Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McInnes, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sykes, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McInnes, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sykes, B. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 273, Issue 42, 27357-27363, October 16, 1998


Structure-based Minimization of Transforming Growth Factor-alpha (TGF-alpha ) through NMR Analysis of the Receptor-bound Ligand
DESIGN, SOLUTION STRUCTURE, AND ACTIVITY OF TGF-alpha 8-50*

Campbell McInnesDagger , Jianjun WangDagger §, Ala-Eddin Al Moustafa, Cedric Yansouni, Maureen O'Connor-McCourt, and Brian D. SykesDagger parallel

From the Dagger  Protein Engineering Network of Centres of Excellence, 713 Heritage Medical Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2S2, Canada and the  Biotechnology Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec H4P 2R2, Canada

    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The investigation of a N-terminally truncated human transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha ; residues 8-50) has been completed to determine the contribution of the N terminus to receptor binding and activation. The deletion protein was proposed and designed through study of NMR relaxation and nuclear Overhauser enhancement data obtained from the TGF-alpha -epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor complex, which indicated that the residues N-terminal to the A loop remain flexible in receptor-bound TGF-alpha and thus suggested their lack of involvement in receptor binding (Hoyt, D. W., Harkins, R. N., Debanne, M. T., O'Connor-McCourt, M., and Sykes, B. D. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 15283-15292; McInnes, C., Hoyt, D. W., Harkins, R. N., Pagila, R. N., Debanne, M. T., O'Connor-McCourt, M., and Sykes, B. D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32204-32211). TGF-alpha 8-50 was shown to have approximately 10-fold lower affinity for the receptor than the native molecule in an assay quantifying the ability to compete with EGF for binding and to have a similar reduction in activity as indicated by a cell proliferation assay. NMR solution structural calculations on this molecule demonstrate correct formation of the three disulfide bonds of TGF-alpha 8-50 and have established the presence of native secondary structure in the B and C loops of the protein. However, some perturbation of the global fold with respect to the orientation of the subdomains was observed. These results suggest that although the N-terminal residues do not contribute directly to binding, they make a significant contribution in defining the conformation of the growth factor, which is required for complete binding and activity and is therefore significant in terms of producing native folding of TGF-alpha . They also show that information obtained from the receptor-bound ligand can be used to guide the design and minimization of TGF-alpha analogues. The implications of the study of TGF-alpha 8-50 for the design and synthesis of reductants of this growth factor are therefore discussed.

    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

The binding of human TGF-alpha 1 to the EGF receptor initiates a number of cell proliferation events including wound healing and embryogenesis (1, 2). Furthermore, this mitogenic protein of 50 residues is involved in the transformation of normal cells into malignant growths (3-5) and is also believed to promote angiogenesis (6). It is thus apparent that this polypeptide is a significant target from a pharmaceutical and drug design perspective, and to this end, considerable effort has been made to elucidate the essential structural features of this tricyclic growth factor required for binding and function (7, 8). Many attempts have also been made to synthesize reductant molecules that display a similar biological profile to the native TGF-alpha , although for the most part these efforts have met with limited success (9-11). NMR structures of the free ligand have been determined by several groups (12-15), and recently studies have been published from this laboratory on the use of NMR relaxation and NOE measurements in determining the essential components of the TGF-alpha -EGFR extracellular domain complex (16, 17). The data from the latter experiments suggest that A and C loops and the C-terminal tail of TGF-alpha contain residues (for the sequence of TGF-alpha and location of disulfides forming the three loops, see Fig. 1) that form the major binding interface with the receptor and that the N-terminal amino acids outside the A loop remain flexible in the receptor-bound species. Since the consensus from the relaxation and NOE data was that the N terminus of TGF-alpha does not play a role in the receptor-ligand interaction, the N-terminal deletion mutant, TGF-alpha 8-50 was synthesized and characterized in terms of NMR structure and biological activity. These experiments were performed to clarify the requirements of the growth factor structure necessary for receptor binding and activation and to determine the contribution of the N-terminal tail to the formation of the global fold of the native molecule. Thus the rationale is to assess any functional changes of the truncated protein with respect to native TGF-alpha in terms of structural variation and concurrently in doing this to ascertain if the N-terminal tail residues are required for establishing the native conformation of the protein. The truncated TGF-alpha was also studied to demonstrate that structural information obtained from NMR experiments on the receptor-bound ligand can be used toward the design of a "minimized" TGF-alpha where nonessential regions of the protein are deleted while retaining near native levels of receptor binding and activation.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic representation of the primary and loop structure of TGF-alpha . The seven N-terminal residues removed in the deletion protein are indicated by shading as are the six cysteines that form the three disulfide loops. The disulfide bonds are represented as thick lines, and the loops formed by these are labeled as A, B, and C.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Synthesis and Purification of TGF-alpha 8-50

TGF-alpha 8-50 was synthesized using standard solid phase synthesis techniques on a Applied Biosystems model 430A peptide synthesizer (Foster City, CA) utilizing t-butoxycarbonyl methodology. The N terminus was acetylated using acetic anhydride, and the peptide was liberated from the resin using a mixture of hydrogen fluoride, anisole and 1,2-ethanedithiol. The crude material was extracted with glacial acetic acid, lyophilized, and then dissolved in 10% acetic acid. The peptide was then purified using reversed phase HPLC (Beckmann System Gold, Fullerton, CA) using a Synchropak RP-4 (250 × 21.2 mm inner diameter) column (Synchrom, Lafayette, IN) at a flow rate of 5 ml/min and subsequently oxidized in air using a solution containing 1.0 M urea, 0.1 M Tris, 1.5 nM oxidized and 0.75 nM reduced glutathione, pH 8.0 (10). A final purification step was used to remove oxidation byproducts, and the final purity was confirmed through reverse phase analytical HPLC. Electrospray mass spectrometry (VG Biotech, Cheshire, UK) verified the presence of a species of the desired molecular weight.

NMR Sample Preparation

To a lyophilized sample of TGF-alpha was added 460 µl of buffer containing 50 mM potassium phosphate, 10 mM potassium chloride, 1 mM ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid, 0.5 mM sodium azide, 0.15 mM sodium 2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonate (internal standard), and 99.9% D2O or 90%/10% (v/v) H2O/D2O. The solution was adjusted to pH 6.5 by the addition of small aliquots of 0.5 N NaOD or 0.5 N HCl bringing the final volume to 500 µl.

NMR Spectroscopy

One- and two-dimensional 1H NMR spectra for TGF-alpha 8-50 were collected on a Varian Unity spectrometer operating at 599.9 MHz. TOCSY (18) and NOESY (19) experiments were acquired at 298 K and referenced relative to an internal sodium 2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonate standard. Pulsed field gradients were implemented in the watergate pulse sequence to suppress the water resonance (20). For TOCSY and NOESY experiments, 64 transients were acquired for each of 256 increments using the hypercomplex method of States et al. (21), and a total of 4096 data points were collected over a spectral width of 8000 Hz for H2O spectra and 6000 Hz for D2O spectra. The SCUBA-NOESY (22) experiment was utilized for acquisition of D2O NOE data. Processing of each two-dimensional FID was accomplished using a shifted sinebell and zero filling to 4096 points in both F1 and F2. A complete resonance assignment was obtained from the TOCSY and NOESY data with the exception of the fast exchanging His12 amide proton and is shown in Table I. The assignment was assisted through the use of chemical shift information previously published for native TGF-alpha (23).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
1H NMR assignments TGF-alpha 8-50 at pH 6.5, 298 K

Structure Calculation of TGF-alpha 8-50

For TGF-alpha 8-50, all cross-peaks were volume integrated using the program VNMR (VNMR 5.1A, Varian Associates, Palo Alto, CA) of which a subset were assigned based on the chemical shift assignments and possible NOE distances in the native protein (Protein Data Bank code 1yug; Ref 15.) calculated using the programs NMRPipe (24) and PIPP (25) and a cut-off distance of 12 Å. The suite of programs CAMRA (26) was implemented to convert the volume integral information to distance restraints. NOE cross-peak intensities were classified as strong (upper boundary, 2.3 Å), medium (3.0 Å), weak (4.0 Å), and very weak (5.0 Å), and the appropriate pseudoatom correction was added. The molecular dynamics/simulated annealing protocol in X-PLOR version 3.8 (27, 28) was utilized to calculate an initial set of structures derived only from the unambiguous distance restraints and native disulfides assumed in the starting structure. A program developed in house was then applied in conjunction with X-PLOR to modify NOE distances causing restraint violations and also to make use of those that have ambiguous assignments to generate a more refined structure. This program uses an approach similar to that of Nilges et al. (29) in that it allows the use of NOE distances that are ambiguous, because in most cases only one restraint will be possible based on distances from the ensemble of structures already calculated using unambiguous restraints. The program therefore removes restraints that are violated by greater than a user defined cut-off distance (0.5 Å) because the nonpossible assignments for the ambiguous restraints will give distance violations greater than the cut-off. The restraints that satisfy the distances in the initial structures will be retained. Because it is possible that a correct restraint can be violated in initial but not final structures, NOEs that are removed can be returned to the restraint file in later runs for reevaluation by the program. As the structures are refined in successive runs, these restraints should now be satisfied and are incorporated in the final data set.

This procedure as a whole allows the restraints that satisfy the distances in the successive structural ensembles to be retained and thus facilitates the incorporation of a greater number of restraints in the X-PLOR calculation. For the distance restraints that are consistently violated by less than the specified cut-off in the calculated structures, the program automatically modifies the upper bound of distance restraints by the average value of the distance violation for a user specified number of structures in which the violation occurs. The modified restraint file is then used in the next round of X-PLOR calculations in an iterative procedure until an structural ensemble is obtained of the desired quality. The reproducibility and accuracy of the ensemble generated for TGF-alpha 8-50 was examined using the program PROCHECK (30), which checks the distribution of backbone dihedral angles in the structures.

Binding and Activity of TGF-alpha 8-50

Cell Culture-- The HBE4-E6E7 cell line was used and was established by transfection of primary human bronchial epithelial cells with a plasmid construct expressing the human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 genes (31). The cell line was maintained in the Keratinocyte-SF (KSF) medium without supplements and incubated at 37 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

Proliferation Assay-- Growth curves were established by measuring the incorporation of [3H]methylthymidine into the acid insoluble fraction of cellular extracts. Briefly, approximately 2 × 104 cells were plated in 1 ml KSF into each well of 12-well tissue culture plates. After 1 day, the medium was changed either with fresh KSF (control) or medium containing TGF-alpha or TGF-alpha 8-50. Cells were allowed to grow for 3 days with [3H]methylthymidine (1 µCi/ml, Amersham Canada) being added during the last 20-24 h. After sequential and multiple washings in cold phosphate-buffered saline, 10% trichloroacetic acid, and 95% ethanol, the plates were allowed to dry, the cells were solubilized in 2% SDS, and the radioactivity was quantitated by liquid scintillation chromatography. The experimental points were determined in triplicate.

EGF Competition Assay-- Cells (2 × 103) were plated in 24-well plates in KSF and grown to confluence. 24 h before performing the experiment, the medium was changed with KSF. Cells were washed three times with binding buffer containing Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 25 mM Hepes, 5 mM MgCl2, 100 µg/ml bacitracin, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4, and incubated in 0.5 ml of binding buffer containing various concentrations of TGF-alpha /TGF-alpha 8-50 with 0.05 nM 125I EGF at 0 C for 2 h. After incubation, the cells were washed twice with ice-cold binding buffer and three times with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline. Cells were solubilized with 1 N NaOH and counted in a gamma  counter. The nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 1 µM unlabeled TGF-alpha or TGF-alpha 8-50. Data were analyzed using the method of Scatchard.

    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Analysis of Chemical Shift Variations between Truncated and Native TGF-alpha -- The deletion of the N-terminal tail of TGF-alpha raises the question of whether or not native disulfide bonds are present in the truncated form of the protein and if it is able to assume a similar global fold to the intact protein. For the purpose of determining whether the correct pairing of the disulfides in TGF-alpha 8-50 is present after synthesis and oxidation, the chemical shifts of the alpha -protons were compared with those of the native protein acquired under similar conditions, i.e. pH 6.5 and 30 °C. The delta Delta values of the comparison (chemical shift differences) are illustrated in Fig. 2, and it can be seen that there are no large deviations in these shifts. This suggests that the three disulfide links between Cys8 and Cys21, Cys16 and Cys32, and Cys34 and Cys43 are present as observed in the intact TGF-alpha . The presence of the native disulfide linkages was confirmed through observation of NOEs between cysteines 8 and 21 (Fig. 3) and 34 and 43 (not shown). Also from the absence of major deviations the assumption can be made that a structure cognate to the native molecule exists. However, despite the lack of large differences in the chemical shifts of the deletion mutant, significant changes of between 0.05 and 0.2 ppm are observed. These occur for the most part in the A and B loops and indicate that deletion of the residues N-terminal to the A loop effects changes in the secondary structure and perhaps in the overall fold of the molecule. In particular, the residues undergoing the largest variation are those of the A loop including Tyr13, Gln14, and Phe15, which have resonances differing from the native protein by 0.17, 0.13, and 0.13 ppm respectively. Of the B loop alpha -protons, those that exhibited the most significant changes were Gly19 and Thr20 in addition to the alpha -resonances of all the residues between Val25 and Lys29. For the hinge region of TGF-alpha 8-50 (residues close to Val33), which allows flexibility between the two subdomains (A and B loops comprise the N subdomain, whereas the C loop and tail form the C subdomain), delta Delta values of between 0.04 and 0.09 ppm were observed for the residues between Cys32 and Ser36 and thus are indicative of a possible variation in the conformation of this region. An important observation of the shifts for the residues of the C loop is that with the exception of Gly40 and Glu44 there are no differences larger than 0.05 ppm, suggesting that the reverse double hairpin secondary structure is present in the truncated protein. The delta Delta alpha -H value for Glu44 of 0.08 ppm is of special interest because this residue forms interactions critical to the stabilization of the orientation of the N- and C-terminal subdomains.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Plot of chemical shift variations (delta Delta ) in the alpha -protons between the truncated TGF-alpha and the native protein for each residue in the molecule. Those residues with a delta Delta value of greater than 0.1 ppm are denoted by white circles.


View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Aliphatic region of a NOESY spectrum of TGF-alpha 8-50 acquired at 600 MHz and 25 °C. The NOE labeled is between the beta  protons of cysteines 8 and 21 and thus is indicative of correct formation of the disulfide bridges.

Receptor Binding and Activation by TGF-alpha 8-50-- Investigation of the biological potency of TGF-alpha 8-50 was performed to assess the contribution of the N-terminal tail to receptor binding and activation. This was accomplished through a competition assay of TGF-alpha 8-50 with EGF on HBE cells displaying the EGF receptor and by measuring the ability of the truncation analogue to effect cell proliferation. The results from the competition assay are shown in Fig. 4. From the plot it is apparent that it requires approximately 10-fold more TGF-alpha 8-50 to displace iodinated EGF from HBE cells than it does for native TGF-alpha , thus indicating that it has 10 times lower affinity for the EGF receptor. The quantitation of the receptor activation assay, however, illustrates that the reduction in the ability of the truncated protein to cell proliferation is of the same order as the corresponding decrease in receptor binding (data not shown).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Plot of data from the competition assay of TGF-alpha and TGF-alpha 8-50. The graph illustrates the percentage of 125I-EGF displaced from the EGF receptor on Human BE cells as a function of ligand concentration.

NMR Structure Determination of TGF-alpha 8-50-- As evidenced from the variation in the alpha -H resonances between the N-terminally deleted and native TGF-alpha s, the conformation of the truncated TGF-alpha did not appear to be identical to that of previously determined structures of TGF-alpha . With the objective of determining more precisely the structural differences that occur in TGF-alpha 8-50, an ensemble of solution structures was calculated for the N-terminally deleted protein using NOE-derived distance restraints. 35 best fit structures were generated from 407 NOE distances using the program X-plor after nine rounds of calculation to minimize restraint violations and make the best use of ambiguous NOEs. The structure statistics for the ensemble of 35 structures are shown in Table II and illustrate their quality in terms of high definition, in terms of fit to the experimental data, and in terms of the component and total energies. Analysis of the average of the 35 structures using the program PROCHECK (30) indicated that 92% of the residues excluding glycine, proline, and end residues are found in the allowed regions of phi-psi space. The residues found in non-allowed regions, which are Phe15 and Cys16, are located in the highly flexible portions of the truncated molecule.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Statistics for ensemble of NMR derived structures of TGF-alpha 8-50

Fig. 5 shows a superposition of the 35 best fit structures to the average structure and depicts the excellent reproducibility of the conformational ensemble. The values for the superposition of residues 15-47 for the 35 structures to the average structure are 0.844 Å for the backbone atom r.m.s. deviations and 1.304 for the heavy atom r.m.s. deviations, which are very favorable in their comparability with the ensemble recently generated for TGF-alpha using similar conditions for data acquisition (15).


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Stereoview of the 35 best fit structures superimposed to the ensemble average structure calculated for the truncated TGF-alpha using X-PLOR and NOE derived distance restraints. The more flexible regions of the protein are colored in gray.

    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

Biological Potency of TGF-alpha 8-50-- TGF-alpha 8-50 was proposed and designed based on the results of the relaxation and NOE analysis data of the ligand-receptor complex, which suggested that the N terminus does not contribute to the complexation process and that the truncated protein should retain the ability to associate with the EGF receptor and initiate cell proliferation. Our results indicate that although the binding and activation are diminished 10-fold, TGF-alpha 8-50 still retains a significant level of potency in terms of competition with EGF for the receptor and ability to effect cell proliferation. The plethora of studies on synthetic fragments of TGF-alpha have for the most part failed to exhibit biological activity close to the order of that observed for the native molecule. Our results differ slightly from those of Tam et al. (10), who previously synthesized TGF-alpha 8-50 and reported binding and mitogenic activity of 3%. Our data imply that TGF-alpha 8-50 is more potent; however, this variation may be the result of different methods used for assaying activity. In our case, the protein synthesized in this laboratory was fully characterized by NMR and thus the possibility of ambiguity in the structure and correct folding of the disulfides is not present, and therefore the biological data are reliable in terms of the integrity of the deletion protein.

Solution Structure of TGF-alpha 8-50-- The NMR-derived solution structure of TGF-alpha 8-50 exhibits similar structural characteristics in comparison with the global fold of the native protein as has been determined by several groups to date (12-15). The overall topology of the truncated protein superimposes favorably to that of the intact TGF-alpha as shown by backbone r.m.s. deviations of 2.78 Å for residues 15-47. The identity between the two structures is demonstrated in Fig. 6, which illustrates the Richardson diagrams of the native and N-terminally deleted TGF-alpha s. The secondary structure elements present in TGF-alpha remain in the structural ensemble of the N-terminally truncated molecule since the B loop beta -sheet comprised of residues 19-24 and 29-34 and the C-terminal reverse double hairpin loop between residues 38 and 46 were observed. The partial helix present in some of the TGF-alpha conformations is no longer present in TGF-alpha 8-50 because the A loop shows considerably flexibility. Some NOEs diagnostic of an alpha -helix are observed for the truncated protein; however, these are insufficient to restrain the A loop into a helical conformation. The conformational differences of the A loop as observed in the structural ensembles are supported by the alpha -H resonances, which show considerable variation when compared with the intact protein, and indeed as previously mentioned, the most significant changes in the resonance frequency of the alpha -H of the N-terminally deleted molecule occur in this region.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Richardson diagrams (34, 35) of the average NMR structures calculated for wild type TGF-alpha and TGF-alpha 8-50. The center figure shows the superposition of the two ensemble average structures.

Upon closer examination of the NMR structure of TGF-alpha 8-50, significant differences in the conformations of the two proteins are evident. In particular, the beta -turn of the B loop sheet of the truncated TGF-alpha is oriented away from the N-terminal tail when overlaid with the beta -sheet of the native protein. Further evidence for this structural change is given by the delta Delta values for the turn residues, i.e. Val25 to Asp28 and by Lys29, which are all between 0.07 and 0.14 ppm. This effect is most presumably the consequence of the absence/disruption of the third strand of the beta -sheet formed by the interactions of Phe5 and Asn6 of the N terminus with Phe23 and Leu24 of the second strand. Disruption of these interactions does not destabilize the B loop beta -sheet; however, it does allow the turn greater freedom to adopt a dissimilar conformation.

The most significant and consequential variation in the structure of the two proteins is in the relative orientation of the C-terminal subdomains comprised of residues 34-50. As can be observed from the superposition of TGF-alpha 8-50 to TGF-alpha in Fig. 6, this region in the deletion protein is angled almost perpendicular to the N-terminal subdomain with the first strand of the reverse double hairpin folded away from the hinge region from Cys32 to Ser36. The differences in the arrangement of the C-terminal subdomain for the two molecules as illustrated by the calculated structures are corroborated by the chemical shift data, which indicate that although notable variations in the alpha -proton resonances occur in the region between Cys32 and Ser36 (Fig. 2), less significant variation in the alpha -H frequencies of the C loop and tail secondary structure are observed. The conformational transition of the C-terminal subdomain that occurs in the N-terminally deleted TGF-alpha is apparently a propagated effect and is the result of disruption of the interactions between the A and C loops. As previously mentioned, the partial helix present in the intact protein is no longer present in TGF-alpha 8-50. The consequence of deletion of the N-terminal tail is variation in the conformation of the A loop, which in turn results in altered interactions between the A and the C loops. The specific interactions that differ from the native protein in defining the fold of the A and C subdomains in TGF-alpha 8-50 appear mostly to be in the packing of the residues that stabilize the orientation of the two regions. The hydrophobic cluster of Phe17, His18, and Tyr38 is more closely packed in the truncated TGF-alpha in addition to a more defined interaction between Phe15 and Arg42. The conformation of the interdomain residues His18 and His35 also varies in the N-terminally deleted molecule, and the association of the side chains of Glu44 and Phe17 is different for TGF-alpha 8-50, an observation that is confirmed by the chemical shift difference for Glu44 alpha -H of 0.08 ppm. These changes indicate the transition in domain structure between the two molecules that result from novel interactions between the residues of the A and the C loops.

It is interesting that the new conformation of TGF-alpha 8-50 and orientation of the subdomains in the truncated molecule is of comparable if not better definition than that seen in the structural ensemble generated for native TGF-alpha . This suggests that the N-terminal tail is not required to give a stable protein fold, although it is necessary to produce the native structure of TGF-alpha in terms of orientation of the subdomains.

Implications of TGF-alpha 8-50 Solution Structure for Functional Differences-- With the solution structure of TGF-alpha 8-50 available, the biological rationale for decreased activity of the truncated protein as indicated by the reduction in receptor binding affinity and mitogenic activity can be envisaged. The previous studies from this laboratory implementing relaxation and NOE analysis techniques to elucidate the residues and regions of TGF-alpha involved in complexation with EGFR (16, 17) were used to design the N-terminally deleted protein. The results obtained implicated residues from the A and C loops and C tail as forming the predominant receptor binding interface. Fig. 7 illustrates the average ensemble structures of TGF-alpha and TGF-alpha 8-50 shown as molecular Connolly surface representations and color coded according to the percentage of NOEs absent in the receptor-bound wild type TGF-alpha , i.e. those present in the free ligand but not in the bound protein.


View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Grasp (36) molecular surface representation of the native and truncated TGF-alpha average structures illustrating the residues color coded according to the percentage of NOEs, which disappear in the receptor-bound form of the native ligand. The residues are colored according to the following percentages of absent NOEs in the bound TGF-alpha : 0%, blue; 0-20%, purple; 20-30%, white; 30-40%, green; and 40-60%, red.

The structure utilized for the native molecule in Fig. 7 is the most recently published structure for TGF-alpha as determined by Moy et al. (15), which was unavailable for our previous studies (17). When this structure is used to display the changes in NOE intensity upon addition of the EGFR, an almost completely contiguous receptor binding face is observed. This visualization gives an even more plausible scenario for the interactions of TGF-alpha with its receptor than indicated in the previous publication from this laboratory (17) since Arg42, Leu48, and Leu49 are now present on the same face of the protein structure as the other residues that lose the highest percentage of NOEs upon receptor binding, i.e. those colored in red and green. As the regions of the truncated protein that exhibit the most significant structural changes are the A and C loops, it can easily be seen that perturbation of the conformation of these regions would lead to a diminution in the affinity to the receptor and concomitantly to a decrease in mitogenic activity. The loss of the partial helical structure of the A loop in the native molecule most probably results in a lower affinity as the important residues His12, Thr13, Phe15, and Phe17 are presented to the receptor in a different manner. The chemical shift differences in the alpha -protons, strongly suggest that in particular Thr13, Gln14, and Phe15 are in quite different environments in the N-terminally deleted TGF-alpha . The resonance and structural perturbations for the truncated TGF-alpha are in good agreement with the NOE analysis data, which implicated His12 and Phe15 on the receptor binding interface, and with prior mutagenesis studies that delineated Phe15 as a critical residue for association of the ligand with the receptor (7). It can be observed from the molecular surface view of TGF-alpha 8-50 in Fig. 7, that His12 is indeed displayed differently to the receptor as it is now no longer contiguous with the rest of the residues that form the primary interactions with the EGFR. In addition, The A-C interactions of Phe15 to Arg42 and Phe17 to Glu44 in the N-terminally deleted molecule present a quite different surface of these residues to the receptor and thus corroborate the postulation that the new orientation of the subdomains is responsible for the decrease in binding and activity of TGF-alpha 8-50.

From Fig. 7, it is also apparent that the residues of the C loop and C-terminal tail implied to be on the EGFR binding face namely Val39, Gly40, Arg42, Glu44, His45, Leu48, and Leu49 are displayed in a different orientation due to the variant C-terminal subdomain conformation in TGF-alpha 8-50. It is evident that these structural changes alone are significant enough to explain the decreased binding and activity of the truncated protein and despite the observation that the N-terminal tail does not contribute directly to interactions with the EGFR, it makes an important contribution to the protein fold in terms of orientation of the subdomains and hence is necessary for the presentation of the binding determinants to the receptor. The results obtained from the truncated TGF-alpha also further confirm the multidomain binding model since it is the relative positioning of the two subdomains that is important to give a fully active protein.

Toward Minimization of TGF-alpha through Truncation and Reoptimization-- Through the knowledge of the structural requirements of TGF-alpha for receptor complexation as delineated by the relaxation rate and NOE analysis data, this study has demonstrated that the proposal of an active truncated protein is possible when enough is known about the receptor binding site on the ligand. The synthesis of a TGF-alpha fragment with a respectable level of activity serves as a platform for further minimization and reoptimization of this growth factor for the purposes of the development of agonists and antagonists as potential therapeutics. Work currently in progress in this laboratory has the aim of engineering the truncated TGF-alpha through phage display to increase the affinity to or beyond native levels (32). This can then be followed by further minimization of the ligand in a manner analogous to the studies of Li et al. (33), who have met with considerable success in the minimization of the polypeptide hormone atrial natriuretic peptide. In the instance of TGF-alpha , however, the process is greatly aided by the availability of NMR data for elucidating the interactions of the minimized proteins with the receptor and thus using a structure-based iterative procedure for the identification of lead compounds demonstrating potential as therapeutics for diseases involving the overexpression or underexpression of TGF-alpha .

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Paul Semchuk for peptide synthesis and purification and also mass spectrometry, Gerry McQuaid and Bruce Lix for maintenance of NMR equipment, and Leigh Willard and Robert Boyko for computer programming assistance. We also acknowledge Richard Harkins at Berlex Biosciences for early discussions proposing the study of TGF-alpha 8-50.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Present address: Dept. of Medical Biochemistry School of Medicine, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901-4413.

parallel To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 403-492-6540; Fax: 403-492-1473; E-mail: bds{at}polaris.biochem.ualberta.ca.

The abbreviations used are: TGF-alpha , transforming growth factor-alpha ; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; NOE, nuclear Overhauser enhancement; NOESY, nuclear Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy; TOCSY, total correlation spectroscopy; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; r.m.s., root mean square.
    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Procedures
Results
Discussion
References

  1. Bennet, N. T., and Schultz, G. S. (1993) Am. J. Surg. 165, 728-737[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Bennet, N. T., and Schultz, G. S. (1993) Am. J. Surg. 166, 75-81[CrossRef]
  3. Prigent, S. A., and Lemoine, N. R. (1992) Prog. Growth. Factor. Res. 4, 1-24[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Salomon, D. S., Brandt, R., Ciardiello, F., and Normanno, N. (1995) Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 19, 183-232[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Rusch, V., Mendelsohn, J., and Dmitrovsky, E. (1996) Cytokine Growth Factor. Rev. 7, 133-141[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Okamura, K., Morimoto, A., Hamanaka, R., Ono, M., Kohno, K., Uchida, Y., and Kuwano, M. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 186, 1471-1479[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Groenen, L. C., Nice, E. C., and Burgess, A. W. (1994) Growth Factors 11, 235-257[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Campion, S. R., and Niyogi, S. K. (1994) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 353-383[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Defeo-Jones, D., Tai, J. Y., Wegrzyn, R. J., Vuocolo, G. A., Baker, A. E., Payne, L. S., Garsky, V. M., Oliff, A., and Rieman, M. W. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 2999-3007[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Tam, J. P., Lin, Y.-Z., Liu, W., Wang, D.-X., Ke, X.-H., and Zhang, J.-W. (1991) Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 38, 204-211[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Heath, W. F., and Merrifield, R. B. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 6367-6371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Kohda, D., Shimada, I, Miyake, T., Fuwa, T., and Inagaki, F. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 953-958[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Kline, T. P., Brown, F. K., Brown, S. C., Jeffs, P. W., Kopple, K. D., and Mueller, L. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 7805-7813[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Harvey, T. S., Wilkinson, A. J., Tappin, M. J., Cooke, R. M., and Campbell, I. D. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 198, 555-562[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Moy, F. J., Li, Y-C., Rauenbuehler, P., Winkler, M. E., Scheraga, H. A., and Montelione, G. T. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 7334-7353[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Hoyt, D. W., Harkins, R. N., Debanne, M. T., O'Connor-McCourt, M., and Sykes, B. D. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 15283-15292[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. McInnes, C., Hoyt, D. W., Harkins, R. N., Pagila, R. N., Debanne, M. T., O'Connor-McCourt, M., and Sykes, B. D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32204-32211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Bax, A., and Davis, D. G. (1985) J. Magn. Reson. 65, 355-360
  19. Jeener, J., Meier, B. H., Bachmann, P., and Ernst, R. R. (1979) J. Chem. Phys. 71, 4546-4553[CrossRef]
  20. Piotto, M., Saudek, V., and Sklenar, V. (1992) J. Biomol. NMR 2, 661-665[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. States, D. J., Haberkorn, R. A., and Rueben, D. J. (1982) J. Magn. Reson. 48, 286-292
  22. Brown, S. C., Weber, P. L., and Mueller, K. (1988) J. Magn. Reson. 77, 166-169
  23. Tappin, M. J., Cooke, R. M., Fitton, J. E., and Campbell, I. D. (1989) Eur. J. Biochem. 179, 629-637[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Delaglio, F., Grzesiek, S., Vuister, G. W., Zhu, G., Pfeifer, J., and Bax, A. (1995) J. Biomol. NMR. 6, 277-293[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Garrett, D. S., Powers, R., Gronenborn, A. M., and Clore, G. M. (1991) J. Magn. Reson. 95, 214-220
  26. Grönwald, W., Willard, L., Jellard, T., Boyko, R. F., Rajarathnam, K, Wishart, D. S., Sönnichsen, F. D., and Sykes, B. D. (1998) J. Biol. NMR, in press
  27. Nilges, M., Clore, G. M., and Gronenborn, A. M. (1988) FEBS Lett. 229, 317-324[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Brünger, A. T. (1993) X-Plor, version 3.1, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
  29. Nilges, M., Macias, M. J., O' Donoghue, S. I., and Oschkinat, H. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 269, 408-422[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., and Thornton, J. (1993) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283-290[CrossRef]
  31. Viallet, J., Liu, C., Emond, J., and Tsao, M. S. (1994) Exp. Cell Res. 212, 36-41[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Tang, X.-B., Dallaire, P., Hoyt, D. W., Sykes, B. D., O'Connor-McCourt, M., and Malcolm, B. A. (1997) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 122, 686-690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Li, B., Tom, J. Y. K., Oare, D., Yen, R., Fairbrother, W. J., Wells, J. A., and Cunningham, B. C. (1995) Science 270, 1657-1660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kraulis, P. J. (1991) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 946-950[CrossRef]
  35. Merritt, E. A., and Murphy, M. E. P. (1994) Acta Crystallogr. Sec. D 50, 869-873[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Nicholls, A., Sharp, K., and Honig, B. (1991) Proteins 11, 281-296[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. T. Nguyen, J. Beck, H. Lue, H. Funfzig, R. Kleemann, P. Koolwijk, A. Kapurniotu, and J. Bernhagen
A 16-Residue Peptide Fragment of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor, MIF-(50-65), Exhibits Redox Activity and Has MIF-like Biological Functions
J. Biol. Chem., September 5, 2003; 278(36): 33654 - 33671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Fan, Y. Zheng, D. Yang, and J. Wang
NMR Solution Structure and Dynamics of an Exchangeable Apolipoprotein, Locusta migratoria Apolipophorin III
J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2003; 278(23): 21212 - 21220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
C. McInnes, S. Grothe, M. O'Connor-McCourt, and B. D. Sykes
NMR study of the differential contributions of residues of transforming growth factor alpha to association with its receptor
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., March 1, 2000; 13(3): 143 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]