JBC GenomeOne product landing page

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Na, S.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Na, S.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. W.

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 18, 10831-10834, May 1, 1998

COMMUNICATION
Steroid Receptor Coactivator-1 Interacts with the p50 Subunit and Coactivates Nuclear Factor kappa B-mediated Transactivations*

Soon-Young NaDagger , Soo-Kyung Lee§, Su-Ji Hanparallel , Hueng-Sik Choi, Suhn-Young Imparallel , and Jae Woon Lee§**

From the Dagger  Department of Biology, the § College of Pharmacy, the  Hormone Research Center, and the parallel  Department of Microbiology, Chonnam National University, Kwangju 500-757, Korea

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) specifically bound to the transcription factor NFkappa B subunit p50 but not to p65 as demonstrated by the yeast two hybrid tests and glutathione S-transferase pull down assays. The p50-binding site was localized to a subregion of SRC-1 (amino acids 759-1141) that encompasses the previously described CBP-p300-binding domain. In mammalian cells, SRC-1 potentiated the NFkappa B-mediated transactivations in a dose-dependent manner. Coexpression of p300 further enhanced this SRC-1-potentiated level of transactivations, consistent with the recent findings in which CBP and p300 were shown to be transcription coactivators of the p65 subunit (Perkins, N. D., Felzien, L. K., Betts, J. C., Leung, K., Beach, D. H., and Nabel, G. J. (1997) Science 275, 523-527; Gerritsen, M. E., Williams, A. J., Neish, A. S., Moore, S., Shi, Y., and Collins, T. (1997) Proc. Acad. Natl. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 2927-2932). These results suggest that at least two distinct coactivator molecules may cooperate to regulate the NFkappa B-dependent transactivations in vivo and SRC-1, originally identified as a coactivator for the nuclear receptors, may constitute a more widely used coactivation complex.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

The transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NFkappa B)1 is important for the inducible expression of a wide variety of cellular and viral genes (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). NFkappa B is composed of homo- and heterodimeric complexes of members of the Rel (NFkappa B) family of polypeptides. In vertebrates, this family comprises p50, p65 (RelA), c-Rel, p52, and RelB. These proteins share a 300-amino acid region, known as the Rel homology domain, which binds to DNA and mediates homo- and heterodimerization. This domain also is target of the Ikappa B inhibitors, which include Ikappa Balpha , Ikappa Bbeta , Ikappa Bgamma , Bcl-3, p105, and p100 (3). In the majority of cells, NFkappa B exists in an inactive form in the cytoplasm, bound to the inhibitory Ikappa B proteins. Treatment of cells with various inducers results in the degradation of Ikappa B proteins. The bound NFkappa B is released and translocates to the nucleus, where it activates appropriate target genes. Ikappa Balpha is degraded in response to all of the known inducers of NFkappa B, whereas Ikappa Bbeta is degraded only when cells are stimulated with inducers such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and interleukin-1, which cause persistent activation of NFkappa B (4). Following degradation of the initial pool of Ikappa Bbeta in response to LPS or interleukin-1, newly synthesized Ikappa Bbeta accumulates in the nucleus as an unphosphorylated protein that forms a stable complex with NFkappa B and prevents it from binding to newly synthesized Ikappa Balpha (5, 6). Bcl-3 is an unusual Ikappa B protein in that it can not only inhibit nuclear NFkappa B complexes but can bind to p50 and p52 dimers on DNA and provide the complexes with transactivating activity (7, 8).

Transcription coactivators bridge transcription factors and the components of the basal transcriptional apparatus (reviewed in Ref. 9). Functionally conserved proteins CBP and p300 have been shown to be essential for the activation of transcription by a large number of regulated transcription factors, including nuclear receptors (10-13), CREB (14-16), AP-1 (17, 18), bHLH factors (19), STATs (20, 21), and, most recently, the NFkappa B component p65 (22, 23). In particular, the nuclear receptor superfamily is a group of ligand-dependent transcriptional regulatory proteins that function by binding to specific DNA sequences named hormone response elements in promoters of target genes (reviewed in Ref. 24). Transcriptional regulation by nuclear receptors depends primarily upon a ligand-dependent activation function, AF-2, located in the C terminus and predicted to undergo an allosteric change upon ligand binding (24). Consistent with this, CBP and p300 have been found to interact directly with nuclear receptors in a ligand- and AF-2-dependent manner (10-13). In addition, a series of factors that exhibit ligand- and AF-2-dependent binding to nuclear receptors have been identified both biochemically and by expression cloning. Among these, a group of highly related proteins have been shown to form a complex with CBP and p300 and enhance transcriptional activation by several nuclear receptors, i.e. steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) (12, 25), AIB1 (26), TIF2 (27), RAC3 (28), ACTR (29), TRAM-1 (30), p/CIP (31), and XICO (32). Interestingly, SRC-1 (33) and its homologue ACTR (29), along with CBP and p300 (34, 35), were recently shown to contain potent histone acetyltransferase activities themselves and associate with yet another histone acetyltransferase protein p/CAF (36). In contrast, it was shown that SMRT (37) and N-CoR (38), nuclear receptor corepressors, form complexes with Sin3 and histone deacetylase proteins (39, 40). From these results, it was suggested that chromatin remodeling by cofactors may contribute through histone acetylation-deacetylation to transcription factor-mediated transcriptional regulation.

In light of the fact that SRC-1 is capable of forming a complex with CBP and p300 that in turn coactivate the NFkappa B component p65 (22, 23), we tested whether SRC-1 itself participates in the NFkappa B-mediated transactivations as well. Herein, we show that 1) SRC-1 specifically binds to the NFkappa B component p50 but not to p65, 2) SRC-1 coactivates the NFkappa B-mediated transactivations, and 3) p300 synergized with SRC-1 in this coactivation. These results suggest that at least two distinct transcription coactivator molecules with histone acetyltransferase activities (i.e. SRC-1 and CBP-p300) may regulate the NFkappa B-mediated transactivations in vivo, and SRC-1, originally identified as a coactivator for the nuclear receptors, may regulate many different transcription factors.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Plasmids-- LexA, B42, T7, or GST vectors to express p50 and p65 were as described previously (41). Polymerase chain reaction-amplified fragments of SRC-1 (A-E as depicted in Fig. 1) were subcloned into EcoRI-SalI restriction sites of the LexA fusion vector pEG202PL (42), EcoRI-XhoI restriction sites of the B42 fusion vector pJG4-5 (42), or EcoRI-XhoI restriction sites of the T7 vector pBS-SK (Stratagene, San Diego, CA). The GST fusion vectors encoding CBP-N (amino acids 1-450) and CBP-C (amino acids 1891-2441) (kind gifts from Dr. Chris Glass, University of California at San Diego) were as described (12). The expression vectors for p300 (kind gift from Dr. David M. Livingston, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA) and SRC-1 (kind gift from Dr. Ming Tsai, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX), along with the transfection indicator construct pRSV-beta -gal and the NFkappa B-responsive reporter construct (kappa B)4-IL-2-Luc, were as described previously (15, 33, 43).

Yeast Two-hybrid Test-- For the yeast two-hybrid tests, plasmids encoding LexA fusions and B42 fusions were cotransformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae EGY48 strain containing the LacZ reporter plasmid, SH/18-34 (42). Plate and liquid assays of beta -gal expression were carried out as described (42, 44-46). Similar results were obtained in more than two similar experiments.

GST Pull Down Assays-- The GST fusions or GST alone was expressed in Escherichia coli, bound to glutathione-Sepharose-4B beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and incubated with labeled proteins expressed by in vitro translation by using the TNT-coupled transcription-translation system, with conditions as described by the manufacturer (Promega, Madison, WI). Specifically bound proteins were eluted from beads with 40 mM reduced glutathione in 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0) and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography as described (47).

Cell Culture and Transfections-- L929 cells were grown in 24-well plates with medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum for 24 h and transfected with 100 ng of LacZ expression vector pRSV-beta -gal and 100 ng of a reporter gene (kappa B)4-IL-2-Luc (43), along with increasing amounts of expression vectors for SRC-1 or p300. Total amounts of expression vectors were kept constant by adding decreasing amounts of pcDNA3 to transfections containing increasing amounts of the SRC-1 or p300 vector. After 12 h, cells were washed and refed with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal calf serum. Cells were harvested 24 h later, luciferase activity was assayed as described (48), and the results were normalized to the LacZ expression. Similar results were obtained in more than two similar experiments.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Interactions of SRC-1 and p50-- We have recently found that XICO (32), a Xenopus homologue of the nuclear receptor coactivator SRC-1 (12, 25), interacts with p50 but not with p65.2 The smallest clone among the original isolates of XICO that readily interacted with p50 consisted of only the central nuclear receptor-binding and CBP-p300-binding domains, suggesting that the interaction interface should be included within these two domains.2 These interactions were further characterized in the yeast two-hybrid tests (42), in which formations of p50-p50 homodimer and p50-p65 heterodimer were readily detected as previously reported (41) (Table I). A series of SRC-1 fragments were subcloned into B42 and LexA vectors as depicted in Fig. 1. Among the LexA fusions, only SRC-D (SRC-1 amino acids 759-1141) encompassing the previously described CBP-p300-binding domain (12, 25-32) was found to confer autonomous transactivation function to a LacZ reporter construct controlled by upstream LexA-binding sites (42) (Table I). This is consistent with the previous findings in which the CBP-p300-binding domain was shown to be essential for autonomous transactivation functions (12, 25-32). Consistent with an idea that p50 interacts with SRC-D, coexpression of a B42 fusion to the full-length p50 further stimulated the LexA/SRC-D-mediated LacZ expression, whereas coexpression of a B42 fusion to the full-length p65 was without any effects (Table I). In contrast, the LacZ expressions mediated by LexA fusions to SRC-A, -B, -C, or -E were not stimulated by coexpression of B42/p50 or B42/p65. Similar results were also obtained with B42 fusions to SRC-1 fragments and LexA fusions to p50 and p65, in which coexpression of the B42/SRC-D and LexA/p50 pair efficiently stimulated the LacZ reporter expression (data not shown).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Interactions between SRC-1 and p50 in yeast
The indicated B42 and LexA plasmids were transformed into a yeast strain containing an appropriate LacZ reporter gene. At least six separate transformants from each transformation were transferred to indicator plates containing 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl beta -D-galactopyranoside, and reproducible results were obtained using colonies from a separate transformation. +++, strongly blue colonies after 2 days of incubation and strong interaction; ++, light blue colonies after 2 days of incubation and intermediate interaction; +, light blue colonies after more than 2 days of incubation and strong interaction; -, white colonies and no interaction.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic representation of the SRC-1 constructs. The full-length human SRC-1 (12, 25) and a series of five SRC-1 fragments are as depicted. The nuclear receptor-interacting, CBP-p300-interacting, bHLH/PAS, serine/threonine-rich, and glutamine-rich domains, along with the recently identified histone acetyltransferase domain (33), are as indicated. The amino acid numbers for each construct are shown.

To further characterize these interactions in vitro, GST alone and GST fusions to p50, p65, CBP-N (amino acids 1-450), or CBP-C (amino acids 1891-2441) were expressed, purified, and tested for interaction with in vitro translated p50, p65, a full-length SRC-1, or various SRC-1 fragments (Fig. 1). As previously reported (23), radiolabeled p65 readily interacted with GST/p50, GST/CBP-N, and GST/CBP-C but not with GST alone, whereas p50 interacted only with GST/p50 (Fig. 2A). The radiolabeled full-length SRC-1 interacted with GST/p50 but not with GST alone or GST/p65 (Fig. 2B). In agreement with the yeast two-hybrid results (Table I), only SRC-D specifically interacted with GST/p50 but not with GST alone or GST/p65 (Fig. 2B). These results, along with the yeast results, suggest that SRC-1 directly associates with p50 through a subregion of SRC-1 containing the CBP-p300-binding domain (i.e. SRC-D).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Interactions of p50 with SRC-1. Full-length p50 and p65 (A) as well as various SRC-1 constructs (B) were labeled with [35S]methionine by in vitro translation and incubated with glutathione beads containing GST alone, GST/p50, GST/p65, GST/CBP-N, and GST/CBP-C, as indicated. Beads were washed, and specifically bound material was eluted with reduced glutathione and resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Cotransfection of SRC-1 Stimulates the NFkappa B-mediated Transactivations-- To assess the functional consequences of these interactions, SRC-1 was cotransfected into L929 cells along with the reporter construct (kappa B)4-IL-2-Luc. This reporter construct, previously characterized to efficiently mediate the NFkappa B-dependent transactivations in various cell types, consists of a minimal promoter from the interleukin-2 gene and four upstream kappa B sites from the IL-6 gene (43). Increasing amounts of cotransfected SRC-1 enhanced the reporter gene expressions in an SRC-1 dose-dependent manner, with cotransfection of 800 ng of SRC-1 increasing the fold activation approximately 3-fold (Fig. 3). Consistent with the reports that CBP and p300 are transcription coactivators of the NFkappa B component p65 (22, 23), increasing amounts of cotransfected p300 had stimulatory effects on the reporter gene expressions, with cotransfection of 100 ng of p300 increasing the fold activation approximately 2-fold. Consistent with an idea that SRC-1 and p300 synergize to coactivate the NFkappa B-mediated transactivations, coexpression of p300 and SRC-1 further increased the reporter gene expressions above the levels observed with SRC-1 or p300 alone (Fig. 3). In various cells, SRC-1 also coactivated the LPS- or tumor necrosis factor alpha -induced level of transactivations (data not shown). In contrast, cotransfection of SRC-1 did not affect the LacZ reporter expression of the transfection indicator construct pRSV-beta -gal either in the presence or the absence of LPS or tumor necrosis factor alpha  (data not shown).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effects of SRC-1 and p300 cotransfection on the NFkappa B-mediated transactivations. L929 cells were transfected with LacZ expression vector and increasing amounts of SRC-1 or p300 expression vectors along with a reporter gene (kappa B)4-IL-2-Luc (43) as indicated. Normalized luciferase expressions from triplicate samples are presented relative to the LacZ expressions, and the standard deviations are less than 5%.

In summary, we have shown that SRC-1 interacts with the NFkappa B subunit p50 and coactivates the NFkappa B-mediated transactivations in synergy with p300, which was recently shown to be a coactivator of the NFkappa B subunit p65 (22, 23). This synergy is believed to reflect a cooperative recruitment of two different coactivator molecules (i.e. SRC-1 and CBP-p300) by p50 and p65, respectively. It is possible that these two distinct histone acetyltransferases (29, 33-35) either modify selective sites on the histone tails or act in a concerted fashion to control different aspects of transcritpional activation. In particular, p50 contains a single consensus acetylation site KXKK (49) (where K is lysine and X is any amino acid) in the Rel domain (p50 amino acids 74-77). It will be interesting to examine whether this site can be acetylated by SRC-1 or CBP-p300 and serves as yet another regulatory target, as recently attested with p53, in which acetylation of the C-terminal regulatory site enhanced its DNA binding activities (49). It is also notable that SRC-1 was originally identified as a coactivator molecule for the nuclear receptor superfamily (12, 25). However, the results presented in this report suggest that SRC-1 may regulate many different transcription factors, joining the class of proteins that were termed integrators (i.e. CBP and p300) (10-13). Finally, competition for a limiting amount of these molecules should be involved with cross-talks between distinct signaling pathways such as the well defined antagonisms between the nuclear receptor- and NFkappa B-mediated transactivations (41, 50-52).

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Ming Tsai for the SRC-1 clones, Dr. Chris Glass for the GST-CBP clones, Dr. Tae Ho Lee for the NFkappa B-responsive reporter construct, and Dr. David Livingston for the p300 mammalian expression vector.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grant 96-0401-08-01-3 from the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (to J. W. L.), grants from the Hormone Research Center (to J. W. L, S.-Y. I., and H.-S. C.), and Grant BSRI 97-4426 (to S.-Y. I.) and Grant GE 96-81/97-143 (to J. W. L.) from the Academic Research Fund of the Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 82-62-530-2934; Fax: 82-62-530-2949; E-mail: jlee{at}chonnam.chonnam.ac.kr.

1 The abbreviations used are: NFkappa B, nuclear factor kappa B; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; SRC-1, steroid receptor coactivator-1; GST, glutathione S-transferase; beta -gal, beta -galactosidase; IL, interleukin; CBP, CREB-binding protein.

2 S.-K. Lee and J. W. Lee, unpublished observations.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

  1. Verma, I. M., Stevenson, J. K., Schwarz, E. M., Van Antwerp, D., and Miyamoto, S. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 2723-2735[Free Full Text]
  2. Baldwin, A. S. (1996) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14, 649-681[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Gilmore, T. D., and Morin, P. J. (1993) Trends Genet. 9, 427-433[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Thompson, J. E., Phillips, R. J., Erdjument-bromage, H., Tempst, P., and Ghosh, S. (1995) Cell 80, 573-582[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Suyang, H., Phillips, R., Douglas, I., and Ghosh, S. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 5444-5449[Abstract]
  6. Weil, R., Laurent-Winter, C., and Israel, A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9942-9949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bours, V., Franzoso, G., Azarenko, V., Park, S., Kanno, T., Brown, K., and Siebenlist, U. (1993) Cell 72, 729-739[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Fujita, T., Nolan, G. P., Liou, H.-C., Scott, M. L., and Baltimore, D. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 1354-1363[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Horwitz, K. B., Jackson, T. A., Bain, D. L., Richer, J. K., Takimoto, G. S., and Tung, L. (1996) Mol. Endocrinol. 10, 1167-1177[Abstract]
  10. Chakravarti, D., LaMorte, V. J., Nelson, M. C., Nakajima, T., Juguilon, H., Montminy, M., and Evans, R. M. (1996) Nature 383, 99-103[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Hanstein, B., Eckner, R., DiRenzo, J., Halachmi, S., Liu, H., Searcy, B., and Brown, M. (1996) Proc. Acad. Natl. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 11540-11545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Kamei, Y., Xu, L., Heinzel, T., Torchia, J., Kurokawa, R., Gloss, B., Lin, S. C., Heyman, R. A., Rose, D. W., Glass, C. K., and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1996) Cell 85, 403-414[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Yao, T.-P., Ku, G., Zhou, N., Scully, R., and Livingston, D. M. (1996) Proc. Acad. Natl. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 10626-10631[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Chrivia, J. C., Kwok, R. P. S., Lamb, N., Hagiwara, M., Montminy, M. R., and Goodman, R. H. (1993) Nature 365, 855-859[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Arany, Z., Sellers, W. R., Livingston, D. M., and Eckner, R. (1994) Cell 77, 799-800[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Kwok, R. P. S., Lundland, J. R., Chrivia, J. C., Richards, J. P., Bachinger, H. P., Brennan, R. G., Roberts, S. G. E., Green, M. R., and Goodman, R. H. (1994) Nature 370, 223-226[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Arias, J., Alberts, A. S., Brindle, P., Claret, F. X., Smeal, T., Karin, M., Feramisco, J., and Montminy, M. (1994) Nature 370, 226-229[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Bannister, A. J., and Kouzarides, T. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 4758-4762[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Eckner, R., Yao, T.-P., Oldread, E., and Livingston, D. M. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 2478-2490[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Bhattacharya, S., Eckner, R., Grossman, S., Oldread, E., Arany, Z., D'Andrea, A., and Livingston, D. M. (1996) Nature 383, 344-347[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Zhang, J. J., Vinkemeier, U., Gu, W., Chakravarti, D., Horvath, C. M., and Darnell, J. E. (1996) Proc. Acad. Natl. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 15092-15096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Perkins, N. D., Felzien, L. K., Betts, J. C., Leung, K., Beach, D. H., and Nabel, G. J. (1997) Science 275, 523-527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Gerritsen, M. E., Williams, A. J., Neish, A. S., Moore, S., Shi, Y., and Collins, T. (1997) Proc. Acad. Natl. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 2927-2932[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Mangelsdorf, D. J., Thummel, C., Beato, M., Herrlich, P., Schutz, G., Umesono, K., Blumberg, B., Kastner, P., Mark, M., Chambon, P., and Evans, R. M. (1995) Cell 83, 835-839[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Onate, S. A., Tsai, S. Y., Tsai, M. J., and O'Malley, B. M. (1995) Science 270, 1354-1357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Anzick, S. L., Kononen, J., Walker, R. L., Azorsa, D. O., Tanner, M. M., Guan, X. Y., Sauter, G., Kallioniemi, O. P., Trent, J. M., and Meltzer, P. S. (1997) Science 277, 965-968[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Voegel, J. J., Heine, M. J. S., Zechel, C., Chambon, P., and Gronemeyer, H. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 3667-3675[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Li, H., Gomes, P. J., and Chen, J. D. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 8479-8484[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Chen, H., Lin, R. J., Schiltz, R. L., Chakravarti, D., Nash, A., Nagy, L., Privalsky, M. L., Nakatani, Y., and Evans, R. M. (1997) Cell 90, 569-580[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Takeshita, A., Gardona, G. R., Koibuchi, N., Suen, C.-S., and Chin, W. W. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27629-27634[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Torchia, J., Rose, D. W., Inostroza, J., Kamei, Y., Westin, S., Glass, C. K., and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1997) Nature 387, 677-684[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Kim, H.-J., Lee, S.-K., Na, S.-Y., Choi, H.-S., and Lee, J. W. (1998) Mol. Endocrinol., in press
  33. Spencer, T. E., Jenster, G., Burcin, M. M., Allis, C. D., Zhou, J., Mizzen, C. A., McKenna, N. J., Onate, S. A., Tsai, S. Y., Tsai, M. J., and O'Malley, B. W. (1997) Nature 389, 194-198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Bannister, A. J., and Kouzarides, T. (1996) Nature 384, 641-643[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Ogryzko, V. V., Schiltz, R. L., Russanova, V., Howard, B. H., and Nakatani, Y. (1996) Cell 87, 953-959[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Yang, X.-J., Ogryzko, V. V., Nishikawa, J., Howard, B. H., and Nakatani, Y. (1996) Nature 382, 319-324[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Horlein, A. J., Naar, A. M., Heinzel, T., Torchia, J., Gloss, B., Kurokawa, R., Ryan, A., Kamei, Y., Soderstrom, M., Glass, C. K., and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1995) Nature 377, 397-404[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Chen, J. D., and Evans, R. M. (1995) Nature 377, 454-457[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Heinzel, T., Lavinsky, R. M., Mullen, T. M., Soderstrom, M., Laherty, C. D., Torchia, J., Yang, W. M., Brard, G., Ngo, S. D., Davie, J. R., Seto, E., Eisenman, R. N., Rose, D. W., Glass, C. K., and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1997) Nature 387, 43-48[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Nagy, L., Kao, H.-Y., Chakravarti, D., Lin, R. J., Hassig, C. A., Ayer, D. E., Schreiber, S. L., and Evans, R. M. (1997) Cell 89, 373-380[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Na, S.-Y., Kim, H.-J., Lee, S.-K., Choi, H.-S., Na, D. S., Lee, M.-O., Chung, M., Moore, D. D., and Lee, J. W. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3212-3215[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Gyuris, J., Golemis, E., Chertkov, H., and Brent, R. (1993) Cell 75, 791-803[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Kim, C. H., Song, Y.-H., Park, K., Oj, Y., and Lee, T. H. (1995) J. Inflamm. 45, 312-322[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Lee, J. W., Moore, D. D., and Heyman, R. A. (1994) Mol. Endocrinol. 8, 1245-1252[Abstract]
  45. Lee, J. W., Choi, H.-S., Gyuris, J., Brent, R., and Moore, D. D. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 243-254[Abstract]
  46. Lee, J. W., Ryan, F., Swaffield, J. C., Johnston, S. A., and Moore, D. D. (1995) Nature 374, 91-94[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Seol, W., Mahon, M. J., Lee, Y.-K., and Moore, D. D. (1996) Mol. Endocrinol. 10, 1646-1655[Abstract]
  48. Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (1995) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Greene Assoc., New York
  49. Gu, W., and Roeder, R. G. (1997) Cell 90, 595-606[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Scheinman, R. I., Cogswell, P. C., Lofquist, A. K., and Baldwin, A. S., Jr. (1995) Science 270, 283-286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Auphan, N., DiDonato, J. A., Rosette, C., Helmberg, A., and Karin, M. (1995) Science 270, 286-290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. De Bosscher, K., Schmitz, M. L., Berghe, W. V., Plaisance, S., Fiers, W., and Haegeman, G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 13504-13509[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Lodrini, T. Munz, N. Coudevylle, C. Griesinger, S. Becker, and E. Pfitzner
p160/SRC/NCoA coactivators form complexes via specific interaction of their PAS-B domain with the CID/AD1 domain
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2008; 36(6): 1847 - 1860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Y. S. Choi, J. Hur, and S. Jeong
{beta}-Catenin binds to the downstream region and regulates the expression C-reactive protein gene
Nucleic Acids Res., August 17, 2007; (2007) gkm547v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S. Sahar, M. A. Reddy, C. Wong, L. Meng, M. Wang, and R. Natarajan
Cooperation of SRC-1 and p300 With NF-{kappa}B and CREB in Angiotensin II-Induced IL-6 Expression in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2007; 27(7): 1528 - 1534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
G. B. Atkins and M. K. Jain
Role of Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors in Endothelial Biology
Circ. Res., June 22, 2007; 100(12): 1686 - 1695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. G. d. Paz, S. Simeonidis, C. Leo, D. W. Rose, and T. Collins
Regulation of NF-{kappa}B-dependent Gene Expression by the POU Domain Transcription Factor Oct-1
J. Biol. Chem., March 16, 2007; 282(11): 8424 - 8434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Cascio, V. Bartella, C. Garofalo, A. Russo, A. Giordano, and E. Surmacz
Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Differentially Regulates Estrogen Receptor-dependent Transcription at Estrogen Response Element and AP-1 Sites in Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., February 9, 2007; 282(6): 3498 - 3506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
P. Mussi, C. Yu, B. W. O'Malley, and J. Xu
Stimulation of Steroid Receptor Coactivator-3 (SRC-3) Gene Overexpression by a Positive Regulatory Loop of E2F1 and SRC-3
Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 20(12): 3105 - 3119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Sammons, S. S. Wan, N. L. Vogel, E. J. Mientjes, G. Grosveld, and B. P. Ashburner
Negative Regulation of the RelA/p65 Transactivation Function by the Product of the DEK Proto-oncogene
J. Biol. Chem., September 15, 2006; 281(37): 26802 - 26812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol TechHome page
K. Derecka, C.K. Wang, and A.P.F. Flint
Interactions between the cytomegalovirus promoter and the estrogen response element: implications for design of estrogen-responsive reporter plasmids.
J. Biomol. Tech., July 1, 2006; 17(3): 218 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
F. Miao, S. Li, V. Chavez, L. Lanting, and R. Natarajan
Coactivator-Associated Arginine Methyltransferase-1 Enhances Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B-Mediated Gene Transcription through Methylation of Histone H3 at Arginine 17
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2006; 20(7): 1562 - 1573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. Yu and R. J. Koenig
Induction of Type 1 Iodothyronine Deiodinase to Prevent the Nonthyroidal Illness Syndrome in Mice
Endocrinology, July 1, 2006; 147(7): 3580 - 3585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Yoshida, Y. Iwasaki, M. Asai, S. Takayasu, T. Taguchi, K. Itoi, K. Hashimoto, and Y. Oiso
Identification of a Functional AP1 Element in the Rat Vasopressin Gene Promoter
Endocrinology, June 1, 2006; 147(6): 2850 - 2863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
M. G. Rosenfeld, V. V. Lunyak, and C. K. Glass
Sensors and signals: a coactivator/corepressor/epigenetic code for integrating signal-dependent programs of transcriptional response
Genes & Dev., June 1, 2006; 20(11): 1405 - 1428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
G. Li, J. H. Heaton, and T. D. Gelehrter
Role of Steroid Receptor Coactivators in Glucocorticoid and Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Regulation of Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor Gene Expression
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2006; 20(5): 1025 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
K. N. Islam and C. R. Mendelson
Permissive Effects of Oxygen on Cyclic AMP and Interleukin-1 Stimulation of Surfactant Protein A Gene Expression Are Mediated by Epigenetic Mechanisms
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2006; 26(8): 2901 - 2912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Hua, M. Tamamori-Adachi, Y. Luo, K. Tamura, M. Morioka, M. Fukuda, Y. Tanaka, and S. Kitajima
A Splice Variant of Stress Response Gene ATF3 Counteracts NF-{kappa}B-dependent Anti-apoptosis through Inhibiting Recruitment of CREB-binding Protein/p300 Coactivator
J. Biol. Chem., January 20, 2006; 281(3): 1620 - 1629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. E. Hoberg, A. E. Popko, C. S. Ramsey, and M. W. Mayo
I{kappa}B Kinase {alpha}-Mediated Derepression of SMRT Potentiates Acetylation of RelA/p65 by p300
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2006; 26(2): 457 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
H. Xie, M. S. Sadim, and Z. Sun
ROR{gamma}t Recruits Steroid Receptor Coactivators to Ensure Thymocyte Survival
J. Immunol., September 15, 2005; 175(6): 3800 - 3809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S.-Q. Kuang, L. Liao, S. Wang, D. Medina, B. W. O'Malley, and J. Xu
Mice Lacking the Amplified in Breast Cancer 1/Steroid Receptor Coactivator-3 Are Resistant to Chemical Carcinogen-Induced Mammary Tumorigenesis
Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 65(17): 7993 - 8002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z. Gao, P. Chiao, X. Zhang, X. Zhang, M. A. Lazar, E. Seto, H. A. Young, and J. Ye
Coactivators and Corepressors of NF-{kappa}B in I{kappa}B{alpha} Gene Promoter
J. Biol. Chem., June 3, 2005; 280(22): 21091 - 21098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R.-C. Wu, C. L. Smith, and B. W. O'Malley
Transcriptional Regulation by Steroid Receptor Coactivator Phosphorylation
Endocr. Rev., May 1, 2005; 26(3): 393 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. Myers, A. D.K. Hill, G. Kelly, E. W. McDermott, N. J. O'Higgins, Y. Buggy, and L. S. Young
Associations and Interactions between Ets-1 and Ets-2 and Coregulatory Proteins, SRC-1, AIB1, and NCoR in Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2005; 11(6): 2111 - 2122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H.-Y. Wu, Y. Hamamori, J. Xu, S. C. Chang, T. Saluna, M.-F. Chang, B. W. O'Malley, and L. Kedes
Nuclear Hormone Receptor Coregulator GRIP1 Suppresses, whereas SRC1A and p/CIP Coactivate, by Domain-specific Binding of MyoD
J. Biol. Chem., February 4, 2005; 280(5): 3129 - 3137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
N. Yin, D. Wang, H. Zhang, X. Yi, X. Sun, B. Shi, H. Wu, G. Wu, X. Wang, and Y. Shang
Molecular Mechanisms Involved in the Growth Stimulation of Breast Cancer Cells by Leptin
Cancer Res., August 15, 2004; 64(16): 5870 - 5875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Arimura, M. van Peer, A. J. Schroder, and P. B. Rothman
The Transcriptional Co-activator p/CIP (NCoA-3) Is Up-regulated by STAT6 and Serves as a Positive Regulator of Transcriptional Activation by STAT6
J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 2004; 279(30): 31105 - 31112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]