|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 26, 16067-16074, June 26, 1998
From the Two new analogues of bovine placental
lactogen (bPL), bPL(G133K) and bPL(G133R), were expressed in
Escherichia coli, refolded, and purified to a native form.
Binding experiments, which are likely to represent the binding to site
1 only, to intact FDC-P1 cells transfected with rabbit (rb) growth
hormone receptor (GHR) or with human (h) GHR, to Nb2 rat lymphoma
cells, or to rabbit mammary gland membranes prolactin receptor (PRLR),
revealed only small or no reduction in binding capacity. The complex
formation between these analogues and receptor extracellular domains
(R-ECD) of various hormones was determined by gel filtration. Wild type bPL yielded 1:2 complex with hGHR-ECD, rat PRLR-ECD, and rbPRLR-ECD, whereas both analogues formed only 1:1 complexes with all R-ECDs tested. Real time kinetics experiments demonstrated that the ability of
the analogues to form homodimeric complexes was compromised in both
PRLR- and GHR-ECDs. The biological activity transduced through
lactogenic receptors in in vitro bioassays in rabbit
mammary gland acini culture and in Nb2 cells was almost fully retained, whereas the activity transduced through somatogenic receptors in FDC-P1
cells transfected with rbGHRs or with hGHRs was abolished. Both
analogues exhibited antagonistic activity in the latter cells. To
explain the discrepancy between the effect of the mutation on the
signal transduced by PLR versus GHRs we suggest that: 1) the mutation impairs the ability of site 2 of bPL to form a stable homodimeric complex with both lactogenic and somatogenic
receptors by a drastic shortening of the half-life of 2:1 complex; 2)
the transient existence of the homodimeric complex is still sufficient to initiate the signal transduced through lactogenic receptors but not
through somatogenic receptors; and 3) one possible reason for
this difference is that JAK2, which serves as a mediator of both
receptors, is already associated with lactogenic receptors prior to
hormone binding-induced receptor dimerization, whereas in somatogenic
receptors the JAK2 receptor association occurs subsequently to receptor
dimerization.
Placental lactogens
(PLs)1 are 22-23-kDa
proteins, secreted by placentas of primates, rodents, and ruminants
(1). These proteins are structurally related to growth hormone (GH) and
prolactin (PRL) and probably share the same mechanism of action.
However, bPL and oPL (2) are unusual in that they are capable of
recognizing and subsequently exhibiting their biological activity
through both lactogenic and somatogenic receptors. It has been shown by us (3) and others that bPL is indeed capable of acting through PRLRs in
bovine mammary glands (4), in the rat Nb2 lymphoma cell line (5), and
through somatogenic receptors in 3T3-F442A preadipocytes (6) and rat
hepatocytes (7). We have also shown that these two activities may be
selectively modified. For instance, in bPL(T188F) or bPL(K73D/F/A), the
binding to full-size somatogenic receptors or their ECDs and to bPLR in
the endometrium, as well as somatogenic receptor-mediated biological
activities, were reduced or abolished, whereas binding to lactogenic
receptors or their ECDs and subsequent biological activity was either
fully or almost fully retained (7, 8). More recently, we have mutated
Lys73, which corresponds to Arg64 in hGH and
has been identified to be important in the interaction with hGHR-ECD
but not with hPRLR-ECD (9). Results of that study suggested that
position 73 in bPL is more important for somatogenic than lactogenic
properties and indicated that the difference could be related to the
possibility that the minimal duration of the existence of the
hormone-induced receptor dimer required for the initiation of the
biological signal by lactogenic or somatogenic receptors may be
different (8). In the present study we mutated Gly133,
which probably corresponds to Gly119 and Gly120
in bGH and hGH. In these hormones, replacement of Gly by a large, positively charged side chain interfered with the formation of a
homodimeric complex and led to the appearance of antagonistic activity
(10, 11). We could therefore expect that analogous mutation in bPL,
namely G133K and G133R, would lead to a similar change. Binding of site
2 of the bPL to both lactogenic and somatogenic receptors and its
subsequent ability to homodimerize the extracellular domain of GH or
PRL receptors were reduced to a similar degree. Surprisingly however,
only the somatogenic receptor-mediated biological activity was
abolished, whereas the activity mediated through lactogenic receptors
was almost fully retained.
Materials --
Recombinant hGH was obtained from Biotechnology
General Inc. (Rehovot, Israel). Recombinant bPL, nonglycosylated rabbit
(rb) and rat (r) PRLR-ECDs and hGHR-ECD were prepared as described previously (12-15). Carrier-free Na[125I] was purchased
from New England Nuclear Corp. (Boston, MA). Molecular weight markers
for gel electrophoresis, RPMI 1640 medium, lysozyme, nalidixic acid,
Triton X-100, bovine serum albumin (RIA grade) were obtained from
Sigma. SDS-PAGE reagents and a Protein Assay kit were purchased from
Bio-Rad. Fetal calf serum and horse serum were purchased from Labotal
Co. (Jerusalem, Israel), and a SuperdexTM75 HR 10/30 column and
Q-Sepharose (fast flow) were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
Reagents for sulfon plasmon resonance (SPR) including CM5 sensor chips,
Hepes-buffered saline (HBS), N-hydroxysuccinimide,
N-ethyl-N'-(3-diethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide,
2(2-pyridinyldithio)ethanamine hydrochloride, and ethanolamine
hydrochloride were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. All other
chemicals were of analytical grade.
Construction of bPL Analogue Expression Vectors--
Synthetic
gene fragments for each bPL analogue were constructed using polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) technology. PCR fragments containing the desired
mutations and appropriate restriction enzyme sites were initially
generated using synthetic oligonucleotides (primers) and pMON3922 DNA
template (16). The forward mutant primers contained the desired
mutations at amino acid 133 and encoded an XbaI restriction
enzyme site: (AAAGTACTTCTAGAACGTGTGGAAATGATACAAA for G133R and
AAAGTACTTCTAGAAAAAGTGGAAATGATACAAA for G133K), whereas the reverse
primer was complementary to the vector immediately 3' to the bPL gene
and to the HindIII restriction site in pMON3922. The PCR
products (~200 base pairs), which encode the C-terminal portion of
the bPL gene with the mutations, were purified using a WizardTM PCR
kit (Promega, Madison, WI) and digested with XbaI and
HindIII restriction enzymes. For each bPL analogue, a
three-way ligation was set up consisting of the PCR fragment, the
NcoI-XbaI N-terminal bPL gene fragment from
pMON3922 (~400 base pairs), and the
NcoI-HindIII expression vector from pMON3401
(17). The ligations were transformed into MAX Efficiency DH10BTM
competent cells, and colonies were grown up in LB medium containing 75 µg/ml spectinomycin at 37 °C overnight. Plasmid DNA was
isolated using a Plasmid Midi kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth,
CA), sequenced with AmpliTaqTM FS and dye terminators, and analyzed on
an ABI 373 Sequencer. Plasmid DNA from each of the bPL analogues
with the correct mutation was used to transform MON105 cells (17) for
expression in the cytoplasm as insoluble aggregates.
Expression, Refolding, and Purification of bPL
Analogues--
Escherichia coli MON105 cells transformed
with the expression plasmids containing the bPL variant genes were
incubated in 500 ml of Terrific Broth medium (18) by shaking at 200 rpm
at 37 °C in 2-liter flasks to an A600 of 0.9, after which nalidixic acid (25 mg/flask) was added. The cells were
incubated for an additional period of 4 h, harvested by 5-min
centrifugation at 10,000 × g, decanted, and then
frozen at SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis--
SDS-PAGE was carried
out according to Laemmli (19) using 15% gels. Gels were stained with
Coomassie Brilliant Blue R.
CD Spectra--
CD spectra were obtained and analyzed as
described previously (20). Protein concentrations were determined using
extinction coefficients of 19500 M Determination of Monomer Content and Complex
Formation--
High pressure liquid chromatography gel
filtration on a SuperdexTM75 HR 10/30 column was performed with
200-µl aliquots of Q-Sepharose column eluted fractions, freeze-dried
samples dissolved in H2O, or complexes between the soluble
recombinant GHR- or PRLR-ECDs and bPL or bPL analogues, using methods
described previously (7).
Binding Experiments--
Iodination of hGH was performed as
described previously (13). The specific activity was approximately
104 cpm/ng. FDC-P1 cells transfected with the somatogenic
receptors rbGHR (FDC-P1-3B9 cell line) or hGHR (FDC-P1-9D11 cell line)
(21, 22) and Nb2-11C cells expressing the lactogenic
receptor were grown in RPMI medium supplemented with 5% fetal calf
serum with or without 0.1 µg/ml hGH for FDC and Nb2 cell
lines, respectively. 16 h prior to the experiment the cells were
washed and transferred to RPMI medium supplemented with 5% horse
serum. FDC cells were washed again with phosphate-buffered saline
containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (pH 4) and then twice with the
same buffer at pH 7.4. All cell lines were resuspended in binding
buffer containing RPMI, 0.5% bovine serum albumin, and 2.5% Hepes (pH
7.4). Ligand binding analysis was performed according to
Pinkas-Karamarski et al. (23) with the following
modifications. Each well contained 100 µl of 4-5 × 106 cells, 50 µl of 2 × 105 to 4 × 105 cpm of [125I]hGH, and various
concentrations of 50 µl of bPL or its analogues in binding buffer.
The treated cells were incubated for 3 h at 4 °C, then washed
once with ice-cold binding buffer, and loaded on top of a 0.7-ml
cushion of calf serum. After centrifugation (12,000 × g, 2 min), the supernatant containing the unbound ligand was
aspirated, and the pellet was counted in a Coupling of bPL or bPL Analogues to a CM-Dextran Matrix via Amino
Groups --
The bPL analogues were covalently linked according to
Johnsson et al. (25). HBS was injected at 5 µl/min, and
activation with 0.05 M
N-ethyl-N'-(3-diethylaminopropyl)
carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide in HBS was carried out for
7-8 min. The analogues were then injected at a concentration of 100 µg/ml in 10 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 5.4, yielding
1000-2000 resonance units (RU) of immobilized hormone. Nonreacted
sites were blocked with an 8-min injection of 1 M
ethanolamine hydrochloride at pH 8.5. Binding capacities were checked
by repeated injections of 5 µM R-ECDs in HBS. Immobilized bPL or its analogues could be regenerated over 50 runs with 4.5 M MgCl2 pulses (1-2 min).
Kinetic Measurements of R-ECD-Hormone Interactions --
All
experiments were performed at a flow rate of 5 µl/min in HBS at
25 °C. Once the hormone being tested was covalently immobilized through amino group coupling, serial dilutions of each R-ECD were injected for 480 s (70-550 s on the scale in Fig. 4.) and then washed with HBS for 720 s (550-1270 s) prior to regeneration. Because the recombinant R-ECDs had been lyophilized with sodium bicarbonate buffers at a salt:protein ratio of 1:2, bulk refractive indexes varied with sample dilution, and these variations were corrected by injecting the same dilutions into flow cells in which unrelated ligands had been immobilized.
Data Analysis and Calculation of Kinetic Constants--
BIAcore
incorporated software (BIA Evaluation and BIA Simulation, version 2.1)
allowed us to fit experimental curves with 1:1 or 1:2
association/dissociation models and calculate the probabilities of each
being the most accurate representation of reality (26) and to calculate
kinetic constants with standard deviations. Reverse verification of
calculated data was performed by simulating the interaction assuming a
variable relative occupation of the two sites.
In Vitro Bioassays--
Two in vitro bioassays in
which the signal was transduced through lactogenic receptors were
performed: rat Nb2-11C lymphoma-cell-proliferation bioassay, in which the original protocol was slightly modified (27),
and Expression of bPL Analogues in E. coli--
One clone of each
E. coli bacteria carrying the mutant plasmids was grown in
Terrific Broth medium, and the protein expression was induced by
nalidixic acid. SDS-PAGE of the bacterial pellet in the presence of
Purification of bPL Analogues--
The profile of bPL analogues
elution from a Q-Sepharose column shows that over 60% of the protein
was eluted with 0.15 M NaCl (not shown). Every third tube
was analyzed for monomer content, and fractions containing >98% pure
monomer were pooled, dialyzed against NaHCO3 (1:5
salt:protein ratio), and lyophilized. This fraction was further used
for binding and biological studies. Fractions eluted with 0.4 M NaCl consisted mainly of oligomers (not shown). SDS-PAGE
of the pooled monomer fraction, performed with and without
Binding Experiments-- The ability of analogues to compete with [125I]hGH and bind somatogenic or lactogenic receptors was analyzed in three intact cell lines and compared with wild type bPL. bPL(G133K) was found to be 60% more potent than bPL, and bPL(G133R) was found to be just as potent as bPL in binding to the mouse myeloid cell line FDC-P1 transfected with somatogenic rbGH receptor (Fig. 2A).The results with the same cell line transfected with hGH receptor revealed that bPL(G133K) did not lose any of its binding ability, and bPL(G133R) retained 50% of its binding capacity as compared with wild type bPL (Fig. 2B). A slightly larger loss in the binding capacity was observed in both analogues when the Nb2-11C cell line, carrying the lactogenic receptors, was used. In those cells, bPL(G133K) and bPL(G133R) lost 75 and 80% of their binding ability, respectively (Fig. 2C). In contrast, the binding capacity of both analogues to lactogenic receptor in the microsomal fraction of rabbit mammary gland was hardly affected (Fig. 2D). In all cases, the results of the binding experiments gave better fit to a one-site than a two-site model.
Gel Filtration Experiments-- The stoichiometry of the complexes formed by interaction of R-ECDs of somatogenic or lactogenic and bPL analogues was determined by gel filtration at several R-ECD:analogue ratios, at a constant concentration of the latter (2 µM). Measuring the size of the eluted peaks and their retention times enabled us to analyze and calculate the stoichiometry and the molecular weight of the complex formed. Whereas bPL was capable of dimerization of hGHR-ECD, both analogues formed only a 1:1 complex even in the highest concentration of R-ECD (Fig. 3A). Similar results were obtained by measuring the complexes formed with rPRL-ECD and rbPRLR-ECD (Fig. 3, B and C).
SPR Determination of the Interaction between hGHR-ECD, rPRLR-ECDs, and rbPRLR-ECDs and bPL, bPL(G133K), and bPL(G133R)-- The interactions of bPL with hGHR-ECD, rPRLR-ECD, and rbPRLR-ECD (Fig. 4, upper panels) were analyzed by comparison with a theoretical model using chi-square analysis. In all three cases the interactions proved to be unsuited to the 1:1 model and strongly favored the two-site model (Table II), thus confirming our previous results (26). Both mutations resulted in a decrease of the apparent stoichiometry. However, whereas in the interactions with hGHR-ECD and rbPRLR-ECD the decrease was moderate (ECD:hormone molar ratio of 0.6-1.0), resulting most likely from the increased koff values of site 2, a drastic decrease was observed in apparent stoichiometry with rPRLR-ECD (Table II and Fig. 4, middle and lower panels). In the latter case the results clearly show that the koff values for both sites 1 and 2 were affected, and a very low RU signal (5-10% compared with the wild type hormone) at the steady state even at the 1000 nM concentrations of the rPRLR-ECD was observed. To facilitate the comparison, the top lines in these figures represent the interaction with the wild type bPL (1000 nM) copied from the upper panel, and the same scale was used for each ECD.
Biological Activity in Vitro-- Proliferation experiments with mouse myeloidic FDC-P1 cells transfected with rbGHR (3B9 cell line) or hGHR (9D11 cell line) show that the somatogenic-receptor-mediated biological activity of both analogues was completely abolished (Fig. 5, A and B). In contrast, both analogues retained substantial biological activity in two bioassays in which the signal was transduced through lactogenic receptors. Proliferation assay of Nb2-11C cells revealed only 3- and 6-fold loss of activity for bPL(G133K) and bPL(G133R), respectively (Fig. 5C). In another bioassay, in which casein secretion in rabbit mammary gland acini was determined, both analogues were as active as wild type bPL (Fig. 5D). To investigate the antagonistic properties of the analogues, the same somatogenic and lactogenic receptor-mediated bioassays were used. In those assays, we measured the ability of the analogues to inhibit proliferation of bPL-stimulated cells in FDC-P1 cells transfected with rbGHR or hGHR and in Nb2-11C cells expressing rPRLR. In both somatogenic FDC-P1 cell lines inhibition was observed when treating the cells at 0.18 nM bPL concentration, which resulted in a submaximal cell proliferation rate. Both bPL(G133K) and bPL(G133R) produced half-maximal inhibition of activity in FDC-P1 cells transfected with rbPRLR at concentrations of 0.13 and 0.27 nM, respectively (Fig. 6A). The inhibitory activity was also observed in the FDC-P1 cell line transfected with hGHR, although about 100-fold higher concentrations (12 and 19 nM, respectively) of both bPL(G133K) and bPL(G133R) were required to achieve the same extent of inhibition (Fig. 6B). In contrast, addition of bPL analogues in 10-100-fold excess to Nb2-11C cells stimulated with 0.011 nM bPL (which is the suboptimal concentration) had no inhibitory effect but had an additive effect and elevated the cell growth to maximum (not shown).
The CD spectra of both bPL(G133K) and bPL(G133R) were almost identical to that of wild type hormone, indicating that mutations at position 133 did not change the overall secondary structure and that the analogues were refolded correctly. This conclusion was further verified by the finding that the in vitro biological activity of both analogues mediated by heterologous lactogenic receptors was fully retained in rabbit mammary gland acini culture and only partially reduced in Nb2-11C rat lymphoma cells. Therefore the changes resulting from the G133K or G133R mutation should be attributed to a specific local effect rather than to an incorrect refolding. Binding of the bPL and bPL analogues to somatogenic and lactogenic receptors was studied using three independent methods: gel filtration of their complexes with soluble recombinant extracellular domains of hGHR and rat and rbPRLRs, binding experiments to intact cells with somatogenic or lactogenic receptors or to microsomal fraction from rabbit mammary gland, and SPR methodology, which was already proven to be an excellent tool for studying the real time kinetics of binding to several soluble lactogenic and somatogenic receptors (26). Gel filtration experiments indicated that unlike the wild type bPL both bPL(G133R) and bPL(G133K) lost their ability to homodimerize soluble ECDs of both rat and rabbit PRLRs and hGHR. In contrast to these findings, binding experiments of both analogues to hGH and rbGH receptors in intact cells indicated no change or only slight change in comparison with bPL. Binding to the lactogenic receptors was only partially reduced for both analogues. The discrepancy obtained by the two methods may be explained by an assumption that the binding experiments of both wild type hormone and both analogues show binding to site 1 only, whereas in gel filtration experiments the wild type hormone is capable of forming a 1:2 complex. This conclusion is further substantiated by the facts that: 1) in all cases the results of binding experiments gave a better match to the one-site than the two-site model and 2) the gel filtration experiments were performed at 2 µM complex concentration, in contrast to the binding assays, carried out at pM to nM concentrations. Thus, in the case of bPL the high concentrations of the reagents favor the appearance of the 2:1 complex in gel filtration but not in the binding experiments. A detailed kinetic analysis by SPR was performed because neither the gel filtration nor the binding experiments provided a sufficient understanding of all the changes in binding properties. The advantage of the kinetic analysis stems from its ability to deduce the stoichiometry of interaction, even in very transient ligand-receptor interactions, and to permit calculations of the kinetic constants. Kinetic analysis and simulation revealed that in all cases both analogues were capable of forming a 1:2 complex with the respective R-ECDs the mutations destabilized the complex mainly because of an increase in koff constants for site 2 and subsequent increase in the corresponding Kd value. The interaction of both analogues with rPRLR-ECD was much more affected than the interaction with rbPRLR-ECD or hGHR-ECD, likely because of the increase in the koff constants for site 1. This interpretation is supported by the competitive binding experiments (Fig. 2C) and by the fact that the biological activity in the rat lymphoma Nb2 cells was reduced. The results presented in this paper raise fundamental questions about the connection between the binding of bPL and its analogues to somatogenic or lactogenic receptors and the biological activity transduced as a result of this interaction. It was shown that despite the reduced affinity of site 2 of the analogues toward both somatogenic and lactogenic receptors, dramatic reduction in biological activity and even conversion of the agonist to antagonist was observed in events mediated through somatogenic receptors only. In contrast, in events mediated through lactogenic receptors, in which the effect of mutation on the binding to lactogenic receptors or their ability to homodimerize the PRLR-ECDs was strongly impaired, the lactogenic receptor-mediated biological activity was not, or was only slightly, affected. Although the three-dimensional structure of bPL is not known, we have recently found that the related hormone oPL has two binding sites and forms a 1:2 complex with rPRLR-ECD (28), suggesting that a similar complex may also be formed with bPL. Structural analysis of the complex suggests that Gly133 of the hormone is located close to the receptor Trp72,3 which is homologous to Trp104 in hGHR and is conserved in all GH and PRL receptors (29). Replacement of Gly by a large, positively charged side chain interferes with the formation of a homodimeric complex, and in the case of hGH (11, 30) or bGH (30) this mutation led to the appearance of antagonistic activity. We could therefore expect that a similar mutation in bPL, namely G133K or G133R, would lead to an appearance of antagonistic activity toward lactogenic receptors as well. As shown above, at least in the two tested models (rabbit mammary gland acini culture and Nb2 lymphoma cells), this did not happen. One possible explanation could be that dimerization of lactogenic receptors is not obligatory for initiation of transduced signal. Such a suggestion seems extremely unlikely in light of both direct (31) and indirect evidence (26, 32), which shows the opposite, and by the recent crystalographic analysis that shows formation of an 1:2 oPL-rPRLR-ECD complex (28). However, an alternative explanation may be proposed in view of our recent suggestion that transient dimerization of PRLRs, lasting a few seconds or less, is sufficient to elicit full biological response (26, 33). This assumption is supported by the finding that after the homodimeric complex is formed, receptor-associated JAK2 or other kinases are instantly activated by mutual transphosphorylation, forming docking sites for other downstream proteins (34, 35). Once this occurs, the receptor dimers are no longer needed. This hypothesis is likely to be true for biological events induced through both lactogenic and somatogenic receptors. The present experiments indicate, however, that the minimal duration of the existence of the homodimeric complex required for the initiation of the biological signal may be shorter for the lactogenic than for the somatogenic receptors. A possible reason for this difference is the recent finding that JAK2, which serves as a mediator of both receptors, is already associated with lactogenic receptors prior to hormone binding-induced receptor dimerization, whereas in somatogenic receptors the JAK2-receptor association occurs subsequently to receptor dimerization (36). Although direct evidence that would support this suggestion is not yet available and our present conclusion is based on inference, it seems to be the only logical and plausible explanation of the experimental data. Transphosphorylation of cytokine receptor-associated kinases is likely a very rapid phenomenon. It should be noted that although initial publications suggested that maximal phosphorylation of JAK2 associated to PRL or GH receptors occurs within 5 min (34), other publications show maximal JAK2 phosphorylation occurring already after 0.5-1 min (37-39). Maximal phosphorylation of JAK2 in MA-10 Leyding cells is also achieved within 0.5 min.4 Furthermore we have reported that maximal rbPRLR phosphorylation in stably transfected CHO cells occurred already after 0.5 min (40), and another group recently reported that maximal phosphorylation of Stat5A and Stat5B, which occurs downstream from JAK2 activation, was detected after 1 min of exposure (41). Documenting this phenomenon at shorter periods is technically difficult. In conclusion it seems that the classical pharmacological theory that the biological activity is directly related to receptor occupancy does not apply to cytokine receptors in which short term homo- or heterodimerization is sufficient to initiate the transduction of the biological signal. Our present hypothesis explains also the paradoxical agonistic activity of hPRL (G129R), which contrary to expectation exhibited no antagonistic activity in the Nb2 lymphoma cells (42). It also suggests an explanation why the hGH(G120R), which is a site 2 antagonist toward somatogenic receptors, was found to be a potent agonist in Nb2 cells cultured in the absence of zinc ions (43).
We are grateful to Dr. A. M. de Vos and Dr. P. A. Elkins from Genentech Inc. (South San Francisco, CA) for the information concerning the structure of the oPL:(rPRLR-ECD)2 complex. We also thank Dr. A. Levanon from Biotechnology General (Israel) for recombinant hGH.
* This work was supported by United States-Israel Binational Agricultural and Development Fund Grant US-2109-92R.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 The abbreviations used are: PL, placental lactogen; PRL, prolactin; PRLR, PRL receptor; GH, growth hormone; GHR, GH receptor; ECD, extracellular domain; R-ECD, receptor ECD; h, human; b, bovine; o, ovine; r, rat; rb, rabbit; RU, resonance unit; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; SPR, sulfon plasmon resonance; HBS, Hepes-buffered saline; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT, retention time.
2 N. Daniel and J. Djiane, unpublished data.
3 A. M. De Vos, personal communication.
4 S. Merchav, personal communication.
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||