|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 42, 27076-27083, October 16, 1998
-Atracotoxins from Australian Funnel-web Spiders Compete with
Scorpion -Toxin Binding but Differentially Modulate Alkaloid Toxin
Activation of Voltage-gated Sodium Channels*
Michelle J.
Little ,
Cathy
Zappia ,
Nicolas
Gilles§,
Mark
Connor¶,
Margaret I.
Tyler **,
Marie-France
Martin-Eauclaire ,
Dalia
Gordon§§§, and
Graham M.
Nicholson ¶¶
From the Department of Health Sciences, University of
Technology, Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales 2007, Australia, the
¶ Department of Pharmacology, University of Sydney,
New South Wales 2006, Australia, Deakin Research Ltd., CSIRO
Division of Food Processing, North Ryde, New South Wales 2113, Australia,  UMR 6560 CNRS, Laboratoire de Biochimie,
Université de la Mediterranée, I. F. R. Jean Roche,
13916 Marseille, Cedex 20, France, and § CEA,
C. E. Saclay, Département d'Ingénierie et d'Etudes des
Protéines, Gif-sur-Yvette F-91911, France
 |
ABSTRACT |
-Atracotoxins from the venom of Australian
funnel-web spiders are a unique group of peptide toxins that slow
sodium current inactivation in a manner similar to scorpion -toxins.
To analyze their interaction with known sodium channel neurotoxin
receptor sites, we studied their effect on
[3H]batrachotoxin and 125I-Lqh II
(where Lqh is -toxin II from the venom of the scorpion Leiurus
quinquestriatus hebraeus) binding and on alkaloid
toxin-stimulated 22Na+ uptake in rat brain
synaptosomes. -Atracotoxins significantly increased
[3H]batrachotoxin binding yet decreased maximal
batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake by
70-80%, the latter in marked contrast to the effect of scorpion
-toxins. Unlike the inhibition of batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake, -atracotoxins increased
veratridine-stimulated 22Na+ uptake by
converting veratridine from a partial to a full agonist, analogous to
scorpion -toxins. Hence, -atracotoxins are able to differentiate
between the open state of the sodium channel stabilized by
batrachotoxin and veratridine and suggest a distinct sub-conductance
state stabilized by -atracotoxins. Despite these actions, low
concentrations of -atracotoxins completely inhibited the binding of
the scorpion -toxin, 125I-Lqh II, indicating that they
bind to similar, or partially overlapping, receptor sites. The apparent
uncoupling between the increase in binding but inhibition of the effect
of batrachotoxin induced by -atracotoxins suggests that the binding
and action of certain alkaloid toxins may represent at least two
distinguishable steps. These results further contribute to the
understanding of the complex dynamic interactions between neurotoxin
receptor site areas related to sodium channel gating.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The venom from Australian funnel-web spiders (Araneae:
Hexathelidae: Atracinae) appears to contain a variety of neurotoxins that target various ionic channels in excitable cells, including calcium (1) and potassium channels (2). The toxins so far identified to
be responsible for severe envenomation or lethality in humans, however,
were shown to be two peptide neurotoxins that target the voltage-gated
sodium channel:
-atracotoxin-Ar11
(formerly robustoxin) from Atrax robustus and
-atracotoxin-Hv1 (formerly versutoxin) from Hadronyche
versuta (3, 4). -Atracotoxin-Hv1 and -atracotoxin-Ar1 have
been shown to exert their neurotoxicity by slowing or removing
tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium current inactivation in rat dorsal root
ganglion neurons (5, 6), an action similar to that of polypeptide
scorpion -toxins and sea anemone toxins (7).
Both -atracotoxin-Ar1 and -atracotoxin-Hv1 consist of 42 amino
acids and are highly homologous with only 7 substitutions. These toxins
show no significant sequence homology with any presently known
neurotoxins. Both spider toxins have a high proportion of basic
residues and appear to be tightly folded molecules containing four
conserved disulfide bonds, including N- and C-terminal cysteines. Recently, the three-dimensional solution structure for
-atracotoxin-Hv1 (8) and -atracotoxin-Ar1 (9) has been
determined. Both display a small three-stranded anti-parallel -sheet
with an "inhibitor cystine knot" motif (10). Interestingly the
three-dimensional fold of these toxins is different from the previously
determined structures of the scorpion -toxins AaH II (11) and
Lqh IT (12) despite similar actions on sodium current inactivation
(13, 14).
Out of the seven identified neurotoxin receptor sites on the
voltage-gated sodium channel, determined by direct radiolabeled toxin
studies, at least two receptor sites were shown to bind various peptide
toxins from different animal venoms that inhibit sodium current
inactivation. Scorpion -toxins and sea anemone toxins such as ATX II
bind to the so-called neurotoxin receptor site 3 and -conotoxins
which bind to receptor site 6 on the -subunit of the sodium channel
(Refs. 15 and 16; for a review see Refs. 7 and 17). Both of these
receptor sites have been shown to have complex allosteric interactions
with neurotoxin receptor site 2 shown to bind several alkaloid toxins
such as batrachotoxin and veratridine (17). The alkaloid toxins induce
persistent activation of sodium channels by shifting the voltage
dependence of activation to very negative membrane potentials and
inhibiting the inactivation process (18, 19). Scorpion -toxins were shown to cooperatively enhance the effect of alkaloid toxins by increasing their binding affinity and activity (20, 21).
Based on apparent similarity in the effect of scorpion -toxins and
-atracotoxins, the aim of the present study was to determine the
likely receptor binding site of funnel-web spider toxins on the sodium
channel and their possible interaction with alkaloid toxin binding and
action using both 22Na+ uptake and radiolabeled
neurotoxin binding assays. We report that -atracotoxins interact
with nanomolar affinities with neurotoxin receptor site 3 in rat brain
synaptosomes but exhibit unusual allosteric interactions with the site
2 alkaloid toxin receptor.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Purification of Toxins--
Colonies of male A. robustus and female H. versuta spiders were
"milked" by direct aspiration from the chelicerae of live spiders
using glass pipettes. Collected crude venom was flushed from pipettes
using 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid and initial fractionation
performed via reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography
(HPLC) using a Vydac semi-preparative column (C18, 10.4 × 250 mm, 15 µm) on a Waters HPLC system. Elution of venom components was performed using a linear gradient of 0-60%
acetonitrile, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid over 36 min with a flow rate
of 4 ml/min. The fraction containing -atracotoxin-Ar1 eluted with
approximately 43% acetonitrile, whereas -atracotoxin-Hv1 eluted
with 40% acetonitrile. These fractions were lyophilized and then
resuspended in 25% acetonitrile, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in
preparation for further purification on a Vydac analytical column
(C18, 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm). The funnel-web spider
toxins were eluted from the analytical column using a linear gradient
of 25-50% acetonitrile, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid over 30 min at a
flow rate of 1 ml/min. Purity of eluted toxins was confirmed by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under reducing and alkylating
conditions with a Tris/Tricine buffer system. Protein concentration was
determined using amino acid composition analysis. Toxins were stored
lyophilized at 20 °C until required, at which time they were
dissolved in 20 mM HEPES-Tris (pH 6.0, 4 °C).
Other Chemicals--
AaH II and Lqh II were purified according
to the methods of Miranda et al. (22) and Sautière
et al. (23) respectively. Batrachotoxin was a generous gift
from Dr. John Daly (Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, NIDDK, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda). Lqh II (catalogue number LTX001) was
purchased from Latoxan (AP-1724, 05150 Rosans, France). Tetrodotoxin
was purchased from Calbiochem (Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia),
and veratridine was obtained from Sigma. [3H]BTX and
carrier-free 22Na+ were purchased from NEN Life
Science Products. All other chemicals were of analytical or HPLC
grade.
Electrophysiological Recordings--
Whole cell patch clamp
recordings of tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium currents were made from
both dorsal root ganglion and periaqueductal gray neurons. Acutely
dissociated dorsal ganglion neurons were prepared from 4- to 12-day-old
Wistar rats according to the methods of Nicholson et al. (5,
6). Micropipettes (0.67-2 megohms) were pulled from borosilicate glass
capillary tubing and were filled with (in mM) CsF 135, NaCl
10, HEPES 5 with the pH adjusted to 7.0 with 1 M CsOH. The
external solution contained (in mM) NaCl 30, MgCl2 1, CaCl2 1.8, CsCl 5, KCl 5, D-glucose 25, HEPES 5, tetraethylammonium (TEA) chloride
20, tetramethylammonium chloride 70, with the pH adjusted to 7.4 with 1 M TEA hydroxide. Membrane current recordings were made at
ambient room temperature (22-25 °C). Large round light dorsal root
ganglion cells with diameters of 20-40 µm were selected for
experiments.
Acutely dissociated periaqueductal gray neurons from adult
Sprague- Dawley rats were prepared according to the methods of Connor
and Christie (24) based on procedures outlined in Ingram et
al. (25). Briefly, horizontal midbrain slices (between 270 and 300 µm thick) containing the periaqueductal gray were cut with a
vibratome. Slices were then incubated for 2 min at 35 °C in 20 units/ml papain (pH 7.3). The slices were then placed in fresh solution
containing 1 mg/ml BSA and 1 mg/ml trypsin inhibitor, and the
periaqueductal gray region was subdissected from each slice with a fine
tungsten wire and cells dissociated from the slices by gentle
trituration. Micropipettes (2-4 megohms) were pulled from borosilicate
glass capillary tubing and were filled with (in mM) CsCl
110, NaCl 20, EGTA 10, CaCl2 2, MgATP 2, HEPES 10 with the
pH adjusted to 7.3 with 1 M CsOH. The external solution contained (in mM) NaCl 80, TEA chloride 60, MgCl2 5, CsCl 5, D-glucose 10; HEPES 10 with
the pH adjusted to 7.4 with 1 M TEA hydroxide. Membrane
current recordings were made at room temperature (21-25 °C).
The experiments used in this study were rejected if there were large
leak currents or currents showed signs of poor space clamping such as
an abrupt activation of currents upon relatively small depolarizing
pulses. Stimulation and recording were both controlled by an AxoData or
pClamp data acquisition system (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA).
Data were filtered at 5 kHz (low pass Bessel filter), and digital
sampling rate was 25-50 kHz. Leakage and capacitative currents were
digitally subtracted with P-P/4 procedures, and series resistance
compensation was >80% for all cells.
Neuronal Membrane Preparations--
Synaptosomes for
22Na+ uptake and [3H]BTX binding
assays were prepared from brains of male Wistar rats (4-8 weeks,
250-350 g) using a combination of homogenization and differential and
density gradient centrifugation according to the method of Gray and
Whittaker (26) as described by Tamkun and Catterall (27). Synaptosomes were suspended in a solution consisting of (in mM) choline
chloride 130, KCl 5.4, MgSO4 0.8, D-glucose
5.5, and HEPES-Tris 50 (pH 7.4, 37 °C) and were stored in liquid
nitrogen until required for 22Na+ uptake
assays, or used within 3 h of preparation for
[3H]BTX binding assays. For 125I-Lqh II
binding studies, rat brain synaptosomes were prepared according to the
method of Kanner (28) using (in mM) D-mannitol 300, EDTA 10, HEPES 10 (pH 7.4, 4 °C), and Ficoll (type 400 Sigma) gradients (14). A combination of proteinase inhibitors consisting of
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (50 µg/ml), pepstatin A (1 µM), iodoacetamide (1 mM), and
1,10-phenanthroline (1 mM) was present in all buffers used
for this procedure. Synaptosomes were frozen at 80 °C in mannitol
buffer until use. Membrane protein concentration was determined using a
Bio-Rad protein assay with BSA as a standard.
Measurement of 22Na+ Uptake--
The
effect of -atracotoxins on 22Na+ uptake in
rat brain synaptosomes was measured using the method described by
Tamkun and Catterall (27). Briefly, rat brain synaptosomes (500 µg of
membrane protein) were preincubated for 10 min with toxins in 100 µl
of sodium-free preincubation medium at 37 °C. The preincubation
22Na+ uptake medium contained (in
mM) choline chloride 130, KCl 5.4, MgSO4 0.8, glucose 5.5, HEPES-Tris (pH 7.4) 50, and 1 mg/ml BSA. Uptake was
initiated by adding 150 µl of assay medium containing (in
mM) choline chloride 128, KCl 5.4, MgSO4 0.8, glucose 5.5, HEPES-Tris (pH 7.4) 50, NaCl 2.66, ouabain 5, 1 mg/ml BSA,
and 0.9 µCi/ml carrier-free 22NaCl. After 5 s at
37 °C, uptake was terminated by the addition of 4 ml of ice-cold
wash solution and rapid filtration through 0.45-µm nitrocellulose
membrane filters (Millipore, Sydney, Australia). The wash solution
consisted of (mM) choline chloride 163, CaCl2 1.8, MgSO4 0.8, HEPES-Tris (pH 7.4) 5, and 1 mg/ml BSA. Maximal 22Na+ uptake was determined in the presence of
1 µM batrachotoxin, whereas uptake not mediated by the
voltage-gated sodium channel was determined in the presence of 1 µM TTX. Nonspecific 22Na+ uptake
was typically less than 35% of total uptake.
Binding Assays--
Equilibrium competition and saturation
assays were performed using increasing concentrations of the unlabeled
toxin in the presence of a constant low concentration of the
radiolabeled toxin. In order to obtain saturation curves ("cold"
saturation), the specific radioactivity and the amount of bound toxin
were calculated and determined for each toxin concentration.
Equilibrium saturation or competition experiments were analyzed by the
iterative computer program LIGAND, using "Cold saturation" and
"Drug" analysis, respectively (Elsevier Biosoft, UK). The
composition of the binding medium for 125I-Lqh II binding
was (in mM) choline Cl 140, CaCl2 1.8, KCl 5.4, MgSO4 0.8, HEPES 25 (pH 7.4); D-glucose 10, BSA
2 mg/ml. Wash buffer composition was (in mM) choline Cl
140, CaCl2 1.8, KCl 5.4, MgSO4 0.8, HEPES 25 (pH 7.4), BSA 5 mg/ml. [3H]BTX binding experiments used
the preincubation medium and wash solution as for
22Na+ uptake experiments (see above). After
incubation, reactions were terminated by dilution with 4 ml of ice-cold
wash solution for [3H]BTX binding experiments or 2 ml of
ice-cold wash solution for 125I-Lqh II binding experiments.
Separation of free from bound toxin was achieved by rapid filtration
under vacuum using Whatman GF/C filters. The filter discs were washed
with a further 2 × 4 ml of wash solution for
[3H]BTX binding or 2 × 2 ml washes for
125I-Lqh II binding.
[3H]BTX Binding Experiments--
Experiments were
performed according to a modification of the method described by
Catterall and colleagues (29). Rat brain synaptosomes (350 µg of
protein/ml) were suspended in 0.2 ml of buffer containing 15 nM [3H]BTX (0.8 µCi). After incubation for
50 min at 37 °C, the reaction mixture was diluted with 4 ml of
ice-cold wash buffer and filtered. Nonspecific binding was determined
in the presence of 300 µM veratridine and was typically
5-15% of total binding. Equilibrium saturation experiments were
analyzed using EBDA and LIGAND computer programs (Elsevier Biosoft,
UK).
125I-Lqh II Binding Assays--
Lqh II was iodinated
by IODO-GEN (Pierce) using 5 µg of toxin and 0.5 mCi of carrier-free
Na125I according to Gordon and Zlotkin (30). Competition
binding experiments using 125I-Lqh II were performed
according to the methods of Gordon et al. (31). The
monoiodotoxin was purified via reverse-phase HPLC using a Vydac
C18 column and a gradient of 5-90% B (A = 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid, B = acetonitrile, 0.1% trifluoroacetic
acid) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min, as described by Cestèle
et al. (32). The concentration of the radiolabeled toxins
was determined according to the specific activity of the
125I corresponding to 4200-3450 dpm/fmol monoiodotoxin,
depending on the time of use (the age of the iodine). Rat brain
synaptosomes (40-50 µg protein/ml) were suspended in 0.2 ml of
binding buffer, containing 125I-Lqh II. After incubation
for 15 min at 22 °C, the reaction mixture was diluted with 2 ml of
ice-cold wash buffer and filtered. Nonspecific toxin binding was
determined in the presence of 100 nM unlabeled Lqh II and
consisted typically of 5-10% of total binding.
Data Analysis--
The IC50 values
obtained for inhibition of 125I-Lqh II binding were
converted to Ki values according to the relationship described by Cheng and Prusoff (33). Equilibrium saturation of
[3H]BTX binding data was fitted according to the
following single-site hyperbolic equation mathematically equivalent to
the Langmuir isotherm.
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where Bmax is the maximal number of moles
of [3H]BTX bound, Kd is the
dissociation constant for [3H]BTX, and x is
the total concentration of batrachotoxin.
Mathematical curve fitting was accomplished using SigmaPlot version
4.14 for Macintosh. All curve fitting routines used a nonlinear least
squares method and splining routines. All data are presented as
means ± S.E. All experiments were performed in duplicate or
triplicate.
 |
RESULTS |
Effect of -Atracotoxins on Sodium
Currents--
Electrophysiological studies using whole cell patch
clamp of dorsal root ganglion neurones have shown that -atracotoxins slow sodium current inactivation and shift the voltage dependence of
activation in a manner similar to scorpion -toxins (5, 6). As shown
in Fig. 1, A and B,
30 nM -atracotoxin-Hv1 slows TTX-sensitive sodium
current inactivation in both dorsal root ganglion neurons and
periaqueductal gray neurons from rat brain. In addition, 30 nM -atracotoxin-Hv1 shifts the threshold of sodium channel activation by approximately 10 mV to more negative membrane potentials (Fig. 1, C and D). These actions are
similar to those reported for scorpion -toxins (13, 34). However,
-atracotoxin-Hv1 caused differential actions on peak sodium current
amplitude in these two populations of neurons. In dorsal root ganglion
neurons -atracotoxin-Hv1 caused a marked reduction in peak sodium
current (Fig. 1A), whereas in periaqueductal gray neurons
there was no significant change in peak sodium current (Fig.
1B). This is in contrast to scorpion -toxins that
typically increase peak sodium current (5, 6, 13, 35, 36). Given these
similar actions on sodium currents, we further compared the actions of
-atracotoxins with those of scorpion -toxins to produce positive
cooperativity with [3H]BTX binding, enhancement of
alkaloid toxin-stimulated 22Na+ uptake, and
competition in radioiodinated scorpion toxin binding assays.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Actions of -atracotoxin-Hv1 on whole cell
tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium currents in rat dorsal root ganglion and
periaqueductal gray neurones. Upper panels show the
slowing of sodium current inactivation induced by -atracotoxin-Hv1
in dorsal root ganglion neurons (A) and periaqueductal gray
neurons from rat brain (B); a represents the
control trace, and b shows the current recorded in the
presence of 30 nM -atracotoxin-Hv1. A,
currents were activated by depolarizing test pulses from 80 mV to
10 mV for 50 ms every 10 s. B, currents were
activated by depolarizing test pulses from 90 mV to 0 mV for 6 ms
every 10 s. C and D show the I/V
relationships recorded before ( ) and after ( ) 30 nM
-atracotoxin-Hv1 from the same neurons as in A and
B, respectively. Note the negative shift in the voltage
dependence of activation in the presence of -atracotoxin-Hv1.
|
|
Enhancement of [3H]BTX Binding by
-Atracotoxin-Hv1--
Scorpion -toxins have been shown to act in
a positive allosteric fashion to increase the binding of site 2 alkaloid toxins such as batrachotoxin (27, 29). We therefore assessed
the ability of -atracotoxins to enhance [3H]BTX
binding to rat brain synaptosomes. -Atracotoxin-Hv1 was found to
significantly enhance the binding of [3H]BTX
approximately 12-fold with a concentration required for half-maximal
enhancement (EC50) of 25.2 ± 4.5 nM
(n = 4, Fig. 2A). In comparison, AaH
II-enhanced [3H]BTX binding under the same conditions
gave a 5.6-fold increase in the maximal response
(Emax) with an EC50 of 14.4 ± 2.3 nM (Fig. 2A, inset). In order to
show that the enhancement of [3H]BTX binding represents
an increase in binding to neurotoxin receptor site 2, -atracotoxin-Hv1-enhanced [3H]BTX binding was measured
in the presence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled batrachotoxin
or veratridine. Both alkaloid toxins were able to completely inhibit
[3H]BTX binding enhanced by 3 µM
-atracotoxin-Hv1 in a concentration-dependent manner
indicating the enhancement is specifically mediated through receptor
site 2 (Fig. 2B).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Enhancement of [3H]BTX binding
by -atracotoxin-Hv1 in rat brain synaptosomes.
A, enhancement of [3H]BTX binding by
increasing concentrations of -atracotoxin-Hv1. Rat brain
synaptosomes (350 µg of protein) were preincubated with 15 nM [3H]BTX for 50 min at 37 °C in the
presence of increasing concentrations of -atracotoxin-Hv1
(main panel) or AaH II (inset). The data
points represent the mean ± S.E. of four experiments (see
"Experimental Procedures" for details). B, inhibition of
-atracotoxin-Hv1 enhanced [3H]BTX binding by
veratridine and batrachotoxin. Rat brain synaptosomes were incubated
with 15 nM [3H]BTX and 3 µM
-atracotoxin-Hv1 in the presence of a range of concentrations of
batrachotoxin ( ) and veratridine ( ) under the same conditions as
in A. Data are presented as a percentage of maximal
[3H]BTX binding in the presence of 3 µM
-atracotoxin-Hv1. Values represent the mean ± S.E. of three
experiments for both veratridine and batrachotoxin. B,
inset, lack of enhancement of -atracotoxin-Hv1-enhanced
[3H]BTX binding by AaH II. Increasing concentrations of
AaH II were incubated with 15 nM [3H]BTX in
the absence (gray columns) and presence (black
columns) of a saturating concentration of -atracotoxin-Hv1 (10 µM) under the same conditions as A. Values
represent the mean ± S.E. of three experiments.
|
|
Analysis of batrachotoxin binding indicated that in the presence of 100 nM AaH II, 20 nM -atracotoxin-Hv1, or 3 µM -atracotoxin-Hv1, [3H]BTX binds to a
single class of high affinity binding sites (Table I) in agreement with earlier studies
(29). In the absence of scorpion -toxins or sea anemone toxins, the
estimated Kd for [3H]BTX was reported
to be 700 nM (29). Under the present conditions, the
Kd of [3H]BTX in the absence of
enhancement was 862 ± 310 nM. The addition of either
AaH II or -atracotoxin-Hv1 reduced the Kd approximately 3.2-fold while not significantly altering the total number of binding sites (see Table I). To examine if AaH II and -atracotoxin-Hv1 enhance [3H]BTX binding by
interacting with closely related or distinct receptor sites, the
increase in [3H]BTX binding was determined in the
simultaneous presence of the two polypeptide toxins (Fig.
2B, inset). Addition of increasing concentrations
of AaH II in the presence of saturating concentrations of
-atracotoxin-Hv1 (10 µM) did not further enhance
[3H]BTX binding as compared with -atracotoxin-Hv1
alone. These data indicate that -atracotoxin-Hv1 and AaH II may bind
to a common receptor site and enhance [3H]BTX binding in
a similar manner.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Effect of AaH II and -atracotoxin-Hv1 on [3H]BTX binding
Rat brain synaptosomes were incubated with 15 nM
[3H]BTX and increasing concentrations of unlabeled
batrachotoxin in the presence of the indicated concentrations of AaH II
or -atracotoxin-Hv1 as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Data have been presented as the means ± S.E.
(n = 3) as determined from nonlinear regression (see
Equation 1 under "Experimental Procedures"). Statistical analysis
using a one-way analysis of variance revealed no significant
differences between any of the data.
|
|
Activation of 22Na+ Uptake by
-Atracotoxins--
To determine whether -atracotoxins can
directly activate voltage-gated sodium channels, their ability to
increase 22Na+ uptake by rat brain synaptosomes
was examined. Both -atracotoxins were able to activate
22Na+ uptake in a
concentration-dependent manner to 30 and 28% of maximum, with concentrations for half-maximal activation (EC50) of
25 ± 8 and 44 ± 18 nM for -atracotoxin-Hv1
and -atracotoxin-Ar1, respectively (Fig.
3). Maximal 22Na+
uptake was determined in the presence of 1 µM BTX, and
the direct stimulation of 22Na+ uptake by
-atracotoxins was expressed as a percentage of maximal flux.
Moreover the -atracotoxin-activated 22Na+
uptake was TTX-sensitive (Fig. 3B, inset)
confirming that it was mediated via the voltage-gated sodium channel.
Similarly, the scorpion -toxin AaH II was also able to directly
activate 22Na+ uptake to 14 ± 3% at a
concentration of 30 nM (Fig. 3A,
inset).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Activation of
22Na+ uptake by funnel-web spider toxins
in rat brain synaptosomes. Synaptosomes (500 µg) were incubated
with a range of concentrations of -atracotoxin-Hv1 (A)
and -atracotoxin-Ar1 (B and C) for 30 min at
37 °C, and 22Na+ uptake was measured after a
5-s period. Nonspecific 22Na+ uptake in the
presence of 1 µM TTX was subtracted, and data were
presented as a percentage of maximal uptake as determined in the
presence of 1 µM batrachotoxin. A, inset,
activation of 22Na+ uptake by AaH II.
Synaptosomes were incubated with a range of concentrations of AaH II
and 22Na+ uptake measured under the same
conditions as above (n = 3). B, inset,
inhibition of -atracotoxin-activated 22Na+
uptake by TTX. Black columns show
22Na+ uptake recorded in the presence of 10 µM -atracotoxin-Hv1, and the gray columns
show data recorded in the presence of 1 µM
-atracotoxin-Ar1. It was found that 1 µM TTX reduced
22Na+ uptake activated by -atracotoxin-Hv1
and -atracotoxin-Ar1 to 3 ± 2% (n = 3) and
1 ± 1% (n = 3), respectively. C,
effect of AaH II on 22Na+ uptake activated by
-atracotoxin-Ar1. Synaptosomes were incubated with a range of
concentrations of -atracotoxin-Ar1 in the absence ( ) and presence
( ) of 30 nM AaH II. All values represent the mean ± S.E. (n = 3-13 for A, n = 3-6 for B, and n = 3 for
C).
|
|
Scorpion -toxins that bind to neurotoxin receptor site 3 have been
shown to enhance activation of 22Na+ uptake by
site 2 alkaloid toxins via an increase in binding affinity and efficacy
(27). This is believed to occur via a positive allosteric interaction
between sites 2 and 3 (for review see Ref. 7). To determine if AaH II
and -atracotoxin-Ar1 have a cooperative action on
22Na+ uptake, increasing concentrations of
-atracotoxin-Ar1 were incubated with 30 nM AaH II. This
concentration of AaH II was able to directly activate
22Na+ uptake (Fig. 3A,
inset). No additivity or cooperativity was observed as
22Na+ uptake activated by the highest
concentrations of both toxins (Fig. 3C) was identical to
flux produced by -atracotoxin-Ar1 alone (approximately 30% of
maximal). Similar results were obtained with -atracotoxin-Hv1 (data
not shown). These results are in accordance with the effect of
concurrent administration of AaH II and -atracotoxins on
[3H]BTX binding (Fig. 2B,
inset).
Low Concentrations of -Atracotoxins Cooperatively Enhance
Batrachotoxin- and Veratridine-activated 22Na+
Uptake--
Since -atracotoxins enhance [3H]BTX
binding, we assessed the effect of 6 nM -atracotoxin on
batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake (Fig.
4). This concentration of
-atracotoxin-Hv1 gives minimal direct activation of
22Na+ uptake (Fig. 3); nevertheless, it is able
to significantly shift the EC50 of batrachotoxin to
activate 22Na+ uptake from 155 ± 36 to
15 ± 10 nM (Fig. 4A). Unexpectedly, this low concentration of -atracotoxin-Hv1 also produced a 30 ± 7% inhibition of the maximum 22Na+ uptake,
activated by 1 µM BTX (Fig. 4A).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Enhancement of batrachotoxin- and
veratridine-stimulated 22Na+ uptake by
-atracotoxins. A, increasing concentrations of
batrachotoxin were incubated with rat brain synaptosomes in the absence
( ) and presence of 6 nM ( ) -atracotoxin-Hv1
(n = 3). The EC50 of batrachotoxin was
reduced from 154 ± 21 to 9.0 ± 4.4 nM in the
presence of -atracotoxin-Hv1. Note the 32% inhibition in
batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake.
B, enhancement of veratridine-activated
22Na+ uptake by -atracotoxin-Hv1. A range of
concentrations of veratridine was incubated with rat brain synaptosomes
in the absence ( ) and presence of 6 nM
-atracotoxin-Hv1 ( ) (n = 3). The EC50
of veratridine was reduced from 4.0 ± 0.3 to 0.6 ± 0.4 µM in the presence of -atracotoxin-Hv1, and the
maximal 22Na+ uptake was increased. For
conditions of incubation see "Experimental Procedures." All data
are presented as a percentage of maximal uptake as determined in the
presence of 1 µM batrachotoxin.
|
|
Since batrachotoxin and veratridine have been shown to compete for
binding to neurotoxin receptor site 2 (see Ref. 29 and Fig.
2B), we compared the effects of -atracotoxin-Hv1 on
veratridine-stimulated 22Na+ uptake. Similar to
the enhancement of batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake, -atracotoxin-Hv1 (6 nM) lowered the EC50 of veratridine 10-fold
from 4.0 ± 1.0 to 0.4 ± 0.1 µM (Fig.
4B). In contrast to the inhibition observed in the presence
of batrachotoxin, the addition of -atracotoxin-Hv1 increased the
maximal effect of veratridine to that observed in the presence of 1 µM batrachotoxin, thus converting veratridine from a
partial agonist to a full agonist. This effect is similar to that of
scorpion -toxins on veratridine-stimulated 22Na+ uptake as described previously by Tamkun
and Catterall (27).
-Atracotoxins Differentially Modify Batrachotoxin- and
Veratridine-activated 22Na+ Uptake--
To
analyze further the interactions of -atracotoxins with alkaloid
toxin-stimulated 22Na+ uptake, we examined the
effect of the funnel-web spider toxins on maximal
22Na+ uptake stimulated either by batrachotoxin
or veratridine. As previously noted in Fig. 4A, increasing
concentrations of -atracotoxins strongly inhibited the maximal
22Na+ uptake stimulated by 1 µM
batrachotoxin (Fig. 5A) with
IC50 values of 10 ± 2 and 14 ± 2 nM
for -atracotoxin-Hv1 and -atracotoxin-Ar1, respectively. Notable
was the inhibition of batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake to a level comparable with that
which the -atracotoxins activate 22Na+
uptake in the absence of batrachotoxin (see Fig. 3, A and
B). As with flux activated directly by -atracotoxins, the
remaining 22Na+ uptake in the presence of both
1 µM batrachotoxin and saturating concentrations of
-atracotoxins could be inhibited by 1 µM TTX (data not
shown).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Differential effect of -atracotoxins on
batrachotoxin- and veratridine-stimulated 22Na+
uptake. A, inhibition of batrachotoxin-activated
22Na+ uptake by -atracotoxins. Rat brain
synaptosomes were incubated for 10 min at 37 °C with 1 µM batrachotoxin and a range of concentrations of either
-atracotoxin-Hv1 ( , n = 3-8) or
-atracotoxin-Ar1 ( , n = 3-5). B,
enhancement of veratridine-activated 22Na+
uptake by increasing concentrations of -atracotoxin-Hv1.
Synaptosomes were incubated with the indicated concentrations of
-atracotoxin-Hv1 in the absence (black columns) and
presence (gray columns) of 300 µM veratridine.
The left-hand (striped) column shows the
activation of 22Na+ uptake by 300 µM veratridine alone. All data are presented as a
percentage of maximal 22Na+ uptake as
determined in the presence of 1 µM batrachotoxin
(n = 3).
|
|
In contrast to the inhibition of batrachotoxin-activated
22Na+ uptake, -atracotoxin-Hv1 was able to
increase uptake activated by saturating (300 µM)
concentrations of veratridine (Fig. 5B). No inhibition of
veratridine-activated 22Na+ uptake by
-atracotoxin-Hv1 was observed, even at concentrations up to 3 µM. This marked difference in the modulation of
batrachotoxin- and veratridine-stimulated 22Na+
uptake by -atracotoxins strongly suggests a differential interaction of the spider toxin receptor site with the alkaloid toxin binding region. Such differences were not observed with scorpion -toxin modulation of alkaloid toxin action (27). Accordingly, we examined the
ability of -atracotoxins to compete directly with the binding of
scorpion -toxins to neurotoxin receptor site 3.
Inhibition of Scorpion -Toxin Binding by
-Atracotoxins--
AaH II and Lqh II, which differ by only 2 amino
acid residues, were shown to have similar LD50 values in
mice and reveal identical IC50 values in competition
binding studies with 125I-AaH II binding to rat brain
synaptosomes (22). Similarly, AaH II and Lqh II compete with identical
Ki values for the binding of 125I-Lqh II
(Fig. 6). Likewise -atracotoxin-Hv1
and -atracotoxin-Ar1 are able to completely inhibit the binding of
125I-Lqh II to rat brain sodium channels with
Ki values of 0.85 ± 0.03 and 1.07 ± 0.2 nM, respectively (Fig. 6). These data indicate that
-atracotoxins may share a common binding site with scorpion
-toxins.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Competition for binding of
125I-Lqh II by -atracotoxins. Rat brain
synaptosomes (43 µg/ml) were incubated for 20 min at 22 °C in the
presence of 0.1 nM 125I-Lqh II with increasing
concentrations of Lqh II ( ), AaH II ( ), -atracotoxin-Hv1 ( )
and -atracotoxin-Ar1 ( ). Nonspecific binding, measured in the
presence of 100 nM Lqh II, was subtracted from all data
points. The curves were fitted using the Logistic equation for
inhibition using a Hill number (nH) of 1 with
regression coefficients (R2) higher than 0.976. The calculated Ki values for inhibition of
125I-Lqh II were as follows: Lqh II, 0.17 ± 0.04 nM; AaH II, 0.2 ± 0.03 nM;
-atracotoxin, 0.85 ± 0.03 nM; -atracotoxin,
1.07 ± 0.2 nM.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
-Atracotoxins Affect Sodium Channels in a Unique
Manner--
The present study shows that -atracotoxins slow sodium
current inactivation and shift the voltage dependence of activation in
peripheral and central neurons in a similar manner to scorpion -toxins. Unlike scorpion -toxins, which typically cause a slight increase or do not alter peak sodium currents (13), -atracotoxins were also shown to decrease peak sodium currents in rat dorsal root
ganglion but not periaqueductal gray neurons (5, 6). This suggests that
the actions of -atracotoxins may be, at least in part,
subtype-specific as the sodium channel subtypes in sensory and rat
brain neurons have been shown to be distinct (37). This assumption
deserves further study, but clearly the most prominent effect to slow
sodium current inactivation is similar in the two preparations (Fig.
1). One of the most intriguing results of the present study, however,
was the observation that -atracotoxins markedly increase
[3H]BTX binding but decrease batrachotoxin-activated
22Na+ uptake (Figs. 2A and
5A). The latter is in marked contrast to the effect of
scorpion -toxins on batrachotoxin-activated
22Na+ uptake in rat brain synaptosomes (27,
34).
The other unexpected result of our study was the differential
modulation of batrachotoxin and veratridine action by -atracotoxins. Unlike the inhibition of batrachotoxin-activated
22Na+ uptake (Fig. 5A), the
-atracotoxins increase veratridine-activated 22Na+ flux by decreasing the EC50
and converting veratridine from a partial to a full agonist (Fig.
4B). This effect on the activity of veratridine is similar
to that observed with scorpion -toxins (27, 34). Hence
-atracotoxins, unlike scorpion -toxins, are able to differentiate
between the open state of the sodium channel stabilized by
batrachotoxin and veratridine (18, 38). Despite these differences in
the effect of -atracotoxins and scorpion -toxins on activation of
sodium channels in electrophysiological and
22Na+ uptake studies, -atracotoxins were
shown to compete at low concentration with the scorpion -toxin Lqh
II on rat brain sodium channels (Fig. 6). This suggests that
-atracotoxins bind to similar receptor sites as scorpion -toxins,
despite their differential interaction with batrachotoxin and
veratridine.
-Atracotoxins May Induce Sub-conductance States--
Alkaloid
toxins, which bind to receptor site 2, are considered to be persistent
activators of sodium channels (7). Their mode of action, however, is
very complex; they induce a strong shift in the voltage dependence of
activation to very negative membrane potentials, inhibit or remove
inactivation, alter ion selectivity, and reduce single channel
conductance (18, 19, 36, 38). Thus despite the persistent activation,
sodium conductance through the permanently open sodium channels is
reduced to around 50% or 15-25% of normal in the presence of
batrachotoxin or veratridine, respectively, indicating that these two
alkaloids stabilize two discrete sub-conductance states (19, 39, 40).
It is conceivable that the decrease in sodium conductance observed with
-atracotoxins in dorsal root ganglia neurons may be due to
stabilization or induction of a distinct sub-conductance state, in
addition to actions on sodium current inactivation (5, 6). The presence of sub-conductance states is suggested to occur also in central neurons
in the presence of batrachotoxin, as indicated by the inhibition of
batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake induced by
-atracotoxins (Fig. 5A). -Atracotoxins can induce 30%
of maximal 22Na+ uptake and inhibit the maximal
uptake stimulated by batrachotoxin to 20-30% (Figs. 3 and
5A). This may indicate that the sub-conductance state
induced by -atracotoxins in the presence of batrachotoxin is about
30% that induced by batrachotoxin alone. Moreover, this sub-conductance state should dominate the open state of the channel even in the simultaneous presence of both batrachotoxin and
-atracotoxins. Our present data, however, cannot provide evidence
for this assumption. Clarification of the mechanistic basis for the
inhibition of sodium current awaits single channel analysis of
-atracotoxin-modified currents.
-Atracotoxins Differentially Interact with Batrachotoxin and
Veratridine Receptor Sites--
An interesting finding of the present
study was that [3H]BTX binding was increased despite a
decrease in batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+
uptake. This suggests an uncoupling between the binding of
batrachotoxin and its action to activate sodium channels. In support of
this hypothesis is the recent study of Wang and Wang (41) that used site-directed mutagenesis in the S6 transmembrane segment of domain I
of sodium channels to study the receptor-binding site of batrachotoxin. They revealed that certain mutants could separate the inhibition of
channel inactivation from the induction of a sub-conductance state by
batrachotoxin. Their results indicate a possible uncoupling between the
binding and some of the effects of batrachotoxin on the sodium channel
as noted in the present study.
In contrast to the inhibition in batrachotoxin-activated
22Na+ uptake, -atracotoxins increased the
effect of veratridine-stimulated 22Na+ uptake
at all concentrations. This may indicate that -atracotoxins interact
differentially with the open sub-conducting state induced by
veratridine than with that stabilized by batrachotoxin. This is
supported by the increase in veratridine-stimulated
22Na+ uptake to the maximal level even at
saturating concentrations of -atracotoxins (3 µM; Fig.
5B), a concentration that induced 70-80% inhibition of
batrachotoxin-stimulated uptake. Independent support for this
differential interaction hypothesis is the different sub-conductance
state reported in the literature for batrachotoxin and veratridine (19,
39, 40).
Implications for the -Atracotoxin Receptor
Site--
Competition binding experiments revealed that both
-atracotoxins were able to completely displace the
125I-scorpion -toxin Lqh II in a
concentration-dependent manner. This suggests that
-atracotoxins bind to at least a partially overlapping receptor site
with that of scorpion -toxins. The above considerations suggest,
however, that despite competitive interactions in binding studies (Fig.
6), the actual binding interactions may differ, at least partially,
between -atracotoxins and scorpion -toxins. This is supported by
the differential modulation by the -atracotoxin receptor site, shown
to be on the extracellular side of the channel (5, 6), of the receptor
site for batrachotoxin and that for veratridine. Hence,
-atracotoxins and scorpion -toxins may bind to partially
overlapping sites on the sodium channel localized within the area of
receptor site 3. In support, another group of scorpion toxins, the
" -like" toxins, which also inhibit sodium current inactivation,
were suggested to bind to a partially overlapping receptor site with
scorpion -toxins and sea anemone toxins (31). Despite the initial
insight into the receptor site 3 area (42, 43), the regions of the
sodium channel involved in binding of these peptide toxins still await
to be discovered.
In summary, the -atracotoxins bind to a similar cluster of receptor
sites as scorpion -toxins. Despite the slowing of sodium current
inactivation and the competition for scorpion -toxin binding
differences among these receptor sites are indicated by the inhibition
of peak sodium current in dorsal root ganglion neurons induced by
-atracotoxins in contrast to the increase obtained with scorpion
-toxins. Moreover, -atracotoxins also differentially interact
with batrachotoxin and veratridine receptor sites to modulate
22Na+ uptake which has not been reported with
the scorpion -toxins. The interaction with alkaloid toxin binding
is, however, suggested to be very similar for both scorpion -toxins
and -atracotoxins as they can markedly increase
[3H]BTX binding and reduce the EC50 values
for both batrachotoxin and veratridine. Since -atracotoxins enhance
batrachotoxin binding yet significantly reduce batrachotoxin-activated
22Na+ uptake, the binding and action of certain
alkaloid toxins may represent at least two distinguishable steps. Our
study further emphasizes the complexity of peptide toxin interaction
with the receptor site 3 area on the extracellular surface of sodium
channels and its allosteric interaction with the receptor site 2 area. This suggests that closely related structural elements within both
receptor site 2 and 3 areas may be responsible for the differences in
the modulation of gating revealed by the combined presence of sodium
channel modulators such as -atracotoxins, scorpion -toxins, and
alkaloid toxins. The present study further highlights the need for more
structural data on the neurotoxin receptor sites in combination with
electrophysiological and biochemical studies in order to understand the
dynamic gating processes of the voltage-gated sodium channel.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. John Morgan (Royal North Shore
Hospital) and Dr. Mike Gray (Australian Museum, Sydney) for helpful
discussions. We are grateful to the general public, shire councils, and
hospitals in the following shires for kind donations of spiders:
Baulkham Hills, Gosford, Hornsby, Hunters Hill, Hurstville,
Kuring-gai, Lane Cove, Manly, North Sydney, Parramatta, Pittwater,
Sutherland, Warringah, Willoughby, Wollondilly, and Wollongong.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by an Australian Research
Council research grant and a University of Technology, Sydney internal research grant (to G. M. N.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
Present address: The Australian Proteome Analysis Facility,
Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales 2109, Australia.
§§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: CEA, C.E.-Saclay,
Département d'Ingénierie et d'Etudes des Protéines,
Gif-sur-Yvette, F-91911, France. Fax: 33 1 69 08 90 71; E-mail:
GORDON{at}dsvidf.cea.fr.
¶¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Health Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, P. O. Box 123, Broadway, New South Wales 2007, Australia. Fax: 61 2 9514-2228;
E-mail: Graham.Nicholson{at}uts.edu.au.
The abbreviations used are:
-atracotoxin-Ar1, (formerly robustoxin) from the venom of the spider
Atrax robustus -atracotoxin-Hv1, (formerly versutoxin)
from the venom of the spider Hadronyche versutaTTX, tetrodotoxinAaH II, -toxin II from the venom of the scorpion
Androctonus australis hectorATX II, sea anemone toxin II
from Anemonia sulcata[3H]BTX, [3H]batrachotoxinin A-20 -benzoateLqh II, -toxin
II from the venom of the scorpion Leiurus quinquestriatus
hebraeusTEA, tetraethylammoniumHPLC, high performance liquid
chromatographyTricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]-glycineBSA, bovine serum albumin.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Fletcher, J. I.,
Smith, R.,
O'Donoghue, S. I.,
Nilges, M.,
Connor, M.,
Howden, M. E. H.,
Christie, M. J.,
and King, G. F.
(1997)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
4,
559-566[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fletcher, J. I.,
Wang, X.,
Connor, M.,
Christie, M. J.,
King, G. F.,
and Nicholson, G. M.
(1998)
in
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design: Animal Toxins and Potassium Channels (Darbon, H., and Sabatier, J.-M., eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Drodrecht, Netherlands, in press
-
Brown, M. R.,
Sheumack, D. D.,
Tyler, M. I.,
and Howden, M. E. H.
(1988)
Biochem. J.
250,
401-405[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sheumack, D. D.,
Claassens, R.,
Whiteley, N. M.,
and Howden, M. E. H.
(1985)
FEBS Lett.
181,
154-156[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nicholson, G. M.,
Willow, M.,
Howden, M. E. H.,
and Narahashi, T.
(1994)
Pfluegers Arch.
428,
400-409[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nicholson, G. M.,
Walsh, R.,
Little, M. J.,
and Tyler, M. I.
(1998)
Pfluegers Arch.
436,
117-126[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Catterall, W. A.
(1986)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
55,
953-985[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fletcher, J. I.,
Chapman, B. E.,
Mackay, J. P.,
Howden, M. E. H.,
and King, G. F.
(1997)
Structure
5,
1525-1535[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pallaghy, P. K.,
Alewood, D.,
Alewood, P. F.,
and Norton, R. S.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
419,
191-196[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pallaghy, P. K.,
Neilsen, K. J.,
Craik, D. J.,
and Norton, R. S.
(1993)
Protein Sci.
3,
1833-1839[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fontecilla-Camps, J. C.,
Almassy, R. J.,
Suddath, F. L.,
and Bugg, C. E.
(1982)
Toxicon
20,
1-7
-
Tugarinov, V.,
Kustanovich, I.,
Zilberberg, N.,
Gurevitz, M.,
and Anglister, J.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
2414-2424[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Strichartz, G. R.,
and Wang, G. K.
(1986)
J. Gen. Physiol.
88,
413-435[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Eitan, M.,
Fowler, E.,
Herrmann, R.,
Duval, A.,
Pelhate, M.,
and Zlotkin, E.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
5941-5947[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fainzilber, M.,
Kofman, O.,
Zlotkin, E.,
and Gordon, D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
2574-2580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Trainer, V. L.,
McPhee, J. C.,
Boutelet-Bochan, H.,
Baker, C.,
Scheuer, T.,
Babin, D.,
Demoute, J. P.,
Guedin, D.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1997)
Mol. Pharmacol.
51,
651-657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gordon, D.
(1997)
in
Toxins and Signal Transduction (Lazarowici, P., and Gutman, Y., eds), pp. 119-149, Harwood Press, Amsterdam
-
Hille, B.,
Leibowitz, M. D.,
Sutro, J. B.,
Schwarz, J. R.,
and Holan, G.
(1987)
Soc. Gen. Physiol. Ser.
41,
109-124[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hille, B.
(1992)
Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes, pp. 308-328, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA
-
Catterall, W. A.
(1977)
J. Biol. Chem.
252,
8669-8676[Free Full Text]
-
Ray, R.,
Morrow, C. S.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1978)
J. Biol. Chem.
253,
7307-7313[Free Full Text]
-
Miranda, F.,
Kopeyan, C.,
Rochat, H.,
Rochat, C.,
and Lissitzky, S.
(1970)
Eur. J. Biochem.
16,
514-523[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sautière, P.,
Cestèle, S.,
Kopeyan, C.,
Martinage, A.,
Drobecq, H.,
Doljansky, Y.,
and Gordon, D.
(1998)
Toxicon
36,
1141-1154[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Connor, M.,
and Christie, M. J.
(1998)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
509,
47-58[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ingram, S.,
Wilding, T. J.,
McCleskey, E. W.,
and Williams, J. T.
(1997)
Mol. Pharmacol.
52,
136-143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gray, E. G.,
and Whittaker, V. P.
(1962)
J. Anat.
96,
79-87[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tamkun, M. M.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1981)
Mol. Pharmacol.
19,
78-86[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kanner, B. J.
(1978)
Biochemistry
17,
1207-1211[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Catterall, W. A.,
Morrow, C. S.,
Daly, J. W.,
and Brown, G. B.
(1981)
J. Biol. Chem.
256,
8922-8927[Free Full Text]
-
Gordon, D.,
and Zlotkin, E.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
315,
125-129[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gordon, D.,
Martin-Eauclaire, M.-F.,
Cestèle, S.,
Kopeyan, C.,
Carlier, E.,
Ben Khalifa, R.,
Pelhate, M.,
and Rochat, H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8034-8045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cestèle, S.,
Ben Khalifa, R.,
Pelhate, M.,
Rochat, H.,
and Gordon, D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
15153-15161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cheng, Y.-C.,
and Prusoff, W. H.
(1973)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
22,
3099-3108[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Couraud, F.,
Martin-Moutot, N.,
Koulakoff, A.,
and Berwald-Netter, Y.
(1986)
J. Neurosci.
6,
192-198[Abstract]
-
Gonoi, T.,
Hille, B.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1984)
J. Neurosci.
4,
2836-2842[Abstract]
-
Strichartz, G. R.,
Rando, T.,
and Wang, G. K.
(1987)
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
10,
237-267[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Felts, P. A.,
Yokoyama, S.,
Dib-Hajj, S.,
Black, J. A.,
and Waxman, S. G.
(1997)
Mol. Brain Res.
45,
71-82[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Garber, S. S.,
and Miller, C.
(1987)
J. Gen. Physiol.
89,
459-480[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Correa, A. M.,
Latorre, R.,
and Bezanilla, F.
(1991)
J. Gen. Physiol.
97,
605-625[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wang, G.,
Dugas, M.,
Armah, B. I.,
and Honerjager, P.
(1990)
Mol. Pharmacol.
37,
144-148[Abstract]
-
Wang, S.-Y.,
and Wang, G. K.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
95,
2653-2658[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rogers, J. C.,
Qu, Y.,
Tanada, T. N.,
Scheuer, T.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15950-15962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Thomsen, W. J.,
and Catterall, W. A.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
10161-10165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. West, G. Bulaj, and D. Yoshikami
Effects of {delta}-Conotoxins PVIA and SVIE on Sodium Channels in the Amphibian Sympathetic Nervous System
J Neurophysiol,
December 1, 2005;
94(6):
3916 - 3924.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Ulbricht
Sodium Channel Inactivation: Molecular Determinants and Modulation
Physiol Rev,
October 1, 2005;
85(4):
1271 - 1301.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Karbat, F. Frolow, O. Froy, N. Gilles, L. Cohen, M. Turkov, D. Gordon, and M. Gurevitz
Molecular Basis of the High Insecticidal Potency of Scorpion {alpha}-Toxins
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 23, 2004;
279(30):
31679 - 31686.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Barbier, H. Lamthanh, F. Le Gall, P. Favreau, E. Benoit, H. Chen, N. Gilles, N. Ilan, S. H. Heinemann, D. Gordon, et al.
A {delta}-Conotoxin from Conus ermineus Venom Inhibits Inactivation in Vertebrate Neuronal Na+ Channels but Not in Skeletal and Cardiac Muscles
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 6, 2004;
279(6):
4680 - 4685.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F Grolleau, M Stankiewicz, L Birinyi-Strachan, X. Wang, G. Nicholson, M Pelhate, and B Lapied
Electrophysiological analysis of the neurotoxic action of a funnel-web spider toxin, delta-atracotoxin-HV1a, on insect voltage-gated Na+ channels
J. Exp. Biol.,
January 2, 2001;
204(4):
711 - 721.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Gilles, C. Blanchet, I. Shichor, M. Zaninetti, I. Lotan, D. Bertrand, and D. Gordon
A Scorpion alpha -Like Toxin That Is Active on Insects and Mammals Reveals an Unexpected Specificity and Distribution of Sodium Channel Subtypes in Rat Brain Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
October 15, 1999;
19(20):
8730 - 8739.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|