J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 40, 26026-26035, October 2, 1998
Identification of the Rat Adapter Grb14 as an Inhibitor of
Insulin Actions*
Anne
Kasus-Jacobi
§,
Dominique
Perdereau
,
Colette
Auzan¶,
Eric
Clauser¶,
Emmanuel
Van Obberghen
,
Franck
Mauvais-Jarvis
,
Jean
Girard
, and
Anne-Françoise
Burnol
**
From
Endocrinologie Métabolisme et
Developpement, CNRS, UPR 1524, 9 rue Jules Hetzel, 92190 Meudon,
France, ¶ INSERM U36, Collège de France, 3 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France, and
INSERM U145, Avenue de Valombrose,
06107 Nice, France
 |
ABSTRACT |
We cloned by interaction with the
-subunit of
the insulin receptor the rat variant of the human adapter Grb14
(rGrb14). rGrb14 is specifically expressed in rat insulin-sensitive
tissues and in the brain. The binding of rGrb14 to insulin receptors is
insulin-dependent in vivo in Chinese hamster
ovary (CHO) cells overexpressing both proteins and importantly, in rat
liver expressing physiological levels of proteins. However, rGrb14 is
not a substrate of the tyrosine kinase of the receptor. In the
two-hybrid system, two domains of rGrb14 can mediate the interaction
with insulin receptors: the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain and a region
between the PH and SH2 domains that we named PIR (for
phosphorylated insulin receptor-interacting region). In vitro interaction assays using
deletion mutants of rGrb14 show that the PIR, but not the SH2 domain,
is able to coprecipitate insulin receptors, suggesting that the PIR is
the major binding domain of rGrb14. The interaction between rGrb14 and
the insulin receptors is almost abolished by mutating tyrosine residue
Tyr1150 or Tyr1151 of the receptor. The
overexpression of rGrb14 in CHO-IR cells decreases insulin stimulation
of both DNA and glycogen synthesis. These effects are accompanied by a
decrease in insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1, but
insulin receptor autophosphorylation is unaltered. These findings
suggest that rGrb14 could be a new downstream signaling component of
the insulin-mediated pathways.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Insulin is the principal hormone controlling energy metabolism, by
modulating metabolic pathways in different target tissues. The liver
occupies a central position in the regulation of glucose homeostasis by
insulin; insulin inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis and stimulates
glycogen and lipid synthesis. On the other hand, insulin stimulates
glucose transport and utilization in skeletal muscle and adipose
tissue. These actions of insulin are mediated through a membrane-bound
receptor. The insulin receptor is a member of the receptor tyrosine
kinase family, members of which contain an intrinsic tyrosine kinase,
which is activated after ligand binding. The best characterized
substrates of the insulin receptor are insulin receptor substrate-1 and
-2 (IRS-1 and IRS-2),1 and
Shc (1, 2). They are all known to bind to the phosphorylated Tyr960 residue of the receptor via their phosphotyrosine
binding (PTB) domain (3-6). Unlike most receptor tyrosine kinases,
tyrosine-phosphorylated residues of the insulin receptor do not
seem to recruit directly a number of SH2-containing proteins. These
proteins are recruited by IRSs, which are considered to be docking
proteins, and by Shc (2, 7, 8). For example, IRS-1 interacts with the
SH2 domains of the tyrosine phosphatase Shp2 and of the regulatory subunit (p85) of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase to activate this enzyme.
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is likely to be implicated in
insulin-stimulated translocation of GLUT4, the isoform of glucose transporters expressed in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue (9). However, at the present time, few other effectors of insulin signaling that could participate specifically in metabolic effects of insulin have been characterized.
Shc and IRSs are ubiquitously expressed, not specifically in
insulin-sensitive tissues, and they are also phosphorylated after activation of a number of receptors, including receptor tyrosine kinases, cytokine receptors, and G protein-coupled receptors (8, 10-14). It is therefore possible that other proteins, possibly implicated more specifically in insulin signal transduction, might exist. Recently, different groups have reported the cloning of new
proteins supposed to be involved in insulin signaling, since they have
been identified by two-hybrid screening using the insulin receptor as
bait (15-20). All but two (human MAD2 (19) and Stat5 (20, 21)) are
spliced variants of the Grb10 protein. Grb10 was originally cloned as a
growth factor receptor-binding protein by interaction with the EGF
receptor (22). It is a molecular adapter and a member of the recently
emerged Grb7 family of proteins, which comprises Grb7, Grb10, and Grb14
(23, 24). Although its precise role remains to be clarified, Grb10 is
likely to be implicated in insulin- and insulin-like growth
factor-1-induced mitogenesis (16, 25).
To identify new proteins implicated in insulin signal transduction, we
performed a two-hybrid screen of a rat liver cDNA library, using
the activated cytoplasmic domain of the insulin receptor as bait. To
favor the identification of metabolic effectors, the rat used for the
construction of the liver cDNA library had been starved for 48 h and refed for 10 h with a diet designed to stimulate transcription of genes implicated in insulin-regulated metabolism. We
have cloned a protein displaying a high homology with the human Grb14,
a member of the Grb7 subfamily of adapters (24). This protein was then
called rGrb14. The data presented in this study suggest that rGrb14 is
potentially a new effector of the insulin receptor. In addition, we
have identified in rGrb14 a region different from the SH2 domain, which
is the main binding domain with the Insulin receptor. This region,
named PIR (for phosphorylated insulin receptor-interacting region), is homologous to
the BPS domain recently described in Grb10 (26).
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Synthetic defined dropout yeast media lacking the
appropriate amino acids were obtained from Bio 101, Inc. (Vista, CA).
Oligonucleotides were purchased at the Pasteur Institut (Paris, France)
and Life Technologies, Inc. Monoclonal anti-Myc antibody (9E10 clone)
was from Boehringer Mannheim. Monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (pY20), and polyclonal antibodies against insulin receptor
-subunit were from Transduction Laboratories. Anti-LexA and anti-Gal4 activation domain antibodies were from CLONTECH (Palo Alto,
Ca). Polyclonal anti-rGrb14 antibodies were raised against the
N-terminal 17 amino acids of rGrb14 (Neosystem) and purified on protein
A-Sepharose before use. All chemicals were from Sigma France, and
enzymes were from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA).
Plasmid Constructions--
The intracellular domains of the rat
insulin receptor and of the human insulin receptor ATP binding site
mutant (IR K1018A) were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
using Pfu polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and inserted
in frame at the BamHI site of the pLex9 plasmid (pLex-IR and
pLex-IR K1018). Other insulin receptor mutants in pLex9 vector and
pACTII-Shc construct were generated as described previously (4, 5).
rGrb14 deletion constructs were generated by PCR and inserted at the
BamHI site of pACTII and of pGEX3X (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech). The rGrb14 mutation of the arginine 464 into lysine (rGrb14
R464K) was performed by site-directed mutagenesis using the Quick
Change site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).
Sequences and constructions were verified by DNA sequence analysis.
The Yeast Two-hybrid Screen of the Rat Liver cDNA
Library--
The yeast two-hybrid screen was performed in the yeast
strain L40 using on one hand pLexIR, which encodes a constitutively activated insulin receptor
-subunit (27), and on the other hand an
oligo(dT)-primed cDNA library from rat liver, cloned in fusion with
the Gal4 activation domain in the pGAD3S2X plasmid (gift from M. Cognet-Vasseur, INSERM U129, Paris, France). After transformation by
the lithium acetate procedure (28), yeasts were plated on a
tryptophan-leucine-histidine-deficient medium. Colonies growing in the
absence of histidine (the first reporter gene) were subsequently tested
for
-galactosidase activity (second reporter gene). The plasmids of
the library producing yeast colonies of a
His+/LacZ+ phenotype were isolated, and the
specificity of association of their products with insulin receptors was
tested using pLex-lamin as negative control. The cDNA inserts of
these positive plasmids were sequenced, using an Applied Biosystems
sequencer (Perkin-Elmer).
5'-RACE and cDNA Cloning--
To determine and clone the
5'-end of the rGrb14 cDNA, the 5'-RACE technique was used on a rat
liver Marathon-Ready premade cDNA library
(CLONTECH), with the Advantage cDNA PCR kit
(CLONTECH) and a primer
5'-GCGGCACACCTGCACTGCCAGC-3' corresponding to the 5' sequence
determined on library cDNA insert, according to the manufacturer's
recommendations. We obtained a 250-base pair fragment, which was
sequenced and corresponds to the 5'-end of the cDNA. Since the
largest library plasmid was lacking only 21 nucleotides of coding
sequence, a full-length cDNA containing KpnI and
BamHI sites at both ends and a Myc epitope at the 3'-end was
reconstructed by PCR with the Pfu polymerase using this
plasmid as template and the two following oligonucleotides as primers:
5'-CCGCGGTACCGGATCCCTACGATCATGACCACGTCCCTGCAAGATGGGCAGAGCGCCGCGGGCCG-3' and
5'-CCGCGGTACCGGATCCGAGATCTTCCTCGCTGATTAGCTTCTGCTCAACAGCCATCCTAGCACAGTAATGC-3'). The sequence integrity of the full-length rGrb14 cDNA was
verified by DNA sequencing.
-Galactosidase Assay--
Yeast strains were transformed by
the lithium acetate method of Gietz (28). Quantitative analyses of
-galactosidase activity were performed using a solution assay as
described previously (29).
rGrb14 Expression--
Total RNA was purified from rat tissues
or the adipocyte cell line 3T3-F442A using the method of Chomczynski
and Sacchi (30). Northern blot analysis was performed as described
previously (31) using as a probe a 32P-radiolabeled
500-base pair XbaI fragment corresponding to the 3'-end of
the rGrb14 cDNA. Rat tissues and 3T3-F442A cells were homogenized
in a sucrose buffer (250 mM sucrose, 5 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM pepstatin A, 10 µM aprotinin, 10 µg/ml
leupeptin). These cell extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE and
immunoblotted with polyclonal anti-rGrb14 antibodies.
Overexpression of rGrb14 in CHO-IR Cells--
rGrb14 cDNA
was inserted into the KpnI site of the pECE vector (32).
Stable expression of rGrb14 was achieved in CHO-IR cell lines after
cotransfection of the pE-rGrb14 plasmid with a plasmid conferring
hygromycin resistance by the calcium phosphate procedure. After
limiting dilution, pure clones were identified by Northern blot
analysis and Western blot analysis using an anti-Myc antibody. We have
used the clone 8A9 for CHO-IR/rGrb14 cells. Preliminary experiments
have established that endogenous rGrb14 mRNA can be detected by
Northern blot in CHO cells using the rat radiolabeled cDNA
probe.
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis--
Confluent
CHO-IR cells were serum-deprived for 48 h and stimulated or not by
insulin (10
7 M) for 10 min at 37 °C. Cells
were solubilized at 4 °C, in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)
buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1%
Triton X-100, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, and a standard mixture of
protease inhibitors (Complete; Boehringer Mannheim), in addition to
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (2 mM), 20 mM
NaF, and 20 mM NaVO3. After a 15-min
centrifugation at 15,000 × g, the supernatant was
incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-phosphotyrosine, anti-IR, anti-rGrb14, or anti-IRS-1 antibodies in the presence of protein A-Sepharose. The resulting immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. The immunoreactive bands were revealed using the ECL detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
For in vivo studies in rats, animals were starved for
24 h, anesthetized, and injected with saline or insulin via the
saphenous vein. After 10 min, the liver proteins were extracted in
lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM
NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 30 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 50 mM NaF, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.2% Triton X-100, 1 mM NaVO3, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 1 µg/ml pepstatin A, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml
aprotinin) and centrifuged for 10 min at 6000 rpm at 4 °C.
Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis were performed as
described above.
In Vitro Interaction Studies--
GST fusion proteins were
produced as described previously (29). CHO-IR cells were serum-starved
for 24 h and stimulated or not stimulated with insulin
(10
7 M) for 10 min at 37 °C. The cell
lysates (4 × 105 cells) were prepared as described
above and incubated overnight at 4 °C with 3 µg of immobilized GST
fusion proteins. After extensive washing, bound proteins were eluted by
heating in SDS sample buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to
nitrocellulose membranes, and immunoblotted with the indicated
antibody, and immunoreactive bands were revealed using the ECL
detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Metabolic and Mitogenic Actions of Insulin in Parental and
rGrb14-transfected CHO-IR Cells--
[14C]Glucose
incorporation into glycogen and [3H]thymidine
incorporation into DNA were measured as described previously (33). Briefly, confluent cells were stimulated with increasing concentrations of insulin for 1 h prior to incubation with 2 µCi of
[14C]glucose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 3 h.
After two phosphate-buffered saline washes, cells were lysed with 30%
KOH, and the endogenous [14C]glycogen was precipitated
and counted for radioactivity. After 72 h of serum depletion,
cells were treated for 16 h with increasing concentrations of
insulin and then exposed to 0.5 µCi of [3H]thymidine
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 45 min. After three phosphate-buffered
saline washes, the DNA was precipitated with 10% trichloracetic acid,
and the radioactive material was dissolved in 1 M NaOH and
counted.
 |
RESULTS |
Two-hybrid Screen of a Rat Liver cDNA Library with the Insulin
Receptor
-Subunit as Bait--
Seven million independent yeast
colonies were tested; 104 clones contained plasmids encoding proteins
that exhibited a specific interaction with the insulin receptor
-subunit and not with the kinase-inactive insulin receptor mutated
in the ATP binding site (IR K1018A) or with unrelated proteins like
lamin. After DNA sequencing, these specific clones were classified into
six different groups encoding distinct proteins (Fig.
1). Three of these proteins were already
described as interacting with the insulin receptor: p85
, p85
, and
Shc p52 (3, 4, 34-39). Other clones encode the C terminus domain of a
splice variant of SH2B, an Src homology-2 domain-containing adapter
(40, 41). Clones encoding the full-length Grb7 were also found. Grb7 is
a molecular adapter, first isolated by interaction with the EGF
receptor (42).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Proteins isolated from a rat liver library by
interaction with the -subunit of the insulin receptor. The
two-hybrid screen performed with the -subunit of the insulin
receptor allowed the isolation of the six schematized proteins. The
number of clones isolated corresponding to the same protein is noted in
parentheses. When clones of different length were isolated,
the longer protein fragment encoded is noted in boldface
type, and the shorter fragment is noted in italic
type. Conserved domains are as follows: PTB domain
(white box); PH domain (striped
box); SH2 domain (gray box).
|
|
Another group corresponds to 14 plasmids containing inserts of the same
cDNA, varying in length from 0.9 to 2.0 kb. This cDNA is the
subject of the present study. The longest insert encodes a 531-amino
acid protein, which lacks its N terminus. The missing sequence was
cloned and identified using the 5'-RACE technique. The full-length
protein is 538 amino acids long, as shown in Fig. 2A. The first methionine codon
was unambiguously identified by its fairly good context for initiating
translation (43) and by the presence of an in frame stop codon 21 nucleotides upstream. This new protein is an adapter, characterized by
the succession of various interacting domains: a central PH domain, a C
terminus SH2 domain, and a proline-rich region in the N terminus of the protein. GenBankTM data base searches revealed significant
homology of this protein with the Grb7 family of proteins (including
Grb14, Grb7, Grb10, Grb-IR, and Grb10-IR/SV1; the last three are
spliced variants of the same gene (16, 44)). The percentage of amino
acid identity of the different domains of this protein with members of
the Grb7 family is schematized on Fig. 2B. Given the high
identity with the amino acid sequence of the human Grb14 (see Fig.
2B) and the homology in nucleotide sequence with the human
Grb14 (83%), it is likely that this protein is the rat variant of
human Grb14. It was therefore named rGrb14.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
rGrb14 cDNA and predicted amino acid
sequence. A, nucleotide and amino acid sequence of
rGrb14. The coding nucleotide sequence is represented in
uppercase type, whereas the 5'- and 3'-untranslated
sequences are represented in lowercase type. The amino acid
sequence is numbered starting from the first methionine, and the
translation termination codon is shown by an asterisk in the
amino acid sequence. The proline-rich region (PP,
double line), PH (single
line), and SH2 domains (dotted line)
are underlined. Residues different from the human Grb14
sequence (24) are in boldface type. B,
schematic representation of the rat rGrb14 structure compared with
human Grb14 (24), human Grb10/IR-SV1 (16), and mouse Grb7 (42). The
indicated percentages refer to amino acid identity between each segment
compared with rGrb14. The PIR (black box) refers
to the structural domain identified in the present study (see Fig.
6).
|
|
rGrb14 Expression in Different Tissues--
The tissue
distribution of rGrb14 was studied by Northern and Western blot
analysis. The main transcript is approximately 2.5 kb long, and a
second smaller transcript (1.9 kb) is also present in some tissues, as
shown in Fig. 3A. rGrb14
mRNAs are expressed in liver, heart, skeletal muscle, pancreas,
brain, and white adipose tissue. On Western blot, the rGrb14 protein is
a 60-kDa band, which is specifically displaced by preincubation of the
antibodies with the antigenic peptide. The protein is present in liver,
heart, and brain (Fig. 3B) and can also be detected in
skeletal muscle (data not shown). Thus, the expression of rGrb14 seems
to be restricted to insulin target tissues and brain. This does not
fully correlate with the human Grb14, which is also expressed in kidney
and placenta (24). In the adipose cell line 3T3-F442A, rGrb14 mRNA
are absent in undifferentiated fibroblasts (Fig. 3C). After
confluence, when fibroblasts begin to differentiate in adipose cells,
there is a slight increase in rGrb14 mRNA expression. Maximum accumulation of rGrb14 mRNA is observed in fully differentiated adipose cells, 8 days after confluence. A similar pattern of expression was observed at the protein level (Fig. 3D), indicating that
rGrb14 may be considered as a marker of adipose cell differentiation. In the same cells, Grb7 mRNA expression did not vary with the differentiation state (data not shown). Thus, the parallelism between
the level of expression and adipose cell differentiation is specific
for rGrb14 among members of the Grb7 family of proteins.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Analysis of rGrb14 mRNA and protein
expression. Northern and Western blot analysis is shown of rat
tissues (A and B) and 3T3-F442A cells
(C and D). Whole cell extracts from rat tissues
(B) and 3T3-F442A cells (D) were immunoblotted
with anti-rGrb14 antibodies, preincubated with or without the antigenic
peptide as indicated. A and B, tissue codes are
as follows: pancreas (Pa); liver (Li); kidney
(Ki); spleen (Sp); brain (Br); white
adipose tissue (WAT); brown adipose tissue (BAT);
small intestine (In); lung (Lu); heart
(He); skeletal muscle (Mu). C and
D, 3T3-F442A cells at various stages of differentiation.
Lane 1, proliferating fibroblasts;
lane 2, confluent cells; lanes
3 and 4, differentiated adipocytes.
|
|
Insulin Stimulates the Association of rGrb14 with the Insulin
Receptor in Vivo--
The rGrb14-insulin receptor interaction was
first investigated in CHO-IR cells (expressing high levels of human
insulin receptors) stably overexpressing a Myc-tagged rGrb14
recombinant protein. CHO-IR/rGrb14 cell lysate was either
immunoprecipitated using anti-insulin receptor antibodies and
immunodetected with anti-Myc antibodies (Fig.
4A) or immunoprecipitated
using anti-rGrb14 antibodies and immunodetected with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (Fig. 4B). Under basal
conditions, rGrb14 is not coprecipitated with the insulin receptors.
After stimulation by insulin, the association of the activated
receptors with rGrb14 is induced.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Insulin induces rGrb14 binding to insulin
receptors in vivo. A and B,
CHO-IR cells were stably transfected with the pE-rGrb14 construct
(CHO-IR/RGrb14). Cells were stimulated or not with insulin
(10 7 M) for 10 min and solubilized.
A, after SDS-PAGE analysis, cell lysates were immunoblotted
with anti-Myc antibodies recognizing the Myc-tagged rGrb14.
Left part, crude cell lysates; right
part, cell lysates immunoprecipitated (IP) with
anti-IR antibodies. B, cell lysates were immunoprecipitated
with anti-rGrb14 antibodies and immunodetected with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (upper panel). The same blot was
stripped and blotted with anti-rGrb14 antibodies to ensure that similar
amounts of rGrb14 were precipitated (lower blot).
C, rats were injected with saline or insulin. After 10 min,
liver cell extracts were prepared, separated by SDS-PAGE, and
immunodetected with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies. Left
part, crude liver extracts; right
part, liver extracts immunoprecipitated with anti-rGrb14
antibodies.
|
|
The association between the insulin receptor and rGrb14 was also
investigated in rat liver. Anesthetized rats were injected intravenously with insulin or saline, and after 10 min, liver proteins
were extracted and immunodetected with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies.
In liver crude extracts, insulin stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of
three major proteins of 180, 95, and 50 kDa (Fig. 4C,
left part). Immunoblotting with corresponding
antibodies confirmed that the 180- and 95-kDa bands are, respectively,
IRS-1 and the
-subunit of the insulin receptor (data not shown).
These liver extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-rGrb14
antibodies prior to immunodetection with anti-phosphotyrosine
antibodies. As shown in the right part of Fig.
4C, insulin stimulates the association between rGrb14 and
the activated insulin receptors in rat liver. These experiments clearly
show that rGrb14 binds to the activated insulin receptors, not only in
two overexpressing systems (the two-hybrid system and the CHO-IR/rGrb14
cell line) but also in cells expressing physiological levels of both
insulin receptors and rGrb14.
In insulin-stimulated liver, tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 is also
detected in the anti-rGrb14 immunoprecipitate. rGrb14 is not revealed
by anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies in CHO-IR/rGrb14 cells or rat liver
lysates immunoprecipitated with anti-rGrb14 antibodies (Fig. 4,
B and C). Thus, rGrb14 is not a substrate of the
insulin receptor tyrosine kinase.
The Molecular Association of rGrb14 to the Insulin Receptor
Involves the Tyrosine Kinase Regulatory Loop of the Receptor--
In
the two-hybrid system, a kinase-inactive insulin receptor mutant
(K1018A, mutated in the ATP binding site) was unable to interact with
either rGrb14 or Shc, an insulin receptor substrate taken as control
(Fig. 5) (27). This underlines the
importance of the receptor activation for the interaction between the
insulin receptors and rGrb14. To identify the tyrosyl residues of the insulin receptor that are necessary for this association, we measured the interaction between rGrb14 and insulin receptors mutated on different tyrosyl residues (Fig. 5). The insulin receptor mutants investigated were expressed at similar levels in yeast, as verified by
Western blot analysis using an anti-LexA antibody (data not shown). The
most striking effect observed was the huge decrease in the interaction
between rGrb14 and the insulin receptor mutated in the tyrosine kinase
regulatory loop, including Tyr1146, Tyr1150,
and Tyr1151. Mutation of Tyr1150 or
Tyr1151 induced a 95% decrease in binding to rGrb14,
whereas the IR Y1146F mutant showed a less marked impairment in its
interaction with rGrb14 (50% decrease). Insulin receptors containing
double mutations at tyrosyl residues of the kinase loop (IR Y1146/1150F
and IR Y1150/1151F) did not bind to rGrb14. In order to distinguish
between a defective interaction due to the mutation of the binding
site(s) and a defective interaction due to a decrease in the tyrosine kinase activity of these mutant proteins, a comparative study of Shc
interactions with these mutants was performed. Interactions between Shc
and IR Y1150F, Y1151F, or Y1150F/Y1151F were not altered, implying that
the tyrosine kinase activity of these mutants was not significantly
impaired in this system. In contrast, the tyrosine kinase activity of
the insulin receptor mutant Y1146F/Y1150F might be altered, since this
mutant did not bind to Shc.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Interaction of rGrb14 with mutated insulin
receptors. Quantification is shown of the two-hybrid interactions
between insulin receptors and rGrb14 (filled
bars) or Shc (empty bars). Results are
the means ± S.E. of 6-8 assays from two independent
transformation experiments. Results are expressed as percentage of the
interaction with the wild type (WT) insulin receptor
(representing, respectively, 880 and 200 units of Miller for IR/rGrb14
and IR/Shc interactions). Activities obtained with insulin receptor
mutants and wild type were compared using the Student's t
test for significance (***, p < 0.001).
|
|
Single mutation of Tyr960 did not alter interaction with
rGrb14. But as expected, this mutation abolished Shc interaction.
Deletion of the two C-terminal tyrosyl residues of the mutant insulin
receptor, IR
1316/1322, modified neither the interaction with
rGrb14 nor the interaction with Shc. Thus, the juxtamembrane domain and
the C-terminal domain of the insulin receptor were not implicated in
the association with rGrb14.
Identification of the rGrb14 Domains Binding to the Insulin
Receptors--
The shorter rGrb14 insert isolated in the initial
library screen encodes the amino acids 358-538 of the protein,
including the SH2 domain (see Fig. 1), suggesting that this fragment
contains the region interacting with the insulin receptors. To assess
the expected role of the SH2 domain of rGrb14 in the interaction, we
have measured the binding of this isolated domain to insulin receptors
using the two-hybrid system (Fig.
6A). The rGrb14 SH2 domain has
a binding activity for insulin receptors. Mutations of the conserved
arginyl residue of the FLVRDS motif is supposed to alter the
phosphotyrosine binding pocket in the SH2 domain, resulting in a
complete loss of its binding activity (45). As expected, the R464K
mutated SH2 domain of rGrb14 no longer displays binding activity to
insulin receptors. These data provide evidence that the SH2 domain is
able to mediate, at least in part, the binding of rGrb14 to insulin
receptors.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
rGrb14 domains interacting with the activated
insulin receptor. A, interactions between insulin
receptor and wild type (WT) or deletion mutants of rGrb14
are quantified in the two-hybrid system, as described in Fig. 5.
Results are expressed as the percentage of the interaction measured
between the wild type rGrb14 and insulin receptors (representing 580 units of Miller). S.E. were less than 10% of each value. Activities
obtained with rGrb14 deletion mutants were compared with that of wild
type rGrb14 using Student's t test for significance (**,
p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001).
B, in vitro interaction of rGrb14 domains with
the insulin receptor. After insulin stimulation (10 7
M for 10 min), CHO-IR cells were lysed. Proteins were
precipitated with GST alone or GST fusion proteins corresponding to
different rGrb14 constructs, as indicated. After SDS-PAGE analysis,
bound proteins were immunodetected with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies
(top part) or anti-IR antibodies
(bottom part).
|
|
Surprisingly, the full-length rGrb14 mutant, which contains an R464K
mutated and therefore inactive SH2 domain, displayed an interaction
with insulin receptors that was similar to that of wild type rGrb14, as
did the truncated rGrb14 deleted from its SH2 domain (Fig.
6A). Furthermore, these two mutants did not bind to
kinase-inactive insulin receptors (results not shown). These data
clearly indicated that the SH2 domain of rGrb14 participated in but was
not primarily involved in the interaction with the insulin receptor,
which required another domain of the rGrb14 protein. rGrb14 deletion
mutant constructs revealed that the major insulin receptor binding
activity was contained in a domain of 100 amino acids located between
the PH and the SH2 domains (amino acids 340-437). As above, we
verified that differences in the interaction of the hybrid proteins
were not due to differences in the levels of expression in yeast (data
not shown). This binding domain of rGrb14 that mediates the interaction
with the activated kinase loop of the insulin receptor was then called
PIR (for phosphorylated insulin
receptor-interacting region). The binding of
the rGrb14 PIR to the insulin receptor was abolished by mutation of
Tyr1150 or Tyr1151 and was 50% decreased by
mutation of Tyr1146 (Table
I). Thus, alterations of the insulin
receptor-PIR interaction induced by single tyrosine mutation in the
activation loop of the receptor perfectly reflected the interactions of
full-length rGrb14 with the same mutants (compare Table I and Fig.
5).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Interaction of the rGrb14 PIR with the insulin receptor mutants
Quantifications of the indicated interactions were performed in the
two-hybrid system as described in Fig. 5. Results are expressed as
percentage of the interaction with the wild type insulin receptor
(representing 453 units of Miller). Activities obtained with insulin
receptor mutants and wild type were compared using the Student's
t test for significance (**, p < 0.01; ***,
p < 0.001).
|
|
The interaction between the different domains of rGrb14 and the
activated insulin receptor was further established using GST pull-down
assays. CHO-IR cell lysates from control and insulin-stimulated cells
were incubated with GST-rGrb14 fusions. Retained proteins were
separated by gel electrophoresis and immunodetected using anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies. As shown in Fig. 6B
(top part), the activated insulin receptors
coprecipitated with rGrb14 PIR and PIR + SH2 domains but not with the
SH2 or the
PIR/
SH2 domains. Similar interactions were revealed
using anti-insulin receptor antibodies (Fig. 6B,
lower panel), confirming that these interactions do not occur with the unstimulated insulin receptors. This experiment confirms that the rGrb14-PIR binds to the activated insulin receptors. Interestingly, no interaction was detected between the insulin receptors and the SH2 domain of rGrb14, even after longer exposure of
the films.
These experiments showed that the PIR played the predominant role for
the rGrb14 interaction with insulin receptors. The rGrb14 PIR did not
show any sequence similarity with previously described domains
implicated in protein-protein interaction. We were unable to show any
alignment with either PTB domains or the KRLB domain, a recently
defined domain of IRS-2 that is implicated in the interaction with
insulin receptors (46). Data base searches demonstrated that the rGrb14
PIR presented homology exclusively with proteins of the Grb7 family.
Sequence comparisons of PIR of the different Grb7 proteins revealed
that a 43-amino acid-long region was highly conserved (corresponding to
amino acids 365-407 of rGrb14), displaying 93, 77, and 73% of
identity when Grb14, Grb10, and Grb7 were compared with rGrb14. The
insulin receptor binding activity contained in PIR is likely to
encompass this conserved domain.
Effect of rGrb14 on Insulin Actions in CHO-IR Cells--
In CHO-IR
cells, the stimulation by insulin of glucose incorporation into
glycogen was decreased in cells overexpressing rGrb14, as demonstrated
by the 62% reduction of the maximal insulin effect, without
significant alteration of the EC50 (0.15 and 0.44 nM, respectively, in CHO-IR and CHO-IR/rGrb14 cells) (Fig.
7A). Similarly, the effect of
insulin on [3H]thymidine incorporation into DNA was
decreased for each insulin concentration tested (Fig. 7B).
Similar results were obtained using different impure clones of
CHO-IR/rGrb14 cells. These data give evidence that overexpression of
rGrb14 has an inhibitory effect on both metabolic and mitogenic actions
of insulin.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of insulin on glycogen and DNA
synthesis in CHO-IR cells overexpressing rGrb14. Empty
squares, CHO-IR cells; filled squares,
CHO-IR/rGrb14 cells. A, glycogen synthesis. Results are the
means + S.E. of nine experiments. B, DNA synthesis. Results
are the means + S.E. of five experiments. Results obtained with or
without overexpression of rGrb14 were compared using the t
test for significance (*, p < 0.05; **,
p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001).
|
|
The inhibition of insulin actions in CHO-IR/rGrb14 cells could be
linked to the alteration of one of the first steps of insulin signaling, such as insulin receptor autophosphorylation or IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation. CHO-IR and CHO-IR/rGrb14 cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies and immunodetected with anti-insulin receptor antibodies (Fig.
8A). After insulin
stimulation, a similar amount of activated insulin receptors was
detected in the two cell lines, indicating that the overexpression of
rGrb14 did not modify insulin receptor autophosphorylation. Control
experiments established that similar amounts of insulin receptors were
immunoprecipitated in the two cell lines (data not shown). On the other
hand, immunoprecipitation of CHO-IR and CHO-IR/rGrb14 cell lysates with
anti-IRS-1 antibodies, followed by an immunodetection with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies, revealed that after insulin
stimulation IRS-1 was less phosphorylated in CHO-IR/rGrb14 that in
CHO-IR cells (Fig. 8B). Thus, the overexpression of rGrb14
inhibited the insulin stimulation of IRS-1 tyrosyl phosphorylation.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of rGrb14 overexpression on
insulin-stimulated protein tyrosine phosphorylation. CHO-IR and
CHO-IR/rGrb14 cells were stimulated or not with insulin
(10 7 M) for 10 min and solubilized.
A, cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies, and after SDS-PAGE analysis were
immunoblotted with anti-IR antibodies. B, cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with anti-IRS-1 antibodies and immunodetected with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (top part). To
ensure that similar amounts of IRS-1 were immunoprecipitated, the same
blot was stripped and reblotted with the anti-IRS-1 antibodies
(bottom part).
|
|
These experiments show that in CHO-IR cells the overexpression of
rGrb14 inhibits insulin actions. The decrease in the effects of insulin
observed in the presence of rGrb14 is at least partly explained by a
decrease in IRS-1 activation, without alteration of insulin receptor
autophosphorylation.
 |
DISCUSSION |
To identify new partners of the insulin receptor, we chose to
screen a library constructed from a rat liver, a target tissue of
insulin. From this library, we have isolated the main effectors of
insulin signal transduction: p85
, p85
, and Shc but not IRSs. IRS-1 and IRS-2 bind to the insulin receptor through their PH and PTB
domains situated in the N terminus of the protein (5, 6, 27, 47). The
library was constructed using oligo(dT) primers, which implies that
clones encoding IRSs should be more that 4 kb long, which is the upper
size limit of such a library. This might explain why we did not isolate
them in this screen. Two other proteins, Grb7 and the SH2B isoform, are
proteins that are likely to be implicated in cell signaling. Grb7 is
known to bind to the EGF receptor, the Ret receptor, and the
platelet-derived growth factor receptor (23, 42, 48, 49), but its
association with the insulin receptor was not reported yet. SH2B, which
was first cloned by interaction with Fc
RI, the
-subunit of the
high affinity IgE receptor, is known to be a potential effector of Janus kinase 2 and also of the insulin receptor (40, 41, 50, 51).
However, the physiological implication of these two proteins in
insulin signal transduction remains to be established.
The last isolated protein, rGrb14, is the focus of the present study.
Several lines of evidence indicate that rGrb14 is likely to be an
important effector of insulin signaling. The expression of rGrb14
nicely correlates with the insulin sensitivity of rat tissues.
Furthermore, in vivo in rat liver, insulin stimulates the
binding of rGrb14 to the insulin receptor
-subunit. In the 3T3F-442A
adipose cell line, the appearance of rGrb14 is concomitant with the
expression of the insulin receptors and IRS-1 (52, 53). Similarly,
insulin induces the association between rGrb14 and the activated
insulin receptors in 3T3F-442A
adipocytes.2 The
rGrb14-insulin receptor interaction, occurring in cells expressing physiological levels of the proteins, suggests that rGrb14 is implicated in the transduction of insulin signaling.
Whereas other effectors such as IRSs and Shc are recruited and
phosphorylated on tyrosyl residues by insulin receptors, rGrb14 binds
to activated insulin receptors but is not a substrate of the tyrosine
kinase. In agreement with this observation, rGrb14 does not contain any
tyrosyl residue in a favorable context for phosphorylation by the
insulin receptor tyrosine kinase (YXXM motif; see Ref. 54).
The absence of phosphotyrosyl residues on rGrb14 implies that, in
contrast to IRSs and Shc, it cannot recruit SH2-containing proteins.
Signaling pathways initiated after rGrb14 binding to insulin receptors
should then be mediated by mechanisms that are different from those
described after IRSs and Shc phosphorylation. This contrasts with the
tyrosine phosphorylation of Grb7 induced after stimulation by EGF or
Ret (48, 55) and of Grb10 after insulin stimulation (15, 44). The
succession of conserved domains in rGrb14 and the sequence comparison
in data banks show that it is a member of the Grb7 family of adapters, which already contains Grb7, human Grb14, and multiple isoforms of
Grb10 (15-18, 22, 24, 42, 56, 57). All of these proteins were cloned
by interaction with activated tyrosine kinase receptors and are
supposed to act as signaling proteins. The other interacting domains of
rGrb14 (the proline-rich domain, which is a potential target for Src
homology 3 domain-containing proteins; the PH domain, which is likely
to bind to phosphoinositides (58); and the SH2 domain, which can bind
to phosphotyrosine residues) are likely to recruit proteins. The
identification of these downstream effectors would shed light on the
role of this new molecular adapter. In this regard, it can be noticed
that a protein of 120 kDa, phosphorylated on tyrosine residues,
coprecipitates with rGrb14 in CHO-IR cells using the in
vitro interaction assays. This association is retained by the SH2
domain. After insulin stimulation, the protein either dissociates or is
dephosphorylated (see Fig. 6). The identity of this protein is
currently under investigation. The protein-interacting role of the SH2
domain of other members of the Grb7 family has already been
demonstrated. For example, the Grb10 SH2 domain binds to several
unidentified proteins before and after insulin stimulation (16, 44). In
addition, the SH2 domain of Grb7 binds Shc, probably at the same
Y(V/I)N motif as Grb2 (55).
We have defined on rGrb14 a protein-protein interacting region, the
PIR, which specifically binds to the phosphorylated insulin receptor.
While this work was in progress, it was reported that the homologous
domain of Grb10 displays the same binding activity (26). This domain
was called BPS (for between PH and
SH2) because of its localization. This suggests that the
homologous region of the other members of the Grb7 family should also
display a similar binding activity. The relative importance of the PIR
and of the SH2 domain in the interaction with insulin receptors might vary among Grb7 proteins. Indeed, a 30-amino acid truncation at the
carboxyl terminus of the Grb10 SH2 domain suppressed the binding to
insulin receptors (17). In contrast, we have shown that rGrb14 deleted
of its entire SH2 domain still displays an interaction with insulin
receptors similar to that of the wild type rGrb14. Furthermore, in
in vitro interaction experiments, the SH2 domain of Grb10,
but not of rGrb14, coprecipitates the activated insulin receptors (Ref.
26 and the present study). Thus, it seems that the SH2 domains of Grb10
and rGrb14 play different functions in the association with the insulin
receptors. Similarly, it was reported that the Grb7 SH2 domain binds
strongly to the ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinase, whereas the SH2 domain
of human Grb14 does not. The substitution of individual amino acids
between these two SH2 domains was shown to switch this binding
specificity (59). It will be interesting to study the differences in
binding and in site recognition between the PIR and SH2 domains of
members of the Grb7 family of proteins. These differences should be
important for the specificity of interactions between the various
growth factor tyrosine kinase receptors and these adapters.
It is interesting to observe that two domains of rGrb14 and Grb10, PIR
(or BPS) and SH2 can mediate binding to insulin receptors. In addition,
in Grb10 the presence of both domains is necessary for an inhibition of
insulin-like growth factor-1-mediated mitogenesis (26). This can be
compared with the implication of two binding domains in the interaction
between insulin receptors and IRS-1 (PH and PTB (60, 61)) or IRS-2 (PTB
and kinase loop regulatory domain (5, 6, 46)). The mechanism of such a
binding mediated by two different domains remains to be elucidated. A
simple hypothesis could be that the second binding domain is necessary
for stabilizing the interaction or that it could confer high
specificity as recently shown for tandem SH2 domains (62).
rGrb14, as well as Grb10, binds to the phosphorylated activation loop
of the insulin receptor, and mutations of the tyrosyl residues of this
loop (Tyr1146, Tyr1150, and
Tyr1151) decrease the interaction (Ref. 26 and the present
study). The binding between rGrb14 or Grb10 and the insulin receptor
could be interpreted either as a phosphotyrosine-mediated interaction or as an interaction with a new epitope exposed after phosphorylation and spatial rearrangement of the activation loop. Indeed, in the activated insulin receptors, phosphorylation of the three tyrosine residues of the activation loop induces a major conformational change
of this region of the protein (63). Furthermore, the activation loop is
relatively mobile, and an equilibrium between the two conformations is
likely to occur (64). This equilibrium should be shifted in favor of
the activated form in the Tris-phosphorylated receptor and in favor of
the inhibited form in the dephosphorylated receptor. The insulin
receptor with the single Y1150F mutation has an increased basal kinase
activity and still displays a nice activation by insulin (32). This
implies that this insulin receptor mutant can be found under the
conformation of the activated form. Since mutation of the single
tyrosyl residue Tyr1150 almost abolishes the interaction
with rGrb14, this suggests that rGrb14 is likely to interact directly
with this residue. However, the possibility cannot be excluded that in
this mutant the other tyrosines, Tyr1151 and
Tyr1146, are not phosphorylated efficiently in the yeast
expression system. Further studies are needed to elucidate if the
rGrb14-insulin receptor binding is a phosphotyrosine-mediated
interaction or if the binding implicates surrounding residues unmasked
in the activated kinase loop conformation.
The functional role of rGrb14 is suggested by the modifications of the
actions of insulin induced by its overexpression in CHO-IR cells. In
this study, we have shown that rGrb14 inhibits DNA and glycogen
synthesis, suggesting that it is an inhibitor of insulin signaling. The
implication of rGrb14 in insulin-induced mitogenesis should be related
to the recent observation that Grb10/IR-SV1 also plays a role in cell
division after insulin stimulation (16). However, different Grb10
isoforms should have opposite effects, as suggested by a recent study
reporting that mGrb10
inhibits insulin-like growth factor-1- but not
insulin-stimulated cell growth (25). The effect of rGrb14 on glycogen
synthesis suggests that it is also a modulator of insulin-regulated
metabolism. The liver cDNA library used in this study was
constructed from a rat that had been starved and refed in order to
stimulate transcription of genes whose products mediate
insulin-regulated metabolism. We have isolated clones encoding rGrb14
and Grb7, but, in contrast to previous reports (15-18), we did not
find any Grb10 isoform. This could be explained by the very low level
of expression of Grb10 in liver (15, 16, 22, 44).
Insulin-stimulated IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation is decreased in
CHO-IR/rGrb14 cells, mediating at least partly the rGrb14 inhibitory
effect. A similar effect was reported in CHO-IR cells overexpressing
Grb-IR, an isoform of Grb10 (15). The decrease in IRS-1 activation
could be due either to the sequestration of the protein when rGrb14 is
overexpressed or to an inhibitory effect of rGrb14 on insulin
signaling. In favor of the first hypothesis, phosphorylated IRS-1 is
detected in the anti-rGrb14 immunoprecipitate in insulin-stimulated rat
liver. However, using either the two-hybrid system or GST pull-down
assays, we were unable to confirm a direct interaction between rGrb14
and IRS-1. In good correlation with this, phosphorylated IRS-1 is not
detected after rGrb14 immunoprecipitation in CHO-IR/rGrb14 cells (see
Fig. 4B), and rGrb14 is not immunoprecipitated with
anti-IRS-1 antibodies (data not shown). The coprecipitation of IRS-1
with rGrb14 in rat liver could be explained by its association with the
insulin receptors in the insulin receptor-rGrb14 complex. In the
anti-phosphotyrosine immunoblot, IRS-1 displays a stronger signal than
the insulin receptors, but this can be attributed to its huge number of
phosphorylated tyrosyl residues (65).
Further studies are required to definitely establish that rGrb14 is an
inhibitor of insulin signal transduction. Indeed, the overexpression of
IRS-1 in CHO-IR cells, a positive mediator of insulin actions, has been
reported to inhibit insulin-stimulated mitogenesis in CHO-IR cells
(66). This paradoxical effect of IRS-1 was explained by the
sequestration of downstream effectors, such as Grb2 (67). Thus,
overexpression of an effector, by modifying the relative ratio of
cellular proteins, can lead either to an amplification of the signal or
to an inhibition due to the sequestration of signaling pathway
components.
Information about the functional role of rGrb14 can also be obtained by
analyzing the molecular interactions between rGrb14 and the insulin
receptors. rGrb14 interacts exclusively with the phosphorylated
tyrosine kinase regulatory loop. The activation loop was demonstrated
as essential for the regulation of the access to the catalytic site of
the insulin receptor tyrosine kinase by crystallographic studies (63,
68). Theoretically, rGrb14 could act in two opposite directions by
interacting with this loop; it could either inhibit the tyrosine kinase
activity by masking access to the catalytic site, or it could maintain
the enzyme in an active conformation by stabilizing the phosphorylated loop. Further studies, including structural cocrystallization, are
needed to answer to this question.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We acknowledge Mireille Cognet-Vasseur
(Paris, France) for the rat liver cDNA library; Anne Vojtek
(Seattle, WA) and Steve Elledge (Houston, TX) for yeast plasmids and
yeast strain; M. F. White, C. R. Kahn (Boston, MA), and T. Issad (Paris, France) for insulin receptor cDNAs; D. Sawka-Verhelle
for insulin receptor mutant constructs; and M. Myers Jr. for anti-IRS-1
antibodies. We thank Emmanuelle Plée-Gautier and Martine Loizeau
for Northern blots.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the Fondation de la
Recherche Médicale and by Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer Grant 1248 (to A.-F. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF076619.
§
Recipient of a student fellowship from the Ministère de la
Recherche and from the Association pour la Recherche sur la Cancer.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel. 33-1-45-07-50-72;
Fax: 33-1-45-07-50-39; E-mail: burnol{at}cnrs-bellevue.fr.
The abbreviations used are:
IRS, insulin
receptor substrate; PTB, phosphotyrosine binding; SH2, Src homology 2; PH, pleckstrin homology; Grb, growth factor-binding protein; rGrb14, rat Grb14; EGF, epidermal growth factor; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; IR, insulin receptor; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; 5'-RACE, 5'-rapid
amplification of cDNA ends; kb, kilobases; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis; GST, glutathione S-transferase.
2
A. Kasus-Jacobi, unpublished results.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
White, M. F.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1-4[Free Full Text]
-
Waters, S. B.,
and Pessin, J. E.
(1996)
Trends Cell Biol.
6,
1-4[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gustafson, T. A.,
He, W.,
Craparo, A.,
Schaub, C. D.,
and O'Neill, T. J.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
2500-2508[Abstract]
-
Tartare-Deckert, S.,
Sawka-Verhelle, D.,
Murdaca, J.,
and Van Obberghen, E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23456-23460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sawka-Verhelle, D.,
Tartare-Deckert, S.,
White, M. F.,
and Van Obberghen, E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
5980-5983[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
He, W.,
Craparo, A.,
Zhu, Y.,
O'Neill, T. J.,
Wang, L.-M.,
Pierce, J. H.,
and Gustafson, T. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
11641-11645[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Myers, M. G., Jr.,
and White, M. F.
(1995)
Trends Endocrinol. Metab.
6,
209-215
-
Bonfini, L.,
Migliaccio, E.,
Pelicci, G.,
Lanfrancone, L.,
and Pelicci, P.
(1996)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
21,
257-261[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bell, G. I.,
Burant, C. F.,
Takeda, J.,
and Gould, G. W.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
19161-19164[Free Full Text]
-
Souza, S. C.,
Frick, G. P.,
Yip, R.,
Lobo, R. B.,
Tai, L.-R.,
and Goodman, H. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
30085-30088[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Argetsinger, L. S.,
Hsu, G. W.,
Myers, M. G., Jr.,
Billestrup, N.,
White, M. F.,
and Carter-Su, C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
14685-14692[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Platanias, L. C.,
Uddin, S.,
Yetter, A.,
Sun, X. J.,
and White, M. F.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
278-282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Velloso, L. A.,
Folli, F.,
Sun, X. J.,
White, M. F.,
Saad, M. J. A.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
12490-12495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kowalski-Chauvel, A.,
Pradayrol, L.,
Vaysse, N.,
and Seva, C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
26356-26361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Liu, F.,
and Roth, R. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
10287-10291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
O'Neill, T. J.,
Rose, D. W.,
Pillay, T. S.,
Hotta, K.,
Olefsky, J. M.,
and Gustafson, T. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22506-22513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hansen, H.,
Svensson, U.,
Zhu, J.,
Laviola, L.,
Giorgino, F.,
Wolf, G.,
Smith, R. J.,
and Riedel, H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8882-8886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Laviola, L.,
Giorgino, F.,
Chow, J. C.,
Baquero, J. A.,
Hansen, H.,
Ooi, J.,
Zhu, J.,
Riedel, H.,
and Smith, R. J.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
99,
830-837[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
O'Neill, T. J.,
Zhu, Y.,
and Gustafson, T. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10035-10040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chen, J.,
Sadowski, H. B.,
Kohanski, R. A.,
and Wang, L.-H.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2295-2300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sawka-Verhelle, D.,
Filloux, C.,
Tartare-Deckert, S.,
Mothe, I.,
and Van Obberghen, E.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
250,
411-417[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ooi, J.,
Yajnik, V.,
Immanuel, D.,
Gordon, M.,
Moskow, J. J.,
Buchberg, A. M.,
and Margolis, B.
(1995)
Oncogene
10,
1621-1630[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Margolis, B.
(1994)
Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.
62,
223-244[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Daly, R. J.,
Sanderson, G. M.,
Janes, P. W.,
and Sutherland, R. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12502-12510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Morrione, A.,
Valentinis, B.,
Resnicoff, M.,
Xu, S.-Q.,
and Baserga, R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
26382-26387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
He, W.,
Rose, D. W.,
Olefsky, J. M.,
and Gustafson, T. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
6860-6867[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
O'Neill, T. J.,
Craparo, A.,
and Gustafson, T. A.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
6433-6442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gietz, D.,
St. Jean, A.,
Woods, R. A.,
and Schiestl, R. H.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
1425-1426[Free Full Text]
-
Kasus-Jacobi, A.,
Perdereau, D.,
Tartare-Deckert, S.,
Van Obberghen, E.,
Girard, J.,
and Burnol, A.-F.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17166-17170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chomczynski, P.,
and Sacchi, N.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
156-159[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Burnol, A.-F.,
Leturque, A.,
Loizeau, M.,
Postic, C.,
and Girard, J.
(1990)
Biochem. J.
270,
277-279[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ellis, L.,
Clauser, E.,
Morgan, D. O.,
Edery, M.,
Roth, R. A.,
and Rutter, W. J.
(1986)
Cell
45,
721-732[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Leconte, I.,
Auzan, C.,
Debant, A.,
Rossi, B.,
and Clauser, E.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
17415-17423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Levy-Toledano, R.,
Taouis, M.,
Blaettler, D. H.,
Gorden, P.,
and Taylor, S. I.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
31178-31182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Staubs, P. A.,
Reichart, D. R.,
Saltiel, A. R.,
Milarski, K. L.,
Maegawa, H.,
Bernahu, P.,
Olefsky, J. M.,
and Seely, B. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27186-27192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lamothe, B.,
Bucchini, D.,
Jami, J.,
and Joshi, R. L.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
373,
51-55[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tartare-Deckert, S.,
Murdaca, J.,
Sawka-Verhelle, D.,
Holt, K. H.,
Pessin, J. E.,
and Van Obberghen, E.
(1996)
Endocrinology
137,
1019-1024[Abstract]
-
Kavanaugh, W. M.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1994)
Science
266,
1862-1865[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Blaikie, P.,
Immanuel, D.,
Wu, J.,
Li, N.,
Yajnik, V.,
and Margolis, B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
32031-32034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rui, L.,
Mathews, L. S.,
Hotta, K.,
Gustafson, T. A.,
and Carter-Su, C.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
6633-6644[Abstract]
-
Riedel, H.,
Wang, J.,
Hansen, H.,
and Yousaf, N.
(1997)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
122,
1105-1113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Margolis, B.,
Silvennoinen, O.,
Comoglio, F.,
Roonprapunt, C.,
Skolnik, E.,
Ullrich, A.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
8894-8898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kozak, M.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
108,
229-241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Frantz, J. D.,
Giorgetti-Peraldi, S.,
Ottinger, E. A.,
and Shoelson, S. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
2659-2667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mayer, B.,
Jackson, P. K.,
Van Etten, R. A.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
609-618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sawka-Verhelle, D.,
Baron, V.,
Mothe, I.,
Filloux, C.,
White, M. F.,
and Van Obberghen, E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
16414-16420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Burks, D. J.,
Pons, S.,
Towery, H.,
Smith-Hall, J.,
Myers, M. G., Jr.,
Yenush, L.,
and White, M. F.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27716-27721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pandey, A.,
Liu, X.,
Dixon, J. E.,
Di Fiore, P. P.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
10607-10610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yokote, K.,
Margolis, B.,
Heldin, C.-H.,
and Claesson-Welsh, L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
30942-30949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Osborne, M. A.,
Dalton, S.,
and Kochan, J. P.
(1995)
Bio/Technology
13,
1474-1478[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wang, J.,
and Riedel, H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
3136-3139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Reed, B. C.,
Kaufman, S. H.,
Mackall, J. C.,
Student, A. K.,
and Lane, M. D.
(1977)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
71,
4876-4880
-
Saad, M. J. A.,
Folli, F.,
Araki, E.,
Hashimoto, N.,
Csermely, P.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
545-557[Abstract]
-
Songyang, Z.,
and Cantley, L. C.
(1995)
Trends Biol. Sci.
20,
470-475
-
Stein, D.,
Wu, J.,
Fuqua, S. A. W.,
Roonprapunt, C.,
Yajnik, V.,
D'Eustachio, P.,
Moskow, J. J.,
Buchberg, A. M.,
Osborne, C. K.,
and Margolis, B.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
1331-1340[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dey, B. R.,
Frick, K.,
Lopaczynski, W.,
Nissley, S. P.,
and Furnaletto, R. W.
(1996)
Mol. Endocrinol.
10,
631-641