|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 15, 9139-9147, April 10, 1998
Definition of Regulatory Sequence Elements in the Promoter
Region and the First Intron of the Myotonic Dystrophy Protein
Kinase Gene*
Chris J.
Storbeck §,
Luc A.
Sabourin ¶,
James D.
Waring , and
Robert G.
Korneluk **
From the Department of Microbiology and Immunology,
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8M5, Canada and the
Solange Gauthier Karsh Molecular Genetics Laboratory,
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario K1H
8L1, Canada
 |
ABSTRACT |
Myotonic dystrophy is the most common inherited
adult neuromuscular disorder with a global frequency of 1/8000. The
genetic defect is an expanding CTG trinucleotide repeat in the
3'-untranslated region of the myotonic dystrophy protein kinase gene.
We present the in vitro characterization of cis
regulatory elements controlling transcription of the myotonic dystrophy
protein kinase gene in myoblasts and fibroblasts. The region 5' to the
initiating ATG contains no consensus TATA or CCAAT box. We have mapped
two transcriptional start sites by primer extension. Deletion
constructs from this region fused to the bacterial chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase reporter gene revealed only subtle muscle specific
cis elements. The strongest promoter activity mapped to a
189-base pair fragment. This sequence contains a conserved GC box to
which the transcription factor Sp1 binds. Reporter gene constructs
containing a 2-kilobase pair first intron fragment of the myotonic
dystrophy protein kinase gene enhances reporter activity up to 6-fold
in the human rhabdomyosarcoma myoblast cell line TE32 but not in NIH
3T3 fibroblasts. Co-transfection of a MyoD expression vector with
reporter constructs containing the first intron into 10 T1/2
fibroblasts resulted in a 10-20-fold enhancement of expression.
Deletion analysis of four E-box elements within the first intron reveal
that these elements contribute to enhancer activity similarly in TE32
myoblasts and 10 T1/2 fibroblasts. These data suggest that E-boxes
within the myotonic dystrophy protein kinase first intron mediate
interactions with upstream promoter elements to up-regulate
transcription of this gene in myoblasts.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Myotonic dystrophy (DM)1
is a dominant multisystemic disorder, which in the adult form shows
myotonia, progressive muscle weakness and wasting, and heart conduction
defects (1). In males, testicular atrophy and premature balding are
also observed (1). Major features of congenital DM include hypotonia,
respiratory distress, mental retardation, and a delay in terminal
muscle differentiation (1). The genetic defect for DM is an expanding
CTG trinucleotide repeat found in the 3'-untranslated region of a
serine threonine protein kinase (DMPK) (2-4). An increase in the
severity of the disease correlates with an increase in the number of
trinucleotide repeats, which provides a molecular basis for genetic
anticipation (4-6).
The consequences of CTG repeat expansion remains uncertain. Conflicting
results have been reported as to the levels of total DMPK transcript
and protein in patients (7-14). The mutant message can be detected by
Northern blot analysis (12, 15, 16) and appears to accumulate in the
nucleus of DM patient myoblasts and fibroblasts (16, 17). Reduction of
mutant (18) and both mutant and normal (19) DMPK mRNA in the
polyadenylated fraction has also been reported. Mice nullizygous for
DMPK are virtually asymptomatic (20, 21), indicating that DMPK is not
an essential protein in this species.
DMPK is expressed mainly in heart, lens, skeletal muscle, testes, and
brain (2, 22, 23). Delineation of the biological role of DMPK in these
tissues will allow a greater understanding of the pathological process
of DM. Accordingly, we have begun analysis of the DMPK gene for
cis elements that direct its expression in various cultured
cell lines. Transgenic mice containing a 15-kb human genomic DNA
fragment encompassing the entire DMPK gene express the human mRNA
and protein in the appropriate tissues, suggesting at least a subset of
tissue-specific cis elements are contained within the
transgene sequence2 (21).
Here we attempt identification of transcriptional regulatory elements
required for increased DMPK mRNA production in cultured myoblasts
versus fibroblasts. A 2-kb fragment of the DMPK upstream sequence driving the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene in
NIH 3T3 fibroblasts and TE32 myoblasts indicates a ubiquitous, housekeeping-type promoter region with only minor muscle-specific regulatory activity. We also investigated various deletions of the DMPK
first intron for transcriptional regulatory sequences, which may
enhance expression of CAT driven by endogenous and exogenous promoters
in fibroblasts and muscle cells. Results presented indicate that the
DMPK gene is regulated by a low level promoter that operates in
conjunction with an enhancer element in the first intron. This first
intron enhancer element is responsive to MyoD, requires the presence of
conserved E-boxes, and in the presence of the DMPK promoter, confers
increased expression of CAT in myoblasts.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Culture, DNA Transfections, CAT, and -Galactosidase
Assays--
Cell lines were grown in -minimal essential medium
containing penicillin and streptomycin supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum and 2 mM glutamine (Life Technologies, Inc.).
In the case of C2C12 differentiation medium, 10% horse serum was used
in place of 10% fetal bovine serum. Mammalian cells were cultured at
37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Primary human foreskin
fibroblasts (HFSF) were a gift from Dr. Chaim Birnboim (Ottawa Regional
Cancer Center, Ottawa, Canada), C2C12 mouse muscle cells, TE32 human
myoblasts (24), NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, human HeLa cells, and
C3H10T1/2 mouse fibroblasts were obtained from the ATCC. Transfections
were performed with 5 µg of CsCl-purified test plasmid, 3 µg of
-galactosidase expression construct (pSV -gal-Promega) by the
calcium phosphate co-precipitate method with a glycerol shock
essentially as described (25). -Galactosidase assays were carried
out by adding 45 µl of cell extract to 155 µl of Z-buffer (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM
NaH2PO4, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, 50 mM 2-mercaptoethanol,
pH 7) and 40 µl of O-nitrophenyl- -pyranogalactoside
(Sigma) (4 mg/ml in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7, 77.3 g of Na2HPO4·7H2O, 29.1 g of
NaH2PO4·H2O in 500 ml of
H2O) and incubating at 30 °C for 2 to 15 h. The
reactions were stopped by adding 100 µl of 1 M
Na2CO3 and the optical density measured at 420 nm on a spectrophotometer. CAT assays were performed essentially as
described (25).
Plasmid DNA Constructions--
A series of deletions of the DMPK
5' region were generated by standard methods and sub-cloned into
PstI or PstI/HindIII-digested promoterless pCAT-Basic vector (Promega). All 5' region CAT deletion constructs (Fig. 4) are named according to the position of the 5' end
of the inserted sequence relative to the DMPK translation initiation
codon, and all share the same 3' termini, which is 42 bp upstream of
the ATG initiation codon. Promoter/first intron combinations 722 CAT
IVS, 722 CAT SVI, TK CAT IVS, and TK CAT SVI were constructed by
subcloning a 2-kb EcoRI/BamHI first intron fragment into EcoRI/BamHI-digested pCAT-Basic
vector downstream of the CAT gene. The 722, 940 DMPK promoter and
TK promoter fragments were inserted into
HindIII/PstI, HindIII/XbaI,
and HindIII sites, respectively, upstream of the CAT gene.
The TK promoter was generated by polymerase chain reaction
amplification of the herpes simplex thymidine kinase (TK) promoter from
a plasmid (4RTKCAT). To construct TK CAT, this polymerase chain
reaction product was subcloned into the HindIII site
upstream of the CAT gene in pCAT-Basic. IVS TK CAT and SVI TK CAT were
constructed by fusing the 2-kb intron 1 fragment into the
PstI site in both orientations upstream of the TK promoter
in TK CAT. First intron deletions were generated by polymerase chain
reaction, cloned into pCR 2.1, excised with EcoRI, and
cloned into pCAT-Basic. Subsequently, TK and DMPK promoter elements
were cloned into these constructions as described above. To ensure all
clones were properly constructed, all plasmid DNA constructions were
analyzed by restriction digest and/or DNA sequencing.
Primer Extension Analysis--
Approximately 50 ng of DMPK
primer 2151 (5'-TTGGACAGGCAGCACCATGGC) was end-labeled with
[ -32P]ATP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using T4
polynucleotide kinase. Primer extension reactions were set up using 60 µg of TE32 myoblast or HFSF RNA essentially as described (25), except
Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.) was used
in place of murine reverse transcriptase. Standards for sizing primer extension products were generated from the control sequence of the
Sequenase 2 kit (U. S. Biochemical Corp.). These were synthesized according to manufacturers instructions with
[ -33P]dATP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using
single-stranded M13mp18 DNA and the 40 primer provided.
Northern Blot Analysis--
RNA was extracted from confluent
plates of cultured mammalian cells according to Birnboim (26) and a
Northern blot performed as described (27). A 1.2-kb XhoI DNA
fragment from the 5' end of the DMPK cDNA (pBS DMK) was labeled
with [ -32P]dCTP using the Redi-prime labeling system
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The membrane was prehybridized at
65 °C for 2-6 h in 6 × SSC, 0.5 × Denhardt's, 0.25%
SDS, and 2.5 mg of herring sperm DNA and then hybridized overnight with
the probe in 4 parts prehybridization buffer, 1 part 50% dextran
sulfate. Following the incubation, the membrane was washed twice for 15 min at room temperature with 2 × SSC, 0.1% SDS then twice at
50 °C for 15 min in 0.2% SSC, 0.1% SDS and then once at 65 °C
in 0.1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS for 15 min. The membrane was covered with
plastic wrap, exposed to film overnight at 80 °C, and developed
the following day. The blot was then stripped by washing twice for 15 min in hot water and hybridized with a fragment of the phosphoglycerate
kinase gene (Pgk-1) probe by performing labeling, prehybridization,
hybridization, and washing steps as described above.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays--
Oligonucleotides
corresponding to both strands of the DMPK GC box (nucleotides
1947-1975, Fig. 3, see below) were annealed using a thermal ramp in a
Perkin-Elmer thermocylcer and end-labeled using
[ -32P]ATP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), T4 kinase, and
forward reaction buffer (Life Technologies, Inc.) followed by
incubation for 45 min to 1 h at 37 °C. Nuclear extracts were
obtained, using the procedure of Hoppe-Seyler et al. (28),
which were quantitated for total protein concentration using a Pierce
Micro-BCA kit according to manufacturer's instructions. Nuclear
extract (5 µg) was incubated with 2.5 × 104 cpm of
labeled oligonucleotide, 1 µg of poly(dI·dC), 1 µl of bovine
serum albumin (10 mg/ml), 2 µl of gel shift buffer (250 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 50 mM MgCl2, 340 mM KCl), and competitor for 20 min on ice. The complexes
were then mixed with 2 µl of gel loading buffer (20% Ficoll 400, 0.1% bromphenol blue), and electrophoresed on a 5% nondenaturing
polyacrylamide gel at 150 V for 1.3 h. Gels were then exposed to
film overnight at 80 °C.
Oligonucleotides--
Sequences of oligonucleotides used in
electrophoretic mobility shift assay and competition analysis (shown in
Fig. 5) were synthesized using an ABI 394 DNA/RNA synthesizer and are
as follows: thymidine kinase oligonucleotide,
5'-ATGACACAAACCCCGCCCAGCGTCTTG-3' (29); AP-2 oligonucleotide,
5'-AGTCCCCAGGCTCCCCAGCAG-3' (30); wild type DMPK oligonucleotide,
5'-TAAGGCTGGGAGGCGGGAGGGGGGCTGG-3'; mutant DMPK oligonucleotide,
5'-TAAGGCTGGGAGGCTTGAGGGGGGCTGG-3' (mutated nucleotides are
shown in boldface italics).
 |
RESULTS |
The focus of this study was on DMPK transcriptional regulation in
muscle cells versus fibroblasts. Initially, we characterized expression of the DMPK mRNA in a number of human and mouse cell lines
in an effort to identify cell lines suitable for the study of DM
protein kinase gene myoblast specific cis elements. Northern blot analysis (Fig. 1) using a probe from
the DMPK cDNA was performed on RNA isolated from a number of human
and mouse cell lines. Relative to a Pgk-1 control, DMPK expression was
strongest in TE32 myoblasts, followed by C2C12 myotubes and C2C12
myoblasts. Weak DMPK expression was observed in NIH 3T3, primary HFSF,
and C3H10T1/2 cells, while the message was barely detectable in HeLa
cells. Given the high expression level of DMPK mRNA in TE32
myoblasts and the lower level in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, comparison of
DMPK-reporter gene fusion construct activities between these cell lines
was deemed a suitable system for identifying myoblast specific
transcription control elements within the DMPK gene.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Northern blot showing expression of DMPK in
various cell lines used in the analysis of DMPK regulatory
elements. Total RNA was isolated from C2C12 mouse myoblasts
(lane 1), C2C12 myotubes (lane 2), NIH 3T3 mouse
fibroblasts (lane 3), C3H 10T1/2 mouse fibroblasts
(lane 4), TE32 human rhabdomyosarcoma cells (myoblasts)
(lane 5), human foreskin fibroblasts (lane 6),
and human HeLa cells (lane 7), and 20 µg was used for
Northern analysis. A Pgk-1 probing is shown as a control for RNA
loading. Location of the DMPK mRNA and 28 and 18 S ribosomal RNA
bands are indicated. DMPK mRNA is most abundant in the myoblast
cell lines.
|
|
Primer extension analysis of the DMPK 5' region mapped two major
transcription start sites in both myoblasts and fibroblasts, one at
position 421 (Fig. 2A) and
the other at position 71 relative to the translation initiation codon
(Fig. 2B). The sequence products shown in Fig. 2A
were electrophoresed longer to accurately size the extension products.
Longer exposures of primer extension gels revealed other minor start
sites, one upstream of 421 consistent with start sites reported
earlier (31) and several between 421 and 71. The location of
transcriptional start sites mapped by primer extension is shown schematically in Figs. 3 and
4.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Primer extension analysis mapping two major
DMPK transcription start sites with mRNA from TE32 myoblasts and
HFSF fibroblasts at positions 71 and 421 relative to the
translation initiation codon. A, upstream primer extension
product reverse transcribed using primer 2151 from 60 µg of TE32 RNA
(lane 1) or from 60 µg of HFSF RNA (lane 2).
B, downstream primer extension product also using primer
2151 reverse-transcribed from 60 µg of TE32 RNA (lane 1).
The DNA size standard in both A and B is a
sequencing ladder generated from single-stranded M13mp18 DNA using the
40 primer (see "Materials and Methods").
|
|

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Nucleotide alignment of approximately 1 kb of
human and mouse DMPK 5'-untranslated region. Consensus binding
sequences for AP-2, AP-1, and Sp1 are indicated with boxes.
Directional arrows (positions 2097 ( 421) and 1747 ( 71))
represent the location of the two major transcriptional start sites
mapped by primer extension. The underlined sequence
beginning at nucleotide position 2167 represents oligonucleotide 2151, which was used in the primer extension analysis. The bold
nucleotide position numbers (i.e. 940)
represent the 5' boundaries of promoter deletion constructs and are
numbered and positioned relative to the translation initiation codon
(ATG), which is underlined and indicated by vertical
arrow. The 3' end of these deletion constructs is marked with a
vertical bar at position 2125. The underlined
sequence beginning at position 1948 represents the DMPK probe used in
electrophoretic mobility shift assays (below). Several conserved
transcription factor consensus binding sequences are located upstream
of the mapped transcription start sites, indicating a possible role for
these factors in initiation of DMPK transcription.
|
|

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Activity of 5' end deletion mutants of DMPK
promoter sequence in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts and TE32 myoblasts.
Successive deletions of the DMPK 5' region were cloned upstream of the
CAT reporter gene. The 3' terminus of each deletion construct is
nucleotide 42 relative to the DMPK translation initiation codon.
These constructs were co-transfected into NIH 3T3 fibroblasts and TE32
myoblasts with pSV -gal and CAT and -galactosidase activities
determined. Relative CAT activities are shown as a fold induction over
the activity of the promoterless CAT-Basic construct. Symbols above the
deletion constructs denote location of conserved consensus
transcription factor binding sites, and directional arrows
above deletion constructs represent locations of mapped transcription
start sites. At least two separate experiments were performed with at
least two samples for each construct. The averages of two experiments
are shown. A minimal promoter was mapped to a 189-bp fragment of DMPK
5'-untranslated region, but was not myoblast specific.
|
|
The 5' region of the DMPK gene contains several well conserved
consensus binding sites for known eukaryotic transcription factors,
including Sp1 (32), AP-1 (33), and AP-2 (30) (Fig. 3). The lack of a
TATA and CCAAT box and the high GC content in this region of the DMPK
gene are characteristic of housekeeping genes (35, 36), growth control
genes (37), and some kinase gene promoters (38, 39). Inspection of
mouse and human DMPK 5' regions show strong homology from nucleotide
1900 to the translation initiation codon (+1) (nucleotide 2170) (Fig.
3) and includes a conserved GC box upstream of the transcription start
site at position 71. Homology between the human and mouse genes is
also evident upstream of the transcription start site located at
position 421.
To identify the location of promoter elements, we constructed promoter
deletion mutants of the DMPK 5' region. A 1963-bp fragment of the DMPK
5' region was fused to the bacterial CAT reporter gene and a series of
deletion constructs from this parental plasmid were constructed (Fig.
4). To localize possible myoblast specific transcriptional control
elements within this sequence, these constructs were transfected into
TE32 myoblasts and NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblasts. Relative CAT activities
were normalized to promoterless CAT-Basic to compare the strengths of
each construct between the two cell lines (Fig. 4). Modest
myoblast-specific expression of CAT was observed for constructs 1963
CAT, 537 CAT, and 403 CAT (Fig. 4); however, most deletion
fragments produced similar relative CAT activities in both cell lines,
suggesting that only weak myoblast-specific regulatory elements are
present in this region of the DMPK gene. A 189-bp deletion fragment of
DMPK 5' sequence driving CAT exhibited the highest level of CAT
expression in TE32, NIH 3T3, and several other cell lines tested,
including HeLa and monkey kidney cells (data not shown). The strength
of this promoter fragment was about half the strength of the
phosphoglycerate kinase promoter in NIH 3T3 cells and the
strength of this promoter in TE32 cells (data not shown). Removal of 66 bp from 232 CAT, which includes a conserved GC box (Fig. 3), resulted
in near-background CAT expression in all cell lines tested, suggesting
important promoter elements reside within this sequence (Fig. 4).
To investigate the possibility that Sp1 may bind this region of the DMK
promoter and activate transcription, electrophoretic mobility shift
assays were performed using a probe to the putative Sp1 binding site.
Four apparent protein-DNA complexes were observed (a-d) (Fig. 5).
Extracts from several cell lines, including TE32 myoblasts, yield
identical banding patterns (data not shown) consistent with the CAT
assay data, suggesting that this region of DMPK 5' sequence is part of
a ubiquitous promoter element. Complex d appears to be probe
as it is present in the lane containing only probe (Fig. 5, lane
1). Complex c can be competed for by wild type DMPK
oligonucleotide, an oligonucleotide corresponding to a medium affinity
Sp1 site (29) from the thymidine kinase promoter (TK), an
oligonucleotide corresponding to GC-rich paired AP-2 sites from the
SV40 early promoter (30) and DMPK oligonucleotides mutated in two
positions in the GC box (lanes 3-10). This suggests that
complex c represents a protein binding GC-rich sequences,
but not specifically to the Sp1 binding site. The binding of the
protein to the DNA in complexes a and b was
specific as a molar excess of both the unlabeled DMPK probe (Fig. 5,
lanes 3 and 4) and TK oligonucleotide (Fig. 5,
lane 5 and 6) could compete for both complexes.
Furthermore, only very weak competition was observed when
oligonucleotides corresponding to the GC-rich binding site of the
unrelated transcription factor AP-2 were used as competitor (Fig. 5,
lanes 7 and 8). In addition, the mutant DMPK
oligonucleotide could only compete weakly for complexes a
and b, suggesting the NIH 3T3 nuclear protein(s) are binding
the GC box specifically (Fig. 5, lane 9 and 10).
Also, this mutant oligonucleotide could not form complexes with NIH 3T3
nuclear extracts (data not shown). Purified Sp1 protein was able to
form a complex with the DMPK oligonucleotide of identical mobility to
complex a seen in lane 2 (lane 11),
but not with mutant oligonucleotide (lane 12), suggesting
that complex a is Sp1-bound to the DMPK oligonucleotide.
Taken together, these results demonstrate that Sp1 binds specifically
to a GC box located within a minimal region of the DMPK 5' sequence,
which behaves as a minimal promoter, suggesting a key role for Sp1 in the basal activity of this DMPK promoter element.

View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Nuclear protein from NIH 3T3 cells forms a
complex with DMPK promoter fragment. A 28-bp double-stranded
oligonucleotide encompassing a conserved GC box in the DMPK promoter
region was incubated with nuclear extracts from NIH 3T3 cells and
purified Sp1 protein, subjected to competition analysis with various
competitors, and analyzed by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. Lane 1 is probe by itself, and
lane 2 is probe incubated with NIH 3T3 nuclear extract.
Lanes 3 and 4 are probe incubated with NIH 3T3
nuclear extract and cold competitor probe added at 10- and 100-fold
molar excess, respectively. Lanes 5 and 6 are the
same as lanes 3 and 4, except the competitor is a
double-stranded oligonucleotide corresponding to a medium affinity GC
box from the thymidine kinase promoter. In lanes 7 and
8, a double-stranded oligonucleotide encompassing a binding
site for the transcription factor AP-2 is competitor at 10- and
100-fold molar excesses, respectively. A double-stranded
oligonucleotide identical to the probe except for two nucleotides (see
"Materials and Methods") is competitor in lanes 9 and
10 at 10- and 100-fold molar excesses, respectively. In
lanes 11 and 12, DMPK probe and mutant DMPK probe
(µDMK) are incubated with purified Sp1 protein. Purified
Sp1 binds to sequence from the DMPK promoter and forms a complex
identical to one formed with NIH 3T3 extracts, implicating Sp1 in DMPK
transcriptional activation.
|
|
Evidence of only minor increases in CAT transcription in myoblasts over
fibroblasts found with control elements in the DMPK 5' region prompted
us to look within the first intron for other sequences that may
increase CAT expression in myoblasts. Mouse and human DMPK sequences
were aligned (Fig. 6) and complete
conservation of five potential E-boxes, a C(A/T)CCC box, a BEE-1
element (40), a CArG box (41, 42), a GC box (29), and two thyroid
hormone response elements (43) was revealed. To explore the possibility that functional muscle-specific regulatory elements are present in the
first intron, a 2-kb fragment (Fig. 9A) containing most of
the first intron was cloned downstream of the CAT gene in both orientations in the presence of a 679-bp fragment of DMPK 5' sequence (Fig. 7A). These constructs
were then transfected into TE32 and NIH 3T3 cells. Fig. 7 shows that
the presence of the first intron, irrespective of orientation, in
combination with DMPK 5' sequence, can activate transcription of the
CAT gene up to 6-fold in TE32 myoblasts, whereas no activation was
observed in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. This demonstrates the existence of an
orientation-independent myoblast-specific transcriptional enhancing
element within the first intron of the DMPK gene.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Sequence comparison between mouse and human
DMPK first introns. Shown in the figure are: positions and
nucleotide comparisons for thyroid hormone response elements and the
first four conserved E-boxes (A). B, position and
nucleotide conservation of the fifth conserved (downstream) E-box.
C, location and conservation of a C(A/T)CCC box, BEE-1
element, GC box, and CArG box.
|
|

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Ability of DMPK first intron element to
activate muscle specific expression of CAT with a fragment of the DMPK
promoter. A, the DMPK first intron was positioned downstream
of CAT in both orientations (IVS = + orientation, SVI = orientation) to test for enhancer activity with a 679-bp fragment of
DMPK 5'-upstream region containing promoter sequence ( 722 CAT).
B, these constructs, as well as the parental construct
( 722 CAT), were co-transfected with pSV -gal into NIH 3T3
fibroblasts and TE32 myoblasts, CAT and -galactosidase activities
were assayed, and relative CAT activities determined. The value of 1 was arbitrarily assigned to the relative activities of 722 CAT in
both cell lines, and activities of all other constructs were determined
relative to these constructs. Three separate experiments were performed
with at least three samples for each construct. Data from a
representative experiment are shown. The DMPK first intron, independent
of orientation, activates expression of CAT via the DMPK promoter
specifically in myoblasts.
|
|
The muscle-specific transcription factor MyoD has the capability of
activating the myogenic program by inducing the expression of
muscle-specific genes via E-boxes located in their transcriptional regulatory regions (44, 45). To further define a myoblast-specific enhancer role for the first intron, we investigated its responsiveness to MyoD and whether it could function in the context of a heterologous promoter. Constructs in which the first intron was cloned upstream or
downstream of the TK promoter driving the CAT gene were generated (Fig.
8A) and co-transfected with a
MyoD expression vector (EMSV-MyoD) or with parental vector (EMSV) into
C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts. This cell line can be readily differentiated
into myoblasts by transfection of members of the MyoD family of
myogenic regulators, and this system is used to indicate MyoD
responsiveness of co-transfected cis sequences (44). Also, a
construct containing the ninth intron (TK CAT I9R), which is similar in
size to the first intron and also contains a similar number of possible
E-box elements, was included in the transfections as a control (Fig.
8A). Expression of CAT from constructs containing the first
intron was activated up to 20-fold over the activity of TK CAT in the
presence of exogenous MyoD (Fig. 8B). This level of
trans-activation, in relation to the TK promoter, was
consistent regardless of orientation and position of the first intron
element. Furthermore, the presence of the ninth intron only weakly
enhanced expression of CAT in the presence of MyoD (Fig.
8B).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Responsiveness of DMPK first intron element
to MyoD. A, the DMPK first intron was positioned in both
orientations either downstream of the CAT gene driven by the TK
promoter or upstream of TK driving CAT. As a control, the DMPK ninth
intron was positioned in the reverse orientation downstream of the CAT
gene driven by the TK promoter. B, these constructs were
co-transfected with pSV -gal into C3H10T1/2 cells either with
EMSV-MyoD or the EMSV parental vector. CAT and -galactosidase
activities were assayed and relative CAT activities determined.
The relative activity of TK CAT in EMSV-transfected cells was assigned
the value of 1, and all other CAT activities were adjusted relative to
this value. Three separate experiments were performed with at least
three samples of each construct. Data from a representative experiment
are shown. MyoD overexpression can activate expression of a CAT
reporter driven by the TK promoter up to 20-fold in the presence of the
DMPK first intron, but not the ninth intron.
|
|
Therefore, the 2-kb first intron fragment acts as a MyoD-responsive
enhancer element in myoblasts. However, it is unknown if MyoD interacts
directly with first intron elements or has a trans effect
through the activation of another transcription factor gene. We
investigated this question by performing deletion analysis of the
entire first intron, particularly of the first four conserved E-boxes.
For these experiments, a 897-bp fragment of the DMPK promoter was used
to drive the CAT gene, because it contains all possible transcription
start sites. Deletion of 653 bp from the 3' end of the entire 2.4-kb
first intron (IN-1) had no effect on CAT activity, indicating this
region is dispensable for enhancer function (Fig.
9, A and B, compare
940 CAT IN-1 to 940 CAT A). Conversely, deletion from the 5' end
appeared to relieve a slight inhibition (compare 940 CAT A, B, and
C). Deletion of 113 bp, which includes the first four conserved E-boxes
from the 5' end of 940 CAT C resulted in complete loss of enhancer
activity, implicating these elements in enhancer function (compare
940 CAT C and 940 CAT D). Further deletions within the 113-bp
region revealed that loss of 51 bp from the 5' end of 940 CAT C,
which corresponds to deletion of two of the four E-boxes, severely
compromised enhancer activity (compare 940 CAT C to 940 CAT G) and
deletion of a further 15 bp completely abrogated enhancer activity
(compare 940 CAT C to 940 CAT H) (Fig. 9B). The enhancer
deletion mutants failed to activate CAT expression in NIH 3T3
fibroblasts (Fig. 9B). These data indicate that a 51-bp
region within the DMPK first intron containing two conserved E-box
elements is required for enhancer function in TE32 myoblasts.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Deletion mapping of DMPK first intron
enhancer. A, schematic map of DMPK first intron showing
putative binding sites for various transcription factors.
IN-1, entire 2.4-kb first intron; IVS, 2-kb first
intron fragment; A-I, various first intron deletions;
E, E-box. Numbers indicate 5' and 3' ends of
first intron fragments relative to ATG initiation codon (see Fig. 3).
B, mapping of first intron sequences required for maximal
enhancer activity in TE32 myoblasts. Constructs were prepared and
transfected as outlined in Fig. 7 and under "Materials and
Methods." The experiment was performed three times with similar
results obtained in each. Shown is a representative experiment.
C, mapping of sequences required for full activity of the
DMPK first intron enhancer in 10T1/2 cells co-transfected with MyoD.
Constructs were prepared and transfected as described in the legend to
Fig. 8 and under "Materials and Methods." The experiment was
performed three times with similar results obtained in each. Shown is a
representative experiment. Deletion of three of the four E-boxes in the
DMPK first intron almost completely abolishes enhancer activity in both
cell types.
|
|
To investigate the role of the E-boxes in the observed activation of
CAT expression in 10T1/2 cells by MyoD, the same first intron deletion
fragments were cloned downstream of the CAT gene driven by the
thymidine kinase promoter. Maximal activation is observed with TKCAT F
but is reduced dramatically with each E-box deletion (compare TK CAT F,
G, and H), although some residual activity remains in deletions TK CAT
H and I. Therefore, the first three E-boxes are required for maximal
stimulation of CAT activity when MyoD is co-transfected with the first
intron deletion constructs into 10T1/2 cells, implicating these
elements as key mediators of the DMPK first intron enhancer
function.
 |
DISCUSSION |
This is the first report describing regulatory elements
controlling mRNA expression of the DMPK gene. Initially we
identified transcription start sites within the 5' region of the DMPK
gene and also confirmed one start site previously reported at
nucleotide position 1394 ( 773 relative to ATG translation initiation
codon) (31). This site was first mapped using primer extension in a cell-free extract system that utilized a cloned fragment of DMPK 5'-untranslated region from 700 to 1550 relative to the ATG codon
and therefore may have missed transcription start sites downstream from
700. Primer extension analysis of human TE32 myoblast and HFSF
fibroblast RNA mapped two major transcriptional start sites at position
71 and 421 and also several minor sites. The relative importance of
each of these start sites in various tissues is not clear. The varied
transcriptional start sites may be due to the lack of a canonical CCAAT
and TATA box in the DMPK promoter region, resulting in multiple sites
of transcription initiation often observed with promoters lacking these
consensus sequences (46-48). However, most housekeeping and growth
control gene promoters have their many initiation sites scattered
within a 15-20-bp region (49). Exceptions to this include the
Ha-ras gene, which has multiple start sites located within a
90-bp region (50), and the 3.7-kb mRNA for testicular
inhibin/activin B-subunit, which initiates transcription from
multiple sites over 150 nucleotides (51). We believe that transcription
initiation from the mapped start site locations ( 71, 421, 773) in
the DMPK 5' region are controlled by separate promoter elements, and we
are currently investigating this possibility. Housekeeping style
promoters have been found for such protein kinase genes as casein
kinase II subunit (47), the murine hck gene (48),
choline kinase R (52), and the -adrenergic receptor kinase (37).
This study sought to identify cis elements that may activate
expression of DMPK preferentially in myoblasts over fibroblasts. It is
likely that distinct cis elements located elsewhere in the gene impact transcription of DMPK in other tissues. Increased levels of
DMPK mRNA in myoblasts versus fibroblasts may be due either to an increase in DMPK transcription in myoblasts or to differential mRNA stability. In an effort to identify
myoblast-specific cis elements, a series of CAT deletion
mutants of DMPK 5' sequence were constructed and tested for CAT
activity in TE32 myoblasts and NIH 3T3 fibroblasts (Fig. 4). However,
only minor myoblast-specific expression of CAT (2-3-fold) was observed
for deletion clones 1963 CAT, 537 CAT, and 403 CAT (Fig. 4), and
this activity alone cannot account for the increased levels of DMPK
mRNA observed in myoblasts over fibroblasts.
Two peaks of promoter activity mapped within the DMPK 5' region by
transfection of CAT deletion constructs into NIH 3T3 cells (Fig. 4) was
consistent with the mapped transcription start sites at position 421
and 71. Of all the DMPK 5' region deletions, maximal promoter
activity was observed with the 189-bp 232 CAT deletion mutant in all
cell lines tested (Fig. 4). Low level DMPK mRNA expression was
detected in many cell lines by RNase protection (data not shown) and
Northern blot analysis (Fig. 1), suggesting a nearly ubiquitous low
level presence of DMPK mRNA in several tissue types. We believe
that transcription initiating from the 71 start site contributes to
this basal level of DMPK mRNA.
Promoter activity of the 189-bp 232 CAT was lost upon the deletion of
66 bp from this sequence (Fig. 4). Our data clearly demonstrate that
the ubiquitous transcription factor Sp1 binds to an oligonucleotide
probe containing a conserved GC box located within this deleted
sequence. Furthermore, this binding is specific and purified Sp1
incubated with this oligonucleotide forms an identical complex (complex
a, Fig. 5) to the slowest migrating complex observed with
NIH 3T3 nuclear extracts. This evidence suggests that Sp1 binds to the
GC box contained in this sequence, thus contributing to a ubiquitous
basal level of transcription in several cell types.
The promoter analysis data indicated that cis elements
controlling the majority of DMPK transcription in myoblasts were most likely located elsewhere in the gene (Fig. 4). In support of this, transgenic mice expressing -galactosidase from a 3.7-kb fragment of
the DMPK promoter region exhibit mainly neural-specific expression (53). Several muscle-specific genes have tissue-specific regulatory elements contained within their first introns (40, 54-56). Therefore we analyzed the DMPK first intron for conserved muscle-specific transcription factor consensus binding sites and found five E-boxes and
a CArG element (Fig. 6) representing MyoD (57) and muscle actin
promoter factor 1 and 2 (41) binding sites, respectively. We tested the
ability of the DMPK first intron to trans-activate CAT gene
expression in the context of a 679-bp fragment of its homologous
promoter (Fig. 7A). A 4-6-fold orientation independent up-regulation was observed in TE32 myoblasts, but not in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, demonstrating that the DMPK first intron contains a
myoblast-specific enhancer element (Fig. 7B).
The MyoD family of basic helix loop helix myogenic regulators bind the
sequence CANNTG to activate muscle-specific gene transcription (44,
57). Existing evidence observed with P19 embryonal carcinoma cells and
DM patient fibroblasts, both overexpressing a stably integrated MyoD
gene, suggests that DMPK mRNA expression may be regulated either
directly or indirectly by one of these transcription factors (15, 16,
58). We tested the responsiveness of the DMPK first intron to MyoD.
This myogenic regulator could trans-activate expression of
CAT in the presence of the DMPK first intron, but not the similarly
sized ninth intron in 10T1/2 cells. Regardless of position or
orientation around the TK promoter (Fig. 8) or the DMPK promoter (data
not shown), CAT expression was trans-activated through the
DMPK first intron by MyoD.
Deletion analysis of the first intron revealed that a 51-bp sequence
containing two conserved E-boxes is required for full enhancer function
in TE32 myoblasts. Deletion of three of the four E-boxes was required
for near-complete abrogation of enhancer function in 10T1/2 cells
co-transfected with MyoD and CAT first intron deletions driven by the
TK promoter. Since E-boxes are the only known cis elements
present within this sequence, and given their complete conservation
between mouse and human sequence (Fig. 6), it is very likely that
factors binding these elements mediate enhancer function. It is
apparent that the first three E-boxes each contribute in an additive
fashion to enhancer activity as the sequential removal of each results
in a decrease in activity in both TE32 and 10T1/2 cells co-transfected
with MyoD. Mutating each of the four E-boxes within the 113-bp segment
of first intron sequence will allow assessment of their relative
importance for enhancer function.
Interestingly, it has been shown that certain rhabdomyosarcoma cell
lines, including TE32, are deficient in a MyoD co-factor that prevents
them from fusing and forming multinucleate myotubes (59). It is
possible that in this cell line MyoD may be able to up-regulate a
subset of genes not involved in the fusion process in the absence of
this co-factor. An alternative explanation is that one of the other
myogenic factors or another transcription factor may activate DMPK
expression through the 51-bp element in the first intron. In any case,
the first three E-boxes in the DMPK first intron are clearly required
for maximal DMPK enhancer function and likely play an important role in
expression of the gene in muscle.
In summary, DMPK transcription in myoblasts is at least partially
regulated by a 51-bp MyoD-responsive element located in the first
intron of the gene. This sequence cooperates with DMPK promoter
elements, one of which binds Sp1, to up-regulate transcription in
myoblasts. These data, in conjunction with other studies showing MyoD
responsiveness of the DMPK transcript (15, 16, 58), implicate this
myogenic factor in regulating transcription of this gene in muscle.
Experiments aimed at understanding the interaction between the promoter
and enhancer and which individual E-boxes within the 51 bp element are
required for enhancer function are underway.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
The clones 4RTKCAT and EMSV-MyoD were kindly
provided by E. N. Olson. We are grateful to Alex MacKenzie for
critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the Muscular
Dystrophy Associations of Canada and the United States, the Medical
Research Council of Canada, and the Canadian Networks of Centers of
Excellence.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) L08835 (for DMPK) and Z21503-Z21506.
§
Supported by the Aurthur Minden predoctoral fellowship from the
Muscular Dystrophy Association of Canada.
¶
Supported by a predoctoral fellowship from the Medical
Research Council of Canada.
**
Recipient of a Medical Research Council Scientist Award. To whom
corresponding should be addressed: Solange Gauthier Karsh Molecular
Genetics Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth
Rd., Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L1, Canada.
1
The abbreviations used are: DM(PK), myotonic
dystrophy (protein kinase); HFSF, human foreskin fibroblasts; CAT,
chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; TK, thymidine kinase; kb, kilobase
pair(s); bp, base pair(s).
2
M. Narang and R. G. Korneluk, submitted for
publication.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Harper, P. S.
(1989)
Myotonic Dystrophy, 2nd Ed., W. B. Saunders, London
-
Brook, J. D.,
McCurrach, M. E.,
Harley, H. G.,
Buckler, A. J.,
Church, D.,
Aburtani, H.,
Hunter, K.,
Stanton, V. P.,
Thirion, J. P.,
Hudson, T.,
Sohn, R.,
Zemelman, B.,
Snell, R. G.,
Rundle, S. A.,
Crow, S.,
Davies, J.,
Shelbourne, P.,
Buxton, J.,
Jones, C.,
Juvonen, V.,
Johnson, K.,
Harper, P. S.,
Shaw, D. J.,
and Housman, D. E.
(1992)
Cell
68,
799-808[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fu, Y. H.,
Pizzuti, A.,
Fenwick, R. G., Jr.,
King, J.,
Rajnarayan, S.,
Dunne, P. W.,
Dubel, J.,
Nasser, G. A.,
Ashizawa, T.,
de Jong, P.,
Wieringa, B.,
Korneluk, R.,
Perryman, M. B.,
Epstein, H. F.,
and Caskey, C. T.
(1992)
Science
260,
1256-1258
-
Mahadevan, M.,
Tsilfidis, C.,
Sabourin, L.,
Shutler, G.,
Amemiya, C.,
Jansen, G.,
Neville, C.,
Narang, M.,
Barcelò, J.,
O'Hoy, K.,
Leblond, S.,
Earle-Macdonald, J.,
de Jong, P.,
Wieringa, B.,
and Korneluk, R. G.
(1992)
Science
255,
1253-1255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hunter, A. G. W.,
Tsilfidis, C.,
Mettler, G.,
Jacob, P.,
Mahadevan, M.,
Suhr, L. C.,
and Korneluk, R. G.
(1992)
J. Med. Genet.
29,
774-779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tsilfidis, C.,
MacKenzie, A. E.,
Mettler, G.,
Barceló, J.,
and Korneluk, R. G.
(1992)
Nat. Genet.
1,
192-195[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fu, Y. H.,
Friedman, D. L.,
Richards, S.,
Pearlman, J. A.,
Gibbs, R. A.,
Pizzuti, A.,
Ashizawa, T.,
Perryman, M. B.,
Scarlato, G.,
Fenwick, R. G., Jr.,
and Caskey, C. T.
(1993)
Science
260,
235-238[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Carango, P.,
Noble, J. E.,
Marks, H. G.,
and Funanage, V. L.
(1993)
Genomics
18,
340-348[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hofmann-Radvanyi, H.,
Lavedan, C.,
Rabes, J. P.,
Savoy, D.,
Duros, C.,
Johnson, K.,
and Junien, C.
(1993)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
2,
1263-1266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Novelli, G.,
Gennarelli, M.,
Zelano, G.,
Pizzuti, A.,
Fattorini, C.,
Caskey, C. T.,
and Dallapiccola, B.
(1993)
Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int.
29,
291-297[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Koga, R.,
Nakao, Y.,
Kurano, Y.,
Tsukahara, T.,
Nakamura, A.,
Ishiura, S.,
Nonaka, I.,
and Arahata, K.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
202,
577-585[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sabourin, L. A.,
Mahadevan, M. S.,
Narang, M.,
Lee, D. S. C.,
Surh, L. C.,
and Korneluk, R. G.
(1993)
Nat. Genet.
4,
233-238[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bhagwati, S.,
Ghatpande, A.,
and Leung, B.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Acta
1317,
155-157[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dunne, P. W.,
Ma, L.,
Casey, L.,
Harati, Y.,
and Epstein, H. F.
(1996)
Cell Motil. Cytoskel.
33,
52-63[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Otten, A. D.,
and Tapscott, S. J.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5465-5469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Davis, B. M.,
McCurrach, M. E.,
Taneja, K. L.,
Singer, R. H.,
and Housman, D. E.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
7388-7393[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Taneja, K. L.,
McCurrach, M.,
Schalling, M.,
Housman, D.,
and Singer, R. H.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
995-1002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Krahe, R.,
Ashizawa, T.,
Abbruzzese, C.,
Roeder, E.,
Carango, P.,
Giacanelli, M.,
Funanage, V. L.,
and Siciliano, M. J.
(1995)
Genomics
28,
1-14[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wang, J.,
Pegoraro, E.,
Menegazzo, E.,
Gennarelli, M.,
Hoop, R. C.,
Angelini, C.,
and Hoffman, E. P.
(1995)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
4,
599-606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Reddy, S.,
Smith, D. B.,
Rich, M. M.,
Leferovich, J. M.,
Reilly, P.,
Davis, B. M.,
Tran, K.,
Rayburn, H.,
Bronson, R.,
Cros, D.,
Balice-Gordon, J.,
and Housman, D.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
13,
325-335[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jansen, G.,
Groenen, P. J. T. A.,
Bächner, D.,
Jap, P. H. K.,
Coerwinkel, M.,
Oerlmans, F.,
van den Broek, W.,
Gohlsch, B.,
Pette, D.,
Plomp, J. J.,
Molenaar, P. C.,
Nederhoff, M. G. J.,
van Echteld, C. J. A.,
Dekker, M.,
Berns, A.,
Hameister, H.,
and Wieringa, B.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
13,
316-324[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jansen, G.,
Mahadevan, M.,
Amemiya, C.,
Wormskamp, N.,
Segers, B.,
Hendriks, W.,
O'Hoy, K.,
Baird, S.,
Sabourin, L.,
Lennon, G.,
Jap, P. L.,
Iles, D.,
Coerwinkel, M.,
Hofker, M.,
Carrano, A. V.,
de Jong, P. J.,
Korneluk, R. G.,
and Wieringa, B.
(1992)
Nat. Genet.
1,
261-266[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dunne, P. W.,
Ma, L.,
Casey, D. L.,
and Epstein, H. F.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
225,
281-288[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
McAllister, R. M.,
Melnyk, J.,
Finkelstein, J. Z.,
Adams, E. C., Jr.,
and Gardner, M. B.
(1969)
Cancer
24,
520-526[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., pp.
7.79-7.83, 16.32-16.36, 16.63, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold
Spring Harbor, NY
-
Birnboim, H. C.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
1487-1497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Farrell, R. E., Jr.
(1993)
RNA Methodologies: A Laboratory Guide for Isolation and Characterization, pp. 158-173, Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA
-
Hoppe-Seyler, F.,
Butz, K.,
Rittmüller, C.,
and von Knebel Doeberitz, M.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
5080[Free Full Text]
-
Jones, K. A.,
Yamamoto, K. R.,
and Tjian, R.
(1985)
Cell
42,
559-572[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mitchell, P. J.,
Wang, C.,
and Tjian, R.
(1987)
Cell
50,
847-861[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mahadevan, M. S.,
Amemiya, C.,
Jansen, G.,
Sabourin, L.,
Baird, S.,
Neville, C. E.,
Wormskamp, N.,
Segers, S.,
Batzer, M.,
Lamerdin, J.,
de Jong, P.,
Wieringa, B.,
and Korneluk, R. G.
(1993)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
2,
299-304[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kadonaga, J. T.,
Jones, K. A.,
and Tijian, R.
(1986)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
11,
20-23
-
Lee, W.,
Mitchell, P.,
and Tjian, R.
(1987)
Cell
49,
741-752[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Deleted in proof
-
Herrick, K. R.,
Gorin, F. A.,
Park, E. A.,
and Tait, R. C.
(1993)
Gene (Amst.)
126,
203-211[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wang, S. P.,
Robert, M. F.,
Gibson, K. M.,
Wanders, R. J.,
and Mitchell, G. A.
(1996)
Genomics
33,
99-104[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ito, F.,
Ishizaka, Y.,
Tahira, T.,
Yamamoto, M.,
Miya, A.,
Imai, K.,
Yachi, A.,
Takai, S.,
Sugimura, T.,
and Nagao, M.
(1992)
Oncogene
7,
1201-1206[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Clegg, C. H.,
Haugen, H. S.,
and Boring, L. F.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
1638-1644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Penn, R. B.,
and Benovic, J. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
14924-14930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Feo, S.,
Antona, V.,
Barbieri, G.,
Passantino, R.,
Cali, L.,
and Giallongo, A.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
5991-6002[Abstract]
-
Ernst, H.,
Walsh, K.,
Harrison, C. A.,
and Rosenthal, N.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
3735-3744[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sartorelli, V.,
Webster, K. A.,
and Kedes, L.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
1811-1822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Muscat, G. E. O.,
Johnson, L. M.,
Dowhan, D.,
Downes, M.,
and Griggs, R.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
583-591[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Davis, R. L.,
Weintraub, H.,
and Lassar, A. B.
(1987)
Cell
51,
987-1000[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Olson, E. N.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
1454-1461[Free Full Text]
-
Gudas, J. M.,
Fridovich-Keil, J. L.,
Datta, M. W.,
Bryan, J.,
and Pardee, A. B.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.).
118,
205-216[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Voss, H.,
Wirkner, U.,
Jakobi, R.,
Hewitt, N. A.,
Schwager, C.,
Zimmermann, J.,
Ansorge, W.,
and Pyerin, W.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
13706-13711[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ziegler, S. F.,
Pleiman, C. M.,
and Perlmutter, R. M.
(1991)
Oncogene
6,
283-288[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sehgal, A.,
Patil, N.,
and Chao, M.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
3160-3167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lu, J.,
Lee, W.,
Jiang, C.,
and Keller, E. B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
5391-5402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Feng, Z. M.,
Wu, A. Z.,
and Chen, C. L.
(1995)
Endocrinology
136,
947-955[Abstract]
-
Uchida, T.
(1994)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
116,
508-518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
King, S. K.,
Wells, D. J.,
Wells, K. E.,
Carey, N.,
and Johnson, K. J.
(1996)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
24,
283S[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yutzey, K. E.,
Kline, R. L.,
and Konieczny, S. F.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
1397-1405[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sternberg, E. A.,
Spizz, G.,
Perry, M. W.,
Vizard, D.,
Weil, T.,
and Olson, E. N.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
2896-2909[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Christensen, T. H.,
Prentice, H.,
Gahlmann, R.,
and Kedes, L.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
6752-6765[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lassar, A. B.,
Buskin, J. N.,
Lockshon, D.,
Davis, R. L.,
Apone, S.,
Hauschka, S. D.,
and Weintraub, H.
(1989)
Cell
58,
823-831[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Skerjanc, I. S.,
Slack, R. S.,
and McBurney, M. W.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
8451-8459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tapscott, S. J.,
Thayer, M. J.,
and Weintraub, H.
(1993)
Science
259,
1450-1453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. F. O'Cochlain, C. Perez-Terzic, S. Reyes, G. C. Kane, A. Behfar, D. M. Hodgson, J. A. Strommen, X.-K. Liu, W. van den Broek, D. G. Wansink, et al.
Transgenic overexpression of human DMPK accumulates into hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myotonic myopathy and hypotension traits of myotonic dystrophy
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
October 1, 2004;
13(20):
2505 - 2518.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Storbeck, S. Drmanic, K. Daniel, J. D. Waring, F. R. Jirik, D. J. Parry, N. Ahmed, L. A. Sabourin, J.-E Ikeda, and R. G. Korneluk
Inhibition of myogenesis in transgenic mice expressing the human DMPK 3'-UTR
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
March 15, 2004;
13(6):
589 - 600.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Furling, L. T. Lam, O. Agbulut, G. S. Butler-Browne, and G. E. Morris
Changes in Myotonic Dystrophy Protein Kinase Levels and Muscle Development in Congenital Myotonic Dystrophy
Am. J. Pathol.,
March 1, 2003;
162(3):
1001 - 1009.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Carrasco, J. Canicio, M. Palacin, A. Zorzano, and P. Kaliman
Identification of Intracellular Signaling Pathways that Induce Myotonic Dystrophy Protein Kinase Expression during Myogenesis
Endocrinology,
August 1, 2002;
143(8):
3017 - 3025.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|