|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 16, 9424-9429, April 17, 1998
dGNaC1, a Gonad-specific Amiloride-sensitive Na+
Channel*
Isabelle
Darboux ,
Eric
Lingueglia,
Guy
Champigny,
Sylvie
Coscoy§,
Pascal
Barbry, and
Michel
Lazdunski¶
From the Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire,
CNRS UPR 411, 660 route des Lucioles, Sophia Antipolis,
06560 Valbonne, France
 |
ABSTRACT |
Amiloride-sensitive sodium channels have been
implicated in reproductive and early developmental processes of several
species. These include the fast block of polyspermy in
Xenopus oocytes that follows the sperm binding to the egg
or blastocoel expansion in mammalian embryo. We have now
identified a gene called dGNaC1 that is specifically
expressed in the gonads and early embryo in Drosophila
melanogaster. The corresponding protein belongs to the
superfamily of cationic channels blocked by amiloride that includes
Caenorhabditis elegans degenerins, the Helix
aspersa FMRF-amide ionotropic receptor (FaNaC), the mammalian
epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC), and acid-sensing ionic
channels (ASIC, DRASIC, and MDEG). Expression of dGNaC1 in
Xenopus oocytes generates a constitutive current that does
not discriminate between Na+ and Li+, but is
selective for Na+ over K+. This current is
blocked by amiloride (IC50 = 24 µM), benzamil (IC50 = 2 µM), and ethylisopropyl amiloride
(IC50 = 49 µM). These properties are clearly
different from those obtained after expression of the previously cloned
members of this family, including ENaC and the human ENaC-like
subunit, NaC. Interestingly, the pharmacology of dGNaC1 is not very
different from that found for the Na+ channel characterized
in rabbit preimplantation embryos. We postulate that this channel may
participate in gametogenesis and early embryonic development in
Drosophila.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The importance of amiloride-sensitive sodium transport during
reproductive and early developmental processes is highlighted by
numerous experiments performed in diverse organisms, such as sea
urchins (1, 2), fish (3), amphibians (4-6), and mammals (7). Amiloride
interacts not only with ubiquitous Na+/H+
antiporters, which are also expressed in gonads and are involved in
initiation of development at fertilization (8), but also with
amiloride-blockable channels that are involved in the fast block of
polyspermy (9) and blastocoel expansion (10). In Xenopus
oocytes, ATP triggers an amiloride-sensitive Na+ channel
immediately after the sperm has bound to the egg. This depolarizes the
egg membrane potential and participates in the fast block of polyspermy
(9). In mammalian embryo, amiloride-sensitive sodium channels are also
involved in the blastocoel expansion (11). During early phases of
animal embryonic development, blastomeres progressively occupy the
periphery of the embryo, and a fluid-filled central cavity,
i.e. the blastocoel, is formed. Fluid accumulation in the
blastocoel is due to an electrogenic transport of sodium, followed by
osmotically driven water, and this event can be partly inhibited by
amiloride (10, 12, 13). Electrophysiological analyses have demonstrated
that amiloride-sensitive channels are expressed in rabbit blastomeres,
but their biophysical and pharmacological properties differ from those
of the classical highly Na+-selective and highly
amiloride-inhibitable channel (10).
Amiloride sensitivity is a common characteristic of structurally
related cationic channels that are associated with a wide range of
distinct physiological functions (14). In Caenorhabditis elegans, neuronal and muscular degenerins, such as MEC-4, MEC-10, UNC-8, and UNC-105, encode amiloride-sensitive channels that are involved in mechanoperception (15-17). In animal epithelia, a highly sodium-selective channel is made up of three homologous subunits ( ENaC (epithelial Na+
channel), ENaC, and ENaC) (18-21). This channel
participates in active vectorial sodium transport. In the snail nervous
system, FaNaC is an ionotropic receptor for the mollusc
cardioexcitatory peptide FMRF-amide. It forms a homotetrameric sodium-selective channel that may be involved in neuromodulation (22,
23). In mammalian brain and/or in sensory neurons, acid-sensing ionic
channels (ASIC) are homo- or heteromultimeric H+-activated
cation channels (24-27). They are suspected to be involved in
nociception linked to acidosis. All these proteins share the same
structural organization, characterized by the presence of two
hydrophobic domains surrounding a large extracellular loop that
includes one cysteine-rich region (or two for degenerins) (28). Despite
a very low identity between the most distantly related proteins of the
family (~15%), some important residues, such as those located in
pre-M1, pre-M2, and M2 regions (where M1 and M2 represent the two
transmembrane hydrophobic -helices), are conserved.
Different members of this family have been described in mammalian
gonads or in adjacent tissues. Expressed sequence tags of ENaC,
NaC (Na+ channel
subunit; an ENaC-like subunit) (29), and ASIC-1 have been identified
in human testis. Only human NaC was indeed detected in testis and
ovary by Northern blot analysis (29). This raises the possibility that
members of the degenerin/ENaC/FaNaC/ASIC gene superfamily might be
involved in the differentiation of gametes and/or development of eggs
after fertilization.
In this study, we have characterized a new member of the family in
D. melanogaster, which is specifically expressed in testis, ovary, and early embryo. Its expression in Xenopus oocytes
was sufficient to generate a constitutive amiloride-sensitive
Na+ channel, with properties that differ from those
obtained after expression of   ENaC or NaC/ ENaC. Since
this Drosophila Na+-selective channel is
specifically expressed in the gonads and early embryo, we postulate
that it may correspond to a channel involved in spermatogenesis,
oogenesis, and/or early embryonic development.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cloning of dGNaC1--
Two sequences from the
Drosophila expressed sequence tag data base (accession
numbers AA264333 and AA264288) were used to design a sense and an
antisense primer carrying an EcoRI (sense primer) and an
XhoI (antisense primer) restriction site, respectively, at
their 5'-ends. The corresponding sequences are as follows: 5'-ACGAATTCAAGAACGGAATAGACACCATG-3' and
5'-TCCTCGAGTTGTCCGCACTTACGAAATAG-3'. These primers were used to
amplify a 1750-base pair fragment by PCR1 with the Expand High
Fidelity PCR system (Boehringer Mannheim) from Drosophila
cDNAs prepared from mid-stage embryos. After methylation of the
internal EcoRI restriction site with EcoRI
methylase (Biolabs), ligation of EcoRI linkers (Biolabs),
and digestion by EcoRI and XhoI, the fragment was
subcloned in the EcoRI and XhoI sites of the
pBSK-SP6-globin vector (30). Three independent clones were sequenced on
both strands. They display an open reading frame of 1686 nucleotides
that is not preceded by stop codon.
Fly Stocks--
All fly stocks (Oregon R or w1118) were
maintained under standard culture conditions.
In Situ Chromosomal Mapping--
For in situ
hybridization to polytene salivary gland chromosomes, the
pBSK-SP6-globin vector containing the entire cDNA sequence of
dGNaC1 was labeled with biotin-11-dUTP (Boehringer Mannheim) by random
priming according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Expression in Oocytes and Electrophysiological Analysis--
For
expression in Xenopus oocytes, cRNA was synthesized from the
NotI-digested vector using a kit from Stratagene.
Xenopus oocytes were injected with 0.5-5 ng of cRNA, and
microelectrode voltage-clamp assays were performed 1-5 days after
injection.
Northern Blotting and RT-PCR--
Total RNA was obtained from
staged embryos, larvae, pupae, and adults by the acidic phenol method
(31). Five micrograms of total RNA from each developmental stage were
fractionated by electrophoresis on a formaldehyde-containing 0.8%
agarose gel and transferred to Nylon membrane (Hybond N, Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). The entire coding sequence of dGNaC1 was
radiolabeled by the random priming method (Promega) and used as a probe
(106 cpm/ml) for overnight hybridization at 42 °C in a
solution containing 30% formamide, 5× Denhardt's solution, 5× SSC,
0.1% SDS, and 100 µg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA. After washing in
0.2× SSC and 0.1% SDS at 55 °C, the blot was exposed to Kodak
X-Omat AR film for 14 days at 70 °C with intensifying screens. The
filter was subsequently hybridized with a probe encoding the
Drosophila rpl17 gene (32) to estimate the relative amount
of RNA loaded in each lane.
For RT-PCR experiments, total RNAs were treated with RNase-free DNase I
(Boehringer Mannheim) to remove contaminating genomic DNA. For first
strand cDNA synthesis, 2 µg of total RNA were oligo(dT)-primed in
a final volume of 20 µl in the presence or absence of 200 units of
Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.). The
reaction was carried out at 42 °C for 1 h and heated at
70 °C for 15 min. For the PCR analysis, 2 µl of RT products were
used with 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) and 200 ng
of the sense primer (the same as described previously for dGNaC1
cloning) and the antisense primer (5'-TCCTCGAGTGAACTGGCTGTAAAGATCAG-3') in a 20-µl reaction mixture. Forty cycles of PCR (94 °C for 1 min,
60 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min) were performed, except for
the rpl17-specific primers, for which only 20 cycles were performed. PCR products were gel electrophoresed and visualized by
ethidium bromide staining.
In Situ Hybridization--
Whole-mount in situ
hybridization of embryos and egg chambers was carried out according to
Tautz and Pfeifle (33). Digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes corresponding to
the whole coding sequence were synthesized according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Promega, Riboprobe, Gemini II-Core
system). Ovaries and testes were dissected in phosphate-buffered saline
and transferred directly to the fix solution consisting of 4%
paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline. After washing in
phosphate-buffered saline and 0.1% Tween 20, tissues were treated with
proteinase K (50 µg/ml for 5 min). RNA probes were hybridized overnight at 55 °C in 25% formamide, 2× SSC, 100 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA, 50 µg/ml heparin, and 0.1% Tween 20. Tissues were mounted in 80% glycerol and viewed with a microscope under Nomarski
optics.
 |
RESULTS |
Cloning and Structure of dGNaC1--
Two partial cDNA
sequences from Drosophila embryo similar to those of other
members of the degenerin/ENaC/FaNaC/ASIC superfamily were found in the
data base of expressed sequence tags (accession numbers AA264333 and
AA264288). One displayed similarity in the 5'-coding region (AA264333),
including the first transmembrane domain, and contained a putative
start codon. The other (AA264288) showed similarity in the 3'-coding
region, including the second transmembrane domain, and contained a
putative stop codon. Two oligonucleotides flanking the putative coding
sequence were used to amplify by PCR a fragment of 1750 base pairs from
Drosophila cDNA. It contains an open reading frame of
1686 base pairs and codes for a protein of 562 amino acids (Fig.
1A). This protein has all the
hallmarks of the degenerin/ENaC/FaNaC/ASIC superfamily, i.e.
two hydrophobic domains flanking a large region including a
cysteine-rich domain (Fig. 1, A and B) that was
shown to be extracellular for the epithelial Na+ channel
(34) and for the degenerin MEC-4 (35). dGNaC1 was mapped by
in situ hybridization to region 82CD on the right arm of the
third chromosome (data not shown).

View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Protein sequence of dGNaC1 and
comparison with other members of the degenerin/ENaC/FaNaC/ASIC family.
A, sequence comparison between dGNaC1 and human ENaC. The
two putative transmembrane regions M1 (M I) and M2 (M
II) are indicated by thick lines above the sequence.
External cysteines are marked with asterisks. Identical and
similar residues are printed white on black and black
on gray, respectively. B, schematic presentation of
structural homologies. CRD, cysteine-rich domain.
C, protein identity between dGNaC1 and other members of the
family. The sequences were aligned using the GCG Pileup program, with
minor manual corrections when necessary, and identities were calculated
with the GCG Distances program without correction for multiple
substitutions. Accession numbers for human ENaC, NaC, ASIC,
FaNaC, and MEC-4 are X76180, U38254, U94403, X92113, and U53669,
respectively.
|
|
Expression of dGNaC1 in Xenopus Oocytes--
When
dGNaC1 cRNA was injected into Xenopus oocytes, an
amiloride-sensitive Na+-selective current was recorded
(Fig. 2A). Large variations in the amplitude of the amiloride-sensitive current were found in different oocyte batches (from a few tens of nA up to ~1 µA). Treatment with ATP, a jump in the external pH, and activation of
protein kinases A and C were not able to alter the current (data not
shown). The ionic substitutions experiments (Fig. 2C) and
the inversion of the amiloride-sensitive current at positive potential
values (Er = 36.5 ± 6.6 mV, n = 11) (Fig. 2D) suggested a higher permeability of the
channel for Na+ over K+ and an equal
permeability for Li+ and Na+. Amiloride and its
derivative, ethylisopropyl amiloride, blocked the channel, with
half-inhibition concentrations (IC50) of 24 and 49 µM, respectively, whereas benzamil was found to be more effective, with an IC50 of 2 µM (Fig.
2B).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Expression of dGNaC1 in Xenopus
oocytes. A, effect of amiloride (Ami) on
the current recorded on a whole oocyte at 70 mV. B,
sensitivity of the current recorded at 70 mV to amiloride and its
derivatives. Each point represents mean values from five oocytes.
C, effect of substituting Na+ for
Li+ or K+ in the external medium on the
amiloride-sensitive current recorded at 70 mV. Results are from seven
different oocytes. D, I-V relationship
of the amiloride-sensitive current (1 mM amiloride)
obtained by a voltage ramp from 150 to 100 mV in
Na+-containing medium. The reversal potential was close to
40 mV. EIPA, ethylisopropyl amiloride.
|
|
Expression of dGNaC1 during Development--
The expression
pattern of dGNaC1 was analyzed by Northern blot
hybridization of total RNA isolated from different developmental stages
(Fig. 3A). Three observations
were made. First, two forms of mRNA are transcribed: one major RNA
transcript of 3.2 kb and a second transcript of 2.3 kb, probably
explained by different mRNA polyadenylation, alternative splicing
of the dGNaC1 gene, or the presence of a closely related
homologous mRNA. Second, the expression level is strongly regulated
during development (Fig. 3A). The mRNA was readily
detected in early embryos (0-4 h), suggesting a high level of maternal
expression. However, no further expression was detected during late
embryogenesis. Third, dGNaC1 is specifically transcribed in
the gonads (Fig. 3, A and B). The highest RNA
level was detected in ovaries; RNA was still detectable in whole
females, but not in females lacking ovaries or in males (Fig.
3A). More sensitive measurements made using RT-PCR
detected dGNaC1 transcripts in whole males due to
specific expression in the genital tract (Fig. 3B). No
signal was observed in males after removal of their genital tracts or
in females after removal of their ovaries (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
A, Northern blot of total RNA showing
the developmental expression of dGNaC1. Total RNA was
prepared from Drosophila at various stages of development.
Hybridization was carried out using the entire dGNaC1
cDNA as a probe. Lanes are marked according to the specific
developmental stage; numbers during embryonic stages refer to hours of
development after fertilization. L3, third larval stage;
P, pupal stage. The blot shows an abundant transcript of 3.2 kb and a less abundant one of 2.3 kb in early embryos (0-4 h). These
transcripts are also abundant in ovaries, but occur at much lower
levels in whole females. The amount of RNA loaded in each lane was
estimated by rehybridization with a cDNA probe coding for the
ribosomal protein L17A (rpl17; bottom panels).
Sizes (in kb) are indicated on the left. B, RT-PCR analysis
of dGNaC1 gene expression in male and female gonads. Ovaries
and male genital tracts were dissected from remaining tissues
(carcasses), and RNAs were prepared as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Expression of the gene encoding ribosomal protein rpl17
served as a control. + and , with and without reverse transcriptase,
respectively.
|
|
A more precise determination of dGNaC1 transcript
localization was assessed by in situ hybridization.
Experiments with digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probes and control
experiments with sense probes were performed on wild-type ovaries and
testes (Fig. 4). dGNaC1 RNA
was not detectable in ovarian stem cells, oogonia, and early cysts
(Fig. 4A). They were weakly detected at stage 5 (according to the criteria of King (36)), and the highest expression was seen at
stage 10, where they were present throughout the nurse cells, oocytes,
and follicle cells (Fig. 4, A and B). In
situ hybridization was also performed on whole-mount embryos. The
criteria of Campos-Ortega and Hartenstein (37) were used to identify stages of embryonic development. At the syncytial stage (stage 4),
prior to cellularization, dGNaC1 was distributed uniformly within the cytoplasm (Fig. 4C). It was also detected in the
cellular blastoderm embryo (Fig. 4D). The pole cells, the
progenitors of the germ line, did not accumulate dGNaC1
transcripts (Fig. 4D). Levels of transcript then declined in
embryos at stage 8, i.e. at early gastrulation (Fig.
4E), and subsequently vanished.

View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
In situ hybridization with a
digoxigenin-labeled dGNaC1 antisense RNA probe to adult
gonads and early embryos. In wild-type ovarioles (A),
weak staining appears in stage 5 and continues to accumulate both in
nurse cells and in the oocyte at stage 10. They are also detectable in
the follicle cell monolayer that surrounds the oocyte at stage 11 (B). High levels of dGNaC1 transcripts are
present throughout the syncytial embryos both prior to pole cell
formation (C) and following pole cell formation, in the
early blastoderm stage (D). No dGNaC1
transcripts are detected in pole cells (D,
arrowhead). During germ band extension, dGNaC1 is
expressed in the presumptive mesoderm (E). Expression is not
detected afterward. Dorsal is up and anterior is to the left.
Expression of dGNaC1 in the adult male reproductive tract
is shown (G). dGNaC1 RNAs are detected in testis,
except at the apical region of the testis (ap.), and in the
seminal vesicle (sem. ves.). No labeling is detected in the
early embryo (F) or in the ovariole and male reproductive
tract (not shown) with a dGNaC1 sense RNA probe.
|
|
In situ hybridization on the male genital tract also
revealed the presence of transcript. dGNaC1 was not detected
in the apical tips, which contain the stem cells and gonial cysts, but
it was detected in the cysts that contain primary spermatocytes or
cells entering meiosis (Fig. 4G). dGNaC1 was also
detected in seminal vesicles (Fig. 4G).
 |
DISCUSSION |
This work reports the identification of a gene related to the
degenerin/ENaC/FaNaC/ASIC superfamily of ion channels in D. melanogaster. This finding is consistent with the view that
amiloride-sensitive Na+ channels are widely expressed
throughout the whole animal kingdom. Physiological studies have
previously shown that a channel related to the epithelial sodium
channel is present in the leech Hirudo medicinalis, where it
controls animal volume (38), and in Lumbricus terrestris
intestine, where amiloride-sensitive sodium transport displays seasonal
changes via an unknown hormonal regulatory mechanism (39). Moreover,
the C. elegans degenerins are widely expressed in nematode
neurons and muscle (40), and Helix or Aplysia
neurons express the FMRF-amide ionotropic receptor (22).
The Drosophila gene encodes dGNaC1, a protein of 562 amino
acids that contains all the conserved motifs characteristic of the
family. This protein has significant but low sequence identity to the
other members of the family (below 20%) (Fig. 1C) and
cannot be linked to any of them by phylogenetic analyses (data not
shown), except for another protein identified in Drosophila
peripheral nervous system that displays 38% identity to dGNaC1 (41,
53). Similarity was stronger around the first and second transmembrane domains, but was low in the large extracellular loop, except for the
cysteine-rich region and the two highly conserved motifs
107FPAVTVC113 and
224GICYTFN230 (Fig. 1A). Despite
distant phylogenetic relationships, the overall structure of dGNaC1
makes it closer to ENaC, ENaC, ENaC, or NaC than to the
other members of the family (Fig. 1B). According to the
classification proposed by Barbry and Hofman (28), dGNaC1 would
therefore group with the proteins involved in vectorial transport, in
agreement with the functional properties of the dGNaC1 channel recorded
in Xenopus oocytes (Fig. 2). It should be noted that the
intracellular COOH-terminal part of dGNaC1, which was shown to have an
important role in epithelial sodium channel regulation (42-44), is
extremely short.
The channel expressed in Xenopus oocytes after injection of
the in vitro transcribed RNA is highly selective for
Na+ over K+ and is blocked by amiloride. While
ENaC is more permeant to Li+ than to Na+,
dGNaC1 does not discriminate between Na+ and
Li+ and displays a small but significant K+
permeability. Amiloride concentrations needed to block this channel are
10-100 times higher than those necessary to block ENaC or NaC (20,
29). Ethylisopropyl amiloride, a classical high affinity blocker of the
Na+/H+ antiporter, can also efficiently block
the dGNaC1 channel, with a potency similar to that of amiloride.
Ethylisopropyl amiloride is much less active than amiloride in blocking
the ENaC channel (20). The dGNaC1 single-channel conductance was
difficult to assess due to a noisy current with no resolved unitary
current levels (data not shown). The pharmacological and biophysical
properties of dGNaC1 are very close to those of an   ENaC
channel comprising a mutated -subunit in which Ser589 in
the second transmembrane domain was changed to a phenylalanine (30),
i.e. the residue found in the equivalent position of
dGNaC1.
Successful heterologous expression of dGNaC1 was obtained only in
Xenopus oocytes. It was actually not possible to record any
dGNaC1 activity in transfected mammalian COS cells (data not shown).
This strongly suggests that dGNaC1 channel activity is modulated by a
Xenopus oocyte-specific factor. This is particularly noteworthy since expression of dGNaC1 transcripts in
Drosophila was also restricted to oocytes of late
vitellogenic stages and to early embryos, in addition to nurse cells
and follicular cells. Transcripts disappeared completely at the stage
of late gastrulation. Thus, dGNaC1 corresponds to a
maternally encoded gene.
The functional properties of dGNaC1 described here can presently be
related to two distinct physiological processes. First, between stages
10 and 14, the oocyte develops in an egg chamber comprising a cyst of
15 nurse cells interconnected by ring canals at the anterior edge. The
single oocyte is surrounded with an epithelium layer of follicle cells
(for review, see Ref. 45). Active transcription and translation by
nurse cells produce the different constituents that are necessary for
efficient growth of the oocyte. They are coupled to transport from
nurse cells to the oocyte through intercellular junctions. Voltage
gradients between nurse cells and the oocyte were first reported and
proposed to explain this transport by Woodruff and Telfer (46).
However, available evidence does not support a role for electrophoresis in the early phases of transport (47). Using a vibrating probe, Overall
and Jaffé (48) have described a large steady Na+
influx through the anterior or nurse cell end of the follicles. Coupled
with efflux at the posterior side of the egg, this transcellular transport is expected to be coupled to osmotic transport of water. The
drag effect that can accompany this active Na+ transport
would in that case carry macromolecules. dGNaC1 transcripts were found in nurse cells and follicular cells. This raises the possibility that dGNaC1 is involved in the entry of sodium into nurse
cells. A second potential role for dGNaC1 could be in the hydration
event that is associated with ovulation in Drosophila (49)
and more generally in the large swelling of the oocytes that is
observed during final maturation. Interestingly, LaFleur and Thomas (3)
have reported that in marine teleosts, such oocyte swelling is
partially blocked by amiloride (3).
A similar dGNaC1 function related to volume increase could take place
in testis, where dGNaC1 transcripts are detected in the
primary spermatocyte stage of development and in later cells in the
spermiogenic pathway. The primary spermatocyte transcribes most if not
all of the gene products needed for the dramatic morphogenetic events
that follow meiosis (for review, see Fuller (50)). The primary
spermatocyte stage lasts 90 h. During this time, the cells grow 25 times in volume (51). Such volume increase may be related to
electrogenic sodium transport through dGNaC1, osmotically followed by
water. Nevertheless, since there exist mechanisms that act during
spermatogenesis to delay translation of certain messages until well
after transcription, a function later in spermiogenesis cannot be
excluded.
Amiloride-sensitive Na+ channels have been implicated in
vertebrate development. In mammalian embryo, the blastocoel is formed by fluid accumulation due to an electrogenic transport of sodium partly
inhibited by amiloride (10, 12, 13). In Drosophila, a stage
5 embryo, which corresponds to mammalian blastula, is indeed a
syncytium lacking a fluid-filled central cavity (for review, see Foe
et al. (52)). Thus, dGNaC1 can hardly be linked to
blastocoelic expansion. Nevertheless, the Na+ channel
characterized in 7-day postcoitus preimplantation embryos in rabbits is
inhibited by amiloride, benzamil, and ethylisopropyl amiloride, with
apparent dissociation constants of 12, 50, and 16 µM,
respectively (10). These values are not very different from those found
for dGNaC1, but they are clearly distinct from those found for the
classical epithelial Na+ channel (28) or for the human
sodium channel -subunit (29). One can thus infer from the
gonad-specific expression of dGNaC1 in Drosophila that
new members of the degenerin/ENaC/FaNaC/ASIC gene superfamily similar
to dGNaC1 will be identified in vertebrate gonads, where they will be
involved in early developmental processes.
In conclusion, we report here the properties of dGNaC1, a new
gonad-specific Drosophila amiloride-sensitive
Na+ channel that may participate in gametogenesis and early
embryonic development. Elucidation of the regulatory properties of this channel will probably reveal important mechanisms controlling early
steps of development.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are very grateful to Drs. Hideki Sakai,
David Pauron, Pierre Leopold, and Michel Semeriva for fruitful
discussions. We thank Dr. Amanda Patel for careful reading of the
manuscript. Thanks are due to Franck Aguila for help with the artwork
and to Valérie Friend, Martine Jodar, Nathalie Leroudier, and
Dahvya Doume for technical assistance. We thank the Laboratoire de
Génétique et Physiologie du Développement (UMR 9943 CNRS-Université) for technical facilities.
 |
Note Added in Proof |
dGNaC1 is identical to the Ripped Pocket
(RPK) protein recently described by Adams et al. (53).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by CNRS, INSERM, and the
Association Française de Lutte contre la Mucoviscidose.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence reported in this paper has been submitted
to the GenBankTM/EMBL/DDBJ Data Bases with accession number Y16240.
Recipient of a grant from the Association Claude Bernard.
§
Recipient of a grant from the Délégation
Générale pour l'Armement.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
33-4-93-95-77-02; Fax: 33-4-93-95-77-04; E-mail: ipmc{at}cnrs.fr.
1
The abbreviations used are: PCR, polymerase
chain reaction; RT, reverse transcription; kb, kilobase(s).
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Epel, D.
(1980)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
339,
74-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shen, S. S.,
and Burgart, L. J.
(1985)
J. Cell Biol.
101,
420-426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
LaFleur, G. J., Jr.,
and Thomas, P.
(1991)
J. Exp. Zool.
258,
126-136[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cameron, I. L.,
Hunter, K. E.,
and Cragoe, E., Jr.
(1982)
Exp. Cell Res.
139,
455-457[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
McCaig, C. D.,
and Robinson, K. R.
(1982)
Dev. Biol.
90,
335-339[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shi, R.,
and Borgens, R. B.
(1994)
Dev. Biol.
165,
105-116[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Benos, D. J.,
Biggers, J. D.,
Balaban, R. S.,
Mills, J. W.,
and Overstrom, E. W.
(1985)
Soc. Gen. Physiol. Ser.
39,
211-235[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Epel, D.
(1990)
Cell Differ. Dev.
29,
1-12[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kupitz, Y.,
and Atlas, D.
(1993)
Science
261,
484-486[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Robinson, D. H.,
Bubien, J. K.,
Smith, P. R.,
and Benos, D. J.
(1991)
Dev. Biol.
147,
313-321[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Biggers, J. D.,
Bell, J. E.,
and Benos, D. J.
(1988)
Am. J. Physiol.
255,
C419-C432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Manejwala, F. M.,
Cragoe, E. J.,
and Schultz, R. M.
(1989)
Dev. Biol.
133,
210-220[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Powers, R. D.,
Borland, R. M.,
and Biggers, J. D.
(1977)
Nature
270,
603-604[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Garty, H.,
and Palmer, L. G.
(1997)
Physiol. Rev.
77,
359-396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Driscoll, M.,
and Chalfie, M.
(1991)
Nature
349,
588-593[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Huang, M.,
and Chalfie, M.
(1994)
Nature
367,
467-470[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Liu, J.,
Schrank, B.,
and Waterston, R. H.
(1996)
Science
273,
361-364[Abstract]
-
Canessa, C. M.,
Horisberger, J. D.,
and Rossier, B. C.
(1993)
Nature
361,
467-470[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Canessa, C.,
Schild, L.,
Buell, G.,
Thorens, B.,
Gautschi, I.,
Horisberger, J. D.,
and Rossier, B. C.
(1994)
Nature
367,
463-467[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lingueglia, E.,
Voilley, N.,
Waldmann, R.,
Lazdunski, M.,
and Barbry, P.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
318,
95-99[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lingueglia, E.,
Renard, S.,
Waldmann, R.,
Voilley, N.,
Champigny, G.,
Plass, H.,
Lazdunski, M.,
and Barbry, P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13736-13739[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lingueglia, E.,
Champigny, G.,
Lazdunski, M.,
and Barbry, P.
(1995)
Nature
378,
730-733[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Coscoy, S.,
Lingueglia, E.,
Lazdunski, M.,
and Barbry, P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8317-8322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Waldmann, R.,
Champigny, G.,
Bassilana, F.,
Heurteaux, C.,
and Lazdunski, M.
(1997)
Nature
386,
173-177[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Waldmann, R.,
Bassilana, F.,
de Weille, J. R.,
Champigny, G.,
Heurteaux, C.,
and Lazdunski, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20975-20978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bassilana, F.,
Champigny, G.,
Waldmann, R.,
de Weille, J. R.,
Heurteaux, C.,
and Lazdunski, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28819-28822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lingueglia, E.,
de Weille, J. R.,
Bassilana, F.,
Heurteaux, C.,
Sakai, H.,
Waldmann, R.,
and Lazdunski, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
29778-29783[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Barbry, P.,
and Hofman, P.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
G571-G585[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Waldmann, R.,
Champigny, G.,
Bassilana, F.,
Voilley, N.,
and Lazdunski, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27411-27414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Waldmann, R.,
Champigny, G.,
and Lazdunski, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
11735-11737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chomczynski, P.,
and Sacchi, N.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
156-159[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Noselli, S.,
and Vincent, A.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.)
118,
273-278[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tautz, D.,
and Pfeifle, C.
(1989)
Chromosoma (Berl.)
98,
81-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Renard, S.,
Lingueglia, E.,
Voilley, N.,
Lazdunski, M.,
and Barbry, P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12981-12986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lai, C.,
Hong, K.,
Kinnell, M.,
Chalfie, M.,
and Driscoll, M.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
1071-1081[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
King, R. C.
(1970)
Ovarian Development in Drosophila melanogaster, Academic Press, New York
-
Campos-Ortega, J. A.,
and Hartenstein, V.
(1985)
The Embryonic Development of Drosophila melanogaster, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
-
Weber, W. M.,
Dannenmaier, B.,
and Clauss, W.
(1993)
J. Comp. Physiol. B Biochem. Syst. Environ. Physiol.
163,
153-159[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cornell, J. C.
(1984)
Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Comp. Physiol.
78,
463-468[CrossRef]
-
García-Añoveros, J.,
and Corey, D. P.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
20,
567-594[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Darboux, I., Lingueglia, E., Pauron, D., Barbry, P., and Lazdunski, M. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., in press
-
Hansson, J. H.,
Nelson-Williams, C.,
Suzuki, H.,
Schild, L.,
Shimkets, R. A.,
Lu, Y.,
Canessa, C. M.,
Iwasaki, T.,
Rossier, B. C.,
and Lifton, R. P.
(1995)
Nat. Genet.
11,
76-82[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jeunemaitre, X.,
Bassilana, F.,
Persu, A.,
Dumont, C.,
Champigny, G.,
Lazdunski, M.,
Corvol, P.,
and Barbry, P.
(1997)
J. Hypertens.
15,
1091-1100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shimkets, R. A.,
Warnock, D. G.,
Bositis, C. M.,
Nelson-Williams, C.,
Hansson, J. H.,
Schambelan, M.,
Gill, J. R., Jr.,
Ulick, S.,
Milora, R. V.,
Findling, J. W.,
Canessa, C. M.,
Rossier, B. C.,
and Lifton, R. P.
(1994)
Cell
79,
407-414[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Spradling, A. C.
(1993)
in
The Development of Drosophila melanogaster (Bate, M., and Martinez-Arias, A., eds), pp. 1-70, Cold Spring Harbor, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Woodruff, R. I.,
and Telfer, W. H.
(1980)
Nature
286,
84-86[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bohrmann, J.,
and Gutzeit, H.
(1987)
Development (Camb.)
101,
279-288[Abstract]
-
Overall, R.,
and Jaffé, L. F.
(1985)
Dev. Biol.
108,
102-119[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mahowald, A. P.,
Goralski, T. J.,
and Caulton, J. H.
(1983)
Dev. Biol.
98,
437-445[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fuller, M. T.
(1993)
in
The Development of Drosophila melanogaster (Bate, M., and Martinez-Arias, A., eds), pp. 71-147, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Tates, A. D.
(1971)
Cytodifferentiation during Spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster: an Electron Microscope Study, J. H. Rasmans, The Hague, The Netherlands
-
Foe, V. E.,
Odell, G. M.,
and Edgar, B. A.
(1993)
in
The Development of Drosophila melanogaster (Bate, M., and Martinez-Arias, A., eds), pp. 149-300, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Adams, C. M.,
Anderson, M. G.,
Motto, D. G.,
Price, M. P.,
Johnson, W. A.,
and Welsh, M. J.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
140,
143-152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Fitsialos, A.-A. Chassot, L. Turchi, M. A. Dayem, K. LeBrigand, C. Moreilhon, G. Meneguzzi, R. Busca, B. Mari, P. Barbry, et al.
Transcriptional Signature of Epidermal Keratinocytes Subjected to in Vitro Scratch Wounding Reveals Selective Roles for ERK1/2, p38, and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Signaling Pathways
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 18, 2007;
282(20):
15090 - 15102.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. O. Hernandez-Gonzalez, J. Sosnik, J. Edwards, J. J. Acevedo, I. Mendoza-Lujambio, I. Lopez-Gonzalez, I. Demarco, E. Wertheimer, A. Darszon, and P. E. Visconti
Sodium and Epithelial Sodium Channels Participate in the Regulation of the Capacitation-associated Hyperpolarization in Mouse Sperm
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 3, 2006;
281(9):
5623 - 5633.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Wang, B. Duan, H. Xu, L. Xu, and T.-L. Xu
Calcium-permeable Acid-sensing Ion Channel Is a Molecular Target of the Neurotoxic Metal Ion Lead
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 3, 2006;
281(5):
2497 - 2505.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Lin, K. J. Mann, E. Starostina, R. D. Kinser, and C. W. Pikielny
A Drosophila DEG/ENaC channel subunit is required for male response to female pheromones
PNAS,
September 6, 2005;
102(36):
12831 - 12836.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Saugstad, J. A. Roberts, J. Dong, S. Zeitouni, and R. J. Evans
Analysis of the Membrane Topology of the Acid-sensing Ion Channel 2a
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 31, 2004;
279(53):
55514 - 55519.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Martinac
Mechanosensitive ion channels: molecules of mechanotransduction
J. Cell Sci.,
May 15, 2004;
117(12):
2449 - 2460.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Hugot, M.-P. Riviere, C. Moreilhon, M. A. Dayem, J. Cozzitorto, G. Arbiol, P. Barbry, C. Weiss, and E. Galiana
Coordinated Regulation of Genes for Secretion in Tobacco at Late Developmental Stages: Association with Resistance against Oomycetes
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 2004;
134(2):
858 - 870.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kellenberger and L. Schild
Epithelial Sodium Channel/Degenerin Family of Ion Channels: A Variety of Functions for a Shared Structure
Physiol Rev,
July 1, 2002;
82(3):
735 - 767.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. P. Hamill and B. Martinac
Molecular Basis of Mechanotransduction in Living Cells
Physiol Rev,
April 1, 2001;
81(2):
685 - 740.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Giannakou and J. A. T. Dow
Characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster alkali-metal/proton exchanger (NHE) gene family
J. Exp. Biol.,
January 11, 2001;
204(21):
3703 - 3716.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J Benos and B. A Stanton
Functional domains within the degenerin/epithelial sodium channel (Deg/ENaC) superfamily of ion channels
J. Physiol.,
November 1, 1999;
520(3):
631 - 644.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Sakai, E. Lingueglia, G. Champigny, M.-G. Mattei, and M. Lazdunski
Cloning and functional expression of a novel degenerin-like Na+ channel gene in mammals
J. Physiol.,
September 1, 1999;
519(2):
323 - 333.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Babinski, S. Catarsi, G. Biagini, and P. Seguela
Mammalian ASIC2a and ASIC3 Subunits Co-assemble into Heteromeric Proton-gated Channels Sensitive to Gd3+
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 8, 2000;
275(37):
28519 - 28525.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|