Wooten, D. C.,
and Yin, H. L.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
147-156[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lin, K.,
Wenegieme, E. F.,
Lu, P.,
Chen, C.,
and Yin, H. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20443-20450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sun, H.,
Lin, K.,
and Yin, H. L.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
138,
811-820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kwiatkowski, D. P.,
Stossel, T. P.,
Orkin, S. H.,
Mole, J. E.,
Colten, H. R.,
and Yin, H. L.
(1986)
Nature
323,
455-458[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Burtnick, L. D.,
Koepf, E. K.,
Grimes, J.,
Jones, E. Y.,
Stuart, D. I.,
McLaughlin, P. J.,
and Robinson, R. C.
(1997)
Cell
90,
661-670[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
McLaughlin, P. J.,
Gooch, J. T.,
Mannherz, H.-G.,
and Weeds, A. G. A.
(1993)
Nature
364,
685-692[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schnuchel, A.,
Wiltscheck, R.,
Eichinger, L.,
Schleicher, M.,
and Holak, T. A.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
247,
21-27[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Markus, M. A.,
Nakayama, T.,
Matsudaira, P.,
and Wagner, G.
(1994)
Protein Sci.
3,
70-81[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Onoda, K.,
Yu, F.-X.,
and Yin, H. L.
(1993)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
26,
227-238[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yu, F.-X.,
Johnston, P. A.,
Sudhof, T. C.,
and Yin, H. L.
(1990)
Science
250,
1413-1415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Campbell, H. D.,
Schimansky, T.,
Claudianos, C.,
Ozsarac, N.,
Kasprzak, A. B.,
Cotsell, J. N.,
Young, I. G.,
de Couet, H. G.,
and Miklos, G. L. G.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
11386-11390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Miklos, G.,
and De Couet, G.
(1990)
J. Neurogenet.
6,
133-151[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Straub, K. L.,
Stella, M. C.,
and Leptin, M.
(1996)
J. Cell Sci.
109,
263-270[Abstract]
-
Chen, K.-S.,
Gunaratne, P. H.,
Hoheisel, J. D.,
Young, I. G.,
Gabor Miklos, G. L.,
Greenberg, F.,
Shaffer, L. G.,
Campbell, H. D.,
and Lupski, J. R.
(1995)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
56,
175-182[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Campbell, H. D.,
Fountain, S.,
Young, I. G.,
Claudianos, C.,
Hoheisel, J. D.,
Chen, K.,
and Lupski, J. R.
(1997)
Genomics
42,
46-54[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Buchanan, S. G.,
and Gay, N. J.
(1996)
Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.
65,
1-44[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tayar, E. N.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
125,
65-70[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Scott, J. E.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
8795-8799[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dinischiotu, A.,
Beullens, M.,
Stalmans, W.,
and Bollen, M.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
402,
141-144[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Windisch, J.,
Marksteiner, R.,
Lang, M.,
and Schneider, R.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
11256-11263[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Suzuki, N.,
Choe, H. R.,
Nishida, Y.,
Yamawakikatoka, S.,
Ohnishi, Y.,
Tamaoki, Y.,
and Kataoka, T.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
8711-8715[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Minato, T.,
Wang, J.,
Akasaka, K.,
Okada, T.,
Suzuki, N.,
and Kataoka, T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
20845-20851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kobe, B.,
and Deisenhofer, J.
(1995)
Nature
374,
183-186[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Claudianos, C.,
and Campbell, H. D.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Evol.
12,
405-414[Abstract]
-
Masuelli, L.,
and Cutler, M. L.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5466-5476[Abstract]
-
Cutler, M. L.,
Bassin, R. H.,
Zanoni, L.,
and Talbot, N.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
3750-3756[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hall, A.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
10,
31-54[CrossRef]
-
Hartwig, J. H.,
Bokoch, G. M.,
Carpenter, C. L.,
Janmey, P. A.,
Taylor, L. A.,
Toker, A.,
and Stossel, T. P.
(1995)
Cell
82,
643-653[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fujita, H.,
Laham, L. E.,
Janmey, P. A.,
Kwiatkowski, D. J.,
Stossel, T. P.,
Banno, Y.,
Nozawa, Y.,
Mllauer, L.,
Ishizaki, A.,
and Kuzumaki, N.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
229,
615-620[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Elroy-Stein, O.,
Fuerst, T. R.,
and Moss, B.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
6126-6130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kwiatkowski, D.,
Janmey, P. A.,
Mole, J.,
and Yin, H. L.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
15232-15238[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Han, L.,
and Colicelli, J.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
1318-1323[Abstract]
-
Vojtek, A. B.,
Hollenberg, S. M.,
and Cooper, J. A.
(1993)
Cell
74,
205-214[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Durfee, T.,
Becherer, K.,
Chen, P. L.,
Yeh, S. H.,
Yang, Y.,
Kilburn, A. E.,
Lee, W. H.,
and Elledge, S. J.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
555-569[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lennon, G.,
Auffray, C.,
Polymeropoulos, M.,
and Soares, M. B.
(1996)
Genomics
33,
151-152[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Guan, K. L.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1991)
Anal. Biochem.
192,
262-267[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Andersson, S.,
Davis, D. L.,
Dahlback, H.,
Jornvall, H.,
and Russell, D. W.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
8222-8229[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
White, M. A.,
Vale, T.,
Camonis, J. H.,
Schaefer, E.,
and Wigler, M. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16439-16442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Altschul, S. F.,
Gish, W.,
Miller, W.,
Myers, E. W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
215,
403-410[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bains, W.,
Ponte, P.,
Blau, H.,
and Kedes, L.
(1984)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
4,
1449-1453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rost, B.,
and Sanders, C.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
232,
584-599[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Berger, B.,
Wilson, D. B.,
Wolf, E.,
Tonchev, T.,
Milla, M.,
and Kim, P. S.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
8259-8263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lupas, A.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
7,
388-393[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wolf, E.,
Kim, P. S.,
and Berger, B.
(1997)
Protein Sci.
6,
1179-1189[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pringault, E.,
Arpin, M.,
Garcia, A.,
Finidori, J.,
and Louvard, D.
(1986)
EMBO J.
5,
3119-3124[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
de Couet, H. G.,
Fong, K. S. K.,
Weeds, A. G.,
McLaughlin, P. J.,
and Miklos, G. L. G.
(1995)
Genetics
141,
1049-1059[Abstract]
-
Kwiatkowski, D.,
Janmey, P. A.,
and Yin, H. L.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
108,
1717-1726[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kohn, W. D.,
Mant, C. T.,
and Hodges, R. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
2583-2586[Free Full Text]
-
Iozzo, R. V.
(1997)
Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.
32,
141-174[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kobe, B.,
and Deisenhofer, J.
(1993)
Nature
366,
751-756[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kobe, B.,
and Deisenhofer, J.
(1994)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19,
415-421[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Li, H. L. Yin, and J. Yuan
Flightless-I regulates proinflammatory caspases by selectively modulating intracellular localization and caspase activity
J. Cell Biol.,
April 21, 2008;
181(2):
321 - 333.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Deng, D. Xia, B. Fang, and H. Zhang
The Flightless I Homolog, fli-1, Regulates Anterior/Posterior Polarity, Asymmetric Cell Division and Ovulation During Caenorhabditis elegans Development
Genetics,
October 1, 2007;
177(2):
847 - 860.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-H. Lee and M. R. Stallcup
Interplay of Fli-I and FLAP1 for regulation of {beta}-catenin dependent transcription
Nucleic Acids Res.,
October 6, 2006;
(2006)
gkl652v3.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Wang, T.-H. Chuang, T. Ronni, S. Gu, Y.-C. Du, H. Cai, H.-Q. Sun, H. L. Yin, and X. Chen
Flightless I Homolog Negatively Modulates the TLR Pathway
J. Immunol.,
February 1, 2006;
176(3):
1355 - 1362.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kidd, R. Abu-Shumays, A. Katzen, J. C. Sisson, G. Jimenez, S. Pinchin, W. Sullivan, and D. Ish-Horowicz
The {epsilon}-Subunit of Mitochondrial ATP Synthase Is Required for Normal Spindle Orientation During the Drosophila Embryonic Divisions
Genetics,
June 1, 2005;
170(2):
697 - 708.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. R. Forsthoefel, K. Cutler, M. D. Port, T. Yamamoto, and D. M. Vernon
PIRLs: A Novel Class of Plant Intracellular Leucine-rich Repeat Proteins
Plant Cell Physiol.,
June 1, 2005;
46(6):
913 - 922.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-H. Lee, H. D. Campbell, and M. R. Stallcup
Developmentally Essential Protein Flightless I Is a Nuclear Receptor Coactivator with Actin Binding Activity
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
March 1, 2004;
24(5):
2103 - 2117.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. D. Campbell, S. Fountain, I. S. McLennan, L. A. Berven, M. F. Crouch, D. A. Davy, J. A. Hooper, K. Waterford, K.-S. Chen, J. R. Lupski, et al.
Fliih, a Gelsolin-Related Cytoskeletal Regulator Essential for Early Mammalian Embryonic Development
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
May 15, 2002;
22(10):
3518 - 3526.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Davy, H. Campbell, S Fountain, D de Jong, and M. Crouch
The flightless I protein colocalizes with actin- and microtubule-based structures in motile Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts: evidence for the involvement of PI 3-kinase and Ras-related small GTPases
J. Cell Sci.,
January 2, 2001;
114(3):
549 - 562.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Q. Sun, M. Yamamoto, M. Mejillano, and H. L. Yin
Gelsolin, a Multifunctional Actin Regulatory Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 19, 1999;
274(47):
33179 - 33182.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|