![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 38, 24723-24729, September 18, 1998
/
Receptor Component IFNAR1*
§,
¶,
,
, and
**
From the
Institut Pasteur, INSERM U276, Paris 75724 Cedex 15, France and the
Institut de Génétique
Moléculaire, CNRS UMR 9942, Montpellier 34033 Cedex 1, France
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cytokine signaling involves the activation of the
Janus kinase (JAK) family of tyrosine kinases. These enzymes are
physically associated with cytokine receptor components. Here, we
sought to define the molecular basis of the interaction between Tyk2 and IFNAR1, a component of the interferon
/
receptor, by
delimiting a minimal IFNAR1 binding region in the Tyk2 protein. Using
an in vitro assay system, we narrowed down the interaction
domain to a region comprising the JH7 and part of the JH6 homology
boxes (amino acids 22-221). When expressed in Tyk2-negative cells, the JH7-6 region was unable to stabilize IFNAR1 protein levels, a critical
function that we previously attributed to the N region (amino acids
1-591) of Tyk2. Moreover, substitution of the JH7-JH6 domain in JAK1
with that of Tyk2 did not restore IFNAR1 level nor interferon
signaling in Tyk2-negative cells. Thus, the major interaction surface
lies within JH7-6, but additional JH regions (JH5-4-3) contribute in a
specific manner to the in vivo assembly of Tyk2 and IFNAR1.
Evidence is also provided of the lack of specificity of the Tyk2
kinase-like and tyrosine kinase domains in interferon
/
receptor
signaling.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Janus kinase (JAK)1
family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases consists of four mammalian
proteins (Tyk2, JAK1, JAK2, and JAK3) that play a critical role in
initiating signaling cascades of a large number of cytokine receptors
(1, 2). All JAK proteins possess a carboxyl-terminal tyrosine kinase
(TK) catalytic domain, a central kinase-like (KL) domain, and a large
amino-terminal (N) region, which has been subdivided into five JAK
homology regions (JH7 to JH3) based on sequence conservation (3). The
specific and noncovalent association of these kinases to the
intracellular region of cytokine receptors governs their activation
upon ligand binding (2). We are interested in understanding the mode of action and specific roles of Tyk2, which is activated, together with
another JAK family member, by the type I interferons (IFN) (several
and one
subtypes), by interleukin (IL) 6, IL-10, and IL-12
(4-9).
The IFN-
/
receptor is present at low numbers on the surface of
all cell types and consists of two transmembrane proteins called IFNAR1
and IFNAR2 (10, 11). The IFNAR2 gene generates several alternatively
spliced forms, but only the product harboring a long intracytoplasmic
domain (IFNAR2c) is part of a functional IFN-
/
receptor (12).
Whereas the stoichiometry and spatial organization of these components
within the receptor complex are unknown, the epitopes on the IFN
molecule contacting IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 are being identified (13). High
affinity binding of IFN-
/
to the receptor results in tyrosine
phosphorylation and enzymatic activation of the associated JAK1 and
Tyk2 in a defined temporal order, which is thought to result from the
topology of each kinase within the complex (14, 15). Studies of
kinase-deficient mutant cell lines showed that in the absence of either
kinase, high affinity IFN-
binding is impaired, demonstrating a
structural role of these enzymes in the formation of functional
receptors (4, 16, 17). Our recent in vivo studies of deleted
forms of Tyk2 expressed in Tyk2-deficient 11,1 cells have highlighted
distinct functions of the protein toward the expression and the binding activity of the receptor complex. Each function appears to be contributed by a different domain adding more complexity to the receptor-kinase complex. The N region, previously defined as the amino-terminal 591 residues and comprising the JH7 to JH3 regions (Fig.
2), maintains the steady-state level of the IFNAR1 protein in the cell.
The kinase-like domain contributes to the formation of high affinity
receptor binding sites, and the tyrosine kinase domain is essential for
optimal binding and signaling function (14, 18, 19).
That Tyk2 interacts physically with IFNAR1 was suggested by
co-immunoprecipitation of the two endogenous proteins from cell extracts and by retention of baculovirus-expressed Tyk2 by a fusion protein bearing the cytoplasmic domain of IFNAR1 (20, 21). It was shown
that the 45 membrane-proximal amino acids of IFNAR1 were necessary and
sufficient for this interaction and that Ala substitution of three
critical residues (Ile-Ile-Glu) disrupted this interaction (22).
Because in vivo co-immunoprecipitation studies in
reconstituted Tyk2-negative cells are hampered by the modulation of
IFNAR1 level by Tyk2 itself (19), an in vitro system was
used here to identify the molecular determinant(s) of Tyk2 which govern
its interaction with IFNAR1. Using carboxyl- and amino-terminal
deletion mutants of N, we delimited a region including JH7 and part of
JH6 that is sufficient to bind recombinant IFNAR1. However, this region
alone could not sustain IFNAR1 in Tyk2-negative cells, showing a
requirement for additional JH boxes (JH5-4-3). Thus, to address the
specificity, if any, of this additional region, a number of Tyk2/JAK1
chimeric constructs were generated. Of four chimeras bearing different
JH domains of Tyk2 fused to JAK1, only one could rescue IFNAR1 protein
levels and IFN-
signaling. This functional chimera contains the
entire N region of Tyk2 fused to the KL and TK domains of JAK1. These
results will be discussed in the light of recent reports on other
JAK/receptor pairs.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmids
Histidine-tagged Constructs--
All constructs were made in
pQE-based expression vectors (Qiagen). To generate plasmid
pHis-N-(1-451), an SphI fragment was released from plasmid
bs-Tyk2 (human Tyk2 cDNA in pBluescript) and cloned into pQE10.
pHis-N-(1-451) encodes p53 (Fig. 2) containing the amino-terminal
sequence Met-Arg-Gly-Ser-(His)6-Thr-Asp-Pro-Arg fused to
Tyk2 amino acids 1-451 and the carboxyl-terminal
Arg-Arg-Pro-Ala-Ala-Lys-Leu-Asn sequence. pHis-N-(1-591) was obtained
by inserting a 140-base pair SacII/EcoRI fragment
spanning amino acids 452-591 into the SacII-HindIII blunt-ended pHis-N-(1-451) DNA.
pHis-N-(1-591) encodes p69 (Fig. 2) with the (His)6
sequence (see above) fused to Tyk2 amino acids 1-591 and the
carboxyl-terminal Ile-Glu-Leu-Ala sequence. pHis-N-(1-385),
pHis-N-(1-369), pHis-N-(1-314), and pHis-N-(1-220) were generated by
digesting pHis-N-(1-451) with PstI and either PmlI, SacII, DraIII, or
NaeI, blunting the ends and re-circularizing each product.
Due to the cloning procedure, the resulting proteins contain between 3 and 5 extra carboxyl-terminal amino acids. The three amino-terminal
deletion mutants were derived from pHis-N-(1-385) (p46 in Fig. 2). A
fragment encoding amino acids 22-385 of Tyk2 was amplified by PCR
using primers with appropriate restriction sites and was ligated into
BamHI-SphI-digested pHis-N-(1-385) to generate
pHis-N-(22-385). The resulting protein (
21 in Fig. 2) contains the
amino-terminal His sequence (see above) fused to Tyk2 amino acids
22-385 and to Ala-Lys-Leu-Asn. pHis-N-(1-385) was digested with
StuI and HindIII, the resulting 1.1-kb fragment was ligated to the HincII-HindIII-digested pQE10
vector to generate pHis-N-(28-385). The resulting protein (
27 in
Fig. 2) contains the amino-terminal His sequence fused to Tyk2 amino
acids 28-385 of Tyk2 and Ala-Lys-Leu-Asn. pHis-N-(1-385) was digested
with PvuII and HindIII, and the resulting 1-kb
fragment was ligated to the
HincII-HindIII-digested pQE11 vector to generate
pHis-N-(54-385). The protein (
53 in Fig. 2) contains the
amino-terminal His sequence fused to Tyk2 amino acids 54-385 and
Ala-Lys-Leu-Asn.
GST Fusion Constructs--
The cytoplasmic domain of the human
IFNAR1 (amino acids 458 to 557) cloned into the bacterial pGEX-2T
expression vector was provided by L. Ling (Biogen Inc., Boston, MA).
The Ile-Ile-Glu
Ala-Ala-Ala mutant (amino acids 504-506) was
obtained by two-step PCR-mediated mutagenesis. The GST-IkB
chain
construct was a gift from R. Weil.
Eucaryotic Expression Constructs--
All final expression
vectors were cloned into the pRc/CMVneo vector (Invitrogen). To
generate
1-21, a SalI fragment of bs-Tyk2 was
substituted with a SalI PCR fragment spanning Tyk2 amino
acids 22-170. The plasmid
1-51 has been described elsewhere (19). Full-length human JAK1 cDNA (a gift of A. Wilks) was cloned into bs
(bs-JAK1), and an oligonucleotide encoding an epitope of the vesicular
stomatitis virus glycoprotein (VSV-G) was added at the 3' end.
bs-T-(1-62)-J encodes amino acids 1-62 of Tyk2 fused to amino acids
55-1142 of JAK1. It was generated by amplifying a fragment spanning
Tyk2 amino acids 1-62 with a NotI site at the 5' end and a
SphI site at the 3' end and ligating it into
NotI-SphI-digested bs-JAK1. bs-T-(1-275)-J
encodes Tyk2 amino acids 1-275 fused to amino acids 275-1142 of JAK1.
It was generated by amplifying a fragment spanning amino acids 1-275
of Tyk2 fused to amino acids 275-502 of JAK1, to which a
NotI site was added at the 5' end and which included a
single RsrII site at the 3' end. The resulting NotI-RsrII
fragment was ligated to NotI-RsrII-digested bs-JAK1. bs-T-(1-518)-J encodes Tyk2 amino acids 1-518 fused to JAK1 amino acids 500-1142. It was generated by digesting bs-T-(1-275)-J with RsrII and partially with XhoI and ligating it to
an XhoI-RsrII PCR fragment spanning amino acids
271-502 of Tyk2. bs-T-(1-581)-J encodes Tyk2 amino acids 1-581 fused
to amino acids 564-1142 of JAK1. It was generated by digesting
bs-T-(1-518)-J with SphI and NsiI and ligating
it with a SphI-NsiI-digested PCR fragment
encoding amino acids 496-581 of Tyk2 fused to amino acids 564-761 of
JAK1. The sequences of the oligonucleotides used for PCRs are available upon request. All chimeric constructs contain 20 nucleotides of 5'-untranslated Tyk2 sequences and the VSV-G epitope at the 3' end.
After sequencing (370A DNA Sequencer, Applied Biosystems), all
resulting cDNAs were introduced into the pRc/CMV vector.
Protein Purification and Interaction Assay
Histidine-tagged proteins were expressed in bacteria, purified
on nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni2+-NTA) agarose beads
according to the manufacturer's protocol (Qiagen), eluted, and
dialyzed against 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 100 mM
KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 20% glycerol, and 0.1%
Nonidet P-40. GST fusion proteins were affinity-purified on
glutathione-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), eluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 10% glycerol, 10 mM glutathione, and stored at
80 °C. Approximately 10 to 100 pmol of
each freshly purified recombinant protein were incubated in 1×
phosphate-buffered saline for 60 min at 4 °C in a total volume of 1 ml. Fifty µl of glutathione-Sepharose beads as a 50% slurry were
added. Beads were pelleted and washed four times in 1×
phosphate-buffered saline, 0.5 M NaCl. Bound proteins were
boiled in Laemmli sample buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by
Coomassie staining or immunoblotting with the appropriate antibody.
Whenever Ni2+-NTA agarose beads were used, binding was
performed in 10 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.4, 100 mM
KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 2 mM imidazole.
Cell Culture
The mutant cell line 11,1 (also called U1A) has been described
(16). Cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum and 250 µg/ml hygromycin. Calcium-phosphate/DNA transfection and selection in
G418 (450 µg/ml) was performed as described (18). Cell survival in
hypoxanthine/aminopterin/thymidine (HAT) or in 6-thioguanine (6TG)
containing media was assayed in the presence of different concentrations of IFN-
2 (human recombinant IFN-
2b, kindly
provided by D. Gewert, Wellcome). Binding experiments with
125I-IFN-
2c were performed as described (19).
Antibodies, Immunoprecipitation, and Immunoblotting
The GST mAb used in Western blot was kindly provided by Hybridolab (Institut Pasteur). The histidine-tag mAb was purchased (Dianova). Tyk2 antibodies used for immunoprecipitation and Western blotting (R5 and T10-2) have been described (19). Anti-IFNAR1 mAb EA12 and GB8 were from Biogen Inc. The anti-phosphotyrosine 4G10 mAb was from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. The VSV-tag mAb was purchased from Sigma. Preparation of cell extracts, immunoprecipitations, and Western blot analysis were performed as described previously (14).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In Vitro Interaction of N and IFNAR1cyt-- An in vitro interaction assay was set up to identify an IFNAR1 binding domain within the first 591 amino acids (the N region) of Tyk2. Histidine-tagged N was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified as a 69-kDa protein (p69) on Ni2+-NTA-agarose beads. The cytoplasmic domain of IFNAR1 was expressed as GST fusion protein (GST-IFNAR1cyt) and purified by glutathione-Sepharose affinity chromatography. The two proteins were co-incubated, and the complex retained on Ni2+-NTA-agarose beads was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining. GST-IFNAR1cyt was retained on beads in the presence, but not in the absence, of p69 (Fig. 1A, lanes 2 and 3).
|
). The
material retained on glutathione-Sepharose beads was analyzed with Tyk2
mAb. p69 bound to GST-IFNAR1cyt and to a much lesser extent to the
mutated version, albeit it did not bind to GST-IkB
(Fig.
1B, lanes 1-3). To confirm this
interaction, the reverse experiment was performed, where
Ni2+-NTA-agarose beads were used to pull down the complex
and the GST mAb was used for blotting: GST-IFNAR1cyt was able to
interact with p69, but not with a control His-MxA protein (Fig.
1C). Taken together, these results show that the N region of
Tyk2 interacts specifically with the cytoplasmic domain of IFNAR1
in vitro. This interaction is impaired by alanine
substitution of three IFNAR1 residues that were previously shown to be
critical for optimal Tyk2 binding (22).
The JH7-6 Region of N Interacts with IFNAR1cyt in Vitro--
To
initially delimit an IFNAR1 binding domain within N, five
carboxyl-terminal truncated versions of His-N were generated and named
according to their apparent molecular weights (Fig. 2). Each protein was tested for its
ability to bind GST-IFNAR1cyt. A glutathione-Sepharose-based
interaction assay was performed, and the bound material was analyzed by
Western blotting with the Tyk2 mAb or, for the three shorter versions,
lacking the Tyk2 epitope, with a commercial His-tag mAb (Fig.
3). All five carboxyl-terminal deleted
versions of p69 retained the ability to interact with GST-IFNAR1cyt
(Fig. 3, lanes 1, 3, 5,
7, 9, and 11), whereas they did not
interact with the control GST-IkB
fusion protein (Fig. 3,
lanes 2, 4, 6,
8, 10, and 12). This result was
confirmed upon using the Ni2+-NTA resin-based assay (Fig.
4A). Thus, the amino-terminal
221 residues of N, comprising JH7 and part of JH6, retain the ability to interact with IFNAR1cyt.
|
|
|
21,
27, and
53 in
Fig. 2). The purified proteins were tested for their ability to
interact with the wild-type or the mutant GST-IFNAR1cyt in pull-down
experiments using either of the two resins.
27 and
53 did not
interact with GST-IFNAR1cyt (Fig. 4A, lanes
5 and 7 and Fig. 4B, lane
2), whereas, as shown above, p46 and p27 bound specifically
to wild-type GST-IFNAR1cyt (Fig. 4A, lanes
1 and 3). On the other hand, the
21 fusion
protein retained IFNAR1 binding capacity (Fig. 4B,
lane 1). These results demonstrate that the first
21 amino acids are dispensable for the in vitro binding of N
to IFNAR1 and that the binding domain boundary is situated between
residues 22 and 28.
Tyk2 Lacking Amino Acids 1-21 Is Able to Restore Signaling in 11,1 Cells--
To correlate the in vitro binding results (Fig.
4) with the function of the native protein in cells, we stably
expressed in Tyk2-negative cells a mutant form derived from the
full-length Tyk2 and lacking amino acids 1-21 (
1-21). Two
independent neor transfectants were studied. As a measure
of in vivo Tyk2 function, we first analyzed the levels of
endogenous IFNAR1. The
1-21 clones were compared with WT cells
expressing wild-type Tyk2, to
1-51 cells expressing a Tyk2 deleted
of residues 1-51 (19), and to 11,1 cells. As can be seen in Fig.
5A, unlike
1-51,
expression of
1-21 restored IFNAR1. In light of the different
in vitro IFNAR1cyt interaction capacity of
21 and
53,
this result is likely to reflect the different ability of the two
deletion mutants to physically interact with IFNAR1 in vivo.
We also measured the IFN-
binding activity of
1-21 expressing
cells, using WT and 11,1 cells as controls. As shown in Fig.
5B, iodinated IFN-
2 bound similarly to WT and to
1-21
expressing cells, whereas it did not bind to 11,1 cells or to
1-51
expressing cells (see also Fig. 5 in Ref. 19). Furthermore, no
difference in the sensitivity to IFN-
could be measured between the
1-21 clones and WT cells upon testing their phenotype in HAT or 6TG
media (18) (data not shown). Thus, we conclude that the amino-terminal
21 residues of Tyk2 are dispensable not only for the in
vitro binding of N to IFNAR1 but also for the in vivo
structural and signaling functions of Tyk2 through the IFN-
/
receptor.
|
Tyk2 JH5-4-3 Are Specifically Required to Sustain IFNAR1-- The recombinant p27 protein, lacking JH5-4-3, was as effective as full-length p69 in complexing with IFNAR1 in vitro (Figs. 3 and 4B). On the other hand, previous work showed that deletion of JH4 and JH3 abrogated the ability of N to sustain endogenous IFNAR1 in 11,1 cells (Fig. 4 in Ref. 19). Altogether, these results indicate that the JH5-4-3 segment plays an essential function in the in vivo assembly of Tyk2 with IFNAR1. We therefore addressed the question of the specificity of this segment by generating chimeric constructs in which amino-terminal portions of Tyk2 were swapped into JAK1 (Fig. 6A). In each chimera, the fusion was made within a stretch of identical residues so as to maintain the integrity of highly conserved regions (see "Materials and Methods"). Wild-type Tyk2, wild-type JAK1, and the four chimeras were independently transfected into 11,1 cells. The level of exogenous protein was measured in neor clones by Western blotting with an antibody specific for the carboxyl-terminal VSV-G epitope tag present in each construct (data not shown). Clones expressing comparable levels of exogenous protein were chosen, and their level of IFNAR1 was analyzed. As can be seen in Fig. 6B, only in cells expressing wild-type Tyk2 or the T-(1-581)-J chimera was the level of IFNAR1 restored. Particularly significant is the lack of IFNAR1 rescuing by the T-(1-518)-J chimera which bears not only the JH7-6 interaction domain defined in vitro, but also the Tyk2 JH5-4 segment. These results demonstrate that the JH regions of JAK1 cannot functionally substitute for the corresponding JH regions of Tyk2 and that regions besides JH7-6 are required for the in vivo interaction of Tyk2 with IFNAR1.
|
-induced phosphorylation levels of the T-(1-518)-J and
T-(1-581)-J chimeras were compared. Two clones expressing the same
chimera were studied and, as they behaved identically, results are
shown for one. The T-(1-581)-J chimera, but not the T-(1-518)-J, was
inducibly phosphorylated to a level comparable with Tyk2 in WT cells
(Fig. 7A, upper
panel). Basal phosphorylation of both chimeras was
detectable upon longer blot exposure (data not shown). In parallel,
immunoprecipitations with antibodies specific for the JAK1 TK domain
were performed to analyze the phosphorylation level of the endogenous
JAK1 protein in these cells. As expected, the JAK1 antibodies reacted
with the chimeric constructs as well (Fig. 7B,
lower panel). Induced phosphorylation of
endogenous JAK1 was comparable in cells expressing wild-type Tyk2 or
the T-(1-581)-J chimera, whereas no activation occurred in cells
expressing the T-(1-518)-J chimera (Fig. 7B,
upper panel). The IFN-
sensitivity of
T-(1-581)-J-expressing cells was measured in media containing HAT or
6TG and IFN-
and was found to be comparable with WT cells (data not
shown). The antiviral response against vesicular stomatitis virus was
also assayed. With WT cells and two clones expressing the T-(1-581)-J
chimera, the dose range for antiviral protection was between 100 pM and 1 pM IFN-
2. Conversely, with
T-(1-518)-J and 11,1 cells no protection was observed with up to 100 nM IFN-
2. Thus, a chimera bearing the N region of Tyk2 and the KL and TK domains of JAK1 can fully replace wild-type Tyk2 in
the IFN-
pathway.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, two approaches were used to delimit the minimal
region within the tyrosine kinase Tyk2 that is required to interact
with the IFNAR1 component of the IFN-
/
receptor complex. An
in vitro approach for testing the interaction of the two
recombinant partners narrowed down the IFNAR1cyt interaction domain to
Tyk2 amino acids 1-221, spanning the homology region JH7 and part of JH6. The amino-terminal boundary of the domain was mapped between amino
acids 21 and 27. We could not delimit more accurately the carboxyl-terminal boundary of the domain because the expression level
of a shorter construct (amino acids 1-172) dropped considerably. The
physiological relevance of this in vitro analysis is
supported by the finding that in 11,1 cells, a mutant form of Tyk2
lacking amino acids 1-21 was as functional as the wild-type protein,
i.e. it restored IFNAR1 levels, ligand binding, induced gene
expression, and antiviral protection. In contrast, further deletion to
amino acid 51 abolished all functions. Alignment and close inspection of the amino-terminal end of the JAK family members revealed some interesting features (Fig. 8) that may
explain the different properties of the deletion mutants. The first
portion (20-25 residues) of this segment is variable in length,
displays low identity, and lacks conserved secondary structures.
Starting around Tyk2 position 28, however, approximately at the amino
boundary of the JH7 region (3), predicted secondary structures common
to the different family members can be found (Fig. 8). The result of
our analysis of amino-terminal deletion mutants together with this
prediction suggest that these structural elements are critical for the
function and/or stability of the domain.
|
Recent studies of other JAK proteins have similarly suggested the
existence of a JH7-6 structural element within the first 200 residues
that would constitute a specific interaction surface for cytokine
receptor chains (2, 23, 24). Functional analysis of JAK2 deletion
mutants or of JAK2/JAK1 chimeras, expressed in JAK2-negative cells,
showed that the first 251 residues of JAK2, spanning JH7-6, were
specifically required for the interaction with the R2 subunit of the
IFN-
receptor (25). Studies of the interaction of the
c chain of
the IL-2, -4, -7, -9, and -15 receptors with deleted forms of JAK3
expressed in COS cells narrowed down the domain of interaction to JH7-6
(JAK3 residues 1-192) as well (26). This JH7-6 region alone was not
tested in a more physiological system, although the same authors did
show that a chimera containing JH7-6-5 and part of JH4 of JAK3
(residues 1-370) fused with JAK2 could restore IL-2 signaling in
JAK3-negative cells stably reconstituted with the 

components
of the IL-2 receptor. On the other hand, structure-function analysis of
JAK1 in the context of the IFN-
receptor showed that the entire
amino-terminal region (JH7-JH3), fused to the kinase domains of JAK2,
was required for the interaction with the R1 subunit of the IFN-
receptor in JAK1-negative cells (25). In this system, the level of the
R1 receptor protein was independent from the presence of the
interacting JAK1. Thus, it appears that the requirements for JH regions
other than JH7-6 vary in different receptor/JAK systems and this may
relate to the variation in the affinities of the interaction between
given partners.
In the present study, we show that, despite its ability to associate with IFNAR1 in vitro, the JH7-6 domain of Tyk2 is not sufficient to rescue IFNAR1 levels when tested in Tyk2-negative cells, indicating a critical requirement for the JH5-4-3 regions for this function. Moreover, our analysis of the Tyk2/JAK1 chimeras (Fig. 6) clearly showed that these regions from JAK1 could not functionally replace the Tyk2 ones, indicating strict specificity. These results suggest that JH5-3 is involved in the IFNAR1 stabilizing function. The mechanism by which this occurs is unknown (19), and no other examples of such phenomenon have been described to date. We cannot exclude the possibility that the JH5-3 region augments the affinity of the interaction of the JH7-6 binding domain with IFNAR1 or that it interacts with another component of the receptor complex. Whatever the mechanism, this contribution would be negligible in the in vitro system and become critical in the cellular environment. A study was recently reported on the IFNAR1 binding region of Tyk2 (27) which showed, in accordance with our in vivo data, that an intact N region was required for maximal binding to IFNAR1. This group also used lysates from bacteria expressing GST-Tyk2 fusions to pull down a CD4-IFNAR1 chimera transfected into 293T cells and proposed the existence of two weak binding sites centered around the JH6 and the JH3 boxes, respectively. We have no evidence of such weak interaction domains, and this discrepancy could be due to the different stringencies of the two experimental approaches. More sensitive methods will be required to define the relative contribution, if any, of independent JH boxes.
Our analysis of the chimeric Tyk2/JAK1 proteins also provides some
clues about the specificity of the KL and the TK domains. Full
restoration of function (gene induction and antiviral protection) by
the T-(1-581)-J chimera demonstrates the interchangeability of these
domains for Tyk2 function in cellular responses to IFN-
. Similar
conclusions were reached for a JAK1/JAK2 chimera in the IFN-
response (25). Although the function of the KL domain is not yet known,
we have previously shown that, in Tyk2, it contributes to the ligand
binding activity of the receptor (18, 19). Given the rescuing capacity
of the T-(1-581)-J chimera, which contains the KL domain of JAK1, we
conclude that this function of KL is not Tyk2-specific.
IFN-
/
-induced activation of the JAKs is thought to involve
trans-phosphorylation of regulatory tyrosine(s) located in the activation loop of the TK domain. This event takes place in a specific
temporal order (JAK1
Tyk2) with JAK1 playing the prominent role
(14, 15). We previously proposed that this order may relate more to
spatial constraints and stoichiometry of the receptor-kinase complex
than to properties intrinsic to each kinase. Our present finding that
endogenous JAK1 appears phosphorylated equally well when juxtaposed to
the T-(1-581)-J chimera or to Tyk2 (Fig. 7B) provides
further evidence of the lack of specificity of these kinases. To fully
demonstrate this, it will be necessary to investigate whether the
reciprocal chimera, bearing the N region from JAK1 fused to the kinase
domains of Tyk2, can restore IFN-
responses in JAK1-negative cells.
In this regard, it has been reported that a chimera bearing the N
region of JAK1 fused to the kinase domains of JAK2 can sustain
substantial though incomplete IFN-
-induced gene expression and
antiviral protection to EMC virus (25). Whether other biological
responses to IFN-
, not measurable in our system, could specifically
require Tyk2 kinase domains cannot be ruled out.
The analysis of the IFNAR1/Tyk2 pair points to a variant, i.e. the expression level and the intrinsic stability of endogenous cytokine receptor subunit, which could be critical for some receptor-kinase complexes and/or in some cell types. It will be interesting to investigate whether the Tyk2 domains defined here for the assembly with IFNAR1 overlap with those involved in the interaction with other Tyk2-activating cytokine receptors, such as the IL-12 or the IL-10 receptors (28, 29). Similarly, it remains to be seen whether any specificity in the function of the kinase domains of Tyk2 could be revealed through the study of these two other receptor-kinase complexes.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank M. C. Gauzzi, T. C. Yeh,
and V. Di Bartolo for discussions and critical review of the
manuscript; H. K. Lorenzo for valuable and generous help in
collecting data and preparing Fig. 8; K. Siew-Lai and R. Schreiber for
providing the sequence of the murine Tyk2 protein. We also thank A. Wilks for providing the human JAK1 cDNA, A. Ziemiecki for the JAK1
antibodies, L. Ling for the GST-IFNAR1 construct and the IFNAR1
antibodies, and R. Weil for the GST-IkB
chain construct.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC), INSERM, and the Ministère de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement Supérieur. The work at the Institut de Génétique Moléculaire was supported by grants from ARC and the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Supported by a World Health Organization (WHO) fellowship. Present address: Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 91501-970 Porto Alegre, Brazil.
¶ Supported in part by the Ministère de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement Supérieur and in part by the Institut de Formation Supérieure Biomédicale (IFSBM).
** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institut Pasteur, INSERM U276, 25 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France. Tel.: 33-1-40-61-33-05; Fax: 33-1-40-61-31-53; E-mail: pellegri{at}pasteur.fr.
The abbreviations used are:
JAK, Janus kinase; KL, kinase-like; TK, tyrosine kinase; IFN, interferon; IFNAR, interferon
receptor; GST, glutathione S-transferasemAb, monoclonal antibodyPAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresisHAT, hypoxanthine/aminopterin/thymidineSTAT, signal tranducer
activator of transcriptionVSV-G, vesicular stomatitis virus
glycoproteinkb, kilobase pair(s)WT, wild-typeIL, interleukinPCR, polymerase chain reaction.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. S. C. Graham, M. Akil, and T. J. Vyse Association of polymorphisms across the tyrosine kinase gene, TYK2 in UK SLE families Rheumatology, June 1, 2007; 46(6): 927 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Potla, T. Koeck, J. Wegrzyn, S. Cherukuri, K. Shimoda, D. P. Baker, J. Wolfman, S. M. Planchon, C. Esposito, B. Hoit, et al. Tyk2 Tyrosine Kinase Expression Is Required for the Maintenance of Mitochondrial Respiration in Primary Pro-B Lymphocytes Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2006; 26(22): 8562 - 8571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Royer, J. Staerk, M. Costuleanu, P. J. Courtoy, and S. N. Constantinescu Janus Kinases Affect Thrombopoietin Receptor Cell Surface Localization and Stability J. Biol. Chem., July 22, 2005; 280(29): 27251 - 27261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. S. Kumar, J. J. Krolewski, and S. Y. Fuchs Phosphorylation and Specific Ubiquitin Acceptor Sites Are Required for Ubiquitination and Degradation of the IFNAR1 Subunit of Type I Interferon Receptor J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 2004; 279(45): 46614 - 46620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Hofmann, A. Q. Lam, S. Frank, Y.-J. Zhou, H. L. Ramos, Y. Kanno, D. Agnello, R. J. Youle, and J. J. O'Shea Jak3-Independent Trafficking of the Common {gamma} Chain Receptor Subunit: Chaperone Function of Jaks Revisited Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2004; 24(11): 5039 - 5049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Saharinen and O. Silvennoinen The Pseudokinase Domain Is Required for Suppression of Basal Activity of Jak2 and Jak3 Tyrosine Kinases and for Cytokine-inducible Activation of Signal Transduction J. Biol. Chem., November 27, 2002; 277(49): 47954 - 47963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Giordanetto and R. T. Kroemer Prediction of the structure of human Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) comprising JAK homology domains 1 through 7 Protein Eng. Des. Sel., September 1, 2002; 15(9): 727 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Usacheva, S. Kotenko, M. M. Witte, and O. R. Colamonici Two Distinct Domains Within the N-Terminal Region of Janus Kinase 1 Interact with Cytokine Receptors J. Immunol., August 1, 2002; 169(3): 1302 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Greiser, C. Stross, P. C. Heinrich, I. Behrmann, and H. M. Hermanns Orientational Constraints of the gp130 Intracellular Juxtamembrane Domain for Signaling J. Biol. Chem., July 19, 2002; 277(30): 26959 - 26965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Kiger, D. L. Jones, C. Schulz, M. B. Rogers, and M. T. Fuller Stem Cell Self-Renewal Specified by JAK-STAT Activation in Response to a Support Cell Cue Science, December 21, 2001; 294(5551): 2542 - 2545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Dondi, E. Pattyn, G. Lutfalla, X. Van Ostade, G. Uze, S. Pellegrini, and J. Tavernier Down- |