|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 18, 11100-11106, May 1, 1998
From the The amyloid precursor superfamily is composed of
three highly conserved transmembrane glycoproteins, the amyloid
precursor protein (APP) and amyloid precursor-like proteins 1 and 2 (APLP1, APLP2), whose functions are unknown. Proteolytic cleavage of
APP yields the Alzheimer's disease is an age-related human dementia whose
principle neuropathological signs are forebrain cholinergic neuronal death, neurofibrilliary tangles, and amyloidosis of cerebral vessels and senile plaques (1). Interest in the regulation of
APP1 expression arose from it
being recognized as the parent protein of To better understand the regulation of neuronally expressed APSF
proteins in vivo, we quantitatively and biochemically
examined APSF protein expression and turnover in a major pathway of the central nervous system, the primary visual projection (Fig.
1B). Previous studies have indicated that APP is synthesized
by neuronal populations and that it undergoes fast anterograde
transport (13-16), although the fate of axonally transported APP is
relatively understudied, and no studies have examined APLP1 or APLP2
for axonal transport. Inspection of translated sequences reveals that
all three APSF proteins carry a consensus clathrin binding region in
the cytoplasmic tail. Various published data allude to a relationship
between APP metabolism and endocytotic/endosomal membrane recycling
(17, 18). Considering the tight regulation of the
exocytotic-endocytotic cycle during excitation-release coupling in the
presynaptic terminal (19), it was hypothesized that metabolism of APP
(and possibly of APLP1 and/or APLP2) would be coupled to
clathrin-mediated endocytosis driven by activity-dependent
presynaptic release of neurotransmitter. As presynaptic turnover would
be suggestive of proteolysis, we also examined presynaptically targeted
APSF proteins for evidence of proteolytic processing. Finally, the
extracellular domains of APP and APLP2 may carry glycosylations (8)
that could potentially interact with extracellular materials (20, 21)
or cell membranes (22) at the synapse. Thus, we examined neuronally
expressed, presynaptically targeted APSF proteins for various types of
glycosylation. In summary, we used a model neuron of the central
nervous system to document the neosynthesis, multiple glycosylation,
and rapid axonal transport of five distinct APP and APLP2 species to
presynaptic terminals in vivo. We show, moreover, that these
APP and APLP2 variants undergo rapid turnover in the presynaptic
terminus independent of presynaptic neuronal activity.
[35S]Met/Cys-labeling of Presynaptic
Proteins--
Adult Syrian hamsters (~150 g) were anesthetized with
a xylazine/Ketalar mixture (ratio 1:9; 0.3 µl/g of body weight). One eye per hamster was intraocularly injected with 100 µCi of
[35S]Met (~1100 Ci/mmol,
Expre35S35S, NEN Life Science Products) in 2 µl of normal saline. This technique allows radiolabeling of nascent
protein in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) whose axons innervate distinct
target regions in the central nervous system (Fig. 1B).
Animals were sacrificed at various intervals after radiolabeling by
pentobarbital overdose, after which the superior colliculus (SuC) and
lateral geniculate nuclei (LGN) contralateral to the injected eyes were
rapidly dissected and frozen at Separation of Labeled Proteins--
Each dissected SuC was
individually homogenized in a glass-glass tissue homogenizer in 550 µl of lysis buffer containing 9.5 M urea, 2% w/v Nonidet
P-40, 5% v/v 2-mercaptoethanol, and 6% v/v ampholines (pH 3.5-5.0,
5.0-8.0, 3.5-10.0) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in the ratio 5:7:3.
500 µl of the homogenate was submitted to isoelectric focusing.
Proteins were separated in the molecular weight dimension by
polyacrylamide gel (5-15% linear gradient) electrophoresis in the
presence of SDS in Laemmli buffer. Proteins were then transferred to
PVDF membranes (Immobilon-P; Millipore) in SDS-free transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine).
Identification of Labeled Proteins--
After PVDF transfers had
been used to generate storage phosphor images (see below), the same
transfers were placed against autoradiographic film (Biomax, Eastman
Kodak Co.) for 5-7 wk, after which the same PVDF transfers were
processed for immunoblotting using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL;
Amersham). In some cases, the blots were stripped (1 h, 50 °C in 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% w/v SDS, 62.5 mM
Tris), rinsed, and reprobed with a different antibody. Thus, each PVDF
transfer generated up to three types of images, a storage phosphor
digital image, an autoradiographic film, and one to three ECL films.
Because the storage phosphor images were not perfectly congruent with
their autoradiograms, regions of interest (ROIs) on the storage
phosphor images were identified by overlaying the autoradiogram and the
ECL film(s) and then comparing the autoradiogram with the storage
phosphor image. The antibodies used to identify APP, APLP1, and APLP2
proteins are detailed in Table I. Spots on the immunoblots that did not overlap with spots on autoradiograms were not considered relevant to
our study of transported protein. Such spots may result from local
expression of APSF proteins in retinal target tissues.
Quantitative Analysis of Labeled Protein--
PVDF membranes
were placed on storage phosphor screens for 7-12 days. Storage
phosphor screens were read on a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
The digitized phosphor signals were quantitated with IPLabGel software
(IPLabs, Vienna, VA), and data were statistically analyzed using Excel
(Microsoft) and Statview (Abacus, Berkeley, CA). Relative protein
signal was measured as the sum of pixel values in a defined ROI,
corrected for background, exposure time, and radioactive decay. Values
reported are averages of 3-7 SuC for each time point for each ROI.
Protein Turnover in Electrically Inactive Presynapse--
Adult
Syrian hamsters were intraocularly injected with 2 µl of
[35S]Met/Cys (as above) containing 300 µM
tetrodotoxin (Alexis Corp., Läufelfingen, Switzerland) to abolish
RGC action potentials for 24 h (23, 24). Such activity blockade
would substantially eliminate visually evoked (but not spontaneous)
synaptic release from RGC termini. Control hamsters received a normal
[35S]Met/Cys injection. Metabolically labeled, rapidly
transported proteins were analyzed from hamsters (n = 5 each condition) sacrificed at 8 h post-injection as described
above.
Analysis of Protein Glycosylation--
Radiolabeled APP and
APLP2 were immunoprecipitated and subjected to enzymatic digestion. LGN
and SuC from hamsters sacrificed 4 h postinjection were pooled and
homogenized in buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 155 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM Pefablock,
10 µg/ml aprotinin, 50 µg/ml leupeptin, 50 µg/ml pepstatin A).
After homogenization, Triton X-100 (12.5 mM) and Nonidet
P-40 (0.2%) was added to the homogenate mixture. The mixture was
precleared with hydrated protein A-Sepharose beads (Sigma). Beads were
removed by centrifugation, and aliquots of the supernatant were
incubated with either D2-II, CT12, or CT15 polyclonal antisera (see
Table I) and mixed overnight at 4 °C. Fresh protein A-Sepharose
beads were mixed with the samples for 1 h at room temperature.
Beads were recovered by centrifugation, washed in immunoprecipitation
buffer (homogenization buffer, Triton X-100, and Nonidet P-40), and
divided into aliquots for enzymatic digestion.
N-Glycosylated residues were digested by adding 2 units of
N-glycanase (Genzyme) to 300-µl aliquots of
immunoprecipitated protein in 15 mM phosphate buffer (pH
7.4) with protease inhibitors (see above) and incubating overnight.
Sialic acid and O-glycosylated residues were digested
sequentially. Neuraminidase (0.3 units; Genzyme) was added to 600-µl
aliquots, and samples were incubated for 4 h. 300 µl was
removed, O-glycanase (40 milliunits; Genzyme) was added to
the remaining 300 µl, and samples were incubated overnight.
Chondroitin sulfate residues were digested by the addition of
chondroitinase AC (0.5 units; Sigma) to 300-µl aliquots in 100 mM Tris acetate buffer (pH 7.0) with protease inhibitors
and incubation for 2 h. Chondroitin sulfate and dermatan sulfate
residues were digested by the addition of chondroitinase ABC (0.5 units; Sigma) to 300-µl aliquots in 100 mM Tris acetate
buffer (pH 8.0) and incubation for 2 h. All digestion was carried
out at 37 °C. Digested samples were frozen on dry ice and
lyophilized. Lyophilized proteins were solubilized in SDS sample
buffer, separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and
transferred to PVDF membranes that were used to expose storage phosphor
screens and Biomax film. Control digestion (no enzyme added)
demonstrated that samples did not undergo spontaneous degradation
during incubations.
Radiolabeling of Presynaptically Targeted Proteins--
The
central nervous system projection neuron of the retina, the RGC, sends
an axon from the retina to synaptic target fields in the SuC and LGN
(Fig. 1B) (24). Since about
95% of RGC axons decussate in the adult Syrian hamster (25), our
studies here focus only on proteins sent to target areas contralateral
to the injected eye. Neosynthesis of protein in the eye and its
subsequent axonal transport is the only significant source of
radiolabeled protein in the target areas relevant to this study (Ref.
26; see footnote 2).
Identification of Axonally Transported APSF Proteins-- To differentiate highly homologous members of the APSF (Fig. 1A), a battery of antisera with well documented specificities (see "Experimental Procedures" and Table I) was used to probe the two-dimensional PVDF transfers. The positions and shapes of ROIs on autoradiograms matched corresponding spots on immublots with high precision. Six ROIs (Fig. 2A) were identified as immunopositive for one or more of these APSF-specific antisera. Fig. 2 summarizes multiple immunoblots. Antisera specific for APP and APLP2 immuoprecipitate radiolabeled proteins of appropriate molecular weight (see Fig. 4) and isoelectric point (not shown). This provides further evidence that overlap of spots on the immunoblots with matching ROIs on autoradiograms does indeed identify those ROIs as transported proteins.
APP Proteins-- Polyclonal antibody (pAb) CT15 (APP C terminus) immunoreactivity on immunoblot ECL films precisely overlapped three ROIs (Fig. 2B, b-d) on autoradiogram film from hamsters sacrificed at 4 h (Fig. 2B). These ROIs on 4-h storage phosphor images matched congruent (but less intense) ROIs on 8 and 12 h storage phosphor images when viewed with contrast enhancement in pseudocolor mode (see Fig. 3). The three CT15-positive ROIs (b-d) were also detected by pAb GID (APP N terminus; Fig. 2C) but were not detected by other antisera specific for the other members of the APSF, including CT12 (APLP2 C terminus, Fig. 2D), CT11 (APLP1 C terminus, Fig. 2E), or D2-II (APLP2 N terminus, not shown). These three ROIs were also immunonegative for pAb R7 (KPI-APP, not shown). These new data, when taken together with other previously published findings (see "Discussion"), lead to the conclusion that ROIs c-e represent full-length variants of APP that are fast axonally transported to presynaptic terminals. ROI f (Fig. 2A) was immunopositive for the APP N-terminal-specific antiserum, GID, which also recognized ROIs b-d (Fig. 2C). However, ROI f was immunonegative for all APSF C-terminal antibodies (CT11, CT12, and CT15; Fig. 2, B-D) and for D2-II (not shown). The most parsimonious explanation for these new data and other previously published evidence (see "Discussion") is that ROI f represents an APP variant lacking the C terminus.
APLP2 Proteins-- Immunoreactivity for pAb CT12 (APLP2 C terminus) precisely overlapped with ROIs a and e (Fig. 2D). These two ROIs were also detected by pAb D2-II (not shown). ROIs a and e were not detected by any of the other antisera specific for the other members of the APSF, namely CT15 (Fig. 2B), GID (Fig. 2C), and CT11 (Fig. 2E). However, ROIs a and e differed in immunoreactivity in that ROI a was immunopositive for the KPI domain-specific antisera R7 (not shown), whereas ROI e was immunonegative. These data suggest that ROIs a and e represent full-length variants of APLP2, resulting from expression of two distinct APLP2 isoforms, one with the KPI-domain (a) and one without the KPI domain (e). APLP1 Proteins-- pAb CT11 showed no reactivity in the adult tissues used in these studies for any radiolabeled ROIs, indicating that axonal transport of APLP1 to mature presynaptic termini is nonexistent or undetectable by our method (Fig. 2E). Quantitation of APP/APLP2 Levels and Turnover-- A visual qualitative impression of the protein turnover is given in a series of storage phosphor images in Fig. 3A. Levels of radiolabeled APP and APLP2 species transported to presynaptic termini of a single SuC, as represented by ROIs a-f, were quantified from storage phosphor images as the sum of pixel values in the individual ROIs. These sums from individual SuCs were grouped and averaged for post-injection time points. The averages were in turn scaled to maximum raw values for each ROI at each time point and graphed (Figs. 3, B and C). Three APP species (ROIs b-d; Fig. 3B) and two APLP2 species (ROIs a and e; Fig. 3C) are prominent among the newly synthesized proteins, arriving at the presynaptic terminus in the earliest wave of fast axonal transport. Visual examination of time course graphs shows that the levels for ROIs a-e peak at 4 h, after which time they decay with similar lifetimes. Table II documents that for the five fastest APSF ROIs, APP (ROIs b-d) and APLP2 (ROIs a and e) contribute equally to the total APSF protein species, which reach the presynaptic terminus by fast axonal transport. Of these five ROIs, a single APLP2 species (ROI a) contributes more than double any other species.
Effects of Synaptic Activity on APP/APLP2 Turnover-- Whether turnover kinetics for synaptically targeted APP/APLP2 species were dependent on neurotransmitter release mechanisms was tested by blocking action potential generation in RGC axons and measuring ROIs a-f 8 h post-radiolabeling. Our reasoning was that were turnover of APP and APLP2 activity-dependent, then ROIs a-e would remain elevated at 8 h rather than falling from peak levels at 4 h. Furthermore, we reasoned that were any ROI f derived from activity-dependent turnover of APP, that the peak of ROI f at 8 h would be diminished by activity blockade. Quantitative analysis of these data showed, however, that relative to control injection, tetrodotoxin injection did not raise ROIs a-e nor lower ROI f 8 h after radiolabeling (p value range 0.19-0.41, one-tailed t tests), i.e. all APP and APLP2 species appear to show the same transport and turnover kinetics in tetrodotoxin-injected animals as in control animals. Global level of protein transported during action potential blockade was not different from control levels (p > 0.23, t test), ruling out the possibility that tetrodotoxin injection has a global effect on transport kinetics per se. These data strongly suggest that axonal transport and presynaptic turnover kinetics of APP and APLP2 are independent of action potential conduction and mechanisms of visually evoked release of neurotransmitter. Glycosylation of Synaptically Targeted APP and APLP2-- Radiolabeled proteins were purified by immunoprecipitation, reacted with glycosidases, separated by one-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred to PVDF. Examination of autoradiograms for bandshift shows that APP undergoes a 1.0-kDa downward shift after treatment with N-glycanase (Fig. 4A). APP undergoes a 4.2-kDa downshift after neuraminidase treatment (Fig. 4B), and further treatment of the same sample with O-glycanase shifts the band down a further 1.5 kDa (Fig. 4B). APLP2 treated with N-glycanase results in a downshift of 1.2 kDa (Fig. 4C). APLP2 treated with neuraminidase shows a downshift of 2.2 kDa (Fig. 4D); subsequent O-glycanase treatment produces a further downshift of 0.8 kDa (Fig. 4D).
We examined APSF proteins that were conveyed by fast axonal transport to RGC presynaptic termini in the SuC and LGN of the Syrian hamster. Our results show that as early as 4 h after metabolic radiolabeling, several newly synthesized, electrophoretically distinct forms of APP and APLP2 reach peak levels in RGC-terminal regions consistent with transport in the most rapid phase of axonal transport. These APP and APLP2 proteins are quantitatively reduced by 50% 3-5 h after reaching RGC termini and after another 4 h were reduced to 10-25% of the peak levels at 4 h. These residence times for intact APP and APLP2 proteins in presynaptic termini are among the shortest seen for fast-transported presynaptic proteins, including cell adhesion molecule L1, the neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), cysteine string protein, SNAP25, and other uncharacterized proteins, some of which persist intact for days.2 A single exception to this pattern (ROI-f, see "Results") was detected, an APP species that peaks 8 h post-labeling and decays to 50% peak value by 12 h post-labeling. Finally, we note that a third member of the APSF, APLP1, was not detected among the radiolabeled proteins that are fast axonally transported to RGC presynaptic terminals. In this system, maintaining constant levels of APP and APLP2 requires
that the kinetics of delivery of APP and APLP2 to presynaptic termini
be matched to the kinetics of their rapid removal. Rapid turnover
kinetics for nonhuman APP has been documented for neuronal and
nonneuronal cells in vitro (27). In these systems, rapid turnover of APP is due largely to a proteolytic Both We have not been able to further trace the proteolytic degradation of APP or any APLP2 species because no other protein fragments with sizes and immunoreactivities consistent with APP or APLP2 proteolysis have been detected in our system. If such proteolysis is occurring, it may be either too rapid to detect with our protocol or accompanied by rapid endocytosis and retrograde transport away from the terminal arbor regions (32). A putative consensus clathrin binding site in C-terminal sequences of APP and APLP2 led us to speculate that APP and APLP2 turnover could be driven by coupling between activity-dependent exocytosis of neurotransmitter and clathrin-mediated endocytosis. We found, however, that APP and APLP2 turnover kinetics were normal even in the complete absence of evoked transmitter release from RGC axon termini. An alternative interpretation is that residual spontaneous transmitter release in activity-blocked termini is sufficient to drive APP and APLP2 turnover. Nevertheless, this finding indicates that turnover mechanisms of APP and APLP2 are independent of actional potential conduction in the presynapse, even though APP may cycle with vesicular traffic at the presynapse (17, 33). However, it has been reported recently that APP colocalizes with a novel vesicle class in synaptosomal preparations that is distinct from the membrane associated with neurotransmitter vesicles (34). Thus, APP and APLP2 may reside in a membrane pool in the presynapse, which cycles independently of the pool involved in transmitter release. Were human APP and APLP2 in nerve terminals subject to the same
synthesis, transport, and turnover kinetics as we document for hamster,
we predict that any perturbation of axonal transport or protein
processing would rapidly lead to abnormal deficits and/or accumulations
of APP and/or APLP2 in various cellular compartments. For instance,
diminution of APP proteolysis would be predicted to lead to robust
accumulation of intact APP at the presynaptic terminus. Alternatively,
reduction of axonal transport to nerve terminals would lead to rapid
depletion of APP at the nerve terminus but abnormally high accumulation
in other cellular compartments where Expression patterns of APSF proteins show developmental regulation and linkage to axonal outgrowth and synapse formation in the retinal projection (16) and in other systems (39-41). The present in vivo data may contribute to understanding the function of neuronal APP and APLP2 in developing and mature neuronal circuits. For example, we find that presynaptically targeted APP and APLP2 proteins in an adult central nervous system pathway have carbohydrate modifications predicted on the basis of putative consensus glycosylation sequences. The present data show that, in addition to NCAM, APP and APLP2 also carry sialic acid to the presynaptic terminal membrane. At the synapse, NCAM and L1 have putative adhesive and signal transduction properties (42) that may regulate some synaptic plasticities and that may be modified by carbohydrate side-chain interactions (43, 44). It is interesting to speculate whether glycosylation of APSF proteins results in analogous modulation of adhesive and signaling properties. In fact, APSF proteins can potentially mediate transmembrane signaling via interactions with G-proteins (45) or the cytoskeleton (46, 47). A role for CSGAG modifications in structural plasticity in the adult central nervous system is suggested by the finding that nascent axons of the primary olfactory projection of adult rat express APLP2, which carries CSGAG (41). Finally, use of APP- and APLP2-specific antisera now shows that axonally transported APLP2 (and not APP) contains a KPI domain (11), and this corrects a previous conclusion (29) due to cross-reactivity of monoclonal antibody 22C11 for APP and APLP2 (5). The presence of a serine protease inhibitor domain such as the KPI on APLP2 at mature synapses reinforces data suggesting that extracellular serine proteases are involved in some forms of activity-dependent plasticity (48). However, evidence that a KPI-homologous peptide can block neuronal calcium channels (49) suggests another mechanism by which the KPI domain may modulate synaptic function. The possibility that APP and APLP2 may mediate some aspects of mature synaptic function underscores a prevalent theme in cellular neurobiology, namely that common sets of proteins are exploited by those cellular processes that control development of neuronal connections and those that maintain mature circuits.
We thank L. DiGiamberardino for constant support, K. Rodolfo and R. Hassïg for assistance in some of the metabolic labeling experiments, J. Shioi for generous contribution of the R7 antibody, and G. Cole for generous contribution of the GID antibody.
* This work was supported by grants from the Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique (Saclay, France) (Collaborateur Temporaire Etranger (to A. W. L.)) and European Economic Community Grant BMH1-CT-948652 (to A. M. C.), the Adler Foundation (to G. T. and S. S. S.), and institutuional funds from CNRS (to K. L. M.) and INSERM (to A. W. L., A. M. C. and K. L. M.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisment" in accordance with 18 U. S. C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Current address: Dept. of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Bldg. E25, Rm 634, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139.
1
The abbreviations used are: APP, amyloid
precursor protein;
2 A. W. Lyckman, L. DiGiamberardino, and K. L. Moya, manuscript in preparation.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||