JBC Avanti Polar Lipids

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Cozar, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Cozar, F. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rao, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 37, 23877-23883, September 11, 1998


Two-site Interaction of Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells with Activated Calcineurin*

Francisco J. Garcia-CozarDagger , Heidi OkamuraDagger , Jose F. AramburuDagger , Karen T. Y. ShawDagger §, Laura Pelletier, Richard Showalter, Ernest Villafranca, and Anjana RaoDagger parallel

From the Dagger  Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School and the Center for Blood Research, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 and  Agouron Pharmaceuticals Inc., San Diego, California 92121

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Transcription factors belonging to the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) family regulate the expression of cytokine genes and other inducible genes during the immune response. The functions of NFAT proteins are directly controlled by the calcium- and calmodulin-dependent phosphatase calcineurin. Here we show that the binding of calcineurin to NFAT is substantially increased when calcineurin is activated with calmodulin and calcium. FK506·FKBP12 drug-immunophilin complexes inhibited the interaction of NFAT with activated calcineurin much more effectively than they inhibited the interaction with inactive calcineurin, suggesting that part of the interaction with activated calcineurin involved the enzyme active site. We have previously shown that NFAT is targeted to inactive calcineurin at a region distinct from the calcineurin active site (Aramburu, J., Garcia-Cozar, F. J., Raghavan, A., Okamura, H., Rao, A., and Hogan, P. G. (1998) Mol. Cell 1, 627-637); this region is also involved in NFAT binding to activated calcineurin, since binding is inhibited by an NFAT peptide spanning the calcineurin docking site on NFAT. The interacting surfaces are located on the catalytic domain of the calcineurin A chain and on an 86-amino acid fragment of the NFAT regulatory domain. NFAT binding to the calcineurin catalytic domain was inhibited by the calcineurin autoinhibitory domain and the RII substrate peptide, which bind in the calcineurin active site, as well as by the NFAT docking site peptide, which binds to a region of calcineurin distinct from the active site. We propose that, in resting cells, NFAT is targeted to a region of the calcineurin catalytic domain that does not overlap the calcineurin active site. Upon cell activation, displacement of the autoinhibitory domain by calmodulin binding allows NFAT to bind additionally to the calcineurin active site, thus positioning NFAT for immediate dephosphorylation at functional phosphoserine residues.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Proteins belonging to the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT)1 family are a family of transcription factors that regulate the expression of many inducible genes during the immune response (1-5) (reviewed in Rao et al. (6)). NFAT proteins are expressed in a variety of immune system cells as well as in endothelial cells, certain neuronal cells, and other cells outside the immune system (6-12). NFAT proteins contain two adjacent ~300-amino acid regions that are conserved within the NFAT family, a regulatory domain located near the N terminus and a strongly conserved DNA binding domain (4-6, 13-18). In resting cells, NFAT proteins are phosphorylated and reside in the cytoplasm; upon stimulation of cells with calcium-mobilizing agents, they become dephosphorylated and translocate rapidly to the nucleus (6, 7, 13, 15, 16, 19, 20). In the nucleus, they interact cooperatively with Fos-Jun proteins and possibly other transcription factors to modulate gene transcription (6, 21-24).

The activity of NFAT transcription factors is directly regulated by calcineurin, a calcium- and calmodulin-dependent phosphatase also known as protein phosphatase 2B (6, 25). Calcineurin controls multiple functions of NFAT proteins, including their nuclear import, their DNA-binding affinity, and their transactivation (reviewed in Rao et al. (6)). Both the phosphorylated and dephosphorylated forms of NFAT1 bind to calcineurin immobilized on calmodulin-Sepharose beads (13, 26). The binding has been mapped to the N-terminal regulatory domains of NFAT proteins using recombinant NFAT1 and NFAT2 expressed in bacteria (15, 27), as well as recombinant NFAT1 and NFAT4 expressed in mammalian cells (13, 16, 17, 26).

Calcineurin is a heterodimer of a catalytic A subunit and a calcium-binding regulatory B subunit (25). The A subunit contains the catalytic domain at its N terminus, followed by binding regions for the B subunit and for calmodulin that were defined by deletion and mutational analysis (28-31). An autoinhibitory domain, whose removal renders calcineurin constitutively active, is located near the C terminus of the calcineurin A chain (29-31). Determination of the calcineurin structure showed that the autoinhibitory domain forms an alpha -helix that is positioned in the active site of the calcineurin catalytic domain, thus preventing the access of substrates to the active site (32). Both in human and in bovine calcineurin, the B-chain binding region is also alpha -helical (32, 33), while the region between the B-chain-binding helix and the autoinhibitory domain is disordered in the crystal structure (32). Calmodulin binding to this disordered region is presumed to displace the autoinhibitory domain from the calcineurin active site, thus permitting the access of substrates to the active site.

The clinically important immunosuppressive drugs, cyclosporin A (CsA) and FK506, have long been known to inhibit T lymphocyte activation and NFAT activation, primarily because of their ability to inhibit the phosphatase activity of calcineurin toward phosphoprotein substrates (reviewed in Refs. 34-37). CsA and FK506 do not inhibit calcineurin activity directly, but form inhibitory complexes with intracellular receptors, known as immunophilins, that are present at high abundance in all cells; the immunophilin receptors for CsA are known as cyclophilins (CyPs), while those for FK506 are known as FK-binding proteins or FKBPs. The structures of human and bovine calcineurin, in complex with FK506·FKBP12, have been solved: the drug-immunophilin complex binds to the calcineurin B-binding alpha -helix of the calcineurin A chain and inhibits calcineurin by an indirect mechanism (32, 33).

Here we show that NFAT proteins interact more strongly with calmodulin-activated than inactive calcineurin. Two regions of calcineurin are implicated in the interaction, both of which are located on the calcineurin catalytic domain. One of these is a targeting region complementary to a region we have recently defined as the docking site for calcineurin on NFAT (27), while the second is a region overlapping the active site that is preferentially exposed in activated calmodulin-bound calcineurin. Based on our data, we suggest that NFAT proteins are targeted to calcineurin in resting cells, and that they make an additional interaction with the active site of calcineurin in activated cells. Our results have implications for the regulation of NFAT by calcineurin in resting and activated cells, and for the development of new types of immunosuppressive drugs.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Reagents-- The glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins GST-LSF, GST-human (h) NFAT1 (1-415), GST-hNFAT2 (1-418), and GST-hNFAT4 (11-419) (abbreviated GST-NFAT1, GST-NFAT2, and so forth) have been described (27, 38). The hexahistidine-tagged NFAT1(1-415) was generated by subcloning the coding region for the 415 N-terminal amino acids of NFAT1 into the pQE32 vector (Qiagen). Hexahistidine-tagged NFAT1 truncation mutants were generated by a polymerase chain reaction and subcloned into pQE vectors (Qiagen). Recombinant bacterially expressed human calcineurin and human FKBP12 were prepared as described previously (32). The recombinant catalytic domain of human calcineurin (CnCAT), incorporating a hexahistidine tag at the C terminus, was made by expressing amino acids 1-347 in bacteria. The recombinant bacterially expressed His151 right-arrow Ala mutant of human calcineurin A was coexpressed with calcineurin B in the pET-15b vector, and was a kind gift of Dr. Jun Liu (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (39). Cyclophilin A (CyPA) was kindly provided by Dr. Christopher Walsh (Harvard Medical School). Bovine calcineurin, calmodulin, and myoglobin were obtained from Sigma. The RII peptide (DLDVPIPGRFDRRVSVAAE) (40), the calcineurin autoinhibitory peptide (YITSFEEAKGLDRINERMPPRRDAMPSD) (31), the control ovalbumin peptide (41), and the SPRIEIT-25 (KPAGASGPSPRIEITPSHELMQAGGY), SPRIEIT-13 (SGPSPRIEITPSH), and SPAIAIA-25 (KPAGASGPSPAIAIAPSHELMQAGGY) peptides from murine NFAT1 (27) were synthesized at the Tufts-New England Medical Center Peptide Synthesis Facility. For some experiments the RII peptide was purchased from Bachem Fine Chemicals, Switzerland. The polyclonal rabbit antiserum directed against the autoinhibitory peptide has been described (13). Protease and phosphatase inhibitors were purchased from Sigma and Calbiochem.

Iodination of Calcineurin-- Calcineurin or the calcineurin catalytic domain (CnCat) (~100 µg) was iodinated with 1 mCi carrier-free Na125I (NEN Life Science Products) using IODO-BEADs (Pierce), then separated from free Na125I on a Sephadex G-25 spin column Biospin 6 (Bio-Rad) and stored in aliquots at -80 °C. Specific activities ranged from 150 to 600 cpm/fmol. Identical results were obtained whether recombinant human calcineurin or bovine calcineurin (Sigma) were used in the binding assay.

Binding Assays-- In some experiments, calcineurin binding to GST proteins was assessed by Western blotting as described previously (13, 15). For 125I-calcineurin binding to GST fusion proteins, equivalent amounts of GST-NFAT or GST-LSF fusion proteins were immobilized on gluthathione-Sepharose beads by incubation for 30 min at 4 °C in binding buffer (50 mM Tris phosphate, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1% Triton X-100, supplemented with 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 20 µM leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Beads were washed, resuspended in binding buffer, and incubated with 125I-calcineurin for 30 min at 4 °C. Binding of calcineurin to hexahistidine-tagged NFAT proteins was assessed after binding them to nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid beads (Qiagen); in these experiments 30 mM imidazole was added to the binding reaction and to the washes to prevent nonspecific binding of calcineurin to the nickel beads. Background binding of calcineurin to the nickel beads is shown in all such experiments. Final concentrations of 200 µM CaCl2, 5 mM EGTA, and 500 nM calmodulin were used unless otherwise noted. Where indicated, CsA·CyPA and FK506·FKBP12 complexes, formed by incubation of equimolar concentrations (40-400 µM) of the drugs with the immunophilins for 1 h on ice, were added at the indicated final concentrations to the binding reaction. The RII, autoinhibitory, and control peptides were used at final concentrations of 200 µM. SPRIEIT and SPAIAIA peptides were used at the indicated final concentrations. After incubation, individual binding reactions were filtered through a 5-µm hydrophilic polyvinylidene difluoride filter (Millipore) using a vacuum manifold (Millipore) to separate bound and unbound 125I-calcineurin. Filters were washed rapidly under continuous suction with 24 ml of 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM CaCl2, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100. Washed filters were transferred to tubes and 125I-calcineurin retained by the immobilized GST or hexahistidine-tagged proteins was quantified in a Hewlett Packard Gammacounter.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

Activated Calcineurin Binds More Strongly than Does Inactive Calcineurin to NFAT-- We measured the binding of 125I-calcineurin to GST fusion proteins containing the first 415 and 418 amino acids of NFAT1 and NFAT2, respectively. We have previously shown that these N-terminal regions of NFAT proteins are sufficient for calcineurin binding (13, 15, 27). 125I-Calcineurin was incubated with GST-NFAT1 or GST-NFAT2 immobilized on glutathione beads, and radioactivity bound to the beads was rapidly separated by filtration. Preliminary experiments (not shown) indicated that peak levels of 125I-calcineurin binding were attained by 30 min, and that binding was linear with the amount of GST-NFAT protein used.

Using this assay, we showed that the binding of 125I-calcineurin to NFAT1 and NFAT2 was markedly dependent on the presence of calcium and calmodulin (Fig. 1). In the absence of calcium (i.e. in buffer containing 5 mM EGTA), a low but significant level of binding was observed (Fig. 1A, open bars). Note that this low level of binding had not previously been detected by Western blotting (13, 15), confirming that the binding assay using iodinated calcineurin was significantly more sensitive. In the presence of 100 µM calcium, there was a substantial increase in calcineurin binding to NFAT1 (not shown) and NFAT2 (Fig. 1, A and B, gray bars), consistent with our earlier results using Western blot analysis (13, 15). When calmodulin was included in the binding reaction, the level of binding was again reproducibly increased, by a further 2-5-fold depending on the batch of iodinated calcineurin (Fig. 1, A and B, hatched bars). As expected from the known calcium requirement for calmodulin to bind and activate calcineurin, calmodulin had no effect on the NFAT-calcineurin association in the absence of calcium (Fig. 1A, black bars). Neither calcium nor calmodulin had any effect on the background binding of calcineurin to the unrelated DNA-binding protein LSF (Fig. 1A, right), emphasizing the specificity of the NFAT-calcineurin association.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Calmodulin enhances the binding of calcineurin to NFAT. 125I-Calcineurin (Cn) (4 nM) was incubated with GST-NFAT2 or GST-LSF in the presence or absence of calcium and/or calmodulin (CaM) as indicated. Reactions lacking calcium contained 5 mM EGTA. The beads were rapidly washed by filtration to remove unbound calcineurin, and bound radioactivity was quantified. Reactions lacking calmodulin contained an equivalent concentration (500 nM) of myoglobin. In A, the average and standard deviation of a representative experiment, performed in triplicate, is shown. Note that error bars for some triplicates are too small to be apparent. In B, a second experiment using a different calcineurin preparation, with a greater calmodulin-dependent increase in binding, is shown.

Identification of a Short Fragment of NFAT1 That Binds to Calcineurin-- To determine the region of NFAT1 involved in binding calcineurin, we tested a series of systematic truncations of the NFAT1 regulatory domain, expressed as hexahistidine-tagged proteins in bacteria. These experiments identified an 86-amino acid fragment, NFAT1(97-183), which bound calcineurin as effectively as the original NFAT1(1-415) recombinant protein (Fig. 2). A shorter fragment, NFAT1(97-144), was also able to bind calcineurin in a calcium- and calmodulin-dependent fashion, but binding was decreased by comparison with NFAT1(1-415) or NFAT1(97-183).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Identification of a short fragment of NFAT that binds to calcineurin. A, 125I-Calcineurin (10 nM) was incubated with the indicated hexahistidine-tagged truncated derivatives of murine NFAT1 (1 µg, immobilized on nickel beads) in buffer containing 30 mM imidazole and EGTA, Ca2+, or Ca2+ and calmodulin (CaM) as indicated. The level of binding to the nickel beads alone under the same conditions is indicated. One of three representative experiments is shown. B, schematic summary of the results. The NFAT1(97-183) fragment binds calcineurin as well as NFAT1(1-415).

These results indicate that the 86-amino acid fragment, NFAT(97-183), contains the region of NFAT involved in calcineurin interaction. This fragment contains the sequence 110SPRIEITPS118, which we have recently shown represents a docking site for calcineurin on NFAT1 (27). Indeed the docking sequence is present in both short NFAT1 fragments, (97-144) and (97-183), that are capable of binding to calcineurin, but absent in NFAT1(1-96) and (140-415), which show little or no calcineurin binding, confirming that the docking sequence makes a major contribution to the NFAT-calcineurin interaction and that regions outside the 87-amino acid fragment NFAT1(97-183) do not interact effectively with calcineurin.

NFAT Binds the Calcineurin Catalytic Domain-- To define the region of calcineurin involved in NFAT binding, we generated a recombinant calcineurin containing only the catalytic domain (residues 1-347) of human calcineurin A (CnCAT). Despite lacking the calcineurin B-binding helix, the calmodulin-binding region and the autoinhibitory domain, this protein showed substantial binding to NFAT (Fig. 3). Binding of 125I-CnCAT to GST-NFAT was equivalent in the presence and absence of calcium (Fig. 3A), consistent with the expectation that CnCAT should not need calcium or the calcineurin B chain to assume a stable protein conformation. Binding of 125I-CnCAT to GST-NFAT was also equivalent in the presence and absence of calmodulin (Fig. 3B), consistent with the fact that CnCAT lacks the autoinhibitory region and the calmodulin-binding domain. Finally, binding of 125I-CnCAT to GST-NFAT proteins was unaffected by drug-immunophilin complexes (Fig. 3C), which are not expected to bind CnCAT since they bind to the CnB-binding helix of the calcineurin A-calcineurin B heterodimer, which is lacking in CnCAT.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   NFAT binds to the calcineurin catalytic domain. A and B, 125I-CnCAT (4 nM) was incubated with GST-NFAT1, GST-NFAT2, and GST-LSF in the presence of Ca2+ or EGTA (panel A), or in the presence of EGTA or Ca2+ and calmodulin (CaM) (panel B). C, 125I-CnCAT was incubated with GST-NFAT2 in the absence (-) or presence of 1 µM CypA or CsA·CypA complexes. D, addition of autoinhibitory (AI) or RII peptides (200 µM) partially inhibited the binding of 125I-CnCAT to GST-NFAT2 when compared with binding in the presence of an ovalbumin peptide used as a negative control (-). Results for panels A-D are shown as average and standard deviations of a representative experiment performed in triplicate. Note that error bars for some triplicates are too small to be apparent. E, the peptide SPRIEIT-25 spanning the calcineurin docking site of NFAT1 inhibited binding of 125I-CnCAT to NFAT in a dose-dependent manner, with IC50 ~ 10 µM, whereas the mutant SPAIAIA peptide had no effect at the highest concentration used.

The use of inhibitory peptides defined two distinct regions for NFAT interaction with the calcineurin catalytic domain. The RII substrate peptide and the calcineurin autoinhibitory domain peptide, both of which bind to the calcineurin active site in their unphosphorylated forms, caused significant but partial inhibition of CnCAT binding to NFAT, indicating that at least part of the binding involved a region close to the calcineurin active site (Fig. 3D). Additionally, binding was inhibited by the SPRIEIT-25 peptide spanning the calcineurin docking site of NFAT1 (Fig. 3E), indicating that the complementary surface on calcineurin that interacts with the NFAT SPRIEIT sequence is present within the calcineurin catalytic domain. Because the SPRIEIT peptides do not inhibit calcineurin phosphatase activity (27), the docking region for NFAT on calcineurin is distinct from the calcineurin active site. Thus NFAT binding to the calcineurin catalytic domain involves at least two regions, the docking site on NFAT that was first defined using inactive calcineurin (27), and a region overlapping the calcineurin active site that is constitutively exposed in the calcineurin catalytic domain. In the following sections we show that these same regions are involved in the interaction of NFAT with calmodulin-activated calcineurin.

Peptides Spanning the NFAT Docking Sequence Inhibit the Binding of Activated Calcineurin to NFAT-- The SPAIAIA mutation in the SPRIEIT docking sequence (R112A, E114A, T116A) impaired not only the basal binding of NFAT1 to inactive calcineurin in the absence of calmodulin (27), but also the calmodulin-dependent binding of activated calcineurin to NFAT (Fig. 4A). Moreover the peptides SPRIEIT-25 and SPRIEIT-13 spanning 25 and 13 residues of this docking sequence competed the binding of activated calcineurin to NFAT1(1-415), whereas the peptide SPAIAIA-25, which incorporated the inactivating mutations, did not (Fig. 4A). The concentration of SPRIEIT peptides required for half-maximal inhibition of the binding of activated calcineurin to NFAT1 was ~25 µM (Fig. 4A), compared with the ~12 µM required for half-maximal inhibition of the binding of inactive calcineurin to NFAT (27). The binding of activated calcineurin to NFAT2 and NFAT4 was also inhibited by the SPRIEIT peptides (Fig. 4B) with an IC50 of ~50 µM, again a higher concentration than necessary to inhibit the binding of inactive calcineurin to these proteins (IC50 of ~25 µM) (27). SPRIEIT peptides were also able to inhibit binding of active and inactive calcineurin to the short NFAT1 fragment (97-183) (data not shown).


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   The SPRIEIT peptides spanning the NFAT1 docking site for calcineurin inhibit the binding of activated calcineurin to NFAT. 125I-Calcineurin (14 nM) was incubated with (A) GST-NFAT1 or (B) GST-NFAT2 or GST-NFAT4 in the presence of Ca2+ and calmodulin and the indicated concentrations of the SPRIEIT-25, SPRIEIT-13, and SPAIAIA-25 peptides. A also shows the level of 125I-calcineurin binding to a mutant GST-NFAT1 bearing the SPAIAIA mutation (R112A, E114A, T116A) in the docking sequence. The level of nonspecific binding of calcineurin was monitored by its binding to GST-LSF (LSF).

Drug-Immunophilin Complexes Partially Inhibit the Binding of Activated Calcineurin to NFAT-- To determine whether NFAT binding to active calcineurin involved the calcineurin active site, we tested the effect of FK506·FKBP12 complexes on the binding of active (calmodulin-dependent) and inactive calcineurin to NFAT1(97-183). In both cases binding was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by the drug-immunophilin complexes, but the extent of inhibition was much greater in the case of active compared with inactive calcineurin (~80% versus ~50% inhibition at 10 µM FK506·FKBP12) (Fig. 5, compare panels A and B). Moreover, approximately 10-fold higher concentrations of FK506·FKBP12 were required to achieve equivalent inhibition of inactive versus active calcineurin (i.e. 0.1 µM FK506·FKBP12 sufficed to inhibit binding of active calcineurin by 30%, whereas 1 µM FK506·FKBP12 was required for equivalent inhibition of binding of inactive calcineurin to NFAT; compare Fig. 5, A and B). The immunophilins CyPA and FKBP12 had no effect on the NFAT-calcineurin in the absence of the relevant immunosupressive drugs (data not shown).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Inhibition of the NFAT-calcineurin interaction by drug-immunophilin complexes. 125I-Calcineurin (Cn) (10 nM) was incubated with NFAT1(97-183) and the indicated concentrations of preformed FK506·FKBP12 complexes in the presence (A) or absence (B) of Ca2+ and calmodulin. The average and standard deviation for four independent experiments is shown. Note that error bars for some quadruplicates are too small to be apparent.

The Catalytic Activity of Calcineurin Is Not Required for NFAT-Calcineurin Binding-- Since the previous experiments implicated the calcineurin active site in NFAT-calcineurin binding, we asked whether the catalytic activity of calcineurin was required for binding to NFAT proteins (Fig. 6). Recombinant wild-type calcineurin or the inactive His151 right-arrow Ala mutant were incubated with GST-NFAT2 in the presence or absence of calmodulin. The beads were then washed and the amount of bound calcineurin was assessed by Western blotting with an antibody to the autoinhibitory peptide of calcineurin A, exactly as described previously (15). Fig. 5 shows that there was equivalent binding of the catalytically active and inactive calcineurin to NFAT, indicating that the NFAT-calcineurin interaction does not require the phosphatase activity of calcineurin. Consistent with this result, catalytically inactive calcineurins, when overexpressed, inhibited the nuclear import of NFAT4 (16), indicating that these proteins remained capable of interaction with NFAT.


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   The phosphatase activity of calcineurin is not required for binding to NFAT. The binding of recombinant wild-type (Wt) calcineurin or the catalytically inactive His151 right-arrow Ala mutant (H151A) to GST-NFAT2 in the presence or absence of calmodulin was assessed by Western blotting.

Characteristics of the NFAT-Calcineurin Interaction-- The NFAT-calcineurin interaction is central to the proper regulation of the immune response (6, 35), and also plays a role in the function of cells and tissues outside the immune system (11, 12). We show here that calmodulin-activated calcineurin binds significantly more strongly than does inactive calcineurin to NFAT. The interacting regions are located on the catalytic domain of the calcineurin A chain and on an 86-amino acid fragment of the NFAT regulatory domain. Our results suggest that the interaction of activated calcineurin with NFAT involves at least two functionally separable regions. One of these is the SPRIEIT sequence of NFAT1, which we have previously identified as the docking site for inactive calcineurin in resting cells (27), while the second involves the enzyme active site. The active site interaction is inhibited by the calcineurin autoinhibitory domain and the RII substrate peptide, which bind in the active site, as well as by drug-immunophilin complexes that partially occlude the active site. The active site contact appears to make a substantially stronger contribution to the NFAT-calcineurin interaction under stimulatory conditions, when the calcineurin has been activated with calcium and calmodulin.

These results shed light on previous findings in which calcineurin was shown to coprecipitate with NFAT4 in cell lysates only after activation of the cells (16). It is likely that the Western blotting assay used was insensitive and permitted detection of the NFAT4-calcineurin interaction only under conditions of calcineurin activation. In other work, cells were not previously activated, but coprecipitation of NFAT and calcineurin was assessed using calcineurin bound to calmodulin beads (13, 26), or in the presence of calcium concentrations that allowed activation by calmodulin in the cell lysates (17). Given the fact that activated (dephosphorylated) as well as inactive (phosphorylated) NFAT bind equivalently to calcineurin (13, 26), the increased binding seen under conditions of cell activation reflects the significant increase in NFAT binding to calcineurin in the activated state.

Analysis of deletion mutants of NFAT4 suggested that NFAT possessed multiple regions of interaction with calcineurin (17). In contrast, our data with both NFAT1 and NFAT4 emphasize the importance of the SPRIEIT docking sequence in the NFAT-calcineurin interaction, and point to a major involvement of the (97-183) fragment of NFAT1. Nevertheless the truncation mutants NFAT1(1-96) and NFAT1(140-415) showed weak calmodulin-dependent binding to calcineurin, suggesting that regions outside the SPRIEIT sequence and the (97-183) region might contribute to calcineurin binding. This may be particularly true for NFAT4.

Based on our data, we propose a model for the interaction of calcineurin with NFAT proteins in resting and activated cells. We suggest that NFAT is targeted to inactive calcineurin via the SPRIEIT docking sequence (and possibly other regions within the (97-183) NFAT1 fragment). This targeting interaction involves a region of the calcineurin catalytic domain that does not overlap the calcineurin active site and ensures the proximity of the enzyme to its substrate in resting cells. Upon cell activation, displacement of the autoinhibitory domain of calcineurin by calmodulin allows NFAT to bind additionally to the calcineurin active site, positioning specific regulatory phosphoserine residues of NFAT for immediate dephosphorylation. Further analysis of this dynamic interaction will facilitate our understanding of how calcineurin regulates NFAT-mediated gene transcription. Moreover it may speed the development of new immunosuppressive drugs that block the NFAT-calcineurin interaction but lack the deleterious site effects of cyclosporin A and FK506.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Jun Liu, Brian Perrino, Fernando Macian, Christopher Walsh, and Patrick Hogan for gifts of reagents and many helpful discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant AI 40127 (to A. R.), a Formación de Personal Investigador postdoctoral fellowship award from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Education (to F. J. G.-C.), a Cancer Research Institute fellowship (to H. O.), a Medical Research Council fellowship (to K. T. Y. S.), an Arthritis Foundation postdoctoral fellowship (to J. F. A.), and a Leukemia Society of America scholar award (to A. R).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Present address: National Institute of Aging, National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Program, Gerontology Research Center, 5600 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224.

parallel To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, The Center for Blood Research, 200 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-278-3260/3261; Fax: 617-278-3280; E-mail: arao{at}cbr.med.harvard.edu.

The abbreviations used are: NFAT, nuclear factor of activated T cells, CsA, cyclosporin A; GST, glutathione S-transferaseCyPA, cyclophilin AFKBP, FK506-binding proteinCnCAT, catalytic domain of calcineurinLSF, late SV40 transcription factor.
    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results & Discussion
References

  1. McCaffrey, P. G., Luo, C., Kerppola, T. K., Jain, J., Badalian, T. M., Ho, A. M., Burgeon, E., Lane, W. S., Lambert, J. N., Curran, T., Verdine, G. L., Rao, A., and Hogan, P. G. (1993) Science 262, 750-754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Northrop, J. P., Ho, S. N., Chen, L., Thomas, D. J., Timmerman, L. A., Nolan, G. P., Admon, A., and Crabtree, G. R. (1994) Nature 369, 497-502[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Masuda, E., Naito, Y., Tokumitsu, H., Campbell, D., Saito, F., Hannum, C., Arai, K.-I., and Arai, N. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2697-2706[Abstract]
  4. Hoey, T., Sun, Y. L., Williamson, K., and Xu, X. (1995) Immunity 2, 461-472[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Luo, C., Burgeon, E., Carew, J. A., McCaffrey, P. G., Badalian, T. M., Lane, W. S., Hogan, P. G., and Rao, A. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3955-3966[Abstract]
  6. Rao, A., Luo, C., and Hogan, P. G. (1997) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15, 707-747[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Shaw, K. T., Ho, A. M., Raghavan, A., Kim, J., Jain, J., Park, J., Sharma, S., Rao, A., and Hogan, P. G. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 11205-11209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Aramburu, J., Azzoni, L., Rao, A., and Perussia, B. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 182, 801-810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Cockerill, G. W., Bert, A. G., Ryan, G. R., Gamble, J. R., Vadas, M. A., and Cockerill, P. N. (1995) Blood 86, 2689-2698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ho, A. M., Jain, J., Rao, A., and Hogan, P. G. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 28181-28186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Delapompa, J. L., Timmerman, L. A., Takimoto, H., Yoshida, H., Elia, A. J., Samper, E., Potter, J., Wakeham, A., Marengere, L., Langille, B. L., Crabtree, G. R., and Mak, T. W. (1998) Nature 392, 182-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Ranger, A. M., Grusby, M. J., Hodge, M. R., Gravallese, E. M., Delabrousse, F. C., Hoey, T., Mickanin, C., Baldwin, H. S., and Glimcher, L. H. (1998) Nature 392, 186-190[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Loh, C., Shaw, K. T., Carew, J., Viola, J. P., Luo, C., Perrino, B. A., and Rao, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 10884-10891[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Luo, C., Burgeon, E., and Rao, A. (1996b) J. Exp. Med. 184, 141-147[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Luo, C., Shaw, K. T., Raghavan, A., Aramburu, J., Garcia-Cozar, F., Perrino, B. A., Hogan, P. G., and Rao, A. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 8907-8912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Shibasaki, F., Price, E. R., Milan, D., and McKeon, F. (1996) Nature 382, 370-373[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Masuda, E. S., Liu, J., Imamura, R., Imai, S. I., Arai, K. I., and Arai, N. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2066-2075[Abstract]
  18. Beals, C. R., Clipstone, N. A., Ho, S. N., and Crabtree, G. R. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 824-834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Loh, C., Carew, J. A., Kim, J., Hogan, P. G., and Rao, A. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3945-3954[Abstract]
  20. Timmerman, L. A., Clipstone, N. A., Ho, S. N., Northrop, J. P., and Crabtree, G. R. (1996) Nature 383, 837-840[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Jain, J., McCaffrey, P. G., Valge-Archer, V. E., and Rao, A. (1992) Nature 356, 801-803[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Jain, J., McCaffrey, P. G., Miner, Z., Kerppola, T. K., Lambert, J. N., Verdine, G. L., Curran, T., and Rao, A. (1993) Nature 365, 352-355[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Chytil, M., and Verdine, G. L. (1996) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6, 91-100[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Chen, L., Glover, J. N. M., Hogan, P. G., Rao, A., and Harrison, S. C. (1998) Nature 392, 42-48[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Klee, C. B., Draetta, G. F., and Hubbard, M. J. (1988) Adv. Enzymol. 61, 149-200
  26. Wesselborg, S., Fruman, D. A., Sagoo, J. K., Bierer, B. E., and Burakoff, S. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1274-1277[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Aramburu, J., Garcia-Cozar, F. J., Raghavan, A., Okamura, H., Rao, A., and Hogan, P. G. (1998) Mol. Cell 1, 627-637[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Sikkink, R., Haddy, A., MacKelvie, S., Mertz, P., Litwiller, R., and Rusnak, F. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 8348-8356[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Manalan, A., and Klee, C. B. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 4291-4295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Hubbard, M. J., and Klee, C. B. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 1868-1874[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Hashimoto, Y., Perrino, B. A., and Soderling, T. R. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 1924-1927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kissinger, C. R., Parge, H. E., Knighton, D. R., Lewis, C. T., Pelletier, L. A., Tempczyk, A., Kalish, V. J., Tucker, K. D., Showalter, R. E., Moomaw, E. W., Gastinel, L. N., Habuka, N., Chen, X., Maldonado, F., Barker, J. E., Bacquet, R., and Villafranca, J. E. (1995) Nature 378, 641-644[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Griffith, J. P., Kim, J. L., Kim, E. E., Sintchak, M. D., Thomson, J. A., Fitzgibbon, M. J., Fleming, M. A., Caron, P. R., Hsiao, K., and Navia, M. A. (1995) Cell 82, 507-522[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Schreiber, S. L., and Crabtree, G. R. (1992) Immunol. Today 13, 136-142[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Crabtree, G. R., and Clipstone, N. A. (1994) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63, 1045-1083[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Liu, J. (1993) Immunol. Today 14, 290-295[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Bierer, B. E., Hollander, G., Fruman, D., and Burakoff, S. J. (1993) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 5, 763-773[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Shirra, M. K., Zhu, Q., Huang, H.-C., Pallas, D., and Hansen, U. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 5076-5087[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Mondragon, A., Griffith, E. C., Sun, L., Xiong, F., Armstrong, C., and Liu, J. O. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 4934-4942[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Blumenthal, D. K., Takio, K., Hansen, R. S., and Krebs, E. G. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 8140-8145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Nalefski, E. A., Shaw, K. T. Y., and Rao, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22351-22360[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
C. Faul, A. Dhume, A. D. Schecter, and P. Mundel
Protein Kinase A, Ca2+/Calmodulin-Dependent Kinase II, and Calcineurin Regulate the Intracellular Trafficking of Myopodin between the Z-Disc and the Nucleus of Cardiac Myocytes
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2007; 27(23): 8215 - 8227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
R. I. Jabr, A. J. Wilson, M. H. Riddervold, A. H. Jenkins, B. A. Perrino, and L. H. Clapp
Nuclear translocation of calcineurin Abeta but not calcineurin A{alpha} by platelet-derived growth factor in rat aortic smooth muscle
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): C2213 - C2225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Martinez-Martinez, A. Rodriguez, M. D. Lopez-Maderuelo, I. Ortega-Perez, J. Vazquez, and J. M. Redondo
Blockade of NFAT Activation by the Second Calcineurin Binding Site
J. Biol. Chem., March 10, 2006; 281(10): 6227 - 6235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S.-C. Miaw, B. Y. Kang, I. A. White, and I-C. Ho
A Repressor of GATA-Mediated Negative Feedback Mechanism of T Cell Activation
J. Immunol., January 1, 2004; 172(1): 170 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-j. Kim, W. Ding, B. Albrecht, P. L. Green, and M. D. Lairmore
A Conserved Calcineurin-binding Motif in Human T Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 p12I Functions to Modulate Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cell Activation
J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2003; 278(18): 15550 - 15557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. van Rooij, P. A. Doevendans, C. C. de Theije, F. A. Babiker, J. D. Molkentin, and L. J. De Windt
Requirement of Nuclear Factor of Activated T-cells in Calcineurin-mediated Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy
J. Biol. Chem., December 6, 2002; 277(50): 48617 - 48626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
Y. Liu, Z. Cseresnyes, W. R. Randall, and M. F. Schneider
Activity-dependent nuclear translocation and intranuclear distribution of NFATc in adult skeletal muscle fibers
J. Cell Biol., October 1, 2001; 155(1): 27 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J. E. Miskin, C. C. Abrams, and L. K. Dixon
African Swine Fever Virus Protein A238L Interacts with the Cellular Phosphatase Calcineurin via a Binding Domain Similar to That of NFAT
J. Virol., October 15, 2000; 74(20): 9412 - 9420.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
J. J. Fuentes, L. Genesca, T. J. Kingsbury, K. W. Cunningham, M. Perez-Riba, X. Estivill, and S. d. l. Luna
DSCR1, overexpressed in Down syndrome, is an inhibitor of calcineurin-mediated signaling pathways
Hum. Mol. Genet., July 1, 2000; 9(11): 1681 - 1690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Park, M. Uesugi, and G. L. Verdine
A second calcineurin binding site on the NFAT regulatory domain
PNAS, June 20, 2000; 97(13): 7130 - 7135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Tokoyoda, Y. Takemoto, T. Nakayama, T. Arai, and M. Kubo
Synergism between the Calmodulin-binding and Autoinhibitory Domains on Calcineurin Is Essential for the Induction of Their Phosphatase Activity
J. Biol. Chem., April 14, 2000; 275(16): 11728 - 11734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
C.-W. Chow and R. J. Davis
Integration of Calcium and Cyclic AMP Signaling Pathways by 14-3-3
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2000; 20(2): 702 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. Aramburu, M. B. Yaffe, C. López-Rodríguez, L. C. Cantley, P. G. Hogan, and A. Rao
Affinity-Driven Peptide Selection of an NFAT Inhibitor More Selective Than Cyclosporin A
Science, September 24, 1999; 285(5436): 2129 - 2133.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Jiang and M. S. Cyert
Identification of a Novel Region Critical for Calcineurin Function in Vivo and in Vitro
J. Biol. Chem., June 25, 1999; 274(26): 18543 - 18551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Nishimura and T. Tanaka
Calcium-dependent Activation of Nuclear Factor Regulated by Interleukin 3/Adenovirus E4 Promoter-binding Protein Gene Expression by Calcineurin/Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells and Calcium/Calmodulin-dependent Protein Kinase Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., June 1, 2001; 276(23): 19921 - 19928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow