|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 40, 26130-26137, October 2, 1998
Cloning and Characterization of the 5'-Flanking Region for the
Human Topoisomerase III Gene*
Jun Chul
Kim ,
Jong-Bok
Yoon§,
Hyeon-Sook
Koo§, and
In Kwon
Chung ¶
From the Department of Biology and
§ Department of Biochemistry, College of Science,
Bioproducts Research Center, Yonsei University,
Seoul 120-749, Korea
 |
ABSTRACT |
The human DNA topoisomerase III
(hTOP3) gene encodes a topoisomerase homologous to the
Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase I subfamily. To
understand the mechanisms responsible for regulating hTOP3
expression, we have cloned the 5'-flanking region of the gene coding
for the hTOP3 and analyzed its promoter activity. The presence of a
single transcription initiation site was suggested by primer extension
analysis. The hTOP3 gene promoter is moderately high in GC
content and lacks a canonical TATA box, suggesting that
hTOP3 promoter has overall similarity to promoters of a
number of housekeeping genes. Examination of the promoter sequence
indicated the presence of four Sp-1 consensus binding sequences and a
putative initiator element surrounding the transcription initiation
site. Transient expression of a luciferase reporter gene under the
control of serially deleted 5'-flanking sequences revealed that the
52-base pair region from 326 to 275 upstream of the transcription
initiation site includes a positive cis-acting element(s) for the
efficient expression of hTOP3 gene. On the basis of gel
mobility shift and supershift assays, we demonstrated that both YY1 and
USF1 transcription factors can bind to the 52-base pair region. When
HeLa cells were transiently transfected with a mutant construct which
had disabled both YY1- and USF1-binding sites, the luciferase activity
was greatly reduced, suggesting that these binding elements play a functional role in the basal activation of the hTOP3
promoter. Transfection studies with mutations that selectively impaired YY1 or USF1 binding suggested that both YY1 and USF1 function as
activators in the hTOP3 promoter.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
DNA topoisomerases are nuclear enzymes that are able to break and
reseal the sugar-phosphate backbone bonds of DNA and thereby adjust the
topological states of DNA (1-4). The existence of multiple
topoisomerases in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes has been documented.
Eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I catalyzes the removal of both positive
and negative supercoils by transiently breaking one strand of the DNA
double helix and therefore changing the linking number of DNA in steps
of one (5). This mechanism clearly distinguishes the type I from type
II enzymes. DNA topoisomerase II catalyzes the strand passing reaction
by making transient double-strand breaks and consequently changing the
linking number of DNA in steps of two (4, 6). This enzyme catalyzes the
ATP-dependent relaxation of negative and positive
supercoils, knotting, unknotting, catenation, and decatenation of DNA
circles. DNA topoisomerase II is essential for cell viability, and a
number of functions have been ascribed to this protein (7-9).
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the third subfamily of DNA
topoisomerases was originally identified from a hyper-recombination mutant that causes an increase in recombination between repetitive DNA
elements (10). Null mutation of the topoisomerase III
(TOP3)1 gene
displays its pleiotropic phenotypes including slow growth, hyper-recombination, and a defect in sporulation. cDNA sequence of
the yeast TOP3 gene revealed that it encodes a DNA
topoisomerase homologous to Escherichia coli DNA
topoisomerase I (10). In vitro biochemical studies with
purified yeast TOP3 have shown that it partially relaxes
negative but not positive supercoils, and its binding activity has a
strong preference for single-stranded DNA (11). Recently, it was shown
that a mutation of yeast SGS1 (slow growth suppressor) gene
suppresses growth defect as well as increased genomic instability of
TOP3 mutant (12). Sequence analysis of the SGS1
gene revealed that the SGS1 protein is highly homologous to the
E. coli RecQ DNA helicase (12, 13). Two-hybrid analysis
revealed that SGS1 protein physically interacts with TOP3, indicating
that these proteins may function as a complex (12). This action
mechanism is similar to that proposed for the Sulfolobus
acidocaldarius reverse gyrase, which contains both a helicase-like
domain and a bacterial DNA topoisomerase I-like domain combined in one
polypeptide (14). Kim et al. (15) recently reported that the
yeast TOP3 gene and EST1 gene, encoding a
putative telomerase, are positioned head-to-head on chromosome XII.
This arrangement suggests that the two genes may be co-regulated and functionally related. Yeast cell lacking TOP3 shows a
shortening of telomeric repeats and a high frequency of loss of
the subtelomeric sequences (15).
Human TOP3 (hTOP3) cDNA has recently been
cloned and shown to consist of 976 amino acids (16). This gene locus
has been mapped to chromosome 17p11.2-12. An alignment of the amino
acid sequences of the hTOP3 with yeast TOP3, and E. coli
topoisomerase I and III, revealed that for the region present in all
four polypeptides, the human protein resembles yeast protein more than
the two E. coli enzymes. Fritz et al. (17)
demonstrated that the CAT4.5 human cDNA partially suppresses
multiple aspects of the ataxia telangiectasia (A-T) phenotype upon
transfection into A-T fibroblast. The CAT4.5 insert is an intronic
fragment fused to a nearly full-length cDNA of the hTOP3
gene. Both the CAT4.5 vector and an antisense hTOP3
construct inhibited spontaneous and radiation-induced apoptosis in A-T
cells, whereas overexpression of a full-length TOP3 cDNA failed to suppress apoptosis. The results suggested that the
hTOP3 may be deregulated in A-T cells and involved in
maintaining genomic stability, perhaps in concert with the Bloom's or
Werner's syndrome DNA helicase (18, 19). The recent study on targeted
disruption of the mouse TOP3 gene revealed that this gene is
essential in early embryogenesis (20). The requirement of mouse TOP3
for viability might be due to its plausible roles in DNA replication and its interaction with the RecQ/SGS1 family of DNA helicases (20).
Although endogenous expression of hTOP3 gene was found in
multiple somatic tissues (17), the mechanisms of transcriptional regulation of the hTOP3 gene at the promoter level are not
known.
In this report, we describe the structural organization and functional
characterization of the hTOP3 gene promoter. Our data demonstrate that the hTOP3 gene contains a single
transcription initiation site and lacks a canonical TATA box near the
initiation site. Functional analysis of the regulatory region of the
hTOP3 promoter identified strong cis-acting elements, at
326 to 275 from the transcription initiation site, for high level
expression of the hTOP3 gene. The functional significance of
the cis-acting elements and their transcription factors is
discussed.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cloning of the 5'-Flanking Region of the hTOP3
Gene--
Approximately 10 µg of HeLa cell genomic DNA was digested
with BamHI and ligated to the BamHI-digested
pBluescript according to standard protocols (21). A portion of the
ligation mixture was used as a template for amplification with two
primers: the T7 standard sequencing primer served as the
vector-specific primer, and the second primer was specific for the
hTOP3 gene-specific primer-1
(5'-CCTTCTCTCCGCCTCATGCGACCGT-3') complementary to nucleotide +113
through +89 from the translation initiation codon (16). The first PCR
products were reamplified with the T7 primer and the nested
gene-specific primer-2 (5'-TCTTCGGGCCGTCGCAGCCACCGGA-3') complementary
to nucleotide 23 through 47 from the translation initiation codon
(see location of primers in Fig. 1B). The amplification products were analyzed on a 1.2% agarose gel in 0.5× TBE and
visualized by ethidium bromide staining. The PCR amplification product
was subcloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega) and sequenced on both strands by the dideoxy sequencing method (U.S. Biochemical Corp.). In
order to test further the specificity of amplification products, the
above procedure was repeated with PstI-digested HeLa cell genomic DNA.
Primer Extension Analysis--
A 20-nucleotide antisense primer
with sequence 5'-GCTGGCCTTTGGAGCTTCAG-3' was synthesized corresponding
to the cDNA region 222-203 bp upstream of the translation
initiation codon (16). An oligonucleotide was radiolabeled at the
5'-end with T4 polynucleotide kinase and [ -32P]ATP
(3,000 Ci/mmol, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The radiolabeled primer (1 ng) was added to 15 µg of total cellular RNA isolated from HeLa cells
in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM dNTPs, and 0.5 mM spermidine. The reaction mixtures were heated at 65 °C for 20 min and hybridized at 37 °C for 2 h. One unit of avian myeloblastosis virus-reverse
transcriptase (Promega) was added to the mixture, and the reaction was
continued at 42 °C for 30 min. After completion of the reaction,
samples were extracted with phenol/chloroform and precipitated with
ethanol. The extension products were dissolved in a denaturing dye
solution and analyzed on a 6% polyacrylamide/urea gel. The size was
determined by comparison with a DNA sequencing ladder.
Northern Hybridization Analysis--
Total cellular RNA was
isolated from exponentially growing cells using Tri reagent (Molecular
Research Center). RNA samples (10 µg/lane) were separated on an 1%
formaldehyde-agarose gel and vacuum-transferred to Hybond
N+ membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) with 20× SSC (150 mM NaCl, 15 mM sodium citrate, pH 7.0). After
fixation of RNA on the membrane by alkaline treatment, the membrane was
prehybridized at 42 °C for 5 h in 5× SSPE, 10× Denhardt's
solution, 100 µg/ml denatured herring sperm DNA, 50% formamide, and
2% SDS. To measure the hTOP3 mRNA level in different
human tissues, the hybridization was performed using a filter blotted
with 2 µg of mRNA prepared from different human organs (MTN blot,
CLONTECH). A probe consisting of a 1.1-kb PstI fragment of the hTOP3 cDNA was labeled
with [ -32P]dCTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) to a
specific activity of 1 × 108 cpm/µg using random
primer DNA labeling system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The blot was
hybridized with the probe at 65 °C for 12-18 h and then washed
serially twice in 2× SSC and 0.1% SDS for 15 min, twice in 1× SSC
and 0.1% SDS for 15 min, and once in 0.1× SSC and 0.1% SDS for 30 min. Control hybridization was carried out using labeled
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase probe for the cell line
Northern blot and using -actin probe for the multiple tissue
Northern blot.
Construction of Promoter-Luciferase Constructs--
A series of
plasmids containing various sizes of the 5'-flanking region of the
hTOP3 gene were constructed by inserting DNA fragments
between the KpnI and BglII sites of the vector
pGL2 (Promega). For a directional cloning, DNA fragments were prepared by PCR reactions using the following synthetic oligonucleotides incorporating 5'-KpnI and 3'-BglII sites: for the
5'-ends of the inserts,
5'-CGGGGTACCGGATCCTGCTACCGCGGCGCCG-3' ( 326 to 303 from the transcription start),
5'-CGGGGTACCTCCGCGCCGCGTGACCCGGAAG-3' ( 274 to 253),
5'-CGGGGTACCGATTAAAAAGTCATGAGAAAGAGG-3' ( 227 to 204),
5'-CGGGGTACCGCAAGAAGGAGTCCGATTAACC-3' ( 176 to 153),
5'-CGGGGTACCGGGGCGGAGTGAGACGGGGGCGG-3' ( 125 to 103),
5'-CGGGGTACCGGACGAGGGGCGCGGGACAGTC-3' ( 74 to 53), and
5'-CGGGGTACCGGGGCGCGCGCCTGGCGGAAGTA-3' ( 26 to 4), and
for the 3'-ends of the inserts, 5'-
GAAGATCTCCCGCCTTCTCCAGCTACTTC-3' (+12 to 9),
5'-GAAGATCTTCACTGAGCCTTTCCCGTGCCGC-3' (+82 to +60). Amplified DNA fragments were digested with KpnI and
BglII and inserted into the immediate upstream of the
luciferase reporter gene.
Transfection and Luciferase Expression Assays--
Cells plated
onto six-well plates were grown to 50-70% confluence prior to
transfection. 2 µg of test constructs were cotransfected with 2 µg
of -galactosidase expression plasmid, pCH110 (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech). Each plasmid containing hTOP3 promoter-luciferase fusion gene was diluted into 0.1 ml of Opti-MEM 1 (Life Technologies, Inc.), and 4 µl of LipofectAMINE was added to 0.1 ml of serum-free medium. Plasmid DNA and LipofectAMINE were then mixed together and
incubated at room temperature for 30 min to form DNA-liposome complexes. The complexes were added to 0.8 ml of serum-free medium, mixed gently, and placed on top of the cells. Following incubation of
the cells for 6 h at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator, 1 ml
of growth medium containing twice the normal concentration of serum was added. After an additional 48 h incubation, the cells were lysed in 0.15 ml of lysis buffer (Promega) and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min to remove cell debris. The supernatants were
assayed for luciferase and -galactosidase activities using the
luciferase and -galactosidase assay systems according to the
manufacturer's recommendation (Promega). Amounts of lysates employed
for the luciferase activity assays were normalized to the
-galactosidase activities.
Nuclear Extracts and Gel Mobility Shift Assays--
HeLa cell
nuclear extracts were prepared from 5 × 107 cells
according to the method of Dignam et al. (22). Nuclear
extracts were quantitated by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad) and stored at 70 °C. The protein concentration was 6 mg/ml. For gel mobility shift assay, duplex probes were end-labeled by filling in with Klenow
DNA polymerase and [ -32P]CTP. Approximately 1 ng of
the labeled probe was mixed with 2.4 µg of nuclear protein in a total
of 20 µl of the binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 5% glycerol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride) containing 1 µg of poly(dI·dC). After incubation in ice
for 20 min, the reaction mixture was separated on a 5% nondenaturing
polyacrylamide gel with 0.5× TBE buffer (40 mM Tris
borate, 1 mM EDTA). The gel was dried and subjected to
autoradiography. For competition experiments, the molar excess of
unlabeled competitor DNA was added prior to the addition of labeled
probe as specified. For supershift experiments, 0.2 µg of antibody
was added to the mixture 20 min prior to the addition of labeled probe,
and the mixture was further incubated for 20 min at room temperature.
All antibodies used in these experiments were purchased from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology.
 |
RESULTS |
Cloning and Characterization of the hTOP3 Promoter Region--
The
5'-flanking region of the hTOP3 gene was cloned using a
gene-specific primer based on the known sequence of hTOP3
cDNA (23). BamHI-digested HeLa cell genomic DNA was
ligated to the linear pBluescript treated with the same restriction
endonuclease. The ligation mixture was subjected to PCR amplification
using a specific primer-1 annealing to the known 5'-end sequence of the
hTOP3 cDNA and the standard sequencing primer T7
annealing to the unknown end. To increase the specificity of the
amplification, the first PCR products were reamplified using the T7
primer and the nested gene-specific primer-2 (see location of primers
in Fig. 1). The amplification products
were analyzed on a 1.2% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide
staining (data not shown). Southern blot analysis of the same gel using
a 32P-labeled 5'-untranslated region of hTOP3
cDNA further confirmed the specificity of the amplification
products (data not shown). By using this method, a 376-bp region
upstream of the known 5'-end of the hTOP3 cDNA
previously published (16) was obtained (Fig. 1). The same process was
performed with PstI-digested HeLa cell genomic DNA, and an
additional 938-bp upstream region was obtained and sequenced (Fig.
1).

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Nucleotide sequence of the 5'-flanking region
of the hTOP3 gene. A, the map shows the
structure of hTOP3 promoter. The transcription initiation
site and the ATG initiation codon are designated as +1 and +305,
respectively. The 5'-flanking region sequenced is shown by the
open box. B, bases are numbered with respect to
the transcription initiation site (designated as +1), which is marked
with an arrow, and the ATG initiation codon is
boxed. The putative regulatory motifs including four Sp-1
sites, a YY1 site, and a USF1 site are underlined.
Gene-specific primers used for promoter cloning are indicated.
|
|
Determination of the Transcription Initiation Site--
To
determine the transcription initiation sites of the hTOP3
gene, primer extension was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." A radiolabeled antisense primer was hybridized to total
RNA isolated from HeLa cells, and the extension products were analyzed
on a sequencing gel (Fig. 2). As deduced
from the extension products, the major transcript is being initiated
from the guanine residue located 304 bp upstream of the ATG codon. Accordingly, this base was designated hereafter as +1 bp unless otherwise stated and extended the 5'-end of hTOP3 cDNA
previously reported by 52 bases (16). The same primer extension product was obtained using total RNA isolated from other human cell lines (data
not shown).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Determination of the hTOP3 gene
transcription initiation site by primer extension analysis. A
radiolabeled oligonucleotide corresponding to positions 222-203 bp
upstream of the translation initiation codon was used as a primer in a
reverse transcription reaction using HeLa cell total RNA or control
yeast RNA. Extension products were analyzed by electrophoresis in
denaturing polyacrylamide gel with a sequencing ladder of
hTOP3 genomic DNA prepared using the same primer. The
extension product is indicated by an arrow.
|
|
Constitutive Expression of the hTOP3 mRNA in Multiple Somatic
Tissues and Various Cell Types--
The identification of the
transcription initiation site revealed that the 5'-untranslated region
of hTOP3 mRNA is 304 bp. By adding this region to the
2,928 bp of the open reading frame and to the 575 bp of 3'-untranslated
sequence (16), the size of hTOP3 mRNA was estimated as
3.8 kb. This was further confirmed by Northern analysis of the
transcription product of the hTOP3 gene. Blot containing
total RNAs from five human cell lines was hybridized with a probe
consisting of a 1.1-kb PstI fragment of the hTOP3
cDNA. One distinct hTOP3 transcript of about 3.8 kb was
detected, and the level of hTOP3 mRNA was approximately
identical in all cell lines examined (Fig.
3A). Control hybridizations
with a glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase probe confirmed nearly equal mRNA amounts in each lane. Northern analysis of
hTOP3 transcript in multiple normal somatic tissues showed
that hTOP3 mRNA is present as a 3.8-kb transcript and is
expressed to a similar level in all tissues except for the weak levels
of expression in lung and kidney (Fig. 3B). The fast
migrating band in the skeletal muscle is known to be an artifact.
(While our paper was being prepared, Fritz et al. (17)
reported the Northern analysis of hTOP3 mRNA in multiple
tissues that overlaps with the result of Fig. 3B in this
study.)

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Northern analysis of hTOP3
mRNA levels in different human cell lines and multiple
somatic tissues. A, RNA samples prepared from HeLa,
MKN-45 (stomach), SW-48 (colon), MCF-7 (breast), and WI-38 (fibroblast)
cells were separated on 1% formaldehyde-agarose gel, transferred, and
probed with hTOP3 cDNA. A human
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) cDNA
probe was used as an internal control for RNA loading. B,
Northern blot analysis was performed on a filter blotted with mRNA
prepared from different human somatic tissues (MTN blot,
CLONTECH). Control hybridization was carried out
using labeled -actin probe.
|
|
Transient Expression Analysis of the hTOP3 Promoter--
In order
to determine the promoter activity and localize important regulatory
regions within the 5'-flanking sequence of the hTOP3 gene, a
series of deleted promoter region-luciferase fusion plasmids were
constructed (Fig. 4A). These
plasmids were transfected into HeLa cells, and the luciferase
activities were measured from the cell lysates. As shown in Fig.
4A, both the 1,262/+82 and 326/+82 fusion constructs
promoted high levels of luciferase expression. In contrast,
5'-deletions of various lengths from 274 to 74 resulted in a
reduction of promoter activity to about 30-43% that of the 326/+82
construct. These results clearly indicate that a positive regulatory
element(s) is located between 326 and 275 and that this region is
essential for a high level expression of the hTOP3 gene.
Transfection of the 26/+82 fusion construct resulted in a lower level
of luciferase activity (30%) as compared with that of the 74/+82
construct. This suggested the presence of another positive regulatory
element(s) between 74 and 27. The 74/+12 construct showed a much
lower luciferase activity when compared with that of the 74/+82
construct, whereas the 26/+12 construct did not have any measurable
promoter activity. Based on these results, the Sp-1-binding site
located downstream of the transcription initiation site may be
essential for the minimal promoter activity of the hTOP3
gene (see Fig. 1 for location of downstream Sp-1-binding site).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Transient expression analysis of the
hTOP3 gene promoter. A, deletion constructs
containing different lengths of the hTOP3 promoter were
subcloned upstream of the luciferase reporter gene in pGL2 vector and
transiently transfected into HeLa cells. Relative positions of the 5'-
and 3'-ends of deleted promoter in each construct are marked. A
-galactosidase expression plasmid was cotransfected as an internal
control. Amount of cell lysate employed for the luciferase activity
assay was normalized to the -galactosidase activity, and the
relative luciferase assay of each construct was expressed as a
percentage of that of 326/+82 construct. The data represent the
average of four independent experiments. B, HeLa, SW-48
(colon), and MCF-7 (breast) cells were cotransfected with the 326/+82
construct and -galactosidase expression plasmid. The relative
luciferase assay was expressed as a percentage of that of HeLa
cells.
|
|
To extend the study of hTOP3 promoter activity to various
human cell types, we transfected the 326/+82 construct into SW-48 (colon) and MCF-7 (breast) cells. A similar level of luciferase activities was shown in these cells to that obtained in HeLa cells (Fig. 4C), suggesting that hTOP3 promoter is
similarly expressed in the different cell types examined.
Analysis of the Binding Activities to the Regulatory Elements by
Gel Mobility Shift Assays--
In order to demonstrate a nuclear
protein factor(s) specific for binding to the 52-bp region extending
from 326 to 275 in the hTOP3 promoter, the nuclear
protein-DNA interaction was detected by reduced electrophoretic
mobility on a native polyacrylamide gel. As shown in Fig.
5A, two major complexes
(complexes A and B) and one weak complex (complex B') were formed with
nuclear extracts from HeLa cells (lane 2) (see below for the
explanation of the complex B' between complex B and free probe). The
specificity of these complexes for the sequence was shown by a
competition experiment, in which the complexes were completely
abolished by competition with a 40- or an 80-fold excess of an
unlabeled wild-type probe (lanes 3 and 4). In
contrast, the same molar excess of a nonspecific DNA fragment failed to
compete (lanes 5 and 6), indicating that the
52-bp region contains cis-elements for transcription factor binding.
Computer analysis of the 52-bp cis-element using MatInspector program
(version 2.1) revealed the presence of putative regulatory consensus
sequences. In order to identify the nuclear proteins involved in the
formation of the protein-DNA complexes, two mutated oligonucleotides
were synthesized and used as competitors in the mobility shift assays.
M1 oligonucleotide contained mutated sequences in the YY1 core-binding
element (CCAT), and M2 oligonucleotide was mutated in the E box
(CACATG) as shown in Fig. 5B. The complex A selectively
decreased in the presence of the excess M1 oligonucleotide, and this
inhibition was dose-dependent with respect to the amount of
the M1 oligonucleotide used in the assay, but the complexes B and B'
were not affected by the M1 oligonucleotide (Fig. 5C, lanes
3-6). Conversely, preincubation with the excess M2
oligonucleotide selectively eliminated complexes B and B' but did not
affect complex A (lanes 7-10). In conjunction with
supershift data using anti-YY1 antibody (see below, Fig.
6B), these results indicated
that the complex B was formed with YY1. The complex B' most likely
contained proteolytic degradation products of YY1, as it was removed by a M2 oligonucleotide and supershifted by the anti-YY1 antibody (Fig.
6B). YY1 has been previously reported to be susceptible to
proteolytic degradation (24).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Gel mobility shift assay of nuclear protein
factors for the cis element of the hTOP3 promoter.
A, the 52-bp radiolabeled duplex probe (1 ng) extending from
326 to 275 was incubated with 2.4 µg of HeLa cell nuclear
extracts in the absence (lane 2) or presence of 40- and
80-fold molar excesses of unlabeled competitors (lanes 3-6)
depicted at the top of each lane. WT and
NS are the unlabeled 52-bp wild-type duplex probe and the
nonspecific DNA of the same size, respectively. Bands A, B,
and B' represent specific protein-DNA complexes.
B, DNA sequences of oligonucleotides used in this study are
shown. C, the 52-bp radiolabeled duplex probe (1 ng) was
incubated with 2.4 µg of HeLa cell nuclear extracts (lane
2). Competition was performed with increasing amounts of unlabeled
M1 (lanes 3-6) and M2 duplex oligonucleotides (lanes
7-10).
|
|

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
YY1 and USF1 bind to the cis element of the
hTOP3 promoter. A, the 52-bp radiolabeled
duplex probe (1 ng) was incubated without (lane 1) or with
2.4 µg of HeLa cell nuclear extracts (lane 2). Lanes
1 and 2 in the following panels were as in
A. Competition was performed with 40- and 80-fold molar
excesses of unlabeled duplex oligonucleotides containing AP1
(lanes 3 and 4), CREBP (lanes 5 and
6), USF1 (lanes 7 and 8), OCT1
(lanes 9 and 10), and c-Myc/Max (lanes
11 and 12) consensus sequences. B, the 52-bp
radiolabeled duplex probe was incubated with 2.4 µg of HeLa cell
nuclear extracts in the binding mixture containing antibody against YY1
(lane 3), OCT1 (lane 4), SREBP (lane
5), c-Myc (lane 6), Max (lane 7), or USF1
(lane 8). C, the 52-bp radiolabeled duplex probe
was incubated with 2.4 µg of HeLa cell nuclear extracts in the
binding mixtures containing antibody against YY1 (lanes 4 and 7) or USF1 (lanes 5 and 8) in the
presence of 40-fold molar excess of unlabeled M1 (lanes
3-5) and M2 (lanes 6-8) duplex
oligonucleotides.
|
|
The Binding of YY1 and USF1 to the Regulatory Element--
Since
many helix-loop-helix proteins such as USF1 and c-Myc/Max are known to
bind to CANNTG (E box) motif (25, 26), we next identified the
transcription factor(s) which is involved in the formation of the
complex A. The duplex oligonucleotides containing the binding consensus
sequences of AP-1, CREBP, USF1, OCT1, and c-Myc/Max were prepared and
used as competitors. In the competition experiments shown in Fig.
6A, the complex A was completely eliminated by the unlabeled
authentic USF1-binding oligonucleotide (lanes 7 and
8) and c-Myc/Max-binding oligonucleotide (lanes
11 and 12). In contrast, the complexes B and B' were
not affected by any of the competitor oligonucleotides used. Wild type
oligonucleotide completely abolished the formation of all complexes
(lanes 13 and 14). These results indicate that
the 52-bp cis-element region could form two specific complexes as
follows: complex A containing USF1 or c-Myc/Max and complex B
containing YY1.
To characterize nuclear factors in the protein-DNA complexes further,
we performed an extensive supershift analysis of the complexes by
utilizing antibodies against various transcription factors having
potential binding sites in the 52-bp cis-element region. As expected,
preincubation with the anti-YY1 antibody reduced the level of complex
B, but had no effect on the complex A (Fig. 6B, lane 3).
Note that complex B' was also supershifted by the anti-YY1 antibody.
Conversely, preincubation with the anti-USF1 antibody selectively
inhibited the formation of complex A and generated a supershifted
complex but did not affect the formation of complexes B and B'
(lane 8). However, when anti-c-Myc or anti-Max antibody was
preincubated with nuclear extracts, both complexes A and B still
remained (lanes 6 and 7), indicating that the
nuclear factor involved in the formation of complex A may be USF1 and not c-Myc/Max. Such control antibodies as anti-OCT1 and anti-SREBP did
not affect the retarded complexes (lanes 4 and
5). Neither the retarded nor the supershifted complex was
found when the antibodies were incubated with the probe in the absence
of cell extracts (data not shown).
The identities of USF1 and YY1 complexes in cell extracts were further
confirmed by gel mobility shift analyses using both oligonucleotide
competition and antibody supershift assays as shown in Fig.
6C. USF1-retarded complex A and YY1-retarded complexes B and
B' were selectively abolished in the presence of a 40-fold excess of M1
and M2 oligonucleotides, respectively (Fig. 6C, lanes 3 and
6). Preincubation with the anti-YY1 antibody selectively abolished complexes B and B' (lane 4), but preincubation of
the anti-USF1 antibody had no effect on the formation of complexes B
and B' (lane 5). Preincubation with the anti-YY1 or
anti-USF1 antibody in the presence of M2 oligonucleotide further
identified the complex A as a USF1 complex (lanes 7 and
8).
Mutational Analysis of the YY1- and USF1-binding Sites in the hTOP3
Promoter--
Since the regulatory elements located in the region
between 326 and 275 exhibited strong binding affinities for YY1 and USF1, we next analyzed the transcriptional regulatory role of this
region. In order to measure the promoter activities of YY1- and
USF1-binding sites, we mutated the hTOP3 promoter by
site-directed mutagenesis at the YY1-binding site, USF1-binding site,
or at both sites (Fig. 7A).
Their promoter activities were examined by transient transfection of
HeLa cells. As shown in Fig. 7B, the double mutation at YY1-
and USF1-binding sites reduced the luciferase gene expression by 60%.
This could suggest that either YY1 binding or USF1 binding or both are
involved in maintaining the expression of wild-type promoter. A point
mutation at the YY1 core-binding site, which permits only USF1 binding,
showed a 13% reduction in the promoter activity, whereas a point
mutation at the USF1 core-binding site, which permits only YY1 binding, reduced the promoter activity by 28%. Thus, both YY1 and USF1 can
increase the activity of the hTOP3 promoter by binding to this region and potentially contribute to its basal activation in HeLa
cells. These results clearly suggest that the YY1- and USF1-binding
sites both function as positive cis-elements for the efficient
expression of the hTOP3 gene. Although the degree to which
YY1 and USF1 contribute may depend on the physiological state of the
cell, the USF1 site has a higher enhancing activity of the
hTOP3 promoter than the YY1 site in HeLa cells.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Mutation analysis of the YY1- and
USF1-binding sites in the hTOP3 promoter.
A, DNA sequences of the wild-type, mutant YY1, mutant USF1,
and mutant YY1-USF1 oligonucleotides. B, the promoter
activity of each construct was measured by transfection into HeLa
cells. The amount of the cell lysate employed for each luciferase
activity assay was normalized to the -galactosidase activity, and
the relative luciferase assay of each construct was expressed as a
percentage of that of 326/+82 construct. The data represent the
average of four independent experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Recently, a human cDNA encoding the hTOP3 has been identified
(16). This enzyme is probably present in many different cell types as
manifested by Northern analysis of hTOP3 mRNA levels in
multiple somatic tissues (17). However, mouse TOP3 was highly expressed
in the testis in comparison with other tissues (27), suggesting that
mouse TOP3 gene might be differentially regulated in a
tissue-specific manner. In this work, to identify the transcriptional control region, we have isolated and characterized genomic clones containing the 5'-flanking region of the hTOP3 gene. The
promoter region, which is sufficient to confer high level expression of a luciferase reporter gene, was mapped to a region between 326 and
+82. This appears to indicate that this region contains cis-acting regulatory elements responsible for the hTOP3 gene
expression and that a number of different DNA binding factors are
involved in the basal hTOP3 expression. The hTOP3
promoter region is moderately high in GC content and lacks a canonical
TATA box, suggesting that hTOP3 promoter has overall
similarity to promoters of a number of housekeeping genes (28). The
dinucleotide CpG occurs approximately every 10 bp in the combined
regions of the basal promoter and the 5'-untranslated sequence of the
hTOP3 promoter, whereas CpG occurs every 50 to 100 bp on
average in the major fraction of the mammalian genome (29, 30). Thus,
methylation of these regions might be involved in regulation of
hTOP3 gene expression.
The transcription initiation site determined by primer extension
analysis showed a single major site at the guanine residue located 304 bp upstream from the ATG codon. Because the hTOP3 promoter
contains no potential upstream TATA-like sequence, transcription initiation does not appear to be associated with TATA box, which would
have the role of directing accurate transcription initiation through a
mechanism that depends on its specific interaction with the
TATA-binding protein (31). Some TATA-less promoters retain the ability
to direct transcription initiation from a specific nucleotide, whereas
others direct transcription initiation at multiple start sites (32).
Many promoters also contain initiator sequences in the vicinity of
transcription initiation that appear to be essential for the precise
location of a transcription initiation site (32). The sequence
surrounding transcription initiation site of the hTOP3
promoter is homologous to the murine terminal transferase initiator
(33). Like many housekeeping genes, the promoter of hTOP3
gene contains four GC boxes around the transcription initiation site
with a potential for binding of the transcription factor Sp1 (Fig. 1).
Although the Sp1 sites are generally located upstream of the
transcription initiation site, Sp1 can also increase promoter activity
at downstream locations (34). One of the GC boxes (from position +7 to
+15), located downstream of the transcription initiation site, is
essential for the minimal promoter activity. The 74/+12 construct,
which does not contain downstream GC box, exhibited much lower
luciferase activity as compared with that of the 74/+82 construct
(Fig. 4).
The basal promoter fragment extending to 326 bp from the
transcription initiation site directed higher levels of luciferase activity in transient transfection assays than that of the promoter fragment extending to 274 bp (Fig. 4). The result clearly
demonstrated that an element(s) responsible for the promoter activity
must be contained in the 52-bp region between 326 and 275. As
manifested by combined gel mobility shift assays, competition
experiments, and supershift assays, this region contains core CCAT and
CACATG motifs for binding of YY1 and USF1 transcription factors,
respectively. Transient transfection studies with mutations showed that
this region is important for the expression of hTOP3
promoter and that both YY1 and USF1 factors function as transcriptional
activators.
YY1 is a zinc finger transcription factor that contains structural
similarity to the GLI-Krüppel protein (35, 36). Depending on the
DNA sequence context, YY1 can function as an activator (37, 38), a
repressor (24, 39, 40), or an initiator of transcription (41, 42). The
YY1-binding element within the hTOP3 promoter matches well
the consensus sequence proposed for the YY1 binding (43-45).
Previously, a number of composite binding elements, in which YY1
competes for occupation by another transcription factor, have been
described (24, 40, 46). In all the reported composite sites, YY1 acted
as a repressor either by decreasing transcription through a repressor
domain in its C terminus or by displacing an activator from the site (43). Unlike these composite YY1-binding sites, YY1 acted as an
activator in the YY1/USF1-binding site of hTOP3 promoter
(Fig. 7B). Recently, Furlong et al.(47)
demonstrated that YY1 functions as an activator to increase human p53
promoter activity in a composite element that can bind both YY1 and NF1
in a mutually exclusive manner. Thus, these cases may reflect the
general function of YY1 as an activator in the composite site.
A number of helix-loop-helix proteins bind as dimers to the
hexanucleotide sequence known as an E box (25, 26, 48-50). Our
supershift assay indicated that a transcription factor, which binds to
an E box of the hTOP3 promoter, was USF1 (Fig. 6). USF1 plays an important role in the basal expression of many genes (51).
Transient transfection of the wild-type fusion plasmid ( 326/+82) into
HeLa cells showed a significant luciferase gene expression (Fig. 7).
This promoter activity was greatly reduced when neither YY1 nor USF1
binds to the 52-bp region, suggesting a functional role of this region
in the basal activity of the hTOP3 promoter. A mutation in a
USF1-only binding element or in a YY1-only binding element showed a
reduction in luciferase gene expression as compared with that of
wild-type construct but exhibited a higher level of luciferase activity
than that for 274/+82 construct (Fig. 7). Although HeLa extracts
contain both YY1 and USF1 in differing amounts, these results confirm
that both YY1 and USF1 have a potential to contribute positively to the
basal hTOP3 promoter activity.
In summary, we have isolated and characterized the hTOP3
promoter region that drives expression of a luciferase reporter gene in
HeLa cells. Our results clearly demonstrate that the 52-bp region
between 326 and 275 containing consensus binding elements for YY1
and USF1 transcription factors is essential for the high level
expression of the hTOP3 gene. From mutations that
selectively impaired YY1 and USF1 binding, we concluded that both YY1
and USF1 function as activators for the hTOP3 expression
(Fig. 7). Further study will be required to elucidate the physiological roles of other embedded elements in the promoter and the upstream regions that regulate the basal and cell cycle-dependent
expression as well as tissue-specific expression of the
hTOP3 gene.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank E. J. Park and S. A. Kim
for helpful discussion and technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grant 95K2-0401-00-01-5 from the
Korea Science and Engineering Foundation through the Bioproducts Research Center at Yonsei University.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF026813.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biology,
College of Science, Yonsei University, 134 Shinchon-dong, Seoul 120-749, Korea. Tel.: 822-361-2660; Fax: 822-312-5657; E-mail: topoviro{at}bubble.yonsei.ac.kr.
The abbreviations used are:
TOP3,
topoisomerase III geneA-T, ataxia telangiectasiaPCR, polymerase
chain reactionbp, base pairkb, kilobase pairUSF, upstream
stimulatory factor.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Chen, A. Y.,
and Liu, L. F.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
34,
191-218[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Liu, L. F.
(1989)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
58,
351-375[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Osheroff, N.
(1989)
Pharmacol. Ther.
41,
223-241[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wang, J. C.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
65,
635-692[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Champoux, J. J.
(1990)
in
DNA Topology and Its Biological Effects (Cozzarelli, N. R., and Wang, J. C., eds), pp. 217-242, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Wang, J. C.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
6659-6662[Free Full Text]
-
DiNardo, S.,
Voelkel, K.,
and Sternglanz, R.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
2616-2620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Holm, C.,
Goto, T.,
Wang, J. C.,
and Botstein, D.
(1985)
Cell
41,
553-563[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Uemura, T.,
and Yanagida, M.
(1984)
EMBO J.
3,
1737-1744[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wallis, J. W.,
Chrebet, G.,
Brodsky, G.,
Rolfe, M.,
and Rothstein, R.
(1989)
Cell
58,
409-419[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kim, R. A.,
and Wang, J. C.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
17178-17185[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gangloff, S.,
McDonald, J. P.,
Bendixen, C.,
Arthur, L.,
and Rothstein, R.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
8391-8398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Watt, P. M.,
Hickson, I. D.,
Borts, R. H.,
and Louis, E. J.
(1996)
Genetics
144,
936-945
-
Confalonieri, F.,
Elie, C.,
Nadal, M.,
Tour, C. B. D. L.,
Forterre, P.,
and Duguet, M.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
4753-4757[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kim, R. A.,
Caron, P. R.,
and Wang, J. C.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
2667-2671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hanai, R.,
Caron, P. R.,
and Wang, J. C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
3653-3657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fritz, E.,
Elsea, S. H.,
Patel, P. I.,
and Meyn, M. S.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4538-4542[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ellis, N. A.,
Groden, J.,
Ye, T.-Z.,
Straughen, J.,
Lennon, D. J.,
Ciocci, S.,
Proytcheva, M.,
and German, J.
(1995)
Cell
83,
655-666[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yu, C.-E.,
Oshima, J.,
Fu, Y.-H.,
Wijsman, E. M.,
Hisama, F.,
Alisch, R.,
Matthews, S.,
Nakura, J.,
Miki, T.,
Ouais, S.,
Martin, G. M.,
Mulligan, J.,
and Schellenberg, G. D.
(1996)
Science
272,
258-262[Abstract]
-
Li, W.,
and Wang, J. C.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
1010-1013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., pp. 9.14-9.23, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Dignam, J. D.,
Levovitz, R. M.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1983)
Nucleic Acids Res.
11,
1475-1489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shyamala, V.,
and Ames, G. F.-L.
(1993)
Methods Enzymol.
217,
436-446[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lu, S.-Y.,
Rodriguez, M.,
and Liao, W. S.-L.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
6253-6263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Carr, C. S.,
and Sharp, P. A.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
4384-4388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gregor, P. D.,
Sawadogo, M.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
1730-1740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Seki, T.,
Seki, M.,
Katada, T.,
and Enomoto, T.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1396,
127-131[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dynan, W. S.
(1986)
Trends Genet.
8,
196-197[CrossRef]
-
Bird, A.,
Taggart, M.,
Frommer, M.,
Miller, O. J.,
and Macleod, D.
(1985)
Cell
40,
91-99[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cross, S. H.,
Charlton, J. A.,
Nan, X.,
and Bird, A. P.
(1994)
Nat. Genet.
6,
236-244[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sawadogo, M.,
and Sentenac, A.
(1990)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
59,
711-754[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Smale, S. T.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1351,
73-88
-
Smale, S. T.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1989)
Cell
57,
103-113[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Courey, A. J.,
Holtzman, D. A.,
Jackson, S. P.,
and Tijian, R.
(1989)
Cell
59,
827-836[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shi, Y.,
Seto, E.,
Chang, L.-S.,
and Shenk, T.
(1991)
Cell
67,
377-388[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pavletich, N. P.,
and Pabo, C. O.
(1993)
Science
261,
1701-1707[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Farnham, P. J.,
and Means, A. L.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
1390-1398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Riggs, K, J.,
Saleque, S.,
Wong, K. K.,
Merrell, K. T.,
Lee, J. S.,
Shi, Y.,
and Calame, K.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
7487-7495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gualberto, A.,
LePage, D.,
Pons, G.,
Mader, S. L.,
Park, K.,
Atchison, M. L.,
and Walsh, K.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
4209-4214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Meier, V. S.,
and Groner, B.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
128-137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Usheva, A.,
and Shenk, T.
(1994)
Cell
76,
1115-1121[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Seto, E.,
Shi, Y.,
and Shenk, T.
(1991)
Nature
354,
241-245[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hyde-DeRuyscher, R. L.,
Fang, P.,
and Schwartz, R. J.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
5090-5100[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shrivastava, A.,
and Calame, K.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
5151-5155[Free Full Text]
-
Yant, S. R.,
Zhu, W.,
Millinoff, D.,
Slightom, J. L.,
Goodman, M.,
and Gumucio, D. L.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
4353-4362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lee, T.-C.,
Chow, K.-L.,
Gualberto, A.,
LePage, D.,
Pons, G.,
Mader, S. L.,
Park, K.,
Atchison, M. L.,
and Walsh, K.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
4209-4214
-
Furlong, E. E.,
Rein, T.,
and Martin, F.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5933-5945[Abstract]
-
Beckmann, H.,
Su, L.,
and Kadesch, T.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
167-179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Blackwood, E. M.,
and Eisenman, R. N.
(1991)
Science
251,
1211-1217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hu, Y.,
Luscher, B.,
Admon, A.,
Mermod, N.,
and Tjian, R.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
1741-1752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sirito, M.,
Lin, Q.,
Maity, T.,
and Sawadogo, M.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
427-433[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Kanamoto, T. Akamizu, T. Tagami, Y. Hataya, K. Moriyama, K. Takaya, H. Hosoda, M. Kojima, K. Kangawa, and K. Nakao
Genomic Structure and Characterization of the 5'-Flanking Region of the Human Ghrelin Gene
Endocrinology,
September 1, 2004;
145(9):
4144 - 4153.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|