HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a Letter to Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Berman, D. M. Articles by Gilman, A. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Berman, D. M. Articles by Gilman, A. G. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

MINIREVIEW
Mammalian RGS Proteins: Barbarians at the Gate^*

David M. Berman and Alfred G. Gilman

From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235

	INTRODUCTION

Top Introduction References

Hundreds or thousands of chemical and physical stimuli regulate the functions of eukaryotic cells by controlling the activities of a surprisingly small number of core signaling units that have been duplicated and adapted to achieve the necessary diversity. The most prevalent of these units, at least in animal cells, are three-protein modules consisting of signal recognition elements (receptors) and signal generators (effectors) whose activities are linked and coordinated by heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins or G proteins.¹ Collectively, mammalian cells contain hundreds of G protein-coupled receptors and dozens of effectors. It is difficult to count functionally distinct G proteins because we do not understand the significance of the heterogeneity offered by the possible combination of 16 , 5 , and at least 12  subunits (for reviews, see Refs. 1-5).

GDP-bound G protein  subunits have high affinity for a tight complex of  and  subunits. This interaction of  with occludes the sites of interaction of both of these signaling molecules with downstream effectors, and the inactive state is maintained by an extremely slow rate of dissociation of GDP from the oligomer (k ~ 0.01/min). An agonist-bound receptor (typically a 35-60-kDa protein with seven plasma membrane-spanning helices) activates an appropriate G protein by poorly understood interactions that promote dissociation of GDP. High intracellular concentrations of GTP ensure a transient existence of the nucleotide-free G protein, and binding of GTP causes conformational changes in  that result in dissociation of GTP- from . Both of these complexes can then activate or inhibit signaling pathways by engaging in interactions with effectors such as adenylyl cyclases, phospholipases, cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases, and ion channels. Termination of signaling is dependent on the GTPase activity of . Typically slow (k_cat ~ 4/min) hydrolysis of GTP to GDP (which remains protein bound) promotes dissociation of  from effectors and reassociation with .

The slow intrinsic rate of GTP hydrolysis by G proteins is regulated by interactions with so-called GTPase-activating proteins or GAPs. GAPs were first recognized as regulators of protein synthesis factors and low molecular weight GTPases such as Ras. It is now appreciated that certain effectors in G protein-regulated pathways act as GAPs on cognate G proteins (6, 7) and that there exists a large, newly discovered family of GAPs for G proteins known as regulators of G protein signaling or RGS proteins. Although one critical biochemical property of this novel RGS protein family has been defined, knowledge of the requisite regulation of these regulators is negligible. There are hints, however, that these proteins may be poised at centers of signaling to intercept activated G proteins, acting, from a G protein's point of view, as "barbarians at the gate" of cellular signaling.

	The RGS Protein Family

RGS proteins were discovered functionally as negative regulators of G protein signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sst2p) (reviewed in Ref. 8) and Caenorhabditis elegans (EGL10) (9). This information converged quickly with demonstrations of interaction of a mammalian RGS protein with G_i3 in a two-hybrid screen (10); induction of related messages by mitogenic stimuli in human B (11, 12) and T (13) cells; and identification of related sequences by data base searches, application of polymerase chain reaction technology, rescue of the Sst2p-deficient phenotype, and homology-based screening (9, 14-18). These developments have been reviewed previously by others (8, 19-21). To date, 19 mammalian genes are known to encode proteins that contain the diagnostic RGS core domain (Fig. 1). Typically, this 120-amino acid core is flanked on both sides by highly variable arms to constitute a 25-kDa protein. However, the RGS core may be split (observed only in lower organisms), and larger family members have been identified (e.g. RGS3, RGS7).

View larger version (50K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1.   A, primary and secondary structure of RGS4. Only the residues observed in the crystal structure are shown in the alignment, which includes other selected RGS proteins (see Ref. 34). Secondary structure is depicted as either a helix for -helical residues or a thick line for coil. The RGS box consists of four segments, each defined by the color of its secondary structure: red (segment 1), gold (segment 2), green (segment 3), and blue (segment 4). The same scheme identifies these segments in the tertiary structure of RGS4 (B). Residues highlighted in yellow are conserved and form the hydrophobic core of the RGS box. Residues highlighted in gray are conserved and make direct contacts with Gi1. The numbers beneath the alignment indicate RGS4 residues that contact switch regions of Gi1 and the specific switch with which they interact. B, the RGS4-Gi1 complex. RGS4 is drawn with the colored segments defined in A. The Ras-like domain of Gi1 is drawn in dark gray, whereas the -helical domain is in light gray. The three switch regions of Gi1 are shown in red. GDP-Mg2+, bound in the active site of Gi1, is shown as a ball-and-stick model. AlF4 is omitted from the figure for clarity. Modified from Ref. 34, with permission.

	RGS Proteins Are G GAPs

Given the genetic evidence that RGS proteins are negative regulators of G protein signaling that act at the level of the dissociated G subunit or above (but not on or below), the most obvious hypotheses were that RGS proteins might act as inhibitors of GDP dissociation, blocking G protein activation, or stimulators of GTPase activity, facilitating deactivation. There is no evidence for the former mechanism. However, of the eight mammalian RGS proteins that have been examined biochemically, all act as GAPs (15, 17, 22-24).

In the absence of a receptor, the rate-limiting step in steady-state hydrolysis of GTP by a G protein is release of product (GDP dissociation). To examine the effect of an RGS protein on actual hydrolysis of GTP, it is necessary to bypass the rate-limiting step or accelerate it substantially. The first approach requires preparation of substrate, GTP-G, by incubation of the G protein with GTP in the absence of Mg²⁺. Catalysis is then initiated by addition of Mg²⁺ in the presence or absence of an RGS protein, and a single round of GTP hydrolysis is monitored over a typical time course of seconds to minutes. Alternatively, reconstitution of a heterotrimeric G protein with an appropriate receptor in phospholipid vesicles permits addition of a receptor agonist to speed product dissociation; the accelerating effect of a GAP on steady-state GTP hydrolysis can then be measured.

RGS4 is readily expressed in bacteria and purified, and its GAP activity has been studied most extensively. Whatever the actual mechanism for acceleration of GTP hydrolysis, GAPs such as RGS4 can be conceptualized to act as enzymes, binding substrate (e.g. G-GTP) and facilitating its conversion to product (G-GDP) (25-27). Parameters that characterize the reaction include affinity of the GAP for a pseudosubstrate complex (e.g. G-GTPS), K_m for "substrate" and V_max (estimated by measurement of initial rates of GTP hydrolysis at varying concentrations of G-GTP), and the pre-steady state rate of GTP hydrolysis (k_cat) at saturating concentrations of the GAP. This intrinsic rate of hydrolysis may exceed the V_max for steady-state turnover of G-GTP by the GAP if, for example, dissociation of the GAP from G-GDP is slow. The interactions of RGS4 with G_o and G_t are catalytic; a single molecule of RGS4 can accelerate the GTPase activity of multiple molecules of G. The maximal rate enhancement is estimated to be roughly 100-fold with G_t (to 0.5/s at 4 °C). V_max and K_m (at 22 °C) are roughly 3/s and 2 µM, respectively; the affinity of RGS4 for GTPS-bound G_t or G_o is approximately equal to the K_m.

The capacities of G proteins to serve as substrates for RGS protein GAPs are influenced by palmitoylation of G, at least in vitro. Thus, palmitoylation of G_z and G_i decreased their affinities for certain RGS proteins by at least 90%, as well as the maximal rate of GTP hydrolysis (28). These observations are particularly intriguing because palmitoylation of G is reversible and, at least in some cases, is regulated in response to activation of cognate receptors.

Berman et al. (26) compared affinities of GTPS-, GDP-, and GDP-AlF₄-bound forms of G_o for RGS4 by testing their capacity to compete with GTP-G_o for the GAP. The GDP-AlF₄-bound forms of G proteins approximate transition-state complexes (29, 30), and RGS4 has markedly higher affinity for this complex than for the substrate or product complexes. Others have made similar observations with different RGS proteins (15, 23, 31, 32). However, preferential affinity for the transition-state complex is not always manifest. A protein designated G_z GAP, now known to be a member of the RGS family (28), has equally high affinities for both GTPS-G_z and GDP-AlF₄-G_z (33).

The high affinity interaction between RGS4 and G_i1-GDP-AlF₄ permitted crystallization and solution of the structure of the complex at 2.8-Å resolution (34) (Fig. 1). Only the core domain of RGS4 was visible in the crystal. Importantly, it has been demonstrated that this domain contains all of the crucial elements for GAP activity (10, 17, 35, 36). The core of RGS4 contains a classic right-handed, antiparallel four-helix bundle that interacts (via loops along its base) with switches I, II, and III of G_i1. The switches of G proteins are those regions whose conformations are sensitive to the identity of the bound nucleotide (GTP or GDP), and the residues of switches I and II are intimately involved with binding and hydrolysis of GTP. RGS4 does not contribute any residues that interact directly with either GDP or AlF₄. However, a conserved Asn residue in RGS4 (Asn¹²⁸) may interact in the ground state with the hydrolytic water molecule or with the side chain of G_i1 residue Gln²⁰⁴, a critical residue that orients and polarizes the catalytic water in the transition state. It is thus suggested that RGS4 acts as a GAP by stabilizing the flexible switch regions of G proteins in conformations resembling those found in the transition state, thus lowering the activation energy barrier; Asn¹²⁸ may further contribute to the chemistry of hydrolysis by interactions with water or Gln²⁰⁴.

	Comparison with RasGAP

Comparisons of the activities and structures of low molecular weight GTPases with those of heterotrimeric G proteins continue to be useful. The basal rate of GTP hydrolysis catalyzed by Ras is 2 orders of magnitude below that catalyzed by a typical G protein; the rates of GAP-stimulated GTP hydrolysis by both proteins are similar. Much of the difference in the basal activities and, thus, the correspondingly greater efficiency of RasGAP is ascribable to a single Arg residue at the active site of G protein  subunits. Arg¹⁷⁸ in G_i1 participates directly in catalysis by stabilization of the negative charge on -phosphoryl oxygen atoms in the transition state. Ras lacks such a residue and is essentially inactive as a GTPase when compared with G_i1. RasGAP participates directly in GTP hydrolysis by insertion of an "arginine finger" into the active site (37). RasGAP also binds to the mobile switches of Ras, orienting Gln⁶¹ appropriately (Gln⁶¹ corresponds to Gln²⁰⁴ in G_i1). The active sites of the transition-state structures of Ras and G_i1 (associated with their respective GAPs) are amazingly similar. In particular, the critical Arg and Gln residues are in nearly identical positions, even though the Arg residues point into the active site from different directions, and one (G_i1) is contributed in cis, the other in trans (Fig. 2).

View larger version (125K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2.   Superposition of the active sites of the Gi1-GDP-AlF4 (blue) and Ras-GDP-AlF3-GAP334 (orange/red) complexes. Reproduced from Ref. 37, with permission.

	Specificity of RGS-G Interactions

Early recognition of the large number of RGS proteins, a number roughly comparable with that of G subunits, prompted speculation of high specificity in their interactions; this has not been realized to the extent anticipated. G protein  subunits are usually categorized as members of one of four subfamilies, designated G_s (two genes), G_i (eight genes), G_q (four genes), and G₁₂ (two genes). Most RGS proteins tested to date act as GAPs toward members of the G_i subfamily and appear to discriminate minimally among them; G_i proteins inhibit adenylyl cyclases, activate K⁺ channels, inhibit Ca²⁺ channels, and activate cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases. Some of these RGS proteins also act as GAPs toward members of the G_q subfamily (phospholipase C activators) (38). Because GAP assays with G_q are difficult technically, this interaction has been tested in only a few cases. GAPs for G_s and G₁₂ subfamily members have not been detected, although inhibitory effects of RGS proteins on G_s-mediated signaling pathways have been observed (see below). Although we suspect that greater specificity of RGS-G protein interactions than is currently evident will be uncovered, it seems clear that an explanation for the large number of RGS proteins does not lie with any scenario resembling their 1:1 correspondence with G protein  subunits.

	RGS Proteins May Be Effector Antagonists

As noted above, RGS4 binds to the switch regions of G_i1. Logically, these switches are also involved in effector binding, because effectors interact preferentially with GTP-bound  subunits. This proximity or overlap of binding surfaces raises the possibility that RGS proteins can compete for effector binding to G. Such competition has been observed between RGS4 and phospholipase C, which compete for binding to GTPS-G_q (38). In addition, both RGS4 and GAIP prevent pertussis toxin-insensitive activation of phospholipase C by GTPS. Because RGS4 does not stimulate hydrolysis of GTPS by G proteins, a GAP mechanism cannot be operative. Transient expression of RGS4 in COS-7 cells blocked activation of inositol phosphate synthesis by AlF₄, also consistent with an effector-antagonist mechanism (39). Similar observations have been made with RGS proteins, G_t, and its effector, the  subunit of a retinal cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase (27, 32).

Competition for effector binding would not be an effective mechanism for negative regulation of G protein-mediated signaling by a protein like RGS4, which is an active GAP. The interaction of RGS4 with G proteins is transient and itself sufficient to interrupt signaling via the GAP mechanism. The affinity of RGS4 for GDP-bound G proteins is low and presumably insufficient to prevent recycling of G. However, it is possible that other members of the RGS protein family might have preferential affinity for GTP- or GDP-bound forms of , rather than the transition-state complex. These proteins could then, in theory, act as effector antagonists or sequestrants of  such that it could not interact with effectors or . Either of these mechanisms would have consequences substantially different from those of a GAP mechanism. Simple stimulation of the GTPase activity of G deactivates the protein and facilitates association with , blocking downstream interactions by both  and . The other two mechanisms would block signaling by  but would leave -mediated signaling intact.

Chatterjee et al. (40) demonstrated that expression of a truncated form of RGS3 (RGS3T) in baby hamster kidney cells impaired stimulation of cyclic AMP accumulation by the calcitonin gene-related peptide or pituitary adenylyl cyclase-activating peptide. These peptides are presumably activating G_s-coupled receptors, and the question of mechanism is thus of considerable interest. We have tested RGS3T in vitro and detected GAP activity toward G_i and G_o but not G_s.² Direct interactions between RGS3T and G_s have not yet been examined to evaluate the possibility that this RGS protein might act as an antagonist, blocking the binding of G_s to adenylyl cyclase. The first crystal structure of a G protein associated with an effector has now been solved, that of G_s with the catalytic domain of adenylyl cyclase.³ Superposition of the structure of G_i1 associated with RGS4 on that of G_s associated with adenylyl cyclase suggests that the interaction of an RGS protein with a G protein  subunit would not block binding of a G protein to adenylyl cyclase. Although both RGS4 and adenylyl cyclase bind to switch II of G, the structures suggest that the two interactions could be accommodated simultaneously. Speculatively, the GAP activity of certain RGS proteins might be manifest only in the presence of ancillary molecules, such as an effector.

	Regulation of RGS Proteins

RGS proteins have voracious catalytic appetites. Their overexpression in various cultured cells demonstrates that they are capable barbarians, in general obliterating the activities of pathways in manners predictable from their specificities in vitro as GAPs. For example, RGS4 and GAIP block G_i-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (41), whereas RGS3T, RGS4, and to a lesser extent RGS1 and RGS2 attenuate G_q- or G_i-regulated activation of MAP kinase (14, 39, 40). Similarly, RGS3, RGS4, and GAIP suppress G_q-mediated synthesis of inositol trisphosphate (39-42). To date, the unanticipated result from such studies is attenuation of receptor-mediated activation of adenylyl cyclase by RGS3T, discussed above.

The existence of such activities dictates their scrupulous regulation in cells. Although there are hints, we do not yet know how RGS proteins are regulated in vivo or to what purpose. The most obvious paradigm involves feedback desensitization of activated, G protein-regulated pathways. Such desensitization is, of course, well known in these signaling systems, and regulation is exerted at many levels. The first RGS protein to be characterized, Sst2p in S. cerevisiae, fills this role and is itself regulated by control of gene transcription (36, 43). It is likely that this will be at least a part of the RGS protein story in mammalian cells, but broad adoption of this paradigm is premature. There has been only one example of enhanced transcription of a mammalian RGS protein gene in response to activation of a G protein-coupled receptor (14), whereas regulation of transcription of other RGS proteins has been noted in response to expression of p53 (44) or polyclonal activation of T cells and B cells (11-13). The apparently broad specificity of the interactions of many RGS proteins with G proteins also dictates caution in interpretation of the physiological consequences of RGS protein action. Will RGS proteins act predominantly as feedback inhibitors of activated pathways, transducers of cross-talk between signaling systems, or both?

Even less well understood are potential roles of subcellular localization and posttranslational modification in regulation of RGS protein function. There are indications that these will be fruitful areas for experimentation. Many RGS proteins have no obvious motifs to specify localization at sites of action, but some do and there are suggestions of others. Ret-RGS1 contains a hydrophobic domain near the amino terminus suggestive of transmembrane insertion (17). GAIP and Ret-RGS1 contain a cysteine string (17, 45), and GAIP is palmitoylated and membrane-bound (45). An RGS protein was discovered as a partner that interacts with the carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic tail of polycystin, a large integral membrane protein of unknown function implicated in the genesis of polycystic renal disease.⁴ RGS4 and other members of the family appear to interact directly with adenylyl cyclases.⁵ Perhaps RGS proteins bind to effectors for G protein action, poised to intercept and deactivate GTP-bound  subunits after their dissociation from . Muallem and Wilkie⁶ have demonstrated that RGS protein boxes, which retain full potency and efficacy when tested in vitro, are markedly less effective than their full-length, "armed" counterparts when tested in vivo.

Although the observations mentioned briefly in the previous paragraph are in some ways disjointed and several of them are quite preliminary, we believe they speak to an exciting future for research in this area. Only simplistic models of RGS protein action can be drawn now (Fig. 3), and we believe they will be proven entirely inadequate. The near future will almost certainly yield a great deal of new information about regulation of RGS protein concentration, activity, and localization. The specificities of their interactions with G protein  subunits will be defined, as will interactions between RGS proteins and other cellular constituents. We suspect that the various members of the family will play broad biological roles, not only in feedback regulation of G protein function but also in coordination of the activities of G protein-regulated signaling systems with other related pathways.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3.   Possible roles of RGS proteins in cellular signaling. The activities and/or concentrations of RGS proteins are presumably controlled by both G protein-coupled and other regulatory pathways. The arrows drawn from effectors to RGS proteins could represent transcriptional regulation, covalent modification, localization, or other forms of regulation. RGS proteins, acting as GAPs, can then exert negative regulatory influences on G protein-coupled pathways, functioning either as feedback inhibitors or mediators of cross-talk between regulatory pathways.

	FOOTNOTES

^* This minireview will be reprinted in the 1997 Minireview Compendium, which will be available in December, 1997. This is the second article of three in the "Signaling by Heterotrimeric G Proteins Minireview Series." Title adapted from Barbarians at the Gate. The Fall of RJR Nabisco (Burrough, B., and Helyar, J. (1991) Harper & Row, New York).

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 214-648-2370; Fax: 214-648-8812.

¹ The abbreviations used are: G protein, heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory protein; GAP, GTPase-activating protein; RGS, regulator of G protein signaling; GTPS, guanosine 5-3-O-(thio)triphosphate; GAIP, G-interacting protein, an RGS protein.

² D. M. Berman and A. G. Gilman, unpublished observation.

³ J. J. G. Tesmer, R. K. Sunahara, A. G. Gilman, and S. R. Sprang, manuscript in preparation.

⁴ G. Walz, personal communication.

⁵ R. K. Sunahara and A. G. Gilman, unpublished observations.

⁶ S. Muallem and T. Wilkie, personal communication.

	REFERENCES

Top Introduction References

1. Gilman, A. G. (1987) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 56, 615-649[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Bourne, H. R., Sanders, D. A., and McCormick, F. (1990) Nature 348, 125-132[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Simon, M. I., Strathmann, M. P., and Gautam, N. (1991) Science 252, 802-808[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Hepler, J. R., and Gilman, A. G. (1992) Trends Biochem. Sci. 17, 383-387[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Neer, E. J. (1995) Cell 80, 249-257[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Berstein, G., Blank, J. L., Jhon, D. Y., Exton, J. H., Rhee, S. G., Ross, E. M. (1992) Cell 70, 411-418[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Arshavsky, V. Y., and Bownds, M. D. (1992) Nature 357, 416-417[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Dohlman, H. G., and Thorner, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3871-3874[Free Full Text]
9. Koelle, M. R., and Horvitz, H. R. (1996) Cell 84, 115-125[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. De Vries, L., Mousli, M., Wurmser, A., and Farquhar, M. G. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 11916-11920[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Newton, J. S., Deed, R. W., Mitchell, E. L. D., Murphy, J. J., Norton, J. D. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1216, 314-316[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Hong, J. X., Wilson, G. L., Fox, C. H., Kehrl, J. H. (1993) J. Immunol. 150, 3895-3904[Abstract]
13. Siderovski, D. P., Heximer, S. P., and Forsdyke, D. R. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 125-147
14. Druey, K. M., Blumer, K. J., Kang, V. H., Kehrl, J. H. (1996) Nature 379, 742-746[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Chen, C. K., Wieland, T., and Simon, M. I. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 12885-12889[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Chen, C., Zheng, B., Han, J., and Lin, S.-C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8679-8685[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Faurobert, E., and Hurley, J. B. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 2945-2950[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Snow, B. E., Antonio, L., Suggs, S., Gutstein, H. B., Siderovski, D. P. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 233, 770-777[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Siderovski, D. P., Hessel, A., Chung, S., Mak, T. W., Tyers, M. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 211-212[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Neer, E. J. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, R31-R33[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Koelle, M. R. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 143-147[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Berman, D. M., Wilkie, T. M., and Gilman, A. G. (1996) Cell 86, 445-452[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Watson, N., Linder, M. E., Druey, K. M., Kehrl, J. H., Blumer, K. J. (1996) Nature 383, 172-175[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Hunt, T. W., Fields, T. A., Casey, P. J., Peralta, E. G. (1996) Nature 383, 175-177[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Ross, E. M. (1995) Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 50, 207-219
26. Berman, D. M., Kozasa, T., and Gilman, A. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 27209-27212[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Nekrasova, E. R., Berman, D. M., Rustandi, R. R., Hamm, H. E., Gilman, A. G., Arshavsky, V. Y. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 7638-7643[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Tu, Y., Wang, J., and Ross, E. M. (1997) Science 278, 1132-1135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Coleman, D. E., Berghuis, A. M., Lee, E., Linder, M. E., Gilman, A. G., Sprang, S. R. (1994) Science 265, 1405-1412[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Sondek, J., Lambright, D. G., Noel, J. P., Hamm, H. E., Sigler, P. B. (1994) Nature 372, 276-279[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Natochin, M., Granovsky, A. E., and Artemyev, N. O. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 17444-17449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Wieland, T., Chen, C.-K., and Simon, M. I. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8853-8856[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Wang, J., Tu, Y. P., Woodson, J., Song, X. L., Ross, E. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 5732-5740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Tesmer, J. J. G., Berman, D. M., Gilman, A. G., Sprang, S. R. (1997) Cell 89, 251-261[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Popov, S., Yu, K., Kozasa, T., and Wilkie, T. M. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 7216-7220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Dohlman, H. G., Apaniesk, D., Chen, Y., Song, J. P., Nusskern, D. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3635-3643[Abstract]
37. Scheffzek, K., Ahmadian, M. R., Kabsch, W., Wiesmuller, L., Lautwein, A., Schmitz, F., and Wittinghofer, A. (1997) Science 277, 333-338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Hepler, J. R., Berman, D. M., Gilman, A. G., Kozasa, T. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 428-432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Yan, Y., Chi, P. P., and Bourne, H. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11924-11927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Chatterjee, T. K., Eapen, A. K., and Fisher, R. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15481-15487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Huang, C., Hepler, J. R., Gilman, A. G., Mumby, S. M. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 6159-6163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Neill, J. D., Duck, L. W., Sellers, J. C., Musgrove, L. C., Scheschonka, A., Druey, K. M., Kehrl, J. H. (1997) Endocrinology 137, 843-846
43. Dietzel, C., and Kurjan, J. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 4169-4177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Buckbinder, L., Velasco-Miguel, S., Chen, Y., Xu, N., Talbott, R., Gelbert, L., Gao, J., Seizinger, B. R., Gutkind, J. S., Kley, N. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 7868-7872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. De Vries, L., Elenko, E., Hubler, L., Jones, T. L. Z., Farquhar, M. G. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 15203-15208[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. James, Y. Lu, Y. Liu, H. G. Vikis, and M. You RGS17, an Overexpressed Gene in Human Lung and Prostate Cancer, Induces Tumor Cell Proliferation Through the Cyclic AMP-PKA-CREB Pathway Cancer Res., March 1, 2009; 69(5): 2108 - 2116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Bansal, J. A. DiVietro, H. S. Kuehn, S. Rao, K. H. Nocka, A. M. Gilfillan, and K. M. Druey RGS13 Controls G Protein-Coupled Receptor-Evoked Responses of Human Mast Cells J. Immunol., December 1, 2008; 181(11): 7882 - 7890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Hu, J. Xing, L. Chen, X. Guo, Y. Du, C. Zhao, Y. Zhu, M. Lin, Z. Zhou, and J. Sha RGS22, A Novel Testis-Specific Regulator of G-protein Signaling Involved in Human and Mouse Spermiogenesis along with GNA12/13 Subunits Biol Reprod, December 1, 2008; 79(6): 1021 - 1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Gold, C. V. Hoang, B. W. Potts, G. Porras, E. Pioli, K. W. Kim, A. Nadjar, C. Qin, G. J. LaHoste, Q. Li, et al. RGS9 2 Negatively Modulates L-3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine-Induced Dyskinesia in Experimental Parkinson's Disease J. Neurosci., December 26, 2007; 27(52): 14338 - 14348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. G Romero, M. Y. Zhou, L. L Yanes, M. W Plonczynski, T. R Washington, C. E Gomez-Sanchez, and E. P Gomez-Sanchez Regulators of G-protein signaling 4 in adrenal gland: localization, regulation, and role in aldosterone secretion J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2007; 194(2): 429 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Heximer and K. J. Blumer RGS Proteins: Swiss Army Knives in Seven-Transmembrane Domain Receptor Signaling Networks Sci. Signal., January 23, 2007; 2007(370): pe2 - pe2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Wang and H. G. Dohlman Regulation of G Protein and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling by Ubiquitination: Insights From Model Organisms Circ. Res., December 8, 2006; 99(12): 1305 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. W. Tedford and G. W. Zamponi Direct G Protein Modulation of Cav2 Calcium Channels Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2006; 58(4): 837 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. G. Romero, M. W. Plonczynski, E. P. Gomez-Sanchez, L. L. Yanes, and C. E. Gomez-Sanchez RGS2 Is Regulated by Angiotensin II and Functions as a Negative Feedback of Aldosterone Production in H295R Human Adrenocortical Cells Endocrinology, August 1, 2006; 147(8): 3889 - 3897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Castellone, H. Teramoto, B. O. Williams, K. M. Druey, and J. S. Gutkind Prostaglandin E2 Promotes Colon Cancer Cell Growth Through a Gs-Axin-{beta}-Catenin Signaling Axis Science, December 2, 2005; 310(5753): 1504 - 1510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Pereira and R. A. Cerione A Switch 3 Point Mutation in the {alpha} Subunit of Transducin Yields a Unique Dominant-negative Inhibitor J. Biol. Chem., October 21, 2005; 280(42): 35696 - 35703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Benians, M. Nobles, S. Hosny, and A. Tinker Regulators of G-protein Signaling Form a Quaternary Complex with the Agonist, Receptor, and G-protein: A NOVEL EXPLANATION FOR THE ACCELERATION OF SIGNALING ACTIVATION KINETICS J. Biol. Chem., April 8, 2005; 280(14): 13383 - 13394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kovoor, P. Seyffarth, J. Ebert, S. Barghshoon, C.-K. Chen, S. Schwarz, J. D. Axelrod, B. N. R. Cheyette, M. I. Simon, H. A. Lester, et al. D2 Dopamine Receptors Colocalize Regulator of G-Protein Signaling 9-2 (RGS9-2) via the RGS9 DEP Domain, and RGS9 Knock-Out Mice Develop Dyskinesias Associated with Dopamine Pathways J. Neurosci., February 23, 2005; 25(8): 2157 - 2165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Traynor and R. R. Neubig REGULATORs OF G PROTEIN SIGNALING & DRUGS OF ABUSE Mol. Interv., February 1, 2005; 5(1): 30 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. Albig and W. P. Schiemann Identification and Characterization of Regulator of G Protein Signaling 4 (RGS4) as a Novel Inhibitor of Tubulogenesis: RGS4 Inhibits Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Signaling Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2005; 16(2): 609 - 625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Jeanneteau, O. Guillin, J. Diaz, N. Griffon, and P. Sokoloff GIPC Recruits GAIP (RGS19) To Attenuate Dopamine D2 Receptor Signaling Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2004; 15(11): 4926 - 4937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Wang, J. Cutler, J. King, and D. Palmer Mutation of the Regulator of G Protein Signaling Crg1 Increases Virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans Eukaryot. Cell, August 1, 2004; 3(4): 1028 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Mao, Q. Zhao, M. Daigle, M. H. Ghahremani, P. Chidiac, and P. R. Albert RGS17/RGSZ2, a Novel Regulator of Gi/o, Gz, and Gq Signaling J. Biol. Chem., June 18, 2004; 279(25): 26314 - 26322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Roy, K. E. Lemberg, and P. Chidiac Recruitment of RGS2 and RGS4 to the Plasma Membrane by G Proteins and Receptors Reflects Functional Interactions Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2003; 64(3): 587 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. K. Chatterjee, Z. Liu, and R. A. Fisher Human RGS6 Gene Structure, Complex Alternative Splicing, and Role of N Terminus and G Protein {gamma}-Subunit-like (GGL) Domain in Subcellular Localization of RGS6 Splice Variants J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 2003; 278(32): 30261 - 30271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Homme, C. P. Schmitt, R. Himmele, G. F. Hoffmann, O. Mehls, and F. Schaefer Vitamin D and Dexamethasone Inversely Regulate Parathyroid Hormone-Induced Regulator of G Protein Signaling-2 Expression in Osteoblast-Like Cells Endocrinology, June 1, 2003; 144(6): 2496 - 2504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Benians, J. L. Leaney, and A. Tinker Agonist unbinding from receptor dictates the nature of deactivation kinetics of G protein-gated K+ channels PNAS, May 13, 2003; 100(10): 6239 - 6244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Y. Zhou, P. T. Toth, and R. J. Miller Direct Interactions between the Heterotrimeric G Protein Subunit Gbeta 5 and the G Protein gamma Subunit-Like Domain-Containing Regulator of G Protein Signaling 11: Gain of Function of Cyan Fluorescent Protein-Tagged Ggamma 3 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2003; 305(2): 460 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Iacovelli, L. Salvatore, L. Capobianco, A. Picascia, E. Barletta, M. Storto, S. Mariggio, M. Sallese, A. Porcellini, F. Nicoletti, et al. Role of G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase 4 and beta -Arrestin 1 in Agonist-stimulated Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 1 Internalization and Activation of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases J. Biol. Chem., March 28, 2003; 278(14): 12433 - 12442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Chen, W. D. Singer, C. D. Wells, S. R. Sprang, and P. C. Sternweis Mapping the Galpha 13 Binding Interface of the rgRGS Domain of p115RhoGEF J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 2003; 278(11): 9912 - 9919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Sterne-Marr, J. J. G. Tesmer, P. W. Day, R. P. Stracquatanio, J.-A. E. Cilente, K. E. O'Connor, A. N. Pronin, J. L. Benovic, and P. B. Wedegaertner G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase 2/Galpha q/11 Interaction. A NOVEL SURFACE ON A REGULATOR OF G PROTEIN SIGNALING HOMOLOGY DOMAIN FOR BINDING Galpha SUBUNITS J. Biol. Chem., February 14, 2003; 278(8): 6050 - 6058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. E. Weatherby, B. S. Zwilling, and W. P. Lafuse Resistance of Macrophages to Mycobacterium avium Is Induced by {alpha}2-Adrenergic Stimulation Infect. Immun., January 1, 2003; 71(1): 22 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Kohout and R. J. Lefkowitz Regulation of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinases and Arrestins During Receptor Desensitization Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2003; 63(1): 9 - 18. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Wang, G. Ho, J. J. Zhang, B. Nieuwenhuijsen, W. Edris, P. K. Chanda, and K. H. Young Regulator of G Protein Signaling Z1 (RGSZ1) Interacts with Galpha i Subunits and Regulates Galpha i-mediated Cell Signaling J. Biol. Chem., December 6, 2002; 277(50): 48325 - 48332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Meng and P. J. Casey Activation of Gz Attenuates Rap1-mediated Differentiation of PC12 Cells J. Biol. Chem., November 1, 2002; 277(45): 43417 - 43424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-C. Nlend, R. J. Bookman, G. E. Conner, and M. Salathe Regulator of G-Protein Signaling Protein 2 Modulates Purinergic Calcium and Ciliary Beat Frequency Responses in Airway Epithelia Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., October 1, 2002; 27(4): 436 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Hollinger and J. R. Hepler Cellular Regulation of RGS Proteins: Modulators and Integrators of G Protein Signaling Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2002; 54(3): 527 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. C. Taylor Src Tyrosine Kinase-Induced Loss of Luteinizing Hormone Responsiveness Is via a Ras-Dependent, Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase Independent Pathway Biol Reprod, September 1, 2002; 67(3): 789 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Martemyanov and V. Y. Arshavsky Noncatalytic Domains of RGS9-1{middle dot}Gbeta 5L Play a Decisive Role in Establishing Its Substrate Specificity J. Biol. Chem., August 30, 2002; 277(36): 32843 - 32848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Benzing, M. Kottgen, M. Johnson, B. Schermer, H. Zentgraf, G. Walz, and E. Kim Interaction of 14-3-3 Protein with Regulator of G Protein Signaling 7 Is Dynamically Regulated by Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha J. Biol. Chem., August 30, 2002; 277(36): 32954 - 32962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Saitoh, Y. Murata, M. Odagiri, M. Itoh, H. Itoh, T. Misaka, and Y. Kubo Alternative splicing of RGS8 gene determines inhibitory function of receptor type-specific Gq signaling PNAS, July 23, 2002; 99(15): 10138 - 10143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Christopoulos and T. Kenakin G Protein-Coupled Receptor Allosterism and Complexing Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2002; 54(2): 323 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Breitweg-Lehmann, C. Czupalla, R. Storm, O. Kudlacek, W. Schunack, M. Freissmuth, and B. Nurnberg Activation and Inhibition of G Proteins by Lipoamines Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2002; 61(3): 628 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Nagahama, S. Usui, T. Shinohara, T. Yamaguchi, K. Tani, and M. Tagaya Inactivation of G{alpha}z causes disassembly of the Golgi apparatus J. Cell Sci., January 12, 2002; 115(23): 4483 - 4493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ehrlich, K. L. Buchanan, F. Tsien, G. Jiang, B. Sun, W. Uicker, C. M.R. Weemaes, D. Smeets, K. Sperling, B. H. Belohradsky, et al. DNA methyltransferase 3B mutations linked to the ICF syndrome cause dysregulation of lymphogenesis genes Hum. Mol. Genet., December 1, 2001; 10(25): 2917 - 2931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B.-E Xu, K. R. Skowronek, and J. Kurjan The N Terminus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sst2p Plays an RGS-Domain-Independent, Mpt5p-Dependent Role in Recovery From Pheromone Arrest Genetics, December 1, 2001; 159(4): 1559 - 1571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. W. Shepard, M. Yang, P. Xie, D. D. Browning, T. Voyno-Yasenetskaya, T. Kozasa, and R. D. Ye Constitutive Activation of NF-kappa B and Secretion of Interleukin-8 Induced by the G Protein-coupled Receptor of Kaposi's Sarcoma-associated Herpesvirus Involve Galpha 13 and RhoA J. Biol. Chem., November 30, 2001; 276(49): 45979 - 45987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Vaiskunaite, T. Kozasa, and T. A. Voyno-Yasenetskaya Interaction between the Galpha Subunit of Heterotrimeric G12 Protein and Hsp90 Is Required for Galpha 12 Signaling J. Biol. Chem., November 30, 2001; 276(49): 46088 - 46093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Azpiazu and N. Gautam G Protein gamma Subunit Interaction with a Receptor Regulates Receptor-stimulated Nucleotide Exchange J. Biol. Chem., November 2, 2001; 276(45): 41742 - 41747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. J. Nestler Psychogenomics: Opportunities for Understanding Addiction J. Neurosci., November 1, 2001; 21(21): 8324 - 8327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-W. Jeong and S. R Ikeda Differential regulation of G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ channel kinetics by distinct domains of RGS8 J. Physiol., September 1, 2001; 535(2): 335 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Nagata, M. Oda, H. Nakata, Y. Shozaki, T. Kozasa, and K. Todokoro A novel regulator of G-protein signaling bearing GAP activity for G{alpha}i and G{alpha}q in megakaryocytes Blood, May 15, 2001; 97(10): 3051 - 3060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Melliti, U. Meza, and B. A Adams RGS2 blocks slow muscarinic inhibition of N-type Ca2+ channels reconstituted in a human cell line J. Physiol., April 15, 2001; 532(2): 337 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Janetopoulos, T. Jin, and P. Devreotes Receptor-Mediated Activation of Heterotrimeric G-Proteins in Living Cells Science, March 23, 2001; 291(5512): 2408 - 2411. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. Harder, X. Lu, W. Wang, F. Buck, M. C. Gershengorn, and T. O. Bruhn Regulator of G Protein Signaling 4 Suppresses Basal and Thyrotropin Releasing-Hormone (TRH)-Stimulated Signaling by Two Mouse TRH Receptors, TRH-R1 and TRH-R2 Endocrinology, March 1, 2001; 142(3): 1188 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Richards New Signaling Pathways for Hormones and Cyclic Adenosine 3',5'-Monophosphate Action in Endocrine Cells Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2001; 15(2): 209 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. M. Angeles, J. Williams, R. E. Purdy, L. Zhang, and W. J. Pearce Effects of maturation and acute hypoxia on receptor-IP3 coupling in ovine common carotid arteries Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2001; 280(2): R410 - R417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D.M. Shin, X.-S. Zhao, X. Luo, A.K. Bera, and S. Muallem Specificity of Ca2+ Signaling in Polarized Cells Advances in Dental Research, December 1, 2000; 14(1): 12 - 15. [PDF]

				A. A. Preobrazhensky, S. Dragan, T. Kawano, M. A. Gavrilin, I. V. Gulina, L. Chakravarty, and P. E. Kolattukudy Monocyte Chemotactic Protein-1 Receptor CCR2B Is a Glycoprotein That Has Tyrosine Sulfation in a Conserved Extracellular N-Terminal Region J. Immunol., November 1, 2000; 165(9): 5295 - 5303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ujioka, D. L. Russell, H. Okamura, J. S. Richards, and L. L. Espey Expression of Regulator of G-Protein Signaling Protein-2 Gene in the Rat Ovary at the Time of Ovulation Biol Reprod, November 1, 2000; 63(5): 1513 - 1517. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. J. Oliveira-dos-Santos, G. Matsumoto, B. E. Snow, D. Bai, F. P. Houston, I. Q. Whishaw, S. Mariathasan, T. Sasaki, A. Wakeham, P. S. Ohashi, et al. Regulation of T cell activation, anxiety, and male aggression by RGS2 PNAS, October 4, 2000; (2000) 220414397. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. Melliti, U. Meza, and B. Adams Muscarinic Stimulation of alpha 1E Ca Channels Is Selectively Blocked by the Effector Antagonist Function of RGS2 and Phospholipase C-beta 1 J. Neurosci., October 1, 2000; 20(19): 7167 - 7173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D Mark, S. Wittemann, and S. Herlitze G protein modulation of recombinant P/Q-type calcium channels by regulators of G protein signalling proteins J. Physiol., October 1, 2000; 528(1): 65 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Rebecchi and S. N. Pentyala Structure, Function, and Control of Phosphoinositide-Specific Phospholipase C Physiol Rev, October 1, 2000; 80(4): 1291 - 1335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Cho, T. Kozasa, K. Takekoshi, J. De Gunzburg, and J. H. Kehrl RGS14, a GTPase-Activating Protein for Gialpha , Attenuates Gialpha - and G13alpha -Mediated Signaling Pathways Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2000; 58(3): 569 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B. M. Sullivan, K. J. Harrison-Lavoie, V. Marshansky, H. Y. Lin, J. H. Kehrl, D. A. Ausiello, D. Brown, and K. M. Druey RGS4 and RGS2 Bind Coatomer and Inhibit COPI Association with Golgi Membranes and Intracellular Transport Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2000; 11(9): 3155 - 3168. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J. Xu, X. X. Li, F. E. Albrecht, U. Hopfer, R. M. Carey, and P. A. Jose Dopamine1 Receptor, Gs{alpha}, and Na+-H+ Exchanger Interactions in the Kidney in Hypertension Hypertension, September 1, 2000; 36(3): 395 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-Q. Dong, D. Chase, G. A. Patikoglou, and M. R. Koelle Multiple RGS proteins alter neural G protein signaling to allow C. elegans to rapidly change behavior when fed Genes & Dev., August 15, 2000; 14(16): 2003 - 2014. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C.-S. Myung and J. C. Garrison Role of C-terminal domains of the G protein beta subunit in the activation of effectors PNAS, August 1, 2000; 97(16): 9311 - 9316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-W. Jeong and S. R. Ikeda Endogenous Regulator of G-Protein Signaling Proteins Modify N-Type Calcium Channel Modulation in Rat Sympathetic Neurons J. Neurosci., June 15, 2000; 20(12): 4489 - 4496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Sabri, E. Pak, S. A. Alcott, B. A. Wilson, and S. F. Steinberg Coupling Function of Endogenous {alpha}1- and {beta}-Adrenergic Receptors in Mouse Cardiomyocytes Circ. Res., May 26, 2000; 86(10): 1047 - 1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Reif and J. G. Cyster RGS Molecule Expression in Murine B Lymphocytes and Ability to Down-Regulate Chemotaxis to Lymphoid Chemokines ,2 J. Immunol., May 1, 2000; 164(9): 4720 - 4729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Maier, A. Babich, N. Macrez, D. Leopoldt, P. Gierschik, D. Illenberger, and B. Nurnberg Gbeta 5gamma 2 Is a Highly Selective Activator of Phospholipid-dependent Enzymes J. Biol. Chem., April 28, 2000; 275(18): 13746 - 13754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. B. Womack, S. E. Gordon, F. He, T. G. Wensel, C.-C. Lu, and D. W. Hilgemann Do Phosphatidylinositides Modulate Vertebrate Phototransduction? J. Neurosci., April 15, 2000; 20(8): 2792 - 2799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sallese, S. Mariggiò, E. D'Urbano, L. Iacovelli, and A. De Blasi Selective Regulation of Gq Signaling by G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2: Direct Interaction of Kinase N Terminus with Activated Galpha q Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2000; 57(4): 826 - 831. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Pedram, M. Razandi, J. Kehrl, and E. R. Levin Natriuretic Peptides Inhibit G Protein Activation. MEDIATION THROUGH CROSS-TALK BETWEEN CYCLIC GMP-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE AND REGULATORS OF G PROTEIN-SIGNALING PROTEINS J. Biol. Chem., March 15, 2000; 275(10): 7365 - 7372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Grant, B. Lassègue, K. K. Griendling, M. Ushio-Fukai, P. R. Lyons, and R. W. Alexander Specific Regulation of RGS2 Messenger RNA by Angiotensin II in Cultured Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Mol. Pharmacol., March 1, 2000; 57(3): 460 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. Moratz, V. H. Kang, K. M. Druey, C.-S. Shi, A. Scheschonka, P. M. Murphy, T. Kozasa, and J. H. Kehrl Regulator of G Protein Signaling 1 (RGS1) Markedly Impairs Gi{alpha} Signaling Responses of B Lymphocytes J. Immunol., February 15, 2000; 164(4): 1829 - 1838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Vorobiov, A. K. Bera, T. Keren-Raifman, R. Barzilai, and N. Dascal Coupling of the Muscarinic m2 Receptor to G Protein-activated K+ Channels via Galpha z and a Receptor-Galpha z Fusion Protein. FUSION BETWEEN THE RECEPTOR AND Galpha z ELIMINATES CATALYTIC (COLLISION) COUPLING J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2000; 275(6): 4166 - 4170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Busconi, J. Guan, and B. M. Denker Degradation of Heterotrimeric Galpha o Subunits via the Proteosome Pathway Is Induced by the hsp90-specific Compound Geldanamycin J. Biol. Chem., January 21, 2000; 275(3): 1565 - 1569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. R. Miles, J. P. Sluka, R. F. Santerre, L. V. Hale, L. Bloem, G. Boguslawski, K. Thirunavukkarasu, J. M. Hock, and J. E. Onyia Dynamic Regulation of RGS2 in Bone: Potential New Insights into Parathyroid Hormone Signaling Mechanisms Endocrinology, January 1, 2000; 141(1): 28 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Tu, S. Popov, C. Slaughter, and E. M. Ross Palmitoylation of a Conserved Cysteine in the Regulator of G Protein Signaling (RGS) Domain Modulates the GTPase-activating Activity of RGS4 and RGS10 J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 1999; 274(53): 38260 - 38267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Garrison, Y. Zhang, M. Pausch, D. Apanovitch, R. Aebersold, and H. G. Dohlman Feedback Phosphorylation of an RGS Protein by MAP Kinase in Yeast J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 1999; 274(51): 36387 - 36391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Meng, J. L. Glick, P. Polakis, and P. J. Casey Functional Interaction between Galpha z and Rap1GAP Suggests a Novel Form of Cellular Cross-talk J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 1999; 274(51): 36663 - 36669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Zhang, S. Y. Neo, X. Wang, J. Han, and S.-C. Lin Axin Forms a Complex with MEKK1 and Activates c-Jun NH2-terminal Kinase/Stress-activated Protein Kinase through Domains Distinct from Wnt Signaling J. Biol. Chem., December 3, 1999; 274(49): 35247 - 35254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. V. Carman, J.-L. Parent, P. W. Day, A. N. Pronin, P. M. Sternweis, P. B. Wedegaertner, A. G. Gilman, J. L. Benovic, and T. Kozasa Selective Regulation of Galpha q/11 by an RGS Domain in the G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase, GRK2 J. Biol. Chem., November 26, 1999; 274(48): 34483 - 34492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. F. Steinberg The Molecular Basis for Distinct {beta}-Adrenergic Receptor Subtype Actions in Cardiomyocytes Circ. Res., November 26, 1999; 85(11): 1101 - 1111. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. N. Potenza, S. J. Gold, A. Roby-Shemkowitz, M. R. Lerner, and E. J. Nestler Effects of Regulators of G Protein-Signaling Proteins on the Functional Response of the {micro}-Opioid Receptor in a Melanophore-Based Assay J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 1999; 291(2): 482 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. M. Hosey What molecular events underlie heterologous desensitization? Focus on "Receptor phosphorylation does not mediate cross talk between muscarinic M3 and bradykinin B2 receptors" Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 1999; 277(5): C856 - C858. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Wang, J. A. Frost, M. H. Cobb, and E. M. Ross Reciprocal Signaling between Heterotrimeric G Proteins and the p21-stimulated Protein Kinase J. Biol. Chem., October 29, 1999; 274(44): 31641 - 31647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Posner, A. G. Gilman, and B. A. Harris Regulators of G Protein Signaling 6 and 7. PURIFICATION OF COMPLEXES WITH Gbeta 5 AND ASSESSMENT OF THEIR EFFECTS ON G PROTEIN-MEDIATED SIGNALING PATHWAYS J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 1999; 274(43): 31087 - 31093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Song, P. De Sarno, and R. S. Jope Muscarinic Receptor Stimulation Increases Regulators of G-protein Signaling 2 mRNA Levels through a Protein Kinase C-dependent Mechanism J. Biol. Chem., October 15, 1999; 274(42): 29689 - 29693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Morris and C. C. Malbon Physiological Regulation of G Protein-Linked Signaling Physiol Rev, October 1, 1999; 79(4): 1373 - 1430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Jalili, Y. Takeishi, and R. A Walsh Signal transduction during cardiac hypertrophy: the role of G{alpha}q, PLC {beta}I, and PKC Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 1999; 44(1): 5 - 9. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Denecke, A. Meyerdierks, and E. C. Bottger RGS1 Is Expressed in Monocytes and Acts as a GTPase-activating Protein for G-protein-coupled Chemoattractant Receptors J. Biol. Chem., September 17, 1999; 274(38): 26860 - 26868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. Guerrero and K. P. Minneman Coupling Efficiencies of beta 1- and beta 2-Adrenergic Receptors Expressed Alone or Together in Transfected GH3 Pituitary Cells J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 1999; 290(3): 980 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. Mukhopadhyay and E. M. Ross Rapid GTP binding and hydrolysis by Gq promoted by receptor and GTPase-activating proteins PNAS, August 17, 1999; 96(17): 9539 - 9544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Cunningham, T. M. Filtz, and T. K. Harden Protein Kinase C-Promoted Inhibition of Galpha 11-Stimulated Phospholipase C-beta Activity Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 1999; 56(2): 265 - 271. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Y. M. Hajdu-Cronin, W. J. Chen, G. Patikoglou, M. R. Koelle, and P. W. Sternberg Antagonism between Goalpha and Gqalpha in Caenorhabditis elegans: the RGS protein EAT-16 is necessary for Goalpha signaling and regulates Gqalpha activity Genes & Dev., July 15, 1999; 13(14): 1780 - 1793. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				P. Chidiac and E. M. Ross Phospholipase C-beta 1 Directly Accelerates GTP Hydrolysis by Galpha q and Acceleration Is Inhibited by Gbeta gamma Subunits J. Biol. Chem., July 9, 1999; 274(28): 19639 - 19643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Chen, K. T. Seow, K. Guo, L. P. Yaw, and S.-C. Lin The Membrane Association Domain of RGS16 Contains Unique Amphipathic Features That Are Conserved in RGS4 and RGS5 J. Biol. Chem., July 9, 1999; 274(28): 19799 - 19806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Polo-Parada and G. Pilar kappa - and µ-Opioids Reverse the Somatostatin Inhibition of Ca2+ Currents in Ciliary and Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons J. Neurosci., July 1, 1999; 19(13): 5213 - 5227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Druey, O. Ugur, J. M. Caron, C.-K. Chen, P. S. Backlund, and T. L. Z. Jones Amino-terminal Cysteine Residues of RGS16 Are Required for Palmitoylation and Modulation of Gi- and Gq-mediated Signaling J. Biol. Chem., June 25, 1999; 274(26): 18836 - 18842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Luo, W. Zeng, X. Xu, S. Popov, I. Davignon, T. M. Wilkie, S. M. Mumby, and S. Muallem Alternate Coupling of Receptors to Gs and Gi in Pancreatic and Submandibular Gland Cells J. Biol. Chem., June 18, 1999; 274(25): 17684 - 17690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Woulfe and J. M. Stadel Structural Basis for the Selectivity of the RGS Protein, GAIP, for Galpha i Family Members. IDENTIFICATION OF A SINGLE AMINO ACID DETERMINANT FOR SELECTIVE INTERACTION OF Galpha i SUBUNITS WITH GAIP J. Biol. Chem., June 18, 1999; 274(25): 17718 - 17724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a Letter to Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Berman, D. M. Articles by Gilman, A. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Berman, D. M. Articles by Gilman, A. G. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?