|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 37, 24249-24257, September 11, 1998
A p56lck-independent Pathway of CD2
Signaling Involves Jun Kinase*
Raute
Sunder-Plassmann and
Ellis L.
Reinherz§
From the Laboratory of Immunobiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Massachusetts 02115
 |
ABSTRACT |
The p56 Src family non-receptor
tyrosine kinase has been shown to be critical for T lymphocyte
differentiation and activation. Hence in the absence of p56,
T cell receptor triggered activation does not occur. We now provide
evidence for a CD2-based signaling pathway which, in contrast to that
of the T cell receptor, is independent of p56. CD2-mediated
interleukin-2 production occurs via activation of Jun kinase in cell
lines lacking p56. Jun kinase then facilitates the binding
of c-Jun/c-Fos heterodimers to the AP-1 consensus site and the
subsequent transcriptional activity of the interleukin-2 promoter.
These data elucidate differences between TCR and CD2 signaling pathways
in the same T cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
CD2 is a cell surface glycoprotein which is expressed on immature
thymocytes and on mature T cells and NK cells (1-3). The ligand for
human CD2 is CD58 (LFA-3), a ubiquitously expressed cell surface
protein found on many cell types including antigen presenting cells (4,
5). Unlike integrins such as CD11a/CD18 (LFA-1), the adhesion between
CD2 and CD58 is not dependent on TCR1 triggering (6, 7).
Rather, the CD2-CD58 interaction between T cells and their cognate
partners facilitates the T cell recognition process and subsequent T
cell activation (8-10).
Cross-linking of CD2 molecules by specific pairs of mAbs recognizing
distinct epitopes on human CD2 initiates a signaling cascade which
leads to T cell cytokine production, proliferation, and cytolytic
activity (11-13). For optimal mAb-mediated activation two antibody
specificities are needed, one directed against conventional CD2
epitopes and the second against an activation-associated epitope of
CD2, termed CD2R. The CD2R epitope has recently been mapped to the
flexible linker region between the two extracellular domains of CD2
(14). Its appearance coincides with reorientation of the adhesion
domain (D1) relative to the membrane proximal domain (D2) of the CD2
extracellular segment. Such domain reorientation occurs upon CD58
binding to CD2 and following T cell activation (14). Furthermore, the
CD2 interaction with CD58 regulates the responsiveness of activated
human T cells to IL-12 (15, 16). Hence, both IL-12-stimulated T cell
proliferation and interferon- production are markedly augmented by
CD2 ligation. Finally, some studies have uncovered a unique role for
CD2 in the regulation of anergy (17). Stimulation of anergized
alloreactive T cells with a combination of specific alloantigen in
conjunction with CD2-CD58 co-receptor ligation reverses the anergic
state. In contrast, identical allostimulation but in the absence of
CD2-CD58 co-ligation on T cells and allostimulators, respectively,
fails to restore responsiveness (17).
Signaling through CD2 is dependent on its cytoplasmic domain (8,
18-20). Comparison of CD2 from various species shows the highest
homology occurring in this segment (21, 22). While the cytoplasmic
domain has no intrinsic protein-tyrosine kinase activity and no
tyrosine residues which might serve as docking sites for SH2 domains
upon phosphorylation (reviewed in Refs. 23 and 24), stimulation via CD2
leads to the tyrosine phosphorylation of several intracellular proteins
(25-27). For these activation events CD2 signaling requires the
presence of the CD3 chain in T cells (27-31) or Fc RI in CD16
expressing NK cells (32).
The CD2 tail contains several proline-rich regions (19). Two of these
(PPPGHR) are known to be important in inducing IL-2 production (33).
Related proline-rich sequences bind to SH3 domains of non-receptor
protein-tyrosine kinases of the Src family (23). For example, the SH3
domain of p56 has been shown to bind to the rat CD2
cytoplasmic tail at least in vitro (34). Peptides corresponding to residues 269-270 and 200-310 (according to the human
CD2 numbers) bind to p56-GST fusion proteins (34). In vivo intracellular colocalization experiments, however, suggest, that p59 rather than p56 has a predominant
association with CD2 (35), perhaps by binding through the
p59 SH3 domain.
The activation of protein tyrosine kinases is one of the proximal steps
in signaling cascades which ultimately lead to the activation of T cell
effector function. For p56 it has been shown that this
kinase is involved in the activation of the Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway (36).
The function of MAPK is manifold. Several studies reported that MAPK
can phosphorylate and activate the transcription factors ELK, Jun, and
Stat-1 and thereby participates in the regulation of gene expression
(37). A different pathway leading to Jun activation is the Rac/JNK
pathway (38). Recently, the Pyk2 tyrosine kinase has been described,
shown to be involved in the activation of JNK (39), and has been linked
to TCR signaling via p59 (40).
In this study, we have begun to dissect the differences in TCR- and
CD2-based signaling pathways. Since p56 is thought to be
most important at a proximal step in CD3 signaling, we investigated the
role p56 plays in CD2 signaling. To this end, we have
employed the Jurkat variant JCaM1.6s which lacks functional
p56 and is unable to transmit TCR signals leading to IL-2
production. We here report that although the TCR pathway is not
functional in JCaM1.6s, these cells can be induced to produce IL-2 by
stimulation via CD2. Furthermore, we present evidence for a
p56-independent CD2 signal transduction pathway which uses
Pyk2 and JNK and leads to the binding of c-Jun/c-Fos heterodimers to
the AP-1 consensus site, important for initiation of IL-2
transcription.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Lines and Antibodies
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): anti-T111,
anti-T112, and anti-T113 recognizing different
epitopes of human CD2 (11) and the anti-human CD3 mAbs 2AD2A2 and
RW28C8 (41) were developed in our laboratory at Dana Farber Cancer
Institute, Boston, MA. 4G10 (anti-phosphotyrosine, IgG2b) was kindly
provided by Tom Roberts (Dana Farber Cancer Institute). Rabbit antisera
against ZAP70, p56, and Pyk2 were kind gifts from J. Bolen
(DNAX, Palo Alto, CA), A. Veillette (McGill Cancer Center, Montreal,
Quebec, Canada), and J. Schlessinger (New York University Medical
Center, New York), respectively. Antibodies against PLC- 1 were
obtained from Upstate Biotechnology Inc., Lake Placid, NY, and rabbit
antisera against p59, Erk1/MAPK, JNK, c-Jun, JunB, JunD,
c-Fos, Fra1, Fra2, and FosB were purchased from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA. Rabbit antiserum against pMAPK was
obtained from New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA.
Cell Lines--
The Jurkat variant, JCaM1.6, that lacks
p56 (42) was obtained from ATCC (Rockville, MD) and sorted
for high CD2 and CD3 expression (JCaM1.6s) and further sorted for those
cells which show a fast and high rise in intracellular free
Ca2+ levels following CD2 stimulation (JCaM1.6s.S3). Both
JCaM1.6s and JCaM1.6s.S3 were analyzed for p56 by in
vitro kinase activity and p56 was found to be not
enzymatically active. J77 is a
CD2posCD3posCD8neg subclone of the
Jurkat cell line (29).
Ca2+ Assay
Ca2+ assay was performed as described (43). Increase
in intracellular free Ca2+ in Indo-1 (Molecular Probes
Inc., Eugene, OR) loaded cells was induced by either a combination of
the anti-CD2 mAbs anti-T112 and anti-T113
(1:100) or 20 µg/ml biotinylated RW28C8 alone or by further
cross-linking with 100 µg/ml avidin (Sigma). Maximal Ca2+
influx was induced by the addition of 10 µg/ml 4-bromo-calcium ionophore A23187 (Sigma). The analysis was performed on an EPICS V cell
sorter (Coulter, Hialeah, FL).
Analysis of Tyrosine Phosphorylation
Immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously (43).
In brief, cells (1 × 107) were stimulated for 5 min
at 37 °C with either a combination of the anti-CD2 mAbs
anti-T112 and anti-T113 (1:100) or the
anti-CD3 mAb 2AD2A2 (1:100). Cells were then washed with ice-cold
TBS (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl),
resuspended in lysis buffer (1 × 107 cells/ml; 1%
Triton X-100 in TBS, 10 µg/ml leupeptin (Sigma), 0.2 TIU/ml aprotinin
(Sigma), 1 mM PMSF (Sigma), 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4 (Fisher Scientific, Fair
Lawn, NJ), 5 mM
Na2H2P2O7 (Sigma), and
5 mM sodium fluoride (Fisher) or 25 mM
-glycerophosphate (Sigma)) and rotated for 30 min at 4 °C
followed by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 5 min.
Proteins were immunoprecipitated from 1 ml of postnuclear lysate with
10 µl of GammaBind Plus-Sepharose (Pharmacia Biotech Inc., Uppsala,
Sweden) preincubated with the respective Abs. Beads bound immune
complexes were washed with lysis buffer and TBS and were eluted by
boiling in SDS (Laemmli) sample buffer. The samples were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE and Western blotted as described below.
In Vitro Kinase Assay--
Lysis of cells (1 × 107 cells/ml) and immunoprecipitation was carried out as
described above. After washing with lysis buffer and kinase buffer (100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MnCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4) the
beads bound immune complexes were resuspended in 50 µl of kinase
buffer containing 2 µM ATP and were incubated with 10 µCi of [ -32P]ATP for 15 min at room temperature.
Kinase reaction was stopped by addition of ice-cold lysis buffer
containing 20 mM EDTA. After washing 3 times with lysis
buffer/EDTA and once with Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, the phosphorylated proteins
were eluted by boiling in SDS sample buffer. The proteins were analyzed
by 9% SDS-PAGE and after drying the gels were subjected to
autoradiography. Some in vitro kinase assays were carried
out in the presence of 10 µg/sample poly(Glu-Tyr) (4:1) (Sigma). The
kinase reaction was stopped by boiling in SDS sample buffer and the
samples were further processed as described above.
Western Blotting--
Western blotting onto nitrocellulose
membranes of proteins resolved by SDS-PAGE was performed according to
standard procedures. Protein detection was carried out by incubating
the membranes with 1:1000 dilutions of specific mAbs (4G10, PLC- 1)
or rabbit heteroantisera (ZAP70, p56, p59, Pyk2,
pMAPK, Erk1/MAPK, Raf) for 1 h at room temperature. The blots were
washed with TBS/Triton X-100 (0.05%) and incubated with 1:2000
dilutions of HRPO-labeled anti-mouse IgG2b, anti-mouse IgG, or
anti-rabbit Abs (Caltag Laboratories, San Francisco, CA), respectively,
for 1 h at room temperature. After washing with TBS/Triton X-100,
the proteins were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL Western
blotting detection reagents, Amersham International, Little Chalfont,
Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) and exposing the membranes to films
for various time intervals. Unspecific binding of Abs was inhibited by
preincubating the membranes with blocking buffer (TBS containing either
5% fetal calf serum or 5% non-fat dry milk and 10 mM
NaN3) for at least 2 h at room temperature.
Jun Kinase Assay
1 × 107 cells were stimulated for 30 min at
37 °C with either a combination of the anti-CD2 mAbs
anti-T112 and anti-T113 (1:100), the
anti-CD3 mAb 2AD2A2 (1:100), or 25 ng/ml phorbol ester (PMA). Cells
were then washed with ice-cold TBS and lysed for 30 min at 4 °C in
100 µl of JNK-lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.7, 300 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Triton
X-100, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.2 mM EDTA, 2 µg/ml
leupeptin (Sigma), 1 mM PMSF (Sigma), 0.1 mM
Na3VO4 (Fisher Scientific), 20 mM
-glycerophosphate (Sigma) followed by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 5 min. The supernatants were then diluted 1:4 to a
final concentration of 20 mM HEPES pH 7.7, 75 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.05%
Triton X-100, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.1 mM EDTA, 2 µg/ml leupeptin (Sigma), 1 mM PMSF (Sigma), 0.1 mM Na3VO4 (Fisher Scientific), 20 mM -glycerophosphate (Sigma) and rotated for 4 h at
4 °C with 10 µl of GammaBind Plus-Sepharose (Pharmacia)
preincubated with anti-JNK Ab. Bead-bound immune complexes were washed
with lysis buffer and kinase buffer (20 mM
MgCl2, 20 mM -glycerophosphate, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 2 mM DTT, 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4) and subsequently resuspended in 50 µl
of kinase buffer containing 20 µM ATP and 2 µg/sample
GST-Jun fusion protein (kindly provided by M. Karin) and were incubated
with 5 µCi of [ -32P]ATP for 20 min at 30 °C. The
kinase reaction was stopped by boiling in SDS (Laemmli) sample buffer
and the samples were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE and after drying the
gels were subjected to autoradiography.
IL-2 Production Assay
1 × 105 cells/well were stimulated in Immulon
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plates (Dynatech Laboratories Inc.,
Chantilly, VA) with either PMA alone (25 ng/ml, Sigma), PMA plus a
combination of the anti-CD2 mAbs anti-T112 and
anti-T113 (1:100), PMA plus the anti-CD3 mAb RW28C8 (1 µg/well, precoated overnight onto the plates at 4 °C) or PMA plus
calcium ionophore A23187 (1 µg/ml). After 48 h culture
supernatants were harvested and examined by human IL-2 specific
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Endogen Inc., Cambridge, MA).
Nuclear Extracts and EMSA
5 × 107 cells, unstimulated or stimulated for
4 or 6 h at 37 °C with either a combination of stimulatory
anti-CD2 (anti-T112 plus anti-T113, 1:100) or
with a 1:100 dilution of anti-CD3 mAb 2AD2A2, were incubated on ice
for 15 min with 400 µl of ice-cold Buffer A (10 mM HEPES
pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2,
0.5 mM DTT, 0.2 mM PMSF) and spun at 13,000 rpm
for 10 s. The pellets were resuspended in 100 µl of ice-cold
buffer C (10 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 420 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 25% (v/v)
glycerol, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.2 mM PMSF) and left for
30 min on ice. After spinning for 5 min at full speed, the supernatants
were removed, aliquoted, and stored at 80 °C. The protein
concentration in the supernatants was determined by BCA Assay (Pierce)
and 10 µg/sample were used in the EMSA.
The double-stranded oligonucleotides (AP1 consensus, NF- B consensus,
NF-AT consensus, and Oct 1 consensus) and the Abs for the supershifts
(anti-c-Jun, JunB, JunD, c-Fos, FRA1, FRA2, Fos-B, NF- B p50 and p65)
used in these EMSA were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
10 µg of NE were incubated in binding buffer (10 mM HEPES
pH 7.5, 30 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 12% (v/v) glycerol, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.2 mM PMSF) for 30 min on ice with 2 µg of poly(dI-dC) (Boehringer Mannheim) and either 2 µl of the respective Ab or a
100-fold excess of unlabeled oligonucleotide as competitor. Subsequently, 0.5 ng of 32P-labeled oligo were added and
incubated with the NE at room temperature for an additional 20 min. The
proteins were separated on 5.2 (EMSA) or 4% (supershift) gels. The
gels were dried and subjected to autoradiography.
 |
RESULTS |
The CD2posCD3pos JCaM1.6s Cells do Not
Express p56lck--
JCaM1.6 is a Jurkat cell line variant,
which lacks functional p56 and is unresponsive to TCR
stimulation such that it fails to generate IL-2 upon anti-CD3
cross-linking (42). To exclude the possibility that different TCR
and/or CD2 surface expression levels between Jurkat and JCaM1.6 might
account for a component of the signaling defect, JCaM1.6 cells were
sorted on a FACSVantage for high co-expression of both CD2 and CD3,
equivalent to the surface expression number of these receptors found on
the Jurkat line J77 (Fig. 1A).
The sorted JCaM1.6 (referred to as JCaM1.6s) as well as JCaM1.6s cells,
further sorted for maximal Ca2+ mobilization upon CD2
cross-linking (termed JCaM1.6s.S3), were analyzed by in
vitro kinase assay for p56 autophosphorylation and
poly(Glu-Tyr) substrate phosphorylation activity. As shown in Fig.
1B, and in contrast to J77, JCaM1.6s does not express detectable amounts of functional p56, as judged by in
vitro autophosphorylation of unstimulated, anti-CD2-, or
anti-CD3 -stimulated JCaM1.6s cells. Similarly, by in
vitro kinase assay, anti-p56 antibody
immunoprecipitates from JCaM1.6s.S3 cells do not reveal
autophosphorylation activity or any enzymatic activity using the
poly(Glu-Tyr) substrate (data not shown).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The phenotype and p56 in
vitro kinase activity of J77 and JCaM1.6s. A, J77
(parental Jurkat cells) and JCaM1.6s cells were stained with
anti-T111 (anti-CD2) or RW28C8 (anti-CD3 ) mAbs and
analyzed on a FACScan. The x axis indicates the log
fluorescence intensity. Equal expression of CD2 or CD3 is shown for
both cell lines. B, J77 or JCaM1.6s cells were left
unstimulated or were stimulated via CD2 (anti-T112 plus
anti-T113 mAbs) or CD3 (2AD2A2 mAb). Lysates were
immunoprecipitated with a p56-specific antiserum, subjected
to in vitro kinase assay and analyzed on SDS-PAGE followed
by autoradiography. The arrows indicate the migration
position of p56.
|
|
CD2 Stimulation in the Absence of p56lck Leads to a
Prolonged and High Amplitude Rise in Intracellular Free
Ca2+--
Although TCR cross-linking by anti-CD3 mAb or
anticlonotypic mAb does not activate JCaM1.6 cells (42), the status of
the CD2 pathway in these cells was not defined. To first address the integrity of CD2 mediated signaling, we analyzed Ca2+
mobilization in both JCaM1.6s, the Ca2+ sorted JCaM1.6 s.S3
and J77 following anti-CD2 or anti-CD3 stimulation. In contrast to
J77, in which both anti-CD2 and anti-CD3 mAbs induced a long lasting
and high rise in intracellular free Ca2+, only anti-CD2
stimulation via the combination of anti-T112 plus anti-T113 mAbs resulted in a substantial Ca2+
influx in JCaM1.6s (data not shown). After sorting, the
Ca2+ response of JCaM1.6s.S3 to anti-CD2 stimulation was
equal or even higher than in J77 (Fig.
2A). Addition of biotinylated
anti-CD3 mAb alone was not sufficient for Ca2+
mobilization in JCaM1.6s (data not shown) or in JCaM1.6s.S3 (Fig. 2A). Rather extensive cross-linking of the biotinylated
anti-CD3 mAb by avidin was required to lead to a detectable
Ca2+ transient. This appears as a low magnitude rise in
Ca2+ of short duration and most probably is due to the
initial release of Ca2+ from intracellular Ca2+
stores (Fig. 2A) (41, 44, 45).

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Analysis of [Ca2+]i
in J77 and JCaM1.6s.S3. A,
Ca2+ mobilization in J77 and JCaM1.6s.S3. Cells were loaded
with Indo-1. Calcium flux was then analyzed on an EPICS V flow
cytometer. Where indicated, a combination of the anti-CD2 mAbs
anti-T112 plus anti-T113 (CD2) or biotinylated
anti-CD3 mAb RW28C8 ( CD3 biot), avidin, and Ca2+
ionophore were added sequentially. B, tyrosine
phosphorylation of PLC- 1 in J77 and JCaM1.6s.S3. Cells were either
unstimulated ( ) or stimulated with a combination of anti-CD2 mAbs or
the anti-CD3 mAb 2AD2A2 and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated
with anti-PLC- 1 Ab. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE
followed by Western blotting with anti-phosphotyrosine mAb 4G10
(left panel). The stripped blots were subsequently
immunoblotted with PLC- 1 Ab (right panel). The migration
position of PLC- 1 is indicated by the arrows (at ~135
kDa).
|
|
PLC- 1 Is Tyrosine Phosphorylated and Activated by CD2
Stimulation in the Absence of p56lck--
Given that
phosphorylation and activation of PLC- 1 leads to increased
phosphatidylinositol turnover and the release of Ca2+
from intracellular Ca2+ stores (45, 46), the
phosphorylation status of PLC- 1 was determined prior to and
following stimulation in the J77 and JCaM1.6s cells. In J77, the
stimulation via both CD2 and CD3 results in a strong tyrosine
phosphorylation of PLC- 1 as shown by anti-Tyr(P) Western blot
analysis of anti-PLC- 1 immunoprecipitations (Fig. 2B). In
contrast, only activation via CD2 leads to a clear tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC- 1 in JCaM1.6s (Fig. 2B), whereas
anti-CD3 stimulation had a minor effect (Fig. 2B). These
differences were not a consequence of gel loading of the anti-PLC- 1
immunoprecipitates as revealed by sequential Western blotting with
anti-PLC- 1 antibody.
CD2 but Not CD3 Stimulation Results in Interleukin 2 Production in the Absence of p56lck--
To next determine
whether the CD2 pathway in JCaM1.6s could elicit IL-2 production, we
determined the levels of IL-2 secretion in the supernatant of anti-CD2
stimulated JCaM1.6s cells in a human IL-2 specific enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (Table I) and by
intracellular staining of IL-2 in these stimulated JCaM1.6s (data not
shown). Parallel analysis was performed in the same cells following
anti-CD3 mAb stimulation. As shown in Table I, stimulation via CD2
in JCaM1.6s cells results in substantial IL-2 production, in fact to a
level equivalent to 50% of the maximal induction measured upon
bypassing receptor triggering with the combination of calcium ionophore
plus PMA. In contrast, and as expected, no IL-2 production is induced
by TCR cross-linking by anti-CD3 . Data from different subclones of
JCaM1.6s obtained by sequential sorting for Ca2+
mobilization following CD2 stimulation are shown (JCaM1.6s.S1, JCaM1.6s.S2, and JCaM1.6s.S3). The amount of IL-2 produced increases with enhanced Ca2+ responsiveness to CD2 stimulation.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
CD2 triggering induces IL-2 production in the absence of p56
Cell culture supernatants were analyzed for IL-2 content after 48 h stimulation with A23187, -CD3 mAb RW28C8, or -CD2 mAbs
anti-T112 plus anti-T113; or after no stimulation
(none). PMA was added to all wells at 25 ng/ml. S.D. of triplicate
samples <5% for all entries.
|
|
Neither p59fyn nor ZAP70 Are Detectably Tyrosine
Phosphorylated following CD2 Stimulation in JCaM1.6s--
Tyrosine
phosphorylation and activation of kinases such as the Src kinases
p56 or p59 or the related tyrosine kinase ZAP70 are major events in TCR signaling and are also thought to be involved in signal transduction via CD2 (47). The Jurkat variant JCaM1.6s gives
us the opportunity to investigate these events in the absence of
p56. To this end, we performed a series of Western blots
with J77 and JCaM1.6s cells following anti-CD2 or anti-CD3
stimulation. In J77, activation via both CD2 and CD3 results in the
tyrosine phosphorylation of p56 and the appearance of a
second p60 band due to the serine/threonine phosphorylation
of p56 (48) (Fig. 3A,
upper panel). As expected, both lck bands are absent in
the phosphotyrosine blot of p56 immunoprecipitates from
JCaM1.6s. Note that the p58 band appearing in the Tyr(P) blot of both
J77 and JCaM1.6s is nonspecific, being unrelated to p56.
Reanalysis of the stripped blot with anti-lck antiserum
shows that these p56- and p60-phosphorylated proteins in J77 indeed
represent p56 (Fig. 3A, lower panel).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Analysis of protein-tyrosine kinase
activation in J77 and JCaM1.6s.S3. Cells were either unstimulated
( ) or stimulated with either a combination of the anti-CD2 mAbs
anti-T112 plus anti-T113 ( CD2) or
the anti-CD3 mAb 2AD2A2 ( CD3) and cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with antisera specific for p56, ZAP70, or
p59, respectively. Immunoprecipitates in panels
A-C using the designated Abs were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed
by Western blotting with anti-phosphotyrosine mAb 4G10 (upper
row). The blots were stripped and subsequently immunoblotted with
the respective Abs (lower row). The migration positions of
p56, ZAP70, or p59 are indicated by
arrows.
|
|
In J77, stimulation via the CD3 pathway leads to a strong tyrosine
phosphorylation of ZAP70, whereas activation via CD2 induces weaker but
definite ZAP70 phosphorylation (Fig. 3B, upper panel). In
contrast to this observation, in JCaM1.6s neither CD2 nor CD3 stimulation induce the phosphorylation of ZAP70 (Fig. 3B, upper panel). Nevertheless, similar amounts of ZAP70 were
immunoprecipitated in each lane, as shown by the results of reprobing
the stripped Tyr(P) blot with an anti-ZAP70 rabbit antiserum (Fig.
3B, lower panel).
In both J77 and JCaM1.6s, the tyrosine phosphorylation of
p59 increases minimally if at all after either CD2 or CD3
stimulation (Fig. 3C, upper panel). The corresponding
p59 blot probed with anti-p59 antibody is shown
in Fig. 3C, lower panel. Note that the band below
p59 is related to immunoglobulin heavy chain.
The Ras-MAPK Pathway Is Not Functional in the Absence of
p56lck--
TCR stimulation of T cells leads to the
activation of Ras resulting in the serine phosphorylation and
activation of Raf, then subsequently the activation of the MAPK
signaling cascade and finally to the initiation of IL-2 transcription
(49). We investigated the activation of Raf and MAPK by Western
blotting of the total lysate of either unstimulated or anti-CD2 or
anti-CD3 stimulated J77 or JCaM1.6s.S3 cells with rabbit antisera
specific for Raf, pMAPK, or MAPK (Fig. 4,
A-C). In J77, both CD2 and CD3 stimulation induced the
phosphorylation and molecular weight shift of Raf (Fig. 4A)
and the subsequent phosphorylation of MAPK as shown by Western blotting
with antisera specific for the phospho-MAPK (Fig. 4B). In
contrast, in JCaM1.6s.S3 stimulation via CD2 had no effect on either
kinase (Fig. 4, A and B). Surprisingly, anti-CD3 triggering in JCaM1.6s.S3 led to the phosphorylation and molecular weight shift of Raf (Fig. 4A) but not to the functional
activation of Raf as judged by the very low or absent phosphorylation
of MAPK (Fig. 4B). As shown in Fig. 4C by
sequential immunoblotting with a MAPK specific antiserum, the described
differences were not due to different amounts of MAPK in the total
lysates. Similarly, in J77, but not in JCaM1.6s.S3, stimulation via
either CD2 or CD3 enhanced the kinase activity of MAPK toward myelin
basic protein in an in vitro kinase assay (data not shown).
Additionally, CD2 stimulated IL-2 production in JCaM1.6s.S3 was not
inhibited by coculture with the MEK1-inhibitor PD98059, which
interferes with the MAPK pathway upstream of MAPK (data not shown).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Analysis of the MAPK pathway in J77 and
JCaM1.6s.S3. Cells were either unstimulated ( ) or stimulated
with either a combination of the anti-CD2 mAbs anti-T112
plus anti-T113 ( CD2) or the anti-CD3 mAb
2AD2A2 ( CD3) and total lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE
followed by Western blotting (WB) with antisera specific for
Raf (A) or phosphorylated MAPK (pMAPK)
(B). The pMAPK blot was stripped and subsequently
immunoblotted with an antiserum specific for MAPK (C). The
migration position of Raf (at ~74 kDa), pMAPK (at ~42 and 44 kDa),
and MAPK (at ~42 and 44 kDa) are indicated by
arrows.
|
|
CD2 but Not CD3 Stimulation Activates Jun Kinase in the Absence of
p56--
Initiation of IL-2 transcription requires the
binding of certain DNA-binding proteins to specific regions within the
IL-2 promoter (50). One of these DNA-binding elements is the AP-1 complex, which consists of homo- or heterodimers of members of the Jun
and Fos protein family (51). In order to bind to and activate the IL-2
promoter, these dimers must assemble and the participating proteins
become phosphorylated (51). Jun kinase (JNK) is involved in the serine
phosphorylation and activation of Jun family members (52). Following
CD2 stimulation in JCaM1.6s.S3 cells, activation of JNK is readily
detected as shown by in vitro kinase activity using a
GST-Jun fusion protein substrate (Fig. 5A). CD3 stimulation induced
JNK activation is significantly lower than CD2 induced JNK activation
in JCaM1.6s.S3, whereas both pathways activate JNK in J77 to a
comparable level (Fig. 5A). The average increase of JNK
activity from three independent experiments following CD2 or CD3
stimulation compared with unstimulated cells is as follows:
JCaM1.6s.S3: CD2, 2.96 ± 0.8; CD3, 1.44 ± 0.4; J77: CD2, 1.54 ± 0.2; CD3, 1.72 ± 0.5-fold increase (over background
unstimulated controls as determined by scanning the autoradiographs on
a PhosphorImager).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
JNK is activated in JCaM1.6s.S3 and
peripheral T cells following CD2 stimulation. J77 and JCaM1.6s.S3
cells (A) or freshly isolated peripheral T cells
(B) were either unstimulated ( ) or stimulated with either
a combination of the anti-CD2 mAbs anti-T112 plus
anti-T113 ( CD2), the anti-CD3 mAb 2AD2A2 ( CD3), or
PMA and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with an antiserum specific
for JNK. Subsequently, the immunoprecipitates were subjected to an
in vitro kinase assay in the presence of a GST-Jun fusion
protein as a substrate and analyzed on SDS-PAGE followed by
autoradiography. The migration position of the GST-Jun fusion protein
is indicated by an arrow.
|
|
Following CD2 Stimulation There Are Predominantly c-Jun/c-Fos
Heterodimers Binding to the AP-1 Consensus Site--
The IL-2 promoter
contains several binding sites for transcription factors which control
IL-2 gene expression including AP-1, NF- B, NF-AT, and the CD28RE
(50, 53). In the case of the AP-1 complex, the major kinase which
serine phosphorylates Jun is JNK (52). Since JNK is activated in
JCaM1.6s.S3 following CD2 stimulation (Fig. 5A), it was
important to determine how this activation would affect AP-1 binding.
As shown by EMSA (electromobility shift assay) in Fig.
6A, compared with CD3
stimulation, the CD2 induced Jun kinase activity in JCaM1.6s.S3 is
accompanied by enhanced expression and binding of AP-1 complexes to the
AP-1 consensus site. This interaction of AP-1 proteins with the AP-1
consensus site double-stranded oligonucleotide is specific for AP-1, as shown by competition experiments using an excess of unlabeled AP-1
oligonucleotide (Fig. 6B). In J77, on the other hand, AP-1 complex binding is similar between CD2 and CD3 stimulation (Fig. 6A).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Analysis of nuclear proteins binding to the
AP-1 consensus site in J77 and JCaM1.6 s.S3 (A and
B) or peripheral T cells (C). A, nuclear extracts
of J77 and JCaM1.6 s.S3 cells either unstimulated ( ) or stimulated
with either a combination of the anti-CD2 mAbs anti-T112
plus anti-T113 ( CD2) or the anti-CD3 mAb 2AD2A2
( CD3) were subjected to EMSAs with
[ -32P]ATP-labeled oligonucleotides specific for the
AP-1 consensus site. B, further analysis of JCaM1.6s.S3 in
the absence ( ) or presence of either a specific (100-fold AP-1) or a
nonspecific (100-fold NF-AT) unlabeled competitor. The complexes were
analyzed on 5.2% gels followed by autoradiography. The migration
position of the AP-1 complex (arrow) and the free oligo are
indicated. C, equivalent EMSA analysis from peripheral T
cells.
|
|
The AP-1 complex consists of homo- or heterodimers of proteins of the
Jun and Fos family (54). It has been suggested that Jun/Fos
heterodimers have a higher affinity for the AP-1 site and are more
efficient in activating IL-2 gene expression (55). The Jun family
contains at least three members, c-Jun, JunB, and JunD, while the Fos
family includes c-Fos, Fra1, Fra2, and FosB (51, 53). Following CD2
stimulation of JCaM1.6s.S3 both homodimers and heterodimers appear to
bind to the AP-1 consensus site as shown by supershift of the AP-1
proteins with the respective Abs specific for JunD, c-Jun, and c-Fos
(Fig. 7, A and B).
These AP-1 complexes do not contain JunB (data not shown), Fra1, Fra2,
or FosB (Fig. 7B). Given that the supershift with anti-c-Jun
and anti-c-Fos Abs results in a mobility shift of their respective complexes to the same position in the gel (Fig. 7A), we
infer that c-Jun/c-Fos heterodimers are formed. In contrast, the
different mobility of the complex in the supershift with anti-JunD Ab
implies that JunD/JunD homodimers are present. CD3 stimulation is less efficient in AP-1 induction in JCaM1.6s.S3 (Fig. 6A).
Moreover, with anti-CD2 stimulation the AP-1 complex is supershifted to the greatest extent by anti-c-Fos mAb. In contrast, with anti-CD3 mAb
stimulation anti-JunD mAb effects the greatest shift. These results
imply that the AP-1 dimer is primarily a complex consisting of
JunD/JunD homodimers following anti-CD3 stimulation (Fig.
7A).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Supershift analysis of nuclear proteins of
JCaM1.6s.S3 binding to the AP-1 consensus site. JCaM1.6s.S3 cells
were unstimulated ( ) or stimulated with either a combination of the
anti-CD2 mAbs anti-T112 plus anti-T113
( CD2) or the anti-CD3 mAb 2AD2A2 ( CD3)
and nuclear extracts were subjected to EMSAs with
[ -32P]ATP-labeled oligonucleotides specific for the
AP-1 consensus site in the presence of Abs specific for members of the
Jun family (A) or the Fos family (B). The
complexes were analyzed on 4% gels followed by autoradiography. The
migration position of the AP-1 complex, the supershifted complexes and
the free oligo are indicated by arrows.
|
|
Although not shown, analysis of the other transcriptional factors
involved in the regulation of IL-2 production including NF-AT, NF- B,
and Oct-1 (50, 53) showed similar inducible nuclear protein binding
profiles to the NF-AT, NF- B, or Oct-1 consensus site in JCaM1.6s.S3
following CD2 or CD3 triggering; moreover, supershift analysis with Abs
specific for c-Jun, JunD, or c-Fos revealed no difference in the
composition of the complex binding to the NF-AT site upon either
anti-CD2 or anti-CD3 stimulation. Similarly, Abs specific for the p50
or p65 subunit of the NF- B complex did not indicate differential
effects of these stimulatory pathways as judged by supershift analysis
of nuclear proteins binding to the NK- B consensus site (data not
shown).
To determine if resting T cells would respond to CD2 stimulation
similarly in terms of JNK activation and binding of AP-1 proteins, we
performed corresponding experiments in freshly isolated peripheral T
cells. JNK is activated via both CD2 and to a lesser extent, via CD3
(Fig. 5B), suggesting, as discussed below, an important role for the
CD2 signaling pathway in T cell co-stimulation. In addition, CD2 but
not CD3 stimulation also efficiently leads to the activation and
binding of AP-1 proteins to the AP-1 consensus site (Fig. 6C).
The Tyrosine Kinase Pyk2 Is Activated following Stimulation via CD2
in the Absence of p56--
Recently, Pyk2 a tyrosine kinase
homologous to the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) has been identified and
linked to the JNK pathway, (39). Pyk2 activation, like JNK activation,
requires a strong Ca2+ signal such as that provided by CD2
stimulation in JCaM1.6s.S3. We investigated the activation of Pyk2 in
JcaM1.6s.S3 following anti-CD2 or anti-CD3 mAb triggering by Western
blot analysis and in vitro kinase assay. Pyk2 is
phosphorylated in response to both CD2 and CD3 triggering (Fig.
8A), but activated only after
CD2 stimulation as judged by in vitro autophosphorylation
(Fig. 8C). Equivalent amounts of Pyk2 were precipitated as
shown by sequential immunoblotting of the phosphotyrosine blot (Fig.
8A) with a Pyk2-specific rabbit antiserum (Fig.
8B).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Pyk2 is activated following CD2
stimulation. JCaM1.6s.S3 cells, either unstimulated ( ) or
stimulated for 3 min with either a combination of the anti-CD2 mAbs
anti-T112 plus anti-T113 ( CD2) or
the anti-CD3 mAb 2AD2A2 ( CD3). Cell lysates were
immunoprecipitaed with Pyk2 Ab and were either subjected to sequential
Western blot analysis with anti-phosphotyrosine-specific mAb 4G10
(A) and an antiserum specific for Pyk2 (B) or to
in vitro kinase analysis (C). The position of
Pyk2 at ~120 kDa is indicated by an arrow.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we identify a
p56-independent CD2 signaling pathway capable of inducing
IL-2 production. Fig. 9 offers a
schematic view of p56-independent as well as
-dependent CD2 activation pathways (37, 39, 56, 57). The
latter is largely indistinguishable from the
p56-dependent TCR pathway except that, unlike
the TCR pathway, it is associated with weak CD3 and ZAP70
phosphorylation. In JCaM1.6 cells, only the p56-independent
CD2 pathway is operative and, in distinction to the TCR pathway, does
not involve p56, ZAP70, or MAPK. Instead, CD2 triggering
activates JNK followed by the binding of c-Jun/c-Fos heterodimers to
the AP-1 consensus site.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Signal transduction via CD2.
p56-dependent and independent activation
pathways following CD2 stimulation are based on prior results (37, 39,
56, 57, 75) and the current studies. In JCaM1.6, only the
p56 independent signal transduction pathway is functional
leading via JNK and subsequent c-Jun activation to the binding of the
AP-1 complex to the IL-2 promoter and the initiation of IL-2
transcription. Both pathways apparently activate PLC- 1 leading to
the generation of a rise in intracellular free Ca2+,
resulting in a calmodulin-dependent activation of
calcineurin. The latter dephosphorylates NF-AT resulting in its nuclear
translocation.
|
|
Prior studies of TCR-based signaling showed that, in the absence of
p56, TCR triggered signals were abrogated (42). In contrast, as shown here, activation via CD2 in the p56-deficient
Jurkat variant JCaM1.6s is not disrupted. CD2 stimulation leads to the tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of PLC- 1, a strong rise in
intracellular free Ca2+ levels, and subsequent production
of IL-2. Furthermore, CD2 signaling stimulates JNK, which leads to the
activation of transcription factors of the Jun family. Phosphorylated
c-Jun/c-Fos heterodimers bind to the AP-1 consensus site, leading to
the induction of IL-2 transcription.
Although CD2 signaling in T cells requires the presence of the CD3
chain (27-31), the precise molecular basis by which cell surface
immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif containing TCR subunits
permit CD2 signaling remains uncertain. The functional involvement of
the CD3 chain in T cells, and the stimulation of
phosphatidylinositol turnover (46, 58) shared by TCR and CD2 pathways
indicates the usage of a common pathway following CD2 and TCR
signaling. Indeed, a complex involving CD2, p59, and CD3
has been shown to exist in T lymphocytes (35). Nevertheless, certain
differences among the pathways are also evident. For example, T cell
activation via CD2, in contrast to via the TCR, is not associated with
Syk phosphorylation and involves minimal if any phosphorylation of
ZAP-70 or CD3 (25, 27, 59). Additionally, the phosphorylation
kinetics and cellular substrates are distinct in these two pathways
(25, 27). Recently, the Tec family kinase ITK has been shown to be
activated upon stimulation via CD2 (60). This ITK activation requires
the presence of functional p56 but is independent of the
surface expression of CD3 (60). Moreover, CD2 plays important roles
in reversing anergy and augmenting IL-12 responsiveness; neither
activities are TCR regulated (15, 17). CD2 signaling is mediated by its
proline-rich intracytoplasmic domain to which SH3 domains of
non-receptor kinases can bind (23, 33). Recent studies indicate that
p56 and p59 are able to bind to CD2 and hence are
implicated in CD2 signaling (34, 35, 61).
p56 is present in thymocytes and mature T cells and is
involved in signaling via the TCR (62). T cells from mice bearing a
disrupted p56 gene (63), mutant Jurkat cells lacking
functional p56 (JCaM1.6) (42), or CTLL-2 cells that lack
p56 expression show defects in TCR-mediated responses (62).
Upon TCR stimulation p56 associates with and phosphorylates
ZAP70 and it has been speculated that ZAP70 may, therefore be, at least
in part, responsible for bringing p56 into the signaling
complex (64, 65). Notwithstanding, other experiments employing mutant
CD3 immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif sequences
demonstrate that p56 can associate with the TCR in the
absence of ZAP70 (66). Nevertheless, p56 is thought to be
responsible for the activation of ZAP70 enzymatic function (48,
65).
The tyrosine kinase ZAP70 is a key molecule in TCR signaling, but can
in some systems be replaced by p72 Syk (67, 68). We and others (25, 59)
have shown that following CD2 stimulation ZAP70 is only weakly if at
all tyrosine phosphorylated or activated in J77. In JCaM1.6s no
tyrosine phosphorylation or activation of ZAP70 after either CD2 or CD3
triggering was observed (Fig. 3B and data not shown).
Furthermore, JCaM1.6 and its parental Jurkat line E6 are deficient in
Syk expression (69) and there is no evidence for the presence or
phosphorylation of Syk in JCaM1.6s (data not shown). We, therefore,
conclude that in JCaM1.6s, CD2-triggered IL-2 production does not
involve tyrosine kinases of the Syk family.
Events downstream of protein-tyrosine kinase activation include the
tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of PLC- 1, which then leads
to an increase in intracellular free Ca2+ concentrations
via the generation of inositol trisphosphate (70). In p56
expressing T cells, TCR stimulation is followed by an initial high
transient Ca2+ peak and a lower amplitude but sustained
plateau phase (41, 44, 46). The initial rise of Ca2+ is
caused by the inositol trisphosphate-mediated release of
Ca2+ from the endoplasmatic reticulum (45) but is not
sufficient for proliferation or IL-2 gene expression (41, 71). Rather the prolonged elevation of intracellular Ca2+ due to the
Ca2+ influx from extracellular sources is the critical
component of the Ca2+ signal (41, 71). The mechanism by
which Ca2+ enters T cells from extracellular stores in not
well understood (72). However, in JCaM1.6s, anti-CD3 stimulation leads
only to a short duration Ca2+ increase in the absence of a
sustained high Ca2+ rise, suggesting that p56 is
involved, either directly or indirectly, in TCR-mediated
Ca2+ influx from extracellular stores. Inositol
trisphosphate is generated by hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol
bisphosphate by PLC- 1. As reported previously, JCaM1.6 cells fail to
show production of inositol phosphates after TCR triggering (73).
Consistent with this finding, PLC- 1, whose catalytic activity is
strongly enhanced by tyrosine phosphorylation (74), is only weakly
phosphorylated upon TCR triggering in JCaM1.6s (Fig. 2B). In
contrast to CD3 stimulation, CD2 stimulation leads to a clear tyrosine
phosphorylation of PLC- 1 (Fig. 2B) and to a strong and
long lasting rise in intracellular free Ca2+ levels in
JCaM1.6s (Fig. 2A). Although Hubert et al. (59)
failed to detect anti-CD2 mAb induced PLC phosphorylation in JCaM1
cells, a difference in the surface expression of CD3 and CD2 on JCaM1 versus the sorted JCaM1.6s cells herein may explain this
discrepancy.
TCR stimulation events downstream of ZAP70 include Shc phosphorylation,
the activation of Sos, and subsequently of Ras leading to the
activation of the MAPK pathway and finally to IL-2 production (56).
This tyrosine kinase activation following TCR engagement has been shown
to be dependent on the presence of functional p56 (36).
Surprisingly, therefore, we observed that although the MAPK pathway is
non-functional after CD2 stimulation as well as CD3 stimulation in
JCaM1.6s.S3, the ability of CD2 mAbs to induce IL-2 production was not
compromised. These observations strongly indicate that CD2 stimulation
can activate signaling pathways distinct from CD3 stimulation.
Pyk2 was recently identified as a tyrosine kinase, which is involved in
Jun kinase activation and associates with the adapter protein Grb2
(39). By forming a complex containing Pyk2 and the GDP-GTP exchange
factor Vav (75), Grb2 can link Pyk2 to the GTP-binding protein Rac,
whose activation finally leads to the activation of JNK (57). In our
study, we show that, following both CD2 and CD3 stimulation, Pyk2 is
tyrosine phosphorylated in JCaM1.6s.S3 cells, but only CD2 triggering
activates Pyk2 enzymatically, providing a possible link to a
stimulation pathway which leads to JNK activation.
JNK is important in the regulation of the IL-2 promoter since JNK
activation correlates with IL-2 production (38, 51, 52, 76). IL-2
promoter regulation involves several transcription factors some of
which are JNK sensitive (50, 51, 77-80). The AP-1 transcription factor
can bind to the IL-2 promoter either directly at the AP-1 site (81, 82)
or together with NF-AT or Oct at their respective binding sites
(83-86). The AP-1 complex is composed of proteins of the Jun and Fos
family (51). JNK, a Ca2+-sensitive serine/threonine kinase
of the MAP kinase family, is critically involved in the
post-transcriptional stimulation of AP-1 activity by phosphorylating
the activation domain of c-Jun. Su et al. (38) reported that
two signals are necessary to efficiently activate JNK, including
different combinations of A23187, TPA, anti-CD3 mAb, or anti-CD28 mAb.
This dual activation requirement and the reported Ca2+
sensitivity distinguishes JNK from other members of the MAPK/JNK family.
The involvement of CD2 stimulation in the activation of JNK has
not yet been previously investigated. In both J77 and JCaM1.6s.S3, JNK
is activated following stimulation via CD2 (Fig. 5A),
suggesting that CD2 utilizes a p56 independent pathway which
leads to the activation of JNK. The strong and long lasting
Ca2+ mobilization observed in JCaM1.6s.S3 following CD2
stimulation might sensitize JNK to p56 independent signals
involved in JNK activation (38). Furthermore, in the absence of
p56, anti-CD2 stimulation is accompanied by the enhanced
binding of the c-Jun/c-Fos heterodimers to the consensus AP-1 sequence
leading to IL-2 production. A previous study performed by stimulating
Jurkat cells with superantigen pulsed HLA-DR transfectants revealed
differences in the composition of the NF-AT·AP-1 complexes following
costimulation with either LFA-3 or B7 (87). These differences were due
to the dimerization of JunD with different members of the Fos family
(Fra1 and Fra2), indicating a selective induction of certain nuclear
factors depending on the costimulatory pathway. In our current study,
we observed no significant difference in the binding of nuclear
proteins to the NF-AT consensus site upon anti-CD2 versus
anti-CD3 stimulated JCaM1.6s.S3. Since the MAPK pathway, known to be
involved in Fos transcription, is non-functional in JCaM1.6, the lack
of Fra1 and Fra2 Fos family members complexed to the AP-1 site in
JCaM1.6s.S3 is perhaps not unexpected. In addition, the coordinate
action of TCR engagement and the B7 versus LFA-3
costimulatory signal could differentially induce Fos family proteins.
In the study by Parra et al. (87), AP-1 and NF- B
complexes binding to their respective site in the IL-2 promoter
revealed no differences after either type of costimulation. By
stimulation via CD2 alone, we found not only JunD but also c-Jun
induced and heterodimerizing with c-Fos in JCaM1.6s.S3 (Fig.
7A). Since the AP-1 site in the IL-2 promoter is a
relatively low affinity site (83), Fos-Jun heterodimers, which are more
effective in DNA binding and transactivation (55), might be required
for optimal activity. Additionally, c-Jun and c-Fos in contrast to
JunB, Fra1, and Fra2 are more efficient transactivators (55, 88, 89).
The function of JunD in IL-2 gene transcription is not defined yet.
Anergy, a state of T cell unresponsiveness to antigenic challenge,
which is induced by TCR stimulation in the absence of the CD28
costimulatory signal (90), is accompanied by preferential induction of
the inhibitory p50-p50 NF- B homodimer and a reduced binding of AP-1
to the IL-2 promoter (91, 92). Recently, it was shown in an
alloreactive system that alloantigen stimulation induced T cell anergy
can be reversed in those cells after culture in IL-2 for 7 days only by
costimulation with CD58 (17). This ability of CD2 stimulation to
reverse anergy is unique and distinct from costimulatory molecules such
as CD28 (17). Our observation that CD2 stimulation can activate JNK and
leads to the induction and binding of c-Jun/c-Fos heterodimers to the
AP-1 site might provide a basis for the role CD2 plays in regulating
anergy. This possibly remains to be investigated in anergized T
cells.
The data presented in this study provide evidence for a CD2 signaling
pathway distinct from that of the TCR and capable of inducing IL-2
production in the absence of p56. This CD2 stimulation induced signaling cascade does not involve either p56 or
ZAP70, key molecules in T cell activation via the TCR, and can also be initiated by CD2 triggering in peripheral T cells. CD2 activates Pyk2
and undoubtedly other kinases, and subsequently stimulates JNK
independent of p56. The precise definition of the
intermediate steps in this activation cascade will now be of interest
to determine.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. A. Rao and T. Roberts
for careful review of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants AI21226 and AI19807.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by Erwin Schrödinger Auslandsstipendium J01036-MED
from the Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Vienna, Austria.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of
Immunobiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St., Boston, MA
02115. Tel.: 617-632-3412; Fax: 617-632-3351; E-mail:
ellis_reinherz{at}dfci.harvard.edu.
The abbreviations used are:
TCR, T cell
receptor; mAb, monoclonal antibody; IL, interleukin; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PLC, phospholipase C; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; DTT, dithiothreitol; GST, glutathione S-transferaseEMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Howard, F. D.,
Ledbetter, J. A.,
Wong, J.,
Bieber, C. P.,
Stinson, E. B.,
and Herzenberg, L. A.
(1981)
J. Immunol.
126,
2117-2122[Abstract]
-
Kamoun, M.,
Martin, P. J.,
Hansen, J. A.,
Brown, M. A.,
Siadak, A. W.,
and Nowinski, R. C.
(1981)
J. Exp. Med.
152,
207-212
-
Rodewald, H. R.,
Awad, K.,
Moingeon, P.,
D'Adamio, L.,
Rabinowitz, D.,
Shinkai, Y.,
Alt, F. W.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
177,
1079-1092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Selvaraj, P.,
Plunkett, M. L.,
Dustin, M.,
Sanders, M. E.,
Shaw, S.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1987)
Nature
326,
400-403[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Krensky, A. M.,
Sanchez-Madrid, F.,
Robbins, E.,
Nagy, J. A.,
Springer, T. A.,
and Burakoff, S. J.
(1983)
J. Immunol.
131,
611-616[Abstract]
-
Dustin, M. L.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1989)
Nature
341,
619-624[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Moingeon, P. E.,
Lucich, J. L.,
Stebbins, C. C.,
Recny, M. A.,
Wallner, B. P.,
Koyasu, S.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1991)
Eur. J. Immunol.
21,
605-610[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Moingeon, P.,
Chang, H. C.,
Sayre, P. H.,
Clayton, L. K.,
Alcover, A.,
Gardner, P.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1989a)
Immunol. Rev.
111,
111-144[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Moingeon, P.,
Chang, H. C.,
Wallner, B. P.,
Stebbins, C.,
Frey, A. Z.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1989)
Nature
339,
312-314[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Koyasu, S.,
Lawton, T.,
Novick, D.,
Recny, M. A.,
Siliciano, R. F.,
Wallner, B. P.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
2603-2607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Meuer, S. C.,
Hussey, R. E.,
Fabbi, M.,
Fox, D.,
Acuto, O.,
Fitzgerald, K. A.,
Hodgdon, J. C.,
Protentis, J. P.,
Schlossman, S. F.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1984)
Cell
36,
897-906[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Brottier, P.,
Boumsell, L.,
Gelin, C.,
and Bernard, A.
(1985)
J. Immunol.
135,
1624-1631[Abstract]
-
Siliciano, R. F.,
Pratt, J. C.,
Schmidt, R. E.,
Ritz, J.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1985)
Nature
317,
428-430[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Li, J.,
Smolyar, A.,
Sunder-Plassmann, R.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
263,
209-226[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gollob, J. A.,
Li, J.,
Kawasaki, H.,
Daley, J. F.,
Groves, C.,
Reinherz, E. L.,
and Ritz, J.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
1886-1893[Abstract]
-
Gollob, J. A.,
Li, J.,
Reinherz, E. L.,
and Ritz, J.
(1995)
J. Exp. Med.
182,
721-731[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Boussiotis, V. A.,
Freeman, G. J.,
Griffin, J. D.,
Gray, G. S.,
Gribben, J. G.,
and Nadler, L. M.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
180,
1665-1673[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
He, Q.,
Beyers, A. D.,
Barclay, A. N.,
and Williams, A. F.
(1988)
Cell
54,
979-984[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chang, H. C.,
Moingeon, P.,
Lopez, P.,
Krasnow, H.,
Stebbins, C.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1989)
J. Exp. Med.
169,
2073-2083[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bierer, B. E.,
Bogart, R. E.,
and Burakoff, S. J.
(1990)
J. Immunol.
144,
785-789[Abstract]
-
Brown, M. H.,
Sewell, W. A.,
Mason, D. Y.,
Rothbard, J. B.,
and Crumpton, M. J.
(1988)
Eur. J. Immunol.
18,
1223-1227[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Clayton, L. K.,
Ramachandran, H.,
Pravtcheva, D.,
Chen, Y. F.,
Diamond, D. J.,
Ruddle, F. H.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1988)
J. Immunol.
140,
3617-3621[Abstract]
-
Pawson, T.,
and Gish, G. D.
(1992)
Cell
71,
359-362[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cohen, G. B.,
Ren, R.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1995)
Cell
80,
237-248[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jin, Y. J.,
Kaplan, D. R.,
White, M.,
Spagnoli, G. C.,
Roberts, T. M.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1990)
J. Immunol.
144,
647-652[Abstract]
-
Ley, S. C.,
Davies, A. A.,
Druker, B.,
and Crumpton, M. J.
(1991)
Eur. J. Immunol.
21,
2203-2209[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Howard, F. D.,
Moingeon, P.,
Moebius, U.,
McConkey, D. J.,
Yandava, B.,
Gennert, T. E.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1992)
J. Exp. Med.
176,
139-145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Breitmeyer, J. B.,
Daley, J. F.,
Levine, H. B.,
and Schlossman, S. F.
(1987)
J. Immunol.
139,
2899-2905[Abstract]
-
Alcover, A.,
Alberini, C.,
Acuto, O.,
Clayton, L. K.,
Transy, C.,
Spagnoli, G. C.,
Moingeon, P.,
Lopez, P.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
1973-1977[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bockenstedt, L. K.,
Goldsmith, M. A.,
Dustin, M.,
Olive, D.,
Springer, T. A.,
and Weiss, A.
(1988)
J. Immunol.
141,
1904-1911[Abstract]
-
Moingeon, P.,
Lucich, J. L.,
McConkey, D. J.,
Letourneur, F.,
Malissen, B.,
Kochan, J.,
Chang, H. C.,
Rodewald, H. R.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
1492-1496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Arulanandam, A. R. N.,
Koyasu, S.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1991)
J. Exp. Med.
173,
859-868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chang, H. C.,
Moingeon, P.,
Pedersen, R.,
Lucich, J.,
Stebbins, C.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1990)
J. Exp. Med.
172,
351-355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bell, G. M.,
Fargnoli, J.,
Bolen, J. B.,
Kish, L.,
and Imboden, J. B.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
183,
169-178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gassmann, M.,
Amrein, K. E.,
Flint, N. A.,
Schraven, B.,
and Burn, P.
(1994)
Eur. J. Immunol.
24,
139-144[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gupta, S.,
Weiss, A.,
Kumar, G.,
Wang, S.,
and Nel, A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
17349-17357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hunter, T.,
and Karin, M.
(1992)
Cell
70,
375-378[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Su, B.,
Jacinto, E.,
Hibi, M.,
Kallunki, T.,
Karin, M.,
and Ben-Neriah, Y.
(1994)
Cell
77,
727-736[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tokiwa, G.,
Dikic, I.,
Lev, S.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1996)
Science
273,
792-794[Abstract]
-
Quian, D.,
Lev, S.,
van-Oers, N. S. C.,
Dikic, I.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Weiss, A.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
185,
1253-1259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Weiss, M. J.,
Daley, J. F.,
Hodgdon, J. C.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
6836-6840[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Straus, D.,
and Weiss, A.
(1992)
Cell
70,
585-593[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Koyasu, S.,
Tse, A. G. D.,
Moingeon, P.,
Hussey, R. E.,
Mildonian, A.,
Hannisian, J.,
Clayton, L. K.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
6693-6697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Alcover, A.,
Weiss, M. J.,
Daley, J. F.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
2614-2618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Berridge, M. J.,
and Irvine, R. F.
(1989)
Nature
341,
197-325[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Imboden, J. B.,
and Stobo, J. D.
(1985)
J. Exp. Med.
161,
446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Weiss, A.,
and Littman, D. R.
(1994)
Cell
76,
263-274[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fischer, S.,
Marie-Cardine, A.,
Ramos-Morales, F.,
Bougeret, C.,
Soula, M.,
Maridonneau-Parini, I.,
and Benarous, R.
(1994)
Cell. Mol. Biol.
40,
605-609
-
Izquierdo, P. M.,
Reif, K.,
and Cantrell, D.
(1995)
Immunol. Today
16,
159-164[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Crabtree, G. R.
(1989)
Science
243,
355-361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Angel, P.,
and Karin, M.
(1991)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1072,
129-157[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hibi, M.,
Lin, A.,
Smeal, T.,
Minden, A.,
and Karin, M.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
2135-2148[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jain, J.,
Loh, C.,
and Rao, A.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
7,
333-342[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jain, J.,
McCaffrey, P. G.,
Valge-Archer, V. E.,
and Rao, A.
(1992)
Nature
356,
801-804[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ryseck, R.-P.,
and Bravo, R.
(1991)
Oncogene
6,
533-542[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cantrell, D.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
14,
259-274[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Crespo, P.,
Bustelo, X. R.,
Aaronson, D. S.,
Coso, O. A.,
Lopez-Barahona, M.,
Barbacid, M.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
455-460[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pantaleo, G.,
Olive, D.,
Poggi, A.,
Kozumbo, W. J.,
Moretta, L.,
and Moretta, A.
(1987)
Eur. J. Immunol.
17,
55-60[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hubert, P.,
Lang, V.,
Debre, P.,
and Bismuth, G.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
4322-4332[Abstract]
-
King, P. D.,
Sadra, A.,
Han, A.,
Liu, X.-R.,
Sunder-Plassmann, R.,
Reinherz, E. L.,
and Dupont, B.
(1996)
Int. Immunol.
8,
1707-1714[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bell, G. M.,
Bolen, J. B.,
and Imboden, J. B.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
5548-5554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Anderson, S. J.,
Levin, S. D.,
and Perlmutter, R. M.
(1994)
Adv. Immunol.
56,
151-178[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Molina, T. J.,
Kishira, K.,
Siderovski, D. P.,
van-Ewijk, W.,
Narendran, A.,
Timms, E.,
Wakeham, A.,
Paige, C. J.,
Hartmann, K.-U.,
Veillette, A.,
Davidson, D.,
and Mak, T. W.
(1992)
Nature
357,
161-164[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Iwashima, M.,
Irving, B. A.,
van-Oers, N. S. C.,
Chan, A. C.,
and Weiss, A.
(1994)
Science
263,
1136-1139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
van-Oers, N. S. C.,
Killeen, N.,
and Weiss, A.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
183,
1053-1062[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sunder-Plassmann, R.,
Lialios, F.,
Madsen, M.,
Koyasu, S.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1997)
Eur. J. Immunol.
27,
2001-2009[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Burkhardt, A. L.,
Stealey, B.,
Rowley, R. B.,
Mahajan, S.,
Prendergast, M.,
Fargnoli, J.,
and Bolen, J. B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
23642-24647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Latour, S.,
Chow, L. M. L.,
and Veillette, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22782-22790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fargnoli, J.,
Burkhardt, A. L.,
Laverty, M.,
Kut, S. A.,
van-Oers, N. S. C.,
Weiss, A.,
and Bolen, J. B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26533-26537[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wange, R. L.,
and Samelson, L. E.
(1996)
Immunity
5,
197-205[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gelfand, E. W.,
Cheung, R. K.,
Mills, G. B.,
and Grinstein, S.
(1988)
Eur. J. Immunol.
18,
917-922[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gardner, P.,
Alcover, A.,
Kuno, M.,
Moingeon, P.,
Weyand, C. M.,
Goronzy, J.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
1068-1076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Goldsmith, M. A.,
and Weiss, A.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
6879-6883[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nishibe, S.,
Wahl, M. I.,
Hernandez-Sotomayor, S. M. T.,
Tonks, N. K.,
Rhee, S. G.,
and Carpenter, G.
(1990)
Science
250,
1253-1256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ramos-Morales, F.,
Druker, B. J.,
and Fischer, S.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
1917-1923[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Derijard, B.,
Hibi, M.,
Wu, I.-H.,
Barrett, T.,
Su, B.,
Deng, T.,
Karin, M.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1994)
Cell
76,
1025-1037[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Durand, D. B.,
Shaw, J. P.,
Bush, M. R.,
Replogle, R. E.,
Balgaje, R.,
and Crabtree, G. R.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
1715-1724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kamps, M. P.,
Corcoran, L.,
LeBowitz, J. H.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
5464-5472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fraser, J. D.,
Irvine, B. A.,
Crabtree, G. R.,
and Weiss, A.
(1991)
Science
251,
313-316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Granelli-Piperno, A.,
and Nolan, P.
(1991)
J. Immunol.
147,
2734-2739[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Muegge, K.,
Williams, T. M.,
Kant, J.,
Karin, M.,
Chiu, R.,
Schmidt, A.,
Siebenlist, U.,
Young, H. A.,
and Durum, S. K.
(1989)
Science
246,
249-251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Serfling, E.,
Barthelmaes, R.,
Pfeuffer, I.,
Schenk, B.,
Zarius, S.,
Swoboda, R.,
Mercurio, F.,
and Karin, M.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
465-473[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jain, J.,
Valge-Archer, V. E.,
and Rao, A.
(1992)
J. Immunol.
148,
1240-1250[Abstract]
-
Ullman, K.,
Northrop, J.,
Admon, A.,
and Crabtree, G.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
188-196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
DeGrazia, U.,
Felli, M. P.,
Vacca, A.,
Farina, A. R.,
Maroder, M.,
Cappabianca, L.,
Meco, D.,
Farina, M.,
Screpanti, I.,
Frati, L.,
and Gulino, A.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
180,
1485-1497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Northrop, J. P.,
Ho, S. N.,
Chen, L.,
Thomas, D. J.,
Timmerman, L. A.,
Nolan, G. P.,
Admon, A.,
and Crabtree, G. R.
(1994)
Nature
369,
497-502[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Parra, E.,
Varga, M.,
Hedlund, G.,
Kalland, T.,
and Dohlsten, M.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1314-1323[Abstract]
-
Chiu, R.,
Angel, P.,
and Karin, M.
(1989)
Cell
59,
979-986[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Suzuki, T.,
Okuno, H.,
Yoshida, T.,
Endo, T.,
Nishina, H.,
and Iba, H.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
5537-5542[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schwartz, R. H.
(1990)
Science
248,
1349-1356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kang, S. M.,
Bart, B.,
Tran, A. C.,
Brorson, K.,
Schwartz, R. H.,
and Lenardo, M. J.
(1992)
Science
257,
1134-1138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sundstedt, A.,
Sigvardsson, M.,
Leanderson, T.,
Hedlund, G.,
Kalland, T.,
and Dohlsten, M.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
979-984[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ibanez, M.-R. Sarrias, M. Farnos, I. Gimferrer, C. Serra-Pages, J. Vives, and F. Lozano
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway Activation by the CD6 Lymphocyte Surface Receptor
J. Immunol.,
July 15, 2006;
177(2):
1152 - 1159.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Murga and D. F. Barber
Molecular Mechanisms of Pre-T Cell Receptor-induced Survival
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 11, 2002;
277(42):
39156 - 39162.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Martelli, J. Boomer, M. Bu, and B. E. Bierer
T Cell Regulation of p62dok (Dok1) Association with Crk-L
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 30, 2001;
276(49):
45654 - 45661.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Lin, M. P. Martelli, and B. E. Bierer
The involvement of the proto-oncogene p120 c-Cbl and ZAP-70 in CD2-mediated T cell activation
Int. Immunol.,
January 1, 2001;
13(1):
13 - 22.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Meinl, D. Lengenfelder, N. Blank, R. Pirzer, L. Barata, and C. Hivroz
Differential Requirement of ZAP-70 for CD2-Mediated Activation Pathways of Mature Human T Cells
J. Immunol.,
October 1, 2000;
165(7):
3578 - 3583.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Martelli, H. Lin, W. Zhang, L. E. Samelson, and B. E. Bierer
Signaling via LAT (linker for T-cell activation) and Syk/ZAP70 is required for ERK activation and NFAT transcriptional activation following CD2 stimulation
Blood,
September 15, 2000;
96(6):
2181 - 2190.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-G. Nemorin and P. Duplay
Evidence That Lck-mediated Phosphorylation of p56dok and p62dok May Play a Role in CD2 Signaling
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 5, 2000;
275(19):
14590 - 14597.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Nishizawa, C. Freund, J. Li, G. Wagner, and E. L. Reinherz
Identification of a proline-binding motif regulating CD2-triggered T lymphocyte activation
PNAS,
December 8, 1998;
95(25):
14897 - 14902.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Katagiri, T. Takahashi, T. Sasaki, S. Nakamura, and S. Hattori
Protein-tyrosine Kinase Pyk2 Is Involved in Interleukin-2 Production by Jurkat T Cells via Its Tyrosine 402
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 23, 2000;
275(26):
19645 - 19652.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|