|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 37, 23773-23780, September 11, 1998
Binding Site for S-Adenosyl-L-methionine
in a Central Region of Mammalian Reovirus 2 Protein
EVIDENCE FOR ACTIVITIES IN mRNA CAP METHYLATION*
Cindy L.
Luongo §¶,
Carlo M.
Contreras § ,
Diane
L.
Farsetta §** , and
Max L.
Nibert §§§
From the Department of Biochemistry, the
§ Institute for Molecular Virology, and the ** Cellular and
Molecular Biology Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison, Wisconsin 53706
 |
ABSTRACT |
One or more proteins in mammalian reovirus core
particles mediate two RNA methylation activities,
(guanosine-7-N)-methyltransferase and
(guanosine-2'-O)-methyltransferase, that contribute to
forming the 5' cap 1 structure on viral mRNA. We used UV
irradiation to identify core proteins that bind
S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM), the methyl-group
donor for both methyltransferases. A
[methyl-3H]SAM-binding site was observed
among the reovirus proteins; was shown to be specific by
competition with low levels of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine, the product of methyl-group transfer from SAM; and was subsequently localized to protein 2. 2 mediates the guanylyltransferase
reaction in cap formation and was previously proposed to mediate one or both methylation reactions as well. SAM binding was demonstrated for
both 2 in cores and 2 expressed in insect cells from a
recombinant baculovirus. Using three different methods to cleave 2,
a binding site for SAM was tentatively localized to a central region of 2, between residues 792 and 1100, which includes a smaller region with sequence similarity to the SAM-binding pocket of other
methyltransferases. Alanine substitutions at positions 827 and 829 within this predicted binding region greatly reduced the capacity of
baculovirus-expressed 2 protein to undergo UV cross-linking to SAM
but had no effects on either the guanylyltransferase activity of this
protein or its conformation as judged by partial proteolysis,
suggesting that one or both of these residues is essential for SAM
binding. Based on these findings, we propose that the two
methyltransferase activities involved in mRNA capping by reovirus
cores utilize a single SAM-binding pocket within a central region of
2.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The first of four enzymes for forming the 5' cap 1 structure
(m7-Gppp
m2'-GpC[pN]n-OH) on each reovirus
mRNA is an RNA triphosphate phosphohydrolase (1-3). This enzyme
removes the phosphate from the 5'-terminal nucleotide of the
nascent mRNA, a guanosine in all 10 reovirus mRNAs, generating
a diphosphorylated terminus that serves as substrate for the RNA
guanylyltransferase. The reovirus protein that mediates this activity
in cores remains unproven; however, two proteins, 1 and µ2, have
been shown to influence the ion and temperature dependence of NTP
hydrolysis by cores (4, 5), and a recombinant 1 protein expressed in
yeast has been shown to act in vitro as both NTPase (6) and
RNA triphosphatase (7).
The next enzyme to act in cap formation is the RNA guanylyltransferase.
The RNA guanylyltransferase activity mediated by core protein 2
(8-10) was the focus of recent work in our
lab.1 Previous work
associated sequences near the N terminus of 2 with this activity,
particularly lysine 226, at which covalent linkage to GMP was found to
occur as part of the catalytic mechanism exhibited by this and related
enzymes (9, 11). We have recently shown that a 40-kDa N-terminal
proteolytic fragment of 2 can mediate both steps in the
guanylyltransferase reaction: covalent linkage to GMP using GTP as
substrate and transfer of GMP to an acceptor molecule, GDP or GTP in
our experiments.1
Lastly, two methyltransferase activities act to form the final cap 1 structure on reovirus mRNAs (3, 12). Both activities appear to be
mediated by reovirus-encoded proteins because no host proteins are
known to be present in reovirus cores (13). The first is an RNA
(guanosine-7-N)-methyltransferase, which uses S-adenosyl-L-methionine
(SAM)2 as substrate for
methyl-group transfer to the N-7 position of the RNA
guanylyltransferase-added 5'-terminal guanosine
(m7-GpppGpC[pN]n-OH) (2). The second is
an RNA (guanosine-2'-O)-methyltransferase, which uses SAM as
substrate for methyl-group transfer to the O-2' position of the 5'-most
RNA polymerase-added nucleotide (m7-Gppp
m2'-GpC[pN]n-OH). For both reactions,
S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (SAH) is formed as the
by-product of methyl-group transfer from SAM. The reovirus protein that
mediates these methylations has remained unproven, although the
literature contains two suggestive findings. First, an observation
reported as unpublished data by Seliger et al. (14)
indicated that the 2 protein was the only reovirus core protein that
underwent covalent cross-linking to 8-azido-S-adenosyl
[35S]methionine. Second, data base sequence comparisons
by Koonin (15) revealed that 2 contains sequences between residues
825 and 888 that bear similarities to other SAM-utilizing
methyltransferases. Notably, this region of similarity includes
sequences found in the SAM-binding pocket of methyltransferases for
which such information is known (15).
Identification of the protein(s) that mediates methyltransferase
reactions by reovirus cores is important for understanding how the
capping enzymes are arranged in these particles. A confounding observation from previous work is that recombinant 2 protein (r 2)
expressed from a vaccinia virus vector does not exhibit methyltransferase activity, possibly because it remains monomeric in
solution (10) and does not adopt the pentameric structure observed for
2 in cores (16). Having confirmed ourselves that r 2 expressed
from a baculovirus vector remains monomeric in solution and also fails
to mediate methyltransferase activity,1 we turned to an
alternative approach to address this potential activity of 2. In
this study, we used UV cross-linking in combination with protein
fragmentation and site-directed mutagenesis to localize a binding site
for [3H]SAM to a central region of 2 sequence,
overlapping that predicted by Koonin (15). Our results strongly suggest
that 2 mediates at least one of the two methylation reactions in
mRNA capping by reovirus cores.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Purification of Virus Particles--
Virions of reovirus T1L or
T3D were purified as described (17). Virion concentrations were
determined from the relationship 1.0 A260 = 2.1 × 1012 virions/ml (18). Cores of reovirus T3D
were prepared by digesting virions at a concentration of 3 × 1013 particles/ml with 200 µg/ml -chymotrypsin (Sigma)
for 1.5 h at 37 °C in virion buffer (10 mM Tris, pH
7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl).
Cores of reovirus T1L were chymotrypsin-digested as described (19). The
chymotrypsin was inactivated with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Sigma). To purify cores, digests were loaded onto a preformed
CsCl gradient ( = 1.30-1.55 g/cm3) and subjected to
equilibrium centrifugation. The particles were dialyzed into virion
buffer. Modified cores were generated as described in Luongo et
al. (20). In brief, 1 × 1013 cores of reovirus
T3D in virion buffer were heated to 52 °C for 30 min, cooled to
37 °C, and treated with 200 µg/ml chymotrypsin for 10 min.
Following treatment, the chymotrypsin was inactivated with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and the modified cores were isolated following equilibrium centrifugation.
UV Cross-linking--
Reactions were UV irradiated using a
modification of the procedure of Ahola et al. (21). In
brief, 20-µl reactions containing the protein sample and 1.7 µCi of
S-adenosyl-L-[methyl-3H]methionine
([3H]SAM) (80 Ci/mmol; DuPont) in 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 2 mM dithiothreitol, and 2 mM
EDTA were pipetted into 0.5-ml microfuge tubes. The reactions were
incubated on ice while being irradiated for 30 min with 254-nm UV light
in a Stratalinker 2400 cross-linking oven (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA)
with the samples placed 4 cm from the light source. We tested several
variations to the reaction conditions in an effort to optimize the UV
cross-linking of [3H]SAM to core proteins. For these
studies, we used an assay in which protein-bound [3H]SAM
was collected by precipitation with trichloroacetic acid after UV
cross-linking and then detected by scintillation counting. The results
(data not shown) suggested a pH optimum of pH 7.5, a preference for low
concentrations of monovalent salts (<75 mM NaCl), and an
insensitivity to low concentrations (10 mM) of divalent salts (MgCl2). Because these conditions were similar to
those we had chosen to begin these studies, we continued to use the original conditions.
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis--
Protein samples were
mixed with one-third volume of 3 × Laemmli loading buffer (3%
SDS, 9% -mercaptoethanol, 375 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 30%
sucrose, and 0.004% bromphenol blue) and heated at 100 °C for 2 min. The two identical samples were resolved on the same gel. The
protein sample on one-half of the gel were visualized by staining with
Coomassie Brilliant Blue (Sigma). For SDS-PAGE, the proteins in the
other half of the gel were electroblotted to nitrocellulose (Bio-Rad)
in 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, pH 8.3. The
nitrocellulose was coated with En3Hance spray surface
autoradiography enhancer (DuPont), and the label was detected by
fluorography. For the continuous phosphate-urea-SDS gels (7.5%
acrylamide, 100 mM Na2PO4, pH 7.0, 20 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 6 M urea, 0.1% SDS)
1.5-mm-thick mini-gels (Bio-Rad) were run at 20 V for 18 h. To
visualize radiolabel in the unstained half of the gel, it was treated
with Intensify universal autoradiography enhancer (DuPont) and dried
onto filter paper under vacuum prior to fluorography.
Expression and Proteolysis of r 2--
The reovirus 2
protein was expressed and purified as described in Luongo et
al.1 In brief, recombinant baculovirus AcMNPV.T3DL2
was generated by transfection of Spodoptera frugiperda
insect cells (Sf21, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with recombinant
bacmid generated by cloning the L2 gene (22) into the pFastBacI vector
(Life Technologies, Inc.). Trichoplusia ni insect cells
(High Five, Invitrogen) were infected with AcMNPV.T3DL2 and harvested
48 h postinfection. R 2 protein was purified by anion exchange
chromatography. To remove residual protein contaminants and concentrate
r 2, the column fractions were ammonium sulfate precipitated. For
thermolysin-limited proteolysis of r 2, the protein was diluted
10-fold with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and placed on ice for
5 min. The protein was then placed at 4 °C and digested with a 5%
volume of 2 mg/ml thermolysin (95 µg/ml final) (Sigma) for 30 min.
The thermolysin was inactivated with 25 mM EDTA, pH
8.0.
Immunoblot Analysis--
Protein was electroblotted from
SDS-polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose (Bio-Rad) in 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, pH 8.3. Binding of the
monoclonal antibody 7F4 was detected using goat anti-mouse IgG alkaline
phosphate conjugate and colorimetric reagents 5-bromo-4-chloro-3 indoyl
phosphate p-toluidine salt and p-nitro blue
tetrazolium chloride (Bio-Rad). The molecular weight standards (kaleidoscope prestained) were purchased from Bio-Rad.
N-terminal Sequencing--
Proteolytic products of 2 were
transferred from an SDS-polyacrylamide gel to polyvinylidene fluoride
paper (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) (23), and the band
corresponding to the 80K fragment was excised from the blot. N-terminal
sequencing by Edman degradation was performed at the University of
Michigan Protein and Carbohydrate Structure facility (Ann Arbor,
MI).
Proteolytic Cleavage by Formate Treatment--
T3D cores at high
concentration (1.2 × 1012) were incubated with
[3H]SAM, subjected to UV cross-linking, and resolved on
an 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The protein band was excised and
incubated in 75% formate (Sigma) (acid hydrolysis) or distilled water
(control) at 37 °C for 16 h. The proteins were resolved on a
10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and visualized as described above for UV
cross-linked protein.
Generation of Mutant r 2--
The L2 gene cloned into the
BamHI site of pBluescript (Stratagene) was the template for
site-directed mutagenesis utilizing the Quik Change site-directed
mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). The complementary mutagenic primers
5'-CGTTGTGCTAGCTCTTGCGACGGGACCAGAGGC and 5'-GCCTCTGGTCCCGTCGCAAGAGCTAGCACAACG
were used because the underlined nucleotides cause missense
mutations that change both aspartate 827 and glycine 829 to alanine. In
addition, these two alterations remove a BglII restriction
site at nucleotide 2491. In brief, 50 ng of template was amplified with
either 125 or 500 ng of each primer under the following conditions: 1 cycle at 94 °C for 30 s followed by 16 cycles at 94 °C for
30 s, 55 °C for 1 min, and 68 °C for 14 min followed by one
cycle at 15 °C for 5 min. Mutant clones were identified by screening
for the loss of the BglII site. The presence of the
mutations were confirmed by sequencing both DNA strands from
nucleotides 1804 to 3157 using the ABI Prism dye terminator cycle
sequencing ready reaction kit (Applied Biosystems). No second site
mutations were identified in this region, which encompasses the
NsiI to NcoI fragment that was ligated with the
7.4-kilobase pair region of pFastBacI-L2 generated by digestion with
NsiI and NcoI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA).
Recombinant bacmid was generated and used to produce recombinant
baculovirus by transfection of Sf21 cells. Mutant protein was
expressed and purified as described for wild type 2.
Autoguanylylation Assay--
The wild type and mutant r 2
proteins were assayed for autoguanylylation activity by incubation of
each protein with 5 µCi of [ -32P]GTP (DuPont) in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, and 2 mM dithiothreitol for 30 min at room temperature. EDTA, pH
8.0, was added to a final concentration of 10 mM to halt
the reaction. The proteins were resolved on a Tris-glycine-SDS 8%
polyacrylamide gel, and the covalent protein-associated radiolabel was
visualized by PhosphorImager analysis (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale,
CA).
Expression of Recombinant 3 (r 3)--
r 3 was expressed
using a recombinant baculovirus system as follows. The reovirus T3D L1
gene, which encodes the 3 protein, cloned into the PstI
site of pBR322 (22) was obtained from Michael Roner (Florida Atlantic
University). The L1 gene was PCR amplified using the forward primer
5'-CGCGGGTACCTCGAGACGACCATGGCATCCATGATAC and the reverse primer 5'-CGCGGGTACCCATGGTAGACTCACGCTGAC.
These primers add KpnI sites (underlined) 5' and 3' of the
L1 coding sequence and XhoI and NcoI restriction
sites (italicized), respectively, 5' of the L1 coding sequence. The
Extend Long Template PCR system (Boehringer Mannheim) was used to
amplify the L1 gene. In brief, buffer 2 supplemented to 5.25 mM MgCl2 (final) was used in the reaction. The
amplification conditions were one cycle at 92 °C for 2 min followed
by 10 cycles at 92 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 35 s, and
68 °C for 3.5 min followed by 20 cycles at 92 °C for 15 s,
65 °C for 35 s, and 68 °C for 3 min 50 s with an
addition of 20 s/cycle followed by one cycle at 68 °C for 7 min. The
L1 PCR product was digested with XhoI and KpnI
(New England Biolabs) and ligated into the pFastBacI vector digested
with the same enzymes. Recombinant bacmid was generated and used to
produce recombinant baculovirus by transfection of Sf21 cells.
For protein expression, High Five cells were infected with 0.6 plaque
forming units of L1 recombinant baculovirus and harvested 62-70 h
postinfection. Cells were placed on ice and lysed in a hypotonic buffer
(10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 2.5 mM MgCl2,
0.5% Triton X-100, 100 mM NaCl, 2% complete protease
inhibitor mixture (Boehringer Mannheim)). Nuclei and large cellular
debris were pelleted at 200 × g for 15 min at 4 °C.
The 3 in the supernatant was partially purified by removal of
protein contaminant by pretreatment with 20% (saturation at 0 °C)
ammonium sulfate and precipitation. The protein precipitated by 35%
ammonium sulfate contained 3 and was resuspended in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0. The resuspended protein was then used for
UV cross-linking.
 |
RESULTS |
UV Cross-linking of [3H]SAM to 2 and/or 3
Proteins in Reovirus Cores and Virions--
To identify which reovirus
core proteins contain binding sites for SAM, core particles of reovirus
T3D were incubated with [methyl-3H]SAM and
irradiated with UV light (254 nm) to cross-link this molecule to its
binding site(s). Following electrophoresis in a Tris-glycine-SDS gel
(8% acrylamide), blotting to nitrocellulose to improve detection of
3H, and fluorography, radiolabel was strongly detected in
the protein band (Fig.
1A). In this type of gel, the
band comprises core proteins 1 (120 copies/particle), 2 (60 copies/particle), and 3 (12 copies/particle). When virions of
reovirus T3D were treated in the same protocol, radiolabel was again
strongly detected in the band and at similar levels as seen with
cores (Fig. 1A). The latter result concurs with findings
that the capping methyltransferases have nearly full activity in
reovirus virions (24). Only minor amounts of radiolabel were associated
with the major outer capsid proteins in virions, µ1C and 3 (600 copies each per virion), providing evidence that the binding of
[3H]SAM is specific to one or more of the proteins.
The same results were obtained with cores and virions of reovirus T1L
(data not shown), indicating that this property is not unique to a
single reovirus strain.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
UV cross-linking of [3H]SAM to
proteins in reovirus particles. Cores (C) and virions
(V) of reovirus T3D were UV irradiated, and the proteins
were resolved by SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining
of one-half of the gel (left panel) or fluorography of an
electroblot of the other half of the gel (right panel). The
apparent molecular weights of protein standards (× 103)
are indicated at far left. A, a Tris-glycine-SDS
8% polyacrylamide gel was used to resolve the band containing
1, 2, and 3 proteins from the other proteins in reovirus
particles. B, a phosphate-urea-SDS 7.5% polyacrylamide gel
was used to separate the protein band containing 2 and 3 from the
band containing 1. The same numbers of cores and virions (3 × 1011) were utilized in the individual reactions.
|
|
To identify which proteins contain binding sites for SAM, core
particles of reovirus T3D were incubated with [3H]SAM,
irradiated with UV light to achieve cross-linking, and subjected to
electrophoresis in a phosphate-urea-SDS gel (7.5% acrylamide). Such
gels provide good separation of the 1 protein from the 2 and 3
proteins, which still comigrate (18). Following fluorography,
radiolabel was strongly detected in the 2/ 3 band but not in the
1 band (Fig. 1B). When virions of reovirus T3D were
treated in the same protocol, radiolabel was again strongly detected in
the 2/ 3 band and at similar levels as observed with cores (Fig.
1B). The same results for cross-linking to
[3H]SAM were obtained with cores and virions of reovirus
T1L (data not shown). These results indicate that the primary binding
sites for SAM identified by UV cross-linking are found in 2 and/or 3, and not in 1, in both particle types of the two reovirus strains.
Competition by SAH and Optimization of [3H]SAM
Binding to Reovirus Protein(s)--
Before proceeding with other
studies to localize the binding site(s), we addressed the specificity
of binding to SAM by the protein(s) in cores by performing
competition experiments with nonradiolabeled SAH, the stable by-product
of methyl-group transfer from SAM in the capping methyltransferase
reaction (2). The capacity of SAH to inhibit methyltransferase
activities in reovirus cores was previously demonstrated (25). In
addition, competition by SAH has been used to demonstrate the
specificity of binding to SAM by other methyltransferases (26-28).
Using SDS-PAGE, electroblotting, and fluorography, we showed that
radiolabeling of the protein(s) in reovirus T3D cores upon UV
cross-linking in the presence of 1 µM
[3H]SAM was inhibited by SAH with an IC50 of
~0.5 µM (Fig.
2A). In contrast,
S-adenosyl-D-homocysteine (dextro form of SAH) had little
or no effect on cross-linking to [3H]SAM at the highest
concentration tested (5 µM) (data not shown), providing
further evidence for the specificity of competition by the
physiological, laevo form of SAH. These results provide evidence that
cross-linking to [3H]SAM reflects the presence of one or
more specific binding sites for SAM in 2 and/or 3.

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of SAH and GpppG on
[3H]SAM binding to proteins. Reovirus T3D cores
(8 × 1011/reaction) were mixed with 1 µM [3H]SAM and various concentrations of
unlabeled competitor SAH (A) or cap analog GpppG
(B) and then UV irradiated. The core proteins were separated
on Tris-glycine-SDS 8% polyacrylamide gels and visualized by Coomassie
Brilliant Blue staining of one-half of each gel (left
panels) or fluorography of the electroblotted other half of each
gel (right panels). The apparent molecular weights of
protein standards (× 103) are indicated at far
left.
|
|
In an effort either to compete or to enhance SAM binding to the proteins in cores, we tested the effects of GTP and the cap analog
GpppG. We hypothesized that GTP binding to the guanylyltransferase region of 2 (9)1 or GpppG binding to one or both
putative methyltransferase regions in 2 (Refs. 14 and 15 and this
study) might enhance the observed SAM binding activity. Nevertheless,
when cross-linking to [3H]SAM was performed in the
presence of up to 20 µM GTP (data not shown) or GpppG
(Fig. 2B), SAM binding to 2 and/or 3 in T3D cores was
unchanged, indicating that these compounds do not modulate this
activity.
Localization of [3H]SAM Binding to a 120K N-terminal
Portion of 2 Protein in Modified Cores--
In an attempt to
localize the binding site(s) for SAM in reovirus cores, we used
modified cores containing 2 protein that lacks 25K of C-terminal
sequences due to sequential treatments with mild heat (52 °C) and
chymotrypsin (20). After subjecting these modified cores to UV
cross-linking in the presence of [3H]SAM, followed by
SDS-PAGE and fluorography, we found the 120K N-terminal
fragment of 2 that is present in these particles to be
strongly radiolabeled (Fig. 3). Because
the complementary, 25K C-terminal region of 2 is degraded as the
modified cores are made (20), we could not address whether it, too,
might contain a SAM-binding site; nonetheless, the available data
demonstrate that at least one SAM-binding site is located within the
120K N-terminal portion of 2. The data also indicate that this large N-terminal portion of 2 is sufficient for at least one SAM-binding activity of 2, consistent with previous findings that removing the C
terminus of 2 by treatment with heat and chymotrypsin does not
reduce the capacity of modified cores to methylate newly transcribed viral mRNAs (20).

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
UV cross-linking of [3H]SAM to
the 120-kDa 2 fragment of heat and chymotrypsin-modified cores.
Cores (C) and heat and chymotrypsin-modified cores
(H) (6 × 1011/reaction) were UV irradiated
in the presence of [3H]SAM and resolved on a
Tris-glycine-SDS 8% polyacrylamide gel. The 120K 2 cleavage product
is evident beneath the protein band in the Coomassie Brilliant
Blue-stained half of the gel (left panel) and after
fluorography of the electroblotted half of the gel (right
panel). The apparent molecular weights of protein standards (× 103) are indicated at far left. The diagram in
the bottom panel represents the pattern of 2 cleavage in
the modified cores. As shown, the 120K fragment represents the
N-terminal portion of 2 (20). The 25K C-terminal portion of 2
(hatched) is not detectable because of its rapid degradation
(20).
|
|
The small amount of radiolabel that was seen to migrate at the position
of full-length 2 protein after cross-linking with modified cores
(Fig. 3) could represent the small amount of uncleaved 2 protein
that remains present in these particles and/or the 3 protein, which
fully resists cleavage during the heat and chymotrypsin treatments
(20). Nonetheless, because radiolabel was mostly associated with the
120K fragment of 2 after cross-linking with modified cores, the
findings strongly suggest that any cross-linking of
[3H]SAM to 3 that may also have occurred with modified
cores or cores was minor compared with that to 2 (see last section
of "Results" for additional analysis of 3).
Localization of [3H]SAM Binding to a 55K C-terminal
Portion of 2 in Cores by Limited Hydrolysis with Formic
Acid--
The deduced amino acid sequence of T3D 2 protein includes
four aspartate-proline pairs that should be sensitive to limited acid
hydrolysis using 75% formic acid (29). The locations of these sites
and the sizes of fragments that result from partial cleavage are shown
in Fig. 4. After incubating with 75%
formic acid to obtain cleavage of gel-isolated 2 protein that had
been previously cross-linked to [3H]SAM in T3D cores and
then subjecting the products to a second round of SDS-PAGE, followed by
electroblotting and fluorography, we observed a number of radiolabeled
bands consistent with the expected fragments (Fig. 4). In particular,
most radiolabel was associated with a band near 55K, the size of
predicted fragment V from the C terminus of 2. The next most
prominent bands were ones near 60K (predicted fragment IV-V), 90K
(predicted fragment III-V), and 120K (predicted fragment II-V).
Fragments of similar sizes and relative intensities to these were
detected in parallel samples analyzed by immunoblot using monoclonal
antibody 7F4, confirming that these fragments all contain the C
terminus of 2. Gel-isolated 2 protein, which had been previously
cross-linked to [3H]SAM in T3D cores but which was
incubated without formic acid prior to the second round of SDS-PAGE,
served as a marker for full-length protein and was observed to be both
radiolabeled and bound by 7F4 (Fig. 4). These findings strongly suggest
that SAM is bound to one or more site within the C-terminal, 55-kDa
fragment resulting from limited acid hydrolysis of 2.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Limited formic-acid hydrolysis of protein
after UV cross-linking to [3H]SAM. The proteins
of T3D cores (1.2 × 1012 particles/reaction) that had
been UV irradiated in the presence of [3H]SAM were
incubated with water (F ) or 75% formic acid
(F+) and then resolved on a Tris-glycine-SDS 10%
polyacrylamide gel. The protein cleavage fragments were visualized
by staining one-third of the gel with Coomassie Brilliant Blue
(left panel). Cross-linking of [3H]SAM to
protein was demonstrated by fluorography after electroblotting another
third of the gel (middle panel). The identity of cleavage
fragments containing the C terminus of 2 was demonstrated by
immunoblot analysis using the 7F4 monoclonal antibody (20, 30)
(right panel). The four hypersensitive sites for acid
hydrolysis in 2 are diagrammed in the bottom panel along
with the expected cleavage fragments (II-V,
III-V, IV-V, and V) that contain the
epitope in region V recognized by 7F4. Full-length 2 and the
cleavage fragments that appear to contain region V are identified in
all three upper panels. The apparent molecular weights of
protein standards (× 103) are indicated at far
left.
|
|
UV Cross-linking of [3H]SAM to r 2 Protein and
Localization to an 80K C-terminal Portion of the Protein by Cleavage
with Thermolysin--
To confirm the capacity of 2 to bind SAM and
to further localize the site of SAM binding in 2, we performed
experiments using a soluble, partially purified form of r 2 that had
been expressed in insect (Sf21 or High Five) cells from a
recombinant baculovirus (AcMNPV) and shown to mediate the capping
guanylyltransferase activity assigned to an N-terminal region of
2.1 The r 2 protein obtained in this manner was
clearly visualized as a stained band after SDS-PAGE and was also
strongly radiolabeled after UV cross-linking in the presence of
[3H]SAM (Fig. 5, 0 time
points). These findings demonstrated that the monomeric r 2 binds
SAM.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
UV cross-linking of [3H]SAM to
r 2 and limited proteolysis with thermolysin. Purified r 2 (3 µl) was untreated (0) or digested with 95 µg/ml
thermolysin for the times indicated and then subjected to UV
irradiation in the presence of [3H]SAM. The proteins were
resolved on two Tris-glycine-SDS 8% polyacrylamide gels and visualized
by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining of one-half of one gel (left
panel), fluorography of an electroblotted half of the same gel
(middle panel), or immunoblot analysis using the 7F4
antibody of the second gel (right panel). The apparent
molecular weights of protein standards (× 103) are
indicated at far left for each gel. The diagram in the
bottom panel shows the two thermolysin (THL)
cleavage sites in 2 that give rise to the 100K and 80K fragments
observed in the gels, the position of the epitope recognized by 7F4,
and the N-terminal sequence of the 80K fragment that was identified by
Edman degradation.
|
|
In an effort to localize the site(s) of SAM binding in r 2, we
screened a variety of proteinases for limited proteolysis of r 2 to
yield distinct fragments. Thermolysin initially cleaved r 2 to yield
fragments with approximate sizes of 40K (data not shown) and 100K (Fig.
5). The 40K fragment was concluded to be derived from N-terminal
sequences of 2 based on its spontaneous, covalent labeling with
[ -32P]GTP (data not shown), characteristic of the
guanylyltransferase activity of this region (9).1 The 100K
fragment was concluded to be the C-terminal complement of the 40K
fragment based on its binding by monoclonal antibody 7F4 (20) (Fig. 5).
As determined from time course analysis (data not shown), while this
initial cleavage by thermolysin was continuing to occur in uncleaved
copies of r 2, both the 40K and 100K fragments became subject to
additional cleavages. In the case of the 100K fragment, secondary
cleavages occurred such that a stable 80K fragment was generated (Fig.
5). Because the 80K fragment is also recognized by 7F4 (Fig. 5), it
must have retained its C-terminal sequences (20) and lost sequences
from the middle of 2. When thermolysin-cleaved r 2 protein was
subjected to UV cross-linking in the presence of [3H]SAM,
radiolabeling of both the 100K and 80K fragments was observed (Fig. 5),
localizing one or more SAM-binding site to the 80K C-terminal portion
of 2. To confirm which region of 2 the 80K fragment represents,
we subjected it to N-terminal sequencing. The sequence obtained by
Edman degradation was
leucine-alanine-arginine-proline-phenylalanine-proline (data not
shown), corresponding to residues 562-567 in the deduced amino acid
sequence of the T3D 2 protein (14) and consistent with cleavage by
thermolysin (N-terminal to leucine). The calculated mass of a fragment
spanning residues 562-1289 (the C terminus of 2) is 80.7 kDa,
consistent with the observed Mr (80K).
The findings for localizing SAM-binding sites within either 2 from
cores or r 2 using three different methods of proteinase or chemical
cleavage can be summarized as follows. The SAM-binding fragments
resulting from each of these treatments overlap sequences between
positions 792, in the most C-terminal aspartate-proline pair in 2,
and ~1100, the site of 2 truncation in cores treated with heat and
chymotrypsin. Thus, if 2 were to contain a single site for binding
SAM that can be identified by UV cross-linking, this region (amino
acids 792 to ~1100) would represent the likely location for this
binding site. It is notable that this region includes the SAM-binding
motif and adjacent sequences with similarity to known SAM-utilizing
methyltransferases (residues 825-888) as described by Koonin (15).
Reduced Capacity of 2 to Bind [3H]SAM after
Alanine Substitutions at Positions 827 and 829--
To test the
predictions of Koonin (15) regarding binding to SAM by residues near
position 830 in 2, as well as our own evidence that SAM is bound in
this region, we created mutations in the pBluescript-inserted cDNA
copy of T3D L2 (see "Experimental Procedures") such that the
encoded 2 protein contained two amino acid substitutions: alanine
827 (for aspartate in wild type 2) and alanine 829 (for glycine in
wild type 2) in the
B-B-aspartate-B-glycine-X-glycine motif (where B represents a hydrophobic residue and X
represent any residue) shared by many methyltransferases (15). The
mutant L2 gene was then used to generate a recombinant baculovirus for expressing the mutant 2 protein in insect cells. Upon demonstrating that the mutant 2 was expressed in these cells, we partially purified it using the same protocol as described for wild type 2.
The purified mutant and wild type 2 proteins were then analyzed for
SAM binding by incubation with [3H]SAM and UV
cross-linking. The results indicate that the mutant 2 protein is
greatly diminished in its capacity to bind SAM (Fig. 6A). By quantitating the
amounts of radiolabel associated with the wild type or mutant 2
proteins with the amounts of each protein loaded in the gel lanes, we
estimated that the mutant protein was labeled with
[3H]SAM at 4% the level of wild type. The greatly
reduced binding to SAM by the mutant 2 was also demonstrated in a
sample to which the 100K fragment of wild type 2 (generated by prior
thermolysin treatment) was added prior to cross-linking with
[3H]SAM. In this case, the 100K fragment of wild type
protein was strongly radiolabeled, and the full-length mutant protein
again showed little detectable labeling above background. In contrast, the mutant 2 protein was efficiently radiolabeled by covalent linkage to GM[32P] (Fig. 6B) as part of the
guanylyltransferase reaction mediated by an N-terminal region of 2
(9)1; was recognized by monoclonal antibody 7F4 (data not
shown), which binds to a C-terminal epitope in 2 (20, 30); and
exhibited an identical pattern of cleavage upon treatment with
thermolysin as the wild type protein (data not shown), indicating that
other regions of 2 were not substantially affected by the alanine
substitutions at 827 and 829. Because mutations at these two closely
spaced positions in 2 so greatly reduced binding to SAM in the
cross-linking assay but did not affect other properties, the results
provide evidence that a single SAM-binding site in 2, involving
residues near position 830, was identified and analyzed in this
study.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Analysis of [3H]SAM binding and
guanylyltransferase activity for an alanine substitution mutant of
r 2. The apparent molecular weights of protein standards (× 103) are indicated at far left. A, UV
cross-linking was undertaken for 2 µl of wild type r 2
(w) or 2 µl of mutant r 2 (m). In addition,
UV cross-linking of 5.5 µl of digest containing the 100K and 80K
fragments of r 2 (generated by treatment with thermolysin for 1 h at 4 °C) was undertaken in the absence ( ) or presence (+) of
mutant r 2. The proteins were resolved on a Tris-glycine-SDS 8%
polyacrylamide gel. Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining of one-half of
the gel (left panel) and fluorography of an electroblot of
the other half of the gel (right panel) were used to
visualize the proteins. B, wild type (w) or
mutant (m) r 2 was incubated with
[ -32P]GTP and resolved on a Tris-glycine-SDS 8%
polyacrylamide gel to demonstrate covalent linkage to
GM[32P] in association with guanylyltransferase activity.
The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (left
panel), and the protein-associated radiolabel was visualized by
PhosphorImager (right panel). The alanine substitutions at
amino acids 827 and 829 within the SAM-binding motif of 2 are shown
in the bottom panel.
|
|
No UV Cross-linking to [3H]SAM by r 3
Protein--
Because 2 and 3 comigrate in phosphate-urea-SDS
gels, the results for UV cross-linking of [3H]SAM to
proteins in reovirus cores (Fig. 1B) leave open to question whether 3 might also contain a binding site for SAM. Similarly, the
small amount of [3H]SAM-labeled protein observed in the
position of full-length 2 and 3 proteins from cores modified by
previous treatment with mild heat and chymotrypsin (Fig. 3) could
represent 3 and/or a small amount of uncleaved 2. To address more
directly whether 3 might also bind SAM, we used a recombinant form
of the T3D 3 protein that was expressed in insect cells from a
recombinant baculovirus. The r 3 protein was partially purified using
a combination of ammonium sulfate precipitation and anion exchange
chromatography (see "Experimental Procedures") and was shown to
have poly(C)-dependent poly(G) polymerase activity (data
not shown) (31). When partially purified preparations of r 2 (see
above) and r 3 were subjected to UV cross-linking in the presence of
[3H]SAM and then analyzed by SDS-PAGE, electroblotting,
and fluorography, SAM bound to r 2 and its 100K fragment (generated
by a contaminating proteinase in this protein preparation1)
but not to r 3 (Fig. 7). Thus, the
results for baculovirus-expressed r 2 and r 3 proteins, coupled
with the results for proteins in cores, suggest that 3 exhibits
little if any binding to [3H]SAM using the UV
cross-linking assay.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
UV cross-linking assay for r 3 in the
presence of [3H]SAM. Partially cleaved r 2 (1 µl
at 1×) or uncleaved r 3 (5 µl at 1×) at the amounts indicated
were UV irradiated in the presence of [3H]SAM. The
proteins were resolved on Tris-glycine-SDS 8% polyacrylamide gel and
visualized by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining of one-half of the gel
(left panel) and fluorography of an electroblot of the other
half of the gel (right panel). The apparent molecular
weights of protein standards (× 103) are indicated at
far left.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Three different fragmentation methods were used to localize
binding sites for SAM in the reovirus 2 protein. In the first, involving C-terminally truncated 2 protein in modified cores, a site
was localized between the N terminus and a position near residue 1100. In the second, involving limited acid hydrolysis of 2 in cores, a
site was localized between position 792 and the C terminus. In the
third, involving thermolysin cleavage of r 2, a site was localized
between position 562 and the C terminus. Recognizing that these
localizations overlap a region of 2 between positions 792 and
~1100, we hypothesized that one or more binding site for SAM is
located within this specific 35-kDa, central region of the protein.
Although it is formally possible that more than one SAM-binding site is
contained within this region, no candidate sequences are evident
besides those identified by Koonin (15) between positions 825 and 888. Moreover, because the alanine substitutions we introduced at positions
827 and 829 within this region so greatly reduced the capacity of r 2
to undergo UV cross-linking to [3H]SAM, the findings
suggest that a single SAM-binding site involving amino acids near
position 830 in 2 has been identified by UV cross-linking in this
study. Although it is tempting to state more definitively that 2
contains only the one SAM-binding site, an important caveat is that a
second SAM-binding site in 2 may be less efficiently cross-linked to
[3H]SAM in our protocol than the site we have studied and
may in fact account for the very low level of activity ( 4% wild type levels) we found remaining in the alanine substitution mutant. Another
possibility is that the alanine substitutions at positions 827 and 829 knocked out two distinct or overlapping SAM-binding sites in 2 at
the same time. Thus, whereas we obtained no strong evidence for a
second SAM-binding site in 2, we cannot definitively rule out that
possibility.
Region of 2 Sufficient for SAM Binding--
We conceived of
other experiments involving expression of 2 or portions of that
protein in Escherichia coli in an effort to identify the
minimal region of 2 that is necessary for SAM binding. The
full-length 2 protein and six deletion mutants expressed to date,
however, have been found to be mostly insoluble, not readily
solubilized, and inactive at SAM binding in the cross-linking assay
(data not shown). Similar difficulties with 2 expression in E. coli have been described by other investigators (9). Thus, we
abandoned that approach for any further experiments in the current
study.
On the other hand, the findings from partial proteolysis of intact 2
described in this paper, which suggest that a central region of 2
contains a SAM-binding site, can be considered in light of other
findings to suggest that a region from 562 to ~1100 is sufficient for
SAM binding. Because the ~25K C-terminal portion of 2 is degraded
in generating the 120K N-terminal fragment in cores treated with heat
and chymotrypsin (20) and because the 120K fragment can subsequently
bind SAM and undergo cross-linking to it (Fig. 3), the ~25K
C-terminal portion must be dispensable for at least one SAM-binding
activity. In addition, because the 40K N-terminal and 100K C-terminal
fragments that can be generated from baculovirus-expressed 2 protein
by mild proteolysis with several proteinases1 including
thermolysin (Fig. 5) are physically separated according to both native
gel electrophoresis and gel filtration chromatography1,
because the 20K N-terminal portion of the 100K thermolysin-generated fragment is degraded in generating the 80K fragment at later times of
thermolysin treatment (data not shown), and because the 80K fragment
can bind SAM and undergo cross-linking to it after proteolysis (Fig.
5), the N-terminal ~60K region of 2 must also be dispensable for
for at least one SAM binding activity. Thus, our data suggest that an
~60-kDa portion of 2 spanning amino acids 562 to ~1100 constitutes the smallest region of the protein defined to date as being
sufficient for SAM binding and UV cross-linking.
Implications for 2 Function as a Capping
Methyltransferase--
Biochemical evidence for SAM binding by 2
supports a general expectation (14, 15) that 2 mediates one or both
of the RNA methylation activities (RNA
(guanosine-7-N)-methyltransferase and RNA
(guanosine-2'-O)-methyltransferase) in forming a 5' cap 1 structure on reovirus mRNA. Nevertheless, the failure of r 2 to
exhibit methylation activity (Ref. 10 and data not shown) still limits
studies to dissect the putative methyltransferase activities of 2 at
a molecular level. This failure may reflect the incapacity of r 2
expressed in isolation from other reovirus proteins to adopt the
pentameric structure observed for 2 in cores (10) (see next
section).
Despite the caveat mentioned in the preceding section, an interesting
possibility that can be inferred from the evidence for a single
SAM-binding site in 2 is that the same region of 2 sequence may
provide binding to SAM for the two different cap methylation activities
in reovirus cores. An example similar to this possibility is seen in
the multi-specific DNA methyltransferases of certain bacteriophages. In
these enzymes, one polypeptide chain includes a single SAM-binding
pocket and a single set of catalytic residues for methylation but
multiple DNA-binding sites that allow specific recognition and
subsequent methylation of several different DNA sequence motifs (32).
Thus, different DNA-binding regions are arranged in those proteins such
that each of the different DNA targets can be effectively bound and
presented to the same catalytic machinery for methylation of defined
bases within them. A similar hypothesis for 2 would be that there
are two different sequence regions in the protein that bind the nascent
cap at the 5' end of reovirus mRNA, one region that binds
GpppGpC[pN]n-OH and presents the base of the terminal
guanosine for methylation at the N-7 position and another region that
binds m7-GpppGpC[pN]n-OH (cap 0) and
presents the sugar of the penultimate guanosine for methylation at the
O-2' position (Fig. 8). Both substrates
are methylated by catalytic machinery using the same SAM-binding
pocket. Another possibility is that once the first methylation occurs,
that is, once m7-GpppGpC[pN]n-OH is
generated, this new RNA acceptor may undergo a change in orientation
rather than translocating the RNA to a distinct binding site, such that
the sugar of the penultimate guanosine is now properly presented for
methylation at the O-2' position. This rearrangement might involve
conformational changes in 2,
m7-GpppGpC[pN]n-OH, or both, possibly
due to the presence of the (guanosine-7-N)-methyl group. The
presence of one or two sites in 2 for binding RNA acceptors is
testable, and such experiments are in progress.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Model for a single SAM binding pocket
associated with putative RNA (guanosine-7-N)-and
(guanosine-2'-O)-methyltransferase activities in 2.
SAM is shown in its binding pocket (dark gray rectangle)
identified in the central portion of 2. The methyl group that is
transferred to the RNA is indicated on the SAM molecule. Catalytic
residues for methyl transfer are represented by the gray oval. The
GpppG binding region is indicated by a rectangle with
straight corners, and the m7-GpppG
binding region is indicated by a rectangle with
rounded corners. The RNA is represented in bold
letters. According to the model shown here, 2 contains two
methyltransferase-associated RNA-binding regions for binding either a
GpppG or a mGpppG RNA terminus. In the upper
panel, the methyl group of the bound SAM is transferred
(curved arrow) to the N-7 position of the terminal G residue
of the RNA bound in the GpppG binding region to generate
m7-GpppGpC[pN]n-OH RNA (cap 0) and SAH,
both of which are released from 2. As shown in the lower
panel, the m7-GpppGpC[pN]n-OH RNA
then binds in the mGpppG binding region of 2 and a
second SAM molecule binds in the SAM binding pocket (as shown by the
arrow). The methyl group of the bound SAM is transferred
(curved arrow) to the O-2' position of the penultimate G
residue to generate m7-Gppp
m2'-GpC[pN]n-OH RNA and SAH, both of
which are released from 2.
|
|
The circumstance suggested in Fig. 8 for 2, one SAM binding site for
the two methylation reactions, has not been described for a capping
methyltransferase to date. For example, the
(guanosine-7-N)-methyltransferase and
(nucleoside-2'-O)-methyltransferase activities of vaccinia virus are mediated by distinct proteins (33, 34). Similarly, the
capping methyltransferase encoded by the ABD1 gene of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been shown to act as a
(guanosine-7-N)-methyltransferase but not as a
(nucleoside-2'-O)-methyltransferase (27). Thus, a detailed
analysis of the SAM binding and methyltransferase activities of 2
may provide unique insights into this class of enzymes.
Relationship of Findings to Pentameric Structure of Core-bound
2--
The arrangement of 2 as homopentamers in reovirus cores
has been known for some time (35, 36) although visualized at higher
resolution only recently by cryoelectron microscopy with (16, 20) or
without (37) three-dimensional image reconstruction. The regions of
2 that are essential for pentamerization remain undefined; however,
the aforementioned three-dimensional reconstructions suggest that
regions at the intermediate radii spanned by 2 (which extends
radially over ~100 Å in reovirus cores) may be most
important.1 Although the SAM-binding pocket is functionally
constituted by a 2 monomer, as shown in this study, it is
conceivable that residues in 2 that contribute to catalysis and/or
to binding RNA acceptor molecules in association with the SAM-binding
pocket (Fig. 8) may be contributed by an adjacent monomer in the
core-bound, pentameric 2. This requirement would provide one
possible explanation for why monomeric 2 does not exhibit
methyltransferase activity. A related, though distinct, possibility is
that the residues necessary to constitute each active methyltransferase
unit are contributed by the same 2 monomer but that interactions
with adjacent monomers in the 2 pentamer are necessary for
permitting these residues to assume their catalytically active
conformations. These putative interactions between adjacent 2
monomers are apparently not required for forming a functional
SAM-binding site, however, as we show in this study using monomeric
r 2 obtained from insect cells.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank K. L. Tyler and H. W. Virgin, IV, for purified stocks of monoclonal antibody 7F4. We also
thank S. J. Harrison, R. Leidner, J. J. Lugus, and
X.-H. Zhou for technical support; T. J. Broering, A. L. Gillian, S. C. Harrison, and K. M. Reinisch for helpful
discussions and reviews of a preliminary manuscript; and S. Shuman for
other helpful discussion.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Public Health Service Grant R29 AI39533 (to M. L. N.) and by
National Research Service Award F32 18409A (to C. L. L.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant T32
CA09075 to the Viral Oncology Training Program (University of
Wisconsin-Madison).
Supported by a Hilldale Fellowship from the University of
Wisconsin-Madison.

Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant T32
GM08349 to the Biotechnology Training Program (University of
Wisconsin-Madison).
§§
Supported by a Shaw Scientist Award from the Milwaukee Foundation
(Milwaukee, WI). To whom correspondence should be addressed: Inst. for
Molecular Virology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1525 Linden Dr.,
Madison, WI 53706. Tel.: 608-262-4536; Fax: 608-262-7414; E-mail:
mlnibert{at}facstaff.wisc.edu.
The abbreviations used are:
SAM, S-adenosyl-L-methionineSAH, S-adenosyl-L-homocysteiner 2, recombinant
2[3H]SAM, [methyl-3H]S-adenosyl-L-methioniner 3, recombinant 3PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresisPCR, polymerase chain reaction.
1
C. L. Luongo, K. M. Reinisch, S. C. Harrison, and M. L. Nibert, manuscript in preparation.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Banerjee, A. K.,
Ward, R.,
and Shatkin, A. J.
(1971)
Nat. New Biol.
230,
169-172[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Furuichi, Y.,
Muthukrishnan, S.,
Tomasz, J.,
and Shatkin, A. J.
(1976)
J. Biol. Chem.
251,
5043-5053[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shatkin, A. J.,
and Kozak, M.
(1983)
in
The Reoviridae (Joklik, W. K., ed), pp. 79-106, Plenum Press, New York
-
Noble, S.,
and Nibert, M. L.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
2182-2191[Abstract]
-
Noble, S.,
and Nibert, M. L.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
7728-7735[Abstract]
-
Bisaillon, M.,
Bergeron, J.,
and Lemay, G.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
18298-18303[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bisaillon, M.,
and Lemay, G.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
29954-29957[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cleveland, D. R.,
Zarbl, H.,
and Millward, S.
(1986)
J. Virol.
60,
307-311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fausnaugh, J.,
and Shatkin, A. J.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
7669-7762[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mao, Z. X.,
and Joklik, W. K.
(1991)
Virology
185,
377-386[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shuman, S.,
and Schwer, B.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
17,
405-410[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Furuichi, Y.,
Morgan, M.,
Muthukrishnan, S.,
and Shatkin, A. J.
(1975)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
72,
362-366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shatkin, A. J.
(1974)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
71,
3204-3207[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Seliger, L. S.,
Zheng, K.,
and Shatkin, A. J.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
16289-16293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Koonin, E. V.
(1993)
J. Gen. Virol.
74,
733-740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dryden, K. A.,
Wang, G.,
Yeager, M.,
Nibert, M. L.,
Coombs, K. M.,
Furlong, D. B.,
Fields, B. N.,
and Baker, T. S.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
1023-1041[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Furlong, D. B.,
Nibert, M. L.,
and Fields, B. N.
(1988)
J. Virol.
62,
246-256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Smith, R. E.,
Zweerink, H. J.,
and Joklik, W. K.
(1969)
Virology
39,
791-810[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dryden, K. A.,
Farsetta, D. L.,
Wang, G.-J.,
Keegan, J. M.,
Fields, B. N.,
Baker, T. S.,
and Nibert, M. L.
(1998)
Virology
225,
33-46
-
Luongo, C. L.,
Dryden, K. A.,
Farsetta, D. L.,
Margarf, R. M.,
Severson, T. F.,
Olson, N. H.,
Fields, B. N.,
Baker, T. S.,
and Nibert, M. L.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
8035-8040[Abstract]
-
Ahola, T.,
Laakkonen, P.,
Vihinen, H.,
and Kaariainen, L.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
392-397[Abstract]
-
Cashdollar, L. W.,
Chmelo, R.,
Esparza, J.,
Hudson, G. R.,
and Joklik, W. K.
(1984)
Virology
133,
191-196[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nibert, M. L.,
and Fields, B. N.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
6408-6418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yamakawa, M.,
Furuichi, Y.,
and Shatkin, A. J.
(1982)
Virology
118,
157-168[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Furuichi, Y.,
and Shatkin, A. J.
(1976)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
73,
3448-3452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Higman, M. A.,
and Niles, E. G.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
14982-14987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mao, X.,
Schwer, B.,
and Shuman, S.
(1995)
Mol. Cell Biol.
15,
4167-4174[Abstract]
-
Liao, H. J.,
and Stollar, V.
(1997)
Virology
228,
19-28[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Anders, D. G.,
and Consigli, R. A.
(1983)
J. Virol.
48,
197-205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Virgin, H. W., IV,
Mann, M. A.,
Fields, B. N.,
and Tyler, K. L.
(1991)
J. Virol.
65,
6772-6781[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Starnes, M. C.,
and Joklik, W. K.
(1993)
Virology
193,
356-366[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lange, C.,
Jugel, A.,
Walter, J.,
and Noyer-Weidner, M.
(1991)
Nature
352,
645-648[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shuman, S.,
and Moss, B.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
181,
170-180[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schnierle, B. S.,
Gershon, P. D.,
and Moss, B.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
2897-2901[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
White, C. K.,
and Zweerink, H. J.
(1976)
Virology
70,
171-180[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ralph, S. J.,
Harvey, J. D.,
and Bellamy, A. R.
(1980)
J. Virol.
36,
894-896[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Centonze, V. E.,
Chen, Y.,
Severson, T. F.,
Borisy, G. G.,
and Nibert, M. L.
(1995)
J. Struct. Biol.
115,
215-225[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Murphy and V. Z. Grdzelishvili
Identification of Sendai Virus L Protein Amino Acid Residues Affecting Viral mRNA Cap Methylation
J. Virol.,
February 15, 2009;
83(4):
1669 - 1681.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Decroly, I. Imbert, B. Coutard, M. Bouvet, B. Selisko, K. Alvarez, A. E. Gorbalenya, E. J. Snijder, and B. Canard
Coronavirus Nonstructural Protein 16 Is a Cap-0 Binding Enzyme Possessing (Nucleoside-2'O)-Methyltransferase Activity
J. Virol.,
August 15, 2008;
82(16):
8071 - 8084.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kroschewski, S. P. Lim, R. E. Butcher, T. L. Yap, J. Lescar, P. J. Wright, S. G. Vasudevan, and A. D. Davidson
Mutagenesis of the Dengue Virus Type 2 NS5 Methyltransferase Domain
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 11, 2008;
283(28):
19410 - 19421.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. E. Murray and M. L. Nibert
Guanidine Hydrochloride Inhibits Mammalian Orthoreovirus Growth by Reversibly Blocking the Synthesis of Double-Stranded RNA
J. Virol.,
May 1, 2007;
81(9):
4572 - 4584.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Li, J. T. Wang, and S. P. J. Whelan
A unique strategy for mRNA cap methylation used by vesicular stomatitis virus
PNAS,
May 30, 2006;
103(22):
8493 - 8498.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Z. Grdzelishvili, S. Smallwood, D. Tower, R. L. Hall, D. M. Hunt, and S. A. Moyer
A Single Amino Acid Change in the L-Polymerase Protein of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Completely Abolishes Viral mRNA Cap Methylation
J. Virol.,
June 15, 2005;
79(12):
7327 - 7337.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. M. Jaafar, H. Attoui, P. P. C. Mertens, P. de Micco, and X. de Lamballerie
Identification and functional analysis of VP3, the guanylyltransferase of Banna virus (genus Seadornavirus, family Reoviridae)
J. Gen. Virol.,
April 1, 2005;
86(4):
1141 - 1146.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. L. Hermann and K. M. Coombs
Inhibition of Reovirus by Mycophenolic Acid Is Associated with the M1 Genome Segment
J. Virol.,
June 15, 2004;
78(12):
6171 - 6179.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Broering, J. Kim, C. L. Miller, C. D. S. Piggott, J. B. Dinoso, M. L. Nibert, and J. S. L. Parker
Reovirus Nonstructural Protein {micro}NS Recruits Viral Core Surface Proteins and Entering Core Particles to Factory-Like Inclusions
J. Virol.,
February 15, 2004;
78(4):
1882 - 1892.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kim, J. S. L. Parker, K. E. Murray, and M. L. Nibert
Nucleoside and RNA Triphosphatase Activities of Orthoreovirus Transcriptase Cofactor {micro}2
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 6, 2004;
279(6):
4394 - 4403.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-L. Huang, Y.-T. Han, Y.-T. Chang, Y.-H. Hsu, and M. Meng
Critical Residues for GTP Methylation and Formation of the Covalent m7GMP-Enzyme Intermediate in the Capping Enzyme Domain of Bamboo Mosaic Virus
J. Virol.,
February 1, 2004;
78(3):
1271 - 1280.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kim, X. Zhang, V. E. Centonze, V. D. Bowman, S. Noble, T. S. Baker, and M. L. Nibert
The Hydrophilic Amino-Terminal Arm of Reovirus Core Shell Protein {lambda}1 Is Dispensable for Particle Assembly
J. Virol.,
October 25, 2002;
76(23):
12211 - 12222.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Broering, A. M. McCutcheon, V. E. Centonze, and M. L. Nibert
Reovirus Nonstructural Protein {micro}NS Binds to Core Particles but Does Not Inhibit Their Transcription and Capping Activities
J. Virol.,
June 15, 2000;
74(12):
5516 - 5524.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. L. Luongo, K. M. Reinisch, S. C. Harrison, and M. L. Nibert
Identification of the Guanylyltransferase Region and Active Site in Reovirus mRNA Capping Protein lambda 2
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 28, 2000;
275(4):
2804 - 2810.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Farsetta, K. Chandran, and M. L. Nibert
Transcriptional Activities of Reovirus RNA Polymerase in Recoated Cores. INITIATION AND ELONGATION ARE REGULATED BY SEPARATE MECHANISMS
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 8, 2000;
275(50):
39693 - 39701.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|