Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cessna, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Low, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cessna, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Low, P. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 42, 27286-27291, October 16, 1998


Hypo-osmotic Shock of Tobacco Cells Stimulates Ca2+ Fluxes Deriving First from External and then Internal Ca2+ Stores*

Stephen G. Cessna, Sreeganga ChandraDagger , and Philip S. Low§

From the Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1393

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Hypo-osmotic shock of aequorin-transformed tobacco cells induces a biphasic cytosolic Ca2+ influx. Because both phases of Ca2+ entry are readily blocked by Ca2+ channel inhibitors, we conclude that the Ca2+ transients are mediated by Ca2+ channels. Evidence that the first but not second Ca2+ transient derives from external Ca2+ stores is that the first but not second influx is (i) eliminated by membrane-impermeable Ca2+ chelators, (ii) enlarged by supplementation of the medium with excess Ca2+, and (iii) reduced by the addition of competitive cations such as Mg2+ and Mn2+. Furthermore, entry of 45Ca during osmotic shock is prevented by inhibitors of the first but not second phase of Ca2+ entry. Evidence that the second wave of Ca2+ influx stems from release of intracellular Ca2+ is based on the above data plus observations that probable modulators of intracellular Ca2+ channels selectively block this phase of Ca2+ influx. Finally, a mechanism of communication between the two Ca2+ release pathways has become apparent, since perturbations that elevate or reduce the first Ca2+ transient lead to a compensating diminution/elevation of the second and vice versa. These data thus suggest that osmotic shock leads to the sequential opening of extracellular followed by intracellular Ca2+ stores and that these Ca2+ release pathways are internally compensated.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Ca2+ is well established as a second messenger in plant signal transduction pathways, including those initiated by such stimuli as cold shock (1), heat shock, (2), touch (3), anoxia (4, 5), elicitor addition (3, 6-9), pathogen infection (10-12), hormone administration (13-16), oxidative stress (17), far red light (18), drought (19), pollen tube elongation (20, 21), and egg cell fertilization (22) (for recent reviews, see Refs. 23-26). These temporary elevations of cytosolic Ca2+ are believed to participate in signal propagation, resulting in activation/inhibition of such downstream effectors as protein kinases, ion channels, phospholipases, oxidases, hydrolases, and/or calmodulin-dependent enzymes (27). As anticipated, blockade of the above-stimulated Ca2+ influxes either inhibits or retards most, if not all, of the associated pathways.

It can be hypothesized that plant cells maintain high Ca2+ concentrations both in their extracellular milieus and in certain intracellular compartments to enable rapid gating of the cation into the low Ca2+ environment of the cytosol (23-29). Indeed, cytosolic Ca2+ transients in hormone/cytokine-treated animal cells have been shown to derive from both internal and external Ca2+ stores (27). Because Ca2+ channels have been identified in both plasma and internal membranes of plant cells (6, 9, 30-38), both Ca2+ pools should be considered as possible sources for mediating plant signaling events.

We and others have observed that elicitation of the oxidative burst in cultured plant cells generally accompanies and requires a rise in cytosolic Ca2+ (7-10). However, it has not been established if the induction of the oxidative burst requires Ca2+ influx from internal or external Ca2+ stores or from both in succession or simultaneously. In the case of the mechanically or osmotically stimulated oxidative burst, the cytoplasmic Ca2+ increase is distinctly biphasic. Thus, using aequorin-transformed tobacco cells to quantitate Ca2+ influx into the cytoplasm of the cell (3), Ca2+ peaks have been repeatedly observed ~15 s and 1.5 min after hypotonic stress (8, 39). In addition, other groups have established that both Ca2+ entry across the plasma membrane and Ca2+ release from internal stores may play roles in plant cell volume/turgor regulation (14, 23). Because this unusual pattern of Ca2+ flux offers the opportunity to examine the Ca2+ signal required for both the induction of the oxidative burst and the regulation of cellular turgor pressure, we have decided to identify the Ca2+ stores responsible for both phases of the Ca2+ influx. We report here that the first Ca2+ transient arises from outside the cell, whereas the second derives from intracellular stores. We further identify inhibitors that can selectively block the first, second, or both phases of Ca2+ flow, and we report observations regarding possible communication between the two pathways responsible for Ca2+ influx.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Materials-- Ruthenium red, lanthanum chloride, gadolinium chloride, and niflumate were all purchased from Sigma/Aldrich. 45Ca in the form of 45CaCl2 salt was obtained from ICN (Costa Mesa, CA), and coelenterazine was from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Other chemicals used were of reagent grade or better and were obtained from major chemical suppliers.

Aequorin-transformed Tobacco Cell Suspension Cultures-- Aequorin-transformed tobacco cell (Nicotiana plumbaginifolia) suspension cultures were established from transformed seedlings and maintained as described previously (8). Two ml of packed filtered cells were transferred to 100 ml of fresh W-38 liquid medium (40) every 7 days and maintained in suspension by continuous shaking. Cells to be used ~12 h later for Ca2+ measurements were transferred at twice their regular cell density. Functional aequorin was reconstituted from the apoenzyme by adding 5 µl of coelenterazine dissolved in ethanol (1 µM final) to 3 ml of suspension-cultured cells at the time of transfer. Functional aequorin capable of reproducible Ca2+ measurements was found to develop 5 to 15 h after transfer of the cells to fresh medium and the addition of coelenterazine.

Aequorin Luminescence Measurements and [Ca2+] Quantitation-- Luminescence measurements were carried out in a digital luminometer (LKB Wallac model 1250, Gaithersburg, MD), as described previously (8). Briefly, 0.5 ml of coelenterazine-treated cells were transferred to the luminometer cuvette and held in suspension by mild stirring during stimulation. Luminescence data was collected 10 times/s. All inhibitors, chelators, and control solvents were added at the times indicated in the figure legends. Plant cells were hypo-osmotically shocked by diluting the suspensions 1:1 with distilled water at the times indicated in the figures. At the end of each experiment, all remaining aequorin was discharged by the addition of 0.5 mM CaCl2 in 10% Nonidet P-40, and luminescence was continually quantitated until recordings returned to basal levels and further addition of CaCl2/detergent solution elicited no further response. Luminescence data were then converted by computer directly to intracellular Ca2+ concentration using the equation described by Allen et al. (41), [Ca2+] = ((L/Lmax)1/3 + [118(L/Lmax)1/3- 1)/(7 × 106 - [7 × 106(L/Lmax)1/3]), where L is the luminescence intensity at any time point, and Lmax is the integrated luminescence intensity from that point to the end of the luminescence recording.

45Ca Influx Experiments-- As above, 3 ml of suspension-cultured tobacco cells transferred at twice the density of continuously cultured cells were used for determination of 45Ca influx as described by Atkinson et al. (10). Briefly, 0.1 µCi of 45Ca was added to 3 ml of cells just before hypo- or iso-osmotic treatment. Inhibitors were added at the times indicated in the figure legends. 45Ca-treated cells were then incubated with gentle shaking for 7 min before suction filtration through Whatman filter paper at 20 mm of Hg and immediate rinsing with 3 ml of normo-osmotic buffer containing 10 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MES,1 and 160 mM sucrose (pH 5.6) to displace any externally bound 45Ca. Filtered and rinsed cells were then resuspended in 3 ml of rinse buffer and shaken for 20 min before suction filtering and rinsing again with 3 ml of rinse buffer. Finally, the cells were scraped into pre-weighed scintillation vials containing 3 ml of ICN Ecolite scintillation liquid. After counting the radioactivity in a Packard 1600CA liquid scintillation analyzer (Meriden, CT) and weighing the vials, the radioactivity/mg of filtered cells was calculated. Data are presented as detailed in the figure legend.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The Biphasic Ca2+ Flux in Tobacco Induced by Hypo-osmotic Shock Is the Result of the Activation of Specific Ion Channels-- It was conceivable that the previously observed hypo-osmotic shock generated Ca2+ transients (8, 39) were not due to regulated ion channels but rather to a membrane disturbance resulting in nonspecific Ca2+ leaks. To evaluate this possibility, we tested the effectiveness of several broad-spectrum Ca2+ channel inhibitors on the induced cytosolic Ca2+ fluxes. Ruthenium red and the trivalent lanthanides gadolinium and lanthanum are known to block many types of Ca2+ channels in both plasma and sarcoendoplasmic reticular membranes of animal cells (42-44), and all three have also been used for characterization of Ca2+ channels and Ca2+-dependent processes in plant cells (5, 8, 30-34, 45, 46). As can be seen in Fig. 1, each of these inhibitors is effective at blocking both phases of Ca2+ flow into hypo-osmotically stimulated tobacco cells. Inhibition of Ca2+ influx by ruthenium red at 50 µM (Fig. 1A) is consistent with the pharmacologic data of both Allen et al. (30) and Pineros and Tester (34), who observed blockade of cyclic-ADP-ribose-activated tonoplast Ca2+ channels and voltage-gated plasma membrane Ca2+ channels, respectively, at similar concentrations. Although this effect of ruthenium red has been previously published (8), we present these data here to allow direct comparisons of the inhibitory effects of Ca2+ channel blockers on these Ca2+ fluxes. Lanthanum and gadolinium ions, which required a 10-min equilibration to achieve maximal channel inhibition, also displayed concentration dependences similar to those observed by others (5, 9, 17). At 10 mM concentration, both lanthanides inhibited greater than 80% total Ca2+ influx, whereas at 1 mM they primarily suppressed influx during the first Ca2+ peak (Figs. 1, B and C).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Effect of ruthenium red, La3+, and Gd3+ on the hypo-osmotic shock induced Ca2+ fluxes in aequorin-transformed tobacco cells. Coelenterazine-treated aequorin-transformed tobacco cells (0.5 ml) were transferred to a luminometer cuvette after 15 min of treatment with the following inhibitors: A, ruthenium red (RR); B, LaCl3; and C, GdCl3. Final concentrations of inhibitors are indicated for each trace. Traces marked control represent data from cells not treated with any inhibitor. Luminescence was monitored, and [Ca2+]cyt was calculated as outlined under "Experimental Procedures." The cells were hypo-osmotically shocked in the cuvette by the addition of an equal volume of distilled water at the times indicated by the arrow. The data shown were collected on the same day from the same batch of cells and are representative of three independent experiments conducted on separate days with different batches of cells.

Inhibition by these agents provides little information regarding the location of channels responsible for the cytosolic Ca2+ transients. Externally provided ruthenium red has been shown to inhibit plasma membrane Ca2+ channels (34) and to enter cultured plant cells and interrupt internal Ca2+ release (4). In addition, lanthanum ions, classically used to identify plasma membrane Ca2+ channel activities, when provided in millimolar concentrations for periods greater than 1 min have also been observed to enter cells and alter internal Ca2+ channels (43, 44). However, the inhibition of Ca2+ influx by these channel blockers does demonstrate that the osmotically induced Ca2+ uptake proceeds through specific Ca2+ channels and not through nonspecific ion leaks.

The First Pulse of Cytosolic Ca2+ Derives from External Ca2+ Pools-- To begin to identify the cellular sources of the two pulses of cytosolic Ca2+, we first performed manipulations that would specifically modify the flux of external Ca2+ across the plasma membrane. EGTA, a membrane-impermeable selective chelator of Ca2+ ions, was added to the extracellular medium at a concentration of 1.5 mM, approximately the concentration of free Ca2+ in the medium. As shown in Fig. 2A, chelation of extracellular Ca2+ with EGTA exerts an inhibitory effect selectively on the first Ca2+ spike generated by hypo-osmotic shock, suggesting that this Ca2+ transient, but not the second, derives from an external source. Inhibition of the first peak was also seen using 1.5 mM 1,2-bis-(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (BAPTA) in place of EGTA, indicating that the nature of the Ca2+-chelating agent is unimportant to the inhibition (data not shown). In contrast to Ca2+ chelation, the addition of extra CaCl2 to achieve a final medium concentration approximately 2.7 and 4.3 times that normally present in the cell culture was seen to elevate the amount of Ca2+ entering during the first phase of the Ca2+ influx (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, supplementation of the growth medium with excess Mg2+, which can either compete with Ca2+ as a channel substrate or antagonize Ca2+ entry as a weak channel blocker (31, 34), also reduced the magnitude of the first Ca2+ peak (Fig. 2C). Mn+2 and Fe2+ were similarly found to inhibit the first, but not alter the second, of the two Ca2+ peaks (data not shown). Inhibition of the first phase of Ca2+ influx was also observed after replacement of the chloride with the sulfate salts of Mg2+ and Fe2+ (data not shown), indicating that this initial phase of Ca2+ entry into the cytosol is not controlled by the nature of the counter ion. Based on the selective suppression of the first Ca2+ transient by either EGTA or nonsubstrate cations and the selective enhancement of this peak by elevated extracellular Ca2+, we propose that the first peak of Ca2+ influx during osmotic shock originates from an apoplastic pool.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effect of extracellular Ca2+ modulators on Ca2+ fluxes. Aequorin luminescence recordings of cytosolic Ca2+ concentration were taken as outlined under "Experimental Procedures." A, cells were diluted 1:1 at the arrow with either 3 mM EGTA dissolved in distilled water (final concentration, 1.5 mM) or distilled water (control). B, cells were diluted 1:1 with either 10 mM CaCl2 dissolved in distilled water (final concentration, 5 mM), 5 mM CaCl2 in distilled water (2.5 mM), or distilled water (control) at the time indicated by the arrow. C, cells were diluted with either 20 mM MgCl2 in distilled water (final concentration, 10 mM), 4 mM MgCl2 in distilled water (2 mM), or distilled water (control). Data presented are representative of three independent experiments. Although Mg2+ is an established modulator of the affinity of aequorin for Ca2+ ions (67), since both L and Ltotal (and thus Lmax) are measured in the presence of elevated Mg2+, no artifact in the measurement or calculation of Ca2+ concentration should result. Additionally, since Mg2+ does not itself stimulate aequorin to luminesce (67), the calculations of intracellular Ca2+ concentration in the presence of Mg2+ should be accurate.

To further confirm the above channel assignment, measurement of 45Ca uptake by hypo-osmotically shocked cells was also performed. Dilution of the suspension-cultured tobacco cells with water caused an increase in the uptake of 45Ca to ~5× the basal level measured in iso-osmotically treated cells. As expected, 10 mM La3+ was seen to largely inhibit this influx (Fig. 3), confirming that the 45Ca uptake is mediated by a Ca2+ channel. More importantly, 10 mM MgCl2 was observed to reduce the uptake by ~60%, a value not inconsistent with the data shown in Fig. 2C. Since the added 45Ca was unequivocally apoplastic and since Mg+2 only reduces the first Ca2+ transient measured by aequorin luminescence, we conclude that this first pulse of osmotically stimulated Ca2+ entry indeed derives from extracellular Ca2+.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effect of Ca2+ modulators on 45Ca2+ influx. Aequorin-transformed tobacco cells (3 ml) were exposed to 0.1 µM Ci 45Ca according to the protocol outlined under "Experimental Procedures" and subjected to the following treatments: control, hypo-osmotic shock induced by 1:1 dilution with distilled water; La3+, 10 mM LaCl3 was added and followed immediately by a 1:1 dilution with distilled water; Mg2+, 10 mM MgCl2 was added and followed immediately by a 1:1 dilution with distilled water; and niflumate, 500 µM niflumate dissolved in Me2SO was added 10 min before 45Ca exposure and dilution with distilled water. Data are presented as relative nuclide uptake/mg of cells and corrected for basal 45Ca binding/uptake, measured in iso-osmotically treated control cells exposed to vehicle alone (1% water or 0.1% Me2SO). Error bars represent mean (S.D. for three independent experiments. Iso-osmotically treated samples gave 45Ca uptake readings of ~20% of the hypo-osmotically treated samples, presumably due to 45Ca binding in the cell wall. 45Ca uptake was greater in control cells pretreated with 0.1% Me2SO than in control cells pretreated with 1% water. This difference in basal 45Ca uptake appears to be due to a transient leak of 45Ca due to Me2SO at the time of its addition. Because uptake in vehicle-treated control cells was invariably subtracted, this perturbation should not influence the results shown.

The Second Peak of Ca2+ Derives from Intracellular Ca2+ Stores-- Although the results shown in Fig. 2 also argue that the second peak of cytosolic Ca2+ must stem from opening an internal store, we set out to confirm this hypothesis with selective modulators of internal Ca2+ release. For this purpose, caffeine, a Ca2+ channel regulator believed to activate Ca2+ release from cyclic-ADP-ribose and ryanodine-sensitive stores in many eukaryotic systems (4, 47, 48), was added to the tobacco suspensions, and the osmotically induced Ca2+ transients were again examined. As anticipated, the addition of caffeine in the absence of any other stimulus induced substantial entry of Ca2+ into the cytosol of the tobacco cell (Fig. 4A). Since these caffeine-activated Ca2+ transients were found to be insensitive to membrane-inpermeant Ca2+ chelators and to competition with extracellular Mn2+ or Mg2+ (data not shown), we reason that this Ca2+ signal indeed derives from the caffeine-induced emptying of an intracellular Ca2+ pool.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   The effect of intracellular Ca2+ modulators on Ca2+ fluxes. Aequorin luminescence recordings and Ca2+ calculations were performed as outlined under "Experimental Procedures." A, 0.5 ml of suspension-cultured cells were treated with either 100 or 40 mM caffeine at the time indicated by the arrow. Aequorin luminescence recordings of control cells treated with isotonic sucrose did not exceed 0.15 µM cytosolic [Ca2+] (data not shown). B, 0.5 ml of suspension-cultured cells were treated with either 40 mM caffeine (from an isotonic 180 mM stock solution) or isotonic sucrose (control) for 10 min before a 1:1 dilution with distilled water at the time indicated by the arrow. C, cells were treated with either 100 or 500 µM niflumate or with a corresponding volume of Me2SO alone (control) 10 min before hypo-osmotic stimulation in the luminometer. Cells were diluted 1:1 with distilled water at the time indicated by the arrow.

Based on its impact in animal cells, the ability of caffeine to autologously discharge certain internal Ca2+ stores should also lead to an insensitivity of the treated cells to stimuli that discharge the same stores. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of caffeine pretreatment on the subsequent ability of hypo-osmotic shock to activate the second phase of cytosolic Ca2+ release. As shown in Fig. 4B, prior exposure to caffeine eliminates the second Ca2+ transient without affecting or perhaps even enhancing the first. This loss of sensitivity to osmotic stimulation confirms that the latter Ca2+ influx is indeed derived from caffeine-sensitive internal stores. Unfortunately, other modulators of intracellular Ca2+ release commonly used in mammalian systems such as ryanodine (20 µM), the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor Ca2+ channel modulator TMB-8 (200 µM), or the sarcoendoplasmic reticular Ca2+ ATPase inhibitor thapsigargin (up to 100 µM) had little or no effect on either of the osmotically activated transients, suggesting that the similarity in pharmacology of internal Ca2+ channels in animals and plants may extend no further than caffeine sensitivity. Nevertheless, the fact that moderate caffeine concentrations were able to specifically inhibit expression of the second phase of Ca2+ entry suggests that this phase of influx is mechanistically distinct from the first and is likely gated through an intracellular channel.

Niflumic acid, an inhibitor of anion channels in plant and animal cells, was also found to serve as a selective inhibitor of the second peak of Ca2+ entry (Fig. 4B). Other groups have observed that anion channel blockers such as niflumate and anthracene-9-carboxylate readily inhibit various anion channel activities in plant cells (14, 49-52), and they have suggested that release of Ca2+ from vacuolar stores may depend on concurrent anion fluxes to depolarize the membrane (14). Consistent with these interpretations, anthracene-9-carboxylate was also observed to block the second phase of Ca2+ uptake at concentrations (100-500 µM) similar to those found effective in the studies mentioned above (data not shown). Importantly and in contrast to the effect of Mg2+ on 45Ca influx, the addition of 500 µM niflumate to the plant cell culture failed to inhibit 45Ca uptake upon hypo-osmotic shock (Fig. 3). Thus, since 45Ca influx only measures the externally derived portion of the biphasic Ca2+ transients and since niflumate has no effect on this 45Ca influx, we conclude that the second Ca2+ peak is generated by release of the cation from internal stores.

The Two Channels Regulating Ca2+ Influx during Hypo-osmotic Shock Communicate-- It did not escape our attention that inhibition of the first Ca2+ transient generally resulted in enlargement of the second (Fig. 2A). Only in the case of Mg2+ addition was this compensating increase in the trailing Ca2+ pulse not consistently observed. Conversely, enhancement of the initial phase of Ca2+ influx by supplementation of the medium with extra Ca2+ invariably reduced the amplitude of the latter (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, inhibition of the second phase of Ca2+ uptake by niflumic acid consistently enhanced the first (Fig. 4B). Similar but somewhat reduced effects were also seen with moderate concentrations of caffeine (Fig. 4A). Taken together, these data argue that some type of communication must occur between the two phases of osmotically stimulated Ca2+-gating and that inhibition or enhancement of one phase of influx somehow leads to a compensating Ca2+ flux during the other. It will be interesting to explore the pathways along which such communication travels.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

We have provided evidence that the two phases of Ca2+ entry into the cytoplasm of osmotically shocked tobacco cells sequentially involve (i) the influx of extracellular Ca2+ and (ii) the release of intracellular (compartmentalized) Ca2+. Thus, prevention of external Ca2+ entry by the addition of EGTA or competing cations (i.e. Mg2+, Mn2+, Fe2+) diminished the first phase of Ca2+ uptake, whereas augmentation of the extracellular Ca2+ pool specifically enhanced this same wave of Ca2+ uptake. Taken together with data on the blockade of the second phase of Ca2+ influx by caffeine and niflumate, i.e. probable modulators of intracellular Ca2+ release, a strong case for the above Ca2+-gating assignments can now be made. This contention is also bolstered by observations that Mg2+, which blocks only the initial phase of Ca2+ influx, prevents externally added 45Ca uptake, and niflumic acid, which eliminates only the second phase of Ca2+ influx, does not.

We have also observed that communication may occur between the two waves of Ca2+ entry into the cytoplasm of a stimulated tobacco cell. Unfortunately, there are currently few clues in the literature regarding the mechanism through which this communication might occur. Although hypo-osmotic stress has been frequently observed in eukaryotic cells to activate release of both intracellular and extracellular Ca2+ stores, little data regarding cross-talk between these two Ca2+ depots has yet been presented (53-58). Furthermore, the gating and signaling pathways activated by hypo-osmotic stimulus in nonplant systems may be very different from those in tobacco, since, opposite to the order of Ca2+-gating in tobacco cells, internal release of Ca2+ appears to precede influx of externally derived Ca2+ in mammalian cells (55-58). This order of Ca2+ channel activation in animal cells is reminiscent of the phenomenon of capacitative Ca2+ entry, in which intracellular release of Ca2+ leads to the activation of plasma membrane Ca2+ channels and the refilling of internal stores (27, 59-61). Although the mechanisms of communication between internal and external Ca2+ stores during capacitative Ca2+ entry are currently an area of intense research, no consensus mechanistic theory has been put forth (61). In osmotically stressed tobacco cells, a Ca2+-sensing mechanism that would adjust the Ca2+ efflux from the second (intracellular) Ca2+ store depending on the quantity of Ca2+ delivered during the first (extracellular) phase of Ca2+ entry can be easily envisioned. The intracellular Ca2+ gate would simply need to be negatively regulated by Ca2+ or a Ca2+-activated enzyme (e.g. a kinase) (62, 63). It will be important in the future to look for such a signaling mediator following treatment of stimulated cells with excess Ca2+ or EGTA (Figs. 2, A and B).

In contrast to the feed-forward signaling mechanism hypothesized above, identification of a communication pathway that responds to the readiness state of the second phase of Ca2+ entry and pre-emptively modulates the first is more difficult to imagine. Nevertheless, pretreatment of osmotically stimulated tobacco cells with moderate concentrations of caffeine or niflumic acid invariably augments the initial Ca2+ transient before eliminating the latter (Fig. 4, A and B). However, Takahashi et al. (39) have presented evidence that the general serine/threonine protein kinase inhibitors K252a and staurosporine selectively inhibit the second phase of Ca2+ influx without a compensating increase in the first phase. Thus, this modification of extracellular Ca2+ influx by internal Ca2+ transport capability may not be a general phenomenon and may depend on the type inhibitors used. There are clearly complexities in these Ca2+ signaling pathways that will require considerable research to resolve. It will be interesting to explore the area of Ca2+ channel communication in plant cells and to possibly identify at both the protein and DNA level the Ca2+ channels and other molecules involved.

It was encouraging to observe that several inhibitors could be identified that selectively block cytosolic influx of Ca2+ from either intracellular or extracellular Ca2+ stores. Although lanthanides and ruthenium red were found to inhibit both pathways of Ca2+ influx, the other modulators detailed above were highly selective for just one pathway. Based on these observations, it should now be possible to resolve which downstream consequences of hypo-osmotic shock rely on which phases of Ca2+ entry for signal propagation. It is conceivable, for example, that pathways designed to adjust cellular volume/turgor pressure during osmotic stress (14, 23, 64, 65) might depend on a different Ca2+ signal than pathways evolved to initiate the osmotically induced oxidative burst (8, 66). Indeed, preliminary studies indicate that only the second of the two phases of Ca2+ entry is required to stimulate reactive oxygen biosynthesis following hypo-osmotic stimulation.2

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Current address: Dept. of Neuroscience, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.

§ Supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant MCB 97259. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Chemistry, 1393 Brown Bldg., Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1393. Tel.: 765-494-5273; Fax: 765-494-0239; E-mail: lowps{at}omni.cc.purdue.edu.

The abbreviation used is: MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid.

2 S. G. Cessna, S. Chandra, and P. S. Low, unpublished observations.

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Knight, H., Trewavas, A. J., and Knight, M. R. (1996) Plant Cell 8, 489-503[Abstract]
  2. Gong, M., van der Luit, A. H., Knight, M. R., and Trewavas, A. J. (1998) Plant Physiol. (Rockv.) 116, 429-437[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Knight, M. R., Campbell, A. K., Smith, S. M., and Trewavas, A. J. (1991) Nature 352, 524-526[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Subbaiah, C. C., Bush, D. S., and Sachs, M. M. (1994) Plant Cell 6, 1747-1762[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Sedbrook, J. C., Kronebusch, P. J., Borisy, G. G., Trewavas, A. J., and Masson, P. H. (1996) Plant Physiol. 111, 243-257[Abstract]
  6. Gelli, A., Higgins, V. J., and Blumwald, E. (1997) Plant Physiol. (Rockv.) 113, 269-279[Abstract]
  7. Pugin, A., Frachisse, J., Tavernier, E., Bligny, R., Gout, E., Douce, R., and Guern, J. (1997) Plant Cell 9, 2077-2091[Abstract]
  8. Chandra, S., and Low, P. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 28274-28280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Zimmermann, S., Nurnberger, T., Frachisse, J.-M., Wirtz, W., Guern, J., Hedrich, R., and Scheel, D. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 2751-2755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Atkinson, M. M., Keppler, L. D., Orlandi, E. W., Baker, C. J., and Mischke, L. F. (1990) Plant Physiol. (Rockv.) 92, 215-221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Xu, H., and Heath, M. C. (1998) Plant Cell 10, 585-598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Levine, A., Pennel, R. I., Alvarez, M. E., Palmer, R., and Lamb, C. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 427-437[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Chen, X., Chang, M., Wang, B., and Wu, B. (1997) Plant J. 11, 363-371[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Ward, J. M., Pei, Z., and Schroeder, J. I. (1995) Plant Cell 7, 833-844[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Lemtiri-Chlieh, F., and MacRobbie, E. A. (1994) J. Membr. Biol. 137, 99-107[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Wu, Y., Kuzma, J., Marechal, E., Graeff, R., Lee, H. C., Foster, R., and Chua, N. (1997) Nature 278, 2126-2130
  17. Price, A. H., Taylor, A., Ripley, S. J., Griffiths, A., Trewavas, A. J., and Knight, M. R. (1994) Plant Cell 6, 1301-1310[Abstract]
  18. Bowler, C., Neuhaus, G., Yamagata, H., and Chua, N. (1994) Cell 77, 73-81[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Knight, H., Trewavas, A. J., and Knight, M. R. (1997) Plant J. 12, 1067-1078[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Rathore, K. S., Cork, R. J., and Robinson, K. R. (1991) Dev. Biol. 148, 612-619[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Pierson, E. S., Miller, D. D., Callaham, D. A., van Aken, J., Hacket, G., and Hepler, P. K. (1996) Dev. Biol. 174, 160-173[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Digonnet, C., Aldon, D., Leduc, N., Dumas, C., and Rougier, M. (1997) Development 124, 2867-2874[Abstract]
  23. Leckie, C. P., McAinish, M. R., Montgomery, L., Priestly, A. J., Staxen, I., Webb, A. A. R., and Hetherington, A. M. (1998) J. Exp. Bot. 49, 339-349[Abstract]
  24. Barbier-Brygoo, H., Joyard, J., Pugin, A., and Ranjeva, R. (1997) Trends Plant Sci. 2, 214-222[CrossRef]
  25. McAinish, M. R., and Hetherington, A. M. (1998) Trends Plant Sci. 3, 32-36[CrossRef]
  26. Gilroy, S., Bethke, P. C., and Jones, R. L. (1993) J. Cell Sci. 106, 453-461[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Clapham, D. E. (1995) Cell 80, 259-268[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Hirschi, K. D., Zhen, R. G., Cunningham, K. W., Rea, P. A., and Fink, G. R. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 8782-8786[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Johannes, E., and Sanders, D. (1995) J. Membr. Biol. 146, 211-224[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Allen, G. J., Muir, S. R., and Sanders, D. (1995) Science 268, 735-737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Ding, J. P., and Pickard, B. G. (1993) Plant J. 3, 83-110[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Muir, S. R., Bewell, M. A., Sanders, D., and Allen, G. J. (1997) J. Exp. Bot. 48, 589-597
  33. Schulz-Lessdorf, B., Dietrich, P., Lohse, M. E., Busch, H., and Hedrich, R. (1994) Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 48, 99-112[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Pineros, M., and Tester, M. (1997) J. Exp. Bot. 48, 551-577
  35. Calvert, C. M., and Sanders, D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 7272-7280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Klusener, B., Boheim, G., Lib, H., Engleberth, J., and Weiler, E. W. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2708-2714[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Cosgrove, D. J., and Hedrich, R. (1991) Planta 186, 143-153[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Gelli, A., and Blumwald, E. (1993) Plant Physiol. (Rockv.) 102, 1139-1146[Abstract]
  39. Takahashi, K., Isobe, M. N., Knight, M. R., Trewavas, A. J., and Muto, S. (1997) Plant Physiol. (Rockv.) 113, 587-593[Abstract]
  40. Murashige, T., and Skoog, F. (1962) Plant Physiol. (Rockv.) 15, 473-497[CrossRef]
  41. Allen, D. G., Blinks, J. R., and Prendergast, F. G. (1976) Science 195, 996-998
  42. Ma, J. (1993) J. Gen. Physiol. 102, 1031-1056[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Peeters, G. A., Kohmoto, O., and Barry, W. H. (1989) Am. J. Physiol. 256, C351-C357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Zha, X., and Morrison, G. H. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 269, C923-C928[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Legue, V., Blancaflor, E., Wymer, C., Perbal, G., Fantin, D., and Gilroy, S. (1997) Plant Physiol. (Rockv.) 114, 789-800[Abstract]
  46. Tahtiharju, S., Sangwas, V., Monroy, A. F., Dhindsa, R. S., and Borg, M. (1997) Planta 203, 442-447[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Konishi, M., and Kurihara, S. (1987) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 383, 269-283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Brown, G. R., Sayers, L. G., Kirk, C. J., Michell, R. H., and Michelangeli, F. (1992) Biochem. J. 282, 309-312
  49. Schwartz, A., Ilan, N., Schwarz, M., Scheaffer, J., Assman, S. M., and Schroeder, J. I. (1995) Plant Physiol. (Rockv.) 109, 651-658[Abstract]
  50. Thomine, S., Guern, J., and Barbier-Brygoo, H. (1997) J. Membr. Biol. 159, 71-82[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Grabov, A., Leung, J., Giraudat, J., and Blatt, M. R. (1997) Plant J. 12, 203-213[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Marten, I., Zeilinger, C., Redhead, C., Landry, D. W., al-Awqati, Q., and Hedrich, R. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3569-3575[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Taylor, A. R., Manison, N. F. H., Fernandez, C., Wood, J., and Brownlee, C. (1996) Plant Cell 8, 2015-2031[Abstract]
  54. Batiza, A. F., Schulz, T., and Masson, P. H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 23357-23362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. McCarty, N. A., and O'Neil, R. G. (1991) J. Membr. Biol. 123, 149-160[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Tinel, H., Wehner, F., and Sauer, H. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 267, F130-F138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Wu, X., Yang, H., Iserovich, P., Fischbach, J., and Reinach, P. S. (1997) J. Membr. Biol. 158, 127-136[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Ishii, T., Hashimoto, T., and Ohmori, H. (1996) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 493, 371-384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Hoth, M., and Penner, R. (1992) Nature 355, 353-356[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  60. Zweifach, A., and Lewis, R. S. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 6295-6299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Parekh, A. B., and Penner, R. (1997) Physiol. Rev. 77, 901-930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Bezprovzvanny, I., Watras, J., and Ehrlich, B. E. (1991) Nature 351, 751-754[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Roberts, D. M. (1993) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 5, 242-246[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Haussinger, D. (1996) Biochem. J. 313, 697-710
  65. Lang, F., Busch, G. L., Ritter, M., Volkl, H., Waldegger, S., Gulbins, E., and Haussinger, D. (1998) Physiol. Rev. 78, 247-306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Yahraus, T., Chandra, S., Legendre, L., and Low, P. S. (1995) Plant Physiol. (Rockv.) 109, 1259-1266[Abstract]
  67. Borle, A. B., and Snowdowne, K. W. (1986) Methods Enzymol. 124, 90-116[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
P. Poutrain, C. Mazars, M. Thiersault, M. Rideau, and O. Pichon
Two distinct intracellular Ca2+-release components act in opposite ways in the regulation of the auxin-dependent MIA biosynthesis in Catharanthus roseus cells
J. Exp. Bot., March 1, 2009; 60(4): 1387 - 1398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. S. Anil, P. Rajkumar, P. Kumar, and M. K. Mathew
A Plant Ca2+ Pump, ACA2, Relieves Salt Hypersensitivity in Yeast: MODULATION OF CYTOSOLIC CALCIUM SIGNATURE AND ACTIVATION OF ADAPTIVE Na+ HOMEOSTASIS
J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2008; 283(6): 3497 - 3506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. A. C. MacRobbie
From the Cover: Osmotic effects on vacuolar ion release in guard cells
PNAS, January 24, 2006; 103(4): 1135 - 1140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
D. Lecourieux, C. Mazars, N. Pauly, R. Ranjeva, and A. Pugin
Analysis and Effects of Cytosolic Free Calcium Increases in Response to Elicitors in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia Cells
PLANT CELL, October 1, 2002; 14(10): 2627 - 2641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. K. Matsumoto, A. J. Ellsmore, S. G. Cessna, P. S. Low, J. M. Pardo, R. A. Bressan, and P. M. Hasegawa
An Osmotically Induced Cytosolic Ca2+ Transient Activates Calcineurin Signaling to Mediate Ion Homeostasis and Salt Tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Biol. Chem., August 30, 2002; 277(36): 33075 - 33080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
G. Komis, P. Apostolakos, and B. Galatis
Hyperosmotic Stress Induces Formation of Tubulin Macrotubules in Root-Tip Cells of Triticum turgidum: Their Probable Involvement in Protoplast Volume Control
Plant Cell Physiol., August 15, 2002; 43(8): 911 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
G. Komis, P. Apostolakos, and B. Galatis
Hyperosmotic stress-induced actin filament reorganization in leaf cells of Chlorophyton comosum
J. Exp. Bot., August 1, 2002; 53(375): 1699 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
H. Knight and M. R. Knight
Imaging spatial and cellular characteristics of low temperature calcium signature after cold acclimation in Arabidopsis
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2000; 51(351): 1679 - 1686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
B. Blume, T. Nürnberger, N. Nass, and D. Scheel
Receptor-Mediated Increase in Cytoplasmic Free Calcium Required for Activation of Pathogen Defense in Parsley
PLANT CELL, August 1, 2000; 12(8): 1425 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. E. Hoyos and S. Zhang
Calcium-Independent Activation of Salicylic Acid-Induced Protein Kinase and a 40-Kilodalton Protein Kinase by Hyperosmotic Stress
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2000; 122(4): 1355 - 1364.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
D. Sanders, C. Brownlee, and J. F. Harper
Communicating with Calcium
PLANT CELL, April 1, 1999; 11(4): 691 - 706.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. G. Cessna and P. S. Low
An Apoplastic Ca2+ Sensor Regulates Internal Ca2+ Release in Aequorin-transformed Tobacco Cells
J. Biol. Chem., March 30, 2001; 276(14): 10655 - 10662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cessna, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Low, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cessna, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Low, P. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement