|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 42, 27357-27363, October 16, 1998
Structure-based Minimization of Transforming Growth Factor-
(TGF- ) through NMR Analysis of the Receptor-bound Ligand
DESIGN, SOLUTION STRUCTURE, AND ACTIVITY OF TGF- 8-50*
Campbell
McInnes ,
Jianjun
Wang §,
Ala-Eddin Al
Moustafa¶,
Cedric
Yansouni¶,
Maureen
O'Connor-McCourt¶, and
Brian D.
Sykes
From the Protein Engineering Network of Centres of
Excellence, 713 Heritage Medical Research Centre, University of
Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2S2, Canada and the ¶ Biotechnology
Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec H4P 2R2, Canada
 |
ABSTRACT |
The investigation of a N-terminally truncated
human transforming growth factor- (TGF- ; residues 8-50) has been
completed to determine the contribution of the N terminus to receptor
binding and activation. The deletion protein was proposed and designed through study of NMR relaxation and nuclear Overhauser enhancement data
obtained from the TGF- -epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor complex, which indicated that the residues N-terminal to the A loop
remain flexible in receptor-bound TGF- and thus suggested their lack
of involvement in receptor binding (Hoyt, D. W., Harkins, R. N., Debanne, M. T., O'Connor-McCourt, M., and Sykes, B. D. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 15283-15292; McInnes, C., Hoyt,
D. W., Harkins, R. N., Pagila, R. N., Debanne, M. T., O'Connor-McCourt, M., and Sykes, B. D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32204-32211). TGF- 8-50 was shown to have
approximately 10-fold lower affinity for the receptor than the native
molecule in an assay quantifying the ability to compete with EGF for
binding and to have a similar reduction in activity as indicated by a
cell proliferation assay. NMR solution structural calculations on this
molecule demonstrate correct formation of the three disulfide bonds of
TGF- 8-50 and have established the presence of native secondary
structure in the B and C loops of the protein. However, some
perturbation of the global fold with respect to the orientation of the
subdomains was observed. These results suggest that although the
N-terminal residues do not contribute directly to binding, they make a
significant contribution in defining the conformation of the growth
factor, which is required for complete binding and activity and is
therefore significant in terms of producing native folding of TGF- .
They also show that information obtained from the receptor-bound ligand can be used to guide the design and minimization of TGF- analogues. The implications of the study of TGF- 8-50 for the design and synthesis of reductants of this growth factor are therefore
discussed.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The binding of human
TGF- 1 to the EGF receptor
initiates a number of cell proliferation events including wound healing
and embryogenesis (1, 2). Furthermore, this mitogenic protein of 50 residues is involved in the transformation of normal cells into
malignant growths (3-5) and is also believed to promote angiogenesis
(6). It is thus apparent that this polypeptide is a significant target
from a pharmaceutical and drug design perspective, and to this end,
considerable effort has been made to elucidate the essential structural
features of this tricyclic growth factor required for binding and
function (7, 8). Many attempts have also been made to synthesize
reductant molecules that display a similar biological profile to the
native TGF- , although for the most part these efforts have met with
limited success (9-11). NMR structures of the free ligand have been
determined by several groups (12-15), and recently studies have been
published from this laboratory on the use of NMR relaxation and NOE
measurements in determining the essential components of the
TGF- -EGFR extracellular domain complex (16, 17). The data from the
latter experiments suggest that A and C loops and the C-terminal tail
of TGF- contain residues (for the sequence of TGF- and location
of disulfides forming the three loops, see Fig.
1) that form the major binding interface
with the receptor and that the N-terminal amino acids outside the A
loop remain flexible in the receptor-bound species. Since the consensus
from the relaxation and NOE data was that the N terminus of TGF-
does not play a role in the receptor-ligand interaction, the N-terminal
deletion mutant, TGF- 8-50 was synthesized and characterized in
terms of NMR structure and biological activity. These experiments were
performed to clarify the requirements of the growth factor structure
necessary for receptor binding and activation and to determine the
contribution of the N-terminal tail to the formation of the global fold
of the native molecule. Thus the rationale is to assess any functional
changes of the truncated protein with respect to native TGF- in
terms of structural variation and concurrently in doing this to
ascertain if the N-terminal tail residues are required for establishing
the native conformation of the protein. The truncated TGF- was also
studied to demonstrate that structural information obtained from NMR
experiments on the receptor-bound ligand can be used toward the design
of a "minimized" TGF- where nonessential regions of the protein
are deleted while retaining near native levels of receptor binding and
activation.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of the primary and
loop structure of TGF- . The seven N-terminal residues removed
in the deletion protein are indicated by shading as are the
six cysteines that form the three disulfide loops. The disulfide bonds
are represented as thick lines, and the loops
formed by these are labeled as A, B, and
C.
|
|
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Synthesis and Purification of TGF- 8-50
TGF- 8-50 was synthesized using standard solid phase
synthesis techniques on a Applied Biosystems model 430A peptide
synthesizer (Foster City, CA) utilizing t-butoxycarbonyl
methodology. The N terminus was acetylated using acetic anhydride, and
the peptide was liberated from the resin using a mixture of hydrogen
fluoride, anisole and 1,2-ethanedithiol. The crude material was
extracted with glacial acetic acid, lyophilized, and then dissolved in
10% acetic acid. The peptide was then purified using reversed phase HPLC (Beckmann System Gold, Fullerton, CA) using a Synchropak RP-4
(250 × 21.2 mm inner diameter) column (Synchrom, Lafayette, IN)
at a flow rate of 5 ml/min and subsequently oxidized in air using a
solution containing 1.0 M urea, 0.1 M Tris, 1.5 nM oxidized and 0.75 nM reduced glutathione, pH
8.0 (10). A final purification step was used to remove oxidation
byproducts, and the final purity was confirmed through reverse phase
analytical HPLC. Electrospray mass spectrometry (VG Biotech, Cheshire,
UK) verified the presence of a species of the desired molecular
weight.
NMR Sample Preparation
To a lyophilized sample of TGF- was added 460 µl of buffer
containing 50 mM potassium phosphate, 10 mM
potassium chloride, 1 mM ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid,
0.5 mM sodium azide, 0.15 mM sodium
2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonate (internal standard), and 99.9%
D2O or 90%/10% (v/v) H2O/D2O. The
solution was adjusted to pH 6.5 by the addition of small aliquots of
0.5 N NaOD or 0.5 N HCl bringing the final
volume to 500 µl.
NMR Spectroscopy
One- and two-dimensional 1H NMR spectra for TGF-
8-50 were collected on a Varian Unity spectrometer operating at 599.9 MHz. TOCSY (18) and NOESY (19) experiments were acquired at 298 K and
referenced relative to an internal sodium
2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonate standard. Pulsed field gradients
were implemented in the watergate pulse sequence to suppress the water
resonance (20). For TOCSY and NOESY experiments, 64 transients were
acquired for each of 256 increments using the hypercomplex method of
States et al. (21), and a total of 4096 data points were
collected over a spectral width of 8000 Hz for H2O spectra
and 6000 Hz for D2O spectra. The SCUBA-NOESY (22)
experiment was utilized for acquisition of D2O NOE data.
Processing of each two-dimensional FID was accomplished using a shifted
sinebell and zero filling to 4096 points in both F1 and F2. A complete
resonance assignment was obtained from the TOCSY and NOESY data with
the exception of the fast exchanging His12 amide proton and
is shown in Table I. The assignment was
assisted through the use of chemical shift information previously
published for native TGF- (23).
Structure Calculation of TGF- 8-50
For TGF- 8-50, all cross-peaks were volume integrated using
the program VNMR (VNMR 5.1A, Varian Associates, Palo Alto, CA) of which
a subset were assigned based on the chemical shift assignments and
possible NOE distances in the native protein (Protein Data Bank code
1yug; Ref 15.) calculated using the programs NMRPipe (24) and PIPP (25)
and a cut-off distance of 12 Å. The suite of programs CAMRA (26) was
implemented to convert the volume integral information to distance
restraints. NOE cross-peak intensities were classified as strong (upper
boundary, 2.3 Å), medium (3.0 Å), weak (4.0 Å), and very weak (5.0 Å), and the appropriate pseudoatom correction was added. The molecular
dynamics/simulated annealing protocol in X-PLOR version 3.8 (27, 28)
was utilized to calculate an initial set of structures derived only
from the unambiguous distance restraints and native disulfides assumed
in the starting structure. A program developed in house was then
applied in conjunction with X-PLOR to modify NOE distances causing
restraint violations and also to make use of those that have ambiguous
assignments to generate a more refined structure. This program uses an
approach similar to that of Nilges et al. (29) in that it
allows the use of NOE distances that are ambiguous, because in most
cases only one restraint will be possible based on distances from the ensemble of structures already calculated using unambiguous restraints. The program therefore removes restraints that are violated by greater
than a user defined cut-off distance (0.5 Å) because the nonpossible
assignments for the ambiguous restraints will give distance violations
greater than the cut-off. The restraints that satisfy the distances in
the initial structures will be retained. Because it is possible that a
correct restraint can be violated in initial but not final structures,
NOEs that are removed can be returned to the restraint file in later
runs for reevaluation by the program. As the structures are refined in
successive runs, these restraints should now be satisfied and are
incorporated in the final data set.
This procedure as a whole allows the restraints that satisfy the
distances in the successive structural ensembles to be retained and
thus facilitates the incorporation of a greater number of restraints in
the X-PLOR calculation. For the distance restraints that are
consistently violated by less than the specified cut-off in the
calculated structures, the program automatically modifies the upper
bound of distance restraints by the average value of the distance
violation for a user specified number of structures in which the
violation occurs. The modified restraint file is then used in the next
round of X-PLOR calculations in an iterative procedure until an
structural ensemble is obtained of the desired quality. The
reproducibility and accuracy of the ensemble generated for TGF-
8-50 was examined using the program PROCHECK (30), which checks the
distribution of backbone dihedral angles in the structures.
Binding and Activity of TGF- 8-50
Cell Culture--
The HBE4-E6E7 cell line was used and was
established by transfection of primary human bronchial epithelial cells
with a plasmid construct expressing the human papillomavirus type 16 E6
and E7 genes (31). The cell line was maintained in the Keratinocyte-SF (KSF) medium without supplements and incubated at 37 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
Proliferation Assay--
Growth curves were established by
measuring the incorporation of [3H]methylthymidine into
the acid insoluble fraction of cellular extracts. Briefly,
approximately 2 × 104 cells were plated in 1 ml KSF
into each well of 12-well tissue culture plates. After 1 day, the
medium was changed either with fresh KSF (control) or medium containing
TGF- or TGF- 8-50. Cells were allowed to grow for 3 days with
[3H]methylthymidine (1 µCi/ml, Amersham Canada) being
added during the last 20-24 h. After sequential and multiple washings
in cold phosphate-buffered saline, 10% trichloroacetic acid, and 95%
ethanol, the plates were allowed to dry, the cells were solubilized in 2% SDS, and the radioactivity was quantitated by liquid scintillation chromatography. The experimental points were determined in
triplicate.
EGF Competition Assay--
Cells (2 × 103)
were plated in 24-well plates in KSF and grown to confluence. 24 h
before performing the experiment, the medium was changed with KSF.
Cells were washed three times with binding buffer containing
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 25 mM Hepes, 5 mM MgCl2, 100 µg/ml bacitracin, 0.1% bovine
serum albumin, pH 7.4, and incubated in 0.5 ml of binding buffer
containing various concentrations of TGF- /TGF- 8-50 with 0.05 nM 125I EGF at 0 C for 2 h. After
incubation, the cells were washed twice with ice-cold binding buffer
and three times with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline. Cells were
solubilized with 1 N NaOH and counted in a counter. The
nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 1 µM unlabeled TGF- or TGF- 8-50. Data were analyzed
using the method of Scatchard.
 |
RESULTS |
Analysis of Chemical Shift Variations between Truncated and Native
TGF- --
The deletion of the N-terminal tail of TGF- raises the
question of whether or not native disulfide bonds are present in the truncated form of the protein and if it is able to assume a similar global fold to the intact protein. For the purpose of determining whether the correct pairing of the disulfides in TGF- 8-50 is present after synthesis and oxidation, the chemical shifts of the
-protons were compared with those of the native protein acquired under similar conditions, i.e. pH 6.5 and 30 °C. The
 values of the comparison (chemical shift differences) are
illustrated in Fig. 2, and it can be seen
that there are no large deviations in these shifts. This suggests that
the three disulfide links between Cys8 and
Cys21, Cys16 and Cys32, and
Cys34 and Cys43 are present as observed in the
intact TGF- . The presence of the native disulfide linkages was
confirmed through observation of NOEs between cysteines 8 and 21 (Fig.
3) and 34 and 43 (not shown). Also from
the absence of major deviations the assumption can be made that a
structure cognate to the native molecule exists. However, despite the
lack of large differences in the chemical shifts of the deletion
mutant, significant changes of between 0.05 and 0.2 ppm are observed.
These occur for the most part in the A and B loops and indicate that
deletion of the residues N-terminal to the A loop effects changes in
the secondary structure and perhaps in the overall fold of the
molecule. In particular, the residues undergoing the largest variation
are those of the A loop including Tyr13, Gln14,
and Phe15, which have resonances differing from the native
protein by 0.17, 0.13, and 0.13 ppm respectively. Of the B loop
-protons, those that exhibited the most significant changes were
Gly19 and Thr20 in addition to the
-resonances of all the residues between Val25 and
Lys29. For the hinge region of TGF- 8-50 (residues
close to Val33), which allows flexibility between the two
subdomains (A and B loops comprise the N subdomain, whereas the C loop
and tail form the C subdomain),  values of between 0.04 and 0.09 ppm were observed for the residues between Cys32 and
Ser36 and thus are indicative of a possible variation in
the conformation of this region. An important observation of the shifts
for the residues of the C loop is that with the exception of
Gly40 and Glu44 there are no differences larger
than 0.05 ppm, suggesting that the reverse double hairpin secondary
structure is present in the truncated protein. The  -H value
for Glu44 of 0.08 ppm is of special interest because this
residue forms interactions critical to the stabilization of the
orientation of the N- and C-terminal subdomains.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Plot of chemical shift variations ( ) in
the -protons between the truncated TGF- and the native protein
for each residue in the molecule. Those residues with a 
value of greater than 0.1 ppm are denoted by white
circles.
|
|

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Aliphatic region of a NOESY spectrum of
TGF- 8-50 acquired at 600 MHz and 25 °C. The NOE labeled is
between the protons of cysteines 8 and 21 and thus is indicative of
correct formation of the disulfide bridges.
|
|
Receptor Binding and Activation by TGF-
8-50--
Investigation of the biological potency of TGF- 8-50
was performed to assess the contribution of the N-terminal tail to
receptor binding and activation. This was accomplished through a
competition assay of TGF- 8-50 with EGF on HBE cells displaying the
EGF receptor and by measuring the ability of the truncation analogue to
effect cell proliferation. The results from the competition assay are shown in Fig. 4. From the plot it is
apparent that it requires approximately 10-fold more TGF- 8-50 to
displace iodinated EGF from HBE cells than it does for native TGF- ,
thus indicating that it has 10 times lower affinity for the EGF
receptor. The quantitation of the receptor activation assay, however,
illustrates that the reduction in the ability of the truncated protein
to cell proliferation is of the same order as the corresponding
decrease in receptor binding (data not shown).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Plot of data from the competition assay of
TGF- and TGF- 8-50. The graph illustrates the percentage of
125I-EGF displaced from the EGF receptor on Human BE cells
as a function of ligand concentration.
|
|
NMR Structure Determination of TGF- 8-50--
As evidenced
from the variation in the -H resonances between the N-terminally
deleted and native TGF- s, the conformation of the truncated TGF-
did not appear to be identical to that of previously determined
structures of TGF- . With the objective of determining more precisely
the structural differences that occur in TGF- 8-50, an ensemble of
solution structures was calculated for the N-terminally deleted protein
using NOE-derived distance restraints. 35 best fit structures were
generated from 407 NOE distances using the program X-plor after nine
rounds of calculation to minimize restraint violations and make the
best use of ambiguous NOEs. The structure statistics for the ensemble
of 35 structures are shown in Table II
and illustrate their quality in terms of high definition, in terms of
fit to the experimental data, and in terms of the component and total
energies. Analysis of the average of the 35 structures using the
program PROCHECK (30) indicated that 92% of the residues excluding
glycine, proline, and end residues are found in the allowed regions of
phi-psi space. The residues found in non-allowed regions, which are
Phe15 and Cys16, are located in the highly
flexible portions of the truncated molecule.
Fig. 5 shows a superposition of the 35 best fit structures to the average structure and depicts the excellent
reproducibility of the conformational ensemble. The values for the
superposition of residues 15-47 for the 35 structures to the average
structure are 0.844 Å for the backbone atom r.m.s. deviations and
1.304 for the heavy atom r.m.s. deviations, which are very
favorable in their comparability with the ensemble recently generated
for TGF- using similar conditions for data acquisition (15).

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Stereoview of the 35 best fit structures
superimposed to the ensemble average structure calculated for the
truncated TGF- using X-PLOR and NOE derived distance
restraints. The more flexible regions of the protein are colored
in gray.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Biological Potency of TGF- 8-50--
TGF- 8-50 was
proposed and designed based on the results of the relaxation and NOE
analysis data of the ligand-receptor complex, which suggested that the
N terminus does not contribute to the complexation process and that the
truncated protein should retain the ability to associate with the EGF
receptor and initiate cell proliferation. Our results indicate that
although the binding and activation are diminished 10-fold, TGF-
8-50 still retains a significant level of potency in terms of
competition with EGF for the receptor and ability to effect cell
proliferation. The plethora of studies on synthetic fragments of
TGF- have for the most part failed to exhibit biological activity
close to the order of that observed for the native molecule. Our
results differ slightly from those of Tam et al. (10), who
previously synthesized TGF- 8-50 and reported binding and mitogenic
activity of 3%. Our data imply that TGF- 8-50 is more potent;
however, this variation may be the result of different methods used for
assaying activity. In our case, the protein synthesized in this
laboratory was fully characterized by NMR and thus the possibility of
ambiguity in the structure and correct folding of the disulfides is not
present, and therefore the biological data are reliable in terms of the integrity of the deletion protein.
Solution Structure of TGF- 8-50--
The NMR-derived solution
structure of TGF- 8-50 exhibits similar structural characteristics
in comparison with the global fold of the native protein as has been
determined by several groups to date (12-15). The overall topology of
the truncated protein superimposes favorably to that of the intact
TGF- as shown by backbone r.m.s. deviations of 2.78 Å for residues
15-47. The identity between the two structures is demonstrated in Fig.
6, which illustrates the Richardson
diagrams of the native and N-terminally deleted TGF- s. The secondary
structure elements present in TGF- remain in the structural ensemble
of the N-terminally truncated molecule since the B loop -sheet
comprised of residues 19-24 and 29-34 and the C-terminal reverse
double hairpin loop between residues 38 and 46 were observed. The
partial helix present in some of the TGF- conformations is no longer
present in TGF- 8-50 because the A loop shows considerably
flexibility. Some NOEs diagnostic of an -helix are observed for the
truncated protein; however, these are insufficient to restrain the A
loop into a helical conformation. The conformational differences of the
A loop as observed in the structural ensembles are supported by the
-H resonances, which show considerable variation when compared with
the intact protein, and indeed as previously mentioned, the most
significant changes in the resonance frequency of the -H of the
N-terminally deleted molecule occur in this region.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Richardson diagrams (34, 35) of the average
NMR structures calculated for wild type TGF- and TGF- 8-50.
The center figure shows the superposition of the two
ensemble average structures.
|
|
Upon closer examination of the NMR structure of TGF- 8-50,
significant differences in the conformations of the two proteins are
evident. In particular, the -turn of the B loop sheet of the
truncated TGF- is oriented away from the N-terminal tail when
overlaid with the -sheet of the native protein. Further evidence for
this structural change is given by the  values for the turn
residues, i.e. Val25 to Asp28 and by
Lys29, which are all between 0.07 and 0.14 ppm. This effect
is most presumably the consequence of the absence/disruption of the
third strand of the -sheet formed by the interactions of
Phe5 and Asn6 of the N terminus with
Phe23 and Leu24 of the second strand.
Disruption of these interactions does not destabilize the B loop
-sheet; however, it does allow the turn greater freedom to adopt a
dissimilar conformation.
The most significant and consequential variation in the structure of
the two proteins is in the relative orientation of the C-terminal
subdomains comprised of residues 34-50. As can be observed from the
superposition of TGF- 8-50 to TGF- in Fig. 6, this region in the
deletion protein is angled almost perpendicular to the N-terminal
subdomain with the first strand of the reverse double hairpin folded
away from the hinge region from Cys32 to Ser36.
The differences in the arrangement of the C-terminal subdomain for the
two molecules as illustrated by the calculated structures are
corroborated by the chemical shift data, which indicate that although
notable variations in the -proton resonances occur in the region
between Cys32 and Ser36 (Fig. 2), less
significant variation in the -H frequencies of the C loop and tail
secondary structure are observed. The conformational transition of the
C-terminal subdomain that occurs in the N-terminally deleted TGF- is
apparently a propagated effect and is the result of disruption of the
interactions between the A and C loops. As previously mentioned, the
partial helix present in the intact protein is no longer present in
TGF- 8-50. The consequence of deletion of the N-terminal tail is
variation in the conformation of the A loop, which in turn results in
altered interactions between the A and the C loops. The specific
interactions that differ from the native protein in defining the fold
of the A and C subdomains in TGF- 8-50 appear mostly to be in the
packing of the residues that stabilize the orientation of the two
regions. The hydrophobic cluster of Phe17,
His18, and Tyr38 is more closely packed in the
truncated TGF- in addition to a more defined interaction between
Phe15 and Arg42. The conformation of the
interdomain residues His18 and His35 also
varies in the N-terminally deleted molecule, and the association of the
side chains of Glu44 and Phe17 is different for
TGF- 8-50, an observation that is confirmed by the chemical shift
difference for Glu44 -H of 0.08 ppm. These changes
indicate the transition in domain structure between the two molecules
that result from novel interactions between the residues of the A and
the C loops.
It is interesting that the new conformation of TGF- 8-50 and
orientation of the subdomains in the truncated molecule is of comparable if not better definition than that seen in the structural ensemble generated for native TGF- . This suggests that the
N-terminal tail is not required to give a stable protein fold, although
it is necessary to produce the native structure of TGF- in terms of
orientation of the subdomains.
Implications of TGF- 8-50 Solution Structure for Functional
Differences--
With the solution structure of TGF- 8-50
available, the biological rationale for decreased activity of the
truncated protein as indicated by the reduction in receptor binding
affinity and mitogenic activity can be envisaged. The previous studies
from this laboratory implementing relaxation and NOE analysis
techniques to elucidate the residues and regions of TGF- involved in
complexation with EGFR (16, 17) were used to design the N-terminally
deleted protein. The results obtained implicated residues from the A
and C loops and C tail as forming the predominant receptor binding interface. Fig. 7 illustrates the average
ensemble structures of TGF- and TGF- 8-50 shown as molecular
Connolly surface representations and color coded according to the
percentage of NOEs absent in the receptor-bound wild type TGF- ,
i.e. those present in the free ligand but not in the bound
protein.

View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Grasp (36) molecular surface representation
of the native and truncated TGF- average structures illustrating the
residues color coded according to the percentage of NOEs, which
disappear in the receptor-bound form of the native ligand. The
residues are colored according to the following percentages of absent
NOEs in the bound TGF- : 0%, blue; 0-20%,
purple; 20-30%, white; 30-40%,
green; and 40-60%, red.
|
|
The structure utilized for the native molecule in Fig. 7 is the most
recently published structure for TGF- as determined by Moy et
al. (15), which was unavailable for our previous studies (17).
When this structure is used to display the changes in NOE intensity
upon addition of the EGFR, an almost completely contiguous receptor
binding face is observed. This visualization gives an even more
plausible scenario for the interactions of TGF- with its receptor
than indicated in the previous publication from this laboratory (17)
since Arg42, Leu48, and Leu49 are
now present on the same face of the protein structure as the other
residues that lose the highest percentage of NOEs upon receptor
binding, i.e. those colored in red and
green. As the regions of the truncated protein that exhibit
the most significant structural changes are the A and C loops, it can
easily be seen that perturbation of the conformation of these regions
would lead to a diminution in the affinity to the receptor and
concomitantly to a decrease in mitogenic activity. The loss of the
partial helical structure of the A loop in the native molecule most
probably results in a lower affinity as the important residues
His12, Thr13, Phe15, and
Phe17 are presented to the receptor in a different manner.
The chemical shift differences in the -protons, strongly suggest
that in particular Thr13, Gln14, and
Phe15 are in quite different environments in the
N-terminally deleted TGF- . The resonance and structural
perturbations for the truncated TGF- are in good agreement with the
NOE analysis data, which implicated His12 and
Phe15 on the receptor binding interface, and with prior
mutagenesis studies that delineated Phe15 as a critical
residue for association of the ligand with the receptor (7). It can be
observed from the molecular surface view of TGF- 8-50 in Fig. 7,
that His12 is indeed displayed differently to the receptor
as it is now no longer contiguous with the rest of the residues that
form the primary interactions with the EGFR. In addition, The A-C
interactions of Phe15 to Arg42 and
Phe17 to Glu44 in the N-terminally deleted
molecule present a quite different surface of these residues to the
receptor and thus corroborate the postulation that the new orientation
of the subdomains is responsible for the decrease in binding and
activity of TGF- 8-50.
From Fig. 7, it is also apparent that the residues of the C loop and
C-terminal tail implied to be on the EGFR binding face namely
Val39, Gly40, Arg42,
Glu44, His45, Leu48, and
Leu49 are displayed in a different orientation due to the
variant C-terminal subdomain conformation in TGF- 8-50. It is
evident that these structural changes alone are significant enough to
explain the decreased binding and activity of the truncated protein and
despite the observation that the N-terminal tail does not contribute
directly to interactions with the EGFR, it makes an important
contribution to the protein fold in terms of orientation of the
subdomains and hence is necessary for the presentation of the binding
determinants to the receptor. The results obtained from the truncated
TGF- also further confirm the multidomain binding model since it is the relative positioning of the two subdomains that is important to
give a fully active protein.
Toward Minimization of TGF- through Truncation and
Reoptimization--
Through the knowledge of the structural
requirements of TGF- for receptor complexation as delineated by the
relaxation rate and NOE analysis data, this study has demonstrated that
the proposal of an active truncated protein is possible when enough is
known about the receptor binding site on the ligand. The synthesis of a
TGF- fragment with a respectable level of activity serves as a
platform for further minimization and reoptimization of this growth
factor for the purposes of the development of agonists and antagonists
as potential therapeutics. Work currently in progress in this
laboratory has the aim of engineering the truncated TGF- through
phage display to increase the affinity to or beyond native levels (32).
This can then be followed by further minimization of the ligand in a
manner analogous to the studies of Li et al. (33), who have
met with considerable success in the minimization of the polypeptide
hormone atrial natriuretic peptide. In the instance of TGF- ,
however, the process is greatly aided by the availability of NMR data
for elucidating the interactions of the minimized proteins with the
receptor and thus using a structure-based iterative procedure for the
identification of lead compounds demonstrating potential as
therapeutics for diseases involving the overexpression or
underexpression of TGF- .
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Paul Semchuk for peptide synthesis
and purification and also mass spectrometry, Gerry McQuaid and Bruce
Lix for maintenance of NMR equipment, and Leigh Willard and Robert
Boyko for computer programming assistance. We also acknowledge Richard
Harkins at Berlex Biosciences for early discussions proposing the study
of TGF- 8-50.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: Dept. of Medical Biochemistry School of Medicine,
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901-4413.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
403-492-6540; Fax: 403-492-1473; E-mail:
bds{at}polaris.biochem.ualberta.ca.
The abbreviations used are:
TGF- , transforming growth factor- ; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; NOE, nuclear Overhauser enhancement; NOESY, nuclear Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy; TOCSY, total
correlation spectroscopy; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; r.m.s., root mean square.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Bennet, N. T.,
and Schultz, G. S.
(1993)
Am. J. Surg.
165,
728-737[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bennet, N. T.,
and Schultz, G. S.
(1993)
Am. J. Surg.
166,
75-81[CrossRef]
-
Prigent, S. A.,
and Lemoine, N. R.
(1992)
Prog. Growth. Factor. Res.
4,
1-24[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Salomon, D. S.,
Brandt, R.,
Ciardiello, F.,
and Normanno, N.
(1995)
Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.
19,
183-232[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rusch, V.,
Mendelsohn, J.,
and Dmitrovsky, E.
(1996)
Cytokine Growth Factor. Rev.
7,
133-141[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Okamura, K.,
Morimoto, A.,
Hamanaka, R.,
Ono, M.,
Kohno, K.,
Uchida, Y.,
and Kuwano, M.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
186,
1471-1479[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Groenen, L. C.,
Nice, E. C.,
and Burgess, A. W.
(1994)
Growth Factors
11,
235-257[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Campion, S. R.,
and Niyogi, S. K.
(1994)
Prog. Nucleic Acids Res.
49,
353-383[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Defeo-Jones, D.,
Tai, J. Y.,
Wegrzyn, R. J.,
Vuocolo, G. A.,
Baker, A. E.,
Payne, L. S.,
Garsky, V. M.,
Oliff, A.,
and Rieman, M. W.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
2999-3007[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tam, J. P.,
Lin, Y.-Z.,
Liu, W.,
Wang, D.-X.,
Ke, X.-H.,
and Zhang, J.-W.
(1991)
Int. J. Pept. Protein Res.
38,
204-211[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Heath, W. F.,
and Merrifield, R. B.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
6367-6371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kohda, D.,
Shimada, I,
Miyake, T.,
Fuwa, T.,
and Inagaki, F.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
953-958[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kline, T. P.,
Brown, F. K.,
Brown, S. C.,
Jeffs, P. W.,
Kopple, K. D.,
and Mueller, L.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
7805-7813[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Harvey, T. S.,
Wilkinson, A. J.,
Tappin, M. J.,
Cooke, R. M.,
and Campbell, I. D.
(1991)
Eur. J. Biochem.
198,
555-562[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Moy, F. J.,
Li, Y-C.,
Rauenbuehler, P.,
Winkler, M. E.,
Scheraga, H. A.,
and Montelione, G. T.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
7334-7353[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hoyt, D. W.,
Harkins, R. N.,
Debanne, M. T.,
O'Connor-McCourt, M.,
and Sykes, B. D.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
15283-15292[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
McInnes, C.,
Hoyt, D. W.,
Harkins, R. N.,
Pagila, R. N.,
Debanne, M. T.,
O'Connor-McCourt, M.,
and Sykes, B. D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
32204-32211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bax, A.,
and Davis, D. G.
(1985)
J. Magn. Reson.
65,
355-360
-
Jeener, J.,
Meier, B. H.,
Bachmann, P.,
and Ernst, R. R.
(1979)
J. Chem. Phys.
71,
4546-4553[CrossRef]
-
Piotto, M.,
Saudek, V.,
and Sklenar, V.
(1992)
J. Biomol. NMR
2,
661-665[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
States, D. J.,
Haberkorn, R. A.,
and Rueben, D. J.
(1982)
J. Magn. Reson.
48,
286-292
-
Brown, S. C.,
Weber, P. L.,
and Mueller, K.
(1988)
J. Magn. Reson.
77,
166-169
-
Tappin, M. J.,
Cooke, R. M.,
Fitton, J. E.,
and Campbell, I. D.
(1989)
Eur. J. Biochem.
179,
629-637[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Delaglio, F.,
Grzesiek, S.,
Vuister, G. W.,
Zhu, G.,
Pfeifer, J.,
and Bax, A.
(1995)
J. Biomol. NMR.
6,
277-293[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Garrett, D. S.,
Powers, R.,
Gronenborn, A. M.,
and Clore, G. M.
(1991)
J. Magn. Reson.
95,
214-220
-
Grönwald, W., Willard, L., Jellard, T., Boyko, R. F.,
Rajarathnam, K, Wishart, D. S., Sönnichsen, F. D., and
Sykes, B. D. (1998) J. Biol. NMR, in press
-
Nilges, M.,
Clore, G. M.,
and Gronenborn, A. M.
(1988)
FEBS Lett.
229,
317-324[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Brünger, A. T.
(1993)
X-Plor, version 3.1, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
-
Nilges, M.,
Macias, M. J.,
O' Donoghue, S. I.,
and Oschkinat, H.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
269,
408-422[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Laskowski, R. A.,
MacArthur, M. W.,
Moss, D. S.,
and Thornton, J.
(1993)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
26,
283-290[CrossRef]
-
Viallet, J.,
Liu, C.,
Emond, J.,
and Tsao, M. S.
(1994)
Exp. Cell Res.
212,
36-41[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tang, X.-B.,
Dallaire, P.,
Hoyt, D. W.,
Sykes, B. D.,
O'Connor-McCourt, M.,
and Malcolm, B. A.
(1997)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
122,
686-690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Li, B.,
Tom, J. Y. K.,
Oare, D.,
Yen, R.,
Fairbrother, W. J.,
Wells, J. A.,
and Cunningham, B. C.
(1995)
Science
270,
1657-1660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kraulis, P. J.
(1991)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
24,
946-950[CrossRef]
-
Merritt, E. A.,
and Murphy, M. E. P.
(1994)
Acta Crystallogr. Sec. D
50,
869-873[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nicholls, A.,
Sharp, K.,
and Honig, B.
(1991)
Proteins
11,
281-296[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. T. Nguyen, J. Beck, H. Lue, H. Funfzig, R. Kleemann, P. Koolwijk, A. Kapurniotu, and J. Bernhagen
A 16-Residue Peptide Fragment of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor, MIF-(50-65), Exhibits Redox Activity and Has MIF-like Biological Functions
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 5, 2003;
278(36):
33654 - 33671.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Fan, Y. Zheng, D. Yang, and J. Wang
NMR Solution Structure and Dynamics of an Exchangeable Apolipoprotein, Locusta migratoria Apolipophorin III
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 30, 2003;
278(23):
21212 - 21220.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. McInnes, S. Grothe, M. O'Connor-McCourt, and B. D. Sykes
NMR study of the differential contributions of residues of transforming growth factor alpha to association with its receptor
Protein Eng. Des. Sel.,
March 1, 2000;
13(3):
143 - 147.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|