![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 33, 20860-20866, August 14, 1998
From the Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Kyushu
University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan
Cytochrome b5 (b5), a
typical tail-anchored protein of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)
membrane, is composed of three functionally different domains:
amino-terminal heme-containing catalytic, central hydrophobic
membrane-anchoring, and carboxyl-terminal ER-targeting domains (Mitoma,
J., and Ito, A. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 4197-4203). To analyze
the potential retention signal of b5, mutant proteins were prepared to
replace each domain with natural or artificial sequences, and
subcellular localizations were examined using immunofluorescence microscopy and cell fractionation. The transmembrane domain functioned to retain the cytochrome in the ER, and the mutation of all or part of
the transmembrane domain with an artificial hydrophobic sequence had
practically no effect on intracellular distribution of the cytochrome.
However, when the transmembrane domain was extended systematically, a
substantial portion of the protein with the domain of over 22 amino
acid residues leaked from the organelle. Thus, the transmembrane length
functions as the retention signal. When cytochromes with mutations at
the carboxyl-terminal end were overexpressed in cells, a substantial
portion of the protein was transported to the plasma membrane,
indicating that the carboxyl-terminal luminal domain also has a role in
retention of b5 in the ER. Carbohydrate moiety of the
glycosylatably-mutated b5 was sensitive to endoglycosidase H but
resistant to endoglycosidase D. Therefore, both transmembrane and
carboxyl-terminal portions seems to function as the static retention
signal.
The secretory pathway in eukaryotic cells consists of discrete
membrane-bound organelles such as endoplasmic reticulum
(ER)1 (1), Golgi apparatus,
plasma membrane, and lysosome. It is widely accepted that proteins
destined for localization in these organelles or for secretion are co-
or post-translationally inserted into the ER and transported from the
ER by a default pathway, in which resident proteins are selectively
retained by specific signals (1). Thus, ER proteins have to be
sequestered away from proteins destined for secretion or other
organelles and are excluded from transport vesicles or are specifically
retrieved from the Golgi compartment, even if they escape from the
ER.
A mechanism through which ER proteins are brought back from the Golgi
apparatus by specific signals and by their receptors (2-6) was
proposed to localize proteins to a specific organelle in the secretion
pathway. The mammalian KDEL (2) and yeast HDEL (3) tetrapeptides at the
carboxyl-terminal ends were first identified as such a signal for ER
luminal proteins. The double lysine motif (KKXX or
KXKXX), which is localized at the
carboxyl-terminal portion of type I integral ER membrane proteins, such
as UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (6, 7) and Wbp1 in yeast (8) is also
well characterized. The KKXX sequence binds the coatomer
protein complex in vitro, and yeast coatomer mutants show
defective retrieval (9, 10). The transmembrane domain has recently been
demonstrated as another retrieval signal for Sec12p, since chimeric
proteins containing this domain were localized in the ER and had
cis-Golgi In addition to these motifs, some proteins in the ER seem to require
two signals in different portions in the molecule. Sönnichsen et al. (13) showed that the calreticulin mutant, which
lacked the Ca2+ binding domain but included the KDEL
sequence, escaped from the ER to a much greater extent. The mutant
protein that changed the carboxyl-terminal portion of Wbp1 from KK to
QQ or SS was retained in the ER, without acquiring Golgi specific
carbohydrate modifications (8, 10). For Sec12p, an amino-terminal
portion of the protein was reported to participate in static retention
in the ER (12), thereby indicating that transmembrane and
amino-terminal domains of Sec12p seem to function independently as
retrieval and retention signals, respectively.
Cytochrome b5 (b5), a typical tail-anchored
protein of the ER membrane, is composed of three functionally different
domains: amino-terminal heme-containing catalytic, central hydrophobic membrane-anchoring, and carboxyl-terminal ER-targeting domains (14).
Although Pedrazzini et al. (15) have shown that insertion of
five amino acids into the transmembrane domain of b5 resulted in
localization of the mutant protein on the cell surface, it has remained
to be determined how long the transmembrane domain can retain b5 in the
ER, whether another portion of the cytochrome has a retention signal,
and how these portions function as signals. We now report that both
transmembrane and luminal domains function as static retention signals
of b5 to the ER and that fewer than 22 amino acid residues of the
transmembrane domain have a major role in retaining b5 in the ER.
Reagents and Biochemicals
Restriction enzymes and DNA modifying enzymes were purchased
from Nippon Gene, Toyobo, Takara, Fermentas MBI, or U. S. Biochemical Corp. The expression vectors pSVL, pSG5, and pcDNA were from
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Stratagene, and Invitrogen, respectively.
Fetal calf serum was from Life Technologies, Inc. Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium was from Nissui. Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG was from Cappel Products. Peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG was from Zymed Laboratories Inc.
Endoglycosidase H and N-Glycosidase F were from Boehringer
Mannheim, and endoglycosidase D was from Seikagaku Co. Ltd.
Construction of Mutant Proteins
cDNAs for rat b5 (14) and OMb, a b5-like heme protein of the
outer mitochondrial
membrane,2 were used to
construct fusion proteins. Mutant proteins were constructed according
to the method of Kunkel (16) or polymerase chain reaction and confirmed
by dideoxy sequencing using Sequenase, then were inserted into
eukaryotic expression vectors pSVL, pcDNA, or pSG5.
OMbC10, OMbB5, and TMOMbB5--
cDNA fragments of OMb and b5
were inserted in tandem into M13mp18 to obtain M13mp18OMb-B5. Deletions
of nucleotides coding the last 10 amino acids of OMb and the catalytic
and transmembrane domains of b5, the transmembrane and last 10 amino
acids of OMb and catalytic domain of b5, and the last 22 amino acids of
OMb and the 1st methionine to 115th isoleucine of b5 were done to obtain OMbC10, OMbB5, and TMOMbB5, respectively, using appropriate oligonucleotides.
TMB5OMbC10--
Nucleotides coding the last 18 amino acids of b5
and the 1st methionine to 89th proline of OMbC10 were deleted from
M13mp18B5-OMbC10, using an appropriate oligonucleotide.
B5AL1-4--
The nucleotides coding a part of the transmembrane
domain of b5 were exchanged using oligonucleotides coding amino acid
sequences shown in Fig. 1C.
B5Syn18C7, B5Syn20C7, B5Syn22C7, B5Syn24C7, B5Syn26C7, and
B5Syn28C7--
Mutants containing an artificial hydrophobic
transmembrane domain of various lengths were constructed from the
M13mp18B5Syn20C10 (14). Because this protein has a 22-amino acid
transmembrane domain
(105LQLALLALAILALLALLSTLMY126), including
residues derived from the b5 molecule, it was designated as B5Syn22C7
instead of B5Syn20C10. To construct B5Syn24C7, B5Syn26C7, and
B5Syn28C7, amino acids AL, ALAL, and ALALAL were inserted between
leucine 121 and serine 122 of B5Syn22C7, using oligonucleotides corresponding to these amino acids. To construct B5Syn20C7 and B5Syn18C7, LL-(120-121) and LALL-(118-121) were deleted from the B5Syn22C7, using oligonucleotides.
B5T7Glyc, B5cmycGlyc, B5syn26C7T7Glyc, and B5syn26C7
cmycGlyc--
To construct a N-linked glycosylation site at
the carboxyl-terminal portion of b5 and B5syn26C7, T7 (MASMTGGQQMG) or
c-myc (EQKLISEEDL) peptide and glycosylating sequence were introduced by polymerase chain reaction, using oligonucleotides corresponding to
these amino acids and the M13 universal primer with pBluescriptSK(+)b5 and B5syn26C7 as a template.
Expression of b5 Derivatives in COS Cells
COS-7 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium supplemented with 10% calf serum in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. DNA transfection was carried out as
described (14), using cationic liposomes (17). The cells were cultured
for 36 h after transfecting the plasmid into the cells.
Cell Fractionation
Cells cultured in three 10-cm diameter dishes were harvested in
ice-cold STE (0.25 M sucrose, 20 mM Tris/HCl,
0.1 mM EDTA, 2 µg/ml each leupeptin and pepstatin, pH
8.0). The suspension was centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min, and the pellet was homogenized gently in 1 ml of STE buffer using
a Potter-Elvehjem type homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged at
500 × g for 5 min to remove nuclear and unbroken
cells, and the pellet was gently homogenized again in 0.5 ml of STE
buffer, then centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min. The
first and second supernatants (1.5 ml) were then layered over sucrose
layers consisting of 0.5 ml of 2 M sucrose solution, 9 ml
of linear gradient from 1.5 M to 0.65 M sucrose
solution, 1.0 ml of 0.5 M sucrose solution, and centrifuged
at 25,000 rpm for 8 to 10 h in an RPS-40T rotor (Hitachi), or 1 ml
of postnuclear supernatants was placed in discontinuous sucrose layers
consisting of 0.5 ml of 2 M, 3 ml of 1.1 M, 5.5 ml of 0.6 M, and 1 ml of 0.5 M sucrose
solution, instead of linear gradient, and centrifuged under the same
conditions. Fractions of 1 ml were collected from the bottom of the
tube and designated as fraction numbers 1 to 11.
Determination of b5 and Its Derivatives
The amount of b5 and derivatives expressed in the transfected
cells was estimated using immunoblot analysis. The subcellular fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by transfer of the
proteins to a polyvinylidene difluoride filter. Rabbit antibodies against b5 and OMb and peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG were
used for the primary and secondary antibody, respectively. Amounts of
proteins were measured using a densitometer.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy
Immunofluorescence microscopy was done as described elsewhere
(2, 14, 18). Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG
was used as the second antibody.
Glycosidase Digestion
After homogenization of COS cells expressing the
glycosylatably-mutated b5s, membrane fractions were prepared by
centrifugation of the postnuclear supernatants at 100,000 × g for 20 min. In endoglycosidase H digestion, the membrane
fraction (25 µg) suspended in citrate buffer, pH 5.5, containing
0.02% SDS, 0.02 M 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride was treated overnight with 2.5 milliunits
of the enzyme at 37 °C. For N-glycosidase F digestion, the membrane fraction (25 µg) suspended in Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.0, containing 0.15% SDS, 0.03 M 2-mercaptoethanol, 1.2%
Triton X-100, and 10 mM EDTA was digested overnight with 2 milliunits of the enzyme at 37 °C. Endoglycosidase D was done at
37 °C overnight in 0.2 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, containing 1% Triton X-100, 10 mM EDTA, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Extent of digestion was
estimated by immunoblot analysis, as described above.
Analytical Methods
Documented methods were used to assay NADPH-cytochrome P450
The Transmembrane Retention Signal of b5 Does Not Reside in a
Specific Amino Acid Sequence--
To determine whether a specific
amino acid sequence of the transmembrane domain of b5 serves as the
retention signal, we constructed several mutant proteins, in which all
or half of the transmembrane portion of the cytochrome was substituted
by a corresponding sequence of OMb, which is a b5-like hemeprotein of
the outer mitochondrial membrane and has a similar molecular
architecture (21) (Fig. 1A).
Hydrophilic catalytic portion and both hydrophilic and transmembrane portions of b5 were replaced with the corresponding portions of OMb to
obtain OMbB5 and OMbC10, respectively. While in the mutants, TMOMbB5
and TMB5OMBC10, the transmembrane domains consist of the amino-terminal half of the domain in OMb and the carboxyl-terminal half
of that in b5 and vice versa, respectively. All mutant
proteins were constructed to have an ER-targeting signal at the
carboxyl-terminals.
Retention of Cytochrome b5 in the
Endoplasmic Reticulum Is Transmembrane and Luminal
Domain-dependent*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
1-6 mannosylated carbohydrates (11, 12).
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-mannosidase II, alkaline phosphodiesterase I, and glutathione S-transferase activities (19, 20).
![]()
RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (86K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Intracellular localization of b5 and fusion
proteins. A, schematic structures of original b5 and
chimeric proteins and amino acid sequences of their transmembrane and
carboxyl-terminal portions. Amino-terminal and transmembrane plus
carboxyl-terminal domains are shown by thick and
thin bars, respectively. Hatched and
dotted boxes are for b5 and OMb, respectively.
The amino acid sequences of transmembrane and carboxyl-terminal domains
are presented in one-letter code. The
numbers above the bars
represent the amino acid position of b5. B,
immunofluorescence microscopy of COS cells expressing b5
(a), OMbB5 (b), OMbC10 (c), TMOMbB5
(d), and TMB5OMbC10 (e). cDNA encoding each
protein in plasmid pSVL was transfected into COS cells. After culture
for 36 h, cells were treated as described under "Materials and
Methods." C, illustration of the transmembrane domain
mutants. Five or three consecutive amino acid residues in the
transmembrane domain of b5 were replaced by an artificial sequence of
ALALA or AAA. D, immunofluorescence microscopy of COS cells
expressing transmembrane domain mutants. a, B5AL1;
b, B5AL2; c, B5AL3; d, B5AL4.
Length of the Transmembrane Domain Is Responsible for the Retention-- Although definition of the absolute length or number of amino acids of the transmembrane domain is difficult, one difference between b5 and OMbC10 or TMB5OMbC10 is length of the hydrophobic stretch; B5 and TMOMbB5 have 19 and 18 amino acids, respectively, whereas OMbC10 and TMB5OMbC10 have 21 and 22 residues, respectively. Although Pedrazzini et al. (15) found that the insertion of five amino acids into the transmembrane domain of b5 resulted in localization of the mutant protein on the cell surface, it remained unknown how long the domain can function as the retention signal. We then systematically constructed derivatives with an artificial hydrophobic sequence of various lengths of 18 to 28, instead of the transmembrane segment of b5 (Fig. 2A). A mutant with the transmembrane segment of 18 amino acids was constructed using an artificial sequence of 15 hydrophobic amino acid residues and three hydrophobic residues derived from the b5 molecule. We termed the mutant B5syn18C7, instead of B5syn15C10, to indicate length of the transmembrane domain. A typical ER pattern of fluorescence was observed with cells expressing B5syn18C7 and B5syn20C7 (Fig. 2B, a and b). In cells expressing B5syn22C7 and B5syn24C7, both the tubular network around the nucleus and edge of the cell was usually stained (Fig. 2B, c and d). In some cells, the cell surface was stained and there was little tubular net work (data not shown). When the transmembrane segment was extended further, B5syn26C7 and B5syn28C7, the cell surface was stained (Fig. 2B, e and f). When the non-permeabilized cells expressing B5syn24C7 and B5syn26C7 were treated with anti-peptide antibody against the carboxyl-terminal 7 amino acids located inside the ER vesicles (18), the plasma membrane was clearly stained. Thus, the mutant proteins were inserted into the membrane with a correct topology (Fig. 2B, g and h).
|
-mannosidase II, alkaline phosphodiesterase I, and glutathione S-transferase for the ER membrane, Golgi apparatus, plasma
membrane, and cytosol, respectively. The patterns of distribution of B5 and B5syn20C7 were the same as that for NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase, confirming that these proteins were exclusively localized in
the ER membrane. As the transmembrane segment was longer, a larger
amount of the protein was recovered in the Golgi and plasma membrane
fractions, as expected from the immunocytochemical study, although some
portion of the protein remained in the ER fraction, even in mutants of
B5syn24C7 and B5syn26C7.
Luminal Domain of b5 Also Affects Retention-- The carboxyl-terminal hydrophilic domain functions as the ER-targeting signal of b5 and is exposed on the luminal side of the ER vesicle (14, 18, 22). When the c-myc peptide was attached to the carboxyl-terminal end of b5, the mutants were precisely targeted to the ER and inserted into the membrane in a topologically correct orientation (18). However, a substantial portion of the protein leaked from the ER, in case of overexpression using the pSG5 vector, instead of pSVL, although the wild type cytochrome was strictly localized to the ER (18) under the same conditions (see Fig. 3B). To confirm participation of the carboxyl-terminal portion on the retention of b5 in the ER, we constructed several mutant proteins, B5Rev and B5syn26Rev, in which the carboxyl-terminal seven amino acids were arranged in the reverse order (Fig. 3A). Cells expressing B5C7Rev stained the plasma membrane, in addition to the ER (Fig. 3B). Subcellular fractionation showed that a larger amount of B5syn26C7Rev was recovered in Golgi and plasma membrane fractions, compared with the finding for B5syn26C7 (Fig. 3C). Change in amino acid sequence of the luminal domain of B5syn26C7 did not affect resistance of proteins to alkaline treatment of the membranes (data not shown). These observations suggest that the carboxyl-terminal portion of the cytochrome participates in retention in the ER, probably by a mechanism independent of that of the transmembrane domain.
|
B5 Is Retained in the ER without Recycling from the Later Compartments-- The ER location of membrane proteins is achieved by retrieval or combination of static retention and retrieval mechanisms (2-6, 11, 12). To investigate whether b5 is statically retained or retrieved from the post-ER compartments, we added an Asn glycosylation site to the carboxyl-terminal end of the original b5 and mutants that are known to leave the ER and analyzed the glycosidase sensitivity. Because the N-glycosylation site should be at least 12-14 amino acids away from the membrane spanning segment (24), T7 or c-myc antigen peptides consisting of 11 or 10 amino acids, respectively, and 5 amino acid peptides with an Asn glycosylation motif were fused to the carboxyl-terminal end of B5 and B5syn26C7 (Fig. 4A) and expressed in COS cells, using a pcDNA vector. The typical ER pattern of the immunofluorescence staining was observed in cells expressing B5T7Glyc (Fig. 4B). The same staining patterns were observed with B5cmycGlyc (data not shown). Therefore these modifications at the carboxyl-terminal end did not affect intracellular localization of the proteins. B5T7Glyc and B5cmycGlyc gave a single band on SDS-PAGE and were sensitive to both endoglycosidase H and N-glycosidase F and converted to a band about 3 kDa smaller (Fig. 4C). Thereby they must remain as a glycoprotein of the high mannose type. On the other hand, B5syn26C7T7Glyc and B5syn26C7cmycGlyc gave higher molecular mass bands (25) as well as a band about 3 kDa larger than the non-glycosylated form, although in these cases a non-glycosylated form was sometimes observed (Fig. 4C). The higher molecular weight bands were sensitive to N-glycosidase F but resistant to endoglycosidase H, whereas the lower band was sensitive to both endoglycosidases, as in the case of B5T7Glyc and B5cmycGlyc, indicating that proteins with higher molecular weight contain complex-type oligosaccharides. This implies that once proteins leak out from the ER to the latter compartment the proteins can be modified by the sugar chain to a complex type and that the molecule found in the ER is retained in the organelle without recycling.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We obtained evidence that retention of b5 in the ER membrane depends on both transmembrane and carboxyl-terminal luminal domains of the molecule and not on the cytoplasmic domain, although the transmembrane domain does have a major effect. Mutation of all or part of the transmembrane domain with an artificial hydrophobic sequence had practically no effect on the intracellular distribution of the cytochrome, whereas lengthening this domain by four or more residues greatly reduced retention in the ER. We thus concluded that length of the transmembrane serves as the retention signal and that there are no key residues responsible for the retention in the domain. Pedrazzini et al. (15) reached a similar conclusion from data that insertion of five amino acids into the transmembrane domain of b5 resulted in localization of the mutant protein to the cell surface. Although the amino acid sequence of the transmembrane domain of b5 is highly homologous among sequences from various animal species (23) there are no known common amino acid sequences in the transmembrane domains between b5 and other ER membrane proteins (28-32). On the other hand, the sequence of the transmembrane domain of OMb (33)2 (Fig. 1) is similar to that of b5, but the mutant with the transmembrane domain of OMb moved forward to the distal organelles in the secretory pathway. These observations lend support to our conclusion.
Although it is difficult to define the absolute length or number of amino acids of the transmembrane domain, we calculated b5 to have 19 amino acid residues (14). Progressive lengthening of the sequence resulted in an increased leakage of proteins from the ER, and a substantial portion of the protein with the domain of 22 residues was no longer retained in the ER. Addition of residues in the transmembrane domain of UBC6, a tail-anchored membrane protein in yeast, affected the efficiency of retention of the protein in the ER (34). Length of the transmembrane domain of membrane proteins, at least of tail-anchored proteins, seems to be a general feature required for retention.
The transmembrane domain of b5 seems to function as a static retention signal, not a retrieval one, although that of Sec12p was reported to function as a retrieval signal and the retrieval depended on Rer1p, a receptor protein (12). A lipid-based mechanism has been proposed for transmembrane domain-mediated retention, as first stated by Munro (35). The mixed lipid populations in the intracellular membrane would separate into lipid microdomains with distinct compositions, thickness, and degree of structural perturbability, and proteins would selectively partition into one domain and so be prevented from entering transport vesicles comprising the other domain by virtue of physical properties of their transmembrane domains (36, 37). The ER is the start of the secretory pathway and it has a lipid composition differing from the plasma membrane (38). The ER has low levels of cholesterol and sphingolipids, which creates a flexible environment suitable for insertion, modification, and assembly of proteins. There is no known mechanism to distinguish differences in length of transmembrane domains by three amino acid residues. When proteins moving through the pathway encounter points where the bilayer composition changes from ER-like to plasma membrane-like, proteins with a longer transmembrane domain would preferentially move forward. In this case, the shorter transmembrane domain, which is responsible for ER retention, seems to be a default signal, and the longer transmembrane domain may possibly have an affinity for cholesterol and/or sphingolipids and be selectively collected into forward-moving cholesterol and sphingolipid-rich vesicles.
The present results also show that the carboxyl-terminal luminal domain of b5, in addition to the transmembrane one, has a role in its retention in the ER membrane. Because a fused protein in which the carboxyl-terminal portion of b5 was attached to the carboxyl-terminal end of syntaxin IA (39, 40), a plasma membrane protein, could not be retained in the ER, this portion may be weak as the retention signal; the transmembrane domain seems to function as the major signal. The signal in the carboxyl-terminal portion appears to work as a static retention signal, like the transmembrane domain, since no Golgi-type carbohydrate moiety was evident in the mutant b5 present in the ER. In conclusion, both transmembrane and carboxyl-terminal luminal domains function as a static retention signal of b5 to the ER, and length of the transmembrane domain apparently has a major effect on the retention. Whether each domain functions independently or concertedly, how length of the transmembrane domain is measured, and how proteins are sorted in the ER remain to be subjects of ongoing studies.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by grants-in-aid for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan and for Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology in Japan (to A. I.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Dept. of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kyushu
University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan.
§ Recipient of a fellowship from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Japanese Junior Scientists. Present address: Laboratory for Cellular Glycobiology, Frontier Research Program, The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan. Tel. and Fax: 81-92-642-2530; E-mail: a.itoscc{at}mbox.nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
The abbreviations used are: ER, endoplasmic reticulum; b5, cytochrome b5OMb, outer mitochondrial membrane cytochrome b5PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
2 A. Ito, unpublished data.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Ronchi, S. Colombo, M. Francolini, and N. Borgese Transmembrane domain-dependent partitioning of membrane proteins within the endoplasmic reticulum J. Cell Biol., April 3, 2008; 181(1): 105 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. de Martin, Y. Du, P. Novick, and S. Ferro-Novick Ice2p is important for the distribution and structure of the cortical ER network in Saccharomyces cerevisiae J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2005; 118(1): 65 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sato, M. Sato, and A. Nakano Rer1p, a Retrieval Receptor for ER Membrane Proteins, Recognizes Transmembrane Domains in Multiple Modes Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2003; 14(9): 3605 - 3616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Borgese, S. Colombo, and E. Pedrazzini The tale of tail-anchored proteins: coming from the cytosol and looking for a membrane J. Cell Biol., June 23, 2003; 161(6): 1013 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Lundbaek, O.S. Andersen, T. Werge, and C. Nielsen Cholesterol-Induced Protein Sorting: An Analysis of Energetic Feasibility Biophys. J., March 1, 2003; 84(3): 2080 - 2089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Touz, H. D. Lujan, S. F. Hayes, and T. E. Nash Sorting of Encystation-specific Cysteine Protease to Lysosome-like Peripheral Vacuoles in Giardia lamblia Requires a Conserved Tyrosine-based Motif J. Biol. Chem., February 14, 2003; 278(8): 6420 - 6426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tanaka, J.-y. Kinoshita, R. Kuroda, and A. Ito Integration of Cytochrome b5 into Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane: Participation of Carboxy-Terminal Portion of the Transmembrane Domain J. Biochem., February 1, 2003; 133(2): 247 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yabal, S. Brambillasca, P. Soffientini, E. Pedrazzini, N. Borgese, and M. Makarow Translocation of the C Terminus of a Tail-anchored Protein across the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane in Yeast Mutants Defective in Signal Peptide-driven Translocation J. Biol. Chem., January 24, 2003; 278(5): 3489 - 3496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ivashkina, B. Wolk, V. Lohmann, R. Bartenschlager, H. E. Blum, F. Penin, and D. Moradpour The Hepatitis C Virus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase Membrane Insertion Sequence Is a Transmembrane Segment J. Virol., November 13, 2002; 76(24): 13088 - 13093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bulbarelli, T. Sprocati, M. Barberi, E. Pedrazzini, and N. Borgese Trafficking of tail-anchored proteins: transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane and sorting between surface domains in polarised epithelial cells J. Cell Sci., April 15, 2002; 115(8): 1689 - 1702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Zamyatnin Jr,, A. G. Solovyev, A. A. Sablina, A. A. Agranovsky, L. Katul, H. J. Vetten, J. Schiemann, A. E. Hinkkanen, K. Lehto, and S. Yu. Morozov Dual-colour imaging of membrane protein targeting directed by poa semilatent virus movement protein TGBp3 in plant and mammalian cells J. Gen. Virol., March 1, 2002; 83(3): 651 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Charloteaux, L. Lins, H. Moereels, and R. Brasseur Analysis of the C-Terminal Membrane Anchor Domains of Hepatitis C Virus Glycoproteins E1 and E2: toward a Topological Model J. Virol., February 15, 2002; 76(4): 1944 - 1958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Schmidt-Mende, E. Bieck, T. Hugle, F. Penin, C. M. Rice, H. E. Blum, and D. Moradpour Determinants for Membrane Association of the Hepatitis C Virus RNA-dependent RNA Polymerase J. Biol. Chem., November 16, 2001; 276(47): 44052 - 44063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Borgese, I. Gazzoni, M. Barberi, S. Colombo, and E. Pedrazzini Targeting of a Tail-anchored Protein to Endoplasmic Reticulum and Mitochondrial Outer Membrane by Independent but Competing Pathways Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2001; 12(8): 2482 - 2496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Watson and J. E. Pessin Transmembrane domain length determines intracellular membrane compartment localization of syntaxins 3, 4, and 5 Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2001; 281(1): C215 - C223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lee, J. Yoon, B. Park, Y. Jun, M. Jin, H. C. Sung, I.-H. Kim, S. Kang, E.-J. Choi, B. Y. Ahn, et al. Structural and Functional Dissection of Human Cytomegalovirus US3 in Binding Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Molecules J. Virol., December 1, 2000; 74(23): 11262 - 11269. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Cocquerel, C. Wychowski, F. Minner, F. Penin, and J. Dubuisson Charged Residues in the Transmembrane Domains of Hepatitis C Virus Glycoproteins Play a Major Role in the Processing, Subcellular Localization, and Assembly of These Envelope Proteins J. Virol., April 15, 2000; 74(8): 3623 - 3633. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|
|