Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Little, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Little, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 42, 27076-27083, October 16, 1998


delta -Atracotoxins from Australian Funnel-web Spiders Compete with Scorpion alpha -Toxin Binding but Differentially Modulate Alkaloid Toxin Activation of Voltage-gated Sodium Channels*

Michelle J. LittleDagger , Cathy ZappiaDagger , Nicolas Gilles§, Mark Connor, Margaret I. Tylerparallel **, Marie-France Martin-EauclaireDagger Dagger , Dalia Gordon§§§, and Graham M. NicholsonDagger ¶¶

From the Dagger  Department of Health Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales 2007, Australia, the  Department of Pharmacology, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia, parallel  Deakin Research Ltd., CSIRO Division of Food Processing, North Ryde, New South Wales 2113, Australia, Dagger Dagger  UMR 6560 CNRS, Laboratoire de Biochimie, Université de la Mediterranée, I. F. R. Jean Roche, 13916 Marseille, Cedex 20, France, and § CEA, C. E. Saclay, Département d'Ingénierie et d'Etudes des Protéines, Gif-sur-Yvette F-91911, France

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

delta -Atracotoxins from the venom of Australian funnel-web spiders are a unique group of peptide toxins that slow sodium current inactivation in a manner similar to scorpion alpha -toxins. To analyze their interaction with known sodium channel neurotoxin receptor sites, we studied their effect on [3H]batrachotoxin and 125I-Lqh II (where Lqh is alpha -toxin II from the venom of the scorpion Leiurus quinquestriatus hebraeus) binding and on alkaloid toxin-stimulated 22Na+ uptake in rat brain synaptosomes. delta -Atracotoxins significantly increased [3H]batrachotoxin binding yet decreased maximal batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake by 70-80%, the latter in marked contrast to the effect of scorpion alpha -toxins. Unlike the inhibition of batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake, delta -atracotoxins increased veratridine-stimulated 22Na+ uptake by converting veratridine from a partial to a full agonist, analogous to scorpion alpha -toxins. Hence, delta -atracotoxins are able to differentiate between the open state of the sodium channel stabilized by batrachotoxin and veratridine and suggest a distinct sub-conductance state stabilized by delta -atracotoxins. Despite these actions, low concentrations of delta -atracotoxins completely inhibited the binding of the scorpion alpha -toxin, 125I-Lqh II, indicating that they bind to similar, or partially overlapping, receptor sites. The apparent uncoupling between the increase in binding but inhibition of the effect of batrachotoxin induced by delta -atracotoxins suggests that the binding and action of certain alkaloid toxins may represent at least two distinguishable steps. These results further contribute to the understanding of the complex dynamic interactions between neurotoxin receptor site areas related to sodium channel gating.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The venom from Australian funnel-web spiders (Araneae: Hexathelidae: Atracinae) appears to contain a variety of neurotoxins that target various ionic channels in excitable cells, including calcium (1) and potassium channels (2). The toxins so far identified to be responsible for severe envenomation or lethality in humans, however, were shown to be two peptide neurotoxins that target the voltage-gated sodium channel: delta -atracotoxin-Ar11 (formerly robustoxin) from Atrax robustus and delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 (formerly versutoxin) from Hadronyche versuta (3, 4). delta -Atracotoxin-Hv1 and delta -atracotoxin-Ar1 have been shown to exert their neurotoxicity by slowing or removing tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium current inactivation in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons (5, 6), an action similar to that of polypeptide scorpion alpha -toxins and sea anemone toxins (7).

Both delta -atracotoxin-Ar1 and delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 consist of 42 amino acids and are highly homologous with only 7 substitutions. These toxins show no significant sequence homology with any presently known neurotoxins. Both spider toxins have a high proportion of basic residues and appear to be tightly folded molecules containing four conserved disulfide bonds, including N- and C-terminal cysteines. Recently, the three-dimensional solution structure for delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 (8) and delta -atracotoxin-Ar1 (9) has been determined. Both display a small three-stranded anti-parallel beta -sheet with an "inhibitor cystine knot" motif (10). Interestingly the three-dimensional fold of these toxins is different from the previously determined structures of the scorpion alpha -toxins AaH II (11) and Lqhalpha IT (12) despite similar actions on sodium current inactivation (13, 14).

Out of the seven identified neurotoxin receptor sites on the voltage-gated sodium channel, determined by direct radiolabeled toxin studies, at least two receptor sites were shown to bind various peptide toxins from different animal venoms that inhibit sodium current inactivation. Scorpion alpha -toxins and sea anemone toxins such as ATX II bind to the so-called neurotoxin receptor site 3 and delta -conotoxins which bind to receptor site 6 on the alpha -subunit of the sodium channel (Refs. 15 and 16; for a review see Refs. 7 and 17). Both of these receptor sites have been shown to have complex allosteric interactions with neurotoxin receptor site 2 shown to bind several alkaloid toxins such as batrachotoxin and veratridine (17). The alkaloid toxins induce persistent activation of sodium channels by shifting the voltage dependence of activation to very negative membrane potentials and inhibiting the inactivation process (18, 19). Scorpion alpha -toxins were shown to cooperatively enhance the effect of alkaloid toxins by increasing their binding affinity and activity (20, 21).

Based on apparent similarity in the effect of scorpion alpha -toxins and delta -atracotoxins, the aim of the present study was to determine the likely receptor binding site of funnel-web spider toxins on the sodium channel and their possible interaction with alkaloid toxin binding and action using both 22Na+ uptake and radiolabeled neurotoxin binding assays. We report that delta -atracotoxins interact with nanomolar affinities with neurotoxin receptor site 3 in rat brain synaptosomes but exhibit unusual allosteric interactions with the site 2 alkaloid toxin receptor.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Purification of Toxins-- Colonies of male A. robustus and female H. versuta spiders were "milked" by direct aspiration from the chelicerae of live spiders using glass pipettes. Collected crude venom was flushed from pipettes using 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid and initial fractionation performed via reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a Vydac semi-preparative column (C18, 10.4 × 250 mm, 15 µm) on a Waters HPLC system. Elution of venom components was performed using a linear gradient of 0-60% acetonitrile, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid over 36 min with a flow rate of 4 ml/min. The fraction containing delta -atracotoxin-Ar1 eluted with approximately 43% acetonitrile, whereas delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 eluted with 40% acetonitrile. These fractions were lyophilized and then resuspended in 25% acetonitrile, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in preparation for further purification on a Vydac analytical column (C18, 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm). The funnel-web spider toxins were eluted from the analytical column using a linear gradient of 25-50% acetonitrile, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid over 30 min at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Purity of eluted toxins was confirmed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under reducing and alkylating conditions with a Tris/Tricine buffer system. Protein concentration was determined using amino acid composition analysis. Toxins were stored lyophilized at -20 °C until required, at which time they were dissolved in 20 mM HEPES-Tris (pH 6.0, 4 °C).

Other Chemicals-- AaH II and Lqh II were purified according to the methods of Miranda et al. (22) and Sautière et al. (23) respectively. Batrachotoxin was a generous gift from Dr. John Daly (Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda). Lqh II (catalogue number LTX001) was purchased from Latoxan (AP-1724, 05150 Rosans, France). Tetrodotoxin was purchased from Calbiochem (Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia), and veratridine was obtained from Sigma. [3H]BTX and carrier-free 22Na+ were purchased from NEN Life Science Products. All other chemicals were of analytical or HPLC grade.

Electrophysiological Recordings-- Whole cell patch clamp recordings of tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium currents were made from both dorsal root ganglion and periaqueductal gray neurons. Acutely dissociated dorsal ganglion neurons were prepared from 4- to 12-day-old Wistar rats according to the methods of Nicholson et al. (5, 6). Micropipettes (0.67-2 megohms) were pulled from borosilicate glass capillary tubing and were filled with (in mM) CsF 135, NaCl 10, HEPES 5 with the pH adjusted to 7.0 with 1 M CsOH. The external solution contained (in mM) NaCl 30, MgCl2 1, CaCl2 1.8, CsCl 5, KCl 5, D-glucose 25, HEPES 5, tetraethylammonium (TEA) chloride 20, tetramethylammonium chloride 70, with the pH adjusted to 7.4 with 1 M TEA hydroxide. Membrane current recordings were made at ambient room temperature (22-25 °C). Large round light dorsal root ganglion cells with diameters of 20-40 µm were selected for experiments.

Acutely dissociated periaqueductal gray neurons from adult Sprague- Dawley rats were prepared according to the methods of Connor and Christie (24) based on procedures outlined in Ingram et al. (25). Briefly, horizontal midbrain slices (between 270 and 300 µm thick) containing the periaqueductal gray were cut with a vibratome. Slices were then incubated for 2 min at 35 °C in 20 units/ml papain (pH 7.3). The slices were then placed in fresh solution containing 1 mg/ml BSA and 1 mg/ml trypsin inhibitor, and the periaqueductal gray region was subdissected from each slice with a fine tungsten wire and cells dissociated from the slices by gentle trituration. Micropipettes (2-4 megohms) were pulled from borosilicate glass capillary tubing and were filled with (in mM) CsCl 110, NaCl 20, EGTA 10, CaCl2 2, MgATP 2, HEPES 10 with the pH adjusted to 7.3 with 1 M CsOH. The external solution contained (in mM) NaCl 80, TEA chloride 60, MgCl2 5, CsCl 5, D-glucose 10; HEPES 10 with the pH adjusted to 7.4 with 1 M TEA hydroxide. Membrane current recordings were made at room temperature (21-25 °C).

The experiments used in this study were rejected if there were large leak currents or currents showed signs of poor space clamping such as an abrupt activation of currents upon relatively small depolarizing pulses. Stimulation and recording were both controlled by an AxoData or pClamp data acquisition system (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Data were filtered at 5 kHz (low pass Bessel filter), and digital sampling rate was 25-50 kHz. Leakage and capacitative currents were digitally subtracted with P-P/4 procedures, and series resistance compensation was >80% for all cells.

Neuronal Membrane Preparations-- Synaptosomes for 22Na+ uptake and [3H]BTX binding assays were prepared from brains of male Wistar rats (4-8 weeks, 250-350 g) using a combination of homogenization and differential and density gradient centrifugation according to the method of Gray and Whittaker (26) as described by Tamkun and Catterall (27). Synaptosomes were suspended in a solution consisting of (in mM) choline chloride 130, KCl 5.4, MgSO4 0.8, D-glucose 5.5, and HEPES-Tris 50 (pH 7.4, 37 °C) and were stored in liquid nitrogen until required for 22Na+ uptake assays, or used within 3 h of preparation for [3H]BTX binding assays. For 125I-Lqh II binding studies, rat brain synaptosomes were prepared according to the method of Kanner (28) using (in mM) D-mannitol 300, EDTA 10, HEPES 10 (pH 7.4, 4 °C), and Ficoll (type 400 Sigma) gradients (14). A combination of proteinase inhibitors consisting of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (50 µg/ml), pepstatin A (1 µM), iodoacetamide (1 mM), and 1,10-phenanthroline (1 mM) was present in all buffers used for this procedure. Synaptosomes were frozen at -80 °C in mannitol buffer until use. Membrane protein concentration was determined using a Bio-Rad protein assay with BSA as a standard.

Measurement of 22Na+ Uptake-- The effect of delta -atracotoxins on 22Na+ uptake in rat brain synaptosomes was measured using the method described by Tamkun and Catterall (27). Briefly, rat brain synaptosomes (500 µg of membrane protein) were preincubated for 10 min with toxins in 100 µl of sodium-free preincubation medium at 37 °C. The preincubation 22Na+ uptake medium contained (in mM) choline chloride 130, KCl 5.4, MgSO4 0.8, glucose 5.5, HEPES-Tris (pH 7.4) 50, and 1 mg/ml BSA. Uptake was initiated by adding 150 µl of assay medium containing (in mM) choline chloride 128, KCl 5.4, MgSO4 0.8, glucose 5.5, HEPES-Tris (pH 7.4) 50, NaCl 2.66, ouabain 5, 1 mg/ml BSA, and 0.9 µCi/ml carrier-free 22NaCl. After 5 s at 37 °C, uptake was terminated by the addition of 4 ml of ice-cold wash solution and rapid filtration through 0.45-µm nitrocellulose membrane filters (Millipore, Sydney, Australia). The wash solution consisted of (mM) choline chloride 163, CaCl2 1.8, MgSO4 0.8, HEPES-Tris (pH 7.4) 5, and 1 mg/ml BSA. Maximal 22Na+ uptake was determined in the presence of 1 µM batrachotoxin, whereas uptake not mediated by the voltage-gated sodium channel was determined in the presence of 1 µM TTX. Nonspecific 22Na+ uptake was typically less than 35% of total uptake.

Binding Assays-- Equilibrium competition and saturation assays were performed using increasing concentrations of the unlabeled toxin in the presence of a constant low concentration of the radiolabeled toxin. In order to obtain saturation curves ("cold" saturation), the specific radioactivity and the amount of bound toxin were calculated and determined for each toxin concentration. Equilibrium saturation or competition experiments were analyzed by the iterative computer program LIGAND, using "Cold saturation" and "Drug" analysis, respectively (Elsevier Biosoft, UK). The composition of the binding medium for 125I-Lqh II binding was (in mM) choline Cl 140, CaCl2 1.8, KCl 5.4, MgSO4 0.8, HEPES 25 (pH 7.4); D-glucose 10, BSA 2 mg/ml. Wash buffer composition was (in mM) choline Cl 140, CaCl2 1.8, KCl 5.4, MgSO4 0.8, HEPES 25 (pH 7.4), BSA 5 mg/ml. [3H]BTX binding experiments used the preincubation medium and wash solution as for 22Na+ uptake experiments (see above). After incubation, reactions were terminated by dilution with 4 ml of ice-cold wash solution for [3H]BTX binding experiments or 2 ml of ice-cold wash solution for 125I-Lqh II binding experiments. Separation of free from bound toxin was achieved by rapid filtration under vacuum using Whatman GF/C filters. The filter discs were washed with a further 2 × 4 ml of wash solution for [3H]BTX binding or 2 × 2 ml washes for 125I-Lqh II binding.

[3H]BTX Binding Experiments-- Experiments were performed according to a modification of the method described by Catterall and colleagues (29). Rat brain synaptosomes (350 µg of protein/ml) were suspended in 0.2 ml of buffer containing 15 nM [3H]BTX (0.8 µCi). After incubation for 50 min at 37 °C, the reaction mixture was diluted with 4 ml of ice-cold wash buffer and filtered. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 300 µM veratridine and was typically 5-15% of total binding. Equilibrium saturation experiments were analyzed using EBDA and LIGAND computer programs (Elsevier Biosoft, UK).

125I-Lqh II Binding Assays-- Lqh II was iodinated by IODO-GEN (Pierce) using 5 µg of toxin and 0.5 mCi of carrier-free Na125I according to Gordon and Zlotkin (30). Competition binding experiments using 125I-Lqh II were performed according to the methods of Gordon et al. (31). The monoiodotoxin was purified via reverse-phase HPLC using a Vydac C18 column and a gradient of 5-90% B (A = 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, B = acetonitrile, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min, as described by Cestèle et al. (32). The concentration of the radiolabeled toxins was determined according to the specific activity of the 125I corresponding to 4200-3450 dpm/fmol monoiodotoxin, depending on the time of use (the age of the iodine). Rat brain synaptosomes (40-50 µg protein/ml) were suspended in 0.2 ml of binding buffer, containing 125I-Lqh II. After incubation for 15 min at 22 °C, the reaction mixture was diluted with 2 ml of ice-cold wash buffer and filtered. Nonspecific toxin binding was determined in the presence of 100 nM unlabeled Lqh II and consisted typically of 5-10% of total binding.

Data Analysis-- The IC50 values obtained for inhibition of 125I-Lqh II binding were converted to Ki values according to the relationship described by Cheng and Prusoff (33). Equilibrium saturation of [3H]BTX binding data was fitted according to the following single-site hyperbolic equation mathematically equivalent to the Langmuir isotherm.
[<SUP>3</SUP><UP>H</UP>]<UP>BTX bound </UP>(<UP>n</UP><UP><SC>m</SC></UP>)=<FR><NU>B<SUB><UP>max</UP></SUB>×x</NU><DE>K<SUB>d</SUB>+x</DE></FR> (Eq. 1)
where Bmax is the maximal number of moles of [3H]BTX bound, Kd is the dissociation constant for [3H]BTX, and x is the total concentration of batrachotoxin.

Mathematical curve fitting was accomplished using SigmaPlot version 4.14 for Macintosh. All curve fitting routines used a nonlinear least squares method and splining routines. All data are presented as means ± S.E. All experiments were performed in duplicate or triplicate.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Effect of delta -Atracotoxins on Sodium Currents-- Electrophysiological studies using whole cell patch clamp of dorsal root ganglion neurones have shown that delta -atracotoxins slow sodium current inactivation and shift the voltage dependence of activation in a manner similar to scorpion alpha -toxins (5, 6). As shown in Fig. 1, A and B, 30 nM delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 slows TTX-sensitive sodium current inactivation in both dorsal root ganglion neurons and periaqueductal gray neurons from rat brain. In addition, 30 nM delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 shifts the threshold of sodium channel activation by approximately 10 mV to more negative membrane potentials (Fig. 1, C and D). These actions are similar to those reported for scorpion alpha -toxins (13, 34). However, delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 caused differential actions on peak sodium current amplitude in these two populations of neurons. In dorsal root ganglion neurons delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 caused a marked reduction in peak sodium current (Fig. 1A), whereas in periaqueductal gray neurons there was no significant change in peak sodium current (Fig. 1B). This is in contrast to scorpion alpha -toxins that typically increase peak sodium current (5, 6, 13, 35, 36). Given these similar actions on sodium currents, we further compared the actions of delta -atracotoxins with those of scorpion alpha -toxins to produce positive cooperativity with [3H]BTX binding, enhancement of alkaloid toxin-stimulated 22Na+ uptake, and competition in radioiodinated scorpion toxin binding assays.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Actions of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 on whole cell tetrodotoxin-sensitive sodium currents in rat dorsal root ganglion and periaqueductal gray neurones. Upper panels show the slowing of sodium current inactivation induced by delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 in dorsal root ganglion neurons (A) and periaqueductal gray neurons from rat brain (B); a represents the control trace, and b shows the current recorded in the presence of 30 nM delta -atracotoxin-Hv1. A, currents were activated by depolarizing test pulses from -80 mV to -10 mV for 50 ms every 10 s. B, currents were activated by depolarizing test pulses from -90 mV to 0 mV for 6 ms every 10 s. C and D show the I/V relationships recorded before (bullet ) and after (open circle ) 30 nM delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 from the same neurons as in A and B, respectively. Note the negative shift in the voltage dependence of activation in the presence of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1.

Enhancement of [3H]BTX Binding by delta -Atracotoxin-Hv1-- Scorpion alpha -toxins have been shown to act in a positive allosteric fashion to increase the binding of site 2 alkaloid toxins such as batrachotoxin (27, 29). We therefore assessed the ability of delta -atracotoxins to enhance [3H]BTX binding to rat brain synaptosomes. delta -Atracotoxin-Hv1 was found to significantly enhance the binding of [3H]BTX approximately 12-fold with a concentration required for half-maximal enhancement (EC50) of 25.2 ± 4.5 nM (n = 4, Fig. 2A). In comparison, AaH II-enhanced [3H]BTX binding under the same conditions gave a 5.6-fold increase in the maximal response (Emax) with an EC50 of 14.4 ± 2.3 nM (Fig. 2A, inset). In order to show that the enhancement of [3H]BTX binding represents an increase in binding to neurotoxin receptor site 2, delta -atracotoxin-Hv1-enhanced [3H]BTX binding was measured in the presence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled batrachotoxin or veratridine. Both alkaloid toxins were able to completely inhibit [3H]BTX binding enhanced by 3 µM delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 in a concentration-dependent manner indicating the enhancement is specifically mediated through receptor site 2 (Fig. 2B).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Enhancement of [3H]BTX binding by delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 in rat brain synaptosomes. A, enhancement of [3H]BTX binding by increasing concentrations of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1. Rat brain synaptosomes (350 µg of protein) were preincubated with 15 nM [3H]BTX for 50 min at 37 °C in the presence of increasing concentrations of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 (main panel) or AaH II (inset). The data points represent the mean ± S.E. of four experiments (see "Experimental Procedures" for details). B, inhibition of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 enhanced [3H]BTX binding by veratridine and batrachotoxin. Rat brain synaptosomes were incubated with 15 nM [3H]BTX and 3 µM delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 in the presence of a range of concentrations of batrachotoxin (bullet ) and veratridine (open circle ) under the same conditions as in A. Data are presented as a percentage of maximal [3H]BTX binding in the presence of 3 µM delta -atracotoxin-Hv1. Values represent the mean ± S.E. of three experiments for both veratridine and batrachotoxin. B, inset, lack of enhancement of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1-enhanced [3H]BTX binding by AaH II. Increasing concentrations of AaH II were incubated with 15 nM [3H]BTX in the absence (gray columns) and presence (black columns) of a saturating concentration of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 (10 µM) under the same conditions as A. Values represent the mean ± S.E. of three experiments.

Analysis of batrachotoxin binding indicated that in the presence of 100 nM AaH II, 20 nM delta -atracotoxin-Hv1, or 3 µM delta -atracotoxin-Hv1, [3H]BTX binds to a single class of high affinity binding sites (Table I) in agreement with earlier studies (29). In the absence of scorpion alpha -toxins or sea anemone toxins, the estimated Kd for [3H]BTX was reported to be 700 nM (29). Under the present conditions, the Kd of [3H]BTX in the absence of enhancement was 862 ± 310 nM. The addition of either AaH II or delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 reduced the Kd approximately 3.2-fold while not significantly altering the total number of binding sites (see Table I). To examine if AaH II and delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 enhance [3H]BTX binding by interacting with closely related or distinct receptor sites, the increase in [3H]BTX binding was determined in the simultaneous presence of the two polypeptide toxins (Fig. 2B, inset). Addition of increasing concentrations of AaH II in the presence of saturating concentrations of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 (10 µM) did not further enhance [3H]BTX binding as compared with delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 alone. These data indicate that delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 and AaH II may bind to a common receptor site and enhance [3H]BTX binding in a similar manner.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Effect of AaH II and delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 on [3H]BTX binding
Rat brain synaptosomes were incubated with 15 nM [3H]BTX and increasing concentrations of unlabeled batrachotoxin in the presence of the indicated concentrations of AaH II or delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data have been presented as the means ± S.E. (n = 3) as determined from nonlinear regression (see Equation 1 under "Experimental Procedures"). Statistical analysis using a one-way analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between any of the data.

Activation of 22Na+ Uptake by delta -Atracotoxins-- To determine whether delta -atracotoxins can directly activate voltage-gated sodium channels, their ability to increase 22Na+ uptake by rat brain synaptosomes was examined. Both delta -atracotoxins were able to activate 22Na+ uptake in a concentration-dependent manner to 30 and 28% of maximum, with concentrations for half-maximal activation (EC50) of 25 ± 8 and 44 ± 18 nM for delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 and delta -atracotoxin-Ar1, respectively (Fig. 3). Maximal 22Na+ uptake was determined in the presence of 1 µM BTX, and the direct stimulation of 22Na+ uptake by delta -atracotoxins was expressed as a percentage of maximal flux. Moreover the delta -atracotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake was TTX-sensitive (Fig. 3B, inset) confirming that it was mediated via the voltage-gated sodium channel. Similarly, the scorpion alpha -toxin AaH II was also able to directly activate 22Na+ uptake to 14 ± 3% at a concentration of 30 nM (Fig. 3A, inset).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Activation of 22Na+ uptake by funnel-web spider toxins in rat brain synaptosomes. Synaptosomes (500 µg) were incubated with a range of concentrations of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 (A) and delta -atracotoxin-Ar1 (B and C) for 30 min at 37 °C, and 22Na+ uptake was measured after a 5-s period. Nonspecific 22Na+ uptake in the presence of 1 µM TTX was subtracted, and data were presented as a percentage of maximal uptake as determined in the presence of 1 µM batrachotoxin. A, inset, activation of 22Na+ uptake by AaH II. Synaptosomes were incubated with a range of concentrations of AaH II and 22Na+ uptake measured under the same conditions as above (n = 3). B, inset, inhibition of delta -atracotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake by TTX. Black columns show 22Na+ uptake recorded in the presence of 10 µM delta -atracotoxin-Hv1, and the gray columns show data recorded in the presence of 1 µM delta -atracotoxin-Ar1. It was found that 1 µM TTX reduced 22Na+ uptake activated by delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 and delta -atracotoxin-Ar1 to 3 ± 2% (n = 3) and 1 ± 1% (n = 3), respectively. C, effect of AaH II on 22Na+ uptake activated by delta -atracotoxin-Ar1. Synaptosomes were incubated with a range of concentrations of delta -atracotoxin-Ar1 in the absence (bullet ) and presence (open circle ) of 30 nM AaH II. All values represent the mean ± S.E. (n = 3-13 for A, n = 3-6 for B, and n = 3 for C).

Scorpion alpha -toxins that bind to neurotoxin receptor site 3 have been shown to enhance activation of 22Na+ uptake by site 2 alkaloid toxins via an increase in binding affinity and efficacy (27). This is believed to occur via a positive allosteric interaction between sites 2 and 3 (for review see Ref. 7). To determine if AaH II and delta -atracotoxin-Ar1 have a cooperative action on 22Na+ uptake, increasing concentrations of delta -atracotoxin-Ar1 were incubated with 30 nM AaH II. This concentration of AaH II was able to directly activate 22Na+ uptake (Fig. 3A, inset). No additivity or cooperativity was observed as 22Na+ uptake activated by the highest concentrations of both toxins (Fig. 3C) was identical to flux produced by delta -atracotoxin-Ar1 alone (approximately 30% of maximal). Similar results were obtained with delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 (data not shown). These results are in accordance with the effect of concurrent administration of AaH II and delta -atracotoxins on [3H]BTX binding (Fig. 2B, inset).

Low Concentrations of delta -Atracotoxins Cooperatively Enhance Batrachotoxin- and Veratridine-activated 22Na+ Uptake-- Since delta -atracotoxins enhance [3H]BTX binding, we assessed the effect of 6 nM delta -atracotoxin on batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake (Fig. 4). This concentration of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 gives minimal direct activation of 22Na+ uptake (Fig. 3); nevertheless, it is able to significantly shift the EC50 of batrachotoxin to activate 22Na+ uptake from 155 ± 36 to 15 ± 10 nM (Fig. 4A). Unexpectedly, this low concentration of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 also produced a 30 ± 7% inhibition of the maximum 22Na+ uptake, activated by 1 µM BTX (Fig. 4A).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Enhancement of batrachotoxin- and veratridine-stimulated 22Na+ uptake by delta -atracotoxins. A, increasing concentrations of batrachotoxin were incubated with rat brain synaptosomes in the absence (bullet ) and presence of 6 nM (open circle ) delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 (n = 3). The EC50 of batrachotoxin was reduced from 154 ± 21 to 9.0 ± 4.4 nM in the presence of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1. Note the 32% inhibition in batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake. B, enhancement of veratridine-activated 22Na+ uptake by delta -atracotoxin-Hv1. A range of concentrations of veratridine was incubated with rat brain synaptosomes in the absence (bullet ) and presence of 6 nM delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 (open circle ) (n = 3). The EC50 of veratridine was reduced from 4.0 ± 0.3 to 0.6 ± 0.4 µM in the presence of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1, and the maximal 22Na+ uptake was increased. For conditions of incubation see "Experimental Procedures." All data are presented as a percentage of maximal uptake as determined in the presence of 1 µM batrachotoxin.

Since batrachotoxin and veratridine have been shown to compete for binding to neurotoxin receptor site 2 (see Ref. 29 and Fig. 2B), we compared the effects of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 on veratridine-stimulated 22Na+ uptake. Similar to the enhancement of batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake, delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 (6 nM) lowered the EC50 of veratridine 10-fold from 4.0 ± 1.0 to 0.4 ± 0.1 µM (Fig. 4B). In contrast to the inhibition observed in the presence of batrachotoxin, the addition of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 increased the maximal effect of veratridine to that observed in the presence of 1 µM batrachotoxin, thus converting veratridine from a partial agonist to a full agonist. This effect is similar to that of scorpion alpha -toxins on veratridine-stimulated 22Na+ uptake as described previously by Tamkun and Catterall (27).

delta -Atracotoxins Differentially Modify Batrachotoxin- and Veratridine-activated 22Na+ Uptake-- To analyze further the interactions of delta -atracotoxins with alkaloid toxin-stimulated 22Na+ uptake, we examined the effect of the funnel-web spider toxins on maximal 22Na+ uptake stimulated either by batrachotoxin or veratridine. As previously noted in Fig. 4A, increasing concentrations of delta -atracotoxins strongly inhibited the maximal 22Na+ uptake stimulated by 1 µM batrachotoxin (Fig. 5A) with IC50 values of 10 ± 2 and 14 ± 2 nM for delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 and delta -atracotoxin-Ar1, respectively. Notable was the inhibition of batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake to a level comparable with that which the delta -atracotoxins activate 22Na+ uptake in the absence of batrachotoxin (see Fig. 3, A and B). As with flux activated directly by delta -atracotoxins, the remaining 22Na+ uptake in the presence of both 1 µM batrachotoxin and saturating concentrations of delta -atracotoxins could be inhibited by 1 µM TTX (data not shown).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Differential effect of delta -atracotoxins on batrachotoxin- and veratridine-stimulated 22Na+ uptake. A, inhibition of batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake by delta -atracotoxins. Rat brain synaptosomes were incubated for 10 min at 37 °C with 1 µM batrachotoxin and a range of concentrations of either delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 (bullet , n = 3-8) or delta -atracotoxin-Ar1 (open circle , n = 3-5). B, enhancement of veratridine-activated 22Na+ uptake by increasing concentrations of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1. Synaptosomes were incubated with the indicated concentrations of delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 in the absence (black columns) and presence (gray columns) of 300 µM veratridine. The left-hand (striped) column shows the activation of 22Na+ uptake by 300 µM veratridine alone. All data are presented as a percentage of maximal 22Na+ uptake as determined in the presence of 1 µM batrachotoxin (n = 3).

In contrast to the inhibition of batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake, delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 was able to increase uptake activated by saturating (300 µM) concentrations of veratridine (Fig. 5B). No inhibition of veratridine-activated 22Na+ uptake by delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 was observed, even at concentrations up to 3 µM. This marked difference in the modulation of batrachotoxin- and veratridine-stimulated 22Na+ uptake by delta -atracotoxins strongly suggests a differential interaction of the spider toxin receptor site with the alkaloid toxin binding region. Such differences were not observed with scorpion alpha -toxin modulation of alkaloid toxin action (27). Accordingly, we examined the ability of delta -atracotoxins to compete directly with the binding of scorpion alpha -toxins to neurotoxin receptor site 3.

Inhibition of Scorpion alpha -Toxin Binding by delta -Atracotoxins-- AaH II and Lqh II, which differ by only 2 amino acid residues, were shown to have similar LD50 values in mice and reveal identical IC50 values in competition binding studies with 125I-AaH II binding to rat brain synaptosomes (22). Similarly, AaH II and Lqh II compete with identical Ki values for the binding of 125I-Lqh II (Fig. 6). Likewise delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 and delta -atracotoxin-Ar1 are able to completely inhibit the binding of 125I-Lqh II to rat brain sodium channels with Ki values of 0.85 ± 0.03 and 1.07 ± 0.2 nM, respectively (Fig. 6). These data indicate that delta -atracotoxins may share a common binding site with scorpion alpha -toxins.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Competition for binding of 125I-Lqh II by delta -atracotoxins. Rat brain synaptosomes (43 µg/ml) were incubated for 20 min at 22 °C in the presence of 0.1 nM 125I-Lqh II with increasing concentrations of Lqh II (bullet ), AaH II (open circle ), delta -atracotoxin-Hv1 (black-square) and delta -atracotoxin-Ar1 (). Nonspecific binding, measured in the presence of 100 nM Lqh II, was subtracted from all data points. The curves were fitted using the Logistic equation for inhibition using a Hill number (nH) of 1 with regression coefficients (R2) higher than 0.976. The calculated Ki values for inhibition of 125I-Lqh II were as follows: Lqh II, 0.17 ± 0.04 nM; AaH II, 0.2 ± 0.03 nM; delta -atracotoxin, 0.85 ± 0.03 nM; delta -atracotoxin, 1.07 ± 0.2 nM.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

delta -Atracotoxins Affect Sodium Channels in a Unique Manner-- The present study shows that delta -atracotoxins slow sodium current inactivation and shift the voltage dependence of activation in peripheral and central neurons in a similar manner to scorpion alpha -toxins. Unlike scorpion alpha -toxins, which typically cause a slight increase or do not alter peak sodium currents (13), delta -atracotoxins were also shown to decrease peak sodium currents in rat dorsal root ganglion but not periaqueductal gray neurons (5, 6). This suggests that the actions of delta -atracotoxins may be, at least in part, subtype-specific as the sodium channel subtypes in sensory and rat brain neurons have been shown to be distinct (37). This assumption deserves further study, but clearly the most prominent effect to slow sodium current inactivation is similar in the two preparations (Fig. 1). One of the most intriguing results of the present study, however, was the observation that delta -atracotoxins markedly increase [3H]BTX binding but decrease batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake (Figs. 2A and 5A). The latter is in marked contrast to the effect of scorpion alpha -toxins on batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake in rat brain synaptosomes (27, 34).

The other unexpected result of our study was the differential modulation of batrachotoxin and veratridine action by delta -atracotoxins. Unlike the inhibition of batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake (Fig. 5A), the delta -atracotoxins increase veratridine-activated 22Na+ flux by decreasing the EC50 and converting veratridine from a partial to a full agonist (Fig. 4B). This effect on the activity of veratridine is similar to that observed with scorpion alpha -toxins (27, 34). Hence delta -atracotoxins, unlike scorpion alpha -toxins, are able to differentiate between the open state of the sodium channel stabilized by batrachotoxin and veratridine (18, 38). Despite these differences in the effect of delta -atracotoxins and scorpion alpha -toxins on activation of sodium channels in electrophysiological and 22Na+ uptake studies, delta -atracotoxins were shown to compete at low concentration with the scorpion alpha -toxin Lqh II on rat brain sodium channels (Fig. 6). This suggests that delta -atracotoxins bind to similar receptor sites as scorpion alpha -toxins, despite their differential interaction with batrachotoxin and veratridine.

delta -Atracotoxins May Induce Sub-conductance States-- Alkaloid toxins, which bind to receptor site 2, are considered to be persistent activators of sodium channels (7). Their mode of action, however, is very complex; they induce a strong shift in the voltage dependence of activation to very negative membrane potentials, inhibit or remove inactivation, alter ion selectivity, and reduce single channel conductance (18, 19, 36, 38). Thus despite the persistent activation, sodium conductance through the permanently open sodium channels is reduced to around 50% or 15-25% of normal in the presence of batrachotoxin or veratridine, respectively, indicating that these two alkaloids stabilize two discrete sub-conductance states (19, 39, 40). It is conceivable that the decrease in sodium conductance observed with delta -atracotoxins in dorsal root ganglia neurons may be due to stabilization or induction of a distinct sub-conductance state, in addition to actions on sodium current inactivation (5, 6). The presence of sub-conductance states is suggested to occur also in central neurons in the presence of batrachotoxin, as indicated by the inhibition of batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake induced by delta -atracotoxins (Fig. 5A). delta -Atracotoxins can induce 30% of maximal 22Na+ uptake and inhibit the maximal uptake stimulated by batrachotoxin to 20-30% (Figs. 3 and 5A). This may indicate that the sub-conductance state induced by delta -atracotoxins in the presence of batrachotoxin is about 30% that induced by batrachotoxin alone. Moreover, this sub-conductance state should dominate the open state of the channel even in the simultaneous presence of both batrachotoxin and delta -atracotoxins. Our present data, however, cannot provide evidence for this assumption. Clarification of the mechanistic basis for the inhibition of sodium current awaits single channel analysis of delta -atracotoxin-modified currents.

delta -Atracotoxins Differentially Interact with Batrachotoxin and Veratridine Receptor Sites-- An interesting finding of the present study was that [3H]BTX binding was increased despite a decrease in batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake. This suggests an uncoupling between the binding of batrachotoxin and its action to activate sodium channels. In support of this hypothesis is the recent study of Wang and Wang (41) that used site-directed mutagenesis in the S6 transmembrane segment of domain I of sodium channels to study the receptor-binding site of batrachotoxin. They revealed that certain mutants could separate the inhibition of channel inactivation from the induction of a sub-conductance state by batrachotoxin. Their results indicate a possible uncoupling between the binding and some of the effects of batrachotoxin on the sodium channel as noted in the present study.

In contrast to the inhibition in batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake, delta -atracotoxins increased the effect of veratridine-stimulated 22Na+ uptake at all concentrations. This may indicate that delta -atracotoxins interact differentially with the open sub-conducting state induced by veratridine than with that stabilized by batrachotoxin. This is supported by the increase in veratridine-stimulated 22Na+ uptake to the maximal level even at saturating concentrations of delta -atracotoxins (3 µM; Fig. 5B), a concentration that induced 70-80% inhibition of batrachotoxin-stimulated uptake. Independent support for this differential interaction hypothesis is the different sub-conductance state reported in the literature for batrachotoxin and veratridine (19, 39, 40).

Implications for the delta -Atracotoxin Receptor Site-- Competition binding experiments revealed that both delta -atracotoxins were able to completely displace the 125I-scorpion alpha -toxin Lqh II in a concentration-dependent manner. This suggests that delta -atracotoxins bind to at least a partially overlapping receptor site with that of scorpion alpha -toxins. The above considerations suggest, however, that despite competitive interactions in binding studies (Fig. 6), the actual binding interactions may differ, at least partially, between delta -atracotoxins and scorpion alpha -toxins. This is supported by the differential modulation by the delta -atracotoxin receptor site, shown to be on the extracellular side of the channel (5, 6), of the receptor site for batrachotoxin and that for veratridine. Hence, delta -atracotoxins and scorpion alpha -toxins may bind to partially overlapping sites on the sodium channel localized within the area of receptor site 3. In support, another group of scorpion toxins, the "alpha -like" toxins, which also inhibit sodium current inactivation, were suggested to bind to a partially overlapping receptor site with scorpion alpha -toxins and sea anemone toxins (31). Despite the initial insight into the receptor site 3 area (42, 43), the regions of the sodium channel involved in binding of these peptide toxins still await to be discovered.

In summary, the delta -atracotoxins bind to a similar cluster of receptor sites as scorpion alpha -toxins. Despite the slowing of sodium current inactivation and the competition for scorpion alpha -toxin binding differences among these receptor sites are indicated by the inhibition of peak sodium current in dorsal root ganglion neurons induced by delta -atracotoxins in contrast to the increase obtained with scorpion alpha -toxins. Moreover, delta -atracotoxins also differentially interact with batrachotoxin and veratridine receptor sites to modulate 22Na+ uptake which has not been reported with the scorpion alpha -toxins. The interaction with alkaloid toxin binding is, however, suggested to be very similar for both scorpion alpha -toxins and delta -atracotoxins as they can markedly increase [3H]BTX binding and reduce the EC50 values for both batrachotoxin and veratridine. Since delta -atracotoxins enhance batrachotoxin binding yet significantly reduce batrachotoxin-activated 22Na+ uptake, the binding and action of certain alkaloid toxins may represent at least two distinguishable steps. Our study further emphasizes the complexity of peptide toxin interaction with the receptor site 3 area on the extracellular surface of sodium channels and its allosteric interaction with the receptor site 2 area. This suggests that closely related structural elements within both receptor site 2 and 3 areas may be responsible for the differences in the modulation of gating revealed by the combined presence of sodium channel modulators such as delta -atracotoxins, scorpion alpha -toxins, and alkaloid toxins. The present study further highlights the need for more structural data on the neurotoxin receptor sites in combination with electrophysiological and biochemical studies in order to understand the dynamic gating processes of the voltage-gated sodium channel.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. John Morgan (Royal North Shore Hospital) and Dr. Mike Gray (Australian Museum, Sydney) for helpful discussions. We are grateful to the general public, shire councils, and hospitals in the following shires for kind donations of spiders: Baulkham Hills, Gosford, Hornsby, Hunters Hill, Hurstville, Kuring-gai, Lane Cove, Manly, North Sydney, Parramatta, Pittwater, Sutherland, Warringah, Willoughby, Wollondilly, and Wollongong.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by an Australian Research Council research grant and a University of Technology, Sydney internal research grant (to G. M. N.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

** Present address: The Australian Proteome Analysis Facility, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales 2109, Australia.

§§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: CEA, C.E.-Saclay, Département d'Ingénierie et d'Etudes des Protéines, Gif-sur-Yvette, F-91911, France. Fax: 33 1 69 08 90 71; E-mail: GORDON{at}dsvidf.cea.fr.

¶¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Health Sciences, University of Technology, Sydney, P. O. Box 123, Broadway, New South Wales 2007, Australia. Fax: 61 2 9514-2228; E-mail: Graham.Nicholson{at}uts.edu.au.

The abbreviations used are: delta -atracotoxin-Ar1, (formerly robustoxin) from the venom of the spider Atrax robustusdelta -atracotoxin-Hv1, (formerly versutoxin) from the venom of the spider Hadronyche versutaTTX, tetrodotoxinAaH II, alpha -toxin II from the venom of the scorpion Androctonus australis hectorATX II, sea anemone toxin II from Anemonia sulcata[3H]BTX, [3H]batrachotoxinin A-20alpha -benzoateLqh II, alpha -toxin II from the venom of the scorpion Leiurus quinquestriatus hebraeusTEA, tetraethylammoniumHPLC, high performance liquid chromatographyTricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]-glycineBSA, bovine serum albumin.
    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Fletcher, J. I., Smith, R., O'Donoghue, S. I., Nilges, M., Connor, M., Howden, M. E. H., Christie, M. J., and King, G. F. (1997) Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 559-566[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Fletcher, J. I., Wang, X., Connor, M., Christie, M. J., King, G. F., and Nicholson, G. M. (1998) in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design: Animal Toxins and Potassium Channels (Darbon, H., and Sabatier, J.-M., eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Drodrecht, Netherlands, in press
  3. Brown, M. R., Sheumack, D. D., Tyler, M. I., and Howden, M. E. H. (1988) Biochem. J. 250, 401-405[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Sheumack, D. D., Claassens, R., Whiteley, N. M., and Howden, M. E. H. (1985) FEBS Lett. 181, 154-156[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Nicholson, G. M., Willow, M., Howden, M. E. H., and Narahashi, T. (1994) Pfluegers Arch. 428, 400-409[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Nicholson, G. M., Walsh, R., Little, M. J., and Tyler, M. I. (1998) Pfluegers Arch. 436, 117-126[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Catterall, W. A. (1986) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 55, 953-985[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Fletcher, J. I., Chapman, B. E., Mackay, J. P., Howden, M. E. H., and King, G. F. (1997) Structure 5, 1525-1535[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Pallaghy, P. K., Alewood, D., Alewood, P. F., and Norton, R. S. (1997) FEBS Lett. 419, 191-196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Pallaghy, P. K., Neilsen, K. J., Craik, D. J., and Norton, R. S. (1993) Protein Sci. 3, 1833-1839[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Fontecilla-Camps, J. C., Almassy, R. J., Suddath, F. L., and Bugg, C. E. (1982) Toxicon 20, 1-7
  12. Tugarinov, V., Kustanovich, I., Zilberberg, N., Gurevitz, M., and Anglister, J. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 2414-2424[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Strichartz, G. R., and Wang, G. K. (1986) J. Gen. Physiol. 88, 413-435[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Eitan, M., Fowler, E., Herrmann, R., Duval, A., Pelhate, M., and Zlotkin, E. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 5941-5947[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Fainzilber, M., Kofman, O., Zlotkin, E., and Gordon, D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2574-2580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Trainer, V. L., McPhee, J. C., Boutelet-Bochan, H., Baker, C., Scheuer, T., Babin, D., Demoute, J. P., Guedin, D., and Catterall, W. A. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 51, 651-657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Gordon, D. (1997) in Toxins and Signal Transduction (Lazarowici, P., and Gutman, Y., eds), pp. 119-149, Harwood Press, Amsterdam
  18. Hille, B., Leibowitz, M. D., Sutro, J. B., Schwarz, J. R., and Holan, G. (1987) Soc. Gen. Physiol. Ser. 41, 109-124[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Hille, B. (1992) Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes, pp. 308-328, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA
  20. Catterall, W. A. (1977) J. Biol. Chem. 252, 8669-8676[Free Full Text]
  21. Ray, R., Morrow, C. S., and Catterall, W. A. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 253, 7307-7313[Free Full Text]
  22. Miranda, F., Kopeyan, C., Rochat, H., Rochat, C., and Lissitzky, S. (1970) Eur. J. Biochem. 16, 514-523[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Sautière, P., Cestèle, S., Kopeyan, C., Martinage, A., Drobecq, H., Doljansky, Y., and Gordon, D. (1998) Toxicon 36, 1141-1154[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Connor, M., and Christie, M. J. (1998) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 509, 47-58[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Ingram, S., Wilding, T. J., McCleskey, E. W., and Williams, J. T. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 52, 136-143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Gray, E. G., and Whittaker, V. P. (1962) J. Anat. 96, 79-87[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Tamkun, M. M., and Catterall, W. A. (1981) Mol. Pharmacol. 19, 78-86[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kanner, B. J. (1978) Biochemistry 17, 1207-1211[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Catterall, W. A., Morrow, C. S., Daly, J. W., and Brown, G. B. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 8922-8927[Free Full Text]
  30. Gordon, D., and Zlotkin, E. (1993) FEBS Lett. 315, 125-129[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Gordon, D., Martin-Eauclaire, M.-F., Cestèle, S., Kopeyan, C., Carlier, E., Ben Khalifa, R., Pelhate, M., and Rochat, H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 8034-8045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Cestèle, S., Ben Khalifa, R., Pelhate, M., Rochat, H., and Gordon, D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15153-15161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Cheng, Y.-C., and Prusoff, W. H. (1973) Biochem. Pharmacol. 22, 3099-3108[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Couraud, F., Martin-Moutot, N., Koulakoff, A., and Berwald-Netter, Y. (1986) J. Neurosci. 6, 192-198[Abstract]
  35. Gonoi, T., Hille, B., and Catterall, W. A. (1984) J. Neurosci. 4, 2836-2842[Abstract]
  36. Strichartz, G. R., Rando, T., and Wang, G. K. (1987) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 237-267[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Felts, P. A., Yokoyama, S., Dib-Hajj, S., Black, J. A., and Waxman, S. G. (1997) Mol. Brain Res. 45, 71-82[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Garber, S. S., and Miller, C. (1987) J. Gen. Physiol. 89, 459-480[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Correa, A. M., Latorre, R., and Bezanilla, F. (1991) J. Gen. Physiol. 97, 605-625[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Wang, G., Dugas, M., Armah, B. I., and Honerjager, P. (1990) Mol. Pharmacol. 37, 144-148[Abstract]
  41. Wang, S.-Y., and Wang, G. K. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 2653-2658[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Rogers, J. C., Qu, Y., Tanada, T. N., Scheuer, T., and Catterall, W. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15950-15962[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Thomsen, W. J., and Catterall, W. A. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 10161-10165[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. J. West, G. Bulaj, and D. Yoshikami
Effects of {delta}-Conotoxins PVIA and SVIE on Sodium Channels in the Amphibian Sympathetic Nervous System
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2005; 94(6): 3916 - 3924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
W. Ulbricht
Sodium Channel Inactivation: Molecular Determinants and Modulation
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2005; 85(4): 1271 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. Karbat, F. Frolow, O. Froy, N. Gilles, L. Cohen, M. Turkov, D. Gordon, and M. Gurevitz
Molecular Basis of the High Insecticidal Potency of Scorpion {alpha}-Toxins
J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 2004; 279(30): 31679 - 31686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Barbier, H. Lamthanh, F. Le Gall, P. Favreau, E. Benoit, H. Chen, N. Gilles, N. Ilan, S. H. Heinemann, D. Gordon, et al.
A {delta}-Conotoxin from Conus ermineus Venom Inhibits Inactivation in Vertebrate Neuronal Na+ Channels but Not in Skeletal and Cardiac Muscles
J. Biol. Chem., February 6, 2004; 279(6): 4680 - 4685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
F Grolleau, M Stankiewicz, L Birinyi-Strachan, X. Wang, G. Nicholson, M Pelhate, and B Lapied
Electrophysiological analysis of the neurotoxic action of a funnel-web spider toxin, delta-atracotoxin-HV1a, on insect voltage-gated Na+ channels
J. Exp. Biol., January 2, 2001; 204(4): 711 - 721.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
N. Gilles, C. Blanchet, I. Shichor, M. Zaninetti, I. Lotan, D. Bertrand, and D. Gordon
A Scorpion alpha -Like Toxin That Is Active on Insects and Mammals Reveals an Unexpected Specificity and Distribution of Sodium Channel Subtypes in Rat Brain Neurons
J. Neurosci., October 15, 1999; 19(20): 8730 - 8739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Little, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Little, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement