|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 32, 20390-20396, August 7, 1998
The Activity of Topoisomerase I Is Modulated by Large T Antigen
during Unwinding of the SV40 Origin*
Daniel T.
Simmons ,
Rupa
Roy,
Lei
Chen,
Dahai
Gai, and
Pamela W.
Trowbridge
From the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware,
Newark, Delaware 19716-2590
 |
ABSTRACT |
When simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen
binds to the virus origin of replication, it forms a double hexamer
that functions as a helicase to unwind the DNA bidirectionally. We
demonstrate in this report that T antigen can unwind and release an
origin DNA single strand of less than full length in the presence of purified human topoisomerase I. The sites nicked by topoisomerase I in
the strands released by T antigen during DNA unwinding were localized
primarily to the "late" side of the origin, and the template for
lagging strand synthesis was preferred significantly over the one for
leading strand synthesis. Importantly, these sites were, for the most
part, different from the sites nicked by topoisomerase I in the absence
of T antigen. These data indicate that T antigen activates
topoisomerase I nicking at discrete sites and releases these nicked
strands during unwinding. We hypothesize that a single molecule of
topoisomerase I can form a functional complex with a double hexamer of
T antigen to simultaneously relax and unwind double-stranded
origin-containing DNA.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Our understanding of mammalian DNA replication has originated
mostly from work on simian virus 40 (SV40). The virus DNA has a single
origin of replication that has been extensively characterized. This
origin is a tripartite stretch of DNA consisting of a central pentanucleotide repeat that serves as the binding sites for T antigen
(the virus initiator protein) (1, 2), an early palindrome from where
melting originally takes place (3, 4), and an A/T-rich track that is
structurally distorted by T antigen (5-7). All three regions are
required for DNA replication (1, 2, 8) and for origin unwinding (9).
Neighboring sequences improve the efficiency of replication but are not
absolutely required (1, 10). These auxiliary sequences are
located on both sides of the origin and may facilitate the unwinding
reaction (11).
A great deal of effort has gone into trying to understand the
composition of the initiation complex at the origin. In the presence of
ATP, T antigen forms a double hexamer that completely protects the core
origin from accessibility to DNase (12-15). This double hexamer
functions as an efficient helicase (16-18) that unwinds the DNA in
both directions (19). At least three cellular proteins have been shown
to interact with T antigen and are believed to be recruited to the
origin to form a functional initiation complex. These include DNA
polymerase -primase (20-23), replication protein A (RPA) (24-26),
and topoisomerase I (27). The order in which these three proteins bind
is not known; nor do we know if all proteins are present
simultaneously.
Recently, the work in our lab has concentrated on the interaction
between T antigen and topoisomerase I. A complex between these two
proteins readily forms in vitro (28), but it has been difficult to demonstrate binding in
vivo.1 Nevertheless,
there are a number of reasons for thinking that an interaction between
T antigen and topoisomerase I has functional significance during SV40
DNA replication. First, topoisomerase I is required for DNA replication
(29-32) as shown in in vitro DNA replication reactions. Its
most obvious function is to relax the torsionally twisted DNA during
replication. Second, topoisomerase I inhibits the ability of T antigen
to unwind DNA at sites other than a complete origin that includes
binding site I, one of the auxiliary sequences. This suggests that it
is present in a protein complex that functions during initiation (27).
Third, topoisomerase I is part of a large protein complex that can
support SV40 DNA replication in vitro (33). Fourth, T
antigen and topoisomerase I can form a complex in the presence of DNA
(34).2 Finally, in
collaboration with Yves Pommier, we (34) have recently shown that T
antigen can reverse the nicking of DNA by topoisomerase I in the
presence of the drug camptothecin, suggesting that T antigen can
influence the activity of topoisomerase I.
When circular DNA is unwound by T antigen, topoisomerase I must relax
the unreplicated, supercoiled portions of the DNA ahead of the
replication forks. Intuitively, a careful balance must exist between
unwinding and nicking activities, and the two must be tightly linked to
one another. If the unwinding activity is much higher than the nicking
activity, the helicase will have to slow down because of torsional
strain in the molecule. On the other hand, if topoisomerase activity is
too high, the DNA will be nicked at too many places and broken strands
may be released by the helicase.
In this study, we investigated the effects of topoisomerase I on origin
DNA unwinding. Using linear DNA fragments, we observed that T antigen
can unwind and release broken single strands in the presence of
topoisomerase I. The DNA breaks were mapped to discrete sites and
differed almost completely from the ones recognized by topoisomerase I
in the absence of T antigen. These results are discussed in terms of a
model whereby a complex of T antigen and topoisomerase I simultaneously
unwinds and relaxes double-stranded DNA.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmids and DNA Substrates Used for Unwinding--
pSKori was
generated by introducing the TaqI-KpnI
origin-containing fragment of SV40 DNA into the large
KpnI-ClaI fragment of pSK( ) (Stratagene). The
DNA substrates used in the unwinding reactions described in this study
were generated by PCR3
amplification of various regions of the SV40 DNA insert of pSKori. An
"up" primer was used in combination with a "down" primer to amplify a certain region of the DNA. The up and down primers used in
this study were as follows: up primers, 4800, 5'-GCT TCA TCC TCA GTA
AGC-3'; 4919, 5'-CAG TTG CAT CCC AGA AGC-3'; 4969, 5'-CCA TCT TCC ATT
TTC TTG-3'; 5019, 5'-ATC TCC TCC TTT ATC AGG-3'; 5171, 5'-AAG CTT TTT
GCA AAA GCC-3'; down primers, 42, 5'-CCA TGG CTG ACT AAT TTT-3'; 276, 5'-CCA GCT GTG GAA TGT GTG-3'; 226, 5'-CAG CAG GCA GAA GTA TGC-3'; 176, 5'-TGT GGA AAG TCC CCA GGC-3'.
The number given for each primer refers to the nucleotide number of the
5'-end of the primer in SV40 DNA. The PCR-generated DNA was purified by
gel electrophoresis and 5'-end-labeled with [ -32P]ATP
in the presence of T4 polynucleotide kinase and subsequently purified
on a "spin" column of Sephadex (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) G-50.
In some experiments, the DNA was cleaved with a restriction endonuclease, and a smaller fragment was purified by agarose gel electrophoresis. This permitted us to generate a DNA fragment labeled
only at one end.
Recombinant Baculoviruses--
Recombinant baculoviruses
expressing WT and mutant T antigens were described previously (28, 35).
Baculoviruses expressing topoisomerase I were obtained from Stewart
et al. (36).
Protein Purification--
T antigen was purified according to
Mastrangelo et al. (15), dialyzed against 0.01 M
Tris, pH 8.0, 0.1 M NaCl, 0.001 M EDTA, 0.001 M dithiothreitol, 50% glycerol (15), and stored unfrozen at 20 °C. Human topoisomerase I was isolated from insect cells infected with a recombinant baculovirus and purified by using standard
chromatography as described previously (36). Concentrations of purified
proteins were estimated by silver staining of acrylamide gels. The
topoisomerase I preparation was judged to be about 90% pure. T antigen
was about 50% pure because it contains heavy and light immunoglobulin
chains eluted from the immunoaffinity column. The contaminating
antibody does not inhibit T antigen's biochemical or DNA replication
activities (27, 35, 37).
DNA-unwinding Assays--
T antigen-mediated DNA-unwinding
reactions were carried out as described previously (27, 37). They were
performed in replication buffer (0.03 M HEPES, pH 7.5, 0.007 M MgCl2, 0.04 M creatine
phosphate, 0.004 M ATP, 0.001 M dithiothreitol,
20 µg/ml creatine phosphokinase, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin) and
in the presence of 40 ng/µl single-stranded binding protein (SSB,
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). In some experiments, topoisomerase I
and/or camptothecin (10 ng/µl) was added. The camptothecin was
freshly diluted in Me2SO as described (34). The samples
were treated with proteinase K and SDS as described previously (37) and
subjected to electrophoresis on a 4% nondenaturing acrylamide gel for
600 V-h or on a 7% acrylamide sequencing gel for 6 h at 1600 V. All gels were exposed to x-ray film. Quantitations were performed by
scintillation counting of bands from dried gels.
 |
RESULTS |
T Antigen Releases Nicked DNA during Unwinding in the Presence of
Topoisomerase I--
We have previously demonstrated that when SV40
large T antigen unwinds an origin-containing linear DNA fragment under
DNA replication conditions, added topoisomerase I has relatively little effect except at high concentrations, where it inhibits unwinding (27).
These unwinding assays were performed with a 112-bp DNA fragment
containing the minimal SV40 origin of replication and T antigen binding
site I. However, when the DNA contains sequences from the late side of
the origin as well, the DNA becomes nicked by the added topoisomerase
I, and the nicked strands become released by T antigen during unwinding
(Fig. 1). A single major band (actually a
doublet; see below) of less than full-length single-stranded DNA was
observed (Nicked, Fig. 1, lanes 3 and
4) in the presence of topoisomerase I and T antigen. Higher
concentrations of topoisomerase I (Fig. 1, lanes
5 and 6) inhibited nicking and unwinding. We demonstrated that the nicked DNA is single-stranded because the same
band was observed after the DNA was denatured by boiling (star in Fig.
2). No nicking was observed in the
presence of T antigen alone (Fig. 1, lane 2).
When the DNA was incubated with topoisomerase I alone, no unwinding or
nicking was detected when the DNA remained native (Fig. 1,
lanes 7-10), but a number of nicked single
strands were seen when the DNA was denatured (Fig. 1, lanes
12-15). The pattern of labeled single strands produced under these latter conditions was different from the one obtained from
single strands released by T antigen in the presence of topoisomerase I. Topoisomerase I alone nicked the DNA at multiple sites, whereas the
single strands released by T antigen were incised at relatively few
sites (see below).

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
T antigen unwinding of SV40 DNA in the
presence of topoisomerase I (Topo I). An
origin-containing fragment of DNA was generated by PCR from pSKori
using the up 5171 and down 176 primers and end-labeled. The DNA was
incubated with or without purified T antigen (400 ng) and various
amounts of topoisomerase I as shown. The reaction was terminated with
stop buffer, and some of the samples were boiled for 5 min to denature
the DNA, as indicated. The DNA was applied to a 4% acrylamide gel in
TBE buffer. The positions of the native double-stranded
(DS), full-length single strands ((SS1 and
SS2 (SS on the left side)),
and less than full-length single strands (nicked) are
shown.
|
|

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
T antigen releases strands nicked at select
sites. A fragment from pSKori was generated by PCR using primers
up 5171 and down 276. The end-labeled fragment was subjected to an
unwinding reaction with or without 400 ng of T antigen and various
amounts of topoisomerase I (Topo I), as indicated. Some
reactions contained camptothecin. Some samples were boiled to denature
the DNA. The double-stranded (DS) and full-length
single-stranded (SS) DNA are indicated on the gel. The
star indicates the position of the major nicked and released
single-stranded DNA.
|
|
T Antigen Does Not Prevent Topoisomerase I Nicking but Directs
Incisions to Additional Sites during Unwinding--
We determined that
topoisomerase I nicks the DNA at multiple sites in the presence of T
antigen, but for the most part, these sites are not used to release
broken strands during unwinding. Fig. 2 demonstrates that if the DNA
from a reaction containing T antigen and topoisomerase I was denatured
by boiling prior to electrophoresis (lanes 7 and
8), the prominent released strands were seen in a background
of less than full-length single strands. These other strands presumably
represent DNA nicked by the topoisomerase I present in the reaction and
not resealed. However, the strands nicked at these sites were not
released during DNA unwinding by T antigen (compare lanes
3 and 7). Importantly, a large proportion of the
DNA nicked at the major sites (star in Fig. 2) was released by T antigen during unwinding.
Since topoisomerase I alone nicks the DNA at multiple sites (Fig. 1),
we asked whether it does so in the presence of T antigen during an
unwinding reaction. To assay for this, we compared the pattern of
single-stranded DNA generated by topoisomerase I in the presence of the
inhibitor camptothecin and in the absence of T antigen with the one
produced under the same conditions but in the presence of T antigen.
Camptothecin acts as a topoisomerase I poison by inhibiting the second
step in catalysis. It permits strand breakage and the formation of a
covalent intermediate between the 3'-phosphate of the nicked strand
with a tyrosine residue (Tyr723) in the protein but
prevents ligation of the broken strand (38-40). We incubated
origin-containing DNA with topoisomerase I and camptothecin in the
presence or absence of T antigen under DNA-unwinding conditions, and
the DNA was analyzed by electrophoresis on an acrylamide gel after
denaturation (Fig. 2, lanes 9-13). In the
absence of T antigen (lanes 12-13), multiple
nicked strands were detected. When T antigen was present, this same
pattern was observed except that it also displayed the strands released
by T antigen (compare lanes 10 and 12,
for instance). Therefore, during DNA unwinding, topoisomerase I is able
to carry out the first step of its reaction at multiple sites on the
DNA, but T antigen releases strands nicked only at very discrete and,
for the most part, different sites.
A Catalytically Inactive Mutant of Topoisomerase I Cannot Nick DNA
during Unwinding--
To eliminate the possibility that an enzyme
other than topoisomerase I was nicking the DNA released by T antigen,
we used a single point substitution mutant of topoisomerase I (Y723P). This mutant is catalytically inactive due to a mutation at the catalytic tyrosine but retains its ability to bind DNA (41). It has
recently been used as a source of protein for determining the
three-dimensional structure of this enzyme (42, 43). Fig. 3 demonstrates that this mutant
topoisomerase I is totally inactive in generating the nicked forms of
DNA. The mutant protein can still interact with T antigen as determined
by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (data not shown) and inhibits, at
higher concentrations, the unwinding of DNA by T antigen (Fig.
3A, lanes 7-10), just like WT
topoisomerase I (Fig. 3A, lanes
3-6).

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
A catalytically inactive mutant of
topoisomerase I (Topo I) does not nick DNA during
unwinding. T antigen (400 ng) and various amounts of WT and Y723P
mutant topoisomerase I were used to program an unwinding reaction of an
end-labeled DNA fragment containing sequences 5171-276. The positions
of the double-stranded (DS), full-length single-stranded
(SS), and nicked single-stranded DNAs (star) are
indicated. A and B represent different exposures
of the same gel.
|
|
T Antigen Deletion Mutants Catalyze the Release of Much Larger
Amounts of Nicked Single Strands--
Deletion mutants of T antigen
missing sequences from the N-terminal end are still able to support DNA
replication in vitro (44, 45).1 One such
deletion mutant missing the first 109 amino acids (designated 110-708)
may be lacking part of a topoisomerase I-binding region (residues
83-246) (28). We were interested in determining, therefore, whether
this mutant was able to promote the release of nicked single strands.
With equal molar amounts of protein, the deletion mutant had slightly
more unwinding activity than WT in the absence of topoisomerase I (Fig.
4, compare lanes 11 and 6), but it possessed substantially more nicked
strand-releasing activity than WT T antigen (Fig. 4, compare
lanes 12-15 with lanes
7-10). Also, whereas WT T antigen's release of nicked DNA
was inhibited at higher concentrations of topoisomerase I (Fig. 4,
lanes 7-10, and Figs. 1 and 3), the ability of
mutant 110-708 to release nicked strands was not affected at all
concentrations tested (Fig. 4, lanes 12-15). Our
interpretation of these results is that a region was removed in the
deletion mutant that down-regulates nicked strand-releasing activity.
Importantly, the pattern of released strands was not altered with the
deletion mutant, indicating that the DNA was nicked at the same sites. However, the higher nicked strand-releasing activity of the mutant along with its altered response to different concentrations of topoisomerase I suggest that its interaction with topoisomerase I is
different in some important way compared with WT T antigen.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Deletion mutant 110-708 has enhanced nicked
strand-releasing activity. An unwinding reaction was carried out
as described for Fig. 1 using either no T antigen (no T) or
molar equivalents of WT T (400 ng) or deletion mutant 110-708 (338 ng)
in the presence or absence of topoisomerase I (Topo I), as
shown.
|
|
To map the inhibitory region removed in deletion mutant 110-708, we
generated several mutants containing smaller deletions from the
N-terminal end and tested them for the ability to unwind and release
nicked DNA in the presence of topoisomerase I. Fig. 5 demonstrates that deletion mutant
83-708 has a reduced origin-unwinding activity and no ability to
release nicked DNA in the presence of topoisomerase I (lanes
3-6). Deletion of an additional 16 amino acids (mutant
99-708) resulted in a protein with similar unwinding and nicked
strand-releasing activities as WT (Fig. 5, lanes
7-10). In contrast, deletion mutant 110-708, as shown in
Fig. 4, had dramatically (about 10-fold) more nicked DNA-releasing
activity (Fig. 5, lanes 12-14). The results
indicate that the region from residue 99 to 109 is necessary for this
inhibitory activity. This region overlaps with the
retinoblastoma-binding domain of T antigen (residues 103-115) (46-48)
and contains one site of phosphorylation (a serine at residue 106)
(49). The 110-708 portion of the molecule seems to concentrate
topoisomerase I's nicking activity to a few specific sites, and
another region overlapping with residues 99-109 appears to
down-regulate this process.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Nicked strand-releasing activity of various T
antigen deletion mutants. An unwinding reaction was carried out as
described for Fig. 1 using either no T antigen or molar equivalents of
deletion mutants 83-708 (353 ng), 99-708 (345 ng), or 110-708 (338 ng). Boiled, a control reaction without T antigen that was
boiled to indicate the positions of the single strands. Topo
I, topoisomerase I.
|
|
Mapping of Sites Nicked by Topoisomerase I in the Presence or
Absence of T Antigen--
In order to map the sites close to the SV40
origin that are nicked by topoisomerase I in the presence or absence of
T antigen, we generated four singly end-labeled DNAs (Fig.
6A), representing each strand
on either side (early or late) of the origin, and incubated each one
with T antigen and topoisomerase I or with topoisomerase I alone. For
the purposes of mapping the sites nicked in broken unwound single
strands, we used deletion mutant 110-708 because this mutant releases
large amounts of nicked strands. We felt that this was appropriate,
since the pattern of released strands is qualitatively identical to
what is obtained with WT T antigen. Fig. 6B shows a
nondenaturing gel analysis of the labeled DNA produced in this reaction
from DNA representing the late side of the top strand
(lagging late; Fig. 6A) and the early
side of the bottom strand (lagging early). In
Fig. 6C, unwinding reactions were performed with DNA
representing the late side of the bottom strand (leading
late) and the early side of the top strand
(leading early). In the same experiment, we
incubated each of the four labeled DNAs with topoisomerase I in the
presence of camptothecin but in the absence of T antigen (Fig. 6,
B and C, lanes 6,
7, 13, and 14) in order to map the
sites nicked by topoisomerase I alone. This experiment demonstrates
that T antigen releases DNA nicked on the late side of the origin (Fig.
6, B and C, lanes 3 and
4) but, for the most part, not on the early side (Fig. 6, B and C, lanes 10 and
11). A second observation was that the majority of displaced
shorter strands originated from the top strand as shown in Fig.
6A (Fig. 6C was exposed about 2.5 times longer
than Fig. 6B). During DNA replication, the preferred sites
would correspond to the template for lagging strand synthesis on the
late side of the origin. A third important observation is that, for the most part, topoisomerase I by itself incised the DNAs in the presence of camptothecin at sites completely different from the ones used to
release broken strands by T antigen.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Mapping of sites nicked by topoisomerase I
(Topo I) in the presence or absence of T antigen. Four
singly end-labeled origin DNAs were made by first carrying out PCR
reactions using oligonucleotide primer pairs up 5171 and down 226, up
4919 and down 176, up 5019 and down 276, or up 4800 and down 42. The
gel-purified DNA was end-labeled and then cleaved with restriction
enzymes BstNI, NcoI, HindIII, or
NdeI, respectively. The larger of the two resulting
fragments was purified on a 2% agarose gel. A, map position
of the four singly end-labeled DNAs termed lagging
late, leading early,
leading late, and lagging
early, respectively. These names were chosen because the
DNAs were used to map the sites nicked on those respective strands. The
asterisk denotes the labeled end of the DNA; the other end
was generated with the restriction enzyme. The positions of the origin
and the "early" and "late" sides of the origin are shown.
B, gel electrophoresis of the reactions with lagging late (5171*-161) and
lagging early (42*-4830) DNAs. C, reactions with leading
late (276*-5176) and leading early (4919*-37) DNAs. Unwinding
reactions were carried out with or without 400 ng of deletion mutant
110-708 and various amounts of topoisomerase I, as shown. Camptothecin
(+C) was present in some samples. In B and
C, the reactions that are labeled T,
+C (lanes 4-7 and 12-14)
were boiled prior to electrophoresis. The positions of the
double-stranded (DS) and single-stranded (SS)
DNAs are indicated.
|
|
In order to map the exact nucleotides where the DNA was nicked in each
case, all of these reaction products were separated on a 7.5%
acrylamide sequencing gel. At the same time, we ran the products of a
dideoxy sequencing reaction using each of four kinased oligonucleotide
primers representing the labeled end of each molecule. For instance,
the DNA representing the late side of the top strand
(lagging late) was labeled with 32P
at nucleotide 5171 (see Fig. 6A). The sites nicked in this
DNA were determined by carrying out a sequencing reaction using a primer whose 5'-end is at nucleotide 5171 (up 5171; in fact, the same
primer was used to generate the DNA fragment by PCR). An example of
this type of analysis in shown in Fig. 7.
We looked for bands that were present in the lanes containing T antigen and topoisomerase I but that were absent from the reactions with only T
antigen (lanes 1-3). The cleavage sites were
then determined by comparison with the sequencing ladder (Fig. 7).
Similarly, we mapped the sites nicked by topoisomerase I alone by
identifying bands that appeared when topoisomerase I was added (Fig. 7,
lanes 4-6).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Sequencing gel analysis of nicked DNA.
The same samples generated for Fig. 6 were applied to a 7% acrylamide
sequencing gel. Four sequencing reactions were also carried out using
pSKori and kinased primers up 5171 (for lagging late), down 42 (for
lagging early), down 276 (for leading late), and up 4919 (for leading
early) in the presence of [ -32P]dATP. Only the
reactions corresponding to "lagging late" are shown. The positions
of the full-length double-stranded (DS) and single-stranded
(SS) DNAs were determined by electrophoresis of untreated
and boiled DNA and are indicated. Topo I, topoisomerase
I.
|
|
Results of the mapping experiment are shown in Fig.
8. The open arrows
represent sites nicked on either strand by topoisomerase I alone, and
the closed arrows designate sites nicked in
strands unwound by T antigen. Several important features of this map
should be pointed out. First, with two exceptions, these sites were
completely different. Second, the major cuts in broken released strands
were localized to the phosphodiester bonds between residues 121 and 122 and between residues 122 and 123. These sites correspond to the ends of
the major nicked single-stranded DNA in Figs. 1-5. The second
preferred sites were between nucleotides 77 and 78 and between
nucleotides 78 and 79. These same sites were also recognized by
topoisomerase I alone, although weakly. These two sets of sites are on
the strand corresponding to the lagging strand template on the late
side of the origin during DNA replication. Third, nearly all of the
nicking occurred on the late side of the origin. The only site nicked
on the early side of the origin was between nucleotides 5226 and 5227 (Fig. 8). It is important to recognize the fact that T antigen can
unwind all four labeled DNAs in the absence of topoisomerase I (clearly
seen in the lighter exposures of Fig. 6, B and C)
and that topoisomerase I nicks both sides of the origin when present
alone (Fig. 8). We infer from these data that the activity and
specificity of topoisomerase I are altered by T antigen during DNA
unwinding.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Summary of sites nicked by topoisomerase I in
the presence or absence of T antigen. The sequence of both strands
of SV40 DNA is shown between nucleotides 5101 and 150. Also shown are
the three components of the core origin (early palindrome
(EP), site II and A/T track) and T antigen binding site I. The thin horizontal arrows indicate
the GAGGC pentanucleotides in sites I and II or the early palindrome.
The open thicker vertical
arrows denote sites nicked on either strand of the DNA by
topoisomerase I in the absence of T antigen, and the filled
vertical arrows represent sites nicked in strands
released by T antigen in the presence of topoisomerase I. The
stars indicate the two major pairs of sites nicked during
strand release in the presence of T antigen and topoisomerase I.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
During DNA replication, SV40 large T antigen is believed to
function as a helicase at the replication forks. T antigen initiates this reaction at the origin by first forming a double hexamer bound to
the four GAGGC pentanucleotides that constitute binding site II (15)
and then structurally distorting and partially melting the DNA (3-7).
One consequence of the unwinding of long or circular DNA is that the
DNA becomes topologically overwound. This torsional strain must be
relieved by the action of a topoisomerase. Relatively little is known
about how the topoisomerase reaction is coupled to unwinding at the
replication forks, but intuitively, it seems that a topoisomerase must
be able to nick and religate a strand before that stretch of DNA
reaches the helicase at the replication fork. In this report, we
demonstrated that when T antigen unwinds an origin-containing fragment
of SV40 DNA in the presence of topoisomerase I, the DNA fragment is
nicked at discrete sites and specific nicked single strands are
released during the unwinding reaction. We have previously demonstrated
that T antigen and topoisomerase I bind to one another in
vitro and our interpretation of these new results is that the
release of nicked forms of the DNA represents a coupled reaction of
unwinding and nicking by a T antigen-topoisomerase I complex. We
observed that the nicking reaction was most efficient when the molar
ratio between T antigen and topoisomerase I was about 15:1. This would
roughly correspond to one molecule of topoisomerase I per double
hexamer of T antigen. At higher concentrations of topoisomerase I,
nicking and unwinding were inhibited (see Fig. 1, for instance). This
indicates that excess topoisomerase I interferes with the activity of
the double hexamer. Thus, a functional complex of a double hexamer of T
antigen and a single molecule of topoisomerase I might efficiently
unwind DNA at the replication forks and at the same time relax the
torsional strain resulting from the unwinding reaction.
We demonstrated that topoisomerase I was carrying out the actual
nicking of the DNA released by T antigen by showing that a
catalytically inactive mutant form of topoisomerase I was totally incapable of participating in the release of broken strands during unwinding. Interestingly, the mutant protein was still able to inhibit
unwinding to full-length single strands, indicating that the mutant
interacts with T antigen in a way very similar to WT topoisomerase
I.
The identification of the sites in SV40 DNA that are nicked in the
coupled reaction revealed that the large majority of these sites were
located on the late side of the origin. This took place although
topoisomerase I by itself can nick the DNA on the other side of the
origin as well. If T antigen forms a double hexamer at the origin and
unwinds the DNA bidirectionally from that region, it seems likely that
the bound topoisomerase I molecule is attached to the hexamer facing
the late side of the origin. Fig. 9
illustrates this model of topoisomerase I-linked unwinding by T
antigen. It is intriguing that, for the most part, the sites nicked by
topoisomerase I in strands released by T antigen are different from
those nicked by topoisomerase I alone in the presence (Fig. 2 and Fig.
8) or absence (Fig. 1) of the inhibitor camptothecin. Since
topoisomerase I is apparently free to nick the DNA at its usual sites
in the presence of T antigen (Fig. 2), this tells us that T antigen
directs topoisomerase I to nick additional sites on the DNA. The most reasonable interpretation of this is that the two proteins work in
concert to nick and unwind the DNA. Consistent with our observations, we would then propose that in the complex (Fig. 9) T antigen activates topoisomerase I nicking at unique sites. In our in vitro
unwinding reactions with linear DNA, these sites are not consistently
religated prior to encountering the T antigen helicase, and single
strands are released from the template. On the other hand, sites nicked by free topoisomerase I are efficiently religated before T antigen unwinds that stretch of DNA.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Model of DNA unwinding and relaxation by T
antigen-topoisomerase I (topo I) complexes. We propose
that a single molecule of topoisomerase I forms a complex with a double
hexamer of T antigen. Based on the results of the mapping experiments
(Figs. 6-8), topoisomerase I binds to the hexamer on the late half of
the origin. Topoisomerase I nicks the DNA at discrete sites (primarily
on the lagging strand template) in the presence of bound T antigen,
forming a transient 3'-PO4 bond with a tyrosine residue in
topoisomerase I. This permits the other portion of the same strand to
swivel around its complementary strand, thus relieving torsional
strain. Either the topoisomerase I religates the DNA and full-length
single strands are unwound by T antigen, or the topoisomerase I fails
to do so before T antigen unwinds the DNA. If this occurs, a shorter
than full-length strand is released.
|
|
Another finding was that the sites of nicking in the released strands
occurred primarily on the lagging strand template. Since topoisomerase
I forms a transient covalent bond with the 3'-phosphate at the nicked
site (39, 50), this implies that the lagging strand template distal to
the site of the nick is free to rotate in order to relieve any
torsional strain (see Fig. 9). It is not clear why this reaction should
occur only on the late side of the origin, but we did not detect it on
the early side of the origin as far away as 300 bp (Fig.
6C).
The nicked strands unwound by T antigen could have topoisomerase I
covalently attached. Since the samples are treated with proteinase K
and heat (65 °C) after the reaction, the topoisomerase I would be
degraded, and the DNA strands would then be able to migrate in an
acrylamide gel. However, we think that this is unlikely, because
proteinase K digestions are incomplete and would leave peptides of
various lengths attached to the 3'-end of the strand. This would result
in a smear of radioactivity on the nondenaturing and denaturing
acrylamide gels. Furthermore, we might expect to see some heterogeneity
in the pattern of released strands from experiment to experiment, and
this was not observed. More likely, the bond between the Tyr-OH of
topoisomerase I and the 3'-PO4 on the DNA is hydrolyzed
before, during, or after release of the labeled DNA strand. We favor
this possibility, because there is no suggestion that the DNA strands
are covalently attached to protein and because of the observation that
we have made in collaboration with Yves Pommier (34) that T antigen can
reverse a topoisomerase I nicking reaction performed in the presence of
the poison camptothecin. In either case, it is clear that the
nicking/unwinding reaction is highly specific.
In a previous publication (34), we reported that full-length T antigen
as well as a fragment of T antigen that binds to topoisomerase I can
inhibit topoisomerase I nicking and relaxation activities. In this
report, however, we observed that T antigen does not inhibit
topoisomerase I nicking either in the presence or absence (Fig. 2) of
camptothecin. The major differences are that in the earlier report we
did not use conditions that would support DNA unwinding
(Escherichia coli SSB was not used, and buffer conditions
were different), T antigen:topoisomerase I ratios were lower, and the T
antigen we used was purified by elution with high pH (instead of
ethylene glycol), because this material binds to topoisomerase I best.
Therefore, we think that the association between these two proteins is
different in the two systems. In the present report, conditions may
more closely resemble the situation in virus-infected cells.
We observed that a deletion mutant of T antigen missing the first 109 amino acids was much more efficient than WT at releasing nicked DNA
strands during unwinding in the presence of topoisomerase I. This
mutant oligomerizes near normally, unwinds DNA somewhat better than WT,
and supports DNA replication in vitro at least as well as,
if not better than, WT (Ref. 35; data not shown). These observations
suggest that a region had been removed in the mutant that normally
inhibits nicking by bound topoisomerase I and/or regulates unwinding in
such a way as to prevent the release of nicked strands. Analysis of
several deletion mutants showed that this inhibitory region was
dependent on amino acids 99-109. This region overlaps with the
retinoblastoma-binding motif of T antigen (46-48) and contains one
potential site of phosphorylation (49). These results lend additional
support to the idea that there is a functional interaction between T
antigen and topoisomerase I during DNA unwinding and that this activity
is regulated.
In summary, the results described in this paper suggest that SV40 T
antigen and topoisomerase I form a functional complex that is used to
simultaneously unwind and relax torsionally strained DNA at replication
forks (Fig. 9).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. James Champoux for the
baculovirus clone expressing wild type topoisomerase I and for the
purified Y723P mutant form of topoisomerase I.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by NCI, National Institutes of
Health, Grant CA36118.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 302-831-8547;
Fax: 302-831-2281; E-mail: dsimmons{at}udel.edu.
The abbreviations used are:
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction; WT, wild type; RPA, replication protein A; SSB, single-stranded binding protein.
1
D. T. Simmons, R. Roy, L. Chen, D. Gai, and
P. W. Trowbridge, unpublished results.
2
C. Wu, unpublished results.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Deb, S.,
DeLucia, A. L.,
Baur, C. P.,
Koff, A.,
and Tegtmeyer, P.
(1986)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6,
1663-1670[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Deb, S.,
Tsui, S.,
Koff, A.,
DeLucia, A. L.,
Parsons, R.,
and Tegtmeyer, P.
(1987)
J. Virol.
61,
2143-2149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Borowiec, J.,
and Hurwitz, J.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
3149-3158[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Parsons, R.,
Anderson, M. E.,
and Tegtmeyer, P.
(1990)
J. Virol.
64,
509-518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dean, F. B.,
and Hurwitz, J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
5062-71[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Borowiec, J. A.,
Dean, F. B.,
and Hurwitz, J.
(1991)
J. Virol.
65,
1228-1235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Roberts, J.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
3939-3943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Deb, S.,
DeLucia, A. L.,
Koff, A.,
Tsui, S.,
and Tegtmeyer, P.
(1986)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6,
4578-4584[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dean, F. B.,
Borowiec, J.,
Ishimi, Y.,
Deb, S.,
Tegtmeyer, P.,
and Hurwitz, J.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
8267-8271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bullock, P. A.,
Joo, W. S.,
Sreekumar, K. R.,
and Mello, C.
(1997)
Virology
227,
460-473[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gutierrez, C.,
Guo, Z. S.,
Roberts, J.,
and DePamphilis, M. L.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
1719-1728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Borowiec, J.,
and Hurwitz, J.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
64-68[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
DeLucia, A. L.,
Lewton, B. A.,
Tjian, R.,
and Tegtmeyer, P.
(1983)
J. Virol.
46,
143-150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tjian, R.
(1978)
Cell
13,
165-179[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mastrangelo, I. A.,
Hough, P. V. C.,
Wall, J. S.,
Dodson, M.,
Dean, F. B.,
and Hurwitz, J.
(1989)
Nature
338,
658-662[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Stahl, H.,
Droge, P.,
and Knippers, R.
(1986)
EMBO J.
5,
1939-1944[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Stahl, H.,
Scheffner, M.,
Wiekowski, M.,
and Knippers, R.
(1988)
Cancer Cells
6,
105-112
-
Smelkova, N. V.,
and Borowiec, J. A.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
8766-8773[Abstract]
-
Wessel, R.,
Schweizer, J.,
and Stahl, H.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
804-815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Murakami, Y.,
Wobbe, C. R.,
Weissbach, L.,
Dean, F. B.,
and Hurwitz, J.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
2869-2873[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Matsumoto, T.,
Eki, T.,
and Hurwitz, J.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
9712-9716[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dornreiter, I.,
Copeland, W. C.,
and Wang, T. S.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
809-820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Murakami, Y.,
and Hurwitz, J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
11008-11017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Collins, K.,
and Kelly, T. J.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
2108-2115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dornreiter, I.,
Erdile, L. F.,
Gilbert, I. U.,
von Winkler, D.,
Kelly, T. J.,
and Fanning, E.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
769-776[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Melendy, T.,
and Stillman, B.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
3389-3395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Simmons, D. T.,
Trowbridge, P. A.,
and Roy, R.
(1998)
Virology
242,
435-443[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Simmons, D. T.,
Melendy, T.,
Usher, D.,
and Stillman, B.
(1996)
Virology
222,
365-374[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wobbe, C. R.,
Weissbach, L.,
Borowiec, J. A.,
Dean, F. B.,
Murakami, Y.,
Bullock, P.,
and Hurwitz, J.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
1834-1838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yang, L.,
Wold, M. S.,
Li, J. J.,
Kelly, T. J.,
and Liu, L. F.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
950-954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wold, M. S.,
Weinberg, D. H.,
Virshup, D. M.,
Li, J. J.,
and Kelly, T. J.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
2801-2809[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Weinberg, D. H.,
Collins, K. L.,
Simancek, P.,
Russo, A.,
Wold, M. S.,
Virshup, D. M.,
and Kelly, T. J.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
8692-8696[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Malkas, L. H.,
Hickey, R. J.,
Li, C.,
Pedersen, N.,
and Baril, E. F.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
6362-6374[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pommier, Y., Kohlhagen, G., Wu, C., and Simmons, D. T. (1998)
Biochemistry, in press
-
Chen, L.,
Joo, W. S.,
Bullock, P. A.,
and Simmons, D. T.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
8743-8749[Abstract]
-
Stewart, L.,
Ireton, G. C.,
Parker, L. H.,
Madden, K. R.,
and Champoux, J. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
7593-7601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wun-Kim, K.,
Upson, R. H.,
Young, W.,
and Simmons, D. T.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
7608-7611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Been, M. D.,
Burgess, R. R.,
and Champoux, J. J.
(1984)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
782,
304-312[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hsiang, Y. H.,
Hertzberg, R.,
Hecht, S.,
and Liu, L. F.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
14873-14878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Covey, J. M.,
Jaxel, C.,
Kohn, K. W.,
and Pommier, Y.
(1989)
Cancer Res.
49,
5016-5022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Madden, K. R.,
and Champoux, J. J.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
525-532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Redinbo, M. R.,
Stewart, L.,
Kuhn, P.,
Champoux, J. J.,
and Hol, W. G.
(1998)
Science
279,
1504-1513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Stewart, L.,
Redinbo, M. R.,
Qiu, X.,
Hol, W. G.,
and Champoux, J. J.
(1998)
Science
279,
1534-1541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gjorup, O. V.,
Rose, P. E.,
Holman, P. S.,
Bockus, B. J.,
and Schaffhausen, B. S.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
12125-12129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Weisshart, K.,
Bradley, M. K.,
Weiner, B. M.,
Schneider, C.,
Moarefi, I.,
Fanning, E.,
and Arthur, A. K.
(1996)
J. Virol.
70,
3509-3516[Abstract]
-
DeCaprio, J. A.,
Ludlow, J. W.,
Figge, J.,
Shew, J.-Y.,
Huang, C.-M.,
Lee, W.-H.,
Marsilio, E.,
Paucha, E.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(1988)
Cell
54,
275-283[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
DeCaprio, J. A.,
Ludlow, J. W.,
Lynch, D.,
Furukawa, Y.,
Griffin, J.,
Piwnica-Worms, H.,
Huang, C.-M.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(1989)
Cell
58,
1085-1095[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Whyte, P.,
Buchkovick, K. J.,
Horowitz, J. M.,
Friend, S. H.,
Raybuck, M.,
Weinberg, R. A.,
and Harlow, E.
(1988)
Nature
334,
124-129[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Scheidtmann, K. H.,
Echle, B.,
and Walter, G.
(1982)
J. Virol.
44,
116-133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gupta, M.,
Fujimori, A.,
and Pommier, Y.
(1995)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1262,
1-14[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Mahon, B. Liang, I. Tikhanovich, J. R. Abend, M. J. Imperiale, H. P. Nasheuer, and W. R. Folk
Restriction of Human Polyomavirus BK Virus DNA Replication in Murine Cells and Extracts
J. Virol.,
June 1, 2009;
83(11):
5708 - 5717.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Khopde and D. T. Simmons
Simian Virus 40 DNA Replication Is Dependent on an Interaction between Topoisomerase I and the C-Terminal End of T Antigen
J. Virol.,
February 1, 2008;
82(3):
1136 - 1145.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Wang, D. Manna, and D. T. Simmons
Role of the Hydrophilic Channels of Simian Virus 40 T-Antigen Helicase in DNA Replication
J. Virol.,
May 1, 2007;
81(9):
4510 - 4519.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Yu, E. Khan, M. A. Khaleque, J. Lee, G. Laco, G. Kohlhagen, S. Kharbanda, Y.-C. Cheng, Y. Pommier, and A. Bharti
Phosphorylation of DNA Topoisomerase I by the c-Abl Tyrosine Kinase Confers Camptothecin Sensitivity
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 10, 2004;
279(50):
51851 - 51861.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. T. Simmons, D. Gai, R. Parsons, A. Debes, and R. Roy
Assembly of the replication initiation complex on SV40 origin DNA
Nucleic Acids Res.,
February 11, 2004;
32(3):
1103 - 1112.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Jiao and D. T. Simmons
Nonspecific Double-Stranded DNA Binding Activity of Simian Virus 40 Large T Antigen Is Involved in Melting and Unwinding of the Origin
J. Virol.,
December 1, 2003;
77(23):
12720 - 12728.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Wu, R. Roy, and D. T. Simmons
Role of Single-Stranded DNA Binding Activity of T Antigen in Simian Virus 40 DNA Replication
J. Virol.,
March 15, 2001;
75(6):
2839 - 2847.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Gai, R. Roy, C. Wu, and D. T. Simmons
Topoisomerase I Associates Specifically with Simian Virus 40 Large-T-Antigen Double Hexamer-Origin Complexes
J. Virol.,
June 1, 2000;
74(11):
5224 - 5232.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Wilderman, B. Hu, and M. E. Woodworth
Conformational Changes in Simian Virus 40 Rearranged Regulatory Regions: Effects of the 21-Base-Pair Promoters and Their Location
J. Virol.,
December 1, 1999;
73(12):
10254 - 10263.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. W. Trowbridge, R. Roy, and D. T. Simmons
Human Topoisomerase I Promotes Initiation of Simian Virus 40 DNA Replication In Vitro
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
March 1, 1999;
19(3):
1686 - 1694.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Halmer, B. Vestner, and C. Gruss
Involvement of Topoisomerases in the Initiation of Simian Virus 40 Minichromosome Replication
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 25, 1998;
273(52):
34792 - 34798.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Wu, D. Edgil, and D. T. Simmons
The Origin DNA-Binding and Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Domains of Simian Virus 40 Large T Antigen Are Distinct
J. Virol.,
December 1, 1998;
72(12):
10256 - 10259.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|