|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 17, 10120-10131, April 24, 1998
Sugar Response Sequence in the Promoter of a Rice -Amylase
Gene Serves as a Transcriptional Enhancer*
Chung-An
Lu ,
Eng-Kiat
Lim§¶, and
Su-May
Yu§
From the Graduate Institute of Life Sciences,
National Defense Medical Center, and Institute of Molecular Biology,
Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China and the
§ Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, Nankang,
Taipei 11529, Taiwan, Republic of China
 |
ABSTRACT |
Expression of -amylase genes in both rice
suspension cells and germinating embryos is repressed by sugars and the
mechanism involves transcriptional regulation. The promoter of a rice
-amylase gene Amy3 was analyzed by both loss- and
gain-of-function studies and the major sugar response sequence (SRS)
was located between 186 and 82 base pairs upstream of the transcription
start site. The SRS conferred sugar responsiveness to a minimal
promoter in an orientation-independent manner. It also converted a
sugar-insensitive rice actin gene promoter into a sugar-sensitive
promoter in a dose-dependent manner. Linker-scan mutation
studies identified three essential motifs: the GC box, the G box, and
the TATCCA element, within the SRS. Sequences containing either the GC
box plus G box or the TATCCA element each mediated sugar response, however, they acted synergistically to give a high level glucose starvation-induced expression. Nuclear proteins from rice suspension cells binding to the TATCCA element in a sequence-specific and sugar-dependent manner were identified. The TATCCA element
is also an important component of the gibberellin response complex of
the -amylase genes in germinating cereal grains, suggesting that the
regulation of -amylase gene expression by sugar and hormone signals
may share common regulatory machinery.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Sugar repression of gene expression is a fundamental and
ubiquitous regulatory system for adjusting to changes in nutrient availability in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. In
microorganisms, glucose or other rapidly metabolizable carbon sources
repress the expression of genes that code for enzymes related to the
metabolism of other carbon sources. Our understanding of the mechanisms
of sugar repression has been based largely on studies of
microorganisms. In the case of Escherichia coli, a model to
explain at the molecular level, the mechanism of sugar repression has
been determined (1, 2). The mechanism of glucose repression in yeast is
more complicated and is less understood than it is in E. coli (3-5). Studies using Saccharomyces cerevisiae
mutants have revealed many of the components involved in the response
to carbon catabolite repression (5), but it is still unclear how all of
these components interact to regulate transcription. A universal
signaling pathway which leads to the regulation of all
glucose-repressible genes has yet to be determined.
As in microorganisms, sugar repression of gene expression also allows
plant cells to cope effectively with changes in the carbon sources
present in their environment. However, in multicellular plants,
feedback repression by excess sugars provides an additional mechanism
for maintaining an economical balance between supply (source) and
demand (sink) for carbohydrate allocation and utilization among tissues
and organs (6-8). Despite the fact that sugar repression of gene
expression is likely a central control mechanism mediating energy
homeostasis and carbohydrate distribution in plants, the molecular
mechanism of sugar feedback regulation remains elusive. For example,
sugar feedback regulation of genes involved in photosynthesis (9) and
carbohydrate metabolism (10-12) has been shown to act at the level of
gene transcription. A conserved glucose-sensing mechanism, via the
action of hexokinase, has been observed between plants and
microorganisms (13-15). However, the mechanism which connects the
sensing and transmission of sugar signals and the repression of gene
transcription in plants is mostly unknown.
The sugar-dependent repression of -amylase gene
expression provides an ideal model for studies on the molecular
mechanisms that mediate glucose repression in plants. -Amylases are
endo-amylolytic enzymes which catalyze the hydrolysis of
1,4-linked glucose polymers that play an important role in the
degradation of starch and glycogen in higher plants, animals, and many
microorganisms. -Amylases in plants are recognized as essential
enzymes whose major function is hydrolysis of starch stored in the
endosperm during germination of cereal grains. Expression of
-amylase genes in rice is found under different modes of
tissue-specific regulation: in the embryo of germinating seeds and in
cultured suspension cells, expression is activated by sugar deprivation
and repressed by sugar provision (8, 16-18); in the endosperm of
germinating seeds, expression is activated by gibberellic acid and
repressed by abscisic acid and osmotic stress (8, 19). Studies with
rice suspension cells have shown that -amylase expression,
carbohydrate metabolism, and vacuolar autophagy are coordinately
regulated by sucrose levels in the medium (20). Both the transcription
rate and mRNA stability of -amylase genes in cells increase in
response to sucrose depletion in the culture medium (12). Use of
transgenic rice carrying an -amylase gene promoter- -glucuronidase
(GUS)1 gene proved that the
regulation of -amylase gene expression by sugars involves a
transcriptional control mechanism (10, 21, 22).
Sugar-dependent repression of -amylase gene expression has also been observed in Aspergillus oryzae (23) and
Drosophila melanogaster (24) and the mechanism was shown to
involve transcriptional control (25, 26).
Rice -amylase isozymes are encoded by at least nine genes (7). By
using -amylase gene-specific DNA fragments and nuclear run-on
transcription analysis, transcription of eight -amylase genes was
shown to increase in response to sucrose starvation (27). A positive
correlation between the transcription rates and the steady-state
mRNA levels suggests that transcriptional regulation plays an
important role in the differential expression of individual -amylase
genes. To date, studies on the transcriptional regulation of
-amylase gene expression in plants have mostly focused on the
hormonal regulation in germinating cereal grains (28-33). Since sugars
regulate the expression of -amylase genes in germinating seeds as
well as in cultured suspension cells, studies on the mechanism of sugar
feedback regulation using rice suspension cells as a model system may
lead us to a better understanding of the mechanisms controlling
carbohydrate metabolism in higher plants. We chose Amy3
as a model gene for this study because it constitutes approximately
60% of total -amylase mRNAs in cells starved for sucrose (27)
and its expression in germinating embryo is regulated by sugars (8,
16). The Amy3 promoter has been shown to mediate
sugar-dependent regulation of GUS reporter gene expression
in transgenic rice suspension cells (22).
In this report we developed a transient expression system using
protoplasts prepared from rice suspension cells to determine the
cis-acting sugar-responsive sequences in the
Amy3 promoter. The literature has revealed that, in the
case of studying regulation by environmental and physiological cues,
results obtained from transient assays often rapidly and efficiently
provide important information for further studies and reflect the
in vivo situation in planta. For example, studies
on auxin (34, 35) and gibberellin (28, 29, 32) response elements using
transient assays have led to the identification of interacting
transcription factors (28, 36). By conducting loss-of-function,
gain-of-function, and linker-scan mutation analyses, we defined the
minimal sequence in the Amy3 promoter that drives high
level glucose starvation-induced expression. This minimal sequence
served as a transcriptional enhancer and converted a sugar-insensitive
promoter into a sugar-sensitive promoter. We also identified three
essential motifs, the GC box, the G box, and the TATCCA element, that
form the sugar response complex and act cooperatively in controlling
Amy3 expression. Finally, we demonstrated that nuclear
proteins from rice suspension cells bind to the TATCCA element in a
sequence-specific and sugar-dependent manner. To our
knowledge, this is the first identification of the functional sugar
response elements and the existence of interacting trans-acting factors
for sugar repressible genes in plants.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Rice Cell Culture--
Suspension cell cultures of rice
(Oryza sativa cv. Tainan 5) were propagated as described
previously (17). Established suspension cells were subcultured every 7 days by transferring about 0.5 ml of cells into 25 ml of fresh liquid
Murashige and Skoog medium (37) containing 3% sucrose in a 125-ml
flask. Cells were cultured on a reciprocal shaker at 120 rpm and
incubated at 26 °C in the dark.
Primer Extension Analysis--
Three 18-20-base gene-specific
oligonucleotides complementary to the signal peptide regions of
Amy7 and Amy8, and the 5'-untranslated leader of Amy3 (Fig. 1B) were synthesized and
used as primers. The primer extension analysis was performed according
to Sutliff et al. (38).
Plasmid Construction--
A 1.7-kilobase
SalI-EcoNI fragment, containing the promoter, the
5'-untranslated sequence, and 84 bp downstream of the translation start
site of Amy3 was end-blunted and cloned into the
ClaI site of pBSI-132, forming p3G-132II. pBSI-132 was
generated by insertion of a PvuII fragment (GUS coding
sequence-nopaline synthase gene (nos) terminator fusion)
from pBSI (21) into the HindIII site of pTRA132 (cauliflower
mosaic virus 35S RNA (CaMV35S) promoter-hygromycin B phosphotransferase
(hph) coding sequence-tumor morphology large gene
(tml) terminator fusion) (39) by blunt-end ligation. Plasmid p3G-132II was used as the progenitor for all constructs reported in
this paper. The sequences of oligonucleotides used in preparation of
the Amy3 promoter constructs are listed in Table
I. Appropriate combinations of 5' and 3'
primers were used to generate different 5' deletions, internal
deletions, and other mutations by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). For
a series of 5'-deleted constructs, the PCR products were digested with
EcoRI and PstI and ligated into pBluescript KS+
(Stratagene) to generate p3.4, p3.5, and p3.6. These plasmids were
digested with KpnI and PstI and the promoter regions were ligated into the KpnI and
PstI-digested pLuc, forming p3Luc.3, p3Luc.4, p3Luc.5, and
p3Luc.6. pLuc was generated by insertion of a
SalI-BglII fragment (luciferase (Luc)
coding sequence-nos terminator fusion) from pJD312 (40) into
the SmaI site of pBluescript. For internal deletion
constructs, PCR was performed using the oligonucleotide-directed
mutagenesis as described by Picard et al. (41). In this
method, the 5' internal deletion primers were first paired with 3'
primers to generate short DNA fragments. The PCR products then served
as 5' primers and paired with 3' primers to generate internal deletion
fragments. These fragments were cloned into pLuc using the same
procedures for 5'-deleted constructs and generates p3Luc.7, p3Luc.8,
and p3Luc.9.
To prepare constructs for the gain-of-function analysis, a CaMV35S
minimal promoter-alcohol dehydrogenase intron I (AdhI) fragment was obtained by PCR using pJD312 as template, inserted into
the PstI and NcoI sites of pLuc to generate
p35mALuc. DNA fragments containing various regions of the wild type or
mutant Amy3 promoters were PCR amplified, cloned into
pBluescript, and generated p3.15 through p3.19 and p3.40. These
plasmids were digested with XhoI and PstI and the
promoter regions were cloned into p35mALuc to generate p3Luc.15 through
p3Luc.19 and p3Luc.40. Then p3Luc.18 containing SRS ( 186 to 82) in
correct orientation was digested with XhoI and
PstI, blunt-ended, and religated. Plasmid containing SRS in
reverse orientation was then generated and designated as p3Luc.18R. The
186 to 122 fragment in p3Luc.19 and the 133 to 82 fragment in
p3Luc.40 were digested with XhoI and PstI and religated. Plasmids containing multiple copies of these fragments were
generated and designated as p3Luc.19 × 2 and p3Luc.41 through p3Luc.44. Mutation of the duplicated TATCCA element in the downstream and upstream copy of fragment 133 to 82 in p3Luc.41 was generated by mutation using the PCR-based oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis (41) and designated as p3Luc.41 m1 and p3Luc.41 m2, respectively.
The linker-scan mutation of SRS was generated by mutation at 10-bp
intervals using the PCR-based oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis and
p3Luc.18 as DNA template. The mutated SRS fragments were digested with
XhoI and PstI and cloned into p35mALuc to
generate p3Luc.28 through p3Luc.36.
For construction of plasmids carrying SRS in the Act1
promoter, the Act1 5' region (including 1.4-kb 5'-flanking
sequence, 79-bp 5' noncoding exon, 447-bp 5' intron, and 25-bp first
coding exon) was excised from pDM302 (42) with HindIII and
subcloned into pBluescript. The EcoRI site in the multiple
cloning sites of pBluescript was removed by digestion with
EcoRV and XbaI and then blunt-ended and
religated. The SRS sequence along with the 35S minimal promoter and
part of the AdhI intron were excised with HindIII
from p3Luc.18 and inserted into the HindIII site of
pBluescript and generated p3.182. The SRS was excised with EcoRI from p3.182 and inserted into the EcoRI
site ( 459) of Act1 promoter in pBluescript in one, two, or
three copies and generated p3.37+, p3.37++, and p3.37+++. The three
plasmids were then digested with SalI and PstI
and the SRS-containing Act1 promoters were used to replace
the 35S promoter and AdhI intron in pJD312 and generated
p3Luc.37+, p3Luc37++, and p3Luc.37+++.
Protoplast Isolation--
Three days after subculture, 25-ml of
suspension cell culture was transferred to a 9-cm Petri dish. The
Murashige and Skoog medium was removed and cells were washed once with
CPW7.4 buffer (2 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM KNO3, 10 mM
CaCl2/2H2O, 1 mM
MgSO4/7H2O, 1 µM KI, 0.16 µM CuSO4/5H2O, 5 mM
MES, and 0.4 M mannitol, pH 5.8) (43). Cells were incubated
with 15 ml of protoplast isolation buffer (1% cellulase RS and 0.1%
pectolyase Y-23 in CPW7.4 buffer) at 25 °C for 4 h with shaking
at 50 rpm. After cell wall digestion, protoplasts were filtered through
a 33-µm nylon mesh (Small Parts, Inc.), washed three times with
CPW7.4 buffer by centrifugation at 100 × g for 5 min, and gently resuspended in 2 ml of CPW7.4 buffer. The protoplasts
were layered on 5 ml of 0.6 M sucrose cushion in CPW7.4
buffer in a 15-ml Conical tube, and centrifuged at 40 × g for 10 min in a swing bucket rotor. Protoplasts at the top
of sucrose cushion were collected and transferred to 10 ml of CPW7.4
buffer. Cells were then washed with electroporation buffer (0.14 M NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 0.7 mM
KH2PO4, 4.2 mM
Na2HPO4, 5 mM CaCl2,
0.4 M mannitol) (44), resuspended with the same buffer, and
adjusted to 5 × 106 protoplast/ml.
Electroporation and Protoplast Culture--
Plasmid DNA was
transfected into rice protoplasts by electroporation. Each sample
containing 2 × 105 protoplasts in 0.4 ml of
electroporation buffer was mixed with 20 µg of test plasmid DNA, 5 µg of control plasmid DNA, and 50 µg of carrier (calf thymus) DNA.
The mixture was transferred to a cuvette and placed on ice for 10 min.
Electroporation was performed with a electroporator (BTX) with
conditions set at 1000 V/cm, 400 microfarads, and 186 . After
electroporation, the protoplasts were kept on ice for 10 min, then
mixed with 0.4 ml of electroporation buffer and 0.8 ml of 2 × modified Murashige and Skoog medium (containing 0.2 mg of
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 0.1 mg of kinetin per liter) plus
400 mM glucose or 400 mM mannitol and 5 mM glucose. The protoplasts were plated in a 3-cm Petri
dish and cultured 18 h at 26 °C in the dark.
GUS and Luciferase Assays--
Protoplasts (2 × 106) were collected by centrifugation for 10 s at
12,000 × g, resuspended in 0.3 ml of extraction buffer
(100 mM K2HPO4, pH 7.8, 1 mM EDTA, 7 mM -mercaptoethanol, 1% Triton X-100, and 10% glycerol), and vortexed for 10 s at high speed. The disrupted protoplasts were centrifuged at 12,000 × g and 4 °C for 5 min. Supernatant was collected and used
for GUS or luciferase activity assay. The enzyme activities in cell
extract could be maintained stable for at least 1 month at
80 °C.
The fluorogenic assay for GUS activity was performed with modification
of a method described by Jefferson (45). For each assay, 100 µl of
2 × GUS assay buffer (100 mM NaPO4, pH 7, 20 mM -mercaptoethanol, 20 mM
Na2EDTA, 0.2% (w/w) sodium lauryl sarcosine, 0.25% (v/v)
Triton X-100, and 1.8 mM 4-methylumbelliferyl -D-glucuronide) was dispensed into a 1.5-ml Eppendorf
tube. One hundred µl of cell extract was added and incubated at
37 °C in the dark for various lengths of time. Fifty µl of the
reaction mixture was dispensed into 1950 µl of 0.2 M
Na2CO3 immediately (t = 0 min)
and repeated after 120 min. Fluorescence (excitation at 365 nm and
emission at 455 nm) was determined using a TKO 100 fluorometer
(Hoefer).
For luciferase assay, 50 µl of cell extract was placed in a
luminometer cuvette (Sarstedt), and then 180 µl of luciferase assay
buffer (25 mM Tricine, pH 7.8, 15 mM potassium
phosphate, pH 7.8, 15 mM MgSO4, 4 mM EGTA, 2 mM ATP, and 1 mM
dithiothreitol) was added. The mixture was allowed to equilibrate to
room temperature (in about 15 min). Placing the cuvette in the counting
chamber of a luminometer (LUMAT, Berthold) automatically activated the machine and 50 µl of 250 µM luciferin (Promega) was
injected into the cuvette to start the reaction. The photons emitted
were integrated over a 20-s period and expressed as relative light
units/20 s.
Plasmid pUGI containing the ubiquitin promoter-GUS gene fusion served
as an internal standard. pUGI was generated by insertion of the
BamHI-HindIII fragment (ubiquitin
(ubi) promoter) from pAHC18 (46) into pBSI digested with the
same enzymes. Expression from the ubiquitin promoter was reduced less
than 2-fold by glucose starvation of protoplasts. The GUS activity
expressed from pUGI was used to standardize luciferase activity in cell
extracts from cells grown with or without glucose.
Transformation of Tobacco--
DNA fragments containing the
Amy3-Luc-Nos chimeric gene were excised from plasmids
p3Luc.5 and p3Luc.6 with KpnI and SpeI and
ligated into the KpnI and XbaI sites of pBIN19
(47) to generate pA3Luc.5 and pA3Luc.6. pA3Luc.5 and pA3Luc.6 were
transferred into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105
using an electroporation method described in the manufacturer's
instruction manual for the electroporator (BTX). The tobacco variety
Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Petit Havana SR1 was used in this
study. Transgenic tobacco cell lines were obtained by transformation of
leaf discs with Agrobacterium according to the method of
Horsch et al. (48). Suspension cell cultures of the
transgenic tobacco were propagated as described previously (17).
Preparation of Nuclear Extract--
About 5 g (fresh
weight) of rice suspension cells grown in the presence or absence of
sucrose were pulverized in liquid nitrogen and homogenized in 200 ml of
homogenization buffer (400 mM mannitol, 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
EDTA, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 5 mM
dithiothreitol,and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride).
After this step, preparation of nuclear extract followed the procedures
as described by Mitsunaga et al. (49).
Gel Mobility Shift Assay--
Oligonucleotides F1 through F5
were synthesized and their sequences are shown in Fig. 7A.
F2 used as probe was prepared by phosphorylation of the 5'-hydroxyl
terminal with T4 polynucleotide kinase and [ -32P]ATP
(5000 Ci/mmol). DNA-protein binding reaction was carried out by
incubation of 0.02 ng of labeled F2 with 20 µg of nuclear extract in
a total volume of 20 µl of solution containing 17 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 60 mM KCl, 7.5 mM
MgCl2, 0.12 mM EDTA, 17% glycerol, and 1.2 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 µg of poly(dI-dC) (Pharmacia), and
3 or 10 ng (150- or 500-fold amount of probe, respectively) competitor
DNA. The assay mixture was incubated for 20 min at room temperature.
After this step, electrophoresis of the assay mixture and
autoradiography of gel followed the procedures as described by
Mitsunaga et al. (49).
 |
RESULTS |
Sequence Analyses of the -Amylase Gene Promoters--
Although
the promoter regions of Amy3(RAmy3D) (22),
Amy7(RAmy1A) (19), and
Amy8(RAmy3E) (10, 21) have been shown to
mediate sugar or hormonal regulation of GUS reporter gene expression in
transgenic rice, the transcription start sites of these -amylase genes have not been mapped precisely. Here the transcription start site
of Amy3 was mapped at 28 bp, and those of
Amy7 and Amy8 were mapped 29 bp downstream
of the TATA box and designated as +1 (Fig.
1A). Inspection of the
promoter regions reveals two conserved sequence elements of 10 bp (TT
box) and 31 bp (GC box) (50) that are present in the Amy3
and Amy8 promoters but not in the Amy7
promoter (Fig. 1B). The GA response element (28, 31) is
present in the Amy7 promoter, but not in the
Amy3 and Amy8 promoters. A G box sequence
(containing ACGT core) is located 141 to 132 of the
Amy3 promoter and 334 to 325 of the
Amy8 promoter. G box is present in the promoters of a
variety of genes that are responsive to several environmental and
physiological cues (51). Another sequence of 6 bp (TATCCA element) is
present in two copies in the Amy3 promoter but only in
one copy in the Amy7 and Amy8 promoters.
Function of these elements in the sugar-dependent regulation of -amylase gene expression has not been previously determined. We first chose the Amy3 promoter as a model
for the following study.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Nucleotide sequence comparison of the
promoter regions of three rice -amylase genes. A,
alignment of sequences surrounding the TATA box and the transcription
and translation start site regions (shown in bold). The
sequences are numbered relative to the transcription start site (+1).
The transcription start sites of three -amylase genes were mapped by
primer extension analysis. The sequence complementary to the
oligonucleotide primer used for primer extension is indicated by
arrow. B, nucleotide sequences of the conserved regions in
three -amylase genes. Sequences of the promoter regions of
Amy3(RAmy3D),
Amy7(RAmy1A), and
Amy8(RAmy3E) have been published (57). The
sequences are numbered relative to the transcription start site (+1).
Thin head arrows indicate identical repetitive
sequences.
|
|
Deletion Analysis of the Amy3 Promoter--
We made a
transcriptional fusion of the 1-kilobase promoter region (900-bp
promoter plus 91-bp untranslated sequences) of Amy3 to
the coding region of a luciferase gene (Fig.
2, p3Luc.3). This chimeric gene has been
stably transfected into rice suspension cells and found to confer
sugar-dependent repression of luciferase expression (data
not shown). To identify sequences in the Amy3 promoter
that are involved in the sugar-dependent regulation, three
constructs containing progressive deletions at the 5' end of the
Amy3 promoter were made. The resultant constructs were then analyzed by transient expression in rice protoplasts (Fig. 2A). We found that 5 mM glucose could cause
starvation of rice protoplasts and 400 mM glucose is
normally required to maintain the osmolarity of rice protoplasts. The
protoplasts were therefore analyzed in 5 mM glucose plus
400 mM mannitol (starved) or 400 mM glucose
(non-starved) condition after transfection. The results show that
deletion to position 450 upstream of the transcription start site
(p3Luc.4) produced a dramatic drop in the level of glucose
starvation-induced expression. Expression was further reduced when
deletion was made to 274 (p3Luc.5). Despite the dramatic reduction in
the absolute level of expression caused by the two promoter deletions,
the fold induction of expression by glucose starvation was maintained
at a similar level. Deletion of the next 174 bp (to position 100)
(p3Luc.6) abolished the expression regardless of the concentration of
glucose.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Deletion analysis identified two regions
important for high level sugar-dependent expression of the
Amy3 promoter. A, transient assay of
luciferase activity in rice protoplasts. Plasmids carrying truncated
Amy3 promoters were constructed by PCR as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Each of these plasmids was
co-transfected with pUGI into rice protoplasts. The transfected
protoplasts were divided into two groups and cultured in medium
containing 400 mM glucose or 5 mM glucose plus
400 mM mannitol. Luciferase and GUS activities were
determined after 18 h. Error bars indicate the S.E. of
three replicates for each construct. X indicates fold
increase. B, assay of luciferase activity in transgenic
tobacco suspension cells. Transgenic tobacco suspension cells carrying
the 274-bp Amy3 promoter-Luc-Nos
gene (derived from pA3Luc.5) and the 100-bp Amy3
promoter-Luc-Nos gene (derived from pA3Luc.6)
were grown in the presence or absence of sucrose for 2 days. Cells were
collected and luciferase activity was determined as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Error bars indicate the S.E.
of luciferase activity from 10 independent transgenic cell lines for
each construct.
|
|
Fragments containing the 274-bp Amy3
promoter-Luc in p3Luc.5 and the 100-bp Amy3
promoter-Luc in p3Luc.6 were subcloned into binary vectors
and transfected into tobacco via the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Ten independent transgenic tobacco plants for each
construct were used for generation of suspension cell cultures and
expression of luciferase was analyzed. As shown in Fig. 2B, the 274-bp promoter (pA3Luc.5) conferred glucose starvation-induced expression of luciferase, whereas the 100-bp promoter (pA3Luc.6) abolished the expression regardless of the concentration of glucose. Results of Fig. 2, A and B, suggest that the
cis-element(s) required for sugar-dependent
regulation is located within the region between positions 274 and
100 of the Amy3 promoter.
Because the conserved GC box, G box, and TATCCA element were located
between 172 and 105 of the Amy3 promoter (Fig.
1B), three constructs containing internal deletions between
174 and 42 were made (Fig. 2A). Deletions from 174 to
126 (including the GC box and G box) (p3Luc.7) or from 125 to 86
(including the TATCCA element) (p3Luc.8) led to a drastic decrease in
the absolute level of luciferase activity but still conferred glucose response. Surprisingly, deletion from 85 to 42 (p3Luc.9) restored a
glucose-dependent expression similar to that of the
full-length promoter (p3Luc.3). The above deletion analyses indicate
that the regions between 990 and 450 and 274 and 86 are
required for high level glucose starvation-induced expression of the
Amy3 promoter.
Functional Analysis of the Sugar Response Sequence in the Amy3
Promoter--
To determine whether the cis-acting
element(s) required for sugar-dependent regulation is
located within the region downstream of 274 of the Amy3
promoter, fragments covering various regions between 274 and 82
were inserted upstream of a CaMV35S minimal promoter-AdhI-Luc fusion gene, as shown in Fig.
3. These constructs were then tested for
transcriptional activity in rice protoplasts. Expression of the basic
construct containing no Amy3 promoter sequence (p35mALuc)
did not respond to glucose starvation. When the 274 to 82
(p3Luc.15) and 186 to 82 (p3Luc.18) fragments were fused upstream
of the 35S minimal promoter, high levels of glucose starvation-induced
expression of luciferase were observed. Fragment 274 to 176
contains three protein binding sequences, designated Box B1, Box B2, and
Box B3 (49). Each of the three boxes contain a conserved GCCG(G/C)CG
motif and have been proposed to be involved in
sugar-dependent regulation of Amy3 promoter (49). Deletion of the promoter region containing the three boxes (p3Luc.18) resulted in a 30% increase of glucose starvation-induced expression, suggesting that this region may contain negative
cis-acting elements. Surprisingly, when fragment 186 to
82 was inserted in reverse orientation upstream of the 35S minimal
promoter (p3Luc.18R), expression of luciferase in response to glucose
starvation was as high as that with the promoter fragment inserted in
the correct orientation (p3Luc.18). These results demonstrate that the
region between 186 and 82 contains most, if not all, of the
cis-acting element(s) required to confer high level glucose
starvation-induced expression on the 35S minimal promoter. We have
designated this region as a sugar-response sequence (SRS).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Functional analysis identified SRS conferring
glucose starvation inducibility to a minimal promoter. The
Amy3 promoter fragments containing different regions
between 274 and 82 were fused upstream of the CaMV35S minimal
promoter-AdhI-luciferase-Nos 3' fusion gene as
described under "Experimental Procedures." These plasmids were
transfected into rice protoplasts and luciferase activity was
determined as described in the legend to Fig. 2. The conserved
sequences designated as Box B1, Box B2, and Box B3 (open box),
GC box + G box (stippled box), and TATCCA element
(filled box) are indicated in the promoter region.
|
|
One copy of fragment 186 to 122 (p3Luc.19), which contains the GC
box and G box, caused significant reduction in expression, but still
conferred glucose response. Two copies of fragment 186 to 122
(p3Luc.19 × 2) increased the expression in response to glucose
starvation. One copy of fragment 133 to 82 (p3Luc.40), which
contains the duplicated TATCCA element, slightly elevated the
expression of luciferase as compared with the control (p35mALuc), but
no glucose response was observed. Interestingly, when this fragment was
repeated in tandem (p3Luc.41), glucose response was restored and the
absolute level of luciferase activity was higher than that of the
promoter containing the GC box and G box (p3Luc.19 or p3Luc.19x2). To
examine whether the sequence and/or position of TATCCA element relative
to TATA box is important, mutations in the duplicated TATCCA elements
were generated. Results showed that mutation in either the downstream
(p3Luc.41m1) or the upstream (p3Luc.41m2) copy of the duplicated TATCCA
element reduced the expression.
A 52-bp Fragment Containing the TATCCA Element Enhances
Transcriptional Activity--
Comparison of the luciferase activity
produced by p3Luc.40 and p3Luc.41 in Fig. 3 suggests that the 52-bp
fragment encompassing 133 to 82 enhances transcription. Mutation in
the TATCCA element within this fragment reduced transcription, which
further suggests that the TATCCA element is essential for enhancing
transcription. To demonstrate the function in enhancing transcription,
multiple copies of the 52-bp fragment were fused upstream of the 35S
minimal promoter and the luciferase activity was assayed. As shown in Fig. 4, duplication of the 52-bp fragment
resulted in the increase of starvation induced luciferase activity. The
increase became almost linear as more copies of the fragment were
added. Luciferase activity in non-starved cells also increased linearly
with additional copies of the 52-bp fragment, consequently, the fold
induction of the luciferase activity by glucose starvation was not
increased in parallel. The results suggest that the 52-bp fragment
enhances transcription of the minimal promoter regardless of the
glucose concentration.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
A 52-bp fragment containing the TATCCA
element enhances sugar-dependent transcription.
Multiple copies of fragment 133 to 82 containing the duplicated
TATCCA element was fused upstream of the 35S minimal promoter as
described under "Experimental Procedures." These constructs were
transfected into rice protoplasts and luciferase activity was
determined as described in the legend to Fig. 2.
|
|
SRS Acts as a Transcriptional Enhancer in a Sugar-insensitive
Promoter--
The SRS conferred high level glucose starvation-induced
expression on the 35S minimal promoter in an orientation-independent manner, suggesting it may also function as a transcriptional enhancer. To confirm the enhancer function, SRS was inserted in one, two, and
three tandem copies in the EcoRI site ( 459 bp upstream of the transcription start site) of the rice Act1 promoter
(52). The wild type and the SRS-containing Act1 promoters
were fused upstream of Luc gene as shown in Fig.
5. These sugar response sequence
constructs were then tested for transcriptional activity in rice
protoplasts. Expression of the control construct (p35mALuc) was not
detected. Expression of the wild type Act1 promoter
(pActLuc) and the Act1 promoter containing one to three
copies of SRS was similar in high concentration glucose. Expression of
the Act1 promoter containing one copy of SRS (p3Luc.37+)
increased 2-fold as compared with that of the wild type Act1
promoter in the glucose-starved cells. Surprisingly, duplication of SRS
(p3Luc.37++) dramatically increased fold induction by glucose
starvation and the fold induction increased almost linearly as more
copies of SRS were added (p3Luc.37+++). The results demonstrate that
expression of the Act1 promoter becomes inducible by glucose
starvation if the promoter is inserted with multiple copies of SRS.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
SRS converts the sugar-insensitive
Act1 promoter into a sugar-sensitive promoter. SRS was
inserted in one, two, or three tandem copies into the EcoRI
site ( 459) of the rice Act1 promoter as described under
"Experimental Procedures." These constructs were transfected into
rice protoplasts and luciferase activity was determined as described in
the legend to Fig. 2.
|
|
Linker-scan Mutation Analysis of SRS in the Amy3
Promoter--
Understanding that SRS confers a high level glucose
starvation-induced expression on the Act1 and 35S minimal
promoters, the next step was to more precisely locate the
cis-acting elements involved in sugar responsiveness.
Various 10-bp fragments containing EcoRI sites (GAATTC) were
introduced into individual constructs to replace various regions within
SRS in p3Luc.18, thus generating constructs p3Luc.28 through p3Luc.36,
as shown in Fig. 6A. These constructs were then tested for luciferase activity and the results are
shown in Fig. 6B. All the linker substitutions had more or less effect on expression as compared with the wild type sequence. The
GC box can be further divided into three GC-rich subdomains designated
as GC1, GC2, and GC3 boxes. The GC2 and GC3 boxes each contain the
identical 9-bp sequence CCGACGCGG. Mutations in the GC2 box (p3Luc.29)
and GC3 box (p3Luc.30) resulted in 40 and 60% reduction of expression,
respectively. Two mutations in the duplicated TATCCA element (p3Luc.33
and p3Luc.34) caused dramatic reduction in the level of glucose
starvation-induced expression to 12 and 8% of the control (p3Luc.18),
respectively. Mutations in the G box (p3Luc.31) resulted in a 80%
reduction of expression. These results demonstrate that all of the
sequences within SRS are necessary, and that the GC3 box, the G box,
and the TATCCA element are the most important sequences for high level
glucose starvation-induced expression.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Linker-scan mutation analysis of SRS
identified essential elements required for sugar-dependent
regulation. Plasmids carrying a series of linker-scan mutagenized
SRS fused upstream of the CaMV35S minimal promoter were constructed by
PCR as described under "Experimental Procedures." A,
nucleotide sequences of the wild type SRS and the linker-scan mutated
SRS. Sequences different from the wild type promoter are shown in
lowercase. B, constructs in A were
transfected into rice protoplasts and luciferase activity was
determined as described in the legend to Fig. 2.
|
|
Nuclear Proteins Binding to the cis-Acting Elements in
SRS--
Since the 52-bp fragment containing the TATCCA element
enhanced glucose starvation-induced transcriptional activity (Fig. 4)
and the TATCCA element is essential in conferring
sugar-dependent regulation (Fig. 6), we examined whether
nuclear proteins from rice suspension cells bind to the TATCCA element.
DNA fragments encompassing various regions of SRS were synthesized and
designated as F1 through F5 (Fig.
7A). These fragments were
assayed for their ability to interact with nuclear protein extract from
rice suspension cells grown in the presence or absence of sucrose. In
the gel mobility shift assay using F2, which contains the TATCCA
element, as the probe, two DNA-protein complexes (C1 and C2) were
observed regardless of whether the nuclear extract was from cells grown in the presence of sucrose (+S) (Fig. 7B, lane 2) or in the
absence of sucrose ( S) (Fig. 7B, lane 3).
However, the band intensity between F2 and the nuclear extract was
5-fold higher for S cells than that for +S cells. C1 and C2 were
competed out by a 500-fold amount of F2 itself (Fig. 7B, lanes 6 and 11) and a 150-fold amount of F5 which contains F2
(Fig. 7B, lanes 9 and 14).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Gel mobility shift assay identified nuclear
protein factors binding to the TATCCA element in a sequence-specific
and sugar-dependent manner. A, diagram showing
the sequences and positions of synthetic oligonucleotides within SRS
that were used for gel mobility shift assay. B-D, gel
mobility shift assays. Nuclear proteins were prepared from rice
suspension cells that had been grown in the presence (+) or absence
( ) of sucrose (S) for 2 days. The labeled F2
(B), F3 (C), or TATA box (D) was used
as a probe. Sequence of oligonucleotide containing the TATA box is
GTTCTATATATGCCCCC (position of TATA box underlined).
Lanes 1 and 4, no nuclear protein; lanes
2 and 3, no competitor DNA; lanes 5-8 and
10-13, 500-fold excess (w/w) of competing DNA; lanes
9 and 14, 150-fold excess (w/w) of competing DNA.
Positions of the DNA-protein complexes, C1, C2, and C3, and the free
probe are shown with arrows.
|
|
In the gel mobility shift assay using F3, which contains the G box and
5'-flanking sequence of the TATCCA element, one DNA-protein complex
(C3) was also observed regardless of whether the nuclear extract was
from +S cells (Fig. 7C, lane 2) or S cells (Fig. 7C,
lane 3). However, the band intensity between F3 and the nuclear extract was 4.5-fold higher for +S cells than that for S cells. C3
was competed out by a 500-fold amount of F3 itself and F4 (Fig. 7C, lanes 7 and 8 and lanes 12 and
13) and a 150-fold amount of F5 (Fig. 7C, lanes 9 and 14). Because F3 contains a 7-bp sequence, TTTATTG
(positions 126 to 120), which is also present in F4 and F5
(positions 99 to 93), we believe that C3 was formed between this
7-bp sequence with a nuclear protein. F2 competed slightly for C3
probably because it contains a 4-bp sequence ATTG which overlaps part
of the 7-bp sequence (Fig. 7C, lanes 6 and
11).
An additional gel shift assay using a DNA fragment containing the TATA
box of Amy3 as a probe, two to three DNA-protein
complexes, were observed regardless of whether the nuclear extract was
from +S cells (Fig. 7D, lane 2) or S cells (Fig. 7D,
lane 3). The band intensity of the complexes was similar between
the two nuclear extracts. These complexes were not competed out by a
500-fold amount of F2 (Fig. 7D, lanes 5 and 7),
but were competed out by the TATA box itself (Fig. 7D, lanes
6 and 8). This result demonstrates that the apparent
differences in the levels of the SRS DNA binding factors shown in Fig.
7, B and C, are due to changes in the functional amounts of the factors and not due to extraction and/or solubilization of nuclear factors. The above results also demonstrate that nuclear proteins from rice suspension cells bind to the TATCCA element and its
flanking sequences in a sequence-specific and
sugar-dependent manner.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The GC Box, G Box, and TATCCA Element Act Synergistically in
Regulating Sugar-dependent Expression of a Minimal
Promoter--
Linker-scan mutation analysis identified the GC3 box, G
box, and TATCCA element within SRS as the most essential sequences to
confer high-level glucose starvation-induced expression. Fragment 186
to 122, which contains the GC box and G box (p3Luc.19) only, dramatically reduced the glucose starvation-induced expression of the
35S minimal promoter (Fig. 3). Such reduction was probably not simply
due to an alteration in the distance between these sequences and the
TATA box, because mutation of the TATCCA element within SRS (p3Luc.33
and p3Luc.34) without alteration in the distance still resulted in
significant reduction of glucose starvation-induced expression (Fig.
6). Apparently, the TATCCA element is an indispensable element for
high-level expression. The 52-bp fragment ( 133 to 82), which
contains the duplicated TATCCA element only (p3Luc.40), shows no
induction in Fig. 3, but an 1.8-fold induction in Fig. 4. The
discrepancy was probably due to technical difficulty and variation in
preparation and electroporation of rice protoplasts from one experiment
to another, but the variation always remained below a factor of two in
three repeated experiments for each construct. Therefore, the
luciferase activity from p3Luc.40 is not significantly different
between cells grown with and without glucose and are close to
background. Duplication of the 52-bp fragment (p3Luc.41) recovered the
glucose starvation-induced expression, indicating that stable
interaction between trans-acting factor(s) and the TATCCA
element requires neighboring sequences around 133 and/or 82.
Mutations in either the downstream or upstream copy of the TATCCA
element (p3Luc.41 m1 and p3Luc.41 m2) reduced the starvation-induced expression which suggests both the sequence of TATCCA element and the
distance relative to TATA box are essential for expression.
The extent of sugar repression from either construct p3Luc.19x2 (7-fold
repression) or construct p3Luc.41 (4-fold repression) is significant
between cells grown with and without glucose, however, the fold
repression between the two constructs are not significantly different.
Sequence containing either the GC box plus G box or the TATCCA element
each can confer sugar-dependent regulation on the 35S
minimal promoter. However, presence of both sequences contribute to
high level glucose starvation-induced expression, suggesting that these
sequences act synergistically and their association was termed a sugar
response complex.
The 52-bp Fragment Containing the TATCCA Element Enhances
Sugar-dependent Transcription--
It is interesting to
note that the absolute level of expression from more than four copies
of the 52-bp fragment containing the TATCCA element far exceeded that
from SRS regardless of the glucose concentration (Fig. 4).
Particularly, the 52-bp fragment can substitute for the GC box and G
box for conferring high level glucose starvation-induced expression.
Multiple copies of the 52-bp fragment enhanced transcription regardless
of the glucose concentration, which suggests that transcription factors
binding to the cis-acting element (possibly the TATCCA
element) is constantly present in the nucleus. More copies of the 52-bp
fragments may recruit more transcription factors to the promoter
region. The higher level of expression induced by glucose starvation
could be due to an increase in the abundance of transcription factors or in the affinity for binding between the cis-acting
element and the transcription factors under glucose starvation. On the other hand, the fold induction of luciferase activity from SRS under
glucose starvation was higher than that from multiple copies of the
52-bp fragment (Fig. 4), suggesting that an additional sequence(s) is
required for the sugar repression of gene expression. The additional
sequence(s) must be present between 186 and 133.
The TATCCA Element Enhances GA- and Sugar-dependent
Promoter Activities--
Examination of promoter sequences of nine
rice, nine barley, and five wheat -amylase genes that are available
in GenBank reveals that all except four of these genes have TATCCA
variants, and that they all contain a TATCCA element at positions
approximately 100 to 150 bp upstream of transcription start sites. This
observation suggests that the TATCCA element may play a role in the
regulation of -amylase gene expression. Mutations of the TATCCA
element in the promoters of both barley high-PI -amylase gene Amy
pHV19 (28) and low-PI -amylase gene Amy32b (29) were found to lower expression to about 20% of maxima but maintained GA responsiveness. In
our study, mutation of the duplicated TATCCA element (p3Luc.33 and
p3.Luc.34) also reduced the Amy3 promoter activity to 12 and 8%, respectively, of the wild type sequence (p3Luc.18) but maintained sugar responsiveness (Fig. 6). These results suggest that
the TATCCA element enhances transcription in concert with the hormone-
or sugar-regulated interactions on other sequences to promote the
transcription of -amylase promoters in an environmental signal- and
tissue-dependent manner. The function of the TATCCA element, possibly with the involvement of its flanking sequences, seems
to operate somewhat differently between the GA- and
sugar-dependent regulatory systems, i.e. GA
control of expression exerted by the promoter fragments containing the
GA response element and TATCCA element from barley Amy pHV19 or rice
OSamy-c is orientation-dependent (28, 33),
whereas the sugar control of expression exerted by the promoter
fragment containing SRS from Amy3 is
orientation-independent (Fig. 3).
In addition to the TATCCA element, the G box was also identified as an
essential component of the sugar response complex. The G-box is present
in the 5'-upstream regions of plant genes exhibiting regulation by a
variety of environmental signals and physiological cues (51). Taken
together, the above studies suggest that the regulation of -amylase
gene expression by environmental factors, i.e. osmotic
stress (8) and physiological cues (gibberellin or sugar signal), may
share some common regulatory machinery. These findings provide new
insight into the mechanisms involved in the regulation of -amylase
gene expression in cereals.
SRS Converts a Sugar-insensitive Promoter into a Sugar-sensitive
Promoter--
The expression of the Act1 promoter-GUS gene
(data not shown) or Act1 promoter-Luc (Fig. 5,
pActLuc) in rice protoplasts is normally not significantly affected by
glucose. Insertion of SRS in the 459 position of the Act1
promoter alters the mode of regulation of this promoter by glucose.
Previously, the Act1 promoter deletion to nucleotide 459
has been shown to still display high activity in rice protoplasts (53),
suggesting that conversion of the promoter activity in response to
glucose is not simply due to disruption of the promoter sequence by
SRS. It is interesting to note that the absolute level of glucose
starvation-induced expression of the Act1 promoter
containing SRS was dramatically higher than that of the 35S minimal
promoter fused to SRS (compare Fig. 5 with Fig. 3), suggesting that SRS
may enhance the transcription of a promoter by a much higher magnitude
if the promoter has full function.
The enhancement of transcription exerted by multiple copies of SRS
under glucose starvation could be due to stable and/or multiple
interactions between trans-acting factors and the sugar response element(s) within SRS. An activator which enhances
transcription in proportion to the copy number of SRS is likely to be
involved in the glucose starvation-induced expression of the
Amy3 promoter. This notion is also supported by the
linker-scan mutation study in which the expression of the 35S minimal
promoter fused to various mutated SRS varied significantly in low
concentration glucose, indicating that the activator binding sites are
affected by various mutations. Taken together, all of these
observations suggest that glucose repression involves repression of a
functional activator(s) which otherwise interacts with SRS and
activates transcription.
Nuclear Protein Factors Binding to the TATCCA Element and Its
Flanking Sequences in a Sequence-specific and
Sugar-dependent Manner--
An important step toward
understanding the molecular mechanism of sugar-dependent
regulation is the identification of trans-acting regulatory
proteins. By gel mobility shift assay, nuclear proteins from rice
suspension cells were found to specifically bind to the TATCCA element
and its flanking sequences (Fig. 7, B and C). The
protein factors were present in the nuclei of +S or S cells, which
suggests that the protein factors are constantly present in the
nucleus. Higher amounts of complex formations between the nuclear
proteins from the S cells and the TATCCA element could be due to the
existence of higher amounts of transcription factors in the S cells,
or the higher binding affinity of transcription factors with the TATCCA
element under sucrose starvation. Higher amounts of complex formations
between the nuclear protein(s) from the +S cells and the flanking
sequences of the TATCCA element can be similarly explained. However,
protein factors bind to the TATCCA element and its flanking sequences
may serve opposite functions, activator and repressor, respectively.
Although the data shown in Figs. 5 and 6 suggest that activators may be
involved in the sugar starvation-induced Amy3 expression,
the possibility that the repressor is also involved in the sugar
repression of Amy3 expression cannot be ruled out. This
possibility is supported by an observation that the protein synthesis
inhibitor cycloheximide enhanced transcription of the
Amy3 promoter (data not shown), probably through an
inhibition of repressor synthesis. As judged from the involvement of
multiple cis-acting elements in the sugar response and the
complexity of DNA-protein interaction patterns, the transcription
factors may be post-translationally modified, recruit additional
proteins, or exhibit specificity in their interaction with other
transcription factors.
Conclusion--
In the last decade, molecular mechanism of GA
regulation of -amylase gene expression have been extensively studied
and functional analyses have identified several promoter sequences
important for the GA response. Despite the fact that sugar also serves
as an essential signal in controlling the expression of -amylase genes in cultured rice suspension cells (17), in germinating rice seed
(8, 16), and in germinating barley embryo (54, 55), to date the sugar
response sequence has been studied only for the rice
Amy3. In addition, although carbohydrate depletion induces expression of a variety of genes involved in photosynthesis, reserve mobilization, and export processes (56), the
cis-acting sugar response elements in the promoters of these
genes have not been precisely defined neither. A 20-bp sequence (at
position 90 to 70 upstream of the transcription start site) in a
Drosophila -amylase gene promoter was shown to be
necessary for full activity of this promoter in transformed larvae
(25). However, this 20-bp sequence does not contain a GC box or G
box-like sequence or TATCCA element. Conserved cis-acting
elements have not yet been found among promoters of sugar repressible
genes in plants, Drosophila, and yeasts. Our studies have
initiated an important question as to whether the mechanisms through
which sugar regulates gene expression are conserved or diverged
throughout the evolution of different kingdoms.
In summary, our studies present identification of functional sugar
response elements and the existence of interacting
trans-acting factors which regulate sugar repressible genes
in plants. These results should lay the foundation for the eventual
elucidation of the signal transduction pathway leading to sugar
feedback regulation of gene expression in plants. In addition,
identification of the TATCCA-binding protein would also facilitate
study of the complex regulatory network in which -amylase genes
respond to sugars and gibberellins for conversion of stored starch into
nutrients in germinating cereal grains (8).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Li-Fei Liu for providing rice
suspension cells, Dr. Teh-hui Kao for critical review of this
manuscript, and Lin-Tze Yu for technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a grant from Academia Sinica and
National Science Council Grant NSC84-2311-B-001-026 of the Republic of
China.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Current address: The Plant Laboratory, Dept. of Biology,
University of York, P. O. Box 373, York YO1 5YW, United Kingdom.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
886-2-2788-2695; Fax: 886-2-2788-2695 or 886-2-2782-6085; E-mail:
sumay{at}ccvax.sinica.edu.tw.
1
The abbreviations used are: GUS,
-glucuronidase; bp, base pair(s); PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
CaMV35S, cauliflower mosaic virus 35S RNA; MES,
4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine; SRS,
sugar response sequence; Luc, luciferase.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Saier, M. H., Jr.
(1991)
New Biol.
3,
1137-1147[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Saier, M. H., Jr.,
Chauvaux, S.,
Deutscher, J.,
Reizer, J.,
and Ye, J.-J.
(1995)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20,
267-271[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Carlson, M.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
169,
4873-4877[Free Full Text]
-
Entian, K-D.,
and Barnett, J. A.
(1992)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
17,
506-510[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gancedo, J. M.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
206,
297-313[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sheen, J.
(1994)
Photosynth. Res.
39,
427-438[CrossRef]
-
Thomas, B. R.,
and Rodriguez, R. L.
(1994)
Plant Physiol.
106,
1235-1239[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yu, S.-M.,
Lee, Y.-C.,
Fang, S.-C.,
Chan, M.-T.,
Hwa, S.-F.,
and Liu, L.-F.
(1996)
Plant Mol. Biol.
30,
1277-1289[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sheen, J.
(1990)
Plant Cell
2,
1027-1038[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chan, M.-T.,
Chao, Y.-C.,
and Yu, S.-M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
17635-17641[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Maas, C.,
Schaal, S.,
and Werr, W.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
3447-3452[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sheu, J.-J.,
Jan, S.-P.,
Lee, H.-T.,
and Yu, S.-M.
(1994)
Plant J.
5,
655-664[CrossRef]
-
Graham, I. A.,
Denby, K. J.,
and Leaver, C. J.
(1994)
Plant Cell
6,
761-772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jang, J.-C.,
and Sheen, J.
(1994)
Plant Cell
6,
1665-1679[Abstract]
-
Jang, J.-C.,
Leon, P.,
Zhou, L.,
and Sheen, J.
(1997)
Plant Cell
9,
5-19[Abstract]
-
Karrer, E. E.,
and Rodriguez, R. L.
(1992)
Plant J.
2,
517-523[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yu, S.-M.,
Kuo, Y.-H.,
Sheu, G.,
Sheu, Y.-J.,
and Liu, L.-F.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
21131-21137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yu, S.-M.,
Tzou, W.-S.,
Lo, W.-S.,
Kuo, Y.-H.,
Lee, H.-T.,
and Wu, R.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.)
122,
247-253[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Itoh, K.,
Yamaguchi, J.,
Huang, N.,
Rodriguez, R. L.,
Akazawa, T.,
and Shimamoto, K.
(1995)
Plant Physiol.
107,
25-31[Abstract]
-
Chen, M.-H.,
Liu, L.-F.,
Chen, Y.-R.,
Wu, H.-K.,
and Yu, S.-M.
(1994)
Plant J.
6,
625-636[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chan, M.-T.,
Chang, H.-H.,
Ho, S.-L.,
Tong, W.-F.,
and Yu, S.-M.
(1993)
Plant Mol. Biol.
22,
491-506[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Huang, N.,
Chandler, J.,
Thomas, B. R.,
Koizumi, N.,
and Rodriguez, R. L.
(1993)
Plant Mol. Biol.
23,
737-747[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tonomura, K.,
Suzuki, H.,
Nakamura, K.,
Kuraya, K.,
and Tanaba, O.
(1961)
Agric. Biol. Chem.
25,
1-6
-
Benkel, B. F.,
and Hickey, D. A.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
1337-1339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Magoulas, C.,
Bally-Cuif, L.,
Loverre-Chyurlia, A.,
Benkel, B.,
and Kickey, D.
(1993)
Genetics
134,
507-515[Abstract]
-
Tsuchiya, K.,
Tada, S.,
Gomi, K.,
Kitamoto, K.,
Kumagai, C.,
and Tamura, G.
(1992)
Biosci. Biotech. Biochem.
56,
1849-1853[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sheu, J.-J.,
Yu, T.-S.,
Tong, W.-F.,
and Yu, S.-M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
26998-27004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gubler, F.,
and Jacobsen, J. V.
(1992)
Plant Cell
4,
1435-1441[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lanahan, M. B.,
Ho, T.-H. D.,
Rogers, S. W.,
and Rogers, J. C.
(1992)
Plant Cell
4,
203-211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rogers, J. C.,
and Rogers, S. W.
(1992)
Plant Cell
4,
1443-1451[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rogers, J. C.,
Lanahan, M. B.,
and Rogers, S. W.
(1994)
Plant Physiol.
105,
151-158[Abstract]
-
Skriver, K.,
Olsen, F. L.,
Rogers, J. C.,
and Mundy, J.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
7266-7270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tanida, I.,
Kim, J.-K.,
and Wu, R.
(1994)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
244,
127-134[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Liu, Z.-B.,
Ulmasov, T.,
Shi, X.,
Hagen, G.,
and Guilfoyle, T. J.
(1994)
Plant Cell
6,
645-657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ulmasov, T.,
Liu, Z.-B.,
Hagen, G.,
and Guilfoyle, T. J.
(1995)
Plant Cell
7,
1611-1623[Abstract]
-
Ulmasov, T.,
Hagen, G.,
and Guilfoyle, T. J.
(1997)
Science
276,
1865-1868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Murashige, T.,
and Skoog, F.
(1962)
Physiol. Plant
15,
473-497[CrossRef]
-
Sutliff, T. D.,
Huang, N.,
Litts, J. C.,
and Rodriguez, R. L.
(1991)
Plant Mol. Biol.
16,
579-591[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hayashimoto, A.,
Li, Z.,
and Murai, N.
(1990)
Plant Physiol.
93,
857-863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Luehrsen, K. R.,
de Wet, J. R.,
and Walbot, V.
(1992)
Methods Enzymol.
216,
397-414[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Picard, V.,
Ersdal-Badju, E.,
Lu, A.,
and Bock, S. C.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
2587-2591[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cao, J.,
Duan, X.,
McElroy, D.,
and Wu, R.
(1992)
Plant Cell Rep.
11,
586-591
-
Frearson, E. M.,
Power, J. B.,
and Cocking, E. C.
(1973)
Dev. Biol.
33,
130-137[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ou-Lee, T.-M.,
Turgeon, R.,
and Wu, R.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
6815-6819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jefferson, R. A.
(1987)
Plant Mol. Biol. Rep.
5,
387-405
-
Bruce, W. B.,
Christensen, A. H.,
Klein, T.,
Fromm, M.,
and Quail, P. H.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
9692-9696[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bevan, M. W.
(1984)
Nucleic Acids Res.
12,
8711-8721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Horsch, R. B.,
Fry, J.,
Hoffmann, N.,
Neidermeyer, J.,
Rogers, S. G.,
and Fraley, R. T.
(1988)
in
Plant Molecular Biology Manual (Gelvin, S. B., and Schilperoort, R. A., eds), Vol. A5, pp. 1-9, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
-
Mitsunaga, S.-i.,
Rodriguez, R. L.,
and Yamaguchi, J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids. Res.
22,
1948-1953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Huang, N.,
Koizumi, N.,
Reinl, S.,
and Rodriguez, R. L.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
7007-7014[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
DeVetten, N. C.,
and Ferl, R. J.
(1994)
Int. J. Biochem.
26,
1055-1068[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
McElroy, D.,
Zhang, W.,
Cao, J.,
and Wu, R.
(1990)
Plant Cell
2,
163-171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wang, Y.,
Zhang, W.,
Cao, J.,
McElroy, D.,
and Wu, R.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
3399-3406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Briggs, D. E.,
and Clutterbuck, V. J.
(1973)
Phytochemistry
12,
1047-1050[CrossRef]
-
Smith, M. T.,
and Briggs, D. E.
(1980)
Phytochemistry
19,
1025-1033[CrossRef]
-
Koch, K. E.
(1996)
Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
47,
509-540[CrossRef]
-
Huang, N.,
Sutliff, T. D.,
Litts, J. C.,
and Rodriguez, R. L.
(1990)
Plant Mol. Biol.
14,
655-668[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Ismail, E. S. Ella, G. V. Vergara, and D. J. Mackill
Mechanisms associated with tolerance to flooding during germination and early seedling growth in rice (Oryza sativa)
Ann. Bot.,
January 1, 2009;
103(2):
197 - 209.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Polge, M. Jossier, P. Crozet, L. Gissot, and M. Thomas
{beta}-Subunits of the SnRK1 Complexes Share a Common Ancestral Function Together with Expression and Function Specificities; Physical Interaction with Nitrate Reductase Specifically Occurs via AKIN{beta}1-Subunit
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 2008;
148(3):
1570 - 1582.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-A. Lu, C.-C. Lin, K.-W. Lee, J.-L. Chen, L.-F. Huang, S.-L. Ho, H.-J. Liu, Y.-I. Hsing, and S.-M. Yu
The SnRK1A Protein Kinase Plays a Key Role in Sugar Signaling during Germination and Seedling Growth of Rice
PLANT CELL,
August 1, 2007;
19(8):
2484 - 2499.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P.-W. Chen, C.-M. Chiang, T.-H. Tseng, and S.-M. Yu
Interaction between Rice MYBGA and the Gibberellin Response Element Controls Tissue-Specific Sugar Sensitivity of {alpha}-Amylase Genes
PLANT CELL,
September 1, 2006;
18(9):
2326 - 2340.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Li, K. K. Lee, S. Walsh, C. Smith, S. Hadingham, K. Sorefan, G. Cawley, and M. W. Bevan
Establishing glucose- and ABA-regulated transcription networks in Arabidopsis by microarray analysis and promoter classification using a Relevance Vector Machine
Genome Res.,
March 1, 2006;
16(3):
414 - 427.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Tatematsu, S. Ward, O. Leyser, Y. Kamiya, and E. Nambara
Identification of cis-Elements That Regulate Gene Expression during Initiation of Axillary Bud Outgrowth in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2005;
138(2):
757 - 766.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-H. Chen, L.-F. Huang, H.-m. Li, Y.-R. Chen, and S.-M. Yu
Signal Peptide-Dependent Targeting of a Rice {alpha}-Amylase and Cargo Proteins to Plastids and Extracellular Compartments of Plant Cells
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2004;
135(3):
1367 - 1377.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. I. Gibson
Sugar and phytohormone response pathways: navigating a signalling network
J. Exp. Bot.,
January 2, 2004;
55(395):
253 - 264.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Laurie, R. S. McKibbin, and N. G. Halford
Antisense SNF1-related (SnRK1) protein kinase gene represses transient activity of an {alpha}-amylase ({alpha}-Amy2) gene promoter in cultured wheat embryos
J. Exp. Bot.,
February 1, 2003;
54(383):
739 - 747.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Atanassova, M. Leterrier, C. Gaillard, A. Agasse, E. Sagot, P. Coutos-Thevenot, and S. Delrot
Sugar-Regulated Expression of a Putative Hexose Transport Gene in Grape
Plant Physiology,
January 1, 2003;
131(1):
326 - 334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-A. Lu, T.-h. D. Ho, S.-L. Ho, and S.-M. Yu
Three Novel MYB Proteins with One DNA Binding Repeat Mediate Sugar and Hormone Regulation of {alpha}-Amylase Gene Expression
PLANT CELL,
August 1, 2002;
14(8):
1963 - 1980.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Rolland, B. Moore, and J. Sheen
Sugar Sensing and Signaling in Plants
PLANT CELL,
May 1, 2002;
14(90001):
S185 - 205.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P.-W. Chen, C.-A. Lu, T.-S. Yu, T.-H. Tseng, C.-S. Wang, and S.-M. Yu
Rice alpha -Amylase Transcriptional Enhancers Direct Multiple Mode Regulation of Promoters in Transgenic Rice
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 12, 2002;
277(16):
13641 - 13649.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Fujiki, M. Ito, T. Itoh, I. Nishida, and A. Watanabe
Activation of the Promoters of Arabidopsis Genes for the Branched-Chain {alpha}-Keto Acid Dehydrogenase Complex in Transgenic Tobacco BY-2 Cells under Sugar Starvation
Plant Cell Physiol.,
March 1, 2002;
43(3):
275 - 280.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Yamauchi
A TGACGT Motif in the 5'-Upstream Region of {{alpha}}-Amylase Gene from Vigna mungo is a cis-Element for Expression in Cotyledons of Germinated Seeds
Plant Cell Physiol.,
June 1, 2001;
42(6):
635 - 641.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-L. Ho, Y.-C. Chao, W.-F. Tong, and S.-M. Yu
Sugar Coordinately and Differentially Regulates Growth- and Stress-Related Gene Expression via a Complex Signal Transduction Network and Multiple Control Mechanisms
Plant Physiology,
February 1, 2001;
125(2):
877 - 890.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Toyofuku, M. Kasahara, and J. Yamaguchi
Characterization and Expression of Monosaccharide Transporters (OsMSTs) in Rice
Plant Cell Physiol.,
August 1, 2000;
41(8):
940 - 947.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Ciceri, F. Locatelli, A. Genga, A. Viotti, and R. J. Schmidt
The Activity of the Maize Opaque2 Transcriptional Activator Is Regulated Diurnally
Plant Physiology,
December 1, 1999;
121(4):
1321 - 1327.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-M. Yu
Cellular and Genetic Responses of Plants to Sugar Starvation
Plant Physiology,
November 1, 1999;
121(3):
687 - 693.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|