J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 28, 17954-17961, July 10, 1998
Involvement of Retinoic Acid/Retinoid Receptors in the Regulation
of Murine
B-crystallin/Small Heat Shock Protein Gene Expression in
the Lens*
Rashmi
Gopal-Srivastava
,
Ales
Cvekl, and
Joram
Piatigorsky§
From the Laboratory of Molecular and Developmental Biology, NEI,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-2730
 |
ABSTRACT |
Crystallins are a diverse group of abundant
soluble proteins that are responsible for the refractive properties of
the transparent eye lens. We showed previously that Pax-6 can activate
the
B-crystallin/small heat shock protein promoter via the
lens-specific regulatory regions LSR1 (
147/
118) and LSR2
(
78/
46). Here we demonstrate that retinoic acid can induce the
accumulation of
B-crystallin in N/N1003A lens cells and that
retinoic acid receptor heterodimers (retinoic acid receptor/retinoid X
receptor; RAR/RXR) can transactivate LSR1 and LSR2 in cotransfection
experiments. DNase I footprinting experiments demonstrated that
purified RAR/RXR heterodimers will occupy sequences resembling retinoic
acid response elements within LSR1 and LSR2. Electrophoretic mobility
shift assays using antibodies indicated that LSR1 and LSR2 can interact
with endogenous RAR/RXR complexes in extracts of cultured lens cells.
Pax-6 and RAR/RXR together had an additive effect on the activation of
B-promoter in the transfected lens cells. Thus, the
B-crystallin gene is activated by Pax-6 and retinoic acid receptors,
making these transcription factors examples of proteins that have
critical roles in early development as well as in the expression
of proteins characterizing terminal differentiation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The refractive properties of the transparent eye lens depend on a
diverse group of globular proteins called crystallins that comprise
approximately 90% of the water-soluble proteins of this tissue (1, 2).
Despite their specialized function in the lens, crystallins are
surprisingly diverse and may differ among species. Moreover,
crystallins often play more than one biological role, a situation
called gene sharing (3), with many being related or identical to
metabolic enzymes or stress proteins (4-6). These multifunctional
crystallins are expressed very highly in the lens and to a lesser
extent in other tissues, where they have nonrefractive roles.
The molecular basis for the specialized expression of crystallin genes
has been investigated for some time (7). While no one
cis-control element or transcription factor is solely
responsible for the high lens expression of the crystallin genes, Pax-6
(8-11) and retinoic acid (RA)1 (12-14) appear to have
prominent roles. This is consistent with the critical use of these transcription factors for eye and lens development (15-28).
We have been studying mouse
B-crystallin, a conserved small heat
shock protein (29, 30) that is constitutively expressed highly in the
lens and more moderately in many other tissues (31, 32).
B-crystallin is also induced by stress (33) and overexpressed in
numerous diseases (34, 35). The differential constitutive expression of
the murine
B-crystallin gene is developmentally and
transcriptionally controlled (32, 36, 37). Transgenic mouse experiments
have established that the sequences downstream of
164 are sufficient
to direct lens-specific gene expression (38). This 5'-flanking sequence
contains two lens-specific regulatory regions called LSR1 (
147/
118)
and LSR2 (
78/
46). Pax-6 can interact with both LSR1 and LSR2 and
activate the
B-crystallin promoter in transient transfection
experiments (39). In the present study, we show by DNase I
footprinting, antibody/electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA),
site-directed mutagenesis, and transient-cotransfection experiments
that RAR/RXR heterodimers can interact at retinoic acid-responsive
elements (RAREs) within LSR1 and LSR2 and can activate the
B-crystallin promoter in lens cells either alone or collaboratively
with Pax-6.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Nucleic Acid Isolation--
For transfection experiments,
plasmid DNA was isolated and purified using the Qiagen plasmid kit
according to the manufacturer's instructions (Qiagen Inc., Chatsworth,
CA).
Northern (RNA) Analysis--
Total RNA was isolated from
N/N1003A cells (40) treated with RA (Sigma) by using the RNA Isolation
Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and subsequently fractionated by
electrophoresis through a 1.5% agarose-formaldehyde gel. The RNA was
transferred to a Duralon membrane (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and
hybridized to a 230-base pair HindIII-BamHI
restriction fragment from exon 3 of the mouse
B-crystallin gene
(32). The probe was labeled by using the Ready-To-Go Random Prime
Labeling System (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Prehybridizations were
performed at 60 °C for 30 min, and hybridizations were carried out
at 60 °C for 90 min by using QuickHyb (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. Membranes were washed
and autoradiographed as described previously (41). Methylene blue
staining was performed as earlier (42) to monitor the integrity of RNA,
the relative amounts of RNA loaded on the gel, and the efficiency of
transfer to Duralon membranes. Membranes were exposed for
autoradiography on Kodak XAR5 film at
80 °C with an intensifying
screen for 12 h.
Nuclear Extracts, Oligonucleotides, and Antisera--
Nuclear
extracts (9) were prepared from
TN4-1 (43) and N/N1003A lens cells.
Complementary oligodeoxynucleotides were synthesized (model 380A
synthesizer; Applied Biosystems) and annealed at a 1:1 molar ratio as
described previously (44). The oligodeoxynucleotides were labeled on
one strand using T4 polynucleotide kinase, and electrophoretic mobility
shift assays (EMSAs) were performed as described previously (44).
Double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides LSR1, LSR2, and short LSR2
containing sequences
136 to
109,
78 to
28, and
73 to
48,
respectively, of the
B-crystallin promoter were used for EMSAs.
Anti-mouse RAR/RXR monoclonal antibodies (45) were generous gifts from
Drs. Pierre Chambon and Maria Gaub (Centre National de la Recherche
Scientifique, Strasbourg, France). Polyclonal antibodies were bought
from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA) (anti-RXR
,
catalog number sc 831; anti-RAR
, catalog number sc 551; anti-RAR
,
catalog number sc 552; anti-RAR
, catalog number sc 773; and
anti-RXR
, catalog number sc 774).
EMSA and DNase I Footprinting--
A polymerase chain
reaction-generated fragment corresponding to the
190 to +40 sequence
of the
B-crystallin gene was used for footprinting experiments with
purified mouse RAR/RXR receptors. DNA and protein were incubated and
treated with DNase I as described previously (44). The RAR/RXR proteins
were kindly provided by Drs. Keiko Ozato and Jorge Blanco (NICHD,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). RAR
was obtained from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology. End-labeling, EMSA, and DNase I footprinting
were performed as described earlier (44).
Western (Protein) Analysis--
Nuclear extracts prepared from
TN4-1 and N/N1003A lens cells were fractionated by electrophoresis
in a Tris-glycine polyacrylamide gel; the separated proteins were
transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using a Trans-Blot (Bio-Rad).
Immunoblotting was performed according to the manufacturer's
instructions (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA).
Site-directed Mutagenesis--
Plasmids containing mutations
generated previously (38) within the
164/+44
EcoRI/PstI fragment of the mouse
B-crystallin gene, cloned in pRD30A (36), were used for transient transfection experiments and EMSAs. In brief, site-specific mutations (Mu-9762 and
Mu-9763) (38) were introduced by using an oligodeoxynucleotide-directed mutagenesis kit (Sculptor in vitro mutagenesis kit, Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). Mutated oligodeoxynucleotides contained the
substitution sequence TCTAGA (XbaI site) and 20 bases on
each side complementary to the
B-crystallin promoter sequence. The
resulting mutated restriction fragments were subcloned into pRD30A at
the unique BamHI site (36). All constructs were confirmed by
sequencing the ligated junctions and mutated regions.
Cell Culture, Transient Transfections, and CAT Assays--
Mouse
COP-8 fibroblasts (46) and N/N1003A lens cells were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Inc.)
containing 10% fetal calf serum and 50 µg/ml of gentamicin in 10%
CO2. The cells were propagated on 60-mm diameter plastic dishes. 10 µg of wild-type
B-promoter-cat plasmids
(p65-7 and p11-3) (36) or mutated test plasmids (Mu-9762 and Mu-9763)
(38); increasing amounts (0.25-1 µg) of pSV40RAR
and pRSVRXR
(gifts from Drs. Keiko Ozato and Jorge Blanco), which express the
wild-type RAR
and RXR
, respectively (47); and 2 µg of internal
control pCH110, which expresses
-galactosidase (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech), were cotransfected for 6 h by the calcium phosphate
method as described previously (44). Cells were treated with 100 µl
of 0.1 ng/ml of RA in the morning following transfection for 1 h. The cells were harvested, and extracts were prepared 48 h after transfection. CAT activities were determined by the biphasic assay (48), and
-galactosidase activities were determined as described previously (44). The transfection data represent the means of three
separate experiments, with each experiment being conducted in
duplicate.
 |
RESULTS |
Northern Blot Hybridization of
B-crystallin mRNA--
In
order to test whether retinoid signaling can induce endogenous
B-crystallin gene expression in lens cells, Northern blot hybridizations were performed with total RNA isolated from N/N1003A cells treated with increasing concentrations of RA (Fig.
1). The intensity of hybridization of the
labeled probe to
B-crystallin mRNA was approximately 3 times
greater in the cells treated with higher concentrations of RA (Fig. 1,
lanes 1-3). Control tests showed no increase in
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and
-actin mRNAs after
treatment with RA (data not shown).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Northern blot hybridization of total RNA from
RA-treated N/N1003A lens cells. RNA was isolated from N/N1003A
cells treated with 0.1, 1, and 10 ng/ml of RA (lanes 1-3,
respectively). 10 µg of total RNA was loaded onto each lane. The
membrane was hybridized with the B-crystallin exon 3 probe as
described under "Experimental Procedures."
|
|
Western Blot Analysis for RAR/RXR Receptors--
Nuclear extracts
from N/N1003A and
TN4-1 lens cells were used to test for the
presence of RAR/RXR receptors. Western blot analysis using anti-RAR and
anti-RXR antibodies showed that both
TN4-1 and N/N1003A cells
express RAR (Fig. 2A,
lanes 3 and 4) and RXR receptors (Fig.
2B, lanes 3 and 4),
consistent with the induction of
B-crystallin gene expression by RA.
Purified RAR
(Fig. 2A, lane 2) and
RXR
(Fig. 2B, lane 1) were used as
positive controls in these tests.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Western blot analysis of nuclear proteins
from TN4-1 and N/N1003A cells. A Tris-glycine polyacrylamide
gel (Novex, San Diego, CA) was used. Markers, the molecular
weight markers used as standards (Seeblue; Novex, San Diego, CA).
A, the arrow indicates the major immunoreactive
band for RAR. RAR migrated just below the 64-kDa marker protein.
B, the arrow indicates the major immunoreactive
band for RXR . RXR migrated just below the 64-kDa marker
protein.
|
|
DNase I Footprinting with Lens Nuclear Extract and RAR/RXR--
We
next examined the possibility that heterodimers of retinoic acid
receptors can bind to the lens-specific sites LSR1 and LSR2. Three
retinoic acid receptor heterodimers (RAR
/RAR
, RXR
/RAR
, and
RAR
/RXR
) were tested for the ability to protect the
190/+40 fragment of the
B-crystallin gene from digestion with DNase. Fig.
3 shows that three regions were protected
by each of the heterodimers tested, with the weakest footprint
generated by RXR
/RAR
. The protected regions comprised LSR1
(
132/
110), LSR2 (
73/
54), and a region between LSR1 and LSR2
(
106/
87). The LSR1 and LSR2 sequence was footprinted on both DNA
strands; however, the intervening region (
106/
87) was not
footprinted on the upper (sense) strand (data not shown).

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
DNase I footprinting of the murine
B-crystallin promoter with purified RAR/RXR proteins. Lower
(antisense) strand 5'-end-labeled probe was incubated with protein
(6-12 µg) for 15 min and digested with DNase I as described
previously (44). G + A lanes, Maxam-Gilbert G + A reactions.
Lanes 1-3 contain free DNA; lanes 4-7 contain
DNAs incubated with RAR/RXR protein. Regions found protected from DNase
I digestion are diagrammed, with their corresponding positions
boxed and numbered. The shaded
boxes represent the strong DNase I-protected sequences in
LSR1 and LSR2 regions.
|
|
The footprinted sequences and the surrounding nucleotides are shown in
Fig. 4A. Regions that resemble
the consensus binding sequence for RAR/RXR (12) are designated RARE in
Fig. 4B; the nucleotides represented by the
larger uppercase letters conform with
the RAR/RXR consensus binding sequence, while the nucleotides represented by the smaller letters deviate from
the consensus binding sequence. In general, the DNase I-footprinted
sequences in both LSR1 and LSR2 match quite well with the RAR/RXR
consensus binding sequence.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
A, summary of DNase I footprinting for
lower (antisense) strand. Footprints for RAR/RXR are shown as
open boxes. B, alignment of RAR/RXR
recognition sequences in mouse B-crystallin promoter.
Large uppercase letters indicate
matching of the nucleotides with the consensus binding site for
RAR/RXR.
|
|
EMSAs Using Competitor Oligodeoxynucleotides and RAR/RXR
Antibodies--
Next we examined the binding of nuclear proteins
derived from the N/N1003A lens cells to the LSR1 and LSR2 regions of
the
B-crystallin promoter. Incubation of double-stranded
oligodeoxynucleotide LSR2 (
78/
28) with the N/N1003A nuclear extract
resulted in the formation of three major complexes (Fig.
5A, lane
2, C1-3). These complexes were abolished by
competition with self-oligodeoxynucleotide LSR2 (Fig. 5A,
lane 3) and diminished with a double-stranded
oligodeoxynucleotide containing LSR1 (Fig. 5A,
lane 4). Double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides RARE and RAR
, which both contain the consensus RARE site, competed for the formation of complexes 1 and 3 (Fig. 5A,
lanes 5 and 6, respectively). By
contrast, double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide 9718/9719, which
contains the chicken
A-crystallin Pax-6 binding site, and
double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide 926/927, which contains a
consensus binding sequence for Pax-6, competed for the formation of
complex 2 but not complexes 1 and 3 (Fig. 5A, lanes 7 and 8, respectively). Although
we cannot be certain, we believe that the two complexes migrating
faster than complex 3 are nonspecific, since they were not
significantly affected by competition with oligodeoxynucleotides
containing consensus RARE and Pax-6 binding sites.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
A, autoradiograms of EMSAs indicating
that N/N1003A lens nuclear proteins contain RAR/RXR and Pax-6, which
bind to LSR2 of the B-crystallin promoter. Components used in the
binding reactions are indicated above the lanes.
0.1 ng of labeled LSR2 binding site oligodeoxynucleotide containing
sequences from positions 78/ 28 of B-crystallin promoter (all
lanes) was used. The arrows indicates the probe complexed
with nuclear protein. The binding reactions included N/N1003A nuclear
extract (lanes 2-8) plus the following nonradioactive
competitors: an B-crystallin promoter LSR2 oligodeoxynucleotide
( 78/ 28) (lane 3), LSR1 oligodeoxynucleotide
(lane 4), oligodeoxynucleotide containing the
consensus RARE site (47) (lane 5),
oligodeoxynucleotide containing the -RARE consensus site (69, 70)
(lane 6), oligodeoxynucleotide 9718/9719 from the
A-crystallin promoter ( 60/ 27) containing the Pax-6 binding site
(8) (lane 7), or oligodeoxynucleotide 926/927
containing a consensus Pax-6 binding site (71) (lane
8). The nonradioactive oligodeoxynucleotides were used in
100-fold molar excess as competitor DNAs. B, autoradiograms
of EMSAs indicating that N/N1003A lens nuclear proteins contain
RAR/RXR, which binds to LSR1 of the B-crystallin promoter. 0.1 ng of
labeled LSR1 binding site oligodeoxynucleotide containing sequences
from positions 136/ 109 of the B-crystallin promoter
(all lanes) was used.
|
|
Double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide LSR1 (
136/
109) also formed two
shifted complexes when incubated with nuclear extracts derived from
N/N1003A (Fig. 5B, lane 2) and
TN4-1 (Fig. 5B, lane 3) lens
cells. Oligodeoxynucleotides containing the consensus RARE sequence or
the LSR1 sequence competed efficiently for the formation of these
complexes (Fig. 5B, lanes 5 and
6, respectively). The LSR2 oligodeoxynucleotide competed
weakly for formation of the LSR1 complexes (Fig. 5B,
lane 4).
In order to investigate the possibility that the lens nuclear proteins
that bind to the lens-specific regions of the
B-crystallin promoter
have antigenic similarity to RAR/RXR receptors, EMSAs were performed
using double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides containing LSR2 sequences
(
78/
28) and purified RAR
/RXR
heterodimers. A gel shift
complex indicated by C was formed (Fig.
6A, lanes 2 and 11) that was supershifted (indicated by
S) by monoclonal antibodies to RXR
(Fig. 6A,
lane 3) or RXR(
,
,
) (Fig.
6A, lane 6) and by polyclonal
antibodies to RAR
, -
, and -
(RAR(
,
,
)) (Fig. 6A, lane 8) or RXR
(Fig.
6A, lane 10). Neither monoclonal antibodies to RXR
(Fig. 6A, lane 4)
and RXR
(Fig. 6A, lane 5) nor a
polyclonal antibody to RXR
(Fig. 6A, lane
9) supershifted the RAR
/RXR
complex with the LSR2
oligodeoxynucleotide. A major gel shift complex was also formed with a
shorter double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide containing the LSR2
sequence (
73/
48) and
TN4-1 lens cell nuclear extract (Fig.
6B, lane 5). This complex was
diminished by treatment with a monoclonal antibody to RXR
(Fig.
6B, lane 3) and was essentially
abolished with monoclonal antibodies to RXR(
,
,
) (Fig.
6B, lane 1) or RXR
alone (Fig. 6B, lane 3). The RAR antibodies used
in Fig. 6A did not diminish the complexes formed using the
TN4-1 nuclear extract (data not shown). Taken together, these data
show that RAR
/RXR
heterodimers bind to the
B-crystallin
promoter via LSR1 and LSR2 and suggest that similar binding occurs in
lens cell nuclei. However, these data do not indicate which of the
multiple RARs and RXRs bind to LSR2 in the lens cell nuclear
extracts.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
A, EMSA analyses of protein-DNA
interactions using purified RAR/RXR proteins and
32P-labeled LSR2 oligodeoxynucleotide ( 78/ 28). Free and
protein-complexed oligodeoxynucleotides were resolved by 5%
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; supershifts were performed with
monoclonal (lanes 3-6) or polyclonal (lanes
8-10) antibodies. Anti-RXR( , , ) and anti-RAR( , , )
recognize all the forms of their respective antigens. Antibodies are
described under "Experimental Procedures." C, specific
complex; S, supershifted complex. B,
autoradiograms of EMSAs indicating that TN4-1 lens nuclear proteins
are antigenically related to RAR/RXR. Components used in the binding
reactions are indicated above the lanes. 0.1 ng
of labeled LSR2 binding site oligodeoxynucleotide containing sequences
from positions 78/ 48 of the B-crystallin promoter
(all lanes) was used. The arrow
indicates the probe complexed with nuclear protein.
|
|
Functional Cotransfection Tests with RAR
/RXR
and Pax-6
cDNA Expression Plasmids--
To test whether RAR
/RXR
receptors can activate the
B-crystallin promoter, transient
cotransfection experiments were performed using cDNA expression
plasmids in N/N1003A lens cells. Vector alone (pRSV) did not activate
the
164/+44
B-crystallin promoter fused to the cat gene
(p65-7) in cotransfected N/N1003A cells (data not shown). p65-7
contains LSR1 and LSR2. By contrast, cotransfection with a mixture of
pSV40RAR
and pRSVRXR
caused a 5-6-fold RA-dependent stimulation of CAT activity in the cells transfected with p65-7 (Fig.
7A). Cotransfection with
either pSV40RAR
or pRSVRXR
alone, however, did not stimulate the
reporter gene expression to a significant level (data not shown).
pSV40RAR
and pRSVRXR
stimulated CAT expression approximately
3-fold in cotransfection experiments using p11-3, which contains LSR2
but lacks LSR1 (Fig. 7A). The absolute amount of CAT
activity produced from p11-3 was at least 3-fold lower than that
resulting from p65-7 (data not shown). Site-specific mutations Mu-9762
and Mu-9763 that were generated previously in the
147/
118 sequence
(38) of LSR1 were used to verify that RAR
/RXR
stimulates
B-promoter activity through LSR1. Thus, the mutated promoter
constructs (Mu-9760 and Mu-9761) were compared with the wild-type
construct (p65-7) for their ability to direct expression of the
cat gene in N/N1003A cells cotransfected with pSV40RAR
and pRSVRXR
. The
B-crystallin promoters containing the Mu-9762
and Mu-9763 mutations were only about half as responsive as the wild
type promoter in p65-7 to stimulation by pSV40RAR
and pRSVRXR
in
the cotransfected cells (Fig. 7B).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Cotransfection of B-crystallin
promoter-cat and RAR and RXR cDNA constructs in
the N/N1003A lens cell line. A, relative CAT levels in
N/N1003A cells cotransfected with pSV40RAR and pRSVRXR (wild type
RAR and RXR cDNAs, respectively) and either p11-3 (wild type
115/+44 B-crystallin promoter fragment fused to cat
gene) or p65-7 (wild type 164/+44 B-crystallin promoter fragment
fused to cat gene). The CAT levels expressed are relative to
that obtained in parallel cells cotransfected with pSV40RAR ,
pRSVRXR , and pRD30A (the promoterless parent vector) (36).
B, relative CAT levels in N/N1003A cells co-transfected with
p65-7 or the 164/+44 promoter fragment containing the Mu-9762 or
Mu-9763 and pSV40RAR and pRSVRXR . CAT levels are relative to
parallel tests using pRD30A instead of p65-7. Cells were harvested
48 h after DNA removal; CAT activity was determined by the
biphasic assay (48) and normalized with respect to the activity of
-galactosidase, which resulted from cotransfection of pCH110 (see
"Experimental Procedures"). The transfection data represent the
means of three separate experiments, with each experiment being
conducted with duplicate dishes.
|
|
Finally, since both Pax-6 (39) and RAR
/RXR
(above) can stimulate
B-crystallin promoter activity, we tested whether these transcription factors have an additive or synergistic effect in cotransfection experiments. First, we confirmed that the Pax-6 expression plasmid, pKW10-Pax-6 (49), can stimulate CAT expression in
N/N1003A lens cells transfected with p65-7, since our earlier experiments showing a maximum 5-fold increase in
B-crystallin promoter activity were performed in the COP-8 fibroblast cell line
(39). The data in Fig. 8A show
that pKW10-Pax-6 has a similar effect on p65-7 activity in the
cotransfected N/N1003A cells as previously in COP-8 cells, even with
respect to the decrease at higher concentrations of pKW10-Pax-6.
Similar results were obtained with pKW10-Pax-6 and p11-3, which
contains only LSR2 (data not shown). Cotransfection experiments using
pKW10-Pax-6, pSV40RAR
, and pRSVRXR
in conjunction with p11-3
(Fig. 8B) or p65-7 (Fig. 8C) showed that Pax-6
and RAR
/RXR
have an additive stimulatory effect on
B-crystallin promoter activity. The additive stimulation was
approximately twice as great with p65-7 as with p11-3. These data
suggest that LSR1 and LSR2 are regulatory regions that utilize both
Pax-6 and RAR/RXR for
B-crystallin promoter activity.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Transfection of B-crystallin
promoter-cat and Pax-6 cDNA and RAR/RXR cDNA
constructs in the N/N1003A lens cell line. A, relative
CAT levels in N/N1003A cells co-transfected with pKW10-Pax-6 (wild type
Pax-6 cDNA) and either p11-3 or p65-7. B, relative CAT
levels in N/N1003A cells cotransfected with pKW10-Pax-6 and pSV40RAR
and pRSVRXR with either p11-3 or p65-7 (C). CAT levels
are relative to parallel tests using pRD30A instead of p65-7 or
p11-3. Cells were harvested 48 h after DNA removal; CAT activity
was determined by the biphasic assay (48) and normalized with respect
to the activity of -galactosidase, which resulted from
cotransfection of pCH110 (see "Experimental Procedures"). The
transfection data represent the means of three separate experiments,
with each experiment being conducted with duplicate dishes.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have shown previously in transgenic mice using reporter
transgenes that the high lens and lower nonlens expression of the mouse
B-crystallin gene are developmentally controlled at the transcriptional level (36, 37). Lens-specific expression has been
localized to LSR1 (
147/
118) and LSR2 (
78/
46), with the minimal
lens-specific
B-crystallin promoter fragment identified being the
115/+44 sequence (38, 39). The combined presence of LSR1 and LSR2 in
the
164/+44 promoter fragment is approximately 30 times more active
in the lens than is LSR2 alone in the minimal promoter fragment in
transgenic mice (39). Promoter activity is augmented approximately
7-fold in the transgenic mouse lens when the
426/+44 promoter
fragment is used, which includes an enhancer at positions
426/
259
(36, 38). Thus, high lens activity of the mouse
B-crystallin gene
depends on coupling multiple cis-control elements and their
cognate transcription factors.
We have shown earlier and confirm here that Pax-6 can activate the
B-crystallin promoter via both LSR1 and LSR2 in transient transfection experiments (39). Pax-6 also contributes to the lens
expression of the mouse (9) and chicken (8)
A-, the chicken
1-
(10), and the guinea pig
- (11) crystallin genes (7). In recent
transgenic mouse experiments, a mutant TATA-like sequence associated
with LSR2 preferentially reduced
B-crystallin promoter activity in
the lens in a Pax-6-independent fashion, indicating that, as expected,
multiple factors contribute to the specialized activity of the
B-crystallin promoter in the lens (50). The present investigation
shows that retinoic acid receptors, especially RAR
/RXR
heterodimers, can also bind LSR1 and LSR2 and activate the
B-crystallin promoter. The activation of the
B-crystallin
promoter by the simultaneous presence of RAR
/RXR
and Pax-6 is
additive rather than synergistic and leaves unresolved whether or not
these factors physically interact with each other or through
co-factors. Indeed, the mechanism of gene activation by retinoid
receptors has not been established and involves chromatin alterations
as well as direct interactions with DNA sequences (51). It remains to
be determined if retinoic acid receptors play a role in the nonlens or
stress-induction of the
B-crystallin/small heat shock protein
(35).
Retinoic acid receptors are members of the superfamily of nuclear
factors (thryroid hormone, steroid hormone, and vitamin D3 receptors)
and are involved in a wide array of developmental processes (52-56).
The importance of retinoid signaling for eye development in mice has
been established by application of exogenous RA (57) and by deleting
various combinations of RAR and RXR genes (18, 19, 58, 59). The
existence of retinoic acid receptors in cultured lens cells was shown
in our Western blots in the present experiments. A role of retinoid
signaling for lens differentiation is implied by the generation of
abnormal lens phenotypes by ectopic expression of cellular RA-binding
protein 1 (15) and RAR (60) and by the expression of reporter genes driven by RAREs of the RAR
gene in the presumptive (61) and developing (20) lens of transgenic mice. It has also been demonstrated that a minimal promoter-lacZ reporter gene fused to the RARE
from the human RAR
-2 gene is expressed in the zebrafish as early as embryonic day 9.5 in specific embryonic regions including the optic cup
(62). Thus, retinoic acid receptors and Pax-6 are both examples of
general factors that play essential roles in the early development of
the lens as well as in the regulated expression of crystallin genes,
which encode the major proteins of the terminally differentiated lens
(1). This is consistent with the idea that one of the selective
mechanisms used for recruiting the multifunctional crystallins is their
responsiveness to transcription factors required for the development
and maintenance of the transparent lens (5, 6, 63).
So far our data show only that RXR
and at least one of the RARs
(
,
, or
) are present in the N/N1003A and
TN4-1 lens cells. With respect to the intact lens, a broad complex forms with the
LSR2 oligodeoxynucleotide and lens nuclear extract; however, this
complex was unaffected by the addition of the set of RAR and RXR
antibodies used in the experiments with the cultured cells (data not
shown). Because of the overlap between the Pax-6 and RAR/RXR binding
sites, it is possible that Pax-6, RAR/RXR, and other factors present in
the lens nuclei bind simultaneously at LSR2 and leave the
antibody-interactive sites for the retinoic acid receptors unavailable.
In any case, further experiments are necessary to establish
unequivocally which retinoic acid receptors may be involved in the
activation of the
B-crystallin gene in the cultured lens cells and
in the intact lens.
The present results add to previous experiments indicating that RA and
its receptors play a critical role in the regulation of crystallin
genes in the lens. RA has been shown to activate the
1-crystallin
gene in stably transformed mouse teratocarcinoma stem cells (64) and in
cultured lens epithelial cells from newly hatched chickens (17). Recent
cotransfection experiments using reporter genes in recombinant plasmids
have provided more direct evidence implicating retinoic acid receptors
in the control of the chicken
1-crystallin gene (14). Unlike the
1-crystallin promoter/enhancer, the
2-crystallin
promoter/enhancer is not stimulated by RAR
in the cotransfected
primary lens epithelial cells. This differential responsiveness is
particularly interesting, since
2-crystallin, an active
argininosuccinate lysase, is present at a relatively low concentration
in the chicken lens, while enzymatically inactive
1-crystallin is
the major
-crystallin in the lens (3, 65).
Extensive experiments have demonstrated that the mouse
F-crystallin
gene is controlled by retinoid signaling. It was first shown that
RAR/RXR heterodimers bind to a novel everted RARE (called
F-HRE)
consisting of two half-sites separated by eight base pairs in the
5'-flanking sequence (66). The regulation of the
F-crystallin gene
by retinoic acid receptors appears very complex, inasmuch as
F-HRE
is activated by T3R/RXR as well as RAR/RXR, yet is
repressed by T3R/RAR
(13). There is also an RAR-related
orphan receptor, ROR
1, that is expressed in the mouse lens and binds
as a monomer to the
F-HRE 3'-half site and spacer sequences (66).
ROR
1 stimulates
F-crystallin promoter activity in transfected
primary chicken lens epithelial cells. Moreover, ROR
1 occupancy and
promoter activation are blocked by competing RAR/RXR heterodimers in
the absence of RA; the blockage of ROR
1 activation of
F-HRE by
RAR
is dose-dependent and similar to the repression of
the T3 response from
F-HRE reporter plasmids. The
novelty of
F-HRE (12) and the involvement of ROR
1, which does not
compete for binding to
-RARE or TRE (66), raises the possibility
that the stimulation of the
F- and
B-crystallin promoters
operates by different pathways.
Many invertebrates have complex eyes with cellular lenses containing
abundant crystallins (67). Virtually nothing is known about the
developmental pathways controlling the development of these
lens-containing invertebrate eyes or about the regulatory mechanisms
used for expressing their crystallin genes. Recent experiments have
raised the possibility that retinoid signaling may extend to crystallin
gene expression in invertebrates. Two novel lens crystallin genes (J1A-
and J1B-crystallin) cloned from the cubomedusan jellyfish
(Tripedalia cystophora) (68) have RARE half-sites in their
promoter regions, and these sequences bind a cloned RXR homologue
derived from the same
species.2 If a causal
connection can be made between retinoic acid receptors and J-crystallin
gene expression, it would provide strong evidence that retinoid
signaling is a conserved pathway for crystallin gene expression
throughout the animal kingdom.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Dr. M. Busslinger (IMP,
Vienna, Austria) for the Pax-6 expression plasmid, to Drs. K. Ozato
and J. Blanco (NICHD, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) for
RAR and RXR expression plasmids and recombinant proteins, and Drs. M. Gaub and P. Chambon (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique) for
the RAR and RXR antisera.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: National Cancer Institute, EPN, Room 609, 6130 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Bldg. 6, Rm. 201, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-2730. Tel.: 301-496-9467; Fax: 301-402-0781; E-mail: joram{at}helix.nih.gov.
1
The abbreviations used are: RA, retinoic acid;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; RAR, retinoic acid
receptor; RXR, retinoid X receptor; RARE, retinoic acid-responsive
element; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.
2
Z. Kostrouch, M. Kostrouchova, W. Lowe, E. Jannini, J. Piatigorsky, and J. E. Rall, manuscript in
preparation.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Wistow, G.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
57,
479-504[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bloemendal, H.,
and de Jong, W. W.
(1991)
Prog. Nucl. Acid Mol. Biol.
41,
259-281
-
Piatigorsky, J.,
O'Brien, W. E.,
Norman, B. L.,
Kalumuck, K.,
Wistow, G. J.,
Borras, T.,
Nickerson, J. M.,
and Wawrousek, E. F.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
3479-3483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Piatigorsky, J.,
and Wistow, G. J.
(1989)
Cell
57,
197-199[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
de Jong, W. W.,
Hendriks, W.,
Mulders, J. W. M.,
and Bloemendal, H.
(1989)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
14,
365-368[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Piatigorsky, J.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
4277-4280[Free Full Text]
-
Cvekl, A.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1996)
BioEssays
18,
621-630[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cvekl, A.,
Sax, C. M.,
Bresnick, E. M.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
7363-7376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cvekl, A.,
Kashanchi, F.,
Sax, C. M.,
Brady, J. N.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
653-660[Abstract]
-
Cvekl, A.,
Sax, C. M.,
Li, X.,
McDermott, J. B.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
4681-4685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Richardson, J.,
Cvekl, A.,
and Wistow, G.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
4676-4680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tini, M.,
Otulakowski, G.,
Breitman, M. L.,
Tsui, L-C.,
and Giguere, V.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
295-307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tini, M.,
Tsui, L-C.,
and Giguere, V.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
1494-1506[Abstract]
-
Li, X.,
Cvekl, A.,
Bassnett, S.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1997)
Dev. Genet.
20,
258-266[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Perez-Castro, A. V.,
Tran, V. T.,
and Nguyen-Huu, M. C.
(1993)
Development
119,
363-375[Abstract]
-
Ruberte, E.,
Friederich, V.,
Morris-Kay, G.,
and Chambon, P.
(1992)
Development
115,
973-987[Abstract]
-
Patek, C. E.,
and Clayton, R. M.
(1990)
Exp. Eye Res.
50,
345-354[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lohnes, D.,
Mark, M.,
Mendelsohn, C.,
Dolle, P.,
Dierich, A.,
Gorry, P.,
Gansmuller, A.,
and Chambon, P.
(1994)
Development
120,
2723-2748[Abstract]
-
Kastner, P.,
Grondona, J. M.,
Mark, M.,
Gansmuller, A.,
LeMeur, M.,
Decimo, D.,
Dolle, P.,
and Chambon, P.
(1994)
Cell
78,
987-1003[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Balkan, W.,
Colbert, M.,
Block, C.,
and Linney, E.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
3347-3351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ton, C. C.,
Hirvonen, H.,
Miwa, H.,
Weil, M.,
Monaghan, P.,
Jordan, T.,
van Heyningen, V.,
Hastie, N.,
Meijer-Heijboer, H.,
Drechsler, M.,
Royer Pokora, B. Z.,
Collins, F.,
Swaroop, A.,
Strong, L. C.,
and Saunders, G. F.
(1991)
Cell
67,
1059-1074[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Quiring, R.,
Walldorf, U.,
Kloter, U.,
and Gehring, W.
(1994)
Science
265,
785-789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Halder, G.,
Callaerts, P.,
and Gehring, W. J.
(1995)
Science
267,
1788-1792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Halder, G.,
Callaerts, P.,
and Gehring, W. J.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
5,
602-609[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hill, R. E.,
Favor, J.,
Hogan, B. L. M.,
Ton, C. T. T.,
Saunders, G. F.,
Hanson, I. N.,
Prosser, J.,
Jordan, T.,
Hastie, N. D.,
and van Heyningen, V.
(1991)
Nature
354,
522-525[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Glaser, T.,
Jepeal, L.,
Edwards, J. G.,
Young, S. R.,
Favor, J.,
and Maas, R. L.
(1994)
Nat. Genet.
8,
463-471
-
Glaser, T.,
Walton, D. S.,
and Maas, R. L.
(1992)
Nat. Genet.
8,
463-471
-
Martha, A.,
Ferrell, R. E.,
Mintz-Hittner, H.,
Lyons, L. A.,
and Saunders, G. F.
(1994)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
54,
801-811[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ingolia, T. D.,
and Craig, E. A.
(1982)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
79,
2360-2364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
de Jong, W. W.,
Leunissen, J. A.,
Mulders, J. W. M.,
and Voorter, C. E. M.
(1993)
Mol. Biol. Evol.
10,
103-126[Abstract]
-
Bhat, S. P.,
and Nagineni, C. N.
(1989)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
158,
319-325[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dubin, R. A.,
Wawrousek, E. F.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
1083-1091[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Klemenz, R.,
Frohli, E.,
Aoyama, A.,
Hoffman, S.,
Simpson, R. J.,
Moritz, R. L.,
and Schafer, R.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
803-812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Iwaki, T.,
Kume-Iwaki, A.,
Liem, R. K.,
and Goldman, J. E.
(1989)
Cell
57,
71-78[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sax, C. M.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1994)
Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol.
69,
155-201[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dubin, R. A.,
Gopal-Srivastava, R.,
Wawrousek, E. F.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
4340-4349
-
Haynes, J. I., II,
Duncan, M. K.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1996)
Dev. Dyn.
207,
75-88[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gopal-Srivastava, R.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
1281-1286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gopal-Srivastava, R.,
Cvekl, A.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
23029-23036[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Reddan, J. R.,
Chepelinsky, A. B.,
Dziedzic, D. C.,
Piatigorsky, J.,
and Goldenberg, E. M.
(1986)
Differentiation
33,
168-174[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gopal-Srivastava, R.,
Haynes, J. I., II,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
7081-7090[Abstract]
-
Duncan, M. K.,
DiCicco-Bloom, E. M.,
Xiang, X.,
Benezra, R.,
and Chada, K.
(1992)
Dev. Biol.
154,
1-10[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yamada, T.,
Nakamura, T.,
Westphal, H.,
and Russell, P.
(1989)
Curr. Eye Res.
9,
31-37
-
Gopal-Srivastava, R.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
7144-7152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rochette-Egly, C.,
Lutz, Y.,
Pfister, V.,
Heyberger, S.,
Scheuer, I.,
Chambon, P.,
and Gaub, M. P.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
204,
525-536[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tyndall, C.,
La Mantia, G.,
Thacker, C. M.,
Favaloro, J.,
and Kamen, R.
(1981)
Nucleic Acids Res.
9,
6231-6250[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Minucci, S.,
Zand, D. J.,
Dey, A.,
Marks, M. S.,
Nagata, T.,
Grippo, J. F.,
and Ozato, K.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
360-372[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Neumann, J. R.,
Morency, C. A.,
and Russian, K. O.
(1987)
BioTechniques
5,
444-447
-
Czerny, T.,
Schaffner, G.,
and Busslinger, M.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
2048-2061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Haynes, J. I., II,
Gopal-Srivastava, R.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
241,
407-413[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Minucci, S.,
Wong, J.,
Blanco, J. C. G.,
Shi, Y-B.,
Wolffe, A. P.,
and Ozato, K.
(1998)
Mol. Endocrinol.
12,
315-324[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Morriss-Kay, G.
(1993)
BioEssays
15,
9-15[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Giguere, V.,
Tini, M.,
Flock, G.,
Ong, E.,
Evans, R. M.,
and Otulakowski, G.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
538-553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chambon, P.
(1994)
Cell Biol.
5,
115-125
-
Means, A. L.,
and Gudas, L. J.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
64,
201-233[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Eichele, G.
(1997)
Trends Genet.
13,
343-345[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hyatt, G. A.,
Schmitt, E. A.,
Marsh-Armstrong, N. A.,
McCafferey, P.,
Drager, U. C.,
and Dowling, J. E.
(1996)
Development
122,
195-204[Abstract]
-
Krezel, W.,
Dupe, V.,
Mark, M.,
Dierich, A.,
Kastner, P.,
and Chambon, P.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
9010-9014[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Grondona, J.,
Kastner, P.,
Gansmuller, A.,
Decimo, D.,
Chambon, P.,
and Mark, M.
(1996)
Development
122,
2173-2188[Abstract]
-
Balkan, W.,
Klintworth, G. K.,
Bock, C. B.,
and Linney, E.
(1992)
Dev. Biol.
151,
622-625[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rossant, J.,
Zirngibl, R.,
Cado, M.,
Shago, M.,
and Giguere, V.
(1991)
Genes Dev.
5,
1333-1344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hyatt, G. A.,
and Dowling, J. E.
(1997)
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
38,
1471-1475[Free Full Text]
-
Piatigorsky, J.
(1993)
Dev. Dyn.
196,
267-272[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Goto, K.,
Hayashi, S.,
Takeichi, M.,
and Kondoh, H.
(1988)
Cell Differ.
24,
139-147[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kondoh, H.,
Araki, I.,
Yasuda, K.,
Matsubasa, T.,
and Mori, M.
(1991)
Gene (Amst.)
99,
267-271[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tini, M.,
Fraser, R. A.,
and Giguere, V.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
20156-20161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tomarev, S. I.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
235,
449-465[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Piatigorsky, J.,
Horwitz, J.,
and Norman, B. L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
11894-11901[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
DeThe, H.,
del Mar Vivanco-Ruiz, M.,
Tiollais, P.,
Stunneberg, H.,
and Dejean, A.
(1990)
Nature
343,
177-180[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sucov, H. M.,
Murakami, K. K.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
87,
5392-5396