|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 20, 12274-12280, May 15, 1998
DNA Strand Invasion Promoted by Escherichia coli RecT
Protein*
Philippe
Noirot and
Richard D.
Kolodner§
From the Division of Human Cancer Genetics, Dana Farber Cancer
Institute, and the Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular
Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
 |
ABSTRACT |
The RecT protein of Escherichia coli
is a DNA-pairing protein required for the RecA-independent
recombination events promoted by the RecE pathway. The RecT protein was
found to bind to both single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and double-stranded
DNA (dsDNA) in the absence of Mg2+. In the presence of
Mg2+, RecT binding to dsDNA was inhibited drastically,
whereas binding to ssDNA was inhibited only to a small extent. RecT
promoted the transfer of a single-stranded oligonucleotide into a
supercoiled homologous duplex to form a D (displacement)-loop. D-loop
formation occurred in the absence of Mg2+ and at 1 mM Mg2+ but was inhibited by increasing
concentrations of Mg2+ and did not require a high energy
cofactor. Strand transfer was mediated by a RecT-ssDNA nucleoprotein
complex reacting with a naked duplex DNA and was prevented by the
formation of RecT-dsDNA nucleoprotein complexes. Finally, RecT mediated
the formation of joint molecules between a supercoiled DNA and a linear
dsDNA substrate with homologous 3'-single-stranded tails. Together
these results indicate that RecT is not a helix-destabilizing protein promoting a reannealing reaction but rather is a novel type of pairing
protein capable of promoting recombination by a DNA strand invasion
mechanism. These results are consistent with the observation that RecE (exonuclease VIII) and RecT can promote RecA-independent double-strand break repair in E. coli.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In Escherichia coli, the major recombination pathway
requires the function of the RecA and RecBCD proteins (for reviews, see Refs. 1 and 2). The recombination and repair deficiencies in recB
recC mutants can be suppressed by two types of mutations called
sbcA and sbcB(sbcC) (3-5). The sbcA
mutations map on the cryptic Rac prophage and induce the expression of
the RecE and RecT proteins (for review, see Ref. 6). Recombination in
recB recC sbcA mutants occurs by what is called the RecE
pathway (7), which in many ways is similar to the bacteriophage Red
pathway (6). A distinctive property of the RecE pathway is that it promotes RecA-independent recombination of circular plasmids as well as
intramolecular recombination of linearized plasmid DNAs (8-11) and
also promotes RecA-independent double strand break repair
(DSBR)1 (12). These types of
recombination events have been shown to require functional
recE and recT genes (13, 14).
The recE gene product is an ATP-independent exonuclease,
also called exonuclease VIII (15). Exonuclease VIII degrades
preferentially linear duplex DNA in the 5' to 3' direction, yielding
5'-mononucleotides and also degrades single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) at low
rates (16). The recT gene product was found to bind to ssDNA
and to promote the renaturation of complementary ssDNA in an
ATP-independent fashion (17). Also, the RecT protein in combination
with exonuclease VIII was shown to promote homologous pairing and
strand exchange between a circular ssDNA and a linear duplex DNA. In
this reaction, exonuclease VIII degraded the linear duplex to expose
ssDNA that was then annealed by RecT to a complementary region on the
ssDNA circle. Subsequently, RecT promoted heteroduplex extension and partial strand exchange (18). This degradation/reannealing/strand exchange mechanism explains how the presence of RecE and RecT can
render some types of recombination RecA-independent (6). However,
in vivo evidence indicates that the ends of a linear duplex
DNA may not be involved directly in the initial pairing event, and it
was suggested that internal duplex-duplex initiation events could be
promoted by the RecE pathway (11, 19). Also, it has been pointed out
that DSBR, which clearly requires a pairing function, cannot occur
simply by a degradation and reannealing mechanism (20). This suggests
that recombination promoted by the RecE pathway involves pairing events
more complex than annealing of ssDNA, possibly similar to those
promoted by RecA (6). These pairing events could either involve
additional unidentified protein factors or alternatively, they could be
the result of a previously unrecognized RecT pairing activity.
In this paper, we investigate further the pairing activities promoted
by RecT in vitro. We found that RecT can promote the invasion of a supercoiled DNA by either a homologous ssDNA or homologous single-stranded ends of a linear duplex, a DNA substrate similar to that generated by the RecE exonuclease. The joint molecules contain D-loops (displacement loops), supporting the idea that RecT
could be involved directly in the initiation of DSBR in the RecE
pathway. Our biochemical analysis of the DNA binding properties of RecT
and the requirements for strand transfer indicate that RecT belongs to
a novel class of DNA-pairing proteins.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Strains, Plasmids, and Media--
E. coli strains
Novablue (endA1
hsdR17(rK12 mK12+)
supE44 thi-1 recA1 gyrA96 relA1 lac[F'
proA+B+
lacIqZ M15::Tn10]) and Novablue(DE3),
containing a T7 RNA polymerase gene inducible with isopropyl
-D-thiogalactopyranoside, were from Novagen. pRac31 is
pBR322 containing a fragment of the Rac prophage which carries a
wild-type recT gene (13). pUC18 and pUC19 are from the
laboratory collection, and pHV2900OB is a pUC18 derivative carrying a
2.27-kilobase pair DNA fragment inserted into the polylinker (21).
E. coli cells were grown at 37 °C in LB medium (22)
supplemented with 0.2% glucose. Ampicillin and kanamycin were added to
final concentrations of 100 and 30 µg/ml, respectively.
Transformations were carried out as described previously (22).
Enzymes and Proteins--
Restriction enzymes, T4 polynucleotide
kinase, T4 DNA ligase, DNA polymerase Klenow fragment, and bovine serum
albumin were from New England Biolabs. Bacteriophage T7 gene
6 exonuclease and T7 DNA polymerase (Sequenase version 2.0)
were from U. S. Biochemical Corp. Proteinase K was from Boehringer
Mannheim.
Oligonucleotides--
Synthesis of oligonucleotides was
performed at the Molecular Biology Core Facility, Dana Farber Cancer
Institute. Primers used to amplify RecT were T1
(5'-cgggatccagaaggaatatgcaaatgactaagcaac) and T2
(5'-acgcgtcgacggtgcattacaccgccaggc); regions complementary to the recT region are underlined. Oligonucleotides used in
DNA binding and D-loop assays were 50 nucleotides long. Oligonucleotide 26 (5'-caccgtcaccgacttgagccatttgggaattagagccagcaaaatcaccag) corresponds to positions 2629-2579 of bacteriophage M13 wild-type. Oligonucleotide 34 (5'-ctatgcggcatcagagcagattgtactgagagtgcaccatatgcggtgtg)
corresponds to positions 146-195 of pUC18. Oligonucleotide 35 (5'-cacaccgcatatggtgcactctcagtacaatctgctctgatgccgcatag) is
complementary to oligonucleotide 34.
Overexpression and Purification of RecT--
A 0.85-kilobase
pair DNA fragment containing the recT gene was amplified by
polymerase chain reaction from pRac31 with primers T1 and T2, and the
polymerase chain reaction product was digested with BamHI + SalI and inserted into pET24+ (Novagen) cleaved with the
same enzymes. The resulting plasmid, pRDK577, carried a wild-type recT gene (verified by DNA sequencing) under the control of
the T7 promoter. The RecT-overproducing strain, RDK3294, was obtained by transformation of pRDK577 into Novablue(DE3). RecT synthesis was
induced by the addition of isopropyl
-D-thiogalactopyranoside (1 mM final
concentration) to a log-phase culture of RDK3294 (OD650 = 0.8) and incubation for 4 h. RecT purification was performed as
described previously (17). A final step was added in the purification
procedure to remove the KPO4 buffer from the RecT preparation obtained from the hydroxylapatite column. The RecT fraction
(28 mg of protein) was loaded at 25 ml/h onto a PBE94 column (20 × 1 cm) equilibrated with buffer A (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10% w/v
glycerol) containing 0.1 M NaCl and eluted with an 80-ml
linear gradient of buffer A containing 0.1-1 M NaCl. The
fractions containing RecT were pooled, dialyzed against buffer A
containing 60% w/v glycerol and 100 mM NaCl, and stored at
20 °C. Analysis by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
Coomassie staining indicated that the final RecT fraction (25 mg of
protein) was greater than 95% pure. Protein concentrations were
determined by using the Bio-Rad assay kit with bovine serum albumin as
a standard.
DNA Substrates--
All DNA concentrations are expressed in
nucleotide residues. Double-stranded oligonucleotides were obtained by
mixing complementary oligonucleotides in equimolar amounts (2 mM) and annealing them by incubation in a water bath at
95 °C for 5 min in buffer R (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl) followed by slow cooling
to room temperature over 12 h. The duplex oligonucleotide was
purified from unannealed oligonucleotides by high performance liquid
chromatography on a GEN-PAC FAX column (Waters, Milford, MA) using a
NaCl gradient (25 ml) from 0.3 to 1 M, in 10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, run at 0.75 ml/min. Under
these conditions, only duplex DNA bound to the column and eluted as a
single peak at 0.67 M NaCl. Single- or double-stranded
oligonucleotides were 5'-end labeled with [ -32P]ATP
(Amersham) and T4 polynucleotide kinase and then purified on a Sephadex
G-25 column (Boehringer Mannheim) to remove unincorporated label.
To generate a 5'-resected DNA duplex, pUC19 DNA was cleaved with
NarI, and the linear form was purified by electrophoresis through a 5% polyacrylamide gel. Then, the 5'-ends were digested in
the buffer recommended by the supplier with 8 units of T7 gene 6 exonuclease/µg of DNA, for 90 s at 30 °C. Under
these conditions, an average of 150 bases was removed from each
5'-end.
DNA Binding Assay--
Reaction mixtures (30 µl) contained
32P-labeled ssDNA or dsDNA (0.83 and 1.66 µM,
respectively) in buffer T (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, and 0.5 mM dithiothreitol). The concentrations of NaCl, MgCl2, and RecT are indicated
in the figure legends. The reaction mixtures were incubated 20 min at 37 °C and filtered by means of a double-filter system (23) through KOH-treated nitrocellulose (24) and DEAE-cellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell). For stability analysis, the RecT-DNA complexes were preformed in 240-µl volumes containing 25 mM NaCl,
as described above. A 75-fold molar excess of unlabeled ss- or dsDNA
was added to the preformed complex, and aliquots (20 µl) were taken
at various time points, filtered, and rinsed with 100 µl of binding
buffer at 4 °C, as described (23). Data were quantified with a
PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics). All experiments were repeated at
least three times.
D-loop Formation Assay--
Reaction mixtures (30 µl)
contained 0.83 µM 32P-labeled single-stranded
oligonucleotide, 25 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, 100 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, 0.5 mM
dithiothreitol, and RecT as indicated in figure legends. Mixtures were
incubated for 20 min at 25 °C, and supercoiled DNA was added at the
concentrations indicated in individual experiments. Mixtures were then
incubated for an additional 30 min at 37 °C, and the reactions were
stopped by the addition of 0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0, 10% SDS,
and 10 mg/ml proteinase K to the final concentrations of 50 mM, 0.2%, and 550 µg/ml, respectively. Incubation at
37 °C was continued for 20 min, and the mixtures were supplemented
with 5 µl of tracking dye (0.25% bromphenol blue, 0.25% xylene
cyanol, and 60% glycerol) and loaded on a 0.9% agarose gel in TAE
buffer (40 mM Tris acetate, pH 8.0, 2 mM EDTA). Electrophoresis was performed for 150 min at 5 volts/cm at 25 °C. The gel was soaked in 300 ml of water containing 1 µg/ml ethidium bromide for 20 min, photographed, and soaked in 300 ml of 7%
trichloroacetic acid for 30 min at 4 °C, neutralized in 200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.2, for 20 min, and dried onto Whatman 3MM
paper for 3 h at 60 °C. Radiolabeled DNA species were then
quantified using a PhosphorImager. Conditions for the reactions using
DNA substrates resected with T7 gene 6 exonuclease were the
same except that 19 µM resected pUC19 DNA (0.11 pmol) and
40 µM supercoiled pHV2900OB (0.12 pmol) were used as
substrates. Electrophoresis was carried out in a 0.7% agarose gel for
16 h at 1.6 volts/cm at 25 °C.
 |
RESULTS |
RecT Binds to ssDNA and dsDNA--
To examine the DNA binding
properties of RecT, nitrocellulose filter binding assays were carried
out with single- and double-stranded oligonucleotides, in buffer T
containing 25 mM NaCl and no MgCl2. RecT was
capable of binding to ssDNA and dsDNA (Fig.
1), and for both DNAs, binding was
maximal after 5 min (data not shown). Surprisingly, RecT exhibited a
greater affinity for dsDNA than for ssDNA because half-maximum binding
was observed at a protein/DNA ratio of 1 RecT monomer/3.3 base pairs
and 1 RecT monomer/1.6 bases, respectively. To investigate the effect
of Mg2+, binding reactions were repeated in the same buffer
containing 5 mM MgCl2 (Fig. 1). RecT binding to
dsDNA was reduced dramatically (half-maximum binding at 8 RecT
monomers/base pair), whereas binding to ssDNA was much less affected
(half-maximum binding at 1 RecT monomer/1.2 bases).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of Mg2+ on RecT binding to
ssDNA and dsDNA. Binding reactions (30 µl) were performed for 20 min at 37 °C in buffer T containing 0.83 µM ssDNA
( ) and 1.66 µM dsDNA ( ) and the indicated
concentrations of RecT. Complex formation was measured by filter
binding as described under "Experimental Procedures." All reactions
contained 25 mM NaCl and either no MgCl2
(solid line) or 5 mM MgCl2
(broken line). The plotted data represent the average of at
least three independent experiments.
|
|
The effect of salt concentration on RecT binding was also investigated.
Binding isotherms for ssDNA and dsDNA were determined at NaCl
concentrations of 0, 25, 50, 100, and 150 mM (Fig.
2). RecT-ssDNA complex formation was
optimum between 0 and 25 mM NaCl, and binding was decreased
at NaCl concentrations ranging from 50 to 150 mM.
Interestingly, at RecT concentrations of less than 0.5 µM, RecT-dsDNA complex formation displayed a different
salt sensitivity. As the NaCl concentration was increased, binding to
dsDNA was found to be enhanced by the presence of 25 mM
NaCl, but then binding was decreased at NaCl concentrations ranging from 50 to 150 mM. These results suggest that RecT could
have different modes of binding to ssDNA and dsDNA.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of salt concentration on RecT binding
to ssDNA and dsDNA. Reactions were carried out in the absence of
Mg2+, as described in the legend to Fig. 1. The
concentrations of NaCl in the binding buffer were were 0 mM
( , ), 25 mM ( , ), 50 mM ( , ),
100 mM (*, ×), and 150 mM ( , ).
Panel A, binding to ssDNA (closed symbols).
Panel B, binding to dsDNA (open symbols). The
plotted data represent the average of at least three independent
experiments.
|
|
To gain more insight into the nature of the RecT-DNA complexes,
RecT-ssDNA and RecT-dsDNA complexes were formed in buffer T containing
25 mM NaCl. These complexes were then challenged with a
75-fold molar excess of unlabeled ss- or dsDNA, and their decay was
monitored over time (Fig. 3). Strikingly,
both complexes exhibited a biphasic decay, indicating that they were
composed of two types of complexes: an unstable complex with a
half-life of less than 1 min and a very stable complex with a half-life of greater than 120 min. The RecT-dsDNA complex contained a greater proportion (45%) of the stable form compared with the RecT-ssDNA complex (22%).

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Decay of RecT-ssDNA and RecT-dsDNA complexes
is biphasic. Binding was performed in 240-µl reactions
containing buffer T, 25 mM NaCl, 0.83 µM
32P-labeled ssDNA (closed symbols) or 1.66 µM 32P-labeled dsDNA (open
symbols), and 3.3 µM RecT (for ssDNA) or 1 µM RecT (for dsDNA). After incubation for 30 min at
37 °C, a 75-fold molar excess of the respective unlabeled DNA was
added to the reaction to prevent subsequent binding of RecT to the
labeled DNA. At various time points aliquots were drawn, and the amount
of DNA remaining bound to RecT was measured by filter binding. The
fraction of bound DNA is normalized to a control reaction in which no
unlabeled DNA was added. The background level of binding to labeled
DNA, determined by adding the 75-fold excess of unlabeled DNA at the
onset of the reaction, was 3.7 and 5.5% for ssDNA and dsDNA,
respectively. The half-lives of the stable complexes, extrapolated from
these data, were about 7 h for ssDNA and dsDNA.
|
|
RecT Promotes D-loop Formation--
The results presented above
revealed that RecT has a greater affinity and forms more stable
complexes with dsDNA than with ssDNA. To test if RecT could promote a
pairing reaction involving a fully duplex DNA, we monitored the
invasion of a supercoiled DNA by a 32P-labeled ssDNA (50 nucleotides). The RecT-ssDNA complexes were preformed separately and
then mixed with the supercoiled DNA substrate. The joint molecules,
which are D-loops, were detected as the comigration of radioactivity
with the supercoiled plasmid DNA. The kinetics of joint molecules
formation is presented in Fig. 4. After
about 30 min, the reaction reached a plateau corresponding to 33% of the supercoiled DNA being converted into D-loops. A slight increase in
D-loop formation was observed reproducibly at 120 min (Fig. 4B), indicating that the reaction had not yet reached
completion. Similar levels of D-loop formation were obtained with
oligonucleotides homologous to several different loci in the
supercoiled plasmid, indicating that D-loop formation is not specific
for a particular DNA sequence (data not shown).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
RecT promotes D-loop formation. Panel
A, reaction mixtures (30 µl) containing 32P-labeled
ssDNA (0.83 µM) in buffer T with 25 mM NaCl
were preincubated with 0.33 µM RecT. Supercoiled pUC18
DNA (30 µM) was added and the reaction incubated at
37 °C for the indicated times. The reaction products were
deproteinized and resolved in a 0.9% agarose gel. jm, joint
molecules; ss, ssDNA. Panel B, graphical
representation of the results of three independent kinetics
experiments.
|
|
The requirements for D-loop formation are summarized in Table
I. D-loop formation was strictly
dependent on the presence of RecT. D-loops were not detected when
heterologous ssDNA was substituted for homologous ssDNA or when linear
pUC18 DNA was substituted for supercoiled pUC18 DNA in the reaction.
These results indicate that joint molecule formation requires
homologous pairing and is stabilized by supercoiling, consistent with
the known properties of D-loops (25). D-loop formation was optimum at
25 mM NaCl and decreased at salt concentrations higher than
50 mM. The presence of 3 mM EDTA did not affect
D-loop formation, showing that Mg2+ ions are not required.
D-loop formation occurred in the presence of 1 and 2.5 mM
MgCl2 but was inhibited almost completely by the addition
of 5 mM MgCl2. Interestingly, both RecT binding
to dsDNA and joint molecule formation were inhibited by the presence of Mg2+ (see Fig. 1) and stimulated by the addition of 25 mM NaCl (see Fig. 2). This correlation between D-loop
formation and RecT binding to dsDNA suggests a potential role for
RecT-dsDNA complexes in the pairing reaction.
Under the reaction conditions described above, D-loop formation occurs
in the presence of two different types of RecT-ssDNA complexes, the
stable and unstable complexes observed in Fig. 3. Although the role of
these different complexes is not known, it is noteworthy that the
amount of stable RecT-ssDNA complex formed under our experimental
conditions (22%) corresponds to the level of RecT-ssDNA complex at
which D-loop formation is optimal (20-26%, see below), suggesting
that the stable form of RecT-ssDNA complexes could possibly be the
active species involved in pairing. To test this hypothesis, RecT-ssDNA
complexes were formed with amounts of RecT ranging from 0 to 1.0 µM, under the conditions used for the D-loop assay, and
then incubated in the presence of a 64-fold excess of heterologous
oligonucleotide for 40 min to compete away the majority of the unstable
RecT-ssDNA complexes and only a small portion of the stable RecT-ssDNA
complexes. The resulting complexes were then assayed for their activity
in D-loop formation assays. The results showed that from 32 to 100% of
the D-loop formation activity was retained under these conditions, depending on the initial amount of RecT present (data not shown). These
results demonstrate that the stable RecT-ssDNA complexes are active in
promoting D-loop formation, and, if the unstable complexes have any
activity at all, it must be significantly less that that of the stable
RecT-ssDNA complexes.
dsDNA-RecT Complexes Cannot Pair with ssDNA--
In the
experiments presented above, formation of joint molecules was obtained
when ssDNA-RecT complexes were preformed before the addition of dsDNA,
consistent with the idea that the RecT-ssDNA filament promoted pairing
(26). To investigate further the role of the dsDNA-RecT complexes in
joint molecule formation, dsDNA was preincubated with RecT, and the
dsDNA-RecT complex was then mixed with uncoated ssDNA. Under these
conditions, D-loops were not detected even after 60 min of incubation
(data not shown). These results indicate that the RecT-dsDNA complex is
incapable of promoting the pairing reaction. However, when RecT was
added to a mixture of uncoated ss- and dsDNA substrates, weak but
significant D-loop formation (1% of the dsDNA converted) was observed
(data not shown). This suggests that RecT can promote pairing of ss- and dsDNA substrates but that the formation of RecT-dsDNA complex inhibits the pairing reaction.
To test this possibility further, the effect of RecT concentration on
D-loop formation was examined. Varying amounts of RecT were
preincubated with the ssDNA, and the reaction was initiated by adding
dsDNA to the mixture. The results are presented Fig. 5. The amount of joint molecules formed
increased with increasing concentrations of RecT and reached an optimum
at between 0.3 and 0.43 µM RecT, corresponding to a ratio
of about 1 RecT monomer/2.5 bases of ssDNA. This optimal pairing
activity occurred at subsaturating concentrations of RecT, where
20-26% of the ssDNA is bound (see Fig. 1). At RecT concentrations
exceeding 0.43 µM, D-loop formation diminished sharply,
indicating that pairing was inhibited by an excess of RecT. One
possible explanation for this inhibition is that in excess of the
optimum concentration, enough RecT would be available to bind to the
dsDNA substrate and inhibit the pairing reaction.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
D-loop formation as a function of RecT
concentration. Panel A, the indicated RecT concentrations
were preincubated with 0.83 µM 32P-labeled
ssDNA in buffer T containing 25 mM NaCl, for 20 min at
25 °C. Supercoiled pUC18 DNA (30 µM) was added and the
reaction mixture (30 µl) incubated for another 30 min at 37 °C.
The reaction products were deproteinized and separated by
electrophoresis in a 0.9% agarose gel. jm, joint molecules;
ss, ssDNA. Panel B, graphical representation of
the results of three independent experiments.
|
|
To test directly whether RecT-dsDNA complexes inhibit the pairing
reaction, preformed RecT-ssDNA filaments were mixed with RecT-dsDNA
complexes that were made separately in the presence of different
concentrations of RecT. In the same reaction, an uncoated dsDNA,
pHV2900OB, which is also homologous to the ssDNA and distinguishable
from pUC18 by size, was included. The quantities of D-loops formed with
the RecT-coated dsDNA and the uncoated dsDNA substrates were compared.
As shown in Fig. 6, the capacity to form
joint molecules was decreased for the RecT-coated dsDNA but remained
unaffected for the uncoated dsDNA present in the same reaction. This
inhibition of the pairing reaction occurred at a ratio of 1 RecT
monomer/67 base pairs, which is about 70 times below saturation level
(from Fig. 1, saturation occurred at about 1 RecT monomer/base pair),
suggesting that the inhibition is not caused by complete coating of the
dsDNA. This experiment also confirms that RecT-dsDNA complexes are
unable to pair with uncoated ssDNA (Fig. 6, lanes d,
g, and j).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
RecT-dsDNA complexes inhibit pairing.
Supercoiled pUC18 DNA was precoated with varying amounts of RecT, in
7.5 µl of buffer T + 25 mM NaCl for 20 min at 25 °C,
to give the indicated ratios of RecT monomer/base pairs. The RecT-ssDNA
filaments were formed with 0.83 µM
32P-labeled ssDNA and either 0 µM
(lanes a, d, g, and j),
0.17 µM (lanes b, e, h,
k), or 0.33 µM RecT (lanes c,
f, i, l), as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The reactions (30 µl, final volume)
were initiated by adding precoated pUC18 (15 µM) and
uncoated pHV2900OB dsDNA (28 µM) and incubated for 30 min
at 37 °C. The reaction products were deproteinized and separated by
electrophoresis in a 0.9% agarose gel. The joint molecules, which
comigrate with the supercoiled molecules, are indicated. ss,
ssDNA; pUC, supercoiled pUC18; pHV, supercoiled
pHV2900OB
|
|
RecT Mediates the Strand Transfer of the Single-stranded Ends of a
DNA Duplex--
We have shown that RecT has a higher affinity for
dsDNA than for ssDNA and that the RecT-dsDNA complexes inhibited
pairing. Together, these findings raised the question of whether
RecT-ssDNA complexes competent for strand transfer could be formed at
the single-stranded ends of a duplex DNA that has been resected by an
exonuclease. Such a resected duplex is assumed to be the DNA substrate
to initiate recombination in the RecE pathway (6). To test this idea,
pUC19 DNA was linearized by NarI and treated briefly with an
exonuclease that degrades the 5'-strands. This linear duplex DNA with
3'-single-stranded tails (3'-ssDNA) was then preincubated with varying
amounts of RecT, and supercoiled pHV2900OB was added to initiate the
reaction. The formation of joint molecules (Fig.
7) increased with the amount of RecT and reached an optimum at 0.67 µM RecT, where 8% of the
supercoiled DNA was trapped in joint molecules. Increasing the RecT
concentration further resulted in a decrease in joint molecule
formation. The formation of joint molecules was not observed if the
exonuclease treatment of the linear pUC19 DNA was omitted (data not
shown), consistent with the known requirement of RecT for ssDNA ends
(18). As a control, a DNA substrate having 29 base pairs of heterology at each single-stranded end was generated by cleaving pUC19 with XbaI, at the center of the polylinker region (which is not
present in pHV2900OB (21)), followed by limited degradation of the
5'-strands with T7 gene 6 exonuclease. No joint molecule
formation was observed with this DNA substrate (data not shown),
indicating that homologous single-stranded tails are required for the
formation of D-loops. These results show that RecT can promote pairing
of a supercoiled DNA with a DNA duplex having homologous
single-stranded tails, indicating that RecT filaments can form on those
single-stranded tails. Interestingly, strand transfer occurred at
subsaturating concentrations of RecT (1 RecT monomer/14 base pairs),
where one would predict that most of the RecT protein would be bound to dsDNA (see Fig. 1).

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Strand transfer with a 5'-resected DNA duplex
mediated by RecT. pUC19 DNA was linearized by NarI and
partially degraded with T7 gene 6 exonuclease, as described
under "Experimental Procedures," to generate a resected duplex
carrying 3'-single-stranded tails about 150 bases long, designated
3'ssDNA. 3'-ssDNA (19 µM) was incubated with
the indicated amounts of RecT for 20 min at 25 °C. Supercoiled
pHV2900OB dsDNA (40 µM) was added to initiate the
reactions (lanes d-n) or was omitted in controls
(lanes a-c). The reaction mixtures were incubated 50 min at
37 °C, deproteinized, and the products resolved by electrophoresis
in a 0.7% agarose gel and revealed by ethidium bromide staining.
Unreacted supercoiled pHV2900OB dsDNA is in lane o. The slow
migrating band in 3'-ssDNA, denoted 3'ssDNA*, was always
present after exonuclease degradation and disappeared after 15 min at
70 °C (data not shown), indicating that it is the result of sticky
end artifacts. jm, joint molecules; nc, nicked
circular duplex; ccc, supercoiled pHV2900OB.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
To investigate the pairing reactions promoted by RecT, we examined
the interactions between RecT and DNA, using a nitrocellulose filter
binding assay. We found that RecT bound to ssDNA as well as to dsDNA
but with an apparent higher affinity for dsDNA than for ssDNA. Binding
to dsDNA was inhibited by the addition of Mg2+. Previous
filter binding studies only revealed RecT binding to ssDNA, and
previous electron microscopy studies revealed RecT-ssDNA helical
nucleoprotein filaments but only sparse internal binding of RecT with
dsDNA (17, 26). These differences can be explained by the fact that the
previous binding studies were carried out in the presence of high salt
and high Mg2+, conditions which strongly inhibited binding
of RecT to dsDNA (see Figs. 1 and 2). Interestingly, RecT binding to
dsDNA was enhanced by the addition of 25 mM NaCl, whereas
binding to ssDNA was not. Analysis of the decay of RecT-ssDNA and
RecT-dsDNA complexes revealed that RecT displayed at least two modes of
binding to DNA. Each complex was composed of two forms, an unstable
complex with a half-life < 1 min, and a very stable complex with
a half-life > 120 min. Under our experimental conditions, more of
the bound DNA was of the stable form with dsDNA (45%) than with ssDNA
(22%). Although the role of these different complexes is not known,
the results of competition experiments suggest that the stable form of
the RecT-ssDNA complexes is the most active species involved in pairing
and could possibly be the only active species.
A striking feature of RecT binding to DNA is its sensitivity to
Mg2+. The addition of 5 mM MgCl2 to
the reaction drastically reduced the binding of RecT to dsDNA and, to a
much smaller extent, its binding to ssDNA. This observation explains
why previous binding studies, carried out in the presence of 13 mM MgCl2, did not detect RecT binding to dsDNA
(17). Electron microscopy studies revealed that in the presence of
MgCl2, RecT monomers assemble into doughnut-shaped oligomers containing 7 or 8 monomers and rod-like structures but that
in the absence of MgCl2, no oligomer was formed (26).
Together these results suggest that optimum binding to DNA is achieved when RecT is only in a monomer form, suggesting in turn that RecT oligomers might not be proficient for binding, especially to dsDNA.
The results presented in this study show that RecT protein can
efficiently transfer a ssDNA into a homologous duplex DNA in vitro, leading to the formation of a joint molecule containing a
D-loop. Strand transfer did not require any high energy cofactor; it
occurred at 0, 1, and 2.5 mM MgCl2 and was
inhibited completely by the presence of 5 mM
MgCl2. Optimum strand transfer was achieved when RecT was
preincubated with ssDNA at a ratio of 1 RecT monomer/2.5 bases of ssDNA
and subsequently reacted with uncoated dsDNA, indicating that pairing
is mediated by a RecT-ssDNA complex. RecT-dsDNA complexes were unable
to participate in pairing with uncoated ssDNA or with RecT-ssDNA
complexes. However, both strand transfer and RecT binding to dsDNA
displayed the same sensitivity to salt and Mg2+
concentrations, suggesting that the capacity of RecT to bind dsDNA
likely plays some role in strand transfer. In contrast, RecT binding to
dsDNA was not required for the annealing of complementary ssDNA because
this reaction occurred efficiently in the presence of high
MgCl2 concentrations (17,
18).2 Taken together, these
results suggest that RecT promotes joint molecule formation by a
mechanism that is different from annealing. Finally, RecT can mediate
D-loop formation between a supercoiled dsDNA and a linear dsDNA having
homologous 3'-single-stranded tails, indicating that, despite its
higher affinity for dsDNA, RecT is able to polymerize on the
single-stranded tails, making them invasive. Indeed, this type of
binding was observed previously by electron microscopy under conditions
in which RecT would not bind to dsDNA (26).
Our understanding of homologous pairing reactions comes mostly from the
extensive studies of the E. coli RecA protein (for a review,
see Ref. 27) and similar proteins such as the bacteriophage T4 UvsX
protein (28), Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 (29), and human
Rad51 (30). This class of homologous pairing proteins requires a high
energy cofactor and Mg2+ to form a nucleoprotein filament
on the ssDNA which then promotes synapsis with the homologous duplex
partner. RecT protein also forms nucleoprotein filaments with ssDNA
which then catalyze the strand transfer reaction. However, unlike RecA,
RecT performs strand transfer without ATP and in the absence of
Mg2+ as well as at low concentrations of Mg2+.
Other ATP-independent DNA-pairing proteins have been shown to promote
pairing and strand exchange in vitro, such as the
bacteriophage T7 gene 2.5 protein (31), E. coli RecO protein
(32), and S. cerevisiae Sep1 protein (33, 34). However, in
all cases, the addition of Mg2+ was required for the
reaction. This feature of RecT, which could be related to its higher
affinity for dsDNA than for ssDNA, suggests that RecT differs from
these other DNA strand transfer proteins. Alternately, the inhibition
of strand transfer by high Mg2+ concentrations could be
similar to the situation with RecA protein where presynaptic filament
formation occurs more efficiently at low concentrations of
Mg2+ compared with high concentrations of Mg2+,
presumably because of the inhibitory effect of secondary structure in
ssDNA at high Mg2+ concentrations (35). It also suggests
that the level of unbound Mg2+ in the cell could regulate
the RecT-promoted strand transfer reactions. Unfortunately, no accurate
measurement of free Mg2+ levels is currently available (36 and references therein), although they are generally thought to be at
low levels in the range on 1 mM where RecT promotes D-loop
formation.
Genetic evidence indicates that RecT is required for DSBR in
recBC sbcA strains (14). This RecT-promoted DSBR is
independent of RecA function and occurs by a conservative mechanism
(12, 37). Here, we provide in vitro evidence that RecT can
promote the invasion of a DNA duplex by a ssDNA to form a D-loop, which is the predicted initiation step in DSBR models (38, 39). Therefore,
our results indicate that RecT can initiate recombination not only by
promoting DNA-reannealing and heteroduplex exchange (18) but also by a
DNA strand invasion mechanism, thus providing an explanation for the
RecA independence of DSBR in recBC sbcA strains. Double
strand breaks have been shown to induce
recombination-dependent DNA replication in recBC
sbcA strains where the RecE pathway of recombination is activated
(40). In this background, recombination-dependent DNA replication was
shown to depend on a functional RecE pathway and partially on RecA
function. It was suggested that the residual recombination-dependent DNA replication activity observed
in the absence of RecA could be attributed to the pairing activity of RecT (40). Our finding that in vitro, RecT promotes
efficient D-loop formation with DNA substrates similar to those that
the RecE exonuclease would generate strongly supports this
interpretation. Taken together, these results suggest that RecT can
promote D-loop formation in vivo. The biological importance
of this process is underlined by mounting evidence suggesting that
D-loop formation can be used not only to repair double-strand breaks
but also to generate active replication forks (for review, see Ref.
41).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Pascale Bertrand, Hernan
Flores-Rozas, Gerry Marsischky, Tiehua Ni Abhijit Datta, and Marie
Francoise Noirot-Gros for helpful discussions and critical reading of
this manuscript and to all other members of our laboratory for
enthusiastic support. We also are very grateful to Era Cassuto for
constructive comments on this manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM26017 (to R. D. K.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: INRA, CRJJ, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas, France.
§
Present address and to whom correspondence should be addressed:
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California San
Diego School of Medicine, CMME3080, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA
92093-0660.
1
The abbreviations used are: DSBR, double strand
break repair; D-loop, displacement loop; ssDNA, single-stranded DNA;
dsDNA, double-stranded DNA.
2
P. Noirot, unpublished results.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Smith, G. R.
(1988)
Microbiol. Rev.
52,
1-28[Free Full Text]
-
Smith, G. R.
(1989)
Cell
58,
807-809[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Barbour, S. D.,
Nagaishi, H.,
Templin, A.,
and Clark, A. J.
(1970)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
67,
128-135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lloyd, R. G.,
and Buckman, C.
(1985)
J. Bacteriol.
164,
836-844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Templin, A.,
Kushner, S. R.,
and Clark, A. J.
(1972)
Genetics
72,
105-115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kolodner, R.,
Hall, S. D.,
and Luisi-DeLuca, C.
(1994)
Mol. Microbiol.
11,
23-30[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Clark, A. J.
(1974)
Genetics
78,
259-271[Free Full Text]
-
Fishel, R. A.,
James, A. A.,
and Kolodner, R.
(1981)
Nature
294,
184-186[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Laban, A.,
and Cohen, A.
(1981)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
184,
200-207[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Symington, L. S.,
Morrison, P.,
and Kolodner, R.
(1985)
J. Mol. Biol.
186,
515-525[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Luisi-DeLuca, C.,
and Kolodner, R. D.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
227,
72-80[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Takahashi, N. K.,
Kusano, K.,
Yokochi, T.,
Kitamura, Y.,
Yoshikura, H.,
and Kobayashi, I.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
5176-5185[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Clark, A. J.,
Sharma, V.,
Brenowitz, S.,
Chu, C. C.,
Sandler, S.,
Satin, L.,
Templin, A.,
Berger, I.,
and Cohen, A.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
7673-7682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kusano, K.,
Takahashi, N. K.,
Yoshikura, H.,
and Kobayashi, I.
(1994)
Gene (Amst.)
138,
17-25[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kushner, S. R.,
Nagaishi, H.,
Templin, A.,
and Clark, A. J.
(1971)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
68,
824-827[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Joseph, J. W.,
and Kolodner, R.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
10418-10424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hall, S. D.,
Kane, M. F.,
and Kolodner, R. D.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
277-287[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hall, S. D.,
and Kolodner, R. D.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
3205-3209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Takahashi, N. K.,
Sakagami, K.,
Kusano, K.,
Yamamoto, K.,
Yoshikura, H.,
and Kobayashi, I.
(1997)
Genetics
146,
9-26[Abstract]
-
Kobayashi, I.,
and Takahashi, N.
(1988)
Genetics
119,
751-757[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chedin, F.,
Dervyn, E.,
Dervyn, R.,
Ehrlich, S. D.,
and Noirot, P.
(1994)
Mol. Microbiol.
12,
561-569[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Wong, I.,
and Lohman, T. M.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
5428-5432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McEntee, K.,
Weinstock, G. M.,
and Lehman, I. R.
(1980)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
77,
857-861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shibata, T.,
DasGupta, C.,
Cunningham, R. P.,
and Radding, C. M.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
1638-1642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Thresher, R. J.,
Makhov, A. M.,
Hall, S. D.,
Kolodner, R.,
and Griffith, J. D.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
254,
364-371[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kowalczykowski, S. C.,
Dixon, D. A.,
Eggleston, A. K.,
Lauder, S. D.,
and Rehrauer, W. M.
(1994)
Microbiol. Rev.
58,
401-465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Formosa, T.,
and Alberts, B. M.
(1986)
Cell
47,
793-806[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sung, P.,
and Robberson, D. L.
(1995)
Cell
82,
453-461[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Baumann, P.,
Benson, F. E.,
and West, S. C.
(1996)
Cell
87,
757-766[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kong, D.,
and Richardson, C. C.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2010-2019[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Luisi-DeLuca, C.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
566-572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chen, J.,
Kanaar, R.,
and Cozzarelli, N. R.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
1356-1366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Johnson, A. W.,
and Kolodner, R. D.
(1991)
J Biol. Chem.
266,
14046-14054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Thresher, R.,
Christiansen, G.,
and Griffith, J.
(1988)
J. Mol. Biol.
201,
101-113[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Taylor, A. F.,
and Smith, G. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24459-24467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yokochi, T.,
Kusano, K.,
and Kobayashi, I.
(1995)
Genetics
139,
5-17[Abstract]
-
Resnick, M. A.
(1976)
J. Theor. Biol.
59,
97-106[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Szostak, J. W.,
Orr-Weaver, T. L.,
Rothstein, R. J.,
and Stahl, F. W.
(1983)
Cell
33,
25-35[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Asai, T.,
Bates, D. B.,
and Kogoma, T.
(1994)
Cell
78,
1051-1061[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kogoma, T.
(1996)
Cell
85,
625-627[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Ling, M. Yoshida, and T. Shibata
Heteroduplex Joint Formation Free of Net Topological Change by Mhr1, a Mitochondrial Recombinase
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 3, 2009;
284(14):
9341 - 9353.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Pohl and J. A. Nickoloff
Rad51-Independent Interchromosomal Double-Strand Break Repair by Gene Conversion Requires Rad52 but Not Rad55, Rad57, or Dmc1
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
February 1, 2008;
28(3):
897 - 906.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Mazloum, Q. Zhou, and W. K. Holloman
D-loop formation by Brh2 protein of Ustilago maydis
PNAS,
January 15, 2008;
105(2):
524 - 529.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Ling, A. Hori, and T. Shibata
DNA Recombination-Initiation Plays a Role in the Extremely Biased Inheritance of Yeast [rho-] Mitochondrial DNA That Contains the Replication Origin ori5
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
February 1, 2007;
27(3):
1133 - 1145.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Handa and I. Kobayashi
Type III Restriction Is Alleviated by Bacteriophage (RecE) Homologous Recombination Function but Enhanced by Bacterial (RecBCD) Function
J. Bacteriol.,
November 1, 2005;
187(21):
7362 - 7373.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Enomoto, T. Kinebuchi, M. Sato, H. Yagi, T. Shibata, H. Kurumizaka, and S. Yokoyama
Positive Role of the Mammalian TBPIP/HOP2 Protein in DMC1-mediated Homologous Pairing
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 20, 2004;
279(34):
35263 - 35272.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. B. Reuven, A. E. Staire, R. S. Myers, and S. K. Weller
The Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Alkaline Nuclease and Single-Stranded DNA Binding Protein Mediate Strand Exchange In Vitro
J. Virol.,
July 1, 2003;
77(13):
7425 - 7433.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. S. Vellani and R. S. Myers
Bacteriophage SPP1 Chu Is an Alkaline Exonuclease in the SynExo Family of Viral Two-Component Recombinases
J. Bacteriol.,
April 15, 2003;
185(8):
2465 - 2474.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. Nimonkar and P. E. Boehmer
The Herpes Simplex Virus Type-1 Single-strand DNA-binding Protein (ICP8) Promotes Strand Invasion
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 7, 2003;
278(11):
9678 - 9682.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Yokoyama, H. Kurumizaka, S. Ikawa, S. Yokoyama, and T. Shibata
Holliday Junction Binding Activity of the Human Rad51B Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 17, 2003;
278(4):
2767 - 2772.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ayora, R. Missich, P. Mesa, R. Lurz, S. Yang, E. H. Egelman, and J. C. Alonso
Homologous-pairing Activity of the Bacillus subtilis Bacteriophage SPP1 Replication Protein G35P
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 20, 2002;
277(39):
35969 - 35979.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kurumizaka, S. Ikawa, M. Nakada, R. Enomoto, W. Kagawa, T. Kinebuchi, M. Yamazoe, S. Yokoyama, and T. Shibata
Homologous Pairing and Ring and Filament Structure Formation Activities of the Human Xrcc2{middle dot}Rad51D Complex
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 12, 2002;
277(16):
14315 - 14320.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Kobayashi
Behavior of restriction-modification systems as selfish mobile elements and their impact on genome evolution
Nucleic Acids Res.,
September 15, 2001;
29(18):
3742 - 3756.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kurumizaka, S. Ikawa, M. Nakada, K. Eda, W. Kagawa, M. Takata, S. Takeda, S. Yokoyama, and T. Shibata
Homologous-pairing activity of the human DNA-repair proteins Xrcc3{middle dot}Rad51C
PNAS,
April 25, 2001;
(2001)
91603098.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. McClelland, L. Florea, K. Sanderson, S. W. Clifton, J. Parkhill, C. Churcher, G. Dougan, R. K. Wilson, and W. Miller
Comparison of the Escherichia coli K-12 genome with sampled genomes of a Klebsiella pneumoniae and three Salmonella enterica serovars, Typhimurium, Typhi and Paratyphi
Nucleic Acids Res.,
December 15, 2000;
28(24):
4974 - 4986.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. T. Akhmedov and B. S. Lopez
Human 100-kDa homologous DNA-pairing protein is the splicing factor PSF and promotes DNA strand invasion
Nucleic Acids Res.,
August 15, 2000;
28(16):
3022 - 3030.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P.P. Muyrers, Y. Zhang, F. Buchholz, and A. F. Stewart
RecE/RecT and Redalpha /Redbeta initiate double-stranded break repair by specifically interacting with their respective partners
Genes & Dev.,
August 1, 2000;
14(15):
1971 - 1982.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kuzminov
Recombinational Repair of DNA Damage in Escherichia coli and Bacteriophage lambda
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
December 1, 1999;
63(4):
751 - 813.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Baechtold, M. Kuroda, J. Sok, D. Ron, B. S. Lopez, and A. T. Akhmedov
Human 75-kDa DNA-pairing Protein Is Identical to the Pro-oncoprotein TLS/FUS and Is Able to Promote D-loop Formation
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 26, 1999;
274(48):
34337 - 34342.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. I. Passy, X. Yu, Z. Li, C. M. Radding, and E. H. Egelman
Rings and filaments of beta protein from bacteriophage lambda suggest a superfamily of recombination proteins
PNAS,
April 13, 1999;
96(8):
4279 - 4284.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. Sharples, L. M. Corbett, and I. R. Graham
lambda Rap protein is a structure-specific endonuclease involved in phage recombination
PNAS,
November 10, 1998;
95(23):
13507 - 13512.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Kagawa, H. Kurumizaka, S. Ikawa, S. Yokoyama, and T. Shibata
Homologous Pairing Promoted by the Human Rad52 Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 7, 2001;
276(37):
35201 - 35208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kurumizaka, S. Ikawa, M. Nakada, K. Eda, W. Kagawa, M. Takata, S. Takeda, S. Yokoyama, and T. Shibata
Homologous-pairing activity of the human DNA-repair proteins Xrcc3{middle dot}Rad51C
PNAS,
May 8, 2001;
98(10):
5538 - 5543.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|