|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 41, 26670-26674, October 9, 1998
Release of Thioredoxin via the Mechanosensitive Channel MscL
during Osmotic Downshock of Escherichia coli Cells*
Bassam
Ajouz,
Catherine
Berrier,
Alexia
Garrigues,
Madeleine
Besnard , and
Alexandre
Ghazi§
From the Laboratoire des Biomembranes, ERS CNRS 571, Bât.
430, Université Paris-Sud 91405 Orsay Cedex, France
 |
ABSTRACT |
Escherichia coli cells possess
several mechanosensitive ion channels but only MscL, the channel with
the highest conductance, which is activated at the highest membrane
tension, has been cloned. We investigated the putative involvement of
MscL in the effluxes caused by osmotic downshock. Osmotic shock caused
the release of potassium glutamate, trehalose, and glycine betaine from
wild type cells and cells lacking MscL. There was no difference between the two strains, but the extreme rapidity of the efflux process, as
shown herein for glycine betaine, suggests that it is channel-mediated. Osmotic downshock also induces the release of some cytosolic proteins from EDTA-treated cells. We investigated the release of thioredoxin. This protein was totally released from wild type cells but was retained
by MscL cells. Release was restored by expression of the
gene coding for MscL. Thus MscL is not necessary for the excretion of
osmoprotectants, but it does open in vivo
during shock and catalyzes the efflux of thioredoxin and possibly other
small cytosolic proteins. It follows that the other mechanosensitive
channels, which are known to be activated at lower tension, must also
open during osmotic shock. Their opening and that of MscL could account
for the rapid release of osmolytes.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Mechanosensitive (MS)1
ion channels are channels gated by mechanical forces exerted on cell
membranes. They are present in a large variety of cells, in animals,
plants, and bacteria. In bacteria, these channels have been documented
by patch-clamp experiments in Escherichia coli,
Streptococcus faecalis, and Bacillus subtilis (reviewed in Sukharev et al. (1)). A characteristic of
bacterial MS channels (which distinguishes them from their counterparts in animal cells) is their multiplicity and high conductance. High conductance MS channels are also present in Archaea (2). In E. coli, on the basis of conductance and kinetics, three
families of MS channels were distinguished: MscM (M for mini), MscS (S for small), and MscL (L for large). These channels are activated at
different thresholds of applied pressure; the higher the conductance of
a channel, the higher the pressure needed to trigger its opening (3).
The MscL channel has been purified and its gene has been cloned (4).
Expression of the mscL gene is necessary and sufficient for
activity of the MS channel with the highest conductance (4-6). The
mscL gene codes for a 15-kDa protein with two transmembrane domains (6). Two-dimensional crystals of the channel have been obtained, indicating that it is a homohexamer (7). The protein is
located in the plasma membrane (6, 8). Homologues of mscL
have been identified in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (9).
The genes coding for the other MS channels have not been identified.
Complete genome sequencing of organisms such as E. coli and
B. subtlis shows that these genes probably have sequences different from that of mscL, for which no paralogue has been
found.
The function of the MS channels in bacteria is still a matter of
speculation. It has been known for a long time that hypo-osmotic shock
causes the release of solutes from E. coli, without lysis of
the cells (10). The localization of high conductance MS channels in the
plasma membrane of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (11-13)
led to the suggestion that shock-induced effluxes are mediated by these
channels (14). More specifically, it was proposed that the
physiological role of these channels is to catalyze the efflux of
osmolytes or osmoprotectants upon osmotic shock (14, 15). Cultivated in
high osmolarity media, bacteria such as E. coli are able to
synthesize or accumulate high concentrations of osmoprotectants and
potassium which counterbalance the outside osmolarity (reviewed in
Czonka and Epstein (16)). Upon a shift to a low osmolarity medium,
excretion of compatible solutes is required to restore normal turgor.
The efflux of potassium and osmoprotectants, triggered by osmotic
downshock, has indeed been reported in E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium (17-20), Lactobacillus
plantarum (21), Corynebacterium glutamicum (22), and
Listeria monocytogenes (23).
In addition to species of low molecular weight (ions, metabolites, and
osmoprotectants), some cytoplasmic proteins including elongation factor
Tu (24), thioredoxin (25), and DnaK (26) are also excreted from
E. coli upon osmotic downshock (27). The release of
thioredoxin and DnaK occurs under conditions in which other cytoplasmic
proteins are totally retained (25, 26); how these cytoplasmic proteins
can be excreted in the absence of cell lysis constitutes a riddle.
To examine the possible involvement of MscL in these processes, we
studied the efflux of various molecules triggered by osmotic downshock
in the wild type and mscL strains of E. coli.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
E. coli thioredoxin reductase and
thioredoxin were supplied by IMCO (Stockholm, Sweden). The thioredoxin
antibody was obtained from Sigma.
[methyl-14C]Choline chloride was obtained from
Amersham (Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom).
Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions--
All experiments
were performed using the parental E. coli AW 405 strain (28)
and various derivatives, E. coli AW405 (referred to here as
the wild type strain), AW405 carrying a chromosomal insertion in the
mscL gene (referred to here as the MscL
strain), and a MscL RecA strain carrying
the mscL expression plasmid p5-2-2 (referred to here as the
restored strain) (4). These strains were kindly donated by Dr. P. Blount. Cells were grown aerobically at 37 °C in M9 minimal medium
containing 20 µg/ml thiamine, 40 µg/ml L-threonine, 40 µg/ml L-leucine, 40 µg/ml L-histidine, 10 µg/ml streptomycin, and 22 mM glucose as the carbon
source with, in addition, 50 µg/ml ampicillin for the restored
strain. Expression of mscL in this strain was induced with 2 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside. In some
experiments (trehalose assays, detection of MalE) glucose was replaced
with 44 mM glycerol or 20 mM maltose. Culture
at high osmolarity was performed by adding 500 mM NaCl
(final concentration) to the culture.
Shock-induced Release of Potassium--
K+ efflux
was studied with a valinomycin K+-selective electrode,
connected to a microcomputer, which was used to monitor the appearance
of K+ in the external medium, as described previously (29).
Cells were harvested by centrifugation and suspended at A
650 = 50 (25 mg dry weight/ml) in 10 mM
Hepes-NaOH buffer, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM
KCl, and 0.4% glucose. The resulting suspension was diluted 25-fold in
the shock medium (Hepes-NaOH buffer, pH 7.5, NaCl ranging from 0 to 80 mM).
Shock-induced Release of Endogenous Glutamate--
Growing
cells (A650 between 0.1 and 0.2) were
subjected to an osmotic upshock by addition of NaCl (500 mM
final concentration). Osmotic downshock was achieved by a 5-fold
dilution with the same medium but devoid of NaCl. At various time
intervals, 10-ml samples of the cell suspension were withdrawn and
centrifuged. The pellet was suspended in 1 ml of M9 medium, and the
cells were disrupted with a vibro-disrupter (MM2000 type, Retsch,
Germany). Glutamate content was determined enzymatically, as described
by Beutler (30), using a Boehringer kit assay. Cell growth was
monitored in parallel by absorbance measurement.
Shock-induced Release of Endogenous Trehalose--
Growing cells
were subjected to an osmotic upshock followed by an osmotic downshock
as described above. At various time intervals, 8-ml samples of the cell
suspension were withdrawn and centrifuged. The pellets were treated
with ice-cold 10% trichloroacetic acid, and the trehalose content was
measured using the phenol method, as described previously (31). Cell
growth was monitored in parallel by absorbance measurement.
Shock-induced Release of Radiolabeled Glycine
Betaine--
[N-methyl-14C]Glycine
betaine was synthesized enzymatically by oxidation of
[N-methyl-14C]choline (specific activity, 55 Ci/mol) and was purified as described previously (32). Cells grown at
high osmolarity were harvested by centrifugation and suspended at
A650 = 0.5 in 10 mM Hepes-KOH buffer, pH 7.2, 600 mM NaCl, containing 0.4% (w/v)
glucose. Transport was initiated by the addition of
[N-methyl-14C]glycine betaine (1 mM final concentration). At given time intervals, 100-µl
samples were withdrawn, filtered through Millipore HA filters, and
washed with 5 ml of buffer. The radioactivity of the filters was
counted. Osmotic downshock was performed as described in the figure
legends.
To increase the time resolution of the filtration experiments, a rapid
filtration assay was used. An aliquot (100 µl) of the suspension of
cells that had accumulated betaine at a high NaCl concentration was
deposited onto the filter, and vacuum was applied. Under these
conditions the bacteria were adsorbed to the filter and retained their
glycine betaine for at least 15 s, as shown by control experiments
in which the filters were washed with 5 ml of iso-osmotic solution,
after adsorption of the cells. Various volumes (from 5 ml to 800 µl)
of shock buffer were rapidly applied to the filters onto which the
bacteria were adsorbed. The filters were then washed with 5 ml of
buffer containing 600 mM NaCl. The permeation rate of the
shock buffer through the filter, when vacuum was applied, was
determined independently and found to be 4 ml/s. Thus, the cells loaded
with glycine betaine and adsorbed onto the filters were in contact with
the shock solution for times varying from 1.25 s to 200 ms. A
volume of 800 µl of the shock buffer was the smallest that wetted all
the bacteria deposited on the filter. Also, for smaller volumes, the
time required to deliver the solution manually became limiting.
Shock-induced Release of Thioredoxin--
Cells were suspended
at A650 = 5 in a plasmolysis buffer containing
10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 20% (w/v) sucrose, in the absence or presence of 2.5 mM EDTA, and incubated for 10 min at
room temperature. The iso-osmotic dilution or the hypo-osmotic shock
were performed by diluting 200 µl of the cell suspension 5-fold with
suspension buffer or distilled water, respectively. The cells were then
separated from the medium by centrifugation in a bench centrifuge. The
pellet was suspended in 100 µl of electrophoresis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 0.2% bromphenol blue, 10%
glycerol, 1% mercaptoethanol), and boiled for 4 min. A 4-µl aliquot
was then subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in a 15%
acrylamide gel. A 200-µl aliquot of the supernatant was incubated
overnight with 20% trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged in a bench
centrifuge. The precipitated proteins were suspended in 20 µl of
electrophoresis buffer and boiled for 4 min. A 4-µl aliquot was
subjected to electrophoresis. For determination of total thioredoxin
cell content, 1 ml of cells at A650 = 1 were centrifuged, and the pellet was suspended in 100 µl of
electrophoresis buffer. A 4-µl sample was loaded onto the gel and
subjected to electrophoresis. Western blotting was performed as
described elsewhere (33). Thioredoxin antibody and goat anti-rabbit IgG
conjugated with alkaline phosphatase were used for immunodetection.
Release of the periplasmic protein MalE was detected with MalE
antibodies provided by Dr. G. Richarme. Control experiments with
pure commercial thioredoxin, in the presence of gadolinium, were
performed to ensure that this ion does not modify immunodetection.
Quantification of the intensity of protein bands was performed by
scan densitometry.
Thioredoxin was determined enzymatically with thioredoxin reductase as
described previously (34). Osmotic downshock was performed as described
above. To determine the total thioredoxin cell content, cells were
disrupted by two passages through a French press cell. The resulting
suspension was centrifuged for 30 min at 90,000 rpm in a TL-100
ultracentrifuge (Beckman Instruments), and the supernatant was kept for
thioredoxin determination. All measurements were made in
triplicate.
 |
RESULTS |
Efflux of Potassium and Glutamate--
The first response of
E. coli cells to an osmotic upshock is an uptake of
potassium (35) which is released when the external osmolarity is
lowered (14, 17, 19). The uptake and release of potassium by E. coli cells, in response to changes in the external NaCl
concentration, were determined by monitoring the external potassium
concentration with a valinomycin electrode (29). Cells, resuspended in
a 200 mM NaCl medium were diluted 25-fold in media containing 0 to 80 mM NaCl. Upon shock, the cells lost
50-85% of their potassium content. Whatever the intensity of the
osmotic downshock, no difference was observed between wild type and
MscL strains (not shown).
In parallel with the uptake of potassium, cells synthesize and
accumulate glutamate (31, 36). In our experiments, cells (wild type,
MscL , and restored) growing in minimal medium were
subjected to a large osmotic upshock by addition of NaCl (500 mM final concentration). This resulted in the synthesis of
glutamate, the level of which reached some 300 nmol/mg of dry weight
within 10 min before declining, probably as trehalose was synthesized.
A 5-fold dilution with NaCl-free medium resulted in a monophasic
release of 80% of the internal glutamate from wild type,
MscL strains, and from the restored strain (not shown).
No clear differences between the three strains were observed in three
separate experiments.
Efflux of Trehalose--
In a second phase of adaptation to high
osmolarity media, E. coli synthesizes trehalose, which
accumulates in the cytoplasm and partially replaces potassium and
glutamate (31, 37). Cells (wild type, MscL , and restored)
growing in minimal medium were shocked by addition of NaCl (500 mM final concentration). This resulted in the synthesis of
trehalose, the level of which reached some 300 nmol/mg of dry weight
within 2 h (Fig. 1). A 5-fold
dilution with NaCl-free medium caused similar releases of trehalose
from the wild type (Fig. 1A), MscL (Fig.
1B) and restored strains (not shown). Interestingly, the release of trehalose was clearly biphasic with a rapid and a slow component in each of three similar experiments.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Shock-induced release of endogenous trehalose
in wild type (A) and MscL
(B) strains. Cells growing in M9 medium, at 37 °C,
were first subjected to a hyperosmotic shock (first arrow)
by addition of NaCl (500 mM final concentration), to induce
the synthesis of trehalose. Trehalose efflux was triggered by a
hypo-osmotic shock (second arrow) obtained by diluting the
cell culture 5-fold in the growth medium. , before osmotic upshock;
, after osmotic upshock; , after osmotic downshock.
|
|
Efflux of Glycine Betaine--
E. coli cells subjected
to an osmotic shock accumulate glycine betaine if it is present in the
external medium (38). Glycine betaine then replaces potassium glutamate
or trehalose (31). In the following experiments, cells were grown in
minimal medium in the presence of 500 mM NaCl, washed, and
suspended at room temperature in Hepes-KOH buffer, pH 7.5, containing
600 mM NaCl. Addition of 1 mM radioactive
glycine betaine to the medium resulted in the uptake of more than 1 µmol/mg of dry weight (Fig. 2). Given the cell volume, previously measured under similar osmotic conditions and in the presence of glycine betaine (39), this corresponds to a
concentration higher than 1 M. A 5-fold dilution of the
cell suspension with NaCl-free medium resulted in the total release of
glycine betaine, which was then accumulated back to a much lower level.
If, immediately after the hypo-osmotic shock and release of glycine
betaine, the initial high osmolarity of the medium was restored by
addition of concentrated NaCl, the internal concentration of glycine
betaine returned to a level similar to that present initially. This
shows that the massive efflux of glycine triggered by osmotic downshock
occurred without damage to the cells. We studied the release of betaine
from wild-type and MscL strains as a function of the
intensity of the shock. Cells that had previously accumulated glycine
betaine in a buffer containing 10 mM Hepes-KOH, pH 7.4, 600 mM NaCl, were shocked in media of decreasing concentrations
of NaCl. Efflux of glycine betaine occurred only above a threshold
corresponding to a change of about 200 mM in external NaCl
concentration. The extent of betaine release paralleled that of the
shock intensity, and no significant difference between the two strains
could be observed, regardless of intensity of the shock, in three
separate experiments (Fig. 3).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Shock-induced release of accumulated glycine
betaine from wild type cells. Cells grown in M9 medium containing
500 mM NaCl were suspended at room temperature in 10 mM Hepes-KOH buffer, pH 7.2, 600 mM NaCl
containing 0.4% (w/v) glucose. Radiolabeled glycine betaine (1 mM final concentration) was added at zero time to initiate
glycine betaine uptake, and samples were withdrawn and filtered at
intervals. After 150 min the suspension was divided into three
fractions. The first served as a control ( ), the second ( ) and
the third ( ) were diluted 5-fold in the same medium devoid of NaCl
and glycine betaine. Immediately after the osmotic downshock, the
initial high osmolarity of the medium was restored in the third
fraction ( ) by addition of concentrated NaCl without further
addition of glycine betaine. At intervals, samples were withdrawn and
filtered, and the filters were counted for radioactivity.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Release of accumulated glycine betaine as a
function of shock intensity in wild type ( ) and MscL
( ) strains. Cells that had accumulated glycine betaine in a
buffer containing 600 mM NaCl were subjected to osmotic
shock by a 5-fold dilution of the suspension with shock media of
various NaCl concentrations (0-600 mM). The diluted
suspension was filtered, and the filters were counted for
radioactivity. The glycine betaine content retained in the cells after
the shock is plotted against the NaCl concentration of the shock
medium.
|
|
Gadolinium is the only known inhibitor of bacterial MS channels (14),
and it is unfortunately relatively nonspecific. It could not be used in
the trehalose experiments because it precipitates with phosphate in
culture media. We examined its possible inhibitory effect on the
release of glycine betaine. However, in the absence of shock, when the
cells were simply diluted in an iso-osmotic medium containing 1 mM gadolinium, 30% of the internal glycine betaine was
released as compared with the control. The reason for this effect is
unclear.
In all these experiments, the release of glycine betaine was completed
within the 3-4 s required to dilute and filter the cell suspension. We
attempted to increase the time resolution of our experiments by
performing the rapid filtration assay described under "Experimental
Procedures." We found that the complete release of glycine betaine
took less than 200 ms, the limit of resolution for this assay. No
difference was observed between the strains for this type of assay,
whatever the intensity of the shock.
Efflux of Thioredoxin--
Some small cytosolic proteins are
released by osmotic shock from Tris-EDTA treated E. coli
cells (24-27). Our results confirm this surprising finding for
thioredoxin. Cells were resuspended in a plasmolysis medium and
subjected to an osmotic downshock by a 5-fold dilution in water as
described previously (25), and release of thioredoxin was monitored by
immunodetection. The Tris-EDTA treatment that disrupts the outer
membrane was found essential; no release of thioredoxin was observed in
the absence of treatment (Fig.
4A). While no release of
thioredoxin was observed when Tris-EDTA-treated cells were simply
diluted in an iso-osmotic medium, the release was total when the cells
were osmotically shocked (Fig. 4B). Release was totally
blocked by 1 mM gadolinium in the shock medium (Fig.
4B). In the MscL strain, release was severely
impaired and most of the thioredoxin remained in the cells (Fig.
4C). Significantly, in the restored strain, the efflux of
thioredoxin was similar to that found for the wild type strain (Fig.
4C). A trivial explanation for these results could be that,
for unknown reasons, the outer membrane in MscL is more
resistant to the Tris-EDTA treatment; thioredoxin would then simply
remain trapped in the periplasm. Fig. 4D shows that such is
not the case. The release, triggered by osmotic shock, of the
periplasmic maltose binding protein MalE was similar in both wild type
and MscL cells (n = 2). The impairment of
thioredoxin release in MscL was observed in six separate
experiments. However, it was never complete. Moreover, it showed some
variability; the amount of thioredoxin released by MscL
cells ranged from 19 to 40% of the total cell content
versus 99-100% in wild type cells (e.g. compare
Fig. 4, C and D). Finally, we studied the same
phenomenon using a different, quantitative, assay in which thioredoxin
was enzymatically determined with thioredoxin reductase (34). In all
three strains, the cell thioredoxin content was found to be about 60 pmol/mg of dry weight in good agreement with a previous determination
(25). In three separate experiments, a 90-100% release of thioredoxin
was observed from wild type EDTA-treated cells upon osmotic shock. In
contrast, MscL EDTA-treated cells released only 16-20%
of their total thioredoxin. In the mutant expressing the
mscL gene, 82-90% of thioredoxin was released upon
shock.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Shock-induced release of thioredoxin.
A, thioredoxin is not released by cells that have not been
treated by EDTA. Wild type cells were suspended in 10 mM
Tris, pH 7.6, 20% (w/v) sucrose, and diluted 5-fold with the same
buffer (iso-osmotic dilution) or distilled water (osmotic shock). The
suspension was centrifuged, and the presence of thioredoxin in the
pellet and in the supernatant, after trichloroacetic acid
precipitation, was revealed by immunoblotting. 1,
thioredoxin cell content before dilution or shock; 2,
thioredoxin in the pellet (P) and supernatant
(S), after iso-osmotic dilution; 3, thioredoxin
in the pellet and supernatant after osmotic shock; 4,
thioredoxin in the pellet and supernatant after osmotic shock in the
presence of 1 mM gadolinium. B, release of
thioredoxin after EDTA treatment. Wild type cells were suspended in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 2.5 mM EDTA, 20% (w/v)
sucrose and diluted 5-fold with the same buffer or distilled water.
1, 2, and 3 are as indicated above.
C, release of thioredoxin is impaired in
MscL . Wild type (WT), MscL and
restored (R) cells were EDTA-treated and subjected to an
osmotic shock. After centrifugation, thioredoxin in the pellet
(P) and in the supernatant (S) was revealed by
immunoblotting. Quantification of protein bands by densitometry
indicated that the release of thioredoxin from wild type,
MscL , and restored cells represented, respectively, 99, 34, and 88% of the total thioredoxin content of each strain.
D, retention of thioredoxin in MscL cells is
not due to an inadequate treatment of the outer membrane for this
strain. Wild type (WT) and MscL cells were
EDTA-treated, shocked, and centrifuged. The release of the periplasmic
binding protein MalE to the supernatant (S), detected by
immunoblotting, was similar, indicating that in both strains the
Tris-EDTA treatment annihilated the outer membrane. In contrast, the
release of thioredoxin from wild type and MscL cells
represented, respectively, 100 and 19% of the total thioredoxin
content of each strain.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The study of osmoregulation in bacteria had initially focused on
the accumulation of potassium and osmoprotectants following osmotic
upshock. More recent reports, dealing with different bacterial species,
have shown that osmoprotectants are released upon osmotic downshock
(18-23). As shown here for glycine betaine, efflux occurs without
lysis of the cells, and the cells are able to accumulate glycine
betaine again immediately after the shock if necessary. This efflux is
thus clearly an important physiological process, probably widespread in
bacteria, which allows an immediate release of membrane tension. The
efflux pathways have not been identified, but they clearly differ from
the transport systems used for influx. In L. plantarum a
fast and a slow efflux of glycine betaine were reported (21). No slow
phase of glycine betaine efflux was observed in our experiments, but it
may have been masked by reuptake. It is noteworthy that we observed a
biphasic release of trehalose, which is not transported back into the
cells. It was proposed that the slow component of glycine betaine
efflux in L. plantarum is carrier-mediated. A similar system
may exist for trehalose in E. coli. A fast component of
efflux was observed for all osmoprotectants. It is highly probable that
it is channel-mediated. This conclusion is dictated by the extreme
rapidity of the phenomenon. In this study we attempted to increase the
time resolution. The efflux rate of glycine betaine was found to be
higher than 300,000 nmol/min/mg of dry weight, a figure which is not
compatible with a carrier-mediated process. The high conductance MS
channels present in the cell membrane of bacteria are therefore obvious
candidates for the fast efflux pathway (14, 15). Nevertheless, we have
shown here that deletion of mscL, the only known gene that
codes for a bacterial MS channel (4), has no detectable effect on the release of K+, glutamate, trehalose, and glycine betaine.
However, as MscM and MscS channels are present (3), this does not rule
out the involvement of MS channels in the process.
A few cytoplasmic proteins including thioredoxin, translation
elongation factor Tu, and DnaK are known to be released by osmotic shock (24-26). Release of these cytoplasmic proteins has been
documented in Tris-EDTA-treated cells. When this treatment was omitted,
thioredoxin was not excreted into the external medium (23) (this
study). As the Tris-EDTA treatment disrupts the outer membrane, in
intact cells, thioredoxin is in fact released during shock from the
cytoplasm to the periplasm. Thioredoxin is a 12-kDa protein that
participates in several thiol-dependent, cellular-reductive
processes (40). The physiological significance of this transfer of
thioredoxin into the periplasm is unclear.
The release of thioredoxin was severely impaired in cells lacking MscL,
and was totally blocked by gadolinium, an inhibitor of bacterial MS
channels (14), and in particular of MscL (5). This demonstrates clearly
that most of the thioredoxin efflux occurs via MscL. Residual
thioredoxin efflux may be carried by MscS. The finding that a protein
can pass through a channel is unexpected and surprising. However, the
conductance of MscL (1500 pS in 0.1 M KCl) is unusually
high for an endogenous channel. The size of the open channel pore was
recently probed experimentally by measuring blockade of MscL by large
organic polymers (poly-L-lysines) of increasing sizes. The
open pore diameter was estimated to be around 40 Å, consistent with
direct calculation based on the channel conductance (41). The size of
the thioredoxin molecule, determined by x-ray diffraction studies, is
25 × 30 × 35 Å (42). It is thus compatible with that of
the pore. In this context, it is noteworthy that high conductance MS
channels of B. subtilis, reconstituted in a planar lipid
bilayer, have recently been found to be able to catalyze the transfer
of double-stranded DNA (43).
Our results demonstrate for the first time that the opening of MscL
does occur in vivo, during osmotic shock. This could not be
inferred from previous patch-clamp studies. In these experiments, negative pressure is applied via the pipette to the patch, but the
relevant parameter is the membrane tension which is related to pressure
by Laplace's law, via the radius of curvature of the patch. The radius
of curvature of the patch, which cannot be evaluated easily, differs
from that of the cells. These considerations have precluded a simple
comparison between the pressure applied in patch-clamp experiments and
the intensity of osmotic shock felt by intact cells.
MscL is the channel with the highest conductance, which requires the
highest tension to open (2). Therefore, if MscL opens during osmotic
shock, so do the other MS channels, MscM and MscS. It is thus highly
probable that rapid efflux of osmoprotectants occurs via these channels
(and via MscL in the wild type). MscL is present in a the large number
of bacteria (9). If it is not required for osmoprotectant efflux, at
least when MscS and MscM are present, what is its physiological role?
One possibility is that, being activated at the highest tension, it is
an emergency device used as a last resort. The multiplicity of MS
channels present in bacteria would reflect a redundancy dictated by the importance of osmoregulation for cell viability. Another possibility, which might account for the unusually high conductance of MscL, is that
transfer of some proteins from the cytoplasm to the periplasm during
osmotic shock, as documented herein for thioredoxin, has a
physiological meaning which is not understood at present.
In conclusion, we have shown that MscL opens during osmotic downshock
and is responsible for the release of thioredoxin, and possibly of
other small proteins. A full understanding of the process taking place
during osmotic downshock will require the identification of the various
genes coding for MS channels in E. coli.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Dr. P. Blount for the gift
of the three strains used in this study. We thank Dr. Richarme for the
gift of the antibody against MalE and Dr. L. Letellier for help with the potassium electrode. We also thank Dr. D. Le Rudulier for advice
concerning the synthesis and purification of glycine betaine and Dr. B. Martinac for communication of a manuscript prior to publication.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: URA CNRS 1218, Faculté de Pharmacie,
Université Paris-Sud, 5 rue Jean-Baptiste Clément 92296 Châtenay-Malabry Cedex, France.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel.: 33 1 69 15 71 94;
Fax: 33 1 69 85 37 15; E-mail:
alexandre.ghazi{at}biomembr.u-psud.fr.
The abbreviation used is:
MS, mechanosensitive.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Sukharev, S. I.,
Blount, P.,
Martinac, B.,
and Kung, C.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
59,
633-657[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Le Dain, A. C.,
Saint, N.,
Kloda, A.,
Ghazi, A.,
and Martinac, B.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
12116-12119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Berrier, C.,
Besnard, M.,
Ajouz, B.,
Coulombe, A.,
and Ghazi, A.
(1996)
J. Membr. Biol.
151,
175-187[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sukharev, S. I.,
Blount, P.,
Martinac, B.,
Blattner, F. R.,
and Kung, C.
(1994)
Nature
368,
265-268[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Häse, C. C.,
Le Dain, A. C.,
and Martinac, B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
18329-18334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Blount, P.,
Sukharev, S. I.,
Moe, P. C.,
Shroeder, M. J.,
Guy, H. R.,
and Kung, C.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
4798-4805[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Saint, N.,
Lacapère, J-J.,
Gu, L. Q.,
Ghazi, A.,
Martinac, B.,
and Rigaud, J-L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14667-14670[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Häse, C. C.,
Minchin, R. F.,
Kloda, A.,
and Martinac, B.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
232,
777-782[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Moe, P. C.,
Blount, P.,
and Kung, C.
(1998)
Mol. Microbiol.
28,
583-592[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tsapis, A.,
and Kepes, A.
(1977)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
469,
1-12[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zoratti, M.,
and Petronilli, V.
(1988)
FEBS Lett.
240,
105-109[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Berrier, C.,
Coulombe, A.,
Houssin, C.,
and Ghazi, A.
(1989)
FEBS Lett.
259,
27-32[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zoratti, M.,
Petronilli, V.,
and Szabó, I.
(1990)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
168,
443-450[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Berrier, C.,
Coulombe, A.,
Szabó, I.,
Zoratti, M.,
and Ghazi, A.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
206,
559-565[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zoratti, M.,
and Ghazi, A.
(1993)
in
Alkali Transport Systems in Prokaryotes (Bakker, E. P., ed), pp. 349-358, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
-
Csonka, L. N.,
and Epstein, W.
(1996)
in
Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, Cellular and Molecular Biology (Neidhardt, F. C., ed), pp. 1210-1223, ASM Press, Washington, D. C.
-
Meury, J.,
Robin, A.,
and Monnier-Champeix, P.
(1985)
Eur. J. Biochem.
151,
613-619[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lamark, T.,
Styrvold, O. B.,
and Strom, A. R.
(1992)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
75,
149-154[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schleyer, M.,
Schmid, R.,
and Bakker, E. P.
(1993)
Arch. Microbiol.
160,
424-431[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Koo, S. P.,
Higgins, S. F.,
and Booth, I. R.
(1991)
J. Gen. Microbiol.
137,
2617-2625[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Glaasker, E.,
Konings, W.,
and Poolman, B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
10060-10065[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ruffert, S.,
Lambert, C.,
Peter, H.,
Wendisch, V. F.,
and Krämer, R.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
247,
572-580[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Verheul, A.,
Glaasker, E.,
Poolman, B.,
and Abee, T.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
6979-6985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jacobson, G. R.,
and Rosenbusch, J. P.
(1976)
Nature
261,
23-26[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lunn, C. A.,
and Pigiet, V. P.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
11424-11430[Free Full Text]
-
El Yaacoubi, A.,
Kohiyama, M.,
and Richarme, G.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
7074-7078[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Beacham, I. R.
(1979)
Int. J. Biochem.
10,
877-883[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Armstrong, J. B.,
Adler, J.,
and Dahl, M. M.
(1967)
J. Bacteriol.
93,
390-398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Boulanger, P.,
and Letellier, L.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
9767-9775[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Beutler, H. O.
(1985)
in
Methods of Enzymatic Analysis (Bermeyer, H. U., ed), Vol. 8, pp. 369-376, Verlag Chemie, Deerfield Beach, FL
-
Dinnibier, U.,
Limpinsel, E.,
Schmid, R.,
and Bakker, E. P.
(1988)
Arch. Microbiol.
150,
348-357[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ikuta, S.,
Matuura, K.,
Imamura, S.,
Misaki, H.,
and Horiuti, Y.
(1977)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
82,
157-163[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Towbin, H.,
Staehelin, T.,
and Gordon, J.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
4350-4354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Holmgren, A.,
Ohlsson, I.,
and Grankvist, M. L.
(1978)
J. Biol. Chem.
253,
430-436[Free Full Text]
-
Epstein, W.,
and Schultz, S. G.
(1965)
J. Gen. Physiol.
49,
221-234[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McLaggan, D.,
Naprstek, J.,
Buurman, E. T.,
and Epstein, W.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1911-1917[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Larsen, P. I.,
Sydnes, L. K.,
Landfald, B.,
and Strom, A. R.
(1987)
Arch. Microbiol.
147,
1-7[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Perroud, B.,
and Le Rudulier, D.
(1985)
J. Bacteriol.
161,
393-401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Houssin, C.,
Eynard, N.,
Shechter, E.,
and Ghazi, A.
(1991)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1056,
76-84[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Holmgren, A.
(1985)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
54,
237-271[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cruickshank, C. C.,
Minchin, R. F.,
Le Dain, A. C.,
and Martinac, B.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
73,
1925-1931[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Katti, S. K.,
LeMaster, D. M.,
and Eklund, H.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
212,
167-184[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Szabó, I.,
Bathori, G.,
Tombola, F.,
Brini, M.,
Coppola, A.,
and Zoratti, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
25275-25282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Dotsch, J. Severin, W. Alt, E. A. Galinski, and J.-U. Kreft
A mathematical model for growth and osmoregulation in halophilic bacteria
Microbiology,
October 1, 2008;
154(10):
2956 - 2969.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Ren, X. Wang, S. Hao, H. Hu, and C.-c. Wang
Translocation of {alpha}-Synuclein Expressed in Escherichia coli
J. Bacteriol.,
April 1, 2007;
189(7):
2777 - 2786.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kocer, M. Walko, W. Meijberg, and B. L. Feringa
A Light-Actuated Nanovalve Derived from a Channel Protein
Science,
July 29, 2005;
309(5735):
755 - 758.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. A. Folgering, P. C. Moe, G. K. Schuurman-Wolters, P. Blount, and B. Poolman
Lactococcus lactis Uses MscL as Its Principal Mechanosensitive Channel
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 11, 2005;
280(10):
8784 - 8792.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Syntichaki and N. Tavernarakis
Genetic Models of Mechanotransduction: The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
Physiol Rev,
October 1, 2004;
84(4):
1097 - 1153.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Koprowski and A. Kubalski
C Termini of the Escherichia coli Mechanosensitive Ion Channel (MscS) Move Apart upon the Channel Opening
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 21, 2003;
278(13):
11237 - 11245.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Anishkin, V. Gendel, N. A. Sharifi, C.-S. Chiang, L. Shirinian, H. R. Guy, and S. Sukharev
On the Conformation of the COOH-terminal Domain of the Large Mechanosensitive Channel MscL
J. Gen. Physiol.,
February 24, 2003;
121(3):
227 - 244.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. F. Batiza, M. M.-C. Kuo, K. Yoshimura, and C. Kung
Gating the bacterial mechanosensitive channel MscL invivo
PNAS,
April 16, 2002;
99(8):
5643 - 5648.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. U. Kuhlmann and E. Bremer
Osmotically Regulated Synthesis of the Compatible Solute Ectoine in Bacillus pasteurii and Related Bacillus spp.
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
February 1, 2002;
68(2):
772 - 783.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Vázquez-Laslop, H. Lee, R. Hu, and A. A. Neyfakh
Molecular Sieve Mechanism of Selective Release of Cytoplasmic Proteins by Osmotically Shocked Escherichia coli
J. Bacteriol.,
April 15, 2001;
183(8):
2399 - 2404.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. P. Hamill and B. Martinac
Molecular Basis of Mechanotransduction in Living Cells
Physiol Rev,
April 1, 2001;
81(2):
685 - 740.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Sardesai and J. Gowrishankar
trans-Acting Mutations in Loci Other than kdpDE That Affect kdp Operon Regulation in Escherichia coli: Effects of Cytoplasmic Thiol Oxidation Status and Nucleoid Protein H-NS on kdp Expression
J. Bacteriol.,
January 1, 2001;
183(1):
86 - 93.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Saier Jr.
A Functional-Phylogenetic Classification System for Transmembrane Solute Transporters
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
June 1, 2000;
64(2):
354 - 411.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. K. Ray, G. Zeng, M. B. Potters, A. M. Mansuri, and T. J. Larson
Characterization of a 12-Kilodalton Rhodanese Encoded by glpE of Escherichia coli and Its Interaction with Thioredoxin
J. Bacteriol.,
April 15, 2000;
182(8):
2277 - 2284.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Rees, G. Chang, and R. H. Spencer
Crystallographic Analyses of Ion Channels: Lessons and Challenges
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 14, 2000;
275(2):
713 - 716.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Ajouz, C. Berrier, M. Besnard, B. Martinac, and A. Ghazi
Contributions of the Different Extramembranous Domains of the Mechanosensitive Ion Channel MscL to Its Response to Membrane Tension
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 14, 2000;
275(2):
1015 - 1022.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Berrier, A. Garrigues, G. Richarme, and A. Ghazi
Elongation Factor Tu and DnaK Are Transferred from the Cytoplasm to the Periplasm of Escherichia coli during Osmotic Downshock Presumably via the Mechanosensitive Channel MscL
J. Bacteriol.,
January 1, 2000;
182(1):
248 - 251.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. SUKHAREV
Mechanosensitive channels in bacteria as membrane tension reporters
FASEB J,
May 1, 1999;
13(9001):
55 - 61.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ruffert, C. Berrier, R. Krämer, and A. Ghazi
Identification of Mechanosensitive Ion Channels in the Cytoplasmic Membrane of Corynebacterium glutamicum
J. Bacteriol.,
March 1, 1999;
181(5):
1673 - 1676.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|