|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 19, 11874-11880, May 8, 1998
Production of the Thyrotrophin Receptor Extracellular Domain as a
Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored Membrane Protein and Its
Interaction with Thyrotrophin and Autoantibodies*
Clive R.
Da Costa and
Alan P.
Johnstone
From the Department of Cellular and Molecular Sciences, St.
George's Hospital Medical School,
London SW17 0RE, United Kingdom
 |
ABSTRACT |
The thyrotrophin (TSH) receptor (TSHR) is
synthesized as a single polypeptide with a predicted large
extracellular domain (ECD), a seven-transmembrane pass region and a
C-terminal intracellular tail. It is a common target for production of
autoantibodies. To investigate whether the ECD is solely responsible
for ligand interaction, we directed the expression of this domain in
isolation on the cell surface by means of a
glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor sequence. Immunoblotting
detected TSHR material of Mr 70,000 expressed
at high levels. In immunoprecipitation studies, the GPI-anchored ECD
was recognized by experimental and pathological antibodies. The
molecule was detected on the cell surface by flow cytofluorimetry at up
to 10-fold higher amounts than the highest expressing full-length
receptor clone. Radioligand binding studies confirmed this and showed
that the recombinant molecule bound TSH with high affinity similar to
full-length receptor; however, studies with human autoimmune sera
indicated differences in the degree of inhibition when compared with
full-length receptor. The existence of the GPI anchor was confirmed by
cleavage with a GPI-specific phospholipase C and biosynthetic labeling
with [3H]ethanolamine. TSHR material was also present
inside the cell in both soluble and membrane-bound forms. Thus, the
recombinant GPI-anchored ECD is the smallest known fragment of the TSHR
that retains high-affinity TSH binding and is expressed at high levels on the cell surface as well as internally; this approach may well be
useful for other membrane proteins.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Thyrotrophin (TSH)1 is a
heterodimeric glycoprotein indispensable for the control of thyroid
structure and function and ultimately metabolism. TSH exerts its
effects by binding to a specific receptor (TSHR) on the thyroid
follicular cell; this activates the adenylate cyclase pathway and,
possibly, the phosphatidylinositol pathway (1-4). The TSHR belongs to
a family of G-protein coupled receptors and has clinical significance
because it is a frequent target for autoantibody production in
humans.
The cDNA sequence (5-7) predicts a polypeptide of
Mr 84,500 with six potential glycosylation
sites. The receptor is envisaged to form a large extracellular domain
(ECD) (polypeptide Mr 45,000 plus carbohydrate),
a seven-transmembrane region, and a cytoplasmic tail. It is closely
related to the receptors for the other glycoprotein hormones (follicle
stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and chorionic gonadotrophin)
but has two unique insertions of 8 and 50 amino acids (residue numbers
38-45 and 317-366) in the ECD.
It is generally assumed that the ECD is solely responsible for ligand
interaction and that the transmembrane and cytoplasmic regions are
involved in signal transduction. However, we showed that the
recombinant ECD expressed in isolation as a soluble 60,000 Mr glycoprotein was recognized by autoimmune
antibodies but did not bind to TSH with high affinity (8), suggesting
that additional components may play a role in ligand interaction. This
conclusion is supported by data from other groups (9-11). Evidence for
the extracellular loops between the transmembrane regions making an important contribution to TSH binding has been provided by experiments in which mutations or insertions in the first or second extracellular loops resulted in a receptor that was unable to bind TSH (12-14). Conversely, the recombinant ECD expressed on the cell surface, in an
ill-defined way by virtue of an 11-amino acid tail derived from a
cloning vector, was able to bind TSH with similar affinity to
full-length receptor (15), and the isolated recombinant ECD is reported
to bind TSH, although less effectively than the full-length molecule
(16, 17).
Studies on the ECD are hampered by the fact that, when expressed alone
in eukaryotic cells, the recombinant protein is retained within the
cell rather than being secreted as expected (8, 9). We have managed to
facilitate secretion of ECD material by fusing it to the "hinge"
region of rat CD8 or to domains 3 and 4 of rat CD4 (18) and truncated
versions of the ECD (down to 261 residues) are secreted (19); however,
although these modified ECD are recognized by at least some
autoantibodies, they do not bind TSH with high affinity, the same
situation as for the ECD retained inside cells. ECD expressed alone in
prokaryotes or baculovirus is insoluble and without function (8,
20-25), although there are some reports of producing soluble material from such systems by experimental manipulation (11, 16, 17).
In order to address more clearly the issue of the minimal structural
requirements for TSH binding, we have expressed the ECD in isolation on
the cell surface in a defined way by means of a
glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor and report here
characterization of the recombinant product, including binding of TSH
and autoantibodies.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Construction of TSHR ECD with GPI Anchor--
Polymerase chain
reaction was used to add sequences directing attachment of a GPI anchor
to the ECD at residue 412, Ile, which is just prior to the first
predicted transmembrane sequence of the TSHR. The template used was a
construct encoding domains 3 and 4 of rat CD4 attached to the C
terminus of the human ECD (18). Domain 3 possesses some amino acids
that are acceptable for GPI attachment. These were used together with
artificially created sequences to direct a signal for GPI anchoring.
The primers used were an 18-base sequence corresponding to nucleotide
positions 973-990 of the human TSHR cDNA (sense)
5'-ATCAGAGGAATCCTTGAG-3' and a 55-base sequence containing a signal for
GPI attachment, a stop codon, and an artificial BamHI site
for subsequent cloning (antisense)
5'-GAGGATCCTAGACGAGCACGAGCAGGAGCAGAAGGATGAGTAGGAAGAAGAACTC-3'. The
nucleotide and corresponding amino acid sequence for the added material
is shown in Fig. 1, the double
underlined serine residue serving as the putative attachment site.
The polymerase chain reaction consisted of 30 cycles (95 °C 1 min;
60 °C 2 min; 72 °C 1 min) and produced a fragment encompassing
nucleotides 973-1332 of the TSHR (including a NdeI site at
position 1265) plus the anchor sequence. The coding region for the
extracellular region of the human TSHR has been cloned into the
prokaryotic expression vector pGEX-3X (8). This was digested with
EcoRI, the overhang filled in with Klenow, further digested
with NdeI, and the NdeI-digested polymerase chain
reaction fragment was ligated into this. The BamHI fragment
containing the ECD plus GPI anchor signal was then excised, ligated
into the eukaryotic expression vector pEE14, and the product
transfected into CHO-K1 cells, as described (26), to generate stable
lines, which were selected by their resistance to methionine
sulfoximine and by using slot blotting to identify colonies with a
large number of copies of plasmid incorporated into genomic DNA. The
sequence of the construct used for transfection was confirmed by
dideoxy sequencing using a commercial kit (Pharmacia Ltd.).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The sequence directing attachment of a GPI
anchor. The artificial nucleotide, and corresponding protein,
sequence is shown beginning at residue 412 (isoleucine) of the human
TSHR. The engineered thrombin cleavage site is underlined
and the cleavage position indicated by an arrow. The protein
sequence directing attachment of the GPI-anchor is shown in
bold and the putative attachment site of the anchor (serine)
is double underlined.
|
|
Other Recombinant TSHR Constructs--
CHO lines expressing
full-length TSHR (designated "FLD4" and "FLE4.2") and isolated
ECD (designated "ExG2") have been described previously (8, 26).
Membrane Preparation--
An enriched membrane fraction of
recombinant CHO cells was prepared as described (27) using freeze/thaw
and hypotonic homogenization.
Immunoblotting--
Samples were sonicated at 100 watts on ice
for 3 × 10 s and then heated at 100 °C for 5 min in
SDS-PAGE loading buffer (65 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS,
10% glycerol, 5% -mercaptoethanol, 0.001% bromphenol blue).
SDS-PAGE was carried out according to the method of Laemmli (28).
Western transfer onto nitrocellulose (Electran, 0.45 µm; BDH, Poole,
United Kingdom) was as described (29). Immunoblotting was carried out
using monoclonal antibodies to TSHR (18) and the Boehringer Mannheim
chemiluminescence blotting substrate kit.
Separation of Membrane-associated from Soluble
Proteins--
Confluent cells were removed from 9-cm dishes using
Versene (Life Technologies, Inc., Paisley, UK) and washed in PBS. An
aliquot (2 × 106 cells) was centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 5 min, resuspended in 100 µl of 1% (v/v) Triton
X-114 in PBS containing protease inhibitors (2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin), incubated on ice for 10 min and then at 30 °C for 5 min.
The sample was then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min to enhance phase separation. An equal volume of 2 × SDS-PAGE
loading buffer was added to the aqueous (containing soluble proteins) and detergent phase (containing membrane proteins) and the samples analyzed by immunoblotting.
Removal of Carbohydrate--
Cells were removed from 9-cm dishes
using Versene, washed in PBS and solubilized in 200 µl of 1% Nonidet
P-40 in PBS containing protease inhibitors (2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml
leupeptin) for 1 min on ice, insoluble material being removed by
centrifugation at 13,000 g for 5 min. One quarter of the
supernatant (equivalent to 2 × 105 cells) was
analyzed by immunoblotting to check for recovery of protein in the
Nonidet P-40 extracts. The remaining supernatant was split into two
aliquots (equivalent to 3 × 105 cells) and diluted
with an equal volume of 0.1% SDS in PBS, so that the final Nonidet
P-40 and SDS concentrations were 0.5 and 0.05%, respectively. To one
aliquot was added 10 milliunits of N-glycosidase F
(Boehringer) and both aliquots were incubated at 37 °C for 16 h
and the resultant digest analyzed by immunoblotting.
Flow Cytofluorimetry--
Cells were removed from 9-cm dishes
using Versene and their reaction with an anti-TSHR monoclonal antibody
analyzed by flow cytofluorimetry as described (18).
For experiments investigating the susceptibility of the recombinant
protein to enzymes, the cells were detached from four dishes, washed
twice with PBS, and the pellet from each dish (approximately 5-6 × 106 cells) resuspended by the addition of 100 µl of
PBS containing 0.5 unit of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase
C (PIPLC), 1 unit of thrombin, 0.125% trypsin, or no enzyme; all
samples except for the trypsin one also contained 2% fetal calf serum. After incubation for 1 h at 37 °C, the cells were washed with PBS and reacted with an anti-TSHR monoclonal antibody in the normal way
for analysis by flow cytofluorimetry.
Radioligand Binding Assay--
Cells grown in 24-well plates
(approximately 105/well) were washed twice with binding
buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl,
0.1% bovine serum albumin) and unlabeled TSH or human sera added.
Radioiodinated TSH (a kind gift of BRAHMS Diagnostica, Berlin, Germany)
was added at approximately 30,000 cpm/well. The final volume was 300 µl and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The cells
were then washed rapidly with 500 µl of ice-cold binding buffer,
solubilized in 500 µl of 0.5 M NaOH, and their radioactivity determined. Nonspecific binding, determined in the presence of 150 nM TSH, was subtracted from all counts.
For binding experiments involving membrane preparations, 40-100 µg
of membrane protein was used for each point and incubated with regular
mixing in tubes, as described above for cells. The membranes were then
isolated by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 15 min at
4 °C, washed twice with 1 ml of ice-cold binding buffer, and the
radioactivity associated with the pellets measured as described above.
For comparison between different membrane preparations or different
experiments, the counts were corrected for membrane protein content as
measured in the final NaOH solution using the method of Lowry (30).
Biosynthetic Labeling of Cells and
Immunoprecipitation--
Cells (5-6 × 106) were
washed twice with PBS and incubated in serum-free, methionine-free,
HEPES-buffered Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (ICN Flow, Thame,
UK) at 37 °C for 30 min. The culture supernatants were then replaced
with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 2% fetal
calf serum and 100 µCi of [35S]methionine or
[3H]ethanolamine (Amersham, Bucks, UK) at 37 °C for
3 h. The cells were washed twice with PBS and solubilized on
ice with PBS containing 1% Nonidet P-40 and protease inhibitors (2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml aprotinin,
10 µg/ml leupeptin). The cell extract was centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C and the Nonidet P-40-soluble
material stored at 20 °C until analyzed by immunoprecipitation (8).
For experiments involving PIPLC and thrombin, cells were labeled as
described above and then washed twice with PBS. The cells (approximately 5-6 × 106) were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in 1 ml of PBS, 2% bovine serum albumin containing 0.5 unit of PIPLC, 1 unit of thrombin, or no enzyme. The supernatants were
then removed and the cells extracted with Nonidet P-40 as described
above; the supernatants and the Nonidet P-40 extracts were analyzed by
immunoprecipitation.
 |
RESULTS |
Following transfection of CHO cells with the GPI construct in the
pEE14 vector, successful transfectants were identified and selected by
their resistance to methionine sulfoximine; further screening of these
stable lines by means of slot blotting DNA identified one clone with
the highest copy number of TSHR sequences, which was designated
"GPIA6." Western blotting of crude extracts from GPIA6, as well as
other clones with lower copy number, using monoclonal antibodies
detected a band of approximately 70,000 Mr
expressed at high levels, approximately 10,000 larger than the isolated
ECD (Fig. 2A, tracks 1 and
3). Digestion with N-glycosidase F decreased the
Mr by approximately 10,000 (Fig. 2A, track
4); a similar decrease in Mr was also
observed for isolated ECD in ExG2 extracts (Fig. 2A, track
2). N-Glycosidase F does not remove the entire
carbohydrate moiety, unlike endoglycosidase F which was used in an
earlier study (31) where an Mr of 15,000 was attributed to carbohydrate on the ECD of ExG2 cells. Approximately 50%
of the recombinant material partitioned into the detergent phase in
Triton X-114-treated cells (Fig. 2B, tracks 3 and
4), indicating that it was membrane bound; in contrast, the
vast majority of the ECD construct in ExG2 cells partitioned into the
aqueous phase (Fig. 2B, tracks 1 and 2),
indicating that it was not membrane bound, as expected (8). In
confirmation of this, approximately 30% of TSHR material was released
in soluble form after freeze/thawing and homogenization of GPIA6 cells
(Fig. 2C, tracks 4-6) compared with greater than 90%
released from ExG2 cells (Fig. 2C, tracks 1-3).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Characterization of recombinant GPI-anchored
TSHR by immunoblotting. A, recombinant CHO lines expressing
ECD alone (ExG2) (tracks 1 and 2) or GPI-anchored
ECD (GPIA6) (tracks 3 and 4) were solubilized in
Nonidet P-40 and incubated in the absence (tracks 1 and
3) or presence (tracks 2 and 4) of
N-glycosidase F before analysis by immunoblotting.
B, recombinant CHO lines expressing ECD alone (ExG2)
(tracks 1 and 2) or GPI-anchored ECD (GPIA6)
(tracks 3 and 4) were solubilized in Triton X-114
and the mixture separated into aqueous (tracks 1 and
3) and detergent (tracks 2 and 4)
phases which were then analyzed by immunoblotting. C,
recombinant CHO lines expressing ECD alone (ExG2) (tracks
1-3) or GPI-anchored ECD (GPIA6) (tracks 4-6) were
suspended in 10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, containing protease inhibitors (2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin) and either taken
directly for analysis by immunoblotting (tracks 1 and
4) or subjected to two freeze/thaw cycles on dry ice and
then passed through a 25-gauge needle 10 times. After centrifugation
(12,000 × g, 30 min, 4 °C) to separate soluble from
membrane-bound material, the pellets (tracks 2 and
5) and supernatants (tracks 3 and 6)
were analyzed by immunoblotting. The equivalent of 2 × 105 cells was loaded on each track. In each case, the blot
was incubated with 2C11 monoclonal antibody against TSHR and bound
antibody detected using peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody
and a chemiluminescence detection system. The positions on SDS-PAGE of
marker proteins of known Mr (× 10 3) are indicated on the right of each
panel.
|
|
Analysis of GPIA6 cells using flow cytofluorimetry showed that TSHR
material was present on the cell surface (Fig.
3). Using several different monoclonal
antibodies, the fluorescence signal was 3-10-fold higher for GPIA6
cells than for cells expressing the full-length receptor (FLE4.2),
indicating a substantial increase in surface expression for the
GPI-anchored molecule.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Analysis of cell-surface expression of
GPI-anchored TSHR by flow cytofluorimetry. Histograms are
presented showing the binding of two monoclonal antibodies against the
TSHR (2C11 and 3B12) to CHO lines expressing GPI-anchored ECD (GPIA6)
or, for comparison, full-length TSHR (FLE4.2). Each panel shows the
reaction of an irrelevant monoclonal antibody (NS)
(bold solid line) as well as 3B12 (dashed line)
and 2C11 (fainter dotted line). Bound antibodies were
detected using a fluorescein-labeled anti-mouse IgG antibody and a
FACscan cytofluorimeter.
|
|
Immunoprecipitation of detergent-solubilized GPIA6 cells, which had
been biosynthetically radiolabeled with methionine, demonstrated that
the GPI-anchored material was recognized by autoantibodies in sera from
several patients with Graves' disease (Fig.
4A), which also react with the
recombinant isolated ECD in ExG2 cells as reported previously (8). The
TSHR material from GPIA6 cells, but not from ExG2 cells, also
incorporated radiolabeled ethanolamine (Fig. 4B), as
expected for a GPI-anchored protein.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Biosynthetic labeling of GPI-anchored TSHR
and recognition by human autoantibodies. Recombinant CHO lines
expressing ECD alone (ExG2) (tracks 1-3) or GPI-anchored
ECD (GPIA6) (tracks 4-6) were biosynthetically labeled with
either [35S]methionine (panel A) or
[3H]ethanolamine (panel B), solubilized in
Nonidet P-40, and immunoprecipitated with pooled normal human sera
(tracks 1 and 4) or serum from Graves' patient
S235 (tracks 2 and 5) or S342 (tracks 3 and 6).
Following SDS-PAGE fractionation, the radioactive proteins were
detected by autoradiography. The positions of marker proteins of known
Mr (× 10 3) are indicated on the
right of each panel.
|
|
In confirmation of the GPI-anchored structure, incubation of GPIA6
cells with PIPLC decreased the fluorescence signal in flow cytofluorimetry by approximately 70%, whereas this treatment had no
effect (or caused a slight increase) on the full-length molecule in
FLE4.2 cells (Table I). Similarly,
thrombin decreased the fluorescence signal by approximately 50% for
GPIA6 cells but had much less effect on FLE4.2 cells, presumably
cutting at the thrombin site engineered into the GPI construct just
before the GPI attachment signal sequence (see "Experimental
Procedures" and Fig. 1). Analysis by immunoprecipitation of the
soluble and membrane-bound TSHR content from similar digests of
biosynthetically labeled cells demonstrated release of soluble ECD from
GPIA6 cells by PIPLC or thrombin treatment (Fig.
5).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Susceptibility of recombinant GPI-anchored TSHR to cleavage by thrombin
or PIPLC
CHO lines expressing GPI-anchored ECD (GPIA6) or full-length TSHR
(FLE4.2) were incubated with the indicated enzyme and the consequent
decrease in cell surface TSHR molecules determined by flow
cytofluorimetry using 2C11 monoclonal antibody and fluorescein-labeled
anti-mouse IgG antibody. Values given are the means of the fluorescence
intensity (arbitrary units) from one representative experiment after
subtraction of the mean fluorescence in the presence of a nonspecific
IgG. The decrease caused by each treatment is also given as a
percentage of the value with no addition (mean ± S.E. of three
independent experiments).
|
|

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
The release of TSHR material from
GPI-anchored receptors by thrombin or PIPLC. A,
recombinant CHO lines expressing ECD alone (ExG2) (tracks
1-4) or GPI-anchored ECD (GPIA6) (tracks 5-8) were
biosynthetically labeled with [35S]methionine and then
incubated in the absence (tracks 1, 2, 5, and 6)
or presence (tracks 3, 4, 7, and 8) of PIPLC and
the supernatants immunoprecipitated with pooled normal human sera
(tracks 1, 3, 5, and 7) or a mixture of sera from
Graves' disease patients S235 and S342 (tracks 2, 4, 6, and
8). B, recombinant CHO lines expressing
GPI-anchored ECD (GPIA6) were biosynthetically labeled with
[35S]methionine and then incubated in the absence
(tracks 1-4) or presence (tracks 5-8) of
thrombin. After this digestion, the supernatants (tracks 1, 2, 5, and 6) and solubilized cell pellets (tracks 3, 4, 7, and 8) were immunoprecipitated with pooled normal
human sera (tracks 1, 3, 5, and 7) or a mixture
of sera from Graves' disease patients S235 and S342 (tracks 2, 4, 6, and 8). Following SDS-PAGE fractionation, the
radioactive proteins were detected by autoradiography. The positions of
marker proteins of known Mr (× 10 3) are indicated on the right of each
panel.
|
|
Intact GPIA6 cells bound 125I-labeled TSH, with a maximum
approximately 3-fold higher than that of FLE4.2 cells, which express the full-length receptor (Fig.
6A). When plotted as a
percentage of maximum binding, the curves from the two cell lines are
very similar (Fig. 6B), indicating that the two recombinant
molecules have a similar affinity for TSH; Scatchard analyses of the
data from seven independent experiments gave KD
values of 0.209 ± 0.042 nM for GPIA6 cells and
0.281 ± 0.032 nM for FLD4 cells (mean ± S.E.).
Membranes prepared from GPIA6 cells also bound 125I-labeled
TSH (Fig. 7); in contrast, those from
ExG2 cells (which have soluble ECD that does not bind TSH) were
negative and those from FLE4.2 and FLD4 cells (which express less
receptors than GPIA6) were negative or slightly positive.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Radioligand binding analysis of GPI-anchored
TSHR in intact cells. Recombinant CHO lines expressing
GPI-anchored ECD (GPIA6, solid squares) or full-length TSHR
(FLD4, open circles) in 24-well plates were incubated with a
constant amount of radioiodinated TSH together with varying
concentrations of unlabeled TSH. The amount of radioactivity bound to
the cells was then determined and the nonspecific binding in the
presence of 150 nM unlabeled TSH was subtracted.
Panel A shows the binding curve from one representative
experiment as counts/min bound to the cells (mean ± S.E. of
triplicate wells). In panel B the data from seven
independent experiments, each in triplicate, are presented as a
percentage of the binding in the absence of any inhibitor (mean ± S.E.).
|
|

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Radioligand binding analysis of GPI-anchored
TSHR in membranes. In two separate experiments (A and
B) membranes from recombinant CHO lines expressing
full-length TSHR (FLE4.2 and FLD4), ECD alone (ExG2), or GPI-anchored
ECD (GPIA6) were incubated with radioiodinated TSH in the absence
(cross-hatched bars) or presence (solid bars) of
150 nM unlabeled TSH. The amount of radioactivity bound to
the membranes was determined and is presented relative to the protein
content of each sample.
|
|
The ability of autoantibodies in the sera of Graves' disease patients
to inhibit the binding of 125I-labeled TSH to intact cells
was then investigated (Fig. 8). While
most of the sera that inhibited binding to full-length receptors also
inhibited binding to the GPI-anchored molecules, there were clear
differences in the amount of this inhibition. Thus serum from patients
S361, H804, H254, H291, S235, and H569 inhibited binding to the
GPI-anchored molecules significantly less than to the full-length
receptors, whereas serum from patient S342 or S778 was more inhibitory
on the GPI-anchored material.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of sera from Graves' disease patients
on the binding of TSH to GPI-anchored TSHR. Recombinant CHO lines
expressing GPI-anchored ECD (GPIA6) (cross-hatched bars) or
full-length TSHR (FLE4.2) (solid bars) in 24-well plates
were incubated with radioiodinated TSH together with serum from the
indicated patient (final concentration 6.7%, v/v, for all except S235,
which was 0.2%). The amount of radioactivity bound to the cells was
then determined and the nonspecific binding in the presence of 150 nM unlabeled TSH was subtracted. The data are presented as
a percentage of the binding in the presence of pooled normal human sera
(mean ± S.E. of triplicate wells).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A GPI anchor consists of phosphatidylinositol (inserted in the
outer leaflet of the plasma membrane), a glycan core, and an ethanolamine covalently attached to the C-terminal residue of the
protein. No clear consensus sequence exists for directing such
anchoring but there are some general requirements for creating a
synthetic anchor sequence: (i) a hydrophobic region at the C terminus
of the molecule (10-20 amino acids) not followed by a cluster of basic residues; (ii) a "spacer domain" of 7-10 residues preceding the hydrophobic region; (iii) small amino acids after the
spacer region, where cleavage of the precursor and attachment of the
anchor occurs (32). The GPI anchor is preassembled and added to nascent
proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (33, 34). Concomitant with this
step, the initial C-terminal peptide is removed so that the GPI anchor
is covalently attached to a new C-terminal amino acid on the protein
(35). By introducing sequences conforming to these general rules (Fig.
1), we have directed the attachment of a GPI anchor to the end of the
TSHR ECD. This is demonstrated by the biosynthetic labeling of the material with ethanolamine (Fig. 4B) and susceptibility to
release from membranes by PIPLC (Fig. 5 and Table I). This achievement allowed studies on the structural requirements of the TSHR for binding
TSH, and also demonstrates the general utility of this approach for
expressing other proteins with simple membrane anchors.
In addition to the membrane anchored form, a significant amount of
recombinant material was present in a soluble, non-membrane bound form
(Fig. 2, B and C), presumably retained inside the
endoplasmic reticulum. There is no obvious explanation for this. It is
possible that the engineered thrombin site is susceptible to partial
spontaneous cleavage, as noted for other recombinant molecules
containing this site (36), or that an endogenous PIPLC cleaved within
the GPI anchor (37); alternatively, the soluble form could be a partially processed product before addition of the GPI anchor. There is
a slight difference in Mr of the two forms, the
soluble appearing slightly larger (Fig. 2, B and
C); a GPI anchor contributes 1500 to the
Mr of a polypeptide on SDS-PAGE but such small
changes to larger glycosylated proteins are not easily observed
(34).
The GPI-anchored material was expressed at much higher levels than the
full-length receptor, as demonstrated by its ease of detection using
immunoblotting (Fig. 2) and radioligand binding to crude membranes
(Fig. 7), neither of which techniques detect full-length molecules in
our hands. The GPI-anchored material was present on the cell surface in
significantly greater amounts than the full-length receptor
(3-10-fold), as demonstrated by flow cytofluorimetric analyses (Fig.
3) and radioligand binding to whole cells (Fig. 6A). This
observation supports our earlier conclusion (38) that the similar,
limited expression of full-length recombinant molecules in mammalian
cells reported by several groups using different expression systems is
related to the number of receptor molecules (with a bulky
seven-transmembrane region) that a cell can tolerate without impairing
its viability, a simpler membrane attachment allows increased
cell-surface capacity. However, an increase of this magnitude is
unlikely to be sufficient to account for the increased signals observed
on immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation, and radioligand binding to
membranes. Consequently, we think that the available data indicate
that, in addition to the recombinant material expressed on the cell
surface, a substantial amount is retained inside the cell, probably in
the endoplasmic reticulum, in a membrane-bound form as well as the
soluble form discussed above.
The recombinant material from GPIA6 cells was consistently observed as
two bands in immunoprecipitation analyses; using immunoblotting only
one band was detected, corresponding to the upper band in immunoprecipitation (Figs. 2, 4, and 5). Both bands were also biosynthetically labeled by [3H]ethanolamine (Fig.
4B), suggesting that they both contained a GPI anchor.
Presumably, the lower band is a minor component (and hence not easily
detectable by immunoblotting) which is synthesized efficiently but
which is then degraded or metabolized further thus preventing its
accumulation.
The KD of our full-length receptor for TSH was
calculated in an earlier study to be 0.225 nM (26), which
is in good agreement with the values determined for the native receptor on thyroid membranes and also with similar full-length recombinant preparations of other groups. In this study, we again obtained a
similar KD value for the full-length receptor and, furthermore, observed that the GPI-anchored material bound TSH with a
very similar high affinity (Fig. 6). This is in contrast to the ECD
alone which does not bind TSH with high affinity (8-11). Neither of
these truncated recombinant molecules contains the extracellular loops
and so these cannot be required for TSH binding. It is possible that
membrane insertion assists correct folding of the ECD, thus allowing
complete formation of the TSH-binding site; this would be in agreement
with one earlier report (15). However, the isolated ECD is folded well
enough to be recognized by autoantibodies, which do not react with
linear epitopes (39). There is no obvious difference in the
carbohydrate content of the ECD alone compared with GPI-anchored ECD
(Fig. 2) that can be postulated to explain the difference in TSH
binding, although we cannot rule out a subtle difference in
carbohydrate structure.
The GPI-anchored ECD contains none of the TSHR regions that are
predicted to lie within the membrane or cytoplasm. Consequently, this
recombinant construct would not be expected to couple to second
messenger systems and, in support of this, we found that TSH did not
induce cAMP production (data not shown).
Autoantibodies in the sera of some Graves' disease patients recognize
the GPI-anchored material, as demonstrated by immunoprecipitation (Fig.
4) and by their inhibition of TSH binding (Fig. 8). However, there was
no direct correlation between the two techniques and not every serum
that inhibited TSH binding was positive in immunoprecipitation (e.g. patient H804), possibly reflecting a requirement for
antibodies of higher affinity in order to be detectable by
immunoprecipitation, because of its stringent washes.
Significant differences were noted in the amount of inhibition by
individual sera between the GPI-anchored and full-length material (Fig.
8). As an example, it is notable that serum from patient S235 which
reacted well with the GPI-anchored material by immunoprecipitation only
inhibited TSH binding to that same material by about 25%, in contrast
to its 90% inhibition of full-length material. It should be noted that
all sera probably contain more than one autoantibody; if some of these
react with the extracellular loops, this might explain the greater
amount of TSH-binding inhibition of these sera with the full-length
construct. This conclusion is somewhat at odds with the data from one
other study (19) which found that a truncated version of the ECD of
only 261 residues neutralized the majority of autoantibodies from all
patients. There is no obvious explanation for the converse situation
where a serum inhibits the GPI-anchored material more than the
full-length (e.g. patients S342 and S778).
The recombinant GPI-anchored TSHR reported here represents the smallest
known fragment of TSHR that has retained high-affinity TSH binding. The
high expression of this material by stable recombinant cell lines
coupled with its susceptibility to PIPLC allows the production of
functional material in both membrane-bound and soluble form. Such
material will undoubtedly be useful in defining the structure-function
relationships of this important molecule, a task which has proved to be
surprisingly arduous.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Dr. Guy Whitley and Dr.
Stephen Nussey, both of St. George's Hospital Medical School, and Dr.
Philip Shepherd, of United Medical and Dental Schools London, for
helpful discussions. We thank BRAHMS Diagnostica, Berlin, for the kind
gift of radiolabeled TSH.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a Biotechnology and Biological
Sciences Research Council earmarked studentship (to C. R. D. C.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cellular and
Molecular Sciences, Div. of Immunology, St. George's Hospital Medical
School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, United Kingdom. Tel.:
44-181-725-5780; Fax: 44-181-725-3549; E-mail:
sggf600{at}sghms.ac.uk.
1
The abbreviations used are: TSH,
thyroid-stimulating hormone (thyrotrophin); ECD, extracellular domain;
GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PIPLC, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C; PAGE,
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; TSHR, thyrotrophin receptor; CHO,
Chinese hamster ovary.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Van Sande, J.,
Raspé, E.,
Perret, J.,
Lejeune, C.,
Maenhaut, C.,
Vassart, G.,
and Dumont, J. E.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
74,
R1-R6[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Van Sande, J.,
Lejeune, C.,
Ludgate, M.,
Munro, D. S.,
Vassart, G.,
Dumont, J. E.,
and Mockel, J.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
88,
R1-R5[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kosugi, S.,
Okajima, F.,
Ban, T.,
Hidaka, A.,
Shenker, A.,
and Kohn, L. D.
(1993)
Mol. Endocrinol.
7,
1009-1020[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kosugi, S.,
and Mori, T.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
199,
1497-1503[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Libert, F.,
Lefort, A.,
Gerard, C.,
Parmentier, M.,
Perret, J.,
Ludgate, M.,
Dumont, J. E.,
and Vassart, G.
(1989)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
165,
1250-1255[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nagayama, Y.,
Kaufman, K. D.,
Seto, P.,
and Rapoport, B.
(1989)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
165,
1184-1190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Misrahi, M.,
Loosfelt, H.,
Atger, M.,
Sar, S.,
Guiochon-Mantel, A.,
and Milgrom, E.
(1990)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
166,
394-403[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Harfst, E.,
Johnstone, A. P.,
and Nussey, S. S.
(1992)
J. Mol. Endocrinol.
9,
227-236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rapoport, B.,
McLachlan, S. M.,
Kakinuma, A.,
and Chazenbalk, G. D.
(1996)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
81,
2525-2533[Abstract]
-
Vlase, H.,
Matsuoka, N.,
Graves, P. N.,
Magnusson, R.P.,
and Davies, T. F.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
1658-1666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bobovnikova, Y.,
Graves, P. N.,
Vlase, H.,
and Davies, T. F.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
588-593[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kosugi, S.,
and Mori, T.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
349,
89-92[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Haraguchi, K.,
Saito, T.,
Endo, T.,
and Onaya, T.
(1994)
Life Sci.
55,
961-968[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kaneshige, M.,
Haraguchi, K.,
Endo, T.,
Anazai, E.,
and Onaya, T.
(1995)
Horm. Metab. Res.
27,
267-271[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shi, Y.,
Zou, M.,
Parhar, R. S.,
and Farid, N. R.
(1993)
Thyroid
3,
129-133[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chazenbalk, G. D.,
and Rapoport, B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
1543-1549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Seetharamaiah, G. S.,
Kurosky, A.,
Desai, R. K.,
Dallas, J. S.,
and Prabhakar, B. S.
(1994)
Endocrinology
134,
549-554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Johnstone, A. P.,
Cridland, J. C.,
DaCosta, C. R.,
Harfst, E.,
and Shepherd, P. S.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
105,
R1-R9[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chazenbalk, G. D.,
Jaume, J. C.,
McLachlan, S. M.,
and Rapoport, B.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
18959-18965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Takai, O.,
Desai, R. K.,
Seetharamaiah, G. S.,
Jones, C. A.,
Allaway, G. P.,
Akazizu, T.,
Kohn, L. D.,
and Prabhakar, B. S.
(1991)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
179,
319-326[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Loosfelt, H.,
Pichon, C.,
Jolivet, A.,
Misrahi, M.,
Caillou, B.,
Jamous, M.,
Vannier, B.,
and Milgrom, E.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
3765-3769[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Huang, G. C.,
Collison, K. S.,
McGregor, A. M.,
and Banga, J. P.
(1992)
J. Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
137-144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Huang, G. C.,
Page, M. J.,
Nicholson, L. B.,
Collison, K. S.,
McGregor, A. M.,
and Banga, J. P.
(1993)
J. Mol. Endocrinol.
10,
127-142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Seetharamaiah, G. S.,
Desai, R. K.,
Dallas, J. S.,
Tahara, K.,
Kohn, L. D.,
and Prabhakar, B. S.
(1993)
Autoimmunity
14,
315-320[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Costagliola, S.,
Alcalde, L.,
Ruf, J.,
Vassart, G.,
and Ludgat, M.
(1994)
J. Mol. Endocrinol.
13,
11-21[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Harfst, E.,
Johnstone, A. P.,
Gout, I.,
Taylor, A. H.,
Waterfield, M. D.,
and Nussey, S. S.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
83,
117-123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Perret, J.,
Ludgate, M.,
Libert, F.,
Gerard, C.,
Dumont, J. E.,
Vassart, G.,
and Parmentier, M.
(1990)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
171,
1044-1050[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Towbin, H.,
and Gordon, J.
(1984)
J. Immunol. Methods
72,
313-340[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lowry, O. H.,
Rosebrough, N. J.,
Farr, A. L.,
and Randall, R. J.
(1951)
J. Biol. Chem.
193,
265-275[Free Full Text]
-
Harfst, E.,
Ross, M. S.,
Nussey, S. S.,
and Johnstone, A. P.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
102,
77-84[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Coyne, K. E.,
Crisci, A.,
and Lublin, D. M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
6689-6693[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bangs, J. D.,
Hereld, D.,
Krakow, J. L.,
Hart, G. W.,
and Englund, P. T.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
3207-3211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Udenfriend, S.,
and Kodukula, K.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
64,
563-591[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Boothroyd, J. C.,
Paynter, C. A.,
Cross, G. A.,
Bernards, A.,
and Borst, P.
(1981)
Nucleic Acids Res.
9,
4735-4743[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Classon, B. J.,
Brown, M. H.,
Garnett, D.,
Somoza, C.,
Barclay, A. N.,
Willis, A. C.,
and Williams, A. F.
(1992)
Int. Immunol.
4,
215-227[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bangs, J. D.,
Andrews, N. W.,
Hart, G. W.,
and Englund, P. T.
(1986)
J. Cell Biol.
103,
255-263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Harfst, E.,
and Johnstone, A. P.
(1992)
Anal. Biochem.
207,
80-84[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Libert, F.,
Ludgate, M.,
Dinsart, C.,
and Vassart, G.
(1991)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
73,
857-860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Mizutori, C.-R. Chen, F. Latrofa, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
Evidence that Shed Thyrotropin Receptor A Subunits Drive Affinity Maturation of Autoantibodies Causing Graves' Disease
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
March 1, 2009;
94(3):
927 - 935.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-C. Ho, S.-S. Goh, I. H C Kee, P. K H Chow, C.-P. Yeo, and D. H C Khoo
Effects of genetic immunization of Swiss outbred mice with human thyroid stimulating hormone receptor cDNA plasmids harboring gain-of-function mutations
J. Mol. Endocrinol.,
February 1, 2007;
38(2):
277 - 288.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. N. Pichurin, C.-R. Chen, G. D. Chazenbalk, H. Aliesky, N. Pham, B. Rapoport, and S. M. McLachlan
Targeted Expression of the Human Thyrotropin Receptor A-Subunit to the Mouse Thyroid: Insight into Overcoming the Lack of Response to A-Subunit Adenovirus Immunization
J. Immunol.,
January 1, 2006;
176(1):
668 - 676.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Latrofa, G. D. Chazenbalk, P. Pichurin, C.-R. Chen, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
Affinity-Enrichment of Thyrotropin Receptor Autoantibodies from Graves' Patients and Normal Individuals Provides Insight into Their Properties and Possible Origin from Natural Antibodies
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
September 1, 2004;
89(9):
4734 - 4745.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D. Chazenbalk, F. Latrofa, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
Thyroid Stimulation Does Not Require Antibodies with Identical Epitopes But Does Involve Recognition of a Critical Conformation at the N Terminus of the Thyrotropin Receptor A-Subunit
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
April 1, 2004;
89(4):
1788 - 1793.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. N. Pichurin, O. Pichurina, R. C. Marians, C.-R. Chen, Terry. F. Davies, B. Rapoport, and S. M. McLachlan
Thyrotropin Receptor Knockout Mice: Studies on Immunological Tolerance to a Major Thyroid Autoantigen
Endocrinology,
March 1, 2004;
145(3):
1294 - 1301.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Smits, C. Govaerts, I. Nubourgh, L. Pardo, G. Vassart, and S. Costagliola
Lysine 183 and Glutamic Acid 157 of the TSH Receptor: Two Interacting Residues with a Key Role in Determining Specificity toward TSH and Human CG
Mol. Endocrinol.,
April 1, 2002;
16(4):
722 - 735.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Vlaeminck-Guillem, S.-C. Ho, P. Rodien, G. Vassart, and S. Costagliola
Activation of the cAMP Pathway by the TSH Receptor Involves Switching of the Ectodomain from a Tethered Inverse Agonist to an Agonist
Mol. Endocrinol.,
April 1, 2002;
16(4):
736 - 746.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Metcalfe, N. Jordan, P. Watson, S. Gullu, M. Wiltshire, M. Crisp, C. Evans, A. Weetman, and M. Ludgate
Demonstration of Immunoglobulin G, A, and E Autoantibodies to the Human Thyrotropin Receptor Using Flow Cytometry
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
April 1, 2002;
87(4):
1754 - 1761.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W. Szkudlinski, V. Fremont, C. Ronin, and B. D. Weintraub
Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone and Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Structure-Function Relationships
Physiol Rev,
April 1, 2002;
82(2):
473 - 502.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D. Chazenbalk, S. M. McLachlan, P. Pichurin, X.-M. Yan, and B. Rapoport
A Prion-Like Shift between Two Conformational Forms of a Recombinant Thyrotropin Receptor A-Subunit Module: Purification and Stabilization Using Chemical Chaperones of the Form Reactive with Graves' Autoantibodies
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
March 1, 2001;
86(3):
1287 - 1293.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Tanaka, G. D. Chazenbalk, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
Evidence that Cleavage of the Thyrotropin Receptor Involves a "Molecular Ruler" Mechanism: Deletion of Amino Acid Residues 305-320 Causes a Spatial Shift in Cleavage Site 1 Independent of Amino Acid Motif
Endocrinology,
October 1, 2000;
141(10):
3573 - 3577.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Lee, J. Y. Park, B. Y. Cho, and C.-B. Chae
Expression of the Functional Extracellular Domain of Human Thyrotropin Receptor Using a Vaccinia Virus System: Its Purification and Analysis of Autoantibody Binding
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
April 1, 1999;
84(4):
1391 - 1397.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D. Chazenbalk, Y. Wang, J. Guo, J. S. Hutchison, D. Segal, J. C. Jaume, S. M. McLachlan, and B. Rapoport
A Mouse Monoclonal Antibody to a Thyrotropin Receptor Ectodomain Variant Provides Insight into the Exquisite Antigenic Conformational Requirement, Epitopes and in Vivo Concentration of Human Autoantibodies
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
February 1, 1999;
84(2):
702 - 710.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Nagayama, H. Namba, N. Yokoyama, S. Yamashita, and M. Niwa
Role of Asparagine-linked Oligosaccharides in Protein Folding, Membrane Targeting, and Thyrotropin and Autoantibody Binding of the Human Thyrotropin Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 11, 1998;
273(50):
33423 - 33428.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Rapoport, G. D. Chazenbalk, J. C. Jaume, and S. M. McLachlan
The Thyrotropin (TSH)-Releasing Hormone Receptor: Interaction with TSH and Autoantibodies
Endocr. Rev.,
December 1, 1998;
19(6):
673 - 716.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-J. Remy, C. Nespoulous, J. Grosclaude, D. Grebert, L. Couture, E. Pajot, and R. Salesse
Purification and Structural Analysis of a Soluble Human Chorionogonadotropin Hormone-Receptor Complex
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 12, 2001;
276(3):
1681 - 1687.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Govaerts, A. Lefort, S. Costagliola, S. J. Wodak, J. A. Ballesteros, J. Van Sande, L. Pardo, and G. Vassart
A Conserved Asn in Transmembrane Helix 7 Is an On/Off Switch in the Activation of the Thyrotropin Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 15, 2001;
276(25):
22991 - 22999.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|