Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marians, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by McHenry, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marians, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by McHenry, C. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Role of the Core DNA Polymerase III Subunits at the Replication Fork
alpha IS THE ONLY SUBUNIT REQUIRED FOR PROCESSIVE REPLICATION*

Kenneth J. MariansDagger , Hiroshi HiasaDagger , Deok Ryong Kim§, and Charles S. McHenry§

From the Dagger  Molecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021 and the § Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Genetics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The DNA polymerase III holoenzyme is composed of 10 subunits. The core of the polymerase contains the catalytic polymerase subunit, alpha , the proofreading 3' right-arrow 5' exonuclease, epsilon , and a subunit of unknown function, theta . The availability of the holoenzyme subunits in purified form has allowed us to investigate their roles at the replication fork. We show here that of the three subunits in the core polymerase, only alpha  is required to form processive replication forks that move at high rates and that exhibit coupled leading- and lagging-strand synthesis in vitro. Taken together with previous data this suggests that the primary determinant of replication fork processivity is the interaction between another holoenzyme subunit, tau , and the replication fork helicase, DnaB.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The replisome of Escherichia coli is a complex protein machine composed of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme (pol III HE),1 which synthesizes the nascent DNA, and the primosome, which unwinds the parental duplex and synthesizes primers for the initiation of Okazaki fragment synthesis (1). The composition of the primosome can vary depending on the manner in which the replication fork helicase, DnaB (2), is introduced to the DNA. Primosomes loaded at oriC are composed of only DnaB and DnaG (3), the primase (4), whereas primosomes loaded at recombination intermediates (5) are likely to also include PriA, PriB, PriC, and DnaT (6, 7). The function of these latter four proteins at the replication fork have yet to be established.

The pol III HE is itself composed of 10 subunits (8). alpha , the catalytic polymerase subunit (9), epsilon , the 3' right-arrow 5' proofreading exonuclease (10), and theta , a subunit of unknown function, associate to form the polymerase core (11). alpha  binds epsilon  but not theta , whereas theta  binds epsilon  but not alpha  (12), suggesting a linear array of alpha epsilon theta . The association of alpha  and epsilon  acts to improve the catalytic efficiency of each polypeptide, increasing the polymerase activity of alpha  by 2-3-fold (13, 14) and the exonuclease activity of epsilon  by 8-fold on a mispaired substrate and 32-fold on a paired substrate (13). It was also suggested that epsilon  increased the processivity of alpha  during DNA synthesis on primed single-stranded DNA (15).

The DnaX complex is composed of six subunits organized as tau 2gamma 2delta delta 'chi psi (16, 17). tau  acts to dimerize two core assemblies via an interaction with alpha  (18, 19). At the replication fork, this results in a physical coupling of the leading- and lagging-strand polymerases in space (20). The other subunits in the DnaX complex, which have been referred to as the gamma  complex (21), are likely involved in loading and unloading the processivity subunit, beta (22, 23), from the DNA (24, 25). The beta  dimer encircles the DNA and associates with alpha  to topologically lock the polymerase onto the template, thereby enabling processive synthesis (26, 27). tau  also plays a central role at the replication fork where, as a result of a protein-protein interaction with DnaB, it cements the replisome together, allowing rapid replication fork movement (28). This interaction also results in the protection of beta  on the leading-strand side from premature recycling by the gamma -complex (29), thus defining which of the two polymerase cores becomes the leading-strand polymerase at the replication fork (29, 30).

We have been studying the action of the pol III HE at replication forks formed during rolling circle DNA replication on specialized tailed form II (TFII) DNA templates in the presence of the single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) and the phi X-type primosomal proteins. In this report, we have analyzed the contributions of the three subunits of the polymerase core to replication fork function. We find that only the alpha  subunit is required to form replication forks that are as processive and which move at the same rate as those formed with the intact HE. In addition, replication forks containing only alpha  responded to control of Okazaki fragment synthesis as mediated by the primase (31-33), elaborated coupled leading- and lagging-strand synthesis, and were as stable as replication forks formed with the complete polymerase core.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Reagents, DNAs, Enzymes, and Replication Proteins-- NTPs and dNTPs were from Pharmacia Biotech Inc. [alpha -32P]dATP was from Amersham. Alkaline phosphatase was from Boehringer Mannheim. Single-stranded circular DNAs from bacteriophages f1AY-7/M and f1R229-A/33 were prepared as described previously (34). pBROTB form I DNA was prepared as described (35).

PriA, PriB, PriC, DnaT, DnaB, DnaC, and DnaG were purified as described (36). DnaA and HU were purified by an unpublished procedure.2 Pol III HE subassemblies and subunits were purified as indicated: core, alpha epsilon , and alpha  (14), beta  (37), tau  and gamma  (38), delta  and delta ' by an unpublished procedure,3 and chi psi (39). SSB was purified according to Minden and Marians (40).

Rolling Circle DNA Replication Assay-- TFII DNA was prepared as described by Mok and Marians (41). Reaction mixtures (12 µl) containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 12 mM MgOAc, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 5 µM ATP, 80 mM KCl, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 1.1 µM SSB, 0.42 nM TFII DNA, 3.2 nM DnaB, 56 nM DnaC, 240 nM DnaG (or as indicated), 28 nM DnaT, 2.5 nM PriA, 2.5 nM PriB, 2.5 nM PriC, and the pol III core, alpha epsilon , or alpha as indicated and all other HE subunits at 28 nM, were preincubated at 30 °C for 2 min. NTPs were added to final concentrations of 1 mM ATP, 200 µM GTP, 200 µM CTP, and 200 µM UTP, and dNTPs to 40 µM and the reaction was incubated for 2 min at 30 °C. [alpha -32P]dATP (2000-4000 cpm/pmol) was added to the reaction mixture and the incubation was continued at 30 °C for an additional 10 min. DNA synthesis was quenched by addition of EDTA to 40 mM. Total DNA synthesis was determined by assaying an aliquot of the reaction mixture for acid insoluble radioactivity. The reaction mixtures were treated with alkaline phosphatase (3 units) at 37 °C for 45 min and the DNA products analyzed by alkaline gel electrophoresis as described (31). The phi X-type primosomal proteins were used rather than just DnaB, DnaC, and DnaG because the former group of proteins assembles replication forks about 15-fold more efficiently than the latter (41).

Determination of Coupling of Leading- and Lagging-strand Synthesis-- Standard rolling circle reaction mixtures containing core, alpha epsilon , or alpha  as indicated were incubated for 2 min at 30 °C in the absence of label to establish active replication forks. Aliquots (1 µl) were then transferred to a prewarmed dilution reaction mixture (90 µl) containing all buffer components, NTPs, dNTPs, [alpha -32P]dATP, SSB, and primase at their standard concentrations, but that lacked DNA template, all other HE subunits, and the preprimosomal proteins (PriA, PriB, PriC, DnaT, DnaB, and DnaC). The incubation was continued at 30 °C for 10 min and terminated by the addition of EDTA. As a control for Okazaki fragment size, the original reaction mixture was incubated at 30 °C for 10 min in the presence of [alpha -32P]dATP and in the absence of any diluent. Reactions were then processed and analyzed as described above.

Determination of Replication Fork Processivity-- Standard rolling circle reaction mixtures were assembled either in the presence of core, alpha epsilon , or alpha , as indicated. The effect of the anti-beta antibody (42) on initiation was assessed by including it in the reaction mixture from the start, before the ATP concentration was raised and before the dNTPs and other NTPs were added. The effect of the antibody on elongation was determined by adding the antibody along with the [alpha -32P]dATP 2 min after the reactions had been initiated. Reactions were then processed and analyzed as described above.

Determination of Replication Fork Rates-- Standard rolling circle replication reactions containing core, alpha epsilon , or alpha  were increased in size 4-fold. Reaction mixtures were incubated for 6 min at 30 °C after the addition of [alpha -32P]dATP. 5-Methyl-dCTP was then added to a final concentration of 0.4 mM and aliquots (7 µl) were withdrawn every 10 s for the next minute. Each aliquot was mixed with 1 µl of 20 mM ddTTP to terminate the elongation reaction. Aliquots were then heated at 68 °C for 10 min and then treated with 10 units each of the AluI, HaeIII, HhaI, and HpaII restriction endonucleases for 2 h at 37 °C. DNA products were analyzed by electrophoresis through alkaline-agarose gels (20 × 25 × 0.5 cm) at 40 V for 48 h. The electrophoresis buffer was changed once after 24 h.

Determination of Replication Fork Stability-- oriC DNA replication was reconstituted as described by Hiasa and Marians (43) using pBROTB DNA as the template in the presence of DnaA, DnaB, DnaC, DnaG, SSB, HU, and the pol III HE reconstituted with either core, alpha epsilon , or alpha  as indicated. Replication reactions (75 µl) were initiated in the absence of any topoisomerase. After a 2-min incubation, [alpha -32P]dATP was added and the incubation continued for 1 min. Under these conditions only an early replication intermediate (ERI) is formed. Subsequent nascent chain elongation requires the release of the accumulated topological constraint. The label was chased by the addition of an 100-fold excess of cold dATP (time 0) and the incubation continued. Aliquots (15 µl) were removed at the indicated times, mixed with the SmaI restriction endonuclease (20 units), and incubated an additional 10 min. DNA products were then analyzed by electrophoresis through denaturing alkaline-agarose gels as described (43).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Okazaki Fragment Synthesis Is Modulated Properly at Replication Forks Containing only alpha -- Incubation of the TFII DNA template, SSB, the primosomal proteins, and the pol III HE generates replication forks that support rolling circle DNA replication. These forks produce multigenome length double-stranded tails that are composed of a long, continuous leading strand and short (about 2 kb) Okazaki fragments (31). We have demonstated that the forks formed in vitro possess many of the characteristics of bona fide E. coli replication forks. They are highly processive, synthesizing leading strands in excess of 0.5 megabase in length (31), move at rates comparable to that of the fork in vivo (31, 41), exhibit coupled leading- and lagging-strand DNA synthesis (20, 44), and regulate the size of the Okazaki fragments produced in response to various reaction parameters (31, 44-47). To examine the roles of the three subunits of the polymerase core at the replication fork, we therefore assessed the ability to form replication forks with alpha epsilon and alpha  alone, as well as the characteristic properties of the forks formed.

HE reconstituted with alpha epsilon theta , alpha epsilon , or alpha  was titrated in rolling circle replication reactions in the presence of the TFII DNA template, SSB, and the primosomal proteins. Neither epsilon  nor theta  were required to form replication forks capable of producing long leading strands and short Okazaki fragments (Fig. 1). The lagging-strand products were of typical size, between 1 and 2 kb in length. We did note that a higher concentration of HE containing only alpha  was required to produce active replication forks. This probably reflects either a decrease in affinity for the template for alpha  compared with alpha epsilon or a decrease in affinity of one of the protein-protein interactions required to establish a replication fork. This is consistent with the lower level of DNA synthesis observed with alpha  alone, presumably reflecting a lower efficiency of initiation.


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1.   Replication forks formed with alpha epsilon and alpha  synthesize leading- and lagging-strand DNA. Standard rolling circle replication reactions containing HE reconstituted with alpha epsilon theta (lanes 1-4), alpha epsilon (lanes 5-8), or alpha  (lanes 9-12) were incubated, processed, and analyzed as described under "Materials and Methods." The concentration of HE increases 3-fold from left to right and lane to lane for each reconstituted enzyme. The incorporation (in pmol) of [32P]dAMP into acid-insoluble product for lanes 1-12 was 65, 114, 111, 137, 8, 76, 115, 106, 5, 29, 43, and 37, respectively.

Okazaki fragment size is governed by a transient protein-protein interaction between primase and DnaB at the replication fork (33, 46). DnaG acts distributively with respect to the cycle of lagging-strand synthesis, loading onto the template via interaction with the helicase, synthesizing a primer, and then dissociating from the fork to be replaced by another molecule from solution for the next round of primer synthesis (32). Thus, Okazaki fragment size is inversely proportional to both the primase concentration (31, 46) and the affinity of the protein-protein interaction between primase and DnaB (33).

Replication forks formed with alpha epsilon theta , alpha epsilon , or alpha  responded in an identical fashion to primase concentration (Fig. 2). This indicated that neither epsilon  nor theta  were required for the interaction between primase and the replication fork and that their absence from the fork in no way compromised cycling of the lagging-strand polymerase from the just completed Okazaki fragment to the new primer. This argues that neither dissociation of the lagging-strand polymerase from the Okazaki fragment nor the ability of the polymerase to find and bind to the new primer terminus requires either epsilon  or theta .


View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2.   Replication forks formed with alpha epsilon theta , alpha epsilon , or alpha , respond to variation in the concentration of primase in the same manner. Standard rolling circle replication reactions containing the indicated concentrations of primase and HE reconstituted with alpha epsilon theta (lanes 1-5), alpha epsilon (lanes 6-10), or alpha  (lanes 11-15) were incubated, processed, and analyzed as described under "Materials and Methods." The concentration of primase increases 2-fold from left to right and lane to lane for each reconstituted enzyme. The incorporation (in pmol) of [32P]dAMP into acid-insoluble product for lanes 1-15 was 114, 116, 117, 102, 93, 87, 79, 84, 69, 77, 46, 40, 49, 54, and 54, respectively.

Replication Forks Containing Only alpha  Are Processive, Move at High Rates, and Elaborate Coupled Leading- and Lagging-strand Synthesis-- The replication forks that form at oriC are extraordinarily processive. Each fork presumably synthesizes a leading strand of about 2.3 × 106 nt in length in one polymerase binding event. We have developed a protocol that allows us to test replication fork processivity (41) that makes use of the observation that once formed in an elongation complex with alpha , beta  is no longer accessible to antibody (42). Thus, replication forks that are processive are resistant to inhibition by anti-beta antibody.

Rolling circle replication reactions containing alpha epsilon theta , alpha epsilon , or alpha  received the anti-beta antibody either 3 min before initiation (I in Fig. 3) or 3 min after initiation (E in Fig. 3). When added before initiation, all DNA replication was inhibited with any combination of core subunits, as would be expected because the replication fork cannot form without free beta  (Fig. 3). On the other hand, when the anti-beta antibody was added after replication forks had formed, only lagging-strand synthesis was inhibited, long leading strands that could not enter the alkaline-agarose gel were still formed for each combination of core subunit (Fig. 3). Inhibition of lagging-strand synthesis was expected because the synthesis of each new Okazaki fragment requires a new beta  dimer (31, 46). Note that the Okazaki fragments synthesized in this experiment are much larger than the typical ones (e.g. in Figs. 1 and 2). This was because the concentration of beta  was lowered in this experiment to observe the effect of the antibody. Because beta  is used stoichiometrically during lagging-strand synthesis, Okazaki fragment size is inversely related to its concentration (31, 48). These experiments demonstrate that replication fork processivity is unaffected by the absence of either the epsilon  or theta subunits.


View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3.   Replication forks formed with only alpha  are processive. Anti-beta antibody challenge experiments were performed with standard rolling circle DNA replication reactions containing HE reconstituted with alpha epsilon theta (lanes 1-4), alpha epsilon (lanes 5-8), or theta  (lanes 9-12) as described under "Materials and Methods." In lanes labeled with an I, when used, the anti-beta antibody was added before the addition of HE to the reaction mixture. In lanes labeled with an E, when used, the anti-beta antibody was added 3 min after the start of the reaction. The discrete band that can be seen in some lanes with a mobility between 9.4 and 23.1 kb is inactive dimeric template DNA that becomes labeled by the addition of a few nucleotides.

The E. coli replication fork moves at about 1000 nt/s at 37 °C. Replication fork speed in the rolling circle system has been measured at 600-800 nt/s at 30 °C (31, 41). We therefore investigated whether the epsilon  or theta  subunits had any affect on replication fork speed.

The technique used measures the speed of established replication forks in the following manner (31), rolling circle replication reactions are initiated under normal conditions in the presence of [alpha -32P]dATP. After 6 min of incubation, when significant initiation of replication has occurred, 5-methyl-dCTP is added in 10-fold excess over dCTP and aliquots are taken every 10 s for 1 min. The reaction is then terminated by adding a 60-fold excess of ddTTP over dTTP. This generates long, labeled, leading strands that are unmethylated except in the regions synthesized during the last minute of synthesis. The unmethylated regions are removed by digestion with restriction endonucleases that have 4-base recognition sequences with dCMP residues in them. What remains is the methylated region of the DNA. When electrophoresed through alkaline-agarose gels, these DNA products appear as long smears with sharp trailing edges. The trailing edge represents the longest leading strand synthesized in the reaction and the change in its size as a function of time is a direct measure of the speed of the replication fork.

The analysis of replication fork speed for forks containing alpha epsilon theta , alpha epsilon , or alpha  is shown in Fig. 4. The size of the leading strands in all three cases is nearly identical for each replication fork at each time point during the 1-min sampling period. This indicates that the rate of replication fork progression in each case was identical. The actual values, calculated using PhosphorImager traces of each lane to locate the trailing edge of the smear, for the forks containing core, alpha epsilon , and alpha  were 660, 656, and 654 nt/s, respectively.


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4.   Replication forks formed with alpha epsilon theta , alpha epsilon , or alpha  move at identical rates. Replication fork rates were determined as described under "Material and Methods". The time indicated refers to the time after the addition of 5-methyl-dCTP to the reaction mixture.

tau couples the leading- and lagging-strand polymerases together in space at the replication fork (20). Thus, when the lagging-strand alpha  dissociates from the just completed Okazaki fragment, it does not dissociate from the fork, but is held there via protein-protein interactions as predicted originally by the trombone model of Alberts and co-workers (49, 50). This allows the lagging-strand polymerase to find the new primer terminus with minimal delay. It also makes lagging-strand synthesis resistant to extreme dilution. This can be assessed by observing the size of Okazaki fragments made before and after dilution. Coupling of the leading- and lagging-strand polymerases is manifested as the retention of the synthesis of Okazaki fragments after dilution of roughly the same size as those synthesized before dilution. If the polymerases were not coupled, one would expect that Okazaki fragment size would either get very large, because the distance on the template between two successful initiation events would increase as a result of the delay in the polymerase associating with the primer, or, as we have observed (20), the entire fork would fall apart and synthesis would not be observed at all.

Fig. 5 shows that lagging-strand synthesis is preserved when replication forks containing core, alpha epsilon , or alpha  are diluted 90-fold into reaction mixtures that contain only SSB, DnaG, and beta  at their original concentrations, all other protein components were omitted from the dilution reaction mixture. The concentrations of SSB, DnaG, and beta  must be maintained after dilution because each of these proteins acts distributively during multiple cycles of lagging-strand synthesis (31). These results are identical to those we have observed previously with bona fide HE purified from bulk E. coli (20, 44). As we have remarked before (20), we consistently observe a slight shift in Okazaki fragment size after dilution that we believe is attributable to the large excess of SSB over active template in the dilution reaction mixture. Thus, neither epsilon  nor theta  are required for coupling of the leading- and lagging-strand polymerases at the replication fork.


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5.   Replication forks formed with either alpha epsilon or alpha  exhibit coupled leading- and lagging-strand DNA synthesis. Standard rolling circle replication reaction mixtures containing HE reconstituted with alpha epsilon theta (lanes 1 and 2), alpha epsilon (lanes 3 and 4), or alpha  (lanes 5 and 6) were diluted 90-fold as described under "Materials and Methods." B and A refer to DNA products made before and after dilution, respectively.

Replication Forks Formed with alpha epsilon theta , alpha epsilon , or alpha  Exhibit Identical Stabilities-- The presence or absence of a 3' right-arrow 5' proofreading exonuclease function might only affect the stability of the polymerases when the fork was paused. Thus, we considered that we might not observe any differences between replication forks in the presence and absence of epsilon  when they were moving, as they were in all the experiments described above. Because it is difficult to pause replication forks in the rolling circle replication assay, we used the oriC replication system, where forks can be paused as a result of accumulated positive overwindings in the template DNA (51), to investigate this issue.

This protocol exploits the fact that oriC replication will initiate on a superhelical plasmid DNA template in the absence of a topoisomerase. Replication proceeds until excess positive supercoils accumulate, causing the replication forks to pause, resulting in the formation of an ERI where the nascent leading strands are about 600 nt in length. Replication fork progression is resumed if the accumulated topological constraint is relieved by either the addition of a topoisomerase or by breaking the phosphodiester backbone of the template. The use of a restriction endonuclease to relieve topological constraint results in a replication fork run-off on the now linear template (6.0 kb).

To assess replication fork stability, we actually measured decay of the capacity of paused forks in the ERI to resume DNA replication. ERIs were formed containing alpha epsilon theta , alpha epsilon , or alpha  in the presence of [alpha -32P]dATP. An 100-fold excess of nonradioactive ATP was added (time 0) and aliquots were removed at the indicated times. Aliquots were processed by the addition of the SmaI restriction enzyme to linearize the template and an additional 10-min incubation to permit elongation by active replication forks. When analyzed by native agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig. 6A) two bands are therefore observed, ERI that has not been elongated and linear DNA, which represents the product of active replication forks. The stability of paused replication forks in the ERI is then measured as the fraction of ERI that can be converted to linear DNA as a function of time (Fig. 6B).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6.   Replication forks formed with alpha epsilon theta , alpha epsilon , or alpha  exhibit identical stabilities. A, ERIs were formed and labeled in standard oriC DNA replication reactions containing HE reconstituted with alpha epsilon theta (lanes 1-5), alpha epsilon (lanes 6-10), or alpha  (lanes 11-15) as described under "Materials and Methods." Excess cold ATP was added at 0 time, aliquots were withdrawn at the indicated times, the SmaI restriction endonuclease (20 units) was then added to each aliquot, and the aliquots were incubated for an additional 10 min. The reactions were processed and analyzed as described under "Materials and Methods." B, the relative extent of elongation of ERI to linear DNA is plotted as a function of time of incubation of the paused ERI.

We do not, as yet, know the reason that the forks decay and there are, of course, many possibilities. However, for the purpose of this assay, we assume that the mechanism of decay is the same in all cases. Replication forks containing core, alpha epsilon , or epsilon  displayed identical stabilities, decaying with essentially the same rates (Fig. 6B). Thus, the presence of epsilon , even under conditions where the exonuclease would be expected to be active, does not have an affect on replication fork stability.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The replication fork is a complex structure where upward of 30 protomers combine to execute ordered, semi-conservative DNA replication in a rapid and highly efficient fashion. Understanding the role of the polypeptides at the fork is the key to understanding how the replisome functions. We have been using a rolling circle DNA replication system reconstituted with purified proteins in an effort to contribute to this understanding. The availability of all the protein components in highly purified form has allowed an analysis of the replication fork functions that are disrupted when various polypeptides are omitted from replication fork assembly. Such analyses revealed, for example, the requirement for a protein-protein interaction between the tau  subunit of the HE and DnaB that literally defined the replisome, cementing the polymerase and the helicase together, enabling rapid replication fork movement (28), and determining which of the two polymerase cores will be the leading-strand polymerase (29, 30).

In this report we have considered the contributions of the three subunits of the polymerase core to replication fork function. alpha , epsilon , and theta  purify as a tight 1:1:1 complex when polymerase activity is scored by, e.g. using nicked salmon sperm DNA as the template (11). When processive DNA synthesis is used as the assay, the core is isolated as a component of the HE (8). theta  is the product of holE (12, 52), which can be disrupted in E. coli without any apparent affect (53). Biochemical analyses have also failed to attribute a catalytic activity to theta . epsilon  is the proofreading 3' right-arrow 5' exonuclease (10) encoded by dnaQ (54). It can form a tight complex with both alpha  and theta , apparently forming the bridge between them in the core (12). Strains deficient in epsilon  show the expected mutator effect (55). alpha  is the polymerase subunit (9), encoded by dnaE (56) and is, of course, essential for viability.

Because these three proteins form such a tight complex, it is expected that they are present at the replication fork. On one level, the contribution of epsilon  is obvious. At a different level, we have investigated whether epsilon  and theta  played additional roles that affected replication fork function directly. We have assessed the distinguishing characteristics of replication forks that contained alpha epsilon theta , alpha epsilon , or only alpha . We found that replication forks that contained only alpha  performed in a fashion indistinguishable from those containing the complete core. Thus, neither epsilon  nor theta  were required to either maintain high rates of processive replication fork movement, to couple the leading- and lagging-strand polymerases, or to ensure proper recycling of the lagging-strand polymerase from the just completed Okazaki fragment to the new primer terminus. This makes it unlikely that these subunits are required to maintain the structural integrity of the replisome. Replication fork assembly did require higher concentrations of alpha  than alpha epsilon . This reduced efficiency suggests that epsilon  may facilitate the interaction of alpha  with another protein at the replication fork.

In a study examining processivity of alpha epsilon theta , alpha epsilon , and alpha  on primed single-stranded phage DNAs in the presence of beta  and the gamma -complex, Studwell-Vaughan and O'Donnell (12) concluded that alpha , while maintaining a reasonable processivity in the range of 1-3 kb, was still significantly less processive than the combination of alpha epsilon and suggested that highly processive DNA synthesis by the HE was contingent on the exonuclease subunit. Kim and McHenry (14) did not observe this difference when they used tau  complex to load beta  onto the DNA and an anti-beta antibody challenge similar to the one described in this report to test processivity. This latter report did note that HE reconstituted with only alpha  synthesized DNA at about one-fifth the rate of HE reconstituted with alpha epsilon or alpha epsilon theta . Thus, the results observed at bona fide replication forks are somewhat different from each of these reports, underscoring the importance of assessing function in the proper context. Presumably, the major difference is that the tau -DnaB interaction that occurs at replication forks is the overriding factor in the determination of fork rate and processivity.

However, a structural role for epsilon  at the replication fork under certain conditions cannot be completely ruled out. dnaQ disruptions in Salmonella typhimurium display two phenotypes, a mutator defect and a slow growth defect (57). Spontaneous suppressor mutations of the slow growth phenotype that have been mapped to alpha  arise very rapidly in these strains. The purified supressor polymerase was shown to have 3-5-fold higher activity than the wild-type polymerase (58). This suggests that epsilon  activates alpha  in vivo. It is interesting to consider that this apparent difference may reflect the basic difference between the rolling circle replication system and replication forks on the chromosome of E. coli. That is, the in vitro system proceeds in an unimpeded fashion around the template, whereas in the cell, replication forks encounter all sorts of protein roadblocks on the DNA as well as damaged bases in the template. It may be that under these circumstances epsilon  is required for stability of the fork. This possibility awaits further investigation.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM34557 (to K. J. M.) and GM36255 (to C. S. M.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 The abbreviations used are: pol III HE, the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme; SSB, the single-stranded DNA-binding protein; TFII, tailed form II; ERI, early replication intermediate; kb, kilobase pair(s); nt, nucleotide(s).

2 D. Langley and K. J. Marians, unpublished data.

3 M. Olson, J. Carter, H. G. Dallmann, and C. S. McHenry, unpublished data.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials & Methods
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Marians, K. J. (1992) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61, 673-719[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. LeBowitz, J. H., and McMacken, R. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 4738-4748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kaguni, J. M., and Kornberg, A. (1984) Cell 38, 183-190[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Bouché, J. P., Zechel, K., and Kornberg, A. (1975) J. Biol. Chem. 250, 5995-6001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kogoma, T. (1996) Cell 85, 625-627[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Ng, J. Y., and Marians, K. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15642-15648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ng, J. Y., and Marians, K. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15649-15655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Maki, H., Maki, S., and Kornberg, A. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 6570-6578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Welch, M. M., and McHenry, C. S. (1982) J. Bacteriol. 152, 351-356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Scheuermann, R. H., and Echols, H. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 7747-7751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. McHenry, C. S., and Crow, W. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 1748-1753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Studwell-Vaughan, P. S., and O'Donnell, M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11785-11791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Maki, H., and Kornberg, A. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 4389-4392[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kim, D. R., and McHenry, C. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20681-20689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Studwell, P. S., and O'Donnell, M. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 1171-1178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Dallmann, H. G., and McHenry, C. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29563-29569[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Onrust, R., Finkelstein, J., Turner, J., Naktinis, V., and O'Donnell, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13366-13377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. McHenry, C. S. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 2657-2663[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Stukenberg, P. T., and O'Donnell, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13384-13391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kim, S., Dallmann, H. G., McHenry, C. S., Marians, K. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 21406-21412[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. McHenry, C. S., and Kornberg, A. (1977) J. Biol. Chem. 252, 6478-6484[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Fay, P. J., Johanson, K. O., McHenry, C. S., Bambara, R. A. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 976-983[Free Full Text]
  23. Fay, P. J., Johanson, K. O., McHenry, C. S., Bambara, R. A. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 5692-5699[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Wickner, S. (1976) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 73, 16558-16565
  25. O'Donnell, M. E. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 16558-16565[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Stukenberg, P. T., Studwell-Vaughan, P. S., O'Donnell, M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11328-11334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kong, X-P., Onrust, R., O'Donnell, M., and Kuriyan, J. (1992) Cell 69, 425-437[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Kim, S., Dallmann, H. G., McHenry, C. S., Marians, K. J. (1996) Cell 84, 643-650[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Kim, S., Dallmann, H. G., McHenry, C. S., Marians, K. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 4315-4318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Yuzhakov, A., Turner, J., and O'Donnell, M. (1986) Cell 86, 877-886
  31. Wu, C. A., Zechner, E. L., and Marians, K. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4030-4044[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Tougu, K., Peng, H., and Marians, K. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 4675-4682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Tougu, K., and Marians, K. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 21398-21405[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Model, P., and Zinder, N. (1974) J. Biol. Chem. 83, 231-251
  35. Marians, K. J., Soeller, W., and Zipurksy, L. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 5656-5662[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Marians, K. J. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 262, 507-521[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Johanson, K. O., Haynes, T. E., and McHenry, C. S. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 11460-11465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Dallmann, H. G., Thimmig, R. L., and McHenry, C. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29555-29562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Olson, M. W., Dallmann, H. G., and McHenry, C. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29570-29577[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Minden, J. S., and Marians, K. J. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 9316-9325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Mok, M., and Marians, K. J. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 16644-16654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Johanson, K. O., and McHenry, C. S. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 12310-12315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Hiasa, H., and Marians, K. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 6058-6063[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Wu, C. A., Zechner, E. L., Hughes, A. J., Jr., Franden, M. A., McHenry, C. S., Marians, K. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4064-4073[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Zechner, E. L., Wu, C. A., and Marians, K. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4045-4053[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Zechner, E. L., Wu, C. A., and Marians, K. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4054-4063[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Wu, C. A., Zechner, E. L., Reems, J. A., McHenry, C. S., Marians, K. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4074-4083[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Stukenberg, P. T., Turner, J., and O'Donnell, M. (1994) Cell 78, 877-887[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Alberts, B. M., Morris, C., Mace, D., Sinha, N., Bittner, M., and Morgan, L. (1975) in DNA Synthesis and Its Regulation (Goulian, M., and Hanawat, P., eds), pp. 241-269, W. A. Benhamin, Inc., Menlo Park, CA
  50. Sinha, N. K., Morris, C. F., and Alberts, B. M. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 4290-4293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Hiasa, H., and Marians, K. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 16371-16375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Carter, J. L., Franden, M. A., Aebersold, R., Kim, D. R., McHenry, C. S. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 3281-3286[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Slater, S. C., Lifsics, M. R., O'Donnell, M., and Maurer, R. (1994) J. Bacteriol. 176, 815-821[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Scheuermann, R. H., Tam, S., Burgers, P, M. J., Lu, C., Echols, H. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 7085-7089[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Deguen, G. E., and Cox, R. C. (1974) J. Bacteriol 117, 477-487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Gefter, M., Hirota, Y., Kornberg, T., Wechsler, J. A., Barnaux, C. (1971) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 68, 3150-3153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Lancy, E. D., Lifsics, M. R., Kehre, D. G., Maurer, R. (1989) J. Bacteriol. 171, 5572-5580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Lifsics, M. R., Lancy, E. D., and Maurer, R. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 6965-6973[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. Atkinson and P. McGlynn
Replication fork reversal and the maintenance of genome stability
Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2009; 37(11): 3475 - 3492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. A. Buss, Y. Kimura, and P. R. Bianco
RecG interacts directly with SSB: implications for stalled replication fork regression
Nucleic Acids Res., December 1, 2008; 36(22): 7029 - 7042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Bacteriol.Home page
J. R. Pohlhaus, D. T. Long, E. O'Reilly, and K. N. Kreuzer
The {varepsilon} Subunit of DNA Polymerase III Is Involved in the Nalidixic Acid-Induced SOS Response in Escherichia coli
J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2008; 190(15): 5239 - 5247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
B. T. I. Payne, I. C. van Knippenberg, H. Bell, S. R. Filipe, D. J. Sherratt, and P. McGlynn
Replication fork blockage by transcription factor-DNA complexes in Escherichia coli
Nucleic Acids Res., October 6, 2006; 34(18): 5194 - 5202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Bacteriol.Home page
A. K. Chikova and R. M. Schaaper
The Bacteriophage P1 hot Gene Product Can Substitute for the Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase III {theta} Subunit
J. Bacteriol., August 15, 2005; 187(16): 5528 - 5536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. McGlynn, R. G. Lloyd, and K. J. Marians
Formation of Holliday junctions by regression of nascent DNA in intermediates containing stalled replication forks: RecG stimulates regression even when the DNA is negatively supercoiled
PNAS, July 17, 2001; 98(15): 8235 - 8240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Bacteriol.Home page
S. A. Taft-Benz and R. M. Schaaper
The C-Terminal Domain of DnaQ Contains the Polymerase Binding Site
J. Bacteriol., May 1, 1999; 181(9): 2963 - 2965.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 GeneticsHome page
P. L. Foster and W. A. Rosche
Increased Episomal Replication Accounts for the High Rate of Adaptive Mutation in recD Mutants of Escherichia coli
Genetics, May 1, 1999; 152(1): 15 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Liu, L. Xu, S. J. Sandler, and K. J. Marians
Replication fork assembly at recombination intermediates is required for bacterial growth
PNAS, March 30, 1999; 96(7): 3552 - 3555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Ducoux, S. Urbach, G. Baldacci, U. Hubscher, S. Koundrioukoff, J. Christensen, and P. Hughes
Mediation of Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA)-dependent DNA Replication through a Conserved p21Cip1-like PCNA-binding Motif Present in the Third Subunit of Human DNA Polymerase delta
J. Biol. Chem., December 21, 2001; 276(52): 49258 - 49266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marians, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by McHenry, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marians, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by McHenry, C. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement