|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 14, 8308-8316, April 3, 1998
Evolution of an Escherichia coli Protein with
Increased Resistance to Oxidative Stress*
Zhe
Lu §,
Elisa
Cabiscol§¶,
Nuria
Obradors ,
Jordi
Tamarit¶,
Joaquim
Ros¶,
Juan
Aguilar , and
E.
C. C.
Lin **
From the Department of Microbiology and Molecular
Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, the
¶ Departament de Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques,
Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain, and
the Departament de Bioquímica, Facultat de Farmacia,
Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
 |
ABSTRACT |
L-1,2-Propanediol:NAD+
1-oxidoreductase of Escherichia coli is encoded by the
fucO gene, a member of the regulon specifying dissimilation
of L-fucose. The enzyme normally functions during fermentative growth to regenerate NAD from NADH by reducing the metabolic intermediate L-lactaldehyde to propanediol which
is excreted. During aerobic growth L-lactaldehyde is
converted to L-lactate and thence to the central metabolite
pyruvate. The wasteful excretion of propanediol is minimized by
oxidative inactivation of the oxidoreductase, an
Fe2+-dependent enzyme which is subject to
metal-catalyzed oxidation (MCO). Mutants acquiring the ability to grow
aerobically on propanediol as sole carbon and energy source can be
readily selected. These mutants express the fucO gene
constitutively, as a result of an IS5 insertion in the
promoter region. In this study we show that continued selection for
aerobic growth on propanediol resulted in mutations in the
oxidoreductase conferring increased resistance to MCO. In two
independent mutants, the resistance of the protein was respectively
conferred by an Ile7 Leu and a Leu8 Val
substitution near the NAD-binding consensus amino acid sequence. A
site-directed mutant protein with both substitutions showed an MCO
resistance greater than either mutant protein with a single amino acid
change.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Oxidative damage to macromolecules is an inescapable price for the
evolution of aerobic metabolism. The co-evolution of protective agents,
both catalytic (enzymes such as superoxide dismutases and catalases)
and stoichiometric (antioxidants such as glutathione and
-tocopherol), can at best reduce the magnitude of damage. Evolution
of active mechanisms of repair apparently is limited only for DNA,
probably because of chemical feasibility and strong selective pressure.
For other kinds of damaged macromolecules clearing by turnover seems to
be the only option. A possible exception is the repair of oxidized
methionine residues on the surface of proteins by a specific sulfoxide
reductase (1). The replacement strategy seems satisfactory for the
perpetuation of unicellular organisms, although it is not always
available or adequate for multicellular organisms. For instance,
accumulation of oxidatively damaged proteins is often associated with
senescence and various disease states (2-4).
A significant fraction of protein damages is thought to result from the
metal-catalyzed oxidation system
(MCO)1 mediated by reactive
species such as hydrogen peroxide, as outlined in Reactions 1 (2, 4,
5).
H2O2 is formed routinely by
monooxygenation reactions and occasionally by autoxidation of
flavo-dehydrogenases, when an element in the electron transport chain
is rate-limiting. Cationic iron is maintained in the ferrous state by
reducing compounds, such as NADH or NADPH. The presence of
H2O2 and Fe2+ generates, by the
Fenton reaction, a highly reactive HO· (hydroxyl radical) which
can covalently attack an amino acid residue.
When the iron is bound to a protein, the
H2O2-dependent redox cycling of
Fe2+ to Fe3+ is thought to proceed in a
"cage," thus allowing the hydroxyl radical to extract an H atom
from a local amino acid residue, before diffusing into the surrounding
medium (6-9). Such a model would account for the limited number of
amino acid residues that are susceptible to the damage, with each
protein exhibiting a distinctive target signature of residues. The
model is also supported by the evidence of substrate protection against
oxidative damage (6, 8, 10). Although Arg, Cys, His, Lys, Met, and Pro residues are most susceptible to metal-catalyzed destruction, only the
oxidation of Arg, Pro, His, and Lys has been reported to result in the
formation of a carbonyl derivative which provides a means for
monitoring the protein oxidation process (2, 11).
L-1,2-Propanediol:NAD+ 1-oxidoreductase of
Escherichia coli is an
Fe2+-dependent enzyme that normally functions
as a reductase in a fermentation pathway for the dissimilation of
L-fucose or L-rhamnose (12). This enzyme,
inducible by either of the methyl pentoses, is inactivated during
aerobic growth (9, 13, 14). In this study we tried to find out whether
repeated selection of mutants that utilize this enzyme exclusively as a
dehydrogenase for aerobic growth, on propanediol as the sole carbon and
energy source, would result in an altered protein resistant to
oxidative inactivation.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Sequencing the fucO Gene of Strains ECL1, ECL3, ECL56, ECL421,
ECL430, and ECL459--
The oligonucleotide primers
5'-CGGATCCGGCATTATCACATCAG and 5'-CGAATTCAAGAGTAATTTCGTAAAGC flanking
the coding region of fucO (15, 16) were synthesized and used
to amplify by polymerase chain reaction the gene of each strain. A
sample of each amplified product was digested with restriction enzymes
to give five overlapping fragments that were then subcloned into
pBluescript vectors (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Each of these fragments
was sequenced for both strands with the T3 and T7 primers (Stratagene,
La Jolla, CA) by the dideoxy method.
Selecting an E. coli Strain with Complete Deletion of the Fuc
Sequence--
Cells with deletions in the fuc locus were
selected from strain ECL330 bearing a fuc::Mu
d1-ampr insertion by growth at a nonpermissive temperature
(42 °C) that allows the growth of only Mu dl cells.
Clones with a Mu dl Amps Fuc
phenotype were identified by growth at 42 °C on MacConkey/fucose medium and then purified by growing at 37 °C on the same medium. The
deletion ranges in these cells were screened by Southern blots probed
with a set of fuc fragments spanning the entire region of
the fuc regulon (17). A strain completely deleted in the fuc regulon was thus identified and designated as
ECL733.
Cells of the fuc strain ECL733 were used as hosts for
introducing by vectors single copies of the fuc regulon,
each bearing a distinctive fucO allele. Detailed procedures
are described below.
Generating Mutant Alleles of fucO--
The
fucOIle-7 Leu and
fucOLeu-8 Val mutations were regenerated
by site-directed mutagenesis (18) of the wild-type sequence. A
fucO allele with the above two mutations combined,
fucOIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val, was created in
parallel. A 5-kb SalIo-BamHI fragment
cut from pfuc16 (19) containing the wild-type fucO allele
was subcloned into an M13 mp18 vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), and
the DNA was used to transfect CJ236 cells (Bio-Rad). Single-stranded
M13 DNA was then prepared from the cells, hybridized to the
oligonucleotide primers containing the desired point mutations (ordered
from Oligos Etc., Inc., Guilford, CT), and used as template for
synthesizing the second DNA strand. The duplex products were used to
transfect XL1 cells (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). A plaque from each
transfection was purified, and a fucO fragment in the phage
DNA was sequenced to confirm the nucleotide substitution(s). The phage
DNA containing the mutated fucO alleles was respectively designated FM5/OIle-7 Leu,
FM5/OLeu-8 Val, and
FM5/OIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val.
Cloning the Entire Wild-type Fuc Regulon into a Shuffling
Vector--
As shown in Fig. 1, a
modified pBluescript plasmid was used as an intermediary shuffling
vector for carrying fuc sequences onto vector. The
modification was made by inserting a camr gene
cut from a pBC KS+ plasmid (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) into
the pBluescript polylinker region, to place the cloned fuc
sequence close to a selectable marker for subsequent insertion into the
chromosome via vectors (see below). The resulting plasmid was
designated pBB. The wild-type fuc regulon (about 9 kb) was
cloned into pBB in a two-step procedure as follows: step 1, an
approximately 8-kb fuc fragment
PvuII-SalI1 was cut from pfuc1
containing the entire fuc regulon (19) and inserted into
pBB; and step 2, the remaining 1-kb fuc fragment Sa1I1-Sa1I2 was appended to the insertion by
substituting the EcoRI-SalI1 fragment
in the first insertion with the
EcoRI-SalI2 fragment cut from pfuc1.
The resulting plasmid was designated pFB1. For the propagation of
various plasmids, XL1 cells were used.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Cloning of the fuc+
regulon into the shuffling vector. V, vector fragment;
I, insert fragment. Arrows indicate the digestion
sites used in generating the fragments for ligations. See
"Experimental Procedures."
|
|
Cloning Fuc Regulons with the Mutated fucO Alleles into the
Shuffling Vector--
The mutant fuc regulons were cloned
into the shuffling vector by substituting the wild-type fucO
sequence in pFB1 with the mutated counterparts. This procedure was
carried out in eight steps, illustrated in a condensed manner in Fig.
2. Step 1: a pBC KS+ plasmid
was modified by destroying the single PvuI restriction site
with the Klenow enzyme and ligase, resulting in a second shuffling
vector pBC* (not shown). Step 2: a 7-kb fuc
fragment SalI0-EcoRI was cut from
pfuc16 and inserted into pBC*, resulting in pFC1. Step 3: a
2.2-kb fragment BamHI-BamHIlinker was
deleted from pFC1 to eliminate a PstI site in the pBC
polylinker region, resulting in pFC2 (not shown). Step 4: the 0.5-kb
fuc0 fragment PstI-PvuI in pFC2 was
cut off and substituted with a corresponding fragment bearing one of
the fucO mutations cut from FM5/OIle-7 Leu,
FM5/OLeu-8 Val, or
FM5/ OIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val, resulting
in pFC2/OIle-7 Leu,
pFC2/OLeu-8 Val, or
pFC2/OIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val (not shown).
Step 5: the PstI-PvuI fragments in
pFC2/OIle-7 Leu,
pFC2/OLeu-8 Val, and
pFC2/OIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val were
sequenced to confirm the correct substitutions. Step 6: the
BamHI-BamHIlinker fragment from pFC1
was inserted back into pFC2/OIle-7 Leu,
pFC2/OLeu-8 Val, and
pFC2/OIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val, resulting in
plasmids pFC1/OIle-7 Leu,
pFC1/OLeu-8 Val, and
pFC1/OIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val. Step 7: the
5-kb fuc fragment PstI-EcoRI in pFB1
was cut off and substituted with a corresponding fragment cut from
pFC1/OIle-7 Leu,
pFC1/ OLeu-8 Val, or
pFC1/OIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val, resulting in
pFB1/OIle-7 Leu,
pFB1/OLeu-8 Val, or
pFB1/OIle7- Leu, Leu-8 Val, plasmid bearing
full-length fuc regulon. Step 8: the
PstI-PvuI fragments in
pFB1/OIle-7 Leu,
pFB1/OLeu-8 Val, and
pFB1/OIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val were sequenced
to confirm the correct fucO mutation status.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Cloning fuc regulons with
wild-type and mutated fucO alleles into
shuffling vectors. Various fuc regulons bearing
different fucO alleles were cloned into pFB1 vectors.
Om represents OIle-7 Leu,
OLeu-8 Val, or
OIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val.
V, vector segment; I, insert fragment.
Arrows indicate the digestion sites used in generating the
fragments for ligations. See "Experimental Procedures."
|
|
Inserting Wild-type and Mutant Fuc Regulons into Host
Chromosomes via Vectors--
The plasmids pFB1,
pFB1/OIle-7 Leu,
pFB1/OLeu-8 Val, and
pFB1/OIle-7 Leu, Leu8 Val were digested
with restriction enzymes ApaI and XbaI, yielding
11-kb fragments each containing a full-length fuc regulon
and the camr gene. These fragments were then
ligated with wild-type DNA cut with the same enzymes. The ligation
mixtures were packaged with the Gigapack Gold Lambda packaging extract
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and used to infect the fuc
strain ECL733. Cells bearing the foreign sequences on the chromosome
were selected as lysogens growing on chloramphenicol and
MacConkey/fucose plates. Single copy fuc regulon insertions
were confirmed by Southern blots probed with fuc fragments
at both ends of the fuc sequence. The strains bearing the
wild-type and mutant fuc regulons at the att site are designated ECL734, ECL735, ECL736, and ECL737.
Growth Conditions and Preparation of Cell Extracts--
Cells
were grown aerobically as described previously (20) on Luria broth or
0.5% casein acid hydrolysate. Anaerobic cultures were grown as
described previously (20) in 1% casein acid hydrolysate supplemented
with 1 mM pyruvate. Where indicated, L-fucose
was added as inducer at 10 mM concentration for aerobic
growth and 20 mM for anaerobic growth. For enzyme assays,
cells were harvested at the end of the exponential phase, and cell
extracts were prepared as described previously (20) in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5. For enzyme purification, the
extracts were prepared using a 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH
7.5, containing 2.5 mM NAD.
Enzyme Purification--
Propanediol oxidoreductase was purified
from extracts of cells grown anaerobically in Luria broth plus
L-fucose by the method of Cabiscol et al. (9).
Enzyme purity was assessed by electrophoresis performed according to
Laemmli (21) using 10% acrylamide as resolving gel. Proteins were
stained with Coomassie Blue R-250.
Enzyme Activity Assays--
Propanediol oxidoreductase was
routinely assayed by its NADH-dependent glycolaldehyde
reduction to ethylene glycol (22). Glycolaldehyde, readily available
commercially, was shown to be an alternative substrate for the enzyme
(23). In experiments testing enzyme protection by NAD or propanediol,
the enzyme was assayed by NAD-dependent propanediol
dehydrogenation (20). Protein concentration was determined by the
Bradford method (24) using bovine serum albumin as standard.
Immuno-quantification of propanediol oxidoreductase protein was carried
out by Laurell rocket immunoelectrophoresis (25) according to a
calibration curve (not shown) derived by using the propanediol
oxidoreductase purified from strain ECL1. Antibodies were obtained as
described (26).
Testing Thermal Stability--
Stock solutions of purified
propanediol oxidoreductases (0.5 mg/ml) in 50 mM Tris-HCl
buffer at pH 7.5 were kept at 4 °C. At time 0, 0.5 ml of each
solution was transferred to tubes preincubated at different
temperatures, with or without supplementation with 50 mM
DL-1,2-propanediol or 1 mM NAD. Enzyme
activities were assayed at various intervals. Thermal stability of the
enzyme in crude extract (0.5-ml samples containing 8 mg/ml of total
protein) was tested under similar conditions.
Testing Oxidative Inactivation by NADH--
Purified propanediol
oxidoreductases (0.5 mg/ml) were incubated at 20 °C in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, in the presence of 0.5 mM NADH. Enzyme activities were assayed at various
intervals.
Testing Oxidative Inactivation by Ascorbate Plus
Iron--
Purified propanediol oxidoreductases (0.5 mg/ml) were
preincubated at 20 °C for 5 min with 50 mM
1,2-propanediol, followed by addition of 15 µM
FeCl3 and 30 mM ascorbate according to Levine et al. (27). Enzyme activities were assayed at various
intervals.
Immunodetection of Protein Carbonyl
Groups--
Dinitrophenylhydrazine derivatization of protein
carbonyl groups resulting from oxidation was performed according to
Levine et al. (28). Electrophoresis was performed using 10%
acrylamide as resolving gel. After electrophoresis the proteins were
transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes by semi-dry
blotting. Immuno-detection of protein-bound dinitrophenylhydrazones was
performed according to Levine et al. (27). The primary
antibody was a polyclonal rabbit preparation (Dako, V0401, Denmark).
The secondary antibody was goat anti-rabbit conjugated with alkaline
phosphatase (Tropix, Bedford, MA).
Metal Analyses--
Atomic absorption spectroscopy measurements
were conducted with a Jobin-Yvon spectrometer, JY-38. Samples were
submitted to high performance liquid chromatography gel filtration in a
Protein Pak 125 (Waters) prior to metal analysis to eliminate reagents and metals not bound to the enzyme. The eluent used was MilliQ water
(resistivity greater that 18 M ). Fractions were collected in
metal-free polypropylene tubes.
Fourth Derivative Spectra--
Absorption spectra and their
fourth derivative were taken on a Shimadzu UV-160A spectrophotometer,
using a derivative interval of 2.4 nm, a slit width of 2 nm, and a scan
rate of 80 nm/min. Purified enzymes were dissolved in 50 mM
Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5.
 |
RESULTS |
Wild-type and Propanediol-positive Strains and Comparison of Their
fucO DNA Sequences--
Propanediol oxidoreductase is encoded by the
fucO gene, a member of the fuc regulon specifying
the utilization of L-fucose. The genes of the
fuc regulon are organized in two divergent operons, fucPIK and fucAO (Fig.
3). Induction of the operons requires the activator FucR (17, 29) and its effector,
L-fuculose-1-phosphate (30). L-1,2-Propanediol,
a product of L-fucose fermentation, cannot serve
aerobically as a sole carbon and energy source, because the 3-carbon
compound fails to induce the fuc regulon expression. If
fucO is expressed constitutively at an adequate level, the cell should be able to grow on propanediol by converting it to pyruvate
via L-lactaldehyde and L-lactate (Fig. 3).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Metabolic pathway and genetic organization of
the L-fucose system. Utilization of the methylpentose
depends on L-fucose permease (encoded by fucP),
L-fucose isomerase (encoded by fucI),
L-fuculose kinase (encoded by fucP),
L-fuculose-1-phosphate aldolase (encoded by
fucA), and L-1,2-propanediol:NAD+
oxidoreductase. Under fermentative conditions, the oxidoreductase
serves to reduce L-lactaldehyde to propanediol which
appears to be excreted via a facilitator (35, 56). Under aerobic or
other respiratory conditions, L-lactaldehyde is oxidized to
L-lactate by an NAD+-dependent
oxidoreductase (41) encoded by the ald gene at min 31.2 (68-70). L-Lactate is further oxidized to pyruvate by a
flavo-dehydrogenase encoded by lctD (71, 72). Determination
of the metabolic flow of L-lactaldehyde by respiratory
growth conditions (heavy arrows) depends on transcriptional
control of ald (73, 74) and post-translational inactivation
of the fucO gene products (15, 42, 43, 71). The
fuc genes, located at min 60 of the chromosome are organized
in two divergent operons, FucAO, fucPIK, under
the positive control of fucR (17, 29). Propanediol
oxidoreductase and L-lactaldehyde dehydrogenase are also
required for the dissimilation of L-rhamnose (12, 20,
75).
|
|
Mutants as described above were actually isolated and previously
reported. Strain ECL3 was isolated from wild-type strain ECL1 after 100 generations of selection on propanediol, attaining a doubling time of
about 90 min (31). Strain ECL421 was isolated from another wild-type
clone after a similar selection for 140 doublings (32). In both
mutants, an IS5 insertion occurred at precisely the same location in
the region between the two diverging operons, causing constitutive
activation of fucAO and noninducibility of fucPIK
(15, 33).2
Since strains ECL3 and ECL421 were isolated after prolonged selection
on propanediol, mutations in the coding region of fucO conferring resistance to oxidative damage might also have taken place.
Indeed, it was found that the ECL3 enzyme exhibited a decreased thermal
stability (34). To determine the exact nature of the mutations and
their phenotypic consequences, the fucO alleles of the
wild-type and the two mutant strains were amplified by polymerase chain
reaction for gene cloning and sequencing. For comparison, the
fucO alleles of three other derivative strains were included
in the procedure as follows: ECL430, selected from ECL3 for improved
propanediol-scavenging power (35); ECL56, a Fuc+ revertant
of ECL3 generated by an unlinked mutation (33, 36); and ECL459, the
corresponding Fuc+ revertant of ECL421 (15). A single
nucleotide substitution, an A to C change converting the N-terminal
Ile7 to Leu7, was found in the fucO
of strains ECL3, ECL56, and ECL430. Another single nucleotide
substitution, a C to G change converting the N-terminal
Leu8 to Val8, was found in the fucO
of strains ECL421 and ECL459 (data not shown).
Reconstruction of the fucO Mutations in an Otherwise Wild-type
Background--
To find out whether the two different single
fucO mutations conferred resistance of the enzyme to aerobic
inactivation, we tested plasmid-borne wild-type and mutant
fucO alleles in a standard wild-type background. Preliminary
activity assays of the oxidoreductase were not satisfactorily
reproducible. The difficulty seems to be attributable to variations in
the plasmid copy number.
To improve the reproducibility of enzyme activity assays, we decided to
use strain ECL733 with a complete deletion of the fuc
regulon to host a -borne fuc regulon with one of the
fucO alleles. First, each of the two fucO
mutations was re-created by site-directed mutagenesis in a wild-type
fuc sequence to ensure that the mutation detected was
sufficient to account for any observable phenotypic difference. In
addition, a double mutation, Ile7 Leu and
Leu8 Val, was created in parallel to discover whether
there is an additive effect of the single mutations. A complete
fuc regulon was then engineered to bear the wild-type
fucO or one of the re-created mutant fucO
alleles, inserted into DNA, and packaged in vitro to
infect the fuc strain ECL733. The purified lysogens
were used for further study.
Expression of fucO Genes--
The lysogens ECL734
(fucO+), ECL735
(fucOIle-7 Leu), ECL736
(fucOLeu-8 Val), and ECL737
(fucOIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val) and the
wild-type nonlysogen, ECL1, were grown aerobically or anaerobically on
casein acid hydrolysate in the presence of L-fucose as
inducer of the fuc regulon. Extracts from each culture were assayed for propanediol oxidoreductase activity
(Table I). The specific activities of
propanediol oxidoreductase (units/mg enzyme protein) in extracts of
anaerobically grown cells were all about the same, irrespective of the
nature of the fuc allele. In contrast, the specific activity
of the enzyme in extracts of aerobically grown cells was dependent on
the fucO allele: FucO+ < FucOIle-7 Leu < FucOLeu-8 Val < FucOIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val. It should be mentioned that
if the inducer was not added, there was no detectable oxidoreductase
activity in extracts prepared from the different strains, even when the
cells were grown anaerobically (not shown), indicating that
transcriptions were from the same fuc promoter. The data
taken together indicate that a single amino acid substitution was
sufficient to confer significant resistance of the protein to oxidative
damage and that the double amino acid substitutions have an additive
protective effect. On the other hand, the amino acid substitutions do
not appear to have a significant effect on the catalytic property of
the enzymes, at least when assayed by the reduction of the substrate
analog glycolaldehyde (Table II).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Propanediol oxidoreductase activities of wild-type and fucO mutant
strains grown aerobically and anaerobically
|
|
Thermal Inactivation of Wild-type and Mutant Propanediol
Oxidoreductase Enzymes--
Additional evidence of structural
alteration of the mutant propanediol oxidoreductase was their decreased
thermal stability. When purified wild-type and mutant propanediol
oxidoreductases were incubated at two different temperatures at pH 7, the activity decay rate of the enzymes followed the same order: at
50 °C, FucO+ (t1/2 = 6.6 min),
FucOIle-7 Leu (t1/2 = 2.3 min),
FucOLeu-8 Val (t1/2 = 1.5 min), and
FucOIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val (t1/2 = 0.9 min) (Fig. 4A); at
20 °C, FucO+ (t1/2 = 840 min),
FucOIle-7 Leu (t1/2 = 340 min),
FucOLeu-8 Val (t1/2 = 140 min),
and FucOIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val (t1/2 = 48 min) (Fig. 4B). It is, however, not clear from these experiments whether the loss of activity resulted from irreversible denaturation of the protein or the loss of the cofactor
Fe2+.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Thermal inactivation of mutant and wild-type
propanediol oxidoreductases. Purified FucO+) ( ),
FucOIle-7 Leu ( ), FucOLeu-8 Val) ( ),
and FucOIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val) ( ) were tested for
stability under various conditions. A, 50 °C;
B, 20 °C; C, 20 °C in the presence of 50 mM DL-1,2-propanediol; and D,
20 °C in the presence of 1 mM NAD. At the indicated
times samples were withdrawn for enzyme activity assay by the rate of
glycolaldehyde-dependent oxidation of NADH (A
and B) or by the rate of
1,2-propanediol-dependent reduction of NAD (C
and D). In each case, the specific activity of the enzyme at
0 time was expressed as 100%.
|
|
It is well known that the presence of the coenzyme or a substrate can
stabilize enzymes from thermal inactivation. This seems to apply
to the three mutant enzymes in the presence of 1 mM NAD (Fig. 4C) or 50 mM
DL-1,2-propanediol (Fig. 4D).
Oxidative Inactivation of Purified Propanediol Oxidoreductase
Enzymes by NADH--
Since propanediol oxidoreductase is an iron
enzyme, the presence of both molecular oxygen and NADH is expected to
result in an intrinsically catalyzed Fenton reaction that damages the
protein. Purified wild-type and mutant enzymes were incubated for 120 min in the presence of 0.5 mM NADH at 20 °C under air.
As shown in Fig. 5A,
FucO+ was rapidly inactivated (t1/2 = 15 min). In contrast, the mutant proteins were substantially more stable:
FucOIle-7 Leu (t1/2 = 28 min),
FucOLeu-8 Val (t1/2 = 54 min), and
FucOIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val (t1/2 = 110 min). The possibility that differences in sensitivity of the
enzymes are attributable to the disparities in the amount of iron bound
was excluded by the finding that the metal contents of the four
different purified enzymes were equal, as determined by atomic
absorption spectroscopy. The iron-dependent Fenton reaction as the cause of the observed enzyme inactivation was suggested by the
NADH dependence of oxidative protein damage, as revealed by
immunochemical assays for the carbonyl groups generated (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Oxidative inactivation of purified wild-type
and mutant propanediol oxidoreductases. A, Fuc+
( ), FucOIle-7 Leu ( ), FucOLeu-8 Val
( ), and FucOIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val ( ) were
incubated at 20 °C with 0.5 mM NADH. At the indicated
times samples were withdrawn for assay of enzyme activity which was
expressed as percent of the 0 time value. B, Western blot of
oxidized enzymes. After 40 min of incubation with NADH, samples were
taken and processed for immunodetection of protein carbonyl groups
produced during oxidation. Samples of unoxidized control proteins were
taken before NADH was added for incubation. C, control
protein; Ox, NADH-treated protein.
|
|
Oxidative Inactivation of Purified Propanediol Oxidoreductase
Enzymes by Ascorbate and Fe3+--
Other evidence of the
susceptibility of propanediol oxidoreductase to damage by Fenton
reaction was demonstrated by incubation of the protein in the presence
of ferric chloride and ascorbate, instead of NADH, as the reductant
(28). All four enzymes were incubated at 20 °C for 120 min in the
presence of 50 mM DL-1,2-propanediol to
stabilize the proteins against simple thermal inactivation. The
relative rates of inactivation of the four enzymes were consistent with
those observed during incubation with NADH (Fig. 5A):
FucO+ (t1/2 = 70 min),
FucOIle-7 Leu (t1/2 = 110 min),
FucOLeu-8 Val (t1/2 = 260 min),
and FucOIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val (t1/2 = 430 min) (Fig. 6).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Inactivation of pure propanediol
oxidoreductase by ascorbate and iron. Purified FucO+)
( ), FucOIle-7 Leu ( ),
FucOLeu-8 Val) ( ), and
FucOIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val ( ) were oxidized at
20 °C with ascorbate and iron in the presence of 1,2-propanediol. At
the indicated times samples were taken to assay enzyme activity
which was expressed as percent of the initial activity before
incubation with ascorbate and iron was started.
|
|
Analysis of Fourth Derivative Ultraviolet Spectra of Wild-type and
Mutant Enzymes--
On the basis of crystallographic data on the
highly conserved folding motifs of NAD-dependent
oxidoreductases, it can be predicted that the amino acid substitutions
found in the mutant FucO proteins are close to the A- 2 turn of
the mononucleotide-binding motif (or Rossmann fold) where
Tyr31 is located (17, 37).
Since alterations in the chemical environments of aromatic amino acid
residues produce changes in their fourth derivative spectra (38), we
thought that the Tyr31 in FucO might serve as a reporter
for conformational changes in the NAD binding domain. The spectra
obtained from these wild-type and mutant FucO proteins were therefore
compared (Fig. 7). The peaks in the range
of 270-300 nm correspond to the absorption of tyrosine and tryptophan
in the proteins; the main peak expected of Tyr is at 282 nm, whereas
that of Trp is at 290 nm (39, 40). Although the data showed no apparent
variation for the Trp spectra, clear differences in the Tyr peak can be
discerned. In a control experiment, wild-type and mutant proteins
denatured by incubation in 6 M guanidine chloride displayed
no difference in the fourth derivative spectra (data not shown). It is
therefore tempting to suppose that Tyr31 is responsible for
the alteration of the peak.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Fourth derivative spectra representation of
the wild-type and mutant FucO proteins. The plot taken from a
Shimadzu UV 160A spectrophotometer shows the spectra of purified
propanediol oxidoreductase from strains: A, Fuc+
(0.7 mg/m); B, FucOIle-7 Leu (0.9 mg/ml);
C, FucOLeu-8 Val (0.75 mg/ml); and
D, FucOIle-7 Leu, Leu-8 Val (0.4 mg/ml).
The spectra were taken between 240 and 320 nm. Arrows
indicate the main differences observed between mutant and wild-type
proteins.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Although early work on propanediol oxidoreductase showed that
Fe2+ activates the apoenzyme (41) and that the protein
induced during aerobic growth lacked catalytic activity (42, 43), MCO
of the enzyme protein was not suspected until a hint was provided by
the work on Fe2+-catalyzed inactivation of E. coli glutamine synthetase (6, 7, 44-46). In the case of FucO, the
Fe2+ is at the catalytic center which binds the protein to
NADH for fermentative reduction of L-lactaldehyde. During
aerobic metabolism when the enzyme serves no physiological role, the
generation of H2O2 allows the Fe2+
to catalyze a Fenton reaction, and the highly reactive OH·
formed is likely to diffuse a distance of the order of its mean free
path, which is only a few times of the free radical's radius, before
hitting a target amino acid residue (i.e.
diffusion-controlled encounter). A frequent occurrence is the
destruction of the side chain of a conserved His277, 10 residues away from the proposed metal-binding site,
His263-X-X-X-His267,
causing a decrease in the apparent affinity of the protein for NAD
(13).
It is remarkable that the relatively conservative hydrophobic amino
acid substitutions, Ile7 Leu and/or Leu8
Val, near the NAD-binding sequence
Gly15-Arg-Gly-Ala-Val-Gly20 of FucO (15, 16,
47) could confer significant protective effects against MCO damage.
This resistance, however, is achieved at a price of decrease in protein
stability. The loss of stability might be attributable to "cavity
creation" associated with diminished hydrophobic interactions. In the
case of T4 lysozyme a Leu Ala substitution raised the
 G of the folded form of the enzyme by 1.9 kcal/mol;
increases as high as 6.2 kcal/mol have been observed in hydrophobic
amino acid substitutions in other proteins (48).
Interestingly, the alcohol oxidoreductase II of Zymomonas
mobilis, an enzyme highly homologous to FucO (16), is damaged by
MCO in a similar way (9). Similar cases of enzyme inactivation by MCO
were observed in studies of Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Glycerol:NAD 2-oxidoreductase, which serves for the utilization of
glycerol under fermentative conditions, is inactivated during aerobic
metabolism (49). The initial step involves the MCO-caused loss of
apparent affinity for NAD (50, 51). 1,3-Propanediol:NAD
1-oxidoreductase (disposing of NADH by reduction of
3-hydroxypropionaldehyde during fermentative growth on glycerol) and
ethanol:NAD oxidoreductase (disposing of NADH by reduction of
acetyl-CoA during sugar fermentation) seem to be likewise inactivated
(52, 53).
Although protein turnover necessitated by MCO is metabolically costly
(44, 54, 55), inactivation of certain enzymes during aerobic
respiration can be beneficial in the balance. In the case of FucO, the
continued presence of a catalytically active protein during aerobic
utilization of L-fucose or L-rhamnose would wastefully deplete both L-lactaldehyde and NADH (56, 57). Viewed from this angle, the bound Fe+2 might be regarded as
an adaptive self-destruct mechanism for facilitating the transition
from fermentative to aerobic metabolism. The same reasoning should
apply to ethanol oxidoreductase. In the case of glycerol
oxidoreductase, the rapid inactivation of the enzyme would facilitate
the shift from the relatively ineffective anaerobic substrate capturing
pathway initiated by the NAD-coupled oxidoreductase to the more avid
aerobic substrate scavenging pathway initiated by the ATP-driven kinase
(58), a kinetic advantage predictable by the Haldane equation relating
Keq to the
kcat/Km.
In contrast to NAD(P) enzymes that are involved in fermentative
metabolism, those that are needed for both aerobic and anaerobic metabolism, such as glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, isocitric dehydrogenase, and malate dehydrogenase of K. pneumoniae,
are resistant to inactivation by oxidative metabolism (53). The same is
true for the E. coli NAD-linked L-lactaldehyde
dehydrogenase that is required only for aerobic substrate utilization
(14). These resistant enzymes are probably dependent on
Zn2+ instead of Fe2+ or are
metal-independent (see below). An interesting case is the
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in Leuconostoc
mesenteroides, which is thought to mediate only anaerobic glucose
catabolism by a pentose pathway (59); it is
Fe2+-dependent and subject to MCO inactivation
(8).
On the basis of amino acid sequence homology,
NAD(P)-dependent alcohol dehydrogenases (oxidoreductases)
fall into the following three families: (i) long chain
Zn2+-dependent, (ii) short chain
Zn2+-independent, and (iii) Fe2+-activated (60,
61). Zymomonas mobilis, an O2-tolerant and obligately ethanologenic anaerobe (62), has two alcohol
oxidoreductases, one is Fe2+-dependent and the
other dependent on Zn2+ (16, 63-65). As one would expect,
the Zn2+ enzyme is MCO-resistant, but the Fe2+
enzyme is susceptible to MCO damage (66). It was suggested that having
two enzymes with different metal ion requirement would be a nutritional
insurance (67). The question of whether the Zn2+ enzyme
plays the major role in aerobic ethanologenesis and the Fe2+ enzyme in anaerobic ethanologenesis has not been
addressed. The yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, also
possesses both Zn2+ and Mn2+ alcohol
dehydrogenases (60). The physiological and/or evolutionary basis for
employing both metal ions has yet to be explored.
In light of the fact that no Fe2+-dependent
oxidoreductase is known to have an aerobic function, it is tempting to
suggest that such enzymes evolved early when the global environment was
highly reducing and the supply of ferrous iron was abundant. With the emergence of photosynthesis and attendent accumulation of
O2, aerobic metabolism developed, and iron became mostly
sequestered as insoluble Fe3+ compounds.
Fe2+-dependent oxidoreductases were gradually
supplanted by Zn2+-dependent ones. Those
oxidoreductases that persisted as Fe2+ enzymes did so
either because there was a lack of selective pressure to switch to
Zn2+ or because retention of Fe2+ actually
provided the cell with an adaptive mechanism for thrifty shift from
anaerobic to aerobic metabolism.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Yan Zhu for pointing out the
proximity of the FucO substitutions to the NAD-binding sequence.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by United States Public Health
Service Grants GM40993 and GM30693 from the NIGMS and Grant PB94-0829 from the Direcciòn General de Investigacion Cientifica y
Técnica, Madrid, Spain. Help from the Comissionat per
Universitats i reçerca de la Generalitat de Catalunya" and the
"Ajuntament de Lleida" was also received.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Both authors contributed equally to this article.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Microbiology
and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Ave.,
Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-432-1925; Fax: 617-738-7664; E-mail:
ELIN{at}WARREN.MED.HARVARD.EDU.
1
The abbreviations used are: MCO, metal catalyzed
oxidation; kb, kilobase pair(s).
2
Z. Lu, unpublished observations.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Levine, R. L.,
Mosoni, L.,
Berlett, B. S.,
and Stadtman, E. R.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
15036-15040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Stadtman, E. R.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
62,
797-821[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Stadtman, E. R.
(1995)
in
Molecular Aspects of Aging (Esser, K., and Martin, G. M., eds), pp. 129-143, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK
-
Dean, R. T.,
Fu, S.,
Stocker, R.,
and Davies, M. J.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
324,
1-18
-
Stadtman, E. R.,
and Oliver, C. N.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
2005-2008[Free Full Text]
-
Fucci, L.,
Oliver, C. N.,
Coon, M. J.,
and Stadtman, E. R.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
1521-1525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Farber, J. M.,
and Levine, R. L.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
4574-4578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Szweda, L.,
and Stadtman, E. R.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
3096-3100[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cabiscol, E.,
Aguilar, J.,
and Ros, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
6592-6597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Stadtman, E. R.
(1986)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
11,
11-12
-
Berlett, B. S.,
and Stadtman, E. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20313-20316[Free Full Text]
-
Lin, E. C. C.
(1996)
in
Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology (Neidhardt, F. C., Curtiss, R., Ingraham, J. L., and , eds), 2nd Ed., pp. 307-342, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
-
Cabiscol, E.,
Hidalgo, E.,
Badia, J.,
Baldoma, L.,
Ros, J.,
and Aguilar, J.
(1990)
J. Bacteriol.
172,
5514-5515[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cabiscol, E.,
Badia, J.,
Baldoma, L.,
Hidalgo, E.,
Aguilar, J.,
and Ros, J.
(1992)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1118,
155-160[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chen, Y.-M.,
Lu, Z.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1989)
J. Bacteriol.
171,
6097-6105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Conway, T.,
and Ingram, L. O.
(1989)
J. Bacteriol.
171,
3754-3759[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lu, Z.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
4883[Free Full Text]
-
Kunkel, T. A.,
Roberts, J. D.,
and Zakour, R. A.
(1987)
Methods Enzymol.
154,
367-382[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chen, Y.-M.,
Zhu, Y.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1987)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
210,
331-337[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Boronat, A.,
and Aguilar, J.
(1979)
J. Bacteriol.
140,
320-326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Boronat, A.,
Caballero, E.,
and Aguilar, J.
(1983)
J. Bacteriol.
153,
134-139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Caballero, E.,
Baldoma, L.,
Ros, J.,
Boronat, A.,
and Aguilar, J.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
7788-7792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
134-139[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Laurell, C. B.
(1966)
Anal. Biochem.
15,
45-52[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Boronat, A.,
and Aguilar, J.
(1981)
J. Bacteriol.
147,
181-185[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Levine, R. L.,
Williams, J. A.,
Stadtman, E. R.,
and Shacter, E.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
233,
346-357[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Levine, R. L.,
Garland, D.,
Oliver, C.,
Amici, A.,
Climent, I.,
Lenz, A. G.,
Ahn, B. W.,
Shaltiel, S.,
and Stadtman, E. R.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
186,
464-478[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Skjold, A. C.,
and Ezekiel, D. H.
(1982)
J. Bacteriol.
152,
521-523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bartkus, J. M.,
and Mortlock, R. P.
(1986)
J. Bacteriol.
165,
710-714[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sridhara, S.,
Wu, T. T.,
Chused, M.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1969)
J. Bacteriol.
93,
87-95
-
Hacking, A. J.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1977)
J. Bacteriol.
130,
832-838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hacking, A. J.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1976)
J. Bacteriol.
126,
1166-1172[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Boronat, A.,
and Aguilar, J.
(1981)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
672,
98-107[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hacking, A. J.,
Aguilar, J.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1978)
J. Bacteriol.
136,
522-530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zhu, Y.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1988)
J. Bacteriol.
170,
2352-2358[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Branden, C.,
and Tooze, J.
(1991)
Introduction to Protein Structure, p. 145, Garland Publishing Inc., New York
-
Butler, W. L.
(1979)
Methods Enzymol.
56,
501-515[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Padros, E.,
Dunach, M.,
Morros, A.,
Sabes, M.,
and Manosa, J.
(1984)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
9,
508-510[CrossRef]
-
Dunach, M.,
Sabes, M.,
and Padros, E.
(1983)
Eur. J. Biochem.
134,
123-128[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sridhara, S.,
and Wu, T. T.
(1969)
J. Biol. Chem.
244,
5233-5238[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Boronat, A.,
and Aguilar, J.
(1981)
J. Bacteriol.
147,
181-185
-
Chen, Y.-M.,
Lin, E. C. C.,
Ros, J.,
and Aguilar, J.
(1983)
J. Gen. Microbiol.
129,
3355-3362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Levine, R. L.,
Oliver, C. N.,
Fulks, R. M.,
and Stadtman, E. R.
(1981)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
78,
2120-2124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Almassy, R. J.,
Janson, C. A.,
Hamlin, R.,
Xuong, N.-H.,
and Eisenberg, D.
(1986)
Nature
323,
304-309[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Levine, R. L.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
11823-11827[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
de Vries, G. E.,
Arfman, N.,
Terpstra, P.,
and Dukhuizen, L.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
5346-5353[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Matthews, B. W.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
62,
139-160[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lin, E. C. C.,
Levin, A. P.,
and Magasanik, B.
(1960)
J. Biol. Chem.
235,
1824-1829[Free Full Text]
-
Ruch, F. E., Jr.,
Lin, E. C. C.,
Kowit, J. D.,
Tang, C.-T.,
and Goldberg, A. L.
(1980)
J. Bacteriol.
141,
1077-1085[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chevalier, M.,
Lin, E. C. C.,
and Levine, R. L.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
42-46[Abstract]
-
Johnson, E. A.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
169,
2050-2054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Johnson, E. A.,
Levine, R. L.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1985)
J. Bacteriol.
164,
479-483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Roseman, J. E.,
and Levine, R. L.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
2101-2110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lee, Y. S.,
Park, S. C.,
Goldberg, A. J.,
and Chung, C. H.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
6643-6646[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zhu, Y.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1989)
J. Bacteriol.
171,
862-867[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zhu, Y.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
169,
785-789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Forage, R. G.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1982)
J. Bacteriol.
151,
591-599[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Garvie, E. I.
(1974)
in
Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology (Buchanan, R. E., Gibbons, N. E., Cowan, S. T., and , eds), 8th Ed., pp. 510-513, Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore
-
Reid, M. F.,
and Fewson, C. A.
(1994)
Crit. Rev. Microbiol.
20,
13-56[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hektor, H.
(1997)
Physiology and Biochemistry of Primary Alcohol Oxidation in the Gram-positive Bacteria, University of Groningen, Netherlands
-
Carr, J. G.
(1974)
in
Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology (Buchanan, R. E., Gibbons, N. E., Cowan, S. T., and , eds), 8th Ed., p. 533, Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore
-
Wills, C.,
Kraofil, P.,
London, D.,
and Martin, T.
(1981)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
210,
775-785[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Conway, T.,
Sewell, G. W.,
Osman, Y. A.,
and Ingram, L. O.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
2591,
2597
-
Keshav, K. F.,
Yomano, L. P.,
An, H.,
and Ingram, L. O.
(1990)
J. Bacteriol.
172,
2491-2497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tamarit, J.,
Cabiscol, E.,
Aguilar, J.,
and Ros, J.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
1102-1104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mackenzie, K. E.,
Eddy, C. K.,
and Ingram, L. O.
(1989)
J. Bacteriol.
171,
1063-1067[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chen, Y.-M.,
Zhu, Y.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
169,
3289-3294[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Baldoma, L.,
and Aguilar, J.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
13991-13996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hidalgo, E.,
Chen, Y.-M.,
Lin, E. C. C.,
and Aguilar, J.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
6671-6678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cocks, G. T.,
Aguilar, J.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1974)
J. Bacteriol.
118,
83-88[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dong, J.-M.,
Taylor, J. S.,
Latour, D. J.,
Iuchi, S.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
6671-6678
-
Baldoma, L.,
and Aguilar, J.
(1988)
J. Bacteriol.
170,
416-421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Limon, A.,
Hidalgo, E.,
and Aguilar, J.
(1997)
Microbiology
143,
2085-2095[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chen, Y.-M.,
Tobin, J. F.,
Zhu, Y.,
Schleif, R. F.,
and Lin, E. C. C.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
169,
3712-3719[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lin, E. C. C.
(1976)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
30,
535-578[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Echave, M. A. Esparza-Ceron, E. Cabiscol, J. Tamarit, J. Ros, J. Membrillo-Hernandez, and E. C. C. Lin
DnaK dependence of mutant ethanol oxidoreductases evolved for aerobic function and protective role of the chaperone against protein oxidative damage in Escherichia coli
PNAS,
April 2, 2002;
99(7):
4626 - 4631.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Holland-Staley, K. Lee, D. P. Clark, and P. R. Cunningham
Aerobic Activity of Escherichia coli Alcohol Dehydrogenase Is Determined by a Single Amino Acid
J. Bacteriol.,
November 1, 2000;
182(21):
6049 - 6054.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Zientz, I. G. Janausch, S. Six, and G. Unden
Functioning of DcuC as the C4-Dicarboxylate Carrier during Glucose Fermentation by Escherichia coli
J. Bacteriol.,
June 15, 1999;
181(12):
3716 - 3720.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Membrillo-Hernandez, P. Echave, E. Cabiscol, J. Tamarit, J. Ros, and E. C. C. Lin
Evolution of the adhE Gene Product of Escherichia coli from a Functional Reductase to a Dehydrogenase. GENETIC AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF THE MUTANT PROTEINS
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 20, 2000;
275(43):
33869 - 33875.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Echave, M. A. Esparza-Ceron, E. Cabiscol, J. Tamarit, J. Ros, J. Membrillo-Hernandez, and E. C. C. Lin
DnaK dependence of mutant ethanol oxidoreductases evolved for aerobic function and protective role of the chaperone against protein oxidative damage in Escherichia coli
PNAS,
April 2, 2002;
99(7):
4626 - 4631.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|