Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yasuda, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yasuda, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 39, 25381-25387, September 25, 1998


Estrogen-dependent Production of Erythropoietin in Uterus and Its Implication in Uterine Angiogenesis*

Yoshiko YasudaDagger , Seiji Masuda§, Mariko Chikuma§, Kazuhiko Inoue§, Masaya Nagao§, and Ryuzo Sasaki§

From the Dagger  Department of Anatomy, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka 589-0014 and the § Division of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Although erythropoietin (Epo) has been shown to possess in vitro angiogenic activity, its physiological significance has not been demonstrated. Normally angiogenesis does not occur actively in adults but an exception is the female reproductive organ. In the uterine endometrium, angiogenesis takes place actively for supporting the endometrial growth that occurs during transition from the diestrus to estrous stage. This transition is under control of 17beta -estradiol (E2), an ovarian hormone, and can be mimicked by injection of E2 to ovariectomized (OVX) mouse. Thus, the uterus is a pertinent site to examine the Epo function in angiogenesis. We found that Epo protein and its mRNA were produced in an E2-dependent manner, when the uterus from OVX mouse was cultured in vitro. The de novo protein synthesis was not needed for E2 induction of Epo mRNA. Administration of E2 to OVX mouse induced a rapid and transient increase in Epo mRNA in the uterus. Injection of Epo into the OVX mouse uterine cavity promoted blood vessel formation in the endometrium. Furthermore, injection of the soluble Epo receptor capable of binding with Epo into the uterine cavity of non-OVX mouse in diestrus stage inhibited the endometrial transition to proestrus stage, whereas heat-inactivated soluble Epo receptor allowed the transition to occur. These results, combined with our finding that the endothelial cells in uterine endometrium express Epo receptor, strongly suggest that Epo is an important factor for the E2-dependent cyclical angiogenesis in uterus.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Angiogenesis is the formation of new blood vessels by the extension of pre-existing vessels into avascular area and involves the proteolytic degradation of the vascular basal membrane, proliferation and migration of endothelial cells, and alignment of the migrating cells for tubular formation. Angiogenesis occurs very actively in embryogenesis, but it is down-regulated in the healthy adult. Active neovascularization in adults takes place in certain pathological conditions such as arthritis, diabetic retinopathy, wound healing, and tumor growth (reviewed in Ref. 1). An exception in adults is the female reproductive organ, where active angiogenesis is demanded to support the cyclic remodeling of tissues. In every estrus cycle, capillary networks in the ovaries are formed for supporting development of follicles and corpora lutea. In the uterus, cyclic formation of blood vessels in the functional endometrium occurs to compensate for the lost vessels. In response to embryonic implantation, decidual transformation of the endometrium is accompanied by neovascularization, which ultimately leads to formation of maternal vessels in the placenta.

Cyclic development of the uterine endometrium is under the control of E2,1 which is produced by ovarian follicles (2). This endometrial development can be mimicked by the administration of E2 to the OVX immature or adult animals (3-5). A number of growth factors including fibroblast growth factor, tumor growth factor, and VEGF have been implicated in angiogenesis (Refs. 6-8 and references therein). One of the early events caused by the E2 administration to the OVX rats is the increased vascular permeability in the endometrium (9). Based on the temporal pattern of mRNA expression after the E2 administration (10) and capability of increasing vascular permeability as well as the mitogenic activity for vascular endothelial cells (11-13), VEGF has been proposed to be a critical factor in the early phase of E2-induced angiogenesis (10, 14).

Epo is a key factor for regulating erythropoiesis by stimulating proliferation and differentiation of late erythroid precursor cells (15-19). Epo involved in erythropoiesis is produced by the kidney in adults and the liver in fetuses. In addition to the erythropoietic function of Epo, we and others (20-26) have recently shown that the brain has a paracrine Epo/EpoR system, which is independent of erythropoietic system; neurons express EpoR (20, 22) and astrocytes produce Epo (24-26). We have shown (22, 27) that brain Epo contributes to neuron survival by protecting neurons from ischemic damage.

Angiogenic activity of Epo has been studied by the use of in vitro cultured endothelial cells. EpoR mRNA is expressed in endothelial cells from human umbilical vein, bovine adrenal capillary, and rat brain capillary (28, 29). Epo stimulates proliferation and migration of human and bovine endothelial cells (30) and also angiogenesis of the rat thoracic aorta (31). Recent studies of human umbilical vein endothelial cells indicate that Epo signaling in endothelial cells is conducted via tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins including phosphorylation of transcription factor STAT-5, which is similar to that in erythroid cells (32). However, it is unknown whether endothelial EpoR is physiologically functional or is only a vestige reflecting a common developmental lineage between endothelial cells and hematopoietic cells (8). The uterus where the active angiogenesis takes place in an E2-dependent manner may be a target pertinent to examine the physiological significance of Epo in angiogenesis. We found E2-dependent Epo production in uterus, suggesting the estrous cycle-dependent fluctuation of Epo concentration in the uterine tissues. This finding prompted us to examine the role of Epo in the E2-induced endometrial regeneration with an expectation that Epo acts as a uterine angiogenic factor.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Epo, Epo Assay, and sEpoR-- Recombinant human Epo was produced and isolated as described previously (33, 34). Epo was measured with a sandwich-type enzyme-linked immunoassay using two monoclonal antibodies that bind Epo at different epitopes (35). This assay measures Epo as low as 1 pg/ml. Recombinant human Epo was used as a standard. Recombinant murine soluble EpoR (sEpoR), an extracellular domain of EpoR capable of binding with Epo, was produced and isolated as described in the previous report (36).

RT-PCR-- Total RNA was prepared by the use of RNA Isolation System kit (Promega). The RT reaction was performed using a random nonamer primer and 1 µg of RNA in a volume of 20 µl. PCR primers of Epo and beta -actin were those described previously (22, 26), and those of VEGF were sense primer (mVEGF130F, 5'-TGCTGTACCTCCACCATGCCAA-3') and antisense primer (mVEGF657R, 5'-ACCGCCTTGGCTTGTCACATCT-3') (GenBankTM accession number M95200; Ref. 48). PCR cycles and conditions for denaturation, annealing, and elongation were 40 cycles, 1 min at 94 °C, 2 min at 63 °C, and 3 min at 72 °C of Epo; 25 cycles, 1 min at 94 °C, 2 min at 64 °C, and 3 min at 72 °C of VEGF; 25 cycles, 1 min at 94 °C, 2 min at 61 °C, and 3 min at 72 °C of beta -actin. The amplified DNA was fractionated by electrophoresis and stained with ethidium bromide. Band intensity was quantified using a Macintosh computer using the public domain NIH image program.2 The PCR cycle used here was set within the range so that the cycle number was approximately proportional to the band intensity of the amplified DNA.

Mouse-- Animals were maintained and handled in accordance with the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals at Kyoto University. Four-week-old outbred mice of the ICR strain (Clea) were ovariectomized and used for experiments at 4-6 weeks after OVX. Ten-week-old mice in the diestrus stage, which was determined by the vaginal smear, were used for experiments of non-OVX mice.

Culture of the Uterus from OVX Mouse-- Bilateral horns of the uterus from OVX mouse were cut into two separate horns. One horn was cultured in the medium containing E2 for 6 h in a humid 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C in phenol red-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 20% charcoal-treated fetal calf serum, and the contralateral horn was cultured without E2 as a control. Epo protein secreted in the culture media was measured. Tissues were used for detection of Epo mRNA by RT-PCR.

Administration of E2 and Epo to OVX Mouse-- E2 (0.5 mg/kg) or vehicle (olive oil) was given intraperitoneally. Epo was injected into the uterine cavity of the OVX mouse as follows. The abdominal wall of the mouse under deep anesthesia was incised, and the entire uterus was pulled out. Then the uterus was ligated at the oviduct and vaginal ends to form three uterine cavities, two lateral and one central. Epo in 100 µl of saline was injected into one of the lateral cavities through a microsyringe with a 32-gauge needle (Hamilton) and saline into the contralateral cavity as a control. Then the whole uterus was returned to the abdominal cavity, and the abdominal incision was sutured. At 24 h after injection, the uterus was excised and fixed in Zamboni solution.

Administration of sEpoR to Non-OVX Mouse-- sEpoR or heat-inactivated sEpoR in 100 µl of saline was injected into uterine cavity of 10-week-old non-OVX mice in the diestrus stage with the above-described procedures for Epo injection. At 24 h after injection, the uterus was excised and fixed in Zamboni solution.

Immunohistochemistry-- Methods for preparing cryosections and staining tissues were as described previously (37). Vascular endothelial cells and EpoR-expressing cells were detected by the use of anti-factor VIII (von Willebrand factor) antiserum (Dako, 1:200) and anti-N-terminal EpoR antiserum (38), respectively. Immunocomplexes were visualized using ABC kit (Vector) and diaminobenzidine (Dojin).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

E2-dependent Production of Epo and Its mRNA by the in Vitro Cultured Uterus-- If we assume that Epo plays an important role in E2-dependent angiogenesis in the uterine endometrium, there would be two possibilities for Epo production. One possibility is that uterine target cells gain responsiveness to Epo by the action of E2, and the serum Epo derived from the kidney acts on the E2-sensitive cells. The other would be that a local site for Epo production exists in the uterine tissues, and the production is induced by E2, resulting in an E2-dependent increase of Epo concentration in uterine tissues sufficient for activating angiogenesis. To test the latter possibility, we first examined if the in vitro cultured uterus from OVX mouse produced Epo protein and its mRNA in an E2-dependent manner. One of the bilateral horns of the uterus prepared from the OVX mouse was cultured in the medium containing E2, and the other horn was cultured in the absence of E2 as a control. Epo production into the culture medium was almost undetectable in the absence of E2, whereas the culture with E2 produced Epo in an E2-dependent manner, and the increase was evident at physiological concentrations of E2 (10-8 M) (Fig. 1a). Cycloheximide and actinomycin D completely inhibited E2-induced production of Epo by the cultured uterus (Fig. 1b), demonstrating that Epo secreted into the culture media was newly synthesized. Epo mRNA was detected with RT-PCR, and restriction mapping confirmed that the amplified DNA band was the specific product derived from Epo mRNA (data not shown). Epo mRNA was definitely expressed in the uterus cultured with E2, but it was undetectable in that cultured without E2 (Fig. 1b). Actinomycin D completely blocked expression of Epo mRNA, whereas the expression was superinduced by cycloheximide, indicating that the de novo protein synthesis is not needed for induction of Epo mRNA. Epo that supports erythropoiesis is produced by the kidney in a hypoxia-inducible manner (17, 18). We cultured the uterus in the absence or presence of 10-7 M E2 in 21, 5, and 2% O2, but Epo production was not activated by the low oxygen concentrations (data not shown).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   In vitro cultured uterus from OVX mouse produces Epo protein and its mRNA in an E2-dependent manner. As described under "Experimental Procedures," one horn of the uterus from an OVX mouse was cultured in the medium containing E2 for 6 h, and the contralateral horn was cultured without E2 as a control. Epo secreted in the culture media was measured, and the tissues were used for detection of Epo mRNA by RT-PCR. a, E2-dependent production of Epo protein; b, effects of 200 µM cycloheximide (CHX) and 10 µM actinomycin D (Act D) on 10-7 M E2-dependent expression of Epo mRNA and Epo protein. Each value indicates the average Epo of duplicate cultures.

In Vivo E2-induced Expression of Epo mRNA in the Uterus-- We examined whether or not E2 injection to the OVX mouse induced Epo mRNA in the uterus. E2 was given intraperitoneally, and the uterus was removed at intervals to extract RNA. Epo and beta -actin mRNAs were measured semi-quantitatively by setting PCR cycles to be approximately proportional to the band intensity of the amplified DNA. The two upper panels in Fig. 2a show Epo mRNA- and beta -actin mRNA-derived products from two individual mice, and the lowest panel in Fig. 2a indicates band intensities of Epo mRNA-derived product (n = 5 mice). There was a clear increase of Epo mRNA at 1 h after E2 injection, and the increase continued for at least 4 h, but at 8 h its level decreased to that of E2-uninjected mice. VEGF mRNA was also increased at 1 h after E2 injection, and thereafter its level was gradually reduced (the lowest panel in Fig. 2b), which was in agreement with the previous finding (10). Three amplified DNA bands (the most upper panel in Fig. 2b) are derived from VEGF mRNAs produced by alternative splicing of the primary transcript (39, 40). The major band is derived from VEGF164 mRNA.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   E2 induces in vivo expression of Epo and VEGF mRNAs in the uterus of OVX mice. At intervals after injection of E2 to OVX mice, uteri were removed for semi-quantitative measurement of Epo, VEGF, and beta -actin mRNAs by RT-PCR (see "Experimental Procedures"). a, Epo mRNA-derived product; b, VEGF-derived product. The amplified bands of two individual mice are shown. Lanes C (open columns) indicate controls; mice given vehicle. Closed columns indicate band intensities relative to the intensity (open column) of controls. Three VEGF products are derived from alternative splicing (39, 40). Band intensity was measured for only the most abundantly expressed VEGF mRNA. Bars represent mean ± S.D. (n = 5).

In Vivo Effects of Epo on Uterine Endometrium-- To examine the effects of Epo on uterine tissues in vivo and compare with those of E2, Epo was injected into one of the uterine bilateral cavities of OVX mouse and saline into the contralateral cavity as a control. E2 or olive oil (solvent for E2) was given intra-peritoneally. At 24 h after injection, we inspected uterine tissue sections under light microscopy. Administration of E2 to OVX mice caused development of uterine tissues including uterine hypertrophy and endometrial growth (compare Fig. 3c with a and b). Similar development was found in the uterus after injection of Epo (Fig. 3e). Little enlargement of the uterus occurred in OVX mouse that received saline (compare Fig. 3, a and d).


View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   E2 and Epo injection into the uterine cavity of OVX mouse stimulates growth of uterine tissues and angiogenesis in the endometrium. E2 or olive oil was given intraperitoneally. Recombinant human Epo was injected into one of the bilateral cavities, and saline was injected into the contralateral cavity as a control (see "Experimental Procedures"). At 24 h after administration, uterine tissues were processed. a-e, transverse sections of uteri stained with hematoxylin; f-j, high power views of endometrium stained immunocytochemically with anti-factor VIII antiserum; and k-o, those of endometrium stained with the control rabbit IgG. a, f, and k, sham-operated; b, g, and l, olive oil administration; c, h, and m, E2 administration; d, i, and n, saline injection; e, j, and o, 4 µg of Epo injection. Arrows in f-j highlight typical blood vessels. Bars are 500 µm in a-e and 50 µm in f-o.

A clear difference between E2- or Epo-injected mouse and oil- or saline-injected mouse was found when endometrial sections were stained with the antiserum against factor VIII, an endothelial cell-specific marker; blood vessel formation was stimulated upon administration of Epo (Fig. 3j) as well as E2 (Fig. 3h). To demonstrate this stimulation by a more quantitative manner, we counted blood vessels in the sections. Stimulation by Epo was similar to that by E2, when vessel density was expressed per field; both increased the density by 210% (Fig. 4a). However, endometrial sections from E2-injected mouse were significantly lower in cell density than those from Epo-injected mouse (see Fig. 3, h and j). Thus, the vessel number per endometrial cell increased by 440% upon E2 injection, whereas the increase by Epo injection was 230% (Fig. 4b). E2 causes a rapid increase in microvascular permeability, resulting in a lower cell density of the endometrium (10). Moreover, the action of Epo somewhat differs from that of E2 in the morphology of vessels; most of the vessels induced by Epo were smaller in diameter than those induced by E2. Neither development of uterine tissues nor stimulation of blood vessel formation was observed when Epo was pretreated with an excess amount of sEpoR (data not shown).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Epo- and E2-induced endometrial angiogenesis in OVX mouse. Sections stained with anti-factor VIII antiserum (Fig. 3, g-j) were used to count vessel density in the endometrium. a, total vessels per mm2; b, total vessels per 102 cells. Shaded columns indicate the results of control mice that received injection of olive oil or saline, and black columns indicate those of mice that received injection of E2 or Epo. Individual vessels were counted on a × 200 field (i.e. × 20 objective lens and × 10 ocular lens; 0.0564-mm2 per field) that was displayed on a 19 × 19 cm monitor by color video camera. Four to six mice were used for each experiment, i.e. olive oil, E2, saline, and Epo. More than 50 sections per uterus and at least 2 fields per section were selected at random for counting. The total number of cells was also counted per section. Results are expressed as mean ± S.E. Asterisks indicate p < 0.05, significantly different from the values of controls (oil or saline). The statistical significance of differences was determined with Student's t test.

In Vivo Effects of sEpoR on Uterine Endometrium-- The cyclic remodeling of uterine tissues in the murine estrus cycle takes place every 3-5 days. The above-mentioned results suggest that Epo is involved in the estrus cycle-dependent endometrial growth through stimulation of angiogenesis. To demonstrate this possibility, sEpoR or the heat (56 °C, 30 min)-inactivated sEpoR was injected into one of the uterine bilateral cavities of the non-OVX mouse in diestrus stage and saline into the contralateral cavity. At 24 h (proestrus) after injection, we inspected uterine tissue sections under light microscopy. Transition from diestrus (Fig. 5a) to proestrus (Fig. 5d) caused endometrial growth. This endometrial growth was severely inhibited by the injection of sEpoR (Fig. 5b) but not by the inactivated sEpoR (Fig. 5c). To quantify the effect of sEpoR, the areas of myometrium and endometrium layers were calculated. The endometrium/myometrium ratios in the sEpoR-injected uterus were significantly smaller than those in the inactivated sEpoR- or saline-injected uterus (Table I), indicating that sEpoR was detrimental to the endometrial growth in the transition from diestrus to proestrus. Further detailed inspection of magnified sections stained with the anti-factor VIII indicated that the formation of blood vessels in the endometrium is inhibited by sEpoR but not by the inactivated sEpoR (Fig. 5, e-g).


View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Injection of sEpoR into mouse uterine cavity inhibited growth of the uterine tissues, accompanied with the poor angiogenesis in the endometrium. Non-OVX 10-week-old mice in the diestrus stage received injection of test materials into their uterine cavities as described under "Experimental Procedures." At 24 h after injection, uterine tissues were processed. a-d, transverse sections of uteri stained with hematoxylin; e-g, high power views of endometrium stained immunocytochemically with anti-factor VIII antiserum; and h-j, those of endometrium stained with the control rabbit IgG. a, diestrus uterus; b, e, and h, 8 µg of sEpoR injection; c, f, and i, 8 µg of heat-inactivated sEpoR injection; d, g, and j, saline injection. E and M indicate endometrium and myometrium, respectively. Arrows in e-g highlight typical blood vessels. Bars are 500 µm in a-d and 50 µm in e-j.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
sEpoR but not heat-inactivated sEpoR inhibits endometrial growth
The values were calculated from the weight of the myometrial and endometrial areas cut out from the micrographs in Fig. 5, b-d. Ten sections per uterus of mouse (n = 5-7). Each value is the mean ± S.D.

Expression of EpoR in the Endometrial Endothelial Cells-- Immunochemical staining of the uterine section from non-OVX mice in the estrous stage using the antiserum against the extracellular domain of EpoR (Fig. 6, a and b) and anti-factor VIII antiserum (Fig. 6, c and d) showed that the uterine microvascular endothelial cells express EpoR as well as factor VIII.


View larger version (156K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   EpoR is expressed in microvascular endothelial cells in endometrium. Uteri of 10-week-old mice (non-OVX) in estrus stage were used for immunocytochemical detection of EpoR and factor VIII in vascular endothelial cells. a and c, low power views of endometrium; b and d, high power views of a and c, respectively. a and b, stained with anti-EpoR antiserum; c and d, stained with anti-factor VIII antiserum. Arrows in a and c shows representative blood vessels and those in b and d indicate endothelial cells. Bars are 50 µm (a and c) and 25 µm (b and d).

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

We found that the uterus is a novel site for Epo production. E2 has been reported to influence Epo production (41, 42), but the production site responding to E2 was not known. The major regulator in the uterus appears to be different from that in other Epo production sites. Oxygen is a primary signal for regulation of Epo biosynthesis in the kidney and liver; hypoxia induces transcriptional activation of the Epo gene (reviewed in Ref. 43). This induction requires de novo protein synthesis (43). In contrast, the E2-induced increase of Epo mRNA in the uterus is very rapid and does not require de novo protein synthesis. Furthermore, Epo production in uterus is not induced by hypoxia. E2 does not induce Epo production in the kidney and brain.3 This unique regulation of uterine Epo production may ensure the appropriate local function of Epo in the uterus with small, if any, distortion on erythropoiesis and the central nervous system. A data base search of the DNA sequences of Epo genes (44) indicated that the 5'-flanking regions of human and mouse genes contain sequences highly homologous to the sequence responsible for E2 receptor binding. A functional analysis of these sequences with respect to E2 response is in progress.

Identification of the cells responsible for production of uterine Epo has not been completed. Collagenase digestion of the uterus from OVX mouse and the subsequent fractionation of the dispersed cells suggest that the uterine Epo is produced in an E2-dependent manner by the fraction rich in endometrial stromal cells.4

Injection of Epo into the uterine cavity of OVX mouse caused endometrial alterations, which differed somewhat from those induced by E2. The cell density in the endometrium of the mouse given E2 is apparently lower than that of the mouse given Epo. Presumably the low cell density results from an increased vascular permeability due to stimulation of VEGF production by E2 (9). A high density of vessels with a larger diameter, which is seen in mice given an E2 injection, may reflect more extensive proliferation and maturation of the endothelial cells. Taken together with the inhibitory effect of sEpoR on the endometrial transition from the diestrus to proestrus stage, these results indicate that Epo is one of the E2-regulated signal molecules that is required for execution of the cyclic angiogenesis in estrus cycle; Epo is essential, although it is not sufficient, for completion of this process. The interplay of Epo with other angiogenic factors, particularly with VEGF, must be studied for better understanding of uterine angiogenesis.

Vascular endothelial cells in the adult still express a large number of hematopoietic cell differentiation markers (8, 45), which has been thought to indicate a common developmental lineage between hematopoietic cells and endothelial cells (46). In agreement with this finding, endothelial cells from some sources express EpoR (28, 29) and Epo exhibits the in vitro angiogenic activity on these cells (30, 31). These findings and the immunochemical detection of EpoR in uterine endothelial cells suggest that Epo directly acts on these cells.

It is hard to speculate that systemically distributable blood Epo is involved in physiological angiogenesis including that in the uterus. This possibility may be excluded by our finding that the uterine tissue produces Epo transiently in an E2-dependent manner, and the low ligand affinity to EpoR expressed in endothelial cells (29, 30) may at least in part support the hypothesis that blood Epo is not involved in physiological angiogenesis. The ligand affinity to EpoR in endothelial cells is much lower than that in erythroid precursor cells; the Kd value of EpoR in endothelial cells is ~1 nM (29, 30), whereas the Kd value of the high affinity site in erythroid cells is ~50 pM (38). The reason for the expression of only the low affinity site in endothelial cells is unclear. Since the normal concentration of serum Epo is ~15 milliunits/ml (~5 pM) (34), EpoR in endothelial cells appears to be nonfunctional physiologically and only to be a remnant reflecting a memory of a common origin of hematopoietic cells and endothelial cells (8). Although the Epo-producing cells in uterus remain to be identified, probably a paracrine Epo/EpoR system would exist in the uterus so that the E2-induced increase in the uterine Epo concentration may be locally high enough to act on endothelial cells through the low affinity site. Presumably expression of only the low affinity site is crucial for preventing unregulated angiogenesis by the action of kidney-derived Epo in the circulation. A similar Epo/EpoR system may also operate in the ovary where active angiogenesis takes place for follicle maturation and growth of corpus luteum (47), because the ovary produces Epo.4

Homozygous mice carrying a null mutation in Epo or EpoR gene died around embryonic day 13 due to deficiency of the fetal liver erythropoiesis (15, 16). No defect was found in endothelial cells in the EpoR null mouse embryos (15). Thus, Epo is unimportant in vasculogenesis, which occurs in the embryonic stage accompanying differentiation of precursors into endothelial cells, and its importance in blood vessel formation seems to be restricted in the female reproductive organ in adults.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by grants-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan and from the "Research for the Future" program in The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and by the Mochida Memorial Foundation For Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (to S. M.). A preliminary report of these studies was presented at the 4th International Lübeck Conference on the Pathophysiology and Pharmacology of Erythropoietin and Other Hematopoietic Growth Factors, June 27-29, 1997, Lübeck, Germany (Chikuma, M., Inoue, K., Masuda, S., Yasuda, Y., Nagao, M. & Sasaki, R. (1997) Ann. Hematol. 74, A164 (abstr.)).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Applied Life Sciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan. Tel.: 81-75-753-6271; Fax: 81-75-753-6274; E-mail: rsasaki{at}kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp.

The abbreviations used are: E2, 17beta -estradiolOVX, ovariectomizedVEGF, vascular endothelial growth factorEpo, erythropoietinEpoR, erythropoietin receptorsEpoR, soluble EpoRRT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

2 National Institutes of Health image program written by Wayne Rasband is available from the Internet by anonymous ftp from zippy.nimh.nih.gov.

3 M. Chikuma, S. Masuda, T. Kobayashi, M. Nagao, and R. Sasaki, manuscript in preparation.

4 S. Masuda, M. Chikuma, K. Inoue, T. Kobayashi, M. Nagao, and R. Sasaki, unpublished observations.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Hanahan, D., and Folkman, J. (1996) Cell 86, 353-364[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Clark, J. H., and Markaverich, B. M. (1988) in The Physiology of Reproduction; Actions of Ovarian Steroids (Knobil, E., and Neil, J., eds), pp. 675-724, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
  3. Ham, K. N., Hurley, J. V., Lopata, A., and Ryan, G. B. (1970) J. Endocrinol 46, 71-81[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Stack, G., and Gorski, J. (1984) Endocrinology 115, 1141-1150[Abstract]
  5. Kirkland, J. L., LaPointe, L., Justin, E., and Stancel, G. M. (1979) Biol. Reprod. 21, 269-272[Abstract]
  6. Folkman, J., and Klagsbrun, M. (1987) Science 235, 442-447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Schott, R. J., and Morrow, L. A. (1993) Cardiovas. Res. 27, 1155-1161[Free Full Text]
  8. Bikfalvi, A., and Han, Z. C. (1994) Leukemia (Baltimore) 8, 523-529[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Hechter, O., Krohn, L., and Harris, J. (1941) Endocrinology 23, 25-31
  10. Cullinan-Bove, K., and Koos, R. D. (1993) Endocrinology 133, 829-837[Abstract]
  11. Connolly, D. T., Heuvelman, D. M., Nelson, R., Olander, J. V., Eppley, B. L., Delfino, J. J., Siegel, N. R., Leimgruber, R. M., and Feder, J. (1994) J. Clin. Invest. 84, 1470-1478
  12. Ferrara, N., Houck, K., Jakeman, L., and Leung, D. W. (1992) Endocrinol. Rev. 13, 18-32[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Leung, D. W., Cachianes, G., Kuang, W. J., Goeddel, D. V., and Ferrara, N. (1989) Science 246, 1306-1309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Shweiki, D., Itin, A., Neufeld, G., Gitay-Goren, H., and Keshet, E. (1993) J. Clin. Invest. 91, 2235-2243
  15. Wu, H., Liu, X., Jaenisch, R., and Lodish, H. F. (1995) Cell 83, 59-67[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Lin, C. S., Lim, S. K., D'Agati, V., and Costantini, F. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 154-164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Krantz, S. B. (1991) Blood 77, 419-434[Free Full Text]
  18. Jelkmann, W. (1992) Physiol. Rev. 72, 449-489[Free Full Text]
  19. Youssoufian, H., Longmore, G., Neumann, D., Yoshimura, A., and Lodish, H. F. (1993) Blood 81, 2223-2236[Free Full Text]
  20. Masuda, S., Nagao, M., Takahata, K., Konishi, Y., Gallyas, F., Jr., Tabira, T., and Sasaki, R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11208-11216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Digicaylioglu, M., Bichet, S., Marti, H., H., Wenger, R., H., Rivas, L. A., Bauer, C., and Gassmann, M. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 3717-3720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Morishita, E., Masuda, S., Nagao, M., Yasuda, Y., and Sasaki, R. (1997) Neuroscience 76, 105-116[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Liu, C., Shen, K., Liu, Z., and Noguchi, C. T. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 32395-32400[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Masuda, S., Okano, M., Yamagishi, K., Nagao, M., Ueda, M., and Sasaki, R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19488-19493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Marti, H., Wenger, R. H., Rivas, L. A., Straumann, U., Digicaylioglu, M., Henn, V., Yonekawa, Y., Bauer, C., and Gassmann, M. (1996) Eur. J. Neurosci. 8, 666-676[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Masuda, S., Chikuma, M., and Sasaki, R. (1997) Brain Res. 746, 63-70[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Sakanaka, M., Wen, T. C., Matsuda, S., Masuda, S., Morishita, E., Nagao, M., and Sasaki, R. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 4635-4640[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Anagnostou, A., Liu, Z., Steiner, M., Chin, K., Lee, E. S., Kessimian, N., and Noguchi, C. T. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 3974-3978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Yamaji, R., Okada, T., Moriya, M., Naito, M., Tsuruo, T., Miyatake, K., and Nakano, Y. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 239, 494-500[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Anagnostou, A., Lee, E. S., Kessimian, N., Levinson, R., and Steiner, M. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 5978-5982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Carlini, R. G., Reyes, A. A., and Rothstein, M. (1995) Kidney Int. 47, 740-745[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Haller, H., Christel, C., Dannenberg, L., Thiele, P., Lindschau, C., and Luft, F. C. (1996) Kidney Int. 50, 481-488[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Goto, M., Akai, K., Murakami, A., Hashimoto, C., Tsuda, E., Ueda, M., Kawanishi, G., Takahashi, N., Ishimoto, A., Chiba, H., and Sasaki, R. (1988) Bio/Technology 6, 67-71[CrossRef]
  34. Goto, M., Murakami, A., Akai, K., Kawanishi, G., Ueda, M., Chiba, H., and Sasaki, R. (1989) Blood 74, 1415-1423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Okano, M., Masuda, S., Narita, H., Masushige, S., Kato, S., Imagawa, S., and Sasaki, R. (1994) FEBS Lett. 349, 229-233[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Nagao, M., Masuda, S., Abe, S., Ueda, M., and Sasaki, R. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 188, 888-897[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Yasuda, Y., Nagao, M., Okano, M., Masuda, S., Sasaki, R., Konishi, H., and Tanimura, T. (1993) Dev. Growth & Differ. 35, 711-722[CrossRef]
  38. Nagao, M., Matsumoto, S., Masuda, S., and Sasaki, R. (1993) Blood 81, 2503-2510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Tischer, E., Gospodarowicz, D., Mitchell, R., Silva, M., Schilling, J., Lau, K., Crisp, T., Fiddes, J. C., and Abraham, J. A. (1989) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 165, 1198-1206[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Tischer, E., Mitchell, R., Hartman, T., Silva, M., Gospodarowicz, D., Fiddes, J. C., and Abraham, J. A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11947-11954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Peschle, C., Rappaport, I. A., Sasso, G. F., Condorelli, M., and Gordon, A. S. (1973) Endocrinology 92, 358-362[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Anagnostou, A., Zander, A., Barone, J., and Fried, W. (1976) J. Lab. Clin. Med. 88, 700-706[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Bunn, H. F., and Poyton, R. O. (1996) Physiol. Rev. 76, 839-885[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Galson, D. L., Tan, C. C., Ratcliffe, P. J., and Bunn, H. F. (1993) Blood 82, 3321-3326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Risau, W., Sariola, H., Zerwes, H. G., Sasse, J., Ekblom, P., Kemler, R., and Doetschman, T. (1988) Development 102, 471-478[Abstract]
  46. Augustin, H. G., Kozian, D. H., and Johnson, R. C. (1994) BioEssays 16, 901-906[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Augustin, H. G., Braun, K., Telemenakis, I., Modlich, U., and Kuhn, W. (1995) Am. J. Pathol. 147, 339-351[Abstract]
  48. Claffey, K. P., Wilkison, W. O., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 16317-16322[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
T. Rabie and H. H. Marti
Brain Protection by Erythropoietin: A Manifold Task
Physiology, October 1, 2008; 23(5): 263 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
P. Solar, J. Koval, J. Mikes, J. Kleban, Z. Solarova, J. Lazur, I. Hodorova, P. Fedorocko, and A. J. Sytkowski
Erythropoietin inhibits apoptosis induced by photodynamic therapy in ovarian cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2008; 7(8): 2263 - 2271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. A. May and F. R. Khuri
Unraveling the Mystery of Erythropoietin-Stimulating Agents in Cancer Promotion
Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 68(11): 4013 - 4017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
V. Pelekanou, M. Kampa, M. Kafousi, K. Dambaki, K. Darivianaki, T. Vrekoussis, E. Sanidas, D. D. Tsiftsis, E. N. Stathopoulos, and E. Castanas
Erythropoietin and Its Receptor in Breast Cancer: Correlation with Steroid Receptors and Outcome
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2007; 16(10): 2016 - 2023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. Saintigny, B. Besse, P. Callard, A.-C. Vergnaud, S. Czernichow, M. Colombat, P. Girard, P. Validire, J.-L. Breau, J.-F. Bernaudin, et al.
Erythropoietin and Erythropoietin Receptor Coexpression Is Associated with Poor Survival in Stage I Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 13(16): 4825 - 4831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
E. Gao, M. Boucher, J. K. Chuprun, R.-H. Zhou, A. D. Eckhart, and W. J. Koch
Darbepoetin alfa, a long-acting erythropoietin analog, offers novel and delayed cardioprotection for the ischemic heart
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H60 - H68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. Contaldo, C. Meier, A. Elsherbiny, Y. Harder, O. Trentz, M. D. Menger, and G. A. Wanner
Human recombinant erythropoietin protects the striated muscle microcirculation of the dorsal skinfold from postischemic injury in mice
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H274 - H283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. Kokhaei, A. O. Abdalla, L. Hansson, E. Mikaelsson, M. Kubbies, A. Haselbeck, H. Jernberg-Wiklund, H. Mellstedt, and A. Osterborg
Expression of Erythropoietin Receptor and In vitro Functional Effects of Epoetins in B-Cell Malignancies
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3536 - 3544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Y. Lai and J. R. Grandis
Understanding the Presence and Function of Erythropoietin Receptors on Cancer Cells
J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2006; 24(29): 4675 - 4676.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. R. Coleman, C. Westenfelder, F. E. Togel, Y. Yang, Z. Hu, L. Swenson, H. G. D. Leuvenink, R. J. Ploeg, L. V. d'Uscio, Z. S. Katusic, et al.
Cytoprotective doses of erythropoietin or carbamylated erythropoietin have markedly different procoagulant and vasoactive activities
PNAS, April 11, 2006; 103(15): 5965 - 5970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page