![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 38, 24912-24920, September 18, 1998
' Subunit Inhibit Transcript Cleavage and Transcript Elongation*
,
¶
From the
Waksman Institute,
Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, the ¶ Department of Genetics,
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey,
Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, and the § Institute of
Molecular Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences,
Moscow 123182, Russia
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A 190 amino acid-long region centered around
position 1050 of the 1407-amino acid-long
' subunit of
Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) is absent from
homologues in eukaryotes, archaea and many bacteria. In chloroplasts,
the corresponding region can be more than 900 amino acids long. The
role of this hypervariable region was studied by deletion mutagenesis
of the cloned E. coli rpoC, encoding
'. Long deletions
mimicking
' from Gram-positive bacteria failed to assemble into
RNAP. Mutants with short, 40-60-amino acid-long deletions spanning
' residues 941-1130 assembled into active RNAP in
vitro. These mutant enzymes were defective in the transcript
cleavage reaction and had dramatically reduced transcription elongation
rates at subsaturating substrate concentrations due to prolonged
pausing at sites of transcriptional arrest. Binding of a monoclonal
antibody, Pyn1, to the hypervariable region inhibited transcription
elongation and intrinsic transcript cleavage and, to a lesser degree,
GreB-induced transcript cleavage, but did not interfere with GreB
binding to RNAP. We propose that mutations in and antibody binding to
the hypervariable, functionally dispensable region of
' inhibit
transcript cleavage and elongation by distorting the flanking conserved
segment G in the active center.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DNA-dependent RNA polymerases from eubacteria share a
common subunit composition (1). The core
RNAP1 enzyme (subunit
composition
2
') is catalytically proficient but is
unable to initiate transcription on promoters. Binding of a
subunit
converts the core enzyme into a holoenzyme, which can recognize a
specific set of promoters (2). The
and
' subunits together
constitute more than 80% of the core RNAP mass and jointly form the
catalytic center of the enzyme (3, 4). RNAPs from eukaryotes and
archaea have subunits that are homologous to
and
' of
eubacterial enzymes (5-7). The evolutionary conservation within the
/
' lineages is limited to relatively short segments of primary
sequence; each subunit has 8-10 highly conserved segments. The amino-
to carboxyl-terminal order of the conserved segments is invariant.
The spacing between the conserved segments can vary even when subunits
from closely related species are compared, due to an accumulation of
insertions and deletions. There are several reasons why studies of such
evolutionarily variable regions can shed light on RNAP structure and
function. First, these regions may form docking sites for
species-specific regulators of transcription (8, 9). Second, variable
regions are likely to be surface-exposed and can therefore be used for
affinity tagging of RNAP and transcription complexes (10). Third,
variable regions often tolerate splits, allowing preparation of
functional RNAP with relatively short
and/or
' subunit
fragments, dramatically facilitating mapping of protein-protein and
protein-nucleic acid contacts during transcription (11, 12).
The focus of this report is an evolutionary hypervariable region in the
C-terminal portion of Escherichia coli
' (amino acids 1141-1131). This region is highly variable in proteobacteria and is
absent from homologs from most other bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes.
Despite this apparent redundancy, numerous point mutations that altered
the termination and elongation properties of E. coli RNAP
were localized in the hypervariable region (25, 37, 38). In addition,
mutations in the largest (
'-like) subunit of yeast RNAP II that
occurred very close to the hypervariable region dramatically decreased
interaction of the enzyme with transcript cleavage factor TFIIS (33).
Here, we probed the role of the hypervariable region and adjacent
segments of E. coli
' by deletion mutagenesis of the
cloned rpoC gene. Mutant RNAPs were assembled in
vitro, and their elongation and termination properties, as well as
their abilities to interact with the TFIIS analog GreB, were
determined. A long deletion that completely removed the hypervariable
region blocked enzyme assembly in vivo and in
vitro. Short (40-60 amino acid) deletions, which together span
the entire hypervariable region, did not prevent RNAP assembly and
basic transcription function in vitro; however, the mutant
enzymes had a dramatic defect in transcript elongation at low substrate
concentrations. At high substrate concentrations, the mutants elongated
and terminated transcription normally. The mutant enzymes were also
defective in GreB-induced transcript cleavage, but the nature of the
defect was complex, because both the ability to interact with GreB and the ability to support intrinsic transcript cleavage by the RNAP catalytic center were altered by mutations. A binding epitope for an
inhibitory mAb, Pyn1, was mapped in the hypervariable region. Binding
of Pyn1 to RNAP efficiently inhibited both the RNA synthesis and
transcript cleavage reactions.
Our data thus demonstrate that the evolutionary hypervariable region of
', which is completely absent from homologues from eukaryotes,
archaea, and many eubacteria, is unexpectedly important for E. coli RNAP assembly and is involved in transcript elongation and
cleavage. Because this region is missing from
' homologues from most
organisms, however, this involvement is probably indirect.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Deletion Mutagenesis of the Cloned rpoC Gene--
The
pUC19-based pMKa201S793F rpoC expression plasmid was used to
generate deletions in the rpoC gene. The plasmid is a
derivative of pMKA201 (13) and carries a transdominant
streptolydigin-resistance mutation, changing
' Ser793 to
Phe (14). To generate nested Bal31 deletions in
pMKa201S793F, a unique BamHI linker was inserted
in the EcoRI site at codon 987 of the structural gene.
pMKa201S793F was underdigested with EcoRI (cut
twice at codons 175 and 987 of the structural gene and once in the
vector), and ligated to the EcoRI fragment from phage mp17Km
carrying the kanamycin resistance gene (11). Kanamycin-resistant transformants were screened for the appearance of inducible truncated fragments of the
' polypeptide using SDS-PAGE. Recombinant plasmids containing kanamycin cassette inserted at rpoC position 987 was treated with BamHI to remove the cassette and
recircularized. The resultant plasmid pIB
987 overproduced
' with 6 amino acids (IPRIRG) inserted between amino acids 987 and
988.
987 was linearized with
BamHI, treated with Bal31 for various times, and
recircularized. After transformation in E. coli XL1-Blue
cells, transformants were screened for the appearance of inducible
'
polypeptides with increased mobility on SDS-gels.
pIB
(1145-1198) was constructed by treating
pMKa201S793F with AsuI (cut twice at codons 1145 and 1198 of the structural gene) and religating.
pIB
(1091-1130) was constructed from a plasmid expressing
the C-terminal portion of rpoC (
'877-1407,
Ref. 12), containing two in-frame KpnI recognition sites
corresponding to rpoC codons 1091 and 1130. The
rpoC fragment containing the deletion was then recloned back
into pMKa201S793F.
Plasmids expressing
(877-948),
(941-1130),
(1042-1091), and
(1131-1155)S were constructed by annealing a pair of corresponding "outward" primers, followed by polymerase chain reaction
amplification of the whole pMKa201S793F plasmid (30 cycles
of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 56 °C, and 8 min at 72 °C). Each
primer used in the amplification reaction contained an in-frame
BamHI site. The amplified plasmid was treated with
BamHI, recircularized, and transformed in XL1-Blue cells.
Transformants were screened for the appearance of inducible
'
polypeptides with increased mobility on SDS-gels, and deletions were
confirmed by DNA sequencing. To minimize polymerase chain reaction-related errors, deletions were recloned as
SalI-SacII (cut at rpoC codons 877 and
1321, respectively) fragments back into appropriately treated parental
pMKa201S793F.
All of the overexpressed
' subunit variants were found in inclusion
bodies when induced with 1 mM IPTG at 37 °C.
Antibodies-- mAbs Pyn1 and Pyn4 were described previously (15). mAbs were precipitated from ascites fluid by addition of (NH4)2SO4 to 50% saturation. Before use, aliquots of precipitated protein were dialyzed into transcription buffer. Some mAb preparations contained an RNase activity. Hence, transcription reactions were supplemented with 0.5 mg of tRNA to prevent the degradation of RNA in transcription complexes. The working concentration of mAb was determined by combining a fixed amount of RNAP with increasing amounts of mAb, followed by separation of protein complexes on native 4-15% Phast gels (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The amount of mAb used in transcription reactions was twice the amount needed to shift completely the band of RNAP on a native gel.
RNAP Reconstitution--
RNAP was reconstituted according to the
published procedure (16). The molar ratio of
,
, and mutant
'
in the reconstitution reactions was 1:4:8. After reconstitution and
thermoactivation in the presence of
70, RNAP
preparations were either used directly or further purified by
FPLC/gel-filtration on a Superose-6 and Mono Q columns (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as described (17), concentrated by filtration through a C-100 concentrator (Amicon) to ~1 mg/ml, and stored in 50%
glycerol storage buffer at
20 °C.
Affinity Cross-linking--
The synthesis of photoactive
4-azidotetrafluorobenzylamino-pApUpC derivative will be described
elsewhere (18).2 A standard
20-µl cross-linking reaction contained 0.5-1 µg of RNAP holoenzyme
immobilized on ~5 µl of Ni2+-NTA agarose (Qiagen), 0.5 µg of the 324-base pair DNA fragment containing T7 A1 promoter
(template 1 of Ref. 18), and 10 µM ApUpC in standard
transcription buffer containing 40 mM KCl, 40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 10 mM MgCl2.
Reactions were incubated for 5 min at 37 °C to form the open
complexes and transferred to room temperature, and ATP and GTP were
added to a final concentration of 25 µM. After a 10-min
incubation, reactions were washed three times with 1.5 ml of
transcription buffer as described (13) and left in a ~20-µl volume.
-[32P]CTP (3000 Ci/mmol, NEN Life Science Products)
was added to a final concentration of 0.3 µM, and the
incubation was continued for 10 min. After washing, the immobilized
EC12 was UV-irradiated with a hand-held lamp at 254 nm for
3 min. The lamp was positioned flat at the top of open Eppendorf tubes that contained the reaction mixtures and that were kept on ice. After
irradiation, EC12 was desorbed from the solid support by
addition of imidazole to 100 mM, an equal volume of
SDS-containing Laemmli loading buffer (20) was added, and proteins were
separated by SDS-PAGE.
In Vitro Transcription--
To determine transcription
elongation rates, elongation complexes stalled at position +20 were
prepared in 50 µl of transcription buffer containing 25 µl of
Ni2+-NTA agarose, 20 nM of T7 A1 promoter DNA
fragment described above, 40 nM RNAP, 0.5 mM
ApU, 50 µM CTP and GTP, 2.5 µM
[
32P]ATP (300 Ci/mmol). Reactions were incubated for
15 min at 23 °C and were washed as described above. Washed
EC20 was synchronously started by making reactions 2.5 µM with NTPs. Reactions proceeded for 0-600 s at
23 °C. Reactions were terminated by the addition of
formamide-containing loading buffer. To determine transcription
termination efficiencies, EC20 was restarted by the
addition of 250 µM NTPs. Reactions proceeded for 1 min at
23 °C. Products were analyzed by urea-PAGE electrophoresis (7 M urea, 6% polyacrylamide), followed by autoradiography
and PhosphorImager analysis.
Transcript Cleavage-- Purified immobilized elongation complexes were briefly washed with 1 ml of transcription buffer, pH 9.0. Reactions were left in ~50 µl and incubated at room temperature. At various time points, reaction aliquots were withdrawn, combined with an equal volume of formamide-containing loading buffer, and analyzed by denaturing gel-electrophoresis and autoradiography. Cleavage with GreB was done as described earlier (21).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Deletion Mutagenesis of the Hypervariable Region of E. coli rpoC
and Mapping of mAb Binding Epitopes--
Alignment of the amino acid
sequence of E. coli
' with homologues from other
organisms reveals a long region of primary sequence (E. coli
residues 941-1131) that is present in proteobacteria but is totally
absent in homologues from other eubacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes
(Fig. 1). In contrast, a much longer
sequence (up to 900 amino acids) is found in the corresponding region
of
' subunits from cyanobacteria and chloroplasts. On the N terminus of this hypervariable region is highly conserved segment G (residues 912-940). C-terminal to the hypervariable region is a short segment of
conserved sequence that we will refer to as segment G' (residues 1132-1148; Fig. 1). Segments G and G' form one continuous stretch of
conserved amino acids in eukaryotes, archaea, and most bacteria. Sequence C-terminal to G' is not conserved and is followed by the
C-terminal conserved segment H (residues 1324-1362).
|
(941-1130) removed all of the E. coli hypervariable region and thus resembles the
' subunit from
Mycobacterium leprae (22).
(1131-1155)S removed all of
segment G' and replaced it with a Ser residue;
(877-948) (not shown
in Fig. 1) deleted conserved segment G.
(1145-1198) removed 54 amino acids immediately C-terminal to G'.
(1145-1198)
removed coding sequences between in-frame naturally occurring
recognition sites of restriction endonuclease AsuI and is
referred to as
Asu throughout the text. Similarly,
(1091-1130) removed coding sequences between the
in-frame naturally occurring KpnI sites and is referred to
as
Kpn.
Previously, one of us reported the isolation of two anti-
' mAbs,
Pyn1 and Pyn4, using RNAP core enzyme as an antigene (15). Pyn1
efficiently inhibited transcription by E. coli RNAP as well as by the Pseudomonas putida
enzyme,3 whereas Pyn4 had no
effect on transcription (15). We localized Pyn1 and Pyn4 binding
epitopes using the
' deletion mutants described above. To locate mAb
binding epitopes, cells expressing different plasmid-borne variants of
rpoC were induced and lysed, and proteins were separated by
SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blotting with Pyn1 or Pyn4. As shown in
Table I, all deletions in the
hypervariable region abolished Pyn1 binding and thus must have
destroyed the binding epitope. In contrast,
(877-948),
(1131-1155)S, and
Asu did not affect Pyn1
binding. These data suggest that
' amino acids 949-1091 contain the
Pyn1 binding epitope. However, because both
(941-1000)
and
Kpn
(1091-1130), which are 90 amino acids apart,
disrupt Pyn1 binding, the antibody epitope may be conformational rather
than linear. Thus, we can not exclude that
' sequences outside the
hypervariable region may also participate in the binding of this
inhibitory antibody.
|
Asu was the only deletion that abolished the binding of
Pyn4. We conclude that
' amino acids 1145-1198 contribute to Pyn4 binding epitope.
Properties of rpoC Mutants in Vivo--
All rpoC
deletions were obtained in pMKa201S693F rpoC expression
plasmid. In this plasmid, a transdominant streptolydigin-resistant S693F allele of rpoC is placed under the control
of the inducible lac promoter (14). Therefore, the function
of mutant, plasmid-borne rpoC can be tested in
vivo by registering its ability to confer streptolydigin
resistance to the sensitive host cells CAG 14064 (13). When CAG 14064 cells overproducing the WT and mutant
' subunits were plated on a
medium containing 12.5 µg/ml streptolydigin, only cells overproducing
parental S693F
', and the linker insertion
987 formed colonies
(Table I).
',
as well as
987,
(1042-1091),
(941-1000),
(987-1042),
Kpn, and
Asu formed colonies at the elevated temperature (data
not shown). Cells overproducing S693F
',
987, and
Asu grew
robustly at 42 °C, whereas the others formed minute colonies (Table
I).
We do not know whether the mutant
' subunits were the only source of
' at high temperature. Landick et al. (24) encountered similar "partial" phenotypes when testing in vivo
function of mutant, plasmid-borne rpoB genes. These authors
suggested that growth at restrictive temperature may occur when the
plasmid-borne rpo gene provides enough partially functional
RNAP to allow the growth of the host, which has a low level of the
wild-type, chromosomally encoded RNAP even at restrictive temperature.
In contrast, administering streptolydigin completely inhibits
wild-type, chromosomal RNAP, and thus prevents the cell growth.
In Vitro Reconstitution of Mutant RNAPs--
Because the results
of functional assays in vivo were inconclusive, we assembled
mutant
' into RNAP in vitro. Assembled RNAP forms
characteristic peaks during chromatography on Superose-6 and Mono Q
columns (17). No such peaks were observed in the course of purification
of reconstitution mixtures containing
(877-948),
(1131-1155)S,
and
(941-1130) and WT
,
, and
subunits; neither crude
reconstitution mixtures nor chromatographic fractions contained any
RNAP activity (Table I and data not shown).
' subunits expressed from pMK201 plasmid are fused to the
C-terminal His6 tag, allowing easy purification of RNAP
harboring plasmid-borne
' (13). Our repeated attempts to purify
RNAPs harboring the two largest
' deletions from cells using
affinity chromatography failed (data not shown). We conclude that
deletions of conserved segments G and G', as well as removal of the
entire hypervariable region, completely abolish the ability of
' to enter E. coli RNAP core in vitro and in
vivo.
5 smaller deletions (
(941-1000),
(987-1042),
(1042-1091),
Kpn and
Asu) assembled into RNAP in vitro as judged by
the appearance of characteristic chromatographic peaks in the course of
purification. The catalytic proficiency of RNAP mutants was demonstrated by template-dependent affinity labeling of
shortened
' polypeptides with derivatized nascent RNA. In this
reaction, Ni2+-NTA agarose-immobilized RNAP was used to
form open complexes with the T7 A1 promoter-containing DNA fragment.
Transcription was primed with a derivatized, photoactive ApUpC,
complimentary to positions +1-+3 of the promoter. In the presence of
unlabeled GTP and ATP, transcription proceeded to position +11 and was
halted because of the absence of CTP, specified by the position +12 of the template. After extensive washing, elongation complexes stalled at
position 11 (EC11) were extended with radioactive CTP to
obtain EC12. EC12 containing radioactive and
photoactive RNA was washed and UV-irradiated to induce protein-RNA
cross-link formation, and the reaction products were separated by
SDS-PAGE. Irradiation of RNAPWT elongation complexes
resulted in radioactive labeling of both
and
' with equal
efficiency (Fig. 2A). As can
be seen from the autoradiogram presented on Fig. 2A,
labeled, full-sized
' is absent from lanes containing mutant
enzymes, establishing that little or no contaminating
RNAPWT was present. Instead, lanes containing mutant
enzymes have a labeled band with the mobility of
, which represents
a mixture of labeled full-sized
and mutant
' subunits
(full-sized
' and
are 1407 and 1342 amino acids long,
respectively; deletions in
' make it impossible to separate the two
proteins by SDS-PAGE). Control experiments established that
(i) subunit labeling was template-dependent, and
(ii) subunit labeling did not occur when photoactive,
radioactive RNA 12-mer was added to RNAP in trans. Furthermore, cleavage of the RNA-product adduct with formic acid demonstrated that the RNA moiety of the adduct was 12 nucleotides in
length (data not shown).2 On the basis of these results, we
conclude that the mutant enzymes are assembled, active, and free of
contaminating RNAPWT.
|
Transcription by Mutant RNA Polymerases--
We decided to
concentrate on RNAP
Kpn and RNAP
Asu
because preliminary experiments showed that
RNAP
(941-1000), RNAP
(987-1042), and
RNAP
(1042-1091) are very similar to
RNAP
Kpn.
' region under study altered the elongation and termination properties of RNAP in vivo and in vitro.
Accordingly, we checked the transcription elongation and termination
properties of mutant RNAPs. Immobilized elongation complexes stalled at
position 20 of the T7 A1 promoter-driven transcription unit were
prepared. To determine elongation rates, transcription was resumed by
the addition of NTPs at subsaturating (2.5 µM)
concentration. At various time points, reaction aliquots were
withdrawn, and the products were analyzed by denaturing PAGE (Fig.
2A). As can be seen from Fig. 2, RNAP
Asu did
not differ significantly from RNAPWT in this assay, but
RNAP
Kpn was dramatically "slower." The apparent slow
rate of transcript elongation by RNAP
Kpn was caused by
extended (t[ifrax;1/2] ~ 2.5 min) pausing at template positions 26 and 27, and later at positions 37 and 56. The same pausing
pattern was obtained when transcription by immobilized RNAP
Kpn was resumed from positions 12, 23, and 25 (data
not shown).
Extended pausing by RNAP
Kpn at positions 26, 27, and 56 is intriguing, because transcription complexes artificially stalled at these positions are efficiently converted into an arrested conformation (26-30). During arrest at EC26 or EC27, the
catalytic center of the enzyme disengages from the 3'-end of the
nascent RNA, and RNAP slides backward. As a result, the catalytic
center repositions to about position 20. This intermediate complex is
still able to continue transcription by sliding forward to the active
conformation; it can also slide back even further, to position 11, and
become permanently arrested. The permanently arrested, dead-end complex
can only be rescued by transcript cleavage. In the presence of the
transcript cleavage factor GreB, the catalytic center hydrolyses the
RNA at position 11. The newly generated 3'-end of the 5'-end-proximal,
11-mer cleavage product can then be elongated by RNAP; the
3'-end-proximal cleavage products are lost from the complex.
To investigate the nature of the RNAP
Kpn pause at
position 26, immobilized EC20 was incubated for 2 min in
the presence of low (2.5 µM) concentrations of NTPs,
followed by a brief (30 s) incubation with GreB (Fig. 3A). As can be seen, addition
of GreB to transcription reaction resulted in the appearance of new
products. These new cleavage products were stably associated with
transcription complexes (data not shown) and had the electrophoretic
mobility of 20- and 22-mers. Control lanes of Fig. 3A
demonstrate that the addition of GreB to stalled, arrested
RNAP
Kpn EC27 resulted in cleavage,
generating a 5'-terminal 11-mer, as expected. Based on these data, we
conclude that in paused RNAP
Kpn EC26 and
EC27, the transcript has reversibly slid out of the active
site, and therefore, the paused complexes correspond to intermediate of the arrested complex formation pathway (28-30).
|
Kpn could be explained by its
increased ability to slide backward at certain parts of the template. Although the ability to slide back is difficult to test, we
investigated the efficiency of EC27 arrest complex
formation by RNAP
Kpn. In this experiment, shown in Fig.
3B by the extent of transcription arrest by artificially
stalled, purified RNAP
Kpn EC27 was
determined by the ability to be chased into EC32 upon the
addition of ATP and CTP. Freshly purified EC27 formed by
both RNAPWT and RNAP
Kpn were elongation
competent (Fig. 3B, lanes 2 and 5).
However, after 5 min of incubation at 37 °C in the absence of
nucleotides only 10% of initial EC27 could be chased upon
addition of nucleotides. Importantly, there was no difference between
RNAP
Kpn and RNAPWT in the extent of arrest
(Fig. 3B, lanes 3 and 6).
Extensive pausing by RNAP
Kpn could be caused by an
unusually high apparent Km for the incoming UTP
(corresponding to position 27), accompanied by reversible sliding to
position 20. Indeed, increasing NTP concentration decreased pausing by
RNAP
Kpn. At high (250 µM) substrate
concentrations, RNAP
Kpn completed a single round of
transcription in 1 min and terminated transcription on the
tR2 terminator with nearly the same efficiency as RNAPWT
and RNAP
Asu (Fig. 3C).
Transcript Cleavage by Mutant RNAPs--
A genetic screen of yeast
RPO21 (an evolutionary homologue of rpoC) identified
mutations that altered the ability of RNAP II to interact with
transcript cleavage factor TFIIS (31). Seven mutations were isolated
and they all clustered between conserved segments G and H (32). It was
subsequently shown that these mutations inhibited interaction of mutant
RNAP II with TFIIS by as much as 50-fold (33). Because these mutations
occurred very close to hypervariable region studied here (see Fig. 1),
we investigated the transcript cleavage activity of mutant E. coli RNAPs. As can be seen from Fig.
4A, EC21 formed by
RNAP
Kpn required approximately 10 times more GreB to
achieve the same extent of cleavage as complexes formed by
RNAPWT and RNAP
Asu. The same result was
obtained when the GreB homolog GreA was used to induce the cleavage
reaction (data not shown).
|
Asu EC20 had
undergone cleavage (Fig 4B, lanes 2 and 6,
respectively). In contrast, only 10% of RNAP
Kpn
EC20 had undergone cleavage after a 5-min incubation, and
less than 60% was cleaved after a 20-min incubation in pH 9.0 buffer
(lanes 10 and 12). To estimate GreB binding to RNAP
Kpn,
we performed UV-photo-cross-linking of GreB to derivatized 3'-end of
nascent RNA in RNAPWT and RNAP
Kpn
EC21 (Fig. 4C). In agreement with previous data
(36, 39),
' and GreB were efficiently cross-linked to derivatized,
radioactive RNA. Lowering the amount of GreB in the reaction resulted
in decreased cross-linking of GreB to RNA, but the amount of
'-RNA
cross-link remained constant. As can be seen from Fig. 4C,
RNAP
Kpn complexes required approximately 10 times more
GreB to achieve the same extent of GreB-RNA cross-links as complexes
formed by RNAPWT. This effect was especially evident at low
GreB concentrations (compare Fig. 4C, lanes 6 and
12). From this result, we conclude that
Kpn either
directly decreases GreB binding to RNAP or alters the relative position
of GreB and the RNA 3'-end, thus decreasing the efficiency of GreB-RNA
cross-linking near the catalytic center.
To estimate GreB binding to mutant RNAP directly, we used GreB protein
tagged with an N-terminal heart muscle protein kinase (HMPK)
recognition site.4 Different
amounts of 32P-end-labeled HMPK-GreB were combined with
RNAPWT or RNAP
Kpn core enzymes, and after a
short incubation to allow complex formation, the reaction products were
resolved by native PAGE and GreB-containing complexes were visualized
by autoradiography (Fig. 4D). As can be seen, both enzymes
formed complexes with [32P[HMPK-labeled GreB with the
same efficiency.
Effects of mAb Binding to RNAP on Transcription in Vitro--
In
agreement with our previous data (15), mAb Pyn1 efficiently inhibited
elongation of the nascent RNA from EC20 to EC23
by RNAPWT (Fig. 5A,
top, lane 3). Transcription by RNAP
Kpn was
unaffected by Pyn1 (Fig. 5A, top, lane 7),
because Pyn1 did not bind RNAP
Kpn (Fig. 5A,
bottom, lane 5). In contrast, Pyn4 had no effect on EC20 to EC23 conversion by both enzymes, even
though more than 50% of elongation complexes were bound to mAb at the
experimental conditions used (lanes 3 and 6).
|
Kpn was
unaffected at these conditions (data not shown). When GreB was added to
RNAPWT, EC20 transcript cleavage occurred even
in the presence of Pyn1 (Fig. 5C). Still, an ~10-fold
excess of GreB was required in the presence of Pyn1 to achieve the same
extent of cleavage as in its absence (compare Fig. 5C, lanes
5 and 7). GreB did not cause dissociation of Pyn1 from
RNAP, as the experiment shown in Fig. 5D demonstrates. In
this experiment, different amounts of 32P-end-labeled
HMPK-GreB were combined with RNAPWT core in the presence or
the absence of Pyn1. After a short incubation to allow complex
formation, the reaction products were resolved by native PAGE, and
GreB-containing complexes were visualized by autoradiography. In the
absence of Pyn1, [32P[HMPK-GreB formed a complex with
RNAP (Fig. 5D, lanes 1-3). Addition of Pyn1
resulted in the appearance of a radioactive complex with a slower
electrophoretic mobility (lanes 4-6). We conclude that GreB
and Pyn1 can simultaneously bind to the RNAP core molecule.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A set of deletions in the cloned E. coli rpoC gene was
constructed to evaluate the role of an evolutionarily hypervariable region of the RNAP
' subunit (amino acids 941-1130) in enzyme function. This region is completely absent from
' subunits of most
bacteria and is highly divergent within proteobacteria (Fig. 1).
Suprisingly, deletion of the entire hypervariable region completely prevented RNAP assembly both in vivo and in
vitro. Obviously, similar deletions (relative to E. coli
') naturally found in the
' subunits from other
bacteria do not prevent RNAP assembly in these organisms. Apparently,
compensating differences in the
,
, and/or
' subunits of these
bacteria allow RNAP assembly to proceed.
The five functional deletions obtained in this work together remove 243 amino acids (>17%) of
' and prove that, as in
, long regions of
' sequence are dispensable for basic functions of E. coli
RNAP in vitro. These functional deletions clearly fall into
two classes.
Asu removes 54 amino acids N-terminal of the hypervariable region and does not change RNAP transcription in vitro. In contrast, deletions of similar size spanning the
hypervariable region (
941-1000,
987-1042,
1042-1091, and
1091-1130 (
Kpn)) cause a dramatic defect in transcription
elongation at subsaturating substrate concentrations and inhibit
transcript cleavage.
The functional difference between the two classes of mutants is also
evident from different effects of mAb binding. Pyn1 binds to the
hypervariable region (amino acids 948-1130) and efficiently inhibits
RNA synthesis and intrinsic transcript cleavage. In contrast, Pyn4, the
binding epitope of which is destroyed by
Asu, has no effect on
transcription. The hypervariable region is highly immunogenic: in an
independent study Luo and Krakow (34) isolated several mAbs that
interacted with this region of E. coli
'. mAb 311G2 inhibited RNA synthesis by interfering with substrate binding, and its
binding epitope was within
' amino acids 1047-1093. Thus, 311G2
must be very similar to Pyn1.
The most striking feature of RNAP
Kpn-like enzymes is
prolonged pausing at sites of transcriptional arrest (26-30),
suggesting that the hypervariable region is involved in transcript
elongation and cleavage. However, this involvement is probably
indirect, because the hypervariable region is completely absent from
RNAP of most organisms. We therefore propose that the deletions in
'
studied here act indirectly, by affecting function(s) of adjacent conserved segments. There is good evidence that segment G, which is
located immediately to the N terminus of the hypervariable region,
participates directly in transcript cleavage and transcriptional arrest. Borukhov et al. (35) demonstrated that an 80-amino
acid-long
' fragment containing the 8 C-terminal-most amino acids of
conserved segment G and the 74 N-terminal-most amino acids of the
hypervariable region contains the site that is cross-linked to the
3'-end of the nascent RNA in EC20. It was later found that
this protein-RNA contact is indicative of the arrested conformation of
the elongation complex (40). Further protein-RNA cross-linking
experiments established that segment G and GreB proteins
could both be cross-linked to the nascent RNA 3'-terminus and thus must
be within several Å of each other in the complex (36). Thus, it is
likely that segment G can form an alternative, unproductive RNA binding
site during transcript elongation. The defect in
RNAP
Kpn-like enzymes could be the result of increased
interactions between region G and the RNA 3'-end in the mutant complex
at the potential arrest sites, causing backsliding, and elevated
apparent Km for the incoming nucleoside
triphosphate. This defect is only observed at subsaturating substrate
concentrations, because at high substrate concentrations, addition of
NMP to the 3'-end of the nascent RNA occurs faster than backsliding,
and mutant enzymes elongate RNA normally. Close inspection of the gel
shown in Fig. 2B reveals that RNAPWT also pauses
at the sites of transcriptional arrest, but clears the pause sites
rapidly. Thus, reversible backsliding may play a role in
RNAPWT pausing as well.
One of the goals of this study was to obtain RNAP mutants defective in
interactions with transcript cleavage factors. Data of Wu et
al. (33) suggested that the region of the largest (
'-like) subunit of yeast RNAP II between conserved segments G and H may form
the primary site of TFIIS interactions with its target RNAP. Seven
tightly clustered linker insertion mutants studied by these authors
showed little or no effect in intrinsic transcript cleavage and
transcription elongation at high NTP concentrations but were defective
in the TFIIS-dependent transcript cleavage, and did not
form a complex with TFIIS in vitro. Three of the seven yeast mutations occurred immediately to the right of conserved segment G'. In
E. coli, the corresponding amino acids are removed by
(1145-1198) (
Asu) mutation. Suprisingly,
Asu is the least
defective of the five functional RNAP mutants obtained in this work. In
contrast,
Kpn-like enzymes with deletions in hypervariable region
itself are defective in Gre-dependent transcript cleavage,
but the defect is relatively mild. Unlike the situation with yeast
RNAP, the interactions between the mutant enzymes and the transcript
cleavage factor were not affected as measured by the native gel binding assay. The nature of the cleavage defect is complex, because both the
intrinsic transcript cleavage activity of the catalytic center and
GreB-RNA cross-linking are affected by mutations. The latter defect
could be due to repositioning of segment G, which is known to be close
to GreB in the elongation complex (see above). Thus, our data suggest
that TFIIS and GreB, which are functional analogs, but not homologous
to each other, may interact with their respective RNA polymerases
differently.
Published alignments of
'-like RNAP subunits (7, 24) differ
significantly from the alignment presented in Fig. 1. The main feature
of our alignment is the existence of an additional conserved segment,
G' (E. coli positions 1031-1040). Our alignment offers
clues to the striking differences in the biochemical properties of
mutant enzymes obtained in this work and is supported by the pattern of
evolutionary variation in this region. In archaea, eukaryotes, and most
bacteria, segments G and G' are fused, forming one continuous stretch
of conserved amino acids. In contrast, in proteobacteria,
cyanobacteria, and chloroplasts, a long insertion occurred at the G/G'
boundary (referred to as the hypervariable region in this work). The
sequence of this insert appears to be unrelated between proteobacteria
and cyanobacteria, and is highly divergent within each group.
Interestingly, the site of the insertion relative to the G/G' boundary
is the same in both groups, which are far apart from each other
phylogenetically (41). Thus, insertions at the G/G' boundary may have
occurred at least twice in evolution. The inserted region is highly
immunogenic, and may therefore loop out at the surface of the RNAP.
Deletions in or mAb binding to the hypervariable region may alter the
relative position of G and G', resulting in the observed defects in
transcription. The importance of G' is highlighted by the fact that the
smallest deletion obtained in this work,
(1131-1155)S,
which removed G', failed to assemble in RNAP in vitro. On
the other hand, it is possible that removal of approximately 50 amino
acids C-terminal to G' in the
Asu mutant did not alter the relative
positions of G and G' and thus had no major impact on the transcription properties of RNAP. Ongoing site-specific mutagenesis should clarify the functional role of this segment in RNA polymerase assembly, catalytic function, and transcript cleavage.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Arkady Mustaev for reagents and advice on protein-RNA cross-linking, Nick Loizos for the gift of plasmid overproducing HMPK-GreB, and Robert Landick and Cathleen Chan for useful comments and critically reading the manuscript. Part of this work was done by N. Z. during her time at Alex Goldfarb's laboratory (Public Health Research Institute, New York, NY).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by The Borroughs Wellcome Fund for Biomedical Research Career Award, by the start-up funds from Rutgers University (to K. S.), and by Research Grants 96-04-49019 and 96-1598076 from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and INTAS-RFBR Grant 9501150 (to V. N.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
732-445-6095; Fax: 732-445-5735; E-mail:
severik{at}waksman.rutgers.edu.
The abbreviations used are: RNAP, RNA polymerase; EC, elongation complex stalled at position +n of the template, mAb, monoclonal antibodyPAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresisUTP, uridine triphosphateWT, wild-typeHMPK, heart muscle protein kinase.
2 A. Mustaev and A. Goldfarb, manuscript in preparation.
3 A. Lebedev and V. Nikiforov, unpublished results.
4 N. Loizos, unpublished results.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|