![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 26, 16027-16037, June 26, 1998
From the Department of Biomedical Sciences and Biotechnology,
University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy, the
Heparin binds extracellular HIV-1 Tat protein and
modulates its HIV long terminal repeat (LTR)-transactivating activity
(M. Rusnati, D. Coltrini, P. Oreste, G. Zoppetti, A. Albini, D. Noonan, F. d'Adda di Fagagna, M. Giacca, and M. Presta (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11313-11320). On this basis, the glutathione
S-transferase (GST)-TatR49/52/53/55/56/57A
mutant, in which six arginine residues within the basic domain of Tat
were mutagenized to alanine residues, was compared with GST-Tat for its
capacity to bind immobilized heparin. Dissociation of the
GST-TatR49/52/53/55/56/57A·heparin complex occurred at
ionic strength significantly lower than that required to dissociate the
GST-Tat·heparin complex. Accordingly, heparin binds immobilized
GST-Tat and GST-TatR49/52/53/55/56/57A with a dissociation
constant equal to 0.3 and 1.0 µM, respectively. Also, the
synthetic basic domain Tat-(41-60) competes with GST-Tat for heparin
binding. Suramin inhibits [3H]heparin/Tat interaction,
125I-GST-Tat internalization, and the LTR-transactivating
activity of extracellular Tat in HL3T1 cells and prevents
125I-GST-Tat binding and cell proliferation in
Tat-overexpressing T53 cells. The suramin derivative
14C-PNU 145156E binds immobilized GST-Tat with a
dissociation constant 5 times higher than heparin and is unable to bind
GST-TatR49/52/53/55/56/57A. Although heparin was an
antagonist more potent than suramin, modifications of the backbone
structure in selected suramin derivatives originated Tat antagonists
whose potency was close to that shown by heparin.
In conclusion, suramin derivatives bind the basic domain of Tat,
prevent Tat/heparin and Tat/cell surface interactions, and inhibit the
biological activity of extracellular Tat. Our data demonstrate that
tailored polysulfonated compounds represent potent extracellular Tat
inhibitors of possible therapeutic value.
tat is a viral regulatory gene of the human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1),1 the etiologic agent
of AIDS (1, 2). tat is essential for viral replication,
since the Tat protein promotes transcription of the viral genome by
interacting with the transactivation responsive element located at the
5'-end of viral mRNAs (3-5). Tat can be released by HIV-infected
cells (6), and significant levels of Tat have been detected in
HIV-1-seropositive subjects (7). As an extracellular molecule, Tat
exerts pleiotropic effects on uninfected cells. Extracellular Tat
promotes the production of growth factors and cytokines (8-17) and of
cytokine receptors (13, 18-20). Tat stimulates proliferation (10,
21-24), migration (21, 25, 26), and protease production (27-29) in
different cell types. Extracellular Tat exerts an angiogenic activity
in vitro (30) and in vivo (21, 28, 31). In the
central nervous system, Tat released by HIV-infected macrophages can
induce neurotoxicity by acting directly on neurons (32-36) or by
stimulating different cell types to produce and release neurotoxic
molecules (12, 37, 38). Finally, extracellular Tat transforms and
immortalizes keratinocyte in culture (39). Thus, extracellular Tat
exerts a wide spectrum of biological effects on several cell types,
suggesting its implication in different AIDS-associated pathologies
including Kaposi's sarcoma (27, 41), AIDS dementia (42), and the
increased incidence of tumors in AIDS patients (28, 43).
The ability of extracellular Tat to induce peripheral blood
mononucleated cell apoptosis (7, 44, 45) implicates the protein also in
CD4+ cell depletion and in the progression of AIDS. Moreover,
extracellular Tat appears to be responsible for the burst of virus
replication that takes place at the beginning of HIV infection (46,
47). This possibility is supported by the observation that anti-Tat
antibody causes a significant delay in HIV-1 replication in infected
peripheral blood mononucleated cells (48-50) and that an inverse
correlation exists between the levels of natural anti-Tat antibody and
those of p24 antigen in HIV-seropositive subjects (48). Finally, Tat
exerts negative effects on the immune system also by repressing the
transcription of the major histocompatibility complex class I gene
(51), by inhibiting antigen-induced lymphocyte proliferation and
generation of functional suppressive CD8+ cells (52, 53), by impairing thymocyte development (54), and by inhibiting interferon-induced iNos
activity in macrophages (55). Thus, from the bulk of data it emerges
that extracellular Tat may be implicated both in the progression of
AIDS and in the pathogenesis of several AIDS-associated diseases. On
this basis, Tat protein should be considered as a target for novel
anti-HIV strategies.
Tat protein is a polypeptide of 86-102 amino acids depending on the
viral strain, which is encoded by two exons and is translated from
multiply spliced 2-kilobase mRNAs (56). The amino acid sequence
1-72 encoded by the first exon is endowed with full transactivating activity (3, 4, 57), while the carboxyl-terminal region encoded by the
second exon (amino acids 72-86) is not required either for the
transactivating activity of Tat or for the replication of HIV-1 (5,
57). However, this latter region is necessary for different biological
activities of Tat (29, 58-60) and contains an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif
responsible for Tat binding to integrin receptors (61, 62).
Within the sequence encoded by the first exon of tat is
present a so-called basic domain (amino acids 49-57) constituted by a
stretch of repeated Arg and Lys residues. This highly immunoreactive region is well conserved among Tat proteins isolated from different strains of HIV-1 (47, 63). The basic domain is implicated in several
aspects of Tat biology. Indeed, it is necessary for Tat stability (64),
nuclear and nucleolar delivery
(65),2 and interaction with
nucleic acids (66). It mediates some of the neurotoxic effects of
extracellular Tat (12, 33, 35), and it is necessary for the mitogenic,
chemotactic, and angiogenic activities of extracellular Tat (21). The
basic domain cooperates with the RGD motif in the interaction of Tat
protein with integrins (61), and it is implicated in Tat binding and
activation of the Flk-1/KDR receptor (67).
Tat protein binds to cell surface heparan sulfate (HS) and heparin (68,
69). This interaction occurs through the negatively charged sulfate
groups of the glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) (68), suggesting that the
positively charged Arg and Lys residues present within the basic domain
of Tat may be responsible for the interaction. Soluble polysulfated
GAGs can inhibit the transactivating activity of extracellular Tat, and
their inhibitory action appears to be directly related to their
capacity to bind Tat protein (68). These observations point to the
basic domain of Tat as a preferential molecular target for polysulfated
compounds able to interact with extracellular Tat protein and
neutralize its biological activity.
Suramin is a polysulfonated naphthylurea originally developed for the
treatment of trypanosomiasis and onchocerciasis. Suramin has been used
recently in the treatment of cancer (70). In vitro, suramin
blocks the activity of several growth factors by inhibiting their
binding to cognate receptors (71-73). Suramin inhibits the activity of
heparanase (74) and of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (29, 75).
Moreover, suramin inhibits cell adhesion and migration (76). All of
these in vitro activities may explain, at least in part, the
capacity of suramin to inhibit tumor growth and metastasis in different
experimental models (77, 78). As an angiogenesis inhibitor, suramin has
been demonstrated to inhibit the activity exerted by fibroblast growth
factors (FGFs) and vascular endothelial growth factor on cultured
endothelial cells by preventing their interaction with cell surface
HS-proteoglycans and tyrosine-kinase receptors and to block their
angiogenic activity in different animal models (see Ref. 79 and
references therein). This is due, at least in part, to the capacity of
suramin to bind to the heparin-binding region of the growth factor via
one or more of its sulfate groups. Accordingly, suramin is able to
mimic heparin/HS for the capacity to protect FGF2 from trypsin
digestion. Interestingly, the same capacity was observed for the
related polysulfonated compound trypan blue (80).
In this work, we have characterized the interaction of heparin,
suramin, and suramin-related compounds with Tat protein, focusing on
the role played by the basic domain of Tat in this interaction. The
data demonstrate the possibility of synthesizing polysulfonated, heparin-mimicking compounds equipotent to natural heparin in
interfering with the biological activity of extracellular Tat.
Reagents--
Suramin was from Bayer AG (Leverkusen, Germany).
Trypan blue was from Sigma. Heparin (13.6 kDa) was from Laboratori
Derivati Organici SpA (Milan, Italy). Chondroitin sulfate C was a gift of M. Del Rosso (University of Florence, Italy). Preparation of Recombinant Wild Type HIV-1 Tat and of the
Different Tat Mutants--
Recombinant wild type HIV-1 Tat and the
different Tat mutants were expressed in Escherichia coli as
glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins. The
respective plasmid constructs are derivatives of plasmid pGST-Tat 2E,
which was originally obtained by cloning the coding region of both
exons of HIV-1HXB2 Tat in the commercial vector pGEX2T, as already
described (82). This construct codes for the wild type 86-amino acid
Tat protein. The mutated derivatives include GST-Tat-1e (containing
one-exon Tat and comprising the first 72 amino acids of the protein),
GST-Tat Cell Cultures--
The T53 cell line was established from
adenocarcinoma of skin adnexa of BKV/Tat transgenic mice,
and it expresses and secretes high levels of Tat protein (24, 28).
HL3T1 cells are derived from HeLa cells and contain integrated copies
of pL3CAT, a plasmid where the bacterial gene for chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase (CAT) is directed by the HIV-1 LTR (83). All cells
were grown and maintained in Dulbecco's modified minimal essential
medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (Life Technologies,
Inc.).
LTR/CAT-transactivating Assay--
HL3T1 cells were seeded in
24-well dishes at a density of 20,000 cells/cm2 in DMEM
containing 10% FCS. After 24 h, cell cultures were washed twice
with PBS and incubated for a further 24 h in fresh medium containing 10% FCS and 100 µM chloroquine in the absence
or in the presence of recombinant GST-Tat (200 ng/ml) and of increasing concentrations of the molecule under test. At the end of incubation, conditioned medium was removed, and cell cultures were incubated for a
further 24 h in DMEM containing 10% FCS. At the end of
incubation, cells were extracted, and the amount of CAT present in the
cell extracts was determined by the CAT ELISA kit (Boehringer Mannheim) according to manufacturer's instructions.
Labeling of GST-Tat--
Recombinant GST-Tat was labeled with
125I (17 Ci/mg, NEN Life Science Products) using IODO-GEN
(Pierce). Iodogen was dissolved in chloroform to a concentration of 10 µg/ml. 200 µl of this solution were added to glass tube and
evaporated to dryness under a steam of nitrogen. Recombinant GST-Tat (4 µg) was resuspended in 80 µl of 0.2 M sodium phosphate,
pH 7.2, and added to the glass tube together with 1 mCi of sodium
125I. The mix was then incubated at room temperature for 20 min. At the end of incubation, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 30 µl of the dipeptide Gly-Tyr (0.1 M in
H2O). Free 125I was separated from
125I-GST-Tat by affinity chromatography onto a
heparin-Sepharose column (100 µl) equilibrated in 25 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 0.15 M NaCl (TBS) and added
with 0.1% BSA (TBS/BSA). To this purpose, the reaction mixture was
loaded onto the column, which was then extensively washed with TBS/BSA.
125I-GST-Tat was then eluted by the column with TBS/BSA
containing 2 M NaCl. The radioactivity recovered in the 2 M NaCl eluate was routinely 80% trichloroacetic
acid-precipitable. The specific radioactivity of
125I-GST-Tat was 400 cpm/fmol.
Cell Internalization of 125I-GST-Tat--
HL3T1
cells were seeded in 24-well dishes at a density of 45,000 cells/cm2 in DMEM containing 10% FCS. After 24 h,
cell cultures were washed twice with TBS and incubated at 37 °C for
different periods of time in binding medium (serum-free medium
containing 0.15% gelatin and 20 mM Hepes buffer, pH 7.5)
added with the compound under test in the presence of 20 ng/ml of
125I-GST-Tat and 200 ng/ml of unlabeled GST-Tat used as a
carrier. At the end of incubation, the medium was removed, and cells
were washed three times with cold TBS and lysed by incubation with 0.5% Triton X-100 in 0.1 sodium phosphate, pH 8.1. Radioactivity was
then measured in the cell extract. Nonspecific radioactivity was
evaluated by incubating the cells at 4 °C with 20 ng of
125I-GST-Tat and was subtracted from each experimental
point.
T53 Cell Proliferation Assay and Binding of
125I-GST-Tat--
T53 cells were seeded in 24-well dishes
at 25,000 cells/cm2, in DMEM containing 10% FCS. After
24 h, subconfluent cultures were washed twice with DMEM and
incubated for 24 h in fresh medium containing 10% FCS in the
absence or in the presence of the compounds under test. At the end of
incubation, cells were trypsinized and counted in a Burker chamber. The
extent of cell proliferation dependent on the autocrine activity of
endogenous extracellular Tat was assessed by incubating cells with a
1:25 dilution of anti-Tat antiserum during the assay.
The Basic Domain in HIV-1 Tat Protein as a Target for
Polysulfonated Heparin-mimicking Extracellular Tat
Antagonists*
,
International Center for Genetic Engineering and
Biotechnology, 34012 Trieste, Italy, § Pharmacia Upjohn,
20014 Nerviano, Milan, Italy, and the ¶ Institute of Microbiology
and Interdepartment Center for Biotechnology, University of
Ferrara, 44100 Ferrara, Italy
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-Cyclodextrin tetradecasulfate was from Consultants on Glycosaminoglycans (Milan, Italy). The PNU compounds are suramin-related distamycin A derivatives (81) (see Fig. 9 for structural details). Anti-Tat polyclonal antibody
were from American Biotechnologies/Intracel (London). This antibody
recognizes with the same efficiency all of the Tat mutants utilized in
this study (data not shown). The synthetic peptides representing the
amino acid sequences 1-20, 41-60, and 71-85 of HIV-1 Tat (virus
strain HIV-1 LAI) were obtained from the Medical Research Council AIDS
Reagent Project (National Institute for Biological Standards and
Control, Potters Bar, Herts, UK). The synthetic peptides representing
the sequences 103-120 and 103-146 of basic fibroblast growth factor
(FGF-2) were kind gifts from A. Baird (Prizm Pharmaceuticals, San
Diego, CA).
1-21 (containing a deletion of the amino acid
sequence 1-21), GST-TatH13E (containing a mutation of
histidine 13 to glutamine), and GST-TatK49/52/53/55/56/57A (in which the arginine residues at positions 49, 52, 53, 55, 56, and 57 in the basic domain were mutated to alanine residues). These constructs
were obtained by a recombinant polymerase chain reaction procedure
using overlapping oligonucleotides corresponding to the mutated
sequences; a detailed description of the construction of these mutants
as well as of their transcriptional properties will be presented
elsewhere.3 Recombinant
fusion proteins were purified to homogeneity from bacterial lysates by
glutathione-Sepharose affinity chromatography (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) according to the manufacturer's instructions, with minor
modifications. Briefly, lysates were mixed with 1 ml of a 50% (v/v)
slurry of glutathione cross-linked agarose beads (Sigma). The fusion
protein was allowed to bind to the beads at 4 °C on a rotating wheel
for 1 h. The suspension was then loaded on an empty plastic
column, letting the unbound proteins pass through, and the beads were
submitted to a high salt wash (0.8 M NaCl) to free the
fusion protein from contaminating bacterial nucleic acids. The fusion
protein was eluted in 1 ml of 100 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing 2 mM dithiothreitol and 20 mM free
glutathione (Sigma). The purity and integrity of the protein was
routinely checked by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and silver
staining. Usually, this purification procedure leads to >95%
purification of the recombinant proteins. The purified proteins were
stored in aliquots at
80 °C until use.
Preparation of Heparin-conjugated Sepharose Gel and Heparin-Sepharose Affinity Chromatography-- 1,6-Diaminoexyl-derivatized Sepharose gel was prepared from CNBr-activated Sepharose 6B gel (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the manufacturer's instructions. 1-ml aliquots of the gel were then suspended in 3 ml of distilled water, pH 4.5, containing 1 mg of heparin and 10 mg of N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N'-ethylcarbodiimide HCl. The suspension was kept overnight at 4 °C under gentle mixing. Gels were then sequentially washed with 10 ml of H2O, pH 4.5, 10 ml of 2.0 M NaCl, and 20 ml of H2O. The resin was then used to evaluate the capacity of the different GST-Tat mutants to bind to immobilized heparin. In detail, 3-µg aliquots of the different recombinant GST-Tat mutants were loaded onto heparin-Sepharose columns (5 × 60 mm) connected to a fast protein liquid chromatography apparatus (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The column was eluted with a 0.15-2.0 M NaCl gradient. Tat immunoreactivity in the various fractions was evaluated by immuno-dot blot analysis with the anti-Tat antiserum and quantified by soft laser scanning of the nitrocellulose membrane.
Preparation of 3H-Labeled Heparin--
Heparin was
3H-labeled as described previously (84) with minor
modifications. Briefly, 3 mg of heparin were dissolved in 600 µl of
0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 2.5 mCi of
NaB3H4 (1 Ci/mmol) (NEN Life Science Products)
and incubated for 3 h at room temperature under gentle shaking. 18 mg of glucose were then added to the suspension, and it was incubated
for a further 3 h. At the end of incubation, the sample was
extensively dialyzed (cut-off, 1000 Da) against distilled water and
kept at
20 °C until use. The specific radioactivity of the
3H-labeled heparin was approximately 5000 cpm/nmol.
Immobilization of GST-Tat to Glutathione-Agarose Beads-- Aliquots (400 µl) of glutathione-agarose beads were mixed with 250-µg aliquots of recombinant GST-Tat, of GST-TatR49/52/53/55/56/57A mutant or of GST protein devoid of the Tat moiety. After 6 h of incubation at 4 °C, the resin beads were extensively washed, resuspended in TBS, and stored at 4 °C until use. Under these conditions, up to 90% of the proteins bound to the resin. To evaluate the capacity of heparin to bind to wild type and mutagenized Tat, 50 µg of [3H]heparin were loaded onto 80 µl columns containing the different immobilized GST-Tat proteins. After extensive washing with TBS, the columns were eluted stepwise with TBS containing increasing concentrations of NaCl. Radioactivity in the different fractions was measured in a liquid scintillation counter. To evaluate the dissociation constant (Kd) of the interaction of heparin with immobilized wild type Tat or Tat mutant, the columns were loaded with increasing concentrations of [3H]heparin and eluted with 3.0 M NaCl. Binding data were then analyzed according to the procedure originally described by Scatchard (85).
[3H]Heparin Competition Binding Assay to Immobilized GST-Tat-- To evaluate their relative affinity for Tat protein, the different compounds were tested for their capacity to compete for the binding of 3H-labeled heparin to immobilized GST-Tat. For this purpose, a series of 80-µl GST-Tat-glutathione-agarose columns were loaded with samples containing 25 µg of 3H-labeled heparin and increasing concentrations of the molecule under test. Columns were then washed extensively with TBS and eluted with a 3.0 M NaCl wash. Radioactivity in the eluate was measured in a liquid scintillation counter.
Coating of GST-Tat Fusion Proteins to Plastic and Binding Assay-- 100-µl aliquots of 100 mM NaHCO3, pH 9.6 (carbonate buffer), containing 40 µg/ml of GST-Tat or of GST-TatR49/52/53/55/56/57A were added to polystyrene non-tissue culture microtiter plates. After 16 h of incubation at 4 °C, the solution was removed, and wells were washed three times with TBS. The amount of GST, GST-Tat, and GST-TatR49/52/53/55/56/57A bound to plastic was evaluated by protein determination using the Quantigold reagent (Diversified Biotech, Boston, MA). The results demonstrated that 12.8 ± 0.2, 10 ± 0.9, and 11.5 ± 0.5% of original added GST, GST-Tat, and GST-TatR49/52/53/55/56/57A bind to plastic, respectively, indicating that there were no significant differences in coating efficiency among the molecules tested. Plastic-bound Tat resists extraction with 6 M urea or 95% ethanol and can be solubilized only by drastic treatment with detergent (i.e. 1-h incubation at 37 °C with 0.5% Triton X-100 or 30-min incubation at 50 °C with 2% SDS). For the competition binding assay, 4 nmol of 14C-PNU 145156E (12,500 cpm/nmol) (Pharmacia Upjohn, Nerviano, Italy) were incubated for 2 h at 4 °C in wells coated with 40 µg/ml GST-Tat in the absence or in the presence of the competitor under test. At the end of incubation, wells were washed three times with cold TBS, and Tat-associated radioactivity was solubilized by incubating the wells for 30 min at 50 °C with 2% SDS in H2O, collected, and measured in a liquid scintillation counter.
For the determination of the Kd of interaction of 14C-PNU 145156E with Tat molecules, 100-µl aliquots of TBS containing different concentrations of 14C-PNU 145156E were added into wells coated with 40 µg/ml GST-Tat or GST-TatK49/52/53/55/56/57A mutant. Then samples were processed exactly as described above. Binding data were analyzed by the Scatchard plot procedure. Nonspecific 14C-PNU 145156E binding was evaluated by using wells coated with a 40 µg/ml concentration of the GST protein devoid of the Tat moiety. Similar results were obtained when binding experiments were performed in the absence or in the presence of 1% BSA overcoating of the wells (30 min at room temperature).| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Role of the Basic Domain of Tat Protein in Heparin
Interaction--
To investigate the role of the basic domain of Tat in
heparin binding, four recombinant Tat mutants were produced as GST
fusion proteins in E. coli:
GST-TatR49/52/53/55/56/57A, obtained by the substitution of
six arginine residues within the basic domain with alanine residues;
Tat-1e, characterized by the deletion of the amino acid sequence
encoded by the second exon of the tat gene and
containing the RGD motif; GST-Tat
1-21, obtained by deletion of the first 21 amino-terminal residues required for transactivating activity (3, 4, 57); and GST-TatH13E, characterized by the substitution of histidine at position 13 with a
glutamic acid residue. These mutants were compared with wild type Tat
(amino acid residues 1-86) expressed as GST fusion protein for the
capacity to bind to heparin-Sepharose and to be eluted from the resin
by a linear gradient of NaCl concentration. Previous experiments had
demonstrated that the GST moiety does not interfere in Tat/heparin
interaction (68).
1-21 elute
from heparin-Sepharose at high ionic strength (1.3 M NaCl).
In contrast, GST-TatR49/52/53/55/56/57A elutes from the
column at a NaCl concentration significantly lower (0.6 M)
than the other GST-Tat forms, thus indicating that neutralization of
the positive charges in the basic domain of Tat significantly reduces
its interaction with the GAG.
|
|
1-21 and GST-Tat-1e, respectively, were
evaluated for their capacity to compete with GST-Tat immobilized onto
glutathione-agarose beads for the binding to [3H]heparin.
As shown in Fig. 3, peptide Tat-(41-60)
prevents the binding of [3H]heparin to immobilized
GST-Tat in a dose-dependent manner, whereas peptides
Tat-(1-20) and Tat-(71-85) are ineffective. Under the same
experimental conditions, the heparin-binding synthetic peptide FGF-2-(103-120) that carries six basic amino acid residues (86) competes with immobilized GST-Tat for the binding to
[3H]heparin with a potency that is approximately 5 times
lower than that of peptide Tat-(41-60). Interestingly, the
heparin-binding synthetic peptide FGF-2-(103-146) also competes poorly
(approximately 30% inhibition of [3H]heparin binding at
25 µg/sample) despite the fact that it carries 11 basic residues (86)
(data not shown), thus supporting the specificity of the interaction of
the peptide Tat-(41-60) with the GAG.
|
Effect of Polyanionic Molecules on Heparin Binding and HIV LTR-transactivating Activity of Extracellular Tat-- The above data indicate that the basic domain of Tat may represent a target for compounds able to inhibit Tat/heparin interaction and, possibly, the biological activity of extracellular Tat. On this basis, the capacity of non-GAG polyanions to inhibit the heparin binding and HIV LTR-transactivating activity of extracellular Tat was evaluated.
To evaluate this inhibition, [3H]heparin was allowed to bind to GST-Tat immobilized onto a glutathione-agarose column. Then different concentrations of suramin, trypan blue, or polysulfated
-cyclodextrin were loaded onto the column and evaluated for their capacity to displace [3H]heparin from immobilized Tat. As
shown in Fig. 4A, suramin and trypan blue displace [3H]heparin from GST-Tat with a
similar potency (ED50 equal to approximately 5 µM for both compounds), significantly lower than that of
unlabeled heparin (ED50 equal to 0.2 µM). In
contrast, polysulfated
-cyclodextrin does not displace
[3H]heparin from GST-Tat although this compound has the
highest degree of sulfation among the molecules tested (14 sulfate
groups per molecule versus 6 and 4 sulfonate groups per
molecule for polysulfated
-cyclodextrin, suramin, and trypan blue,
respectively). These data underline the importance of the backbone
structure of the molecule in presenting its sulfate/sulfonate group(s)
to Tat protein.
|
-cyclodextrin does not inhibit the transactivating
activity of GST-Tat (Fig. 4B).
In conclusion, polyanionic compounds prevent Tat/heparin interaction
and inhibit the LTR-transactivating activity of extracellular Tat.
Their Tat-antagonist activity, less potent than that of heparin, appears to depend not only on the sulfate/sulfonate group density of
the molecule but also on its backbone structure.
Suramin and Heparin Exert Their Tat Antagonist Activity by a Similar Mechanism of Action-- On the basis of the results described above, suramin was utilized to study the mechanism of action of polysulfonated compounds as extracellular Tat antagonists. In a first set of experiments, suramin and heparin were administered to HL3T1 together with GST-Tat or at different times after GST-Tat administration. As shown in Fig. 5, the transactivating activity of Tat is completely abolished when the two molecules are administered within the first 2-3 h following the beginning of GST-Tat treatment. The addition of heparin or suramin to the cell culture medium 5 h after the beginning of Tat treatment is instead ineffective. These data suggest that the inhibitory activity exerted by heparin and suramin depends on an early interaction with GST-Tat. Also, they are in agreement with previous observations indicating that Tat-mediated LTR transactivation is rapid and transient with maximal stimulation 5 h after the beginning of Tat treatment (82).
|
|
|
Suramin Derivative Binds Tat Protein: Role of the Basic Domain of Tat-- Our results demonstrate that arginine residues in the basic domain of Tat protein play an important role in heparin interaction (see above). The similar antagonist activity exerted by heparin and suramin on the biological activity of extracellular Tat prompted us to assess the possible role of the basic domain of Tat in its interaction with polysulfonated compounds. For this purpose, the fusion protein GST-Tat was coated onto non-tissue culture plastic and evaluated for its capacity to bind 14C-PNU 145156E, a polysulfonated distamycin A derivative structurally related to suramin (formerly named FCE 26644 (87)). As shown in Fig. 8A, the binding of 14C-PNU 145156E to GST-Tat-coated plastic is dose-dependent, with ED50 = 5 µg/ml. Under the same experimental conditions, 14C-PNU 145156E binds poorly and to a similar extent to GST protein devoid of the Tat moiety and to BSA, here used as a negative control, thus demonstrating the specificity of Tat interaction. In agreement with their structural similarities, unlabeled PNU 145156E and suramin inhibit the binding of 14C-PNU 145156E to GST-Tat-coated plastic with the same potency, half-maximal inhibition being observed at concentrations of the unlabeled compounds equimolar to the radiolabeled molecule (Fig. 8B).
|
Tat Antagonist Activity of Suramin Derivatives--
Suramin shows
a limited potency in inhibiting the biological activity of
extracellular Tat when compared with heparin. We have demonstrated
previously the possibility to modulate the Tat-binding capacity and
antagonist activity of heparin by structural modifications of the
polysaccharide molecule (68). These data, together with the observation
that sulfated
-cyclodextrin does not exert a significant Tat
antagonist activity (see above), indicate that the backbone structure
of the molecule is of importance in presenting its sulfate groups to
Tat protein in an optimal spatial conformation. To assess whether
structural modifications of a polysulfonated compound might mimic the
structural requirements for optimal Tat interaction, a series of
distamycin A derivatives structurally related to suramin were tested
for their capacity to inhibit the LTR-transactivating activity exerted
by GST-Tat on H3T1 cells. These molecules are dimeric ureido compounds
incorporating the bisamido-N-methylpyrrolenaphthalene-sulfonic acid group with
differences in the number and position of the sulfonic acids in the
naphthalene ring (see Fig. 9) (81). For
each molecule, dose-dependent experiments were performed,
and ID50 values were calculated and compared with those
obtained for suramin and heparin. Among the molecules tested, PNU
151779 and PNU 157666 showed a Tat-inhibitory activity that is
approximately 100 times more potent than that of suramin and similar to
that exerted by heparin (Fig.
10A). Accordingly, when the
distamycin A derivatives were tested for their capacity to inhibit T53
cell proliferation, PNU 151779 and PNU 157666 exerted an inhibitory
activity more potent than suramin (Fig. 10B).
|
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present paper, we have shown that polysulfonated compounds interact with HIV-1 Tat protein. This interaction affects the capacity of Tat to bind heparin and inhibits the biological activity of extracellular Tat both when administered exogenously as a recombinant GST-Tat protein and when produced endogenously by Tat-overexpressing cells.
Results obtained in our laboratory had demonstrated that Tat protein interacts with specific region(s) of heparin/HS and that a high affinity interaction requires at least some 2-O-, 6-O-, and N-positions to be sulfated (68). These data indicate that defined structural features of the sulfated GAG (size, backbone structure, degree of sulfation) are required to allow its optimal interaction with Tat protein. Moreover, the Tat binding activities of the sulfated GAGs tested correlate with their capacities to affect the transactivating activity of extracellular Tat (68). On this basis, we concluded that the design of specifically tailored, polysulfated saccharide analogs with high affinity for Tat protein might allow the development of potent extracellular Tat antagonists of possible therapeutic value.
These conclusions were based on increasing evidence of the involvement of extracellular Tat in different AIDS-associated disorders including Kaposi's sarcoma (27, 41), neurological disorders (42), and increased tumor incidence (28, 43). Also, the capacity of anti-Tat antibody to delay HIV-1 replication in infected peripheral blood mononucleated cells (48-50) and the inverse correlation between the levels of natural anti-Tat antibody and those of p24 antigen in HIV-seropositive subjects (48) suggest that extracellular Tat may be involved in the progression of the disease. On this basis, Tat has been recently proposed as a specific target for AIDS vaccine (80), thus supporting the potential use of Tat antagonists in HIV infection.
Our data indicate that suramin and its derivatives act as Tat antagonists by mimicking heparin/HS for its capacity to bind extracellular Tat via its basic domain. We have shown that neutralization of arginine residues 49, 52, 53, 55, 56, and 57 results in a Tat mutant characterized by a reduced affinity for heparin when compared with the wild type molecule. This was observed both when free GST-TatR49/52/53/55/56/57A was evaluated for its capacity to interact with immobilized heparin or when the immobilized mutant was assessed for its interaction with free heparin. Accordingly, Scatchard plot analysis of the binding data demonstrated a 3-fold decrease in the affinity of [3H]heparin for GST-TatR49/52/53/55/56/57A when compared with GST-Tat. The possibility that the reduced heparin-binding capacity of GST-TatR49/52/53/55/56/57A is the mere consequence of conformational changes of the mutagenized protein appears to be ruled out by the following observations. (i) Different mutations in the Tat molecule, including the deletion of 21 amino acid residues at the N terminus of the protein or of the whole sequence encoded by the second exon, do not affect significantly Tat/heparin interaction; (ii) a synthetic peptide representing the basic domain of Tat specifically prevents the interaction of free heparin with immobilized Tat; and (iii) the GST-TatR49/52/53/55/56/57A mutant shows a capacity to bind thrombospondin-1 similar to that of the wild type molecule.5 However, the neutralization of six arginine residues within the basic domain is not sufficient to abolish the heparin-binding capacity of Tat. This indicates that the remaining lysine residues in the basic region and/or other basic amino acids scattered onto the surface of the Tat protein may also contribute to heparin binding by interacting with various sulfate groups distributed along the GAG molecule. This should not be the case for the suramin derivative 14C-PNU 145156E, whose smaller size would allow the interaction of its sulfonate group(s) mainly with the basic domain of Tat, as shown by its incapacity to bind the TatR49/52/53/55/56/57A mutant. This observation, together with the ability of suramin, trypan blue, and various suramin-like distamycin A derivatives to displace [3H]heparin from immobilized GST-Tat, supports the hypothesis that low molecular weight polysulfonated compounds compete with heparin/HS for the binding to the basic domain of the Tat molecule.
Interestingly, the basic domain mediates several biological activities of extracellular Tat. It is necessary for the mitogenic, chemotactic, and angiogenic activity exerted by Tat (21); it cooperates with the RGD motif in integrin interaction (61); and it is involved in the binding and activation of the Flk-1/KDR receptor (67). The basic domain is necessary also for Tat stability (64), nuclear and nucleolar delivery (65),2 and interaction with nucleic acids (66). It mediates some of the neurotoxic effects of extracellular Tat (12, 33, 35). Again, some of the biological activities described for synthetic peptides mimicking the basic domain of Tat may reflect their capacity to bind ECM and cell surface HS-proteoglycans. Indeed, cell-associated HS molecules may act as receptors for extracellular Tat (21, 69).
Our results demonstrate that heparin and suramin are able to prevent cell surface binding and internalization of extracellular Tat with a consequent inhibition of its mitogenic and LTR-transactivating activity. Of particular interest is the capacity of polyanionic compounds also to inhibit cell proliferation in Tat-overexpressing T53 cells. In these cells, neutralizing anti-Tat antibodies cause approximately an 80% decrease in cell proliferation (see above), thus indicating that T53 cell proliferation depends mainly on an extracellular loop of stimulation triggered by endogenously produced Tat. Although we cannot rule out the possibility that polyanionic compounds may also interact with T53 cell-produced growth factors other than Tat, our data suggest these compounds can bind native Tat, thus interfering with its autocrine loop of stimulation. This hypothesis is supported by the capacity of polyanionic compounds to inhibit the binding of 125I-GST-Tat to T53 cell surface. Also, a linear correlation exists among the ID50 values of heparin, suramin, and distamycin A derivatives for the competition of Tat/heparin interaction and the inhibition of T53 cell proliferation (see above). Finally, it is important to recall that suramin and heparin do not enter the cells either in the absence or in the presence of Tat (see above), ruling out the possibility that the two compounds interfere with intracellular transduction signals for mitogenesis.
The absolute potency shown by the various polyanionic compounds tested in inhibiting the different biological activities of free Tat is significantly different from that required to displace heparin from the immobilized protein. This apparent discrepancy may be related to the different experimental conditions utilized in the various biological and biochemical assays. They include, for instance, the different amount of GST-Tat present in the assays (200 ng/ml free Tat for the LTR transactivation assay versus a 600 µg/ml concentration of the immobilized protein in the [3H]heparin/GST-Tat competition binding assay). Also, Tat is added exogenously as a GST chimera in the LTR transactivation and 125I-GST-Tat binding assays, while it is produced endogenously in the native form during the T53 proliferation assay. Finally, it is important to note that heparin represents an optimal ligand for Tat when compared with other sulfated GAGs, including HS (68). This appears to be of importance when the data obtained in the [3H]heparin/GST-Tat competition binding assay are compared with those obtained in the LTR transactivation and T53 cell proliferation assays. Indeed, while in the former assay polyanionic compounds must displace heparin already bound to immobilized GST-Tat, they compete with cell surface HS proteoglycans for the binding to free Tat in the latter assays.
As observed previously for sulfated GAG/Tat interaction (68), the
capacity of non-GAG polysulfonated compounds to bind extracellular Tat
and to inhibit its biological activity depends on the backbone structure of the molecule and, at least in part, on its degree of
sulfation. We have found that polysulfated
-cyclodextrin is unable
to bind Tat and to inhibit its LTR-transactivating activity although
this molecule carries 14 sulfated groups. On the contrary, suramin and
trypan blue exert a significant Tat antagonist activity despite the
fact that they carry only 6 or 4 sulfonate groups per molecule,
respectively. Relevant to this point is the observation that a series
of distamycin A derivatives structurally related to suramin (81) differ
significantly for their Tat-binding capacity and antagonist activity.
In particular, PNU 151779 and PNU 157666 are more potent than suramin
in inhibiting the LTR-transactivating activity and mitogenic capacity
of extracellular Tat. Like suramin, both compounds carry six sulfonate
groups per molecule (Fig. 9), while PNU 151752, which carries only two
sulfonate groups, is the least active among the derivatives tested.
Clearly, these data point to the importance of the backbone structure
of the molecule in presenting its sulfonate group(s) to Tat protein
under optimal steric conditions. A detailed structure-activity
relationship study will be required to define the molecular features of
polysulfonated compounds suitable for the design of potent
extracellular Tat antagonists. In this respect, our preliminary
observations indicate the possibility of synthesizing compounds almost
equipotent to natural heparin.
Previous observations had shown that polysulfated compounds, including sulfated GAGs, might act as inhibitors of HIV. For instance, heparin and dextran sulfate prevent HIV adsorption and internalization in CD4+-sensitive cells (88) as a consequence of their capacity to disrupt gp120 interaction with CD4 (89, 90) and/or with cell-associated HS (91, 92). Also, polysulfated polysaccharides prevent syncytium formation between HIV-infected and uninfected cells (89, 90). This may explain the capacity of polysulfated polysaccharides to inhibit HIV-1 replication and cytopathogenicity in different experimental models (reviewed in Ref. 93). Accordingly, suramin and suramin-related compounds have been demonstrated to inhibit reverse transcriptase activity of several retroviruses and to suppress the replication and cytopathic effect of HIV at concentrations that are nontoxic for the host cells and attainable in humans (94, 95). In particular, several PNU compounds prevent virus attachment to CD4+ cells and inhibit HIV-induced cell killing and viral replication (81). Interestingly, preliminary observations from our laboratory indicate that the potency of the different PNU compounds in inhibiting HIV-induced cell killing parallels their potency as extracellular Tat antagonists.6 This correlation may be of importance for the design of "multitarget" polysulfated compounds able to affect different aspects of HIV infection and AIDS-related disorders.
The "multitargeting" activity of polysulfated compounds, synergistic with other anti-HIV drugs like AZT (93), together with their capacity to interact with the highly conserved basic region of Tat, may overcome the problems related to the heterogeneity, high rate of mutation, and drug resistance development of HIV that represent major impediments to conventional vaccination and chemotherapy against AIDS.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. P. Oreste and Dr. G. Zoppetti
for polysulfated
-cyclodextrin, the Medical Research Council AIDS
Reagent Project (Potters Bar, Herts, UK) for the synthetic peptides
representing different fragments of HIV-1 Tat, and L. Pizzi and M. Stramezzi for expert technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by "AIDS Project," Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Ministero della Sanità, Rome (to M. P.), by AIRC (Special Project Angiogenesis) (to M. P.), and by the Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica (60%) (to M. R. and M. P.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Department of
Biomedical Sciences and Biotechnology, Via Valsabbina 19, 25123 Brescia, Italy. Tel.: 39-30-3715311; Fax: 39-30-3701157; E-mail: presta{at}med.unibs.it.
1 The abbreviations used are: HIV-1, human immunodeficiency virus type 1; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FCS, fetal calf serum; GAG, glycosaminoglycan; GST, glutathione S-transferase; HS, heparan sulfate; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; LTR, long terminal repeat; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; BSA, bovine serum albumin.
2 M. Giacca, unpublished observations.
3 M. Giacca, manuscript in preparation.
4 A. Corallini, manuscript in preparation.
5 M. Rusnati, manuscript in preparation.
6 M. Rusnati, unpublished observations.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|