JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirsch, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hanafusa, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirsch, K. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hanafusa, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 40, 25673-25679, October 2, 1998


Direct Binding of p130Cas to the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor C3G*

Kathrin H. Kirsch, Maria-Magdalena GeorgescuDagger , and Hidesaburo Hanafusa§

From the Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

p130Cas (Cas; crk-associated substrate) belongs to a new family of docking molecules. It contains one Src homology (SH) 3 domain in its amino-terminal region followed by a region containing binding motifs for SH2 and SH3 domains. To gain further insight into Cas signaling we used the SH3 domain of Cas in a two-hybrid screen to search a human placenta library for binding partners. The screen confirmed a previous finding of its binding to the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) but also identified C3G, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor. We found direct interaction between Cas and C3G in vitro and in vivo. A series of analysis with C3G deletion mutants revealed a proline-rich Cas-binding site (Ala0-Pro1-Pro2-Lys3-Pro4-Pro5-Leu6-Pro7) located NH2-terminal to the previously characterized Crk binding motifs in C3G. Mutagenesis studies showed that Pro1, Lys3, and Pro4 within the ligand-binding site are critical for high affinity interaction. These results, combined with sequence alignments of proline-rich binding elements from proteins known for Cas binding, define the consensus sequence XXPXKPX which is recognized by the CasSH3 domain. Cas shows structural characteristics of a docking molecule and may serve to bring C3G to specific compartments within the cell.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Cas1 was initially identified as a highly phosphorylated protein of 130-kDa in v-Src and v-Crk transformed rat 3Y1 fibroblasts (1). It belongs to a new family of structurally related proteins also including HEF1 (human enhancer of filamentation 1)/Cas-L and Efs (embryonal Fyn-associated substrate)/Sin (2-4). Cas contains an NH2-terminal SH3 domain followed by a stretch of proline-rich sequences, a central substrate domain composed of a cluster of potential SH2-binding sites, and a COOH-terminal domain which contains consensus binding sites for the SH3 and SH2 domains of c-Src (5). Recently, it has been shown that the SH3 domain of Cas binds the tyrosine kinases FAK, RAFTK (related adhesion focal tyrosine kinase)/PYK2 and FRNK (FAK-related non-kinases) (6-8) and the two protein tyrosine phosphatases PTP1B and PTP-PEST (9, 10). All these structural features indicate that Cas is a docking molecule which can assemble and transmit cellular signals through SH2 and SH3 containing intracellular proteins.

In normal fibroblasts, Cas is evenly distributed in the cytoplasm and a small fraction localizes to focal adhesions (11) or in cellular fractions enriched with membranes of the endoplasmatic reticulum (10). Although the exact role for Cas has not been identified it seems to be an important molecule in multiple signaling pathways. Cas becomes tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to many different stimuli including B-cell receptor engagement (12), growth factors such as nerve growth factor (13), epidermal growth factor (14), and platelet-derived growth factor, neuropeptides, phorbol esters, and bioactive lipids (15), osmotic shock of 3T3L1 adipocytes (16) as well as integrin mediated cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion (17-19). Recently, it has been demonstrated that Cas can act as a downstream mediator of FAK-promoted cell migration (20).

Elevated tyrosine phosphorylation appears to result in increased association of Cas with SH2 domain-containing signaling molecules to trigger downstream signaling pathways. The SH2 domains of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-p85, Grb2, Nck, phospholipase C-gamma , and Crk have been found to bind phosphorylated Cas (18, 20). Two guanine nucleotide exchange factors, Sos and C3G, which bind to the NH2-terminal SH3 domain of Crk (CrkSH3(N)), have also been detected in Cas immunoprecipitation complexes (18, 21). The physiological relevance of these associations is not clearly understood, but may be involved in the activation of different downstream pathways. Sos has been shown to be an activator of the Ras/MAP kinase cascade (reviewed in Ref. 22) and C3G was shown to transmit signals to JNK1 in fibroblasts (23). Recent studies indicate that the substrate specificity of C3G is directed against the small G-proteins Rap1 and R-Ras (24, 25). In certain systems, Rap1 can act as Ras antagonist (reviewed in Refs. 26 and 27). However, it has also been shown that Rap1 can mediate sustained ERK activation in rat pheochromocytoma cells induced by nerve growth factor (28).

In this study we found that Cas associates directly, in vivo and in vitro, with C3G. This association was mediated through the interaction of the SH3 domain of Cas with a proline-rich motif in C3G and was independent of tyrosine phosphorylation. Mapping of this motif revealed that it is distinct from the well studied proline-rich motifs of C3G that bind to the CrkSH3(N) domain. The specificity of binding between the CasSH3 domain and C3G was analyzed by mutagenesis of the component residues and a consensus motif for the SH3 domain of Cas was subsequently generated.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Cells and Reagents-- Two Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains were used, HF7c (29) and SFY526 (30). Human 293T kidney epithelial (293T) cells and mouse NIH3T3 fibroblast cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal calf serum or calf serum, respectively. The human placenta MATCHMAKER cDNA library (HL4003AB) and the MATCHMAKER Two-Hybrid system (PT1265-1) were obtained from CLONTECH. Polyclonal antiserum to CrkII (C-18) and C3G (C-19) and the monoclonal antibody to glutathione S-transferase (GST) (B-14) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Mouse monoclonal antibodies against phosphotyrosine (RC20), FAK, and Cas were purchased from Transduction Laboratories.

Plasmid Construction-- The cDNA fragment encoding the rat CasSH3 domain (amino acid residues 99 to 161) was generated by polymerase chain reaction using customized primers. EcoRI and BamHI sites were added to the 5'- and 3'-ends and cloned into pGBT9 (CLONTECH). BamHI and EcoRI sites were added to the 5'- and 3'-ends and cloned into pGEX-2TK (Pharmacia) and pGEX-4T-3 (Pharmacia). The cDNA of CasSH3 in pGEX-4T-3 was cut out with BamHI and NotI and subcloned in-frame into the mammalian expression vector pEBG (31) that expresses proteins fused with GST. Human full-length C3G (hC3G) was previously cloned into the mammalian expression vector pCAGGS (32). GST-fusion protein constructs for v-CrkSH3 domain wild type, mutant W405L, and c-CrkSH3(C) have been described previously (33, 34). GST-fusion peptides derived from the C3G sequence (amino acid residues 216 to 226 and 265 to 276) were constructed with double-stranded oligonucleotides that possessed a 5' BamHI and a 3' EcoRI overhang and cloned in-frame into pGEX-2TK vector. For mapping the Cas-binding site in C3G, deletion constructs of C3G were generated by polymerase chain reaction with customized primers and were cloned into pACT2 (CLONTECH). All polymerase chain reaction products and all junctions were verified by DNA sequencing.

Two-hybrid Library Screening-- The HF7c yeast strain, which carries HIS3 and lacZ genes (lacZ reporter under the control of GAL4 17-mers UAS), was transformed first with pGBT9-CasSH3 (pGBT9 carries the TRP1 gene as selectable marker) and subsequently with a human placenta cDNA library cloned in pGAD10 (pGAD10 carries the LEU2 gene as selectable marker). Competent yeast cells were obtained using the YEASTMAKER yeast transformation system (CLONTECH), and cells were transformed with the indicated plasmids according to the manufacturer's instructions. Double transformants were grown on yeast plates lacking leucine, tryptophan, and histidine. After 6 days, 365 yeast colonies were individually assayed for beta -galactosidase activity by filter assay. The filter assay was carried out as described (35). Briefly, transformants growing on a filter were lysed by freeze thawing in liquid nitrogen, and each filter was incubated in Z-buffer (16.1 g/liter Na2HPO4·7H2O, 5.5 g/liter NaH2PO4·H2O, 0.75 g/liter KCl, 0.246 g/liter MgSO4·7H2O, pH 7.0) containing 50 µl of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta -D-galactopyranoside solution (20 mg/ml of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta -D-galactopyranoside in N,N-dimethylformamide) at 30 °C for 4 h (up to 24 h for screening experiments). Positive clones were selected, and target plasmids containing library cDNA inserts were isolated according to the CLONTECH manual and transformed into HB101 bacteria for amplification. Target cDNAs were subjected to DNA sequence analysis.

Expression of GST Fusion Peptides and in Vitro Binding Assay-- Expression and affinity purification of GST fusion proteins were carried out as described elsewhere (36). Briefly, bacteria harboring the above described expression plasmids were cultured in medium containing 40 mg/ml ampicillin, isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside was added to a concentration of 0.1 mM, and bacteria were cultured for an additional 4 h. Cells were centrifuged, resuspended in STE buffer (150 mM sodium chloride, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.05% Nonidet P-40) and lysed by adding 500 µg/ml chicken lysozyme for 10 min at 4 °C. Digestion of genomic DNA was carried out by adding Triton X-100 to a final concentration of 1% and 50 µg/ml DNase I for 30 min at 4 °C. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation, and GST fusion proteins were affinity purified using glutathione-agarose beads (Molecular Probes), washed 4 times, and eluted with elution buffer (10 mM glutathione, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0). For in vitro binding assays, cell lysates were incubated with 10 µg of GST fusion proteins or GST alone rebound to glutathione beads, for 2 h at 4 °C, the beads were washed 4 times with HNTG lysis buffer (see "Cell Lysis"), and bound proteins were eluted by boiling in Laemmli sample buffer, resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore), and then detected by Western blotting.

Transient Transfection of Plasmid DNA-- 293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal calf serum in 60-mm plastic dishes, and cDNAs were introduced into cells using the modified calcium phosphate transfection system (Stratagene).

Cell Lysis, Immunoprecipitation, and Western Blotting-- Whole cell extracts were prepared by detergent solubilization in HNTG lysis buffer (50 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 150 mM sodium chloride, 1% Triton X-100, 10 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 20 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM sodium molybdate) 30 min at 4 °C, and clarified by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 15 min. Cell lysates were incubated with 1 µg of the indicated antibody bound to Protein A/G PLUS-Agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 2 h at 4 °C, washed with lysis buffer, and loaded onto SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Gels were blotted onto Immobilon-P transfer membranes and blocked overnight at 4 °C with blocking solution 3% bovine serum albumin in TBS/Tween (150 mM sodium chloride, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.1% Tween 20) before probing with the indicated antibody. Some blots were stripped with Western blot stripping buffer (100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS, 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8), washed, and re-blocked prior to probing with another antibody.

Far Western Blotting-- Far Western blotting was carried out with 32P-radiolabeled and purified GST-CasSH3 fusion protein or GST alone. 100 µg of GST fusion protein bound to glutathione beads (100 µl) were incubated with 1 volume of HMK buffer (100 mM sodium chloride, 12 mM magnesium chloride, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) containing 100 units of cAMP-dependent heart muscle protein kinase (Sigma), 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 50 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP for 30 min at 4 °C. The reaction was stopped by adding 1 ml of HMK stop buffer (1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 8.0) and the pellet washed twice with cold 1 × phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% Triton X-100, twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline, and once with 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. Radiolabeled GST fusion protein was eluted at room temperature with 1 ml of elution buffer. After incubation in blocking solution, blots were incubated with 0.5 ml of 32P-labeled probe overnight in fresh blocking solution, washed extensively with TBS/Tween, and exposed to autoradiography films (Kodak).

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Yeast Two-hybrid Screen Identifies the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor C3G as a CasSH3 Interacting Protein-- CasSH3 domain (Fig. 1) was expressed as a fusion protein with the GAL4 DNA-binding domain in the reporter yeast strain HF7c and used to screen for interactions with a library of human placenta cDNA-encoded polypeptides fused to the transcription activation domain of GAL4. Out of 2 × 106 independent transformants 36 cDNAs supported Cas-dependent transcription activation of two independent reporter genes (HIS3 and LacZ). Analysis of these clones by restriction enzyme digests and sequencing showed that four clones encoded the COOH-terminal noncatalytic part (amino acid residues 752-1025) of FAK (Fig. 2A). This polypeptide contained only one of the proline-rich sequences described previously as binding sites for the SH3 domain of Cas (6, 7).


View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Two-hybrid bait. The region of rat Cas (CasSH3) used in the yeast two-hybrid screen is indicated under the diagram of full-length Cas. Black bars indicate regions containing proline-rich (P) sequences. Substrate domain, region which contains 15 potential sites of tyrosine phosphorylation positioned within the motif YXXP (X denotes any amino acid).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Peptides identified in the two-hybrid screen. A, alignment of clone F1 (FAK) with respect to its position along the full-length human FAK protein, and of C3G peptides (C1 and C2) with respect to their positions along the full-length human C3G. Clone C2 contains a 124-nucleotide insertion after amino acid 648. Black bars indicate positions of proline-rich sequences (PXXP motifs) defined as Cas and Crk-binding sites in FAK and C3G, respectively. Amino acid residues are indicated. B, two-hybrid interaction of CasSH3 with clones C1, C2, and F1. SFY526 yeast cells expressing pGBT9 (vector control, lane 1), pGBT9-v-CrkSH3 (lane 2), and pGBT9-CasSH3 (lane 3) were subsequently transformed with the two-hybrid clones C1, C2, and F1 in yeast vector pGAD10 as indicated and tested in beta -galactosidase filter assay. Black blotches indicate interaction.

Six additional Cas interacting cDNAs, representing two distinct overlapping clones C1 and C2, encoded sequences identical to the NH2 terminus of the human guanine nucleotide exchange factor C3G (Fig. 2A). The open reading frame of clone C1 is identical to amino acid residues 11 to 446 of C3G. Clone C2 contained a 124-nucleotide insertion at amino acid residue 648 which resulted in an potential truncated protein due to in-frame stop codons. The central region of C3G contains four similar proline-rich XPPXLPXK sequences (Fig. 2A) which bind with high selectivity the CrkSH3(N) domain (37). Since clone C2 encompassed all four proline-rich Crk-binding sites and clone C1 only one Crk-binding site, we were interested to see whether the CrkSH3(N) domain was capable of interacting with both C1 and C2 clones similarly to the CasSH3 domain in a yeast two-hybrid assay. Interestingly, of two clones only C2 supported CrkSH3(N)-dependent transcription activation (Fig. 2B, lane 2). These results suggested that either the binding sites for the CasSH3 and CrkSH3(N) domains in C3G are different, or that Cas interacts through the same proline-rich sequence of C3G as Crk but with higher affinity.

CasSH3 Domain Binds C3G Directly in Vitro and in Vivo-- To analyze the interaction between the CasSH3 domain and C3G in mammalian cells, we examined their in vitro binding. We compared the binding of the CasSH3 and individual CrkSH3 domains to C3G. As shown by Knudsen et al. (37) the interaction of Crk with C3G is mediated by the NH2-terminal SH3 domain of Crk adapter proteins, which we used as positive control, while no binding has been observed by the COOH-terminal SH3 domain of CrkII (c-CrkSH3(C)), which we introduced as negative control. GST fusion proteins containing the different SH3 domains were captured on glutathione beads, and equivalent amounts were incubated with cell extracts from NIH3T3 fibroblasts. As shown in Fig. 3A, binding of endogenous C3G to the CasSH3 domain was observed to the same extent or even better when compared with the v-CrkSH3 domain. No binding was detectable with c-CrkSH3(C) and GST alone. Furthermore, no binding was observed with v-CrkSH3(W405L), containing a point mutation in the SH3 domain (34).


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   In vitro interaction of Cas and C3G. A, comparison of binding capability of SH3 domains of Crk and Cas to C3G. 10 µg of SH3 domains indicated above expressed as GST fusion proteins were bound to glutathione beads and incubated with 1 mg of lysates from NIH3T3 cells. Precipitated proteins were washed extensively with lysis buffer, subjected to SDS-PAGE (8%), and transferred to Immobilon-P membrane. The upper part of the blot was probed with an antiserum to C3G. The lower part of the blot was probed with a monoclonal antibody to GST. B, direct interaction of C3G and FAK with Cas. 1 mg of total cell lysates of NIH3T3 cells were precipitated with antibodies indicated above each lane. Blots were probed for binding with [32P]GST-CasSH3. Localization of C3G, FAK, and Crk are marked with arrows. The amounts of FAK, Crk, and C3G immunoprecipitated was analyzed in the panels below with anti-FAK monoclonal antibody, anti-CrkII, and anti-C3G antiserum. hc indicates the heavy chain. IP, immunoprecipitation; WB, Western blot.

To determine whether the interaction of the SH3 domain of Cas with C3G is direct or is mediated by other proteins, a Far Western blot analysis was carried out. Bacterially expressed GST-CasSH3 domain fusion protein was purified and labeled with 32P on a specific cAMP-dependent protein kinase site located at the COOH-terminal end of GST. The labeled fusion protein was used to probe FAK, C3G, and Crk immunoprecipitates of NIH3T3 cell lysates, which were resolved on SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes. As shown in Fig. 3B (upper panel), the labeled CasSH3 domain bound predominantly to a single protein with a molecular mass of about 120 kDa (first lane) which corresponds to FAK and to a single protein with a molecular mass of 145 kDa (third lane) which corresponds to C3G, as confirmed by probing with specific antibodies. The direct interaction of the CasSH3 domain and FAK was a confirmation of a previous finding by Harte et al. (7) and used as positive control in our experiment. Weak binding of labeled CasSH3 domain to C3G but not to Crk could also be detected in Crk immunoprecipitates (Fig. 3B, second lane). C3G binds to the family of Crk adapter proteins and therefore it can be found in Crk immunoprecipitates. However, the amount of endogenous C3G coimmunoprecipitated by Crk was low. No binding of 32P-labeled GST was observed (data not shown). These results show that the SH3 domain of Cas is able to interact directly with C3G.

We were also able to detect the in vivo interaction of endogenous Cas and C3G in C3G immunoprecipitates of total cell lysates of human promyelocytic HL60 cells, NIH3T3 mouse fibroblasts, and primary chicken embryo fibroblasts (data not shown). However, by applying that method we could not conclude that this in vivo interaction is direct. Crk proteins could act as bridging molecules between Cas and C3G, since they are known to bind to both. Thus we chose to transiently overexpress only the SH3 domain of Cas together with C3G in human 293T kidney epithelial cells. When we cotransfected the GST CasSH3 domain and C3G, we detected C3G in anti-GST immunoprecipitates by anti-C3G Western blotting (Fig. 4, upper panel). Conversely, we detected CasSH3 in anti-C3G immunoprecipitates by anti-GST Western blotting (Fig. 4, second panel). These data suggest that the CasSH3 domain and C3G associate directly in vivo.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Coimmunoprecipitation of Cas and C3G. 293T cells were transfected with the vectors alone (2 µg each) or vectors containing cDNAs of C3G and GST-CasSH3. Immunoprecipitation was carried out with anti-GST (upper panel) or anti-C3G antiserum (second panel) using 500 µg of lysate. Blots were probed with anti-C3G antiserum or anti-GST antibody. Expression of C3G (third panel) and GST-CasSH3 (fourth panel) were determined from whole cell lysates (30 µg of total protein) by immunoblotting with the appropriate antibodies. WB, Western blot; IP, immunoprecipitation.

Identification of the Proline-rich Motif Binding to the SH3 Domain of Cas-- The site of interaction of C3G with Cas was investigated by assessing the ability of various C3G constructs to support transcription activation in a Cas dependent manner using the yeast two-hybrid assay system (Fig. 5A). All C3G deletion constructs were cloned into the yeast expression vector pACT2 and expressed as HA-tagged GAL4 activation domain fusion peptides. That allowed us to assay for protein expression of the examined constructs (data not shown). First, we found that the 3'-end of clone C2, construct DL1, which includes three Crk-binding sites, is unable to activate transcription in CasSH3 background. These data immediately suggested that the sequence motif in C3G recognized by the SH3 domain of Cas is different from the Crk-binding sites. Two clones, C1 and C2, overlapped in a region of 330 amino acids, which includes one cluster of PXXP motifs located near the 3'-end of that region (amino acid residues 439 to 446). However, since this cluster of PXXP motifs is also present in construct DL1, it cannot be a binding site for the CasSH3 domain. Two additional clusters of PXXP motifs located in the middle of this overlapping region, amino acid residues 215 to 231 (NH2-terminal cluster) and 267 to 273 (COOH-terminal cluster), could also serve as potential CasSH3 domain-binding sites. All C3G constructs (DL2, DL3, DL4, and DL8) containing both clusters of those proline-rich sequences supported CasSH3-dependent transcription activation. Deletion of the NH2-terminal cluster (residues 215 to 231) of PXXP motifs in construct DL7 did not abolish the interaction between the SH3 domain of Cas and C3G. In contrast, the C3G construct DL5 which lacks the COOH-terminal cluster (residues 267 to 273) of PXXP motifs failed to interact with the CasSH3 domain in our two-hybrid assay.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Mapping of Cas-binding sites in C3G. A, all C3G target constructs for expression in yeast were introduced in yeast vector pACT2 except C1 and C2 which are the original two-hybrid clones introduced in pGAD10 and transfected into SFY526 cells expressing either two-hybrid bait pGBT9-CasSH3 or pGBT9-v-CrkSH3. Transformants were grown on plates lacking leucine and tryptophan. Three single colonies of each transfection were analyzed for interaction in beta -galactosidase filter assay (see "Experimental Procedures"). Results represent three independent experiments. The protein expression was confirmed for all transformants tested. Binding above background (pGAD424 or pACT2 alone) was assessed. Multiple + signs indicate strong binding; -, no binding; +/-, weak binding. Numbers indicate the C3G amino acid residue boundaries of the constructs. Black bars indicate PXXP motifs known as binding sites for CrkSH3(N) domain. Gray bars represent clusters of PXXP motif as potential CasSH3-binding sites. B, schematic representation of the structure of C3G, showing the region that interacts with the CasSH3 domain, and the putative proline-rich binding motif (bold letters) within. Black bars represent PXXP motifs which are known as CrkSH3(N)-binding sites.

The shortest C3G constructs which were still able to bind the SH3 domain of Cas (DL4 and DL7) contained this COOH-terminal PXXP motif, APPKPPLP (Fig. 5B). This sequence is different from the Crk binding motif, and indeed DL4 did not interact with CrkSH3 in the two-hybrid assay. The binding capacity of this sequence was further tested by the ability of the peptide GST-V265APPKPPLPGIR to bind endogenous Cas protein (Fig. 6A). As negative controls, GST fusion peptides carrying proline to alanine or proline to glutamine mutations of the central two prolines (P270A/P271A, P270E/P271E) disrupting all possible PXXP motifs, the core consensus motif for SH3 domain binding, were no longer able to interact with Cas. We also confirmed that endogenous Crk did not bind to the CasSH3 domain.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Cas binds to proline-rich sequences upstream of Crk-binding sites in C3G. Specific binding of endogenous Cas and c-Crk to GST-C3G fusion peptides. 1 mg of total protein of NIH3T3 cells were incubated with 10 µg of wild-type GST-C3G fusion peptide (amino acid residues 265-276, lanes 2 and 6), the double mutant GST-C3G fusion peptide M5 (P270/271A, lanes 3 and 7; and P270/271E, lanes 4 and 8), the wild-type GST-C3G fusion peptide (amino acid residues 282-291, lane 9), and the point mutant K289L GST-C3G fusion peptide (amino acid residues 282-291, lane 10) bound to glutathione S-agarose. The left panel was first probed with anti-Cas antiserum, striped with stripping buffer (see "Experimental Procedures"), and re-probed with anti-Crk antiserum (middle panel). The right panel was probed with anti-Crk antiserum.

DL5, which contains the NH2-terminal cluster (residues 215 to 231) of PXXP motifs did not support the transcription activation with CasSH3 in the two-hybrid assay. To confirm this observation, we also synthesized GST-T216SPVKPSSPAS, which is similar to the above described motif, and examined its capacity to bind Cas protein. We found that this peptide does not bind either Cas or CrkSH3 domains (data not shown).

Fine Mapping of the CasSH3 Binding Motif in C3G-- To analyze the importance of individual amino acid residues within the CasSH3 domain binding motif, a mutagenesis study of the V265APPKPPLPGIR peptide was performed. GST fusion peptides carrying individual point mutations of all proline residues to alanine and lysine to alanine (P267A, P268A, K269A, P270A, P271A, and P273A) or a double mutation (P270A/P271A) were constructed. As shown in Fig. 7, among the proline to alanine mutations only the mutation of residue 267 and residue 270 greatly reduced binding to endogenous Cas (Fig. 7, GST-M1 and GST-M4). In addition, a drastic decrease in binding could be observed when the K269A mutation was introduced. These results showed that those two prolines and a lysine at position 269 are crucial for binding and form the core PXKP motif which is recognized by the CasSH3 domain.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Mutational analysis of the Cas binding sequence in C3G. Sequences shown here were used as GST-C3G fusion peptides to precipitate endogenous Cas. NIH3T3 cell lysates (1 mg of total protein) were incubated with 10 µg of GST fusion peptides bound to glutathione S-agarose beads as indicated above, and the blots were probed with anti-Cas antiserum. Arrowheads point to the position where a single mutation to alanine almost entirely abolished binding.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Cas belongs to a new family of cytoplasmic docking molecules. It becomes tyrosine phoshorylated after cell adhesion and phosphorylated Cas can be detected in focal adhesion complexes (3, 7, 38). The structural organization of focal adhesions is characterized by a complex network of protein-protein interactions which link the actin cytoskeleton to extracellular matrix proteins (39).

To further identify molecules of the signaling transduction pathway involving Cas, we employed the yeast two-hybrid screen using the SH3 domain of rat Cas as bait and searched for interacting molecules encoded by a human placenta cDNA library. Among the interacting peptides identified by the screen were the widely expressed nonreceptor tyrosine kinase FAK that is critical in integrin-mediated signal transduction pathways (6, 40-42). FAK has already been described to associate with Cas in a two-hybrid screen when FAK residues 1-748 were used as bait (6), and its isolation in our two-hybrid screen demonstrated that the CasSH3 domain used as bait was folded properly and functional.

We also isolated C3G, a 145-kDa protein with guanine nucleotide exchange activity for Rap1 and R-Ras (24, 25, 43). The results reported herein show that besides the Cas-FAK interaction Cas can also form a stable complex with C3G in vitro and in vivo. The potential cellular role of Cas has still not been clearly resolved to date, with at least one report suggesting that Cas is involved in FAK-mediated cell movement (20). Interestingly, in 3T3 cells containing constitutively active c-Src and in COS-7 cells stimulated with fibronectin, deletion of the Src-binding domain of Cas resulted in total loss in the recruitment of Cas to focal adhesions (11). In contrast, in unstimulated cells the localization of Cas to focal adhesions was not affected by the deletion of the Src-binding domain. These data suggest that after integrin activation Cas and FAK form a ternary complex with activated Src, where Src acts as an adapter molecule that links Cas and FAK. Subsequently, the SH3 domain of Cas is released of its initial binding to FAK or FAK-like molecules. A truncated Src protein encompassing only the SH3 and SH2 domain of c-Src, expressed in Src null cells, bound to both FAK and Cas and promoted their association in vivo (44). In that scenario, C3G could bind to the SH3 domain of Cas and link FAK to downstream signaling pathways other than extracellularly regulated kinases as proposed by Schlaepfer et al. (45). The consequence of Cas binding to C3G could be the activation of the JNK pathway by integrin stimulation. Recently, it has been demonstrated that in 293T cells C3G activates JNK1 by a Ras-independent mechanism (46). We believe that the binding of Cas to its target molecules is a dynamic process which may be regulated by activation of integrins and other upstream pathways. The existence of a linear signal transduction pathway in the action of platelet-derived growth factor involving phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Rac that leads to the tyrosine phosphorylation of Cas have been demonstrated, and a similar pathway has been proposed for the action by low concentrations of epidermal growth factor (14, 15). However, further work is needed to clarify the physiological role of the Cas·C3G complex formation.

C3G contains in its central region four proline-rich binding motifs that can bind the small adapter protein Crk (37). In this report we clearly demonstrated that the Cas-C3G association is not mediated by those Crk-binding sites on C3G. Nonetheless, the SH3 domain of Cas binds to the NH2-terminal region of C3G which harbors one proline-rich Cas-binding site distinct from the Crk-binding sites on C3G. The presence of several protein binding motifs in C3G raises the possibility that two or more motifs may function in a cooperative fashion. It is possible that Crk brings C3G near the CasSH3 domain after binding via its SH2 domain to tyrosine-phosphorylated Cas and a cooperative binding stabilizes it. Okada and Pessin (47) have demonstrated the dissociation of the C3G-Crk complex in Chinese hamster ovary cells following epidermal growth factor and insulin stimulation. Taken together, these findings suggest that Crk may initiate the binding of C3G to Cas before Crk gets released. However, in this report we clearly demonstrated that Cas can bind C3G directly.

SH3 domains bind proline-rich motifs with the core consensus sequence PXXP (48). Amino acid residues immediately adjacent to the proline residues seem to be important for specificity of different SH3 domains (49, 50). Cas has already been shown to interact via its SH3 domain with FAK, and it has been proposed that this interaction is mediated by the ligand consensus sequence XPXXPXR for left-handed polyproline II helix (6, 7), which requires a positively charged amino acid residue at the COOH terminus of the peptide ligand (51). On the other hand, SH3 domain ligands, including AFAP-110, CDC42 GAP, and Shc, missing at least one critical consensus residue have been recently reported (50). PTP1B and PTP-PEST (10, 52) have proline-rich sequences, PPPRPPK and PPPKPPR, respectively, similar to that APPKPSR motif in FAK, which binds the SH3 domain of Cas. However, the newly identified direct interaction of Cas with C3G, and the characterization of the CasSH3 domain ligand-binding site as APPKPPL in C3G demonstrated that Cas can specifically bind to ligands lacking the positively charged residue at the COOH terminus. The APPKPPL motif is conserved in Drosophila C3G which supports the biological importance of this interaction.2

Yu et al. (49) has argued that non-proline residues contact more variable regions of the SH3 domain such as the RT and n-Src loops, and play an important role in specificity. The alignments of proline-rich binding motifs already tested for interaction with the SH3 domain of Cas are summarized in Table I. These results suggested that a positively charged amino acid residue at position P2 within the core PXXP motif mediates specificity. We clearly demonstrated with a mutational analysis of the Cas binding motif 2 on C3G (corresponding to the COOH-terminal cluster) the critical role of lysine 269 (position P2) within the APPKPPL ligand-binding site. The NMR structure of p85SH3 in complex with a high affinity peptide suggested that a basic residue at position P2 interacts with an acidic residue in the RT loop (49). The SH3 domains of Cas and its related molecules HEF1 and Efs share a glutamate in the RT loop which may interact with the positively charged lysine and result in a hydrophilic interaction. However, amino acids surrounding the core PXKP motif seem to contribute to the specific Cas-C3G interaction either in a positive or negative fashion. Despite the fact that motif 1 (corresponding to the NH2-terminal cluster) in C3G (Table I) contains the PXKP motif, we were unable to show binding of Cas to this site. This proline-rich motif contains two residues which may have a negative effect on binding to Cas. Position P-1 contains serine, an amino acid residue with an uncharged polar side chain, where all other motifs recognized by Cas contain an amino acid residue with a nonpolar side chain, preferably proline, and position P1 contains a valine where all other motifs have a proline. However, we showed with a proline to alanine mutation within the APPKPPLP ligand-binding site that proline at position P1 is not crucial for binding. Interestingly, all of the CasSH3 ligand consensus motifs identified so far contain multiple proline residues while this PXXP motif contains only the two conserved prolines. In this report, we show that the SH3 domain of Cas selects peptides sharing the consensus motif XXPp + PpX (where + and X represent positively charged residues and any residue, respectively; lowercase positions contain residues that tend to be proline).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Alignments of sequences tested for binding the CasSH3 domain

In conclusion, the two-hybrid system has enabled us to identify the direct interaction of Cas with the guanine nucleotide exchange factor C3G. Thus, further work is necessary to examine the significance of the Cas·C3G complex formation and to shed light on the physiological role of Cas. The fact that the CasSH3 domain has other interactors besides C3G raises the questions of whether there is competition in binding, or Cas binds different molecules in distinct compartments? Further work will clarify how the binding is regulated, either by conformational change or via other stabilizing molecules, like Crk suggested for C3G on Cas.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. M. Matsuda (NIH, Japan) for pCAGGS-C3G; B. Knudsen for GST-C3G 282-291, GST-K289L, and c-CrkSH3(C); and C. Bougeret for GST-v-CrkSH3 and GST-v-Crk(W405) constructs. We also thank Dr. A. Monteiro for critical reading of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant CA44356.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Supported by a fellowship from the Medical Research Council of Canada.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 212-327-8802; Fax: 212-327-7943; E-mail: saburo{at}rockvax.rockefeller.edu.

The abbreviations used are: Cas, Crk-associated substrate; SH, Src homology; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinaseGST, glutathione S-transferase.

2 S. Ishimaru and H. Hanafusa, personal communication.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Sakai, R., Iwamatsu, A., Hirano, N., Ogawa, S., Tanaka, T., Mano, H., Yazaki, Y., and Hirai, H. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 3748-3756[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Ishino, M., Ohba, T., Sasaki, H., and Sasaki, T. (1995) Oncogene 11, 2331-2338[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Law, S. F., Estojak, J., Wang, B., Mysliwiec, T., Kruh, G., and Golemis, E. A. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3327-3337[Abstract]
  4. Alexandropoulos, K., and Baltimore, D. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 1341-1355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Nakamoto, T., Sakai, R., Ozawa, K., Yazaki, Y., and Hirai, H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 8959-8965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Polte, T. R., and Hanks, S. K. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 10678-10682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Harte, M. T., Hildebrand, J. D., Burnham, M. R., Bouton, A. H., and Parsons, J. T. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13649-13655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Astier, A., Avraham, H., Manie, S. N., Groopman, J., Canty, T., Avraham, S., and Freedman, A. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 228-232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Garton, A. J., Burnham, M. R., Bouton, A. H., and Tonks, N. K. (1997) Oncogene 15, 877-885[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Liu, F., Hill, D. E., and Chernoff, J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31290-31295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Nakamoto, T., Sakai, R., Honda, H., Ogawa, S., Ueno, H., Suzuki, T., Aizawa, S., Yazaki, Y., and Hirai, H. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3884-3897[Abstract]
  12. Ingham, R. J., Krebs, D. L., Barbazuk, S. M., Turck, C. W., Hirai, H., Matsuda, M., and Gold, M. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32306-32314[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Ribon, V., and Saltiel, A. R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7375-7380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ojaniemi, M., and Vuori, K. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25993-25998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Casamassima, A., and Rozengurt, E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9363-9370[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Chen, D., Elmendorf, J. S., Olson, A. L., Li, X., Earp, H. S., and Pessin, J. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27401-27410[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Petruzzelli, L., Takami, M., and Herrera, R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7796-7801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Vuori, K., and Ruoslahti, E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22259-22262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Nojima, Y., Mimura, T., Morino, N., Hamasaki, K., Furuya, H., Sakai, R., Nakamoto, T., Yazaki, Y., and Hirai, H. (1996) Hum. Cell 9, 169-174[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Cary, L. A., Han, D. C., Polte, T. R., Hanks, S. K., and Guan, J. L. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 140, 211-221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Okada, S., and Pessin, J. E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 25533-25538[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Schlessinger, J. (1994) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4, 25-30[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Tanaka, S., Ouchi, T., and Hanafusa, H. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 2356-2361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Gotoh, T., Hattori, S., Nakamura, S., Kitayama, H., Noda, M., Takai, Y., Kaibuchi, K., Matsui, H., Hatase, O., and Takahashi, H. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 6746-6753[Abstract]
  25. Gotoh, T., Niino, Y., Tokuda, M., Hatase, O., Nakamura, S., Matsuda, M., and Hattori, S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 18602-18607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Bokoch, G. M. (1993) Biochem. J. 289, 17-24
  27. Noda, M. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1155, 97-109[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. York, R. D., Yao, H., Dillon, T., Ellig, C. L., Eckert, S. P., McCleskey, E. W., and Stork, P. J. S. (1998) Nature 392, 622-626[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Bartel, P., Chien, C. T., Sternglanz, R., and Fields, S. (1993) BioTechniques 14, 920-924[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Feilotter, H. E., Hannon, G. J., Ruddell, C. J., and Beach, D. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 1502-1503[Free Full Text]
  31. Mayer, B. J., Hirai, H., and Sakai, R. (1998) Curr. Biol. 5, 296-305
  32. Tanaka, S., Morishita, T., Hashimoto, Y., Hattori, S., Nakamura, S., Shibuya, M., Matuoka, K., Takenawa, T., Kurata, T., and Nagashima, K. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 3443-3447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Knudsen, B. S., Zheng, J., Feller, S. M., Mayer, J. P., Burrell, S. K., Cowburn, D., and Hanafusa, H. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2191-2198[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Altun-Gutekin, Z. F., Chandriani, S., Bougeret, C., Ischizaki, T., de Graaf, P., van Bergen en Heneguowen, P., Hanafusa, H., Wagner, F. A., and Birge, R. B. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 3044-3058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Monteiro, A. N., August, A., and Hanafusa, H. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 13595-13599[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Smith, D. B., and Johnson, K. S. (1988) Gene (Amst.) 67, 31-40[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Knudsen, B. S., Feller, S. M., and Hanafusa, H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 32781-32787[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Petch, L., Bockholt, S., Bouton, A., Parsons, J., and Burridge, K. (1995) J. Cell Sci. 108, 1371-1379[Abstract]
  39. Jockusch, B. M., Bubeck, P., Giehl, K., Kroemker, M., Moschner, J., Rothkegel, M., Rudiger, M., Schluter, K., Stanke, G., and Winkler, J. (1995) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 379-416[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Clark, E. A., and Hynes, R. O. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14814-14818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Schwartz, M. A., Schaller, M. D., and Ginsberg, M. H. (1995) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 549-99[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve], 549-599
  42. Parsons, J. T. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 146-152[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. van den Berghe, N., Cool, R. H., Horn, G., and Wittinghofer, A. (1997) Oncogene 15, 845-850[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Schlaepfer, D. D., Broome, M. A., and Hunter, T. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1702-1712[Abstract]
  45. Schlaepfer, D. D., Hanks, S. K., Hunter, T., and van der Geer, P. (1994) Nature 372, 786-791[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Tanaka, S., and Hanafusa, H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1281-1284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Okada, S., and Pessin, J. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 28179-28182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Ren, R., Mayer, B. J., Cicchetti, P., and Baltimore, D. (1993) Science 259, 1157-1161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Yu, H., Chen, J. K., Feng, S., Dalgarno, D. C., Brauer, A. W., and Schreiber, S. L. (1994) Cell 76, 933-945[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Sparks, A. B., Rider, J. E., Hoffman, N. G., Fowlkes, D. M., Quillam, L. A., and Kay, B. K. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 1540-1544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Lim, W. A., Richards, F. M., and Fox, R. O. (1994) Nature 372, 375-379[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Garton, A. J., Flint, A. J., and Tonks, N. K. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6408-6418[Abstract]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
T. Tazaki, K. Miyazaki, E. Hiyama, T. Nakamoto, R. Sakai, N. Yamasaki, Z.-i. Honda, M. Noda, N. Miyasaka, T. Sueda, et al.
Functional analysis of Src homology 3-encoding exon (exon 2) of p130Cas in primary fibroblasts derived from exon 2-specific knockout mice.
Genes Cells, February 1, 2008; 13(2): 145 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
G. Gaidos, S. Soni, D. J. Oswald, P. A. Toselli, and K. H. Kirsch
Structure and function analysis of the CMS/CIN85 protein family identifies actin-bundling properties and heterotypic-complex formation
J. Cell Sci., July 15, 2007; 120(14): 2366 - 2377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. J. S. Stork and T. J. Dillon
Multiple roles of Rap1 in hematopoietic cells: complementary versus antagonistic functions
Blood, November 1, 2005; 106(9): 2952 - 2961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Ling, T. Zhu, and P. E. Lobie
Src-CrkII-C3G-dependent Activation of Rap1 Switches Growth Hormone-stimulated p44/42 MAP Kinase and JNK/SAPK Activities
J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2003; 278(29): 27301 - 27311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
D. A. Hsia, S. K. Mitra, C. R. Hauck, D. N. Streblow, J. A. Nelson, D. Ilic, S. Huang, E. Li, G. R. Nemerow, J. Leng, et al.
Differential regulation of cell motility and invasion by FAK
J. Cell Biol., March 3, 2003; 160(5): 753 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
A. K. Voss, P. Gruss, and T. Thomas
The guanine nucleotide exchange factor C3G is necessary for the formation of focal adhesions and vascular maturation
Development, March 2, 2003; 130(2): 355 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J.-T. Kim and C.-K. Joo
Involvement of Cell-Cell Interactions in the Rapid Stimulation of Cas Tyrosine Phosphorylation and Src Kinase Activity by Transforming Growth Factor-beta 1
J. Biol. Chem., August 23, 2002; 277(35): 31938 - 31948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Huang, H. Hamasaki, T. Nakamoto, H. Honda, H. Hirai, M. Saito, T. Takato, and R. Sakai
Differential Regulation of Cell Migration, Actin Stress Fiber Organization, and Cell Transformation by Functional Domains of Crk-associated Substrate
J. Biol. Chem., July 19, 2002; 277(30): 27265 - 27272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Suzuki, T. Nakamoto, S. Ogawa, S. Seo, T. Matsumura, K. Tachibana, C. Morimoto, and H. Hirai
MICAL, a Novel CasL Interacting Molecule, Associates with Vimentin
J. Biol. Chem., April 19, 2002; 277(17): 14933 - 14941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]