|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 33, 21040-21053, August 14, 1998
Testin Secreted by Sertoli Cells Is Associated with the Cell
Surface, and Its Expression Correlates with the Disruption of
Sertoli-Germ Cell Junctions but Not the Inter-Sertoli Tight
Junction*
Josephine
Grima ,
Connie C. S.
Wong §,
Li-ji
Zhu ,
Shu-dong
Zong , and
C. Yan
Cheng ¶
From the The Population Council, New York, New York
10021 and § Department of Zoology, University of Hong Kong,
Hong Kong, People's Republic of China
 |
ABSTRACT |
Testin is a testosterone-responsive Sertoli cell
secretory product. In the present study, we demonstrated that the
amount of testin secreted by Sertoli cells in vitro was
comparable with several other Sertoli cell secretory products. However,
virtually no testin was found in the luminal fluid and cytosols of the
testis and epididymis when the intercellular junctions were not
previously disrupted, suggesting that secreted testin may be reabsorbed
by testicular cells in vivo. Studies using Sertoli cells
with and without a cell surface cross-linker and radioiodination in
conjunction with immunoprecipitation illustrated the presence of two
polypeptides of 28 and 45 kDa, which constitute a binding protein
complex that anchors testin onto the cell surface. The 28- and 45-kDa
peptide appear to be residing on and inside the cell surface,
respectively. Immunogold EM studies illustrated testin was abundantly
localized on the Sertoli cell side of the ectoplasmic specialization (a modified adherens junction) surrounding developing spermatids. In
contrast, very few testin gold particles were found at the site of
inter-Sertoli tight junctions. When the inter-Sertoli tight junctions
were formed or disrupted, no significant change in testin expression
was noted. This is in sharp contrast to the disruption of Sertoli-germ
cell junctions, which is accompanied by a surge in testin expression.
These results demonstrate the usefulness of testin in examining
Sertoli-germ cell interactions.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Testin, a testosterone-responsive glycoprotein secreted by rat
Sertoli cells in vitro, consists of two highly homologous
variants with an apparent Mr of 35,000 and
37,000 (1-4). Immunofluorescent microscopy and immunohistochemistry
reveal that testin resides near the basal lamina of the seminiferous
epithelium in most stages of the cycle, consistent with its
localization at the Sertoli-germ cell junction (5-6). However, a
transient but drastic increase in testin accumulation was noted between
Sertoli cells and the head of elongated spermatids at early stage VIII
preceding spermiation (7), consistent with its localization at the
ectoplasmic specialization, which is a modified adherens junction (see
Table I). These observations suggest that testin may be a sensitive
marker in examining the cellular events of Sertoli-germ cell
interactions.
Once the mRNA sequence of testin was known, Northern blots and
reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction were used to survey the
testin mRNA distribution in multiple organs from both adult and
immature male and female rats. It was found that testin is
predominantly expressed in the gonad (6). We postulated that this
expression correlated with the rapid turnover of intercellular junctions in the testis and ovary during germinal cell development. This hypothesis was supported by the observations that testin mRNA
can also be detected in non-gonadal tissues such as pre- and neo-natal
rat kidney at the time of extensive tissue restructuring due to organ
growth (8). Moreover, the steady-state testin mRNA level in the
ovary is high at proestrus, estrus, and metestrus, correlating with the
maturation of intrafollicular ova and the eventual rupturing of the
follicle at ovulation that coincides with the rapid turnover of
inter-granulosa cell junctions (8, 9). In addition, testin expression
was drastically reduced to an almost undetectable level at diestrus,
during which functional regression of the corpora lutea occurs (8,
9).
Other recent in vivo and in vitro studies reveal
that testin is a sensitive marker to monitor the disruption of
intercellular junctions in the testis, since the expression of testin
is positively correlated to this event (8). For instance, a surge in
testin expression and an intense accumulation of its protein in the
cytosol of the testis are found when germ cells, mainly round and
elongated spermatids, were depleted from the seminiferous epithelium by either lonidamine (8), busulfan (2, 3), or X-irradiation (10) at the time when Sertoli-germ cell junctions were disrupted. A
brief hypotonic treatment lysing germ cells in Sertoli-germ cell
cocultures, thereby disrupting the inter-Sertoli-germ cell junctions,
also induced a drastic increase in testin expression by Sertoli cells
(8). These studies, however, cannot distinguish whether the observed
drastic increase in testin expression correlates with the disruption of
inter-Sertoli tight junctions or adherens and gap junctions, which are
found between Sertoli cells as well as between Sertoli and germ cells
(Table I; for reviews, see Refs. 11-13). As such, we have used an
established culture model that selectively disrupts tight junctions
in vitro (14) by [Ca2+] depletion using
primary Sertoli cells cultured in vitro to assess whether
such a disruption is associated with any changes in testin expression.
In addition, we seek to (i) identify the distribution of testin in the
epithelium by immunogold EM to define its subcellular localization,
(ii) examine the effect of anti-testin IgG on the re-establishment of
inter-Sertoli tight junctions after their disruption as assessed by the
transepithelial electrical resistance (TER)1 measurement, (iii)
characterize the binding protein complex that anchors testin onto cell
surface, and (iv) examine whether the expression of testin is mediated
by germ cells or is dependent on the status of the intercellular
junctions.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Animals and Preparation of Biological Fluids
Adult or immature Sprague-Dawley rats were obtained from Charles
River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). Preparation of testicular and
epididymal cytosols from adult rats (450 gm b.w.) were performed as
described previously (1, 2). Rete testis fluid was collected from rats
(450 gm b.w.) by micropuncture 4 h after ligation of efferent
ducts while rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (40 mg/kg
b.w., intraperitoneal) as described (15, 16). The use of animals for
studies described in this report was approved by the Rockefeller
University Institution Animal Care and Use Committee with Protocol
Numbers 94-132, 95-129, 95-29-R1, and 97-117.
Preparation of Testicular Cell Cultures
Sertoli Cells Cultured at Low Density--
Primary Sertoli cells
were prepared from 20-day-old Sprague-Dawley rats as described
previously (6, 8). All the experiments using Sertoli cell-enriched
cultures reported in this paper were derived from 20-day-old rats
unless otherwise specified. Cells were plated at a density of 4.5 × 106 cells/9 ml/100-mm dish (about 5 × 104 cells/cm2) in serum-free Ham's F12
nutrient mixture/Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (F12/DMEM, 1:1,
v/v) supplemented with insulin (10 µg/ml), human transferrin (5 µg/ml), bacitracin (5 µg/ml), and epidermal growth factor (5 ng/ml)
and incubated at 35 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air, 5%
CO2 (v/v). About 48 h after plating, cultures were
hypotonically treated with 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, for 2.5 min to lyse residual germ cells (17) to obtain Sertoli cell cultures
with greater than 95% purity. Cells were washed twice with F12/DMEM,
and the cells were allowed to recover for an additional 24 h
before their use. Under these conditions, specialized tight
junctions were not formed when assessed by various criteria as
described previously (4).
Sertoli Cells Cultured at High Density--
To assess the effect
of anti-testin IgG or [Ca2+] depletion on the
inter-Sertoli tight junction, primary Sertoli cells isolated as
described above from 20-day-old rats were cultured at high cell density
to allow the establishment of specialized junctions. Briefly, about
2 × 106 cells/cm2 were plated on
MatrigelTM (1:8)-coated HA filters in the apical chamber of
a bicameral unit (Millipore, Bedford, MA) (4). To assess the formation of tight junctions, TER across the Sertoli cell columnar monolayer was
quantified using a Millicell electrical resistance system. Briefly,
current was passed through the epithelial monolayer between two
silver-silver chloride electrodes. Resistance was calculated from the
change in voltage across the monolayer induced by a short (~2 s)
20-µA pulse of current. The resistance was multiplied by the surface
area of the filter to yield the areal resistance in ohms/cm2. The net value of electrical resistance was then
computed by subtracting the background, which was measured on
Matrigel-coated cell-free chambers, from values of Sertoli cell-plated
chambers. Disruption of the tight junctions were achieved by incubating the Sertoli cell monolayer in [Ca2+]-free F12/DMEM for 15 min as described (14), which is manifested by a drastic decline in TER.
Thereafter, cells were returned to [Ca2+]-containing
F12/DMEM with or without anti-testin IgG or normal rabbit serum IgG
(200 µg/ml) for 20 min at room temperature with gentle rocking and
then returned to 35 °C for the re-establishment of the tight
junction as described previously (14). Disruption and reformation of
the tight junction was assessed by TER measurement. IgG was purified
from decomplemented sera (56 °C for 30 min) by sequential ammonium
sulfate precipitation and DEAE chromatography as described previously
(18). Each time point contained triplicate cultures, and each
experiment was repeated at least three times using different batches of
cells.
Primary Sertoli Cell Cultures from 35- and 90-day-old
Rats--
Primary cultures of Sertoli cells from 35- and 90-day-old
Sprague-Dawley rats were prepared essentially as described previously (19). The cells were suspended in F12/DMEM supplemented with various
factors as described for immature Sertoli cells (see above) and plated
at approximately 4.5 × 106 cells/9 ml/100-mm dish and
cultured for 2 days at 35 °C with 95% air, 5% CO2.
Thereafter, cells were hypotonically treated to remove the residual
germ cells (17). The resulting cell purity was about 85% when judged
microscopically, and these cells were used for RNA extraction after 4 days in culture to compare the basal steady-state testin mRNA level
between Sertoli cells isolated from rats of different ages.
Germ Cells--
Total germ cells were isolated from 90-day-old
Sprague-Dawley rat (about 300 gm b.w.) testes by a mechanical procedure
without any enzymatic treatment as detailed elsewhere (20). These cell preparations consisted largely of spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and
round spermatids with a relative percentage of 16:19:65 when verified
by microscopic examination and DNA flow cytometry as described (20,
21). Virtually all elongated spermatids were removed in the glass wool
filtration step (20). Germ cells were cultured at a density of
22.5 × 106 cells/9 ml of F12/DMEM supplemented with
sodium DL-lactate (6 mM) and sodium pyruvate (2 mM) in 100-mm dishes for 20 h at 35 °C to obtain
germ cell-conditioned medium (GCCM) as described (20, 21) or used
immediately after their isolation for binding and coculture
experiments. These cells were largely free of somatic cell
contamination when assessed by various criteria as detailed elsewhere
(20).
Sertoli-Germ Cell Cocultures--
To assess the effects of germ
cells on Sertoli cell testin expression, primary Sertoli cells isolated
from 20-day-old rats were plated at 5 × 104
cells/cm2 and cultured for 2 days; thereafter, cells were
hypotonically treated to remove contaminating germ cells (17) (day 0).
Cells were then cultured for an additional 24 h (day 1), washed
once, and cultured for 3 additional days (day 4) to ensure that the testin steady-state mRNA level had returned to base line since the
culture procedure per se can induce damage on the
intercellular junctions, which is a potent stimulator of testin
expression (8). Thereafter, different amounts of germ cells using a
Sertoli:germ cell ratio of 1:2.5, 1:5, and 1:10 were added to Sertoli
cells and cultured for an additional 20 h (day 5). It must be
noted that under these conditions, specialized junctions between
Sertoli and germ cells had not yet formed, since their formation would require at least 24-48 h in culture (22, 23). Before their termination, cultures were subjected to a hypotonic treatment to lyse
germ cells 20 min before the addition of RNA STAT-60TM for
RNA extraction to eliminate RNA contributed by germ cells in the sample
to be analyzed. As such, the RNA that were examined in this experiment
were largely derived from Sertoli cells. To assess the effect of the
disruption of Sertoli-germ cell junctions, some cocultures that had
incubated for 30 h (day 5) were subjected to a hypotonic treatment
on day 5 that was 24 h before their termination on day 6. Control
dishes were Sertoli-germ cell cocultures incubated until day 6 without
hypotonic treatment on day 5 but subjected to a hypotonic treatment 20 min before termination to eliminate RNA contributed by germ cells in
the sample to be analyzed.
Pulse-Chase Analysis of the Synthesis and Secretion of Testin by
Sertoli Cells in Sertoli-Germ Cell Cocultures
To assess the effect of germ cells or GCCM on the synthesis and
secretion of testin by immature Sertoli cells in vitro,
Sertoli cells were prepared at a density of 4.5 × 106
cells/9 ml/100-mm dish as described above. Twenty four h after the
hypotonic treatment, germ cells (10 × 106 cells/dish)
or GCCM (10 µg of protein/dish) were added and cocultured with
Sertoli cells for 18 h in F12/DMEM containing 1/100th of the
normal methionine concentration. The cells were then pulse-labeled for
15 min with 100 µCi of [35S]methionine per dish and
subsequently washed three times to remove any remaining
[35S]methionine. At specified time points, media and
cells were harvested and stored at 20 °C until used.
Immunoprecipitation was performed as described (4). In one set of
control experiments (Con 1), Sertoli cells were cultured alone without
germ cells or GCCM and immunoprecipitated with the testin antibody at
specified time points. In other controls (Con 2), Sertoli cells were
cultured alone but immunoprecipitated with preimmune serum to assess
the specificity of the testin antibody. Samples were resolved onto 10%
T polyacrylamide gels and visualized by autoradiography.
RNA Extraction and Northern Blot Analysis
Total RNA was extracted from cell cultures or tissues using RNA
STAT-60TM as described previously (6, 8, 24). Northern blot
analysis was performed as described previously using a
-32P-labeled testin cDNA probe by nick translation
(6) for hybridization. To ensure that equal amounts of RNA were loaded
into each lane, some blots were rehybridized with a
-32P-labeled -actin cDNA probe (6), and data were
normalized after densitometric scanning analysis.
Glycerol-induced Intercellular Junction Damage in the Testis
Recent studies have shown that glycerol can induce permanent
damage of the blood-testis barrier and inhibit spermatogenesis by
disrupting the inter-Sertoli cell tight junction near the basal lamina
within 2 weeks after glycerol administration (25). As such, we seek to
examine if there is any change in testin expression when the tight
junctions between Sertoli cells are disrupted 2 weeks after glycerol
treatment and to examine the changes of testin expression when germ
cells are later depleted. A 20% glycerol solution was prepared in PBS
(10 mM sodium phosphate, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4)
and used to induce intercellular junction damage in the testis after
intratesticular injection as described (25). Adult Sprague-Dawley rats
approximately 90 days of age (about 250-300 gm b.w.) were used.
Animals were anesthetized with MetofaneR before treatment.
Control and test animals received 200 µl of PBS or 20% glycerol
solution by intratesticular injection through the polar axis of each
testis, respectively. Four to six rats were used per treatment group
and rats were sacrificed by CO2 asphyxiation at specified
time points. Northern blot analysis and immunohistochemistry was
performed as described previously (6, 8, 24). Tissue homogenates of the
testis were also prepared as described previously (2).
Binding and Uptake of 125I-Testin by Sertoli
Cells
Purified testin isolated from SCCM as described previously (2)
was radiolabeled with 125I-Bolton-Hunter reagent (specific
activity, 3056-3324 Ci/mmol, NEN Life Science Products) to a specific
activity of approximately 50 µCi/µg of protein. For binding
experiments, Sertoli cells were plated in 12-well dishes at a
concentration of 5 × 105 cells/well/ml F12/DMEM.
These cells were used on day 3. Cells were washed three times with
F12/DMEM containing 1% BSA. Approximately 1 × 106
cpm of 125I-testin were added per well in duplicate with or
without a 100-fold excess of unlabeled testin and incubated at 35 or
4 °C for several different time points. Cells were then washed three
times in F12/DMEM containing 1% BSA (w/v) to remove unbound
125I-testin. Cells were solubilized in 1 M NaOH
for radioactivity determination. Specific binding was determined from
the difference between total binding and nonspecific binding (in the
presence of 100-fold excess unlabeled testin). Radioactivity in
solubilized cell extracts was determined in a Packard Cobra II
-counter.
Membrane Preparation and Solubilization of
125I-Testin
Primary monolayer cultures of Sertoli cells were prepared from
20-day-old rats as described above and plated at a density of 4.5 × 106 cells/9 ml/100-mm dish. Four days after hypotonic
treatment, Sertoli cells were washed twice with media and incubated
with 5 × 106 cpm 125I-testin/5 ml of
F12/DMEM for 4 h at 35 °C. Cells were washed three times with
fresh media and scraped off in PBS containing 2 mM of
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 2 mM
N-ethylmaleimide to inhibit protease activity. Cell
membranes were disrupted by repeated freeze-thawing. Membranes were
pelleted for 15 min at 12,000 × g and washed three
times to remove residual cytosolic proteins. The membranes were then
solubilized with 100 µl of corresponding buffer and heated at
100 °C for 10 min, and testin was visualized by autoradiography
after SDS-PAGE. The membrane solubilization buffers consisted of 20 mM Tris containing 1.6% 2-mercaptoethanol with or without
1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, or 1% Nonidet P-40. All buffers were
adjusted to pH 6.8 at 22 °C. Extracellular matrix (ECM) was the
remaining amorphous substances in the dishes used for membrane
preparation as described previously (52). It was extracted with the
same buffers as described above by heating at 100 °C for 10 min.
Sertoli Cell Membrane and Cell Surface Labeling
Sertoli cells were cultured at high cell density (0.75 × 106 cells/cm2) on Matrigel (1:5 diluted with
F12/DMEM)-coated dishes as described (4) to allow the formation of
specialized junctions. Cell membranes were prepared as described above
for iodination. For surface labeling, live cells were cross-linked with
3,3'-dithiobis(sulfosuccinimidyl) propionate (DTSSP, a
membrane-impermeable and thiol cleavage cross-linker) as described by
the manufacturer (Pierce) before Na[125I] labeling using
Iodogen (26), and therefore only proteins on the cell surface were
labeled. About 500 µg of protein of Sertoli cell membrane or
DTSSP-cross-linked cells (12 × 106) were labeled with
2.5 mCi of Na[125I] in a Pierce Reacti-vial coated with
100 µg of Iodogen (26). Free Na[125I] was removed by
dialysis against 6 liters of 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4 with 2-3
changes over a period of 2 days. 125I-Membrane ghosts were
solubilized in 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, containing 0.1% Brij
97, 0.1% SDS, 0.1% Triton X-100, 2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 2 mM EDTA for 3 h
at 37 °C. Samples were dialyzed overnight in PBS to remove
detergents. Immunoprecipitation was then performed using either testin
antibody or preimmune serum (1:50) overnight at 4 °C with agitation
on a rotator. Immunocomplexes were purified on a protein A-Sepharose
column (0.75 × 10 cm, inner diameter) previously equilibrated
with 10 column volumes of PBS. Nonbound proteins were removed by a
15-column volume of PBS. Specifically bound proteins were eluted from
the column using 0.1 M glycine, pH 3.5, and collected in
0.5-ml fractions. Aliquots (5 µl) were counted in a Packard Cobra II
-counter. Selected fractions were resolved by SDS-PAGE onto a 10% T
SDS-polyacrylamide gel and visualized by autoradiography. The
monospecificity of the testin antibody used in this study has been
characterized and described (1, 2, 4).
Ultrastructural Localization of Testin in the Seminiferous
Epithelium by Immunogold Electron Microscopy.
For immunogold EM study, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (250 gm
b.w.) were used, and the animals were sacrificed by CO2
asphyxiation. Testes were perfused via the testicular artery with
ice-cold physiological saline to remove contaminating blood for 10 s, followed by 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.2, containing 0.2%
glutaraldehyde and 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. The testes were
quickly cut into small pieces and immersed in the same fixatives
containing 4% sucrose at 4 °C for 2 h. After thoroughly
washing with the same buffer, samples were dehydrated in ascending
concentrations of ethanol at low temperature: 30% ethanol, 30 min at
4 °C; 50% ethanol, 30 min at 20 °C; 70% ethanol, 30 min at
35 °C; 95% ethanol, 30 min at 35 °C; 100% ethanol, twice
for 30 min at 35 °C. Lowicryl K4M infiltration and embedding
solutions were prepared according to the manufacturer's specifications
(Polysciences, Inc. Warrington, PA). Dehydrated specimens were
infiltrated as follows: Lowicryl/ethanol 1:1, 60 min at -35 °C;
Lowicryl/ethanol 2:1, 60 min at 35 °C; and Lowicryl overnight at
35 °C. The specimens were then transferred to Lowicryl embedding
solution in precooled beam capsules. Polymerization was induced by UV
irradiation at 35 °C overnight followed by 2 days of UV
irradiation at room temperature. Semi-thin sections stained with
toluidine blue were used to select relevant tissue and cells. Thin
sections cut by an ultramicrotome were mounted on formaval-coated
nickel grids for subsequent immunogold localization. The sections were
exposed to undiluted goat serum for 1 h at room temperature, then
incubated overnight at 4 °C on drops of affinity-purified anti-testin IgG. Affinity chromatography using protein A-Sepharose 4B
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was performed according to the manufacturer protocol. After washing in PBS (4×, 15 min), the grids
were floated for 30 min at room temperature on drops of colloidal
gold-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG second antibody (particle size 10 nm,
AuroProbe EM GAR G10, Amersham) diluted 1:40 in PBS containing 0.1%
BSA. The grids were thoroughly washed with PBS and then fixed with
2.5% glutaraldehyde and post-fixed in 1% OsO4. After
drying in the desiccator, the grids were stained by lead citrate and
uranyl acetate. Normal rabbit serum and omission of testin antiserum
were used as controls. Sections were viewed with an Hitachi 800 electron microscope.
Radioimmunoassays (RIA)
RIAs for testin (2), androgen binding protein (16, 27),
clusterin (28), and 2-macroglobulin (29) were performed as detailed in previous reports.
General Methods
Protein estimation was performed as described previously (30)
using BSA as a standard. Statistical analysis was performed by
Student's t test using the GB Statistical Analysis Software package (Version 3.0) (Dynamics Microsystems, Inc., Bethesda, MD).
 |
RESULTS |
Distribution of Testin in Biological Fluids and Reproductive Tissue
Extracts and Its Comparison to Three Other Sertoli Cell Secretory
Products--
To better understand the biological features of testin,
we compared its distribution in various biological fluids and
compartments to three other Sertoli cell secretory products: namely
androgen binding protein, clusterin, and 2-macroglobulin
in the rat by RIA. When Sertoli cells were cultured in the monolayer at
5 × 104 cells/cm2, when some of the
specialized junctions did not form (such as occluding tight junctions,
see Table I), the amount of testin secreted by Sertoli cells in vitro was comparable with that
of androgen binding protein, clusterin, and
2-macroglobulin (Fig. 1A). However, the level of
testin in rete testis fluid from intact adult testes was several orders
of magnitude lower than these three other secretory proteins, which
were highly concentrated in the rete testis fluid (Fig. 1B).
By any measure, it is logical to expect that any secretory proteins of
Sertoli cell origin be concentrated in the luminal fluid since the
blood-testis barrier formed by adjacent Sertoli cells limits the
transport of proteins from the systemic circulation to the interstitium
unless it is being actively transported there. On the other hand,
testin may be rapidly reabsorbed by either Sertoli or germ cells after
its secretion by Sertoli cells. If testin is indeed secreted basally, it is expected to be detected in the serum at high concentration; however, earlier RIA data revealed a very low level of testin in the
serum, and its concentration did not alter after orchiectomy (2). As
such, results shown in Fig. 1B illustrate the unique feature
of testin, indicating this protein is not accumulated in the luminal
fluid and is likely to be reabsorbed onto the testicular cell. When the
levels of testin in the cytosols of the intact testis (Fig.
1C) and epididymis (Fig. 1D) were quantified and compared with these other Sertoli cell proteins, it was found that
testin was almost negligible in both organs when compared with these
other Sertoli cell proteins, further suggesting that the secreted
testin might become reabsorbed by testicular cells.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The concentration of rat testin in Sertoli
cell-enriched culture medium (A), rete testis fluid
(B), testis (C), and epididymis (D)
and its comparison to rat-androgen-binding protein,
clusterin, and 2-macroglobulin. These proteins were
assayed by corresponding RIA as described under "Materials and
Methods." Results are the mean ± S.D. of six
determinations.
|
|
Binding of 125I-Testin by Sertoli Cells, Germ Cells,
and ECM--
To investigate whether testin is bound to the Sertoli
cell membrane, the following experiments were performed. Highly
purified Sertoli cells prepared as described under "Materials and
Methods" were plated in 12-well dishes at 5 × 105
cells/well/ml F12/DMEM. Briefly, 125I-testin (1 × 106 cpm, about 10 fmol) was incubated with cells for
specific time points at 35 or 4 °C in F12/DMEM (Fig.
2A). Nonspecific binding was
estimated by using 100-fold excess unlabeled purified testin. Cells
were then washed three times in F12/DMEM to remove unbound 125I-testin. Cells were subsequently solubilized in 1 M NaOH for radioactivity determination. Fig. 2A
shows that Sertoli cells bound 125I-testin specifically in
a temperature-dependent manner of which the binding was
saturated by 2 h. We next investigated whether testin can also
bind to germ cells or ECM. Sertoli cells were cultured at 4.5 × 106 cells/9 ml/100-mm dish for 2 days, contaminating germ
cells were lysed by a hypotonic treatment (17), and the cultures were
incubated at 35 °C for 4 days. Highly purified Sertoli cells or germ
cells were then incubated with 125I-testin (about 5 × 106 cpm) for 4 h at 35 °C. The dishes were washed,
and cell membranes were isolated as described under "Materials and
Methods." Cell membranes and ECM were then solubilized in the
corresponding buffer, heated at 100 °C for 10 min, and resolved by
SDS-PAGE, and the 125I-testin was visualized by
autoradiography. In Fig. 2B, lanes 1 and
10 are the 125I-testin used for incubation,
showing the two molecular variants of testin I and testin II.
Lanes 2-5 are the Sertoli cell membranes solubilized with
20 mM Tris containing 1.6% 2-mercaptoethanol; 20 mM Tris containing 1% SDS; 20 mM Tris
containing 1% SDS and 1.6% 2-mercaptoethanol; and 20 mM
Tris containing 1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 1% Nonidet P-40, and 1.6%
2-mercaptoethanol, respectively. All buffers used were adjusted to pH
6.8 at 22 °C. Lanes 6-9 are the ECM on the Petri dish
extracted with the same buffers as shown in lanes 2-5.
These results indicate not only that 125I-testin binds onto
the Sertoli cell membrane and ECM, but its solubilization requires the
use of detergents, suggesting that its association with the cell
membrane is not a nonspecific attachment. In the absence of detergents
(lanes 2 and 6 versus lanes 3-5 and 7-9, Fig. 2B), none of the
125I-testin that was bound onto the Sertoli cells could be
solubilized. Germ cells also bound 125I-testin (lane
11, Fig. 2B) specifically, since the presence of 100-fold excess unlabeled testin (lane 12, Fig.
2B) competed with the binding.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Binding of 125I-testin to primary
Sertoli cell cultures (A), and its solubilization from
Sertoli cells (SC), germ cells (GC), and ECM (B).
A, binding assay was performed as described under
"Materials and Methods." 125I-Testin (1 × 106 cpm) was incubated at 35 or 4 °C for specified time
points. Nonspecific binding was estimated using a 100-fold excess of
unlabeled testin. B, autoradiograph showing the
solubilization of membrane-bound 125I-testin from SC, GC,
and ECM. 125I-Testin (5 × 106 cpm/5
ml/100-mm dish) was incubated with primary Sertoli cells for 4 h
at 35 °C as described under "Materials and Methods." Membrane
proteins were solubilized in 100 µl of corresponding buffer, heated
at 100 °C for 10 min, and resolved on a 10% T SDS-polyacrylamide
gel, and testin was visualized by autoradiography. Lanes 1 and 10, 125I-testin tracer. Lanes
2-5, SC membranes solubilized with either 20 mM Tris
containing 1.6% 2-mercaptoethanol, 20 mM Tris containing
1% SDS and 1.6% 2-mercaptoethanol, 20 mM Tris containing
1% SDS, or 20 mM Tris containing 1% SDS, 1% Triton
X-100, 1% Nonidet P-40, and 1.6% 2-mercaptoethanol, respectively. All
buffers were adjusted to pH 6.8 at 22 °C. Lanes 6-9 is
the remaining ECM on the SC dishes extracted with the same buffers as
shown in lanes 2-5. Primary adult germ cells were also
incubated for 4 h at 35 °C with 125I-testin
(lane 11) or with 125I-testin plus a 100-fold
excess of unlabeled testin to assess nonspecific binding (lane
12). The germ cell membranes were solubilized in SDS sample buffer
and heated at 100 °C for 10 min.
|
|
Identification of a Protein Complex on the Sertoli Cell Membrane
That Binds Testin--
We next sought to investigate whether the
binding of 125I-testin onto the cell membrane as shown in
Fig. 2 is mediated by a binding protein. Sertoli cells were cultured at
high cell density on Matrigel-coated dishes for 4 days to allow the
formation of specialized junctions. Plasma membranes were isolated as
described under "Materials and Methods," and the whole membrane
fraction was labeled with Na[125I] by Iodogen (26).
Immunoprecipitation was then performed on the labeled membrane proteins
using either testin antibody or preimmune serum (1:50). The
monospecificity of this antiserum has been characterized and
established (2, 4, 6). Immunocomplexes were purified by protein
A-Sepharose column and resolved on a SDS-polyacrylamide gel and shown
in Fig. 3A. Lane 1 (S) is the 14C-methylated protein standard.
Lane 3 is 125I-testin, where the two molecular
weight variants of testin were clearly visible. Lanes 2 and
4 are the Sertoli cell membrane (SM) proteins
after cell labeling and immunoprecipitation run under reducing
(R) and nonreducing (NR) conditions,
respectively. Radiolabeled testin I and II extracted from the membrane
are clearly visible in the SM samples (Fig. 3A, lanes
2 and 4) when compared with 125I-testin
alone (lane 3). It was noted that two other cell membrane proteins that were labeled and immunoprecipitated in conjunction with
testin, designated as a (45 kDa) and b (28 kDa)
are also visible in lanes 2 (reducing) and 4 (nonreducing), indicating that they are single polypeptide chains.
Lanes 5 and 6 are the corresponding controls of
lanes 2 and 4, where the testin antibody
incubation was substituted with preimmune serum, illustrating the bands
a and b shown in Fig. 3A are
components of the binding protein complex. These results, however,
cannot distinguish whether these two peptides reside on the cell
surface or are found inside the membrane. In contrast to the whole
membrane labeling, Fig. 3B shows the result obtained from
the surface labeling of viable Sertoli cells previously treated with a
membrane-impermeable and thiol-cleavable cross-linker, DTSSP.
Lane 1 (S) is the 14C-methylated
protein standard. Lane 2 is 125I-testin, where
the two molecular variants of testin are clearly visible. Lanes
3 and 4 are the Sertoli cell surface-labeled proteins after extraction and immunoprecipitation run under reducing
(R) and nonreducing (NR) conditions,
respectively. Radiolabeled testin I and II in conjunction with the
28-kDa protein, designated b, are clearly visible in the
DTSSP-treated surface-labeled sample (Fig. 3B, Lane
3) under reducing conditions. Under nonreducing conditions, the
band b together with testin were not visible and possibly
retarded in the gel because the complex had not been cleaved with a
reducing agent, since DTSSP is a thiol-cleavable cross-linker (Fig.
3B, lane 4 versus lane 3). These
results indicate that the 28-kDa protein (band b) and testin
I and II reside on the cell surface, and the 45-kDa protein
a is localized inside the cell membrane. In both sets of
experiments, the gels were also Coomassie Blue-stained to visualize any
proteins that might not have been labeled. However, no other proteins
were identified.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Identification of the testin binding protein
complex on the Sertoli cell membrane. Proteins were visualized by
SDS-PAGE and autoradiography under reducing (R) and
nonreducing (NR) conditions. A, cell membrane
proteins labeled with Na[125I] were visualized by
SDS-PAGE and autoradiography after immunoprecipitation using testin
antibody. Lane 1 , labeled S, is the
14C-methylated protein standard. Lane 3 is the
125I-testin, where the two molecular variants are clearly
visible. Lanes 2 and 4 are the Sertoli cell
membrane (SM) proteins after cell membrane labeling and
immunoprecipitation run under reducing and nonreducing conditions,
respectively. Radiolabeled testin I and II extracted from the membrane
are seen in the Sertoli cell membrane samples along with peptide
a (45 kDa) and b (28 kDa) under reducing
(lane 2) and nonreducing (lane 4) conditions.
Lanes 5 and 6 are the corresponding controls in
which Sertoli cell membrane was immunoprecipitated with preimmune
serum. Similar results were obtained in three separate experiments
using different batches of Sertoli cells. D, dye-front. B,
cell surface labeling with Na[125I], where Sertoli cells
were previously cross-linked with DTSSP. Lane 1 (S) is the 14C-methylated protein standard.
Lane 2 is the 125I-testin. Lane 3 is
the surface-labeled Sertoli cell membrane proteins cross-linked with
DTSSP before iodination and immunoprecipitation. Radiolabeled testin I
and II extracted from the membrane are clearly visible in the Sertoli
cell membrane samples along with the b (28 kDa) peptide
(lane 3), which was retarded in the gel in the absence of
reducing agent (2-mercaptoethanol) (lane 4). These results
illustrate that testin I, II, and the b peptide reside on
the Sertoli cell surface.
|
|
Localization of Testin in the Rat Testis by Immunogold EM--
To
examine the subcellular localization of testin, immunogold EM was
carried out, and about 300 cross-sections were examined. Fig.
4 summarizes the result of these
analyses. Immunoreactive testin as marked by gold (black)
particles was abundantly localized near the surface of a Sertoli cell
adjacent to the ectoplasmic specialization (a modified adherens
junction) around a developing spermatid (Fig. 4A). The
Sertoli cell was typified by the presence of microtubule bundles (Fig.
4A, arrowheads). Very few gold particles representing immunoreactive testin were found along the tight junction
between two adjacent Sertoli cells (Fig. 4B). These data are
in agreement with previously published immunofluorescent microscopy and
immunohistochemistry revealing the abundant presence of testin between
Sertoli and germ cells (5-7). Fig. 4C is a control section stained with IgG isolated from preimmune serum showing a cross-section between two Sertoli cells as typified by the presence of actin filament
bundles (shown by the arrowheads) where no gold particles were seen. The plasma membranes may not be obvious in these sections, probably due to the omission of OsO4 in the initial tissue
fixation, since the use of this fixative caused a loss of antigenicity
of the testin molecule, making localization impossible.

View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Immunogold EM localization of testin in the
rat testis. A and B are sections of
Lowicryl-embedded rat testes stained with affinity-purified anti-testin
IgG followed by a second antibody conjugated to gold particles. Gold
particles corresponding to immunoreactive testin appeared as
black dots in these figures. A, this section
shows a transverse section of a SC and a developing spermatid (germ
cell (GC)), as manifested by the presence of the acrosome
cap (Ac) and nucleus (Nu). Gold particles
accumulated at the sites of ectoplasmic specializations on the Sertoli
cell side near the cell surface. Arrowheads indicate the
microtubule bundles, which are one of the junctional elements of
ectoplasmic specializations in Sertoli cells. Bar, 0.3 µm.
B, this shows the cross-section to actin filament bundles
(arrowheads) between two transversely sectioned adjacent
Sertoli cells exhibiting the fine structure of the tight junction.
Immunoreactive testin was found to associate with actin bundles in the
tight junction. Bar, 0.1 µm. C, this is a
control micrograph in which the anti-testin IgG was substituted with
rabbit IgG. This is a parallel section of two SC, where the actin
filaments (arrowheads) can be seen. No gold particles were
found. Bar, 0.1 µm.
|
|
Effect of Anti-testin IgG on the Formation of Tight Junctions and
the Expression of Testin after Their Disruption by Calcium
Depletion--
Since earlier studies reveal a tight relationship
between the expression of testin and the integrity of intercellular
cell junctions in the testis (8), we sought to examine whether a disruption of the inter-Sertoli tight junction can induce a surge in
testin expression similar to what was shown when the Sertoli-germ cell
junctions were disrupted (8). It is known that epithelial tight
junctions, such as those found in the Madin-Darby canine kidney cells
in vitro, can be disrupted by the removal of calcium ions
from the medium and can be quickly reassembled after its replacement
(14, 33, 34). The integrity of the inter-Sertoli tight junctions was
assessed by TER measurement (31, 32). The inter-Sertoli tight junction
was disrupted by [Ca2+] depletion in primary Sertoli cell
cultures. Sertoli cell cultures were prepared as described under
"Materials and Methods," and TER measurements were taken
thereafter. It was noted that tight junctions were established in these
Sertoli cell cultures by day 3-4 (Fig.
5A), when the TER reached its
plateau with a measurement of about 50-60 ohms/cm2, which
is similar to a previous report (35). On day 5, extracellular [Ca2+] was removed from the bicameral unit by rinsing the
cell monolayer gently with Ca2+-free F12/DMEM, and the
units were incubated in Ca2+-free F12/DMEM for 15 min. At
the end of this 15-min period, a significant decline in TER was noted
(Fig. 5A), illustrating the tight junction had become leaky.
This result is consistent with other tight junction forming epithelia
such as Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (14). In some experiments,
cells were incubated with or without either anti-testin IgG (200 µg/ml) or normal rabbit IgG (200 µg/ml) together with fresh
F12/DMEM containing [Ca2+] to assess the effect of testin
antibody on the reformation of tight junctions between Sertoli cells.
It was noted that the tight junctions were re-established within 90 min
(Fig. 5A) as shown by an increase in TER. However, the
presence of anti-testin IgG did not interfere with the reformation of
tight junctions in these cultures (Fig. 5A). More important,
when the testin steady-state mRNA level was assessed in the samples
when the tight junctions were being disrupted and re-established, no
detectable change in testin expression was noted (Fig. 5B).
When the same blot shown in Fig. 5B was rehybridized with a
-actin probe (Fig. 5C) and the data were
densitometrically scanned and normalized against -actin (Fig.
5D), testin expression was found not to correlate with the
disruption or formation of tight junction, which is entirely different
from the testin mRNA expression during the disruption of
Sertoli-germ cell junctions (8). In other experiments, the testin
expression was also monitored up to 5 days after tight junctions were
disrupted in vitro by Ca2+ depletion, and no
changes in testin expression were noted (data not shown). Also, Sertoli
cells were cultured with anti-testin IgG or normal rabbit IgG in
F12/DMEM between days 1 and 4 when tight junctions were being formed;
no differences in TER were noted between these cultures and control
cultures without any IgG (data not shown). These analyses clearly
illustrate the lack of correlation between testin expression and the
formation or disruption of inter-Sertoli tight junctions.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Disruption of the tight junctional complexes
between Sertoli cells by [Ca2+] depletion in the absence
or presence of anti-testin IgG or normal rabbit IgG (200 µg/ml), and
its effect on TER and testin mRNA expression. Sertoli cells
were plated on Matrigel-coated bicameral units as described under
"Materials and Methods." A, effect of anti-testin IgG on
the recovery of Sertoli cell TER after [Ca2+] depletion.
B, Northern blot showing the regulation of testin mRNA expression after [Ca2+] depletion.
C, this is the same blot shown in (B) but
rehybridized with -actin. D, a graph showing the relative
testin mRNA expression after normalization against -actin after
densitometric scanning at 600 nm from three different
experiments.
|
|
Changes in Testin Expression in the Testis by Glycerol-induced
Disruption of the Blood-Testis Barrier--
To confirm the lack of
correlation between testin expression and the disruption of
inter-Sertoli tight junctions, we sought to use an in vivo
animal model in which the tight junctions were disrupted followed by a
progressive disruption of Sertoli-germ cell junctions due to germ cell
depletion. Administration of glycerol intratesticularly is known to
cause long term cessation of spermatogenesis in rats without any
apparent changes on Leydig cell function, serum gonadotropin and
testosterone levels, and secondary sexual characteristics (36, 37).
Recent studies have shown that glycerol can induce permanent damage of
the blood-testis barrier by disrupting the inter-Sertoli tight junction
near the basal lamina within 2 weeks after glycerol administration
(25). A disruption of the blood-testis barrier was manifested by an
influx of [3H]inulin and [125I]albumin to
the rete testis fluid, seminiferous tubule fluid, and the testicular
tissue within 2 weeks post-glycerol treatment after in vivo
infusion of radiolabeled substances (25). We have examined the effect
of glycerol-induced disruption of inter-Sertoli tight junctions and the
subsequent damage on Sertoli-germ cell junctions as a result of germ
cell depletion on the steady-state testicular testin mRNA level
(Fig. 6). The morphological changes in
the testis after glycerol treatment were also examined
immunohistochemically where testin appears as a reddish-brown
precipitate (Fig. 7). Adult rats were
anesthetized with MetofaneR and received control (PBS) or
treatment solution (200 µl of PBS containing 20% glycerol) injected
via a 26-gauge needle through the polar axis of each testis beginning
at one pole and terminating at the other (25). 2, 4, and 8 weeks later,
testes were removed for RNA extraction and Northern blot analysis. Fig.
6A is a Northern blot using about 20 µg of total RNA per
lane. No changes in the testicular testin steady-state
mRNA level were apparent by 2 weeks at the time when tight
junctions were disrupted (Fig. 6, A and B). It
was found that virtually all germ cells were still present in the
epithelium by 2 weeks after glycerol administration (Fig. 7C
versus Fig. 7, A and B). However, a
significant increase in the testin steady-state mRNA level (Fig. 6,
A and B), which was also accompanied by an
accumulation of testin (Fig. 6, C and D) in the
testis was clearly visible by 4 and 8 weeks after glycerol treatment
when germ cells, in particular round and elongated spermatids, were
depleted from the seminiferous epithelium at 4-8 weeks (Fig. 7D and E versus Fig. 7, A,
B, and C). When the concentrations of testin in
the testis of these rats were quantified by RIA and compared with
control rats, a significant increase in testin concentration was noted
(Fig. 6C). Since there was a significant decline in testicular weight by 8 weeks after glycerol treatment, the changes in
testin level were taken into account with the reduction in testicular
weight. Once the data were expressed as testin per pair testes (Fig.
6D), a 7-fold increase was detected in glycerol-treated rats
by 8 weeks. These results are also consistent with the
immunohistochemistry data, since there is drastic increase in
immunoreactive testin accumulated in the tubular lumen at 4-8 weeks
after glycerol treatment (Fig. 7, D and E)
compared with control rats (Fig. 7B) and rats treated with
glycerol for 2 weeks (Fig. 7C). Glycerol, however, had no
effect on testin expression in the epididymis up to 8 weeks post-treatment (Fig. 6, A and B), illustrating
the specificity of this chemical treatment in the testis. However,
immunohistochemistry analysis revealed that testin was accumulated in
the epididymal lumen 4-8 weeks post-glycerol treatment (data not
shown).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
A study on the relationship between
glycerol-induced disruption on inter-testicular cell junctions and
testin expression as well as its protein accumulation in the rat
testis. A, a Northern blot using about 20 µg of total
RNA/lane from testis and epididymis of rats at 2, 4, and 8 weeks (W) after an intratesticular injection of glycerol
including control rats. kb, kilobases. B, same
blot as shown in A but rehybridized with a -actin
cDNA probe. C, testin concentration in the testicular
cytosol in glycerol-treated rats 8 weeks post-treatment
versus control (n = 4) when quantified by
RIA. D, changes in testin content per pair of testes 8 weeks
after glycerol treatment when the reduction in organ weight was taken
into account (n = 4). In both C and
D, results are mean ± S.D. of four rats. *,
significantly different from control; p < 0.001.
|
|

View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Morphological changes and the associated
pattern of testin immunohistochemical localization in adult rat testes
after intratesticular glycerol treatment. Immunoreactive testin
appears as a reddish-brown precipitate as denoted by
arrowhead. A and B are
photomicrographs of the cryostat sections of testes from a control rat.
C, D, and E are photomicrographs
of rats treated with glycerol after 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively.
Four animals in each treatment group including control were processed
for microscopic examination, and at least 50-100 sections were
examined. A single set of representative data are shown here.
A, control rat showing the cross-section of a normal
seminiferous tubule at stage VII of the spermatogenic cycle stained
with preimmune serum indicating the specificity of the staining.
B is the same as in A, except that it was stained
with testin antibody. Immunoreactive testin was found between
spermatocytes/spermatogonia and Sertoli cells at the basal compartment.
Testin was also found between Sertoli cells and the heads of the
elongated spermatids (es) at the adluminal compartment.
C, two weeks after glycerol treatment, it is noted that all
elongated spermatids were depleted, but the number of round spermatids
(rs) and spermatocytes (p) remained relatively
unchanged. Testin is still localized in the basal compartment between
Sertoli and germ cells. Four (D) and eight (E)
weeks after glycerol treatment, a massive reduction of germ cells from
the epithelium and an accumulation of immunoreactive testin was found
in the lumen of the tubule.
|
|
Effect of GCCM or Germ Cells on Sertoli Cell Testin Steady-state
mRNA Level--
It is known that germ cells neither express testin
mRNA (7) nor do they secrete any testin in vitro (20).
But it is not known whether GCCM or germ cells can regulate testin
expression. To examine such a possibility, Sertoli cells cultured at
5 × 104 cells/cm2 when specialized
junctions did not form were incubated with increasing concentrations of
GCCM proteins for a 20-h period (Fig.
8A). Fig. 8A shows
that GCCM had no affect on the Sertoli cell testin steady-state mRNA level. Fig. 8B is the same blot such as the one
shown in Fig. 8A but hybridized with a -actin cDNA
probe. Fig. 8C is the densitometrically scanned data of
three separate Northern blots normalized against -actin, indicating
that germ cell-released proteins had no apparent effect on Sertoli cell
testin expression. Fig. 8D is the RIA result showing the
concentration of testin in the corresponding spent media, suggesting
GCCM did not affect Sertoli cell testin secretion. However, a transient
but consistent increase in the concentration of testin in the spent
media was noted using 5 µg of GCCM protein/dish (Fig.
8D).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effects of GCCM on the Sertoli cell
steady-state testin mRNA level and the amount of testin secreted by
Sertoli cells in vitro. A, Northern blot
showing the level of Sertoli cell testin expression when cultured with
an increasing concentration of GCCM for a 20-h period. Approximately 10 µg of total RNA were loaded per lane. kb,
kilobases. B, the same blot shown in A but
rehybridized with a -actin probe. C, a graph showing the
relative testin mRNA level in Sertoli cells cultured with various
amounts of GCCM proteins and normalized against -actin after
densitometric scanning of three blots such as the one shown in
A. D, the concentration of testin in the spent
medium in these cultures were quantified by a testin-specific RIA.
ns, not significantly different from Sertoli cells cultured
in the absence of germ cells; *, p < 0.01.
|
|
We next examined whether germ cells can affect Sertoli cell testin
expression in vitro (Fig. 9).
Since the isolation of Sertoli cells from the seminiferous tubule
involves the disruption of Sertoli-germ cell junctions, which would
have induced changes in testin expression, Sertoli cells used for this
experiment were cultured for 4 days before the addition of germ cells
to allow its testin steady-state mRNA level to return to the basal
level. Lane 1 is total RNA derived from Sertoli cells
cultured for 48 h in vitro; cells were terminated 20 min before the hypotonic treatment (Day 0). Lane
2 is RNA from Sertoli cell cultures 24 h after hypotonic
treatment (Day 1). Lane 3 is the Sertoli cell RNA isolated
from cultures on day 5 that served as a control for lanes
4-6. As expected, a steady decline in testin expression during
cultures is noted (Fig. 9A, lanes 1-3),
suggesting that the isolation of Sertoli cells from the seminiferous
tubule can enhance testin expression because these steps disrupted the
Sertoli-germ cell junctions. The hypotonic treatment step on day 0 (i.e. 48 h after Sertoli cells were isolated from the
tubules) could not induce a surge in testin expression in these
cultures (Fig. 9A, lane 2 versus lane
1) possibly because these primary cultures were relatively free of
germ cells; as such, not many Sertoli-germ cell junctions could be
disrupted. Alternatively, the expression of testin at this time was
already maximized, and the removal of residual germ cells could no
longer elicit an additional increase in testin expression. Different
germ cell numbers using a Sertoli:germ cell ratio of 1:2.5, 1:5, and
1:10 were then plated onto these Sertoli cell cultures on day 4 and
incubated for an additional 20 h (day 5) to examine the effects of
germ cells. Immediately before RNA extraction, each culture dish was
hypotonically treated to lyse germ cells to eliminate RNA contributed
by germ cells in the sample to be analyzed. As such, total RNA
extracted from these dishes were largely of Sertoli cell origin. It was
found that germ cells did not generate a dose-dependent and
significant effect on the Sertoli cell testin expression as shown in
Fig. 9, A-C (lanes 4-6 versus lane
3), even though it is apparent that the presence of germ cells
reduced Sertoli cell testin expression slightly. It must be noted that
under these conditions, specialized Sertoli-germ cell junctions did not
form since their formation would require an incubation period of at
least 24-48 h in vitro (22, 23). In some experiments, the
Sertoli-germ cell cocultures were allowed to incubate for 30 h
in vitro and were subjected to a hypotonic treatment on day
5 to disrupt the Sertoli-germ cell junctions, and the cells were
harvested on day 6 for analysis. A significant increase in testin
expression was found as a result of the disruption of the junctions
(Fig. 9A, lane 7 versus lane 8).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
The effect of germ cells (GC) and
hypotonic treatment (HT) on the SC testin steady-state
mRNA level in Sertoli-germ cell cocultures in
vitro. A, Northern blot showing the steady-state
testin mRNA level in Sertoli cells when cocultured with increasing
numbers of germ cells for a 20-h period. Approximately 10 µg of total
RNA were loaded per lane. In these cultures, germ cells were
lysed by a hypotonic treatment 20 min before their termination to
eliminate RNA contributed by germ cells in the samples being analyzed.
kb, kilobases. B, ethidium bromide staining of
the same blot shown in A. C, a graph
showing the relative testin mRNA level in Sertoli cells cocultured
with germ cells after densitometric scanning at 600 nm of three
Northerns such as the one shown in A. BH, Sertoli
cells were terminated 20 min before hypotonic treatment; AH,
24 h after hypotonic treatment; Ctrl, control cultures
where Sertoli cells were cultured alone and terminated on day 5;
2.5, 5, and 10 are coculture
experiments where germ cell:Sertoli cell ratio was at 2.5:1, 5:1, and
10:1; germ cells were added onto Sertoli cells (5 × 104 cells/cm2) on day 4 and cocultured for
20 h and terminated on day 5; 10 H and
Ctrl/10H correspond to lanes 7 and 8 shown in A.
|
|
Effect of Germ Cells or GCCM on Testin Synthesis and
Secretion--
To study the effect of germ cells or GCCM on Sertoli
cell testin secretion, Sertoli cells (4.5 × 106
cells/9 ml/100-mm dish) were cocultured with germ cells (1 × 107) or GCCM (10 µg of protein) for 18 h in
vitro. Thereafter, cells were pulse-labeled with
[35S]methionine for 15 min and chased with cold
methionine at specified time points. Fig.
10, A and B show
the relative amounts of 35S-labeled testin in the cytosol
and media, respectively, at specified time points. It was noted that
testin appeared in the cytosol within 15 min with a testin I:testin II
ratio of 3:1 when the x-ray film was densitometrically scanned at 600 nm (Fig. 10A). By 24 h, all the newly synthesized
35S-labeled testin was no longer detectable in the cytosol
but secreted into the medium (Fig. 10A), indicating that
germ cells did not inhibit testin secretion into the media. Testin was
detected in the medium within 1 h after pulse-labeling and peaked
at 24 h, concomitant with the disappearance of testin in the
cytosol, but the ratio of testin I:testin II had shifted, becoming
1:1.5 (Fig. 10, B versus A). The
reason for such a shift in ratio is not immediately known; it is
possibly the result of post-translational processing such as
glycosylation. Con 1 is the corresponding control using Sertoli cells
without either germ cells or GCCM, whereas Con 2 is the corresponding
control using preimmune serum instead of the anti-testin antibody for
immunoprecipitation. The level of [35S]-labeled testin
shown in Con 1 using Sertoli cells cultured alone without either germ
cells or GCCM is not significantly different from the corresponding
cultures with either germ cells or GCCM (Fig. 10, A and
B).

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
The effect of germ cells (GC) or
GCCM on the synthesis and secretion of testin by primary Sertoli cells
cultured in vitro by pulse-chase analysis.
A, this is an autoradiograph of a 10% T SDS-polyacrylamide
gel showing the immunoprecipitated radiolabeled cytosolic proteins.
After an 18-h coculture period of Sertoli with germ cells
(GC) or GCCM, cultures were labeled for 15 min with
[35S]methionine and then chased with cold methionine for
15 min to 96 h and immunoprecipitiated with anti-testin II
antibody. Control 1 (Con1) shows radiolabeled cytosolic
proteins from Sertoli cells cultured in the absence of either GC or
GCCM for 30 min and 24 h and immunoprecipitated with anti-testin
antibody. Control 2 (Con2) is identical to control 1, except
that the samples were immunoprecipitated with preimmune rabbit serum.
B, this is an autoradiograph similar to the one shown in
A, except that the immunoprecipitated proteins were
recovered from the spent media. Lane M is
14C-methylated protein molecular weight markers consisting
of 10,000 cpm each of myosin (Mr 200,000),
phosphorylase b (Mr 97, 400), BSA
(Mr 69,000), ovalbumin
(Mr 46,000), carbonic anhydrase
(Mr 30,000), soybean trypsin inhibitor
(Mr 21, 500), and lysozyme
(Mr 14, 300).
|
|
Age-dependent Expression of Testin--
Earlier
studies have shown that the expression of testin in adult rats is
confined to the gonad (6). When the steady-state mRNA level of
testin from the seminiferous tubule isolated from 10, 20, and 60 days
of age was examined by Northern blot, it was found that tubules from
immature rats had almost 10-fold more testin mRNA than mature rats
(8). However, these earlier studies did not take into consideration the
increase in RNA contributed by germ cells in the samples being
analyzed, since there is a drastic increase in germ cell:Sertoli cell
ratio during maturation. When the changes in testin steady-state
mRNA level in the testis were quantified by Northern blot, it was
found that there is a steady increase in testin expression per pair of
testes during maturation (Fig. 11),
illustrating that testin expression correlates with the onset of
spermatogenesis. We next examined the testin steady-state mRNA
level in Sertoli cells isolated from testes at different ages.
Unexpectedly, an age-dependent reduction of testin
expression (Fig. 12A) was
noted when about 10 µg of total RNA was used for analysis (Fig.
12B). These blots were then rehybridized with a -actin
probe and densitometrically scanned at 600 nm, and the data were
normalized against -actin. An 8-fold reduction in testin expression
was observed during maturation, when the steady-state mRNA level
was compared between Sertoli cells isolated from 20- and 90-day-old
rats (Fig. 12C). These results illustrate that an
age-dependent reduction in testin expression likely
correlates with the differentiation status of the Sertoli cell.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
The relative testin steady-state mRNA
level in the rat testis (mRNA level per pair organ) during
maturation. Northern blots were normalized against -actin after
densitometric scanning at 600 nm, and the changes in testin expression
was then taken into consideration based on the increase in testicular
weight during maturation. Results are shown as mRNA level
(arbitrary unit) per pair testes from one experiment. Two other
experiments using different animal samples yielded identical
results.
|
|

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 12.
The testin steady-state mRNA level in
Sertoli cells isolated from rats at 20, 35, and 90 days of age, which
illustrates an age-dependent reduction in expression.
A, about 10 µg of total RNA was used per lane,
and the Northern blot was hybridized with a 289-base pair testin
cDNA probe as described under "Materials and Methods."
B, the same blot such as the one shown in A but
stained with ethidium bromide, showing the integrity of the RNA; the
same amount of RNA was used per each lane. C,
densitometric scanning data of two blots such as the one shown in
A at 600 nm but normalized against -actin. D,
day.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Table I summarizes the three types of specialized junctions that
are present in other epithelia that are also found in the mammalian
testis (for reviews, see Refs. 11-13). All three types of junctions,
namely occluding, anchoring, and communicating junctions, can be found
between Sertoli cells. However, only anchoring and communicating
junctions are present between Sertoli and germ cells. Moreover, some of
the anchoring junctions between Sertoli and germ cells such as
tubulobulbar complexes are unique to the testis (Table I).
Surprisingly, the component proteins that constitute these junctions
between Sertoli and germ cells, let alone the molecules that regulate
the disassembly and reassembly of these junctions throughout different
stages of spermatogenesis as a result of migration of developing germ
cells from the basal lamina to the adluminal compartment of the
seminiferous epithelium (for reviews, see Refs. 11, 12), are largely
unknown. Although the mechanisms and cellular events that regulate germ
cell translocation in the epithelium are poorly understood, studies in
organogenesis, embryogenesis, tumor growth, and metastasis have yielded
some crucial information with regard to germ cell movement, since these other cellular processes also involve extensive turnover of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions as well as cell migration (for reviews, see Refs. 38 and 39). It is known that both embryogenesis and tumor
growth involve the participation of proteases, protease inhibitors,
signaling molecules, growth factors, and junctional complex components
such as cell adhesion molecules (for reviews, see Refs. 40-45). For
the past decade, studies from different laboratories have identified
several of these component molecules in the testis (for reviews, see
Refs. 11-13 and 46). Recent studies from this laboratory have also
illustrated the involvement of proteases, protease inhibitors, and cell
adhesion molecules in the early stage of Sertoli-germ cell interactions
preceding the establishment of specialized cell junctions in
vitro (47, 48), suggesting that the establishment of specialized
junctions between testicular cells is not simply a series of
morphological events. Instead, multiple factors are involved,
illustrating the complexity of junction formation in the seminiferous
epithelium. The present report demonstrates testin is likely to be a
sensitive marker to probe the events of cell junction disruption in the
testis.
In this study, testin was shown to correlate with the disruption of
Sertoli-germ cell junctions but not the inter-Sertoli tight junction.
Several lines of evidence have excluded the involvement of testin in
the formation and/or disruption of tight junction. First, immunogold EM
revealed very few testin are found in the tight junction between
Sertoli cells. Second, anti-testin IgG did not interfere or facilitate
the formation of tight junctions between Sertoli cells in
vitro, nor did it affect the recovery of tight junctions after
[Ca2+] depletion induced disruption of the inter-Sertoli
tight junction. Third, the expression of testin is not affected by the
disruption of tight junctions in vitro, as demonstrated in
the [Ca2+] depletion experiment. This observation is in
sharp contrast to the disruption of Sertoli-germ cell junctions, which
is accompanied by a surge in testin expression (8). Fourth, changes in
testin expression after glycerol treatment did not coincide with the damage of the blood-testis barrier by 2 weeks (25) but rather, with the
depletion of germ cells, which disrupted the Sertoli-germ cell
junctions. We thus conclude that the testin that was found in both the
adluminal and basal compartments of the seminiferous epithelium as
visualized by immunofluorescent microscopy and immunohistochemistry (5-7) is the protein localized between Sertoli and germ cells, most
likely at the adherens junction such as the desmosome-like junction,
ectoplasmic specialization, and tubulobulbar complex. It is unlikely
that testin is involved in the gap junction, since the component
molecules of the gap junction have been very well characterized, and
the primary sequence of testin does not bear any homology to any of the
existing connexin family members (for review, see Ref. 13).
It has been shown that the testin steady-state mRNA level in the
adult rat testis is significantly enhanced as a result of either a
chemical treatment such as glycerol, lonidamine (8), and busulfan (3)
or a physical treatment such as hypotonic treatment (8) and
X-irradiation (10). The depletion of germ cells after these treatments
would undoubtedly disrupt the Sertoli-germ cell junctions. It is our
belief that several factors may be operating independently or
synergistically that regulate testin expression as shown in these
in vitro and in vivo experiments. First, germ cells may regulate testin expression via cell-cell contacts or through
a factor(s) released from germ cells. As such, a depletion of germ
cells leads to a change in testin expression. Second, testin may be a
structural component of the Sertoli-germ cell junction. Thus, when the
intercellular junction is damaged, another yet-to-be identified factor
is released to stimulate the production of testin to replace the lost
structural component or to trigger another cascade of events. Third,
testin may be a stress-induced protein in response to the stress and/or
cellular death caused by these experimental manipulations.
The present study using germ cells or their conditioned medium
cocultured with Sertoli cells failed to demonstrate a significant effect on Sertoli cell testin steady-state mRNA level. This result seemingly suggests that germ cells do not play a major role in regulating testin expression. However, one must note that these cocultures were terminated at 20 h, at the time when specialized Sertoli-germ cell junctions had not yet formed, since morphological analysis has shown that the establishment of specialized junctions between Sertoli and germ cells in vitro, such as
desmosome-like adherens junctions, requires a culture period of 24-48
h (22, 23). As such, it remains to be determined whether testin is involved in the formation of Sertoli-germ cell junctions. The fact that
there is a surge in testin expression when the Sertoli-germ cell
junctions are disrupted may suggest testin somehow participates in the
destruction of cell junctions by acting as a protease or that it
protects the testis against tissue damage by acting as a protease
inhibitor. Alternatively, the increase in testin expression is the
result of cell junction disruption that is associated with other
cellular events. However, testin was found to be neither a protease nor
a protease inhibitor (6), making the former possibility unlikely.
Although the glycerol or lonidamine (8)-induced Sertoli-germ cell
junction damage can elicit an increase in testin accumulation in the
testicular cytosol by up to 20-30-fold, most of the testin was
accumulated in the lumen and was likely flushed out. Therefore, it is
very unlikely that testin is being used for the reassembly of the
damaged junction. The present study, however, illustrates that the
testin steady-state mRNA level per pair of testes increases
steadily during testicular maturation when the increase in organ weight
and the increase in germ cell to Sertoli cell ratio are taken into
consideration. These results suggest that the rapid assembly and
disassembly of intercellular junctions at the onset of spermatogenesis
is likely to be one of the most critical factors in regulating testin
expression.
Studies on the binding of testin onto the Sertoli and germ cell
membrane reveal that the dissociation of testin from the cell surface
after its binding requires the use of a detergent illustrating that
other biochemical changes may take place when testin couples onto the
binding protein complex. This result also supports the notion that
testin may be a structural component between Sertoli and germ cells.
The amount of testin binding to Sertoli cells is limited to only
0.1-0.5% that of total 125I-testin in the incubation
mixture, regardless of an increase in Sertoli cell number used for the
in vitro assay. This result together with the detergent
solubilization experiment strongly suggests that the interaction of
testin with its binding protein complex is not a classical
ligand-receptor interaction. The fact that a secretory protein can
become tightly associated with the cell surface via a receptor-binding
protein in a fashion dissimilar to a classical ligand-receptor
interaction is not without precedence. Wnt, a growing class
of multi-functional signaling molecules (glycoproteins with apparent
Mr between 34,000 and 42,000) involved in both
tumorigenesis and patterning events during development and tissue
differentiation by coordinating the organization of groups of cells in
the developing vertebrate (49, 50), are secretory proteins that can
become tightly associated with the cell surface or ECM and originally thought to be via a nonreceptor-mediated mechanism (51-53). A recent study, however, has demonstrated that Dfz2, a 694-amino acid
polypeptide, is the receptor protein of the signaling molecules of the
Wnt gene family (54). The binding of the Wnt proteins onto
the receptor, similar to testin, cannot be assessed by conventional
receptor-ligand assays such as a Scatchard plot, probably due to their
low abundancy. A comparison between testin and nine members of the
Wnt family, including Wnt-1 and Wnt-2
(55), using DNASIS, PROSIS, and BESTFIT programs at the levels of amino
acid and nucleotide sequences revealed that they share 10-30%
identity (data not shown). As such, testin is likely a distant member
of the Wnt gene family, and it does share some of the
unusual feature of the Wnt.
In the present and other earlier studies (3, 8, 10), it was shown that
disruption of testicular cell junctions by glycerol, lonidamine,
busulfan, or hypotonic treatment can lead to a surge in testin
expression. Such a change in expression may be a response to cellular
stress, when junctions are being disrupted. Studies in muscle, in
particular, cardiac and skeletal myocytes, reveal that 5-30% of the
cell population undergo plasma membrane disruption under physiological
conditions, due to the contractile nature of these cells (56-58).
Likewise, about 3% and 6% of the epidermal and endothelial cells in
the skin (56) and aorta (59), respectively, are being disrupted. Even
though the level of cell wounding for the Sertoli and germ cell in the
testis is not known, extensive plasma membrane disruption in testicular
cells is expected to occur due to the rapid morphological changes
during spermatogenesis. Until recently, membrane resealing was thought
to be a passive event. The "wound hormone" hypothesis (60) suggests
that chemical mediators of tissue restructuring such as growth factors,
stored in cytosol, are released during membrane disruptions (for
review, see Ref. 61). For instance, basic fibroblast growth factor
(bFGF), which lacks a signal peptide sequence, is a potent
growth-promoting factor when it is released extracellularly due to
plasma membrane damage (62, 63). Studies by immunoprecipitation has
demonstrated the release of bFGF by germ cells (64), suggesting the
bFGF found in GCCM is likely the result of germ cell wounding, since bFGF under the normal physiological condition is not a secretory protein because of the lack of a signal peptide. Other studies have
demonstrated that the use of trypsin to isolate germ cells from the
tubules (64) can alter many of the cell surface properties (20, 22,
65). As such, the secretion of bFGF by germ cells as demonstrated in
this earlier study (64) may be the result of trypsin-induced plasma
membrane damage that causes of release of bFGF. It is possible that
bFGF is an important growth-promoting and signaling molecule that
participates in repairing the disrupted testicular cell junctions
during spermatogenesis and whose release from germ cells is the result
of degeneration (66-68) and apoptosis (69). Testin, on the other hand,
is a secretory protein with a definite signal sequence (6). However,
its protein level in the rete testis fluid and cytosols of the testis
and epididymis as well as its expression are virtually undetectable
except in the gonad. When Sertoli cells are being cultured in
vitro, the amount of testin secreted into the spent medium is
comparable with other Sertoli cell secretory products. It is our belief
that upon dissociation of the testicular cells from the tubule during the preparation of Sertoli cells, testin expression is induced and
remains elevated, as demonstrated in the present study. This observation thus supports the postulate that the expression of testin
may be induced by cell wounding.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The work was supported in part by Contraceptive Research and
Development Program (CONRAD) Grant CIG-96-05, Rockefeller Foundation Grants PS9528, PS9601, and PS9721, National Institutes of Health Grant
HD-13541, and grants from the Noopolis Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: The Population
Council, 1230 York Ave., New York, NY 10021. Tel.: 212-327-8738; Fax:
212-327-7678; E-mail: yan{at}popcbr.rockefeller.edu.
The abbreviations used are:
TER, transepithelial
electrical resistance; b.w., body weight; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium; GCCM, germ cell-conditioned medium; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; BSA, bovine serum albumin; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; ECM, extracellular matrix; DTSSP, 3,3'-dithiobis(sulfosuccinimidyl) propionate; EM, electron microscopy; RIA, radioimmunoassay; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; SC, Sertoli cells.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Cheng, C. Y.,
and Bardin, C. W.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
12768-12779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cheng, C. Y.,
Grima, J.,
Stahler, M. S.,
Lockshin, R. A.,
and Bardin, C. W.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
21386-21393[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cheng, C. Y.,
Morris, I.,
and Bardin, C. W.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
191,
224-231[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Grima, J.,
Pineau, C.,
Bardin, C. W.,
and Cheng, C. Y.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
89,
127-140[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zong, S. D.,
Bardin, C. W.,
Phillips, D.,
and Cheng, C. Y.
(1992)
Biol. Reprod.
47,
568-572[Abstract]
-
Grima, J.,
Zhu, L. J.,
Zong, S. D.,
Catterall, J. F.,
Bardin, C. W.,
and Cheng, C. Y.
(1995)
Biol. Reprod.
52,
340-355[Abstract]
-
Zong, S. D.,
Zhu, L. J.,
Grima, J.,
Aravindan, R.,
Bardin, C. W.,
and Cheng, C. Y.
(1994)
Biol. Reprod.
51,
843-851[Abstract]
-
Grima, J.,
Zhu, L.,
and Cheng, C. Y.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
6499-6509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zhu, L. J.,
Moo-Young, A.,
Bardin, C. W.,
and Cheng, C. Y.
(1997)
Biol. Reprod.
56,
1330-1335[Abstract]
-
Jegou, B.,
Pineau, C.,
De La Calle, J. F. V.,
Touzalin, A. M.,
Bardin, C. W.,
and Cheng, C. Y.
(1993)
Endocrinology
132,
2557-2562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Byers, S.,
Pelletier, R. M.,
and Suarez-Quian, C.
(1993)
in
The Sertoli Cell (Russell, L. D., and Griswold, M. D., eds), pp. 431-446, Cache River Press, Clearwater, FL
-
Byers, S.,
Jegou, B.,
MacCalman, C.,
and Blaschuk, O.
(1993)
in
The Sertoli Cell (Russell, L. D., and Griswold, M. D., eds), pp. 461-476, Cache River Press, Clearwater, FL
-
Enders, G. C.
(1993)
in
The Sertoli Cell (Russell, L. D., and Griswold, M. D., eds), pp. 488-460, Cache River Press, Clearwater, FL
-
Gumbiner, B.,
and Simons, K.
(1986)
J. Cell Biol.
102,
457-468[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Howards, S. S.,
Johnson, A.,
and Jessee, S.
(1975)
Fertil. Steril.
26,
13-19[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cheng, C. Y.,
Gunsalus, G. L.,
Morris, I. D.,
Turner, T. T.,
and Bardin, C. W.
(1986)
J. Androl.
7,
175-179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Galdieri, M.,
Ziparo, E.,
Palombi, F.,
Russo, M. A.,
and Stefanini, M.
(1981)
J. Androl.
5,
249-259
-
Cheng, C. Y.,
Mathur, P. P.,
and Grima, J.
(1988)
Biochemistry
27,
4079-4088[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wright, W. W.,
Zabluoff, S. D.,
Erickson-Lawrence, M.,
and Karzai, A. W.
(1989)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
564,
173-175[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Aravindan, G. R.,
Pineau, C.,
Bardin, C. W.,
and Cheng, C. Y.
(1996)
J. Cell. Physiol.
168,
123-133[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pineau, C.,
Syed, V.,
Bardin, C. W.,
Jegou, B.,
and Cheng, C. Y.
(1993)
J. Androl.
14,
87-98[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Enders, G. C.,
and Millette, C. F.
(1988)
J. Cell Sci.
90,
105-114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cameron, D. F.,
and Muffly, K. E.
(1991)
J. Cell Sci.
100,
623-633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Li, A. H. Y.,
Zwain, I. H.,
Pineau, C.,
Saso, L.,
Cazzolla, N.,
Bardin, C. W.,
Silvestrini, B.,
and Cheng, C. Y.
(1994)
Biol. Reprod.
50,
1287-1296[Abstract]
-
Eng, F.,
Wiebe, J. P.,
and Alima, L. H.
(1994)
J. Andol.
15,
311-317
-
Fraker, P. J.,
and Speck, J. C.
(1978)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
80,
849-856[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cheng, C. Y.,
Gunsalus, G. L.,
Musto, N. A.,
and Bardin, C. W.
(1984)
Endocrinology
114,
1386-1394[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Grima, J.,
Zwain, I.,
Lockshin, R. A.,
Bardin, C. W.,
and Cheng, C. Y.
(1990)
Endocrinology
126,
2989-2997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Stahler, M. S.,
Schlegel, P.,
Bardin, C. W.,
Silvestrini, B.,
and Cheng, C. Y.
(1991)
Endocrinology
128,
2805-2814[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Claude, P.
(1978)
J. Membr. Biol.
39,
219-232[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Diamond, J. M.
(1977)
Physiologist
20,
10-18[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Martinez-Palomo, A.,
Meza, I.,
Beaty, G.,
and Cereijido, M.
(1980)
J. Cell Biol.
87,
736-745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Meldolesi, J.,
Castiglioni, G.,
Parma, R.,
Nassivera, N.,
and De Camilli, P.
(1978)
J. Cell Biol.
79,
156-172[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Onoda, M.,
Suarez-Quian, C. A.,
Djakiew, D.,
and Dym, M.
(1990)
Biol. Reprod.
43,
672-683[Abstract]
-
Wiebe, J. P.,
and Barr, K. J.
(1984)
Life Sci.
34,
1747-1754[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wiebe, J. P.,
and Barr, K. J.
(1984)
Contraception
29,
291-302[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pedersen, RA
(1988)
in
The Physiology of Reproduction (Knobil, E., and Neill, J., eds), Vol. 1, pp. 187-230, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
-
Larsen, W. J.,
and West, S. E.
(1988)
Tissue Cell
20,
809-848[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tryggvason, K.,
Hoyhta, M.,
and Salo, T.
(1987)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
907,
191-217[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nicolson, G. L.
(1982)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
695,
113-176[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Poste, G.,
and Fidler, I. J.
(1980)
Nature
283,
139-146[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Adams, J. C.,
and Watt, F. M.
(1993)
Development
117,
1183-1198[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Takeichi, M.
(1988)
Development
102,
639-655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Eddy, E. M.,
Clark, J. M.,
Gong, D.,
and Fenderson, B. A.
(1981)
Gamete Res.
4,
333-362[CrossRef]
-
Fritz, I. B.,
Tung, P. S.,
and Ailenberg, M.
(1993)
in
The Sertoli Cell (Russell, L. D., and Griswold, M. D., eds), pp. 217-235, Cache River Press, Clearwater, FL
-
Chung, S. S. W.,
Mo, M. Y.,
Silvestrini, B.,
Lee, W. M.,
and Cheng, C. Y.
(1998)
Endocrinology
139,
1853-1862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mruk, D.,
Zhu, L. J.,
Silvestrini, B.,
Lee, W. M.,
and Cheng, C. Y.
(1997)
J. Androl.
18,
612-622[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McMahon, A. P.
(1992)
Trends Genet.
8,
236-242
-
Nusse, R.,
and Varmus, H. E.
(1993)
Cell
69,
1073-1087
-
Papkoff, J.,
and Schryver, B.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
2723-2730[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bradley, R. S.,
and Brown, A. M. C.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
4616-4622[Abstract]
-
Smolich, B. D.,
McMahon, J. A.,
McMahon, A. P.,
and Papkoff, J.
(1993)
Mol. Biol. Cell
4,
1267-1275[Abstract]
-
Bhanot, P.,
Brink, M.,
Samos, C. H.,
Hsieh, J. C.,
Wang, Y.,
Macke, J. P.,
Andrew, D.,
Nathans, J.,
and Nusse, R.
(1996)
Nature
382,
225-230[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gavin, B. J.,
McMahon, J. A.,
and McMahon, A. P.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
2319-2322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McNeil, P. L.,
and Khakee, R.
(1992)
Am. J. Pathol.
140,
1097-1109[Abstract]
-
Clarke, M. S. F,
Caldwell, R. W.,
Miyake, K.,
and McNeil, P. L.
(1995)
Circ. Res.
76,
927-934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McNeil, P. L.
(1993)
Trends Cell Biol.
3,
302-307[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yu, Q. C.,
and McNeil, P. L.
(1992)
Am. J. Pathol.
141,
1349-1360[Abstract]
-
McNeil, P. L.,
Muthukrishnan, C.,
Warder, E.,
and D'Amore, A.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
811-822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McNeil, P. L.,
and Steinhardt, R. A.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
137,
1-4[Free Full Text]
-
Mignatti, P.,
Morimoto, T.,
and Rifkin, D. B.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
11007-11101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Muthukrishnan, L.,
Warder, E.,
and McNeil, P. L.
(1991)
J. Cell. Physiol.
148,
1-16[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Han, I. S.,
Sylvester, S. R.,
Kim, K. H.,
Schelling, M. E.,
Venkateswaran, S.,
Blanckaert, V. D.,
McGuinness, M. P.,
and Griswold, M. D.
(1993)
Mol. Endocrinol.
7,
889-897[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ziparo, E.,
Geremia, R.,
Russo, M. A.,
and Stefanini, M.
(1980)
Am. J. Anat.
159,
385-388[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Huchkins, C.
(1978)
Anat. Rec.
190,
905-926[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kerr, J. B.
(1992)
J. Reprod. Fertil.
95,
825-830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Russell, L. D.,
Alger, L. E.,
and Nequin, L. G.
(1987)
Endocrinology
120,
1615-1632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Billig, H.,
Furuta, I.,
Rivier, C.,
Tapanainen, J.,
Parvinen, M.,
and Hseuh, A. J. W.
(1995)
Endocrinology
136,
5-12[Abstract]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. A Tarulli, S. J Meachem, S. Schlatt, and P. G Stanton
Regulation of testicular tight junctions by gonadotrophins in the adult Djungarian hamster in vivo
Reproduction,
June 1, 2008;
135(6):
867 - 877.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. D. Mruk, B. Silvestrini, and C. Y. Cheng
Anchoring Junctions As Drug Targets: Role in Contraceptive Development
Pharmacol. Rev.,
June 1, 2008;
60(2):
146 - 180.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J Meachem, S. M Ruwanpura, J. Ziolkowski, J. M Ague, M. K Skinner, and K. L Loveland
Developmentally distinct in vivo effects of FSH on proliferation and apoptosis during testis maturation
J. Endocrinol.,
September 1, 2005;
186(3):
429 - 446.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. P.Y. Lee, D. D. Mruk, C.-h. Wong, and C. Y. Cheng
Regulation of Sertoli-Germ Cell Adherens Junction Dynamics in the Testis Via the Nitric Oxide Synthase (NOS)/cGMP/Protein Kinase G (PRKG)/{beta}-Catenin (CATNB) Signaling Pathway: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study
Biol Reprod,
September 1, 2005;
73(3):
458 - 471.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Kleymenova, C. Swanson, K. Boekelheide, and K. W. Gaido
Exposure In Utero to Di(n-Butyl) Phthalate Alters the Vimentin Cytoskeleton of Fetal Rat Sertoli Cells and Disrupts Sertoli Cell-Gonocyte Contact
Biol Reprod,
September 1, 2005;
73(3):
482 - 490.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Y. Siu, C.-h. Wong, W. M. Lee, and C. Y. Cheng
Sertoli-Germ Cell Anchoring Junction Dynamics in the Testis Are Regulated by an Interplay of Lipid and Protein Kinases
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 1, 2005;
280(26):
25029 - 25047.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-h. Wong, D. D. Mruk, M. K. Y. Siu, and C. Y. Cheng
Blood-Testis Barrier Dynamics Are Regulated by {alpha}2-Macroglobulin via the c-Jun N-Terminal Protein Kinase Pathway
Endocrinology,
April 1, 2005;
146(4):
1893 - 1908.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. D. Mruk and C. Y. Cheng
Sertoli-Sertoli and Sertoli-Germ Cell Interactions and Their Significance in Germ Cell Movement in the Seminiferous Epithelium during Spermatogenesis
Endocr. Rev.,
October 1, 2004;
25(5):
747 - 806.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K.Y. Siu and C. Y. Cheng
Extracellular Matrix: Recent Advances on Its Role in Junction Dynamics in the Seminiferous Epithelium During Spermatogenesis
Biol Reprod,
August 1, 2004;
71(2):
375 - 391.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. P.Y. Lee and C. Y. Cheng
Ectoplasmic specialization, a testis-specific cell-cell actin-based adherens junction type: is this a potential target for male contraceptive development?
Hum. Reprod. Update,
July 1, 2004;
10(4):
349 - 369.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K.Y. Siu and C. Y. Cheng
Interactions of Proteases, Protease Inhibitors, and the {beta}1 Integrin/Laminin {gamma}3 Protein Complex in the Regulation of Ectoplasmic Specialization Dynamics in the Rat Testis
Biol Reprod,
April 1, 2004;
70(4):
945 - 964.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. D. Mruk, M. K.Y. Siu, A. M. Conway, N. P.Y. Lee, A. S.N. Lau, and C. Y. Cheng
Role of Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteases-1 in Junction Dynamics in the Testis
J Androl,
July 1, 2003;
24(4):
510 - 523.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-y. Lui, W. M. Lee, and C. Y. Cheng
Sertoli-Germ Cell Adherens Junction Dynamics in the Testis Are Regulated by RhoB GTPase via the ROCK/LIMK Signaling Pathway
Biol Reprod,
June 1, 2003;
68(6):
2189 - 2206.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Y. Siu, D. D. Mruk, W. M. Lee, and C. Y. Cheng
Adhering Junction Dynamics in the Testis Are Regulated by an Interplay of {beta}1-Integrin and Focal Adhesion Complex-Associated Proteins
Endocrinology,
May 1, 2003;
144(5):
2141 - 2163.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-y. Lui, W. M. Lee, and C. Y. Cheng
Transforming Growth Factor {beta}3 Regulates the Dynamics of Sertoli Cell Tight Junctions Via the p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway
Biol Reprod,
May 1, 2003;
68(5):
1597 - 1612.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sutou, K. Miwa, T. Matsuura, Y. Kawasaki, Y. Ohinata, and Y. Mitsui
Native Tesmin Is a 60-Kilodalton Protein that Undergoes Dynamic Changes in Its Localization During Spermatogenesis in Mice
Biol Reprod,
May 1, 2003;
68(5):
1861 - 1869.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. S. N. Lau and D. D. Mruk
Rab8B GTPase and Junction Dynamics in the Testis
Endocrinology,
April 1, 2003;
144(4):
1549 - 1563.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. K. Cheng, C. H. Cheung, and W. M. Lee
Mouse Testin: Complementary DNA Cloning, Genomic Organization, and Characterization of Its Proximal Promoter Region
Biol Reprod,
April 1, 2003;
68(4):
1376 - 1386.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-Y. Lui, D. Mruk, W. M Lee, and C. Y. Cheng
Sertoli Cell Tight Junction Dynamics: Their Regulation During Spermatogenesis
Biol Reprod,
April 1, 2003;
68(4):
1087 - 1097.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. P.Y. Lee, D. Mruk, W. M. Lee, and C. Y. Cheng
Is the Cadherin/Catenin Complex a Functional Unit of Cell-Cell Actin-Based Adherens Junctions in the Rat Testis?
Biol Reprod,
February 1, 2003;
68(2):
489 - 508.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Y. Siu, W. M. Lee, and C. Y. Cheng
The Interplay of Collagen IV, Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}, Gelatinase B (Matrix Metalloprotease-9), and Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteases-1 in the Basal Lamina Regulates Sertoli Cell-Tight Junction Dynamics in the Rat Testis
Endocrinology,
January 1, 2003;
144(1):
371 - 387.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Y. Cheng and D. D. Mruk
Cell Junction Dynamics in the Testis: Sertoli-Germ Cell Interactions and Male Contraceptive Development
Physiol Rev,
October 1, 2002;
82(4):
825 - 874.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D.P. Dickinson
CYSTEINE PEPTIDASES OF MAMMALS: THEIR BIOLOGICAL ROLES AND POTENTIAL EFFECTS IN THE ORAL CAVITY AND OTHER TISSUES IN HEALTH AND DISEASE
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine,
May 1, 2002;
13(3):
238 - 275.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Zhang, A. Z. Wu, Z.-M. Feng, D. Mruk, C. Y. Cheng, and C.-L. C. Chen
Gonadotropins, via cAMP, Negatively Regulate GATA-1 Gene Expression in Testicular Cells
Endocrinology,
March 1, 2002;
143(3):
829 - 836.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Maekawa, Y. Toyama, M. Yasuda, T. Yagi, and S. Yuasa
Fyn Tyrosine Kinase in Sertoli Cells Is Involved in Mouse Spermatogenesis
Biol Reprod,
January 1, 2002;
66(1):
211 - 221.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. P.Y. Chung, D. Mruk, M.-y. Mo, W. M. Lee, and C. Y. Cheng
A 22-Amino Acid Synthetic Peptide Corresponding to the Second Extracellular Loop of Rat Occludin Perturbs the Blood-Testis Barrier and Disrupts Spermatogenesis Reversibly In Vivo
Biol Reprod,
November 1, 2001;
65(5):
1340 - 1351.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Y. Cheng, B. Silvestrini, J. Grima, M.-y. Mo, L.-j. Zhu, E. Johansson, L. Saso, M.-G. Leone, M. Palmery, and D. Mruk
Two New Male Contraceptives Exert Their Effects by Depleting Germ Cells Prematurely from the Testis
Biol Reprod,
August 1, 2001;
65(2):
449 - 461.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-Y. Lui, W. M. Lee, and C. Y. Cheng
Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}3 Perturbs the Inter-Sertoli Tight Junction Permeability Barrier in Vitro Possibly Mediated via Its Effects on Occludin, Zonula Occludens-1, and Claudin-11
Endocrinology,
May 1, 2001;
142(5):
1865 - 1877.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. P. Y. Chung and C. Y. Cheng
Is Cadmium Chloride-Induced Inter-Sertoli Tight Junction Permeability Barrier Disruption a Suitable in Vitro Model to Study the Events of Junction Disassembly during Spermatogenesis in the Rat Testis?
Endocrinology,
May 1, 2001;
142(5):
1878 - 1888.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Grima, B. Silvestrini, and C. Yan Cheng
Reversible Inhibition of Spermatogenesis in Rats Using a New Male Contraceptive, 1-(2,4-Dichlorobenzyl)-Indazole-3-Carbohydrazide
Biol Reprod,
May 1, 2001;
64(5):
1500 - 1508.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Grima and C. Y. Cheng
Testin Induction: The Role of Cyclic 3',5'-Adenosine Monophosphate/Protein Kinase A Signaling in the Regulation of Basal and Lonidamine-Induced Testin Expression by Rat Sertoli Cells
Biol Reprod,
December 1, 2000;
63(6):
1648 - 1660.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. T. Samy, J. C. H. Li, J. Grima, W. M. Lee, B. Silvestrini, and C. Y. Cheng
Sertoli Cell Prostaglandin D2 Synthetase Is a Multifunctional Molecule: Its Expression and Regulation
Endocrinology,
February 1, 2000;
141(2):
710 - 721.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. D. Mruk and C. Y. Cheng
Sertolin Is a Novel Gene Marker of Cell-Cell Interactions in the Rat Testis
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 17, 1999;
274(38):
27056 - 27068.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Syed, E. Gomez, and N. B. Hecht
mRNAs Encoding a von Ebner's-like Protein and the Huntington Disease Protein Are Induced in Rat Male Germ Cells by Sertoli Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 16, 1999;
274(16):
10737 - 10742.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|