Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stella, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ricci, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stella, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ricci, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 36, 23267-23273, September 4, 1998


Flexibility of Helix 2 in the Human Glutathione Transferase P1-1
TIME-RESOLVED FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY*

Lorenzo StellaDagger , Anna Maria Caccuri§, Nicola Rosato, Maria Nicotra§, Mario Lo Bello§, Fabio De Matteisparallel **, Anna P. Mazzetti§, Giorgio FedericiDagger Dagger , and Giorgio Ricci§§§

From the Departments of Dagger  Chemical Sciences and Technologies, § Biology,  Experimental Medicine and Biochemical Sciences, and parallel  Physics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Via della Ricerca Scientifica 00133 Rome, Italy, the ** Istituto Nazionale di Fisica della Materia, 00133 Rome, Italy, and the Dagger Dagger  Ospedale Pediatrico IRCCS "Bambin Gesú," 00165 Rome, Italy

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References

Time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy and site-directed mutagenesis have been used to probe the flexibility of alpha -helix 2 (residues 35-46) in the apo structure of the human glutathione transferase P1-1 (EC 2.5.1.18) as well as in the binary complex with the natural substrate glutathione. Trp-38, which resides on helix 2, has been exploited as an intrinsic fluorescent probe of the dynamics of this region. A Trp-28 mutant enzyme was studied in which the second tryptophan of glutathione transferase P1-1 is replaced by histidine. Time-resolved fluorescence data indicate that, in the absence of glutathione, the apoenzyme exists in at least two different families of conformational states. The first one (38% of the total population) corresponds to a number of slightly different conformations of helix 2, in which Trp-38 resides in a polar environment showing an average emission wavelength of 350 nm. The second one (62% of the total population) displays an emission centered at 320 nm, thus suggesting a quite apolar environment near Trp-38. The interconversion between these two conformations is much slower than 1 ns. In the presence of saturating glutathione concentrations, the equilibrium is shifted toward the apolar component, which is now 83% of the total population. The polar conformers, on the other hand, do not change their average decay lifetime, but the distribution becomes wider, indicating a slightly increased rigidity. These data suggest a central role of conformational transitions in the binding mechanism, and are consistent with NMR data (Nicotra, M., Paci, M., Sette, M., Oakley, A. J., Parker, M. W., Lo Bello, M., Caccuri, A. M., Federici, G., and Ricci, G. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 3020-3027) and pre-steady state kinetic experiments (Caccuri, A. M., Lo Bello, M., Nuccetelli, M., Nicotra, M., Rossi, P., Antonini, G., Federici, G., and Ricci, G. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 3028-3034) indicating the existence of a pre-complex in which GSH is not firmly bound to the active site.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References

Cytosolic glutathione transferases (GSTs; EC 2.5.1.18)1 are a family of dimeric isoenzymes which catalyze the addition of the natural tripeptide glutathione (GSH) to a variety of organic compounds which contain an electrophilic center (1), so they have a crucial role in the cellular catabolism and transport of toxic organic compounds (2). They are grouped into at least five isoenzyme classes (Alpha, Mu, Pi, Theta, and Sigma) which have a similar molecular mass (46-48 kDa) but different amino acid sequence and substrate specificity (3-6).

An important contribution to the characterization of these isoenzymes is due to the definition of the three-dimensional structure of representative isoenzymes, obtained by x-ray crystallography (7-12). Despite the low homology of amino acid sequence for GSTs belonging to different classes, all GST isoenzymes show very similar tertiary and quaternary structures and quite identical GSH-binding sites (G-site) (13). Crystallographic data provide details about enzyme-substrate interactions and catalysis. In fact, some snapshots are available which define the apoenzyme structure, the enzyme-GSH complex, the enzyme-product complex, and also the three-dimensional structure of the enzyme in complex with a transition-state analogue (14). Nevertheless, a number of unclarified questions about the catalytic mechanism (i.e. the controversial occurrence of an induced fit mechanism and the unexplained mechanism of GSH ionization at the active site) suggest that these "static" pictures are not sufficient to compose a movie which reveals all details of the binding and catalytic events.

Investigations about the dynamics of GSTs may provide the explanatory key for many unsolved questions and, in this context, the human GST P1-1 appears an interesting model. In fact, several pieces of evidence suggest that conformational motions of this enzyme have a crucial role both in the binding of substrates and in the catalytic mechanism. More precisely, the flexibility of helix 2 seems to modulate the G-site affinity for GSH (15); helix 4 motions are possibly involved more directly in the catalytic event which is rate-limited by a structural transition of the ternary complex (16).

In this paper we focus on the dynamics of helix 2 by means of time-resolved fluorescence to probe its relevance in the GSH-binding step. The irregular alpha -helix 2 (residues 35-46) displays the highest thermal factors of domain 1 and Trp-38 and Lys-44, which reside in this protein segment, are involved in the GSH binding by hydrogen bond interactions (10) (see Fig. 1). Its high flexibility is also suggested by a number of observations including the facile disulfide bond formation between Cys-47 and Cys-101, which appear about 18 Å apart in the crystal structure (17). Moreover helix 2 moves about 4 Å away from helix 4 when GSH binds to the G-site (15). Mutation of Cys-47, which resides at the end of helix 2 and probably modulates its flexibility by an electrostatic interaction with Lys-54, causes an increased mobility of this loop, a lowered affinity for GSH, and strong positive cooperativity toward GSH (18, 19). Similar kinetic changes were recently observed by replacing Gly-41, a possible joint residue for this helix, thus confirming that any critical point mutation perturbing the flexibility on this helix may be crucial for the binding process and for the intersubunit structural communication.2 Recent data also suggest that the segmental motions involving helix 2 are fast enough to be strongly modulated by the viscosity of the solution (15). However, no data are available for a more precise time scale in which these motions occur as well as for the trajectory of this segment and the thermodynamic parameters which define this flexibility. Another important question is how the movements of this segment have an active role in modulating the interaction of the enzyme with the substrate.


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Ribbon representation of the GST P1-1 monomer in complex with GSH. Trp-28 and Trp-38 (red) and GSH (green) are shown using stick representation. This figure was created with the program MOLMOL (37).

A method currently used to monitor the dynamics of proteins is time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The versatility of this approach to investigate the motions of protein segments is well documented (20) and arises from its intrinsic "kinetic" character. The fluorescence properties of the protein tryptophans are modulated by a number of interactions with the protein environment and with the solvent which occur only in the lifetime of their excited state (about 1 ns). So, fast conformational transitions which occur in or below this time frame and which also involve tryptophan residues can be revealed and studied. Furthermore, the existence of different conformations that interconvert in times slower than the fluorescence lifetime results in a non-exponential intensity decay, and thus can be detected. Recently, time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy has been applied to study glutathione S-transferase A1-1 from rat (21); since this isoenzyme has a single Trp per subunit, located in the H-site, the intrinsic fluorescence was used to characterize the dynamics of that region. Another fluorescence study focused on the protonation state of Tyr-7 of the same isoenzyme (22). In the case of GST P1-1, two tryptophans are located in each monomer, Trp-28 and Trp-38. The latter is a good intrinsic probe for helix 2 transitions as it resides on this segment and interacts directly with the bound substrate (Fig. 1). By site-directed mutagenesis we expressed the enzyme with Trp-28 replaced by histidine. The mutated enzyme shows kinetic properties and a structure very similar to the native enzyme, so it is a useful model for the present investigation.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References

Site-directed Mutagenesis-- Mutants of human GST P1-1 were obtained by site-directed mutagenesis, carried out according to a previously described procedure (19). The single-stranded DNA template was generated using plasmid p18seq-1, which contains the full-length nucleotide sequence encoding for GST P1-1 in plasmid pEMBL18 (19). The following oligonucleotide was used as mutagenic primer for W28H: 5'-TCCTCCTTGTGGCTCTGGC. The nucleotide sequence of this mutant was checked by the dideoxy chain termination method. The mutated 780 base pairs SphI-SphI DNA fragments from plasmid p18seq-1 were subcloned under control of trc promoter in expression plasmids expressing large amounts of recombinant enzyme in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli cells (23). GST P1-1 and W28H mutant were purified by affinity chromatography on immobilized glutathione (24).

Kinetic Measurements-- Kinetic parameters kcat and Km were determined by using 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene as co-substrate in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, as described previously (15).

Fluorescence Spectroscopy-- Steady state fluorescence measurements were performed on a SPEX FluoroMax photon counting spectrofluorometer (SPEX Industries Inc., Edison, NJ), at 20 °C, with a 4-nm band pass for both excitation and emission. Spectra were corrected for background signal, which was always <1% of the total intensity.

For time-resolved fluorescence measurements, a frequency domain ISS fluorometer (ISS Inc., Champaign, IL) was used. Excitation at 295 nm was provided by a cavity-dumped, externally frequency doubled rhodamine 6G dye-laser (model 700, Coherent), synchronously pumped by a mode-locked Nd-YAG laser (Antares model, Coherent, Palo Alto, CA). The absorbance of the samples at 295 nm was about 0.1-0.2. The enzyme sample was in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, containing 0.1 mM EDTA. Emission was collected through a WG320 filter (Corion) to remove any scatter light. In the wavelength-dependent lifetime measurements, instead, an emission monochromator (Jobin Yvon Y10, 4-nm band pass) was used. Phase-modulation lifetime measurements were carried out at 12 frequencies from 7 to 200 MHz. Color errors due to photomultiplier response were minimized by the use of reference standard solutions of p-terphenyl (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) in ethanol (lifetime = 1.05 ns). All lifetimes measurements were carried out at "magic angle" configuration. The sample holder was thermostated and was kept at 20 °C, unless where it is otherwise specified.

Phase-modulation data were analyzed with the Globals Unlimited software (25), with different models, including one, two, or three exponential lifetimes, or continuous lifetime distributions of different shapes (see "Results"). Goodness of fit was assessed by the value of minimized chi 2, which was calculated using standard deviations of ± 0.2° and ± 0.004 for phase angles and modulation ratios, respectively. Rigorous chi 2-surface error analysis was performed to evaluate uncertainties of recovered fit parameters (26). Statistical evaluation and comparison between the different decay models was carried out using the Schwarz criterion (27).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References

Kinetic and Structural Properties of W28H Mutant-- W28H mutant shows kinetic parameters very similar to those of the native enzyme. At 25 °C and in the presence of 1 mM 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene as co-substrate (in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5), it has an apparent kcat = 36 ± 3 s-1 (38 ± 4 s-1 for wild type) and a Km value for GSH of 0.20 ± 0.02 mM (0.15 ± 0.01 mM for wild type). Far UV circular dichroism spectrum of the mutant (not shown) overlaps that of the native enzyme, suggesting that mutation does not cause any remarkable change in the structure of the enzyme.

Steady State Fluorescence-- Fig. 2 shows the fluorescence emission spectra (excitation 295 nm) of WT and W28H GST together with that of the reference compound N-acetyl-tryptophan-amide (NATA). The 295-nm excitation wavelength excites selectively the Trp residues. For samples of the same protein concentration (0.1 mg/ml) the total fluorescence intensity of W28H is only 0.30 that of the wild type enzyme; therefore, if the W28H mutation does not change appreciably the quantum yield of Trp-38, the relative contributions of Trp-28 and Trp-38 to the overall fluorescence of wild type GST P1-1 are approximately 70 and 30%, respectively. The quantum yield of Trp-38 in the mutant, relative to NATA, is 0.30 ± 0.01, as determined by the ratio of the respective fluorescence intensities, integrated between 300 and 450 nm, for samples of the same tryptophan concentration (A295 <<  0.1) and of the same buffer composition.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Steady-state fluorescence spectra of wild-type and W28H GST P1-1 and NATA. Emission spectra of wild type glutathione S-transferase (continuous line), W28H mutant (broken line), and NATA (lambda exc. = 295 nm, T = 20 °C, pH 6.5). The spectra correspond to solutions of the same molarity.

Time-resolved Fluorescence of W28H-- Phase-shift and demodulation data relative to the fluorescence intensity decay of W28H at 20 °C are shown in Fig. 3. Data are analyzed with several decay models (Table I): single, double, and triple lifetime, continuous distributions of lifetimes, with Gaussian, uniform and Lorentzian shape, as well as the combination of a "discrete" lifetime with a continuous distribution and a double continuous distribution.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Frequency domain fluorescence decay data. Phase (open circle , bullet ) and modulation (Delta , black-triangle) data relative to the fluorescence intensity decay of W28H in the absence (open symbols) and presence (closed symbols) of glutathione 5 mM (T = 20 °C, pH 6.5, lambda exc. = 295 nm). Continuous lines represent the best fits. Experimental errors are smaller than symbol width.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Fits to different models of the W28H fluorescence intensity decay (T = 20 °C, pH 6.5, lambda exc = 295 nm)
For equations used in the fits see Ref. 30. Symbols used: tau , the lifetime of discrete exponential components; c and w, center and width of a distribution of lifetimes, respectively; alpha i, molar fraction of component i (Sigma i alpha i = 1); Npar, number of independent parameters used in the fit; chi 2, reduced chi-square; SC, parameter of the Schwarz criterium. Parameters tau , c, w are expressed in ns; alpha , Npar, chi 2, and SC are dimensionless. Fits with a Gaussian or uniform distribution were worse (not shown). Errors on the parameters of the best fit (Lorentzian distribution plus exponential) were calculated with a rigorous correlated errors analysis (25): Delta c = ±0.1 ns, Delta w = ±0.05 ns, Delta alpha Lor = ±0.03, Delta tau  = ±0.03 ns.

The single- and double-exponential models, as well as a single continuous distribution do not give an adequate fit of the decay of the W28H mutant (as evident from the high chi 2 values). Judging from the chi 2 values, the best fit is obtained with a single-exponential plus a continuous Lorentzian distribution of lifetimes. Furthermore, this model has only 4 free parameters, compared with the 5 of the triple exponential and double Lorentzian models, that also achieve good chi 2 values. The superiority of the "Lorentzian plus exponential" model is quantified by the Schwarz criterion (27), which calculates a parameter that takes into account both the accuracy of the fit and the number of parameters utilized, and thus compares "non-nested" models with a different number of parameters. Again, the model with an exponential and a distribution gives the best value for this parameter. Finally, the double distribution model gives a near zero width of the distribution centered at a shorter time (0.005 is a lower limit imposed by the fitting program), making this model equivalent to the Lorentzian plus exponential one. Thus a good description of the fluorescence intensity decay of Trp-38 is given by a Lorentzian distribution of lifetimes, centered at 1.7 ± 0.1 ns, with a width of 1.0 ± 0.05 ns, plus a discrete lifetime (tau  = 0.42 ± 0.03 ns). The molar fractions associated with the two components are 0.38 ± 0.03 and 0.62 ± 0.03, respectively.

A control measurement of the fluorescence decay of NATA, performed under identical conditions, is accurately described by a single-exponential fit (chi 2 = 1.1), with a value of 2.9 ± 0.1 ns, in agreement with literature values (28). This rules out the possibility that the heterogeneity in the fluorescence decay of W28H mutant results from instrumental response, and suggests that the heterogeneity arises from interaction of the tryptophan residue with the protein matrix. Comparison of the NATA fluorescence lifetime with the average lifetime obtained from the best fit of W28H fluorescence decay (0.83 ± 0.07 ns) gives a ratio of 0.29 ± 0.03 in perfect agreement with the ratio of steady state intensities. This is a further indication that the model used to describe the fluorescence decay is correct, and also shows that quenching of Trp-38 is only due to dynamic factors.

Even though it is impossible to associate a confidence probability to our model choice, since the so called "F test" can be applied only to "nested models" (27), a strong support to our hypothesis comes from a global analysis of all the time-resolved data collected. As described in the following sections, the fluorescence time decay of W28H GST P1-1 has been measured under various conditions, varying the temperature or the concentration of glutathione in solution. In all the experiments performed the Lorentzian plus exponential model gave the best fit, as judged both by the reduced chi 2 and by the Schwarz criterium. Furthermore, as shown below, the parameters recovered using this model follow a specific trend with temperature or substrate concentration. On the other hand, when a triple exponential model was used, the parameters varied in an unpredictable, random way with the macroscopic variables. Therefore, the triple exponential fit does not have any physical meaning, even though it could describe the experimental data with reasonable values of chi 2.

Temperature Effect-- The fluorescence intensity time decay of W28H is studied as a function of temperature from 5 to 20 °C. Experiments at higher temperature are not carried out; even at 30 °C a small decrease of enzymatic activity is observed during the measurement time (about 30 min), possibly due to the enzyme exposure to laser excitation. The Lorentzian plus exponential model gives the best fit at all temperatures studied. The molar fractions of the two components are unchanged, while the two lifetimes are quenched, as a direct effect of the temperature increase (Table II). The width of the Lorentzian distribution increases with decreasing temperature, while the other component can be adequately described by a discrete lifetime at all the temperatures studied.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
W28H GST fluorescence intensity decay parameters as a function of temperature (pH 6.5, lambda exc = 295 nm)
For parameters definitions and errors see Table I. The model with a Lorentzian distribution plus a discrete component gives the best fit under all conditions.

Fluorescence Decay-associated Spectra-- The fluorescence intensity decay of the two components is also studied as a function of emission wavelength, from 305 to 365 nm, exciting at 295 nm. These wavelength dependent measurements can be used to determine the fluorescence spectra of individual lifetime components. The ideal situation for this kind of analysis is when one can distinguish experimentally a different decay lifetime for each conformer. In that case, one can assume that each lifetime has the same value at all the wavelengths studied (neglecting solvent relaxation problems); the only varying parameters are the fluorescence fractions associated to the lifetimes, that allow a reconstruction of the decay-associated spectra. Unfortunately, this approach cannot be applied in our case: if we assume that the parameters of the Lorentzian distribution and of the discrete lifetime are the same at all the wavelengths, the fit gives parameters comparable to those obtained without the monochromator but the chi 2 values are rather high (Table III, part A). This is due to the fact that the above procedure is not correct for the lifetime distribution. The lifetimes of the conformers that constitute this component are so similar (and so many) that it is impossible to distinguish experimentally every one of them; we can only describe them collectively (as a distribution). However, each conformer has, in principle, a (slightly) different emission spectrum. As a consequence, the fraction of total fluorescence that can be associated to a given lifetime value within the lifetime distribution is a function of wavelength: the lifetime distribution shape varies with emission wavelength and cannot be assumed constant.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
W28H GST fluorescence intensity decay parameters, as a function of emission wavelength (T = 20 °C, pH 6.5, lambda exc = 295 nm)
A), fit with a Lorentzian distribution plus a discrete component, with the parameters c, w, and tau  linked. B), fit with four discrete components, of which three free and one (tau ) linked. ftau is the fraction of the total fluorescence relative to lifetime tau . For the errors on the parameters see Table I.

It is well known that three discrete lifetimes can fit satisfactorily almost any distribution (29). Therefore, we performed the global fit of wavelength dependent data with four discrete lifetime: three of them were left free to vary, in order to model the distribution of varying shape, while the fourth one was forced to have the same value at all the wavelengths studied (since the problems described above do not affect the discrete lifetime of our Lorentzian plus exponential model). The results give acceptable chi 2 values and the value for the short component is equal (within the experimental error) to that obtained with the other measurements (Table III, part B). Fig. 4 shows the spectrum associated with the short component and also that relative to the Lorentzian distribution, calculated by difference.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Decay associated spectra. Decay associated spectra of W28H (T = 20 °C, pH 6.5, lambda exc. 295 nm). See text for the analysis method. open circle , short component; bullet , long component; no symbol, total spectrum.

These spectra have their "center of mass" (average wavelength calculated by weighting each wavelength with its respective intensity) at about 320 and 350 nm, for the short and long component, respectively. The fraction of total fluorescence that can be associated to the short component by integrating the two DAS is 0.23 ± 0.06. This fraction can be calculated also from the data in Table I, as ftau  = tau  alpha tau /<tau >, and it is 0.31 ± 0.04. The two values are coincident within experimental error.

Influence of GSH Binding on the Time-resolved Fluorescence-- To check the effect of the GSH binding on the two components of the fluorescence intensity decay, the W28H mutant was studied in the presence of different concentrations of glutathione. The results are shown in Table IV and Fig. 5, and indicate that the substrate quenches the discrete component and increases its molar fraction (not to be confused with the fraction of total fluorescence associated to this lifetime), from 62 to 83% (extrapolating at saturating GSH concentration). Conversely, it widens the Lorentzian distribution, without moving its center. To check for a possible aspecific intermolecular quenching by unbound glutathione, control measurements were performed with NATA; the glutathione concentrations used in the experiments above (up to 5 mM) do not cause any change in the NATA lifetime. Therefore the effects observed on protein fluorescence are caused only by bound glutathione.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV
W28H GST fluorescence intensity decay parameters as a function of glutathione concentration (T = 20 °C, pH 6.5, lambda exc = 295 nm)
For intensity decay parameters definitions and errors see Table I. The steady state quenching fraction is defined as the ratio of the variation of steady state fluorescence intensity caused by adding a given concentration of glutathione, divided by the intensity in the absence of glutathione; lambda peak is the wavelength at which the steady state fluorescence spectrum shows its maximum; C.o.M. or "center of mass" of the steady state spectrum, is the average wavelength, calculated by weighting each wavelength with its respective intensity. The fluorescence intensity decay of NATA is well described by a single lifetime of 2.9 ns at all the glutathione concentrations used.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effect of GSH binding on the fluorescence time decay. Fluorescence intensity decay parameters of W28H as a function of glutathione concentration (T = 20 °C, pH 6.5, lambda exc. 295 nm). For parameters definitions see Table I.

Fluorescence quenching by GSH binding was also studied by analyzing the steady state spectra. The percentage of quenching as a function of glutathione concentration is displayed in Fig. 6, where both the data obtained from the average lifetime and the total steady state intensity were included. The two sets of data are comparable within the experimental error and, fitting them globally, a KD = 80 ± 10 µM is obtained. The spectra also show a shift of their maximum from 344 to 341 nm by increasing GSH concentration. This is consistent with the finding that the two components observed in the fluorescence intensity decay have different spectra, with the short component (whose fraction increases with GSH concentration) peaked at shorter wavelengths than the other.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Fluorescence quenching by GSH binding. W28H fluorescence quenching as a function of glutathione concentration (T = 20 °C, pH 6.5, lambda exc. = 295 nm). , quenching efficiency as measured from time resolved fluorescence data; open circle , quenching efficiency measured from steady state intensity.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References

Time-resolved spectroscopy is a well established method to detect conformational heterogeneity in proteins. Tryptophan fluorescence is extremely sensitive to the surroundings of the fluorophore and, if the protein can assume multiple conformations, each of them has, in principle, a different fluorescence lifetime. Therefore conformational heterogeneity is reflected in a nonexponential intensity decay (30-32). In our case, the time behavior of the fluorescence intensity of W28H GST deviates markedly from a simple exponential, indicating the presence of different structures in solution. In more detail, the fluorescence data are consistent with a model with two lifetime components: a discrete lifetime and a continuous Lorentzian distribution of lifetimes. This is the simplest model consistent with all the collected data, but we are aware that the real situation could be even more complex and heterogeneous. According to this analysis, the environment of Trp-38 is sampling two families of conformations (corresponding to the two lifetime components). One of them is associated to a continuous distribution of lifetimes, and therefore must correspond to many (slightly) different structures. The interpretation of the other component is less straightforward, due to possible effects of conformational dynamics. When several substates are present, any interconversion between them will influence the fluorescence parameters, depending on the relative magnitudes of fluorescence lifetime and interconversion rate. Let us first consider the two extreme cases: if the conformational fluctuations are much slower than the lifetime of the excited state, their effect on the fluorescence parameters can be neglected. If, on the other hand, the interconversion is much faster than the fluorescence lifetime, an averaging effect causes a single exponential decay. In all the intermediate cases, the recovered fluorescence lifetimes and associated fractions depend both on the parameters characteristic of the different conformational substates and on the interconversion rate (31, 33, 34). The decay becomes less heterogeneous as the dynamics becomes faster. Usually, possible effects of excited state dynamics can be detected by varying the temperature (and therefore the interconversion rate). In our experiments, the molar fractions of the two major components remain unchanged at all the temperatures studied. Therefore, the interconversion between them is always much slower than the fluorescence lifetimes (i.e. much slower than 10-9 s). On the other hand, the width of the Lorentzian distribution increases at lower temperatures, as a consequence of a slower conformational dynamics. Therefore, the interconversion between the structures that constitute this distribution must happen in times comparable with the fluorescence lifetime. For the discrete lifetime, several interpretations are possible: it could correspond either to a single structure, or to many conformations (with different lifetimes) interconverting very rapidly. The second hypothesis is not likely: lowering the temperature (and therefore slowing down the dynamics) the averaging effect of fast interconversions should have been reduced and the discrete lifetime should have become a distribution with appreciable width. Instead, it remained discrete at all the temperatures studied. Therefore, the discrete component seems to correspond to a single rigid structure (or to a set of conformations so similar to be undistinguishable on the basis of fluorescence lifetimes), even though the alternative hypothesis cannot be definitely discarded. The spectra associated to the two major decay components have a 30-nm difference between their centers of mass (see Fig. 4). This demonstrates that the two families of structures detected by the fluorescence time decay are definitely different also regarding the polarity of the Trp-38 environment (and possibly also its solvent accessibility).

In conclusion, time-resolved fluorescence data indicate that apo-GST is extremely mobile in the surroundings of Trp-38, adopting at least two families of conformations, that interconvert in times slower than 1 ns: one is formed by many slightly different structures, while the other probably corresponds to a more rigid conformation, in which Trp-38 is in a much less polar environment.

After glutathione binding, the two conformational families are still present, although the equilibrium is shifted toward the discrete lifetime component, whose molar fraction (extrapolated at saturating glutathione concentrations) increases to 83%. Furthermore, the fluorescence of this component is quenched, while the average lifetime of the Lorentzian distribution remains unchanged. On the other hand, the distribution becomes wider, as a consequence of a slower interconversion between conformations. Since both lifetime components are influenced in some way by the presence of glutathione, the substrate is likely bound to both conformational families. Anyway, its interaction with the protein is different in the two cases: it causes only an increased rigidity to the flexible, polar component, while it quenches the discrete lifetime fluorescence (either by direct interaction, or by an induced conformational change). The other consequence of glutathione binding is a shift of the conformational equilibrium toward the structure corresponding to an apolar environment for Trp-38. In this sense we can say that fluorescence data demonstrate the presence of an induced fit in GST P1-1. It is interesting to correlate our results with recent NMR data (35) and pre-steady state experiments (36) regarding the same enzyme. Both strongly suggest that, at saturating GSH concentrations, an equilibrium exists between two forms: the final Michaelis complex (E*·GSH) and a pre-complex (E·GSH) which represents a small fraction of the total enzyme; in the E·GSH conformation the protein fluorescence is not quenched, and glutathione is flexible and not firmly bound to the active site. The similarities of these results with our data are striking; therefore, we can tentatively associate the single exponential component of the fluorescence intensity decay at saturating substrate concentrations to the tightly bound complex and the Lorentzian distribution of lifetimes to the weakly bound pre-complex. Our data indicate that a similar conformational equilibrium between two major conformations exists also in the absence of substrate. These two conformational states differ in the Trp-38 environment polarity. Finally, we have shown that E·GSH can assume many conformations (while E*·GSH is probably more rigid). A possible (but not univocal) binding mechanism, coherent with all available experimental findings (NMR, kinetic and fluorescence data), is reported in Scheme 1. 


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Scheme I

In this scheme Enq is the flexible non quenched population and Eq is the quenched conformer. kq is the first order rate constant for the transition from Enq to Eq and k-q refers to the inverse reaction. Pre-steady state measurements (36) indicate that the rate-limiting step for protein fluorescence quenching by GSH binding is the transition from the pre-complex Eq·GSH to E*q·GSH. Therefore, binding of GSH to Eq must be kinetically not relevant compared with binding to Enq, and it is not indicated; nevertheless, it could be thermodynamically possible. For the same reason, the interconversion between Eq and Enq must be faster than the interconversion after GSH binding.

    Conclusions
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References

The results of this paper may be considered as a first quantitative approach to the conformational dynamics of GST P1-1, and demonstrate the role of structural fluctuations in the substrate binding mechanism. On the basis of the present fluorescence data and of other experimental findings (35, 36), we propose the following hypothesis: helix 2 fluctuates rapidly between two families of conformations (with times slower than nanoseconds but much faster than milliseconds) in the absence of substrate. GSH can enter the active site easily only in the flexible, solvent accessible conformation, forming the weakly bound pre-complex. At this stage, the GSH molecule shows an extended backbone conformation similar to that found in the crystal complex but its glutamyl moiety is not yet firmly anchored to the G-site (35). Then, a much slower conformational transition leads to the Michaelis complex, in which Trp-38 is also quenched. In this scenario, helix 2, which is flexible in the pre-complex and contacts the glycyl end of GSH with Trp-38 and Lys-44, could act as a driver for GSH to find the correct anchorage in the active site. A similar role has been suggested also on the basis of pre-steady state kinetic data (36). We are aware that Scheme 1 is just one of the possible mechanisms which well fit with experimental data. Molecular dynamics simulations are in progress to define the binding process, more in detail.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank S. Khrapunov for helpful suggestions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by a grant from the Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica (Funds 40% and 60%) and by a grant from National Research Council, Progetto Finalizzato ACRO.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Viale della Ricerca Scientifica, 00133 Rome, Italy. Tel.: 39-6-72594375; Fax: 39-6-2025450; E-mail: RICCIG{at}UNIROMA2.IT.

The abbreviations used are: GST, glutathione transferase; NATA, N-acetictryptophan-amide.

2 M. Lo Bello, M. Nuccetelli, E. Chiessi, A. Lahm, A. P. Mazzetti, A. Battistoni, A. M. Caccuri, A. J. Oakley, M. W. Parker, A. Tramontano, and G. Ricci, manuscript in preparation.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
References

  1. Jakoby, W. B., and Habig, W. H. (1980) in Enzymatic Basis of Detoxification (Jakoby, W. B., ed), Vol. 2, pp. 63-94, Academic Press, New York
  2. Armstrong, R. N. (1991) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 4, 131-139[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Mannervik, B., Alin, P., Guthenberg, C., Jensson, H., Tahir, M. K., Warholm, M., and Jörnvall, H. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 7202-7206[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Meyer, D. J., Coles, B., Pemble, S. E., Gilmore, K. S., Fraser, G. M., and Ketterer, B. (1991) Biochem. J. 274, 409-414
  5. Meyer, D. J., and Thomas, M. (1995) Biochem. J. 311, 739-742
  6. Buetler, T. M., and Eaton, D. L. (1992) Environ. Carcinog. Ecotoxicol. Rev. 10, 181-203
  7. Sinning, I., Kleywegt, G. J., Cowan, S. W., Reinemer, P., Dirr, H. W., Huber, R., Gilliland, G. L., Armstrong, R. N., Ji, X., Board, P. G., Olin, B., Mannervik, B., and Jones, T. A. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 232, 192-212[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Ji, X., Zhang, P., Armstrong, R. N., and Gilliland, G. L. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 10169-10184[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Reinemer, P., Dirr, H. W., Ladenstein, R., Schaffer, J., Gallay, O., and Huber, R. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 1997-2005[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Reinemer, P., Dirr, H. W., Ladenstein, R., Huber, R., Lo Bello, M., Federici, G., and Parker, M. W. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 227, 214-226[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Wilce, M. C. J., Board, P. G., Feil, S. C., and Parker, M. W. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2133-2143[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Ji, X., von Rosenvinge, E. C., Johnson, W. W., Tomarev, S. I., Piatigorsky, J., Armstrong, R. N., and Gilliland, G. L. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 5317-5328[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Armstrong, R. N. (1994) Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. Sect. A 10, 1-44
  14. Ji, X., Armstrong, R. N., and Gilliland, G. L. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 12949-12954[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Ricci, G., Caccuri, A. M., Lo Bello, M., Rosato, N., Mei, G., Nicotra, M., Chiessi, E., Mazzetti, A. P., and Federici, G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16187-16192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Caccuri, A. M., Ascenzi, P., Antonini, G., Parker, M. W., Oakley, A. J., Chiessi, E., Nuccetelli, M., Battistoni, A., Bellizia, A., and Ricci, G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16193-16198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ricci, G., Del Boccio, G., Pennelli, A., Lo Bello, M., Petruzzelli, R., Caccuri, A. M., Barra, D., and Federici, G. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 21409-21415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ricci, G., Lo Bello, M., Caccuri, A. M., Pastore, A., Nuccetelli, M., Parker, M. W., and Federici, G. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1243-1248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Lo Bello, M., Battistoni, A., Mazzetti, A. P., Board, P. G., Muramatsu, M., Federici, G., and Ricci, G. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1249-1253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Eftink, M. R. (1991) Methods of Biochemical Analysis 35, 127-205[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Wang, R. W., Bird, A. W., Newton, D. J., Lu, A. Y. H., and Atkins, W. M. (1993) Protein Sci. 2, 2085-2094[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Dietze, E. C., Wang, R. W., Lu, A. Y. H., and Atkins, W. M. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 6745-6753[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Battistoni, A., Mazzetti, A. P., Petruzzelli, R., Muramatsu, M., Federici, G., Ricci, G., and Lo Bello, M. (1995) Protein Express. Purif. 6, 579-587[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Simons, P., and Vander Jagt, D. L. (1981) Methods Enzymol. 77, 235-237[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Beechem, J. M., Gratton, E., Ameloot, M., Knutson, J. R., and Brand, L. (1991) in Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy. (Lakowicz, J. R., ed), Vol. 2, pp. 241-305, Plenum Press, New York
  26. Beechem, J. M., and Gratton, E. (1988) Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 909, 70-81
  27. Landaw, E. M., and Di Stefano, J. J. (1984) Am. J. Physiol. 246, R665-R667
  28. Bismuto, E., and Irace, G. (1989) Photochem. Photobiol. 50, 165-168[CrossRef]
  29. Ferreira, F. T., Stella, L., and Gratton, E. (1994) Biophys. J. 66, 1185-1196[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Alcala, J. R., Gratton, E., and Prendergast, F. (1987) Biophys. J. 51, 587-596[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Alcala, J. R., Gratton, E., and Prendergast, F. (1987) Biophys. J. 51, 597-604[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Alcala, J. R., Gratton, E., and Prendergast, F. (1987) Biophys. J. 51, 925-936[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Gratton, E., Alcala, J. R., and Prendergast, F. G. (1989) in Fluorescent biomolecules (Jameson, D. M., and Reinhart, G., eds), pp. 17-32, Plenum Press, New York
  34. McMahon, L. P., Yu, H. T., Vela, M. A., Morales, G. A., Shui, L., Fronczek, F. R., McLaughlin, M. L., and Barkley, M. D. (1997) J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 3269-3280[CrossRef]
  35. Nicotra, M., Paci, M., Sette, M., Oakley, A. J., Parker, M. W., Lo Bello, M., Caccuri, A. M., Federici, G., and Ricci, G. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 3020-3027[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Caccuri, A. M., Lo Bello, M., Nuccetelli, M., Nicotra, M., Rossi, P., Antonini, G., Federici, G., and Ricci, G. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 3028-3034[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Koradi, R., Billeter, M., and Wüthrich, K. (1996) J. Mol. Graph. 14, 51-55[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Hou, M. T. Honaker, L. M. Shireman, L. M. Balogh, A. G. Roberts, K.-c. Ng, A. Nath, and W. M. Atkins
Functional Promiscuity Correlates with Conformational Heterogeneity in A-class Glutathione S-Transferases
J. Biol. Chem., August 10, 2007; 282(32): 23264 - 23274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Perbandt, J. Hoppner, C. Betzel, R. D. Walter, and E. Liebau
Structure of the Major Cytosolic Glutathione S-Transferase from the Parasitic Nematode Onchocerca volvulus
J. Biol. Chem., April 1, 2005; 280(13): 12630 - 12636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. M. Caccuri, G. Antonini, P. G. Board, J. Flanagan, M. W. Parker, R. Paolesse, P. Turella, G. Chelvanayagam, and G. Ricci
Human Glutathione Transferase T2-2 Discloses Some Evolutionary Strategies for Optimization of the Catalytic Activity of Glutathione Transferases
J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2001; 276(8): 5432 - 5437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stella, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ricci, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stella, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ricci, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement