|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 18, 11257-11266, May 1, 1998
Activation of Gene Expression by a Ligand-induced Conformational
Change of a Protein-DNA Complex*
Kyu Y.
Rhee §,
Donald F.
Senear¶, and
G. Wesley
Hatfield
From the Departments of Microbiology and Molecular
Genetics and ¶ Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of
California, Irvine, California 92697
 |
ABSTRACT |
IlvY protein binds cooperatively to tandem
operator sites in the divergent, overlapping, promoter-regulatory
region of the ilvYC operon of Escherichia coli.
IlvY positively regulates the expression of the ilvC gene
in an inducer-dependent manner and negatively regulates the
transcription of its own divergently transcribed structural gene in an
inducer-independent manner. Although binding of IlvY protein to the
tandem operators is sufficient to repress ilvY
promoter-specific transcription, it is not sufficient to activate
transcription from the ilvC promoter. Activation of ilvC promoter-specific transcription requires the
additional binding of a small molecule inducer to the IlvY protein-DNA
complex. The binding of inducer to IlvY protein does not affect the
affinity of IlvY protein for the tandem operator sites. It does,
however, cause a conformational change of the IlvY protein-DNA complex, which is correlated with the partial relief of an IlvY protein-induced bend of the DNA helix in the ilvC promoter region. This
structural change in the IlvY protein-DNA complex results in a 100-fold
increase in the affinity of RNA polymerase binding at the
ilvC promoter site. The ability of a protein to regulate
gene expression by ligand-responsive modulation of a protein-DNA
structure is an emerging theme in gene regulation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
LysR-type proteins are the most common class of transcriptional
regulatory proteins in prokaryotes (1). Regulation by LysR-type proteins is distinguished by several highly conserved unique
properties. LysR-type proteins typically activate transcription of a
target gene(s) and autoregulate their own synthesis from a single
regulatory locus. In most cases, the target gene is divergently
transcribed from the structural gene encoding the LysR-type protein.
Activation of the target gene requires the binding of a metabolically
important small molecule inducer, whereas autoregulation of the LysR
gene is inducer-independent. Inducer binding, however, does not
significantly alter the DNA binding affinity of these proteins (1).
Thus, unlike other well characterized inducer-responsive activator
proteins, LysR-type proteins are unusual in that the binding of inducer activates transcription by affecting an activator property of the
protein distinct from its DNA binding activity. However, the molecular
basis of this regulation has not been determined for any member of this
important class of transcriptional regulatory proteins.
IlvY protein is a prototypic member of the LysR family of
transcriptional regulatory proteins and is required for the regulation of ilvC gene expression in Escherichia coli
(2-5). The ilvC gene encodes acetohydroxy acid
isomeroreductase (EC 1.1.1.86), an enzyme involved in the biosynthesis
of the branched chain amino acids, L-isoleucine,
L-valine, and L-leucine (5). Together with IlvY
protein, either substrate of this enzyme, -acetolactate or
-acetohydroxybutyrate, induces the activation of ilvC
gene expression. Like other LysR-type proteins, IlvY protein also
represses transcription of its own divergently transcribed structural
gene in an inducer-independent manner (3, 4, 6).
In this report, we describe the first molecular mechanism for
inducer-mediated activation by a LysR-type protein. Specifically, we
show that IlvY protein binds cooperatively to the tandem operator sites
in the divergent-overlapping promoter region of the ilvYC operon (Fig. 1) in an inducer-independent
manner and autoregulates its own gene expression by an RNA polymerase
occlusion mechanism. We further show that the binding of IlvY protein
to the tandem operators is necessary but not sufficient to activate
transcription from the ilvC promoter. Activation of
transcription from the divergent ilvC promoter requires the
additional binding of an inducer molecule to an IlvY protein-operator
DNA complex. Inducer binding effects the partial relief of an IlvY
protein-induced DNA bend centered around the 35 hexanucleotide
element of the ilvC promoter. This ligand-induced structural
change in the DNA helix enhances the binding affinity of RNA polymerase
at the ilvC promoter. Thus, IlvY protein activates
transcription from the ilvC promoter by the binding of an
inducer molecule that directs a conformational change in the structure
of an IlvY protein-operator DNA complex and enhances the recruitment of
RNA polymerase to the ilvC promoter without affecting the
occupancy of IlvY protein at the tandem operator sites.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Organization of the ilvYC operon.
A, planar representation of the DNA helix in the divergent
overlapping ilvYC promoter region. The position of each
nucleotide residue is projected onto the surface of a cylinder, which
is then unrolled onto a flat surface. A continuous ramp connects each
phosphate residue. The position of the plane of each base pair is
indicated by a vertical line drawn only across
the major groove. The strand designated by a stippled gray
line has its 5'-end at the left end of the diagram; thus, this
strand should be read left to right, top to bottom. Nucleotide
positions relative to the start of ilvC transcription are
indicated on the top of the diagram, and nucleotide positions relative
to the start of ilvY transcription are indicated on the
bottom of the diagram. The open circles denote guanine
residues protected from dimethyl sulfate methylation by IlvY protein.
The shaded regions denote the major grooves of the 35 and
10 hexanucleotide regions of the ilvC (dark
gray) and ilvY (stippled gray) promoters.
The symbols O1 and O2 denote the tandem
operator sequences recognized by IlvY protein. The in vivo
transcriptional initiation sites for the ilvC and
ilvY genes are indicated by arrows. B,
nucleotide sequence of the region depicted above (ilvC bp
positions 81 to +12). The in vivo transcriptional
initiation sites for the ilvC and ilvY genes are
indicated by arrows and the 10 and 35 hexanucleotide
sequences of each promoter are underlined (3).
|
|
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Chemicals and Reagents--
Polyethyleneimine was purchased from
Miles Laboratories. Restriction endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase, and T4
polynucleotide kinase were purchased from New England Biolabs. E. coli RNA polymerase, pancreatic RNasin, and DNase I were purchased
from Boehringer Mannheim. Shrimp alkaline phosphatase was purchased
from United States Biochemicals. Radiolabeled nucleotides were
purchased from NEN Life Science Products. DNA oligonucleotides were
synthesized by Operon Technologies. Site-directed mutagenesis was
performed using the oligonucleotide directed in vitro
mutagenesis kit version 2.0 from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. DNA
sequencing was performed using the SequenaseTM kit from
United States Biochemicals.
Plasmids--
Plasmid DNA isolation and all recombinant DNA
manipulations were carried out using standard methods (7). Plasmid
pET3cY, used for the overexpression of the ilvY gene
product, was created by site-directed mutagenesis of the
ilvY gene, contained on a 1400-bp
BamHI-PvuII DNA fragment (derived from plasmid
pRW1Y) (3). An NdeI restriction site was created at the
beginning of the ilvY protein coding sequence. This site
replaced the natural GTG translation initiation codon with the more
common ATG codon. The 1225-bp NdeI-BamHI
restriction fragment from the resulting plasmid, containing the
ilvY gene, was ligated into the compatible NdeI-BamHI sites of the Studier vector pET3c (8)
to yield the plasmid pET3cY. Plasmid pRWSR-2, used to generate the DNA
fragments (containing ilvYC sequence from bp position 111
to +1 cloned into the BamHI and EcoRI sites of
pUC19) described in the binding and chemical footprinting experiments,
has been previously described (6). Plasmid pBENDY, used to create the
isometric O1O2-containing DNA fragments for
circular permutation assays, was created by ligating an end-filled
132-bp EcoRI-HindIII DNA fragment containing the
tandem O1O2 operator sites into the unique
SalI restriction site of plasmid pBEND2 (9) Plasmid pDD3Y,
used for the in vitro transcription reactions, was
constructed by ligating an end-filled 220-bp
BglII-EcoRI DNA restriction fragment (containing
ilvYC sequence from bp 220 to +1 relative to the
transcription start site of ilvC) into the BamHI
site (end-filled) of the plasmid pDD3 (10). The BamHI site
in pDD3 is flanked on both sides by tandem
rrnBT1T2 transcriptional terminator
sequences (10).
Purification and Characterization of IlvY Protein--
A 4-liter
culture of strain BL21DE3 (8) containing plasmid pET3cY was grown to an
A600 = 0.8 at 20 °C, induced with the addition of isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside to a
final concentration of 0.75 mM, and allowed to continue
growing for an additional 6-8 h. Cells were harvested by
centrifugation and resuspended in 40 ml of an ice-cold solution
containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 100 mM
NaCl, 5% glycerol, and 0.5 mM dithiothreitol (Buffer A).
Cells were disrupted by sonication in a Rosett cell using a Tekmar
Sonic Disruptor set at 100 W. Sonication of cells was performed on ice
with 12 × 20 s bursts interrupted by 2-min cooling
intervals. To avoid partial proteolysis owing to the high arginine/lysine ratio of the IlvY protein (11), phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride was added to the cell suspension at a final concentration of 1 mM immediately before and after sonication. All subsequent steps were performed at 4 °C or on ice. The crude cell lysate was
cleared by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm in a Beckman JA20 rotor for 40 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant solution was transferred to
an Erlenmeyer flask, and a 10% (v/v) solution of polyethyleneimine was
slowly added dropwise to a final concentration of 0.6% (v/v) with
gentle stirring and incubated for an additional 20 min. This mixture
was centrifuged for 30 min at 10,000 rpm in a Beckman JA20 rotor. The
resulting precipitate was resuspended in 10 ml of Buffer A containing
0.3 M NaCl and gently stirred for 15 min. This suspension
was centrifuged for 20 min at 12,000 rpm in a Beckman JA20 rotor. The
resulting supernatant solution was slowly loaded onto a 4 ml
phosphocellulose column pre-equilibrated in Buffer A. After loading the
sample, the column was washed with one column volume of Buffer A. IlvY
protein was eluted from the column with an 80-ml linear KCl gradient
(0.1-0.5 M) in Buffer A. Typically, the protein eluted at
a [KCl] = 0.4 M. 1-ml fractions were collected and
analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. 2 µl of each
fraction were assayed in a 20-µl reaction volume using the mobility
shift binding protocol described below. Appropriate fractions were
pooled and concentrated in an Amicon Microcon-10 ultrafiltration
device. Protein concentrations were measured according to the method of
Bradford (12) using the Bio-Rad DC Protein Assay Kit. A final yield of
about 0.5 mg of greater than 95% purified IlvY protein is routinely
obtained from 1 liter of cells.
The specific DNA binding activity of the purified IlvY protein was
estimated from a titration of its binding to a molar excess of DNA
fragments containing the tandem operator sites. The concentration of
O1O2-containing DNA fragments used yielded an
operator site concentration of 4.4 × 10 8
M, which was titrated with substoichiometric concentrations
of IlvY protein dimer between 1.9 × 10 9
M and 1.5 × 10 8 M. Bound
and free DNA were separated by nondenaturing gel electrophoresis. The
fraction of bound complex was proportional to the IlvY dimer concentration over the entire concentration range. As expected, this
result was consistent with stoichiometric formation of a protein-DNA
complex since the operator site concentration exceeds the effective
binding dissociation constant for the operator sites (2.2 × 10 9 M; see below) by 20-fold. The fraction of
active IlvY protein dimer estimated from the slope of the plot of
operator sites bound per IlvY protein dimer was never less than 50%.
The percent activity was used to calculate active dimer concentrations
in subsequent experiments.
The quarternary structure of the IlvY protein was determined by gel
filtration chromatography. A 0.05-ml sample containing 0.2 mg of
purified IlvY protein in Buffer A was applied to a 0.6 × 30-cm
column of Sephacryl S200HR equilibrated in Buffer A. The IlvY protein
was eluted from the column in Buffer A at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/hr.
110-µl fractions were collected and assayed for protein content and
for DNA binding activity using the mobility shift binding protocol
described below. The elution profiles of a mixture of molecular weight
standards (100 mg of alcohol dehydrogenase, 150 kDa; 100 mg of
hexokinase, 102 kDa; 100 mg of ovalbumin, 46 kDa) were determined in a
separate experiment. The molecular weight of an IlvY monomer based on
its deduced amino acid sequence is 33 kDa. The DNA binding activity of
the IlvY protein eluted from the column at the position of a globular
protein with a molecular weight of 65-70 kDa. No evidence of lower or
higher molecular weight species was apparent. Thus, at concentrations
as high as 200 µg/ml (6 µM protein monomer), IlvY
protein exists in solution as a homodimer.
Mobility Shift Binding Assays--
Mobility shift binding assays
were performed according to the methods of Fried and Crothers (13) as
described by Wek and Hatfield (6) with the exception that gels were run
in 1× TAE buffer (40 mM Tris acetate (pH 8.5), 2 mM EDTA·2H2O). Radiolabeled DNA used in these
experiments was present at final concentrations not exceeding 2 × 10 11 M to ensure that the free concentration
of IlvY protein was equivalent to the total IlvY protein concentration.
Binding reactions were performed in a final volume of 20 µl
containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 50 mM KCl,
10 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 6 mM -mercaptoethanol, 100 µg of bovine serum
albumin/ml, and 2.5 µg of sonicated herring sperm DNA/ml. Free and
bound DNA fragments were visualized by autoradiography following the
exposure of Kodak XAR-5 film to the dried gels overnight at 25 °C.
The autoradiograms were digitized with a Hewlett-Packard ScanJet IIcx
digital scanner. Band intensities were measured using the public domain
NIH IMAGE gel quantitation software. The intensity of each band was
corrected for background differences and normalized to the total
intensity of all bands in each lane. The equilibrium binding data were
analyzed by nonlinear least squares estimations. The algorithm for this
analysis (14) uses a variation of the Gauss-Newton procedure to
determine the best fit model-dependent parameter values
corresponding to a minimum in the variance of each data point (15). The
confidence levels for the curve fits reported correspond to
approximately one standard deviation (65% confidence).
DNase I Footprinting Experiments--
DNase I footprinting
reactions were performed according to the methods of Galas and Schmitz
(16) as described by Wek and Hatfield (6) using uniquely
5'-32P-end-labeled DNA fragments containing
ilvYC DNA from bp positions 111 to +1, derived from
plasmid pRWSR-2. Binding reactions contained 10 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 7.6), 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2,
0.1 mM EDTA, 6 mM -mercaptoethanol, 100 mg
of bovine serum albumin/ml, and 2.5 mg of sonicated herring sperm
DNA/ml in a final volume of 40 µl. Operator DNA was present at a
final concentration of less than 10 10 M.
Purified IlvY protein was present at a final protein dimer concentration of 5 × 10 8 M.
-Acetohydroxybutyrate was present as specified in the figure legends. DNase I exposure was for 1 min at 25 °C. This yielded less
than 30% nicked DNA fragments, determined by Cerenkov counting of the
band corresponding to uncleaved DNA. This low nicking frequency is not
expected to affect the intrinsic protein-DNA binding (17). Samples were
resolved by electrophoresis on an 8% denaturing polyacrylamide gel
(7.6% acrylamide, 0.4% N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide)
containing 8 M urea in TBE buffer (7) and visualized by
autoradiography following the exposure of Kodak XAR-5 film to the gels
at 70 °C in the presence of a Cronex Quanta III intensifying
screen (DuPont). The autoradiograms were digitized with a
Hewlett-Packard ScanJet IIcx digital scanner. The band intensity in
each lane corresponding to the DNase I-hypersensitive site located at
bp 37 in the ilvC promoter region was measured using the
public domain NIH IMAGE gel quantitation software. The intensity of
each band was corrected for background differences and normalized to
the intensity of the unprotected band in the same lane at bp 90.
Hydroxyl Radical Footprinting Experiments--
Hydroxyl radical
footprinting was performed as described by Tullius and Dombroski (18)
using the same DNA fragments (<1 × 10 10
M) used in the DNase I footprinting reactions. Binding
reactions were performed under equilibrium binding conditions as
described above with the exception that glycerol was omitted from the
reaction mixture. Samples were treated with hydroxyl radical for
exactly 2 min at 25 °C and quenched with the addition of 20 µl of
0.2 M thiourea to ensure conditions of single-hit kinetics
as described above. Reaction products were resolved by electrophoresis
on a 10% denaturing polyacrylamide gel (9.5% acrylamide, 0.5%
N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide) containing 8 M urea
in TBE buffer (7) and visualized by autoradiography as described above.
Data were analyzed by utilizing the public domain NIH IMAGE gel
quantitation software. Regions of protection were determined by
comparing the relative peak heights of each integrated band obtained
from an integration of the bands of a digital image of each lane.
In Vitro Transcription Reactions--
In vitro
transcription reactions were conducted using the closed circular
supercoiled (>80%) plasmid pDD3Y (described above), in the absence
and presence of purified IlvY protein and/or inducer, according to the
procedures of Hauser et al. (19). RNA polymerase-plasmid DNA
complexes were formed by preincubating 1 unit (2.4 pmol) of RNA
polymerase and 100 ng of plasmid DNA (0.2 pmol) in a 20-µl reaction
mixture (0.04 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.1 M KCl,
0.01 M MgCl2, 1.0 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 200 mM CTP, 20 mM UTP, 10 mCi of [ -32P]UTP (3000 Ci/mmol), 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin and 40 units of RNasin for 10 min at 25 °C. Transcription reactions were initiated by the addition
of 2 µl of 2 mM ATP, 2 mM GTP solution.
Reactions were terminated after 4 min with the addition of 20 µl of
stop solution (95% formamide, 0.025% bromphenol blue, 0.025% xylene cyanol). Transcription under these conditions was determined to be
linear with respect to time for at least 6 min and was proportional to
the amount of plasmid DNA template used. To correct for differences in
the total amount of transcription between reactions, the amount of
ilv-specific transcription was determined by normalizing the relative signal of ilv-specific transcription to the
relative signal of transcription arising from the RNA-I promoter
present on each plasmid DNA template in the transcription reaction.
Reaction products were separated by electrophoresis on an 8%
denaturing polyacrylamide gel (7.6% acrylamide, 0.4%
N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide) containing 8 M urea
in TBE buffer (7) and visualized by autoradiography as described
above.
Circular Permutation Assays--
Binding reactions were
performed as described above using isometric DNA fragments containing
the tandem O1O2 operators derived from the
plasmid pBENDY. Products were resolved by electrophoresis through an
8% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel (7.92% acrylamide, 0.079%
N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide) in 1× TAE (20) buffer (7). In
reactions performed with inducer, 1 mM -acetolactate was
included both in the gel and in the running buffer. Analysis of bend
mapping was performed as described by Wu and Crothers (21). Estimates of bend angles were obtained as described by Thompson and Landy (22)
using the empirical relationship cos( /2) = Rf (slowest)/Rf (fastest).
Abortive Transcription Assays--
Abortive transcription
initiation assays were performed in the presence or absence of 2 mM inducer ( -acetohydroxybutyrate) according to the
methods of Hawley et al. (23) as described by Parekh and
Hatfield (24). Briefly, reactions were initiated by the addition of RNA
polymerase at final concentrations of 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 nM to a preformed IlvY protein-DNA complex. IlvY
protein-DNA complexes were preformed by incubating 30 nM IlvY protein dimer with 1 nM supercoiled DNA plasmid
template, pDD3Y, for 20 min at 37 °C in reaction buffer A (0.04 M Tris-HCl (pH = 8.0), 0.1 M KCl, 0.01 M MgCl2, 1.0 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin), 40 mM
UTP, 100 mCi [ -32P]UTP, and 0.5 mM ApA.
The inclusion of the dinucleotide ApA in the reaction mixture restricts
transcription initiation to the ilvC promoter of the plasmid
DNA template, pDD3Y, yielding the abortive product ApApUpU. Abortive
transcription products were isolated by nondenaturing electrophoresis
in a 25% polyacrylamide gel (23.75% acrylamide, 1.25%
N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide) in 1× TBE buffer (7), and
quantitated by Phosphor-Imager analysis. is a measure of the lag
time required for open complex formation observed in a product
versus time plot. obs values were determined by a nonlinear least-squares analysis of the kinetic data using the
program LAGPLOT described by Goodrich (25). The apparent binding
affinity of RNA polymerase (KB) and the
first-order isomerization rate constant (k2)
were determined by plotting obs as a function of 1/(RNA
polymerase) on the basis of a least-squares fit to the equation
obs = (1/k2) + (1/k2KB(RNA polymerase))
using the TAUPLOT program of Goodrich (25).
 |
RESULTS |
Operator Binding by Purified IlvY Protein--
Previous analyses
with IlvY protein-enriched cell-free extracts indicated that IlvY
protein binds to tandem operator sites (O1O2)
in the divergent-overlapping ilvYC promoter region and that
this binding is cooperative (6). To explore the quantitative nature of
this cooperativity, binding titrations of purified IlvY protein to DNA
fragments containing the tandem operators
(O1O2) and to DNA fragments with either
O1 or O2 deleted were performed (Fig.
2). These assays were conducted using
concentrations of operator sites well below the effective binding
dissociation constant for the tandem operator sites to evaluate the
microscopic binding constants governing the assembly of IlvY
protein-operator DNA complexes. The gel mobility shift of the tandem
operator-containing DNA fragment showed only a single liganded complex,
which we interpret to be O1O2 with both sites
bound by IlvY protein dimer. The half-saturation point for IlvY binding
to the DNA fragment containing O1 and O2 corresponds to an effective affinity of 2.2 nM, consistent
with a previous estimate (2 nM) obtained with IlvY protein
enriched cell free extracts (6). The lack of an intermediate band
corresponding to IlvY protein bound to either O1 or
O2 alone in the gel mobility shift experiment performed to
generate the data in Fig. 2 is indicative of highly cooperative binding
(17). In fact, the IlvY protein concentration required to half-saturate
O1 alone is 8-fold greater than the concentration required
to half-saturate the tandem operator sites (Fig. 2). We found
previously that it was not possible to saturate the O2 site
alone; at 8 × 10 8 M IlvY dimer, the
highest concentration used in the binding experiments, less than 15%
of the DNA migrated as bound in gel shift assays (6). Based on this
measurement, the affinity of IlvY protein for the O2 site
alone is calculated to be K2 < 0.45 µM. When this experiment was repeated with the highly
purified IlvY protein reported here, the same result was obtained.
Therefore, the affinity for O2 alone is at least 200-fold
weaker than for sites O1O2 together (6). The
observation that the apparent binding affinity for either operator site
is reduced when the other site is removed indicates cooperative binding
to the adjacent sites.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
IlvY protein-DNA binding isotherm
curves as a function of increasing IlvY protein
concentration in the presence of a limiting amount of
32P-end-labeled DNA fragment containing either the tandem
operators (O1O2) ( ) or the O1
operator alone ( ). The data presented are the average values
obtained from three separate experiments ± S.E. The solid curves
represent the best fit to both the O1 alone and
O1O2 data shown. The interaction free energy
changes used to simulate these curves are: G1 = 10.4 kcal/mol; G2 = 9.8 kcal/mol;
Gc = 3.0 kcal/mol.
|
|
To determine the affinity of IlvY protein for site O1 and
to more precisely evaluate the cooperativity, the IlvY protein
titrations of O1O2 and O1 alone
(Fig. 2) were analyzed according to a general cooperative binding model
(17). The adjustable parameters are the Gibbs free energy changes
corresponding to the microscopic equilibrium constants for IlvY protein
binding to O1 ( G1 = RT ln
K1) and to O2
( G2 = RT ln K2), and
for cooperativity ( Gc = RT ln
Kcoop). When a complete titration of site
O2 alone is absent, the analysis does not provide
independent estimates of G2 and
Gc. Instead, we found such a high numerical
correlation that increasing values of one compensated for decreasing
values of the other. This correlation did not affect
G1 for which a precise estimate,
G1 = 10.4 ± 0.1 kcal/mol, was
obtained. Thus, it was possible to define a lower limit to the
cooperativity and an upper limit to the affinity for O2
alone by conducting a series of analyses of the O1 alone
and O1O2 data in which different values of
Gc were entered as fixed input parameters.
For each fit, estimates of G1,
G2, and the variance of the fit were
obtained. A minimum in the variance was obtained for
Gc = 3.0 kcal/mol. For
Gc 2.6 kcal/mol the variance increased
substantially reflecting the fact that it is not possible to account
for the offset between the curves for IlvY protein binding to
O1 alone versus to O1O2 without significant cooperativity. By comparing ratios of variances obtained for fits with different values of Gc
against an F-statistic, we conclude that Gc 2.6 kcal/mol, corresponding to at least 120-fold cooperativity, is
required to obtain an adequate fit. This also sets a maximum affinity
for O2 of 35 nM ( G2 10.0 kcal/mol). Setting G2 = 8.5
kcal/mol corresponding to our previous estimate of
K2 (0.45 µM) yields
Gc = 4.3 kcal/mol or 1500-fold cooperativity. Whether 1500-fold or only 120-fold, the cooperativity is
sufficient that the O1O2 operator exists as
liganded at either O1 alone or at O2 alone less
than 1% of the time at any IlvY dimer concentration, a conclusion that
is consistent with the absence of any intermediate band in the gel
shift assay. The effect is that IlvY protein fills the tandem operator
sites in a single concerted step.
DNA Binding Site Specificity of Purified IlvY Protein--
DNase I
footprinting experiments were conducted to demonstrate that the
purified IlvY protein exhibits site-specific binding to the tandem
operator sites in the divergent promoter region of the ilvYC
operon (Fig. 1). The results in Fig.
3A show that purified IlvY
protein protects 2 adjacent 27-bp regions of DNA (ilvC bp
76 to 50 and 44 to 18) separated by 4 intervening DNase
I-sensitive nucleotides on a 240-bp EcoRI-HindIII
DNA fragment containing the tandem operator sites. These observed
regions of protection on the nontranscribed strand of the
ilvC gene correspond to those previously defined as
O1 and O2 with partially purified IlvY protein
(6). The results in Fig. 3B demonstrate that the purified
protein protects three regions of DNA on the transcribed strand of the
ilvC gene (ilvC bp 78 to 55, 51 to 43,
and 41 to 19). These sequences are also contained in the DNA
regions of dyad symmetry previously defined as O1 and
O2.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
DNase I footprint of IlvY protein-operator
DNA interactions in the ilvYC promoter region.
Autoradiogram of DNase I protection patterns obtained in the absence
and presence of a minimally saturating amount of purified IlvY protein
(4 × 10 8 M dimer) bound to a 240-bp
EcoRI-HindIII DNA fragment containing
ilv bp positions 111 to +1 (relative to ilvC
transcription). DNA fragments were uniquely 32P-end-labeled
on either the transcribed strand of the ilvY gene
(A) or the transcribed strand of the ilvC gene
(B). Regions of protection are designated with brackets, and
the exact nucleotide positions of protection are indicated adjacent to
the brackets. Base pair position numbering is relative to the start of
ilvC transcription (3). Lanes 1 and 3,
DNA probe only; lanes 2 and 4, IlvY protein
bound-DNA.
|
|
Effect of IlvY Protein Binding to O1O2 on
Transcription from the ilvY Promoter--
To investigate how IlvY
protein binding to the tandem operators, O1O2,
affects transcription from the ilvY promoter, transcription from the ilvY promoter was assayed in vitro using
a negatively supercoiled plasmid DNA template, pDD3Y. This plasmid
contains the divergent ilvC and ilvY promoters
flanked by Rho-independent ribosomal, rnnB T1
T2, terminators. Transcription from the ilvY and
ilvC promoters generates 369 nucleotide and 154 nucleotide products, respectively. The results in Fig.
4 demonstrate that transcription from the
ilvY promoter is repressed as a function of increasing
concentration of IlvY protein. The fractional repression calculated
from the data in Fig. 4 and the fractional saturation of
O1O2 taken from Fig. 2 have similar dependences
on IlvY protein concentration (Fig. 5).
Both repression of transcription from the ilvY promoter and
binding of the IlvY protein to O1O2 are unaffected by the addition of inducer (6).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
In vitro transcription reactions of the
divergent overlapping ilvYC promoter region in the absence
and presence of increasing concentrations of purified IlvY
protein. Autoradiogram of the RNA products of in vitro
transcription reactions using the supercoiled DNA template, pDD3Y (see
"Materials and Methods"). ilvY and ilvC
identify the 369- and 154-nucleotide RNA transcripts that originate
from the respective promoters. Lane 1, no IlvY protein;
lanes 2-9, [IlvY protein] = 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, 12, 16, 20, 32, and 40 nM, respectively. The 108-nucleotide transcript
designated ori originates from the RNA-I promoter.
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Comparison of IlvY protein binding ( ) to
the tandem operators (O1O2) and
repression of transcription originating from the ilvY
promoter ( ). IlvY protein DNA binding was determined by
mobility shift experiments of the type described under "Materials and
Methods." Transcription levels were determined from autoradiographic
band intensities of ilvY promoter-specific transcripts
obtained from experiments of the type illustrated in Fig. 4. All
measurements were obtained from autoradiogram exposures where band
intensities were linear with respect to time. The solid curves show the
results of the analysis of these data as described in the text. For
this analysis, the free energy changes used for binding of IvY protein
to O1O2 were: G1 = 10.4 kcal/mol; G2 = 9.8 kcal/mol;
Gc = 3.0 kcal/mol.
|
|
The simplest model consistent with these repression data and with the
observation that O1O2 and the ilvY
promoter occupy the same region of DNA on the same face of the DNA
helix (6), is that repression is mediated by competition between IlvY
protein and RNA polymerase binding. To assess whether such a model can account for the repression curve in Fig. 5, these data were analyzed using a simple competitive binding model in which the rule is that RNA
polymerase binding to the ilvY promoter and IlvY protein dimer binding to either operator are mutually exclusive. The
G values for IlvY protein binding to
O1O2 were set as equal to the best estimates
obtained from analysis of the data in Fig. 2. The fitted parameter was
the free energy change corresponding to the equilibrium dissociation
constant for RNA polymerase binding to the ilvY promoter.
The results of this analysis, shown as the solid curves in Fig. 5,
match the offset between the two curves with a predicted
Kd for RNA polymerase binding to the ilvY
promoter in the absence of IlvY protein of 2 ± 0.6 × 10 9 M. We conclude, therefore, that IlvY
protein represses transcription from the ilvY promoter by an
RNA polymerase occlusion mechanism in an inducer-independent
manner.
Effects of Inducer on IlvY Protein-ilvC Promoter
Interactions--
The binding of inducer to IlvY protein does not
significantly increase the affinity of IlvY protein for the tandem
operators. Yet, it results in the appearance of a DNase I
hypersensitive band in the region of the O2 operator
sequence that overlaps the 35 region of the ilvC promoter
(6). These results suggested that the binding of inducer might direct a
conformational change of the IlvY protein-operator DNA complex. In
addition, the binding of RNA polymerase to the ilvC promoter
is detectable by DNase I footprinting only when both IlvY protein and
inducer are present (6). We proposed, therefore, that the role of
inducer is to facilitate a conformational change in the IlvY
protein-O1O2 complex, which recruits RNA
polymerase to the ilvC promoter (6). To test this
hypothesis, in vitro transcription and DNase I footprinting assays were conducted to quantitatively compare the effects of inducer
on the DNase I hypersensitivity in the ilvC 35
hexanucleotide region and on transcription from the ilvC
promoter.
The autoradiogram in Fig. 6 shows the
effect of increasing inducer concentrations on the DNase I footprinting
pattern produced by the binding of IlvY protein to
O1O2. At all inducer concentrations, IlvY
protein remains bound to both operator sites. However, the DNase I
hypersensitive site at bp 37 on the nontranscribed strand (relative
to the ilvC transcription start site; Fig. 6A)
increases in intensity as inducer concentration is increased. Inducer
binding also results in the appearance of several DNase I
hypersensitive sites on the transcribed strand (Fig. 6B).
The inducer concentration dependence of the hypersensitive site on the
nontranscribed strand is plotted in Fig.
7 (open squares).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effects of co-inducer binding to the IlvY
protein-DNA complex on DNA structure. Autoradiogram of DNase I
protection patterns of a 240-bp EcoRI-HindIII DNA
fragment (containing ilv bp positions 111 to +1 relative
to ilvC transcription; Ref. 10) obtained in the presence of
a minimally saturating amount of purified IlvY protein (4 × 10 8 M dimer) and increasing concentrations of
-acetohydroxybutyrate (AHB). DNA fragments were uniquely
32P-end-labeled on either the nontranscribed (panel
A, lanes 1-5) or transcribed (panel B,
lanes 6-8) strands. The regions of protection corresponding
to the tandem operators O1O2 are identified. The positions
of the DNase I hypersensitive sites on both strands that are induced by
the addition of AHB are indicated with arrows. Lane
1, DNA fragment only; lanes 2-5, [AHB] = 0, 0.15, 0.30, and 1.25 mM, respectively; lane 6, DNA
fragment only; lanes 7-8, [AHB] = 0 and 1.25 mM, respectively.
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Comparison of inducer-directed activation of
transcription originating from the ilvC promoter ( ) and
inducer-directed induction of the DNase I hypersensitive site at bp
37 ( ). Transcription levels were determined from
autoradiographic band intensities of ilvC promoter-specific
transcripts obtained from experiments of the type illustrated in Fig. 8
and normalized to the transcription level obtained at the highest
inducer (AHB) level (1.25 mM). The band
intensity in each lane corresponding to the DNase I
hypersensitive site located at bp 37 in the ilvC promoter
region was corrected for background differences and normalized to the
intensity of an unprotected band in the same lane. All
measurements were obtained from autoradiogram exposures where band
intensities were linear with respect to time.
|
|
In vitro transcription assays were performed with a
negatively supercoiled plasmid DNA template, pDD3Y. In the absence of IlvY protein, basal level transcription from both the ilvY
and ilvC promoters is observed (Fig.
8, lane 1). Addition of 4 × 10 8 M IlvY protein dimer, which yields
greater than 99% saturation of O1O2 (Fig. 2),
represses production of the 369-nucleotide ilvY transcript
but does not significantly affect production of the 154-nucleotide
transcript originating from the ilvC promoter (Fig. 8,
lane 2). The addition of inducer, however, activates
transcription from the ilvC promoter 10-15-fold (Fig. 8,
lanes 3-11). This inducer-mediated activation is plotted in
Fig. 7 (open triangles).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
In vitro transcription reactions of the
divergent overlapping ilvYC promoter region in the presence
of a minimally saturating concentration of purified IlvY protein and
increasing concentrations of the co-inducer -acetohydroxybutyrate
(AHB). Autoradiogram of the RNA products of in
vitro transcription reactions using the supercoiled DNA template,
pDD3Y (see "Materials and Methods"). ilvY and
ilvC identify the 369- and 154-nucleotide RNA transcripts
that originate from their respective promoters. Lane 1, no
IlvY protein; lanes 2-11, [IlvY protein] = 4.0 × 10 8 M dimer and [AHB] = 4.7 × 10 3 mM; 9.4 × 10 3
mM; 1.8 × 10 2 mM; 3.75 × 10 2 mM; 7.5 × 10 2
mM; 1.5 × 10 1 mM; 3.0 × 10 1 mM; 1.25 mM; 2.5 mM; 5 mM, respectively. The 108 nucleotide
transcript designated ori originates from the RNA-I
promoter.
|
|
The data derived from these ilvC transcription and DNase I
hypersensitivity titrations (Fig. 7) were analyzed to estimate the
affinity of the inducer, -acetohydroxybutyrate, for the IlvY protein-O1O2 complex. Using a simple,
noncooperative binding model, a Kd value of 0.31 mM ( G4.7 ± 0.3 kcal/mol) was obtained from
the transcription data and a Kd value of 0.55 mM ( G = 4.4 ± 0.2 kcal/mol), was
obtained from the DNase I data. Since these experimental values are
indistinguishable from one another, both transcriptional induction and
DNase I hypersensitivity appear to be the result of a single inducer
binding event. Neither binding transition shows any indication of
either positive or negative cooperativity.
These results demonstrate that the binding of IlvY protein to the
tandem operators is necessary, but not sufficient, for activation of
transcription from the ilvC promoter. Activation requires
the additional binding of inducer to an IlvY protein-operator DNA complex.
Effects of Inducer on the Conformation of the IlvY
Protein-DNA Complex--
The appearance of DNase I hypersensitive
sites in and around the protected regions of DNase I footprints (Fig.
6) are often indicative of protein-induced DNA bends. In fact, other
LysR type activator-repressor proteins have been shown to induce DNA
bends at their target DNA binding sites; and, in some cases, these
bends are modulated by the binding of an effector ligand (26-28). To examine the possibility that IlvY protein might incite a bend in the
DNA helix, circular permutation assays were conducted according to the
methods of Wu and Crothers (21). A 240-bp
EcoRI-HindIII DNA fragment containing the tandem
operator sites of the ilvYC operator-promoter region, was
ligated into the unique SalI site of the plasmid pBEND2 (9),
and isometric (circularly permuted) DNA fragments containing the tandem
operators were generated by cleavage at six tandemly repeated
restriction endonuclease sites flanking the SalI site. The
relative base pair positions of the ilv specific DNA
fragment within each of these circularly permuted fragments is
identified in Fig. 9B. These
DNA fragments were incubated with IlvY protein in the presence and
absence of inducer, and the products of these binding reactions were
resolved by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Circular permutation analysis of IlvY protein
binding to the tandem operators. A, autoradiogram of a
minimally saturating concentration of IlvY protein (4 × 10 8 M dimer) bound to isometric
"circularly-permuted" 32P-end-labeled DNA fragments
containing the tandem operators O1O2.
Bound denotes IlvY protein-bound DNA complexes and Free
denotes unbound DNA fragments. Relative base pair position of an
ilv-specific DNA fragment (bp positions 111 to +1 relative
to the start of ilvC transcription) (3) contained within a
270-bp circularly permuted DNA fragment: lanes 1 and
11, 13 bp; lanes 2 and 10, 43 bp;
lanes 3 and 9, 61 bp; lanes 4 and
8, 67 bp; lanes 5 and 7, 79 bp;
lane 6, 110 bp. Lanes 11-7 are repeats of
lanes 1-5, respectively. B, table of relative
Rf value as a function of the relative base pair
position of an ilv-specific DNA fragment (bp positions 111
to +1 relative to the start of ilvC transcription) (3)
contained in a 270-bp DNA fragment and calculated angles of bending for
Free, IlvY protein-bound, and IlvY
protein- -acetolactate-bound DNA fragments. The relative
Rf value of each of these species was determined by
normalizing the migration of the DNA fragment yielding the fastest
migrating species as an Rf value of 1. Calculated
angles of DNA bending were determined using the empirical relationship
cos ( /2) = Rf (slowest)/Rf
(fastest).
|
|
The binding of IlvY protein to these circularly permuted DNA fragments
results in the formation of protein-DNA complexes with differing
position-dependent electrophoretic mobilities (Fig. 9A), indicating a protein-induced DNA bend. The center of
the IlvY protein-induced DNA bend was estimated by plotting the
relative mobility of each of the IlvY protein-DNA complexes against the relative bp position of the center of each DNA fragment and
extrapolating this curve to the relative bp position of the IlvY
protein-DNA fragment with the slowest mobility (21). This localized the center of the IlvY protein-induced DNA bend to within the
O2 site near the DNase I-hypersensitive site at bp 37. In
the presence of inducer, the center of the IlvY protein-induced bend of
the DNA helix did not change but the difference between the mobilities of the fastest and slowest migrating complexes decreased (Fig. 9B). This result suggests that the binding of inducer to the
IlvY protein-DNA complex relaxes the angle of the IlvY protein-induced bend of the DNA helix. In the absence of IlvY protein, the free DNA
fragments also exhibited differing position-dependent
electrophoretic mobilities. Using the empirical relationship cos
/2 = Rf (slowest)/Rf
(fastest) (22), the angles of IlvY protein-induced DNA bending were
estimated to be 60° in the absence of inducer and 50° in the
presence of 1 mM inducer. In the absence of IlvY protein, a
sequence-specific DNA bend of 36°, also centered in the
O2 region, was observed (Fig. 9B).
Although the difference between these bend angles is small and may not
be significant, additional evidence for this inducer-mediated change of
IlvY protein-induced bending of the DNA helix was obtained from the
results of DNase I footprinting experiments of the transcribed strand
of the ilvC gene. In the absence of substrate inducer, IlvY
protein protects three contiguous regions of DNA (ilvC bp 78 to 55, 51 to 43, and 41 to 19) in the operator sequences defined as O1 and O2 (Fig. 3B). The
addition of inducer to an IlvY protein-DNA complex, however, results in
the appearance of several DNase I-hypersensitive sites (ilvC
bp 76, 70, 61, 57, 49, 47, and 30) aligned along one face
of the DNA helix (Fig. 6B). The addition of inducer also
results in the protection of an additional DNase I reactive site at
ilvC bp 55 on the opposite face of the DNA helix. A
schematic summary of these DNase I footprinting protection patterns in
the presence and absence of inducer on both the transcribed and
nontranscribed strands of the ilvC gene is shown in Fig.
10. Given the pattern and periodicity
of DNase I reactive sites induced and protected, these results and the DNA bending assays suggest that the binding of inducer facilitates the
conversion of a sharp IlvY protein-induced DNA bend to a smoother bend
of a smaller angle.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Schematic representation of IlvY
protein-operator DNA interactions in the ilvYC promoter
region. Indicated are the protection patterns of the IlvY
protein-bound ilvC promoter region in the absence
(A) and presence (B) of inducer. , nucleotide
positions protected by IlvY protein from hydroxyl radical cleavage;
, nucleotide positions protected by IlvY protein from dimethyl
sulfate modification. Solid black arrows indicate nucleotide
positions whose sensitivity to DNase I cleavage is enhanced (up arrows)
or diminished (down arrows) with the addition of inducer to an IlvY
protein-DNA complex. Solid gray arrows indicate nucleotide
positions whose sensitivity to hydroxyl radical cleavage is enhanced
(up arrows) or diminished (down arrows) with the
addition of inducer to an IlvY protein-DNA complex. The dark
bars denote the 35 and 10 hexanucleotide regions of the
ilvC promoter. The symbols O1 and O2
denote the tandem operator sequences recognized by IlvY protein. The
in vivo transcriptional initiation site for the
ilvC promoter is indicated with an arrow (3). The
DNA helix is oriented to display the open face of the major grooves of
the tandem operators O1O2.
|
|
The results of hydroxyl radical footprinting experiments also support
an inducer-mediated conformational change in an IlvY protein-operator
DNA complex. The binding of IlvY protein to the tandem operators
results in the protection of nucleotide residues predominantly aligned
along one face of the DNA helix, and alters the relative chemical
reactivity of several residues within the protected regions. These
results are shown in Fig. 11 and
schematically summarized in Fig. 10. In addition, it is important to
note that in both DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprinting
experiments, IlvY protein remains bound to both operator sites even in
the presence of inducer.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Hydroxyl radical footprint of IlvY
protein-operator DNA interactions in the ilvYC promoter
region. Plots of the relative band intensities in digitized images
of autoradiograms of hydroxyl radical protection patterns obtained in
the absence (thick line) and presence (thin black
line) of a minimally saturating amount of purified IlvY protein
(4 × 10 8 M dimer) bound to a 240 bp
EcoRI-HindIII DNA fragment containing
ilv bp positions 111 to +1 (relative to ilvC
transcription) (3). DNA fragments were uniquely
32P-end-labeled on either the nontranscribed (A)
or the transcribed (B) strand of the ilvC gene.
Hydroxyl radical protection patterns obtained in the presence of both
IlvY protein (4 × 10 8 M dimer) and AHB
(1.25 mM) are indicated with a thin gray
line.
|
|
Effects of Substrate Inducer on the Kinetics of the Transcription
Initiation Reaction at the ilvC Promoter--
To determine the effects
of inducer binding to a preformed IlvY protein-DNA complex on the
kinetics of the transcription initiation reaction at the
ilvC promoter, abortive transcription assays of the
ilvC promoter region complexed with IlvY protein were
performed in the presence and absence of inducer (23). An IlvY protein dimer concentration of 4 × 10 8 M, which
yields greater than 99% saturation of O1O2
(Fig. 2) was used in each transcription reaction. The results of these assays showed that the addition of 1 mM inducer to an IlvY
protein-operator DNA complex increases the binding affinity of the
ilvC promoter for RNA polymerase (KB)
nearly 100-fold and decreases the isomerization rate for open complex
formation (k2) approximately 7-fold (Table I). Thus, the principal effect of
substrate-inducer binding to an IlvY protein-DNA complex on the
transcription initiation reaction at the ilvC promoter is to
increase the affinity of ilvC promoter for RNA
polymerase.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Effects of substrate inducer-mediated activation on the kinetic
constants of the transcription initiation reaction from the ilvC
promoter
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We previously demonstrated that, in vivo, IlvY protein
autoregulates expression of its own structural gene in the
divergent-overlapping ilvYC operon in an inducer-independent
manner and that both inducer and IlvY protein are required for the
activation of ilvC gene expression (6). We further
demonstrated that both activation and repression appear to be mediated
from the same regulatory locus. Thus, we suggested that the binding of
inducer to IlvY protein targets an activator property distinct from its
DNA binding activity and that the inducer-directed activation of
transcription from the ilvC promoter might functionally be
correlated with a conformational change of a preformed IlvY
protein-operator DNA complex (6). Previous work also demonstrated that
the binding of inducer to IlvY protein does not significantly affect
the occupancy of IlvY protein at the tandem operators (6). The results
of DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprinting experiments reported here
demonstrate that, in the absence or presence of inducer, IlvY protein
remains bound to both operator sites. Therefore, these results
definitively establish that the role of inducer in the IlvY
protein-mediated activation of transcription from the ilvC
promoter is not to recruit IlvY protein to the ilvC promoter region.
The binding of inducer to an IlvY protein-DNA complex evokes the
induction of a hypersensitive DNase I site in the 35 hexanucleotide region of the ilvC promoter (Fig. 6) and other changes in
the DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprinting patterns in the tandem operator region (Figs. 6, 10, and 11). These results suggest a
ligand-induced conformational change in the IlvY protein-operator DNA
complex. Quantitative analyses of these ligand-induced DNA structural
changes further establish that this conformational change is
functionally correlated with transcriptional activation. For example,
the inducer concentration that results in half-maximal induction of the
DNase I hypersensitive site at bp 37 in the 35 hexanucleotide
region of the ilvC promoter is the same concentration
that half-maximally activates transcription from this
promoter (Fig. 7).
The nature of the inducer-directed conformational change in the IlvY
protein-operator DNA complex is suggested by the results of circular
permutation assays (Fig. 9). These experiments indicate that the
binding of IlvY protein to DNA fragments containing the tandem operator
sites increases a sequenced-directed DNA bend of approximately 36° to
a bend angle of approximately 60°. The mean geometric center of both
the sequence-directed and IlvY protein-induced bends is positioned in
the 35 hexanucleotide region of the ilvC promoter. The
addition of inducer to the IlvY protein-operator DNA complex causes the
partial relief of this bend to about 50°. This conclusion is
supported by the distribution of hydroxyl radical and DNase I reactive
sites on both strands of an IlvY protein-operator DNA complex in the
presence and absence of inducer. In fact, these results suggest that
the binding of inducer facilitates the conversion of a sharp IlvY
protein-induced DNA bend to a smoother bend of a smaller angle. We
conclude, therefore, that alterations in the local geometry of the DNA
helix around the ilvC promoter region play an important role
in the IlvY protein-mediated activation of transcription from the
ilvC promoter.
Protein-induced DNA bending is known to influence the rate of
transcription initiation at many promoters. In some cases,
protein-induced bending of the DNA helix enhances the binding of RNA
polymerase to the promoter region (29). In other cases, it enhances the rate of open complex formation (23, 24). The results of abortive transcription assays (Table I) indicate that the principal effect of
the inducer-mediated conformational change in the IlvY protein-operator DNA complex is to increase the binding affinity of RNA polymerase for
the ilvC promoter nearly 100-fold. This suggests that the functional effect of the inducer-mediated conformational change in the
IlvY protein-DNA complex and the associated alterations in DNA bending
is to remodel the structure of the poor 35 hexanucleotide region of
the ilvC promoter region to make it a better template for
RNA polymerase recognition. The results of these abortive transcription
assays are also in general agreement with the proposal that the 35
region of a promoter is involved in the initial recognition of a
promoter by RNA polymerase (29). The nucleotide sequence of the 35
hexanucleotide region of the ilvC promoter (TTTCCG) exhibits
only a 3/6 match to the consensus sequence (TTGACA).
The results reported here also demonstrate that IlvY protein represses
the expression of its own structural gene by a simple RNA polymerase
occlusion mechanism. The results of in vitro transcription reactions conducted in the presence of increasing concentrations of
IlvY protein show that IlvY protein binding to the tandem operators represses transcription from the ilvY promoter and that the
fractional repression of ilvY expression and the fractional
saturation of the tandem operator sites exhibit the same dependences on
IlvY protein concentration (Fig. 5). The simplest interpretation
consistent with this set of data is that IlvY protein competitively
inhibits the binding of RNA polymerase at the ilvY promoter
site. This conclusion is consistent with the results of chemical and
enzymatic structural probing experiments, which demonstrate that both
IlvY protein and RNA polymerase bind to overlapping DNA sequences on the same face of the DNA helix (6).
It is interesting that the inducer titration curves of ilvC
transcription shown in Fig. 7 correspond to a simple noncooperative binding model. This result shows that the activation of transcription from the ilvC promoter is not dependent on cooperative
binding of inducer to multiple sites on the IlvY protein at the
O1O2 sites. These experiments also show that
the measured inducer concentration required to half-maximally activate
in vitro transcription from the ilvC promoter is
nearly the same as that required to half-maximally saturate the enzyme
product of the ilvC gene (5). These concentrations are in
good agreement with the inducer concentrations required for in
vivo activation of ilvC expression (6, 30, 31).
It is interesting to consider the activation mechanism described here
in relation to that of the MerR protein (32), a mechanistically similar
ligand-responsive activator protein which is not a member of the LysR
family of proteins. In this case, the binding of the inducer, mercuric
ion, to a MerR-operator DNA complex in the divergent-overlapping merR-merTPCAD operator-promoter region also facilitates the
partial relief of a MerR-induced DNA bend. However, in this case the
primary effect of the binding of inducer, and relief of protein-induced DNA bending, is the partial unwinding of the spacer region between the 35 and 10 hexanucleotide regions of the
merTPCAD promoter. This unwinding facilitates open complex
formation and/or promoter clearance by the transcription apparatus
rather than the recruitment of RNA polymerase to the promoter site as
is the case for IlvY protein. Thus, whereas both of these cases
illustrate an important role for ligand-induced conformational changes
of preformed protein-DNA complexes in the regulation of gene
expression, they also highlight the functionally distinct roles these
conformational changes may play. However, both of these examples
emphasize the importance of protein-induced conformational changes on
the structure of the DNA helix for the regulation of gene
expression.
The kinetic effect of the ligand-induced, IlvY protein-directed,
structural change in the IlvY protein-ilvC promoter DNA
complex reported here is to recruit RNA polymerase to the promoter
site. This might be accomplished by remodeling the DNA helix to
facilitate improved RNA polymerase-DNA interactions. Alternatively, the
primary effect of the inducer-mediated IlvY protein conformational
change might be to facilitate protein-protein interactions between IlvY and RNA polymerase. In this case, the relaxation of the bend angle in
the ilvC promoter region might be the fortuitous consequence of the inducer-mediated IlvY protein conformational change, and the
primary role of IlvY protein might be to enhance RNA polymerase recruitment via facilitated protein-protein interactions with RNA
polymerase across opposite faces of the DNA helix. The relative contributions of each of these components awaits further analysis.
Finally, it is interesting to note that inducer-responsive alterations
in the angle of protein-induced bending of the DNA helix have also been
reported for other LysR-type proteins such as OccR (33), CysB (28), and
CatR (27). Thus, ligand-mediated alterations in protein-induced bending
of the DNA helix appears to be a general feature among members of the
LysR family. However, the functional relationship between
ligand-induced conformational changes and the activation mechanism in
these cases is uncertain. Thus, the initial elucidation of the
activation mechanism employed by the IlvY protein reported here should
facilitate our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms of other
LysR-type regulatory systems.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Elaine Ito for technical
assistance, Stuart Arfin, Steve Sheridan, and She-Pin Hung for helpful
discussions, and J. Goodrich for supplying the LAGPLOT and TAUPLOT
computer programs.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant
MCB-9723452 (to G. W. H.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by a University of California Irvine Medical Scientist
Training Program Fellowship.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
714-824-5858; Fax: 714-824-8598; E-mail: gwhatfie{at}uci.edu.
1
The abbreviations used are: bp, base pair(s);
TBE, Tris-borate-EDTA; AHB, -acetohydroxybutyrate.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Schell, M. A.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
47,
597-626[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Henikoff, S.,
Haughn, G. W.,
Calvo, J. M.,
and Wallace, J. C.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
6602-6606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wek, R. C.,
and Hatfield, G. W.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
2441-2450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Watson, M. D.,
Wild, J.,
and Umbarger, H. E.
(1979)
J. Bacteriol.
139,
1014-1020[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Umbarger, H. E.
(1987)
in
Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium (Neidhart, F. C., Ingraham, J. L., Brooks-Low, K., Magasanik, B., Schaechter, M., and Umbarger, H. E., eds), pp. 352-367, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
-
Wek, R. C.,
and Hatfield, G. W.
(1988)
J. Mol. Biol.
203,
643-663[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Colds Spring Harbor, New York
-
Studier, F. W.,
and Moffat, B. A.
(1986)
J. Mol. Biol.
189,
113-130[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kim, J.,
Zweib, C.,
Wu, C.,
and Adhya, C.
(1989)
Gene
85,
5-23
-
Wek, R. C.,
and Hatfield, G. W.
(1986)
Nucleic Acids Res.
14,
2763-2777[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Viale, A. M.,
Kobayashi, H.,
Azakawa, T.,
and Henikoff, S.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
5224-5229[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fried, M. G.,
and Crothers, D. M.
(1981)
Nucleic Acids Res.
9,
6505-6525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Johnson, M. L.,
and Faunt, L. M.
(1992)
Methods Enzymol.
210,
1-37[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hildebrand, F. B.
(1956)
Introduction to Numerical Analysis, McGraw-Hill Publishing Corp., New York
-
Galas, D. J.,
and Schmitz, A.
(1978)
Nucleic Acids Res.
5,
3157-3170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Senear, D. F.,
and Brenowitz, M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
13661-13671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tullius, T. D.,
and Dombroski, B. A.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
5469-5473[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hauser, C. A.,
Sharp, J. A.,
Hatfield, L. K.,
and Hatfield, G. W.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
1765-1770[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Maniatis, T.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Sambrook, J.
(1982)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
-
Wu, H. M.,
and Crothers, D. M.
(1984)
Nature
308,
509-513[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Thompson, J. F.,
and Landy, A.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
9687-9705[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hawley, D. K.,
Malan, T. P.,
Mulligan, T. P.,
and McClure, W. R.
(1982)
in
Promoters (Chamberlin, R., ed), Praeger Press, New York
-
Parekh, B. S.,
and Hatfield, G. W.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
1173-1177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Goodrich, J.
(1992)
Regulation of Transcription from the Escherichia coli Galactose OperonPh.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University
-
Wang, L.,
Helmann, J. D.,
and Winans, S. C.
(1992)
Cell
69,
659-666[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Parsek, M. R.,
Kivisaar, M.,
and Chakrabarty, A. M.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
15,
819-828[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hryniewicz, M. M.,
and Kredich, N. M.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
3673-3682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gilbert, W.
(1976)
in
RNA Polymerase (Losick, R., and Chamberlin, M., eds), Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
-
Ratzkin, B.,
Arfin, S. M.,
and Umbarger, H. E.
(1972)
J. Bacteriol.
112,
131-141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Arfin, S. M.,
Ratzkin, B.,
and Umbarger, H. E.
(1969)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
37,
902-908[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ansari, A. Z.,
Bradner, J. E.,
and O'Halloran, T. V.
(1995)
Nature
374,
371-375[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wang, L.,
Helmann, J. D.,
and Winans, S. C.
(1992)
Cell
69,
659-667
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Peck, R. F. Fisher, and S. R. Long
Diverse Flavonoids Stimulate NodD1 Binding to nod Gene Promoters in Sinorhizobium meliloti.
J. Bacteriol.,
August 1, 2006;
188(15):
5417 - 5427.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Knowle, R. E. Lintner, Y. M. Touma, and R. M. Blumenthal
Nature of the Promoter Activated by C.PvuII, an Unusual Regulatory Protein Conserved among Restriction-Modification Systems
J. Bacteriol.,
January 15, 2005;
187(2):
488 - 497.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. R. Kim, S. E. Lee, C. M. Kim, S. Y. Kim, E. K. Shin, D. H. Shin, S. S. Chung, H. E. Choy, A. Progulske-Fox, J. D. Hillman, et al.
Characterization and Pathogenic Significance of Vibrio vulnificus Antigens Preferentially Expressed in Septicemic Patients
Infect. Immun.,
October 1, 2003;
71(10):
5461 - 5471.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Feng, Q. Li, H.-L. Hu, X.-C. Chen, and G.-F. Hong
Inactivation of the nod box distal half-site allows tetrameric NodD to activate nodA transcription in an inducer-independent manner
Nucleic Acids Res.,
June 15, 2003;
31(12):
3143 - 3156.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Heil, L. T. Stauffer, and G. V. Stauffer
Glycine binds the transcriptional accessory protein GcvR to disrupt a GcvA/GcvR interaction and allow GcvA-mediated activation of the Escherichia coli gcvTHP operon
Microbiology,
July 1, 2002;
148(7):
2203 - 2214.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Hu, S. Liu, Y. Yang, W. Chang, and G. Hong
In Rhizobium leguminosarum, NodD represses its own transcription by competing with RNA polymerase for binding sites
Nucleic Acids Res.,
July 15, 2000;
28(14):
2784 - 2793.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Vijesurier, L. Carlock, R. M. Blumenthal, and J. C. Dunbar
Role and Mechanism of Action of C {middle dot} PvuII, a Regulatory Protein Conserved among Restriction-Modification Systems
J. Bacteriol.,
January 15, 2000;
182(2):
477 - 487.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Y. Rhee, M. Opel, E. Ito, S.-p. Hung, S. M. Arfin, and G. W. Hatfield
Transcriptional coupling between the divergent promoters of a prototypic LysR-type regulatory system, the ilvYC operon of Escherichia coli
PNAS,
December 7, 1999;
96(25):
14294 - 14299.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|