|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 40, 25713-25720, October 2, 1998
The Nuclear Receptors Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor
and Rev-erb Mediate the Species-specific Regulation of
Apolipoprotein A-I Expression by Fibrates*
Ngoc
Vu-Dac §,
Sandrine
Chopin-Delannoy§¶,
Philippe
Gervois ,
Edith
Bonnelye¶,
Geneviève
Martin ,
Jean-Charles
Fruchart ,
Vincent
Laudet¶, and
Bart
Staels
From the U.325 INSERM, Département
d'Athérosclérose, Institut Pasteur, and the Faculté
de Pharmacie, Université de Lille II, Lille, France and
¶ Endocrin'os group, CNRS UMR319, Institut de Biologie de Lille,
Lille, France
 |
ABSTRACT |
Fibrates are widely used hypolipidemic drugs
which activate the nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR) and thereby alter the transcription of genes controlling
lipoprotein metabolism. Fibrates influence plasma high density
lipoprotein and its major protein, apolipoprotein (apo) A-I, in an
opposite manner in man (increase) versus rodents
(decrease). In the present study we studied the molecular mechanisms of
this species-specific regulation of apoA-I expression by fibrates. In
primary rat and human hepatocytes fenofibric acid, respectively,
decreased and increased apoA-I mRNA levels. The absence of
induction of rat apoA-I gene expression by fibrates is due to 3 nucleotide differences between the rat and the human apoA-I promoter A
site, rendering a positive PPAR-response element in the human apoA-I
promoter nonfunctional in rats. In contrast, rat, but not human, apoA-I transcription is repressed by the nuclear receptor Rev-erb , which binds to a negative response element adjacent to the TATA box of the
rat apoA-I promoter. In rats fibrates increase liver Rev-erb mRNA levels >10-fold. In conclusion, the opposite regulation of rat and human apoA-I gene expression by fibrates is linked to differences in cis-elements in their respective promoters
leading to repression by Rev-erb of rat apoA-I and activation by
PPAR of human apoA-I. Finally, Rev-erb is identified as a novel
fibrate target gene, suggesting a role for this nuclear receptor in
lipid and lipoprotein metabolism.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Fibrates are a class of drugs used in the treatment of atherogenic
dyslipidemia (1). Fibrates are ligands for transcription factors
belonging to the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)1 subfamily of nuclear
receptors (2, 3). After ligand activation and heterodimerization to the
9-cis retinoic acid receptor RXR, PPARs bind to specific
response elements, termed peroxisome proliferator response elements
(PPREs), in the regulatory regions of target genes. PPREs consist of a
direct repeat of the degenerated hexamer AGGTCA sequence separated by 1 nucleotide (DR-1). Fibrates exert their effects on plasma lipids by
altering the transcription of genes involved in lipoprotein metabolism
(1). Direct evidence that fibrate action on lipoprotein metabolism is
mediated by PPAR , the principal PPAR form in liver, came from
studies in mice rendered deficient for PPAR by homologous
recombination (4). Functional PPREs have been identified in the
promoters of a number of genes involved in plasma triglyceride
(e.g. human apoC-III (5) and mouse and human lipoprotein
lipase (LPL) (6)) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) metabolism
(e.g. human apoA-I (7) and apoA-II (8)).
Whereas both in man and rodents fibrates efficiently decrease plasma
triglycerides, their effects on HDL occur in an opposite manner in
these species. Whereas in man plasma HDL cholesterol consistently
increases upon fibrate treatment (9), a pronounced decrease is observed
in rats (10). Previously, it was demonstrated that these species
differences in HDL response to fibrates are associated with opposite
changes of apoA-I expression, the major HDL apolipoprotein. In rats,
fibrate treatment lowers hepatic, but not intestinal, apoA-I mRNA
levels, due to a decreased transcription rate of the apoA-I gene in
liver (10). In contrast, the transcription rate of the human apoA-I
gene is induced by PPAR , which interacts with a positive PPRE
located in the A site of the human apoA-I gene promoter liver-specific
enhancer (7). Furthermore, fibrates enhance apoA-I expression and
production both in vivo in man and in vitro in
human hepatoma cells (11-14). The observation that fibrates regulate
human and mouse apoA-I gene transcription in an opposite manner in
livers of transgenic mice overexpressing the human apoA-I gene driven
by its homologous promoter including the PPRE sequence (15) suggested
that the species-specific differences in fibrate response are due to
cis-element sequence differences between the rodent and
human apoA-I genes. However, the exact molecular mechanisms implicated
have not been determined yet. In addition, although the mechanisms of
positive regulation of gene expression by fibrates via PPAR interacting
with positive PPRE sequences are well understood (for review, see
Schoonjans et al. (16)), little is known on the mechanisms
of negative gene regulation by fibrates and PPARs.
In this study, we determined the molecular mechanisms behind the
differential regulation of rat versus human apoA-I gene
expression by fibrates. Our results demonstrate that this opposite
regulation is due to sequence differences of two distinct enhancer
regions in the rat and human apoA-I genes. On the one hand, the human apoA-I gene promoter A site contains a positive PPRE to which PPAR
binds. The lack of induction of apoA-I gene transcription by fibrates
in rats is due to 3 nucleotide differences between the rat and the
human apoA-I gene promoter A sites, resulting in the transformation of
the positive PPRE in the human apoA-I promoter in a nonfunctional site
in rats. On the other hand, rat, but not human, apoA-I gene
transcription is repressed via an element overlapping the TATA box to
which the nuclear orphan receptor Rev-erb binds. Furthermore,
fibrates induce Rev-erb and repress apoA-I gene expression only in
rat liver, but not in intestine. Interestingly, the rat apoA-I promoter
Rev-erb response element (RevRE) is not conserved in the human
apoA-I gene promoter.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Fenofibric acid and fenofibrate, and ciprofibrate
were kind gifts of Dr. Alan Edgar (Laboratoires Fournier, Daix, France) and Dr. Herbert (Sanofi, Toulouse, France) respectively. Bezafibrate and hematoxylin were from Sigma.
Animal Studies--
Adult Sprague-Dawley rats (3 months old)
were treated for 14 days with the specified fibrates at the indicated
concentrations (w/w) mixed in chow. At the end of the treatment period
all animals were fasted overnight, weighed, and sacrificed by
exsanguination under ether anesthesia between 9 and 11 a.m. Livers
were frozen in liquid N2 or stored in phosphate-buffered
saline until RNA or in situ hybridization analysis.
Cell Culture--
Human hepatoma HepG2 cells (E.C.A.C.C., Porton
Down, Salisbury, UK) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum at 37 °C in a
humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, 95% air. Medium was
changed every other day. Human and rat hepatocytes were isolated by
collagenase perfusion and cultured as described previously (17). At the
end of the treatment period with fenofibric acid (in
Me2SO), cells were washed three times with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline, homogenized in 4 M guanidinium
isothiocyanate, and used for RNA analysis.
RNA Analysis--
RNA preparation, Northern blot hybridizations,
and quantifications were performed as described previously (10). The
rat apoA-I (10), apoE (10), Rev-erb (18), HNF-4 (19), and human
acidic ribosomal phosphoprotein 36B4 cDNAs (20) were used as
probes.
Recombinant Plasmids--
Polymerase chain reaction
amplification and cloning of the rat apoA-I promoter into the pBLCAT5
promoterless expression vector was described previously (21).
Site-directed mutagenesis of the apoA-I RevRE was accomplished using
the oligonucleotide 5'-CAC ACA TAT ATA GGC AGG GAA GAA GA-3' as a
mutagenic primer on single-stranded DNA templates according to Kunkel
(22). The rat wild-type (5'-GAT CCA CAC ATA TAT AGG TCA GGG AAG AAG
A-3') and mutant apoA-I RevRE (5'-GAT CCA CAC ATA TAT AGG CAG GGA AGA
AGA-3') and the rat (5'-GAT CCA CTG AAC CCT TGA TCC CAG CTC TG-3') and
human wild type (5'-GAT CCA CTG AAC CCT TGA CCC CTG CCC TA-3') and
mutant (5'-GAT CCA CTG ATC CCT TGT CCC CTG CCC TA-3') apoA-I A-site
oligonucleotides were cloned into the BamHI/BglII
sites of pIC20H (23), digested with HindIII, and subcloned
upstream of the thymidine kinase (TK) promoter of pBLCAT4 (24) to
generate, respectively, rAI-TATAwt-TKCAT, rAI-TATAmt-TKCAT, rAIAwt-TKCAT,
hAIAwt-TKCAT, and hAIAmt-TKCAT. Identity of all
clones was verified by sequence analysis.
Transient Transfections--
Transfections in HepG2 cells were
performed at 50-60% confluency by the calcium phosphate
coprecipitation procedure with a mixture of plasmids that contained in
addition to the reporter (1-5 µg/60 mm culture dish) and expression
vector(s) (100-1000 ng), 0.35 µg of
cytomegalovirus- -galactosidase expression vector as a control for
transfection efficiency. All samples were complemented to an equal
total amount of DNA. After 4 h cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and incubated for another 16 h with the
indicated stimuli in fresh medium containing 5% calf serum delipoproteinized by ultracentrifugation in KBr (1.21 g/ml) and subsequently treated with AG-1-X8 resin (Bio-Rad) plus activated charcoal. Stimuli were dissolved in Me2SO and added to the
medium at the indicated concentrations and periods of time. Control
cells received vehicle only. CAT activity was determined on cell
extracts as described by Gorman et al. (25). Autoradiographs
were quantified by liquid scintillation counting and results were
normalized for transfection efficiency. Transfection experiments were
performed at least three times.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSA)--
hPPAR ,
mRXR , and hReverb proteins were synthesized in vitro
using the rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (Promega). EMSAs with
Rev-erb , PPAR and/or RXR were performed as described previously (7,
26). For competition experiments, increasing amounts of the indicated
cold oligonucleotides were included just before adding labeled
oligonucleotide. After 15 min of incubation at room temperature,
DNA-protein complexes were separated by electrophoresis on a 4%
polyacrylamide gel in 0.25× Tris borate-EDTA buffer at 4 °C.
 |
RESULTS |
ApoA-I Gene Expression Is Regulated in an Opposite Manner by
Fenofibrate in Human Versus Rat Hepatocytes--
To study whether the
species differences in response to fibrates are due to a distinct
regulation of apoA-I expression in liver, the effects of fenofibric
acid, the active form of fenofibrate, on apoA-I gene expression were
compared between primary cultures of human versus rat
hepatocytes. Addition of fenofibric acid to primary human hepatocytes,
at a concentration (100 µM) within the range of plasma
concentrations attained in fenofibrate-treated patients, resulted in a
>2-fold increase of apoA-I mRNA levels (Fig.
1A). In contrast, in rat
hepatocytes fenofibric acid decreased apoA-I mRNA levels in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1B). As a control,
mRNA levels of the ribosomal protein 36B4 did not change upon
treatment of either human or rat hepatocytes with fenofibric acid (Fig.
1). These data indicate that the species-distinct regulation of the
apoA-I gene is due to a direct effect of fenofibrate on the
hepatocyte.

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Fenofibric acid influences apoA-I mRNA
levels in primary cultures of adult human and rat hepatocytes in an
opposite manner. Human (A) and rat (B)
hepatocytes were treated for 24 h with fenofibric acid at the
indicated doses. Total RNA (10 µg) was subjected to Northern blot
analysis using human (A) or rat (B) apoA-I
(top panels) and 36B4 (bottom panels) cDNA
probes.
|
|
The Human, but Not the Rat, ApoA-I Promoter A Site Contains a
Positive PPAR-response Element--
Since previously a positive PPRE
has been identified in the human apoA-I promoter A site (7), we
wondered whether the lack of induction of apoA-I gene expression by
fibrates in rats could be due to the absence of a functional PPRE in
the rat apoA-I promoter. Interestingly, when the human and rat apoA-I A
sites, which are composed of 3 degenerated hexameric half-sites
separated by 2 and 1 nucleotides, respectively (DR-2 and DR-1), were
aligned, 3 nucleotide differences were observed (Fig.
2A). To determine whether
these nucleotide differences conferred a different PPAR binding
potential to the rat and human apoA-I A sites, EMSA experiments were
performed. Incubation of radiolabeled human A site oligonucleotide with
in vitro produced PPAR protein, in the presence of its
heterodimeric partner RXR, resulted in the formation of a retarded
complex (Fig. 2B, lane 3). This complex was
specific since it could be competed out by adding excess unlabeled
human A site oligonucleotide (Fig. 2, B, lane 4,
and C, lanes 7-10). In contrast, unlabeled rat A site oligonucleotide did not compete for binding to the human A
site (Fig. 2, B, lane 5, and C,
lanes 11-14).

View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
PPAR/RXR heterodimers bind to the human, but
not to the rat apoA-I A site. A, sequence alignment of
the human (hAIA) and rat (rAIA) wild-type apoA-I
A sites. The degenerated half-sites are indicated by arrows.
The sequence differences between the human and rat A sites are
underlined. B and C, gel retardation
assays were performed on end-labeled hAIA oligonucleotide in the
presence of in vitro transcribed/translated hPPAR ,
mRXR , or unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate (/ = no extract added;
Lys. = unprogrammed lysate). Competition experiments for
binding to in vitro transcribed/translated hPPAR /mRXR
were performed by adding 50 (lanes 7 and 11), 100 (lanes 4, 5, 8, and 12),
200 (lanes 9 and 13) or 400-fold (lanes
10 and 14) molar excess of cold hAIA (lanes
4 and 7-10) or rAIA (lanes 5 and
11-14) oligonucleotide.
|
|
Next, the human and rat A sites were cloned in front of a heterologous
promoter, and transient co-transfection experiments were performed in
HepG2 cells. PPAR co-transfection resulted in a significant increase of
human A site driven CAT activity (Fig. 3). Due to the high basal activity of
PPAR in HepG2 cells, possibly due to the activation by endogenous PPAR
ligands, no further activation was observed in the presence of
fenofibric acid (Fig. 3). However, activation by fibrates was observed
when the same experiments were performed in other cells, such as in
HeLa or CV-1 cells (not shown). In contrast, rat apoA-I A site-driven
CAT activity was not increased by PPAR, fenofibric acid, or both
together (Fig. 3). These data clearly indicate that only the human, but
not the rat, apoA-I A site functions as a PPRE.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
PPAR activates the human, but not rat, apoA-I
A site. The human (hAIAwt) and rat
(rAIAwt) apoA-I A sites were cloned upstream of the TK
promoter, and HepG2 cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids
(5 µg) in the presence of co-transfected mPPAR or pSG5 vector
plasmids (1 µg). Cells were treated with fenofibric acid
(FF) (500 µM) or vehicle, and CAT activity was
measured and expressed as mean ± S.D.
|
|
The Orphan Receptor Rev-erb Represses Transcription of the Rat
ApoA-I Promoter--
In a previous report, the nuclear receptor
ROR 1 was identified as a positive regulator of apoA-I expression in
the intestine (28). Interestingly, nuclear receptors of the ROR and
Rev-erb groups regulate transcription through identical response
elements, leading to cross-talk between the positive ROR and the
negative Rev-erb nuclear receptors (29-32). Therefore, it was tested
whether Rev-erb , which is expressed in liver (18, 33), could act as
a repressor of rat apoA-I transcription. Co-transfection of CAT
reporter constructs driven by the rat apoA-I promoter with a Rev-erb
expression vector resulted in dose-dependent repression of
CAT activity in HepG2 cells (Fig. 4,
A and B). Interestingly, human apoA-I promoter
activity was not repressed by Rev-erb co-transfection (Fig.
4A). These results indicate that the rat, but not the human, apoA-I gene is a Rev-erb target gene.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Rev-erb represses transcription of the
rat, but not the human, apoA-I promoter. A, HepG2 cells
were transfected with the rat (r( 256/+91)AI-CAT) or human
(h( 256/+26)AI-CAT) apoA-I promoter reporter plasmids (2 µg) in the presence of co-transfected hRev-erb plasmid (1 µg).
B, HepG2 cells were transfected with the indicated rat
apoA-I promoter reporter plasmids (2 µg) in the presence of
increasing amounts (0, 100, 500, and 1000 ng) of co-transfected
hRev-erb plasmid. C, HepG2 cells were transfected with
the wild-type (r( 252/+26)wtAI-CAT) or mutated
(r( 252/+26)wtAI-CAT) rat apoA-I promoter
constructs (2 µg) in the presence of increasing amounts (0, 100, 250, 500, and 1000 ng) of co-transfected hRev-erb plasmid. Empty pSG5
vector was added to an equal amount of plasmid DNA. CAT activities were
measured after 24 h and expressed as mean ± S.D.
|
|
To determine whether this repression of apoA-I promoter activity is
mediated by the previously identified response element for ROR 1 (28)
located adjacent to the TATA box, the activity of Rev-erb was
analyzed on an apoA-I promoter construct carrying a mutation in the
ROR 1 response element (see Fig. 6A). Whereas wild-type
apoA-I promoter activity was significantly repressed in a
dose-dependent manner, Rev-erb failed to repress the
activity of the mutated construct (Fig. 4C), thereby
indicating that the Rev-erb and ROR response elements
coincide.
Rev-erb Represses Transcription of the Rat ApoA-I Promoter
through Both Active and Passive Mechanisms--
Since Rev-erb may
repress transcription either actively, by recruiting nuclear
co-repressors of the N-CoR family (34, 35), or passively, by competing
for binding with other, positive factors, such as the proteins binding
to the TATA box, the activity of a C terminus-truncated Rev-erb 236,
which can still bind to DNA, but does not actively repress
transcription (36), was tested on rat apoA-I promoter transcription. In
contrast to wild-type Rev-erb , which repressed transcription already
at low concentrations, Rev-erb 236 started to repress apoA-I
transcription only at higher amounts of expression vector (Fig.
5A).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Repression of the rat apoA-I gene promoter by
Rev-erb is due to both active and passive repression
mechanisms. A, HepG2 cells were transfected with the
r( 252/+26)AI-CAT reporter plasmid (2 µg) in the presence of
increasing amounts (0, 500, and 1000 ng) of either the wild-type
(Rev-erb ) or truncated (Rev-erb 236)
Rev-erb expression plasmids. B, HepG2 cells were
transfected with the rat wild type
(rAI-TATAwt-TK-CAT) and mutated
(rAI-TATAmt-TK-CAT) apoA-I TATA site-containing TK
promoter plasmids (2 µg) in the presence of increasing amounts (0, 250, 500, and 1000 ng) of Rev-erb expression plasmid. Empty pSG5
vector was added to an equal amount of plasmid DNA.
|
|
To determine whether Rev-erb could repress transcription from a
heterologous promoter, the rat apoA-I TATA site (AI-TATA) was cloned in
front of the TK promoter, and transient transfection assays were
performed. Compared with the empty expression vector, co-transfection
of Rev-erb resulted in a significant decrease of wild-type rat
AI-TATA driven CAT activity (Fig. 5B). In contrast, neither
mutated AI-TATA nor TK promoter alone driven CAT activity were
repressed by Rev-erb co-transfection (Fig. 5B).
Altogether, these observations suggest that the repression of rat
apoA-I transcription by Rev-erb is likely due to a combination of
active and passive transcriptional repression mechanisms.
Rev-erb Binds to the Rat, but Not the Human, ApoA-I Promoter
TATA Site--
EMSAs were performed to determine whether Rev-erb
could bind to the rat AI-TATA site. Incubation of labeled rat wild-type AI-TATA oligonucleotide with Rev-erb resulted in the formation of a
retarded complex (Fig. 6, A
and B, lane 2). The binding was specific since it
could be competed out by excess amounts of either unlabeled consensus
monomeric RevRE (30, 37) or rAI-TATAwt oligonucleotides
(Fig. 6B, lanes 3-6). In contrast, neither
rAI-TATAmt nor human AI-TATA oligonucleotides could compete
for binding of Rev-erb to rAI-TATAwt (Fig. 6,
lanes 7-10). Similar results were obtained using the
consensus RevRE oligonucleotide as a probe (Fig. 6C).
Similar as cold RevRE oligonucleotide (Fig. 6C, lanes 12-14), cold rAI-TATAwt oligonucleotide (Fig.
6C, lanes 15-17) competed efficiently for
binding of Rev-erb to RevRE, whereas the human
hAI-TATAwt (Fig. 6C, lanes 18-20)
oligonucleotide failed to compete. Altogether, these data indicate that
whereas the rat apoA-I promoter contains a functional Rev-erb
response element, the human AI-TATA site does not bind Rev-erb .

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Rev-erb binds to the wild-type rat, but
not to the mutated rat or human apoA-I TATA sites. A,
sequence comparison of the consensus (RevRE), the rat
wild-type (rAI-TATAwt) and mutated
(rAI-TATAmt) and the human
(hAI-TATAwt) apoA-I TATA sites. The AGGTCA half-site
is indicated by an arrow. The sequence differences between
the rat wild-type, mutated, and human sites are underlined.
B and C, gel retardation assays were performed on
end-labeled rAI-TATA (lanes 1-10) or RevRE (lanes
11-20) oligonucleotides in the presence of in vitro
transcribed/translated hRev-erb or unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate
(/). Competition experiments for binding of hRev-erb were performed
by adding 1 (lanes 12, 15, and 18), 10 (lanes 3, 5, 7, 9,
13, 16, and 19) and 100-fold
(lanes 4, 6, 8, 10,
14, 17, and 20) molar excess of cold
RevRE (lanes 3, 4, and 12-14), rat
wild-type (lanes 5, 6, and 15-17),
rat mutated (lanes 7 and 8) or human (lanes
9, 10, and 18-20) apoAI-TATA
oligonucleotide (- = no competitor added).
|
|
Fibrates Induce Rev-erb mRNA Levels in Rat Liver--
To
determine whether the negative regulation of rat apoA-I gene expression
by fibrates is mediated via Rev-erb , adult rats were treated for 14 days with different doses of fenofibrate, and Rev-erb mRNA
levels were measured by Northern blot analysis in livers and
intestines, the major sites of apoA-I production. Administration of
fenofibrate resulted in a pronounced induction of Rev-erb gene
expression (Fig. 7A). This
induction of Rev-erb mRNA was dose-dependent, being
evident at a dose level of 0.05% (w/w) of fenofibrate and further
enhanced at 0.5%. Interestingly, the induction of Rev-erb mRNA
levels was inversely proportional to the decrease of apoA-I mRNA
levels in liver (Fig. 7A). In contrast to liver, intestinal
Rev-erb mRNA levels did not change significantly after
fenofibrate treatment (control, 100 ± 19%; fenofibrate 0.005%, 90 ± 3%; fenofibrate 0.05%, 110 ± 10%; fenofibrate
0.5%, 144 ± 5%), which correlates well with the absence of
effects of fibrates on intestinal apoA-I mRNA levels (10).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Fibrates induce Rev-erb gene expression in
rat liver. Adult male rats were treated for 14 days with
fenofibrate at the indicated doses (w/w in chow) (A) or with
the indicated fibrates at a dose of 0.5% w/w in chow (B and
C). RNA was extracted and apoA-I (A and
B), HNF-4 (A and B), apoE
(A and B), and Rev-erb (A and
C) mRNA levels were measured. Values are expressed
relative (R.A.U. = relative arbitrary units) to chow-treated
controls and represent the mean ± S.D. of four
animals/group.
|
|
To determine whether the induction of liver Rev-erb gene expression
is a general property of fibrates, rats were treated for 14 days with
different fibrates. All fibrates tested significantly increased
Rev-erb mRNA levels, which was most pronounced for ciprofibrate
(>30-fold), followed by fenofibrate (>25-fold) and bezafibrate
(±15-fold) (Fig. 7B). All fibrates also repressed liver
apoA-I mRNA levels (Fig. 7B). As a control mRNA
levels of apoE, whose expression has been shown not to be controlled by fibrates (10), did not change significantly upon fibrate treatment (Fig. 7, A and B). Interestingly, hepatic
mRNA levels of the nuclear receptor HNF-4, which is a major
regulator of liver apolipoprotein gene transcription and whose
expression has been shown to be repressed by fibrates (5), did not
change significantly in either experiment (Fig. 7, A and
B).
Finally, the induction of Rev-erb gene expression by fibrates was
also observed by in situ hybridization experiments using liver slices from rats treated with different fibrates (data not shown). Compared with controls, hybridization with an antisense Rev-erb riboprobe resulted in an enhanced signal intensity in livers
from fibrate-treated rats, which was evenly distributed throughout the
liver, indicating that Rev-erb mRNA levels increase after
fibrate treatment in the apoA-I-producing parenchymal cells of the
liver.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Fibrates are hypolipidemic drugs, which have been discovered by
virtue of their cholesterol-lowering activity in rats (for review, see
Staels and Auwerx (1)). Ironically, this cholesterol lowering is
entirely due to a decrease of plasma HDL cholesterol concentrations and
its major apolipoprotein, apoA-I (10), an effect nowadays considered to
be negative, due to the protective activities of HDL and apoA-I against
atherosclerosis (38, 39). In contrast, in man fibrates consistently
elevate plasma HDL and apoA-I and increase the production rate of its
major apolipoproteins, apoA-I and apoA-II (8, 13, 40). In the present
study, we addressed the mechanisms of the differential response of
apoA-I expression to fibrates in man and rat. Using primary human and rat hepatocytes we demonstrate that the opposite action of fenofibrate is due to a direct effect on the hepatocyte. These data are in line
with a previous report showing opposite regulation of human (increase)
versus mouse (decrease) apoA-I gene expression by fibrates in livers of transgenic mice overexpressing the human apoA-I gene under
control of its homologous promoter (15). The experiments in these mice
also indicated that this species-specific opposite regulation between
human versus mouse is due to differences in cis-,
but not in trans-acting elements (15). The results presented in this study indicate that the differences in fibrate response between
the human and rat apoA-I genes are due to a combination of two distinct
mechanisms implicating two different cis-elements binding
two distinct nuclear receptors, PPAR and Rev-erb (Fig. 8).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Scheme summarizing our current understanding
of the species-distinct regulation of apoA-I gene transcription by
fibrates.
|
|
On the one hand, the absence of induction of apoA-I gene expression by
fibrates in rats is linked to 3-nucleotide differences between the rat
and human apoA-I promoter A sites, thereby rendering the positive PPRE
in the human apoA-I promoter nonfunctional in rats. Since in
vitro promoter mapping studies identified a positive PPRE in the
human apoA-I promoter A site (7), and since human apoA-I gene
expression is induced at the transcriptional level by fibrate treatment
in livers of transgenic mice (15) overexpressing the human apoA-I gene
under control of its homologous promoter including this PPRE, it is
highly likely that this element indeed confers the positive response of
the human apoA-I gene to fibrates. The demonstration that this element
is not functional in the rat apoA-I A site would therefore explain the
lack of induction of rat apoA-I gene expression by fibrates.
On the other hand, a negative site for the nuclear receptor Rev-erb
is present in the rat, but not in the human, apoA-I promoter, and
fibrate treatment results in a pronounced increase of liver expression
of the Rev-erb gene. Together with Rev-erb (also termed RVR,
BD73) and the Drosophila receptor E75, Rev-erb (also termed ear-1) belongs to a subfamily of orphan receptors,
which repress transcription of target genes (41). Rev-erb appears to
be ubiquitously expressed (18, 33), but its functions are ill defined.
A number of indirect observations suggested a role for Rev-erb in
metabolic control and energy homeostasis. First, Rev-erb expression
is induced during differentiation of preadipocytes into adipocytes
(42). Second, Rev-erb is transcribed from the opposite strand of the
thyroid hormone receptor (TR) gene, with its 3' exons overlapping
with TR 2, a dominant negative regulator of TR action, suggesting a
role for Rev-erb as a modulator of thyroid hormone signaling (18,
33, 43, 44). Indeed, the level of Rev-erb expression appears to be a
determinant of the ratio of TR 1:TR 2 mRNA levels (42, 45, 46).
In addition, Rev-erb has been suggested to bind to a subset of TR
response elements (TREs), composed of DR-4 sequences (47), as well as to compete with TR for binding to TREs (48). Finally, overexpression of
Rev-erb in mouse myoblasts leads to inhibition of muscle
differentiation, possibly due to interference with thyroid
hormone-induced muscle differentiation pathways (48). Interestingly, a
significant level of cross-talk exists also between the peroxisome
proliferator and thyroid hormone signaling pathways. Indeed, in rodents
peroxisome proliferators and thyroid hormones often regulate the same
target genes (49). In addition, certain of these genes have been shown to carry both TREs and PPREs (50, 51). Cross-talk between PPAR and TR
may furthermore occur by competition for binding to DNA (52, 53) or for
the common heterodimeric partner RXR (53-56), or by formation of
PPAR:TR heterodimers, as has been suggested by one report (57). Our
data identifying Rev-erb as a fibrate target gene suggests another
layer of cross-talk between the TR and PPAR signaling pathways. Indeed
it is conceivable that the induction of Rev-erb expression after
fibrates results in decreased TR 2 mRNA levels, resulting both in
a higher level of expression of functionally active TR 1 as well as
lower levels of the dominant negative TR 2 protein, altogether
leading to enhanced thyroid hormone action. Studies to test this
hypothesis are currently underway in our laboratory.
The identification of the rat apoA-I gene, a major determinant of HDL
metabolism, as a target for Rev-erb , is the first demonstration of a
role for this nuclear receptor in lipoprotein metabolism, albeit in
rats. Although this site is not conserved in the human apoA-I gene, the
fact that, both in rats (this study) and in
man,2 Rev-erb expression
is controlled by fibrates, which are major regulators of lipoprotein
metabolism, points to a role for this nuclear receptor in lipoprotein
metabolism and possibly atherogenesis. It will therefore be of interest
to determine which human genes are regulated by Rev-erb .
Rev-erb family members bind in vitro either to a monomeric
half-site, to a subset of DR-2 (termed RevDR2) or to DR-4 TRE sequences (29-31, 36, 37, 47, 58, 59). In addition to the human Rev-erb gene,
which is negatively autoregulated by Rev-erb binding to a RevDR2
sequence (36), the rat apoA-I gene is only the second natural
Rev-erb target gene identified to our knowledge. The Rev-erb
response element in the rat apoA-I promoter is composed of a AGGTCA
half-site preceded by an AT-rich region consisting of the TATA box.
Previously, it was suggested that Rev-erb represses transcription
only from RevDR2, but not from monomeric sites (31). Our results
demonstrating that Rev-erb represses transcription via a monomeric
site, both in the context of the homologous as well as a heterologous
promoter, suggest that Rev-erb is also active on monomeric sites.
Similarly, Rev-erb actively represses transcription of the
N-myc gene via a monomeric sequence (32). Active
transcription repression by Rev-erb may occur by recruting nuclear
receptor corepressors of the N-CoR family, which interact with the C
terminus of Rev-erb (34, 35). However, the truncated Rev-erb 236
form (36), which lacks the the N-CoR binding domains, also represses
transcription, albeit to a smaller extent than wild-type Rev-erb ,
suggesting that the repression of apoA-I transcription by Rev-erb is
due to a combination of both active and passive mechanisms. Passive
transcriptional repression may occur by competition for binding of
either TATA-box binding protein (TBP) to the TATA box or for positive
transcription factors to the monomeric site.
Several lines of evidence point to a functional role for Rev-erb in
the transcriptional repression of rat apoA-I gene expression by
fibrates. First, the repression of rat apoA-I expression by fibrates
occurs at the transcriptional level (10). Second and in contrast to the
induction by fibrates of direct PPAR-target genes, such as acyl-CoA
oxidase, the repression of apoA-I gene expression is a relatively slow
process requiring between 12 and 24 h, pointing to an indirect
action of fibrates (60). Third, the Rev-erb response element is only
present in the rat, but not in the human, apoA-I promoter, which
correlates well with the difference in response of human
versus rat apoA-I gene expression to fibrates. Finally,
Rev-erb gene expression is only induced in the liver, but not in the
intestine, and fibrates repress apoA-I gene expression only in rat
liver, but not in intestine (10).
In addition to the rat apoA-I gene, fibrates have been shown to repress
the transcription of a wide array of genes involved in lipid and energy
metabolism, such as rat S14 (56), rat apoA-IV (61), rat
lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (62), rat hepatic lipase (63), and
the human, rat, and mouse apoC-III (4, 5, 64, 65) genes in liver.
Furthermore, the antidiabetic thiazolidinediones, which are ligands for
PPAR , have been shown to repress the transcription of the human and
rat leptin genes in adipose tissue (66-69). Although the mechanism of
positive regulation by fibrates via PPAR interacting with PPRE
sequences in target gene promoters has been fairly well studied,
relatively little is known about the mechanisms of negative transcriptional regulation by these agents. Since both apoC-III and
apoA-I gene expression are increased in livers of PPAR knock-out mice and since their expression is not repressed by fibrate treatment in the same mice (4), PPAR expression appears to be required for the
negative regulation by fibrates, at least with respect to the mouse
apoA-I and apoC-III genes. A previous study indicated that fibrates may
repress transcription of the human and rat apoC-III and rat transferrin
genes in liver by down-regulating the expression of the strong positive
transcription factor HNF-4 as well as by displacement of HNF-4 binding
by non-productive PPAR/RXR heterodimers (5, 70). It is unlikely,
however, that the repression of rat apoA-I gene transcription occurs
through this mechanism. Indeed, we could not confirm any significant
regulation of HNF-4 gene expression by fibrates, whereas both
Rev-erb and apoA-I mRNA levels changed much more pronouncedly in
the livers of animals treated with all fibrates tested. Moreover,
whereas HNF-4 is an important regulator of hepatic apoC-III gene
transcription, this transcription factor appears of lesser importance
for human apoA-I transcriptional regulation in HepG2 cells (71,
72). In addition, the role of HNF-4 in controlling rat apoA-I gene
transcription is unclear, since HNF-4 may inhibit and activate its
transcription via the A and C sites, respectively (73, 74). Finally,
down-regulation of HNF-4 expression and competition for its binding
would be expected to affect a wide array of genes in liver whose
expression is controlled by HNF-4, such as human apoA-II and apoB (75).
However, whereas apoB expression is unaffected by fibrates (10), human
apoA-II gene expression is induced by fibrates via PPAR:RXR binding to the HNF-4 site (8). It is tempting to speculate that the induction of
Rev-erb expression by fibrates may be a general mechanism leading to
the transcriptional repression of a certain number of genes. For
instance, since Rev-erb increases upon adipocyte differentiation
(42), it will be of interest to determine whether this nuclear receptor
also regulates the transcription of a number of genes in adipose
tissue, such as possibly the leptin gene.
In conclusion, the species-distinct regulation of apoA-I gene
expression by fibrates is linked to sequence differences in cis-acting elements (see Fig. 8 for overview). In man,
apoA-I transcription is induced via PPAR binding to a positive PPRE. This site is not conserved in rats resulting in the lack of binding of
PPAR to the rat apoA-I promoter. In contrast, rat apoA-I transcription is repressed by Rev-erb , whose expression is induced by fibrates and
which binds to a RevRE site adjacent to the TATA box in the rat, but
not in the human apoA-I promoter. These observations indicate that the
expression of the transcription factor Rev-erb may be under control
not only by pharmacological, but also by dietary factors (such as fatty
acids) as well as inflammatory cytokines (such as PG-J2 and LT-B4),
which all bind to and activate PPARs (2, 3, 76-78). Altogether these
observations suggest a role for the nuclear orphan receptor Rev-erb
in metabolic control.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to A. Begue, B. Derudas, Y. Delplace, and O. Vidal for technical assistance, to V. Kosykh, Y. De
Launoit, and M. Briggs for discussions, and to D. Stéhelin for
support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This research was supported by the Région Nord-Pas de
Calais.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Both authors contributed equally to this article.
Member of CNRS. To whom correspondence should be addressed:
U.325 INSERM, Dépt. d'Athérosclérose, Institut
Pasteur, 1 Rue Calmette, 59019 Lille, France. Tel.: 33--3-20-87 73 88;
Fax: 33-3-20-87 73 60; E-mail: Bart.Staels{at}pasteur-lille.fr.
The abbreviations used are:
PPAR, peroxisome
proliferator-activated receptor; PPRE, peroxisome proliferator response
element; RXR, 9-cis retinoic acid receptorRevRE, Rev-erb response elementTK, thymidine kinaseHDL, high density
lipoproteinTR, thyroid hormone receptorEMSA, electrophoretic
mobility shift assaysTRE, TR response elementCAT, chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase.
2
N. Vu-Dac, S. Chopin-Delannoy, P. Gervois, E. Bonnelye, G. Martin, J.-C. Fruchart, V. Laudet, and B. Staels,
manuscript in preparation.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Staels, B.,
and Auwerx, J.
(1997)
Curr. Pharm. Des.
3,
1-14
-
Devchand, P. R.,
Keller, H.,
Peters, J. M.,
Vazquez, M.,
Gonzalez, F. J.,
and Wahli, W.
(1996)
Nature
384,
39-43[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Forman, B. M.,
Chen, J.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4312-4317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Peters, J. M.,
Hennuyer, N.,
Staels, B.,
Fruchart, J.-C.,
Fievet, C.,
Gonzalez, F. J.,
and Auwerx, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27307-27312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hertz, R.,
Bishara-Shieban, J.,
and Bar-Tana, J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13470-13475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schoonjans, K.,
Peinado-Onsurbe, J.,
Lefebvre, A.-M.,
Heyman, R. A.,
Briggs, M.,
Deeb, S.,
Staels, B.,
and Auwerx, J.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
5336-5348[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Vu-Dac, N.,
Schoonjans, K.,
Laine, B.,
Fruchart, J.-C.,
Auwerx, J.,
and Staels, B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
31012-31018[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Vu-Dac, N.,
Schoonjans, K.,
Kosykh, V.,
Dallongeville, J.,
Fruchart, J.-C.,
Staels, B.,
and Auwerx, J.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
96,
741-750
-
Tikkanen, M. J.
(1992)
Curr. Opin. Lipidol.
3,
29-33
-
Staels, B.,
Van Tol, A.,
Andreu, T.,
and Auwerx, J.
(1992)
Arterioscler. Thromb.
12,
286-294[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tam, S.-P.
(1991)
Atherosclerosis
91,
51-61[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jin, F.-Y.,
Kamanna, V. S.,
Chuang, M.-Y.,
Morgan, K.,
and Kashyap, M. L.
(1996)
Arterioscler. Throm. Vasc. Biol.
16,
1052-1062[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Saku, K.,
Gartside, P. S.,
Hynd, B. A.,
and Kashyap, M. L.
(1985)
J. Clin. Invest.
75,
1702-1712
-
Hahn, S. E.,
and Goldberg, D. M.
(1992)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
43,
625-633[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Berthou, L.,
Duverger, N.,
Emmanuel, F.,
Langouët, S.,
Auwerx, J.,
Guillouzo, A.,
Fruchart, J.-C.,
Rubin, E.,
Denèfle, P.,
Staels, B.,
and Branellec, D.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
97,
2408-2416[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schoonjans, K.,
Staels, B.,
and Auwerx, J.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1302,
93-109[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Li, A. P.,
Roque, M. A.,
Beck, D. J.,
and Kaminski, D. L.
(1992)
J. Tissue Cult. Methods
14,
139-146
-
Lazar, M. A.,
Hodin, R. A.,
Darling, D. S.,
and Chin, W. W.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
1128-1136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sladek, F. M.,
Zhong, W.,
Lai, E.,
and Darnell, J. E.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
2353-2365[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Masiakowski, P.,
Breathnach, R.,
Bloch, J.,
Gannon, F.,
Krust, A.,
and Chambon, P.
(1982)
Nucleic Acids Res.
10,
7895-7903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Saladin, R.,
Vu-Dac, N.,
Fruchart, J.-C.,
Auwerx, J.,
and Staels, B.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
239,
451-459[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kunkel, T. A.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
488-492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Marsch, J. L.,
Erfle, M.,
and Wykes, E. J.
(1984)
Gene (Amst.)
32,
481-485[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Luckow, B.,
and Schütz, G.
(1987)
Nucleic Acids Res.
15,
5490[Free Full Text]
-
Gorman, C. M.,
Moffat, L. F.,
and Howard, B. H.
(1982)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
2,
1044-1051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Vanacker, J. M.,
Laudet, V.,
Adelmant, G.,
Stéhelin, D.,
and Rommelaere, J.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
7668-7672[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Quéva, C.,
Ness, S. A.,
Grässer, F. A.,
Graf, T.,
Vandenbunder, B.,
and Stéhelin, D.
(1992)
Development
114,
125-133[Abstract]
-
Vu-Dac, N.,
Gervois, P.,
Grötzinger, T.,
De Vos, P.,
Schoonjans, K.,
Fruchart, J.-C.,
Auwerx, J.,
Mariani, J.,
Tedgui, A.,
and Staels, B.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
22401-22404[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Retnakaran, R.,
Flock, G.,
and Giguère, V.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
1234-1244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Forman, B. M.,
Chen, J.,
Blumberg, B.,
Kliewer, S. A.,
Henshaw, R.,
Ong, E. S.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
1253-1260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Harding, H. P.,
and Lazar, M. A.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
4791-4802[Abstract]
-
Dussault, I.,
and Giguère, V.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1860-1867[Abstract]
-
Miyajima, N.,
Horiuchi, R.,
Shibuya, Y.,
Fukushige, S.-i.,
Matsubara, K.-i.,
Toyoshima, K.,
and Yamamoto, T.
(1989)
Cell
57,
31-39[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zamir, I.,
Harding, H. P.,
Atkins, G. B.,
Hörlein, A.,
Glass, C. K.,
Rosenfeld, M. G.,
and Lazar, M. A.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5458-5465[Abstract]
-
Downes, M.,
Burke, L. J.,
Bailey, P. J.,
and Muscat, G. E. O.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
4379-4386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Adelmant, G.,
Bègue, A.,
Stéhelin, D.,
and Laudet, V.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
3553-3558[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Harding, H. P.,
and Lazar, M. A.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
3113-3121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Miller, N. E.,
Forde, O. H.,
and Thelle, D. S.
(1977)
Lancet
1,
965-968[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rubin, E. M.,
Krauss, R. M.,
Spangler, E. A.,
Verstuyft, J. G.,
and Clift, S. M.
(1991)
Nature
353,
265-267[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lussier-Cacan, S.,
Bard, J.-M.,
Boulet, L.,
Nestruck, A. C.,
Grothé, A.-M.,
Fruchart, J.-C.,
and Davignon, J.
(1989)
Atherosclerosis
78,
167-182[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Laudet, V.,
and Adelmant, G.
(1995)
Curr. Biol.
5,
124-127[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chawla, A.,
and Lazar, M. A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
16265-16269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lazar, M. A.,
Jones, K. E.,
and Chin, W. W.
(1990)
DNA Cell Biol.
9,
77-83[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Laudet, V.,
Bègue, A.,
Henry-Duthoit, C.,
Joubel, A.,
Martin, P.,
Stéhelin, D.,
and Saule, S.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
1105-1112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lazar, M. A.,
Hodin, R. A.,
Cardona, G.,
and Chin, W. W.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
12859-12863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Munroe, S. H.,
and Lazar, M. A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
22083-22086[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Spanjaard, R. A.,
Nguyen, V. P.,
and Chin, W. W.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
286-295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Downes, M.,
Carozzi, A. J.,
and Muscat, G. E. O.
(1995)
Mol. Endocrinol.
9,
1666-1678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hertz, R.,
Kalderon, B.,
and Bar-Tana, J.
(1993)
Biochimie (Paris)
75,
257-261[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Castelein, H.,
Gulick, T.,
Declercq, P. E.,
Mannaerts, G. P.,
Moore, D. D.,
and Baes, M. E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
26754-26758[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hertz, R.,
Nikodem, V.,
Ben-Ishai, A.,
Berman, I.,
and Bar-Tana, J.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
319,
241-248
-
Miyamoto, T.,
Kaneko, A.,
Kakizawa, T.,
Yajima, H.,
Kamijo, K.,
Sekino, R.,
Hiramatsu, K.,
Nishii, Y.,
Hashimoto, T.,
and Hashizume, K.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7752-7758[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hunter, J.,
Kassam, A.,
Winrow, C. J.,
Rachubinski, R. A.,
and Capone, J. P.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
116,
213-221[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Juge-Aubry, C. E.,
Gorla-Bajszczak, A.,
Pernin, A.,
Lemberger, T.,
Wahli, W.,
Burger, A. G.,
and Meier, C. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
18117-18122[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chu, R.,
Madison, L. D.,
Lin, Y.,
Kopp, P.,
Rao, M. S.,
Jameson, J. L.,
and Reddy, J. K.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
11593-11597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ren, B.,
Thelen, A.,
and Jump, D. B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17167-17173[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bogazzi, F.,
Hudson, L. D.,
and Nikodem, V. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
11683-11686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dumas, B.,
Harding, H. P.,
Choi, H. S.,
Lehmann, K. A.,
Chung, M.,
Lazar, M. A.,
and Moore, D. D.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
996-1005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bonnelye, E.,
Vanacker, J. M.,
Desbiens, X.,
Begue, A.,
Stehelin, D.,
and Laudet, V.
(1994)
Cell Growth Differ.
5,
1357-1365[Abstract]
-
Berthou, L.,
Saladin, R.,
Yaqoob, P.,
Branellec, D.,
Calder, P.,
Fruchart, J. C.,
Denefle, P.,
Auwerx, J.,
and Staels, B.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
232,
179-187[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Staels, B.,
van Tol, A.,
Verhoeven, G.,
and Auwerx, J.
(1990)
Endocrinology
126,
2153-2163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Staels, B.,
van Tol, A.,
Skretting, G.,
and Auwerx, J.
(1992)
J. Lipid Res.
33,
727-735[Abstract]
-
Staels, B.,
Peinado-Onsurbe, J.,
and Auwerx, J.
(1992)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1123,
227-230[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Staels, B.,
Vu-Dac, N.,
Kosykh, V. A.,
Saladin, R.,
Fruchart, J. C.,
Dallongeville, J.,
and Auwerx, J.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
95,
705-712
-
Haubenwallner, S.,
Essenburg, A. D.,
Barnett, B. C.,
Pape, M. E.,
DeMattos, R. B.,
Krause, B. R.,
Minton, L. L.,
Auerbach, B. J.,
Newton, R. S.,
Leff, T.,
and Bisgaier, C. L.
(1995)
J. Lipid Res.
36,
2541-2551[Abstract]
-
De Vos, P.,
Lefebvre, A. M.,
Miller, S. G.,
Guerre-Millo, M.,
Wong, K.,
Saladin, R.,
Hamann, L.,
Staels, B.,
Briggs, M. R.,
and Auwerx, J.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
98,
1004-1009[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zhang, B.,
Graziano, M. P.,
Doebber, T. W.,
Leibowitz, M. D.,
White-Carrington, S.,
Szalkowski, D. M.,
Hey, P. T.,
Wu, M.,
Cullinan, C. A.,
Bailey, P.,
Lollmann, B.,
Frederich, R.,
Flier, J. S.,
Strader, C. D.,
and Smith, R. G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
9455-9459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kallen, C. B.,
and Lazar, M. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5793-5796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hollenberg, A. N.,
Susulic, V. S.,
Madura, J. P.,
Zhang, B.,
Moller, D. E.,
Tontonez, P.,
Sarraf, P.,
Spiegelman, B. M.,
and Lowell, B. B.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5283-5290[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hertz, R.,
Seckbach, M.,
Zakin, M. M.,
and Bar-Tana, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
218-224[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fraser, J. D.,
Keller, D.,
Martinez, V.,
Santiso-Mere, D.,
Straney, R.,
and Briggs, M. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13892-13898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ginsburg, G. S.,
Ozer, J.,
and Karathanasis, S. K.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
96,
528-538
-
Chan, J.,
Nakabayashi, H.,
and Wong, N. C. W.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
1205-1211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Murao, K.,
Bassyouni, H.,
Taylor, A. H.,
Wanke, I. E.,
and Wong, N. C. W.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
301-306[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ladias, J. A. A.,
Hadzopoulou-Cladaras, M.,
Kardassis, D.,
Cardot, P.,
Cheng, J.,
Zannis, V.,
and Cladaras, C.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
15849-15860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Forman, B. M.,
Tontonoz, P.,
Chen, J.,
Brun, R. P.,
Spiegelman, B. M.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1995)
Cell
83,
803-812[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kliewer, S. A.,
Lenhard, J. M.,
Willson, T. M.,
Patel, I.,
Morris, D. C.,
and Lehman, J. M.
(1995)
Cell
83,
813-819[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kliewer, S. A.,
Sundseth, S. S.,
Jones, S. A.,
Brown, P. J.,
Wisely, G. B.,
Koble, C. S.,
Devchand, P.,
Wahli, W.,
Willson, T. M.,
Lenhard, J. M.,
and Lehmann, J. M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4318-4323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Mymin, T. Dembinski, and M. H. Friesen
Iatrogenic Severe Depression of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
J. Clin. Pharmacol.,
July 1, 2009;
49(7):
865 - 871.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Verges, E. Florentin, S. Baillot-Rudoni, J.-M. Petit, M. C. Brindisi, J.-P. Pais de Barros, L. Lagrost, P. Gambert, and L. Duvillard
Rosuvastatin 20 mg restores normal HDL-apoA-I kinetics in type 2 diabetes
J. Lipid Res.,
June 1, 2009;
50(6):
1209 - 1215.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-R. Taskinen, D. R. Sullivan, C. Ehnholm, M. Whiting, D. Zannino, R. J. Simes, A. C. Keech, P. J. Barter, and for the FIELD study investigators
Relationships of HDL Cholesterol, ApoA-I, and ApoA-II With Homocysteine and Creatinine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Fenofibrate
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
June 1, 2009;
29(6):
950 - 955.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Mukherjee, K. T. Locke, B. Miao, D. Meyers, H. Monshizadegan, R. Zhang, D. Search, D. Grimm, M. Flynn, K. M. O'Malley, et al.
Novel Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha} Agonists Lower Low-Density Lipoprotein and Triglycerides, Raise High-Density Lipoprotein, and Synergistically Increase Cholesterol Excretion with a Liver X Receptor Agonist
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
December 1, 2008;
327(3):
716 - 726.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Jaichander, K. Selvarajan, M. Garelnabi, and S. Parthasarathy
Induction of paraoxonase 1 and apolipoprotein A-I gene expression by aspirin
J. Lipid Res.,
October 1, 2008;
49(10):
2142 - 2148.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Fontaine, E. Rigamonti, B. Pourcet, H. Duez, C. Duhem, J.-C. Fruchart, G. Chinetti-Gbaguidi, and B. Staels
The Nuclear Receptor Rev-erb{alpha} Is a Liver X Receptor (LXR) Target Gene Driving a Negative Feedback Loop on Select LXR-Induced Pathways in Human Macrophages
Mol. Endocrinol.,
August 1, 2008;
22(8):
1797 - 1811.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. P. Burris
Nuclear Hormone Receptors for Heme: REV-ERB{alpha} and REV-ERB{beta} Are Ligand-Regulated Components of the Mammalian Clock
Mol. Endocrinol.,
July 1, 2008;
22(7):
1509 - 1520.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Duez and B. Staels
The nuclear receptors Rev-erbs and RORs integrate circadian rhythms and metabolism
Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research,
June 1, 2008;
5(2):
82 - 88.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Zadelaar, R. Kleemann, L. Verschuren, J. de Vries-Van der Weij, J. van der Hoorn, H. M. Princen, and T. Kooistra
Mouse Models for Atherosclerosis and Pharmaceutical Modifiers
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
August 1, 2007;
27(8):
1706 - 1721.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. Cha, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Wu, D. Su, J. Y. Han, X. Fang, B. Yu, M. D. Breyer, and Y. Guan
Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor {alpha}/{gamma} Dual Agonist Tesaglitazar Attenuates Diabetic Nephropathy in db/db Mice
Diabetes,
August 1, 2007;
56(8):
2036 - 2045.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Y. Ng, Y. Huang, L. M. Reddy, J. R. Falck, E. T. Lin, and D. L. Kroetz
Cytochrome P450 Eicosanoids are Activators of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha}
Drug Metab. Dispos.,
July 1, 2007;
35(7):
1126 - 1134.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kakizawa, S.-i. Nishio, G. Triqueneaux, S. Bertrand, J. Rambaud, and V. Laudet
Two differentially active alternative promoters control the expression of the zebrafish orphan nuclear receptor gene Rev-erb{alpha}
J. Mol. Endocrinol.,
May 1, 2007;
38(5):
555 - 568.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Benoit, A. Cooney, V. Giguere, H. Ingraham, M. Lazar, G. Muscat, T. Perlmann, J.-P. Renaud, J. Schwabe, F. Sladek, et al.
International Union of Pharmacology. LXVI. Orphan Nuclear Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev.,
December 1, 2006;
58(4):
798 - 836.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Canaple, J. Rambaud, O. Dkhissi-Benyahya, B. Rayet, N. S. Tan, L. Michalik, F. Delaunay, W. Wahli, and V. Laudet
Reciprocal Regulation of Brain and Muscle Arnt-Like Protein 1 and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha} Defines a Novel Positive Feedback Loop in the Rodent Liver Circadian Clock
Mol. Endocrinol.,
August 1, 2006;
20(8):
1715 - 1727.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Y. Han, T. Chiba, J. S. Campbell, N. Fausto, M. Chaisson, G. Orasanu, J. Plutzky, and A. Chait
Reciprocal and Coordinate Regulation of Serum Amyloid A Versus Apolipoprotein A-I and Paraoxonase-1 by Inflammation in Murine Hepatocytes
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
August 1, 2006;
26(8):
1806 - 1813.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Xu, L. Lu, C. Greyson, M. Rizeq, K. Nunley, B. Wyatt, M. R. Bristow, C. S. Long, and G. G. Schwartz
The PPAR-{alpha} activator fenofibrate fails to provide myocardial protection in ischemia and reperfusion in pigs
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
May 1, 2006;
290(5):
H1798 - H1807.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. G. Mikael, J. Genest Jr, and R. Rozen
Elevated Homocysteine Reduces Apolipoprotein A-I Expression in Hyperhomocysteinemic Mice and in Males With Coronary Artery Disease
Circ. Res.,
March 3, 2006;
98(4):
564 - 571.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Mooradian, M. J. Haas, and N. C. W. Wong
The Effect of Select Nutrients on Serum High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Apolipoprotein A-I Levels
Endocr. Rev.,
February 1, 2006;
27(1):
2 - 16.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Blaschke, Y. Takata, E. Caglayan, R. E. Law, and W. A. Hsueh
Obesity, Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor, and Atherosclerosis in Type 2 Diabetes
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
January 1, 2006;
26(1):
28 - 40.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Singh, R. Kauffman, W. Bensch, G. Wang, P. McClelland, J. Bean, C. Montrose, N. Mantlo, and A. Wagle
Identification of a Novel Selective Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha} Agonist, 2-Methyl-2-(4-{3-[1-(4-methylbenzyl)-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl]propyl}phenoxy)propanoic Acid (LY518674), That Produces Marked Changes in Serum Lipids and Apolipoprotein A-1 Expression
Mol. Pharmacol.,
September 1, 2005;
68(3):
763 - 768.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Genolet, S. Kersten, O. Braissant, S. Mandard, N. S. Tan, P. Bucher, B. Desvergne, L. Michalik, and W. Wahli
Promoter Rearrangements Cause Species-specific Hepatic Regulation of the Glyoxylate Reductase/Hydroxypyruvate Reductase Gene by the Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {alpha}
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 24, 2005;
280(25):
24143 - 24152.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Natsoulis, L. El Ghaoui, G. R.G. Lanckriet, A. M. Tolley, F. Leroy, S. Dunlea, B. P. Eynon, C. I. Pearson, S. Tugendreich, and K. Jarnagin
Classification of a large microarray data set: Algorithm comparison and analysis of drug signatures
Genome Res.,
May 1, 2005;
15(5):
724 - 736.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Wallace, M. Schwarz, P. Coward, J. Houze, J. K. Sawyer, K. L. Kelley, A. Chai, and L. L. Rudel
Effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {alpha}/{delta} agonists on HDL-cholesterol in vervet monkeys
J. Lipid Res.,
May 1, 2005;
46(5):
1009 - 1016.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. N. Ramakrishnan, P. Lau, L. J. Burke, and G. E. O. Muscat
Rev-erb{beta} Regulates the Expression of Genes Involved in Lipid Absorption in Skeletal Muscle Cells: EVIDENCE FOR CROSS-TALK BETWEEN ORPHAN NUCLEAR RECEPTORS AND MYOKINES
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 11, 2005;
280(10):
8651 - 8659.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Duez, B. Lefebvre, P. Poulain, I. P. Torra, F. Percevault, G. Luc, J. M. Peters, F. J. Gonzalez, R. Gineste, S. Helleboid, et al.
Regulation of Human ApoA-I by Gemfibrozil and Fenofibrate Through Selective Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha} Modulation
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
March 1, 2005;
25(3):
585 - 591.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Li and C. K. Glass
PPAR- and LXR-dependent pathways controlling lipid metabolism and the development of atherosclerosis
J. Lipid Res.,
December 1, 2004;
45(12):
2161 - 2173.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Sarker, R. K. Semple, S. F. Dinneen, S. O'Rahilly, and S. C. Martin
Severe Hypo-{alpha}-Lipoproteinemia During Treatment With Rosiglitazone
Diabetes Care,
November 1, 2004;
27(11):
2577 - 2580.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Ory
Nuclear Receptor Signaling in the Control of Cholesterol Homeostasis: Have the Orphans Found a Home?
Circ. Res.,
October 1, 2004;
95(7):
660 - 670.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Guo, S. P. Sahoo, P.-R. Wang, D. P. Milot, M. C. Ippolito, M. S. Wu, J. Baffic, C. Biswas, M. Hernandez, M.-H. Lam, et al.
A Novel Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha}/{gamma} Dual Agonist Demonstrates Favorable Effects on Lipid Homeostasis
Endocrinology,
April 1, 2004;
145(4):
1640 - 1648.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Mooradian, M. J. Haas, and N. C.W. Wong
Transcriptional Control of Apolipoprotein A-I Gene Expression in Diabetes
Diabetes,
March 1, 2004;
53(3):
513 - 520.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Morishima, N. Ohkubo, N. Maeda, T. Miki, and N. Mitsuda
NF{kappa}B Regulates Plasma Apolipoprotein A-I and High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol through Inhibition of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {alpha}
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 3, 2003;
278(40):
38188 - 38193.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Prieur, H. Coste, and J. C. Rodriguez
The Human Apolipoprotein AV Gene Is Regulated by Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-{alpha} and Contains a Novel Farnesoid X-activated Receptor Response Element
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 3, 2003;
278(28):
25468 - 25480.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Ripp, K. C. Falkner, M. L. Pendleton, V. Tamasi, and R. A. Prough
Regulation of CYP2C11 by Dehydroepiandrosterone and Peroxisome Proliferators: Identification of the Negative Regulatory Region of the Gene
Mol. Pharmacol.,
July 1, 2003;
64(1):
113 - 122.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. A. Francis, J.-S. Annicotte, and J. Auwerx
PPAR-{alpha} effects on the heart and other vascular tissues
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
June 5, 2003;
285(1):
H1 - H9.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Vu-Dac, P. Gervois, H. Jakel, M. Nowak, E. Bauge, H. Dehondt, B. Staels, L. A. Pennacchio, E. M. Rubin, J. Fruchart-Najib, et al.
Apolipoprotein A5, a Crucial Determinant of Plasma Triglyceride Levels, Is Highly Responsive to Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor alpha Activators
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 9, 2003;
278(20):
17982 - 17985.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Gouedard, N. Koum-Besson, R. Barouki, and Y. Morel
Opposite Regulation of the Human Paraoxonase-1 Gene PON-1 by Fenofibrate and Statins
Mol. Pharmacol.,
April 1, 2003;
63(4):
945 - 956.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. F. Watts, P. H. R. Barrett, J. Ji, A. P. Serone, D. C. Chan, K. D. Croft, F. Loehrer, and A. G. Johnson
Differential Regulation of Lipoprotein Kinetics by Atorvastatin and Fenofibrate in Subjects With the Metabolic Syndrome
Diabetes,
March 1, 2003;
52(3):
803 - 811.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Mardones, A. Pilon, M. Bouly, D. Duran, T. Nishimoto, H. Arai, K. F. Kozarsky, M. Altayo, J. F. Miquel, G. Luc, et al.
Fibrates Down-regulate Hepatic Scavenger Receptor Class B Type I Protein Expression in Mice
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 28, 2003;
278(10):
7884 - 7890.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Raspe, G. Mautino, C. Duval, C. Fontaine, H. Duez, O. Barbier, D. Monte, J. Fruchart, J.-C. Fruchart, and B. Staels
Transcriptional Regulation of Human Rev-erbalpha Gene Expression by the Orphan Nuclear Receptor Retinoic Acid-related Orphan Receptor alpha
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 13, 2002;
277(51):
49275 - 49281.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Duez, Y.-S. Chao, M. Hernandez, G. Torpier, P. Poulain, S. Mundt, Z. Mallat, E. Teissier, C. A. Burton, A. Tedgui, et al.
Reduction of Atherosclerosis by the Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor alpha Agonist Fenofibrate in Mice
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 6, 2002;
277(50):
48051 - 48057.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Mooradian, M. J. Haas, J. Chehade, and N. C.W. Wong
Apolipoprotein A-I Expression in Rats Is Not Altered by Troglitazone
Experimental Biology and Medicine,
December 1, 2002;
227(11):
1001 - 1005.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Raspe, H. Duez, A. Mansen, C. Fontaine, C. Fievet, J.-C. Fruchart, B. Vennstrom, and B. Staels
Identification of Rev-erb{alpha} as a physiological repressor of apoC-III gene transcription
J. Lipid Res.,
December 1, 2002;
43(12):
2172 - 2179.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kalsotra, S. Anakk, C. L. Boehme, and H. W. Strobel
Sexual Dimorphism and Tissue Specificity in the Expression of CYP4F Forms in Sprague Dawley Rats
Drug Metab. Dispos.,
September 1, 2002;
30(9):
1022 - 1028.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Eligini, M. Brambilla, C. Banfi, M. Camera, L. Sironi, S. S. Barbieri, J. Auwerx, E. Tremoli, and S. Colli
Oxidized phospholipids inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 in human macrophages via nuclear factor-{kappa}B/I{kappa}B- and ERK2-dependent mechanisms
Cardiovasc Res,
August 1, 2002;
55(2):
406 - 415.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Coste and J. C. Rodriguez
Orphan Nuclear Hormone Receptor Rev-erbalpha Regulates the Human Apolipoprotein CIII Promoter
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 19, 2002;
277(30):
27120 - 27129.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Soria, C. Bocos, and E. Herrera
Opposite metabolic response to fenofibrate treatment in pregnant and virgin rats
J. Lipid Res.,
January 1, 2002;
43(1):
74 - 81.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Post, H. Duez, P. P. Gervois, B. Staels, F. Kuipers, and H. M.G. Princen
Fibrates Suppress Bile Acid Synthesis via Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha}-Mediated Downregulation of Cholesterol 7{alpha}-Hydroxylase and Sterol 27-Hydroxylase Expression
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
November 1, 2001;
21(11):
1840 - 1845.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. KERSTEN, S. MANDARD, P. ESCHER, F. J. GONZALEZ, S. TAFURI, B. DESVERGNE, and W. WAHLI
The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {alpha} regulates amino acid metabolism
FASEB J,
September 1, 2001;
15(11):
1971 - 1978.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. GERHOLD, M. LU, J. XU, C. AUSTIN, C. T. CASKEY, and T. RUSHMORE
Monitoring expression of genes involved in drug metabolism and toxicology using DNA microarrays
Physiol Genomics,
April 27, 2001;
5(4):
161 - 170.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Cui, H. Kawashima, T. B. Barclay, J. M. Peters, F. J. Gonzalez, E. T. Morgan, and H. W. Strobel
Molecular Cloning and Regulation of Expression of Two Novel Mouse CYP4F Genes: Expression in Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor alpha -Deficient Mice upon Lipopolysaccharide and Clofibrate Challenges
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
April 13, 2001;
296(2):
542 - 550.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Wolfrum, C. M. Borrmann, T. Börchers, and F. Spener
Fatty acids and hypolipidemic drugs regulate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha - and gamma -mediated gene expression via liver fatty acid binding protein: A signaling path to the nucleus
PNAS,
February 15, 2001;
(2001)
51619898.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. T. Miller, L. A. Scappino, S. M. Long, and J. C. Corton
Role of Thyroid Hormones in Hepatic Effects of Peroxisome Proliferators
Toxicol Pathol,
January 1, 2001;
29(1):
149 - 155.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. P. Torra, V. Tsibulsky, F. Delaunay, R. Saladin, V. Laudet, J.-C. Fruchart, V. Kosykh, and B. Staels
Circadian and Glucocorticoid Regulation of Rev-erb{alpha} Expression in Liver
Endocrinology,
October 1, 2000;
141(10):
3799 - 3806.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Marrapodi and J. Y. L. Chiang
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {alpha} (PPAR{alpha}) and agonist inhibit cholesterol 7{alpha}-hydroxylase gene (CYP7A1) transcription
J. Lipid Res.,
March 1, 2000;
41(3):
514 - 520.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Marrapodi and J. Y. L. Chiang
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {alpha} (PPAR{alpha}) and agonist inhibit cholesterol 7{alpha}-hydroxylase gene (CYP7A1) transcription
J. Lipid Res.,
March 1, 2000;
41(4):
514 - 520.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Desvergne and W. Wahli
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors: Nuclear Control of Metabolism
Endocr. Rev.,
October 1, 1999;
20(5):
649 - 688.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Giguère
Orphan Nuclear Receptors: From Gene to Function
Endocr. Rev.,
October 1, 1999;
20(5):
689 - 725.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Nian, D. J. Drucker, and D. Irwin
Divergent regulation of human and rat proglucagon gene promoters in vivo
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
October 1, 1999;
277(4):
G829 - G837.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Macdonald, P. R. Holden, and R. A. Roberts
Addition of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {{alpha}} to Guinea Pig Hepatocytes Confers Increased Responsiveness to Peroxisome Proliferators
Cancer Res.,
October 1, 1999;
59(19):
4776 - 4780.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kassam, J. P. Capone, and R. A. Rachubinski
Orphan Nuclear Hormone Receptor RevErbalpha Modulates Expression from the Promoter of the Hydratase-dehydrogenase Gene by Inhibiting Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor alpha -Dependent Transactivation
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 6, 1999;
274(32):
22895 - 22900.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Hennuyer, P. Poulain, L. Madsen, R. K. Berge, L.-M. Houdebine, D. Branellec, J.-C. Fruchart, C. Fievet, N. Duverger, and B. Staels
Beneficial Effects of Fibrates on Apolipoprotein A-I Metabolism Occur Independently of Any Peroxisome Proliferative Response
Circulation,
May 11, 1999;
99(18):
2445 - 2451.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Gervois, S. Chopin-Delannoy, A. Fadel, G. Dubois, V. Kosykh, J.-C. Fruchart, J. Najïb, V. Laudet, and B. Staels
Fibrates Increase Human REV-ERB{alpha} Expression in Liver via a Novel Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Response Element
Mol. Endocrinol.,
March 1, 1999;
13(3):
400 - 409.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N.J. Woodyatt, K.G. Lambe, K.A. Myers, J.D. Tugwood, and R.A. Roberts
The peroxisome proliferator (PP) response element upstream of the human acyl CoA oxidase gene is inactive among a sample human population: significance for species differences in response to PPs
Carcinogenesis,
March 1, 1999;
20(3):
369 - 372.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Dallongeville, E. Bauge, A. Tailleux, J. M. Peters, F. J. Gonzalez, J.-C. Fruchart, and B. Staels
Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor alpha Is Not Rate-limiting for the Lipoprotein-lowering Action of Fish Oil
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 9, 2001;
276(7):
4634 - 4639.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. R. Singaraja, V. Bocher, E. R. James, S. M. Clee, L.-H. Zhang, B. R. Leavitt, B. Tan, A. Brooks-Wilson, A. Kwok, N. Bissada, et al.
Human ABCA1 BAC Transgenic Mice Show Increased High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and ApoAI-dependent Efflux Stimulated by an Internal Promoter Containing Liver X Receptor Response Elements in Intron 1
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 31, 2001;
276(36):
33969 - 33979.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Wolfrum, C. M. Borrmann, T. Borchers, and F. Spener
Fatty acids and hypolipidemic drugs regulate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha - and gamma -mediated gene expression via liver fatty acid binding protein: A signaling path to the nucleus
PNAS,
February 27, 2001;
98(5):
2323 - 2328.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|