|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 16, 9951-9958, April 17, 1998
Characterization of V3 Loop-Pseudomonas Exotoxin
Chimeras
CANDIDATE VACCINES FOR HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS-1*
David J.
FitzGerald §,
Charlotte M.
Fryling ,
Marian L.
McKee ,
JoAnn C.
Vennari¶,
Terri
Wrin¶,
Mary E. M.
Cromwell ,
Ann L.
Daugherty , and
Randall J.
Mrsny
From the Biotherapy Section, Laboratory of Molecular
Biology, Division of Basic Science, NCI, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4255 and ¶ Cell Banking and Drug
Delivery/Biology, Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Genentech
Inc., South San Francisco, California 94080-4990
 |
ABSTRACT |
To develop a candidate vaccine for human
immunodeficiency virus, type 1 (HIV-1), chimeric proteins were
constructed by inserting sequences derived from the V3 loop of gp120
into a nontoxic form of Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE). Inserts
of 14 or 26 amino acids, constrained by a disulfide bond, were
introduced between domains II and III of PE. V3 loop-toxin proteins
expressed in Escherichia coli and corresponding to either
MN (subtype B) or Thai (subtype E) strains, were recognized by
strain-specific monoclonal anti-gp120 antibodies. When loop sequences
were introduced into an enzymatically active form of the toxin, there
was no loss of toxin-mediated cell killing, suggesting that these
sequences were co-transported to the cytosol. Sera from rabbits
injected with nontoxic PE-V3 loop chimeras were reactive for
strain-specific gp120s in Western blots, immunocapture assays,
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and neutralized HIV-1 infectivity.
Since toxin vectors were designed to receive oligonucleotide duplexes
encoding any V3 loop sequence, this approach should allow for the
production of V3 loop-toxin chimeras corresponding to multiple HIV
isolates.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Infection with human immunodeficiency virus-1
(HIV-1),1 which progresses to
AIDS, represents a disease pandemic that cannot yet be controlled by
vaccination (1). Because the pathology associated with HIV infection is
not fully understood, there are concerns that vaccines made from
attenuated strains of HIV could be unsafe, whereas subunit vaccines
might not be complex enough to generate an appropriate immune response.
Further, it is unlikely that immunity produced against one strain of
HIV-1 will be effective in providing large scale protection against
such a mutable virus. Studies of infected individuals termed
nonprogressors have indicated that a combined response of neutralizing
antibody and reactive cytotoxic T-cells can retard the onset of AIDS
(2). Therefore, the development of a stable vaccine, which could elicit
both humoral and cellular responses and be flexible enough to
incorporate sequences from many HIV-1 strains, is desirable. Current
vaccine approaches range from the development of recombinant viruses
(3, 4) through the use of purified envelope proteins (5) to the
evaluation of conjugates composed of viral peptides (6-8). Despite
much effort, a consensus vaccine candidate has not emerged.
Here we characterize a series of recombinant V3 loop-toxin chimeric
proteins. The V3 loop was chosen because it represents the major
neutralizing epitope of HIV-1. Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE) was
chosen because it has been used as an effective carrier-adjuvant in
vaccines directed against bacterial pathogens (9, 10) and because its
functional domains have been well characterized (11). Because of the
latter, it was possible to identify a location where the introduction
of a V3 loop insert was unlikely to cause a major disruption in toxin
structure.
Previous work has shown that the third variable (V3) loop of the
envelope protein, gp120, contains the principal neutralizing domain of
HIV-1 (12-14). Further, immunization with a recombinant form of gp120
appears sufficient to protect chimpanzees from infection by HIV-1
challenge (15). Thus, gp120 and its parent molecule, gp160, have been
used to vaccinate human volunteers (16, 17). Because of the importance
of the envelope protein and specifically its V3 loop for HIV
infectivity, our efforts have focused on the development of chimeras
composed of strain-specific V3 loop sequences. PE has a nonessential
subdomain, termed Ib, which is composed of a small loop flanked by a
disulfide bond. Chimeras were designed to introduce V3 loop amino acids
in this location where they could form a loop and be exposed at the
surface of the protein. Although V3 loops vary considerably among the
various HIV-1 strains (18), specific antibodies to this region have
been shown to neutralize infectivity of the virus and to prevent viral
cell fusion in vitro (6). Because our vector allows for the
introduction of many different sequences, we anticipate that a chimera
displaying the V3 loop of any isolate could be produced.
PE is secreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a 67-kDa protein
composed of three prominent globular domains (Ia, II, and III) and one
small subdomain (Ib) connecting domains II and III (19). Domain Ia of
PE binds to the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP)
(20, 21), also known as the 2- macroglobulin receptor.
LRP is expressed on the surface of most mammalian cells and tissues,
including those of the immune system (22). Domain II mediates
translocation to the cytosol, and domain III has ADP-ribosylating activity (23). Once bound to LRP, the toxin traffics via coated pits to
an endosomal compartment, where it is cleaved by the protease, furin,
to generate a 37-kDa C-terminal fragment composed of domains II, Ib,
and III (24, 25). This fragment translocates to the cell cytosol,
ADP-ribosylates elongation factor 2, and shuts down protein synthesis.
When glutamic acid 553 in domain III is deleted ( E553), the toxin
still gains access to the cytosol (26) but is rendered nontoxic since
this mutation eliminates ADP-ribosylating activity (27). In the
construction of our chimeras, we deleted much of subdomain Ib from the
( E553) version of PE and substituted V3 loop sequences of various
sizes in its place. The resulting chimeras were characterized
structurally, evaluated for display of V3 loop sequences, and tested as
immunogens for the generation of antiviral responses.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmid Construction--
Plasmid pMOA1A2VK352 (24), encoding
PE, was digested with SfiI and ApaI (residues
1143 and 1275, respectively) and then re-ligated with a duplex
containing a novel PstI site. The coding strand of
the duplex had the following sequence:
5'-TGGCCCTGACCCTGGCCGCCGCCGAGAGCGAGCGCTTCGTCCGGCAGGGCACCGGCAACGACGAGGCCGGCGCGGCAAACCTGCAGGGCC-3'. The resulting plasmid encoded a slightly smaller version of PE that lacked much of domain Ib. The PstI site was
subsequently used to introduce duplexes encoding V3 loop sequences
flanked by cysteine residues. To make nontoxic proteins, vectors were modified by subcloning to introduce the enzymatically inactive domain
III from pVC45 E553. An additional subcloning, from pJH4 (23), was
needed to produce a vector that lacked a signal sequence. Insertion of
duplexes and subcloning modifications were initially verified by
restriction analysis, and final constructs were confirmed by dideoxy
double strand sequencing.
Chimera Protein Expression and Purification--
All ntPE-V3
loop chimeric proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli
SA2821/BL21( DE3) using a T7promoter/T7 polymerase system (28).
SA2821/BL21( DE3) cells were transformed with the appropriate plasmid
and grown to an absorbance of 1.0 (600 nm) in medium containing ampicillin. To induce high level protein expression,
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactoside (1 mM) was
added to the culture and incubated for an additional 90 min. E. coli cell pellets were resuspended in 50 mM Tris, 20 mM EDTA, pH 8.0 (TE buffer) and dispersed using a Tissue
Miser. Cell lysis was accomplished with lysozyme (200 µg/ml; Sigma). Membrane-associated proteins were removed by washing with 2.5% Triton
X-100 and 0.5 M NaCl.
PE-V3 loop chimeras were present in inclusion bodies, which were
recovered by centrifugation. After washing with TE containing 0.5%
Triton X-100 and then with TE alone, inclusion bodies were solubilized
by the addition of 6 M guanidine and 65 mM
dithioerythritol. Refolding was allowed to proceed at a final protein
concentration of 100 µg/ml for a minimum of 24 h at 8 °C in
0.1 M Tris, pH 8.0, containing 0.5 M
L-arginine (Sigma), 2 mM EDTA, and 0.9 mM glutathione. The protease inhibitor
4,2-aminoethylbenzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride (AEBSF, Boerhinger
Mannheim) was added to a final concentration of 0.5 mM.
Proteins were dialyzed against 20 mM Tris, 2 mM
EDTA and 100 mM urea, pH 7.4. Following dialysis, proteins were applied to a Q Sepharose column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). After washing with 20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing 0.1 M NaCl, chimeric proteins were eluted with 0.3 M NaCl in the same buffer and concentrated using
Centriprep-30 ultrafiltration devices (Amicon, Inc., Beverly, MA). A
high performance liquid chromotography gel filtration column (G3000SW;
Toso Haas, Montgomeryville, PA) was used to isolate final products. A
typical yield of properly folded protein per 4 liters of bacterial
culture was 50-100 mg, with a purity greater than 95%.
Biochemical Characterization--
Chimeric proteins were
separated by SDS-PAGE using 8-16% gradient polyacrylamide gels
(Novex, San Diego, CA), and visualized by staining with Coomassie Blue.
For Western blot analysis, proteins were transferred onto Immobilon-P
membranes (Millipore Corp, Bedford, MA) and exposed to either an
anti-PE mouse monoclonal antibody (M40-1; Ref. 29) or an anti-gp120
mouse monoclonal antibody (1F12 for MN sequences or 1B2 for Thai-E
sequences; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA). The primary
antibody was detected by a secondary anti-mouse antibody conjugated to
horseradish peroxidase. Reactive products were visualized by the
addition of diaminobenzadine and hydrogen peroxide. Immunocapture
experiments were performed for 30 min at 23 °C using anti-gp120
monoclonal antibodies. Antibody-chimeric protein complexes were
recovered with protein G-Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
and separated using SDS-PAGE (as above). Recombinant forms of gp120
derived from HIV-1-MN (gp120/MN, subtype B; Genentech, Inc.) and a Thai
subtype E isolate (gp120/Thai-E-Chiang Mai; Advanced Biotechnologies,
Columbia, MD) were used as standards.
To determine sulfhydryl content, chimeric proteins (15 nmol) in PBS, pH
7.4, containing 1 mM EDTA, were reacted with 1 mM dithionitrobenzoate (Pierce) for 15 min at 23 °C. The
release of thionitrobenzoate was monitored at 412 nm.
Dithionitrobenzoate reactivity was confirmed by the use of
cysteine.
Biophysical Characterization--
Circular dichroism (CD)
spectra were collected on an Aviv 60DS spectropolarimeter. Near-UV CD
spectra (400 nm to 250 nm) were obtained in 0.2-nm increments with a
0.5-nm bandwidth and a 5-s time constant (150 readings/s averaged) for
samples in a 1-cm path length cell. Far-UV spectra (250 nm to 190 nm)
were collected in 0.2-nm increments with a 0.5-nm bandwidth and a 3-s
time constant in a 0.05-cm path length cell. Each spectrum was
digitally smoothed using the Savitsky-Golay algorithm (30), corrected
for concentration, and normalized to units of mean residue weight
ellipticity ( MRW) using the following relationship.
|
(Eq. 1)
|
obs is the observed ellipticity,
Mr(monomer) is the molecular weight of the
monomer, nmonomer is the number of amino acids in the monomer, d is the path length of the cell (cm), and
c is the concentration of the sample in the cell
(mg/ml).
Cell-based Cytotoxicity Assays--
Human A431 (epidermoid
carcinoma) cells were seeded in 24-well tissue culture plates at 1 × 105 cells/well in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5%
fetal bovine serum. After 24 h, cells were treated for 18 h
at 37 °C with 4-fold dilutions of either wtPE or toxic forms (with a
glutamic acid residue at position 553 and capable of ADP-ribosylating
elongation factor 2) of the chimeric proteins. Inhibition of protein
synthesis was assessed by monitoring the incorporation of
[3H]leucine.
Immunizations--
Rabbits were immunized subcutaneously at four
sites with 200 µg (total) of each ntPE-V3 chimeric protein. The first
injection was administered with complete Freund's adjuvant. All
subsequent injections (at 2, 4, and 12 weeks) were given with
incomplete Freund's adjuvant. Venous bleeds were obtained weekly after
the third injection and screened by immunoblotting against gp120.
ELISA--
Ninety-six-well plates (Pierce) were coated with
gp120 (100 ng/well) derived from either an MN strain or a Thai strain
(gp120/Chiang Mai from ABI; see above). Gp120 in PBS was added for
2 h at room temperature followed by a blocking solution of 1%
bovine serum albumin and 0.2% Tween 20. Subsequent washes were with
0.2% Tween 20 in PBS (TPBS). The appropriate dilution of primary
antibody in TPBS was added to each well for 30-60 min at room
temperature. To detect the primary antibody, donkey anti-rabbit IgG
conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
diluted 1:1000 in TPBS was added for 30 min. Bound peroxidase was
visualized using 3,3',5,5'-tetramethyl benzidine (Pierce) mixed with
0.01% hydrogen peroxide. H2SO4 was added to
quench the reaction and allow absorbance to be measured at 450 nm.
Prebleed sera were used to determine nonspecific binding in the assay.
To determine specific binding, absorbance with a prebleed serum sample
was subtracted from the corresponding value obtained with immune
sera.
In preliminary experiments, anti-PE antibodies were shown to interfere
with access to the V3 loop of the ntPE-V3 chimeras. To remove anti-PE
reactivity, immune sera were first passed over a PE affinity column.
Sera passing through the column were retained for use in the above
mentioned ELISA. To make the affinity column, wtPE (10 mg) was
dissolved in 0.5 M NaCl, 0.1 M sodium borate, pH 8.0, and reacted with CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Serum samples of 5-8 ml were passed over
individual columns of approximately 2 mg each of wtPE.
Viral Neutralization Assay--
One assay utilized MT4 cells as
a indicator of HIV-1-mediated cell death (31). Duplicate serial
dilutions of antiserum were incubated with HIV-1/MN (provided by M. Norcross, Food and Drug Administration and grown in FDA/H9 cells (32))
and the mixture added to MT4 cells for 7 days. Viral-mediated cell
death was assessed using a
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide dye assay
(33) and spectrophotometric analysis at 570 nm. The serum 50%
inhibitory concentration was calculated and reported as the
neutralization titer. A second assay used p24 production of as an
indicator of viral growth (34). Primary virus was first titrated to
determine the amount that reproducibly yielded significant but
submaximal amounts of p24. Virus preparations were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with various dilutions of rabbit sera, either immune or
prebleed, and this mixture was then added in quadruplicate to 2.5 × 105 PBMCs. The culture continued for 3 days at which
time cells were washed and resuspended in medium containing interleukin
2. Accumulation of p24 was detected by an ELISA.
 |
RESULTS |
Construction of Chimeras--
Wild-type (wt) PE is composed of 613 amino acids and has a molecular mass of 67,122 Da. Deletion of a
glutamic acid 553 ( E553) results in a nontoxic version of PE (27),
referred to as ntPE (Fig. 1A).
To generate chimeric proteins, we replaced much of subdomain Ib with V3
loop sequences (Fig. 1B) from either an MN (subtype B) or
Thai (subtype E) strain of HIV-1. The MN sequence is from a
T-cell-tropic strain, and the Thai-E sequence comes from a
macrophage-tropic strain. Plasmids were constructed by inserting
oligonucleotide duplexes encoding V3 loop sequences into a PE-based
vector that was designed with a novel PstI site (see
"Experimental Procedures"). In an effort to produce a V3 loop of
similar topology to that found in gp120, the 14- or 26-amino acid
inserts were flanked by cysteine residues (Fig. 1C,
bold type). Construction of the vector resulted in several
changes in the amino acid sequence of ntPE near the insertion point of the V3 loop (Fig. 1C, italics). Insertion of an
irrelevant 16-amino acid sequence resulted in the construction of a
control chimera referred to as ntPE-FP16. Removal of the Ib loop (6 amino acids) and modification of flanking amino acids adjacent to the
V3 loop insert resulted in a small increase in molecular mass compared with wild-type PE (Fig. 1C).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A, a schematic depiction of PE showing
its major structural domains: Ia, II, and III. Also shown is the minor
domain, Ib, and the approximate location of the single amino acid
deletion ( E553) to ablate PE toxicity. B, a PE-V3 loop
chimera showing where domain Ib has been replaced by the V3 loop.
C, amino acid sequences, represented with
single-letter code, which replaced the Ib loop of wild-type
PE with a V3 loop sequence of gp120 (bold type) from either
the MN-B or Thai-E (Th-E) strains of HIV-1. The insert was
bordered by two cysteine residues to allow for the formation of a
disulfide bond at the base of the loop. The insertion of a unique
PstI restriction site into the toxin vector resulted in
several modifications to the sequence of wild-type PE
(italics). An irrelevant insert was prepared as a control
and is designated ntPE-FP16. Calculated molecular masses are shown for
full-length expressed proteins.
|
|
Characterization of Chimeras--
SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig.
2A) of purified ntPE-V3 loop
chimeras was consistent with calculated masses (Fig. 1C).
Western blots, using monoclonal antibodies raised against gp120/MN
(1F12) or gp120/Thai-E (1B2), showed strain-specific reactivity with
the MN- and Thai-E-V3 loop chimeras (Fig. 2B). Free
sulfhydryl analysis of purified ntPE-V3 loop chimeras failed to
demonstrate any unpaired cysteines (data not shown), suggesting that
the purified ntPE-V3 loop chimeras had refolded and oxidized to form a
novel disulfide bond at the base of the V3 loop (Fig. 1B).
We anticipated that the formation of this disulfide bond would result
in the exposure of the V3 loop at the surface of the chimeras. This was
tested directly by immunocapture studies (Fig. 2C). The 1F12
and 1B2 monoclonal antibodies selectively captured the soluble MN and Th-E chimeric proteins confirming that the V3 loops were accessible to
antibody probes. Despite the fact that the 1F12 antibody reacted strongly with ntPE-V3MN14 in Western blots (Fig. 2B), it
captured only a small amount of soluble protein (Fig. 2C,
lane 3), suggesting that the reactive epitope was not
completely accessible when only 14 amino acids were inserted.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Characterization of ntPE-V3 loop chimeras
after separation by SDS-PAGE. A, Coomassie Blue staining of
purified ntPE-V3 loop chimeras following separation by SDS-PAGE.
Approximately 1 µg of protein was loaded on each lane. B,
Western blot analysis of ntPE-V3 loop chimeras. After transfer to
Immobilon P membranes, proteins were probed with monoclonal antibodies
raised against intact gp120/MN (1F12) or gp120/Thai-E (1B2).
C, immunocapture studies, using either 1F12 or 1B2
immobilized on protein G-Sepharose, were used to characterize the
exposure of V3 loop sequences on the surface of the various chimeric
proteins. Proteins were visualized by staining gels with Coomassie
Blue. gp120 and FP16 (with an irrelevant insert) were used as positive
and negative controls, respectively. The capture of PE-V3 loop proteins
is indicated with a single arrowhead and of gp120 by a
double arrowhead. The left panel shows the
presence of the antibody heavy chain (hc) only since the
light chain (lc) was run off the gel. The right
panel shows both chains.
|
|
To evaluate the impact of amino acid inserts on the secondary structure
of the chimeras, we performed near- and far-UV CD spectral analysis on
purified ntPE-V3MN14 and ntPE-V3MN26 proteins and compared these to
wild-type PE (wtPE) (Fig. 3, A
and B). Secondary structure calculations (Fig.
3C) suggested that there were no significant differences
between these proteins and wtPE. ntPE-V3MN14 demonstrated more negative
ellipticity than ntPE-V3MN26 and wtPE, suggesting more strain may occur
on the disulfide bond at the base of the loop insert for this chimera.
Both ntPE-V3MN14 and ntPE-V3MN26 showed an apparent red-shift at 290 nm, possibly due to the additional tyrosine residues in the chimeras.
Alternatively, this red-shift could result from a slight environmental
perturbation of a tryptophan residue. Altogether, these results suggest
that the V3 loop inserts did not produce large alterations in the
secondary structure relative to wild-type toxin and that changes in
tertiary structure were consistent with the presence of the 14 and 26 amino acid inserts.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
V3 loop amino acid sequence insertions do not
significantly alter the secondary structure of wild-type PE.
Near-UV (A) and far-UV (B) CD spectra (mean of
three scans following background spectrum subtraction) were digitally
smoothed, corrected for concentration, and normalized to units of mean
residue weight ellipticity. C, secondary structure
calculations were performed using the SELCON fitting program. *,
calculated -helix content agrees with values determined from changes
in observed ellipticity at 222 nm.
|
|
Because inserts were placed within the C-terminal fragment of PE that
normally translocates to the cytosol, it was of interest to determine
whether the V3 loop influenced translocation efficiency. We tested this
directly by producing enzymatically active versions of PE-V3MN14 and 26 (containing glutamic acid 553 and having the ability to ADP-ribosylate
elongation factor 2) and comparing their activity with wtPE in
cytotoxicity assays. Both PE-V3MN26 (shown in Fig.
4) and PE-V3MN14 (data not shown)
exhibited similar toxicity to wtPE in human A431 cells. We conclude
that neither the size of the insert, the location of placement nor the
presence of a novel disulfide bond impeded delivery to the cytosol.
Further, these data suggest that the isolation, refolding and
purification protocol used to prepare these chimeras resulted in the
production of a correctly folded and functional protein.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
An enzymatically active PE-V3 loop chimera is
toxic for cells. Inhibition of protein synthesis, assessed by
[3H]leucine incorporation, was determined in human A431
cells following an 18-h exposure to various concentrations of either
wild-type PE or a toxic form (with a glutamic acid residue at position
553 and capable of ADP-ribosylating elongation factor 2) of
PE-V3MN26.
|
|
Immunization of Rabbits with Chimeras--
To investigate the
immune response to the chimeras, rabbits were injected subcutaneously
with 200 µg of either the MN or Thai-E version of the protein. In
Western blots, serum samples from rabbits immunized with the ntPE-V3MN
proteins exhibited a strong reactivity for immobilized recombinant
gp120/MN (Fig. 5A). Reactive
titers increased with time. At 6 weeks, reactivity was noted at 1:200 dilution; at 12 weeks, reactivity was noted at 1:5,000 dilution; and at
later times, reactivity could be detected at 1:25,000. Anti-V3 loop/MN
sera were either less reactive or not reactive with gp120/Thai-E (Fig.
5A). Rabbits injected with the ntPE-V3ThE produced reactive
sera for gp120/Thai-E with little or no reactivity for gp120/MN (Fig.
5A). Sera from rabbits injected with nontoxic PE
(i.e. ntPE with no insert) exhibited no reactivity for gp120 of either subtype (data not shown).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Characterization of rabbit sera following
immunization with either ntPE-V3MN26 or ntPE-V3ThE26. A,
Western blot reactivity of rabbit antisera diluted 1:1000 for
recombinant gp120/MN and gp120/Thai-E was assessed following SDS-PAGE
and the transfer of proteins to Immobilon P membranes. Reactive primary
antibody was detected by a secondary anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to
horseradish peroxidase. B, sera obtained from a rabbit
injected with ntPE-V3MN26 were diluted 1:10,000 and then incubated with
various concentrations of either soluble gp120/MN or ntPE-V3MN26. The
residual reactivity for immobilized gp120/MN is shown. Dotted
column, no competitor; shaded column, gp120/MN;
striped column, ntPE-V3MN26. C, sera obtained from a rabbit injected with ntPE-V3ThE26 were diluted
1:10,000 and then incubated with various concentrations of either
soluble gp120/Thai-E or ntPE-V3ThE26. The residual reactivity for
immobilized gp120/Thai-E is shown. Gp120/MN and ntPE-V3MN26 (at 20 nM) were also tested as potential competitors. Dotted
column, no competitor; bold diagonal striped column,
gp120.Thai-E; horizontal striped column, ntPE-V3ThE26;
shaded column, gp120/MN; light diagonal striped
column, ntPE-V3MN26.
|
|
Characterization of Anti-V3 Loop Response--
Using an ELISA
format, sera from rabbits immunized with either ntPE-V3MN26 or
ntPE-V3ThE26 were characterized further. Wells were coated with gp120
derived from either the MN or Thai-E strain and then probed with
various dilutions of rabbit antisera. Specific reactivity to both
envelope proteins (after background subtraction; see "Experimental
Procedures") was detected down to a dilution of 1:300,000 with a
linear response in the dilution range of 1:10,000 to 1:100,000.
Specifically, we wished to compare the reactivity for the V3 loop of
gp120 with that of the V3 loop inserted within the toxin. However,
because most of the antibodies produced against the ntPE-V3 chimeras
were to toxin epitopes, it was not useful to probe immobilized chimeric
protein directly. Instead we devised a competitive ELISA that allowed
comparisons of antibody responses to soluble gp120 with those to
soluble ntPE-V3 chimeras. For technical reasons, it was first necessary
to remove anti-PE antibodies. This was done by passing immune rabbit
sera over a wtPE affinity column and using the flow-through (see
"Experimental Procedures").
Relative reactivities for V3 loop sequences was determined by first
mixing a 1:10,000 dilution of immune rabbit sera (post-affinity depletion; see above) with various concentrations of either soluble gp120 or ntPE-V3 and then measuring the residual reactivity for immobilized gp120. When assessing reactivity to immobilized gp120/MN, soluble gp120/MN exhibited a slightly better blocking activity than
ntPE-V3MN26 (Fig. 5B). Neither soluble gp120/Thai-E nor
ntPE-V3ThE26, up to concentrations of 20 nM, exhibited any
blocking activity (data not shown). In contrast, when probing
immobilized gp120/Thai-E, ntPE-V3ThE26 exhibited a greater blocking
activity than gp120/Thai-E (Fig. 5C). Neither soluble
gp120/MN nor ntPE-V3MN26 exhibited any blocking activity (Fig.
5C). Together, these data support the conclusion derived
from Fig. 2, i.e. that the V3 loop sequence cloned into
recombinant PE closely resembles the same loop contained within
gp120.
HIV-1 Neutralizing Activity--
Sera from immunized rabbits
neutralized HIV-1 infectivity in two separate in vitro
assays (Figs. 6 and
7). Pre-immune sera showed no protection
of a human T-cell line, MT4, from killing by HIV-1 MN. However,
following immunization with ntPE-V3MN26, sera obtained from one rabbit
at weeks 8 and 27 were protective against viral challenge with 50%
neutralization occurring at approximately a 1:400 dilution (Fig. 6).
Sera from a second rabbit exhibited 50% neutralization at 1:30
dilution. Based on the immunization schedule, week 5 sera reflected the
response in animals immunized and boosted once, while week 8 sera were
from animals boosted twice and week 27 sera came from animals boosted
three times. These data suggested that subcutaneous injections of
ntPE-V3 loop chimeras could result in the production of neutralizing
antibodies.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
A ntPE-V3 loop chimera administered to
rabbits produces an antibody response capable of neutralizing HIV-1
infectivity in vitro. Rabbits were immunized
subcutaneously with 200 µg of ntPE-V3MN26 and boosted similarly after
2, 4, and 12 weeks. Sera collected up to 27 weeks after the initial
administration were evaluated for the ability to protect a human T-cell
line, MT4, from killing by HIV-1 MN, as assessed by an
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide dye
conversion assay. Values represent triplicate readings normalized
against a control MT4 incubation not challenged by virus.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Neutralization of clinical HIV isolates.
Postvaccination sera from rabbits injected with ntPE-V3MN26 were mixed
with either a B or E subtype virus. After a 1-h incubation at 37 °C,
viral infectivity was determined by adding treated virus to PBMCs for
another 3 days. Inhibition of viral growth was evaluated by measuring
p24 levels. , p24 antigen (uninfected); , p24 antigen + prebleed
sera; , p24 antigen + immune sera (24 weeks).
|
|
Neutralization was evaluated further in viral growth assays where
suppression of p24 production was used as an indicator of HIV
neutralization (34). Clinical isolates corresponding to subtype B,
RVL05, and subtype E, Th92009, were incubated with dilutions of rabbit
sera and cultured in PBMCs for a total of 5 days (see "Experimental
Procedures"). Because the sera taken from one of the rabbits
immunized with ntPE-V3MN26 neutralized virus in the MT4 assay at a
dilution of 1:400, this serum was used to evaluate activity against the
clinical isolates. A serum sample taken at 24 weeks exhibited
neutralizing activity against both a B and E subtype isolate (see Fig.
7 and "Discussion"). No neutralizing activity was seen with the
prebleed sera from the same rabbit.
 |
DISCUSSION |
A vaccine to prevent HIV infection and/or retard viral progression
within an infected individual is clearly needed. Many approaches are
being considered, and some of these have been tested in clinical trials, but no superior candidates have yet emerged. Here we
characterize V3 loop-toxin chimeras and report on their ability to
produce strain-specific (MN-subtype B versus Thai-subtype E)
antibody responses in rabbits (Fig. 5). When injected subcutaneously,
the MN chimera produced, in at least one rabbit, neutralizing
antibodies to both a subtype B and E isolate of HIV-1. Despite the fact
that the MN26 and ThE26 inserts were ~50% identical at the amino
acid level (Fig. 1C), injection of ntPE-V3ThE26 produced
sera that consistently failed to recognize the MN insert or gp120/MN.
In contrast, some rabbits injected with ntPE-V3MN26 produced sera that
recognized both the MN and Thai-E sequences (albeit with a lower titer
to the Thai-E sequence) and neutralized a representative clinical
isolate from each subtype. The basis for this differential response
remains to be determined.
Neutralizing antibodies were generated following the injection of
proteins that had been refolded from inclusion bodies expressed in
E. coli. In part, such favorable responses might have been due to the three-dimensional structure adopted by the V3 loop sequences
within these chimeras. This view is supported by immunocapture data
showing that soluble chimeric proteins were recognized by strain-specific anti-V3 loop monoclonal antibodies (Fig.
2C). Further, the reactivity of immune sera for immobilized
gp120 could be completely absorbed with excess soluble gp120 (Fig. 5,
B and C). Thus anti-V3 loop antibodies were
primarily raised against epitopes that are exposed on gp120. Studies on
the secondary structure of V3 loop peptides have shown that a
turn-turn-helix motif is evident with circular (constrained by a
disulfide bond) but not linear peptides (35). Also, circular peptides
are recognized more readily by anti-V3 loop monoclonal antibodies than
linear ones (35). Our data support the contention that V3 loops of PE
chimeras have similar topologies to those found in gp120.
When enzymatically active versions of the chimeras were added to cells
they inhibited protein synthesis with a similar dose response to that
of wtPE (Fig. 4). Since the V3 loop sequences were inserted into the
toxin's 37-kDa translocating fragment, one can assume that V3 loop
sequences were co-transported to the cytosol. Toxin-mediated delivery
to the cytosol may result in the generation of viral peptides and
presentation via major histocompatibility complex class I antigens
(36). This is under investigation for the ntPE-V3 loop chimeras.
Previously, PE was shown to mediate the delivery of influenza peptides
to major histocompatibility complex class I antigens (37). PE has also
been shown to transport various peptides and enzymes to the cytosol
(38, 39). Therefore, we believe these chimeras may be useful for the
generation of HIV-reactive cytotoxic T-cells.
Sexual transmission of HIV-1 is via exposure at mucosal surfaces to
both virus and virally infected cells. Ideally, a vaccine for HIV would
produce not only a neutralizing systemic response, and possibly a
cytotoxic T lymphocyte response but could also be used to generate
mucosal immunity. The importance of mucosal immunization for defense
against HIV has been proposed (40, 41). In cystic fibrosis patients
infected with P. aeruginosa, there is a strong IgA anti-PE
response (42). Our preliminary data indicate that PE-V3 loop chimeras,
administered at mucosal surfaces, can elicit an IgA anti-V3 loop
response (data not shown).
Other chimeras containing components of HIV-1 have been constructed and
their immunogenic properties evaluated. These include a poliovirus
antigen containing an epitope of the gp41 transmembrane glycoprotein
from HIV-1 (43), a mucin protein containing multiple copies of the V3
loop (44), a genetically modified cholera B chain with V3 loop
sequences (45), and a chemically detoxified PE-V3 loop peptide
conjugate (46). These various approaches were each capable of producing
anti-HIV responses. However, distinguishing features of our approach
include the display of V3 loop sequences in near-native conformation,
the ease with which multiple strain-specific chimeras can be produced
(which will allow vaccine formulation with mixtures of chimeric
proteins), and the potential to elicit both antibody and cellular
responses from the same protein. In addition, because our chimeras are
wholly recombinant constructs, there is no need to attach V3 loops
using chemical cross-linking agents or use chemical treatments to
inactivate the enzymatic activity of the toxin. Many conjugate vaccines
use foreign proteins as carriers and adjuvants, but these are rarely
directed to bind specific surface receptors. The favorable immune
responses to PE-derived chimeric proteins may in part result from the
targeting of V3 loops to cells expressing LRP/ 2-
macroglobulin receptor on their surface. By deleting the toxin's
binding domain and replacing it with other cell-binding ligands, future
versions of these chimeras may be targeted to selected cell
populations.
Envelope proteins of HIV-1, such as gp120, are being evaluated as
subunit vaccines with the expectation that antibodies to the V3 loop
region of gp120 will provide protection through virus neutralization
(12, 13, 47, 48). Conformational epitopes are believed to be required
for optimal protective immunity (47). However, the injection of
inactive virus or even the envelope protein itself has the potential to
produce a mixture of neutralizing and so called "enhancing"
antibodies (49-52). Because ntPE-V3 loop chimeras are constructed
exclusively with amino acids derived from the tip of the V3 loop, we
hope to generate a neutralizing response without the risk of generating
enhancing antibodies.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Steve Neal for photography, the
animal care staff for excellent technical support, and Wei Huang for
assistance with the viral neutralization assays. We are also grateful
to Mike Norcross and Melissa Ashlock for reading the manuscript and to Robert S. Vaccinus and Beth McClimens for their perspectives.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Bldg. 37, Rm. 4B03, 37 Convent Dr., MSC 4255, Bethesda, MD 20892-4255. Tel.: 301-496-9457; Fax: 301-402-1969.
1
The abbreviations used are: HIV, human
immunodeficiency virus; E553, mutant toxin lacking glutamic acid at
position 553; LRP, low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein;
nt, nontoxic; ntPE-V3MN14, a 14-amino acid insert from the V3 loop of
HIV-1 MN; ntPE-V3MN26, a 26-amino acid insert from the V3 loop of HIV-1 MN; ntPE-V3ThE26, a 26-amino acid insert from the V3 loop of HIV-1 Thai-E; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; PBS,
phosphate-buffered saline; PE, Pseudomonas exotoxin; TPBS,
0.2% Tween 20 in PBS; V3 loop, the third variable domain of gp120;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; TE buffer, Tris-EDTA buffer;
wt, wild-type.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Cease, K. B.,
and Berzofsky, J. A.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
12,
923-989[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pantaleo, G.,
Menzo, S.,
Vaccarezza, M.,
Graziosi, C.,
Cohen, O. J.,
Demarest, J. F.,
Montefiori, D.,
Orenstein, J. M.,
Fox, C.,
Schrager, L. K.,
Margolick, J. B.,
Buchbinder, S.,
Giorgi, J. V.,
and Fauci, A. S.
(1995)
N. Engl. J. Med.
332,
209-216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Moldoveanu, Z.,
Porter, D. C.,
Lu, A.,
McPherson, S.,
and Morrow, C. D.
(1995)
Vaccine
13,
1013-1022[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Perales, M. A.,
Schwartz, D. H.,
Fabry, J. A.,
and Lieberman, J.
(1995)
J. Acquired Immune Defic. Syndr. Hum. Retrovirol.
10,
27-35[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Berman, P. W.,
Murthy, K. K.,
Wrin, T.,
Vennari, J. C.,
Cobb, E. K.,
Eastman, D. J.,
Champe, M.,
Nakamura, G. R.,
Davison, D.,
Powell, M. F.,
Bussiere, J.,
Francis, D. P.,
Matthews, T.,
Gregory, T. J.,
and Obijeski, J. F.
(1996)
J. Infect. Dis.
173,
52-59[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ahlers, J. D.,
Pendleton, C. D.,
Dunlop, N.,
Minassian, A.,
Nara, P. L.,
and Berzofsky, J. A.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
150,
5647-5665[Abstract]
-
Ahlers, J. D.,
Dunlop, N.,
Pendleton, C. D.,
Newman, M.,
Nara, P. L.,
and Berzofsky, J. A.
(1996)
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
12,
259-272[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rubinstein, A.,
Goldstein, H.,
Pettoello-Mantovani, M.,
Mizrachi, Y.,
Bloom, B. R.,
Furer, E.,
Althaus, B.,
Que, J. U.,
Hasler, T.,
and Cryz, S. J.
(1995)
AIDS
9,
243-251[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cohen, D.,
Ashkenazi, S.,
Green, M. S.,
Gdalevich, M.,
Robin, G.,
Slepon, R.,
Yavzori, M.,
Orr, N.,
Block, C.,
Ashkenazi, I.,
Shemer, J.,
Taylor, D. N.,
Hale, T. L.,
Sadoff, J. C.,
Pavliakova, D.,
Schneerson, R.,
and Robbins, J. B.
(1997)
Lancet
349,
155-159[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cohen, D.,
Ashkenazi, S.,
Green, M.,
Lerman, Y.,
Slepon, R.,
Robin, G.,
Orr, N.,
Taylor, D. N.,
Sadoff, J. C.,
Chu, C.,
Shiloach, J.,
Schneerson, R.,
and Robbins, J. B.
(1996)
Infect. Immun.
64,
4074-4077[Abstract]
-
Pastan, I.,
Chaudhary, V.,
and FitzGerald, D. J.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
61,
331-354[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Emini, E. A.,
Schleif, W. A.,
Nunberg, J. H.,
Conley, A. J.,
Eda, Y.,
Tokiyoshi, S.,
Putney, S. D.,
Matsushita, S.,
Cobb, K. E.,
Jett, C. M.,
Eichberg, J. W.,
and Murthy, K. K.
(1992)
Nature
355,
728-730[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Javaherian, K.,
Langlois, A. J.,
McDanal, C.,
Ross, K. L.,
Eckler, L. I.,
Jellis, C. L.,
Profy, A. T.,
Rusche, J. R.,
Bolognesi, D. P.,
Putney, S. D.,
and Matthews, T. J.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
6768-6772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rusche, J. R.,
Javaherian, K.,
McDanal, C.,
Petro, J.,
Lynn, D. L.,
Grimaila, R.,
Langlois, A.,
Gallo, R. C.,
Arthur, L. O.,
Fischinger, P. J.,
Bolognesi, D. P.,
Putney, S. D.,
and Matthews, T. J.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
3198-3202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Berman, P. W.,
Gregory, T. J.,
Riddle, L.,
Nakamura, G. R.,
Champe, M. A.,
Porter, J. P.,
Wurm, F. M.,
Hershberg, R. D.,
Cobb, E. K.,
and Eichberg, J. W.
(1990)
Nature
345,
622-625[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kovacs, J. A.,
Vasudevachari, M. B.,
Easter, M.,
Davey, R. T.,
Falloon, J.,
Polis, M. A.,
Metcalf, J. A.,
Salzman, N.,
Baseler, M.,
Smith, G. E.,
Volvovitz, F.,
Masur, H.,
and Laner, H. C.
(1993)
J. Clin. Invest.
92,
919-928
-
Gorse, G. J.,
Rogers, J. H.,
Perry, J. E.,
Newman, F. K.,
Frey, S. E.,
Patel, G. B.,
and Belshe, R. B.
(1995)
Vaccine
13,
209-214[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
White-Scharf, M. E.,
Potts, B. J.,
Smith, L. M.,
Sokolowski, K. A.,
Rusche, J. R.,
and Silver, S.
(1993)
Virology
192,
197-206[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Allured, V. S.,
Collier, R. J.,
Carroll, S. F.,
and McKay, D. B.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
1320-1324[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kounnas, M. Z.,
Morris, R. E.,
Thompson, M. R.,
FitzGerald, D. J.,
Strickland, D. K.,
and Saelinger, C. B.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
12420-12423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
FitzGerald, D. J.,
Fryling, C. M.,
Zdanovsky, A.,
Saelinger, C. B.,
Kounnas, M.,
Winkles, J. A.,
Strickland, D.,
and Leppla, S.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
1533-1541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Krieger, M.,
and Herz, J.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
63,
601-637[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hwang, J.,
FitzGerald, D. J.,
Adhya, S.,
and Pastan, I.
(1987)
Cell
48,
129-136[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ogata, M.,
Fryling, C. M.,
Pastan, I.,
and FitzGerald, D. J.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
25396-25401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chiron, M. F.,
Fryling, C. M.,
and FitzGerald, D. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18167-18176[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ogata, M.,
Chaudhary, V. K.,
Pastan, I.,
and FitzGerald, D. J.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
20678-20685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lukac, M.,
Pier, G. B.,
and Collier, R. J.
(1988)
Infect. Immun.
56,
3095-3098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Studier, F. W.,
Rosenberg, A. H.,
Dunn, J. J.,
and Dubendorff, J. W.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
185,
60-89[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ogata, M.,
Pastan, I.,
and FitzGerald, D. J.
(1991)
Infect. Immun.
59,
407-414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gorry, P. A.
(1990)
Anal. Chem.
62,
570-573[CrossRef]
-
Miyoshi, I.,
Kubonishi, I.,
Yoshimoto, S.,
Akagi, T.,
Ohtsuki, Y.,
Shiraishi, Y.,
Nagata, K.,
and Hinuma, Y.
(1981)
Nature
294,
770-771[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Popovic, M.,
Sarngadharan, M. G.,
Read, E.,
and Gallo, R. C.
(1984)
Science
224,
497-500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Robertson, G. A.,
Kostek, B. M.,
Schleif, W. A.,
Lewis, J. A.,
and Emini, E. A.
(1988)
J. Virol. Methods
20,
195-202[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wrin, T.,
Loh, T. P.,
Vennari, J. C.,
Schuitemaker, H.,
and Nunberg, J. H.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
39-48[Abstract]
-
Catasti, P.,
Fontenot, J. D.,
Bradbury, E. M.,
and Gupta, G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
2224-2232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Goletz, T. J.,
Klimpel, K. R.,
Leppla, S. H.,
Keith, J. M.,
and Berzofsky, J. A.
(1997)
Hum. Immunol.
54,
129-136[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Donnelly, J. J.,
Ulmer, J. B.,
Hawe, L. A.,
Friedman, A.,
Shi, X. P.,
Leander, K. R.,
Shiver, J. W.,
Oliff, A. I.,
Martinez, D.,
Montgomery, D.,
and Liu, M. A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
3530-3534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Debinski, W.,
Siegall, C. B.,
Fitzgerald, D.,
and Pastan, I.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
1751-1753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Prior, T. I.,
FitzGerald, D. J.,
and Pastan, I.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
3555-3559[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bukawa, H.,
Sekigawa, K.,
Hamajima, K.,
Fukushima, J.,
Yamada, Y.,
Kiyono, H.,
and Okuda, K.
(1995)
Nat. Med.
1,
681-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mestecky, J.,
Kutteh, W. H.,
and Jackson, S.
(1994)
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
10,
S11-S20
-
Cukor, G.,
Blacklow, N. R.,
Nowak, N. A.,
Rich, C. M.,
Braverman, L. E.,
and Fischer, R. A.
(1983)
J. Clin. Microbiol.
18,
457-462[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Evans, D. J.,
McKeating, J.,
Meredith, J. M.,
Burke, K. L.,
Katrak, K.,
John, A.,
Ferguson, M.,
Minor, P. D.,
Weiss, R. A.,
and Almond, J. W.
(1989)
Nature
339,
385-388[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fontenot, J. D.,
Gatewood, J. M.,
Mariappan, S. V.,
Pau, C. P.,
Parekh, B. S.,
George, J. R.,
and Gupta, G.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
315-319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Backstrom, M.,
Lebens, M.,
Schodel, F.,
and Holmgren, J.
(1994)
Gene (Amst.)
149,
211-217[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cryz, S., Jr.,
Goldstein, H.,
Pettoello-Mantovani, M.,
Kim, A.,
Furer, E.,
Que, J. U.,
Hasler, T.,
and Rubinstein, A.
(1995)
Vaccine
13,
67-71[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Steimer, K. S.,
Scandella, C. J.,
Skiles, P. V.,
and Haigwood, N. L.
(1991)
Science
254,
105-108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wang, C. Y.,
Looney, D. J.,
Li, M. L.,
Walfield, A. M.,
Ye, J.,
Hosein, B.,
Tam, J. P.,
and Wong-Staal, F.
(1991)
Science
254,
285-288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Toth, F. D.,
Mosborg-Petersen, P.,
Kiss, J.,
Aboagye-Mathiesen, G.,
Zdravkovic, M.,
Hager, H.,
Aranyosi, J.,
Lampe, L.,
and Ebbesen, P.
(1994)
Clin. Exp. Immunol.
96,
389-394[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Eaton, A. M.,
Ugen, K. E.,
Weiner, D. B.,
Wildes, T.,
and Levy, J. A.
(1994)
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
10,
13-18[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mitchell, W. M.,
Torres, J.,
Johnson, P. R.,
Hirsch, V.,
Yilma, T.,
Gardner, M. B.,
and Robinson, W., Jr.
(1995)
AIDS
9,
27-34
-
Montefiori, D. C.,
Pantaleo, G.,
Fink, L. M.,
Zhou, J. T.,
Zhou, J. Y.,
Bilska, M.,
Miralles, G. D.,
and Fauci, A. S.
(1996)
J. Infect. Dis.
173,
60-67[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Hsieh, D. M. Tham, W. Feng, F. Huang, S. Embaie, K. Liu, D. Dean, R. Hertle, D. J. FitzGerald, and R. J. Mrsny
Intranasal Immunization Strategy To Impede Pilin-Mediated Binding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Airway Epithelial Cells
Infect. Immun.,
November 1, 2005;
73(11):
7705 - 7717.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Hertle, R. Mrsny, and D. J. Fitzgerald
Dual-Function Vaccine for Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Characterization of Chimeric Exotoxin A-Pilin Protein
Infect. Immun.,
November 1, 2001;
69(11):
6962 - 6969.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|